Equivalent Linear Site Response Analyses of Kathmandu Valley

33
EQUIVALENT LINEAR SITE RESPONSE ANALYSES OF KATHMANDU VALLEY Dipendra Gautam 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 P eriod (sec) S pectralA cceleration (g)

description

Ground response analyses of Kathmandu valley, Nepal

Transcript of Equivalent Linear Site Response Analyses of Kathmandu Valley

Page 1: Equivalent Linear Site Response Analyses of Kathmandu Valley

EQUIVALENT LINEAR SITE RESPONSE ANALYSES OF

KATHMANDU VALLEY

Dipendra Gautam

0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 40

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

1.2

1.4

Period (sec)

Spect

ral A

ccel

era

tion (

g)

Page 2: Equivalent Linear Site Response Analyses of Kathmandu Valley

OUTLINES

Introduction

Geology of Nepal

Geology of Kathmandu Valley

Seismicity

Research Objectives

Methodology

Results

Discussions

Conclusion

Research Horizon

Acknowledgements

04/19/2023 2

0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 40

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

1.2

1.4

Period (sec)

Spect

ral A

ccel

era

tion (

g)

Page 3: Equivalent Linear Site Response Analyses of Kathmandu Valley

INTRODUCTION

Effects of Earthquakes:

Ground Shaking

Structural Hazards

Liquefaction

Landslides

04/19/2023 3

0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 40

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

1.2

1.4

Period (sec)

Spect

ral A

ccel

era

tion (

g)

Page 4: Equivalent Linear Site Response Analyses of Kathmandu Valley

INTRODUCTION

Ground Shaking

04/19/2023 4

0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 40

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

1.2

1.4

Period (sec)

Spect

ral A

ccel

era

tion (

g)

Source: www.google.com

Page 5: Equivalent Linear Site Response Analyses of Kathmandu Valley

INTRODUCTION

Structural hazard

04/19/2023 5

0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 40

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

1.2

1.4

Period (sec)

Spect

ral A

ccel

era

tion (

g)

Source: www.google.com

Page 6: Equivalent Linear Site Response Analyses of Kathmandu Valley

INTRODUCTION

Liquefaction

04/19/2023 6

0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 40

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

1.2

1.4

Period (sec)

Spect

ral A

ccel

era

tion (

g)

Source: www.google.com

Page 7: Equivalent Linear Site Response Analyses of Kathmandu Valley

INTRODUCTION

Landslide

04/19/2023 7

0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 40

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

1.2

1.4

Period (sec)

Spect

ral A

ccel

era

tion (

g)

Source: www.google.com

Page 8: Equivalent Linear Site Response Analyses of Kathmandu Valley

INTRODUCTION

8

Site Effects

0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 40

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

1.2

1.4

Period (sec)

Spect

ral A

ccel

era

tion (

g)

Amplitude r(t)= source signal e(t)* distance from source p(t)* local site effects s(t)

Page 9: Equivalent Linear Site Response Analyses of Kathmandu Valley

INTRODUCTION

04/19/2023 9

0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 40

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

1.2

1.4

Period (sec)

Spect

ral A

ccel

era

tion (

g)

Seismic Hazard Map of Nepal ( After DMG)

Kathmandu

Page 10: Equivalent Linear Site Response Analyses of Kathmandu Valley

INTRODUCTION

Site Effects are important

1985 Mexico City earthquake (Mw=8.1) 1989 Loma Prieta earthquake (Mw=7.1)

NEPAL: An earthquake prone area…!

04/19/2023 10

0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 40

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

1.2

1.4

Period (sec)

Spect

ral A

ccel

era

tion (

g)

Page 11: Equivalent Linear Site Response Analyses of Kathmandu Valley

GEOLOGY OF NEPAL

11

0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 40

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

1.2

1.4

Period (sec)

Spect

ral A

ccel

era

tion (

g)

Kathmandu

After Uprety and Le Fort, 1999

Page 12: Equivalent Linear Site Response Analyses of Kathmandu Valley

GEOLOGY OF KATHMANDU VALLEY

04/19/2023 12After DMG

0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 40

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

1.2

1.4

Period (sec)

Spect

ral A

ccel

era

tion (

g)

Page 13: Equivalent Linear Site Response Analyses of Kathmandu Valley

GEOLOGICAL CROSS SECTION OF KATHMANDU VALLEY

04/19/2023 13After Sakai, 2001

0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 40

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

1.2

1.4

Period (sec)

Spect

ral A

ccel

era

tion (

g)

Page 14: Equivalent Linear Site Response Analyses of Kathmandu Valley

SEISMICITY

14

Rupture zones of large Himalayan earthquakes since 1800 (After Bilham et. al., 2001, modified by Feldl, 2005)

0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 40

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

1.2

1.4

Period (sec)

Spect

ral A

ccel

era

tion (

g)

Page 15: Equivalent Linear Site Response Analyses of Kathmandu Valley

SEISMICITY

04/19/2023 15

Intense micro-seismicity monitored between 1994 and 2005 ( after DMG, 2006)

0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 40

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

1.2

1.4

Period (sec)

Spect

ral A

ccel

era

tion (

g)

Page 16: Equivalent Linear Site Response Analyses of Kathmandu Valley

RESEARCH OBJECTIVES

Work out equivalent linear site response

analyses of soft sediment deposit of Kathmandu

valley

Comparison of computed parameters with the

damage pattern of 1934 Bihar-Nepal earthquake

04/19/2023 16

0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 40

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

1.2

1.4

Period (sec)

Sp

ect

ral

Acc

ele

ratio

n (

g)

Page 17: Equivalent Linear Site Response Analyses of Kathmandu Valley

METHODOLOGY

04/19/2023 17

0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 40

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

1.2

1.4

Period (sec)

Spect

ral A

ccel

era

tion (

g)

Page 18: Equivalent Linear Site Response Analyses of Kathmandu Valley

BOREHOLE LOCATIONS

04/19/2023 18

0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 40

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

1.2

1.4

Period (sec)

Spect

ral A

ccel

era

tion (

g)

Page 19: Equivalent Linear Site Response Analyses of Kathmandu Valley

INPUT MOTION

(Uttarkashi earthquake) Time History

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40-0.3

-0.2

-0.1

0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

Period (sec)

Acc

eler

atio

n (g

)

Response spectra

0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 40

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

1.2

1.4

Period (sec)

Spe

ctral

Acce

lerati

on (g

)

04/19/2023 19

0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 40

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

1.2

1.4

Period (sec)

Spect

ral A

ccel

era

tion (

g)

Page 20: Equivalent Linear Site Response Analyses of Kathmandu Valley

DATA ANALYSIS

04/19/2023 20

Boreholes: 53

Spatial variation

Depth of boring : 20 m to 30 m

Sediment deposit sites of

Kathmandu, Lalitpur and

Bhaktapur

0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 40

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

1.2

1.4

Period (sec)

Sp

ect

ral

Acc

ele

ratio

n (

g)

Page 21: Equivalent Linear Site Response Analyses of Kathmandu Valley

RESULTS

PEAK HORIZONTAL ACCELERATION

PEAK SPECTRAL ACCELERATION

AMPLIFICATION FACTOR

PREDOMINANT PERIOD

PEAK SPECTRAL VELOCITY

AVERAGE SHEAR WAVE VELOCITY04/19/2023 21

0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 40

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

1.2

1.4

Period (sec)

Sp

ect

ral

Acc

ele

ratio

n (

g)

Page 22: Equivalent Linear Site Response Analyses of Kathmandu Valley

RESPONSE OF SOIL

22

0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 40

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

1.2

1.4

Period (sec)

Spect

ral A

ccel

era

tion (

g)

Filling materials

Sandy silt

Medium to stiff clayey silt of low plasticity

30 m

Input motion: 6.9 Magnitude earthquake with epicentral distance of 34 km, PHA = 0.32 g

Surface: Amplified 7.788 times

Page 23: Equivalent Linear Site Response Analyses of Kathmandu Valley

Peak Horizontal Acceleration (g)

23

0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 40

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

1.2

1.4

Period (sec)

Sp

ect

ral

Acc

ele

ratio

n (

g)

BKTPATAN

THAMEL

Page 24: Equivalent Linear Site Response Analyses of Kathmandu Valley

Peak Spectral Acceleration (g)

24

0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 40

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

1.2

1.4

Period (sec)

Sp

ect

ral

Acc

ele

ratio

n (

g)

BKT

THAMEL

PATAN

Page 25: Equivalent Linear Site Response Analyses of Kathmandu Valley

Amplification factor

25

0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 40

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

1.2

1.4

Period (sec)

Sp

ect

ral

Acc

ele

ratio

n (

g)

BKT

THAMEL

PATAN

Page 26: Equivalent Linear Site Response Analyses of Kathmandu Valley

Predominant period (s)

26

0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 40

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

1.2

1.4

Period (sec)

Sp

ect

ral

Acc

ele

ratio

n (

g)

THAMEL

BKTPATAN

Page 27: Equivalent Linear Site Response Analyses of Kathmandu Valley

Peak Spectral Velocity (cm/s)

27

0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 40

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

1.2

1.4

Period (sec)

Sp

ect

ral

Acc

ele

ratio

n (

g)

THAMEL

BKTPATAN

Page 28: Equivalent Linear Site Response Analyses of Kathmandu Valley

Avg. Shear Wave Velocity (m/s)

28

0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 40

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

1.2

1.4

Period (sec)

Sp

ect

ral

Acc

ele

ratio

n (

g)

THAMEL

BKT

Page 29: Equivalent Linear Site Response Analyses of Kathmandu Valley

DISCUSSION

Consistent results with the damage

pattern of 1934 Bihar-Nepal earthquake,

and the hazard map of JICA

04/19/2023 29

0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 40

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

1.2

1.4

Period (sec)

Sp

ect

ral

Acc

ele

ratio

n (

g)

Page 30: Equivalent Linear Site Response Analyses of Kathmandu Valley

CONCLUSIONS

Results are consistent with the damage patterns of 1934 Bihar-Nepal earthquake

Higher amplification, higher peak spectral acceleration: Gokarna, and Kalimati Formation

Lower the shear wave velocity, lower is the amplification

30

0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 40

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

1.2

1.4

Period (sec)

Sp

ect

ral

Acc

ele

ratio

n (

g)

Page 31: Equivalent Linear Site Response Analyses of Kathmandu Valley

RESEARCH HORIZON

Development of Vs-N relationship for Kathmandu

valley

Assessment of signal attenuated at local site

Development of site specific design spectra using

‘NONLIN’

04/19/2023 31

0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 40

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

1.2

1.4

Period (sec)

Sp

ect

ral

Acc

ele

ratio

n (

g)

Page 32: Equivalent Linear Site Response Analyses of Kathmandu Valley

04/19/2023 32

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 40

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

1.2

1.4

Period (sec)

Sp

ect

ral

Acc

ele

ratio

n (

g)

Page 33: Equivalent Linear Site Response Analyses of Kathmandu Valley

04/19/2023 33

Thank you for your kind presence !!!

0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 40

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

1.2

1.4

Period (sec)

Sp

ect

ral

Acc

ele

ratio

n (

g)