Erratum to Molecular Dynamics Simulations of Highly Crowded Amino Acid Solutions: Comparisons of...
1
Erratum to Molecular Dynamics Simulations of Highly Crowded Amino Acid Solutions: Comparisons of Eight Different Force Field Combinations with Experiment and with Each Other Casey T. Andrews and Adrian H. Elcock* Department of Biochemistry, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa 52242 J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2013, 9, 4585-4602. DOI: 10.1021/ct400371h P age 4589. In the discussion of the viscosity data shown in Figure 2A, it was incorrectly stated that fits of the data gave small but consistently negative values for β. Instead, it should read that the fits gave small but consistently positive values for β. Page 4594. In the legend for Figure 7, the results obtained with the CHARMM27 and GROMOS 53A6 force fields were incorrectly labeled. The results obtained with the CHARMM27 force field are represented by the red symbols, and the results obtained with the GROMOS 53A6 force field are represented by the green symbols. The authors apologize for these mistakes. ■ AUTHOR INFORMATION Corresponding Author *E-mail: [email protected]. Received: February 20, 2014 Published: March 6, 2014 Erratum pubs.acs.org/JCTC © 2014 American Chemical Society 1834 dx.doi.org/10.1021/ct500151a | J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2014, 10, 1834-1834
Transcript of Erratum to Molecular Dynamics Simulations of Highly Crowded Amino Acid Solutions: Comparisons of...
Erratum to Molecular Dynamics Simulations of Highly CrowdedAmino Acid Solutions: Comparisons of Eight Different Force FieldCombinations with Experiment and with Each OtherCasey T. Andrews and Adrian H. Elcock*
Department of Biochemistry, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa 52242
J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2013, 9, 4585−4602. DOI: 10.1021/ct400371h
Page 4589. In the discussion of the viscosity data shown inFigure 2A, it was incorrectly stated that fits of the data gave
small but consistently negative values for β. Instead, it shouldread that the fits gave small but consistently positive values forβ.Page 4594. In the legend for Figure 7, the results obtained
with the CHARMM27 and GROMOS 53A6 force fields wereincorrectly labeled. The results obtained with the CHARMM27force field are represented by the red symbols, and the resultsobtained with the GROMOS 53A6 force field are representedby the green symbols.The authors apologize for these mistakes.
■ AUTHOR INFORMATIONCorresponding Author*E-mail: [email protected].
Received: February 20, 2014Published: March 6, 2014
Erratum
pubs.acs.org/JCTC
© 2014 American Chemical Society 1834 dx.doi.org/10.1021/ct500151a | J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2014, 10, 1834−1834
