Ethics Three “random” chats “knowing doing gap” Categories of normative sciences Logic —...

28
Ethics Three “random” chats “knowing doing gap”

Transcript of Ethics Three “random” chats “knowing doing gap” Categories of normative sciences Logic —...

Ethics Three “random” chats

“knowing doing gap”

Categories of normative sciences

• Logic — things that are true• Aesthetics — things that are

admirable• Ethics — things that are good

Heroic figures in ethics

• Aristotle — definitions• Kant — criteria• Perry — personal

– versus communitarian

• Rawls — operational• Professional — liability• Habermas — dialogue• Küng — empirical

• Various schemes:environmental, feminist, power, etc

William Perry

• Levels of intellectual sophistication

• Ethical development

Dualism 1-3

• 1 Assumption of dualistic structure of world taken for granted, unexamined

• 2 Truth exists, but not all authorities are knowledgeable

• 3 Absolute truth has not been discovered, yet

Multiplicity 4-6

• 4 Knowledge is not secure but is any person’s

• 5 Knowledge is always changing or subject to change

Commitment to realism 6-9

• 6 Knowledge is not something that is external and definite but something that each individual constructs

Initial commitment

• 7 Knowledge is the world view one has constructed from learning and experience, along with the ethical implications of this view

• 8 Knowledge is a creative resolution between uncertainty and the need to act

• 9 Individual must break through to new perspectives and discard those no longer useful

Perry summary

• 9 levels• 1-3 absolute• 4-~6 relative• ~6-9 personal

Professional ethics

• Avoiding legal problems• Privacy, permission

Purpose

• Ends• Means• Rationalisable

– E.g., historical, economic

• Objective/subjective

Ethics v meta-ethics

• Environmental ethics• Sadism• Marxism (ideology & false

consciousness)• Feminism• Hedonism• Virtue ethics• Utilitarianism

continued…

• Deontology• Consequentialism• Situation ethics• Monism v pluralism• Utilitarianism• Virtue ethics

continued…

• Relativism• Absolutism

– Universalism– Realism– Absolutism (Perry position 1!)

• Machiavelli– Private– Public

HCI stances

• Standards IS09471• User’s task• Usability• Cost-effectiveness• Metrics. Empirical• Design• Enjoyment

‘Usability’ as applied ethics

• Kant’s categorical imperative• Reciprocity

– Help lines?– Bug reports?– User participation? (evaluation…)

Kant

• Criterion• Some ‘nice’ principles

– E.g., reciprocity, universalisability

Küng’s 6 rules

• Solving problems: don’t create greater problems

• Burden of proof: demonstrate avoids human or environmental damage

• Common good: e.g., benefits the community, for a period

• Urgency: e.g., survival more important than privacy

…continued

• Ecology: system more important than individuals

• Reversibility: system must be reversible, removable, not cause dependency

Post-marxist critical theory

• One dimensional man (Marcuse)– “I shop therefore I am”

• Atomised (Lyotard)– What is choice/democracy when you

have 500 channels of TV?

What I want

• Operational ethics• Bridge ‘knowing-doing gap’

Justice

• Distributive• Restorative• Punitive• Political

Aristotle’s view

• Doing good for others• Only virtue you can’t fake

Justice by programming

• Fair chocolate bar

John Rawls

• Justice• Veil of ignorance• Creating a just world• Creating a just system

Conclusions

• Ethics v politics• CS is politics• Get involved!

Next lecture — Thursday 2pm

An ethical debate on tags and tagging

Where from?

• Communitarian• Individual• Artificial