Environmental Weed Risk Assessment results for Cajanus ...
7
Environmental Weed Risk Assessment results for Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp. Invasiveness Score 4.07 Impacts Score 1.00 10 2 1 Climate Score 1 Kimberley 40.74 Pilbara 8.15 Gascoyne 4.07 Southwest 4.07 Final FFI Score Low Environmental Weed Risk Rating Negligible Negligible Negligible pigeon pea Maps: Current Australian distribution [above left], predicted preferred climate [above right] and global distribution [bottom]. Common Name/s: FINAL FFI Score Weed Risk Interpretation - Invasive Species Weed Assessor > 235 Very High Use not supported, significant environmental risks 112 - 235 High Use not recommended, any spread to be reported and controlled 50 - 111 Medium Can be used, monitor, manage and report any offsite movement 18 - 49 Low Can be used with minimal concern < 18 Negligible Can be used without concern For more details on the CRC Future Farm Industries system see: Stone, L., Munday, C. and Bettink, K. (2012). Environmental Weed Risk Assessment Protocol. Future Farm Industries CRC (20 pp.). http://www.futurefarmonline.com.au/about/weedrisk.htm Rod Randall Assessors Name/s Synonym/s:
Transcript of Environmental Weed Risk Assessment results for Cajanus ...
Environmental Weed Risk Assessment results forCajanus cajan (L.) Millsp.
Invasiveness Score
4.07Impacts Score
1.00
10
2
1
ClimateScore
1
Kimberley 40.74
Pilbara 8.15
Gascoyne 4.07
Southwest 4.07
Final FFIScore
Low
EnvironmentalWeed
Risk Rating
Negligible
Negligible
Negligible
pigeon pea
Maps: Current Australian distribution [above left], predicted preferred climate[above right] and global distribution [bottom].
Common Name/s:
FINAL FFI Score Weed Risk Interpretation - Invasive Species Weed Assessor > 235 Very High Use not supported, significant environmental risks 112 - 235 High Use not recommended, any spread to be reported and controlled 50 - 111 Medium Can be used, monitor, manage and report any offsite movement 18 - 49 Low Can be used with minimal concern < 18 Negligible Can be used without concern
For more details on the CRC Future Farm Industries system see:Stone, L., Munday, C. and Bettink, K. (2012). Environmental Weed Risk Assessment Protocol. Future Farm IndustriesCRC (20 pp.). http://www.futurefarmonline.com.au/about/weedrisk.htm
Rod RandallAssessors Name/s
Synonym/s:
Environmental Weed Risk Assessment results forCenchrus americanus (L.) Morrone
Invasiveness Score
5.56Impacts Score
3.00
10
7
1
ClimateScore
0.5
Kimberley 166.67
Pilbara 116.67
Gascoyne 16.67
Southwest 8.33
Final FFIScore
High
EnvironmentalWeed
Risk Rating
High
Negligible
Negligible
pearl millet
Maps: Current Australian distribution [above left], predicted preferred climate[above right] and global distribution [bottom].
Common Name/s:
FINAL FFI Score Weed Risk Interpretation - Invasive Species Weed Assessor > 235 Very High Use not supported, significant environmental risks 112 - 235 High Use not recommended, any spread to be reported and controlled 50 - 111 Medium Can be used, monitor, manage and report any offsite movement 18 - 49 Low Can be used with minimal concern < 18 Negligible Can be used without concern
For more details on the CRC Future Farm Industries system see:Stone, L., Munday, C. and Bettink, K. (2012). Environmental Weed Risk Assessment Protocol. Future Farm IndustriesCRC (20 pp.). http://www.futurefarmonline.com.au/about/weedrisk.htm
Rod RandallAssessors Name/s
Synonym/s:
Environmental Weed Risk Assessment results forCentrosema pascuorum Mart. ex Benth.
Invasiveness Score
4.81Impacts Score
3.00
4
2
1
ClimateScore
4
Kimberley 57.78
Pilbara 28.89
Gascoyne 14.44
Southwest 57.78
Final FFIScore
Medium
EnvironmentalWeed
Risk Rating
Low
Negligible
Medium
centro
Maps: Current Australian distribution [above left], predicted preferred climate[above right] and global distribution [bottom].
Common Name/s:
FINAL FFI Score Weed Risk Interpretation - Invasive Species Weed Assessor > 235 Very High Use not supported, significant environmental risks 112 - 235 High Use not recommended, any spread to be reported and controlled 50 - 111 Medium Can be used, monitor, manage and report any offsite movement 18 - 49 Low Can be used with minimal concern < 18 Negligible Can be used without concern
For more details on the CRC Future Farm Industries system see:Stone, L., Munday, C. and Bettink, K. (2012). Environmental Weed Risk Assessment Protocol. Future Farm IndustriesCRC (20 pp.). http://www.futurefarmonline.com.au/about/weedrisk.htm
Rod RandallAssessors Name/s
Synonym/s:
Environmental Weed Risk Assessment results forChamaecrista rotundifolia (Pers.) Greene
Invasiveness Score
5.19Impacts Score
1.00
6
1
0.5
ClimateScore
0.5
Kimberley 31.11
Pilbara 5.19
Gascoyne 2.59
Southwest 2.59
Final FFIScore
Medium
EnvironmentalWeed
Risk Rating
Negligible
Negligible
Negligible
Wynn cassia
Maps: Current Australian distribution [above left], predicted preferred climate[above right] and global distribution [bottom].
Common Name/s:
FINAL FFI Score Weed Risk Interpretation - Invasive Species Weed Assessor > 235 Very High Use not supported, significant environmental risks 112 - 235 High Use not recommended, any spread to be reported and controlled 50 - 111 Medium Can be used, monitor, manage and report any offsite movement 18 - 49 Low Can be used with minimal concern < 18 Negligible Can be used without concern
For more details on the CRC Future Farm Industries system see:Stone, L., Munday, C. and Bettink, K. (2012). Environmental Weed Risk Assessment Protocol. Future Farm IndustriesCRC (20 pp.). http://www.futurefarmonline.com.au/about/weedrisk.htm
Rod RandallAssessors Name/s
Synonym/s:
Environmental Weed Risk Assessment results forChloris gayana Kunth
Invasiveness Score
6.67Impacts Score
2.00
10
2
2
ClimateScore
7
Kimberley 133.33
Pilbara 26.67
Gascoyne 26.67
Southwest 93.33
Final FFIScore
High
EnvironmentalWeed
Risk Rating
Low
Low
Medium
Rhodes grass
Maps: Current Australian distribution [above left], predicted preferred climate[above right] and global distribution [bottom].
Common Name/s:
FINAL FFI Score Weed Risk Interpretation - Invasive Species Weed Assessor > 235 Very High Use not supported, significant environmental risks 112 - 235 High Use not recommended, any spread to be reported and controlled 50 - 111 Medium Can be used, monitor, manage and report any offsite movement 18 - 49 Low Can be used with minimal concern < 18 Negligible Can be used without concern
For more details on the CRC Future Farm Industries system see:Stone, L., Munday, C. and Bettink, K. (2012). Environmental Weed Risk Assessment Protocol. Future Farm IndustriesCRC (20 pp.). http://www.futurefarmonline.com.au/about/weedrisk.htm
Lynley Stone, John Virtue and Sue BoschmaAssessors Name/s
Synonym/s:
Environmental Weed Risk Assessment results forCicer arietinum L.
Invasiveness Score
4.07Impacts Score
1.00
0.5
0.5
2
ClimateScore
10
Kimberley 2.04
Pilbara 2.04
Gascoyne 8.15
Southwest 40.74
Final FFIScore
Negligible
EnvironmentalWeed
Risk Rating
Negligible
Negligible
Low
chickpeas
Maps: Current Australian distribution [above left], predicted preferred climate[above right] and global distribution [bottom].
Common Name/s:
FINAL FFI Score Weed Risk Interpretation - Invasive Species Weed Assessor > 235 Very High Use not supported, significant environmental risks 112 - 235 High Use not recommended, any spread to be reported and controlled 50 - 111 Medium Can be used, monitor, manage and report any offsite movement 18 - 49 Low Can be used with minimal concern < 18 Negligible Can be used without concern
For more details on the CRC Future Farm Industries system see:Stone, L., Munday, C. and Bettink, K. (2012). Environmental Weed Risk Assessment Protocol. Future Farm IndustriesCRC (20 pp.). http://www.futurefarmonline.com.au/about/weedrisk.htm
Rod RandallAssessors Name/s
Synonym/s:
Environmental Weed Risk Assessment results forDesmanthus virgatus (L.) Willd.
Invasiveness Score
7.04Impacts Score
3.00
7
3
4
ClimateScore
1
Kimberley 147.78
Pilbara 63.33
Gascoyne 84.44
Southwest 21.11
Final FFIScore
High
EnvironmentalWeed
Risk Rating
Medium
Medium
Low
wild tantan
Maps: Current Australian distribution [above left], predicted preferred climate[above right] and global distribution [bottom].
Common Name/s:
FINAL FFI Score Weed Risk Interpretation - Invasive Species Weed Assessor > 235 Very High Use not supported, significant environmental risks 112 - 235 High Use not recommended, any spread to be reported and controlled 50 - 111 Medium Can be used, monitor, manage and report any offsite movement 18 - 49 Low Can be used with minimal concern < 18 Negligible Can be used without concern
For more details on the CRC Future Farm Industries system see:Stone, L., Munday, C. and Bettink, K. (2012). Environmental Weed Risk Assessment Protocol. Future Farm IndustriesCRC (20 pp.). http://www.futurefarmonline.com.au/about/weedrisk.htm
Rod RandallAssessors Name/s
Synonym/s:
![An intra-specific consensus genetic map of pigeonpea [Cajanus … · 2017-08-25 · ORIGINAL PAPER An intra-specific consensus genetic map of pigeonpea [Cajanus cajan (L.) Millspaugh]](https://static.fdocuments.in/doc/165x107/5f72f42408f2804e715f64dc/an-intra-speciic-consensus-genetic-map-of-pigeonpea-cajanus-2017-08-25-original.jpg)
