Epistemological Foundations and Boundaries of Knowledge Terence Palmer School of Theology &...
-
Upload
christine-miller -
Category
Documents
-
view
212 -
download
0
Transcript of Epistemological Foundations and Boundaries of Knowledge Terence Palmer School of Theology &...
Fear as an Invitation to Destructive Forces
Epistemological Foundationsand Boundaries of Knowledge
Terence PalmerSchool of Theology & Religious StudiesBangor UniversityBeyond Boundaries Post-Grad Conference 2009
2
EpistemologyThe philosophical theory of knowledge.One view is that justification distinguishes
genuine knowledge. There are two types of justification:
1. Rationalism – logic and maths – pure reasoning.
2. Empiricism- impressions of sense data.
3
Fear viewed through scientific empiricismDarwinian evolutionFear as the natural response to a threatSurvival mechanism in a hostile worldFight or flightPhysiological homeostasisUnderstanding stress related illness and
stress management
4
Fear to the clinical psychologistFixation to trauma hypothesisHelplessness and loss of power and controlHard wired schemataUnconscious drive to overcome helplessnessSelf repeating cycleThe fear is real – but...Can the real danger be overcome? – and...Is the threat real or imagined?
5
Epistemology of religionWhat is the origin of knowledge?What of universal or transcendental
knowledge?What has religious experience to contribute?What is the nature of truth?Hermeneutics - how truth is interpretedSubjective meaning
6
Plato’s Model of Knowledge
7
A synthesised epistemologyScientific empiricism – impressions of sense
dataReligious empiricism – subjective experienceRadical empiricism – impressions of 6th sense
dataPragmatism – does it work?
8
Fear as an emotional energyTransmitted like a beaconSensed, but not by the five sensesUniversal Law of Attraction – like attracts
likeEmotional energy attracts spiritual energyEarthboundsNon- humanFixed in fear Turning the tablesDemons become angels
9
Justification & ValidationTo believe we know the truth from one
epistemological foundation is a mistake
To reject any idea or hypothesis that is based on belief without rigorously testing it is a mistake
Pragmatism – does it work?