Eutrophication and Algal Proliferation in Florida’s Springs Forest Hydrology Spring 2014.

30
Eutrophication and Algal Proliferation in Florida’s Springs Forest Hydrology Spring 2014

Transcript of Eutrophication and Algal Proliferation in Florida’s Springs Forest Hydrology Spring 2014.

Page 1: Eutrophication and Algal Proliferation in Florida’s Springs Forest Hydrology Spring 2014.

Eutrophication and Algal Proliferation in Florida’s Springs

Forest HydrologySpring 2014

Page 2: Eutrophication and Algal Proliferation in Florida’s Springs Forest Hydrology Spring 2014.

Water Quality and Aquatic Health

• Tenet #1: Contaminants from land end up in the water– Industrial, urban, agricultural chemicals

• Tenet #2: Aquatic systems may respond, often in undesirable ways

• Habitat viability• Aesthetics (color, aroma, clarity)• Function (support C storage, N removal, flow)• Human use potential (e.g., drinking or irrigation water)

Page 3: Eutrophication and Algal Proliferation in Florida’s Springs Forest Hydrology Spring 2014.

Eutrophication

• Def: Excess C fixation– Primary production is

stimulated. Can be a good thing (e.g., more fish)

– Can induce changes in dominant primary producers (e.g., algae vs. rooted plants)

– Can alter dissolved oxygen dynamics (nighttime lows)• Fish and invertebrate impacts• Changes in color, clarity, aroma

Page 4: Eutrophication and Algal Proliferation in Florida’s Springs Forest Hydrology Spring 2014.
Page 5: Eutrophication and Algal Proliferation in Florida’s Springs Forest Hydrology Spring 2014.

More P

Less P

http://www.sjrwmd.com/publications/pdfs/fs_lapopka.pdf

Reduction in Water Clarity = Changes

in Bottom Habitats

Page 6: Eutrophication and Algal Proliferation in Florida’s Springs Forest Hydrology Spring 2014.

Eutrophication may stimulate the growth of algae that produce harmful toxins

Red Tide

Page 7: Eutrophication and Algal Proliferation in Florida’s Springs Forest Hydrology Spring 2014.

Dead Zone in the Gulf of Mexico

http://serc.carleton.edu/microbelife/topics/deadzone/

Page 8: Eutrophication and Algal Proliferation in Florida’s Springs Forest Hydrology Spring 2014.

Scope of the Problem in Florida

Source: USEPA (http://iaspub.epa.gov/waters10/state_rept.control?p_state=FL&p_cycle=2002)

Page 9: Eutrophication and Algal Proliferation in Florida’s Springs Forest Hydrology Spring 2014.

What Causes Eutrophication?

• Leibig’s “Law of the Minimum”– Some element (or light

or water) limits primary production

– Adding that thing will increase yields (GPP)

– What is limiting in forests? Crops? Lakes? Pelagic ocean?

Justus von Liebig

Page 10: Eutrophication and Algal Proliferation in Florida’s Springs Forest Hydrology Spring 2014.

What Limits Aquatic Production?

Page 11: Eutrophication and Algal Proliferation in Florida’s Springs Forest Hydrology Spring 2014.

Typical Symptoms: Alleviation of Nutrient Limitation

(GPP)

• Phosphorus limitation in shallow temperate lakes

• Nitrogen limitation in estuarine systems

V. Smith, L&O 2006V. Smith, L&O 1982

Page 12: Eutrophication and Algal Proliferation in Florida’s Springs Forest Hydrology Spring 2014.

Global Nitrogen Enrichment

• Humans have massively amplified global N cycle– Terrestrial Inputs

• 1890: ~ 150 Tg N yr-1

• 2005: ~ 290+ Tg N yr-1

– River Outputs• 1890: ~ 30 Tg N yr-1

• 2005: ~ 60+ Tg N yr-1

• N frequently limits terrestrial and aquatic primary production– Eutrophication

Gruber and Galloway 2008

Page 13: Eutrophication and Algal Proliferation in Florida’s Springs Forest Hydrology Spring 2014.

Local Nitrogen Enrichment• The Floridan Aquifer (our

primary water source) is:– Vulnerable to nitrate

contamination– Locally enriched as much as

30,000% over background (~ 50-100 ppb as N)

• Springs are sentinels of aquifer pollution– Florida has world’s highest

density of 1st magnitude springs (> 100 cfs)

Arthur et al. 2006

Page 14: Eutrophication and Algal Proliferation in Florida’s Springs Forest Hydrology Spring 2014.

Weeki Wachee20011950’s

Mission Springs Chassowitzka (T. Frazer)

Weeki Wachee

Mill Pond Spring

Page 15: Eutrophication and Algal Proliferation in Florida’s Springs Forest Hydrology Spring 2014.

GROW FASTER LOST MORE SLOWLY

Core Question:

What Causes Algae to Reach Nuisance Levels?

Page 16: Eutrophication and Algal Proliferation in Florida’s Springs Forest Hydrology Spring 2014.

• Hnull: N loading alleviated GPP limitation, algae exploded (conventional wisdom)

• Evidence generally runs counter to this hypothesis– Springs were light limited even at low concentrations (Odum 1957)– Algal cover/AFDM is uncorrelated with [NO3] (Stevenson et al. 2004)

– Flowing water mesocosms show algal growth saturation at ~ 110 ppb (Albertin et al. 2007)

– Nuisance algae exists principally near the spring vents, high nitrate persists downstream (Stevenson et al. 2004)

Page 17: Eutrophication and Algal Proliferation in Florida’s Springs Forest Hydrology Spring 2014.

N Enrichment in Springs

From Stevenson et al. 2004 Ecological condition of algae and nutrients in Florida Springs DEP Contract #WM858

Fall 2002 (closed circles) and Spring 2003 (open triangles)

No correlation between algae and N

Page 18: Eutrophication and Algal Proliferation in Florida’s Springs Forest Hydrology Spring 2014.

N Enrichment and Primary Production[No Significant Association]

• More N does not mean more GPP

(GPP)

Page 19: Eutrophication and Algal Proliferation in Florida’s Springs Forest Hydrology Spring 2014.

Alexander Springs (50 ppb N-NO3)

Visualizing the Problem

Silver Springs (1,400 ppb N-NO3)

Page 20: Eutrophication and Algal Proliferation in Florida’s Springs Forest Hydrology Spring 2014.

Qualitative Insight: Comparing Assimilatory Demand vs. Load

• Primary Production is very high– 8-20 g O2/m2/d (ca. 1,500 g C/m2/yr)

• N demand is proportional– 0.05 – 0.15 g N/m2/day

• N flux (over 5,000 m reach) is large– Now: ca. 30 g N/m2/d (240 x Ua)

– Before: ca. 2.5 g N/m2/d (20 x Ua)

• In rivers, the salient measure of availability may be flux (not concentration)

• Because of light limitation, this is best indexed to demand

• When does flux:demand become critical?

Page 21: Eutrophication and Algal Proliferation in Florida’s Springs Forest Hydrology Spring 2014.

Back to First Principles:Controls on Algal Biomass

bottom up effects

top down effects

Algae Biomass

Grazers Flow RatesDissolved Oxygen

Nutrients Light

mediating factors

Page 22: Eutrophication and Algal Proliferation in Florida’s Springs Forest Hydrology Spring 2014.

Algal Loss Rates - Scouring

• Flow has widely declined, in areas a lot– Silver Springs– White Springs– Kissingen Spring

• Lower discharge means lower scour

• Algal cover varies with flow velocity (King 2014)

Page 23: Eutrophication and Algal Proliferation in Florida’s Springs Forest Hydrology Spring 2014.

Algal Loss Rates - Grazing

• Algal cover is predicted by:– Dissolved oxygen (DO)– Grazer density

• DO is keystone variable for aquatic animal health– Proxy for groundwater age?

Page 24: Eutrophication and Algal Proliferation in Florida’s Springs Forest Hydrology Spring 2014.

Observational Evidence:Grazers and Algae are Correlated

Liebowitz et al. (in review)

Threshold effect?

~ 20 g m-2

Combined model (snails, flow, light) explains over 50% of algae variation

Snail Biomass (g m-2)

Alg

ae B

iom

ass

(g m

-2)

Page 25: Eutrophication and Algal Proliferation in Florida’s Springs Forest Hydrology Spring 2014.

Experimental Evidence: Snails Control Algae

• Enclosed & excluded snails

Liebowitz et al. (in prep)

0 50 100 150 200 250 300 3500

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

f(x) = 2.46086606987551 exp( − 0.00313473225145049 x )R² = 0.640491892532922

f(x) = 12.8376995134515 exp( − 0.00459539280306784 x )R² = 0.55239167058656

f(x) = 14.9535593057998 exp( − 0.00782615105298781 x )R² = 0.847684879293451

f(x) = 38.1271888766727 exp( − 0.00923800694915261 x )R² = 0.934313949655305

HS

Expo-nential (HS)

GF

Expo-nential (GF)

MP

Expo-nential (MP)

ST

Gastropod wet weight (g m-2)

Alg

ae

AF

DM

(g

m-2

)

Page 26: Eutrophication and Algal Proliferation in Florida’s Springs Forest Hydrology Spring 2014.

Observational Evidence:What Controls Snails?

• Changes in DO– Flow varying?

• Changes in salinity & [Ca++]• Human disturbance• Snail density model r2 > 0.6

– Dissolved oxygen– Salinity– pH– Light– SAV

Liebowitz et al. (in review)

Strong (2004)

Page 27: Eutrophication and Algal Proliferation in Florida’s Springs Forest Hydrology Spring 2014.

Evidence of Alternative States

Experiment 1 – Low Initial Algae: Intermediate density of snails able to control algal accumulation.

Experiment 2 – High Initial Algae: No density of snails capable of controlling accumulation.

Shape of hysteresis is site dependent.

Page 28: Eutrophication and Algal Proliferation in Florida’s Springs Forest Hydrology Spring 2014.

Summary

• Nitrate is a poor predictor of algal abundance– Load >> Demand (N is, and may have always been

sufficient to satisfy all ecosystem demand)• Grazers exert a dominant control on algae

– Evidence of “escape density” thresholds that are really important for management

• Dissolved oxygen (among other things) impacts grazers– Even short term stress has lasting impacts, in part

because algal biomass can escape control

Page 29: Eutrophication and Algal Proliferation in Florida’s Springs Forest Hydrology Spring 2014.

Complex Ecological Causes