Erratum: New method for the solution of the logarithmic nonlinear Schrödinger equation via...
1
PHYSICAL REVIEW A VOLUME 35, NUMBER 3 Errata FEBRUARY 1, 1987 Erratum: Measurements of tilt angle and heat capacity in the vicinity of one smectic- A — chiral — smectic- C transition [Phys. Rev. A 33, 2181 (1986)] S. Dumrongrattana, G. Nounesis, and C. C. Huang In the figure caption of Fig. 1, the sample thickness should be 72 pm instead of 36 pm. Erratum: New method for the solution of the logarithmic nonlinear Schrodinger equation via stochastic mechanics [Phys. Rev. A 33, 3502 (1986)] Antonio B. Nassar The beginning of the sentence right above Eq. (19a) should read "Thus, for F =0, the zero-point energy will be given by". ... Erratum: Resolved nuclear hyperfine structure of a muonated free radical using level-crossing spectroscopy [Phys. Rev. A 34, 681 (1986)] R. F. Kiefl, S. Kreitzman, M. Celio, R. Keitel, G. M. Luke, J. H. Brewer, D. R. Noakes, P. W. Percival, T. Matsuzaki, and K. Nishiyama In Eq. (1) M+ should be W —. On page 683, left-hand column, on the sixth line from the bottom, "Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen results" should read "electron-spin-resonance results. " Erratum: Flow patterns and nonlinear behavior of traveling waves in a convective binary fluid [Phys. Rev. A 34, 693 (1986)] Elisha Moses and Victor Steinberg The contrast in Fig. 2 was greatly diminished in print. This eliminated the possibility of observing changes in the flow pattern between the propagating structure [Fig. 2(a)] and the stationary one [Fig. 2(c)]. Notice that the rolls are shorter in the propagating structure, especially near the ends of the cell. As we point out, this is connected to the existence of a backflow (i. e. , mass conservation), which is probably located near the side walls. Note also the disruption of the parallel structure apparent in Fig. 2(b), where the system is at the transition from oscillatory to stationary behavior. 35 1444 1987 The American Physical Society
Transcript of Erratum: New method for the solution of the logarithmic nonlinear Schrödinger equation via...
PHYSICAL REVIEW A VOLUME 35, NUMBER 3
Errata
FEBRUARY 1, 1987
Erratum: Measurements of tilt angle and heat capacity in the vicinityof one smectic- A —chiral —smectic- C transition
[Phys. Rev. A 33, 2181 (1986)]
S. Dumrongrattana, G. Nounesis, and C. C. Huang
In the figure caption of Fig. 1, the sample thickness should be 72 pm instead of 36 pm.
Erratum: New method for the solution of the logarithmic nonlinearSchrodinger equation via stochastic mechanics
[Phys. Rev. A 33, 3502 (1986)]
Antonio B. Nassar
The beginning of the sentence right above Eq. (19a) should read "Thus, for F =0, the zero-point energy will be givenby". . . .
Erratum: Resolved nuclear hyperfine structure of a muonated free radicalusing level-crossing spectroscopy
[Phys. Rev. A 34, 681 (1986)]
R. F. Kiefl, S. Kreitzman, M. Celio, R. Keitel, G. M. Luke, J. H. Brewer,D. R. Noakes, P. W. Percival, T. Matsuzaki, and K. Nishiyama
In Eq. (1) M+ should be W —.On page 683, left-hand column, on the sixth line from the bottom, "Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen results" should read
"electron-spin-resonance results. "
Erratum: Flow patterns and nonlinear behavior of traveling wavesin a convective binary fluid
[Phys. Rev. A 34, 693 (1986)]
Elisha Moses and Victor Steinberg
The contrast in Fig. 2 was greatly diminished in print. This eliminated the possibility of observing changes in the flowpattern between the propagating structure [Fig. 2(a)] and the stationary one [Fig. 2(c)]. Notice that the rolls are shorterin the propagating structure, especially near the ends of the cell. As we point out, this is connected to the existence of abackflow (i.e., mass conservation), which is probably located near the side walls. Note also the disruption of the parallelstructure apparent in Fig. 2(b), where the system is at the transition from oscillatory to stationary behavior.
35 1444 1987 The American Physical Society
