EUREF Symposium, Paris, 6-8 June 2012 Impact of Individual GNSS Antenna Calibration Used in the EPN...
-
Upload
madison-newman -
Category
Documents
-
view
214 -
download
1
Transcript of EUREF Symposium, Paris, 6-8 June 2012 Impact of Individual GNSS Antenna Calibration Used in the EPN...
![Page 1: EUREF Symposium, Paris, 6-8 June 2012 Impact of Individual GNSS Antenna Calibration Used in the EPN on Positioning Q. Baire, E. Pottiaux, C. Bruyninx,](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022032721/56649edc5503460f94becdb0/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
EUREF Symposium, Paris, 6-8 June 2012
Impact of Individual GNSS Antenna Calibration Used in the EPN on
PositioningQ. Baire, E. Pottiaux, C. Bruyninx, P. Defraigne, W. Aerts, J. Legrand,
N. Bergeot and J.M. Chevalier
![Page 2: EUREF Symposium, Paris, 6-8 June 2012 Impact of Individual GNSS Antenna Calibration Used in the EPN on Positioning Q. Baire, E. Pottiaux, C. Bruyninx,](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022032721/56649edc5503460f94becdb0/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
EUREF Symposium, Paris, 6-8 June 2012
Outline
• Individual antenna calibration methods• Methodology• Precise Point Positioning• Data sets
• Impact on geodetic positioning• Comparison between individual and igs08.atx calibrations• Comparison between different individual calibrations
• Summary and conclusions
![Page 3: EUREF Symposium, Paris, 6-8 June 2012 Impact of Individual GNSS Antenna Calibration Used in the EPN on Positioning Q. Baire, E. Pottiaux, C. Bruyninx,](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022032721/56649edc5503460f94becdb0/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
EUREF Symposium, Paris, 6-8 June 2012
• The position of a station refers to the Antenna Reference Point (ARP)
Phase Center VariationPhase Center Variation
ARP
Direction of the signal
Real wavefront
Ideal wavefront
• The distance measured refers to the phase center of the antenna
• Phase center offset (PCO): difference between the ARP and the phase center of the antenna
• Phase center variation (PCV): deviation of the phase center with respect to an ideal wavefront
• PCV is elevation and azimuth dependent
PCO
![Page 4: EUREF Symposium, Paris, 6-8 June 2012 Impact of Individual GNSS Antenna Calibration Used in the EPN on Positioning Q. Baire, E. Pottiaux, C. Bruyninx,](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022032721/56649edc5503460f94becdb0/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
EUREF Symposium, Paris, 6-8 June 2012
• Robot calibrations
Individual calibration methodsIndividual calibration methods
• Carried outdoor• Use real GNSS signals• Signal treated with a GNSS receiver•Multipath mitigated by the movement of the
robot• Used by the IGS to generate type mean
calibrations
Geo++Also Ife, SendStadt Berlin
![Page 5: EUREF Symposium, Paris, 6-8 June 2012 Impact of Individual GNSS Antenna Calibration Used in the EPN on Positioning Q. Baire, E. Pottiaux, C. Bruyninx,](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022032721/56649edc5503460f94becdb0/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
EUREF Symposium, Paris, 6-8 June 2012
• Anechoic chamber calibrations
Individual calibration methodsIndividual calibration methods
• Anechoic supposed to reduce reflections• Use generated sine wave • Vector Network Analyzer•Multipath mitigated by the chamber
Uni-Bonn
![Page 6: EUREF Symposium, Paris, 6-8 June 2012 Impact of Individual GNSS Antenna Calibration Used in the EPN on Positioning Q. Baire, E. Pottiaux, C. Bruyninx,](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022032721/56649edc5503460f94becdb0/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
EUREF Symposium, Paris, 6-8 June 2012
• Differences between Geo++ and Uni-Bonn calibration for the same antenna on L3
Differences of calibrationDifferences of calibration
TRM59800.00 NONE 54099 installed in RTBT
- =
Geo++ Uni-Bonn
![Page 7: EUREF Symposium, Paris, 6-8 June 2012 Impact of Individual GNSS Antenna Calibration Used in the EPN on Positioning Q. Baire, E. Pottiaux, C. Bruyninx,](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022032721/56649edc5503460f94becdb0/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
EUREF Symposium, Paris, 6-8 June 2012
• Differences between Geo++ and Uni-Bonn calibration for the same antenna on L3
Differences of calibrationDifferences of calibration
TRM59800.00 NONE 54099 installed in RTBT
TRM59800.00 NONE 54144 installed in RTBQ
- =
Geo++ Uni-Bonn
- =
Geo++ Uni-Bonn
![Page 8: EUREF Symposium, Paris, 6-8 June 2012 Impact of Individual GNSS Antenna Calibration Used in the EPN on Positioning Q. Baire, E. Pottiaux, C. Bruyninx,](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022032721/56649edc5503460f94becdb0/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
EUREF Symposium, Paris, 6-8 June 2012
• The impact on positioning is not direct:–PCO+PCV will affect each satellite differently at each epoch
How to estimate the impact How to estimate the impact on positioningon positioning
![Page 9: EUREF Symposium, Paris, 6-8 June 2012 Impact of Individual GNSS Antenna Calibration Used in the EPN on Positioning Q. Baire, E. Pottiaux, C. Bruyninx,](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022032721/56649edc5503460f94becdb0/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
EUREF Symposium, Paris, 6-8 June 2012
A similar approach was followed as the one used by Rebischung et al., 2011:– Two separate PPP: identical processing options (satellite antenna calibrations,
orbits and clocks, etc…), except for the receiver antenna calibration model.
–Receiver antenna calibration model: igs08.atx and individual calibrations.
–Position offset caused by the changed of receiver antenna calibration model: difference between the daily positions obtained by the different PPP
• Final position offset of a station obtained by taking the mean of the daily estimates over the considered data set of that station
Methodology : PPPMethodology : PPP
![Page 10: EUREF Symposium, Paris, 6-8 June 2012 Impact of Individual GNSS Antenna Calibration Used in the EPN on Positioning Q. Baire, E. Pottiaux, C. Bruyninx,](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022032721/56649edc5503460f94becdb0/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
EUREF Symposium, Paris, 6-8 June 2012
• Two data sets are analyzed here
– The EPN stations with individual calibration• from the beginning (2003 for the first individual calibration in the EPN) to April 2011. • compared to the type calibrations from igs08.atx.
– The six antennas installed at ROB• Each of those antenna have been individually calibrated by both GEO++ and Uni-Bonn. • comparing the two calibrations for each antenna.
Methodology : Data setsMethodology : Data sets
![Page 11: EUREF Symposium, Paris, 6-8 June 2012 Impact of Individual GNSS Antenna Calibration Used in the EPN on Positioning Q. Baire, E. Pottiaux, C. Bruyninx,](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022032721/56649edc5503460f94becdb0/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
EUREF Symposium, Paris, 6-8 June 2012
• The first set of data :– EPN stations with individual calibration: from 2003 to April 2011. They are compared to
the type calibrations from igs08.atx.
Impact on Geodetic PositioningImpact on Geodetic PositioningIndividual vs igs08.atx type calibrationsIndividual vs igs08.atx type calibrations
• black: antenna/radome pairs with absolute individual calibrations (15.98%)
• green: antenna/radome pairs with true absolute type calibrations (69.26%)
• orange: antenna/radome pairs with absolute calibrations converted from relative values (6.56%)
• red: antenna/radome pairs without absolute calibrations. In this case, the radome is neglected and the calibration values of the antenna with radome 'NONE' is used (8.20%)
![Page 12: EUREF Symposium, Paris, 6-8 June 2012 Impact of Individual GNSS Antenna Calibration Used in the EPN on Positioning Q. Baire, E. Pottiaux, C. Bruyninx,](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022032721/56649edc5503460f94becdb0/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
EUREF Symposium, Paris, 6-8 June 2012
Impact on Geodetic PositioningImpact on Geodetic PositioningIndividual vs igs08.atx type calibrationsIndividual vs igs08.atx type calibrations
North
East
Up
• Position jumps for the 53 station/antenna+radome pairs individually calibrated
• Horizontal:• Distribution around 0 mm• Values up to 4 mm
• Vertical:• No clear distribution• Great differences up to 10 mm
![Page 13: EUREF Symposium, Paris, 6-8 June 2012 Impact of Individual GNSS Antenna Calibration Used in the EPN on Positioning Q. Baire, E. Pottiaux, C. Bruyninx,](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022032721/56649edc5503460f94becdb0/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
EUREF Symposium, Paris, 6-8 June 2012
Impact on Geodetic PositioningImpact on Geodetic PositioningIndividual vs igs08.atx type calibrationsIndividual vs igs08.atx type calibrations
• Some position biases equal to 0:• Type mean based on 1 individual calibration
• A particular model of antenna, the TRM55971.00 TZGD, is present in 11 stations and with individual calibration
What are the differences between each individual calibration and the type calibration ?
![Page 14: EUREF Symposium, Paris, 6-8 June 2012 Impact of Individual GNSS Antenna Calibration Used in the EPN on Positioning Q. Baire, E. Pottiaux, C. Bruyninx,](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022032721/56649edc5503460f94becdb0/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
EUREF Symposium, Paris, 6-8 June 2012
Impact on Geodetic PositioningImpact on Geodetic PositioningIndividual vs igs08.atx type calibrationsIndividual vs igs08.atx type calibrations
• The type calibration is the mean of GEO++ calibration of 8 antennas• All the individual calibration not done
by the same institute
• The north component shows differences up to 2 mm with respect to the type calibration
• The up component shows large differences up to 10 mm with respect to the type calibration
SenStadt BerlinIfE LW
a
![Page 15: EUREF Symposium, Paris, 6-8 June 2012 Impact of Individual GNSS Antenna Calibration Used in the EPN on Positioning Q. Baire, E. Pottiaux, C. Bruyninx,](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022032721/56649edc5503460f94becdb0/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
EUREF Symposium, Paris, 6-8 June 2012
• The second set of data :– The six antennas installed at ROB. Each of those antenna have been individually
calibrated by both GEO++ and Uni-Bonn. The impact of the calibration method on the positioning is investigated by comparing the two calibrations for each antenna.
•What is the impact of the calibration method on the positioning ?
Impact on Geodetic PositioningImpact on Geodetic PositioningGeo++ vs Uni-BonnGeo++ vs Uni-Bonn
![Page 16: EUREF Symposium, Paris, 6-8 June 2012 Impact of Individual GNSS Antenna Calibration Used in the EPN on Positioning Q. Baire, E. Pottiaux, C. Bruyninx,](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022032721/56649edc5503460f94becdb0/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
EUREF Symposium, Paris, 6-8 June 2012
Impact on Geodetic PositioningImpact on Geodetic PositioningGeo++ vs Uni-BonnGeo++ vs Uni-Bonn
One LEIATR25.R3 NONE antennaAll the other antennas are TRM59800.00 NONE
antennas.
• No systematic effect on the horizontal component. But significant effect
• Values up to -7 mm. Too few values to evocate a trend
![Page 17: EUREF Symposium, Paris, 6-8 June 2012 Impact of Individual GNSS Antenna Calibration Used in the EPN on Positioning Q. Baire, E. Pottiaux, C. Bruyninx,](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022032721/56649edc5503460f94becdb0/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
EUREF Symposium, Paris, 6-8 June 2012
Impact on Geodetic PositioningImpact on Geodetic PositioningGeo++ vs Uni-BonnGeo++ vs Uni-Bonn
![Page 18: EUREF Symposium, Paris, 6-8 June 2012 Impact of Individual GNSS Antenna Calibration Used in the EPN on Positioning Q. Baire, E. Pottiaux, C. Bruyninx,](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022032721/56649edc5503460f94becdb0/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
EUREF Symposium, Paris, 6-8 June 2012
Impact on Geodetic PositioningImpact on Geodetic PositioningGeo++ vs Uni-BonnGeo++ vs Uni-Bonn
![Page 19: EUREF Symposium, Paris, 6-8 June 2012 Impact of Individual GNSS Antenna Calibration Used in the EPN on Positioning Q. Baire, E. Pottiaux, C. Bruyninx,](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022032721/56649edc5503460f94becdb0/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
EUREF Symposium, Paris, 6-8 June 2012
SummarySummary
• Comparisons between station positions computed with individual and igs08.atx receiver antenna calibrations show that (results for Europe):
– The position offset can reach 4 mm in horizontal component and 10 mm in the vertical component.– The position offsets have a greater impact on the vertical component.– For the same antenna model, the position offsets induced by different individual calibrations with respect
to igs08.atx calibrations can reach 2 mm in the horizontal component and 10 mm in the vertical component.
![Page 20: EUREF Symposium, Paris, 6-8 June 2012 Impact of Individual GNSS Antenna Calibration Used in the EPN on Positioning Q. Baire, E. Pottiaux, C. Bruyninx,](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022032721/56649edc5503460f94becdb0/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
EUREF Symposium, Paris, 6-8 June 2012
SummarySummary
• Individual receiver antenna calibrations from Geo++ and UniBonn show that (results for 6 antennas in Brussels):
– The position offsets can reach 3 mm in the horizontal component and 7 mm in the vertical component.–Position offsets induced by different calibration methods can be larger than those induced by the
difference between an individual and type calibrations.
![Page 21: EUREF Symposium, Paris, 6-8 June 2012 Impact of Individual GNSS Antenna Calibration Used in the EPN on Positioning Q. Baire, E. Pottiaux, C. Bruyninx,](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022032721/56649edc5503460f94becdb0/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
EUREF Symposium, Paris, 6-8 June 2012
ConclusionConclusion
• This effect will depend on the latitude of the station:
![Page 22: EUREF Symposium, Paris, 6-8 June 2012 Impact of Individual GNSS Antenna Calibration Used in the EPN on Positioning Q. Baire, E. Pottiaux, C. Bruyninx,](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022032721/56649edc5503460f94becdb0/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
EUREF Symposium, Paris, 6-8 June 2012
ConclusionConclusion
• Use of individual calibrations for positioning applications:– physically more relevant than type mean calibrations– can lead to inconsistent results (e.g. IGS use type mean calibrations)
![Page 23: EUREF Symposium, Paris, 6-8 June 2012 Impact of Individual GNSS Antenna Calibration Used in the EPN on Positioning Q. Baire, E. Pottiaux, C. Bruyninx,](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022032721/56649edc5503460f94becdb0/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
EUREF Symposium, Paris, 6-8 June 2012
ConclusionConclusion
• Use of individual calibrations for positioning applications:– physically more relevant than type mean calibrations– can lead to inconsistent results (e.g. IGS use type mean calibrations)
![Page 24: EUREF Symposium, Paris, 6-8 June 2012 Impact of Individual GNSS Antenna Calibration Used in the EPN on Positioning Q. Baire, E. Pottiaux, C. Bruyninx,](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022032721/56649edc5503460f94becdb0/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
EUREF Symposium, Paris, 6-8 June 2012
ConclusionConclusion
• Difference between individual and type mean calibrations–Nothing on the accuracy on positioning–No clue of an improvement of the repeatability so far
• But–No jumps in the timeseries when the type mean calibration are updated
Individual calibrations ensure continuity in the timeseries