EUROPEAN COMMUNITY CONTRIBUTION AGREEMENT€¦ · in Eastern Europe, the Caucasus and Central...
Transcript of EUROPEAN COMMUNITY CONTRIBUTION AGREEMENT€¦ · in Eastern Europe, the Caucasus and Central...
EUROPEAN COMMUNITY CONTRIBUTION AGREEMENT
WITH AN INTERNATIONAL ORGANISATION
EUROPEAID / DCI-ENV / 2011 / 260-062
OECD - UNECE ANNUAL NARRATIVE REPORT
(June 2015-May 2016)
January 2017
Table of contents
1. Background of the project ...................................................................................... 3 2. Summary of progress during the review period of June 2015-May 2016 ............. 4 3. Detailed report on the implementation of the Project during the review period of
June 2015-May 2016 .................................................................................................. 6
3.1 Work package 1: Promoting the political commitment in EECCA countries at
national level towards action and innovation-oriented partnership ....................... 6 3.2 Work package 2: Development of a robust analytical basis to substantiate
policy dialogues; elaboration of the policy packages ............................................ 7 3.3 Work package 3 (Benchmarking and exchange of experiences) ................... 20
The second benchmarking report “Implementation of the Basin Management Principle
in Eastern Europe, the Caucasus and Central Asia” was released in May 2016, written
by Peep Mardiste and UNECE consultant Vahagn Tonoyan. While the first report
from 2014 gave an overview of implementation of all key IWRM principles in the
region, the 2016 benchmarking report concentrated on the key principle of IWRM –
adoption and implementation of the basin principle. The Study was released in
English and Russian. .................................................................................................... 20 3.4 Work package 4 (Dissemination of project information and stakeholder
involvement) ........................................................................................................ 22
4. Difficulties encountered and measures taken to overcome problems .................. 24 5. Changes introduced in the project implementation ............................................. 24
6. Achievements and results .................................................................................... 24
1. Background of the project
The project “Support to the EU Water Initiative in Eastern Europe, the Caucasus and Central
Asia (EECCA)” aimed to assist the countries in the region in adopting a more integrated
approach to water management, addressing the current fragmentation of water resource
management and improving multi-stakeholder participation. It aimed to identify and remove
the key hurdles that impede the deployment of integrated water resources management
(IWRM), while reflecting countries' level of socio-economic development. The project also
contributed to achieving progress towards water-related Millennium Development Goals
(MDGs) in the EECCA countries as well as specific targets on water management set up in
the EU policies and programmes, including the EU Water Policy, the EU Neighbourhood
Policy, the EU Eastern Partnership and the EU Central Asia Strategy programmes. The
project was a regional component of the European Union’s Water Initiative (EUWI)1 focused
on EECCA and built upon outcomes and the political momentum initiated by the OECD and
UNECE under the EU-funded contract DCI-ENV/2008/149-674, carried out in 2008-2012.
That project supported mapping of the situation and initiation of National Policy Dialogues on
water in eight EECCA countries. Follow-up in the EU Neighbourhood region will be
guaranteed through EUWI+ project, starting in September 2016.
The activities carried out under the Project supported the National Policy Dialogues (NPDs)
on integrated water resources management (IWRM) and water supply and sanitation (WSS) in
ten EECCA countries: Armenia, Azerbaijan, Georgia, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, the Republic
of Moldova, Russia, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan and Ukraine. The project also aimed to launch
and implement National Policy Dialogues in Belarus and Uzbekistan. The NPDs helped
elaborate policy packages (government strategies, laws, regulations), as well as monitor
implementation of the adopted policy packages; the latter was essential, as implementation
remains a major bottleneck in EECCA countries. The NPDs also served as national
mechanisms for coordination of the development aid and technical assistance in the water
sector. They contributed to a more efficient use of the EU and other donors’ technical co-
operation in the region.
Another specific objective of the project was to support the organisation of annual meetings
of the EUWI EECCA Working Group, which serves as a platform for regional dissemination
and sharing of lessons learned and experience gathered during the implementation of the
Project.
The implementation of the project was facilitated by the Organisation for Economic Co-
operation and Development (OECD) and the United Nations Economic Commission for
Europe (UNECE). The OECD was the strategic partner for economic and financial aspects of
water resources management, including water supply and sanitation. The UNECE was the
strategic partner for integrated water resources management.
1 The European Union’s Water Initiative (EUWI) is a political initiative which seeks to assist
partner countries in the development and implementation of policies, strategies and priorities
for the water and sanitation sector which donors could align with and support. The Initiative
ensures that existing resources are more effectively utilised and new resources are attracted in
the sector to meet the specific requirements of individual developing countries and river basin
organisations.
2. Summary of progress during the review period of June 2015-May
2016
Overall, substantial progress was made during the reporting period of 1 June 2015 - 31 May
2016 on all project elements resulting in important outputs and progress in reforming water
policies in individual countries and at the regional level. The key achievements of the
reporting period included:
National Policy Dialogues (NPDs) were active in ten countries2. As part of the project
12 high-level NPD Steering Committee meetings were organised in 7 countries (see
Section 3.1);
A regional EUWI EECCA Working Group meeting, organised on 12-13 May 2016 in
Paris to discuss results of the project and launch plans of the EUWI+ project;
New Water Code of Turkmenistan was passed to Parliament (was finally adopted after
completion of the project, in October 2016);
Two new by-laws to the national water law were drafted in Georgia;
National targets under the Protocol on Water and Health were drafted in Azerbaijan
and Georgia;
National Policy Dialogue was used as platform to discuss transboundary cooperation
and/or treaties between following countries: Georgia-Armenia, Georgia-Azerbaijan,
Kazakhstan-Russia, Kazakhstan-Kyrgyzstan;
The development of a policy package including methodological guidelines for setting
fee rates for the use of surface water resources and water bodies in the Kyrgyz
Republic, as well as draft Government Resolution on approval of the methodology.
A number of reports and other materials on project-related activities were prepared
and used to communicate policy-relevant results of, and lessons learnt from, this
Project and disseminate them in EECCA countries (see Sections 3.3 and 3.4).
In addition to the analytical work and support to the NPDs, the OECD and UNECE have
organised, and contributed to, a number of meetings during the reporting period, highlighting
findings and achievements of the current Project:
Plenary discussion and side event at the 7th Meeting of Parties (MOP) of the Water
Convention (17-18 November 2015, Budapest);
Contribution to the World Water Week 2016 (28 August 2016, Stockholm);
Training on implementation of modern irrigation technologies organised in
Kyrgyzstan (18 March 2016, Bishkek).
A Communication Strategy of the Project was implemented through a number of targeted
priority actions. These included:
Regular meetings of the Steering groups in the countries. Relevant representatives of
the target groups were systematically invited, in particular: national authorities in
charge of water-related activities; permanent delegations of the European
Commission to EECCA countries; and permanent representatives of other donors and
IOs active on water issues.
2 These are: Armenia, Azerbaijan, Georgia, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Moldova, Tajikistan,
Turkmenistan and Ukraine; and at a sub-sovereign level in Russia (Republic of Buryatia, Lake
Baikal basin).
A continuous update of the EUWI EECCA web site
(http://www.oecd.org/env/outreach/partnership-eu-water-initiative-euwi.htm),
The updating of the brochure on the achievements of the EUWI in EECCA in 2006-
2016
(https://issuu.com/oecd.publishing/docs/euwi_report_layout_english_june_01.)
Dissemination of the results of the Project during a number of events where the
OECD and UNECE participated.
3. Detailed report on the implementation of the Project during the
review period of June 2015-May 2016
3.1 Work package 1: Promoting the political commitment in EECCA countries
at national level towards action and innovation-oriented partnership
Work package 1 aimed at strengthening the political commitment of governments in EECCA
countries to water sector reforms through high-level policy and expert dialogues on water
policies in individual countries. During the reporting period the implementation of this
objective was supported by the following activities:
Continuous support to high-level policy dialogues through organisation of twelve
meetings of the National Policy Dialogues (NPD) Steering Committees in eight
countries:
o 13 November 2015, Moldova: 22nd NPD Steering Committee meeting
o 30 November 2015, Kyrgyzstan: 13th NPD Steering Committee meeting
o 2 December 2015, Kazakhstan: 3rd NPD Steering Committee working
meeting
o 3 December 2015, Tajikistan: 9th NPD Steering Committee meeting
o 14 December 2015, Armenia: 14th NPD Steering Committee meeting
o 25 February 2016, Azerbaijan: 5th NPD Steering Committee meeting
o 5 April 2016, Georgia: 4th NPD Steering Committee meeting
o 12 April 2016, Tajikistan: 10th NPD Steering Committee meeting
o 15 April 2016, Kyrgyzstan: 14th NPD Steering Committee meeting
o 26 April 2016, Armenia: 15th NPD Steering Committee meeting
o 26 May 2016, Moldova: 23rd NPD Steering Committee meeting
o 30-31 May 2016, Kazakhstan: 3rd NPD Steering Committee meeting
Note: Support to the NPD in Moldova was provided by assisting the Ministry of Environment
in drafting new regulation on the NPD Coordination (Steering) Committee (updated
composition and mandate). The regulation was approved by respective ministerial ordinance
issued in March 2016.
Organisation of expert meetings on selected priority topics:
Expert workshop in Bishkek on 14 April, 2016 on assisting Kyrgyzstan in developing
methodologies for the introduction of new economic instruments for water resource
management.
Reaching out to senior policy makers to build support to the NPDs and EUWI
EECCA activities3, including meetings with:
o Minister of Foreign Affairs, Turkmenistan (Mr. Rashid Meredov)
o Minister of Energy and Water, Tajikistan (Mr. Usmonali Usmanzoda)
o Minister of Environment, Moldova (Mr Munteanu)
o Minister of Agriculture and Water Resources, Turkmenistan (Mr. Nursahet
Sapardurdyyev)
o Acting Minister of Environment, Ukraine (Mr. Sergey Kurykin)
o Chairman of the State Committee on Water Systems of the Ministry of
Agriculture, Armenia (Mr. Aram Haroutunyan)
o First Deputy Minister of Environment Protection and Natural Resources,
Georgia (Mr. Teimuraz Murgulia)
o First Deputy Minister of Energy and Water, Tajikistan (Mr. Sulton
Rahimzoda) o Deputy Minister of Economy, responsible for the energy sector, Kyrgyzstan (Mr.
Dzunushaliev)
o Deputy Minister of Agriculture, Kazakhstan (Mr. Yerlan Nysanbaev)
o Deputy Minister of Environment, Moldova (Mr. Andrian Delinschi)
o Deputy Minister of Nature Protection, Armenia (Mr. Khachik Hakobyan)
o Director of State Sanitary and Epidemiological Surveillance Service of the
Ministry of Health, Tajikistan (Mr. Kholmakhmad Nazarov)
o Deputy chair of the Water Resources Committee, Kazakhstan (Mr. Bekniyaz)
Detailed country specific activities carried out under this Work package are presented under
Work package 2 (Section 3.2).
3.2 Work package 2: Development of a robust analytical basis to substantiate
policy dialogues; elaboration of the policy packages
Work package 2 aimed at supporting analytical work to prepare policy packages for the
NPDs. The activities were carried out under three actions:
Action 2.1: preparation of the policy packages on water policy reforms (IWRM and
WSS);
Action 2.2: strengthening the use of economic instruments in water policies;
Action 2.3: promoting sound business models and realistic financial plans for water
supply and sanitation policies.
An overview of activities for each country under the Work Packages 1 and 2 are presented
below.
3 It is especially important as neither OECD nor UNECE have offices in the countries and have limited
opportunities to meet senior officials regularly.
Armenia (AM)4
The NPD process was re-started in autumn of 2015 after the Ministry of Nature Protection
had lost interest in NPD process in early 2015 due to the changes in the management of the
Ministry. In summer 2015, the State Committee of Water Systems of the Ministry of
Agriculture indicated its readiness to lead the NPD process and managed to get all
participating ministries to re-nominate their members. A Steering Committee meeting was
organised on 14 December 2015 after a year-long pause. A subsequent NPD Steering
Committee meeting took place on 26 April 2016.
During the reporting period, the UNECE concentrated its support in Armenia to the
implementation of the UNECE Protocol on Water and Health. Back in December 2014
national targets were set and an action plan for achieving them was adopted. Constant
discussion was maintained with different ministries to push for formal adoption of targets and
for ratification of the Protocol. In January 2016, the Ministry of Nature Protection failed with
a formal request to the Ministry of Foreign Affairs to speed up the process. Unfortunately, it
did not result in action by the end of the reporting period. Formal approval of the drafted
targets and the ratification of the Protocol would help in coordinating and monitoring the
activities of different national agencies providing access to quality drinking water and
reducing water-borne diseases.
As announced at the 26 April 2016 NPD Steering Committee, an institutional reform in the
water sector in Armenia will reach a new milestone in 2017 with the enactment of provisions
on drinking water. As a result, a single water service operator will be chosen to supply
drinking water for the entire country5, instead of the five separate companies operating
previously. Importantly, the new operator will be required to provide water to some 500
communities that are not currently served by operators. The provision of wastewater services
in some settlements might also be included in the contract of the future service provider, a
requirement that does not exist in current contracts with service providers. Although the
coverage with improved sanitation for urban dwellers is 96%, the proper treatment of
wastewater is largely absent in Armenia.
The study on environmental and economic value of water was launched by the OECD as per
the ad-hoc request of the Armenian water authorities. Managing water demand and efficient
allocation of water resources across competing uses is a pre-condition for economic growth,
and assessment of the use and non-use values of water resources is crucial to support the
revision of current water prices. Water has environmental and economic value when used and
even when not used – this principle is clearly stated in the Water Code of Armenia, but at the
moment this principle is not fully implemented due to insufficient knowledge on
environmental and economic value of water. First results of the study were presented at the
NPD meeting in spring 2016. The results were still preliminary, as some uncertainties still
held for some of the data used in the calculations. Nevertheless, these preliminary results
already provided e.g. good indications of the value of water in agriculture. This study was
completed in June 2016.
4 See also http://www.unece.org/env/water/npd/countrydialogues/am
5 A 15-year lease contract with VEOLIA was signed in November 2016. The operator was selected
through a competitive international tender.
Table 1. Armenia – highlights of the activity period 01.06.2015-31.05.2016
Focus of activities Activities carried out Outputs
Ratification of the
Protocol on Water
and Health
Negotiations with relevant
ministries to push for the
ratification.
Decision of the 14.12.2015
Steering Committee “The
Steering Committee stresses
the importance to continuing
the works towards ratification
of the Protocol in Armenia, as
well as formal adoption of the
targets either through
Government Resolution or
Government of Armenia
Protocol Session Resolution.“
Support to the
reform of economic
instruments for
water resources
management
Assessment of the use and
non-use values of water
resources to support the
revision of current water
prices
Results of the study are
currently being considered by
the State Committee of Water
Systems to revise the bulk
water tariffs for the irrigation
sector of Armenia (specifically
in the Ararat valley).
The activities in Armenia over the reporting period contributed to Action 2.1 (preparation of
the policy packages on water policy reforms) and Action 2.2 (strengthening the use of
economic instruments in water policies).
The implementation of the Protocol on Water and Health contributes to achieving water-
related MDGs (and future SDGs) in Armenia as one of the Overall Objectives of the present
project (see attached Logical Framework of the Project). UNECE started a project “Self-
Assessment of Equitable Access to Water and Sanitation in Armenia” which will help
Armenia to identify parts of the society with poor access to good quality water services,
enabling to design actions to improve their quality of life. The project worplan was introduced
at the 15th Steering Committee meeting on 26 April 2016.
Azerbaijan (AZ)6
In Azerbaijan, major work started on the Protocol on Water and Health. Although Azerbaijan
ratified the Protocol in 2000, it had failed to design mandatory national targets and target
dates under the Protocol. UNECE provided its technical know-how and financed work of
national expert groups which drafted national targets in period of August 2015 – March 2016.
Draft targets were presented at the 5th NPD Steering Committee meeting on 25 February
2016. Targets are expected to be formally adopted in first half of 2017 by joint order of
ministers of environment and health. In close coordination with the drafting of national
targets, a project “Self-Assessment of Equitable Access to Water and Sanitation in
Azerbaijan” was launched. Its aim is to identify groups that due to social, ethnical or
geographical peculiarities have poor access to drinking water and/or sanitation. The
assessment exercise is financed by France.
One of the key priorities discussed at the 25 February 2016 NPD Steering Committee was the
endorsement of the national water strategy by the Government, and addressing the comments
6 See also http://www.unece.org/env/water/npd/countrydialogues/az
received from different ministries and agencies. The Government is expected to endorse the
document in the coming months. The long-debated strategy, once endorsed, will lay the
ground for the adoption of the key principles of integrated water resources management
(IWRM) and initiate the process of relevant changes in national legislation, bringing it into
line with the European Union Water Framework Directive. The OECD and UNECE
moderated the interministerial discussion on this issue and provided the ad hoc support, in
close cooperation with the EU-funded EPIRB project.
As Azerbaijan is a part of the Eastern Partnership region, the EU strongly supports
harmonization of the water legislation of Azerbaijan with the EU water acquis. Many of the
concepts of the WFD including RBMP can be applied in Azerbaijan through the
implementation of the national water strategy. The Ministry of Ecology initiated development
of an action programme for implementation of the water strategy. It is expected that the new
EUWI+ project (2016-2020) will support implementation of the water strategy.
The need to reach bilateral agreement with neighbouring Georgia on use of transboundary
Kura resources was once again discussed at the 25 February 2016 NPD Steering Committee
meeting. Based on agreement between the two deputy ministers of environment, countries
approached donors to have a study done. OSCE is funding the study which was started in
spring 2016.
Table 2. Azerbaijan – highlights of the activity period 01.06.2015-31.05.2016
Focus of activities Activities carried out Outputs
Drafting of the
national targets
under the Protocol
on Water and Health
Five national short-term
experts hired to prepare first
draft of the national targets
Draft targets presented and
discussed at the NPD
Steering Committee meeting
of 25.02.2016
Draft national targets and
target dates (in Russian and
Azerbaijani)
Support to the
development and
endorsement of the
national water
strategy by the
Government
Ad hoc support provided to
the Ministry of Ecology to
finalise the national water
strategy
• Draft strategy
document (input to final
version coordinated by
EPIRB project)
The activities in Azerbaijan over the reporting period contributed to Action 2.1 (preparation
of the policy packages on water policy reforms) and Action 2.2 (strengthening the use of
economic instruments in water policies).
The assessments done in the transboundary basin further contributed to the implementation of
Water Framework Directive (WFD) principles in Azerbaijan (specifically, of Article 9 of the
Water Framework Directive which requires that also environmental and resource costs are
taken into account in prices for water services) as one of the Overall Objectives of the present
project on supporting the implementation of the EUWI in EECCA.
Belarus (BE)
During the previous reporting period, a joint OECD and UNECE mission was organised in
March 2015 to assist in launching the NPD process. It turned out however that the leading
ministries (of environment and economy) chose to wait until the start of new, EUWI+ project
for 2016-2020 for starting the fully-fledged NPD process with establishment of an NPD
Steering Committee and setting a national workplan. Thus no substantial activities took place
during the reporting period.
Georgia (GE)7
Development of modern water legislation formed the core part of UNECE support to Georgia
during the reporting period. During previous reporting periods, a group of national experts
had prepared a new water law and two bylaws. During the curent reporting period, two further
bylaws were prepared by local experts – on water protection zones and on water quality
standards.
To further the transboundary water cooperation with neighbouring countries, a working
meeting was organised by UNECE in Tbilisi on 4 April 2016 for representatives of Armenia
and Georgia. Results of the past joint projects were reported and options for initiating new
project on Debed/Khrami transboundary basin were discussed. UNDP and OSCE also
attended the working meetings as both have history of supporting transboundary water
projects between the two countries.
The Ministry of Environment and Natural Resources of Georgia, the EPIRB project and the
OECD conducted a study to review economic instruments for water resources management
and to explore ways to strengthen their use to manage the demand for water, promote low cost
options, and raise additional revenues for water policies.
Georgia is one of the Eastern Neighbourhood countries which signed the Association
Agreement with the EU and therefore the country made commitments to approximate to the
EU water acquis. Compliance with the EU’s Water Framework Directive (WFD) requires the
use of economic instruments, including water pricing, to cover the costs of water services.
These instruments have a two-fold purpose: providing incentives for sustainable water use by
the various user groups (including households, farmers, businesses, hydropower plants), and
furnishing financial resources needed for the management of national water resources and the
supply of water services to users. Both of these purposes are highly relevant to Georgia, and
in most cases the economic instrument will have a dual impact. However, it is arguable that
the financial motive is more important in present circumstances. The study considered
different options for the reform of economic instruments in Georgia. More specifically,
implementation of recommendations on water abstraction charges reform and development of
a new methodology for setting the abstraction charges have been requested as a follow up
action.
7 See also http://www.unece.org/env/water/npd/countrydialogues/ge
Table 3. Georgia – highlights of the activity period 01.06.2015-31.05.2016
Focus of activities Activities carried out Outputs
Harmonization of
the national water
legislation with the
EU legislation
National experts hired to
draft two bylaws
Two bylaws drafted and
presented at 05.04.2016
NPD Steering Committee
Development of
bilateral cooperation
on transboundary
basins
Working meeting between
Armenia and Georgia was
organised by UNECE in
Tbilisi on 04.04.2016.
Agreement of
representatives of Armenia
and Georgia to continue the
dialogue
Support to the
reform of economic
instruments for
water resources
management
Review of EIs for WRM
conducted by a joint team of
the EPIRB project and
OECD
Review of economic
instruments for water
resources management with
recommendations on their
reform
The activities in Georgia over the reporting period contributed to Action 2.1 (preparation of
the policy packages on water policy reforms) and Action 2.2 (strengthening the use of
economic instruments in water policies).
The assessments done in the transboundary basin further contribute to the implementation of
Water Framework Directive (WFD) principles in Georgia (specifically, of Article 9 of the
Water Framework Directive which requires that also environmental and resource costs are
taken into account in prices for water services) as one of the Overall Objectives of the present.
Kazakhstan (KZ)
In Kazakhstan, both the OECD and UNECE have been successful in raising additional
funding for NPD process which will enable activities to continue after end of the current
project period in May 2016. Therefore, only some of the meeting and mission costs were
funded through the current grant during the reporting period. The OECD has mobilised co-
financing through grant agreements with Norway and Switzerland, as well as with the
Government of Kazakhstan (under the OECD Country Programme for Kazakhstan),and
UNECE is the implementing partner along with UNDP for the project on green economy and
water resources, financed by EU Delegation in Astana.
In 2013-2014, a series of awareness raising activities were organised in Kazakhstan for
different ministries and other stakeholders on the advantages of becoming Party to the
UNECE-WHO/Europe Protocol on Water and Health. As result, a decision was taken at the
second EUWI NPD Steering Committee meeting in 2014 to launch the ratification process.
According to the governmental legislative workplan, ratification documents are to be finalised
by the end of 2016. In late 2015, the process of setting national targets under the Protocol
were started through the NPD process and draft targets were discussed at the NPD Steering
Committee meeting 30-31 May 2016. It is expected that ratification of the Protocol and
adoption of national targets will take place in 2017.
In October 2015, a Kazakh-Russian bilateral committee on transboundary waters decided to
launch a joint assessment on Ural river and Kigac tributary of the Volga river. UNECE
supports the work of a bilateral group of experts. Regular working meetings were held and
preliminary results were discussed at the May 2016 NPD Steering Committee meeting. It is
expected that as a result, a new bilateral Protocol on use of Kigac river water resources will be
signed in 2017. For Ural, a joint strategy for use of resources is being prepared, featuring also
climate change issues.
In December, 2015, two new activities were launched aimed at: (a) strengthening the role of
Multi-Purpose Water Infrastructure (MPWI) in Kazakhstan in transition to the green economy
model, inclusive and sustainable economic growth, and achieving greater levels of water,
food and energy security; and (b) improving mechanisms and instruments of state support to
agriculture, rural development and a water intensive industry impacting the water resources
and water sector in Kazakhstan. The activities have been implemented through the NPD with
support from the EU, Norway and the Government of Kazakhstan (under the OECD country
programme for Kazakhstan).
Table 4. Kazakhstan – highlights of the activity period 01.06.2015-31.05.2016
Focus of activities Activities carried out Outputs
Ratification of the
Protocol on Water
and Health
Regular meetings with key
ministries to ensure smooth
ratification process when
formal inter-ministerial
process will be launched
National targets drafted
Draft version of national
targets prepared (to be
finalised in early 2017)
The work on
strengthening the
role of Multi-
Purpose Water
Infrastructure
(MPWI) in
Kazakhstan in
transition to the
green economy
model, inclusive and
sustainable
economic growth,
and achieving
greater levels of
water, food and
energy security
A pilot study on Shardara
MPWI on syr-Darya river (in
South Kazakhstan)
supported by the
development of a computer
based model. Key findings
and preliminary
recommendations were
discussed at the NPD
Steering Committee meeting
in May 2016.
Interim Report on
Strengthening the Role of
Multi-Purpose Water
Infrastructure in
Kazakhstan
Review and
assessment of
mechanisms and
instruments of state
support to
agriculture, rural
development and a
water intensive
industry impacting
water resources and
the water sector in
Kazakhstan.
Key findings of the review
and assessment and
preliminary
recommendations were
discussed at the NPD
Steering Committee meeting
in May 2016.
Interim report on Review
and Assessment of
Mechanisms and
Instruments of State
Support to Agriculture,
Rural Development and a
Water Intensive Industry
Impacting the Water Sector
in Kazakhstan
The activities in Kazakhstan over the reporting period contributed to Action 2.1 (preparation
of the policy packages on water policy reforms) and Action 2.2 (strengthening the use of
economic instruments in water policies) with focus on subsidies (state support).
The implementation of the Protocol on Water and Health, the work on MPWI and previous
work on sustainable business models for WSS, contributed to achieving water and nexus
related SDGs (previously MDGs) in Kazakhstan (specifically, the targets on WSS and water,
food and energy security) as one of the Overall Objectives of the present project (see attached
Logical Framework of the Project’ on supporting the implementation of the EUWI in
EECCA).
Kyrgyz Republic (KG)8
At the March 2015 NPD Steering Committee meeting, a study on the most suitable water-
saving technologies for the Kyrgyz irrigation sector was presented by UNECE consultants. As
a follow-up activity, specific recommendations on the use of efficient irrigation techniques
were presented during the November 2015 NPD Steering Committee meeting. In addition, a
full-day training was organised in Bishkek on 18 March 2016 to present the finding of the
studies. Both guiding documents are used by a special unit created for modern irrigation
technologies under the Ministry of Agriculture. Proposed wider use of sprinkler or drip
irrigation in place of surface irrigation could boost agricultural productivity in Kyrgyzstan —
where the agriculture sector consumes some 90 per cent of available water resources — while
significantly reducing water use. The two studies also recommended increasing the share of
crops that need less water and produce higher economic value, such as fruits, vegetables and
berries.
Back in 2013, the national targets in context of the UNECE-WHO/Europe Protocol on Water
and Health were adopted. Funded by Finland, a project started in mid-2015 to update the
targets and to implement few. The project was introduced at the 30 November 2015 NPD
Steering Committee meeting and interim results were reported at the 15 April 2016 Steering
Committee meeting. Planned implementation of selected targets in 2017 will help to develop
policies and actions to reduce harm caused by water-borne diseases, in line with the SDG
goals.
Key priorities of the OECD in Kyrgyzstan during the reporting period were to support:
Improving water use efficiency through strengthening economic incentives by
introducing fee for use of water resources and water bodies; and
Achieving greater levels of water security, especially in rural areas, while following
the nexus approach.
At the NPD meeting in April 2016, draft methodological guidelines for setting fee rates for
the use of surface water resources and water bodies in the Kyrgyz Republic were presented,
discussed and generally supported. The follow up work (preparing submission of the
methodology to the government for eventual approval, as well as proposals on eliminating
inconsistencies in water legislation revealed through the study) is implemented by the key
beneficiary of this activity – Department of Water Resources and Melioration under the
Ministry of Agriculture and Melioration.
At the same NPD meeting, a new project was presented aimed at supporting the government
of Kyrgyzstan in establishing national definitions and indicators of the water, food and energy
security in KR. This work was co-funded by the EU under this contribution agreement and
has been implemented through the NPD. It will be finalised with financial support from
Finland (FinWater WEI-II programme) and the EU (WECOOP-II project providing support to
NPDs in Central Asia).
8 See also http://www.unece.org/env/water/npd/countrydialogues/kg
It is important to note that the work funded by the EU under this Project not only generated
the new demand but also helped to mobilise funding from Finland, an EU member-state, to
support the follow up projects thus contributing to the NPD.
Table 5. Kyrgyzstan – highlights of the activity period 01.06.2015-31.05.2016
Focus of activities Activities carried out Outputs
Increasing water
saving in irrigation
sector
National expert drafted a
study on application of
modern irrigation
technologies in new
agricultural lands in hilly
landscapes
Full-day training on
implementation of modern
irrigation technologies organised in Bishkek on 18
March 2016
Feedback collected from
other stakeholders at NPD
Steering Committee meeting
Study “Application of the
modern irrigation
technologies in
Kyrgyzstan” prepared (in
Russian) and adopted by
NPD Steering Committee
on 30 November 20159
Reforming
Economic
Instruments for
Water Resources
Management in
Kyrgyzstan
Elaboration of a policy
package including
methodological guidelines
for setting fee rates for the
use of surface water
resources and water bodies
in the Kyrgyz Republic, as
well as draft Government
Resolution on approval of
the methodology. The
package was discussed at,
and generally supported by,
the NPD SC meeting in
April 2016.
Policy package including
methodological guidelines
for setting fee rates for the
use of surface water
resources and water bodies
in the Kyrgyz Republic, as
well as draft Government
Resolution on approval of
the methodology.
Support to achieving
greater levels of
water security,
especially in rural
areas, while
following the nexus
approach
A new project aimed at
supporting the government
of Kyrgyzstan in establishing
national definitions and
indicators of the water, food
and energy security was
launched at the NPD SC
meeting in April 2016.
Draft proposal on key
components and elements
of water, food and energy
security (sent out for
comments to relevant line
ministries and agencies in
Kyrgyzstan)
The activities in Kyrgyzstan over the reporting period contributed to Action 2.1 (preparation
of the policy packages on water policy reforms) and Action 2.2 (strengthening the use of
economic instruments in water policies).
9
http://www.unece.org/index.php?id=44699
The implementation of the Action Plan and of the follow up OECD study further contribute to
the implementation of Water Framework Directive (WFD) principles in Kyrgyzstan
(specifically, of Article 9 of the Water Framework Directive which requires that also
environmental and resource costs are taken into account in prices for water services) as one of
the Overall Objectives of the present project (see attached Logical Framework of the Project
on supporting the implementation of the EUWI in EECCA). The work on water security
following the nexus approach contributes to achieving water- and nexus-related SDGs
(previously, MDGs) in Kyrgyzstan (specifically, the targets on WSS, water, food and energy
security) which was another key Overall Objectives of the project.
Republic of Moldova (MD)
10
During the reporting period the National Policy Dialogue in Moldova focused on: i) the
implementation of actions to achieve national water and health targets; and ii) the
identification of ways to improve domestic financial support mechanisms for WSS and
establishing a sound economic regulatory system for WSS in Moldova. The OECD and
UNECE also jointly contributed to establishing new norms for design and construction of
small-scale WSS systems (with installed capacity below 200 m3/day). This work is forecast
for continuation and completion under the EUWI Plus project.
Within the first element, which has been financially supported by the Swiss Agency for
Development and Cooperation (SDC), the national programme for implementation of the
Protocol in 2016-2025 with clear deadlines and budget was finalised.11
The Programme was
discussed among stakeholders on 13 November 2015 and 26 May 2016 NPD Steering
Committee meetings. It’s the first such elaborated programme for the implementation of the
Protocol on the EECCA region and has already attracted interest in other countries.
Under the second element, the OECD completed a study that analysed existing domestic
financial support mechanisms for WSS and identified ways of streamlining them and
increasing their efficiency and cost-effectiveness. The results of this work were discussed at
the NPD Coordination Council meeting in May 2015 during which the main policy
recommendations of the study were discussed and endorsed.
This activity has generated demand with the Ministry of Environment for a follow up work on
establishing a sound system of economic regulation for WSS and new (revised) norms for
small-scale WSS systems. A request was sent to the OECD indicating that it was a topical
political issue (see the letter in the Annex to this report) and projects were launched
accordingly. Over the reporting period, an interim report on the economic regulatory system
in Moldova was produced and its key findings and preliminary recommendations were
discussed and generally supported at the NPD SC meeting in May 2016. This work was
discussed at the recent NPD CC meeting in November 2016 and is expected to be finalised, as
part of the work programme under the EUWI+ project for Eastern Partnership (EaP)
countries.
10
See also http://www.unece.org/env/water/npd/countrydialogues/md 11
See
http://www.unece.org/fileadmin/DAM/env/documents/2016/wat/Moldova_National_Forum_
Water_for_Health/Protocol_rus_Web.pdf (in Russian)
Table 6. Moldova – highlights of the activity period 01.06.2015-31.05.2016
Focus of activities Activities carried out Outputs
Implementation of
the Protocol on
Water and Health
Organization of stakeholder
discussion at NPD Steering
Committee meeting
(documents were drafted by
national experts with
financing provided by
Switzerland)
Finalised national
programme for
implementation of the
Protocol on Water and
Health in 2016-2025
Support to the
Government of
Moldova in
establishing a sound
economic regulatory
system for WSS
Key findings and
preliminary
recommendations were
discussed and generally
supported at the NPD SC
meeting in May 2016.
Support to the Government
of Moldova in establishing
a sound economic
regulatory system for WSS
The activities in Moldova over the reporting period contributed to Action 2.1 (preparation of
the policy packages on water policy reforms) and Action 2.2 (strengthening the use of
economic instruments in water policies).
The implementation of the Protocol on Water and Health, the proposed improvement in
domestic financial support mechanisms in WSS and the follow up work on establishing a
sound economic regulatory system for WSS and on new norms for small-scale WSS systems,
contribute to achieving water-related SDGs (previously MDGs) in Moldova (specifically, the
target on WSS), as well the internationally (UN) adopted “Equitable Access to Water for All”
objective in a more cost-effective way, particularly in rural areas. Furthermore, improved
domestic financial support mechanisms and a sound economic regulatory system for WSS
will contribute not only to financial sustainability of WSS but also to improving incentives for
the sustainable use of water resources thus helping to achieve the environmental objectives
under the Water Framework Directive.
Both achieving water-related SDGs and implementation of the EU water policy principles
(such as the WFD) were the two Overall Objectives of the project (see attached Logical
Framework of the Project on supporting the implementation of the EUWI in EECCA).
Russian Federation (RU)
Work on improving economic instruments for water resources management in the Lake
Baikal basin, the Republic of Buryatia was completed in 2015 and reported on previously. In
the reporting period, the OECD focused on publishing results of the study in the OECD Water
Study series (for reference to the report see section 3.4) and disseminating project results in
the EECCA region.
Table 7. Russia – highlights of the activity period 01.06.2015-31.05.2016
Focus of activities Activities carried out Outputs
Dissemination of
results of the study
on the use of
Economic
Instruments for
WRM in the
Republic of Buryatia
(Lake Baikal basin)
Publication and
dissemination of results of
the study.
Final report published in the
OECD Water Study series
The activities in Buryatia (Russian Federation) implemented under the project contributed
to Action 2.1 (preparation of the policy packages on water policy reforms) and Action 2.2
(strengthening the use of economic instruments in water policies).
The implementation of the proposed policy recommendations contributes to the
implementation of Water Framework Directive (WFD) principles in Russia (specifically, of
Article 9 of the Water Framework Directive which requires that also environmental and
resource costs are taken into account in prices for water services). Furthermore, they
contribute also to achieving water-related SDGs (specifically, the target on WSS), as well
the internationally (UN) adopted “Equitable Access to Water for All” objective in Buryatia,
as they envisage a shift to a sound tariff policy in WSS and in irrigation.
Both achieving water-related SDGs (previously MDGs) and implementation of the EU
water policy principles (such as the WFD) were Overall Objectives of the project.
Tajikistan (TJ)12
A key achievement of the NPD process over last years was its contribution to the
development of the Water Sector Reform Programme 2016-2025. After years of preparations
and discussions at NPD Steering Committee meetings, the Programme was adopted by the
Government in December 2015 and implementation is underway. Most importantly, the
programme established a framework for the transition to water resource management
according to the basin principle by 2020 and clarifies the competencies of different national
institutions in the water sector.
Tajikistan is not a Party to the Protocol on Water and Health but sees value of being engaged.
With support from Finland, revision of 2013 draft targets in context of the Protocol started in
mid-2015. At 12 April 2016 NPD Steering Committee meeting the progress was reported and
finalised targets are expected by the end of 2016.
Table 8. Tajikistan – highlights of the activity period 01.06.2015-31.05.2016
Focus of activities Activities carried out Outputs
Ensure application
of IWRM principles
Discussion platform for local
stakeholders provided in
form of NPD Steering
Committee meetings
(normally attended by over
60 participants)
National Water Sector
Reform Programme 2016-
2025 adopted by
Government in December
2015
The activities in Tajikistan over the reporting period contributed to Action 2.1 (preparation of
the policy packages on water policy reforms).
Support to application of IWRM principles in irrigation sector further contributes to the
implementation of Water Framework Directive (WFD) principles in Tajikistan as one of the
Overall Objectives of the project.
12
See also http://www.unece.org/env/water/npd/countrydialogues/tj
Turkmenistan (TM)13
In Turkmenistan, the preparations for and implementation of institutional reforms in water
sector lead to minimal level of NPD activities during the reporting period. In January 2016,
the key partner - former Ministry of Water Economy - was merged with Ministry of
Agriculture. In result, the Chair of NPD process was changed as well. NPD Steering
Committee meeting was announces and prepared for 1 April 2016 but was cancelled by the
Ministry few days before. In order to establish the contacts with newly created Ministry of
Agriculture and Water Resources, UNECE Deputy Executive Secretary Mr Andrey Vasilyev
met minister Mr Nursahet Sapardurdyyev in Ashgabat on 11 May 2016 to discuss
continuation of NPD process.
After acceding to the UNECE Water Convention in 2012, the development of new water
legislation has been the priority for UNECE support. In the framework of the NPD process
and with support of UNECE, an inter-ministerial expert group drafted a new Water Code in
2013-2014 to enact necessary legal changes in line with the Water Convention and principles
of IWRM. UNECE kept pushing for speedy adoption but the Code was finally adopted by
Mejlis, the National Parliament only in October 2016. The new Code opens up possibility for
shift from administrative to basin principle, clarifies rights of Water User Associations,
introduces goals for close cooperation with neighbouring countries and deals with
transboundary impacts.
Table 9. Turkmenistan – highlights of the activity period 01.06.2015-31.05.2016
Focus of activities Activities carried out Outputs
Promotion of
international treaties
on water
management
Bilateral meetings were
organised between UNECE
Deputy Executive Secretary
and senior Turkmen
decision-makers to increase
political support to joining of
relevant UNECE treaties
Awareness of officials from
many relevant ministries
and agencies raised
Modernisation of
water legislation
Constant contact with
Parliament to guarantee
expert support for finalising
of new Water Code
New Water Code adopted
(after end of the reporting
period, in October 2016)
The activities in Turkmenistan over the reporting period contributed to Action 2.1
(preparation of the policy packages on water policy reforms).
Promotion of international treaties on water management contributes to the implementation of
Water Framework Directive (WFD) principles in Turkmenistan as one of the Overall
Objectives of the present project.
Ukraine (UA)
Although the EUWI National Policy Dialogue process on IWRM started in 2007 it has been
on hold since then due to political instability in the country. Preparatory missions by the
UNECE took place in December 2015 and January 2016 and aimed to discuss priorities of the
upcoming EUWI+ project and to seek options of re-establishing the NPD Steering
Committee. Discussions were held at the Ministry of Ecology and Natural Resources, State
13
See also http://www.unece.org/env/water/npd/countrydialogues/tm
Agency of Water and with relevant international donors. Consultations with the Ministry of
Ecology continued at the margins of the EUWI EECCA working group meeting that took
place at the OECD in May 2016.
3.3 Work package 3 (Benchmarking and exchange of experiences)
The aim of Work package 3 was to establish a common understanding of water policy
reforms across EECCA countries. Two activities were envisaged: (1) benchmarking
achievements of the countries in achieving the MDGs and implementing IWRM principles in
their legislations, (2) coordination of NPD activities with other actors in the region working at
local, transboundary and regional levels.
Benchmarking
The second benchmarking report “Implementation of the Basin Management Principle in
Eastern Europe, the Caucasus and Central Asia” was released in May 2016, written by Peep
Mardiste and UNECE consultant Vahagn Tonoyan. While the first report from 2014 gave an
overview of implementation of all key IWRM principles in the region, the 2016
benchmarking report concentrated on the key principle of IWRM – adoption and
implementation of the basin principle. The Study was released in English and Russian.14
Coordination of activities
Efforts were made to ensure that NPDs provided a platform for coordination of water sector
activities in the respective countries. Donor coordination sessions at the meetings were
organised as part of most NPD Steering Committee meetings and attracted high participation
from donors and international organizations. Donors that participated in Steering Committee
meetings were EU, Austria (ADA), Czech Republic, Finland, Germany (GIZ), Japan (Jica),
Norway, Switzerland (SDC), USA (USAID), OSCE, UNDP, WHO, World Bank, EBRD and
ADB.
19th EUWI EECCA Working Group meeting (12-13 May 2016, Paris)
The 19th EUWI EECCA working group meeting took place in May 2016. Chaired by
Romania, the meeting gathered around 40 experts from the region and donor organsiations
and provided a platform for interaction and cooperation.
Meeting delegates acknowledged the role of EUWI in promoting water sector reforms in the
region and expressed their appreciation for the substantial financial support provided by the
European Commission and bilateral donors in the region. Participants underlined the
importance of involving line ministries and addressing conflicting goals through consensus
building and recalled the recent progress made as part of National Policy Dialogues within the
region and welcomed plans for continued cooperation in 2016-2020.
14
See
http://www.unece.org/fileadmin/DAM/env/water/meetings/NPD_meetings/Publications/bench
marking-2016-EN.pdf (English version) and
http://www.unece.org/fileadmin/DAM/env/water/meetings/NPD_meetings/Publications/bench
marking-2016-RU.pdf (Russian version)
Delegates requested more frequent regional exchange of progress and also requested that
support for SDGs implementation be among the EUWI goals. Finally, the need to put more
focus on implementation in the next phase of the EU-funded project was discussed.15
NPD plenary discussion and side event at the 7th Meeting of Parties (MOP) of the Water
Convention (17-18 November 2015, Budapest)
The NPD side event was organised during the first day of the MOP, within the high-level
segment. Success of the NPD process was underlined in presentations by the UNECE
Executive Secretary (Under-Secretary-General UN) and representatives of OECD and
Romania as Chair of the EUWI EECCA Working Group. Reresentative of the European
Commission informed participants about decision to finance EUWI+ project for 2016-2020.
New Memorandums of Understanding for next phase of EUWI project were signed at the side
event between UNECE Executive Secretary and deputy ministers of environment from
Georgia and Moldova. The plenary discussion on NPDs on 18 November involved deputy
ministers from Armenia, Georgia and Kazakhstan as panelists, providing case studies of
successful interventions of NPD framework.
Contribution to the World Water Week 2015 (27 August 2015, Stockholm)
UNECE representative participated at the EUWI Multi-Stakeholder Forum, organised during
the World Water Week on 27 August 2015 in Stockholm. The Forum presented experience
and good practice from the ongoing work and debated on further actions developed in the
different partnerships established in the EUWI framework.
Policy Perspectives
Policy Perspectives summarising regional work on Economic Instruments for water resources
management and on the economic dimension of water management in the transboundary Kura
basin, were prepared by the OECD to communicate results and lessons learnt from the work
in EECCA. Policy Perspectives are a good tool for consolidating results from a number of
projects ahead of dissemination. These documents were distributed and presented within
EECCA countries, at NPDs and at the EUWI EECCA WG meeting in May 2016. They were
also distributed at the EfE Ministerial conference in Batumi in June 2016.
The “Reforming economic instruments for water management in EECCA countries” Policy
Perspective summarises key policy messages and recommendations on the role of economic
instruments in addressing challenges and achieving key water policy objectives including
relevant Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) in the Eastern Europe, the Caucasus and
Central Asia (EECCA) countries.16
The document concludes that Economic instruments have
an important role to play in achieving water policy objectives including water-related SDGs
and that existing economic instruments in EECCA countries require improvement to deliver
these objectives.
15
http://www.oecd.org/env/outreach/euwaterinitiative2016wgmeeting.htm 16
https://issuu.com/oecd.publishing/docs/policy_perspective_economic_instrum
3.4 Work package 4 (Dissemination of project information and stakeholder
involvement)
Dissemination of project information
During the reporting period a number of actions were undertaken to implement the
Communication Strategy. These included:
An update of a brochure “The Reform of Water Policies in Eastern Europe, the
Caucasus and Central Asia in 2006–2016” by OECD and UNECE was released in
May 2016, indicating success stories and future plans in the region.17
One issue of the 8-page EUWI NPD newsletter (November 2015).18
Four press releases were issued by UNECE, in English and Russian, to feature
achievements of NPDs.19
Information has been regularly updated on dedicated web-pages on OECD and
UNECE websites (http://www.oecd.org/env/outreach/partnership-eu-water-initiative-
euwi.htm); www.unece.org/env/water/npd), as well as at EU development
cooperation site http://capacity4dev.ec.europa.eu/env-east. Websites give access to
presentations made at the meetings, meeting reports, other relevant reports,
newsletters and press releases. Both websites are extensively used in the EECCA
region as a source of information on IWRM and WSS issues.
The following substantive reports on river basin and country specific NPD activities were
prepared in the period of June 2015 to May 2016. The reports were used for communicating
policy relevant results and lessons learnt and dissemination within EECCA countries:
Implementation of the Basin Management Principle in Eastern Europe, the Caucasus
and Central Asia20
Sustainable Business Models for Water Supply and Sanitation in Small Towns and
Rural Settlements in Kazakhstan21
Reforming Economic Instruments for Water Resources Management in Kyrgyzstan 22
Improving Economic Instruments for Water Resources Management in the Republic
of Buryatia (Lake Baikal Basin) 23
Legislation, Regulations, Key Actors, their Inter-action and Roles in the Water
Supply and Sanitation Sector of the Kyrgyz Republic: Brief Overview
17 see https://issuu.com/oecd.publishing/docs/euwi_report_layout_english_june_01. 18 see http://www.unece.org/index.php?id=42610 19 see http://www.unece.org/env/water/npd/news 20
See http://www.unece.org/fileadmin/DAM/env/water/meetings/NPD_meetings/Publications/benchmarking-
2016-EN.pdf (English version) and
http://www.unece.org/fileadmin/DAM/env/water/meetings/NPD_meetings/Publications/benchmarking-
2016-RU.pdf (Russian version) 21http://www.oecd.org/countries/kazakhstan/sustainable-business-models-for-water-supply-and-sanitation-in-
small-towns-and-rural-settlements-in-kazakhstan-9789264249400-en.htm) 22http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/deliver/fulltext?itemId=/content/book/9789264249363-
en&mimeType=freepreview&redirecturl=http://www.keepeek.com/Digital-Asset-
Management/oecd/environment/reforming-economic-instruments-for-water-resources-management-in-
kyrgyzstan_9789264249363-en&isPreview=true) 23 (http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/deliver/fulltext?itemId=/content/book/9789264266452-
en&mimeType=freepreview&redirecturl=http://www.keepeek.com/Digital-Asset-
Management/oecd/environment/improving-economic-instruments-for-water-resources-management-in-the-
republic-of-buryatia-lake-baikal-basin_9789264266452-en&isPreview=true)
Improving Domestic Financial Support Mechanisms in Water Supply and Sanitation
in Moldova
Strengthening the Economic Regulatory System for WSS in Moldova (Interim
report).
Assessing the environmental and economic value of water: review of existing
approaches and application to the Armenian context.
Facilitating the reform of economic instruments for water management in Georgia.
The NPD process was also used to provide oversight on production of the following
publications:
Reconciling resource uses in transboundary basins: assessment of the water-food-
energy-ecosystems nexus (November 2015)24
.
Final assessment of the water-food-energy-ecosystems nexus in the Syr Darya Basin
(November 2015)25
.
Reconciling resource uses in transboundary basins: assessment of the water-food-
energy-ecosystems nexus (chapter 5) ─ Summary nexus assessment of the
Alazani/Ganykh River Basin (May 2016)26
.
The NPD in Kazakhstan was also used to facilitate and promote dialogue on the following
substantive work streams:
Review and Assessment of Mechanisms and Instruments of State Support to
Agriculture, Rural Development and a Water Intensive Industry Impacting the Water
Sector in Kazakhstan (Interim report).
Strengthening the Role of Multi-Purpose Water Infrastructure in Kazakhstan (Interim
report on Shardara pilot study).
Stakeholder involvement
12 NPD Steering Committee meetings that took place in the reporting period were attended
by variety of stakeholders from within and outside government agencies.
An expert workshop under the OECD study on assisting Kyrgyzstan in developing
methodologies for the introduction of new economic instruments for water resource
management took place in Bishkek in April 2016.
24 see http://www.unece.org/env/water/publication/ece_mp.wat_46.html 25 see http://www.unece.org/index.php?id=41427
4. Difficulties encountered and measures taken to overcome problems
The main difficulties encountered during the reporting period included:
In Turkmenistan, the new Water Code that UNECE helped to draft in 2013 was kept
on shelve for years because Government wanted to enact it together with new Land
Code. With no progress to report, responsible ministry cancelled the planned 1 April
2016 NPD Steering Committee just few days before it was expected to take place.
Water Code was finally adopted by the Parliament in October 2016.
In Belarus, it was expected that following the March 2015 OECD-UNECE mission an
NPD Steering Committee will formally be set up by Government to start the NPD
process. The procedure proved however so complex that it was decided that the
Steering Committee will be set up after the launch of the EUWI+ project.
A key lesson is that maintaining direct contacts with both senior officials and middle
managers within ministries and agencies is essential to make sure that NPD processes
continue after political and/or institutional changes in the countries. Such approach has helped
to complete continue ongoing projects and to discuss new priority actions even if political
leadership has changed (such as in Armenia, Moldova and Turkmenistan during the reporting
period).
5. Changes introduced in the project implementation
Besides some delays with certain outcomes, there has been no major change in the
programme and activities planned for the reporting period.
6. Achievements and results
One of the key objectives of the project is to provide platforms for broad national-level
discussions on water management issues. During the reporting period, 12 high-level EUWI
NPD Steering Committee meetings were held in 7 participating countries. They resulted in the
following outcomes:
The elaboration of two by-laws to a new national water law in Georgia;
Adoption of new Water Code by the Parliament of Turkmenistan (after project
period);
The elaboration of a policy package consisting of the Methodological Guidelines for
Setting Fee Rates for the Use of Surface Water Resources and Water Bodies in the
Kyrgyz Republic, and draft Government Resolution on approval of the methodology;
Several regulatory gaps and inconsistencies in water legislation and regulation in
Kyrgyzstan revealed through respective studies led by the OECD (on methodology for
setting fee rates for the use of surface water resources and water bodies; and the
overview of legislation and regulation for WSS) triggered follow up work by
respective government agencies on improving water legislation and regulation;
Analysis of domestic financial support mechanisms in water supply and sanitation in
Moldova was completed and presented to respective authorities in Moldova, as well as
interim results of the follow up study aimed at strengthening the economic regulatory
system for WSS in Moldova;
Transboundary cooperation and/or treaties between following countries were
discussed, using National Policy Dialogues as platforms: Georgia-Armenia, Georgia-
Azerbaijan, Kazakhstan-Russia, Kazakhstan-Kyrgyzstan;
Results of analysis of the use of economic instruments for water management at the
national level (Kyrgyzstan) and the subnational level (Republic of Buryatia, Lake
Baikal Basin, the Russian Federation) were published. Overall results of the work on
this topic in all EECCA countries concerned as well as at the transboundary level (in
Azerbaijan and Georgia) were summarised in the Policy Perspectives brochure
prepared and published by the OECD and were used to communicate and disseminate
results in EECCA countries;
Results of analysis on sustainable business models for water supply and sanitation in
small towns and rural settlements in Kazakhstan published in respective report in the
OECD Studies on Water series, were communicated and disseminated in EECCA
countries;
Support to the reform of economic instruments of water management in Georgia
through developing recommendations on the reform steps;
Preparations for the ratification of the Protocol on Water and Health under Water
Convention were advanced in Armenia, Georgia, Kazakhstan and Turkmenistan.
Table 10. Main activities under the ongoing National Policy Dialogues
Instruments/frameworks AM AZ GE KG KZ MD RU TJ TM UA
Water Framework Directive’s principles.
EU Urban Wastewater Directive x x x x x x x x
UNECE Water Convention (transboundary waters) x x x x
UNECE-WHO Protocol on Water and Health x x x x x x x
Climate change adaptation (EU, OECD and UNECE
instruments) x
EU Flood Directive/UNECE instruments
Institutional frameworks (e.g. River Basin Councils) x x x x x
Overcoming fragmentation in, and sustainable business
models for WSS systems x
Economic instruments for, and financing of, water resources
management x x x x
New water legislation/strategy on IWRM x x x x x
EUWI EECCA Working Group (May 2016, Paris)
EECCA countries delegates confirmed their commitment to water policy reforms, and
approximation to EU acquis. Delegates acknowledged the political priorities of the European
Commission in the region (sustainable inclusive socio-economic development, security and
stability) and priorities for future work on water: the water-energy-food security nexus; green
economy; sustainable development goals and water diplomacy. The forthcoming EUWI Plus
project was presented and discussions took place about the need to maintain regional dialogue
with Central Asia. Delegates expressed their will to maintain the EECCA Working Group and
continue to meet annually.
Project activities and their results were presented at various international meetings, including
the World Water Week 2016 (28 August 2016, Stockholm).It allowed to co-ordinate in-
country work with other initiatives and mobilise an additional support to the regulatory
reform. For example the discussions within the NPDs in Kyrgyzstan and Tajikistan were used
to mobilise an additional support from Finland to follow-up activities supported by the
Project. In Kazakhstan, part of the implementation of NPD biannual workplan has been co-
funded (a) from the grant provided by the Government of Kazakhstan under the OECD
Country Programme for Kazakhstan and (b) through a new project financed through the EU
Delegation in Astana.
Annexes (provided in separate files)
Annex 1: Agendas of NPD meetings and the agenda and summary of the EUWI EECCA
Working Group held over the reporting period.
Annex 2: Additional output documents produced over the reporting period. Note: Other
output documents are provided via hyperlink in the body of the report.
Annex 3: Logical Framework for the project