Slide 1

Evaluating Coagulants for Water Treatment Kari Duncan City of Lake Oswego & Doug Wise Eugene Water & Electric Board PNWS-AWWA Section Conference May 2, 2008

Slide 2

Overview Varieties of Coagulants: Inorganic Organic Common Uses Case Studies: EWEB City of Lake Oswego

Slide 3

Entrance Strategy 1.Jar Test 2.Pilot Filter Evaluation 3.Cost Evaluation 4. Plant Scale Test

Slide 4

Entrance Strategy cont. 5.Plant Scale Trial 6.Calculate Real Cost 7.Evaluation Step Operational Effectiveness Operational Effectiveness Look for Unintended Consequences Look for Unintended Consequences

Slide 5

Aluminum Sulfate (Al 2 (SO 4 ) 3 14 H2O Inorganic coagulants aluminum sulfate, aluminum chloride and ferric compounds React with alkalinity to form positive ions which remove contaminants by adsorption. Increasing turbidity higher (sometimes dramatically higher) feed rates.

Slide 6

PACL (Polymeric Inorganic Coagulants) Generic name that encompasses ACH, Sumaclear, Pass-C and others Product variables: Basicity 50% 80 + % Basicity 50% 80 + % Al:Cl ratio Al:Cl ratio Al 2 O 3 content Al 2 O 3 content

Slide 7

PACL A highly charged species that require little or no alkalinity to precipitate floc. Due to the high charge of the PACLs dose may not increase as much during increasing contaminant loading

Slide 8

PACL : ACH PACL formula: Al2(OH) (X) Cl (6-x) Al:Cl ratio increases as basicity increases ACH special type of PACL Al:Cl ratio of 2:1 Al:Cl ratio of 2:1 Basicity of 83% Basicity of 83% Al 2 O 3 content of 23% Al 2 O 3 content of 23%

Slide 9

Molecular Weight Comparison Alum : max MW of 1,000 PACL: MW of 500 2,500 ACH: 4,000 5,000 (some up to 10,000)

Slide 10

Floc Size Inorganic coagulants (Alum), and low basicity PACL form more voluminous, fragile floc. With increasing charge, PACL tend to form smaller floc with greater density ACH forms a very tight, dense floc

Slide 11

Typical dosages Product sales advisors often quote an Aluminum percentage ratio For example, if the Al in the PACL is 4x that of Alum, they will cite an expected 25% of alum dosage. 50% basicity PACL; approx 80% of alum dosage ACH: approx 33% of alum dosage.

Slide 12

Coagulation Control Jar Mix Pilot Filters Stream Current Monitors Zeta Potentiometers

Slide 13

Coagulant Control: Jar Test

Slide 14

Coagulant Control: Control Filters

Slide 15

Coagulant Control: Current Monitor

Slide 16

Coagulant Control Jar Test: Remember to look for smaller denser floc due to high basicity denser floc due to high basicity when using high molecular when using high molecular weight products weight products Control Filters Streaming Current Monitor

Slide 17

Benefits Increased filter runs Reduced sludge generation Sludge compacts / dewaters better Greater turbidity removal capacity Effective in low water temperatures PACL does not lower pH

Slide 18

Check With Friends Drinking Water Program Bay Hills Water Association City of Creswell Garden Valley Water District City of Lowell City of Myrtle Point City of Waldport City of Yachats

Slide 19

Cautions What is in the magic elixir?

Slide 20

More Cautions! PACL products range in grade and composition; test product(s) extensively before committing to their use. Some products are sensitive to chlorine. Products which form a suspension or generate sludge after only six months of storage are very low grade.

Slide 21

Case Study #1 Eugene Water & Electric Boards Hayden Bridge Filtration Plant

Slide 22

Slide 23

EWEB 72 MGD Raw Water Flow (108 MGD in 2009) McKenzie River Source Direct Filtration (summer) Conventional Filtration (winter) Alum coagulant Pre-chlorinate Cl 2 gas 50% Caustic: corrosion control

Slide 24

EWEB 7 month trial of Sumaclear 1000 from Summit Research Lab Used Sumaclear predominantly through 2006. Trial examined cost and filter run times while maintaining existing filtered water turbidity goal of 0.035 NTU.

Slide 25

Slide 26

EWEB Field Results Sumaclear 1000 dose was approximately 1/3 of Alum with low raw water turbidity. With raw water turbidity above 4 ntu, Sumaclear 1000 was approximately 1/2 of Alum dose. Experienced longer filter runs with Sumaclear. Sumaclear resulted in an overall economic benefit (chemicals, wash water, sludge management) of approximately 20%.

Slide 27

EWEB Concerns Some changes in distribution water quality coincided with Summaclear 1000 trials. * Apparent DBP increase * Small Lead and Copper increase (may no longer be optimized)

Slide 28

EWEB Finds Fault A: We changed coagulant. B: Our system water quality changed. Therefore: the coagulant change made the system water quality change.

Slide 29

EWEB Review of JAWWA Article on Cl - / SO 4 Ratio Edwards & Triantafyllidou July 2007 as the relative concentration of chloride to sulfate increased in a water supply, a utility was more likely to have a higher 90 th -percentile lead concentration.

Slide 30

PACL : ACH PACL formula: Al2(OH) (X) Cl (6-x) Al:Cl ratio increases as basicity increases ACH special type of PACL Al:Cl ratio of 2:1 Al:Cl ratio of 2:1 Basicity of 83% Basicity of 83% Al 2 O 3 content of 23% Al 2 O 3 content of 23%

Slide 31

EWEB Not so fast.

Slide 32

There Are Other Considerations (EWEB) Multiple changes in treatment variables at the time of test: Added 15 MG Clearwell (May 2003) Added 15 MG Clearwell (May 2003) Changed chlorination practice (May 2004) Changed chlorination practice (May 2004) Switched from Lime to Caustic (July 2004) Switched from Lime to Caustic (July 2004) Switched from Alum to Sumaclear 1000 (2005-2006) Switched from Alum to Sumaclear 1000 (2005-2006)

Slide 33

EWEB Next Steps Continue Monitoring. Special Monitoring. Make Gradual Treatment Changes. Wait and Measure.

Slide 34

Case Study #2 City of Lake Oswego Water Treatment Plant

Slide 35

City of Lake Oswego Water Treatment Plant 16 MGD Clackamas River Source Direct Filtration Plant Alum (Coagulant) Pre-chlorinate with Hypochlorite Lime: corrosion control

Slide 36

City of Lake Oswego Feeds Alum alone during low turbidity. Feeds a combination of Alum and Pass-C (Hydortech product) during high turbidity events. Pass-C: Al = 5/4 % ?? Al = 5/4 % ?? Al2O3: 10.3% Al2O3: 10.3% Basicity: 55% Basicity: 55%

Slide 37

Slide 38

Slide 39

Slide 40

City of Lake Oswego Field Results The use of Pass-C at 3 to 11 mg/L decreases Alum use by up to (75%)* during periods of high raw water turbidity. The use of Pass-C at high turbidity prevents the need for Operators to add additional alkalinity. Improves ease of operation Cost differences appear to be nominal * Rough number

Slide 41

City of Lake Oswego Summary Wide variety of products available. Trial runs are very important. Control your variables. Perform a cost analysis. Shop around and do your research.

Slide 42

Lessons Learned From Coagulant Trials Intuitive expectations may be erroneous.

Slide 43

Lessons Learned Changes in the distribution system may result from changes in treatment at the plant.

Slide 44

Lessons Learned Unknown, unreported and / or undocumented consequences may be common.

Slide 45

Lessons Learned Change only ONE thing at a time.

Slide 46

Lessons Learned Wait Measure Interpret

Slide 47

Acknowledgements Kari Duncan for her work in documenting these results. Randy Prock for developing the data at Hayden Bridge. The Operators at both plants for their patience and persistence.

Slide 48

Questions?