EPA’s Geospatial Metadata Framework

14
1 EPA’s Geospatial Metadata Framework An Overview FGDC Coordination Group Meeting February 12, 2008

description

EPA’s Geospatial Metadata Framework. An Overview. FGDC Coordination Group Meeting February 12, 2008. Agenda. Background Drivers Initial Efforts Reason for Change Current EPA Metadata Suite Policy/Planning Framework Users/Community Technology Demonstration GeoData Gateway - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of EPA’s Geospatial Metadata Framework

1

EPA’s Geospatial Metadata Framework

An Overview

FGDC Coordination Group Meeting February 12, 2008

2

Agenda

• Background – Drivers– Initial Efforts– Reason for Change

• Current EPA Metadata Suite

– Policy/Planning Framework– Users/Community– Technology

• Demonstration– GeoData Gateway– EPA Metadata Editor

• Lessons Learned

• What’s Next?

3

Background

• Drivers – Executive Order 12906– OMB Circular A-16– Intra- and Inter-Agency Sharing

Efforts

• Initial efforts had some problems– Dual system access for

internal/external

– All components not standards-based

– Information not synchronized

– No direct links to data

– Difficult to document metadata

– No direct management by users

– Lack of stewardship

• Result: Not widely used

4

Background

• Desire for Change– EPA decided it needed to organize geospatial metadata

• EPA Metadata Workgroup (2005)– Business Rules: Define EPA’s Implementation of FGDC CSDGM

» EPA Regions and Programs represented» Agreed to an implementation and resulted in EPA Geospatial

Metadata Technical Specification

– Architecture: Define baseline and target architecture» Baseline identified holdings in central and Regional websites

(over 4,000 holdings identified)» Target included a standards-based integrated, dynamic system

5

Current EPA Metadata Suite

• Resulting Components of the EPA Metadata Suite

– Policy/Planning

– User Community

– Technology

Technology

Policies, Procedures, & Standards

User Community

EPA’s Geospatial Metadata

Suite

EPA’s Geospatial Metadata

Suite

66

• Policy/Planning Framework

– EPA Geospatial Metadata Technical Specification

– EPA’s National Geospatial Data Policy (NGDP): Procedure for Geospatial Metadata Management

– GDG Governance Structure Report and Maintenance Plan

– GDG/EME Cost Benefit Analysis

– GDG/EME Strategic Plan

Current EPA Metadata Suite

7

Current EPA Metadata Suite

8

Records Contribtued to the GDG by EPA Organization - Feb 2008

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

• Users/Community– Intense outreach in 2006/07

• Monthly stakeholder sessions• GDG/EME training• Presentations at major conferences• ESRI award & paper

– Groups working with us• 8 out of 10 Regions*• 6 out of 11 programs

Current EPA Metadata Suite

* All groups working with us may not have contributed records yet

9

• Technology Framework

– GeoData Gateway (GDG)• Central, standards-based system

that automates contributions and allows distributed users to manage their information.

• Single-Sign-On with EPA’s Central Identity and Access Management (IAM) System

• Automates contributions to GOS and NSDI

• Reusable components can be integrated with other applications

Current EPA Metadata Suite

10

• Technology Framework

– EPA Metadata Editor (EME) • Simplified interface integrated

in ArcCatalog

• Provides EPA Validation Service and database-driven defaults

• Used across EPA, states & other Feds

• Over 950 downloads since July 2007

Current EPA Metadata Suite

11

Demonstration

12

Lessons Learned• There have been a few bumps along the way…..

– Adopting Relatively New Technology• Often first to discover bugs• Not a large user base to draw on

– Performance & Reliability• Image & feature services inconsistent within Map Viewer components• Sometimes things just ‘stop’ working

– Integration with larger EPA Architecture • Need Service Level Agreements• Need to understand new responsibilities placed on other system owners in

advance!

– Use of COTS Product• Customization always a risk

– User Buy-in is Key• If users bought into system and understand what’s needed, they often put up with

imperfection.

13

What’s Next?

• Implement Strategic Plan

– GDG Outreach• Focus on meeting consumer needs• Continue working with producers• Begin working with application developers

– GDG Technology Enhancements• Performance and usage monitoring• Other minor enhancements to improve user experience

– EME Technology Enhancements• Implement stakeholder feedback• Web-based version to replace GDG web front end• Implement validation web service at GDG

– Continue Integration with EPA IT Infrastructure• Evaluate and implement high-value integration efforts

– Develop Long-term funding plan

* Unique Regional Activities

Research & ScienceResearch & Science

Geospatial Services

Enforcement & Compliance AssistanceEnforcement & Compliance Assistance

Environmental Monitoring & ForecastingEnvironmental Monitoring & Forecasting

Clean-up & RestorationClean-up & Restoration

Pollution Prevention & ControlPollution Prevention & Control

Homeland SecurityHomeland Security

Services to Citizens

Support Delivery of Services

Management of Government ResourcesAdministrative ServicesAdministrative Services

IT ManagementIT Management

Records ManagementRecords Management

Emergency ManagementEmergency Management

Air

Qu

ali

ty M

an

ag

em

en

tA

ir Q

ua

lity

Ma

na

ge

me

nt

Wa

ter

Qu

ali

ty M

an

ag

em

en

tW

ate

r Q

ua

lity

Ma

na

ge

me

nt

La

nd

Qu

ali

ty M

an

ag

em

en

tL

an

d Q

ua

lity

Ma

na

ge

me

nt

Su

bs

tan

ce

Ma

na

ge

me

nt

Su

bs

tan

ce

Ma

na

ge

me

nt

14

For More Information:

• Michelle Torreano – GDG Project Manager & Agency Geospatial Metadata

Coordinator– 202-566-2141– [email protected]

• EPA’s National Geospatial Program– EPA Policies

• http://geodata.epa.gov/policies.html

– EPA Metadata Editor• http://geodata.epa.gov/eme.html