Evaluation of PHO’s KT Project Mel Brockman June 17, 2014.
-
Upload
alina-birk -
Category
Documents
-
view
217 -
download
3
Transcript of Evaluation of PHO’s KT Project Mel Brockman June 17, 2014.
![Page 1: Evaluation of PHO’s KT Project Mel Brockman June 17, 2014.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062515/56649cc05503460f94986a57/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Evaluation of PHO’s KT Project
Mel Brockman
June 17, 2014
![Page 2: Evaluation of PHO’s KT Project Mel Brockman June 17, 2014.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062515/56649cc05503460f94986a57/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Overview CIHR supplement grant obtained.
Time period: June 2012 to June 2013.
External evaluation arranged in late 2013.
![Page 3: Evaluation of PHO’s KT Project Mel Brockman June 17, 2014.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062515/56649cc05503460f94986a57/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Project Overview Two target audiences:
Community/general public. Decision-makers.
Goals: Promote awareness. Encourage action.
Integrated knowledge translation (iKT) approach
![Page 4: Evaluation of PHO’s KT Project Mel Brockman June 17, 2014.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062515/56649cc05503460f94986a57/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Key Activities
![Page 5: Evaluation of PHO’s KT Project Mel Brockman June 17, 2014.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062515/56649cc05503460f94986a57/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Purpose of Evaluation Assess whether…
awareness was generated; action was prompted; and iKT was achieved.
Improvement-focused.
![Page 6: Evaluation of PHO’s KT Project Mel Brockman June 17, 2014.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062515/56649cc05503460f94986a57/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Type of Evaluation
Process Project operations and implementation.
Outcome Short-term (learning-based). Intermediate (action-based).
![Page 7: Evaluation of PHO’s KT Project Mel Brockman June 17, 2014.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062515/56649cc05503460f94986a57/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Methodology Records review.
Key informant interviews (N = 17).
Online surveys: Summit participants (N = 20). PHO network (N = 7).
![Page 8: Evaluation of PHO’s KT Project Mel Brockman June 17, 2014.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062515/56649cc05503460f94986a57/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Key Findings – Positives
Della video a big hit.
Summit was a success despite not arriving at a national agenda.
Public opinion survey a valuable KT research activity.
Partners happy to see the Region getting involved.
![Page 9: Evaluation of PHO’s KT Project Mel Brockman June 17, 2014.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062515/56649cc05503460f94986a57/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Key Findings – Areas for Improvement
Planned activities with school community.
Some groups not effectively engaged.
Process-tracing issues.
iKT not really achieved.
![Page 10: Evaluation of PHO’s KT Project Mel Brockman June 17, 2014.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062515/56649cc05503460f94986a57/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Recommendations Create a comprehensive conceptual
table at the outset; preferably, prior to submitting the grant application.
KT activity
Rationale
Aim Target audience(s)
Target sub-group(s)
Goal(s) activity will contribute to
![Page 11: Evaluation of PHO’s KT Project Mel Brockman June 17, 2014.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062515/56649cc05503460f94986a57/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Recommendations Provide potential partners with enough
information to make an informed decision about whether they are willing and able, time- and resource-wise, to sign on to the grant.
![Page 12: Evaluation of PHO’s KT Project Mel Brockman June 17, 2014.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062515/56649cc05503460f94986a57/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Recommendations Involve committed partners and other
stakeholders in the conceptualization of the project; preferably, prior to submitting the grant application.
![Page 13: Evaluation of PHO’s KT Project Mel Brockman June 17, 2014.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062515/56649cc05503460f94986a57/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Recommendations Collaboratively create a “game plan”
and clearly articulate project team members’ roles and responsibilities at the outset.
![Page 14: Evaluation of PHO’s KT Project Mel Brockman June 17, 2014.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062515/56649cc05503460f94986a57/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Recommendations Establish process-tracing procedures at
the outset.
![Page 15: Evaluation of PHO’s KT Project Mel Brockman June 17, 2014.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062515/56649cc05503460f94986a57/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Recommendations Continue to strive toward better internal
communication and coordination.
![Page 16: Evaluation of PHO’s KT Project Mel Brockman June 17, 2014.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062515/56649cc05503460f94986a57/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Recommendations Be more specific in the identification of
target audiences and target sub-groups within them.
![Page 17: Evaluation of PHO’s KT Project Mel Brockman June 17, 2014.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062515/56649cc05503460f94986a57/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Recommendations Focus on the quality of the activities, not
the quantity.
![Page 18: Evaluation of PHO’s KT Project Mel Brockman June 17, 2014.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062515/56649cc05503460f94986a57/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Recommendations As a team, develop a project plan that is
proportionate to the time and resources that will be available across all team members.
![Page 19: Evaluation of PHO’s KT Project Mel Brockman June 17, 2014.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062515/56649cc05503460f94986a57/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Recommendations Continue to explore creative communication
and dissemination strategies to engage the general public in order to go beyond “preaching to the choir.”
![Page 20: Evaluation of PHO’s KT Project Mel Brockman June 17, 2014.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062515/56649cc05503460f94986a57/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Recommendations Give people specific options for actions
they can take to make a difference.
![Page 21: Evaluation of PHO’s KT Project Mel Brockman June 17, 2014.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062515/56649cc05503460f94986a57/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Recommendations Invest the most time and resources in
activities aimed at increasing health equity locally and provincially.
![Page 22: Evaluation of PHO’s KT Project Mel Brockman June 17, 2014.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062515/56649cc05503460f94986a57/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Recommendations Articulate the desired actions that will
be prompted by the KT activities.
![Page 23: Evaluation of PHO’s KT Project Mel Brockman June 17, 2014.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062515/56649cc05503460f94986a57/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Recommendations Identify at the outset what will be
measured for evaluation purposes and design measures accordingly.
![Page 24: Evaluation of PHO’s KT Project Mel Brockman June 17, 2014.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062515/56649cc05503460f94986a57/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
Recommendations Strive to achieve higher response rates
with data collection activities.
![Page 25: Evaluation of PHO’s KT Project Mel Brockman June 17, 2014.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062515/56649cc05503460f94986a57/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
Activity Level of Fit
Della video High
Computer game for youth High
School presentations and student forums High
Interactive social media tools (e.g., CVC) High
Health Equity Summit High
Mobilize! forum High
Dissemination of SHS report Medium
Conference presentations, journal publications Medium
Replication/public opinion survey Low
Follow-up questionnaire with those who received SHS report Low