Evaluating Grocery Store Siting

14
Heidi Guenin and Nathan McNeil USP 543 – Final Paper 12/10/09 1 Evaluating Grocery Store Siting: A Case Study at SE 122 nd and SE Foster Introduction Grocery store location is a challenging problem both from the business perspective (where could a profitable business locate?) and the equity perspective (where is food access limited or inequitably distributed?). This project examines industry assumptions about grocery store location combined with demographic and other geoanalytic processes. The Bureau of Planning and Sustainability (BPS) is conducting a study of the SE 122nd Avenue corridor from Division Street south to Foster Road. The southern portion of study area has limited grocery access, as determined by several recent studies of food access in Portland, including the MURP Foodability 2009 Planning Workshop study completed last year. 1 (See Image 1) Image 1: Foodability 1 Armstrong, Kim, Elizabeth Chapin, April Chastain, Julia Person, Stephanie VanRheen, and Steve White. "Foodability: Visioning for Healthful Food Access in Portland." Thesis. Portland State University, 2009. Print.

Transcript of Evaluating Grocery Store Siting

Page 1: Evaluating Grocery Store Siting

HeidiGueninandNathanMcNeilUSP543–FinalPaper

12/10/09

1

EvaluatingGroceryStoreSiting:ACaseStudyatSE122ndandSEFoster

Introduction

Grocerystorelocationisachallengingproblembothfromthebusinessperspective(wherecouldaprofitablebusinesslocate?)andtheequityperspective(whereisfoodaccesslimitedorinequitablydistributed?).Thisprojectexaminesindustryassumptionsaboutgrocerystorelocationcombinedwithdemographicandothergeoanalyticprocesses.TheBureauofPlanningandSustainability(BPS)isconductingastudyoftheSE122ndAvenuecorridorfromDivisionStreetsouthtoFosterRoad.Thesouthernportionofstudyareahaslimitedgroceryaccess,asdeterminedbyseveralrecentstudiesoffoodaccessinPortland,includingtheMURPFoodability2009PlanningWorkshopstudycompletedlastyear.1(SeeImage1)Image1:Foodability

1Armstrong,Kim,ElizabethChapin,AprilChastain,JuliaPerson,StephanieVanRheen,andSteveWhite."Foodability:VisioningforHealthfulFoodAccessinPortland."Thesis.PortlandStateUniversity,2009.Print.

Page 2: Evaluating Grocery Store Siting

HeidiGueninandNathanMcNeilUSP543–FinalPaper

12/10/09

2

Thereareseveralcontiguousvacantcommerciallotsinthesouthernportionofthearea.Communitymembershavesuggestedthatthesevacantparcels(hereafterreferredtoastheFostersite)shouldbeexploredasapotentialgrocerystorelocation.(SeeImage2)ThisanalysisexaminesthesuitabilityoftheFostersiteasagrocerystorelocationbasedonacombinationoftraditionallocationfactorsandmorerecentconsumerdemographicresearch.Image2:SE122ndAvenueLandUsebyTaxlot

Page 3: Evaluating Grocery Store Siting

HeidiGueninandNathanMcNeilUSP543–FinalPaper

12/10/09

3

BackgroundandExistingConditions

Standardgrocerystorelocationdecisionstakeintoaccountthesizeofthelotofthepotentialbuildingandparkingsite,marketleakage,variationsinserviceareabystoretype,andpopulationneededtosupportastore.Morerecentresearchalsoexploresdemographictrendsinconsumerstorechoice.LotSize&MarketLeakageTheFostersitehasanareaofroughly63,605squarefeet.ThereareseveralgrocerystoresinPortlandonlotsofasimilarorsmallersize,includingdozensofspecialtystoresandthreeNewSeasonsMarkets.2AnESRIBusinessAnalystreportfortheFostersiteindicatesthatthereismarketleakageof$8,159,848forgrocerystoreswithinafiveminutedriveandof$871,087forspecialtystoreswithinathreeminutedrive.3Marketleakageiscalculatedasretailpotentialminusretailsupplyandisoftenusedineconomicdevelopmentresearchasoneindicatorofwhattypesofnewdevelopmentanareacansupport.StoreTypes&ServiceCatchmentAreasTherearedozensofdifferentschemesusedtocategorizegrocerystoresaccordingtostock,size,andownership.Forourpurposes,wedevelopedasimplifiedversionoftheschemefroma2004articlefromtheJournalofPlanningEducationandResearch,asdetailedlater.4Theauthorsofthearticlenotedthat"fewpeoplewouldsubstitutewalkingfordrivingtothegrocerystore,evenifaccesswereexcellent."5Thisfinding,coupledwithourlimitedtimeframeandthetraditionallocationdecisionparametersledustofocusonautomobilesforthecreationoftheanalysisnetwork.Asupermarketgenerallyhasaconsumercatchmentareaofthreemilesorafiveminutedrive‐time.Specialtystorestypicallyhaveasmallercatchmentareaofonemileorathreeminutedrive‐time.Largediscountstoresoftenoperateataregionallevel,soatenminutedrive‐timeisaconservativeestimateoftheircatchmentarea.6DemographicTrendsDunkleyalsoreviewedexistingliteratureaboutconsumerdemographicsandpreferences,withfindingsrelevanttothisanalysis.Asincomeandeducation

2BureauofPlanningandSustainability,AlmaL.SelectGroceryStoreSizeTypesandMarketforPortland.Rep.Portland:BPS,2007.Print.3ESRIBusinessAnalystOnline.RetailMarketplaceProfile.Rep.2009.Print.4Dunkley,Bill,AmyHelling,andDavidSawicki."AccessibilityversusScale:ExaminingtheTradeoffsinGroceryStores."JournalofPlanningEducationandResearch23.4(2004):387‐401.CSAWebIllumina.Web.20Nov.2009.<http://csaweb105v.csa.com>.5393

6Flores,Alma.Personalinterview.18Nov.2009.

Page 4: Evaluating Grocery Store Siting

HeidiGueninandNathanMcNeilUSP543–FinalPaper

12/10/09

4

decrease,orashouseholdsizeincreases,likelihoodofshoppingindiscountstoresincreases.Size‐constrainedgrocerystoresaremoresuccessfulinareasofhighincomeorinareaswherethereisalargepopulationwithoutpersonalvehicles.A2006articlefromtheInternationalJournalofRetail&DistributionManagementconcludedthatsupermarketpatronage(especiallyof"traditionalneighborhoodmarkets")increaseswithdecreasinghouseholdsize.7

MethodologyOverview

InordertoexaminethesuitabilityoftheFostersite,thisanalysisdrawsonPortlandgrocerystoredatafromBPS,PortlandstreetsdatafromMetro'sRegionalLandInformationSystem,anddemographicinformationfromthe2000Census.GroceryStoreDataThefirststepinthisanalysiswastogeocodeandmapalistofPortlandgrocerystorestoexaminemarketcoveragebystoretypeandtoassessthestoreserviceareasfordemographicorgeographictrends.ApreliminarylistwasreceivedfromBPS,updatedwithrecentlyopenedstores,geocoded,andcategorizedtouseintheanalysis.A.Stepstoanalyzethegrocerystoredatawereasfollows:(SeeImage3)1. ObtainedlistofGroceryStoresfromBPS.2. Addedknownmissingstores(GroceryOutlet,NewSeasons,Pastaworks).3. GeocodedtoPortlandStreetswitha98%matchrateandmatchedthe

remainingstoresmanually.4. Removedlocationsoperatingonlyaswholesalers.5. Assignedacategorytoeachlocationaccordingtosimplifiedscheme

informedbytheliteraturereview:• Supermarket‐full‐servicechainorindependentgrocerystore(ex.:

Albertsons)• Gourmet‐limitedselection;littletonononfooditems(ex.Zupan's

Market)• Specialty‐ethnicstores,greengrocers,bakeries,seafoodmarkets,

butchers,etc.(ex.:AnDongMarket)• Discount‐supercenters,warehouse/wholesalesellers(ex.:Winco)• Massmerchant‐departmentalizedstorethatsellsfoodinadditionto

otherhouseholdgoods(ex.:FredMeyer)

7Carpenter,Jason,andMargueriteMoore."Consumerdemographics,storeattributes,andretailformatchoiceintheU.S.grocerymarket."InternationalJournalofRetail&DistributionManagement34.6(2006):434‐52.Emerald.Web.20Nov.2009.<http://www.emeraldinsight.com>.

Page 5: Evaluating Grocery Store Siting

HeidiGueninandNathanMcNeilUSP543–FinalPaper

12/10/09

5

Image3:GroceryStoresinPortland

StreetNetworkNextastreetnetworkwascreatedusingtheMetroRLISstreetsfile.Lengthswereconvertedtomilesanddrive‐timeswereassignedbasedonspeedlimitassumptionsdetailedbelow.B.StepstocreateaPortlandstreetnetworkwereasfollows:1. Addedamilesfieldtotheattributetableforthestreetshapefile.Themiles

werecalculatedaslength/5280.2. Addedaspeedfieldtotheattributetableforthestreetshapefile.Valuesfor

thespeedfieldwerepopulatedasbelow,accordingtostreettypeandinmilesperhour:

• Freeways=55• Highways=45• Primaryarterials=35• Secondaryarterials=30• Otherarterials=30• Allothers=25

3. Addedtwofields,"TF_Minutes"and"FT_Minutes"andcalculatedbothoftheirvaluestobemiles*60/speed.

4. Theseadditionsallowedforthecreationofanetworkdatasetthatcouldevaluatearoutebasedontimeimpedance.

Page 6: Evaluating Grocery Store Siting

HeidiGueninandNathanMcNeilUSP543–FinalPaper

12/10/09

6

ServiceAreaAnalysisDrawingontheliteraturereviewedandcategoriesofgrocerystores(gourmet,specialty,supermarket,massmerchantanddiscount),standardbusinessmarketcatchmentareaswereassignedtoeachcategory.Networkanalystwasusedtocreateserviceareapolygonsaccordingtotheassigneddrive‐timecatchmentforeachstoreonourlist,aswellasforasitemanuallycreatedattheFostersite.C.Stepstocompleteaserviceareaanalysiswereasfollows:(seeModel&Image4)1. BasedonBPSinformation,dividedgrocerystoresintothreedrive‐time

catchmentgroupsandranthreeseparateserviceareaanalyses,changingonlytheimpedancebreaks.

• Discountstoreserviceareas:10minutebreak• Massmerchantandsupermarket:5minutebreak• Specialtyandgourmet:3minutebreak

2. Eachanalysisgeneratedoverlappingpolygons,androuteswerecalculatedtowardsthefacility.

3. ManuallycreatedafacilityattheFostersite.Ranserviceareaanalysiswith3,5,and10minutebreaks,calculatedtowardsthefacility.

4. IndividuallyselectedFostersiteandcomparisonstorepolygons(seestepD.3),savedaslayer,andthenexportedasshapefilestouseinclipprocessinstepD.5.

Image4:NetworkAnalystServiceAreasbyStoreType

Page 7: Evaluating Grocery Store Siting

HeidiGueninandNathanMcNeilUSP543–FinalPaper

12/10/09

7

DemographicRastersDemographicdatawereusedtoassessthemarketdemographicsofapotentialnewgrocerystoreandofselectexistinggrocerystorelocations.Theliteraturereviewsuggestedthatcertaindemographicgroups(particularlyinrelationstohouseholdsize,medianhouseholdincomeandnumberofhouseholdswithoutamotorvehicle)providedfavorablemarketconditionsfordifferenttypesofstores.RasterswerecreatedfromCensusblockgroupdataandclippedtostorepolygonsinordertocompareourpotentialsitetoexistingstores.D.RastersofMedianIncome,HouseholdSizeandHouseholdswithNoVehicle1. Downloaded2000blockgroupCensusdataforMultnomahandClackamas

Counties(Householdsize(P14);Income(P53);Carownership(H442. Downloaded2000blockgroupshapefilesforMultnomahandClackamas

Countiesandmergedintooneshapefile.3. Joinedmergedblockgroupshapefiletodatatablefromstep1,basedonFIPS.4. Createdrastersurfacesforeachofthethreedemographicvariablesforusein

visualcomparisontoFostersite.1. Usedfeaturetopointconversiontoextractblockgroupcentroids.

Thesecentroidsprovidepointdataforthefollowingrasterinterpolationprocesses.IDWmethodchosentoavoidvaluesbelow0forallfactorsandabove100%forpercentageofhouseholdsowningnovehicles.

2. InterpolatedarastersurfaceforeachdemographicfactorusingIDW.▪ NoVehicle‐IDW2.0power,8points,10560feetmaxradius

(SeeImage5)▪ Householdsize‐IDW2power,8points,10560feetmaxradius

(SeeImage6)▪ MedianIncome‐IDW2.0power,8points,10560feetmax

radius(SeeImage7)3. ChoseotherstorecatchmentareastoanalyzeinstepD.5.5.Visually

examinerasterstochooseareaslikelytohavesimilarcharactertoFostersite(basedonmedianincome,householdsize,andnovehiclepercentage).

5. Createrastersurfacesfordemographicdataforeachoftherelevantserviceareapolygons:(seeModel)

1. ForeachofthethreeFostersiteservicepolygonscreatedinstepC.4,clippedthemergedblockgroupshapefilefromstepD3tothepolygon.

2. Convertednewpolygonstorasterbasedoneachofthethreedemographicfactors:householdsize,medianincome,and%householdswithnovehicle.

3. Examinedrasterstatisticsforeachofthedemographicfactors.

Page 8: Evaluating Grocery Store Siting

HeidiGueninandNathanMcNeilUSP543–FinalPaper

12/10/09

8

4. Theserviceareafordiscountstoreshasahigherincomeandsmallerhouseholdsizethantheotherserviceareas.Thesegroupsarenotaslikelytoshopatdiscountstores.Thedemographicstatistics,coupledwithsizeconstraintsofsite,ledustoexcludediscountstoresfromfurtheranalysis.

5. Foreachservicepolygonofselectedcomparisonstores(stepD.4.3),clippedthemergedblockgroupshapefilefromstepD3tothepolygon.

6. Convertednewpolygonstorasterforeachofthethreedemographicfactors:householdsize,medianincome,and%householdswithnovehicle.

Image5:PortlandAreaHouseholdswithNoMotorVehicle

Page 9: Evaluating Grocery Store Siting

HeidiGueninandNathanMcNeilUSP543–FinalPaper

12/10/09

9

Image6:PortlandAreaAverageHouseholdSize

Image7:PortlandAreaMedianHouseholdIncome

Page 10: Evaluating Grocery Store Siting

HeidiGueninandNathanMcNeilUSP543–FinalPaper

12/10/09

10

ModelDemonstratingStepsTaken

FindingsDiscountStoreThefirststoretypethatweexaminedwasthelargediscountgroceryretailerwithatenminutedrive‐timeservicearea.AreviewoftheserviceareaincomparisontotheexistingaggregateserviceareafordiscountgrocerystoresinPortlandrevealedthatrelativelylittleuniqueserviceareawouldbeincludedfortheSEFosterRoadsite.(SeeImage8)

Page 11: Evaluating Grocery Store Siting

HeidiGueninandNathanMcNeilUSP543–FinalPaper

12/10/09

11

Image8:PotentialDiscountStoreCatchmentArea

10 Minute Drivetime

Income Household Size% Households with no vehicle

Discount Mean $48,290 2.65 6.96%Range $15,787 - $100,514 1.61 - 3.45 0 - 39.6%

122nd Ave Site

AreviewoftheFostersiteshowsthattheserviceareafordiscountstoreshasarelativelyhighincomeandsmallhouseholdsize.Priorstudieshaveshownthatthesegroupsarelikelytoshopatdiscountstores.Thisbasicdemographicdata,coupledwithsizeconstraintsofthesiteandthelackofnewserviceareathatwouldbecreated,ledustoexcludediscountstoresfromfurtheranalysis.Gourmet&SpecialtyStoresToexaminethepossibilityofsitingagourmetorgrocerystoreatoursite,welookedatthethreeminutedrive‐timepolygonscreatedinournetworkanalysis.Byexaminingourrastersformedianincomeandthenforhouseholdswithoutamotorvehicle,weidentifiedtwostoreswithserviceareassimilartothatinthethreeminutecatchmentareaoftheFostersite‐onegourmetstore(Zupan’s)andonespecialtystore(HongPhat).ThethreeminutecatchmentareaoftheFostersite,alongwiththatoftwoselectedstoresareshownbelow.(SeeImage9)

Page 12: Evaluating Grocery Store Siting

HeidiGueninandNathanMcNeilUSP543–FinalPaper

12/10/09

12

Image9–GourmetandSpecialtyStoreCatchmentAreas

3 Minute Drivetime

Income Household Size% Households with no vehicle Income Household Size

% Households with no vehicle

Specialty Mean $46,361 2.78 4.96% Specialty Mean $40,820 2.57 6.30%Range $32,083 - $65,655 2.42 - 3.10 0 - 20.4% Range $26,889 - $62,411 2.03 - 3.18 0 - 31%

Gourmet Mean $58,249 2.05 5.24%Range $25,333 - $85,000 1.57 - 2.50 0 - 34.2%

122nd Ave Site Comparisons

Lookingtothegrocerysitingliterature,whichpointedtohigheraveragehouseholdincomesasbeingakeyfactorinthesuccessofagourmetstore,wedeterminedthatsuchastoremightstruggleattheFostersite;itshouseholdincomewassubstantiallybelowthemedianincomeofthecomparisonstore‐$46,361comparedto$58,249.Basedontheliteratureandonthecomparisonofthesetwoareas,theFostersiteislikelytobebetterservedbyaspecialtystorethanbyagourmetstore.Supermarkets&MassMerchantsThethirdcomparisonwasbetweenafiveminutedrive‐timeserviceareafromtheFostersiteandthecatchmentareasoftwoothergrocerystores‐atraditionalsupermarket(Albertson's)andamassmerchant(FredMeyer).Theserviceareapolygonscreatedfromthesethreesitesinnetworkanalystcanbeseenbelow.(SeeImage10)

Page 13: Evaluating Grocery Store Siting

HeidiGueninandNathanMcNeilUSP543–FinalPaper

12/10/09

13

Image10–SupermarketandMassMerchantCatchmentAreas

5 Minute Drivetime

Income Household Size% Households with no vehicle Income Household Size

% Households with no vehicle

Supermarket Mean $46,682 2.78 7.25% Supermarket Mean $48,318 2.79 6.77%Range $15,787 - $84,278 2.05 - 3.45 0 - 39.6% Range $21,146 - $78,262 1.94 - 3.26 0 - 28.4%

MassMerchant Mean $38,997 2.74 8.86%Range $21,146 - $78,262 1.92 - 3.39 0 - 28.4%

122nd Ave Site Comparisons

Literatureshowedthathouseholdsizeisnegativelyandmedianincomeispositivelycorrelatedtothesekindsofstores,sowelookedtoourdemographicrastersintheseareas.TheFostersiteissimilartobothofthecomparisonsitesandlooksasthoughitmightbeabletosupporteitherkindofstore.Lookingbacktoouravailablesitesize,itappearedasthoughthemassmerchantstorewasnotagoodfit;however,asmallsupermarketmightbeapossibility.

Conclusions

Thesizeofthesitewoulddetermostsupermarketdevelopers,althoughasmentionedpreviously,thereareatleastthreeNewSeasonsMarketsinPortlandonlotssmallerthantheFostersite.Specialtystoresoftenrequiremuchlesslandthansupermarkets,though.Giventhedemographicsofthearea,webelieveaspecialtyethnicmarketwouldservetheareawell.Nextstepsforthisanalysiscouldincludeworkingwithsmallsupermarketdevelopersorwiththelocalbusinessdistrict

Page 14: Evaluating Grocery Store Siting

HeidiGueninandNathanMcNeilUSP543–FinalPaper

12/10/09

14

memberstoattractanappropriatespecialtystore.However,therewereseverallimitationstoouranalysis.Thereareundoubtedlyseveralgrocerystoresmissingfromthelist,andsupplementalfoodacquisitionlocations(suchasminimarts)werenottakenintoaccount.Inaddition,buildingsquarefootageplaysanimportantroleinstoresitingandinthevolumeofsalesneededtosupportastore.Thisanalysisoriginallyincludedsquarefootagefromtaxlotparcels,buthereagain,thedatawasincompleteandoftenincorrect.Thiswasparticularlytrueformixed‐usesites,wherethebuildingsizeoftenincludedallunitsonthesite,oratleastallcommercialunits.Mostshoppersfrequentmorethanonestore,andstorechoiceoftendependsonthenatureofthetrip.Inordertofullyunderstandthegroceryneedsinthearea,residentsurveysandmarket‐basketsurveyswouldneedtobecompleted.Interviewswithgrocerydevelopersandwiththeownersofexistingspecialtystorescouldprovidevaluableinsightintothedecision‐makingconstraintsthattheyface.ESRIGIStoolscanprovideapowerfulandflexiblewaytoanalyzedata,butforthisproject,thedataitselfwastoolimitedtogeneratearobustexamination.