Evaluating SDH Programs

27
Evaluating SDH Programs Caroline Fichtenberg, PhD Managing Director, Social Interventions Research and Evaluation Network, UCSF OPCA APCM Learning Session Aug 16, 2018 SIRENetwork.ucsf.edu

Transcript of Evaluating SDH Programs

Page 1: Evaluating SDH Programs

Evaluating SDH Programs

Caroline Fichtenberg, PhDManaging Director, Social Interventions Research and Evaluation Network, UCSFOPCA APCM Learning SessionAug 16, 2018

SIRENetwork.ucsf.edu

Page 2: Evaluating SDH Programs
Page 3: Evaluating SDH Programs

siren

Reduce Social Needs

Improve Health

Reduce Utilizations

Reduce Costs

Page 4: Evaluating SDH Programs

siren

Screen for unmet social needs

Refer tointernal

resources, e.g. food

pharmacy, medical-legal partnership

Refer toexternal

resources, e.g. food bank,

benefits assistance,

etc.

Provide navigation,

e.g. with CHW, SW,

patient navigator, etc.

“Social needs care”

Refer tointernal

resources, e.g. food

pharmacy, medical-legal partnership

Page 5: Evaluating SDH Programs

siren

Does this work?

Page 6: Evaluating SDH Programs

siren

Researchers Early-Adopters

Page 7: Evaluating SDH Programs

0

200

400

600

800

1000

20162015201420132012201120102009200820072006200520042003200220012000

Num

ber

of art

icle

s

SDH

SDH + Health care

Growth in SDH publications, 2000-2016

Page 8: Evaluating SDH Programs

9843116341115205210

200

400

600

800

1000

20162015201420132012201120102009200820072006200520042003200220012000

Num

ber

of

art

icle

s

Clinical SDH intervention evaluations

SDH

SDH + Health care

Growth in SDH evaluation publications

Gottlieb LM, Wing H, Adler NE. A systematic review of interventions on patients' social and economic needs. Am J Prev Med. 2017

Page 9: Evaluating SDH Programs

• Multicomponent

interventions

• Multiple impacts and

causal pathways

• Time horizon

Barriers to Evaluating Social Needs Interventions

Gottlieb L, Ackerman S, Wing H, Adler N. Evaluation activities and influences at the

intersection of medical and social services. J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2017;28(3):931-

951.

Page 10: Evaluating SDH Programs

• Regression to the

mean

• Lack of control groups

• Limited evaluation

capacity and

resources in

intervention settings

Barriers to Evaluating Social Needs Interventions

Gottlieb L, Ackerman S, Wing H, Adler N. Evaluation activities and influences at the

intersection of medical and social services. J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2017;28(3):931-

951.

Page 11: Evaluating SDH Programs

siren

Measuring Impact (incl. ROI)

Data + Design

Page 12: Evaluating SDH Programs

siren

Measuring Impact (incl. ROI)

Data + Design

- What services patients received

- Relevant outcomes- Potential

confounders

- Control group!!- Time horizon

Page 13: Evaluating SDH Programs

siren

Data for ROI: Think outside the $ box

$

Page 14: Evaluating SDH Programs

siren

Reduce Social Needs

Improve Health

Reduce Utilizations

Reduce Costs

Page 15: Evaluating SDH Programs

siren

Reduce Social Needs

Improve Health

Reduce Utilizations

Reduce Costs

Reduce HealthInequities

Page 16: Evaluating SDH Programs

Call-center based social services referral program: Expenditures $2,443 (10%) lower if social needs met.

Pruitt Z et al. Popul Health Manag. 2018. Epub ahead of print.

Reduce Social Needs

Improve Health

Reduce Utilizations

Reduce Costs

Page 17: Evaluating SDH Programs

Medically tailored meal program:- Fewer emergency department visits- Fewer inpatient admissions- Lower medical spendingNon-tailored meals:- Fewer emergency department visits- Lower medical spending

Berkowitz SA et al. Health Aff (Millwood). 2018;37(4):535-542.

Reduce Social Needs

Improve Health

Reduce Utilizations

Reduce Costs

Page 18: Evaluating SDH Programs

Systematically screening and referring for social needs services during well child care increased families’ receipt of community resources.

Garg A et al. Pediatrics. 2015;135(2):e296-304.

Reduce Social Needs

Improve Health

Reduce Utilizations

Reduce Costs

Reduce HealthInequities

Page 19: Evaluating SDH Programs

Referring to services to address unmet basic resource needs in primary care was associated with modest improvements in blood pressure and lipid levels.

Berkowitz SA et al. JAMA Intern Med 2016;177(2):244-252

Reduce Social Needs

Improve Health

Reduce Utilizations

Reduce Costs

Reduce HealthInequities

Page 20: Evaluating SDH Programs

In-person resource navigation for pediatric patients in primary care and urgent care settings reduced reported social and economic needs and improved caregiver reported child health status 4 months later.Gottlieb LM et al. JAMA Pediatr. 2016;170(11):e162521.

Reduce Social Needs

Improve Health

Reduce Utilizations

Reduce Costs

Reduce HealthInequities

Page 21: Evaluating SDH Programs

Reduce Social Needs

Improve Health

Reduce Costs

Reduce HealthInequities

Improve Experience of

Care

Improve Quality of

Care

Reduce Staff Burnout

ReduceUtilizations

Page 22: Evaluating SDH Programs

Reduce Social Needs

Improve Health

Reduce HealthInequities

Improve Experience of

Care

Improve Quality of

Care

Reduce Staff Burnout

Primary care: Knowing the patient had a social need changed care delivery in 23% of patients and helped improve interactions with and knowledge of the patient in 53%.

Tong ST et al. JABFM 2018;31(3):351-363.

Reduce Costs

Reduce Utilizations

Page 23: Evaluating SDH Programs

Reduce Social Needs

Improve Health

Reduce HealthInequities

Improve Experience of

Care

Improve Quality of

Care

Reduce Staff Burnout

Reduce Costs

Reduce Utilizations

Higher perceived organizational capacity to address SDH in the primary care setting significantly associated with lower provider burnout.

Olayiwola JN et al. JHCPU 2018;29(1):415-429.

Page 24: Evaluating SDH Programs

siren

Page 25: Evaluating SDH Programs

siren http://sirenetwork.ucsf.edu

Page 26: Evaluating SDH Programs

Time

Page 27: Evaluating SDH Programs

siren

Contact: [email protected]: http://sirenetwork.ucsf.eduTwitter: @SIREN_UCSF

Questions?