Measurement and application of equivalent alkane carbon number
Equivalent Number[DD2]
-
Upload
abdul-aziz -
Category
Documents
-
view
220 -
download
0
Transcript of Equivalent Number[DD2]
-
7/30/2019 Equivalent Number[DD2]
1/38
10/9/20
EQUIVALENTNUMBER&MITIGATELIQUIFACTION
Disusun Oleh:
DAMRIZAL DAMOERIN
Referensi:
. , ,, ,Co., Inc., 1984
2. Prakash, Soil Dynamics, McGraw Hill, 1981.
3. Nayak, N. V., Foundation Design Manual, Dhanpat Rai & Sons,Publishers, Delhi, 1982.
-
7/30/2019 Equivalent Number[DD2]
2/38
10/9/20
-
7/30/2019 Equivalent Number[DD2]
3/38
10/9/20
-
7/30/2019 Equivalent Number[DD2]
4/38
10/9/20
-
7/30/2019 Equivalent Number[DD2]
5/38
10/9/20
-
7/30/2019 Equivalent Number[DD2]
6/38
10/9/20
-
7/30/2019 Equivalent Number[DD2]
7/38
10/9/20
-
7/30/2019 Equivalent Number[DD2]
8/38
10/9/20
-
7/30/2019 Equivalent Number[DD2]
9/38
10/9/20
-
7/30/2019 Equivalent Number[DD2]
10/38
10/9/20
-
7/30/2019 Equivalent Number[DD2]
11/38
10/9/20
-
7/30/2019 Equivalent Number[DD2]
12/38
10/9/20
-
7/30/2019 Equivalent Number[DD2]
13/38
10/9/20
-
7/30/2019 Equivalent Number[DD2]
14/38
10/9/20
-
7/30/2019 Equivalent Number[DD2]
15/38
10/9/20
-
7/30/2019 Equivalent Number[DD2]
16/38
10/9/20
-
7/30/2019 Equivalent Number[DD2]
17/38
10/9/20
-
7/30/2019 Equivalent Number[DD2]
18/38
10/9/20
Valera and Donovan (1977) stated that the methods of evaluation of liquefaction potential can be classified into categories:
(1). Methods where both the cyclic shear stresses induced within a soil deposit and the signifi cant number of stresses cycles and their
distribution with time are computed using simplified procedures
(2). Methods where the cyclic sresses induced within a soil deposit are computed by means of ground response analysis.
(3). Empirical methods based on field performance data.
Methods (1):
The maximum shear stress at a depth h:
max = m x a max = [( x h ) / (g)] x (amax)
max : maximum shear stress
: unit weight of soil
h : depth below ground surface
g : acceleration due to gravity
a max : maximum ground surface acceleration
-
7/30/2019 Equivalent Number[DD2]
19/38
10/9/20
max : maximum shear stress
: unit weight of soil
h : depth below ground surfaceg : acceleration due to gravity
a max : maximum ground surface acceleration
The soil column is not a rigid body:
max(modified) = x x g x a maxCd : st ress reduction factor
( 1.0: at the ground surface; 0.5: at about 100 ft below ground surface )
It has been shown that the maximum shear stress determined from the shear stress-time history during an earthquake can be converted into an
equivalent number of significant stress cycles.
According to Seed and Idriss (191):
` av = 0.65 x max(modified) = 0.65 x Cd x [( x h ) / (g)] x (amax)
The 0.65 factor assumes that the equivalent uniform shear stresses,
av , is 65 % of the absolute maximum earthquake induced shear stress.
-
7/30/2019 Equivalent Number[DD2]
20/38
10/9/20
2
-
7/30/2019 Equivalent Number[DD2]
21/38
10/9/20
2
-
7/30/2019 Equivalent Number[DD2]
22/38
10/9/20
2
-
7/30/2019 Equivalent Number[DD2]
23/38
10/9/20
2
-
7/30/2019 Equivalent Number[DD2]
24/38
10/9/20
2
Ug=excess pore waterpressure generatedby cyclic shear
stress
Tv=initialconsolidationpressure
-
7/30/2019 Equivalent Number[DD2]
25/38
10/9/20
2
(a): Ns/Ni=1
-
7/30/2019 Equivalent Number[DD2]
26/38
10/9/20
2
(b): Ns/Ni =2
: Ns/Ni =3
-
7/30/2019 Equivalent Number[DD2]
27/38
10/9/20
2
(d): Ns/Ni =4
-
7/30/2019 Equivalent Number[DD2]
28/38
10/9/20
2
-
7/30/2019 Equivalent Number[DD2]
29/38
10/9/20
2
-
7/30/2019 Equivalent Number[DD2]
30/38
10/9/20
3
-
7/30/2019 Equivalent Number[DD2]
31/38
10/9/20
3
-
7/30/2019 Equivalent Number[DD2]
32/38
10/9/20
3
-
7/30/2019 Equivalent Number[DD2]
33/38
10/9/20
3
-
7/30/2019 Equivalent Number[DD2]
34/38
10/9/20
3
-
7/30/2019 Equivalent Number[DD2]
35/38
10/9/20
3
-
7/30/2019 Equivalent Number[DD2]
36/38
10/9/20
3
Relative Density Dr vs. SPT N
(Holtz and Gibbs, 1957)
Relative Density and Frict ionAngle of Sand vs. SPT N
Nvalue Density D (%) (blows/ft) description
0to44to10
10to3030to50
>50
VerylooseLoose
Medium
Dense
Verydense
0to1515to3535to6565to85
85to100
41
(Terzaghi and Peck, 1967)
-
7/30/2019 Equivalent Number[DD2]
37/38
10/9/20
3
-
7/30/2019 Equivalent Number[DD2]
38/38
10/9/20