Evaluation of scooters using ANSI/RESNA standards
description
Transcript of Evaluation of scooters using ANSI/RESNA standards
This article and any supplementary material should be cited as follows: Souza AE, Pearlman JL, Cooper R, Kelleher A, Gebrosky B, Cooper RA. Evaluation of scooters using ANSI/RESNA standards. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2013;50(7):1017–34. http://dx.doi.org/10.1682/JRRD.2011.03.0054
Slideshow ProjectDOI:10.1682/JRRD.2011.03.0054JSP
Evaluation of scooters using ANSI/RESNA standards
Ana E. Souza, PhD, PT; Jonathan L. Pearlman, PhD; Rosemarie Cooper, MPT; Annmarie Kelleher, OTR/L, MS;
Benjamin Gebrosky, BS; Rory A. Cooper, PhD
This article and any supplementary material should be cited as follows: Souza AE, Pearlman JL, Cooper R, Kelleher A, Gebrosky B, Cooper RA. Evaluation of scooters using ANSI/RESNA standards. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2013;50(7):1017–34. http://dx.doi.org/10.1682/JRRD.2011.03.0054
Slideshow ProjectDOI:10.1682/JRRD.2011.03.0054JSP
• Aim– Evaluate and compare scooter model performance on
American National Standards Institute/ Rehabilitation Engineering and Assistive Technology Society of North America (ANSI/RESNA) tests.
• Relevance– Absence of objective test reports and evidence of high
rate of wheelchair breakdowns in community have led to speculation that not all commercially available devices meet ANSI/RESNA standards.
This article and any supplementary material should be cited as follows: Souza AE, Pearlman JL, Cooper R, Kelleher A, Gebrosky B, Cooper RA. Evaluation of scooters using ANSI/RESNA standards. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2013;50(7):1017–34. http://dx.doi.org/10.1682/JRRD.2011.03.0054
Slideshow ProjectDOI:10.1682/JRRD.2011.03.0054JSP
Method
• Tested 12 three-wheeled scooters according to ANSI/RESNA wheelchair standards.
• Scooter models – Victory, Gogo, Golden Companion (GC) I, and GC II.
• Tests– Static stability; dynamic stability; effectiveness of brakes;
energy consumption; maximum speed, acceleration, and deceleration; climatic; static, impact, and fatigue; power and control systems; tiller.
This article and any supplementary material should be cited as follows: Souza AE, Pearlman JL, Cooper R, Kelleher A, Gebrosky B, Cooper RA. Evaluation of scooters using ANSI/RESNA standards. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2013;50(7):1017–34. http://dx.doi.org/10.1682/JRRD.2011.03.0054
Slideshow ProjectDOI:10.1682/JRRD.2011.03.0054JSP
Results• Stability
– Most: Victory and GC II. – Least: Gogo.
• Environmental conditions– 3 Gogo, 1 GC I, 1 GC II
failed.
• Power and control systems– All GC I and II scooters
failed parts of.
• Static and impact– All scooters passed.
• However, all Gogo scooters and one GC II scooter had structural or motor failure during durability tests.
• Survival life – 62,512 to 1,178,230 cycles
out of 400,000 needed to pass.
• Tiller failures– Occurred with average 1,483
N applied force.
This article and any supplementary material should be cited as follows: Souza AE, Pearlman JL, Cooper R, Kelleher A, Gebrosky B, Cooper RA. Evaluation of scooters using ANSI/RESNA standards. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2013;50(7):1017–34. http://dx.doi.org/10.1682/JRRD.2011.03.0054
Slideshow ProjectDOI:10.1682/JRRD.2011.03.0054JSP
Conclusion
• Results showed inconsistent responses from scooter models within each standard test.– Suggests current models on market:• Are not as reliable as they should be. • May be putting users at risk of injuries.
• Results provided quantitative data that will:– Benefit quality of future scooters developed.– Help clinicians and users identify appropriate
device for specific user.