EQUITY IN THE COMMON CORE ERA

52
EQUITY IN THE COMMON CORE ERA CONSIDERATIONS FOR STUDENT AND PROFESSIONAL LEARNING

Transcript of EQUITY IN THE COMMON CORE ERA

Page 1: EQUITY IN THE COMMON CORE ERA

EQUITY IN THE COMMON CORE ERA

CONSIDERATIONS FOR STUDENT AND PROFESSIONAL LEARNING

Page 2: EQUITY IN THE COMMON CORE ERA

GREAT LAKES EQUITY CENTER One of the ten regional EACs funded by the U.S. Department of Education under Title IV of the 1964 Civil Rights Act. The Great Lakes Equity Center provides assistance to state education agencies and public school districts in the areas of race, gender, and national origin equity.

http://glec.education.iupui.edu/ Copyright by Great Lakes Equity Center 2014

Page 3: EQUITY IN THE COMMON CORE ERA

Our Goals: Participants will be able to…

• articulate a rationale for inclusive learning environments in the Common Core era

• describe core features of UDL and PML and articulate reasons for using these frameworks

• develop ideas about how to employ UDL and PML as frameworks/strategies to advance learning

• describe the role and responsibilities of educators in each of these frameworks

Copyright by Great Lakes Equity Center 2014

Page 4: EQUITY IN THE COMMON CORE ERA

AGENDA

Welcome and session objectives

Common Core 101

Policy-as-practice: Shifts as spaces for reflection and community engagement

Universal Design for Learning & Peer-Mediated Learning as frameworks for success in inclusive classrooms

Wrap up and preparation for session II

Copyright by Great Lakes Equity Center 2014

Page 5: EQUITY IN THE COMMON CORE ERA

COMMON CORE TRUE/FALSE

• False. They are K-12 standards.

Common Core standards cover only grades 6-12

in English/Language

Arts and Mathematics.

Copyright by Great Lakes Equity Center 2014

Page 6: EQUITY IN THE COMMON CORE ERA

COMMON CORE TRUE/FALSE

• False. They were led by the National Governors Association (NGA) and the Council of Chief State School Officers (CCSSO).

The U.S. Department of

Education led the development of

the Common Core State Standards.

Copyright by Great Lakes Equity Center 2013 C i h b G L k E i C 2014

Page 7: EQUITY IN THE COMMON CORE ERA

COMMON CORE TRUE/FALSE

• True. There are two assessments in progress: the Partnership for Assessment of Readiness for College and Career (PARCC) and the Smarter Balanced Assessment Consortium (SBAC).

State-led consortia are developing

assessments for Common Core.

Copyright by Great Lakes Equity Center 2013 C i h b G L k E i C 2014

Page 8: EQUITY IN THE COMMON CORE ERA

COMMON CORE TRUE/FALSE

• True. Decisions about adoption are made at the state level.

States can choose whether or not to adopt the standards.

Copyright by Great Lakes Equity Center 2014

Page 9: EQUITY IN THE COMMON CORE ERA

COMMON CORE TRUE/FALSE

• True. In addition to the standards for English Language Arts and Mathematics, the Common Core also includes documents containing considerations for supporting English Language Learners and students with disabilities.

Common Core standards

include guidance for practice

related to specific student groups.

Copyright by Great Lakes Equity Center 2014

Page 10: EQUITY IN THE COMMON CORE ERA

COMMON CORE STATE STANDARDS INITIATIVE

Copyright by Great Lakes Equity Center 2014

Page 11: EQUITY IN THE COMMON CORE ERA

AGENDA

Welcome and session objectives

Common Core 101

Policy-as-practice: Shifts as spaces for reflection and community engagement

Universal Design for Learning & Peer-Mediated Learning as frameworks for success in inclusive classrooms

Wrap up and preparation for session II

Copyright by Great Lakes Equity Center 2014

Page 12: EQUITY IN THE COMMON CORE ERA

POLICY-AS-PRACTICE

The interpretive and decision-making processes that take place daily in schools and classrooms

and result in sets of standards or patterns at a particular site (Sutton & Levinson, 2001)

Copyright by Great Lakes Equity Center 2014

Page 13: EQUITY IN THE COMMON CORE ERA

POLICY SHIFTS AS REFLECTIVE SPACES

Act Assess Interpret

Learn Policy

Copyright by Great Lakes Equity Center 2014

Page 14: EQUITY IN THE COMMON CORE ERA

WHAT MIGHT IT LOOK LIKE?

“The Common Core has only opened the door to opportunities that exist in challenging our teachers to make the diverse communities within the Jemez Valley Corridor an extension of their classrooms. For Jemez, our focus is to make education relevant to our communities and include the outside experiences of our children in the classroom.”

Copyright by Great Lakes Equity Center 2014

Page 15: EQUITY IN THE COMMON CORE ERA

EQUITY 101

Equity exists when educational practices, policies, curricula, resources, and school cultures are representative of all students, such that each student has access to, can participate in and make progress in high quality and rigorous learning experiences, regardless of her or his race, socio-economic status, gender, ability, religion, national origin, linguistic diversity, or other characteristics.

Copyright by Great Lakes Equity Center 2014

Page 16: EQUITY IN THE COMMON CORE ERA

EQUITY IN THE COMMON CORE ERA

Student-centered

Asset-based

Engaging

Culturally Responsive

Rigorous

Copyright by Great Lakes Equity Center 2014

Page 17: EQUITY IN THE COMMON CORE ERA

Equity in Education

Who benefits and who does not?

Copyright by Great Lakes Equity Center 2014

Page 18: EQUITY IN THE COMMON CORE ERA

GRADUATION AND DROPOUT RATES

• Earn more • Steady

employment • Civic

engagement • Benefits of

citizenship

Copyright by Great Lakes Equity Center 2014

Page 19: EQUITY IN THE COMMON CORE ERA

GRADUATION RATES

Copyright by Great Lakes Equity Center 2014

Page 20: EQUITY IN THE COMMON CORE ERA

GRADUATION RATES FOR STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

OSEP (2007) Copyright by Great Lakes Equity Center 2014

Page 21: EQUITY IN THE COMMON CORE ERA

GRADUATION RATE COMPARISON BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

NCES (2009-2010) Copyright by Great Lakes Equity Center 2014

Page 22: EQUITY IN THE COMMON CORE ERA

DISABILITY RATES BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

Copyright by Great Lakes Equity Center 2014

Page 23: EQUITY IN THE COMMON CORE ERA

GRADUATION RATES FOR STUDENTS WITH LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY

Half of states graduated less than 60% of

students with limited English proficiency in

2010-2011

In some states, only 25-29% graduate.

U.S. Department of Education (2010-2011) Copyright by Great Lakes Equity Center 2014

Page 24: EQUITY IN THE COMMON CORE ERA

WHO’S BENEFITING FROM RIGOROUS INSTRUCTION AND LEARNING OPPORTUNITIES?

Copyright by Great Lakes Equity Center 2014

Page 25: EQUITY IN THE COMMON CORE ERA

© 2013 THE EDUCATION TRUST

35%

68% 63%

94%

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

African American Latino White Asian

Perc

enta

ge o

f stu

dent

s who

wer

e in

the

top

two

quin

tiles

of m

ath

perf

orm

ance

in fi

fth

grad

e an

d in

al

gebr

a in

eig

hth

grad

e

Source: NCES, “Eighth-Grade Algebra: Findings from the Eighth-Grade Round of the Early Childhood Longitudinal Study, Kindergarten Class of 1998-99 (ECLS-K)” (2010).

Even African-American students with high math performance in fifth grade are unlikely to be placed in

algebra in eighth grade

Page 26: EQUITY IN THE COMMON CORE ERA

© 2013 THE EDUCATION TRUST

STUDENTS OF COLOR ARE LESS LIKELY TO ATTEND HIGH SCHOOLS THAT OFFER PHYSICS.

40

66

0

20

40

60

80

100

High schools with the highestAfrican-American and Latino

enrollment

High schools with the lowestAfrican-American and Latino

enrollment

Perc

ent o

f sch

ools

offe

ring

Phys

ics

Source: U.S. Department of Education Office of Civil Rights, Civil Rights Data Collection, March 2012

Page 27: EQUITY IN THE COMMON CORE ERA

STUDENTS OF COLOR ARE LESS LIKELY TO ATTEND HIGH SCHOOLS THAT OFFER CALCULUS.

29%

55%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60%

Schools with the Most Black andLatino Students

Schools with the Fewest Blackand Latino Students

Source: U.S. Department of Education Office for Civil Rights , Civil Rights Data Collection

Percent of Schools Offering Calculus

Page 28: EQUITY IN THE COMMON CORE ERA

DIFFERENCES IN RIGOR IN ELA

LOW RIGOR HIGH RIGOR

Copyright by Great Lakes Equity Center 2014

Page 29: EQUITY IN THE COMMON CORE ERA

What systemic factors are causing these disparities?

DIGGING DEEPER

Copyright by Great Lakes Equity Center 2014

Page 30: EQUITY IN THE COMMON CORE ERA

ASSESS & INTERPRET

Are expectations universally

high?

Are curricula and

instructional practices culturally

responsive?

Do all students have access to

high-quality instruction, tools, and learning

environments?

Copyright by Great Lakes Equity Center 2014

Page 31: EQUITY IN THE COMMON CORE ERA

LEARN

Graduate

Pushout

Copyright by Great Lakes Equity Center 2014

Page 32: EQUITY IN THE COMMON CORE ERA

ACT “In 2004, realizing we weren’t meeting the needs of our special education students, we launched a full-inclusion program…

Students knew we had high expectations for them and they rose to the challenge. Inclusion also caused us to look at our instructional practice, to ensure that it was more precisely targeted to the needs of each one of our students.

We had to bring the curriculum to the kids, not the kids to the curriculum. And now, with the majority of states adopting the Common Core State Standards(CCSS), there is no better time to reflect on the need for more inclusion in schools.”

Greg Mullenholz, 2013

Copyright by Great Lakes Equity Center 2014

Page 33: EQUITY IN THE COMMON CORE ERA

THE COMMON CORE WEBSITE

Copyright by Great Lakes Equity Center 2014

Page 34: EQUITY IN THE COMMON CORE ERA

THE STANDARDS

Copyright by Great Lakes Equity Center 2014

Page 35: EQUITY IN THE COMMON CORE ERA

http://www.corestandards.org/the-standards/download-the-standards

Copyright by Great Lakes Equity Center 2014

Page 36: EQUITY IN THE COMMON CORE ERA

TOWARD EQUITY

Student-centered

Asset-based

Engaging

Culturally Responsive

Rigorous

Copyright by Great Lakes Equity Center 2014

Page 37: EQUITY IN THE COMMON CORE ERA

AGENDA

Welcome and session objectives

Common Core 101

Policy-as-practice: Shifts as spaces for reflection and community engagement

Universal Design for Learning & Peer-Mediated Learning as frameworks for success in inclusive classrooms

Wrap up and preparation for session II

Copyright by Great Lakes Equity Center 2014

Page 38: EQUITY IN THE COMMON CORE ERA

ACT “In 2004, realizing we weren’t meeting the needs of our special education students, we launched a full-inclusion program…

Students knew we had high expectations for them and they rose to the challenge. Inclusion also caused us to look at our instructional practice, to ensure that it was more precisely targeted to the needs of each one of our students.

We had to bring the curriculum to the kids, not the kids to the curriculum. And now, with the majority of states adopting the Common Core State Standards(CCSS), there is no better time to reflect on the need for more inclusion in schools.”

Greg Mullenholz, 2013

Copyright by Great Lakes Equity Center 2014

Page 39: EQUITY IN THE COMMON CORE ERA

INCLUSIVE EDUCATION

Waitoller, F. R., & Kozleski, E. B. (2013). Working in boundary practices: Identity development and learning in partnerships for inclusive education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 31, 35-45.

Redistribution

• of quality opportunities to learn and engage in educational programs

Recognition

• and value of differences as reflected in content, pedagogy, and assessment tools

Represent

• themselves (marginalized groups) in decision-making processes that advance and define claims of exclusion and the respective solutions that affect their children’s educational futures

Copyright by Great Lakes Equity Center 2014

Page 40: EQUITY IN THE COMMON CORE ERA

EQUITY IN THE COMMON CORE ERA

Student-centered

Asset-based

Engaging

Culturally Responsive

Rigorous

Copyright by Great Lakes Equity Center 2014

Page 41: EQUITY IN THE COMMON CORE ERA

PEER-MEDIATED LEARNING (PML)

http://glec.education.iupui.edu/assets/files/2013_7_15_Brief_FINAL.pdf Copyright by Great Lakes Equity Center 2014

Page 42: EQUITY IN THE COMMON CORE ERA

PEER-MEDIATED LEARNING

• Four Principles: • We Learn through Active Engagement • All Individuals are Capable of Active Engagement • All Individuals are Cultural Beings • Collaboration is a Priority

• Fostering Supportive Classroom Communities: • Student driven projects • Create interdependence • Experiences that are Universally Designed for Learning

Copyright by Great Lakes Equity Center 2014

Page 43: EQUITY IN THE COMMON CORE ERA

UNIVERSAL DESIGN FOR LEARNING (UDL)

Copyright by Great Lakes Equity Center 2014

Page 44: EQUITY IN THE COMMON CORE ERA

UNIVERSAL DESIGN FOR LEARNING (UDL)

Center for Applied Special Technology (CAST) http://www.cast.org/udl/index.html

Copyright by Great Lakes Equity Center 2014

Page 46: EQUITY IN THE COMMON CORE ERA

UDL AND CULTURAL RESPONSIVITY

Banks, J. A. (2007). An introduction to multicultural education (4th ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

UDL is culturally responsive (CR) • Relies on students’ interests, needs, learning

preference, and cultural background

UDL provides means to achieve CR • Contributes, adds, transforms, and sparks social

action of non-dominant groups to the mainstream (Banks, 2007)

Copyright by Great Lakes Equity Center 2014

Page 47: EQUITY IN THE COMMON CORE ERA

CONNECTIONS TO COMMON CORE

Copyright by Great Lakes Equity Center 2014

Page 48: EQUITY IN THE COMMON CORE ERA

POSSIBLE CONNECTIONS TO CCSS CCSS.Math.Content.8.SP.A.1 Construct and interpret scatter plots for bivariate measurement data to investigate patterns of association between two quantities. CCSS.Math.Content.8.SP.A.4 Understand that patterns of association can also be seen in bivariate categorical data by displaying frequencies and relative frequencies in a two-way table. CCSS.Math.Practice.MP3 Construct viable arguments and critique the reasoning of others. CCSS.Math.Practice.MP4 Model with mathematics CCSS.Math.Practice.MP5 Use appropriate tools strategically. Copyright by Great Lakes Equity Center 2014

Page 49: EQUITY IN THE COMMON CORE ERA

CONNECTIONS TO PML AND UDL

Copyright by Great Lakes Equity Center 2014

Page 50: EQUITY IN THE COMMON CORE ERA

AGENDA

Welcome and session objectives

Common Core 101

Policy-as-practice: Shifts as spaces for reflection and community engagement

Universal Design for Learning & Peer-Mediated Learning as frameworks for success in inclusive classrooms

Wrap up and preparation for session II

Copyright by Great Lakes Equity Center 2014

Page 51: EQUITY IN THE COMMON CORE ERA

SUMMARY

• Current service provision

Assess

• Policy language

Interpret • Equity • Pedagogical

frameworks • Professional learning

Learn

Act

Copyright by Great Lakes Equity Center 2014

Page 52: EQUITY IN THE COMMON CORE ERA

THANK YOU!

Copyright © 2014 by Great Lakes Equity Center This document and its contents are provided to educators, local and state education agencies, and/or non-commercial entities for use for educational training purposes only. No part of this document may be reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the Great Lakes Equity Center. The contents of this presentation were developed under a grant from the U.S. Department of Education. However, these contents do not necessarily represent the policy of the Department of Education, and you should not assume endorsement by the Federal Government.