Evaluating the quality of outbreak reports on health care-associated infections in São Paulo,...

7
Major article Evaluating the quality of outbreak reports on health care-associated infections in São Paulo, Brazil, during 2000-2010 using the ORION statement ndings and recommendations Amanda Luiz Pires Maciel RN a , Denise Brandão de Assis MD, MSc b , Geraldine Madalosso MD, MSc b , Maria Clara Padoveze RN, MSc, PhD a, * a Department of Collective Health Nursing, School of Nursing, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil b São Paulo State Health Department, Centro de Vigilância Epidemiológica Prof Alexandre Vranjac, Hospital Infection Division, São Paulo, Brazil Key Words: Cross-infection Disease outbreak Background: The standard of outbreak reports must be improved to a level where they are robust enough to properly inuence preventive strategies. We aimed to verify compliance with mandatory outbreak notication, describing epidemiologic characteristics and management, and evaluating the quality of outbreak reports on health care-associated infections in São Paulo State, Brazil. Methods: A systematic search was carried out on PubMed, the Latin American and Caribbean Health Sciences Literature database, Embase, Outbreak Database, the Annals of Brazilian Conferences on Healthcare-Associated Infection Prevention and Infectious Diseases, and reports from the São Paulo State Hospital Infection Division. The quality of reports was evaluated according to the Outbreak Reports and Intervention studies of Nosocomial Infection (ORION) statement guidelines. Results: A total of 87 outbreak reports were identied; however, only 15 outbreaks (17.2%) were reported to the São Paulo State Hospital Infection Division. Bloodstream infection and neonatal intensive care units were mostly implicated (23% and 19.5%, respectively). Quality, evaluated according to ORION statement recommendations, was generally poor. The ORION categories of Background, Objectives, Participants, Setting, Infection-Related Outcomes, and Generality were properly described in 32.2%, 74.7%, 2.3%, 46%, 2.3%, and 12.6% of reports, respectively. Interventions and Culture-Typing were described with details in 51.9% and 55.2% of outbreak reports, respectively. Conclusions: Our ndings pointed out the need for strategies to improve competence in outbreak re- ports, and the ORION statement guidelines may help in this matter. Efforts to promote condence and consequent compliance with mandatory notication of outbreak reports are essential. Copyright Ó 2014 by the Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Health care-associated infections (HAIs) are usually endemic, but it is estimated that 2%-5% of these infections are due to noso- comial outbreaks. 1,2 Despite low frequency, outbreaks can cause concern, increasing morbidity and mortality, and require extensive personnel and nancial resources in addition to being very time consuming. 3,4 Outbreak investigations can provide insight into the eld of health care epidemiology and infection control by describing cause and evaluating the most appropriate interventions for- prevention. 5-7 Since 1998, reporting outbreak investigation to health agencies is mandatory in Brazil. 8 Vonberg and Gastmeier 9 estimated that about 75% of all nosocomial outbreaks published in the medical literature support new ideas for the prevention of nosocomial in- fections. In agreement with this, the quality of outbreak reports and interventions in infection control must be improved to a level where they are robust enough to inuence policy as well as governmental guidelines and practice in health care. 9-12 During the 1990s, when evidence-based medicine gathered momentum, the quality of research reporting was required even more. In that decade, to improve transparency and consistency of research reports, efforts were initiated by researchers, editors, and * Address correspondence to Maria Clara Padoveze, RN, MSc, PhD, Av Dr Enéas de Carvalho Aguiar, 419, CEP - 05403-000, São Paulo, SP, Brazil. E-mail address: [email protected] (M.C. Padoveze). Conicts of interest: None to report. Contents lists available at ScienceDirect American Journal of Infection Control journal homepage: www.ajicjournal.org American Journal of Infection Control 0196-6553/$36.00 - Copyright Ó 2014 by the Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2013.12.017 American Journal of Infection Control 42 (2014) e47-e53

Transcript of Evaluating the quality of outbreak reports on health care-associated infections in São Paulo,...

Page 1: Evaluating the quality of outbreak reports on health care-associated infections in São Paulo, Brazil, during 2000-2010 using the ORION statement findings and recommendations

lable at ScienceDirect

American Journal of Infection Control 42 (2014) e47-e53

Contents lists avai

American Journal of Infection Control

journal homepage: www.aj ic journal .org

American Journal of Infection Control

Major article

Evaluating the quality of outbreak reports on health care-associatedinfections in São Paulo, Brazil, during 2000-2010 using the ORIONstatement findings and recommendations

Amanda Luiz Pires Maciel RN a, Denise Brandão de Assis MD, MSc b,Geraldine Madalosso MD, MSc b, Maria Clara Padoveze RN, MSc, PhD a,*aDepartment of Collective Health Nursing, School of Nursing, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazilb São Paulo State Health Department, Centro de Vigilância Epidemiológica Prof Alexandre Vranjac, Hospital Infection Division, São Paulo, Brazil

Key Words:Cross-infectionDisease outbreak

* Address correspondence to Maria Clara Padoveze,Carvalho Aguiar, 419, CEP - 05403-000, São Paulo, SP

E-mail address: [email protected] (M.C. Padoveze)Conflicts of interest: None to report.

0196-6553/$36.00 - Copyright � 2014 by the Associahttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2013.12.017

Background: The standard of outbreak reports must be improved to a level where they are robustenough to properly influence preventive strategies. We aimed to verify compliance with mandatoryoutbreak notification, describing epidemiologic characteristics and management, and evaluating thequality of outbreak reports on health care-associated infections in São Paulo State, Brazil.Methods: A systematic search was carried out on PubMed, the Latin American and Caribbean HealthSciences Literature database, Embase, Outbreak Database, the Annals of Brazilian Conferences onHealthcare-Associated Infection Prevention and Infectious Diseases, and reports from the São Paulo StateHospital Infection Division. The quality of reports was evaluated according to the Outbreak Reports andIntervention studies of Nosocomial Infection (ORION) statement guidelines.Results: A total of 87 outbreak reports were identified; however, only 15 outbreaks (17.2%) were reportedto the São Paulo State Hospital Infection Division. Bloodstream infection and neonatal intensive careunits were mostly implicated (23% and 19.5%, respectively). Quality, evaluated according to ORIONstatement recommendations, was generally poor. The ORION categories of Background, Objectives,Participants, Setting, Infection-Related Outcomes, and Generality were properly described in 32.2%,74.7%, 2.3%, 46%, 2.3%, and 12.6% of reports, respectively. Interventions and Culture-Typing weredescribed with details in 51.9% and 55.2% of outbreak reports, respectively.Conclusions: Our findings pointed out the need for strategies to improve competence in outbreak re-ports, and the ORION statement guidelines may help in this matter. Efforts to promote confidence andconsequent compliance with mandatory notification of outbreak reports are essential.

Copyright � 2014 by the Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology, Inc.Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Health care-associated infections (HAIs) are usually endemic,but it is estimated that 2%-5% of these infections are due to noso-comial outbreaks.1,2 Despite low frequency, outbreaks can causeconcern, increasing morbidity and mortality, and require extensivepersonnel and financial resources in addition to being very timeconsuming.3,4

Outbreak investigations can provide insight into the field ofhealth care epidemiology and infection control by describing

RN, MSc, PhD, Av Dr Enéas de, Brazil..

tion for Professionals in Infection C

cause and evaluating the most appropriate interventions for-prevention.5-7

Since 1998, reporting outbreak investigation to health agenciesis mandatory in Brazil.8 Vonberg and Gastmeier9 estimated thatabout 75% of all nosocomial outbreaks published in the medicalliterature support new ideas for the prevention of nosocomial in-fections. In agreement with this, the quality of outbreak reports andinterventions in infection control must be improved to a levelwhere they are robust enough to influence policy as well asgovernmental guidelines and practice in health care.9-12

During the 1990s, when evidence-based medicine gatheredmomentum, the quality of research reporting was required evenmore. In that decade, to improve transparency and consistency ofresearch reports, efforts were initiated by researchers, editors, and

ontrol and Epidemiology, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Page 2: Evaluating the quality of outbreak reports on health care-associated infections in São Paulo, Brazil, during 2000-2010 using the ORION statement findings and recommendations

Fig 1. Distribution of outbreaks reports evaluated according to the reference sources, São Paulo State, Brazil, 2000-2010. HAI, health care-associated infection; LILACS, LatinAmerican and Caribbean Health Science Literature database.

A.L.P. Maciel et al. / American Journal of Infection Control 42 (2014) e47-e53e48

methodologists to develop and recommend specific standards forpublished research. Since 1996 multiple statements and checklistshave been developed for publishing a variety of study types, such asthe Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials, the TransparentReporting of Evaluations with Nonrandomized Designs statement,and the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies inEpidemiology statement.13-16 In the field of hospital epidemiology,the Outbreaks Report and Intervention Studies of NosocomialInfection (ORION) statement was created; it consists of a 22-itemchecklist and a summary table that facilitates the synthesis of ev-idence and promotes transparency of reporting.10-12,16-18

Our study aimed to review outbreaks reported in São PauloState, Brazil, and verify compliance with mandatory outbreaknotification, describe epidemiologic characteristics and manage-ment, and evaluate the quality of outbreak reports.

METHODS

A systematic search was performed to describe nosocomialoutbreaks occurring in São Paulo State and reported during thetime period 2000-2010. São Paulo State has approximately41,262,199 inhabitants, representing 21.6% of the total population ofBrazil,19,20 and 891 hospitals that represent 14.2% of all health in-stitutions in the country.21

Data sources

The following databases were used for a systematic search ofavailable articles describing nosocomial outbreaks: Embase, theLatin American and Caribbean Health Science Literature database,and PubMed. We adopted the controlled vocabulary used for sub-ject indexing in Embase (hospital infection, epidemics, and Brazil),the descriptors in health sciences for the Latin American andCaribbean Health Science Literature database, and the MedicalSubject Headings for PubMed (cross-infection, disease outbreak, andBrazil). The Annals of the Brazilian Conference on HAI Preventionand Hospital Epidemiology and Brazilian Conference on InfectiousDisease were reviewed and abstracts describing nosocomial out-breaks were included. The freely accessible worldwide database ofhealth care-associated outbreaksdknown as Outbreak Database(www.outbreak-database.com)dwas accessed and searched using

the term Brazil. Outbreaks reported to the Hospital Infection Divi-sion at the São Paulo State Health Department were also included.

Inclusion criteria

We included HAI outbreaks occurring in São Paulo State andreported during 2000-2010. Articles focusing exclusively on phe-notyping or genotyping methodologies of the pathogens withoutan epidemiologic approach were excluded.

Data collection

The data extraction was done by 1 researcher (A.L.P.M.), and allthe process of data extraction was supervised by a secondresearcher (M.C.P.). These researchers discussed all of the outbreakreports in case of uncertainty during the data extraction.

Two instrumentswereused to capture all the information required.The first was for epidemiologic characteristics, such as geographiclocation and investigation methods applied. The second instrumentwas the ORION Authors (or Reviewers) Checklist, which evaluatesinformation to determine the quality of an outbreak report.10

Variables

To describe the features of the reports the following variableswere selected: geographic location (ie, city, type of health care facility,and ward), descriptive characteristics (ie, infection sites, pathogens,and antimicrobial resistance), investigation methods applied (ie,genotyping methods, epidemiologic approach, and source of trans-mission), and control measures adopted. The ORION items and de-scriptors were used to evaluate the quality of the studies.

Data analysis

A descriptive analysis of the selected variables was carried outusing EPI-INFO version 3.5.2 software (Centers for Disease Controland Prevention, Atlanta, GA).

RESULTS

A total of 87 outbreak investigation reports were identified.Most frequently the publications were from the Annals of Brazilian

Page 3: Evaluating the quality of outbreak reports on health care-associated infections in São Paulo, Brazil, during 2000-2010 using the ORION statement findings and recommendations

Table 1Sources of transmission related to the outbreaks reported in São Paulo State, Brazil, 2000-2010

Source of transmission n (%) Details of the source in reports (n)

Unknown 55 (63.2) Not provided23-25,28,32,33,36-40,42,44,45,47,48,51-54,56-61,63,65,69,70,72-74,77-80,82-84,86-91,93,95,96,99-102,107

Contaminated substances 10 (11.5) Anticoagulant substance (2),26,67 manitol (1),27 parenteral nutrition (2),75,76 enteral nutrition (1),31

chemotherapeutic substance (1),35 lactated Ringer’s solution (1),68 saline (1),30

chlorhexidine (1)34

Colonized staff 3 (3.4) Staff contaminated with Klebsiella pneumoniae associated to onychomycosis in hands (3)29,50,92

Environmental contamination 4 (4.6) Water (3),22,66,105 dialysis equipment (1)55

Infect or colonized patient 4 (4.6) Scabies (2),49,81 incubation period of chickenpox (1),97 and respiratory syncytial virus (1)103

Foods 2 (2.3) Meal (1),108 dessert (1)85

Sick visitor 1 (1.1) Respiratory syncytial virus (1)62

Contaminated substances and environmentalcontamination

1 (1.1) Saline and dialysis reservatory (1)43

Device contamination 1 (1.1) Contamination of urinary catheter by health care workers during patient care (1)94

Pseudo-outbreaks 6 (6.8) Contaminated sample (3),41,64,71 surveillance system (2),98,104 contaminated saline andwater (1)46

A.L.P. Maciel et al. / American Journal of Infection Control 42 (2014) e47-e53 e49

Conferences on HAI Prevention and Hospital Epidemiology (50.6%,n ¼ 44) (Fig 1).

Compliance with mandatory outbreak reporting

Only 15 outbreaks (17.2%) were reported to the Hospital Infec-tion Division at the São Paulo State Health Department, in accor-dance with federal law.

Epidemiologic characteristics

Outbreaks that were reported occurred mainly in large cities suchas São Paulo (57.5%; n ¼ 50),22-71 Campinas (10.3%; n ¼ 9),72-80 andRibeirão Preto (5.7%; n ¼ 5).81-85 These cities are quite different intheir scale; São Paulo is the most populated city in Brazil, with10,659,386 inhabitants and 202 hospitals, whilst Ribeirão Preto is amedium-size city with 583,842 inhabitants and 16 hospitals.19-21

Inpatient health care facilities accounted for 75.9% (n ¼ 66) of theoccurrences, outpatient settings for 14.9% (n ¼ 13), long-term carefacilities for 1.1% (n ¼ 1), and health care workers for 2.3% (n ¼2).22,23,26-48,50-66,68-79,81-108 The remaining 5.7% (n ¼ 5) of outbreakreports did not mention the setting of the event, according to ORIONrecommendations (Item 8).24,25,49,67,80 The most common inpatientsetting was neonatal intensive care units (19.5%; n ¼ 17), followed byadult intensive care units (13.8%; n¼ 12). The occurrence of outbreaksaffecting >1 unit were found in 14.9% (n ¼ 13) of the outbreaksreported, and 11.5% (n ¼ 10) of them involved the entire hospi-tal.23,29,31,34,37-42,44,45,47,48,51,52,58-61,63-66,69-76,79,81,82,84,86,94,96-99,101,103

Bloodstream infections were the most frequently reported site(23.0%; n ¼ 20), followed by skin and soft tissue (9.2%; n ¼ 8). Out-breaks presenting>1 infection site occurred in 16.1% of reports (n¼14). Pyrogenic reaction was the outcome in 6 outbreaks reported(6.9%) and surgical site or gastrointestinal infectionswere describedas the main outcome in 5 reports each (5.7%). Surprisingly, theinfection site was not mentioned in 16 reports (18.4%).23,25-27,29-32,34,40,42,50-55,58-61,63,65-70,72,74-77,79,81-88,90-93,95-99,101,102,104,106-108

Themajorityof outbreakswerecausedbybacteria (72.4%;n¼63)with a predominance of gram-negative bacillus (49.4%; n¼ 43). Themost frequent agents associated with the outbreaks wereAcinetobacter baumanni (11.5%; n¼ 10),Klebsiella pneumonia (10.3%;n ¼ 9), Enterococcus sp (8%; n ¼ 7), and Pseudomonas aeruginosa(6.9%; n¼ 6).22-29,31,32,34,35,37-40,42-44,46-48,50-53,55,58-61,63,64,66-69,71,72,74-76,79,82-84,86-102,104,107,108

The source of transmissionwas identified in only 36.8% (n¼ 32)of the reports (Table 1). Among the reports where this informationwas provided, contaminated substances were frequentlyidentified as the cause of the outbreak (n ¼ 10), mainly intrinsic

contamination (n ¼ 7). Gram-negative bacillus was the mostcommon agent isolated in contaminated substances (n ¼9).22,26,27,29-31,34,35,41,43,46,49,50,55,62,64,66-68,71,75,76,81,85,92,94,97,98,103-105,108

Managementeinfection control measures

Interventions were reported in 89.7% (n ¼ 78) of the studies.Contact precautions was the most common intervention describedto prevent the spread of pathogens (39.1%; n ¼ 34), followed byaudit of units by an infection control team (28.4%; n ¼ 25), patientscreening/surveillance (25%; n ¼ 22), hand hygiene improvement(25%; n ¼ 22), drugs screening (20.5%; n ¼ 18), and enhancedenvironmental cleansing (19.3%; n ¼ 17).19-35,37,38,40,42-66,68-76,78-82,86-92,94-106,108

Quality assessmenteORION statement recommendations

No report achieved full compliance with the ORION checklist(Table 2). Most relevant flaws were identified in the Methods sec-tions of the reports evaluated. Regarding study design, descriptiveepidemiology (85.1%; n ¼ 74) was more common than analyticmethods (14.9%; n ¼ 13); cohort studies and case-control studieswere carried out in 10.3% (n ¼ 9)45,46,48,52,53,55-57,78 and 4.6% (n ¼4)24,85,90,96 of the outbreaks, respectively.

As for the Introduction sections, the organism was described asepidemic or endemic in 62.1% (n ¼ 54) and the clinical backgroundwas explained in 57.5% (n ¼ 50) (ORION item 2).24-27,30-38,40-47,49-62,64,65,67-74,86,87,90,92,93,95,103,105,106,108

Participants (ORION item 7) were found to be unclear in most ofthe reports; for example, the case definition was described only in33.3% (n ¼ 29) and relevant information such as age and length ofstay was rarely presented (9.2%; n ¼ 8 and 13.8%; n ¼ 12, respec-tively).24,26,27,30-33,36-39,45,46,48,50,52-58,62,64,67-73,76-80,83,85,87,90-93,95-103

Failures in describing the setting (ORION item 8) occurred in 22(25.2%) of the reports. Although information on the number of bedswas given in 44.8% (n ¼ 39) and the presence of infection controlteam in 86.2% (n ¼ 75) of studies, the patient to staff ratio was notreported in any of the studies.22-108

Interventions (ORION item 9) were described without details,using generic language such as “reinforcement of infection controlpractices,” “environmental cleaning,” and “cohort.” In 7 cases theinterventions were implemented in phases, due to initial insuffi-ciency in controlling the outbreak.22,25-38,40,41,43,45-51,53-57,62,69,71-73,76-78,81-87,89,90,92,94,95,97-106,108

Cultures were performed in 88.6% (n ¼ 77) of studies and in18.4% (n¼ 16) of reports details of the culture media or antibiogram

Page 4: Evaluating the quality of outbreak reports on health care-associated infections in São Paulo, Brazil, during 2000-2010 using the ORION statement findings and recommendations

Table 2Analysis of outbreak reports in São Paulo State, Brazil, 2000-2010, according to theOutbreak Reports and Intervention studies of Nosocomial Infection (ORION)statement

ORION itemAt least 1 descriptoraccording to ORION

All the descriptorsaccording to ORION

Title and abstract 73/87 (83.9) 58/87 (66.7)Introduction 73/87 (83.9) 28/87 (32.2)BackgroundType of paper 85/87 (97.7) 85/87 (97.7)Dates ey 82/87 (94.3)Objectives ey 65/87 (74.7)

MethodsDesign 66/87 (75.8) 29/87 (33.3)Participants 51/87 (58.6) 2/87 (2.3)Setting 87/87 (100) 40/87 (46)Interventions 42/87 (51.9) 42/87 (51.9)Culturing and typing 60/87 (69) 48/87 (55.2)Infection-related outcomes 72/87 (82.8) 2/87 (2.3)Economic outcomes Not relevantPotential threats to

internal validity*ey 3/13 (23.1)

Sample size Not relevantStatistical methods* ey 11/13 (84.6)

ResultsRecruitment Not relevantOutcomes and estimation ey 34/87 (39.1)Ancillary analyses* ey 8/13 (61.5)Harms Not relevant

DiscussionInterpretation 78/87 (89.7) 78/87 (89.7)Generalizability 34/87 (39) 11/87 (12.6)Overall evidence ey 34/87 (39)

NOTE. Values are given as n (%).*Only for cohort or case-control study.yItems with only 1 descriptor.

A.L.P. Maciel et al. / American Journal of Infection Control 42 (2014) e47-e53e50

were not given (ORION item 10). Genotyping was reported for48.9% (n ¼ 43) of outbreaks, with pulsed field gel electrophoresisbeing the most common method (33.3%; n ¼ 29), followed by po-lymerase chain reaction (4.6%; n¼ 4).22-35,37-48,50-53,55-80,82-108 Onlyin scabies reports were there no biological tests performed 4.7%(n ¼ 4), with clinical symptoms considered as the criteria forcases.36,49,54,81 We identified that 74.7% (n ¼ 65) of reports clearlydefined outcomes (ORION item 11), and in 14.9% (n ¼ 13) a chartwas donewith duration of patient stay and dates of detection of theorganism. In the 13 reports where analytic epidemiology was per-formed, the description of potential bias and confounders (ORIONitem 13) were found in 23.1% (n ¼ 3).24,45,46,48,52,53,55-57,78,85,90,96

In the Discussion sections authors were able to showconcern forthe clinical significance of observations they made during theirinterpretation of the findings (89.7%; n ¼78) and explanatory hy-potheses were generated in all of the reports (89.7%; n ¼ 78)(ORION item 20). Only 36.8% (n ¼ 32) of the Discussion sectionscovered how results could be generalized to different target pop-ulations or settings (ORION items 21 and 22) and the feasibility ofinterventions was also poorly described (this was present in 13.8%[n ¼ 12] of reports).22-38,40,41,43,45-67,69-99,103-105,108

DISCUSSION

Our study summarizes a sample of the outbreaks occurring inSão Paulo State, Brazil, over a given period. In fact, there is a highprobability that many other outbreaks occurred without beingdivulged or reported to the appropriate health authorities. Thislimits our knowledge of the epidemiologic features of the out-breaks, and therefore this may not be an unbiased sample,leading to a point where certain studies are published and others

are not. Some researchers have noted that studies associatedwith multidrug-resistant pathogens may have a greater likeli-hood of being published, and outbreaks with higher attack ratesare more likely to be reported than those with lower attackrates.109,110 Fear of being exposed may prevent health care facil-ities from sharing, in scientific media, the knowledge gatheredfrom outbreak experiences. The concern for potential penaltymay explain the low proportion of outbreak notification to thehealth authorities.111

Only a few of the outbreak investigation reports we reviewedwere designed as analytic epidemiologic studies. This may be dueto a lack of resources or limited availability of infection control staff.On the other hand, almost half of the reports used some kind ofmolecular fingerprinting method. In accordance, Gastmeier et al111

observed an increasing number of outbreak investigations that usegenotyping methods, whereas application of analytic epidemio-logic studies was still below expectations. This can be attributed topublication bias, because a study using genotyping methods mighthave a better chance of publication.

The predominance of outbreak reports in intensive care unitshas been previously identified and neonatal intensive care unitsappear to be the most important subgroup.111-114 The vulnerabilityof these patients, the degree of invasiveness, and the systematicsurveillance system in these areas contributed to these results.Bloodstream infection appeared as an important site of infectiondue to both the severity of the disease and its association withcontaminated substances or devices that can infect numerous pa-tients.111 Many reports we reviewed described multiple sites ofinfection in the same outbreak, a fact that was not observed in otheroutbreak reviews.114,115

A large variety of infection control measures were identified andthe reinforcement of standard infection control practices was themost common action applied, including environmental cleaning,which is known to have a positive influence on the control ofoutbreaks.116 It is of the utmost urgency to reinforce efforts forcontinuous educational programs aimed at preventing HAIs,thereby avoiding the occurrence outbreaks.

In a previous study dealing with outbreak investigations, thesource of transmission was identified in 61.3% of the outbreaks re-ported, and the most common source was index patients.115 In ourstudy, we observed quite a different situation; the source of trans-mission was identified in fewer than half of investigations and thelead position was held by contaminated substances. Interestingly,we found that most substances became contaminated intrinsically,in contrast to what was reported by Vonberg,117 who identifiedcontamination happening more frequently during the use of aproduct. This suggests that the overall quality control of medicaldevices and products could be below acceptable levels, pointing tothe need for better sanitary control. The lack of case definition foundin many reports suggests defective investigation methods, possiblycontributing to misleading information because investigators mighthave included patients not necessarily qualifying as a case.

By using the ORION checklists, we found that important infor-mation associated with outbreak investigations was missing inmany of the reports evaluated in our study. It is highly probable fora similar situation to occur in other regions of Brazil and abroad. Itis possible that in conferences the space provided for abstractscould be a limitation to showing all of the information required foroutbreak reports according to ORION recommendations.

Methodologic weaknesses and inadequate reporting are com-mon in hospital infection control literature, and concern for thestandards of research publication in infection control has beendiscussed in the scientific community. The ORION statement wascreated to help remedy this problem and encourage improvedreporting and higher standards of research.118 The Outbreak

Page 5: Evaluating the quality of outbreak reports on health care-associated infections in São Paulo, Brazil, during 2000-2010 using the ORION statement findings and recommendations

A.L.P. Maciel et al. / American Journal of Infection Control 42 (2014) e47-e53 e51

Database has endorsed the statement, as have some journals, andthe Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America and the Euro-pean Congress of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Disease haveused the ORION abstract checklist for studies submission for theirconferences.9-12,17,18,118

Our findings highlight that the ORION statement contributes tothe development of a stronger evidence base for sound infectioncontrol policies because it can make case reports much more usefulin the prevention and control of HAIs, and it may also improve thequality of case-control, cohort, and cross-sectional studies.

Notification of outbreaks to relevant health authorities isfundamental in driving governmental measures aimed at prevent-ing new cases, deaths, and epidemics. The role of such authoritiesgoes beyond dealing with an outbreak at the point at which it oc-curs. Strategies to support health care facilities via strong educa-tional programs for preventive measures and hospital epidemiologyare essential. It is of the utmost importance that authorities create atolerant environment to promote confidence within health caresettings to report such events, thusminimizing fear of repercussionsand empowering proactiveness for prevention.

References

1. Haley RW, Tenney JH, Lindsey JO, Garner JS, Bennett JV. How frequent areoutbreaks of nosocomial infection in community hospitals? Infect Control1985;6:233-6.

2. Wenzel RP, Thompson RL, Landry SM, Russell BS, Miller PJ, Ponce de Leon S,et al. Hospital acquired infections in intensive care unit patients: an overviewwith emphasis on epidemics. Infect Control 1983;4:371-5.

3. Jarvis WR. Investigation of outbreaks. In: Mayhall CG, editor. Hospitalepidemiology and infection control. Philadelphia [PA]: Lippincott Williams &Wilkins; 2004. p. 107-15.

4. Kanerva M, Blom M, Tuominen U, Kolho E, Anttila VJ, Vaara M, et al. Costs ofan outbreak of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. J Hosp Infect 2007;66:22-8.

5. Desenclos JC, Vaillant V, Delarocque Astagneau E, Campèse C, Che D,Coignard B, et al. Principles of an outbreak investigation in public healthpractice. Med Mal Infect 2007;37:77-94.

6. Reingold AL. Outbreak investigations - a perspective. Emerg Infect Dis 1998;4:21-7.

7. Gastmeier P, Vonberg RP. Outbreaks of nosocomial infections: lessons learnedand perspectives. Curr Opin Infect Dis 2008;21:357-61.

8. Brazil Ministry of Health. Brazilian Ordinance No. 2616, from May 12, 1998.Provides for the Program of Healthcare Association Infection. Federal law.Available from: http://portal.anvisa.gov.br/. Accessed January 10, 2012.

9. Vonberg RP, Gastmeier P. Quality of outbreak descriptions in medical litera-ture. Lancet 2007;7:699-700.

10. Stone SP, Cooper BS, Kibbler CC, Cookson BD, Robert JA, Medley GF, et al. TheORION statement: guidelines for transparent reporting of Outbreak Reportsand Intervention studies of Nosocomial Infection. Available from: http://www.idrn.org/orion.php. Accessed December 15, 2012.

11. Stone SP, Cooper BS, Kibbler CC. The ORION statement: guidelines for trans-parent reporting of outbreak reports and intervention studies of nosocomialinfection. Lancet Infect Dis 2007;7:282-8.

12. Stone SP, Cooper BS, Kibbler CC, Cookson BS, Roberts JA, Medley GF, et al. TheORION statement: guidelines for transparent reporting of Outbreak Reportsand Intervention studies of Nosocomial Infection. J Antimicrob Chemother2007;59:833-40.

13. Larson EL, Cortazal M. Publication guidelines need widespread adoption. J ClinEpidemiol 2012;65:239-46.

14. Equator Network. Enhancing the Quality and Transparency of Health Research(Equator). Available from: http://www.equator-network.org/about-equator/.Accessed August 11, 2013.

15. Simera I, Altman DG, Moher D, Schulz KF, Hoey J. Guidelines for reportinghealth research: the EQUATOR Network’s survey of guideline authors. PLoSMed 2008;5:869-74.

16. Johnson AP, McConnell J. Interventions in healthcare-associated infection:researchers urged to CONSORT with ORION. J Antimicrob Chemother 2007;59:823-4.

17. Struelens MJ. The ORION guidelines: raising research standards for the controlof antimicrobial-resistant pathogens and healthcare-associated infection. ClinMicrobiol Infect 2007;13:1039-40.

18. Pires-Cronenberger S, Nicolle MC, Voirin N, Giard M, Luxemburger C,Vanhems P. Orion (Outbreak Reports and Intervention studies of NosocomialInfection) used for evaluating interventions and investigations of Nosocomialinfection outbreaks. Med Mal Infect 2009;39:259-63.

19. Census 2010. Sao Paolo População estimada 2013. Available from: http://www.ibge.gov.br/estadosat/perfil.php?sigla¼sp#. Accessed July 4, 2012.

20. Census 2010. Rio de Janeiro: Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística.2010. Available from: http://www.ibge.gov.br/home/presidencia/noticias/noticia_visualiza.php?id_noticia¼176l. July 12, 2012.

21. National Register of Health Care Facilities. Rio de Janeiro: Ministry ofHealth. 2012. Available from: http://cnes.datasus.gov.br/Mod_Ind_Unidade.asp?VEstado¼00. Accessed July 5, 2012.

22. Balsamo AC, Cassetari VC, Silveira IR, Moraes C, Netto RS, Ribeiro SE. Outbreakof Colangitis outbreak with P. aeruginosa after endoscopic retrograde chol-angiopancreatography. Braz J Infect Dis 2008;12(Suppl 3):260.

23. Camolesi F, Filho NR. Bloodstream infection outbreak in a neonatal intensivecare unit caused by methicillin resistant coagulase-negative staphylococci.Braz J Infect Dis 2008;12(Suppl 3):263.

24. Lapchik MS, Bertrand RR, Fernandes FRM. A previously use of antibiotics is arisk fator for sintomatic bacteriury by P. aeruginosa in pediatric emergencypatients? Abstract P302. Proceedings of the 12th Brazilian Conference onHealthcare-Associated Infection Prevention and Hospital Epidemiology,September 1-4, 2010, Recife, Brazil.

25. Cavassin LGT, Cavassin ED, Santos LX, Borrasca VL, Dias MBS. Acinetobacterbaumannii resistant to carbapenemics outbreak: is it possible to control?Abstract P466. Proceedings of the 12th Brazilian Conference on Healthcare-Associated Infection Prevention and Hospital Epidemiology, September 1-4,2010, Recife, Brazil.

26. Bowzczoski I, Miranda EJP, Guimarães T, Freire MP, Cais D, Costa SF, et al.Outbreak of bacteremia caused by Pantoea sp. associated to contamination ofanticoagulant citrate dextrose manipulated at the hospital farmacy. AbstractO17. Proceedings of the 12th Brazilian Conference on Healthcare-AssociatedInfection Prevention and Hospital Epidemiology, September 1-4, 2010,Recife, Brazil.

27. Dias MB, Cavassim L, Stempliuk V, Santos LX, Carvalho D, Sampaio J, et al.Burkholderia cepacia outbreak in urologic patients. Abstract O16. Proceedingsof the 12th Brazilian Conference on Healthcare-Associated Infection Preven-tion and Hospital Epidemiology, September 1-4, 2010, Recife, Brazil.

28. Giovani L, Silva LP, Paramo GPL, Carvalho DLM. Surgical site infectionoutbreak: reversing the trend line. Abstract P264. Proceedings of the 12thBrazilian Conference on Healthcare-Associated Infection Prevention andHospital Epidemiology, September 1-4, 2010, Recife, Brazil.

29. Miranda LN, Giro NPZ, Santo SE, Yamaguty KCC, Neves JR, Vivi IMCM. Controlof multidrug-resistant organisms dissemination in a neonatal intensive careunit. Abstract P272. Proceedings of the 12th Brazilian Conference onHealthcare-Associated Infection Prevention and Hospital Epidemiology,September 1-4, 2010, Recife, Brazil.

30. Mangini C, Souza C, Coelho TCV, Barrientos CCA, Anton LB. Control of pyro-genic reactions outbreak related to intravenous solution in a chemotherapyunit. Abstract 653. Proceedings of the 8th Brazilian Conference on Healthcare-Associated Infections Prevention and Hospital Epidemiology, September 4-7,2002, Curitiba, Brazil.

31. Matsuoka DM, Mangini C, Costa SF, Van Heijden IM, Soares RE, Gobara S, et al.A nosocomial outbreak of Salmonella enteritidis associated with lyophilizedenteral nutrition. J Hosp Infect 2004;58:122-7.

32. Correa L, Pereira CAP, Silva MAA, Petrilli AS, Sader HS, Silbert S. A multi-drugresistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa outbreak in a Pediatric Oncology Hospital -impact of control measures. Abstract 664. Proceedings of the 8th BrazilianConference on Healthcare-Associated Infection Prevention and HospitalEpidemiology, September 4-7, 2002, Curitiba, Brazil.

33. Coutinho AP, Abramczyk ML, Santos AMN, Miyoshi MH, Nascimento SD,Medeiros EAS. Case descriptions of respiratory infections caused by respira-tory syncytial virus in a tertiary hospital nursery. Braz J Infect Dis 2001;5-(Suppl 2):121.

34. Teixeira MAS, Carrara D, Almeida GMD, Rossi F, Costa SF, Afiune JY, et al.Burkholderia cepacia outbreak investigation in a cardiac neonatal intensivecare unit. Braz J Infect Dis 2003;7(Suppl 1):23.

35. Veloso A, Moraes VMC, Mattos RP, Cassiolato MN, Jukemura EM, Lopes HV.Empedobacter brevis outbreak report in a chemotherapy unit. Braz J Infect Dis2005;9(Suppl 1):168.

36. Abboud CS, Marques D, Casalis MEP, Ramos AR. Scabies outbreak in hydro-therapy: control and prevention. Braz J Infect Dis 2005;9(Suppl 1):93.

37. Dias MB, Yamashiro J, Borrasca V, Stempliuk VA, Araújo MRE, Costa SF, et al.Pseudo-outbreak of Clostridium difficile associated diarrhea (CDAD) in atertiary-care hospital. Rev Inst Med Trop Sao Paulo 2010;52:133-7.

38. Pereira GH, Muller PR, Zanella RC, Lima MJC, Torchio DS, Levin AS. Outbreak ofvancomycin-resistant enterococci in a tertiary hospital: the lack of effect ofmeasures direct mainly by surveillance cultures and differences in responsebetween Enterococcus faecium and Enterococccus faecalis. Am J Infect Control2010;38:406-9.

39. D’Azevedo PA, Trancesi R, Sales T, Jussimara M, Gales AC, Pignatari AC.Outbreak of Staphylococcus hominis subsp. novobiosepticus bloodstream in-fections in São Paulo city, Brazil. J Med Microbiol 2008;57:256-7.

40. Carlesse F, Pereira CAP, Silva MAA, Pignatari AC, Santiago K. Vancomycinresistant Enterococcus: outbreak investigation by genotyping methods in anoncologic pediatric hospital. Abstract O22. Proceedings of the 12th BrazilianConference on Healthcare-Associated Infection Prevention and HospitalEpidemiology, September 1-4, 2010, Recife, Brazil.

41. Medeiros EAS, Lott TJ, Colombo AL, Godoy P, Coutinho AP, Braga MS, et al.Evidence for a pseudo-outbreak of Candida guilliermondii fungemia in a uni-versity hospital in Brazil. J Clin Microbiol 2007;45:942-7.

Page 6: Evaluating the quality of outbreak reports on health care-associated infections in São Paulo, Brazil, during 2000-2010 using the ORION statement findings and recommendations

A.L.P. Maciel et al. / American Journal of Infection Control 42 (2014) e47-e53e52

42. Takagi EH, Lincopan N, Cassetari VC, Passadori LF, Mamizuka EM,Martinez MB. Carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii outbreak at auniversity hospital. Braz J Microbiol 2009;40:339-41.

43. Costa VF, Galvão LL, Laranja SMR, Grinbaum RS, Mendonça JS. Pyro-genic reaction outbreak in a hemodialysis unit. Braz J Infect Dis 2003;7(Suppl 1):126.

44. Zanella RC, Brandileone MCC, Bokermann S, Almeida SCG, Valdetaro F,Vitorio F, et al. Phenotypic and genotypic characterization of VanA Entero-coccus isolated during the first nosocomial outbreak in Brazil. Microb DrugResist 2003;9:283-91.

45. Aragão PA, Oshiro ICV, Manrique EI, Gomes CC, Matsuo LL, Leone C, et al.Pichia anomala outbreak in a nursery: exogenous source? Pediatr Infect Dis J2001;20:843-8.

46. Silva CV, Magalhães VD, Pereira CR, Kawagoe JY, Ikura C, Ganc AJ. Pseudo-outbreak of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Serratia Marcescens related tobronchoscopes. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2003;24:95-7.

47. Marino CGJ, Martins ST, Verotti MP, Coutinho AP, Costa VF, Wey SB, et al. Anoutbreak of pyrogenic events connected with intravenous infusion devices inpatients admitted to hospital in São Paulo. J Hosp Infect 2001;47:166-7.

48. Dalben MF, Croda MTRCG, Basso M, Krebs VLJ, Varkulja GF. Enterobactercloacae in a neonatal intensive care unit: description of the outbreak and riskfactor analysis. Abstract 761. Proceedings of the 6th Pan-American Conferenceand 10th Brazilian Conference on Healthcare-Associated Infection Preventionand Hospital Epidemiology, September 11-15, 2006, Porto Alegre, Brazil.

49. Lamblet LCR, Daniel RCM, Knobel M, Lopes LG, Grimblat BM. Scabies outbreakin an inpatient unit of a private hospital. Abstract 589. Proceedings of the 6thPan-American Conference and 10th Brazilian Conference on Healthcare-Associated Infection Prevention and Hospital Epidemiology, September 11-15, 2006, Porto Alegre, Brazil.

50. Cassettari C, Silveira IR, Balsamo AC, Franco F. Outbreak of extended-spectrumbeta-lactamase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae in an intermediate-riskneonatal unit linked to onychomycosis in a healthcare worker. J Pediatr2006;82:313-6.

51. Almeida FP, Martino MDV, Silva JRM, Corrêa L, Silbert S. Vancomycin resistantEnterococcus in an adult intensive care unit. Abstract 522. Proceedings of the6th Pan-American Conference and 10th Brazilian Conference on Healthcare-Associated Infection Prevention and Hospital Epidemiology, September 11-15, 2006, Porto Alegre, Brazil.

52. Dalben M, Varkulja G, Basso M, Krebs VLJ, Gibelli MA, Heijden IVD, et al.Investigation of an outbreak of Enterobacter cloacae in a neonatal unit andreview of the literature. J Hosp Infect 2008;70:7-14.

53. Silva CPR, Amarante JMB, Lacerda RA, Biancalana MLN. Klebsiella pneumoniaeoutbreak in a cancer unit of a general hospital e predisposing factors andevaluation of the impact of intervention measures. Braz J Infect Dis 2005;9:225-30.

54. Correa VMSP, Santos MFC, Corrêa L, Odierna MTAS, Nasri F. Challenges incontrolling a scabies outbreak in a long-term institution for the elderly. Ab-stract 636. Proceedings of the 6th Pan-American Conference and 10th Bra-zilian Conference on Healthcare-Associated Infection Prevention and HospitalEpidemiology, September 11-15, 2006, Porto Alegre, Brazil.

55. Souza AV, Moreira CR, Pasternak J, Hirata ML, Saltini DA, Caetano VC, et al.Characterizing uncommon Burkholderia cepacia complex isolates from anoutbreak in a hemodialysis unit. J Medical Microbiol 2004;53:999-1000.

56. Sampaio JLM, Junior DN, Freitas D, Hofling-Lima AL, Miyashiro K, Alberto FL,et al. An outbreak of keratitis caused by Mycobacterium immunogenum. J ClinMicrobiol 2006;44:3201-7.

57. Manfredi SR, Canziani ME, Draihe AS, Dalhoni MA, Andreolli MC, Watanabe R,et al. Model for improving quality in nephrology settings. Nephrol Nurs J2003;30:295-302.

58. Cais DP, Carrara D, Lessa SS, Neres SF, Zeigler R, Siciliano RF, et al. Descriptionof an Enterococcus faecalis outbreak in a neonatal cardiology unit (preliminarydata). Abstract 052818348. Proceedings of the 9th Brazilian Conference onHealthcare-Associated Infection Prevention and Hospital Epidemiology,August 30-September 3, 2004, Salvador, Brazil.

59. Candido VLC, Carvalho RLB, Mimiça LJ, Miranda MAL. Outbreak in a neonatalunit: assessing of control measures. Abstract 05271582. Proceedings of the9th Brazilian Conference on Healthcare-Associated Infection Prevention andHospital Epidemiology, August 30-September 3, 2004, Salvador, Brazil.

60. Cassettari VC, Balsamo AC, da Silveira I, Franco F. Acinetobacter baumanniioutbreak in an intensive care unit. Abstract 052085433. Proceedings of the9th Brazilian Conference on Healthcare-Associated Infection Prevention andHospital Epidemiology, August 30-September 3, 2004, Salvador, Brazil.

61. Feijó RDF, Sassi SJG, Nicoletti C, Boszczowski I, Kawamura D, Sanches F, et al.Acinetobacter baumannii outbreak in an adult intensive care unit. Abstract052632313. Proceedings of the 9th Brazilian Conference on Healthcare-Associated Infection Prevention and Hospital Epidemiology, August 30-September 3, 2004, Salvador, Brazil.

62. Santana SL, Sassi SJ, Feijó RDF, Nicoletti C, Bousquat AE; Hazzan S, et al.Outbreak of respiratory syncytial virus infection in kangaroo mother care unitAbstract 052632314. Proceedings of the 9th Brazilian Conference onHealthcare-Associated Infection Prevention and Hospital Epidemiology,August 30-September 3, 2004, Salvador, Brazil.

63. Sassi SJ, Feijó RDF, Nicoletti C, Boszczowski I, Kawamura D, Sanches F, et al.Outbreak of Klebsiella pneumoniae producing beta-lactamase extended spec-trum in a neonatal intensive care unit controlled by closing the unit. Abstract

052632315. Proceedings of the 9th Brazilian Conference on Healthcare-Associated Infection Prevention and Hospital Epidemiology, August 30-September 3, 2004, Salvador, Brazil.

64. Lapchik MS, Andrioli E, Paulo M Jr, Monteiro A, Melo M. Pseudo-outbreak ofbloodstream infection caused by Staphylococcus aureus sensitive to oxacillin.Abstract 053138397. Proceedings of the 9th Brazilian Conference onHealthcare-Associated Infection Prevention and Hospital Epidemiology,August 30-September 3, 2004, Salvador, Brazil.

65. Zambrini H, Ferreira AS, Hallage NM, Marra A, Boschirolli A. Nosocomialoutbreak of Candida albicans in a neonatal intensive care unit. Abstract061821755. Proceedings of the 9th Brazilian Conference on Healthcare-Associated Infection Prevention and Hospital Epidemiology, August 30-September 3, 2004, Salvador, Brazil.

66. Costa V, Costa SF, Marinho IS, Gaby FL. Control measures in a Burkholderiacepacia outbreak in an intensive care unit and bone marrow transplantation.Abstract 072884876. Proceedings of the 9th Brazilian Conference onHealthcare-Associated Infection Prevention and Hospital Epidemiology,August 30-September 3, 2004, Salvador, Brazil.

67. Dias MBS, Borrasca VL, Stempliuk V. CVC salvage after Pseudomonas putidabloodstream infection outbreak. Abstract 073051347. Proceedings of the 9thBrazilian Conference on Healthcare-Associated Infection Prevention andHospital Epidemiology, August 30-September 3, 2004, Salvador, Brazil.

68. Hospital Infection Division. Adverse events after infusion of lactate’s ringersolution, June, 2007. São Paulo [Brazil]: Centre for Epidemiological Surveil-lance ‘Prof. Alexandre Vranjac’; 2007. Unpublished Technical Report.

69. Hospital Infection Division. Preliminary report about the visit to the Bri-gadeiro Hospital. São Paulo [Brazil]: Centre for Epidemiological Surveillance‘Prof. Alexandre Vranjac’; 2009. Unpublished Technical Report.

70. Colombo AL, Melo ASA, Rosasa RFC, Salomão R, Briones M, Hollis RJ, et al.Outbreak of Candida rugosa candidemia: an emerging pathogen that may berefractory to amphotericin B therapy. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 2003;46:253-7.

71. Grinbaum RS, Guimarães T, Kusano E, Hosino N, Sader H, Cereda RF. A pseudo-outbreak of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium. Infect Control HospEpidemiol 2003;24:461-4.

72. Nascimento FAF, Trabasso P, Fagnani R, Leichsenring M, Levy CE, Cardoso LG,et al. A successful controlling of transmission of Enterococcus sp in a Brazilianteaching hospital. Abstract P273. Proceedings of the 12th Brazilian Conferenceon Healthcare-Associated Infection Prevention and Hospital Epidemiology,September 1-4, 2010, Recife, Brazil.

73. Calil R, Pessoto MA, Rosa IRM, Grassioto OR, Bacha AM, Neto SNYA, et al. Arespiratory syncytial virus outbreak in a neonatal intensive care unit. Ab-stract P286. Proceedings of the 12th Brazilian Conference on Healthcare-Associated Infection Prevention and Hospital Epidemiology, September 1-4,2010, Recife, Brazil.

74. Waib LB, Haber IR, Scudeler MFFM, Schneider MF, Barreto MA, Mendes CS,et al. Acinetobacter baumannii resistant to carbapenemics outbreak in atertiary-Care teaching hospital in Campinas. Abstract P287. Proceedings of the12th Brazilian Conference on Healthcare-Associated Infection Prevention andHospital Epidemiology, September 1-4, 2010, Recife, Brazil.

75. Gonçalves CR, Vaz TMI, Leite D, Pisani B, Simões M, Prandi MAM, et al. Mo-lecular epidemiology of a nosocomial outbreak due to Enterobacter cloacaeand Enterobacter agglomerans in Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil. Rev Inst MedTrop Sao Paulo 2000;42:1-7.

76. Tresoldi AT, Padoveze MC, Trabasso P, Veiga JFS, Marba STM, Nowakonski A,et al. Enterobacter cloacae sepsis outbreak in a newborn unit caused bycontaminated total parenteral nutrition solution. Am J Infect Control 2000;28:58-61.

77. Madalosso G, Assis DB, Padoveze MC, Freire MP. Nontuberculous mycobac-teria infection outbreak related to cosmetic procedures. Abstract 642. Pro-ceedings of the 6th Pan-American Conference and 10th Brazilian Conferenceon Healthcare-Associated Infection Prevention and Hospital Epidemiology,September 11-15, 2006, Porto Alegre, Brazil.

78. Padoveze MC, Fortaleza CMCB, Freire MP, Brandão DA, Madalosso G,Pellini ACG, et al. Outbreak of surgical infection caused by non-tuberculousmycobacteria in breast implants in Brazil. J Hosp Infect 2007;67:161-7.

79. Moretti ML, Cardoso LGO, Levy CE, Von Nowakosky A, Bachur LF,Bratfich O, et al. Controlling a vancomycin-resistant enterococci outbreakin a Brazilian teaching hospital. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 2010;30:369-74.

80. Sampaio JLM, Chimara E, Ferrazoli L, Telles MAS, Del Guercio VMF, Jericó ZVN,et al. Application of four molecular typing methods for analysis of Mycobac-terium fortuitum group strains causing post-mammoplasty infections. ClinMicrobiol Infect 2006;12:142-9.

81. Silva MFI, Souza RP, Patrocínio LMF. Infection control nursing and Occupa-tional Health Nurse working together to control a scabies outbreak amonghealthcare workers. Abstract 654. Proceedings of the 8th Brazilian Conferenceon Healthcare-Associated Infections Prevention and Hospital Epidemiology,September 4-7, 2002, Curitiba, Brazil.

82. Gaspar GG, Belíssimo-Rodrigues F, Martinez R, Patrocínio LMF, Gironi RAR.Enterococcus faecium resistant to vancomycin outbreak: epidemiology econtrol measures. Abstract 620. Proceedings of the 6th Pan-AmericanConference and 10th Brazilian Conference on Healthcare-Associated Infec-tion Prevention and Hospital Epidemiology, September 11-15, 2006, PortoAlegre, Brazil.

Page 7: Evaluating the quality of outbreak reports on health care-associated infections in São Paulo, Brazil, during 2000-2010 using the ORION statement findings and recommendations

A.L.P. Maciel et al. / American Journal of Infection Control 42 (2014) e47-e53 e53

83. Duarte Neto AN, Gobara S, Manrique E, Soares RE, Costa SF, Medeiros EA.Streptococcus pyogenes outbreak in burns unit: description and moleculartyping. Abstract 071595631. Proceedings of the 9th Brazilian Conference onHealthcare-Associated Infection Prevention and Hospital Epidemiology,August 30-September 3, 2004, Salvador, Brazil.

84. Silva MFI, Mazucato-Patrocínio LF, Resuto TJO, Silva MHA, Castro PTO, Belís-simo-Rodrigues F. Control of an outbreak by Pseudomonas aeruginosa resistantto imipinem in an emergency hospital in inland of São Paulo. Abstract072865072. Proceedings of the 9th Brazilian Conference on Healthcare-Associated Infection Prevention and Hospital Epidemiology, August 30-September 3, 2004, Salvador, Brazil.

85. Belíssimo-Rodrigues F, Castro PTO, Resuto TJO, Silva MHA, Mazucato-Patro-cínio LF, Passos ADC, et al. Food poisoning outbreak of at a teaching hospital.Abstract 072865071. Proceedings of the 9th Brazilian Conference onHealthcare-Associated Infection Prevention and Hospital Epidemiology,August 30-September 3, 2004, Salvador, Brazil.

86. Assis DB, Madalosso G, Oliveira TCR, Geremias AL, Garcia DO, Ferraresi LMM,et al. Outbreak investigation of A. baumannii in a neonatal intensive care unit.Braz J Infect Dis 2008;12(Suppl 3):257.

87. Santos RS, Borini MS, Cavalcante AJW, Souza BGM, Andrade CA,Hallage NM. Vancomycin resistant Enterococcus outbreak. Braz J Infect Dis2008;12(Suppl 3):262.

88. Sartori JV, Caraccio MBB. A. baumanni outbreak in intensive care unit: iden-tification and control measures. Braz J Infect Dis 2008;12(Suppl 3):263.

89. Costa ERL, Maciel ALP, Andrade VP, Boszczowski I. Controlling an outbreak ofVentilator associated pneumonia caused by A. baumannii resistant to carba-penemics. Abstract P270. Proceedings of the 12th Brazilian Conference onHealthcare-Associated Infection Prevention and Hospital Epidemiology,September 1-4, 2010, Recife, Brazil.

90. Andrade NMP, Ramos EA, Santos AP, Melo AF, Santana LO, Burgo LE, et al.Investigation and controlling of an Acinetobacter sp. outbreak in an adultintensive care unit. Abstract P284. Proceedings of the 12th Brazilian Confer-ence on Healthcare-Associated Infection Prevention and Hospital Epidemi-ology, September 1-4, 2010, Recife, Brazil.

91. Gales AC, Torres PL, Vilarinho DSO, Melo RS, Silva CFL, Cereda RF. Carbape-nem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa outbreak in an intensive care unit of ateaching hospital. Braz J Infect Dis 2004;8:267-71.

92. Bowzczoski I, Nicoletti C, Puccini D, Pinheiro M, Soares RE, Heijden IMVD,et al. Outbreak of extended spectrum B-lactamase-producing Klebsiellapneumoniae infection in a neonatal healthcare unit related to onychomycosisin a health care worker. Pediatr Infect Dis J 2005;24:648-50.

93. Del’Alamo L, d’Azevedo PA, Strob AJ, Rodrıguez-Lopez DV, Monteiro J,Andrade SS, et al. An outbreak of catalase-negative meticillin-resistantStaphylococcus aureus. J Hosp Infect 2007;65:226-30.

94. Gouveia A Jr, Rodrigues SC, Schneider MF, Cagliari EB, Aoki FH. Control of anurinary tract infections outbreak by Candida in an intensive care unit. Abstract051963304. Proceedings of the 9th Brazilian Conference on Healthcare-Associated Infection Prevention and Hospital Epidemiology, August 30-September 3, 2004, Salvador, Brazil.

95. Valente MG, Padoveze MC, Fortaleza CMCB, Freire MP; Vaz TMI, Zanella RCet al. Outbreak of Klebsiella producing beta-lactamase extended spectrum inhigh-risk nursery. Abstract 052653387. Proceedings of the 9th BrazilianConference on Healthcare-Associated Infection Prevention and HospitalEpidemiology, August 30-September 3, 2004, Salvador, Brazil.

96. Fortaleza CM, Valente MG, Padoveze MC, Freire MP. Epidemiological inves-tigation of nosocomial infection outbreak in neonatal intensive care unit. SãoPaulo [Brazil]: Centre for Epidemiological Surveillance ‘Prof. AlexandreVranjac’; 2004. Unpublished Technical Report.

97. Pellini ACG, Ciccone FH, Cabrera SEM, Salomão MLM, Sisdeli R, Cury MRCO,et al. Investigation of chickenpox cases in the Saeo Jose do Rio Preto teachinghospital. São Paulo [Brazil]: Centre for Epidemiological Surveillance ‘Prof.Alexandre Vranjac’; 2005. Unpublished Technical Report.

98. Hospital Infection Division. Investigation of diarrhea outbreak in Bauru Hos-pital. São Paulo [Brazil]: Centre for Epidemiological Surveillance ‘Prof. Alex-andre Vranjac’; 2005. Unpublished Technical Report.

99. Hospital Infection Division. Report about an investigation of cases with Aci-netobacter isolation in a hospital center of Santo André City, January to July2007. São Paulo [Brazil]: Centre for Epidemiological Surveillance ‘Prof. Alex-andre Vranjac’; 2008. Unpublished Technical Report.

100. Hospital Infection Division. Investigation of meningitis cases after spinalanesthesia in Hospital Center in Franco da Rocha city. São Paulo [Brazil]:Centre for Epidemiological Surveillance ‘Prof. Alexandre Vranjac’; 2006. Un-published Technical Report.

101. Hospital Infection Division. Preliminary assessment of neonatal infections inSanta Casa of Franca city. São Paulo[Brazil]: Centre for Epidemiological Sur-veillance ‘Prof. Alexandre Vranjac’; 2010. Unpublished Technical Report.

102. Hospital Infection Division. Audit performed in Santa Casa of Mogi das Cruzescity in November 20, 2009. São Paulo [Brazil]: Centre for EpidemiologicalSurveillance ‘Prof. Alexandre Vranjac’; 2009. Unpublished Technical Report.

103. Hospital Infection Division. Investigation of cases of respiratory syncytial vi-rus in the neonatal intensive care unit in Sumaré city. São Paulo [Brazil]:Centre for Epidemiological Surveillance ‘Prof. Alexandre Vranjac’; 2009. Un-published Technical Report.

104. Hospital Infection Division. Assessing a possible outbreak of nosocomialinfection in the nursery of Vale do Ribeira Hospital. São Paulo [Brazil]: Centrefor Epidemiological Surveillance ‘Prof. Alexandre Vranjac’; 2004. UnpublishedTechnical Report.

105. Mestrinari ACR, Pavarin APF, Trombim PEO, Oliveira MGL, Pedro HSP, ChimaraE, et al. Rapid growing Mycobacterium in a teaching hospital bronchoscopyservice. Abstract O03. Proceedings of the 12th Brazilian Conference onHealthcare-Associated Infection Prevention and Hospital Epidemiology,September 1-4, 2010, Recife, Brazil.

106. Hospital Infection Division. Nontuberculous mycobacteria rapid growthinfection related to drugs and vaccines administration in Andradina city. SãoPaulo [Brazil]: Centre for Epidemiological Surveillance ‘Prof. AlexandreVranjac’; 2008. Unpublished Technical Report.

107. Hospital Infection Division. Adverse events investigationdhemodialysis,Bauru City. São Paulo [Brazil]: Centre for Epidemiological Surveillance ‘Prof.Alexandre Vranjac’; 2003. Unpublished Technical Report.

108. Wolf A, Hallage NM. Gastrenterocolitis outbreak of Shigella sonnei in ateaching hospital. Abstract 081821755. Proceedings of the 9th BrazilianConference on Healthcare-Associated Infection Prevention and HospitalEpidemiology, August 30-September 3, 2004, Salvador, Brazil.

109. Gastmeier P, Stamm-Balderjahn S, Hansen S, Zuschneid I, Sohr D, Behnke M,et al. Where should one search when confronted with outbreaks of nosoco-mial infection? Am J Infect Control 2006;34:603-5.

110. Utsumi M, Makimoto K, Quroshi N, Ashida N. Types of infectious outbreaksand their impact in elderly care facilities. Age Ageing 2010;39:299-305.

111. Gastmeier P, Stamm-Balderjahn S, Hansen S, Nitzschke-Tiemann F,Zuschneid I, Groneberg K, et al. How outbreaks can contribute to preventionof nosocomial infection: analysis of 1,022 outbreaks. Infect Control HospEpidemiol 2005;26:357-61.

112. Ostrowsky B, Jarvis WR. Efficient management of outbreak investigations. In:Wenzell RP, editor. Prevention and control of nosocomial infection. 4th ed.Philadelphia [PA]: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2003. p. 501-23.

113. Ostrosky-Zeichner L, Baez-Martinez R, Rangel-Frausto S, Ponce-de-León S.Epidemiology of nosocomial outbreaks: 14-year experience at a tertiary-carecenter. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2000;21:527-9.

114. Gastmeier P, Loui A, Stamm-Balderjahn S, Hansen S, Zuschneid I, Sohr D, et al.Outbreaks in neonatal intensive care unitsdthey are not like others. Am JInfect Control 2007;35:172-6.

115. Vonberg RP, Weitzel-Kage D, Behnke M, Gastmeier P. Worldwide OutbreakDatabase: the largest collectionofnosocomialoutbreaks. Infection2011;39:29-34.

116. Dancer SJ. The role of environmental cleaning in the control of hospital-acquired infection. J Hosp Infect 2009;73:378-85.

117. Vonberg RP, Gastmeier P. Hospital-acquired infections related to contami-nated substances. J Hosp Infect 2007;65:15-23.

118. Cooper BS, Cookson BD, Davey PG, Stone SP. Introducing the ORION State-ment, a CONSORT equivalent for infection control studies. J Hosp Infect 2007;65(Suppl 2):85-7.