Evaluation of Emergency Response GIS Solutions

22
Evaluation of Evaluation of Emergency Response GIS Emergency Response GIS Solutions Solutions

description

 

Transcript of Evaluation of Emergency Response GIS Solutions

Page 1: Evaluation of Emergency Response GIS Solutions

Evaluation of Emergency Evaluation of Emergency Response GIS SolutionsResponse GIS Solutions

Page 2: Evaluation of Emergency Response GIS Solutions

Presenters• Steve Thompson

– Introduction– CATS– CAMEO

• Hong Su– Autodesk– Accela

• Jeff Bourdier– E Team– MapTooL– Conclusion

Page 3: Evaluation of Emergency Response GIS Solutions

Why GIS?

“GIS technology gives public safety personnel the ability to manage and analyze large amounts of location-based information. Data (including files from legacy systems) can be stored in a geodatabase and used to visualize spatial relationships and reveal trends critical to public safety response and planning. Computer-generated maps can be shared across a network or the Internet with multiple agencies to coordinate efforts and maximize resources.”

Source: http://www.esri.com/industries/public_safety/

Page 4: Evaluation of Emergency Response GIS Solutions

Why Emergency Response?

"Preparing communities to respond to bioterrorist threats or events is a top priority in our country right now. With GIS as a core component to this solution, the immediate impact will be to make GIS an integral component of the day-to-day operations of public health and public safety organizations.”

Bill Davenhall, Health Industry Solutions Manager, ESRI

Page 5: Evaluation of Emergency Response GIS Solutions

Project Goal

• Identify emergency response software package that best fits the needs for a medium sized city (Arlington, TX)– Evaluate off-the-shelf emergency response

software applications and tools – Assume that no GIS-based emergency response

system currently exists

Page 6: Evaluation of Emergency Response GIS Solutions

Consequence Assessment Tool Set (CATS)

GIS Platform Utilizes ESRI ArcGIS 9 with Spatial Analyst Extension

Applications Natural Disasters, Fires/Explosions, Toxic Releases, Bioterrorism

Functionality Real-time hazard display and analysis, Emergency response planning, Evacuation planning, Real-time response when used in conjunction with E-team

Models and Databases

ALOHA (Areal Locations of Hazardous Atmospheres) – Dispersion Model, DTRA – HPAC SuiteOver 150 databases integrated

Users Local Emergency Planning Committee, First Responders, Response Center Personnel

Support SAIC – Developer website, User-forums, FEMA, EPA

Costs Arcview bundle ($2500) plus cost for CATS, software is free but $650 per seat for technical support and training.

Page 7: Evaluation of Emergency Response GIS Solutions

CATS - Hazard Prediction and

Assessment Capability (HPAC)

Realtime – Roadblock information

Catastrophic Natural Event Prediction

Page 8: Evaluation of Emergency Response GIS Solutions

Computer-Aided Management of Emergency Operations - CAMEO

GIS Platform Utilizes its own mapping tool MARPLOT (Mapping Application for Response Planning and Local Operational Tasks)

Applications Fires/Explosions, Toxic Releases, Bioterrorism

Functionality Real-time hazard display and analysis, Emergency response planning, Evacuation planning,

Models and Databases

ALOHA (Areal Locations of Hazardous Atmospheres) – Dispersion Model, MARPLOT – Mapping, LandView- Population, Tiger data

Users Local Emergency Planning Committee, First Responders, Response Center Personnel

Support NOAA, EPA, Census Dept.

Costs Free, Potential costs for updated meteorological and detailed roads data

Page 9: Evaluation of Emergency Response GIS Solutions

CAMEO Interface

Page 10: Evaluation of Emergency Response GIS Solutions

CAMEO Scenario 1:

• Train Derailment: Train containing benzene has derailed and several tank cars have caught fire and are releasing benzene gas

Page 11: Evaluation of Emergency Response GIS Solutions

ALOHA modeling

Page 12: Evaluation of Emergency Response GIS Solutions

Evaluation of AutodeskGIS Platform Autodesk MapGuide® 6.5 software

Applications Natural Disasters(Earthquake,Floods), Fires, Bombing

Functionality Quickly access, visualize, and analyze critical data so people can understand and appropriately respond to emergencies

Models and Databases

AutoCAD drawings, engineering data, demographics, hazardous material locations

Users Fire and police departments, local government, search and recovery teams

Support website, User-forums

Costs $4,197.00 government price for MapGuide: 10 User Starter Pack,

Additional costs for other modules: Autodesk Preplan, Autodesk Crisis Command, Autodesk Mobile Command, AutoCAD, 3D Studio

Page 13: Evaluation of Emergency Response GIS Solutions

Three Main Components of Autodesk Emergency Response Model

Administrative - Training and preplanning are done in this phase

– Autodesk Pre-Plan

Tactical - Refers to the “first responder” activity that takes place on the scene of an emergency

– Autodesk Mobile Command

Strategic - Refers to the management of a disaster, which often takes place in an emergency command center away from the actual sit

– Autodesk Crisis Command 2

Page 14: Evaluation of Emergency Response GIS Solutions

Autodesk Detail CAD

Drawings

Autodesk 3D Viewer

Autodesk Mapping Building Footprint

Page 15: Evaluation of Emergency Response GIS Solutions

Evaluation of ACCELA

GIS Platform Accela GIS, Built on Vantage360

Applications Natural Disasters(Earthquake,Floods), Fires

Functionality With the ability to automate workflow, track information, and manage data from a centralized database .

Models and Databases

Accela Asset Management, Accela Land Management, Accela GIS, Accela Wireless

Users Government agencies (E-government solution)

Support Interactive Voice Response

Costs Solutions run around $100 month for services

Page 16: Evaluation of Emergency Response GIS Solutions

Components of Accela Emergency Response Solution

Accela Land Management– Capture detailed information on a building or structure– Attach and retrieve CAD drawings, photographs, and other document files

Accela GIS– Maximize time in the field during the response– Automate map analyse and append map layers

Accela Wireless– Perform Rapid Damage Assessment– Real-time Data updates from the field

Page 17: Evaluation of Emergency Response GIS Solutions

Accela GIS Viewer

Page 18: Evaluation of Emergency Response GIS Solutions

Evaluation of E Team

GIS Platform ESRI – Powered by ArcIMS

Applications Any type of emergency

Functionality Every phase of a crisis: “preparedness… response… recovery”

Models and Databases

CATS-generated plume models can be integrated, analyzed, and distributed; DB integration offered as professional service

Users Emergency management, law enforcement, fire, public works, public health, the environment

Support Phone, fax, e-mail, online; professional or “specialized support” services also offered

Costs $1900/license, deals available

Page 19: Evaluation of Emergency Response GIS Solutions

E Team Screen Shots

Page 20: Evaluation of Emergency Response GIS Solutions

Evaluation of MapTooL

GIS Platform ESRI – Map Objects version 2.3

Applications Designed with firefighting in mind, but can be useful for other emergencies based on information collected by user

Functionality Navigation, information retrieval, data collection, administrative decision support

Models and Databases

No native modeling capability, but output from other systems can be displayed and queried within MapTooL

Users First responders and administrative personnel, primarily fire agencies

Support Annual maintenance contract includes 20 hrs. technical support plus DB, liaison, and versioning services

Costs Set-up fee ~$7000, $900/license, annual maintenance fee based on number of licenses purchased

Page 21: Evaluation of Emergency Response GIS Solutions

MapTooL Screen Shots

Page 22: Evaluation of Emergency Response GIS Solutions

Conclusion• Good general solution: E Team and CATS• Good low-cost alternative: CAMEO• Autodesk

– Pro: CAD interface– Con: Complexity (modules)

• MapTooL– Pro: Ease of use– Con: Cost

• Accela generally weak