Eurasia mobile markets - challenges to our mobile networks & business model
-
Upload
dr-kim-kyllesbech-larsen -
Category
Business
-
view
1.541 -
download
1
description
Transcript of Eurasia mobile markets - challenges to our mobile networks & business model
Eurasia Mobile MarketsChallenges to our mobile networks & business models.Mobile Network Optimization Eurasia Summit 2011, 20th September 2011..
Dr. Kim Kyllesbech Larsen, Technology Economics
Technology, Deutsche Telekom.
The mega challenges …
2Dr. Kim Kyllesbech Larsen, Mobile Network Optimization Eurasia Summit 2011, September 20th 2011, Istanbul.
Mega bits
Mega bucks
Mega Hz
The smartphone … The “killer” device and its “killer” applications…
3Dr. Kim Kyllesbech Larsen, Mobile Network Optimization Eurasia Summit 2011, September 20th 2011, Istanbul.
OTT Mobile Apps impact.Mobile revenues in an Apps-centric world could decline rapidly.
4
22.41 23.01
12.7
1 Source 2010 & 2015 Pyramid Research March 2011 Western Europe.
2010A 2015EMobile centric(“worry-free”)
2015EApps centric
(“doom”)
(Free) OTT VoIP and Messaging Apps can lead to adramatic loss of most profitable MNO revenues
CS Voice SMS & MMS PS Data
15.7
3.4
3.3
13.0
3.8
6.2
6.5
6.2
Illustration
?By 2015
more than 70%of users have a smartphone
Dr. Kim Kyllesbech Larsen, Mobile Network Optimization Eurasia Summit 2011, September 20th 2011, Istanbul.
• End of Profit in WEU between 2014 -2016
• Accelerate LTE deployment.
•Manage traffic via pricing, policy & control.
•Spectrum acquisition.
• End of Profit in WEU between 2014 -2016
• Accelerate LTE deployment.
•Manage traffic via pricing, policy & control.
•Spectrum acquisition.
Tellabs global study 1 …The End of Profit.The end to the mobile-only business model as we know it?
5
Western Europe mobile carrier“End to Profit” (Tellabs study).
What can be learned?
Western Europe assessment
Businessmodelbreakdown
Mounting cashpressure
Annual Growth Projection until 2020.
5%
20%
70%
87%
47% 47%
0.5% 1.0%
61% 61%
28% 28%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100% 2010 - 20152015 - 2020
Dr. Kim Kyllesbech Larsen, Mobile Network Optimization Eurasia Summit 2011, September 20th 2011, Istanbul.
0.950.93
0.90 0.870.81
0.76
0.70
0.67
0.62
0.58
0.54
35%37%
39% 39% 39% 37%36%
34%31%
28%25%
36%37%
38% 39% 40% 41% 41% 41%39%
37%36%
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
Year
Ebitda - doom Ebitda - "worry free"
Mobile margin doom… 3-player market with equal market share illustration.
6
Mobile Apps offering “free” voice and messaging (picky bagging on data plans) can lead to a dramatic loss of revenue and margin.
7%
7%
10%
11%
11%
10%
10%
11%
11%
8%
7%
7%
7%
9%
9%
9%
8%
8%
8%
9%
7%
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
Year
Capex to Revenue - doom Capex to Revenue -"worry free"
LTE modernization
Difference primarilydue to Revenue
Capex to Revenue ratioEbitda & margin
Illustration
Dr. Kim Kyllesbech Larsen, Mobile Network Optimization Eurasia Summit 2011, September 20th 2011, Istanbul.
Uncontrolled data growth ... Apple iTune promotion in NL ... free downloads.
180 GB & 855 Mbps
Promotion day
Normal
9× increase in peak throughput.
More than twice the total volume.
30+ thsd downloads in the peak.
7Dr. Kim Kyllesbech Larsen, Mobile Network Optimization Eurasia Summit 2011, September 20th 2011, Istanbul.
• 80% of data traffic carried by 3 sites.
• 20% of users generate 80% of traffic.
• Off-loading is an effective financial remedy … but not easy to achieve!
• 80% of data traffic carried by 3 sites.
• 20% of users generate 80% of traffic.
• Off-loading is an effective financial remedy … but not easy to achieve!
Off-loading benefits are tremendousBut it demands new partnership models for mobile-only.
8
Off-loading Economics.
What can be learned?
Mobile data is “80% fixed”
Dr. Kim Kyllesbech Larsen, Mobile Network Optimization Eurasia Summit 2011, September 20th 2011, Istanbul.
31
2 3 4 3 3 2 2 2 1 1 1 1
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35100% traffic80%+ traffic
“20% mobility”
Data traffic per user
Free Cash Flow
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
HSPA only, No LTE HSPA No LTE 50% off-load from 2012
HSPA + LTE HSPA + LTE 50% off-load from 2012
Businessmodel
breakdown
• Today 50+% on 3G/HSPA
• 2011+ Ramp-up LTE deployment.
• 2015 620 mio mobile subs …10% LTE.
• 2020 670 mio mobile subs …60% LTE.
• 2G below 10% ca. 2015.
• Today 50+% on 3G/HSPA
• 2011+ Ramp-up LTE deployment.
• 2015 620 mio mobile subs …10% LTE.
• 2020 670 mio mobile subs …60% LTE.
• 2G below 10% ca. 2015.
• Today less than 20% on 3G/HSPA
• Before 2015 limited LTE deployment.
• 2017 4.0 bn mobile subs …10%+ LTE.
• 2020 4.5 bn mobile subs … 60%+ LTE.
• 2G below 10% after 2018.
• Today less than 20% on 3G/HSPA
• Before 2015 limited LTE deployment.
• 2017 4.0 bn mobile subs …10%+ LTE.
• 2020 4.5 bn mobile subs … 60%+ LTE.
• 2G below 10% after 2018.
LTE later in Growth markets, but will catch up fast.
9
Growth Markets 1 2
Western Europe 1
1 Pyramid Research (April 2011) until 2015. After 2015 technology diffusion model applied to technology development favoring LTE as main conversion technology.2 China, India, Indonesia, Malaysia, Pakistan, Philippines, Taiwan, Thailand, Vietnam.
2G
3Gincl. HSPAevolution
LTE &evolution
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
2010A 2015E 2020E 2025E
2G
3Gincl. HSPA evolution
LTE & evolution
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
2010A 2015E 2020E 2025E
Mobile Growth Markets (APAC)
Mobile Europe
Dr. Kim Kyllesbech Larsen, Mobile Network Optimization Eurasia Summit 2011, September 20th 2011, Istanbul.
LTE deployment requires available spectrum.
UL(75 MHz)
DL
UL(35MHz)
DL
UL(70 MHz)
TDD(50 MHz)
DL
900 MHz (2G some 3G)
1,800 MHz (2G)
2,600 1 MHz (4G & LTE)
UL(60 MHz)
TDD(100 MHz) DL
2,100 MHz (3G)
3GTDD
part TDD(mainly APAC)
2,300 – 2,400+ MHz
part TDDThis band provides interesting backhaul P2P
options in some Greenfield scenarios
3,400 – 3,500+ MHz
UL DL
400 MHz
UL DL
700 MHz (LTE)
TDD
(20 MHz)
(20 MHz)
3GTDD
1 The shown structure consistent with European band plan. In USA this band is held by Clearwire and primarily used forTDD WiMax.
UL(30MHz)
DL
800 MHz (LTE)
UL(58 MHz)
DL
1,500 MHz (MSS L-band)
TDD
10
UL DL
2,100 MHz (MSS S-band)
Dr. Kim Kyllesbech Larsen, Mobile Network Optimisation Eurasia Summit 2011, September 20th 2011, Istanbul.
Spectrum re-farming … a very complex process...Additional spectrum provides control & mitigate risks.
11
Complex &
Difficult to control
Today
situation
Add “new”
spectrum
Migrate
Traffic
Ready for
re-farmTime
E.g., GSM
E.g., LTEIllustration
2G
3G
Dr. Kim Kyllesbech Larsen, Mobile Network Optimisation Eurasia Summit 2011, September 20th 2011, Istanbul.
Spectrum demand and availability.
1 …
12Dr. Kim Kyllesbech Larsen, Mobile Network Optimisation Eurasia Summit 2011, September 20th 2011, Istanbul.
X-RAYMICROWAVESULTRA-SOUND20Hz 3kHz 50MHz 4GHz 300GHz 400THz
INFRARED
TRADITIONAL CELLULAR / MOBILE SPECTRUM RANGE700MHz 4GHz50MHz
WHITESPACE
11995 50MHz (900 MHz)Voice Centric
×72010 340 MHz (900,1800 & 2100 MHz)Voice Centric with mobile data
×12+2015 590 MHz (800, 900,1800, 2100, 2600 MHz)Broadband data centric with voice.
There are still large amount of untapped spectrum resources available.
With current data growth, by 2030 spectral BW demand could be beyond 4 GHz.
Very HighSmall
Very LowVery Large
BANDWIDTH
COVERED UNIT AREA
Rural / Nation-wide: Digital dividend 900 MHz
LTE deployment models.Availability of a wide range of frequencies will be essential for economical network deployment.
13
Urban – Suburban:
Up-to 2100 MHz
Hot-Spots
2.3To
3.6 GHz
Throughput / Capacity
2.3 - 3.6 GHz Typical BWs/Operator > 40 MHz
Femto-cells
Rural Fixed-likeTypical BWs/Operators < 20 MHz
LTE connectivity
Illustration
Dr. Kim Kyllesbech Larsen, Mobile Network Optimization Eurasia Summit 2011, September 20th 2011, Istanbul.
DWDM
DWDM
DWDM
DWDM
100 GbpsDWDM
EvolvedPacketCore
Backhaul will force you to re-think network design.LTE’s extremely power-full air-interface, i.e., 100+ Mbps, will require extensive backhaul fiber deployment.
14
FTTS1 100+ Mbps
LTE air-interface30mean to 100+peak Mbps
(per sector)
eNode
100GbE
Illustration
32:1 320:1eNodes per element 3200:1
BH Throughput 3+ 32+ 320+ In Gbps
Dr. Kim Kyllesbech Larsen, Mobile Network Optimization Eurasia Summit 2011, September 20th 2011, Istanbul.
The backhaul challenge … macro vs micro.Distribute mobile broadband traffic differently.
15
Node
300 – 7,000 active devicesper macro-cellular node(dense-urban / urban)
100+ Mbpsshared with
up to 7,000 devices.
FTTS1 100+ Mbps
Home Environmentwith ca. 2.3 people per Home 1
connected to Fiber, Cable or VDSL.
Up-to 100+ Mbpsshared by
2+ people.
AP (e.g., WiFi / Femto,..)LTE provides up-to 100 Mbpsper sector
100+ to40 Mbps
1 Average for Western Europe.
Illustration
Dr. Kim Kyllesbech Larsen, Mobile Network Optimization Eurasia Summit 2011, September 20th 2011, Istanbul.
Key challenges.What we need to be passionate about.
Prepare for early LTE deployment → might be needed sooner than later.Prepare for early LTE deployment → might be needed sooner than later.
Radio nodes → multi-mode SDR capabilities to mitigate uncertainty .Radio nodes → multi-mode SDR capabilities to mitigate uncertainty .
Backhaul → Gbps will be needed → Think Fiber and off-loading.Backhaul → Gbps will be needed → Think Fiber and off-loading.
16
Spectrum → acquisition and re-purposing of legacy bands.Spectrum → acquisition and re-purposing of legacy bands.
Dr. Kim Kyllesbech Larsen, Mobile Network Optimization Eurasia Summit 2011, September 20th 2011, Istanbul.
Thank you for your interest!
Contact: [email protected]: +31 6 2409 5202http://nl.linkedin.com/in/kimklarsen
Acknowledgement: I am indebted to my fantastic team for always being patient with my data requests, for their great suggestions and support in creating this presentation.