Environmental Quality Standards of the Water Framework … · 2017. 9. 11. · monitored with...

45
1 Environmental Quality Standards of the Water Framework Directive and the EU approach on water reuse Mario Carere National Institute of Health, Department Environment and Health, Italy, Rome European Project ITN ANSWER-Fisciano, Italy 5 September 2017

Transcript of Environmental Quality Standards of the Water Framework … · 2017. 9. 11. · monitored with...

  • 1

    Environmental Quality Standards of the Water

    Framework Directive and the EU approach on water

    reuse

    Mario Carere

    National Institute of Health, Department Environment and Health, Italy, Rome

    European Project ITN ANSWER-Fisciano, Italy 5 September 2017

  • 2

    WFD

    (key

    aspects)

    To prevent further

    deterioration and

    protects and enhances

    all aquatic ecosystems

    To promote sustainable

    water use based on a long-

    term protection of available

    water resources

    To achieve good

    ecological status for all

    waterbodies within 2015

    To achieve good

    chemical status for all

    waterbodies, included

    grounwaters within 2015

    To apply a combined approch

    through emission controls and

    setting of EQS for water,

    sediment and biota

    To reduce and eliminate

    emission and discharges of

    priority and priority

    hazardous substances

  • WFD-River Basin districts

    3

  • 4

    Water Framework Directive Classification-Surface Waters

    Good Status Surface Waters

    Good Ecological Status Good chemical status

    Compliance with EQS of Priority

    Substances

    Compliance with national EQS defined

    for the other pollutants

    Biological Quality Element

    Hydromorphology Chemico-Physical

    parameters

  • 5

  • 6

  • Draft prioritisation methodology presented at the

    WG Chem March 2014 Substance List

    Persistence Bioaccumulation Toxicity

    Production Use Environmental data

    Haz

    ard

    Ex

    po

    sure

    PEC/PNEC ratio

    Risk-based Ranking

    Risk score >1

    Data from MS, RBSP, Databases NORMAN,..

    MEC/PNEC ratio

    Ecotoxicity in different water fractions (Databases, literature)

    >3 MS, same analytical fraction

    Haz

    ard

    Ex

    po

    sure

    Data treatment Quality checks (QA/QC, >98% data>LoD)

    EU representativeness Criteria: min frequency >PNEC in >3MS ?

    Mean of 90th %

    Substance dossiers

    EQS derivation

    Co

    mb

    ined

    PE

    C/P

    NE

    C

    PRIORITIZATION DECISION

    40?

    substances

    Substance Databases: Agencies, NORMAN, other Directives, …

    Selection Data gathering

    40?

    substances

    #?

    #?

    #?

    Previous exercise: Short-listed/ ranked highly

    Re-evaluate PEC/MEC, #MS and PNEC

  • - Data 2000-2008

    - Surface water

    - 26 Member States + CH and NO

    - 19 613 stations

    - 5 water body types

    - 545 387 sampling

    - 14 567 816 analysis

    - 1 168 substances

    Database content (EU commission)

    Source: GIS layer : Official WFD Districts

  • List of priority substances in the field of water policy-PART 1

    (* Priority hazardous substances)

    Alachlor Anthracene* Atrazine Benzene

    Brominated*

    Dyphenileters

    1,2

    Dichloroetane

    Dichloromethan

    e

    DEHP*

    Hexachlorobutadiene* Hexachlorocyclo

    hexane*

    Isoproturon Lead

    Octylphenols Pentachlorobenz

    ene*

    Pentachlorophe

    nol

    PAH*

    Trifluralin* Dicofol* PFOS* Quinoxyfen*

    Cypermethrine Dichlorvos HBCDD* Heptachlor*

    9

  • List of priority substances in the field of water policy-PART 2

    (* Priority hazardous substances)

    Cadmium* Chloroalkanes* Chlorfenvinphos Chlorpyrifos

    Diuron

    Endosulfan*

    Fluoranthene

    Hexachlorobenzen

    e*

    Mercury*

    Naphtalene

    Nickel

    Nonylphenols*

    Simazine

    Tributyltin*

    Trichlorobenzenes

    Trichloromethane

    Dioxins- PCB

    DL*

    Aclonifen

    Bifenox

    Cybutryne

    Terbutryn

    DDT/DDD/DDE

    Drins

    Tetrachlorometha

    ne

    Tetrachloroetylene

    Trichloroetylene 10

  • EQS (environmental quality standard)-

    WFD definition

    The concentration of a particular pollutant or

    group of pollutants in water, sediment or biota

    which should not be exceeded in order to protect

    human health and the environment.

    11

  • 12

    Environmental Quality Standards

    • EQS: Annual average (Based mainly on Chronic bioassays)

    • EQS: Maximum allowable concentration (Based mainly on acute bioassays)

    • Difference between inland waters (rivers, lakes) and other waters (transitional, coastal and territorial).

    • Specific dispositions for Metals (bioavailability)

  • Sostanze SQA-MA

    µg/L(acque

    interne)

    SQA-MA

    µg/L (altre

    acque)

    SQA-MAC

    µg/L (acque

    interne)

    SQA-MAC

    µg/L

    (altre acque)

    SQA-biota

    (µg/kg peso

    umido)

    Dicofol 1,3 x 10 -3 3,2 x 10 -5 Non appl. Non appl. 33

    PFOS 6,5 x 10-4 1,3 x 10 -4 36 7,2 9,1

    Quinoxifen 0,15 0,015 2,7 0,54

    «Dioxins» Non appl. Non appl. 0,008 TEQ

    Aclonifen 0,12 0,012 0,12 0,012

    Bifenox 0,012 0,0012 0,04 0,004

    Cibutrina

    (irgarol)

    0,0025 0,0025 0,016 0,016

    Cipermetrina 8x10-5 8x10-6 6x10-4

    6x10-5

  • 14

  • CIS Guidance Document

    No. 27 Technical

    Guidance for deriving

    Environmental Quality

    Standards

    Downloadable from

    https://circabc.europa.eu/fa

    ces/jsp/extension/wai/navig

    ation/container.jsp

  • 16

    Protection Objectives Methodology for derivation of specific

    quality standard

    Pelagic community (inland waters)

    Acute and chronic bioassay

    Use of assessment factors

    (annex V Directive 2000/60/EC)

    Pelagic community ( marine waters)

    Acute and chronic bioassays

    Use of assessment factors/ TGD

    Benthic community (inland waters) Equilibrium partitioning method-toxicity data

    benthos

    Benthic Community (marine waters) Equilibrium partitioning mehod– toxicity data

    benthos

    Top predators (marine mammals)

    Toxicity data-birds diet-use of BCF e BMF

    Human Health (consumption of fish products)

    Tolerable daily intake- Use of BCF

    Human Health (consumption of drinking water)

    European Directive 75/440/CE – Drinking water

    directive – 98/83/CE

    Removal Efficiency

  • QS-human health drinking waters

  • Octylphenols (pelagic community) Quality standard µg/L

    Pelagic community (inland waters)

    0,122 (EQS)

    Pelagic community ( marine waters)

    0,0122 (EQS)

    Benthic community (inland waters) Not applicable

    Benthic Community (marine waters) Not applicable

    Top predators (marine mammals/birds)

    15,8

    Human Health (consumption of fish products)

    13,7

    Human Health (consumption of drinking water)

    No standard applied

  • Biota EQS (directive 2013/39/UE)

    21

  • 22

  • 1st Watch List substances

    1. 17-Alpha-ethinylestradiol (EE2) (contraceptive pill ingredient)

    2. 17-Beta-estradiol (E2) (natural hormone/pharmaceutical), to be monitored with Estrone (E1)

    3. Diclofenac (painkiller)

    4. 2,6-ditert-butyl-4-methylphenol (industrial chemical-antioxidant)

    5. 2-Ethylhexyl 4-methoxycinnamate (uv filter sunscreen)

    6. Macrolide antibiotics (Erythromycin, Clarithromycin, Azithromycin)

    7. Methiocarb (plant protection product)

    8. Neonicotinoid pesticides (Imidacloprid, Thiacloprid, Thiamethoxam, Clothianidin, Acetamiprid) (plant protection products/biocides)

    9. Oxadiazon (plant protection product)

    10.Tri-allate (plant protection product)

    23

  • Watch-list

    24

  • Clarithromycin (JRC Report 2014)

    25

  • Clarithromycin-reasons for watch-list inclusion

    26

  • Ecotoxicological data-Clarithromycin

    27

  • PNEC Clarithromycin

    28

  • Reuse types and regulated sectors in EUROPE

  • EU water reuse-Actions

    • Development of guidelines on water reuse management • Proposed legislation on water reuse • Further integration of water reuse in relevant BREFs • Support research and innovation • Improve access to funding for reuse projects The European Council conclusions on the Circular Economy Action Plan welcomed enhancing the recycling and reuse of water, in particular the development of a supportive legislative framework respecting the existing high level of protection to human health and the environment. The Council invited he Commission to seek EFSA opinion on this matter.

  • Recent activity-water reuse legislative proposal (European Commission))

    • Mandate for an activity on water reuse (Strategic Coordination Group)-May 2015-AD hoc water reuse group

    • Mandate to the JRC for the water reuse minimum quality requirements (2016)

    • First general guidance published (June 2016)

    • Opinions of Scheer and EFSA available (June 2017)

    • Final Meeting: 23 June 2017

  • Guidance Introduction

    • This guidance begins by outlining how water reuse can contribute to WFD and other EU policy objectives. It then sets out some definitions to aid the interpretation of this guidance document.

    • It goes on to explore the potential environmental, economic and social

    benefits and drawbacks of water reuse.

    • The guidance continues with a detailed examination of the requirements of EU law to ensure water reuse schemes are compliant with that law. Steps for the planning of water reuse are described and, in particular, how protection of public health is to be ensured.

    • The guidance ends with sections on communication and engagement of the public and other stakeholders and on the funding of water reuse schemes.

  • Minimum Quality requirements for water reuse in agricultural irrigation and aquifer recharge

    JRC coordination with DG ENV

  • JRC activity-minimum quality requirements

    • Overview of the differences in risk management framework: health risk assessment methodologies (water safety plans approach of the WHO) and the USEPA approach (precautionary principle).

    • The proposal considers treatment but also preventive measures, the number of barriers for specific preventive measures and log reduction removal for specific microbiological parameters are presented.

    • The second draft does not cover contaminants of emerging concerns and use of bioassays. However this does not mean that these issues are excluded but rather that they will be addressed in a future iteration of the technical proposal.

  • Physico-chemical parameters

    • The parameters included in the Directive 2013/39/EU (EQSD) on priority substances and other pollutants have to be complied by the reclaimed water used for agricultural irrigation.

    • Total suspended solids (TSS): this parameter indicates secondary treatment effectiveness and it is also related with filtration and disinfection efficacy

    • Turbidity: this parameter is used to indicate filtration effectiveness and suitability for disinfection

    • Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD5): indication of secondary treatment effectiveness and potential for bacterial regrowth

  • Environmental risk assessment

    • An environmental risk assessment has to be carried out in order to assure that the use of reclaimed water for agricultural irrigation has no adverse effects on environmental matrices (e.g. soil, groundwater, surface water) and that it is in compliance with the related EU directives for environmental protection.

    • Regulatory requirements of related EU Directives for environmental protection have to be always fulfilled. MS should ensure that the introduction of water reuse schemes does not compromise the objectives specified by the related EU Directives, such as the Directive 2000/60/EC (Water Framework Directive (WFD) and the EQS of the Directive 2013/39/UE

  • SEITE 41

    Mixtures?

    Compounds not monitored?

    5.00 10.00 15.00 20.00 25.00 30.00 35.000

    500000

    1000000

    1500000

    2000000

    2500000

    3000000

    3500000

    4000000

    4500000

    5000000

    5500000

    6000000

    6500000

    7000000

    7500000

    8000000

    8500000

    9000000

    9500000

    1e+07

    Time-->

    Abundance

    TIC: WER046.D

    thousands of

    compounds in

    environmental samples

    few compounds

    in monitoring e.g.

    48 priority

    pollutants (WFD)

    Scientific Background

  • 42

    Wernersson Ann-Sofie; Carere Mario, et al. (2015): The

    European technical report on aquatic effect-based monitoring

    tools under the water framework directive. Environmental

    Sciences Europe, 2015; 27 (1) DOI: 10.1186/s12302-015-0039-

    4. http://www.enveurope.com/content/pdf/s12302-015-0039-4.pdf

    Press release at:

    http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2015/03/150313083449.ht

    m

    http://www.enveurope.com/content/pdf/s12302-015-0039-4.pdfhttp://www.enveurope.com/content/pdf/s12302-015-0039-4.pdfhttp://www.enveurope.com/content/pdf/s12302-015-0039-4.pdfhttp://www.enveurope.com/content/pdf/s12302-015-0039-4.pdfhttp://www.enveurope.com/content/pdf/s12302-015-0039-4.pdfhttp://www.enveurope.com/content/pdf/s12302-015-0039-4.pdfhttp://www.enveurope.com/content/pdf/s12302-015-0039-4.pdfhttp://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2015/03/150313083449.htmhttp://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2015/03/150313083449.htm

  • 43

  • Publications and links of Interest

    • http://circabc.europa.eu

    (documents water

    framework directive).

    • http://water.europa.eu/

    (wise-water information

    system for europe).

    • http://ec.europa.eu/enviro

    nment/water/index_en.ht

    m (website of DG

    Environment)

    44

    http://water.europa.eu/http://ec.europa.eu/environment/water/index_en.htmhttp://ec.europa.eu/environment/water/index_en.htmhttp://ec.europa.eu/environment/water/index_en.htm

  • Thank You [email protected] www.iss.it

    45

    orbetello lagoon-tuscany/central italy

    http://www.iss.it/