Rami Vainio Dept of Physical Sciences, University of Helsinki, Finland
EU climate change policies: mitigation and adaptation. Where to draw the subsidiarity line in...
-
Upload
clifford-king -
Category
Documents
-
view
214 -
download
0
Transcript of EU climate change policies: mitigation and adaptation. Where to draw the subsidiarity line in...
EU climate change policies: mitigation and adaptation. Where to draw the subsidiarity line
in climate change and sustainable energy policies?
Matti Vainio
European Commission
DG Environment
Save energy, save money, save the climate – local and regional actionsCEMR seminar on climate change in the context of the EU Sustainable Energy Week
31 January 2007
Key Objectives Climate Change and Energy Package
Meeting the 2°C objective: In international negotiations GHG reduction
target of 30% by 2020 for developed countries (vs. 1990).
A firm, independent commitment to achieve at least 20% GHG reduction by 2020 for EU-27 (vs. 1990)
Perspective of Kyoto Protocol: 2012 -8% (EU-15) Today -5% (EU-27)
-1% (EU-15)
Energy efficiency (eg. cars, appliances, buildings) to be improved by 20% by 2020
Renewable energy: 20% mandatory objective by 2020 differentiation of targets necessary between Member States flexibility in target setting within a country between sectors includes minimum biofuels target of 10% by 2020
Sustainable power generation from fossil fuels: aiming at near-zero emissions of new plants by 2020
New steps to reach internal market - options for unbundling and regulatory powers: important for functioning EU ETS decrease hurdles for renewables
Nuclear: Member States’ choice Towards a European strategic energy technology plan
An Energy Policy for Europe
Global Participation
The 2C objective:Global GHG emissions need to peak around 2020
EU & Developed countries: 30% GHG emission reduction target by 2020, compared to 1990 levels
Developing countries: Reduced growth asap, absolute reductions after 2020
Deforestation: halt within two decades and then reverse
Developed countries GHG emissions
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
120%
140%
1990 2005 2020 2030 2040 2050
Baseline Reduction Scenario
Developing countries GHG emissions
0%
40%
80%
120%
160%
200%
240%
280%
320%
1990 2005 2020 2030 2040 2050
Baseline Reduction Scenario
• Firm independent target = long term signal for investors in ETS• Review EU ETS• Link it to compatible systems INVESTMENT COST INVESTMENT COST
GLOBAL GDPGLOBAL GDP
Global carbon market
• Global emissions peak around 2020: global carbon market decreases investment costs with a factor 3.
• Proposals to increase market signals in developing countries:
• Improve and widen CDM
• Improved access to financing (EBRD, GEEREF etc.)
Benefits and Costs
“Winning the Battle” & Stern Review: benefits of limiting Climate Change outweigh costs of action
Costs of inaction: 5%-20% of global GDP (Stern Review) Costs of action for the EU (2030):
-30% target with global participation: -0,19% annualised GDP -20% independent target: -0,02% to -0,09% annualised GDP
Does not include co-benefits: Increased energy security Improved competitiveness through innovation Health benefits from reduced air pollution Limits on climate change
Do we need to draw lines
Where to draw the subsidiarity line in climate change and sustainable
energy policies?
Can you draw a line between national, regional and local policies?
Importance of EU level action
Internal market Cross-border issues, eg
transboundary air pollution, greenhouse gases
Make a difference at global levelestablish leadership in climate change
(eg carbon market)speaking with one voice
Importance of regional and local action: making reduction concrete
Emission reduction InfrastructureTransportPublic procurement
Adaptation InfrastructureRegional and local spatial planningBuilding standards
Importance of local action
Energy efficiency engaging the broad public building codes and practices, enforcement Public procurement (building standards) Infrastructure (heat networks/district heating)
Sustainable transport : local level crucial urban planning transport planning – promoting and
organising public transport public procurement (transport fleet, fuels) congestion charging (eg London) – parking
fees
Importance of local action
Renewable energyBuilding standardsLocal, decentralised in nature Also a number of benefits are local :
employment, new businesses, air quality… Local level important for planning purposes
and engaging/convincing the public Awareness raising – close to the citizen
Conclusions
Climate change is happening Need to adapt
We need to act at all levels Complementarity of action, EU, National,
Regional, Local levels Co-benefits of action
Reduce CO2 emissions Reduce air pollution Save money Make local communities better places to live