Evaluation of IM

35
EVALUATING INSTUCTIONAL MATERIALS ROY SAPICO CAPANGPANGAN Presenter MAEngEd 214

Transcript of Evaluation of IM

Page 1: Evaluation of IM

EVALUATING INSTUCTIONAL MATERIALS

EVALUATING INSTUCTIONAL MATERIALS

ROY SAPICO CAPANGPANGANPresenter

ROY SAPICO CAPANGPANGANPresenter

MAEngEd 214

Page 2: Evaluation of IM

Philosophy & Objectives Conforms to: (a) National Development

goals and priorities (b) DepEd Curriculum Directives & Guidelines

Projects appropriate philosophy of education

Has a conceptual framework and unifying philosophy

Preliminary Writing Stage

Page 3: Evaluation of IM

Philosophy & Objectives

Covers basic requirements of curriculum/courses.

Has clearly defined objectives from the viewpoint of learners.

Are realistic and attainable by target learners.

Page 4: Evaluation of IM

Basic Requirements of BEED

Includes a complete scope and sequence chart which shows the articulation of the series—a vertical and horizontal trace to find the flow of the content from one grade/year level to the next.

Page 5: Evaluation of IM

Basic Requirements of BEED

Includes the presence of the two learning goals in the sample lessons:

(a) Substance—learning opportunities cover specific ideas and/or concepts of learning goals.

(b) Sophistication—learning opportunities are developmentally appropriate.

Page 6: Evaluation of IM

Basic Requirements of BEED

Includes references which are indicated where needed.

Includes a substantial Teachers Manual that would provide a rich background/ relevant materials for effective teaching.

Page 7: Evaluation of IM

Basic Requirements of BEED

Includes a preface which explains clearly the materials’ theoretical underpinning.

Includes a narrative biography of authors with emphasis on training and educational qualification relevant to subject area.

Includes elements which conform to the unit integrated design.

Page 8: Evaluation of IM

Note:

Each error from the above list is considered a demerit. All demerits are added up and transmitted as follows:

Page 9: Evaluation of IM

No. of TX pages

Cut-offs of the Number of Demerits

200 pages or less

50 100 150 200 OVER 200

201 to 300 pages

75 150 225 300 OVER 300

301 to 400 100 200 300 400 OVER 400

401 pages and above

125 250 375 500 OVER 500

RATING 5 4 3 2 1

Page 10: Evaluation of IM

INTERPRETATION:

5Highly recommended for publication (Waived content and language editing)

4Recommended for publication but with minor corrections (if corrections are typographical in nature, editors can correct them, no need to return to the author)

3Recommended for publication but has to be returned to authors for content revisions (conference with the editor is necessary)

2Recommended to publication but has to be returned to author for organization and content revision (a conference with the editor is necessary)

1 Not publishable

Page 11: Evaluation of IM

What steps or improvement can be recommended for the writer?

_____________________________________________________

_____________________________________________________

_____________________________________________________

_____________________________________________________

_____________________________________________________

Page 12: Evaluation of IM

EVALUATING INSTUCTIONAL MATERIALS

EVALUATING INSTUCTIONAL MATERIALS

Writing Stage

Page 13: Evaluation of IM

Philosophy & Objectives Conforms to: (a) National Development

goals and priorities (b) DepEd Curriculum Directives & Guidelines

Projects appropriate philosophy of education

Has a conceptual framework and unifying philosophy

Writing Stage

Page 14: Evaluation of IM

Philosophy & Objectives

Covers basic requirements of curriculum/courses.

Has clearly defined objectives from the viewpoint of learners.

Are realistic and attainable by target learners.

Page 15: Evaluation of IM

Content: Cognition and Competencies

Contains enough materials to be taken up for the year.

Provides varied and challenging exercises and drills for reinforcement and mastery of concepts and skills.

Page 16: Evaluation of IM

Content: Cognition and Competencies

Includes materials for extension of the learners interests and independent study.

Includes materials that are suitable, interesting, current and up-to-date.

Contains specific description/s of illustrative materials that are appropriate and instructional.

Page 17: Evaluation of IM

Content: Cognition and Competencies

Defines new and difficult concepts and terms in context or in a glossary.

Presents up-to-date and unfamiliar materials through comprehensible means.

Gives instructions that are easy to understand and follow.

Page 18: Evaluation of IM

Content: Cognition and Competencies

Includes elements which conform to the unit integrated design.

Includes elements which conform to the recommended formal of REX.

Page 19: Evaluation of IM

Content: Affective Includes a wide range of Philippine

experiences: rural, urban, suburban; minority and mainstreaming; traditional, modern.

Page 20: Evaluation of IM

Content: Affective

Includes materials that promote a global outlook or world view: cross-cultural, ecumenical, etc.

Presents relevant traits and values of contemporary living in a developing society like our country: self-help, initiative, entrepreneurship, planning (vs. bahala na-orientation and the like)

Page 21: Evaluation of IM

Content: Affective

Includes the array of structures and nuances of Philippine society: family and kinship, mores and folkways, customs and traditions, beliefs, values; ecology, etc.

Avoids prejudices and biases, sexism (gender inequality), stereotyping, religious taboo, racial discrimination, political propaganda, and the like.

Page 22: Evaluation of IM

Content: Affective

Reflects the thrusts of responsible parenthood, energy conservation, transformational education: (a) Peace and justice education (b) Environmental education (c) gender-sensitivity education (d) political education

Reflects a recognition of stages of child/youth development toward acceptable adult behavior and thinking

Page 23: Evaluation of IM

Appropriateness of Material Has vocabulary and length of sentences

that are suitable to the learner’s grade or year level.

Content covers and develops learning competencies intended and appropriate for the learner’s grade/year level.

Page 24: Evaluation of IM

Appropriateness of Mateial

Materials suggest/indicate acceptable moral standards in the measurement of significant human experience.

Controversial issues included are appropriate to the maturity of the learners and are handled fairly and from several viewpoints.

Page 25: Evaluation of IM

Presentation and Organization

Includes a strong integration of competencies across subjects.

Includes topics which are thematically and logically presented throughout the material.

Page 26: Evaluation of IM

Presentation and Organization

Contains units/chapters and lessons which are arranged from simple to complex, from observable to abstract.

Contains thought-provoking or self-test questions and strategic points within the lesson.

Page 27: Evaluation of IM

Presentation and Organization

Is consistent with accepted psychological and pedagogical principles.

Is articulated or linked with books immediately preceding and succeeding in the series.

Page 28: Evaluation of IM

Accuracy of Information Provides lessons which are free from

obsolete information and errors in concepts, facts, language, grammar and typography.

Page 29: Evaluation of IM

Note:

Each error from the above list is considered a demerit. All demerits are added up and transmitted as follows:

Page 30: Evaluation of IM

No. of TX pages

Cut-offs of the Number of Demerits

200 pages or less

50 100 150 200 OVER 200

201 to 300 pages

75 150 225 300 OVER 300

301 to 400 100 200 300 400 OVER 400

401 pages and above

125 250 375 500 OVER 500

RATING 5 4 3 2 1

Page 31: Evaluation of IM

INTERPRETATION:

5Highly recommended for publication (Waived content and language editing)

4Recommended for publication but with minor corrections (if corrections are typographical in nature, editors can correct them, no need to return to the author)

3Recommended for publication but has to be returned to authors for content revisions (conference with the editor is necessary)

2Recommended to publication but has to be returned to author for organization and content revision (a conference with the editor is necessary)

1 Not publishable

Page 32: Evaluation of IM

What steps or improvement can be recommended for the writer?

_____________________________________________________

_____________________________________________________

_____________________________________________________

_____________________________________________________

_____________________________________________________

Page 33: Evaluation of IM

Thank you

End of Report

Page 34: Evaluation of IM

EVALUATING INSTUCTIONAL MATERIALS

EVALUATING INSTUCTIONAL MATERIALS

ROY SAPICO CAPANGPANGANPresenter

ROY SAPICO CAPANGPANGANPresenter

MAEngEd 214

Page 35: Evaluation of IM