Latest Stories

It’s now defense as Corona trial resumes

Commentary

Farmers, elections and Smartmatic

By: Ernesto M. OrdoñezPhilippine Daily Inquirer

9:54 pm | Thursday, March 8th, 20120 Recommend

The agricultural sector constitutes the largest voting group in the country. But the integrity of its vote

will be compromised by the possible decision of Comelec to allow Smartmatic to sell its discredited

machines for the 2013 elections. This spells disaster.

During the 2010 elections, three critical groups were routinely called during the Senate and Housedeliberations of the proposed automated election system. These were Namfrel, Automated Election

System Watch and the Alyansa Agrikultura. It was the first time the agricultural sector took part in

congressional hearings that would determine the conduct of elections.

The Alyansa Agrikultura, a coalition of 42 federations and organizations representing all agriculturalsectors, made a significant contribution during these hearings. Congressional co-chair Rep. Teodoro

Locsin cited the AA recommendation on a proposed audit procedure that AA had designed with

Mahar Mangahas of the Social Weather Stations and Baltazar Endriga, the SGV partner who createdand headed the SGV’s information technology division.

AA also secured the signatures of the presidential candidates (except two) favoring an election audit

that was published in major newspapers. However, the Melo Commission turned down the AA

proposal.

Today, AA unites with several groups that strongly oppose the inclusion of Smartmatic among thebidders for next year’s election machines. We hope that the Brillante Commission (the current

Comelec) does not follow the sad example of the Melo Commission (the former Comelec).

Smartmatic deficiencies

The major deficiencies of the Smartmatic machines during the 2010 elections are too many to citehere. However, we will cite three:

– The compact flash cards that determine how votes would be counted were not certified and found

defective only one week before the 2010 elections. To make matters worse, they were changed

�� ������� ��

Farmers, elections and Smartmatic | Inquirer Business http://business.inquirer.net/48239/farmers-elections-and-smartmatic

1 of 3 3/12/2012 3:25 PM

We Recommend

President’s daughter who built a

career in PR

Loyal Innova owners speak up4 Filipinos killed in Canada car

From Around The Web

Is the Lottery Ever a Good

Investment? (Betterment)

These 4 Huge Economies are inDeep Trouble (StreetAuthority)

without the necessary certification. This is a main reason why there are so many anomalies that

remain unresolved.

– Several provisions to safeguard the integrity of the votes, such as the ultra-violet lamps and the

digital signatures, were not only not provided, but actually disabled.

There is therefore no certainty that the votes at the precinct level were the actual votes finallyrecorded for the election.

– The Smartmatic machines may well be second-hand. A Sept. 17, 2011, Inquirer report stated: “A

compact flash card used in one of the precincts in Pikit, North Cotabato, yielded the results of the

election in Colombia.” In a March 5, 2012, letter to the Brillante Commission, AES Watch (whereAgriwatch is a member) stated: “Considering their use in previous election exercises in another

country, the question of how old the PCOS machines are becomes a major concern.”

Conclusion

Since at least eight Philippine and international election-monitoring groups have cited majordeficiencies in Smartmatic that remain undisputed, why allow Smartmatic to bid for next year’s

crucial elections?

An official argued: “Because Smartmatic may be cheaper.” To which a Comelec Commissioner

responded: “It is also cheaper to buy pirated DVDs, but it is wrong.”

Allowing Smartmatic to bid may give you a cheaper price, but it is wrong. It would be deplorable ifthe Brillante Commission follows the misguided direction of the Melo Commission.

March is Women’s Month

The only voting sector larger than the agricultural sector is women. Chair Winnie Monsod of the

Movement for Good Governance will explain why many women strongly oppose Smartmatic’s

possible involvement in next year’s elections. This is supported by leaders of the Rural Women’sMovement.

AES Watch has stated: “We respectfully submit that the noncompliance by Smartmatic-Tim of the

minimum requirements and capabilities that impaired the accuracy, security and auditability of the

May 2010 elections should be a ground for disqualifying the company from participating in thebidding for the 2013 elections.”

All who value election integrity should join hands with these agriculture and women groups in

strongly opposing Smartmatic’s involvement in next year’s electoral exercises.

The author is chairman of Agriwatch, former secretary for presidential flagship programs and

former undersecretary of agriculture and trade. For inquiries, e-mail agriwatch_phil@yahoo.com

or telefax (02) 8522112.

Farmers, elections and Smartmatic | Inquirer Business http://business.inquirer.net/48239/farmers-elections-and-smartmatic

2 of 3 3/12/2012 3:25 PM