EPIC-Germany FFQ Jakob Linseisen Nutritional Epidemiology Division of Cancer Epidemiology German...
-
Upload
anabel-lee -
Category
Documents
-
view
213 -
download
0
Transcript of EPIC-Germany FFQ Jakob Linseisen Nutritional Epidemiology Division of Cancer Epidemiology German...
EPIC-Germany FFQ
Jakob LinseisenNutritional EpidemiologyDivision of Cancer EpidemiologyGerman Cancer Research Centre, Heidelberg
(food frequency questionnaire)
Long-term reproducibility of the
Page 2 | Nutritional Epidemiology Cancer Epidemiology
Follow-up of the EPIC-Heidelberg cohort
Recruitment 1994-1998
2. Follow-up (FFQ* and lifestyle questionnaIre) 4. Follow-up
1. Follow-up (lifestyle questionnaire) 3. Follow-up (lifestyle quest:)
5/2000 1/2001 1/2002 1/2003 1/2004 1/2005 1/2006 1/2007 1/2008
Active follow –up of the cohort in order to collect end-point data (cancer, death, chronic diseases,)
with high response rates: – 1. Follow-up 93% – 2. Follow-up 90% – 3. Follow-up 91%
[*self administered semi-quantitative FFQ (148 items), extended for questions on food preparation methods to estimate heterocyclic aromatic amines (HAA) intake]
Page 3 | Nutritional Epidemiology Cancer Epidemiology
Information collected during 2nd follow-up (EPIC-HD)
Second FUP: Lifestyle questionnaire
Sociodemograhic variables Occupation, Marital status, Smoking status
Physical activity Physical activity
Medical history Current medication incl. hormones,
family cancer history, incident diseases
Dietary supplements Vitamins, minerals, supplements, naturopathy
Food frequency questionnaire
Diet and alcohol consumption Food and nutrient intake, alcoholic beverages,food preparation methods
For women
Reproductive factors year of menopause,oral contraceptives and hormone use, ovarectomy, hysterectomy
Page 5 | Nutritional Epidemiology Cancer Epidemiology
2nd FFQ in EPIC-HD:Questions on food preparation methods and preferred degree of browning
Page 6 | Nutritional Epidemiology Cancer Epidemiology
EPIC-HD, FFQ2: Participation rate
No. participants1 24.956
Deceased 332
Address uncorrect 49 24.575
No reply for FUP2 1.413
Refused (permanent) 607
Short questionnaire 1.017
Lifestyle quest. only 76
Questionnaires back 21.462
87.3 %
1 Cohort size: previous cohort – deceased – refused (permanent) – unknown address
Page 7 | Nutritional Epidemiology Cancer Epidemiology
EPIC-HD, FFQ2:Re-contacting of participants by telephone
5,166 out of 21,462 participants were re-contacted 24 %
Duration of phone calls: roughly 10-15 min (5-30 min) 1,100 hours or 135 working days
Re-contacting if - an entire page was empty;- no answer within an entire food group;- missing answer to “overview”questions;
[This overlapped with phone calls for missing data in life-style questionnaires]
Page 8 | Nutritional Epidemiology Cancer Epidemiology
EPIC-HD, follow-up 2:Re-contacting of participants by telephone
Consequence of modification of conditions for re-contacting participants Re-contact because of after 9000 quest. overall missings in …
(% praticipants re-contacted)
life-style quest. 18 % 10 %
FFQ 17 % 19 %
both questionnaires 9 % 5 %
Total 43% 34 %
24 %
Page 9 | Nutritional Epidemiology Cancer Epidemiology
Characteristics of the study cohort (n=20,733) at baseline (1994-98) and 2nd FUP (2001-03; mean follow-up time of 5.75 years)
Men (9530) Women (11203)
Baseline FUP2 Baseline FUP2
(%)
AGE (YEARS)
<40 18.1 - 0.0 -
40-49 34.4 34.6 39.0 17.7
50-59 32.4 32.3 42.4 38.8
60-69 15.1 31.5 18.6 41.6
70+ - 1.6 - 1.9
BODY MASS INDEX (BMI)
<18.5 1.4 1.4 0.2 0.2
18.5-25 54.5 53.5 30.8 30.3
25-30 30.0 31.0 51.9 52.4
30-35 10.2 10.1 14.6 14.4
>=35 3.9 3.7 2.5 2.5
CURRENT EMPLOYMENT
Full time 27.8 24.3 77.0 55.0
Part time 38.1 32.4 2.5 3.8
Retired 9.8 20.3 16.5 36.5
Jobless 3.2 2.1 3.4 2.6
Not employed (household, parental leave, education)
21.0 19.2 0.6 0.9
(Nagel et al., Br. J. Nutr. 98:194-200, 2007)
Page 10 | Nutritional Epidemiology Cancer Epidemiology
EPIC-HD, FFQ2: … some results
The long-term correlation coefficients ranged from 0.41 (vegetables in men) to 0.77 (alcoholic beverage consumption in women).
Consistently for food groups, 60% to 70% of the participants in both genders were re-classified to the same or adjacent quintile of intake (weighted kappa statistics).
The median intake of potatoes, added fats, sugar/confectionary, cakes and alcoholic beverages was lower in the second than in the first FFQ,
whereas the median intake of fruits, vegetables, cereals/cereal products and non-alcoholic beverages were higher.
(Nagel et al., Br. J. Nutr. 98:194-200, 2007)