Environments for annotation with the Ontology for Microbial Phenotypes

12
Environments for annotation with the Ontology for Microbial Phenotypes Phenotype RCN 2014 Jim Hu

description

Environments for annotation with the Ontology for Microbial Phenotypes. Phenotype RCN 2014 Jim Hu. What’s a phenotype?. What’s a phenotype?. What’s a phenotype?. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of Environments for annotation with the Ontology for Microbial Phenotypes

Page 1: Environments for annotation  with the Ontology for Microbial  Phenotypes

Environments for annotation with the Ontology for Microbial

PhenotypesPhenotype RCN 2014

Jim Hu

Page 2: Environments for annotation  with the Ontology for Microbial  Phenotypes

What’s a phenotype?

Page 3: Environments for annotation  with the Ontology for Microbial  Phenotypes

What’s a phenotype?

Page 4: Environments for annotation  with the Ontology for Microbial  Phenotypes

What’s a phenotype?

Page 5: Environments for annotation  with the Ontology for Microbial  Phenotypes

"Before the physical basis of genes was understood, associating phenotypes with a heritable unit laid the foundation of modern genetics" - Nichols et al 2011

Page 6: Environments for annotation  with the Ontology for Microbial  Phenotypes

OMP issues not directly about environment

• Genotypes not genes or alleles• State phenotypes vs relative phenotypes• Population phenotypes• Observations vs inferences short of GO

– Lac- as a phenotype

Budrene and Berg (1991) Nature 349:630

Page 7: Environments for annotation  with the Ontology for Microbial  Phenotypes

Things the annotation system needs to express

• Properties of wt type strains:– 1. E. coli wt has_phenotype lactose utilization

• Mutant phenotypes– 2. E. coli cya has_phenotype decreased lactose

utilization• relative_to 1

• Environmental dependence– 3. E. coli cya has_phenotype increased lactose

utilization in Environment: + cAMP• relative_to 2

• Genetic interaction– 3. E. coli cya, crp* has_phenotype increased lactose

utilization • relative_to 2

Page 8: Environments for annotation  with the Ontology for Microbial  Phenotypes

Planned annotation components

• Unique annotation ID• Accessions for genotypes for all species/strains

– Genes and alleles in a pangenome context• OMP for phenotype• Relationships for relative phenotypes• Environments• ECO for evidence• Reference

Page 9: Environments for annotation  with the Ontology for Microbial  Phenotypes

Environment issues

• Capturing environment vs. relevant environment– Analogy to relevant genotypes– How granular do we want to be?

• Gray area between phenotype and environment– Option 1: OMP: Drug resistance ENVO: medium term– Option 2: OMP: Growth/Death ENVO: medium + drug

• Environment vs “relevant environment”

Page 10: Environments for annotation  with the Ontology for Microbial  Phenotypes

Future

• Build the needed components– OMP in progress– ECO in progress– Universal bacterial/microbial genotype database?!– Environment: from this workshop

• Build infrastructure– OMP wiki: http://microbialphenotypes.org +

Sourceforge SVN • Coordination with other phenotype projects

– RCN, APO, FYPO etc.• Example annotation sets for

– E. coli– B. subtilis– bacteriophage

Page 11: Environments for annotation  with the Ontology for Microbial  Phenotypes

Acknowledgements etc.

• TAMU– Debby Siegele– Shabnam Eslamfam– Adrienne Zweifel– Jon Herrera– Will Meza– Whitley Lanier

• IGS/Maryland– Michelle Gwinn Giglio– Marcus Chibucos

• NIH R01 GM089636

• http://microbialphenotypes.org• micropheno

Page 12: Environments for annotation  with the Ontology for Microbial  Phenotypes