February 2007

SOVEREIGN LAW FOR INDIVIDUALS

EXPLAINED

Kia ora

Hello & welcome

ONLY LIVING-SOULS CAN GENERATE THE ENERGY REQUIRED TO CREATE

AND PRODUCE ANYTHING

HOWEVER

John Ake

Email : johnake@yahoo.com

During the first half of 2005 I was in New Zealand addressing various audiences on “sovereign law”.There was much interest and as a result I’ve decided to post this essay in response to the many questions that were raised.

It remains for you to join the dots.

Disclaimer

I feel obliged to point out that I am not a practising or licensed legal counsel. This document is only my opinion, not advice and offers no guarantees or magical cures. I do however encourage you in your search for true freedom, knowledge and understanding.

“and you shall know the truth, and the truth shall set you free”. John 8 :32

About the author

1

Without free and ready access to the land and all it provides, we the people have unwittingly alienated ourselves from the very resource necessary to sustain all life.

In allowing a corporation such as the Crown to claim sovereignty [Master status] we have foolishly enslaved ourselves and our posterity unto a life of perpetual plunder [charges, tolls, fines, duties, taxes, fees, levies and tariffs].

My story begins in Aotearoa [New Zealand] through my late father Rakei James Ake - [aka Te Akeake] - a direct descendant of the ancient ‘tangata whenua’ [original occupiers of the land] the indigenous tribal claimants of the offshore volcanic island of Tuhua sometimes referred to by non-Maori as Mayor Island. so named by the early English explorer Captain Cook.

2

Tuhua [Mayor Island]

3154 acres

35 km north of Tauranga off the NZ

Coastline

As descendants of the original inhabitants naturally we have chosen to retain the traditional tribal name.

My ancestors, Te Urungawera, a sub-group [hapu] of the maritime tribe Te Whanau o Tauwhao, occupied and were in possession of this island without break of continuity down to 1901 at which time the then occupants departed to sojourn on the mainland at Whangamata and Bowentown [Otawhiwhi Marae] to strengthen and develop economic, family, tribal and kinship ties. 

We were never overcome by inter-tribal or European conquest nor did we surrender or formally cede our natural inheritance to anyone.

Neither did we give up our basic sovereign rights as indigenous heirs and successors to continue to determine our own destiny. Our ancestors, buried in the land, serve as testimony to a superior claim, just as civilised society demands respect for cemeteries, statues and monuments sacred to their culture [values and beliefs].

Colonisation

However, little by little over time through devious misinformation campaigns, the crown has been able to portray itself as sovereign owner; and, it was as a party to this process that we discovered the real truth about how events and circumstances can be manipulated to weaken the traditional claims of indigenous inhabitants.

For example one of the more insidious methods of colonisation was the ever encroaching process of government land-banking [land-grabs] through mischevious surveys, recording and mapping technologies used as tools to claim and settle upon vast areas and finally by re-naming significant landmarks in order to obscure or even obliterate existing signs of previous occupation.

With the passage of time, this strategy was to make it increasingly difficult for indigenous claimants to maintain legitimate rights of unbroken occupancy.

The seemingly innocent process of land clearance, building construction or the planting of a crop, had the same effect as ‘staking a claim’ because if there was no immediate challenge or intervention then history would view it as consent by default. Put simply, squatters rights. squatocracy

The moral of the story being that any claims, right or wrong, would be legitimised unless a continual challenge was proven to have been maintained.

In the past few hundred years indigenous peoples especially will relate to this experience, and have further been frustrated by the ongoing process of assimilation, superior technologies and more importantly, hard cash or fiat money. The indigenous experience particularly now serves to highlight why today all people have come to better understand the loss of ‘allodial land title’ and the attendant inalienable [God-given] sovereign rights.

Without free and ready access to the land and all it provides, we the people have unwittingly alienated ourselves from the very resource necessary to sustain all life.

3

Understanding sovereignty

Words can change their meanings over time, so I'll start by saying that I use the term "sovereignty" as it is generally understood - both in terms of national sovereignty and individual sovereignty.

In essence it means - self determination or self government.

When a nation talks about sovereignty, it means its right to determine what goes on inside its borders. Its right to exist as a self-determining, self-governing geographic area.

When an individual talks about sovereignty, he means his right to determine what goes on in his own life.

To understand what is meant by sovereignty, let's go back a little, and see how it arises.

In the world as it now stands, all land is the sovereign territory of one nation or another, except the arctic regions which are controlled by international treaty. The oceans of the world, apart from territorial waters, are also covered by various treaties.

If you wanted to have your own sovereign piece of real estate – you’re out of luck.

People may have thought it would be great if we could just buy an island - and run it according to our own ideas.

This thinking misunderstands sovereignty.

Sure, you might purchase an island - there are many around the world for sale. However, when you part with the cash, you are not buying sovereignty, that still resides with the country whose jurisdiction extends over the island.

You’d soon find out who was sovereign if you tried to eliminate income tax on your newly acquired island.

If you really wanted to claim your own sovereign territory, you'd need to keep a watchful eye out for the emergence of a complete new land - say an undersea volcano erupting into a new land mass.

Now, such a new land mass (provided it was outside existing territorial waters) would indeed be "unclaimed" land and this is where we get to the nub of what sovereignty really is.Suppose such a new island appears, in the middle of an ocean somewhere, and you rush by helicopter and land on it. All you would need to do is put up your ‘flag’ - and you would have claimed sovereignty over it.Unfortunately, you may not be alone. While you are rushing all by yourself to your newly discovered island, it is highly likely that some nearby nation is likewise sending a landing party - claiming some "special case" as to why it should be theirs.

4

When push comes to shove, they may decide to remove you by force of arms and the ensuing potential conflict of interest encapsulates the entire history of the world - the battle for territory.

So you can certainly claim sovereignty over a new piece of land but you’ll also need to be able to defend this new found sovereignty.

In these enlightened times one may expect that might is not always right, and that some international court may arbitrate the issue.

It still doesn't change the basic fact that sovereignty must first be claimed - then defended.

If sovereignty didn't need defending, then no country would be in need of armed forces.

Sovereignty is therefore at the mercy of any party that chooses to dispute it.

Tax havens for example exist for this very reason, as a means of defence.

It's a way of protecting sovereignty. It's not enough to simply stand up and declare it - because those who oppose you may not play the game by your rules and use force to deprive you of it.

To assume you have rights under some “constitution”, “statute” or other historical “agreement” is to assume that sovereignty is handed out by the state.

CONSTITUTION = CONSENT TO COMMERCIAL CONTRACT 

You are not granted sovereignty by virtue of being born in any particular country.

You are sovereign because of your status as a flesh and blood living-soul - by virtue of you having an independent mind.

You are already sovereign - but a "prisoner" of a larger, more powerful influence; cultivated ignorance.

Such a mistake could cost you dearly. Even though you may perceive that some statute law may "save" you - you mustn’t ignore the fact that the state can simply rewrite its statutory laws and constitutions to better suit it’s circumstances.

No, your sovereignty does not depend on the state. Your sovereignty was in place long before the formation of the “state”. You have it in the state's absence. Your task is to learn how to defend it cleverly.

Of course, in the present world, there is no free nation. No place where it is easy to fully assert your sovereignty.

Governments want you to have a good job in the same way that a burglar wants you to have a house full of valuables. A nice fat cash cow.

5

However, by learning how to better protect your assets not based on the laws of your nation state, but based on your capacity to outwit it and out-manoeuvre it.

One option is to play off one nation state against another by using various international strategies such as offshore asset protection and thereby use the laws of one country to play off against the laws of another.

As awareness of true human sovereignty spreads and disillusionment with the nation state grows, there will arise more and more means of increasing one's practical freedom.

Anecdote : How do we measure value?

ANECThere was a practitioner who had an exceptional gift for fixing health problems. After serving the people for thirty years she happily retired.

Several years later an ex-patient who was experiencing health problems, contacted the practitioner asking for help because her current doctors and other health professionals were unable to provide a suitable remedy.

The practitioner reluctantly took up the challenge. She spent a very short time with the patient and arrived at a diagnosis. “Ahh”, she said. “Here is the problem”, and with an ink marker drew a cross on Mary’s chest which took five seconds and then gave her a healing potion.

Within days Mary’s health had been fully restored.

The practitioner duly sent an account for $2,000.00.

After a month or so, a letter arrived from Mary’s accountant querying what appeared to be an excessive bill. The practitioner responded :

One Ink Mark …………………………………………………………. $ 1.00Knowing Where To Put The Ink Mark ………………………… $1,999.00

If you think the price of education is too high, then consider thecost of ignorance.

The Ten Commandment Laws

The Bible has always been known as God’s law.

The Law of the Ten Commandments has never changed, because there is no person or institution that has the authority to make any change(s).

If God says something is wrong, it was wrong six thousand years ago, when it was given to Moses, and is still wrong today.

This is consistent with God’s character and true law.

6

There’s the difference. Man’s statute laws are continually being changed and manipulated to suit the circumstance.

If man is the creator of true law then how do we explain the creation of life, and the law that causes it? What causes the sun to rise; the wind to blow; gravity.

The foolishness of this argument is self evident.

True law cannot be changed or manipulated by man. Statutes are not true law they are colourable law; able to be changed.

Origin of Statutes [Colourable Law]

1. God created Man

2. Man created Government

3. Government created Corporations

Man was not created by the state [governments or parliaments] and it follows that the created can never be greater than its creator.

Since when does the servant tell the master what to do? That’s treason.

Man-made statute or decree was how Caesar ruled Rome; and, today is still being masqueraded as true law.

This might better help you to understand the scripture of:-

“give unto Caesar that which is Caesars” and in it’s fuller context

“unto God that which is God’s”

You choose which jurisdiction to place yourself under; God’s or the State’sThe following charted chronology is a visual ready reference.

2 Parallel Jurisdictions

B i b l i c a l l a w S t a t u t e l a w P r i v a t e P u b l i c

God’s lawHoly Bible

Man’s lawLegislation

7

Status Voluntary servitude

Created by theBreath-of-life

RightsLife, Liberty & Property

Birthcertification for people

Common lawLaw on the land

Living-soulUpper and lower case letters

John Doe

Fruits of labourcreated by man’s energy

Non-taxable Living-soul

StatusForced slavery

Created byRegistration

PrivilegesRewards and Penalties

Berthcertification for vessels

Admiralty lawLaw on the high seas

Corporation-soleALL-CAPITAL-LETTERSJOHN DOE

Incomecreated by artful accounting

TaxableCorporate-sole

We have been deceived into surrendering our natural-rights in exchange for attractively presented privileges.

We have been made subservient to a man-made system of rewards and penalties in order to gain power and control over our creative energy and all that we’re capable of producing.

The product of our manual labour; the sweat of our collective brows, part of which was intended for our creator, as thanks-giving and the ethic on which charity is based, has been siphoned off by Caesar [modern-day-government] in a brilliant deception of statutory smoke and mirrors.

In the beginning

The biblical book of Genesis explains who we are; where we come from; and, ultimately the “king dome” under whose “sovereign law” we are bound.

8

And the LORD God formed man of the dust of the ground, and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life; and man became a living soul

Genesis 2: 7 KJV

We can claim sovereign status under the “Law” of a “King” that is not of this “world” [religious belief].

The land shall not be sold for ever; for the land is mine; and, you are strangers and sojourners with me.

Levititicus 25:23 KJV

As people started to live together in societies, there was nothing to prevent individuals from infringing upon the rights and freedoms of each other.

Once that happened, there were only two choices; either, protect ourselves or elect a group of individuals to protect our rights for us.

We chose the latter and man-made [government] was born.

A government’s strategy

In order to implement slave-like control of its citizens, governments had to invent a system that would not directly violate people’s natural-rights; but, at the same time allow them to control and own everything created and produced by man [natural energy source.]

The technique was to create a secondary “corporate” entity [artificial-legal-entity] that mimicked the existence of the original flesh and blood living-soul so well, it was for the most part invisible; and could only be readily identified in the written form. In the spoken form there is no discernible difference.

For every living-soul the government through semantics and its Birth Registries secretly created a mirror-like identity called a corporation-sole.

John Doe and JOHN DOE may sound the same but now you can see the difference in the written form. When a noun is written in all-capital-letters, the Rules of English Grammar says it’s either fictitious [without substance] or it’s a company name [corporation].

Consequently, the government as creator of a “corporation” can now demand anything it wants from [their] corporation simply by manipulating the statute [Corporations Law].

One of the ways governments captured our natural rights and freedoms has been the creation of artificial-legal-entities.

Through their statutes, they have created companies and corporations [dead-corporate-entities] through the clever manipulation of language by the re-definition of certain words.

9

The basic tool for the manipulation of truth is the manipulation of words. Words have been re-defined. If one can control the meaning of words, one can control the people who use those words.

For example the word person and persons has been re-defined in the Interpretation clauses of their statutes as a corporation

How many people would interpret the word person to mean a corporation.

The government want you to assume this ordinary meaning of the word person so as to deceive you into reading and interpreting their statute in their favour.

You might like to refer to “Sir William Blackstone’s Commentaries on the Law’s of England”.

Sir William was a pre-eminent juror in his time and an acknowledged expert in English law.

He confirmed in his expert capacity that there are two (2) persons recognised in statute law. Natural person and artificial person

However, one still needs to approach this thinking with caution as natural-person is often taken to mean human-being and the dictionary defines human-being as a half-monster.

Therefore in statutory or legal matters we should be very careful when using the term person, natural or artificial; you are better off using man or flesh and blood living-soul.

This nicely avoids any mis-interpretation or mis-understanding.

The first step of the process

When mothers give birth to babies they volunteer, through the medical and nursing staff, all the associated information which is then recorded on to a government information database.

This act of recording is the basis of a Registry [Births, Deaths & Marriages Registry].

At some later point, mother or child will then apply to the government for a certified extract [Birth Certificate] Governments through the prism of their central banks use this Registry information to create negotiable instruments against which credit is advanced by the international funding community. The credit is repaid as Income Tax and interest by their purpose created artificial-legal-entity, Taxpayer which underpins the entire monetary system.

Member governments have established Reserve Banks that act as central banks whose policies are influenced by global financial institutions such as the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund.

10

These in turn filter into the BIS [Bank for International Settlements], being the world’s premier central banking institution.

There are three (3) Crowns operating in today’s world. The English Protestant Crown, The Roman Catholic Papal Crown [The Vatican] and the Jewish Khazar Crown.

A world famous Jewish family, the Rothschilds, established and privately control the Bank of England, which in turn spawned and controls most of the central banks in the industrialised world; UK, Europe & America, most notably the Federal Reserve Bank of America. Between them [cartel] they control the worlds monetary system.

For example These are the shareholders in the `Federal' Reserve Bank of America :-

Rothschild Banks of London and Berlin

Lazard Brothers Bank of Paris, Israel

Moses Sieff Banks Of Italy

Warburg Bank of Hamburg and Amsterdam

Lehman Brothers Bank of New York

Kuhn Loeb Bank Of New York

Chase Manhattan Bank Of New York

Goldman Sachs Bank Of New YorkThe law of commercial contract

We’ve totally succumbed to a system of commercial statutes, regulations, codes, ordinances and quasi laws that unrelentingly renders us ripe for the plundering.

In failing to properly recognise and arrest the onslaught of this insatiable juggernaut, we have perpetuated a curse that will continue on down the generations to haunt our heirs and successors.

When taxation that starts at 12% can be arbitrarily lifted to 30% then 60%, 80% and onwards, it soon becomes apparent that 100% is possible; and in so doing reveals the true nature of the beast.

Only living-souls can generate the energy required to create and produce anything; but, this man-made system of artificial-legal-entities has provided a means of swindling flesh and blood people out of their rightful entitlements.It is at this point that the Biblical law available to living-souls and flesh and blood-people almost miraculously disappears before our very eyes to be replaced by man-made statutes that govern the behaviour and activities of person(s) that are defined as corporations.

11

Most people will go their entire lives without ever discovering this clever deception.At first this is a little difficult to grasp but with a bit of perseverance you will come to appreciate the thinking behind such carefully crafted words.Once the government creates their artificial entity that simulates you [i.e. appears to be the same as you from your point of view], but is actually a contrivance of government statutes and regulations -- then they’ve got you.

When you fill out paperwork, application forms and attach your signature, then you have unwittingly entered into a contract.

This makes you subservient to all a governments rules and regulations through assumpsit [latin for assumed] contract because you are now bound by Terms and Conditions through your act of applying for or making application for

The government tricks you, John Doe into volunteering as an agent for or officer of their artificially-created corporatised entity, JOHN DOE.

Hence John Doe [living-soul] mistakenly believes that he is JOHN DOE [corporation-sole] and in the confusion forfeits his natural-rights.

In being a party to such an agreement or contract, albeit unwittingly; you, as a living-soul, flesh and blood-man are deemed to have voluntarily surrendered your rights under God’s Biblical law in exchange for honouring government statute(s).

NOW TAKE A LOOK AT YOUR Driver’s Licence Vehicle Registration Passport Birth Certificate Bank Account Credit Card Tax Assessment Property Deeds Commercial contracts Memberships

They are in the ALL-CAPITAL-LETTERS name of the artificial-legal-entity; and, you have been encouraged to believe there is no difference.

Applying for a Tax File Number or lodging an Income Tax Return invokes a contractual agreement that although may extend privileges, usually you neglect to acquaint yourself with all the penalties that apply which more often than not, are well camouflaged by the tangle of rules and regulations.

Now give some thought to the following

12

Have you ever applied

Have you ever appliedHave you ever appliedHave you ever appliedHave you ever appliedHave you ever appliedHave you ever appliedHave you ever appliedHave you ever appliedHave you ever applied

Have you ever appliedHave you ever appliedHave you ever appliedHave you ever appliedHave you ever appliedHave you ever applied

Have you ever appliedHave you ever appliedHave you ever appliedHave you ever appliedHave you ever applied

for

for afor afor afor afor afor afor afor afor a

to become ato become ato become ato become ato become ato become a

to register ato register ato register ato register ato register a

School Enrolment

Birth CertificateDriver’s LicenceCensus FormPassportTax File NumberWelfare BenefitBank AccountCredit CardMortgage

Subject ofCitizen ofResident ofMember ofVoterElector

TrustCompanyLand Title TeedProperty TitleMotor Vehicle

All the above-mentioned have one thing in common the act of applying for but more precisely a contractual agreement whereby you voluntarily and willingly request by the submission of an Application Form and are now contractually bound to all sorts of fines, taxes, duties, tariffs, customs, excise, registration, permit and licence fees.

We have voluntarily agreed, albeit unwittingly, to be the government’s natural energy source in return for privileges and penalties, rather than exercising your God-given inalienable rights which have fallen from sight in the mistaken belief that only the state can provide for our interests and wellbeing.

Government departments operate as corporations

Since 1 January 1991, every company in Australia has been issued with a nine-digit ACN. The ACN is issued by ASIC [The Australian Securities and Investment Commission] by way of the Corporations Act 2001 and is a unique identifier. No two companies have the same ACN.

Companies registered under the Corporations Act 2001 and business entities carrying on an enterprise in Australia are issued with an ABN

The ABN [Australian Business Number] is a single identifier for use in business dealings with and issued by the Australian Taxation Office (ATO).

Your ABN is based on your ACN but it has 2 additional leading digits and becomes an 11 digit number.

13

Refer to these websites

http://www.asic.gov.au/asic/asic_pub.nsf/byheadline/Australian+Company+Numbers?opendocument#aust_business_no

http://www.asic.gov.au/asic/asic_pub.nsf/byheadline/Australian+Business+Number?opendocument

Australian Company Number Name of Corporation ACN - 056108402 NSW POLICE ACN - 051038843 N.S.W. POLICE DEPARTMENT ACN - 062005850 N.S.W. POLICE SERVICE ACN - 054595649 N.S.W. POLICE SERVICE ACN - 056466963 N.S.W. POLICE SERVICE ACN - 056104940 N.S.W. POLICE SERVICE ACN - 057000521 N.S.W. POLICE SERVICE ACN - 065230122 N.S.W. POLICE SERVICE ACN - 074297233 N.S.W. POLICE SERVICE ACN - 074402494 N.S.W. POLICE SERVICE ACN - 054595096 N.S.W. POLICE SERVICE

Supreme Court of NSW - ABN 77 057 165 500 ACN 057 165 500

Local Court of NSW - ABN 68 199 215 208 ACN 199 215 208

NSW State Debt Recovery Office - ABN 77 766 744 918 ACN 766 744 918

Modern day courts

Modern day courts operate in any one of the following jurisdictions.

1. Law or Common Law

Damages claims between people only. Always requires there be an injured party. No criminal conviction

2. Equity Compelled performance as per contract. No criminal conviction

3. Admiralty Compelled performance as per International Maritime Contract. Criminal conviction applies

14

Judges will sometimes use the term “statutory jurisdiction” to try and confuse lay people that have chosen to defend themselves without engaging a lawyer.

Statutory jurisdiction is the application of the Uniform Commercial Code [UCC] which governs the rules of commerce and contract and is superior to state and federal constitutions.

Hidden away within its articles [currently UCC 1.308] is a common law remedy thus allowing an accused party to call for the injured party to be brought before the court for cross examination.

Common law [Requires there to be an injured party.]

The law of the Bible and similarly common law that has developed over time has but one purpose; to protect our fundamental rights and freedoms of – life, liberty and property.

Common law derives its force and authority from the customs and traditions of the people and cannot be radically altered as that is the nature of tradition; to maintain it as is, without too much change.

Common laws were originally developed from these customs when there were no written laws.

However, throughout history statute law has been corrupted and used in ways it was never intended to be used.

Statute laws have been created to control and enslave people for the sole benefit of those in power.

In 1677, the Statute of Frauds was enacted in England primarily for the purpose of putting a stop to the abusive use of “assumptive contract”. That statute required all, except very minor contracts, to be in writing, signed, sealed, witnessed and proof of delivery.

Under common law, in the protection of rights, the conversion of “free-born Sovereigns” into a legal entity called a “person”, and thus a “taxpayer”, outlaws that free-born Sovereign in violation of article 39 of the Magna Carta [1215].

Today we live in a world where we are told that our fundamental rights still exist, but there are times when we wonder, how is this so?

For example, we can have the full force of the law brought down upon us with a traffic violation, income tax irregularity, refusing to fill in a census form, etc.

These offences do no harm to the life, liberty or property of others.

There are no victims whose rights or freedoms have been violated so we ask; “how can this be?”

Common law ‘Trial by Jury’

15

Genuine common law is the product of the sense of fairness, and justice of the ordinary people and therefore ‘Trial by Jury’ is the only [peaceful] means known to mankind by which supreme power can be retained collectively and responsibly, lodged in the hands of ALL the people.

When a juror feels that the statute involved in any criminal offence is unfair, or that it infringes upon the defendant’s natural God-given inalienable or Constitutional rights, then it is his duty to affirm that the offending statute is really no law at all and that the violation of it is no crime at all, for no one is bound to obey an unjust law.

Such a juror must vote ‘not guilty’ regardless of the pressures or abuses that may be heaped on him by any or all other members of the jury with whom he may in good conscience disagree.

He is voting on the justice of the law according to his own conscience and convictions and not someone else’s.

Only as long as juries of ordinary citizens has the final say does government remain the servant, not the master, of the people.

Invoking sovereign immunity

Fundamental to understanding how to be a true sovereign [living-soul] is learning how to repel the government’s attempts at attaching this artificiality to us. The government being artificial [not a living organism], means that anything it creates is also artificial.The government does not have any energy in its own right. It exists only by the creative energy of we the people. Living-souls imbued with the breath-of-life, can trace this inheritance back to an original source; the author of life, God.This universal law is revealed to us in the Bible as

And the LORD God formed man of the dust of the ground, and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life; and man became a living soul

Genesis 2: 7 KJV

The most stubborn of non believers would have difficulty in challenging this logical belief.This is critical to understanding and invoking sovereign-immunity.

It’s only the artificial or corporate entities that fall within the crown’s [court’s] jurisdiction not living-souls and flesh and blood people.

16

Avoiding prosecution

Natural justice or the right of due process allows for any accusation [violation of law] to be tested [heard] before a properly convened court that will examine the evidence put before a jury of our peers to decide guilt or innocence.

However when a parliamentary statute has been breached or violated, then their court is a legislated government body headed by a magistrate or a judge.

Under ‘Statute’ law both plaintiff and defendant are always ‘artificial legal entities’ aka ‘corporations’

An example is a traffic matter where the issuing Police officer issues a traffic ticket. He’s only acting on behalf of or as agent for his employer, the New South Wales Police, the real Plaintiff in any subsequent court action.

Substitute the word agent for officer and you will see why all Australian Citizens according to the statutes are defined in statutes as persons [corporations] and similarly agents acting for, or on behalf of, a corporatised artificial-legal-entity referred to in the statute as a person.

This in and of itself is against Christian biblical law because our very existence as a living organism, is memorialised by the breath of life. We are not the dead-artificial-legal-entities created by the state.

Challenging the jurisdiction of a court

JURIS [an oath] DICTION; [verbal] … The legal right by which Judges exercise their authority. The power of the courts to inquire into the facts, apply the law, make decisions, and declare judgement.

We must learn how to successfully challenge the jurisdiction of a statutory court by rebutting all of the false assumptions they make, otherwise your silence will be interpreted as voluntarily surrendering jurisdiction.

Be warned though, that turning up in person before a court is routinely interpreted as the voluntary surrender of jurisdiction.

You are deemed to be joined in the discussion [matter] on the basis of your behaviour, otherwise why would you have bothered to appear.

There is a little known procedure whereby the court does recognise your right of Special Appearance but only to make a challenge to the court’s jurisdiction.

Under this circumstance the court accepts that you are not voluntarily surrendering to its jurisdiction.

However, you may not engage in any other discussion or presentation of documents or argument regarding the matter before the court, because you are not yet recognised as being joined in the matter

17

This forum of Special Appearance can quickly revert to General Appearance which makes it a difficult procedure to conduct.

You must deny being a dead-artificial-legal-entity

Either by letter or affidavit you need to identify and refute the following.

That there are two (2) similar-sounding entities identified in law:-

(a) Dead, artificial-legal-entity - JOHN DOE

(b) Living-soul and flesh & blood man - John Doe

Remember as well, Mister [Mr], Missus [Mrs] and Madam are tags that attach artificiality.If for example a judge or a magistrate addresses you as Mr Doe, just invite them to call you John “… your honour may call me John;” because it’s a method of attaching artificiality, hoping you won’t realise it and thus gaining jurisdiction over you.

Do not respond either physically or verbally. Remain respectfully mute and non-responsive.

That neatly avoids their attempt at gaining jurisdiction.

You must deny having an ‘address’ or being a ‘resident’

An address is artificial. You can not take it with you if you move.

You do not live at an address. You have a location. You live in your skin. You inhabit a shelter. You sojourn under the stars. You live in the greater universe continuum.

If you allow the artificial tag of “resident” or “address” to be attached to you, then the state construes that by default or by your silence, you must be their artificial creation whereby they then claim jurisdiction.

The correct method of contact or access, without surrendering jurisdiction is:- General Post

The word post does not refer to any corporate activity to do with artificial-legal-entities, but the word mail does.

You should also know that postcodes indicate commercial activity only between corporate entities.

18

You must deny being a ‘defendant’

Use the term ‘accused’.

When a Plaintiff issues their paperwork; ‘Court Attendance Notice’ Or ‘Summons’ they routinely refer to you as the defendant.

You should never accept under any circumstances this unassuming tag because it wrongly presumes, you, the living-soul and sovereign-man has something to defend and if you remain silent on this then the court interprets your silence as agreeance thus joining you in the controversy and declaring you to be a self-confessed party to the matter.

You must always rebut this assumption in a carefully worded and filed affidavit or letter addressed to the Registrar of the Court.

You must deny agreeing to contract through offering a ‘plea’

Guilty or not guilty has yet to be proven [established]. Until then it’s “innocent”

By insisting on a plea the court [magistrate] is attempting to gain jurisdiction by enticing you into a contractual agreement; thus gaining jurisdiction over the living-soul and sovereign-you, most times without your ever realising it.

You need to clearly state, verbally or in writing or both, that you are “innocent” and that by not offering to plea, the court can not construe that you have consented to contract or voluntarily surrendered to the court’s jurisdiction.

When you turn up before the court for the first time, the magistrate will always try and somehow coax or coerce you into entering a plea of guilty or not guilty, in order to gain jurisdiction.

Sometimes it might be a seemingly innocent question by a Judge such as “Do you understand the charge(s)?”

Remember another way to ask the same question would reveal its true nature.

“Do you stand under the charges?” Now there is no ambiguity and the reality of the situation becomes obvious.

If you admit to standing under the charge(s), then that’s contractual. You have just placed yourself under the court’s jurisdiction.

Eventually out of desperation they will even enter a not guilty plea on your behalf, which is why you need to actively resist, and state it in writing for the court record that you are innocent and do not consent to contract with the court by voluntarily entering a plea.

At least this action can’t be misheard, misunderstood, misinterpreted or ignored.

19

Your affidavit should clearly state that you, the living-soul and sovereign-man is innocent thus nicely avoiding any assumed contract through the act of entering a plea.

Most people do not realise why the police and the courts like you to have a solicitor, lawyer or licensed legal counsel, who as part of their job description, are taught to somehow secure of plea [guilty or not guilty]. If you indicate any objection, their role is to persuade or convince you, otherwise. Sometimes they may even step in and do it on your behalf, making it look like they’re doing you a favour, all the time hoping you’ll not object.

The focus here has nothing to do with innocence or guilt. The act of offering to plea is the same as offering to contract.

So up to this point, your letter or affidavit is a method of rebutting [denying] the assumption of jurisdiction because of an ‘assumed’ contract.

Again, most people will fail to realise that by remaining silent on these seemingly unimportant matters, it will be taken as your voluntary agreement to surrender jurisdiction to the court.

You must resist using paid legal counsel

Most people are not aware that the engagement of a lawyer or solicitor automatically gives jurisdiction to the crown [court].

Licensed legal practitioners have taken an oath of office that binds their loyalty to the crown. They forfeit their professional indemnity [insurances etc] if they promulgate [practise or spread] sovereign-law.

They are professionally trained in statute-law to re–present on behalf of an artificial-legal-entity because it is without substance or actuality.

That is, it has no conscience, morals, intelligence, voice, mobility etc.

The presence of a solicitor or lawyer before a court is a silent signal to a magistrate or judge that the court can safely assume it has jurisdiction because it is customary practice for legal professionals at some point to obtain their clients consent as part of their duty of care.

Some go as far as to provide a ‘Consent to Jurisdiction Form’ which they sign on your behalf, often without bothering to disclose this to you.

Therefore, you have voluntarily consented to the crown’s [court’s] jurisdiction without even realising it.

At this point you have successfully :-

1. Denied being a dead-artificial-legal-entity2. Denied having an “address” or being a “resident”3. Denied being a “defendant”

20

4. Denied agreeing to contract by offering a plea5. Denied “consent to jurisdiction” provided by default through a lawyer

or solicitor acting on your behalf.In order for you just to get to this point you do have to understand a great deal more about some of the other fundamental processes of the law and how it works, otherwise if a Magistrate were to question you on some of the contents of your affidavit, a vague response could bring all your efforts undone.

Sometimes understanding only a little can be very dangerous. It can be just enough to get you into trouble.

It’s like putting a loaded gun in the hands of child and hoping for the best. You need to be sure of all the facts and how to successfully articulate them.

Non payment of court fines

In January 1998, the State Debt Recovery Office [SDRO] , a division of the Office of State Revenue [OSR] in New South Wales, was given the responsibility of collecting outstanding fines.

As part of its charter it was given the power to suspend NSW Driver’s Licences, garnishee wages and seize property.

During the period 1997-1998 my NSW Driver’s Licence had been cancelled by the Roads and Traffic Authority [RTA] through the non-payment of the following outstanding fines.

In February 2003 the NSW Sherrif came to where I lived wanting to seize property for the non-payment of these fines.

I hurriedly wrote a protest letter to the NSW Director of the State Debt Recovery Office complaining that the Crown had no jurisdiction on the grounds that I was not a citizen of the Papal Crown of Rome or a subject of the British Protestant Crown. I added that I would be seeking full and final settlement and compensation if the Sheriff continued with this threatening action.

21

Infringement No. Offence Date Offence Original Fine Costs Total Cost1 203 642 973 19.08.1997 No Standing 101.00 50.00 $151.002 202 962 915 31.08.1997 No Standing 101.00 50.00 $151.003 204 254 252 22.09.1997 Double parked 123.00 50.00 $173.004 204 054 407 08.10.1997 Loading Zone 123.00 50.00 $173.005 204 418 791 11.10.1997 Exceed time limit 1 hour 101.00 50.00 $151.006 100 704 653 09.12.1997 No standing 60.00 100.00 $160.007 200 351 645 09.02.1998 Truck Zone 82.00 50.00 $132.008 200 916 693 27.03.1998 Construction Zone 67.00 50.00 $117.009 201 192 407 03.04.1998 No Stopping 134.00 50.00 $184.00

10 201 202 577 20.04.1998 Disobey Traffic light signal 201.00 50.00 $251.0011 202 515 128 03.06.1998 Loading Zone 82.00 50.00 $132.0012 202 869 441 12.06.1998 Loading Zone 122.00 50.00 $172.0013 205 013 852 14.09.1998 Loading Zone 82.00 50.00 $132.0014 205 631 270 22.10.1998 Loading Zone 82.00 50.00 $132.0015 208 514 899 28.11.1998 Exceed time limit 1 hour 60.00 50.00 $110.00

$2,320.00

In April, back came a response from the NSW Treasurer’s office, that in part suggested I might apply for the ‘annulment’ of all the ‘enforcement orders’ under section 48(2) of the Fines Act 1996. As well all enforcement action had been stayed for a period of eight weeks

In May I wrote again re-stating my defence and how the crown had no legal jurisdiction or sovereign authority, justified in origin to hear these matters.

I confirmed that I did indeed require all of the matters to be annulled and also that my rights to privacy be respected and all such reference to these matters be erased from their Driver’s Licence and Motor Vehicle registration records.

In June the response from the Treasurer’s office called for me to prove by ‘Statutory Declaration’ that I did not receive the notices or commit the offences. As well they wanted copies of documentation proving my ‘address’ during the period in question.

In July I responded with the following letter :-

Tuesday 15th July 2003

Dear Treasurer,

DEFENCE : Law and Sovereignty

I am writing in response to your letter dated 18 June 2003.

As requested, I have enclosed a Statutory Declaration that addresses all of the questions raised in your letter.

May I remind you, as I have stated in previous correspondence, that the Crown has no legal jurisdiction or sovereign authority, justified in origin, to hear these matters.

I am not a Citizen of the Papal Crown of Rome and I am not a subject of the British Protestant Crown.

I am a Sovereign Being, living in a Sovereign Estate, in the greater universe continuum.

My status as Sovereign means my authority is supreme to all other law except the laws of the Creator. As such, I enjoy, as all Sovereigns do, we’ll recognised and well documented inalienable rights.

Artificial Entity : Capitalised Lettering of Names

My name was the ‘intellectual property’ of my parents who gifted the property rights when gifting my name.

22

The State has taken my gifted name and corrupted it into ‘legalese’ and now applies sinister methodology in its use. An ‘artificial entity’ has been created which is referred to in Statute law as ‘person’ or ‘entity’ among other things.

I hold superior claim over my gifted name because it is my personal property and the State could not have created their ‘artificial entity’ without it first being created by my parents as a gift to me.

My name is my property, universally recognised under Common law, and the State can not use it for purposes of ‘demand’ unless there is a contract, which I have not willingly or knowingly signed, as an adult.

The State of New South Wales, by way of Statute law, has used the ‘colour of law’ by issuing a NSW Driver’s Licence to an artificial entity [identified as Capital-Lettering of Names]. I was not informed or advised of this situation and therefore no valid contract, in law, exists. Indeed the State, under the ‘colour of law’ has committed fraud and sought to extort monies from me, as a Sovereign.

In your letter, you also call for proof of residence at the time. It should be remembered that your call is to an ‘artificial entity’ not to a Sovereign as myself, to provide such information.

Thanking you in eager anticipation of your response,

I am

:John-G,:Ake:Sovereign BeingSovereign EstateGreater Universe Continuum

In September back came a response advising that all the matters would annulled under section 48(2) of the Fines Act 1996 and then re-listed at the nearest court to be re-heard.

On 25th November 2003 all the matters that were listed to be re-heard were all withdrawn at the last minute, and all cases were closed.

When an ‘Annulment Application’ is filed into the court under section 48(2) of the fines Act 1996 these are the following bureaucracies that are simultaneously informed about the application.

Infringement Processing BureauState Electrol OfficeClerk of the local courtOffice of the Sheriff,Roads and Traffic Authority [RTA]

Foreclosure, Bankruptcy, Repossession.

23

A corrupt education system continually promotes the false notion of ownership and in fact is a clever means used to exploit the fruits of our labor with imposts such as fines, taxes, tolls, duties, tariffs, customs, levies, excise, registration, permit and licence fees.

Today, many believe that once their mortgage has been paid, they own the land. This is to seriously misunderstand a deceptive legal system that eventually will fully reveal itself in the form of mandatory confiscations, heartless evictions, ruthless bankruptcies, stealthy probate and death duties. Most tenants never come to fully appreciate the feudal 'landlord'   and 'tenancy' law, as the invisible over-riding authority being exercised by the government.

By imagining they actually own a property, having secured papers detailing title, tenants then proceed to improve such property by sowing crops or erecting buildings or structures on the land.

Often they borrow more of the crown's fiat currency to do so.

It is important in this charade that they imagine they own the property otherwise they have little vested interest in its upkeep.

The over extended use of the crowns fiat currency can plunge tenants headlong into a foreclosure action, whereby the value of their expended time and effort is then transmitted to the crown via the ultimate legal sleight of hand.

This modus operandi is repeated over and over again by the crown and has become inter-generational.

In allowing a corporation such as the crown to exert sovereignty [Master status] we have foolishly offered ourselves and our posterity into a life of voluntary subservience.

Even when we are emotionally and financially broken most of us still fail to recognise this elephant in the room.

Offshore strategies - [Asset protection, personal & financial privacy solutions]

Asset protection is the positioning of assets to make them unattractive and legally unreachable by creditors, but available for financial goals and needs.

Remember, governments use our strawman as an invisible third-party middle-man to exploit and plunder the fruits of our labor [productivity - cash and assets].Likewise we need to act similarly by using alternative entities and identities as a means of securing ourselves, our property, cash and our assets.

Beware of those that would discourage you from going offshore

24

The local banking system is afraid you’ll transfer funds to foreign banks that offer better services.

Accountants and money managers are afraid of losing your business.

Credit bureaus and database firms that make money collecting and selling data about you.

Attorneys and lawyers afraid they will be unable to confiscate your savings if your money is safely overseas.

Why do law abiding people go offshore?

to increase personal privacy to protect against an invasive bureaucracy to protect against frivolous lawsuits to protect assets from seizure to assist estate planning to preserve assets for heirs & successors to protect a percentage of your income from income taxes to protect a percentage of your profits from capital taxes to protect capital gains from capital gains taxes to delay any taxation to increase investment diversification..

1. Private Companies, Trusts & Foundations

Trusts are based on Common Law, and are established through a private contractual document that does not need to be filed with a public entity.

Fixed non-discretionary Trusts Discretionary or revocable Trusts Testamentary Trusts Owning an offshore company through a Trust Offshore Trusts

2. Debit and credit card facilities in a foreign jurisdiction.

Offshore banking is tax free, there are no foreign exchange regulations, and all account information is confidential.

Anonymous banking Offshore credit cards

25

3. Easy internet access for monitoring, transfers, purchases & payments.

Offshore mail-drops Offshore merchants Anonymous mobile & sim cards Offshore brokerage

4. Perpetual Traveller status with multiple passports

Tax free cars Immigration services Camouflage passports

The following “novelty” ID cards which can be useful for many circumstances depending on not just who you are, but who or what you want to be.

Readily available on the internet for a nominal fee. No questions asked. No records kept.

Anti-Terroist Army SniperBail Enforcement Agent Black BeltBody Guard SecurityConcealed Weapons Permit Delta ForceExecutive Body Guard Explosives ExpertIdentification Card Intelligence OfficerLocksmith Organised Crime BureauOrdained Minister PhotographerPilot Private DetectivePrivate Investigator Property PassRegistered Mercenary Scuba DiverSecurity Consultant Security Enforcement OfficerSpecial Agent Special ForcesSpecial Investigator Special OperationsSpecial Security Officer Special Weapons PermitState Identification Tax ExemptVietnam Veteran Weapons Specialist

Press agencies and student associations issue ID cards to whomsoever they like.Premium Press Cards

A ‘Press Card’ forgives a multitude of sins. It may get you the best seats, often for free, at restaurants, sporting and social events, and you will often be traded up to first class on flights.

26

Many countries offer special deals for foreign journalists (Germany, for example, offers half price rail travel to foreign journalists). At the other end of the scale, a Press Card really could save your life - in war zones or times of civil unrest, authorities still respect foreign journalists because they fear negative publicity.

Press Card

An Asian ‘PRESS ID’. This card is offered on the internet. Available as a novelty item but very convincing.

Travel Agent ID Card

Identify yourself as a travel agent at hotel chains, airlines and car rental offices for VIP treatment. You can expect upgrades and heavy discounts. Usually an impressive document which identifies you as a bona fide travel agent.

(Note this card does not identify you as an agent on the IATAN list. However, for most purposes, especially outside the USA or at smaller hotels, this card will do the trick.)

British Hong Kong Drivers Licence

The UK government no longer issues any Hong Kong drivers licenses, but not every one knows that.

The British Hong Kong drivers license is an impressive card which identifies you as a resident of British Hong Kong, showing your name, address and date of birth.

In conclusion

For those of you interested in “sovereignty” and what it truly means, my hope is that this document will help you unravel some of the truths and peel back the layers that cleverly disguise what is being masqueraded as “the law”.Invoking sovereign or biblical law in my opinion is far superior to the ever-changing man-made statutes of a parliament.

The Bible is the key that unlocks the mystery of the universe to Man and the mystery of Man to himself.

It is a book of the emancipation of man.

27

The emancipation of man means his delivery from sorrow, sickness, poverty, uncertainty, ignorance, limitation, and finally from death itself.

That we as part of His sovereign creation – the greater universe continuum - may have life in abundance.

"I am come that they might have life, and that they might have it more abundantly"

John 10:10

French novelist Emile Zola wrote "If you shut up the truth and bury it under the ground, it will but grow, and gather to itself such explosive power that the day it bursts through it will blow up everything in its way."

American author Mark Twain wrote "In the beginning of change, the patriot is a scarce man; brave, hated and scorned. When his cause succeeds, however, the timid join him, for then it costs nothing to be a patriot"

_______________________________________________________________         

SEE THE FOLLOWING PAGE FOR

SAMPLE

THREE [3] PAGE AFFIDAVIT

To : The RegistrarDowning Centre Local Court Level 4, 143-147 Liverpool StrSYDNEY 2000

Case No’s : 20618808/07 Case No’s : 20618913/07

Case No’s : 20618928/07Case No’s :

28

20618247/07

Between NEW SOUTH WALES POLICE

Plaintiff

And JOHN PETER DOE of RUSHCUTTERS BAY, Corporation Sole

Accused

Affidavit of John Peter [living-soul]by Special Appearance

challenging the court’s jurisdiction

Application made by:John Peter [Doe]Sojourner, contactable care-of 296 Carrington RoadRushcutters Bay NSW 2246

Affidavit [Challenging the court’s jurisdiction]

On Saturday 3rd February 2007, I John of the family Doe, bondservant of Jesus the Christ; a sojourner contactable care-of 296 Carrington Road, Cromer NSW 2246 declares:-

1. THAT I make this “Special Appearance” before the court, to assist the court in distinguishing between myself John Doe [living-soul] and JOHN DOE [corporation sole]. I am not responding to the complainant’s “Summons” or “Court Attendance Notice”; and, my appearance before the court must not be construed as volunteering jurisdiction.

29

2. THAT I have not engaged the services of licenced legal counsel; and, thereby rebut any assumed “consent to contract” or “consent to jurisdiction”

3. THAT I am “John” with the initial letter capitalised as required by the Rules of English Grammar when writing the description of a living-soul. I am the son of a man and a woman and issue from the family “Doe” with the initial letter capitalised.

4. THAT I am not a life-less, dead-in-law-artificial-legal-entity.

5. THAT I am who I say I am; not, who the imaginations, devices or records of men, say that I am.

6. THAT it is the responsibility of the complainant to bring the correct party before the court. I am not that party.

7. THAT I am innocent. I do not offer a plea of either guilty or not guilty; and, therefore refuse any offer to contract with either the court [the crown] or the complainant.

8. THAT I rebut and deny any claim that I am a “Defendant”; and, instead declare that I am a flesh and blood, living-soul created in the image of my God, according to my standard of truth, the Holy Bible which says :

“.. And the LORD God formed man of the dust of the ground, and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life; and man became a living soul.”

Genesis Chapter 2:7

………………………………….. ………………………………….. Teresa May Wellington John [Doe]

Justice of the Peace Affiant

9. THAT consistent with the biblical law unless I have willfully harmed or violated someone or their property without their consent, I have not committed any wrongdoing; and, therefore I am not liable to any penalty(s).

10. THAT this court coming as it does from a colourable jurisdiction, has no legal jurisdiction or sovereign authority, justified in origin, to hear these matters or impose any penalty(s) upon a declared living-soul and flesh and blood man.

11. THAT let the court record show, through the file-copy of this “Affidavit”, that the accused “reserves the right of allocution” and objects to this court pronouncing any sentence in these matters on the “fact issues” while the “law issues” remain in dispute.

30

12. THAT the accused, in placing this court “On Notice”; reserves the right of allocution, and will formulate objections to a higher Court of Appeal but not in a genuine “Writ of Error” but rather “in the nature of a Writ of Error” which the accused believes is a recognised “colourable objection”.

…………………………………………… John [Doe]

Affiant

“Signed at 49 Wendall Crescent, Kings Cross NSW 2100 before me”

…………………………………………………………………………………………. Teresa May Wellington Justice of the Peace

31