.Evaluation of an Intervention to Foster Time Perpective and Career Decided...

download .Evaluation of an Intervention to Foster Time Perpective and Career Decided...

of 7

Transcript of .Evaluation of an Intervention to Foster Time Perpective and Career Decided...

  • 8/20/2019 .Evaluation of an Intervention to Foster Time Perpective and Career Decided...

    1/16

    Received   03/25/10

    Revised

      11/22/10

    Accepted   11/30/10

    Global Visions

    Evaluation of an Intervention to

    Foster Time Perspective and

    Career Decidedness in a Group of

    Italian dolescents

    Lea Ferrari, Laura Nota, and Salvatore Soresi

    A

     structured 10-didactic unit intervention was devised to foster

     ad olescents

    time

    perspective  and career

     decidedness.

     The study was cond ucted with 50 adolescents

    who  w ere selected from a group of  624;  25 of  the  participants were randomly as-

    signed   to the con trol grou p and 25 were assigned to the

     experimental

     group.  They

    were  selected according to their level of  career  indecision and po or

     propensity

    to

    look   to th e future. A series of   repeated   measure analyses of

     variance

     were carried

    out  to

     evaluate

     p re- and p osttest differences between the

     experimental

     and control

    groups   regarding time perspective and career

     decidedness.

     At posttes t, the experi-

    mental group

     showed

     higher  levels of

     continuity,

     hope,  and career  decidedness  than

    did   the control group .  Implications  for future practice and research arc discussed.

    Keywords:

      time

     perspective,

     career

     decidedness,

      career adaptability

    The aim of this study was to describe and evaluate the efficacy of an

    intervention that was devised to enhance young adolescents time per-

    spective and career decidedness. These two dimensions are com ponents

    of career adaptability and have a crucial role in career designing (Savikas

    et al., 200 9).

    Time perspective is defined by sense of continuity, optimism, and fu-

    ture orientation (Savickas, 1997). Garstensen (2006) asserted that time

    perspective has a positive impact on motivation, cognition, and em otion,

    and it is linked to goal selection and goal pursuit. Savickas (1991) and

    Ringle and Savickas (1983) considered

     

    sense of continuity am ong past,

    present, and future a more cognitive component of time perspective,

    and optimism a more affective component. Gontinuity sustains planning

    skills and optimism refers to a sense of confidence in the achievability

    of

      goals.

      Greed, Patton, and Bartrum (2002) reported that Australian

    students with a higher level of optimism had more career goals, were

    more decided about their career choice, and showed higher levels of

    career planning and exploration. Students with high pessimism showed

    lower career and decision-making knowledge, higher career indecision,

    and lower school achievement.

  • 8/20/2019 .Evaluation of an Intervention to Foster Time Perpective and Career Decided...

    2/16

    For Savickas (1997), time perspective is a core component of career

    adaptability, wh ich is defined as th e readiness to cope with the predict-

    able tasks of prep aring for and particip ating in the w ork role and w ith the

    unpredictable adjustments prompted by the changes in work and work

    con dit ion s (p. 25 4) . Th e propensity to look to the future , acknow ledging

    the r ight to make decisions to build one 's ow n future , looking arou nd to

    explore career opportunities, and building up a sense of self-efficacy in

    prob lem solving con tribute to form ing the critical dim ensions of vocational

    development over the l ife span (Här tung, Porfel i , & Vondracek, 2008;

    Savickas , 2005) . These aspects , which begin developing in childhood

    and then consolidate in adolescence, are an integral part of career adapt-

    ability. According to Savickas, career adaptability can be also described

    as a development of the concept of career maturity. If the latter can be

    seen as a predictable and linear continuum of developmental tasks, career

    adaptability underscores the ability to see the signs of change and adjust

    to respond t o new requests f rom the env ironm ent (Savickas , 19 97 ) . Hirs-

    chi (2009) showed that career adaptability was related to positive youth

    development, including higher levels of well-being and quality of life.

    Propensity to look to the future in an optimist ic way was s tudied in

    re la t ion to ca reer matur i ty . Jane iro and Marques (2010) found tha t

    propensity to look to the f iature was positively correlated with career

    m aturity, operationalized as career plan ning and exp loration in P ortu gu ese

    adolescents . Janeiro (20 10 ) a lso obse rved th e impact of t ime perspective

    on career matur i ty in ninth and 12th graders .

    Be ing or ien ted tow ard the fu ture , sens ing a conn ec t ion be tw een pres -

    ent activi t ies and future outcomes, and adopting an optimist ic a t t i tude

    seem par t icular ly s ignif icant in today 's world of work, which, as Fouad

    and Bynner (2008) highlighted, requires people to face transit ion pe-

    r iods more of ten than in the past and to be ready for ni ture requests .

    However , many individuals in our complex society unfor tunately do

    not or ient themselves toward the future and seldom, if a t a l l , th ink

    about how the i r ca reers could evolve (Creed & Pa t ton ,  2 0 0 3 ;  N o t a ,

    Sores i , So lberg , & Fer ra r i , 2005) . Pee tsma, Hascher , van der Veen ,

    and Roede (2005) emphas ized tha t o lder adolescents focused more on

    their personal development and le isure t ime than they focused on their

    school or career choices . Recently , Ferrar i , Nota , and Soresi (2010)

    showed that I ta l ian adolescents , par t icular ly around the ages of 16 and

    17 years , rare ly thought of how their profess ional l i fe could develop.

    Many of them were of ten engaged in explor ing the self and the reali ty

    sur rounding them but seemed espec ia l ly concerned about the here and

    now , neg lecting to determ ine th e con sequ ence s that such a focus may

    have on the i r fu ture . A m on g these adolescents , the und ec ided and those

    with low-efficacy beliefs in their own decisional abilities showed even

    lower levels of future or ientat ion, continuity , and optimism.

    Another var iable that we considered was career indecis ion, which is

    the inability to select a professional option and the inability to engage

  • 8/20/2019 .Evaluation of an Intervention to Foster Time Perpective and Career Decided...

    3/16

    engaging in more career planning and exploration over time. Creed,

    Fallón, and Hood (2009) found that career decision making together

    with career planning, career exploration, and self-regulation represented

    a second-order factor of career adaptability.

    More recently, Savickas et al. (2009) suggested a life-designing model

    in which youth are assisted in building their lives by positively consider-

    ing their future. People should be helped to strengthen ability to find

    points of connections between past experiences, present life, and future

    expectations. This implies thinking of themselves as persons involved

    in processes of professional development and career advancement, to

    understand professional enhancement and progress, and to be aware of

    the social and relational aspects that may affect professional development

    (Marko & Savickas, 199 8; Savickas, 20 05 ).

    Savickas (2002), in particular, maintained that to increase optimism

    and ability to project into the future, the following should be done by

    counselors: (a) work on strengthening individuals' abilities to make new

    experiences and grasp any opportunities offered by their setting; (b)

    develop decisional abilities and abilities to set educational and career

    goals that can allow the acquisition of increasingly greater control on

    school-career choices; (c) increase vocational knowledge and aspirations

    by exploring the school-career options one is interested in; and (d)

    encourage agency and persistence behaviors by increasing self-efficacy,

    problem-solving abilities, and abilities to cope with barriers.

    With these suggestions in mind, we devised the training called Hopes

    and Expectations for the Futu re, the goal of which is to encourage ado-

    lescents to look toward the fiiture , increase their perception of alternative

    options and scenarios, and acquire decision-making and planning strate-

    gies.

      The intervention was devised for students with low levels of time

    perspective and career decidedness who were randomly assigned either to

    the experimental or to the control group. At posttest, the experimental

    group was expected to show higher levels of continuity, optimism, and

    hope and higher career decidedness than the control group.

    Method

      rticip nts

    D u r i n g t h e first p h a s e o f t h e i n t e r v e n t i o n , 6 2 4 a d o l e s c e n t s p a r t i c i p a t e d ;

    2 6 4 w e r e b o y s a n d 3 6 0 w e r e gi rl s ( M a g e = 1 6 . 2 6 y e a r s ,  S 0 . 5 5 ) w h o

    w e r e a t t e n d i n g v o c a t i o n a l g u i d a n c e a c t i v i t i e s o r g a n i z e d b y t h e s c h o o l . A s

    p a r t o f t h e a c t i v it ie s , s t u d e n t s v o l u n t a r il y c o m p l e t e d a b a t t e r y o f m e a s u r e s

    i n g r o u p t e s t i n g s e s s io n s . W e c o n s i d e r e d t h i s t o b e a c o n v e n i e n c e s a m p l e .

    T h e a c t iv i ti es i n c l u d e d ( a ) a d m i n i s t r a t i o n o f a b a t t e r y o f i n s t r u m e n t s ,

    w b i c b w e r e t b e L o n g - T e r m P e r s o n a l D i r e c t i o n S c a l e ( L T P D ; W e s s m a n ,

    1 9 7 3 ) , th e A c h ie v a bi li ty o f F u t u r e G o a l s S c al e ( A F G ; H e i m b e r g , 1 9 6 1 ) ,

    t h e F l o p e S c a l e ( S n y d e r e t a l . , 1 9 9 1 ) , I d e a s a n d A t t i t u d e s o n S c h o o l -

    C a r e e r F u t u r e : H i g h S c h o o l v e rs io n ( I A S C F ; S o r es i & N o t a , 2 0 0 3 ) ; ( b )

  • 8/20/2019 .Evaluation of an Intervention to Foster Time Perpective and Career Decided...

    4/16

    propen sity toward th e fiature (dm e perspective), and scho ol-career indeci-

    sion. The students who had scores 1

     SD

      below the mean were identified

    and 50 part icipants were selected. These par t icipants recorded lower

    scores t han the o the r 57 4 ado lescen ts on the LT PD , f ( l , 623 ) = 4 .0 02 ,

    p

     = . 0 4 6 ; t h e A FG , i ' ( l , 6 2 3 ) = 1 4 0 . 9 4 5 ,

     p

     = .0 0 1 ; the Ho pe Sca le , P ( l ,

    6 2 3 ) = 4 . 3 2 2 ,  p = .0 38 ; and the IAS CF , i= '( l, 62 3) =

      3 . 9 1 1 ,

      p = . 0 4 8 .

    Considering only the gender variable, the 50 adolescents (38 girls, 12

    boys ; M ag e = 16 .20 ,   SD = .60) were rando m ly assigned to eithe r th e

    experimental or the control grou p. The experimental grou p was mad e up

    of

     6

      boys and 19 gir ls (M ag e = 16 .20 , SD = 0.61 ) and the con trol gro up

    was com prised of 6 boys and 19 girls (M a g e =

      1 6 . 2 1 ,

      SD = 0 .60) . N o

    significant differences were recorded between the experimental and the

    control group as regards the var iables gender , x^( l ) = 0.739, and age,

    ^•(1,  49) = 0 .099 ,  p =  .7 55 , and th e m easures considered in the s tudy,

    L T P D ,

      i ' ( l , 49) = 0 .384 ,  p =  .538 ; AFG, P( l , 49) = 0 .008 ,  p  = . 9 3 1 ;

    Sense of Agency, F{1 49) = 0.3 29 ,/»= .56 9; Pathways, F{1 49) = 0 .3 64 ,

    p = .54 9; and Level of Decision an d Assurance Related to O ne 's Sc hoo l-

    Career Future ,  F{1 49) = 0 .615 , p = . 4 3 7 .

    While the experimental group was taking part in the s tudy, the control

    group cont inued wi th normal school work.

     e sures

    Th e LT PD (Wessman, 197 3) measures eognidve beliefs abou t co nnec don s

    between past, presen t, and fiature behavior (e on dn uity) . Posidve items reflect

    a sense of eondnuity of past, present, atid ñiture as well as motivation for

    and commitment to long-term goals. Negadve items reflect unstructured

    and fragmented con cep do n of dm e widi absence of aims and direction. T he

    20 items of the ins trum en t are rated on a 7-p oin t L ikert scale ranging from

    not at all descriptive

     ( 1 )

     to perfectly descriptive (7). The instrum ent was first

    translated into Italian, following Van de Vijver and Hambleton's (1996)

    suggesdons for the transladon of tests in cross-cultural research, and was

    then back translated. Principal component analysis with subsequent oblimin

    rotadon showed that the Italian version for high school students (Ferrari

    et al., 2010) included 18 items and revealed the presence of three factors

    accoundng for

      47.23%

      of the total variance. The first factor was Sense of

    C on dn uity (nine item s, e.g., I plan much of my life aro un d a few main

    goals ) ,

      die second factor was Structured Concepdon of Time (six i tems,

    e.g., I feel that dm e is brok en, fi-agmented, and with ou t direc do n ), and

    the third factor was called Pro jecd on I n to the FuUire (three item s, e.g., I

    move in an orderly way toward goals set long ahead of

     d m e ) .

      Consistent

    with Wessman's (1 97 3) findings, most i tems could be included in the first

    and second factors. However, in the Italian version, three items make up a

    third factor, which did not appear in the original version of the scale. The

    total scale internal consistency alpha was .79; the first, second, and diird

    alpha values were .82,  .77. and .6 1 , respecdvely. In line with M ark o and

    Savickas (1998) and Savickas, Silling, and Schwartz (1984), die total scale

  • 8/20/2019 .Evaluation of an Intervention to Foster Time Perpective and Career Decided...

    5/16

    the instrument. The Italian version for high school students (Ferrari et

    al.,

      2010) included six items and confirmed the presence of

     

    principal

    co m po ne nt , acc ou ntin g for 46.7 8 of the total variance. Th e total scale

    internal consistency alpha was .74.

    The Hope Scale (Snyder et al., 1991) measures positive motivational

    state and consists of^l2 items that are rated on a 4-point Likert scale that

    ranged from

      definitely false {\

    to

      definitely true

      (4). Th e same proced ure

    was followed for the translation of the instrument. Principal component

    analysis with subsequent oblimin rotation showed that the Italian version

    for high school students (Ferrari et al., 2010) included eight items and

    pro du ced tw o factors tha t acc oun ted for 52.25 of the total variance.

    The first factor comprised four items (e.g., I energetically pursue my

    goals),

      accounting for  39.51 of the total variance and was called Sense

    of Agency. It appeared to measure a more affective aspect of nature ori-

    entation. The second factor comprised items (e.g.. There are lots of ways

    aroun d any problem ), accounting for  12.73 of the total variance and was

    called Pathw ays. It appeared to m easure a m ore co gnid ve aspect of fiiture

    orientation. These results support Snyder et al. 's (1991) findings and the

    factors coincide. The total scale internal consistency alpha was

      .77;

      the

    first and second alpha values were .64 and .71, respectively.

    The IASCF (Soresi & Nota, 2003) is a standardized questionnaire that

    is used to measure career indecision. The measure is derived from the

    work of Jones (1989) and Saviekas and Jarjoura (1991) and is a 16-item

    self-report instrument that asks participants to rate on a 7-point scale (1

    = does

     not

     describe

     m e at all, 7

     = describes

     me very

     well the extent to which

    each s tatem ent describes their usual way of thinkin g and behav ing. A series

    of exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses provided support for a

    three-factor struc tur e, acc ou ntin g for 60.86 of the total variance (Soresi

    & Nota, 2003). The first factor was Level of Decision and Assurance

    Related to One's School-Career Future (LDASCF, 10 items; e.g. , I have

    decided what to do and I am sure I have chosen well). The second factor

    was Level of Locus of Control Associated With Professional Problem-

    Solving (internality; LoC, four items; e.g.. It is useless to devote time

    to professional goals. What an individual will do actually depends on so

    many other factors). The third factor was Ability to Gather Information

    Usefi.ll to Making a Choice (AGI, two items; e.g., I know how to get the

    information I need ). Scale scores were obtain ed by sum min g item response

    scores co rresp on din g t o each of the three factors, after reversing th e scores

    of negatively worded items. Soresi and Nota (2003) reported adequate

    internal consistency reliability estimates, with alpha values for the three

    factors o f .9 2, . 7 1 , and .67 , respectively. In this study, we dec ided to use

    only the first factor, which measures level of decidedness.

     ro edure

    The adolescents of the experimental group were administered the train-

    ing, which comprised 10 weekly meetings of 2 hours each, during the

  • 8/20/2019 .Evaluation of an Intervention to Foster Time Perpective and Career Decided...

    6/16

    At every meeting, participants received didactic material (a student

    manual) and were trained to discuss and practice the proposed skills in

    order to stimulate reflection, increase awareness, and help trainees acquire

    them . Teaching techniques included trainer explanation of concepts, class

    discussion, individual and group exercises, atid feedback.

      s

     suggested by

    Brown and Ryan Krane (20 00 ), special emphasis was placed on written

    exercises, individualized interpretation and feedback, information on

    the world of work, modeling opportunities, and attention to building

    support for choices within one's social network. During the meetings,

    participants were asked to write down their reflections and complete

    exercises about personal situations. They were also given personalized

    feedback and were encouraged to look for sources of support individuals

    who could provide support.

    Each meeting was based on a goal described as the conditions of the

    context in which a given skill was to be applied, performance, and a mastery

    criterion of expected student performance at end of the unit. Specifically,

    participants were asked to answer 10 multiple-choice questions on the

    issues focused on in the meeting. Mastery criterion was achieved if the

    student correctly answered eight of 10 questions; additional meetings

    were planned for students who had not been successful. As suggested

    by Kidd and Killeen (1992) in the evaluation of developmental guidance

    intervention, the use of learning outcomes

     as

     mastery criteria

     is

     appropriate

    because they are relatively easy to assess and help to determine whether

    learning has occurred. Subsequently, in line with suggestions proposed by

    Heppner, Baumgardner, Larson, and Petty (1988), all participants were

    invited to write down their thoughts and reflections on what had been

    dealt with in the meeting. Program aims, phases, teaching techniques and

    sequences, and examples to be used during training were described for

    each meeting in a trainer's manual (the treatment manual).

    The Tim e Perspective ntervention

    This s tructured 10-didactic unit intervention was designed to increase

    future

      time perspective and enhance career decidedness .

    In the first meeting, the activity was illustrated and the importance of

    active participation and of doing the assigned hom ew ork was em phasized.

    Students

     signed a contract as recognition of

     the

      importance

     of their

     active

    participation during meetings and of die homework.

    In

      the second mee t ing , us ing Jan i s and Mann ' s (1977) theory o f

    decisional conflict, the issue of decision was addressed. The students

    were

      given research da ta tha t de m ons tra ted h ow som e dec is ions , som e

    of

      which concerned one ' s fu ture , a re more complex than o thers and

    are therefore m ore w orr isom e, associated with high er levels of r isk, and

    need

      more time and effort to be handled efficaciously. The discussion

    with

     th e s tud en ts focused also on the fact that such decis ions som etim es

    depended on the individual 's ability to take into account social factors

    such

      as exp ectat ion s, req ues ts , and pressures from oth ers (e .g . , family,

  • 8/20/2019 .Evaluation of an Intervention to Foster Time Perpective and Career Decided...

    7/16

    chance events just happen and o thers happen if favorable conditions are

    created. We pointed out that people can capitalize on chance events if

    they have an open mind, are curious, and are persistent, bu t also if they

    are optimistic and are willing to take risks. During the second part of

    the meeting, we focused on the definition of interest and of self-efficacy

    beliefs and on their connections. The students were encouraged to refiect

    on their interests and on their self-efficacy beliefs.

    In the fourth meeting, making reference to the work of Peterson,

    Sampson, Reardon, and Lenz (1996), Amundson (1997), and Mitchell

    and Krumboltz (199 6) , we introduced the issue of irrational ideas. After

    examining the students' own definitions (ideas based on stereotypes,

    hearsay, or pessimistic ideas) and analyzing examples of irrational ideas,

    we encouraged students to discuss the consequences of sticking to ir-

    rational ideas, such as reduced possibility of choice and perception of

    dissatisfaction. The students were urged to transform some irrational

    ideas by using a variety of strategies (e.g., reformulation, searching for

    valid and reliable da ta) . The fifth meeting, which followed an analysis of

    the reform ulated irrational ideas on which the students had reflected,

    focused on environmental factors that are likely to infiuence the choice

    process, interests, efficacy beliefs, and irrational ideas. The s tudents were

    invited to think back to their past and to assess how such factors might

    have affected their life and the way they were now. We also asked them

    to identify individuals who might be actual supports for their career

    project and to find ways to plan such a project.

    During the sixth meeting, based on the work of Betz and Hackett

    (1981) and Gallagher and Kaufman (2005), we encouraged students

    to discuss efficacy beliefs in mathematics and the role such beliefs have

    in characterizing some choices and in determining differences between

    boys and girls. The students were invited to start writing the book of

    their life (Niles & Harris-Bowlsbey, 20 05 ) beginning with significant

    past events. We also asked them to focus on the consequences of those

    events in increasing their streng ths and to identify the connections

    between the past, the present, and the niture.

    During the seventh meeting, we explored with the participants some

    features ofthe current world of work (Blustein, 2006; Savickas, 2005).

    For example, there is a growing need in the workplace for individuals

    with well-developed intellectual abilities, greater flexibility, and relational

    and problem-solving abilities. The youth were then invited to project

    into the future and write at least another chapter of their book, pictur-

    ing themselves in 5 and 10 years' time. They were asked to imagine

    where they would be, what they would do, and the people with whom

    they would interact.

    In the eighth meeting,

     w

    focused on (a) professional objectives (Savickas,

    20 05 ), (b) why it was important for youth to think thro ugh objectives,

    (c) how they could formulate their own professional objective starting

    from refiections on themselves, and (d) their own characteristics and

  • 8/20/2019 .Evaluation of an Intervention to Foster Time Perpective and Career Decided...

    8/16

    formation they obtained in the discussion, the youth were invited to

    define decisional aspects and to compare significant professional options

    in relation to their set professional objective.

    In the 10th and final meeting, we focused on ways the students could

    use in choosing the educational pathways that would enable them to

    pursue their professional objectives. We summarized the work that had

    been completed, encouraging the youth to discuss those tasks. We also

    stimulated students' thoughts about their future and about the differ-

    ences they could see in their current thoughts and the ones they had at

    the beginning of the intervention.

    Results

      ducationai Outcomes

    One of our

     aims

     was that each meeting would allow the youth to increase

    their knowledge and abilities, thereby enabling them to set a goal to

    pursue. In six ou t of nine meetings, all 25 (100 ) participants reached

    the mastery criterion; in the third and the eighth m eeting , 24 (96 )

    students did, and in the sixth meeting, 23 (92 ) students did. Thus,

    our overall goal was reached for most of the students.

      mpirical Outcomes

    Repeated-measures analyses of variance were used to evaluate changes

    in time perspective measures and decidedness over time and as a func-

    tion of treatment condition. The independent variable was treatment

    condition (experimental vs. control), and pre-post measurement was

    the repeated measurement factor (Time) with two levels (pretest and

    posttest m easurement). Only the Treatment Condition x Time interac-

    tion produced effects of interest for the study and will be reported. The

    Bonferroni correction

      {p 

    .05/5) were used. The effect sizes of the

    interactions were calculated in accordance with Field's (2005) sugges-

    tion of converting F ratios to an effect size

      r.

     When r

     =

      .10 the effect

    is considered small, when

      r 

    .30 the effect is considered medium, and

    when r

     =

      .50 the effect is considered large.

    A repeated-measures analysis of variance showed a main interaction ef-

    fect of the treatment condition and the pretest and posttest m easurement,

    Wilks's lambda = .619, P(5, 44) = 5.428, p

     

    .0 01. Univariate analyses

    showed an interaction effect for the LTPD,

     F{1

    48) = 12.774,

     p =

      .001,

    .46. For the AFG, no significant interaction effect emerged. For the

    Hope Scale, an interaction effect emerged on Pathways, P ( l , 48) = 8.178,

    .006, r

     =

      .38. For the LDASCF, an interaction effect emerged, f(l,

    48) = 19.199,

     p 

    .001,

     r=

     .54. T-score means of the experimental and

    the control groups at pretest and posttest are reported in Table 1. The

    interaction graphs (Figures

     

    to 3) highlighted that the experimental group

    showed higher

     sense

     of continuity, higher Pathways (Hope

     Scale),

     and also

    higher levels of career decidedness at posttest than did the control group.

  • 8/20/2019 .Evaluation of an Intervention to Foster Time Perpective and Career Decided...

    9/16

    TABLE 1

    Means T Scores) and Standard Deviations of Experimental

    and Control Groups at Pretest and Posttest

    Pretest Posttest

    Control

    Group

    Experimental

    Group

    Control

    Group

    Experimental

    Group

    Measure

    LTPD

    AFG

    Sense of Agency

    Pathways

    LDASCF

    M

    49.11

    49.87

    49.18

    49.14

    51.11

    S

    9.80

    9.48

    9.02

    8.81

    10.21

    M

    50.88

    50.12

    50.81

    50.89

    48.88

    S

    10.31

    10.68

    11.01

    11.17

    9.85

    M

    48.60

    49.79

    49.79

    49.56

    51.87

    S

    12.17

    11.31

    8.33

    9.37

    12.21

    M

    59.70

    54.88

    58.41

    58.38

    60.52

    S

    10.09

    10.40

    8.59

    9.31

    6.96

    Note

    LTPD = Long-Term Personal Direction Scale; AFG = Achievability of Future

    Goals S cale; LDASCF = Level of D ecision and A ssurance Related to O ne s S chool-

    Career Future.

    own eareer projeet with greater com petence and awareness. As expected,

    at posttest, the experimental group showed higher levels of condnuity,

    hope Pathways), and career decicledness than did the control g rou p.

    Contrary to expectations, no differences were found for Optimism and

     

    58

     —

    56

     —

    0)

    S 54-

    52 —

    5 0 -

    48 —

    • — • Experimental Group

    O-

      O Control

     Group

    /

    o

    /

    /

  • 8/20/2019 .Evaluation of an Intervention to Foster Time Perpective and Career Decided...

    10/16

     

    58 —

    Q 56

    û

    5 2

    50 —

    48 —

    •—•Experimental Group

      O Control Group

    /

    O

    /

    o

    Pretest

    I

    Posttest

    Time

    FIGURE 2

    Pathways for Expérimentai and Control Groups at Pretest

    and Posttest

      ote LTPD = Long Term Personal Direction Scale.

    Sense of Agency. However, the results obtained seem encouraging. The 

    effect sizes were between .38 and .54 and can be considered medium to

    large. They seem satisfactory when compared with the average weighted

    effect sizes of other career interventions, which are about .30 to .34 , as

    reported in meta-analytic studies (Brown Ryan Krane,

     2000;

     Whiston,

    Sexton, Lasoff 1998).

    At the end of the intervention, there was a significant increase in

    students' LTPD scores. Working on continuity between students' past,

    present, and future and on goal setting may have stimulated these youth

    to find a stronger relation between what they were currently doing

    and what they might pursue in the fiiture. In addition, training them

    to think about the future may have made the latter more real to them

    and facilitated projection and anticipation of events (Saviekas, 2002).

    An increase in the hope for the future was also recorded in Pathways.

  • 8/20/2019 .Evaluation of an Intervention to Foster Time Perpective and Career Decided...

    11/16

    60

     

    5 4

    51

    4 8 -

    •—•Experimental Group

    O--O

      ontrol

     Group

    O--/

    /

     o

    T

    Pretest

    T

    Posttest

    Time

    FIGURE 3

    LDASCF for Experimental and Control Groups at Pretest

    and Posttest

      ote

    LDASCF = Level of Decision and A ssurance Related to One s School-Career Future.

    options, and asking the youth to explore the options and relate them

    to their own objectives very likely contributed to the youth having a

    clearer idea of choice. These results seem to support Sampson, P eterson ,

    Reardon , and Lenz s (2 000) position, which proposed a significant role

    for existing knowledge, both on oneself and school-career reality, and

    for decisional strategies in favoring higher levels of decision.

    However, the students scores on the Optimism About the Future

    scale and the dimension of sense of agency did not show any changes.

    It could be that more time is needed for students to experience choice

    situations that make them perceive some sort of optimism and sense

    of agency. It also may be that more experimental activities should be

    proposed, as suggested also by Marko and Savickas (1989), to produce

    a more sizable affective change. Perhaps, as Leondari (20 07) indicated,

    it could also be useful to devote more time to imagine possible desirable

    selves and to envisage possible futures, which is generally associated with

  • 8/20/2019 .Evaluation of an Intervention to Foster Time Perpective and Career Decided...

    12/16

    between present behaviors and nature outcomes) and the affective one

    (i.e.,

     mood and hope about the future)—can be changed and improved

    in developmental-age youth. Implementing specific interventions can

    diminish adolescents' natural tendency to concentrate more on the

    present (Ferrari et al., 2010; Janeiro, 2010).

    Regarding implications for practice, the variables that we focused on in

    the intervention are indeed sensitive to educational actions and they can

    certainly be examined in developmental age both for at-risk youtii and

    in a preventive perspective. The importance of addressing small groups

    should also be considered because such an approach allows the trainer

    to discuss questions at the individual level and to give specific feedback

    to every participant, as suggested by Brown and Ryan Krane (2000).

    Moreover, working with groups allows the intervention to be carried out

    with a larger num ber of individuals, thereby making it less expensive. In

    addition, students also can draw some useflil ideas and refiections from

    the comments, refiections, and proposals of their school peers.

    Future research should examine whether this type of intervention can

    affect career adaptability in general and whether it could prove efficacious

    with students with different characteristics, such as younger studen ts or

    individuals from different ethnic backgrounds.

    Although our findings are encouraging, there are some limitations

    that must be considered. First, we selected a group of low-scoring

    participants. Using this method brings regression toward the mean into

    play and the students ' scores may have a natural tendency to increase,

    even though this did no t happen with the control g roup . Second, our

    control group attended usual school activities. It may simply be that

    the added attention that the experimental group received contributed

    to their higher scores. Future research should propose other kinds

    of training sessions for the control group. Third, it must also be re-

    membered that the satisfactory assessment of training efficacy should

    not be limited to recording changes that occur only a few weeks after

    program completion. This implies that future research should also

    include 6- and 12-month follow-ups to determine whether students

    maintained and generalized the abilities focused on in the training. It

    is difficult to discern which interventions or combinations of interven-

    tions produced significant results. Future research should also examine

    this kind of question.

    In conclusion, our results seem to confirm that this program can expand

    adolescents' perception ofthe future, a period that adolescents do not

    tend to think of in a proactive way. The results also suggest that it is

    possible to encourage adolescents to think that they can do something

    to actively construct their own fiiture.

    References

    Amundson, N. (1997). Myths, metaphors and moxie: The 3Ms of career counseling.

  • 8/20/2019 .Evaluation of an Intervention to Foster Time Perpective and Career Decided...

    13/16

    Brown, S. D ., Ryan Krane, N. E. (20 00 ). Four (or five) sessions and a cloud of dust:

    Old assumptions and new observations about career counseling. In S. D. Brown

    R. W. Lent (Eds.),  Handbook  of counseling psyehology  (3rd ed., pp. 740-766). New

    York, NY: Wiley.

    Carstensen, L. L. (200 6). The influence of sense of time on human developm ent.  Science,

    312,  1913-1915. doi:10.1126/scicnce.1127488

    Creed , P. A., Fallón, T., Hoo d, M. (20 09). The relationship between career adapt-

    ability, person and situation variables, and career concerns in young adults.  Journal of

    Vocational

     Behavior

    74,

      219-229. doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2008.12.004

    Creed , P. A., Patton, W. (20 03). Differences in career attitude and career knowledge

    for high school studen ts with and w ithout paid work experience. International Journal

    for Educational and Vocational Guidance, 3, 21-33.  doi:10.1023/A:1022674528730

    Creed, P. A.,

     Patton,

     W. Bartrum, D . (200 2). M ultidimensional properties of the L OR-T:

    Effects of optimism and pessimism on career and well-being related variables in adoles-

    cents ./ o íím a/o/C areer v4.t.fCi.f>wcHt,  10,  37-52. doi:10.1177/1069072702010001003

    Creed, P. A., P atton, P. A., Prideaux, L. (20 07 ). Predicting change over time in career

    planning and career exploration for high school students. Journal of Ado lescenee, 30,

    377-392. doi:10.1016/j.adolescence.2006.04.003

    Ferrari, L., No ta, L., Soresi, S. (20 10). Time perspective and indecision in young

    and older adolescents.  British fournal of Guidanee Counselling, 38,  6 1 - 8 2 .

    doi:10.1080/03069880903408612

    Field, A. (2005). Discovering statistics using

     SPSS.

     London, England: Sage.

    Fouad, N. A., Bynner, J. (20 08). Work transitions. Am erican Psychologist 63, 241-251.

    doi:10.1037/0003-066X.63.4.241

    Gallagher, A. M., Kaufman, J. C. (2005 ). Gender differences in

     m athematics:

     An inte-

    grative psychological approach.

     New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

    Gati, I. (1986). Making career decisions: A sequential elimination approach. Journal of

      ounseling Psychology,  33, 408-4 17. doi:10.1037/0022-0167.33.4.408

    Gati, I., Asher, I. (20 01). The PIC model for career decision making: Prescreening,

    in-depth exploration, and choice. In F. T. L. Leong A. Barak (Ed s.),  ontemporary

    models in vocational psychology {pç.  7-54). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Härtu ng , P. J., Porfeli, E. J., Vondracek, F. W. (20 08 ). Career adaptability in child-

    hood.  The areer Development Qtiarterly, 57, 56-74.

    Heimberg, L. (1961). D evelopment and eonstruct validation of an inventory or the measurement

    offitture time perspective

     {\Jnpuh\ished

     master s thesis). Vanderbilt University,

     Nashville,

     TN .

    Heppner, P. P., Baumgardner, A. H ., Larson, L. M., Petty, R. E. (1988 ). The utility

    of problem-solving training that emphasizes self-management principles.  ounselling

    Psychology  Quarterly, 1, 129-143.

    Hirschi, A. (2009). Career adaptability development in adolescence: Multiple predictors

    and effect on sense of power and life satisfaction,

      fournal of Vocational

     Behavior

    74,

    145-155.

      doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2009.01.002

    Janeiro, J. N. (2010) . Motivational dynamics in the development of career attitudes am ong

    ^doitsctnts. fournal of Vocational Behavior 76,170-177. doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2009.12.003

    Jane iro, J. N ., Marques, J. F. (201 0) . Career coping st>'les: Differences in career at-

    titudes among secondary school students.  International Journal of Educa tional and

    Vocational

     Guidance,

      10, 35-48. doi:10.1007/sl0775-009-9170-3.

    Janis, I., Mann , L. (197 7). Decision making: A psychological analysis of conflict choice,

    and  commitment.

     New York, NY: Free Press.

    Jones, L. K. (19 89 ). Measuring a three dimensional construct of career indecision among

  • 8/20/2019 .Evaluation of an Intervention to Foster Time Perpective and Career Decided...

    14/16

    Lcondari, A. (2007). Future time perspective, possible selves, and academic

    achievement.  New  Directions for Adult and Continuing Education 114 17-26 .

    doi :10.1002/ace.253

    Marko, K. W., & Savickas, M. L. ( 19 98 ). Effectiveness of a career time perspective in-

    tervention. Journal of

     Vocational

     Behavior 52 106-119. doi:10.1006/jvbc.1996.1566

    Mitchell, L. K., & Krumboltz, J. D . (19 96). Krum boltz's learning theory of career choice

    and counseling. In D. Brown & L. Brooks (Eds.),

      areer choice

     and

     development

     {irá

    ed., pp. 223-280). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Niles, S. G., & Harris-Bowlsbey, J. (2005).

      areer development interventions

      in

     the

     21st

    century

      (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.

    Nota,

     L.,

     Soresi,

     S.

    Solberg,

     S.

     H . V.,

     

    Ferrari,

     L.

     (2005). Promoting vocational development:

    Methods of intervention and techniques used in the Italian context. International Journal

    for Educa tional and

     Vocational Guidance

    5 271-279. doi:10.1007/sl0775-005-3602-5

    Peetsma, T. T. D ., Hascher, T., van der Veen, I., & Rocdc, E. (200 5). Relation between

    adolescents' self-evaluations, time perspectives, motivation for school and their achieve-

    ment in different countries and at different ages.

      European

      Journal of

     Psychology

      of

    Education 20 209-225.

    Peterson, G. W., Sampson, J. P., Jr., Reardon, R. C , & Lenz, J. G. (1 996 ). Becoming

    career problem solvers and decision makers: A cognitive information processing ap-

    proach. In D. Brown & L. Brooks (Eds.),

      areer choice

     and

     development

     {irá ed., pp.

    423-475). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Ringle, P. M., & Savickas, M. L. (1983). Administrative leadership: Planning and time

    perspective.  The Journal of Higher Education 54 649-661.

    Rojewski, J. W. (1994). Predicting career maturity attitudes in rural economically disad-

    vantaged youth. Journal of

      areer

     Development 21 49-61 .

    Sampson, J. P., Jr., Peterson, G. W., Reardon, R. C , & Lenz, J. G. (200 0). Using readiness

    assessment to improve career services: A cognitive information processing approach.

    The areer Development

     Quar terly 49 146-174.

    Savickas, M. L. (1991). Improving career time perspective. In D. Brown & L. Brooks

    (Eds.),  Techniques

     o f

     career counselling

     {pp. 236-249). Boston. MA: Allyn & Bacon.

    Savickas, M. L. (1997). Career adaptability: An integrative construct for life-span, life-

    space theory.

     The areer Development Qttarterly 45

    247-259.

    Savickas, M. L. (2002). Career construction: A developmental theory of vocational be-

    havior. In D. Brown & Associates (Eds.),

      areer choice

     an d

     development

     (4th ed., pp.

    149-205.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Savickas, M. L. (2005). The theory and practice of career construction. In S. D. Brown

    & R. W. Lent (Eds.),

      areer development

     and  counseling:  Putting

     theory

     an d

     research

    to

     work

     (pp. 42-70). New York, NY: Wiley

    Savickas, M. L., & Jarjoura, D. (1991). The Career Decision Scale as a type indicator.

    Journal of

      ounseling Psychology

    38 85-90. doi:10.1037/0022-0167.38.1.85

    Savickas, M. L., Nota, L., Rossier, J., Dauwalder, J.-P., Duarte, M . E., Guichard, J .,. . . van

    Vianen, A. E. M. (2 009) . Life designing:

     A

     paradigm for career construction in the 21st

    century. Jourtial

     o f

     Vocational Behavior 75

    239-2 50. doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2009.04.004

    Savickas, M., Silling, M., & Schwartz, S. (1984). Time perspective in career m aturity and

    decision making.  Journal of

     Vocational  Behavior

    25 258-269. doi:10.1016/0001-

    8791 2884 2990049-6

    Snyder, C. R., H arris, C , Anderson, J. R., HoUeran, S. A., Irving, L. M., Sigmond, S.

    T., . . . Harney, P. (1991). The will and the ways: Development and validation of an

  • 8/20/2019 .Evaluation of an Intervention to Foster Time Perpective and Career Decided...

    15/16

    Tokar, D. M., Withrow, J. R., Hall, R. J., Moradi, B. (20 03). Psychological separa-

    tion, attachment security, vocational self-concept crystallization, and career indeci-

    sion: A structural equation analysis.  Journal of  ounseling

     Psychology,

      50,  3-19.

    doi:10.1037/0022-0167.50.1.3

    Van de Vijver, F. J. R., Ham ble ton , R. K. (1996). Translating tests: Some practical

    guidelines.

     European Psychologist 1,

     89-99.

    Wessman, A. E. (1973). Personality and the subjective experience of time. Journal of

    Personality

     Assessment

    37, 103-114.

    Whiston, S. C , Sexton, T. L., Lasoff D. L. (19 98). C areer-intervention outcom e: A

    replication and extension of Oliver and Spokane

      {1988 .

     Journal of

      ounseling Psychol-

    ogy,

      45, 150-165. doi:10.1037/0022-0167.45.2.150

  • 8/20/2019 .Evaluation of an Intervention to Foster Time Perpective and Career Decided...

    16/16

    Copyright of Career Development Quarterly is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be

    copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written

    permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use.