Environmental Consequences of Ethanol from Corn Grain, Ethanol
Estimating Greenhouse Gas Emissions in Corn-Ethanol Production using the BESS Model
-
Upload
quinn-hicks -
Category
Documents
-
view
32 -
download
3
description
Transcript of Estimating Greenhouse Gas Emissions in Corn-Ethanol Production using the BESS Model
Estimating Greenhouse Gas Emissions in Corn-Ethanol
Production using the BESS Model
Adam J. Liska, Haishun S. Yang,
Kenneth G. Cassman
Department of Agronomy and Horticulture,
University of Nebraska-Lincoln
BESS Model : Life-Cycle Energy & Emissions
BESS Model includes 4 components:
• Crop production
• Ethanol biorefinery
• Cattle feedlot for feeding co-product distiller’s grains
• Anaerobic digestion unit (optional, closed-loop facility)
Three types of life-cycle analysis:
• Energy analysis—life-cycle net energy yield & efficiency
• Emissions analysis—net carbon dioxide (CO2) and
trace greenhouse gases (CH4, N2O), and global
warming potentional (GWP)
• Resource Requirements—crop production area, grain, water, fossil fuels (petroleum, nat. gas, and coal)
BESS results: Net Energy Ratio
USA average
NE average
Iowa average
coal 1.40 1.33 1.46
natural gas 1.49 1.41 1.57
natural gas, wet DG 1.85 1.73 1.97
closed-loop facility 2.45 2.17 2.71
Corn Production SystemEth
an
ol B
iore
fin
eri
es
www.bess.unl.edu
GHG Emissions Reduction (%)
USA average
NE average
Iowa average
coal 26 24 29
natural gas 52 50 55
natural gas, wet DG 65 63 67
closed-loop facility 78 75 81
Corn Production SystemEth
an
ol B
iore
fin
eri
es
www.bess.unl.edu
Component GHG emission category (#2, IA)
% of LC (#3, NE) % of LC
(#4, NE) % of LC
CROP Production Nitrogen fertilizer, N* 7.5 7.5 8.6 Phosphorus fertilizer, P* 1.7 1.1 1.2 Potassium fertilizer, K* 1.0 0.1 0.1 Lime* 5.0 1.3 1.5 Herbicides* 2.7 3.2 3.7 Insecticides* 0.0 0.3 0.3 Seed* 0.3 0.3 0.3 Gasoline** 0.6 1.1 1.3 Diesel** 3.1 8.1 9.4 LPG** 2.2 1.2 1.4 Natural gas** 0.0 2.7 3.1 Electricity** 0.5 4.6 5.3 Depreciable capital 0.5 0.5 0.5
N Fertilizer emissions (N2O) 13.6 13.5 15.6 TOTAL 38.7 45.4 52.4
BIOREFINERY Biorefinery model component Natural Gas Input*** 30.7 27.4 31.6 NG Input: drying DG*** 15.0 13.4 0.0 Electricity input*** 10.5 9.4 10.8 Depreciable capital 0.8 0.7 0.9 Grain transportation 4.2 3.7 4.3 TOTAL 61.3 54.6 47.6 CO-PRODUCT CREDIT Cattle model component**** Diesel -0.0 -0.0 -0.0 Urea production -9.5 -8.4 -10.1 Corn production -16.3 -19.1 -24.7 Enteric fermentation (CH4) -5.0 -4.4 -10.0 TOTAL -30.8 -32.0 -42.2 Default co-product credit (-45.1) (-40.2) (-46.4) GHG reduction relative to gasoline, %
Life-cycle GHG emissions 54.9 50.4 63.1
GHG-intensity, g CO2eq MJ-1 of Ethanol
Life-cycle GHG emissions 40 44 32
BESS Results: Default Scenarios #2-4
www.bess.unl.edu
GHG-intensity of Corn production: BESS results
267276
239
357
172
202
177
189230
181
278
217 226 247
291
300
273
208
172
kg GHG per Mg Grain
150 - 173
174 - 197
198 - 220
221 - 243
244 - 267
268 - 290
291 - 313
314 - 337
338 - 360
48%
56%54%
53%
52%50%
44%46% 45%
53% 48%
51%
48%
53%
58%
43%
48%
45%
41%
Life-cycle GHG reduction compared to gasoline; w/ natural gas ethanol plant with dry distillers grains
Support for BESS Development
• Western Governor’s Association
• Nebraska Energy Office
• Environmental Defense
• Nebraska Center for Energy Sciences
Research
• University of Nebraska-Lincoln,
Institute of Agriculture and Natural Resources
FREE Model Download: www.bess.unl.edu