Epidemiology Kept Simple Chapter 4 Screening for Disease.
-
date post
20-Dec-2015 -
Category
Documents
-
view
217 -
download
0
Transcript of Epidemiology Kept Simple Chapter 4 Screening for Disease.
![Page 1: Epidemiology Kept Simple Chapter 4 Screening for Disease.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062407/56649d425503460f94a1d048/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Epidemiology Epidemiology Kept SimpleKept Simple
Chapter 4Chapter 4
Screening for Screening for DiseaseDisease
![Page 2: Epidemiology Kept Simple Chapter 4 Screening for Disease.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062407/56649d425503460f94a1d048/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
§4.1 Introduction §4.1 Introduction (comment)(comment)
• Accurate identification of true Accurate identification of true health status -- essential for all epi. health status -- essential for all epi. workwork
• The term The term diseasedisease refers to any refers to any health condition or health health condition or health determinantdeterminant
![Page 3: Epidemiology Kept Simple Chapter 4 Screening for Disease.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062407/56649d425503460f94a1d048/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Sources of Epi Sources of Epi InformationInformation
• Interview (direct, surrogate)Interview (direct, surrogate)• QuestionnaireQuestionnaire• Pre-existing recordsPre-existing records• Direct examinationDirect examination
![Page 4: Epidemiology Kept Simple Chapter 4 Screening for Disease.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062407/56649d425503460f94a1d048/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Signs, Symptoms, and Signs, Symptoms, and TestsTests
• Sign = observation by trained Sign = observation by trained observerobserver
• Symptom = observation by patient Symptom = observation by patient • Tests = any objective result Tests = any objective result
![Page 5: Epidemiology Kept Simple Chapter 4 Screening for Disease.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062407/56649d425503460f94a1d048/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Reproducibility and Reproducibility and ValidityValidity
• Reproducibility = agreement upon Reproducibility = agreement upon repetitionrepetition
• Validity = ability to discriminate Validity = ability to discriminate those with and without diseasethose with and without disease
• A test can be reproducible but not A test can be reproducible but not validvalid
• A test can be valid but not A test can be valid but not reproduciblereproducible
![Page 6: Epidemiology Kept Simple Chapter 4 Screening for Disease.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062407/56649d425503460f94a1d048/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
§4.2 Reproducibility §4.2 Reproducibility StatisticsStatistics
• Overall agreement Overall agreement • Percentage of diagnoses that agreePercentage of diagnoses that agree• Some agreement due to chance (e.g., Some agreement due to chance (e.g.,
two coins flipped simultaneously will two coins flipped simultaneously will agree 50% of time)agree 50% of time)
• Kappa statistic - quantifies percent Kappa statistic - quantifies percent agreement above chanceagreement above chance
![Page 7: Epidemiology Kept Simple Chapter 4 Screening for Disease.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062407/56649d425503460f94a1d048/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Kappa Statistic Kappa Statistic (Formula)(Formula)
Rater 2Rater 2
Rater Rater 11 ++ -- TotalTotal
++ aa b b pp11
-- cc dd qq11
TotalTotal pp22 qq22 NN
Text says to convert counts to proportions, but this is not necessary
1221
)(2
qpqp
bcad
![Page 8: Epidemiology Kept Simple Chapter 4 Screening for Disease.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062407/56649d425503460f94a1d048/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Kappa Statistic Kappa Statistic (Illustration)(Illustration)
Rater 2Rater 2
Rater Rater 11 ++ -- TotalTotal
++ 2020 44 2424
-- 55 7171 7676
TotalTotal 2525 7575 100100
76.0
)76)(25()75)(24(
)5)(4()71)(20(2
![Page 9: Epidemiology Kept Simple Chapter 4 Screening for Disease.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062407/56649d425503460f94a1d048/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Interpretation of KappaInterpretation of Kappa• Percent agreement above chancePercent agreement above chance• The closer to 1, better agreementThe closer to 1, better agreement
Range of KappaRange of Kappa InterpretationInterpretation
> .75> .75 Excellent agreementExcellent agreement
.40 to .75.40 to .75 Good agreementGood agreement
< .40< .40 Poor agreementPoor agreement
![Page 10: Epidemiology Kept Simple Chapter 4 Screening for Disease.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062407/56649d425503460f94a1d048/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
§4.3 Validity§4.3 Validity• Compare test results to definitive Compare test results to definitive
diagnostic procedure (“gold diagnostic procedure (“gold standard”)standard”)
• Each case classified asEach case classified as• TP = true positive TP = true positive • TN = true negativeTN = true negative• FP = false positiveFP = false positive• FN = false negativeFN = false negative
![Page 11: Epidemiology Kept Simple Chapter 4 Screening for Disease.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062407/56649d425503460f94a1d048/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Organize Data in TableOrganize Data in Table
Gold StandardGold Standard
Test Test ResultResult ++ -- TotalTotal
++ TP FP TP+FP
-- FN TN FN+TN
TotalTotal TP+FN FP+TN n
![Page 12: Epidemiology Kept Simple Chapter 4 Screening for Disease.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062407/56649d425503460f94a1d048/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
DefinitionsDefinitions
• Notation: Pr(T|D) = probability test Notation: Pr(T|D) = probability test result result given given disease statusdisease status
• Sensitivity = Pr(T+|D+)Sensitivity = Pr(T+|D+)• Specificity = Pr(T-|D-)Specificity = Pr(T-|D-)• Predictive value positive = Pr(D+|Predictive value positive = Pr(D+|
T+)T+)• Predictive value negative = Pr(D-|T-)Predictive value negative = Pr(D-|T-)• Prevalence = Pr(D+)Prevalence = Pr(D+)
![Page 13: Epidemiology Kept Simple Chapter 4 Screening for Disease.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062407/56649d425503460f94a1d048/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
FormulasFormulas
• SEN = TP / (TP + FN)SEN = TP / (TP + FN)• SPEC = TN / (TN + FP)SPEC = TN / (TN + FP)• PVP = TP / (TP + FP)PVP = TP / (TP + FP)• PVN = TN / (TN + FN)PVN = TN / (TN + FN)
![Page 14: Epidemiology Kept Simple Chapter 4 Screening for Disease.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062407/56649d425503460f94a1d048/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Example (HIV Screening Example (HIV Screening Test)Test)
Prevalence = 1000 / 1,000,000 = Prevalence = 1000 / 1,000,000 = .001.001
• SEN = 990 / 1000 = .99SEN = 990 / 1000 = .99• SPEC = 989,010 / 999,000 = .99SPEC = 989,010 / 999,000 = .99• PVP = 990 / 10,980 = .09PVP = 990 / 10,980 = .09• PVN = 989,010 / 989,020 PVN = 989,010 / 989,020 1.000 1.000
HIVHIV
ScreeninScreening Testg Test ++ -- TotalTotal
++ 990 9,990 10,980
-- 10 989,010 989,020
TotalTotal 1000 999,0001,000,000
![Page 15: Epidemiology Kept Simple Chapter 4 Screening for Disease.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062407/56649d425503460f94a1d048/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Example (HIV Screening Example (HIV Screening Test)Test)
Prevalence = 10,000 / 1,000,000 Prevalence = 10,000 / 1,000,000 = .10= .10
• SEN = 99000 / 100,000 = .99SEN = 99000 / 100,000 = .99• SPEC = 891,000 / 900,000 = .99SPEC = 891,000 / 900,000 = .99• PVP = 99,000 / 108,000 = .92PVP = 99,000 / 108,000 = .92• PVN = 891,000 / 900,000 = .99PVN = 891,000 / 900,000 = .99
HIVHIV
ScreeninScreening Testg Test ++ -- TotalTotal
++ 99,000 9,000 108,000
-- 1,000 891,000 892,000
TotalTotal 100,000 900,0001,000,000
![Page 16: Epidemiology Kept Simple Chapter 4 Screening for Disease.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062407/56649d425503460f94a1d048/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Conclusion Conclusion
• A test that is 99% sensitive and 99% A test that is 99% sensitive and 99% specific is used in two populationsspecific is used in two populations
• In low prevalence population PVP In low prevalence population PVP = .09= .09
• In high prevalence population, PVP = In high prevalence population, PVP = .92.92
• Therefore, PVP is a function of Therefore, PVP is a function of prevalenceprevalence
![Page 17: Epidemiology Kept Simple Chapter 4 Screening for Disease.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062407/56649d425503460f94a1d048/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Relation Between Relation Between Predictive and Predictive and
Prevalence ValuePrevalence Value• PVP is a function of PVP is a function of
• Test SENTest SEN• Test SPECTest SPEC• prior probability (prevalence) of prior probability (prevalence) of
disease disease
• Bayesian formulas on pp. 88 - 92 Bayesian formulas on pp. 88 - 92 (NR)(NR)
![Page 18: Epidemiology Kept Simple Chapter 4 Screening for Disease.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062407/56649d425503460f94a1d048/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Selecting a Cutoff for a Selecting a Cutoff for a TestTest
• HIV screening test detects color HIV screening test detects color change (Optical Density Ratio)change (Optical Density Ratio)
• Can change cutoff for amount of Can change cutoff for amount of color change to classify as color change to classify as “positive”“positive”
![Page 19: Epidemiology Kept Simple Chapter 4 Screening for Disease.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062407/56649d425503460f94a1d048/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Use Low Cutoff Use Low Cutoff • no false negatives (high SEN)no false negatives (high SEN)• many false positive (low SPEC)many false positive (low SPEC)
![Page 20: Epidemiology Kept Simple Chapter 4 Screening for Disease.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062407/56649d425503460f94a1d048/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Use High Cutoff Use High Cutoff • no false positive (high SPEC)no false positive (high SPEC)• many false negative (low SEN)many false negative (low SEN)
![Page 21: Epidemiology Kept Simple Chapter 4 Screening for Disease.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062407/56649d425503460f94a1d048/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Use In-Between Cutoff Use In-Between Cutoff • medium no. of false positive (intermediate medium no. of false positive (intermediate
SPEC)SPEC)• medium no. of false negative (intermediate medium no. of false negative (intermediate
SEN)SEN)