Environmental Monitoring Report - TotalEnergies
Transcript of Environmental Monitoring Report - TotalEnergies
M5 M6 Block
7 August 2019
Environmental Monitoring Report of Existing
Yadana Facilities
2 | P a g e
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1. Executive Summary ................................................................................................................ 3
2. Introduction ............................................................................................................................ 4
3. Description of the Yadana Project and Environmental Management ................................... 4
3.1 Yadana Onshore Activities ............................................................................................... 5
3.2 Offshore Facilities and Activities ..................................................................................... 7
3.3 TEPM Environmental Management System .................................................................... 9
4. Applicable Regulations Related to the Project ..................................................................... 10
4.1 Compliance with Guidelines .......................................................................................... 14
5. Monitoring Activities in Offshore and Onshore ................................................................... 14
Verification Audit ................................................................................................................. 29
7. Conclusions ........................................................................................................................... 30
8. Appendixes ........................................................................................................................... 31
Appendix 1. Sample Noise Map in Offshore ....................................................................... 31
Appendix 2. Sample of PLC Sewage system ........................................................................ 32
Appendix 3. Internal and External Audit reports ................................................................ 33
Table of Figures
Figure 1 Overview of Yadana Existing Facilities......................................................................... 5
Figure 2: Location of Taninthayi Nature Reserve ...................................................................... 6
Figure 3: Simplified Onshore Process ........................................................................................ 7
Figure 4: Yadana Offshore Complex .......................................................................................... 8
Figure 5: Simplified Offshore Process........................................................................................ 9
Figure 6: Test Result of Cutting Discharge .............................................................................. 16
Figure 7: Laboratory Result of Produced Sand ........................................................................ 18
Figure 8: Sample results of sewage water from Yangon Head Office ..................................... 28
3 | P a g e
Acronyms and Abbreviations
ADB Asia Development Bank
CSR Corporate Social Responsibility
EBS Environmental Baseline Study
ECD Environmental Conservation Department
EIA Environmental Impact Assessment
EMP Environmental Management Plan
ESIA Environment and Societal Impact Assessment
IEE Initial Environmental Assessment
IFC International Finance Corporation
MOGE Myanma Oil and Gas Enterprise
OSCP Oil Spill Contingency Plan
RSES Responsible Safety Environment on Site
TEPM Total Exploration and Production Myanmar
1. Executive Summary
In line with the government’s environmental regulation, Total Exploration and
Production Myanmar (TEPM) was instructed to submit a six monthly environmental
monitoring report after receiving the approval of an EMP report of Yadana existing
facilities in October 2018. Therefore, this report is produced based on the available
information and the current practices of TEPM’s environmental management system.
In order to get the general understanding of offshore and onshore operations, the
simplified process of both offshore and onshore are elucidated and the current
environmental management system of TEPM is also briefly explained. The applicable
regulations related to Yadana project are described.
The monitoring program is totally implemented based on the monitoring measures
elaborated in the EMP report of Yadana existing facilities. The explanation and
justification of these monitoring measures like produced water, produced sand for
offshore and noise and storm water drainage for onshore parts are discussed. In
conclusion, the difference of TEPM’s current industrial practices and the requirements
imposed by ECD is discussed. There are also some commitments made for the next
six monthly environmental monitoring report to be submitted after receiving the
feedback or comments from ECD.
4 | P a g e
2. Introduction
Total EP Myanmar has been operated Yadana project since 1993. The first export gas
was delivered to Thailand in 1998 and local market starting in 2010 through 24”
domestic pipelines. Being the responsible international company in earlier days, even
though there is no obligation to perform EBS and EIA studies, TEPM had conducted
these studies in line with international and internal best practices for every operational
activity. When the Myanmar Environmental Impact Assessment rule and procedure
was issued in December 2015, TEPM was started engaging with the Environmental
Conservation Department for the compliance of existing Yadana facilities several
times. In October 2018, ECD approved the existing Yadana facilities EMP by sending
the letter to TEPM via MOGE.
As per article (108) of 2015 Environmental Impact Procedure, TEPM is required to
submit a six monthly environmental monitoring report for its current existing Yadana
facilities. Therefore, this document is developed for the assurance of complying with
the requirements committed in the Environmental Management Plan of Yadana
facilities. Being the mature Oil and Gas Company in Myanmar, ISO 14001:2015 which
is one of the internal requirements of TOTAL group is recently performed by the
external third party in Dec 2018. Regular internal HSE audits emphasized on
environmental management are also performed to monitor the environmental
compliance of TEPM.
Contact details of Project proponent is provided below:
Name: Saw HUDSON
Position: Environment Engineer
Address: No. 5, Sacred Tooth Relic Lake Avenue,
Punn Pin Gone Quarter No.5, Mayangone Township, Yangon, The Republic of the Union of Myanmar.
Phone: 95 (1) 650 977, 650 989, 660 466
Email: [email protected]
3. Description of the Yadana Project and Environmental
Management
The Yadana Onshore and Offshore project are an existing development operated by
Total Exploration and Production Myanmar (TEPM) consisting of various onshore and
offshore components that extract, produce and transport gas from TEPM’s offshore
Block M5 and M6 to local market and Thailand.
5 | P a g e
The Yadana field is located offshore in Myanmar in the Andaman Sea in blocks M5
and M6. The first gas delivery began in 1998 and commercial production in 2000. The
Yadana Field currently produces natural gas from wellhead platforms WP1, WP2, WP3
and WP4. The gas is transported through a 355.16 km offshore pipeline and 63.67 km
onshore pipeline for gas delivery to a power generation facility in Ratchaburi Province,
Thailand and to the Myanmar domestic market.
TEPM’s Yadana Production operations can be divided into six main components, as
follows,
Yadana Offshore Facilities; WP1,WP2,WP3,WP4,PP, FP,QP, MCP, LCP
Yadana Onshore Facilities, consisting of
o Pipeline Centre;
o Metering Station;
Thaketa Logistics Base and
Kanbauk Village Corporate Social Responsibility Activities.
An overview of Yadana components is illustrated in Figure 1.
Figure 1 Overview of Yadana Existing Facilities
3.1 Yadana Onshore Activities
The onshore components include Kanbauk pipeline center, Thaketa Logistics Base
and Yangon Head Office. The Kanbauk pipeline center consists of landfall, Pipeline
6 | P a g e
Right of Way (ROW), Pipeline Center (PLC), and Metering Station (MS) including
Tanintharyi Nature Reserve, which is the conservation project funded by TEPM, PCML
and PTTEP (see fig 2). The gas pipeline is approximately 63 km long and run parallel
with the PTTEPI Zawtika and the Petronas Carigali (Hong Kong) Myanmar Ltd (PCML)
Yetagun pipeline from Daminseik village to the Thailand border. Kanbauk pipeline
center is located approximately 10 km from the Daminseik landfall location.
In the pipeline center, several activities like overall control of pipeline center, TEPM
conducts corporate social responsibility (CSR) activities with Kanbauk community and
other stakeholders near the onshore facilities. CSR activities primarily consist of
support for education, health and fishing activities. Public participation activities have
also been conducted in this community. TEPM also have been conducting an annual
report of CSR for this community every year since 1999 and distributed to all
stakeholders.
Figure 2: Location of Taninthayi Nature Reserve
PLC/MS Onshore Facilities and Activities
PLC/MS onshore facilities are divided in two main sites: Pipeline Centre (PLC) and
Metering Station (MS). Additional components include a pipeline landfall, permanent
wharf and transit road1, pipeline and service track, and border crossing as permanent
components.
The simplified operating philosophy of onshore part is that the gas transported from
36” pipeline is filtered together with a domestic line in pipeline center located near
1 The transit road and most part of the service track become public roads today. TEPM, as one of the road users, do the regular
monitoring and maintenance where necessary
7 | P a g e
Ownbingwin village. The filtered gas is then sent to the Metering Station near Thai
border where the gas is again filtered for the final gas sale (see in below fig.3).
Figure 3: Simplified Onshore Process
Thaketa Logistics Base
Thaketa Logistic Base is located in Yangon. This logistic base supports TEPM’s
onshore and offshore operations, providing equipment, chemical products and stock
items. Thaketa Logistic Base is comprised of a warehouse, chemical shelter,
dangerous good site, generator house and also a marine transportation port owned by
MOGE for the marine transportation. Moreover, there are two supply boats assigned
to supply cargos from Singapore and Ranong to TEPM offshore and onshore sites.
Alternatively, one of these two boats has to stay in stand-by at Yadana platform.
TEPM Office in Yangon
The TEPM Yangon, head office is located in Yangon, Myanmar. The premises consist
of an office building and two utility buildings, containing a chiller for the HVAC system
and 1 standby generator and an electric room and plumbing system. There are 269
employees working in the office as a total on a working day. The office is shown in
fig.1.
3.2 Offshore Facilities and Activities
The Yadana gas field in Block M5 and M6 is located approximately 100 km offshore
Myanmar at the edge of the continental shelf. The Yadana site is divided into different
platforms: a Living Quarter Platform called (QP), the Production Platform (PP), the Low
8 | P a g e
and Medium Compression Platform (LCP/MCP), the Flare platform (FP2) and 4
Wellhead Platforms: WP1, WP2, WP3 and WP4. WP2, WP3 and WP4 are remote
platforms. An image of the current offshore facilities is shown in fig 4.
Figure 4: Yadana Offshore Complex
The operating facilities are grouped around the southern wellhead WP1 site, where
the relatively low water depth of the Yadana field promotes the use of separate
platforms (i.e. accommodation and process) connected together and to the wellhead
platform by bridges.
Water depth is variable across the field, with depths between 45 m at wellhead platform
(WP) 1 and 2, and 50 m at WP3. The 346 km submarine export pipeline route heads
east, passing to the south of the Gulf of Martaban and coming ashore at a landfall near
the fishing village of Daminseik in the Tanintharyi district of Southern Myanmar. At its
deepest point, the pipeline lies in approximately 145 m of water.
The simplified operating philosophy of offshore platforms is that the gas from the
Yadana reservoir is produced and processed offshore by means of a complex of
manned platforms and remotely operated wellhead platforms. Due to low gas pressure,
the gas is compressed in the LCP and MCP and passed through the dehydration unit
for the removal of water before transporting it to onshore. Then the gas is transported
to shore by tow gas lines: one 36” offshore and 24” onshore gas line transmitting the
gas to the Thai border near Banitong and one domestic gas line at Daw Nyein.
9 | P a g e
Figure 5: Simplified Offshore Process
3.3 TEPM Environmental Management System
TEPM has an Environmental Management System, integrated in the Health Safety
Security, Sustainable Development, Environment and Energy (H3SE) Management
System, which is certified in accordance with the requirements of ISO 14001:2004.
TEPM has also integrated an Energy Management System in accordance with the
requirements of ISO 50001:2011. The respect and care of the environment are a
constant concern of TEPM within all levels of the organization. Measures are taken to
limit and control any significant impact on the environment created by TEPM’s
activities.
Before starting every new TEPM project or final abandonment stage, an Environmental
Baseline Study (EBS) is performed in order to describe the physical, chemical,
biological, and general socioeconomic characteristics of the site and highlight its main
sensitivities. In order to determine and demonstrate its energy performance
improvements, TEPM established an Energy Baseline as well. The baseline
establishes the energy performance before to implement an Environmental
Management System to compare energy performance before and after a change is
made to TEPM site or the system. Then, EIA studies are carried out for every single
project with the independent international recognized consulting companies.
In order to control TEPM activities that may contribute to actual or potential significant
environmental aspects, appropriate procedures have been developed and maintained
10 | P a g e
accordingly. For example, the procedure (2-PR-DS-05-004) “Identification and
evaluation of environmental aspects and impacts” is developed to identify and evaluate
potential environmental impacts of its operational activities. The identification and
follow-up of Energy consumption and significant use are performed in the (2-PR-DS-
05-005) “Energy Management System”. Below is the procedures developed and
enforced for the implementation of health, safety and environmental aspects of TEPM
activities.
(2-PR-DS-05-003) “Waste Management”, (2-PR-DS-05-004) “Identification and Evaluation of Environmental Aspects and
Impacts”, (2-PR-DS-06-003) “Management of Hazardous Products”, (2-PR-DS-06-006) “Noise and Hearing Conservation Program”, (2-PR-DS-09-003) “Emergency Response Plan”, (2-PR-DS-09-004) “Oil Spill Contingency Plan”, (2-PR-DS-07-002) “Management of suppliers Minimum H3SE compliance
requirements”.
Regarding the enforcement of these procedures, every site has the assigned site’s health, safety, environment manager (RSES) for the implementation of the site’s safety, health and environmental aspects. In addition, Health Safety and Environment team lead by Superintendent/Supervisor is assigned to ensure the monitoring of the operational activities of TEPM. In order to evaluate TEPM’s environmental performance, the following data is monitored, accessed and reported to Head quarter monthly and annually:
Atmospheric Emissions, Aqueous Discharges, Chemicals used, Industrial & Domestic solid waste, Environmental Impact and Aspect Energy Performance Others
Regarding the emergency response to the oil and chemical spill, the procedure (2-PR-
DS-09-004) “Oil Spill Contingency Plan” defines at the affiliate level the response to be
implemented in case of hydrocarbon spill from any TEPM facilities or from any
contracted unit (e.g. rig, vessel) working for TEPM. On site, the RSES will manage the
response as per the site OSCP and, as required, be supported by the TEPM
Emergency Response Team, and international oil spill response organization, which
are mobilized if necessary by the TEPM Call out Authority.
4. Applicable Regulations Related to the Project
According to the approved EMP report of TEPM’s existing Yadana facilities, the
general guidelines related to the Yadana Project are mainly outlined here so that the
most relevant parameters are highlighted for the implementation of the operational
activities.
11 | P a g e
Noise Levels
Noise prevention and mitigation measures should be taken by all projects where
predicted or measured noise impacts from a project facility or operation exceed the
applicable noise level guideline at the most sensitive point of reception. Noise impacts
should not exceed the levels shown below, or result in a maximum increase in
background levels of three decibels at the nearest receptor location off-site.
Table 1. Noise Levels
Receptor
One Hour LAeq (dBA)a
Daytime 07:00-22:00
(10:00-22:00 for Public holiday)
Daytime 07:00-22:00
(10:00-22:00 for Public holiday)
Residential, Instructional, educational
55 45
Industrial, commercial 70 70
Odor
Point and diffuse source odors from industries should be minimized using available
prevention and control techniques as described in the IFC EHS industry-specific
guidelines. Point source activities are those that involve stack emissions of odor and
which generally can be controlled using waste reduction, waste minimization and
cleaner production principles or conventional emission control equipment. Diffuse
source activities are generally dominated by area or volume source emissions of odor
(e.g. intensive agricultural activities) and which can be more difficult to control. Projects
should control odors to ensure that odors that are offensive or unacceptable to
neighbors do not occur. Generally, odor levels should not exceed five to ten odorant
units1 at the edge of populated areas in the vicinity of a project. Projects with multiple
odorous point or diffuse releases, or emitting complex odors should conduct an odor
impact assessment to determine ground-level maximum concentrations taking into
account site-specific factors including proximity to populated areas.
Industry-Specific Requirements for Onshore and Offshore Oil and Gas Development
Table 1 Effluent and Emission Standards for Onshore Oil and Gas Development
arameter Guideline
Drilling
fluids and
cuttings
Treatment and disposal in accordance with applicable standards provided in the IFC
EHS Onshore Oil and Gas Development guideline
Produced
sand
Treatment and disposal in accordance with applicable standards provided in the IFC
EHS Onshore Oil and Gas Development guideline
Produced
water
Treatment and disposal in accordance with applicable standards provided in the IFC EHS Onshore Oil and Gas Development guideline
For discharge to surface waters or to land:
12 | P a g e
arameter Guideline
- 5-day Biochemical oxygen demand 25 mg/l
- Chemical oxygen demand 125 mg/l
- Chlorides 600 mg/l (average), 1,200 mg/l maximum
- Heavy metals (total)a 5 mg/l
- pH 6-9b
- Phenols 0.5 mg/l
- Sulfides 1 mg/l
- Total hydrocarbon content 10 mg/l
- Total suspended solids 35 mg/l
Hydrotest
water
Treatment and disposal in accordance with applicable standards provided in the IFC EHS Onshore Oil and Gas Development guideline
For discharge to surface waters or to land:
- 5-day Biochemical oxygen demand 25 mg/l
- Chemical oxygen demand 125 mg/l
- Chlorides 600 mg/l (average), 1,200 mg/l maximum
- Heavy metals (total) 5 mg/l
- pH 6-9
- Phenols 0.5 mg/l
- Sulfides 1 mg/l
- Total hydrocarbon content 10 mg/l
- Total suspended solids 35 mg/l
Completion
and well
work-over
fluids
Treatment and disposal in accordance with applicable standards provided in the IFC EHS Onshore Oil and Gas Development guideline
For discharge to surface waters or to land:
- pH 6-9
- Total hydrocarbon content 10 mg/l
Storm
water
drainage
Storm water runoff should be treated through an oil/ water separation system able to achieve oil and grease concentration of 10 mg/l
Cooling
water
The effluent should result in a temperature increase of no more than 3°C at edge of the zone where initial mixing and dilution take place; where the zone is not defined, use 100 meters from point of discharge
Sewage Holding and discharge to municipal or centralized wastewater treatment systems or onboard treatment to achieve:
- 5-day Biochemical oxygen demand 30 mg/l
- Chemical oxygen demand 125 mg/l
- Oil and grease 10 mg/l
- pH 6-9
- Total coliform bacteria 400/100 ml
- Total nitrogen 10 mg/l
- Total phosphorus 2 mg/l
- Total suspended solids 50 mg/l
Air
Emissions
Achieve WHO ambient air quality guidelines, and apply
the following guideline value to emissions:
- Hydrogen sulfide 5 mg/Nm3c
Table 2 Effluent and Emission Standards for Offshore Oil and Gas Development
13 | P a g e
Parameter Guideline
Drilling fluids
and cuttings
(non-aqueous
drilling fluid)
Non-aqueous drilling fluid, re-inject or ship-to-shore; no discharge to sea
Drilled cuttings, re-inject or ship-to-shore; no discharge except:
- Oil concentration lower than 1% by weight on dry cuttings1
- Mercury maximum 1 mg/kg dry weight in stock barite
- Cadmium maximum 3 mg/kg dry weight in stock barite
- Discharge via a caisson at least 15 meters below sea surface
Drilling fluids
and cuttings
(water-based
drilling fluid)
- Water-based drilling fluid, re-inject or ship-to shore; no discharge to
sea
Water-based drilled cuttings, re-inject or ship-to-shore; no discharge
except:
- Mercury 1 mg/kg dry weight in stock barite
- Cadmium 3 mg/kg dry weight in stock barite
- Maximum chloride concentration must be less than four time’s
ambient concentration of fresh or brackish receiving water
- Discharge via a caisson at least 15 meters below sea surface
Produced
water
Re-inject, discharge to sea maximum one day oil and grease discharge should
not exceed 42 mg/l; 30 day average should not exceed 29 mg/le
Completion
and well
work-over
fluids
Ship-to-shore or re-inject, no discharge to sea except:
- Maximum one day oil and grease discharge should not exceed 42
mg/l; 30 day average should not exceed 29 mg/l
- Neutralize to attain a pH of 5a or more
Produced sand Ship-to-shore or re-inject, no discharge to sea except when oil concentration lower than 1% by weight on dry sand
Hydrotest
water
- Send to shore for treatment and disposal
- Discharge offshore following environmental risk analysis, careful
selection of chemicals
- Reduce use of chemicals
Cooling water The effluent should result in a temperature increase of no more than 3°C at edge of the zone where initial mixing and dilution take place; where the zone is not defined, use 100 meters from point of discharge
Desalination
brine
Mix with other discharge waste streams if feasible
Sewage Compliance with MARPOL 73/78b
Food waste Compliance with MARPOL 73/78b
Storage
displacement
Compliance with MARPOL 73/78b
Bilge water Compliance with MARPOL 73/78b
Deck drainage Compliance with MARPOL 73/78b
14 | P a g e
4.1 Compliance with Guidelines
There was no non-compliance issues during the reporting period.
5. Monitoring Activities in Offshore and Onshore
The monitoring program is developed to monitor the compliance status of the operational
activities. This monitoring demonstrates compliance with legal standards and TEPM’s internal
requirements, provides evidence of the effectiveness of the implemented control measures and
ensures the accuracy of impact predictions for the Project. This monitoring program is also
designed to allow for appropriate management actions to be taken as soon as possible in the
event of any accident or incident. When developing the monitoring measures, the following
strategies have been applied; 1) Consistent with internationally and locally acceptable practices
2) Logistically practical and 3) Cost effective.
Actions follow up of ECD’s approval letter comments and the monitoring table are shown in Table
3 and 4 in the following;
15 | P a g e
Table 3: Monitoring Measures for Offshore Facilities
Environmental
Aspects
Monitoring Parameters Duration / Frequency of
Monitoring
Location of Monitoring Implementation Date of
Monitoring
Remark
1. Cuttings
(Water-Based
Mud, WBM)
Required by NEQG
Total Mercury
(Total Hg)
Cadmium (Cd)
Chloride (Cl-)
Once during drilling at
each well
All WPs Method
Cuttings samples was analyzed for
heavy metals according to globally
recognized standard e.g.US EPA
after drilling campaign in fig 6.
Number of samples
1 sample from section drilled with
WBM per well.
Lab analysis
report
received on
12/04/2017
See in Fig 6
2. Produced
water
Required by NEQG
Oil & Grease
Monthly summary of
volume discharged
Daily onboard
Analysis/Monitoring
for Oil and Grease
Record at
produced water
treatment unit.
Collect after
treatment at the
produced water
treatment unit
prior to discharge
overboard.
Method
Record produced water volume after
treatment prior to discharge
overboard.
Produced water samples analyzed
onboard.
Nil Produced water is
reinjected in the
well. There is no
produced water
discharge in the sea
directly.
3. Produced
sand
Required by NEQG
OOC %
Analysis/monitoring as
required (i.e. frequency
depends on sand
production volumes and
intervals)
Processing Platform Method
Record produced sand volume.
Produced sand samples will be
collected for analysis according to
international guidelines and
requirements such as USEPA.
TEPM There is a negligible
volume of sludge
collected monthly. If
there is a
considerable
amount produced, it
will be sent to
DOWA for the
treatment. Fig 7 is
the laboratory
record of produced
sand.
The implemented monitoring plan for offshore facilities is described in below;
16 | P a g e
Cutting: Cutting discharge during the WP4 drilling campaign was sampled and analyzed for
heavy metals according to globally recognized standard US EPA. The results indicated that all
the test parameters are below the threshold limit values as see in below.
Figure 6: Test Result of Cutting Discharge
17 | P a g e
Produced Water: Since the beginning of the Yadana project, produced water is injected into the reservoir so as to protect the marine
environment. Therefore, there is no produced water discharge into the sea.
Produced Sand: As estimated previously in the WP4 drilling campaign, an insignificant and negligible amount of produced sand
specifically mixed with liquid residue is collected and analyzed monthly in an in-house laboratory located at Yadana offshore platform.
The sampling result is shown in the below picture. Besides, a sand removal package is installed in production platform which constituted
solid-liquid cyclone de-sander and it is designed for the removal of fine sand, scale and other solids from inlet stream (produced water).
In the future, if there is a significant amount of produced sand is collected, it will be sent to a proper treatment facility onshore e.g.
DOWA.
18 | P a g e
Figure 7: Laboratory Result of Produced Sand
The monitoring plan implemented for onshore facilities is discussed in below.
Table 4: Monitoring Measures for Onshore Facilities (including Thaketa Logistics Base)
Environmental Aspects
Monitoring Parameters
Duration/Frequency of Monitoring
Location of Monitoring Implementation Monitoring Date
Remark
Noise Required by NEQG
One Hour LAeq
(dBA)
In event of or
response to
complaints
At site of complaint Standard noise sampling
methods. Compare results with
data from nearest baseline
station and NEQG
TEPM Attached the noise map
in Appendix 1.
Storm Water Drainage
Required by NEQG
Oil & Grease
6 Monthly
In event of spillage
or leakage
In response to
complaints
Storm water
discharge
locations
Samples will be collected for
analysis according to
international guidelines and
requirements such as USEPA.
TEPM Attached the relevant
records in fig 8 and in
Appendix 2
Noise Monitoring in Onshore Sites: Being the International Oil and Gas Company, TEPM implemented the internationally recognized
Oil and Gas standards on noise conservation program for the employee exposure protection. The industrial standard for noise exposure
is 85 dBA, 8 hours per day without hearing protection. The uses of hearing protection are enforced in all TEPM facilities when the
sound level reaches 85 dBA over 8 hours or the peak sound level reaches 140 dBC or the average maximum sound level reaches 110
dBA. The noise maps are displayed in all public areas and the area where noise is exposed (See in appendix 1).
The national emission quality guidelines (NEQG) impose to address the impacts of noise beyond the property boundary of the facilities.
According to this guideline, the noise level should not exceed 70 dBA at the nearest receptor location. To fulfill the requirement, TEPM
prepared the maps based on the measurement made around the noise source and around 50 m intervals in all onshore facilities as
shown in the followings. The receptor location is quite far from the noise source in most sites. Except for the gas engine generator run
in the PLC and MS, the noise source generators existed in Thaketa and Yangon head office is used for emergency only. That means
the generator of Thaketa and Yangon head office runs during the power cut off. There is no complaint received so far from the
neighboring communities.
19 | P a g e
20 | P a g e
21 | P a g e
22 | P a g e
23 | P a g e
24 | P a g e
25 | P a g e
26 | P a g e
27 | P a g e
Storm Water Drainage and Sanitary Wastewater Monitoring
Total EP Myanmar’s onshore site’s storm water includes surface runoff, flow resulting from
rainwater, drainage or other sources. Oily water separators and grease traps are installed and
maintained at the refueling facilities before discharging the surface runoff. The storm water is
connected to the sanitary waste water streams in PLC and MS due to the former plant designs
which were built since the beginning of the project in 1995.
The sanitary wastewater from onshore facilities includes effluents from domestic sewage, kitchen,
laundry facilities and clinics. These wastewaters discharge into the sewage treatment system
after passing through the grease traps where regular collection and maintenance are made by
catering crews. During the summer, the treated effluent is not available due to the treatment of
conventional reed bed system (see in appendix 2). That means this conventional system is
functioning well and no compliant received from the employee and neighboring communities.
Therefore, regular monitoring is not applicable due to the treatment system design. However, due
to the regulation required by ECD, TEPM would consider analyzing the outlet of the treated
effluent which is sieved through during the raining season only from June – October period to be
compliance with the effluent standards of the conventional treatment system. The results will be
reported in next six-monthly reporting periods.
Thaketa logistics base is located in MOGE compound where other companies’ facilities and
MOGE office are residing. Its storm water drainage is connected to the sanitary wastewater
treatment system. The domestic water from a tube well is treated and analyzed regularly to know
the efficiency of the treatment system installed for utilizing. Besides, the nature of work related to
Thaketa logistics base is mainly storage of the goods and transferring of stocks to offshore and
onshore facilities. Therefore, the monitoring of storm water and sanitary wastewater is
impracticable due to previous aged-old design and the influence of neighboring environment such
as MOGE’s car workshop, PTTEP’s pipe storage facilities etc…
In Yangon head office, the sanitary wastewater is discharged into the sewage treatment system
where effluents are treated and discharged into the nearby drainage system. The discharge
effluent is sampled and analyzed monthly in the laboratory. The sample results (no grease
parameter analyzed, but it will be included in the next reporting period) are shown below.
28 | P a g e
Figure 8: Sample results of sewage water from Yangon Head Office
29 | P a g e
Verification Audit
The TEPM‘s environmental management plan is in line with international standard like ISO
14001and ISO 5001. TEPM has achieved the first ISO 14001:2004 in 2005 and now a new
standard of ISO 14001:2015 was certified in 2017. This certificate will be renewed every three
years in 2020. Being the responsible business company in Myanmar and multi-international
company, TEPM has verified its HSE system under the scrutiny of internal and corporate audits.
There is internal and corporate HSE system audit annually performed to monitor and evaluate the
effectiveness and efficiency of the affiliate HSE system. As per comment from ECD stated to
perform the verification audit with registered third party organization or consultant, the recent ISO
14001 audit performed in 2018 is attached in Appendix 3.
30 | P a g e
7. Conclusions
This environmental monitoring report is the very first for TEPM when it comes to existing Yadana
Facilities. Despite the legal requirement do not specify the detail information for producing this
kind of report, TEPM produced this report based on the availability and most relevant information
so that the requirements will be fulfilled.
TEPM manage its operation according to the updated international industrial standards in terms
of environmental protection. There are no complaints received so far regarding the environmental
conservation practices of TEPM in the onshore and offshore environment. In terms of
environmental management and monitoring, annual HSE audit, which focuses on the health,
safety and environmental protection and an annual external ISO 14001 audits which focus mainly
the practices and performance of environmental management in TEPM facilities are conducted
annually.
The operational procedures applied by TEPM have been different when it comes to adopting the
government’s legal requirements which are mainly IFC standard, for example, Industrial noise
thresholds 85 dBA whereas 70 dBA of NEQG. The IFC standards are designed for those
organizations which required loans or funding from the bank like the World Bank or ADB etc…
Their standards are quite demanding for the loaners or fund seekers to protect the environment
where they are operating. Therefore, the requirements imposed by IFC standards are slightly
different for the Oil and Gas sector. The environmental authority should review their requirements
with the updated industrial norms and standards.
The TEPM’s environmental management system is quite robust in terms of environmental protection and conservation. Since the application of ISO 14001:2004 in 2005, TEPM’s environmental management system has been improved, especially in the area of pollution prevention, legislation compliance, stakeholder confidence, increased employee morale, effective environmental aspects/impacts management, and new business opportunities with environmentally aware customers and continual improvement etc... In 2017, TEPM acquired a new ISO 14001:2015 version to be updated with several new requirements such as leadership accountability, risks associated with threat and opportunities, life cycle perspective, value chain control and influence, etc. TEPM successfully achieved the new ISO 14001:2015 version in Dec 2017 and it will be renewed in 2020. Last but not least, TEPM will execute systematically and continuously of the monitoring measures for onshore and offshore facilities described in the EMP report. TEPM will also incorporate the required parameter like grease and oil of the effluents of Yangon Head Office and Pipeline center in the next reporting period and will also include the environmental performance of all TEPM sites’ monthly and annual data.
31 | P a g e
8. Appendixes
Appendix 1. Sample Noise Map in Offshore
32 | P a g e
Appendix 2. Sample of PLC Sewage system
PLC SEWAGE SYSTEM
Meeting: Yangon xx/09/2016,
PLC SEWAGE SYSTEM
PLC Sewage System – September 2016 2
15 m3
2008
ST5
ST 4 ST 3 ST 2 ST 1
ST 5
Old Soak
Pit
New Soak
Pit
Aeration
Pond
Small creekOutlet of aeration pond
To A3 main entrance gate
Local reed growing in old soak pit
Local reed growing in new soak pit
Restaurant
Laundry
Clinc
New Working
Space
Sagaing
Dawei
Bagan
Mandalay
Inlay
Office
Security
Workshop
Control
PLC SEWAGE SYSTEM
Aeration Pond
PLC Sewage System – September 2016 4
PLC SEWAGE SYSTEM – SEPTIC TANKS
ST5
ST4
PLC Sewage System – September 2016 5
PLC SEWAGE SYSTEM
ST1, ST2 & ST3 DESIGN
PLC Sewage System – September 2016 6
● The primary treatment (Septic Tank) is the separation of most of the solids from the liquid effluent, slowly digested by naturally occurring bacteria.(The bleaches and soaps from laundry are killing the bacteria)
Most of the solid material will either sink as sludge or float to the top as scum, leaving the effluent between to flow out to a secondary treatment stage.
● But they will gradually build over time and need to be removed occasionally (de-sludging process). The sludge is withdrawn at a frequency of 6 months to year in large tank. For small tank it can be 2 to 3 years.
● To speed up the process bacterial dozing such as (Aqua Clean) will be needed.
If this process is not functioning properly, solids particulates will washed out into the soak pit which may lead to a blockage resulting bad smell in the vicinity of the soak pit.
PLC SEWAGE SYSTEMPRIMARY TREATMENT
PLC Sewage System – September 2016 7
PLC SEWAGE SYSTEMSECONDARY TREATMENT
● A secondary treatment at PLC sewage system is a ‘Reed Bed Treatment System of sewage’ where a system of perforated pipes is laid in under ground gravel trenches.
● A reed bed system is the subsurface flow of natural treatment system in which “Reed” species such as “Phagramites kaka” is planted over the prepared bed.
● In this system the liquid effluent percolates through the gravel, sand and geo-textile where solids are removed and digested by microorganisms associated with the root system of reeds known as rhizodegredation.
● As a result the remaining liquid is clean enough to filter into the ground water. This process is the main mechanism for the removal of contaminants in an environmentally acceptable manner.
PLC Sewage System – September 2016 8
PLC SEWAGE SYSTEM - DESLUDGING
c. The total of the scum and sludge depths are equal to or greater than half the
liquid depth.
The sewage odour and sewage overflow are indications of a system overload.
PLC Sewage System – September 2016 9
PLC SEWAGE SYSTEM – SCUM LAYER MEASUREMENT
PLC Sewage System – September 2016 10
PLC SEWAGE SYSTEM – SLUDGE LAYER
MEASUREMENT
PLC Sewage System – September 2016 11
PLC SEWAGE SYSTEM – RETENTION TIME
● This is the time that elapses from the entry point of sewage into the
clear zone to the time of exit of the sewage from the clear
zone of the septic tank.
● The septic tank is generally designed with a minimum retention time
of 24 hours and should be able to provide up to two or three days of
retention time.
● If the sewage is not retained in the clear zone of the septic tank for
the minimum retention time period, then the effluent does not get
treated to the desired level.
● Therefore, the solids in the waste do not separate and can go
untreated and the solids may also flow out of the tank along with the
effluent into the soak pit.
PLC Sewage System – September 2016 12
PLC SEWAGE SYSTEM – RETENTION TIME
PLC Sewage System – September 2016 13
PLC SEWAGE SYSTEM – DRAINFIELD (SOAK PIT)
● About 60 percent of the C that makes up the incoming BOD is removed
in the septic tank during the settling processes. The remaining 40
percent of BOD enters the soil absorption field trenches.
● This growth results in a thick layer of cells, commonly called a biomat.
This biomat is where the bulk of biological wastewater treatment occurs
in a septic system soil absorption field.
● the biomat thickens and subsequently reduces the wastewater infiltration
rate in the trench.
● So that PLC sewage system have Reed bed and biomat treatment.
● Manholes are installed before / after Soak pits to inspect the odor smell
and solid wastes.
PLC Sewage System – September 2016 14
PLC SEWAGE SYSTEM - ADDITIVES
The majority of additives are a combination of the various types of bacteria commonly
found in a septic tank.
There is no scientific documentation that chemical additives will improve septic tank
operation. The number of bacteria contained in a chemical additive is very small in
relation to the bacteria already present in septic system.
PLC Sewage System – September 2016 15
PLC SEWAGE SYSTEM
● Detention time for flow in septic tank : 2 daysSeptic
Tank
Location Man-
day
flow (L)
Total
Flow
Max
POB (2-
days)
Max
POB (24
hrs)
Capacit
y (m3)
Remark
Average flow
ST 1
Workshop
70 22 42 3Control Room
ST 2
Admin Office 50 x 15 750 15
24
10
15
57
10
11Bago Dormitory 167.5
Guard Post 70 x 10 700
ST 3
Bagan Dormitory 167.5
167.5
167.5
45 90 15 167.5 L/dayMandalay
Dormitory
Inlay Dormitory
ST 4
Sagaing
Dormitory
167.5
167.5
45 90 15 167.5 L/day
Dawei Dormitory
ST 5
Restaurant 25
52 104 15 145 L/dayClinic 70
Community
Building
50
PLC Sewage System – September 2016 16
PLC SEWAGE SYSTEM
● No liquid discharge at aeration pond and soak pit outlet - Env law and regulations in line
● No foul smell nor odor at soak pits area PLC septic tanks and soak pits are working normal
● Current system- ko Thant zin?
The way forward
● Regular monitoring of odor smell at septic tanks and soak pit (daily)
● Removal of Sludge and Scum from septic tanks as required (monthly visual check, Quarterly thickness level measurement)
● Improvement of efficiency of Soak Pits – odor smell, any anomaly identified clean the distributed drained perforated pipes and biomat layer shall be visually checked the pipes and biomat layer area at end 2017 or 2018 even though no anomaly
● Continue dosing of Aqua Clean as per Site Standing Instruction 3-SI-DOK-HSE-05-002
CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION
33 | P a g e
Appendix 3. Internal and External Audit reports
AUDIT PLANNING & ORGANIZATION
Internal Environmental and IH audit debriefing, October 2018
Audit Team Member- Khin Maung Lwin (HSE)- Soe Oo Kyaw (HSE) - Onshore- Ei Phyu Phyu Htun (HSE) - Thaketa Base- Etienne TOURNEBISE (HSE) - Offshore- Lu Lu Tin Oo (EC) - Yangon Office
Audit PLANNING- 15/24/27-08 & 07-09-2018 - Briefing at Yangon Office- 28-08-2018 - Audit at Thaketa base- 29~31-08-2018 - Audit at PLCMS- 03~05-09-2018 - Audit at Yadana- 11-09-2018 - Audit at Yangon Office- 03-10-2018 - Debriefing at Yangon Office
Audit Interviewees- HSE Superintendent- HSE Supervisors- Logistic Supervisor- HSE technician- Electrical / Instrument team- Site Doctors- Camp boss- Contractors- Laboratory technician
REFERENCES
Internal Environmental and IH audit debriefing, October 2018
● Myanmar National Environmental Quality (Emission) Guideline● ISO 14001-2015 : Environmental Management System Guidelines● ISO 50001-2011 : Energy Management System Guidelines● DIR-GR-HSE-001 One-MAESTRO HSE principles● CR-GR-HSE-001 One-MAESTRO HSE expectations● CR EP HSE 052 : Waste Management in Exploration and Production activities● GS EP MED 062 : Hygiene offshore and onshore base● 1-PR-HSE-01-001: HS3E Management System Manual● 2-PR-DS-05-002: Environmental Monitoring and Reporting● 2-PR-DS-05-003 : Waste Management plan● 2-PR-DS-12-001: HSE Performance Indicators: Definition & Monitoring● 2-PR-HSE-01-001: Compliance Obligations Procedure● 2-PR-HSE-05-004: Identification and Evaluation of Environmental Aspects and Impacts● 2-PR-HSE-05-006: Identification of EMS interested parties, Issues, Risks & Opportunities● 2-PR-HSE-02-001: HSE Communication & Feedback● 2-PR-HSE-02-003: H3SE Objectives, Targets and Action Plan● 2-PR-DS-05-005: Energy Management System Documents● HRAFs● Environmental Aspect/Impact register
SCOPE OF AUDIT
● ISO 14001-2015 Environmental Management systems requirement - Environmental Management System- Objectives and planning to achieve them - Environmental objectives- Objectives and planning to achieve them - Planning actions to achieve environmental objectives- Operational planning and control
• Chemical Handling
• Waste Management
- Emergency preparedness and response- Monitoring, measurement, analysis and evaluation – General
● IH – Health and Hygiene● Energy Management
● Audit for ISO 14001-2015 Surveillance audit (5th to 6th Nov)● Audit for ERNST & YOUNG Audit-Group Audit (29th Oct to 2nd Nov)
Internal Environmental and IH audit debriefing, October 2018
GOOD POINTS
Internal Environmental and IH audit debriefing, October 2018
● Good house keeping and proper waste segregation on Yadana andPLCMS
● Regular monitoring on Diesel, Water and Electrical consumption toreduce on average consumption compared with previous year
● Weekly H&H performed by site doctor, HSE, logistic, maintenance onYadana and PLCMS and weekly follow up actions
● Chemical MSDSs folder are updated on 2018 and kept at Yadanacontrol room
● Food wastes and garden refuse are composted to use as fertilizer inYangon Office (Reduce non-hazardous wastes disposal)
● Rain water are collected to safe water taken from YCDC in Yangonoffice and to use gardening water at PLC to save ground water takenfrom tube wells
● Solar water heater is installed in Yangon office to save electricity usagefrom Government
● Waste water outlet is continuously monitored and analysed in Yangonoffice together with local contractor to get the results within target range– BOD – 25.2 (20-60ppm), COD – 72 (<200ppm)
● Waste inventories are recorded with different colour for different sites’waste received at Thaketa base
ENVIRONMENT & IH AUDITFINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
TEPM ENVIRONMENTAL OBJECTIVE
Internal Environmental and IH audit debriefing, October 2018
● FindingTEPM HSE Environmental objective (Reduce non-hazardous waste 3%) is not included in site HSE objective.
● RecommendationReduce non-hazardous waste by 3% should be included on site HSE objective and review in site HSE committee meeting.
YDN TKA
● Sites commentsEnvironmental objective included in site action plan and presented in every bi-weekly HSE meeting & committee meeting. (PLCMS)
Non-haz Waste reduction 2017 vs 2018 reviewed in HSE committee meeting (YGN)
No comments from other sites.
ENVIRONMENTAL ASPECT/IMPACT REGISTER
Internal Environmental and IH audit debriefing, October 2018
● FindingEnvironmental Aspect / Impact Register doesn’t include:
- 4D Seismic, EMoS activities, ROV campaign. (YDN)
- CI (Corrosion Inhibitor dilution process) (TKA)
- Decommission of old 6” diesel line at wharf (PLCMS)
● RecommendationEnvironmental Aspect / Impact Register should be updated with new activities.
YDN PLCMS TKA
● Sites comments• Old 6” diesel line at wharf has been decommissioned in June 2018
(PLCMS), need to confirm still need to add in PLCMS Env Aspect / Impact register
WASTE MONTHLY REPORTING
Internal Environmental and IH audit debriefing, October 2018
● FindingSome hazardous / non-hazardous waste are consolidated in Environmental monthly report template not in line with current waste disposal options:- kitchen/ gallery waste, garden refuse filled in “Tonnage sent to biological treatment, composting”
(PLCMS, YDN)
- Packaging material / paper filled in “Incinerated tonnage in burn pit” (TKA)
- Mix burnable filled in “incinerated tonnage in burn pit”, Glass “Tonnage permanently stored on site” (YGN, YDN)
● RecommendationMonthly waste report format should be reviewed and revised inline with current TEPM waste produced and waste disposal process (YGN HSE)
● Sites commentsN/A
WASTE MONTHLY REPORTING
Internal Environmental and IH audit debriefing, October 2018
● FindingSome waste is missed to report in site Environmental (waste) monthly report;
- Garden refuse, condensate produced from MS, (PLCMS)
- Spent oil, black waste (YGN)
- Fluorescent lamp, black waste, spent oil (TKA)
● RecommendationAll kind of wastes produced from sites should be reported in site Envoronmental monthly report
PLCMS TKA YGN
● Sites commentsNo comments from sites
WASTE MONTHLY REPORTING
Internal Environmental and IH audit debriefing, October 2018
● FindingSome hazardous wastes received from other sites are mistakenly reported together with site produced wastes in PLCMS site monthly Environmental report (wastes); - Fluorescent light bulbs / neon tubes, medical wastes, paints / paint pot, aerosol, contaminated soil,
other wastes
● RecommendationAll received hazardous wastes from other TEPM sites should not reported as site produced wastes.
PLCMS
● Site commentNo comment from site
WASTE SEGREGATION
Internal Environmental and IH audit debriefing, October 2018
● FindingClinical waste from Medical waste bin (Yellow bin located outside of clinic) is sent together with hazardous waste to onshore.
● RecommendationNot follow the company waste management procedure biological waste to be separated from hazardous wasteMake sure all other sites followed as per recommendation for clinical waste
YDN
● Site commentNo comment from site
WASTE SEGREGATION AND MANIFEST
Internal Environmental and IH audit debriefing, October 2018
● FindingKitchen wastes (galley, glass, cans/tins, plastic bottles, plastic bags) are recorded as catering dry waste in waste manifest, and then reported as dry waste in site monthly Environmental (waste) monthly report
● RecommendationKitchen wastes should record as different waste categories in waste manifest to report different waste in site monthly Environmental (waste) report by site Logistic.
YDN
● Site commentNo comment from site
WASTE MANIFEST
Internal Environmental and IH audit debriefing, October 2018
● FindingWaste manifest are recorded both non-hazardous waste and hazardous waste in one sheet that waste destination / waste receiver are not same
Hazardous waste are sent with manifest from Yadana to PLC through Thaketa base and Thaketa base sign on manifest as hazardous waste receiver instead of waste will be transferred to PLC (there is no waste transit acceptance available on waste manifest)
● RecommendationNon-hazardous waste and hazardous waste should be transferred with different waste manifest.Waste manifest should be reviewed especially for hazardous waste transfer from Yadana to PLC which may need waste transit acceptance and two mean of transporters’ acceptance on waste manifest
YDN
● Site commentNo comment from site
WASTE MANIFEST
Internal Environmental and IH audit debriefing, October 2018
● FindingWaste manifest is not properly filled in:- Smart fresh food waste manifest designated to PLCMS HSE, actually food waste taken by villager for
animal feed (PLCMS)
- Hazardous waste (used cooking oil, oily grease) are recorded at non-hazardous waste location in waste manifest which transport from MS to PLC (PLCMS)
- Vessel stamp and Master sign on waste receiver location on waste manifest instead of transporter acceptance location (YDN)
● RecommendationWaste manifest to be properly filled up.
YDN PLCMS
● Site commentNo comment from sites
WASTE TRANSFER
Internal Environmental and IH audit debriefing, October 2018
● FindingWaste cooking oil, oily sludge waste and dry waste (garbage waste, glass bottles, cans/ tins, plastic bottles, plastic) are sent to Thaketa base with SMART container and all wastes are taken by Yangon SMART.
● RecommendationHazardous waste (waste cooking oil, oily sludge) disposal to be followed as per company procedure.
YDN
● Site commentNo comment from site
WASTE STORAGE AND PACKAGING
Internal Environmental and IH audit debriefing, October 2018
● FindingChemical liquid waste are stored without secondary containment in laboratory.
Chemical liquid waste (chloroform) is going to be sent without proper packaging / labelling. (pack with cartoon box, no pictogram on box)
Dedicated broken glass waste bin for laboratory is located outside of laboratory. (safety point of view)
● RecommendationLiquid waste to be stored with secondary containment.Chemical liquid waste to be transported with proper packing and labelling.Dedicated broken glass waste bin can be arranged inside laboratory with small waste bin.
YDN
● Site commentNo comment from site
WASTE STORAGE
Internal Environmental and IH audit debriefing, October 2018
● FindingSome waste drums stored without label and signage
● RecommendationWaste liquid drum should be labelled to know the content of waste
PLCMS
● Site commentNo comment from site
INDUSTRIAL HYGIENE
Internal Environmental and IH audit debriefing, October 2018
● FindingCartridge mask is used by both laboratory technicians by sharing.
● RecommendationCartridge mask should be used individually to protect contamination one person to another person.
YDN
● Site commentNo comment from site
CHEMICAL MANAGEMENT
Internal Environmental and IH audit debriefing, October 2018
● FindingLaboratory chemical lists and MSDS folder are last updated on August 2016 (YDN)
Some chemicals are still kept in laboratory since long time ago (e.g benzene – 10 liter) (YDN)
MSDSs from cylinders storage area are still with old GHS sign (TKA)
● RecommendationLaboratory chemical MSDS should be reviewed and updated as required.
Review necessity of Chemicals stock which to be kept in laboratory and to be disposed unnecessity chemical.
MSDSs from cylinders storage area to be updated with new GHS sign.
YDN TKA
● Sites commentsNo comment from sites
TRAINING MATRIX
Internal Environmental and IH audit debriefing, October 2018
● FindingSite training matrix follow up is not updated for key personnel. (TKA)
SMART provided training is recorded same training date / due date for all catering crew. (YDN)
● RecommendationTraining matrix to be updated and corrected.
YDN TKA
● Sites commentsSMART provide the correct training follow up sheet after debriefing at Yangon Office
INDUSTRIAL HYGIENE MANAGEMENT
Internal Environmental and IH audit debriefing, October 2018
● FindingThaketa logistic base noise map has last updated on Year 2007.
Domestic water samples for analysis are taken raw water from storage tank and treated water from water treatment unit.
Shower head, basin tag cleaning procedure have been implemented and not included PPE requirement.
● RecommendationThaketa logistic base noise map should be updated.
Treated water sample for analysis should be alternately taken different place from end user points (basin tag, shower head…etc) and free chlorine level should be maintained minimum 0.2 ppm.
Shower head, basin tag cleaning procedure should be updated including with PPE requirement (chemical glove, mask…etc)
TKA
● Site commentNo comment from site
OBSERVATION
Internal Environmental and IH audit debriefing, October 2018
● All mini MSDSs should be placed in catering chemical storage area in 2nd deck camp boss office (noticed “Bleach” chemical MSDS missing in audit time)
● Some waste bins located on site are not same with TEPM waste bin color code. ● CI(corrosion Inhibitor) mixed water tank is kept at PP weather deck without MSDS
available and hazard sign is needed to replace.● Flammable liquid store cabinet are stored together with other personnel
belongings at paint store PP mezz deck.
YDN
● Site commentNo comment from site
ENVIRONMENT & IH AUDITONSHOREAudit debriefing: PLC 31-08-2018
PLCMS NON-HAZARDOUS WASTE MONITORING
Internal Environmental and IH audit debriefing, October 2018
Monitoring non-hazardous waste generation
PLCMS
Internal Environmental and IH audit debriefing, October 2018
YANGON
Internal Environmental and IH audit debriefing, October 2018
YADANA
Internal Environmental and IH audit debriefing, October 2018
THAKETA
Internal Environmental and IH audit debriefing, October 2018
PLCMS
THAKETA
Internal Environmental and IH audit debriefing, October 2018
YANGON
YADANA
Waste taken by SMART
Internal Environmental and IH audit debriefing, October 2018
THAKETA
PLCMSCondensate produced from MS is missed to report
YANGONSpent oil from maintenance / black waste are missed to report
Internal Environmental and IH audit debriefing, October 2018
THAKETA BASEFluorescent lamp, black waste, spent oil (?) are missed to report in monthly report.
Internal Environmental and IH audit debriefing, October 2018
Hazardous waste reported together with waste received from
other sites
Internal Environmental and IH audit debriefing, October 2018
Internal Environmental and IH audit debriefing, October 2018
Waste destination to Thaketa / PLC
Waste receiver from Thaketa
Non-hazardous waste to Thaketa
Hazardous waste to PLC
Internal Environmental and IH audit debriefing, October 2018
This food waste go to animal feed
These wastes to be recorded as hazardous waste
Vessel Master signed in waste receiver location
Internal Environmental and IH audit debriefing, October 2018
Dry waste bags
Waste cooking oil
Internal Environmental and IH audit debriefing, October 2018
Chemical liquid waste packed with cartoon box
Chemical liquid waste without secondary containment
Internal Environmental and IH audit debriefing, October 2018
Waste chemical drums without labelling
Internal Environmental and IH audit debriefing, October 2018
Last updated on August 2016
MSDS with Old GHS sign
Internal Environmental and IH audit debriefing, October 2018
All catering persons are same date recorded
Internal Environmental and IH audit debriefing, October 2018
Internal Environmental and IH audit debriefing, October 2018
Metal waste bin
Non hazardous waste bin
General waste bin with green color
Metal waste bin with gray color
Internal Environmental and IH audit debriefing, October 2018
CI mixed water storage tank is kept at PP weather deck, no MSDS available,
hazard label is needed to replace.
Flammable liquid cabinet are stored together with other personnel
belogings
WASTE MONITORING FROM THAKETA INCLUDING OTHER SITES
Internal Environmental and IH audit debriefing, October 2018
To compare only waste from TKA
THAKETA
Internal Environmental and IH audit debriefing, October 2018
Waste not traceable, no name and sign
This food waste go to animal feed
These wastes to be recorded as hazardous waste
GOOD POINTS
Internal Environmental and IH audit debriefing, October 2018
CN : 01 104 1734929 Audit Report as per TRCert - ISO 14001:2015;
for
Total E&P Myanmar
No. 5 Sacred Tooth Relic Lake Avenue, Punn Pin
Gone Quarter, No. 5 Mayangone Tsp, Yangon,
Myanmar
Audit Report
Client Standard(s) Certification Number(s) Audit Type
Total E&P Myanmar ISO 14001:2015 01 104 1734929 1st Surveillance Audit
Rev. 20180910 Page 2/17
Contents
1 Audit result ................................................................................................. 3
2 Scope ........................................................................................................... 4
2.1 Description of the organization ................................................................ 4
2.2 Scope of certification ................................................................................ 4
3 Changes in the management system / Contract review .......................... 5
4 Audit findings ............................................................................................. 5
5 Dates ............................................................................................................ 7
Audit Report
Client Standard(s) Certification Number(s) Audit Type
Total E&P Myanmar ISO 14001:2015 01 104 1734929 1st Surveillance Audit
Rev. 20180910 Page 3/17
Audit Leader : Mr. Kittipong Tungprasert
Audit Team : Mr. Natthasorn Kosumchotiros, Mr. Phubodee Krichphurin(only5)
Management System Representative : Mr.Khin Maung Lwin
Audit Date : November 5-6, 2018
1 Audit result
Management system effectiveness was verified on site by means of random sampling by an appropriately selected auditor. This applies in particular to the compliance of workflows with standard requirements and the descriptions in management system documentation. The special features of the organization’s business activities, the applicable statutory and regulatory requirements and the requirements set forth in other generally applicable documents were also taken into account. This was done by means of a sampling approach, by conducting interviews and reviewing the appropriate documentation. Audit findings and recommendations regarding opportunities for improvement have been set forth in Sections 4 of this report.
The last audit revealed nonconformities which have been demonstrably corrected. The corrections and corrective actions taken in this respect have been verified.
A stage 1 audit was performed and the organization found ready for certification. Identified weaknesses, if any, have been eliminated and the respective corrective action verified.
The current audit revealed the following nonconformities:
Standard(s): No. of nonconformity
ISO 14001 0
The major nonconformities (No. x) with individual standard elements require a re-audit to verify the effec-tiveness of the corrections and corrective actions (probable date:.ddmmyyyy)
X
The organization has established and maintains an effective system to ensure compliance with its policy and objectives. The audit team confirms in line with the audit targets that the organization’s management system complies with, adequately maintains and implements the requirements of the standard(s).
The auditor therefore recommends (provided the effectiveness of corrections and/or corrective actions addressing the identified nonconformities has been verified):
Award of the new certificates.
X
Maintenance of the existing certification.
Inclusion of the changes (see Section 3) in the scope of application of existing certifications
Maintenance or issue of the certificates only after successful completion of a re-audit.
Audit Report
Client Standard(s) Certification Number(s) Audit Type
Total E&P Myanmar ISO 14001:2015 01 104 1734929 1st Surveillance Audit
Rev. 20180910 Page 4/17
2 Scope
2.1 Description of the organization
Total Exploration and Production Myanmar is located at No. 5 Sacred Tooth Relic Lake Avenue, Punn Pin Gone Quarter, No. 5 Mayangone Tsp, Yangon, Myanmar
Total E&P Myanmar extract the gas offshore platform at the Bay of Bengal and send to the gas to the customer by pipeline. Other 4 sites (Yanada offshore, Thaketa Logistic Base, Pipe Line Center (PLC) and Metering Station (MS) are related to their gas production and transportation works.
Rotation works implement at
-Yadana Offshore: 06:30AM -18:30 PM,
- Onshore-PLC : 07:00AM - 19:00PM,
- Onshore-MS : 07:00AM – 19:00 PM,
- Yangon Office and Thaketa Logistic Base : (08:00AM-17:00PM)
Main Process:
1)Offshore process;
Wells Compressor ( MCP and LCP platform) PP Water, moist removal PLC MS
Customer( PTT)
Key process offshore
PP (Production Platform) : Free water knock-out drum( to remove free water from raw gas)
-Raw gas filter separator ( to remove moist from raw gas with Ethylene Glycol)
2) Pipe Line Center(PLC):
- Transportation of Gas and Associated Hydrocarbons. Onshore Installations including Onshore Pipelines.
Implement of CSR activities for Local Communities.
3) Metering Station (MS)
- Transportation of Gas and Associated Hydrocarbon. Onshore Installations including Onshore Pipelines.
4) Thaketa Logistic Base
- Logistic Support for Operation and Warehousing
2.2 Scope of certification
Scope of certification: (per standard):
Exploration, Production and Transportation of Gas and Associated Hydrocarcons
ISO 9001 standard requirements to be excluded from the scope:
-
Reasons for exclusions: -
In cases involving multi-site certification: Internal auditing throughout the multi-site organization was verified with a positive result. The management representative has appropriate authority over the sites included in the multi-site organization.
The audit took appropriate account of multi-shift operations and provided for representative auditing of all shifts.
No significant difference between each shift, so auditor decided to audit only morning shift.
Audit Report
Client Standard(s) Certification Number(s) Audit Type
Total E&P Myanmar ISO 14001:2015 01 104 1734929 1st Surveillance Audit
Rev. 20180910 Page 5/17
The following sites and their scopes are included in the scope of certification:
Site No. (CN ext.)
Sites included in cert. Name/address of site
No. of emp.
Scope and processes Stand-ard(s)
Au-dited
01 Yangon: No. 5 Sacred Tooth
Relic Lake Avenue, Punn Pin Gone Quarter, No. 5 Mayan-gone Tsp, Yangon, Myanmar
260 Scope: Management of Exploration, Pro-duction and Transportation of Gas and Associated Hydrocarbons
ISO14001:2015 X
02 Yadana Offshore Bay of Bengal, The Republic of the Union Myanmar
100
(rotate by 200)
Scope: Production and Transportation of Gas and associated Hydrocarbons.
Offshore Installations including Pipelines and Satellite Platforms.
ISO14001:2015
03 Thaketa Logistic Base
Address: Shu Khin Tha Myo Pat Road, Thaketa Township, Yangon, The Republic of the Union My-anmar
33 Scope: Logistic Support for Operation and Warehousing
ISO1400
1:2015
X
04 Pipe Line Center(PLC): 138(rotate by 276
Scope: Transportation of Gas and Asso-ciated Hydrocarbons. Onshore Installa-tions including Onshore Pipelines.
Implement of CSR activities for Local Communities.
ISO1400
1:2015
X
05 Metering Station (MS)
Address: Nat Ein Taung,
Yebyu Township, Tanintha-yi Division, Myanmar, The Republic of the Union My-anmar
28(rotate by56)
Scope: Transportation of Gas and Asso-ciated Hydrocarbon. Onshore Installa-tions including Onshore Pipelines.
ISO1400
1:2015
3 Changes in the management system / Contract review
No major changes have been made to the management system and the management system documentation since
the last audit.
The order details which form the basis of the audit (including number of employees, scope and sites) reflect the
actual situation in the organization.
Current audit program is appropriately and no need to change for next audit.
The description of the scope in the certificate appropriately reflects the scope of the management system.
The audit plan was not changed during the audit.
Audit Report
Client Standard(s) Certification Number(s) Audit Type
Total E&P Myanmar ISO 14001:2015 01 104 1734929 1st Surveillance Audit
Rev. 20180910 Page 6/17
4 Audit findings
The audit findings related to the audited standards are listed in the Annexes to this report (see. Annex ISO 14001:2015).
All information gained during the audit will be treated with strict confidentiality by the auditor and the certification body. In view of the sampling approach applied to the audit, weaknesses and nonconformities may still exist which have not been identified during the audit.
No. Unit/Department
Site
Positive findings
1 Management Highly commitment to upgrade ISO 14001 to New version.
The following recommendations and opportunities for improvement provided by the auditor are intended to contrib-ute to the continuous improvement of the management system.
No. Unit/Department
Site
Recommendations and opportunities for improvement
1 Yangon office There was opportunity for improve the PH parameter of effluent discharge it was
not comply with YCDC regulation (7 < PH <8) actual get 5.8 (Acidity) in May 2018
at site Yangon office
Audit Report
Client Standard(s) Certification Number(s) Audit Type
Total E&P Myanmar ISO 14001:2015 01 104 1734929 1st Surveillance Audit
Rev. 20180910 Page 7/17
5 Dates
Due Date for the next audit
November 17, 2019
Agreed date for the next audit -3,+1 from due date
2018.11.27
Mr. Kittipong Tungprasert
Date Audit Leader / Auditor(s)
The auditor confirms his check that there is no conflict of interest, especially that neither he, nor his employer, the
organizational unit to which he belongs or an associated partner in the private sphere has provided consulting ser-
vices - including in-house training and internal audits - to the client on the implementation, development and
maintenance of a management system within the last two years.
Audit Report
Client Standard(s) Certification Number(s) Audit Type
Total E&P Myanmar ISO 14001:2015 01 104 1734929 1st Surveillance Audit
Rev. 20180910 Page 8/17
Annex ISO 14001:2015 Item Audit result
Policy / objectives The environmental policy established by top management was communicated and implemented in the organization. It is suitable for the activities of the organization and its context. It includes the commitment to the protection of the environment continual improvement to enhance environmental performance and compliance with the bind-ing obligations. It provides the framework for establishing and reviewing environmen-tal objectives. The organization has determined suitable objectives, associated indi-cators to monitor progress and actions to achieve them.
Key environmental objectives and associated indicators are:
To reduce on average 3% of consumption of electricity from 2017 ; result: under monitoring
To control SO2 emission < 7.606 tons/year ; result : under monitoring
Environmental aspects,
determination of risks
and their changes since
the last audit
Key environmental aspects are identified and their significance and impact on prod-
ucts and services reviewed and updated at regular intervals. The procedure is de-
fined in 2-PR-HSE-05-04 Environmental aspect and impact register, Last update
30/10/2017. The evaluation criteria include SC (Severity of Consequence) and Occur-
rence the overall impact is calculated by Severity x Occurrence . Total 193 activity
of evaluation.
Aspects were updated on 30/10/2017.
Aspect of life cycle perspectives , impact, situation and obligation was evaluated and
determined cover normal ,abnormal and emergency.
Life cycle perspective
- Upstream: There was consider the impact of environmental aspect during ex-ploration as Energy consumption, Hazardous chemical control and utilize of gas per energy consumption etc.
- Downstream – The waste water came from gas separator process it was con-trol the waste water return to well by pressure of machine.
Risk, opportunities and environmental aspects and identified with their significant
And impact for the environmental management system have been determined (re-
garding environmental aspects, binding obligations and other issues) as below
Key environmental aspects include :
Processes/
Activi-
ties/products
Aspects of
risk
Impact Control of limit impact Pollution control
equipment/ Preven-
tion/Operational control
Gas to explora-
tion and trans-
portation
Gas leak
o Xylene emission from painting
Air pollution ROW Maintenance
Periodical monitoring
Weekly emergency drill
o Disposal by licensed waste service
o Offsite Recycle
Audit Report
Client Standard(s) Certification Number(s) Audit Type
Total E&P Myanmar ISO 14001:2015 01 104 1734929 1st Surveillance Audit
Rev. 20180910 Page 9/17
Item Audit result
o Thinner us-ing
o Electri-cal/water us-age
o Heat
o Potential of fire
o Disposal by licensed waste service
o Exhaust blower
o Awareness control/ EMP
o Program
Waste disposal by
Cinerator
Emission of
Oxides into air
Air pollution Own incinerator at PLC
Site
Operate by competence
Person
Ash store under control
Procedure is provided
o Disposal by licensed waste service
o Onsite treatment by sludge precipitation before discharging
o Awareness control/ EMP
Purge gas to flare o Gas burnt Atmosphere
Air pollution Rate adjusted to air
Monitoring
o Disposal by licensed waste service
o Ear plug, operation
TG running Dieseal gas
Burn to atmos-
phere
Air pollution
Noise
Vibration
Monitoring
Maintenance plan
Energy management
System.
o WI o Claim supplier
o Disposal by licensed waste service
Watermaker
chemical han-
dling
Reject to sea Water pollution Monitoring of fresh water
Quality and rejected wate
o Operational control procedure and MSDS
Waste Collection
Segregation
Disposal
Waste type
Classification
(packing,
Hazardous,
food,
Scrap material
Waste pollu-
tion
Soil contami-
nate
Waste disposal by
Permitted supplier.
o Operational control procedure
o Disposed by licensed supplier
o Disposed by licensed supplier
o Disposed by local governor
o Operational control procedure and li-censed by Thai gov-ernment.
o Operational control procedure and EMP
Audit Report
Client Standard(s) Certification Number(s) Audit Type
Total E&P Myanmar ISO 14001:2015 01 104 1734929 1st Surveillance Audit
Rev. 20180910 Page 10/17
Item Audit result
Mud discharge
To sea
Sea quality
Degrading
Water pollution Use high biodegradable
Water and low toxicity
additive
-Installation of water
tank (for internal use
and fire pump) - 2017
-New toilet-ware for sav-
ing water 2017-2018
- monthly monitoring
consumption in ESC
meeting
-Awareness
-Objective to energy
saving
Sewage system
And water drain-
age
Production of
black wa-
ter/grey water
Water pollution Drainage system and
Bio remediation
Major accident
Gas leak
Gas release to
atmosphere
Air pollution
Noise pollution
Vibration
Emergency contingency
Plan
Leak on pipeline,content
Of whole PL section would
be vented
Use of vehicles//
Heavy equip-
ment
Diesel burnt to
Atmosphere
Particulate
Emission
Air pollution
Noise pollu-
tion/Vibration
Limited Speed
Maintenace
Identification and moni-
toring of compliance
obligations
The organization identifies the relevant legal and other requirements at regular inter-
vals and makes them accessible to all relevant functions. The procedure is defined in
2-PR-HSE-01-001 Process card Law and regulation management. The legal re-
quirements are classified into 8 subjects and evaluated twice a year. It is recorded in
EMS compliance Obligations Register list.
Examined with the list of August, 2018.
Evaluation of compliance
Compliance with applicable legal and other environmental requirements is evaluated
Audit Report
Client Standard(s) Certification Number(s) Audit Type
Total E&P Myanmar ISO 14001:2015 01 104 1734929 1st Surveillance Audit
Rev. 20180910 Page 11/17
Item Audit result
at regular intervals or every month, recorded in EMS compliance Obligation Register.
Last evaluation was in August 2018 – All complied
The following permits and licences are available at the organization including the
evidences of compliance :
Type of
obligation
Obligation
name
Requirment Compliance status Requirment
National
Legisla-
tion
Environemnt
conservation
Law
2012
Aim of this regulation
is to implement the
enviromental conser-
vation leading to
The sustainable de-
velopment of the
country
Comply - -
National Envi-
romental
Quality (Emis-
sion) Guidlines
(2015)
Specific the environ-
mental quality of off-
shore/onshore Oil and
Gas atmosphere
emission
Waste wa-
ter,noise,odor etc.
Comply - -
EIA procedure
2015
The business depsrt-
ment
Organization shall
carry
Out enviromental im-
pact
Assessment for his
plan
Business or activity
Comply - -
Forest Law This law specific the
managment of forest
Comply
Audit Report
Client Standard(s) Certification Number(s) Audit Type
Total E&P Myanmar ISO 14001:2015 01 104 1734929 1st Surveillance Audit
Rev. 20180910 Page 12/17
Item Audit result
1992 land,the establishment
of forest planta-
tion,permission and
removal of forest pro-
duce and the offenced
and penalties relating
to it.
Union of My-
anmar Marine
Fisheries
Law,1990
Pollution control
,disposal of polluting
material into
The union of marine
fisheries
Comply - -
Interna-
tional
Conven-
tion
MARPOL 73/78 Any discharge into the
sea of oil or oily mix-
ture
From ships is prohibit-
ed
Grinded food waste
can be discharged to
sea at
4 nautical miles of the
nearest
coast.MARPOL re-
quires the develop-
ment
Of a Shipboard oil
pollution emergency
plan for every oil tank-
er of 150 gross ton-
nage and above and
all other ships of 400
gross tonnages and
above
Comply - -
ICAO:
Annex 16 to
the conven-
tion on inter-
national Civil
aviation envi-
ronmental
Aircraft noise and
Aircraft
Engine Emission pre-
vention
Comply
Audit Report
Client Standard(s) Certification Number(s) Audit Type
Total E&P Myanmar ISO 14001:2015 01 104 1734929 1st Surveillance Audit
Rev. 20180910 Page 13/17
Item Audit result
protection Vol
1 and II
United Nations
Convention on
the Law of the
Sea ,Montego
Bay 1982
Prevention of Pollution
at Sea
Comply
Vienna Con-
vention for the
Protection of
The Ozone
Layer 1985
Ozone Layaer Protec-
tion
Comply - -
Company
Rule
CR EP HSE
052
Waste manag-
ment in Explo-
ration and pro-
duction process
This company rule
sets out the minimum
requirments for man-
aging waste.
Comply - -
Etc.
Leadership, responsibil-ity and authority and communication
The management demonstrates commitment with respect to the environmental man-agement system and integrates its requirements into the organization´s business processes. The following persons also have significant responsibility for the environ-mental management system:
·The each of the responsibility and authority has defined on the HSE02.04: HSE
Roles & Responsibilities in “Health, Safety, Security, Sustainable Development, Envi-ronment, and Energy management System Manual”.
·Environmental related Communication structure has defined in HSE Board meeting
The organization has set up an effective communication process for both internal and external communication.
Operation and perfor-mance evaluation
The organization identifies all environmentally relevant operations and activities and has established adequate processes for their planning and control. Consistent with a life cycle perspective this includes upstream and downstream activities as far as pos-sible as well as outsourced processes and changes.
The following activities are of particular relevance:
- Upstream: There was consider the impact of environmental aspect during ex-ploration as Energy consumption, Hazardous chemical control and utilize of gas per energy consumption etc.
- Downstream – The waste water came from gas separator process it was con-trol the waste water return to well by pressure of machine.
Audit Report
Client Standard(s) Certification Number(s) Audit Type
Total E&P Myanmar ISO 14001:2015 01 104 1734929 1st Surveillance Audit
Rev. 20180910 Page 14/17
Item Audit result
Factory Tour (Yangon Head office):
Waste management :
There were 3 types (Garden waste, Kitchen waste, Recycle waste ). The disposition of waste was done by the licensed suppliers.
Waste separation was inspected daily and recorded in Waste Tracking system
During audit sampling Waste manifest as Garden waste disposal by YCDC in 11.10.18
and seen monthly waste report .
Chemical Management,
Chemical storage was checked weekly and recorded,no spills or leaks, SDS and etc.
Chemical dispersion at points of use was monitored once a year.
Verified with evidences of Glass cleaner SDS.
Process wastewater treatment
The Septic tank was controlled by aeration pump including the annually clean sep-tic tank was provided. The result of effluent it demonstrate conform to YCDC legal (BOD, COD, DO and PH) but only PH is out of legal limit which result of Monitor-ing and measurement by external lab (AMD).
Production Method& Support, Field Operation
The main activity are office and concern only document.
The aspect was review in Sep 18.
Monitoring and measurement :
Monitoring and measurement of the environmental performance takes place accord-ing to adequate criteria and methods. Environmental indicators have been estab-lished for the analysis and evaluation of environmental performance.
The procedure is defined in GP HSE-05-02 Concerning parameters, for example,
- Atmosphere emission (VOC, TSP, SOx, NOx, HCL, Benzene and H2S)
- Water and liquid effluent
- Oil spill
There was monitoring and measurement in every month which result of monitoring
Conform to obligation since January 2018 until now.
Emergency Preparedness and response
ERP is defines under TERPM Emergency response Plan 2-PR-HSE-09-03.Emergency drill are exercised on weekly basic with exercised and test report pre-pared. Record of emergency response training done for ERP team all sites are avail-able.
Annual Emergency Exercise
•Thaketa Annual Exercise on 17 May 2018
• Yangon Annual Exercise in Jul’2018
Audit Report
Client Standard(s) Certification Number(s) Audit Type
Total E&P Myanmar ISO 14001:2015 01 104 1734929 1st Surveillance Audit
Rev. 20180910 Page 15/17
Item Audit result
• PLANNED: Large Scale Exercise in Nov’2018 All equipment was provided the preventive maintenance plan and check follow up that plan as fire pump, Extinguisher, Vessel, Helicopter etc. its was record result of inspection in SAP.During audit sampling record of preventive maintenance the Fire motor pump in 1 November 2018.
Maintenance :
Aspect evaluated in 30/10/2017 that significant is electricity consumption which got improvement plan.
Risk and Opportunity: waste and electricity consumption per unit from maintenance activities
Maintenance and facilities record and PM plan were checked as below:
- Glycol System Last Preventive maintenance in November 2018.
- Closed drain Vertical closed pipe plan and preventive maintenace record in Feb 2018.
- Condensate injection pump ,last preventive maintenance in 6 September 2017.
All work order was generated in SAP system for check the condition each machine.
PLC site
Waste control area located in the double fenced with entrance key locked. Waste control area is separated from office, and pipeline area. Main waste such as chemical liquid, contaminated container, Pigging sludge, etc. Waste were separated suitable. PLC site had an incinerator for disposal waste. Work instruction for operate incinera-tor was prepared. Air emission from an incinerator was monitored such as CO, SO2, NO2, the resulted was passed standard. Wastewater from canteen and toilet was treated by septic tank. The objective target such as reduce fuel consumption 3% from 2017. The environmental aspect was review in Sep 18.
Thaketa site
Auditor walked thru areas of this site, this site consists of
- Main warehouse of Raw materials for Platform: steel, epoxy resin, chemical and equipment,
- Workshop: for machining work, Fabrication work >> during an audit there was no activity done,
- Store of spare parts to support both offshore and onshore, - Chemical store - Cool room (23 Celsius degree) for storage sealant, silicon, glue and some
chemical, - DG store for storage Paint, Thinner, Tri-ethylene – Glycol, - Waste segregation area/bin: General waste/White bin with identification, Plastic
waste/White bin with identification, Metal waste/Blue bin and Hazardous waste/Red bin,
- Diesel thank 5,000 liter 1 tank, - Generator room has grounding system 4 nodes.
Auditor walked thru all areas, observed environment including environment aspects, interviewed the auditee and verified the objective evidences of operational controls, it was found that overall environment and environment conditions are acceptable with
Audit Report
Client Standard(s) Certification Number(s) Audit Type
Total E&P Myanmar ISO 14001:2015 01 104 1734929 1st Surveillance Audit
Rev. 20180910 Page 16/17
Item Audit result
no NC raised.
Objectives and targets base HSEQ of Y2018 are established as below,
- HSE: no personnel injury / no fatality or lost time injury (recorded as LTI), - Lifting
- All CCU Shall be DNV 2.7.1 standard, - No anomaly from site for 1 unit with 2 color code (including contractor’s
equipment), - No container door anomaly, including contractor’s own, - No drop object anomaly for container including contractor’s own.
- Warehouse - “0” discrepancy for stock cycle counting and partner’s audit.
- Operation - Material cost less than 30KUSD for TKA ops, - Overall budget for variable part to reduce 5%
- Administration - Review and update procedures which are over two years from issue date.
Overall results of the existing objectives and targets are acceptable; however, the existing objectives and targets should be more focused Occupational Health and Safety.
Environment risk / the existing system defined in the Environment manual has been maintained, the risk rating are 1/first priority, 2/tolerable and 3/acceptable. The last risk reviewed in Oct 2017. Overall audit results are acceptable.
Emergency / the existing system defined in the documented procedure / 3-PR-TKA-09-001, Rev. 01. There are 9 scenarios (fire or exploration, serious human accident, oil spillage, bomb terrorist threat, mobilization of assistant means for another entry, road accident, man missing, mass casualty and major natural disaster.
Overall implementation results of emergency preparedness and response of 9 emer-gency situations are acceptable; cut off statistics since Oct 2018.
Internal audit and man-agement review
The organization measures MS implementation, maintenance and effectiveness by means of annually scheduled system audits. The organization reliably carries out these audits.
Internal audit - Organization has been maintained an internal audit as per defined in Procedure 2-PR-HSE-11-001, Rev.04 by yearly (12 months). The last internal audit done in Sept 2018 as planned covering both Offshore and Onshore. Auditor verified the list of qualified auditors (Mr. Ayar Min., Mr. Soe Oo Kyan, Mr. Zaw Min Aung and Mr. Lu Lu Tin.)
The internal audit has no NC raised, however, there are around 20 OFI concerned Waste management, Noise and SDS.
Top management reviews the organization’s environmental management system at regular intervals and in line with the requirements to ensure its continuous suitability, adequacy and effectiveness. The management review of 2018 was carried out in accordance with the requirements and was effective.
Use of certificate and logo
The logo and the certificate are used in compliance with the requirements. This has been checked by sampling. The sampling included business cards, company bro-chures or websites or others.
Audit Report
Client Standard(s) Certification Number(s) Audit Type
Total E&P Myanmar ISO 14001:2015 01 104 1734929 1st Surveillance Audit
Rev. 20180910 Page 17/17
Chapter of standard 4.1 4.2 4.3 5.1 5.2 5.3 6.1 6.2 7.1 7.2
Rating*) 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
No. of nonconformity - - - - - - - - - -
Chapter of standard 7.3 7.4 7.5 8.1 8.2 9.1 9.2 9.3 10
Rating*) * 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1
No. of nonconformity - - - - - - - - -
* Rating: 1 = conforming
2 = not audited in this audit
3 = failed/nonconformity (see nonconformity report))
4 = not applicable