ESCP 2015 Dublin Sissel Ravn Millie Ngaage Dave Golding Carl-Philip Rancinger Merle Stellingwerf.

9
ESCP 2015 Dublin Sissel Ravn Millie Ngaage Dave Golding Carl-Philip Rancinger Merle Stellingwerf

Transcript of ESCP 2015 Dublin Sissel Ravn Millie Ngaage Dave Golding Carl-Philip Rancinger Merle Stellingwerf.

Page 1: ESCP 2015 Dublin Sissel Ravn Millie Ngaage Dave Golding Carl-Philip Rancinger Merle Stellingwerf.

ESCP 2015DublinSissel RavnMillie NgaageDave GoldingCarl-Philip RancingerMerle Stellingwerf

Page 2: ESCP 2015 Dublin Sissel Ravn Millie Ngaage Dave Golding Carl-Philip Rancinger Merle Stellingwerf.

Post appendectomy wound infection

Page 3: ESCP 2015 Dublin Sissel Ravn Millie Ngaage Dave Golding Carl-Philip Rancinger Merle Stellingwerf.

PICO

Patients: Non-perforated appendectomy patients

Intervention: Antibiotic prophylaxis

Comparison: No treatment/ placebo

Outcome: Postoperative infections

Page 4: ESCP 2015 Dublin Sissel Ravn Millie Ngaage Dave Golding Carl-Philip Rancinger Merle Stellingwerf.

Introduction

Appendicitis most common cause of acute abdominal pain requiring surgery

Site infection is the most common complication in surgery

Infections increase morbidity, mortality, length of hospital stay and

health care cost¹, ²

Studies showed prophylactic antibiotics to be effective in reducing post operative infections³

What would be the outcome of a pan-European study?

Page 5: ESCP 2015 Dublin Sissel Ravn Millie Ngaage Dave Golding Carl-Philip Rancinger Merle Stellingwerf.

AimPrimary

- Evaluate the value of prophylactic antibiotics in reducing post operative site infections in patients requiring appendectomy

Secondary

- Compare open and laparoscopic appendectomy with regard to site infections

- Evaluate the diagnostic method: Clinically or CT-scan

Page 6: ESCP 2015 Dublin Sissel Ravn Millie Ngaage Dave Golding Carl-Philip Rancinger Merle Stellingwerf.

Method

Prospective - 2 week capture period

Patient population: patients with non-perforated appendicitis who undergo open or laparoscopic appendectomies, 18+

Variables: experience of surgeon

Follow up: 3 month period

Inclusion/exclusion criteria: Exclude patients with T2DM, previous transplants, HIV status

Primary outcome measures: Southampton wound score? Or define our own parameters? (i.e. positive bacteria culture, extended hospital stay, persistent pyrexia, presence of pus).

Outcome assessed by a blinded clinician

Page 7: ESCP 2015 Dublin Sissel Ravn Millie Ngaage Dave Golding Carl-Philip Rancinger Merle Stellingwerf.

Perspectives

- Establish a European database

- Expand the method to other populations

Page 8: ESCP 2015 Dublin Sissel Ravn Millie Ngaage Dave Golding Carl-Philip Rancinger Merle Stellingwerf.

Any questions or input?

Page 9: ESCP 2015 Dublin Sissel Ravn Millie Ngaage Dave Golding Carl-Philip Rancinger Merle Stellingwerf.

References

1. Barie PS. Surgical site infections: Epidemiology and prevention. Surg Infect 2002;3(Suppl 1):S9–S21. 2. Mangram AJ, Horan TC, Pearson ML, et al. Guideline for prevention of surgical site infection, 1999. Hospital Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1999;20:250–278.3. Andersen BR, Kallehave FL, Andersen HK. Antibiotics versus placebo of postoperative infection after appendicectomy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 Jul 20;(3): CD001439.