Europeana Research

17
Europeana Research Alastair Dunning The Hague, January 2013

description

Presentation by Alastair Dunning

Transcript of Europeana Research

Page 1: Europeana Research

Europeana Research

Alastair Dunning

The Hague, January 2013

Page 2: Europeana Research

What’s the problem ?

The Research Community, particularly the burgeoning digital humanities community, are one of the obvious natural end user groups for Europeana

Yet current Europeana.eu portal is not really a destination site for scholars

Europeana Research is the solution to this.

So what precisely is Europeana Research ?

Page 3: Europeana Research

Defining Europeana Research

Um ... we don’t quite know at the moment.

But we do have some places to start and potential options to follow

Page 4: Europeana Research

1. Helping researchers find non-digitised content

Via the European Library (the Europeana hub for libraries), we have access to >100m bibliographic records drawn from European national libraries

Apex (the hub for archives) is aggregating finding aids from archives throughout the continent.

Unlike, the existing europeana.eu portal, Europeana Research could work on make such descriptions interoperable and allowing researchers to search through non-digitised content

For example: the current CENDARI project is gathering archival descriptions and library metadata related to World War One and holdings of medieval manuscripts

Page 5: Europeana Research

1. Helping researchers find non-digitised content

Pros:

Can build on existing TEL collection

Defined scholarly need

Technically not too complex (except for metadata)

Cons:

Defined scholarly need exists but is a bit niche

Ingestion of new content is slow and incremental

Metadata interoperability is complex

Needs richer metadata than present ?

Page 6: Europeana Research

2. Building corpora of digitised primary sources

But will a focus on non-digitised content meet scholarly demand ?

Europeana Research could concentrate on collecting corpora of related material that benefits from aggregation (full-text documents, digging into data type datasets)

This would allow scholars much greater power in resource discovery.

One current example: The Europeana Newspapers project will aggregate historical newspapers and allow end users to search through full text and metadata (similar to Chronicling America)

Page 7: Europeana Research

2. Building corpora of digitised primary sources

Pros:

Meets scholarly demand and expectationsEarly ingest of important corpora could create quick wins and visibilityFits in with Cloud and Newspapers project

Cons:

Technical complexity, particularly in terms of storageDifferent formats (e.g. newspapers, manuscripts) require interface tweakingWhere to start ? Focus on collection certain collections at the start may alienate certain domainsPlenty of work to curate collections

Page 8: Europeana Research

3. Building tools to exploit digital content

Europeana Research could also ensure access to aggregated content is exposed via APIs

This would allow third parties to build scholarly tools related to such content

For example, tools that would permit the online visualisation, transcription or analysis of metadata and content that is held centrally by Europeana.

An example: A third party could build on a transcription tool on a set of printed documents held in Europeana. The resulting transcription would be added to the metadata Europeana has for that object

Page 9: Europeana Research

3. Building tools to exploit digital content

Pros:

Tools are developed and maintained by third parties. Burden of sustainability is not on us

Can enrich content in new ways – this might also persuade content owners to share more content with Europeana

Fits in with Cloud project

Cons:

Depends on ingest of content (i.e. slide number 2) for tools to be effective

Page 10: Europeana Research

4. Providing a safe house for in copyright material

Much digitised content is of interest to scholars but behind rights agreements

Europeana Research could act as a safehouse for cultural institutions and rights holders who are happy to share their content for research purposes but not for ‘general’ use

Europeana Research could provide the necessary trust and authentication mechanisms to channel content to the scholarly community (or indeed other specific communities)

Page 11: Europeana Research

4. Providing a safe house for in copyright material

Pros:

Meets definite scholarly and publishers’ needEuropeana perhaps the only body that can do this at an international level Partially fits in with Cloud

Cons:

May require complex technical requirements (e.g. authentication)Might possible be for a small user group within research community ?Going against an open philosophy ?Complex licensing arrangements

Page 12: Europeana Research

5. Linking primary source objects with secondary sources

Europeana Research could take the metadata from Europeana.eu and enriches it to the links from secondary sources (e.g. journals, monographs, theses) These enriched links are represented in an advanced version of Europeana.eu

For example, the metadata for a painting would be enriched with links to journal articles where that painting is mentioned

Pros : Meets scholarly need for searching over different datatypes

Cons: Complex to extract entities.

End service is nice to have but not essential.

Page 13: Europeana Research

6. Hosting reference data

Europeana Research hosts thesauri, ontologies and other reference services developed by digital humanities projects (e.g. The Pelagios project of classical world place names, http://pelagios-project.blogspot.nl/p/about-pelagios.html_

For example, dictionary of European historic place names could be maintained by a third party but published by Europeana

Pros : Meets scholarly need for sustaining references sources

Europeana is one of few trusted bodies that could play this role

Cons: Perhaps a niche demand

End service is nice to have but not essential.

Page 14: Europeana Research

5. Linking primary source objects with secondary sources

Europeana Research could take the metadata from Europeana.eu and enriches it to the links from secondary sources (e.g. journals, monographs, theses) These enriched links are represented in an advanced version of Europeana.eu

For example, the metadata for a painting would be enriched with links to journal articles where that painting is mentioned

Page 15: Europeana Research

The Opportunity - How we will achieve this

Europeana Cloud project - 3 year project starting in 2013

Building a shared back-end infrastructure for trusted members from Europeana’s network of cultural heritage institutions.

It will explore some of the issues raised in this presentation

• Developing a Europeana Research platform

• Ingesting and then providing access to content not just metadata

• Building tools on top of content and metadata

• Expanding the Europeana Data Agreement for content

Page 16: Europeana Research

What we need to do today – The Vision

What is our vision for Europeana Research ?

What do we want to achieve in

6 months

18 months

36 months

In the long term all the options are interesting and worth following. But to have any kind of impact, we need to be able to offer engaging content / metadata for researchers. Moving quickly to achieve some early wins will be vital for Europeana Research / TEL.

Page 17: Europeana Research

I hope that makes a little bit of sense