European crop wild relative diversity and conservation

14
European crop wild relative diversity and conservation Brian Ford-Lloyd, Shelagh Kell and Nigel Maxted University of Birmingham, UK

description

European crop wild relative diversity and conservation. Brian Ford-Lloyd, Shelagh Kell and Nigel Maxted University of Birmingham, UK. PGR Forum participants:. National and regional institutes from 21 European countries + IPGRI + IUCN. Five work packages. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of European crop wild relative diversity and conservation

Page 1: European crop wild relative diversity and conservation

European crop wild relative diversity and

conservationBrian Ford-Lloyd, Shelagh

Kell and Nigel MaxtedUniversity of Birmingham,

UK

Page 2: European crop wild relative diversity and conservation

PGR Forum participants:

• National and regional institutes from 21 European countries

• + IPGRI• + IUCN

Page 3: European crop wild relative diversity and conservation

Five work packages

• European crop wild relative assessment

• Threat and conservation assessment• In situ data management

methodologies• Population management

methodologies• Genetic erosion and genetic pollution

methodologies

Page 4: European crop wild relative diversity and conservation

What is a crop wild relative (CWR)?

• A crop wild relative is a wild plant taxon that has an indirect use derived from its relatively close genetic relationship to a crop;

• this relationship is defined in terms of the CWR belonging to gene pools 1 or 2, or taxon groups 1 to 4 of the crop

Page 5: European crop wild relative diversity and conservation

Gene pools? Taxon groups?

• GP-1 cultivated forms and the wild or weedy forms of the crop;

• GP-2 includes the coenospecies (gene transfer possible)

• GP-3 includes species from which gene transfer is impossible

• Taxon Group 1a: the crop• Taxon Group 1b: same

species as crop• Taxon Group 2: same

series or section• Taxon Group 3: same

subgenus• Taxon Group 4: same

genus• Taxon Group 5: different

genus to the crop

Page 6: European crop wild relative diversity and conservation

The European CWR Database

CWR catalogueCrops and their wild relative species

+ uses

CWR case studiesCollection of in-depth data

for selected taxa to illustrate thedata model

MetadataLinks to external data

sources ie. developmentof the “real” CWRinformation system

User requirements+

Data standards

Page 7: European crop wild relative diversity and conservation

How to generate the CWR list?

Genera fromMansfeld’s World

Database

Forestry and ornamentalgenera

CWR genera

Euro+Med PlantBasespecies

List of CWR species

Page 8: European crop wild relative diversity and conservation

Data sources

• Two major databases:– Euro+Med PlantBase (www.euromed.org.uk)

– Mansfeld’s World Database of Agricultural and

Horticultural Crops (http://mansfeld.ipk-gatersleben.de/)

• Forestry genera:

– Schultze-Motel (1966) (Enumeration of cultivated

forest plant species

• Ornamental genera:– Community Plant Variety Office (www.cpvo.eu.int)

Page 9: European crop wild relative diversity and conservation

CWR list Ver.3.1: summary statistics

Families Genera Species

E+M filtered 215 2,422 30,729

Crops (Mansfeld) 157 843 19,091

Forestry 54 135 2,798

Ornamental 87 227 7,388

All groups 164 920* 20,127

*106 genera are common to Mansfeld and forestry lists; 166 genera are common to Mansfeld and ornamental lists

Page 10: European crop wild relative diversity and conservation

Further work on the CWR list

• Establishment of Population Management Methodologies

• Genetic Erosion and Pollution Assessment Methodologies

• Threat and Conservation Assessment

• But……………

Page 11: European crop wild relative diversity and conservation

These tasks are substantial

• There are over 20,000 CWR species in Europe

• These must be prioritised• How to do?

Page 12: European crop wild relative diversity and conservation

Prioritisation is needed:

• Which species are under greatest threat

– Red data assessment?

• Need for indicators of loss/erosion

– In reality proxy indicators of genetic erosion

• Prioritise in terms of economic importance?

Page 13: European crop wild relative diversity and conservation

CBD 2010 targets and WS5

A: Focal area

Status and trendsof the componentsof biological diversity

Threats to biodiversity

A: Focal area

Status and trendsof the componentsof biological diversity

Threats to biodiversity

B: Indicator forimmediate testing

Trends in abundanceand distribution ofselected species

B: Indicator forimmediate testing

Trends in abundanceand distribution ofselected species

C: Possibleindicators (require further development)

Trends in genetic diversity of ....cultivated plants...

Number and costof alien invasions

C: Possibleindicators (require further development)

Trends in genetic diversity of ....cultivated plants...

Number and costof alien invasions

CWR list &Euro+Med

CWR list &Euro+Med

Page 14: European crop wild relative diversity and conservation

Crop Wild Relative CoreDatabase

Names of crops and theirwild relatives; uses; degree

of relatedness (geneticand/or taxonomic)

Euro+ MedPlantBase

Nomenclature

Mansfeld’s World Databaseof Agricultural andHorticultural Crops

Crop names; uses; cultivationhistory; domestication;

references; images

Ancillary datasource 1

Ancillary datasource 2

Ancillary datasource 3

Ancillary datasource 4

EURISCO

Ex SituCollections in

Europe

Ancillary datasource n……..

Crop Wild RelativeData Users

Crop Wild RelativeData Users