ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT...
Transcript of ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT...
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT
FOR
PROPOSED CHANGE IN PRODUCT MIX FOR BULK DRUGS AND
INTERMEDIATES MANUFACTURING UNIT
AT
Polt No. 285, 286 & 287, KIADB
Industrial Area, Bommasandra-Jigani
Link Road, Phase-IV
TALUK: ANEKAL
DISTRICT: BENGALURU, URBAN
STATE: KARNATAKA
COUNTRY: INDIA
BY
M/s. CIPLA Limited
[Project termed under schedule 5(f): Category ‘A’ Synthetic organic chemicals.
ToR vide file no. SEIAA 33 IND 2016, dated: 24th Sep, 2016.
Prepared by
M/s. HUBERT ENVIRO CARE SYSTEMS (P) LTD, CHENNAI(NABET Accredited vide Certificate No. NABET/EIA/1619/RA0083 &
MoEF Recognized Lab vide F. No. Q-15018/13/2016-CPW)
MAY, 2019
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
The following personnel are gratefully acknowledged for their fullest support in collection,
compilation of needful data regarding the project and kind cooperation in fulfilling the
report on Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) of M/s. CIPLA Limited, Bengaluru.
CIPLA Limited,
Mr. Subrat Satpathy – Site Head
Mr. Kapini Gowda - EHS
Declaration of Experts contributing to the EIA
I hereby certify that I was involved in the EIA report for the project titled “ Proposed Change inProduct Mix for Bulk Drugs and Intermediates Manufacturing Unit” at Plot. No. 285, 286 &287, KIADB Industrial Area, Bommasandra-Jigani Link Road, Phase-IV, Anekal Taluk,Bengaluru Urban District & Karnataka State by M/s. CIPLA Limited. I was a part of the EIA
team in the following capacity that developed the above EIA with the support of the following
Team Members.
EIA Co-ordinator Team Member
Name: Dr.J.R. Moses Name: Mr. Abhishek Moses
Signature: Signature:
Date: 08/05/2019 Date: 08/05/2019
Contact Information:Hubert Enviro CareSystems Pvt.Ltd.,# A-21, Phase III, Behind Lion Clube School,Thiru-vi-ka Industrial Area, Guindy,Chennai –600032.Tamil Nadu, India.Email: [email protected]: www.hecs.in
Functional Area Experts (FAEs):
S. No. FunctionalAreas Name of the Expert Signature Duration of
Involvement
1. AP
FAEDr. J R Moses June 2016 – Till date
TMMr. Vamsee Krishna Navooru
Mr. Abhishek Moses
Mr. B. Tamil Selvan
Oct 2016 – Till date
June 2016 – Till date
June 2016 – Till date
Mr. Harsha Vardhan
Mr. N. Varadharajan
Mrs T. Rajani
Feb 2017 – Till date
Sep 2016 – Till date
Aug 2017 – Till date
2. AQ`
FAEDr. J R Moses June 2016 – Till date
TMMr. Abhishek Moses
Mr. Harsha Vardhan
Mr. B. Tamil Selvan
June 2016 – Till date
Feb 2017 – Till date
June 2016 – Till date
3. WP
FAEDr. J R Moses June 2016 – Till date
TMMr. Vamsee Krishna Navooru
Mr. Abhishek Moses
Mr. Chengalvarayan
Mr. B. Tamil Selvan
Mr. Harsha Vardhan
Mrs T. Rajani
Oct 2016 – Till date
June 2016 – Till date
Oct 2016 – Till date
June 2016 – Till date
Feb 2017 – Till date
Aug 2017 – Till date
4. LU
FAEMr. Venkateswarlu June 2017 – Till date
TMMr. N. Varadharajan Sep 2016 – Till date
5. NV FAEMr. Brijesh Kumar March – May 2017
TMMr. Vamsee Krishna Navooru
Mr. N. Varadharajan
Oct 2016 – Till date
Sep 2016 – Till date
6. EB
FAEMr. A. Manoharan Oct 2016 – Till date
TMDr. Rajkumar Samuel
Mr. B. Tamil Selvan
Mrs. Sheetal
June 2016 – Till date
June 2016 – Till date
Feb 2018 to till date
7. SE FAEMr. V. Dhivakar Aug 2016 – June 2017
8. HGFAEMr. Mallikarjuna Rao Oct 2018 to Till date
9. SHW
FAEMr. A. Manoharan June 2016 – Till date
TMMrs T. Rajani Aug 2017 – Till date
10. RH
FAEDr. J R Moses June 2016 – Till date
TMMr. Abhishek Moses
Mr. Harsha Vardhan
Mrs T. Rajani
June 2016 – Till date
Feb 2017 – Till date
Aug 2017 – Till date
AP - Air pollution monitoring, prevention and controlAQ - Meteorology, air quality modeling and predictionWP - Water pollution monitoring, prevention and controlLU - Land useNV - Noise & VibrationEB - Ecology and biodiversity
SE - Socio-economicsHG - Hydrology, ground water and water conservationSHW - Solid and hazardous waste managementRH - Risk assessment and hazards management
Declaration by the Head of the Accredited Consultant Organization
I, Dr. J R Moses hereby, confirm that the above mentioned experts prepared the EIA for
the “Proposed Change in Product Mix for Bulk Drugs and IntermediatesManufacturing Unit” at Plot. No. 285, 286 & 287, KIADB Industrial Area,Bommasandra-Jigani Link Road, Phase-IV, Anekal Taluk, Bengaluru Urban District& Karnataka State, by M/s. CIPLA Limited. I also confirm that I shall be fully
accountable for any misleading information mentioned in this statement.
Signature: Date: 08/05/2019
Name: Dr. J.R Moses
Designation: CEO
Name of the EIA Consultant Organization: Hubert Enviro Care Systems Pvt. Ltd.,
Chennai
Table of ContentsEXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................................ii1. Introduction.............................................................................................................................................2
1.1 Project Background.........................................................................................................................21.2 Project Proponent............................................................................................................................21.3 Proposed Project .............................................................................................................................21.4 Justification & Need for the Project................................................................................................31.5 Location of the project site..............................................................................................................3
1.5.1 Sites considered for the project location .................................................................................61.6 Need for the EIA Study...................................................................................................................6
1.6.1 Project Screening and ToR .....................................................................................................61.6.2 EIA Study................................................................................................................................81.6.3 EIA Cost..................................................................................................................................8
1.7 Overview of the Methodology of the EIA Study ............................................................................91.8 Structure of the EIA Study............................................................................................................12
2. PROJECT DESCRIPTION...................................................................................................................152.1 Type of Project..............................................................................................................................152.2 Size or Magnitude of operation.....................................................................................................212.3 Project Cost ...................................................................................................................................262.4 Process Description.......................................................................................................................262.5 Resource Requirements.................................................................................................................26
2.5.1 Raw Materials .......................................................................................................................262.5.2 Land Details ..........................................................................................................................332.5.3 Water Requirement ...............................................................................................................342.5.4 Power Requirement...............................................................................................................352.5.5 Manpower Requirement........................................................................................................35
2.6 Pollution Control Measures ..........................................................................................................352.6.1 Air Pollution & Fugitive Emission Control ..........................................................................352.6.2 Odour Control .......................................................................................................................362.6.3 Noise Pollution......................................................................................................................362.6.4 Waste Water Generation and Disposal Details .....................................................................362.6.5 Hazardous and Solid waste Management .............................................................................382.6.5.1 Solid waste management.......................................................................................................382.6.5.2 Hazardous waste Management..............................................................................................39
2.7 Existing Infrastructure Facilities ...................................................................................................403. DESCRIPTION OF ENVIRONMENT ................................................................................................43
3.1 Preamble .......................................................................................................................................433.2 Study Area ....................................................................................................................................443.3 Description of the Study Area.......................................................................................................443.4 Environmentally/Ecologically Sensitive areas..............................................................................453.5 Ecological Sensitive Areas and Other Protected Area ..................................................................463.6 Physical Conditions ......................................................................................................................48
3.6.1 PIA District Profile ...............................................................................................................483.6.2 Climatic Conditions ..............................................................................................................483.6.3 Rainfall..................................................................................................................................493.6.4 Natural Resources of Bengaluru Urban PIA District ............................................................493.6.4.1 Flora & Fauna .......................................................................................................................493.6.4.2 Forest Resources ...................................................................................................................49
3.6.4.3 Irrigation ...............................................................................................................................493.6.4.4 Agricultural Resources..........................................................................................................503.6.4.5 Mineral Resources.................................................................................................................513.6.5 Land Use & Land Cover .......................................................................................................533.6.5.1 Land Use Pattern of the Study Area......................................................................................553.6.6 Topography ...........................................................................................................................573.6.7 Geology of the PIA District ..................................................................................................613.6.8 Geomorphology of PIA District............................................................................................633.6.9 Hydrogeology of PIA District...............................................................................................633.6.10 Drainage Pattern in PIA District ...........................................................................................643.6.11 Soils in PIA District ..............................................................................................................673.6.12 Physiography of PIA District ................................................................................................693.6.13 Cyclones & Depressions, Winds and Coastal Erosion in PIA District .................................713.6.14 Seismicity..............................................................................................................................73
3.7 Air Environment ...........................................................................................................................733.7.1 Meteorological Conditions....................................................................................................743.7.2 Meteorological Data Collection ............................................................................................743.7.3 General Meteorological Scenario based on IMD Data .........................................................743.7.4 Meteorological Scenario during Study Period ......................................................................753.7.4.1 Atmospheric Inversion ..........................................................................................................773.7.4.2 Meteorological data during Study Period .............................................................................783.7.5 Ambient Air Quality .............................................................................................................783.7.5.1 Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Stations ............................................................................783.7.5.2 Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Techniques and Frequency ..............................................793.7.5.3 Results and Discussions ........................................................................................................803.7.5.4 Observations .........................................................................................................................90
3.8 Noise Environment .......................................................................................................................903.8.1 Results and Discussions ............................................................................................................903.8.2 Observations .............................................................................................................................913.9 Water Environment .......................................................................................................................913.9.1 Surface Water Resources ..........................................................................................................913.9.1.1 Surface Water Quality Assessment .........................................................................................1043.9.1.2 Results and Discussions ..........................................................................................................1083.9.2 Ground water resources ..........................................................................................................1083.9.2.1 Ground water Quality..............................................................................................................1093.9.2.2 Results and Discussions ..........................................................................................................1143.10 Soil as a resource and its Quality ................................................................................................1143.10.1 Soil quality ..............................................................................................................................1143.10.2 Results and Discussions ..........................................................................................................1183.11 Flora & Fauna .............................................................................................................................1193.11.1 Flora ........................................................................................................................................1193.11.1.1 Aquatic Vegetation .............................................................................................................1203.11.1.2 Planktons.............................................................................................................................1203.11.2 Fauna.......................................................................................................................................1213.11.2.1 Birds ....................................................................................................................................1233.12 Socio-economic profile of the Project Influence Area................................................................1253.12.1 Socio economic Profile of the district .....................................................................................1253.12.2 Socio economic Profile of the study area................................................................................126
3.12.2.1 Employment and Livelihood...............................................................................................1353.12.2.2 Industries within the study area ..........................................................................................1413.12.2.3 Health Facilities within the study area ................................................................................1413.12.2.4 Sanitation Facilities & Drinking water facilities within the Study Area.............................1433.12.2.5 Education facilities..............................................................................................................1493.12.2.6 Other infrastructure facilities ..............................................................................................151
4 ANTICIPATED ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES....................1594.1 General..............................................................................................................................................1594.2 Construction Phase............................................................................................................................1594.3 Operation Phase ..........................................................................................................................159
4.3.1 Air Environment .................................................................................................................1604.3.1.1 Study Area ..........................................................................................................................1604.3.1.2 Objective .............................................................................................................................1614.3.1.3 Meteorological Data............................................................................................................1614.3.1.4 AERMOD Process ..............................................................................................................1624.3.1.5 The status of air pollution due to the existing DG sets Boilers and scrubbers....................1634.3.1.6 CONCLUSION ...................................................................................................................1684.3.1.7 Pollution Control Measures ................................................................................................169Air Pollution & Fugitive Emission Control ........................................................................................1694.3.2 Water Requirement .............................................................................................................1704.3.2.1 Impact due to Waste Water Generation ..............................................................................1704.3.2.2 Mitigation Measures ...........................................................................................................1704.3.2.3 Wastewater Quality and Quantity .......................................................................................1714.3.3 Noise Environment .............................................................................................................1724.3.3.1 Impacts ................................................................................................................................1724.3.3.2 Mitigation Measures ...........................................................................................................1724.3.4 Solid waste management.....................................................................................................1734.3.4.1 Impacts ................................................................................................................................1734.3.4.2 Mitigation Measures ...........................................................................................................1734.3.5 Land Environment...............................................................................................................1744.3.6 Ecology ...............................................................................................................................1744.3.7 Socio-Economic Environment ............................................................................................175
5 ANALYSIS OF ALTERNATIVES....................................................................................................1775.1 History and Background of the Site ............................................................................................1775.2 Current Proposal .........................................................................................................................1775.3 Results of the Analysis................................................................................................................177
6 ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM (EMP)...............................................................1806.1 Introduction.................................................................................................................................1806.2 Objectives ...................................................................................................................................1816.3 Project Environmental Monitoring .............................................................................................1836.4 Monitoring by CIPLA .................................................................................................................1846.5 Compliance Reports....................................................................................................................1846.6 Plantation Monitoring Programm ...............................................................................................1846.7 On-site Mock Drills Requirements .............................................................................................185
7 ADDITIONAL STUDIES ..................................................................................................................1887.1 Public Hearing ............................................................................................................................1887.2 Disaster Management Plan..........................................................................................................1887.3 R& R ...........................................................................................................................................188
7.4 Risk Assessment .........................................................................................................................1888 PROJECT BENEFITS ........................................................................................................................1909 ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN.................................................................................192
9.1 Introduction.................................................................................................................................1929.2 Objectives of EMP ......................................................................................................................1929.3 EMP Roles and Responsibilities .................................................................................................193
9.3.1 Environmental Management Cell .......................................................................................1939.3.2 Compliance against the Consent Condition ........................................................................1959.3.3 Compliance to the Recommendations Mentioned In the CREP Guidelines .......................1969.3.4 Roles and Responsibilities for Environmental Management ..............................................196
9.4 EMP for Construction Phase.......................................................................................................1979.5 EMP for Operational Phase.........................................................................................................197
9.5.1 Air Quality ..........................................................................................................................1989.5.2 Noise Environment .............................................................................................................2009.5.3 Water and Wastewater Management ..................................................................................2009.5.3.1 Rain Water Harvesting System ...........................................................................................2019.5.4 Solid and Hazardous waste Management ...........................................................................2039.5.4.1 Solid waste management.....................................................................................................2039.1.1.1 Hazardous waste Management............................................................................................2039.5.5 Land Environment...............................................................................................................2049.5.6 Ecology ...............................................................................................................................2049.5.7 Green Belt Development Plan.............................................................................................2059.5.8 Socio – Economic Environment..........................................................................................206
9.6 HAZARD IDENTIFICATION AND SAFETY SYSTEM.........................................................2069.6.1 Hazard Identified In the Factory .........................................................................................2069.6.2 Scenario Based Emergency Actions ...................................................................................2069.6.3 Available Safety Systems....................................................................................................2109.6.4 Occupational Health and Safety Program ...........................................................................216Occupational Health Monitoring .....................................................................................................216
9.7 Corporate Social Responsibility..................................................................................................21910 SUMMARY & CONCLUSION .....................................................................................................229
10.1 Summary .....................................................................................................................................22910.2 Conclusion ..................................................................................................................................230
11 DISCLOSURE OF CONSULTANT ..............................................................................................23211.1 Brief Profile of Hubert Enviro Care Systems (P) Limited (HECS) ............................................232
LIST OF TABLES
Table 1-1 Salient Features of the project site and its environs .............................................................5Table 2-1 Site coordinates ........................................................................................................................15Table 2-2 Nearest Habitat Profile from the project site ........................................................................15Table 2-3 Nearest Water Bodies .............................................................................................................15Table 2-4Table 2-4 Details of Existing and proposed products and capacities.................................22Table 2-5 List of Raw Materials & Quantity for Proposed New Products ..........................................27Table 2-6 Existing Solvents & Fuels Materials Tank Storage Details ................................................33Table 2-7 Land use break up details .......................................................................................................34Table 2-8 Water Consumption for the Project .......................................................................................34Table 2-9 Power and Energy Requirement............................................................................................35Table 2-10 Air Pollution Sources and Control Measures .....................................................................35Table 2-11 Liquid Waste Generation & Treatment ...............................................................................36Table 2-12 Municipal Solid Waste ...........................................................................................................39Table 2-13 Hazardous waste ...................................................................................................................39Table 3-1 Environmentally Sensitive Areas within 15km from Project Boundary ............................45Table 3-2 District land use/land cover statistics ....................................................................................53Table 3-3: Land Use/Land Cover statistics of 10 Km radius of the Study Area ...............................55Table 3-4: Climatological Summary – Bangalore Region (1971-2000) .............................................74Table 3-5 : Meteorology Data for the Study Period (September – November 2016) ......................78Table 3-6: Details of Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Locations..........................................................79Table 3-7: Analytical Methods for Analysis of Ambient Air Quality Parameters ...............................79Table 3-8: Summary of the average baseline concentrations of pollutants ......................................81Table 3-9: Summary of the average baseline concentrations of pollutants ......................................82Table 3-10: Ambient PM10 Monitoring Data..........................................................................................83Table 3-11: Ambient PM2.5 Monitoring Data.........................................................................................84Table 3-12 : Ambient SO2 Monitoring Data ...........................................................................................85Table 3-13: Ambient NO2 Monitoring Data ............................................................................................86Table 3-14: Ambient Carbon Monoxide (CO) Monitoring Data ...........................................................87Table 3-15: Ambient Ozone (O3) Monitoring Data ...............................................................................88Table 3-16: Ambient Ammonia (NH3) Monitoring Data........................................................................89Table 3-17: Ambient Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) Monitoring Data ...................................90Table 3-18: Day and Night Equivalent Noise Levels ............................................................................91Table 3-19: List of Major Water Bodies within 10Km radius................................................................92Table 3-20: Water bodies in 10km radius of Project area....................................................................94Table 3-21: Test methods used for the analysis of water quality parameters ................................104Table 3-22: Details of Surface water sampling locations ...................................................................104Table 3-23: Surface water Monitoring Results ....................................................................................105Table 3-24: Groundwater Potential in Bengaluru Urban PIA District ...............................................108Table 3-25: Details of Groundwater Quality Monitoring Locations ...................................................110Table 3-26: Ground Water Monitoring Results ....................................................................................111
Table 3-27: Soil Quality Monitoring Locations .....................................................................................114Table 3-28: Soil Quality Monitoring Results .........................................................................................117Table 3-29: List of Flora Reported/Observed in the Study Area.......................................................119Table 3-30: List of Fauna Reported/Observed in Bannerghatta National Park ..............................120Table 3-31: List of Fauna Reported/Observed in the Study Area.....................................................121Table 3-32: List of Fauna Reported/Observed in Bannerghatta National Park ..............................121Table 3-33: List of Birds Reported/Observed ......................................................................................123Table 3-34: Bengaluru Urban District Social Indicators .....................................................................126Table 3-35: Socioeconomic details of the study area.........................................................................127Table 3-36: Child population within the study area .............................................................................130Table 3-37: Social group details within the study area.......................................................................133Table 3-38: Workers group distribution in the study area ..................................................................137Table 3-39: Industrial estates within the study area ...........................................................................141Table 3-40: List of major Industries within the study area .................................................................141Table 3-41: Health facilities available in Anekal Taluk .......................................................................141Table 3-42: Health profile of Anekal Taluk ...........................................................................................142Table 3-43: Village wise sanitation & drinking water facilities within the study area .....................144Table 3-44: Literacy details within the study area ...............................................................................149Table 3-45: Schools in Anekal Block including both public and private management ..................151Table 3-46 : Details of roads in Anekal taluk .......................................................................................152Table 3-47: Summary of socioeconomic Indicators within the Study area......................................152Table 4-1 Existing Stack emission details of CIPLA ...........................................................................164Table 4-2 TOP 10 HIGHEST CONCENTRATIONS OF PARTICULATE MATTER.......................167Table 4-3 TOP 10 HIGHEST CONCENTRATIONS OF SULPHUR DIOXIDE ...............................167Table 4-4 TOP 10 HIGHEST CONCENTRATIONS OF OXIDES OF NITROGEN ........................168Table 4-5 TOP 10 HIGHEST CONCENTRATIONS OF PARTICULATE MATTER.......................168Table 4-6 Total Maximum GLCs from the proposed Stack Emissions for NOV 2016...................169Table 4-7 Air Pollution Control Measures.............................................................................................169Table 4-8 Liquid Waste Generation & Treatment................................................................................171Table 9-1 EMC Responsibility ................................................................................................................194Table 9-2 Compliance against the Consent Condition .......................................................................195Table 9-3 Roles and Responsibilities of Industry ................................................................................196Table 9-4 Air Pollution Control Measures.............................................................................................198Table 9-5 Municipal Solid Waste ...........................................................................................................203Table 9-6 Hazardous waste and Management....................................................................................203Table 9-7 Identification of Hazards In Each Departments/Section With Hazard Area Map andAffecting Population .................................................................................................................................210Table 9-8 Emergency Shutting Down Procedure................................................................................213Table 9-9 CSR activities carried out (2013 to 2016)...........................................................................220Table 9-10 Cost Estimate for Environment Management Plan.........................................................227
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 1-1 Location map of the CIPLA......................................................................................................4Figure 2-1 Google Satellite Image of the Project Site (10 Km Radius) .............................................17Figure 2-2 Google Satellite Image of the Project Site (5 Km Radius)................................................17Figure 2-3 Google Satellite Image of the Project Site (1 Km Radius)................................................18Figure 2-4 Google Satellite Image demarcation of Project Site ..........................................................18Figure 2-5 Site Master Plan – CIPLA Ltd, Bommasandra ...................................................................19Figure 2-6 Site Photographs.....................................................................................................................21Figure 2-7 Process flow for production ...................................................................................................26Figure 2-8 Water Balance Chart ..............................................................................................................38Figure 3-1 Ecological Sensitive Areas within 10Km radius .................................................................47Figure 3-2 Geology & Minerals Map of Karnataka................................................................................52Figure 3-3 Land Use Pattern in the PIA District ....................................................................................53Figure 3-4 Land Use Map of Bangalore Urban district .........................................................................54Figure 3-5 Land Use Pattern of the Study Area ....................................................................................55Figure 3-6 Land use/Land cover map of the Study Area .....................................................................56Figure 3-7 Physiography map of Karnataka State ................................................................................58Figure 3-8 Contour/Physiography map of Study Area..........................................................................59Figure 3-9: Topo map of the study area .................................................................................................60Figure 3-10 Geology Map of PIA (Karnataka) .......................................................................................62Figure 3-11 Geomorphology Map of Study area ...................................................................................63Figure 3-12 Hydrogeology Map of PIA district .......................................................................................64Figure 3-13 Drainage Map of the Study area ........................................................................................66Figure 3-14 Soil Map of Karnataka State ...............................................................................................68Figure 3-15 Physiography Map of the Study Area ................................................................................70Figure 3-16 Wind Hazard Map of Karnataka .........................................................................................72Figure 3-17 Seismicity Map of India ........................................................................................................73Figure 3-18 Specific Wind rose for the Study Period............................................................................76Figure 3-19 Annual Windrose (Jan 2016 - Dec 2016) ..........................................................................77Figure 3-20 Hourly variation of the mixing heights................................................................................78Figure 3-21 Trends of Measured Ambient PM10 Concentrations in the Study Area ........................83Figure 3-22: Trends of Measured Ambient PM2.5 Concentrations in the Study Area ......................84Figure 3-23: Trends of Measured Ambient SO2 Concentrations in the Study Area.........................85Figure 3-24: Trends of Measured Ambient NO2 Concentrations in the Study Area ........................86Figure 3-25: Trends of Measured Ambient CO Concentrations in the Study Area..........................87Figure 3-26: Trends of Measured Ambient O3 Concentrations in the Study Area ...........................88Figure 3-27: Trends of Measured Ambient NH3 Concentrations in the Study Area.........................89Figure 3-28 Photographs of existing major water bodies within the study area ...............................93Figure 3-29 Ground water level fluctuation decadal mean (May 2001 – May 2010) with May 2011for Bangalore Urban District, Karnataka ...............................................................................................109Figure 3-30 Informal Consultation with Locals ....................................................................................127
Figure 3-31 Map Showing the Study area of the Project in Figure FD 0301 ..................................153Figure 3-32 Map Showing the Air monitoring locations in FigureFD0302.......................................154Figure 3-33 Map Showing the Noise monitoring locations in FigureFD0303 .................................155Figure 3-34 Map Showing the Ground Water & Surface Water monitoring locations inFigureFD0304 ...........................................................................................................................................156Figure 3-35 Map Showing the Soil monitoring locations in Figure FD0305 ....................................157Figure 4-1 Study area showing the Stacks and DG set location in CIPLA boundary....................161Figure 4-2 Wind Rose diagram and frequency distribution for the month of Nov 2016 ................162Figure 4-3 Ground level concentrations of PM during Nov-2016 .....................................................165Figure 4-4 Ground level concentrations of SO2 during Nov-2016 ....................................................165Figure 4-5 Ground level concentrations of NOx during Nov-2016 ...................................................166Figure 4-6 Ground level concentrations of CO during Nov-2016 .....................................................166Figure 9-1 Environment Management Cell Organogram ...................................................................194Figure 9-2 Method to recovery solvent and to control fugitive emissions .......................................200Figure 9-3 Rain Water Harvesting System...........................................................................................202Figure 9-4 Alert Action Plan during Working/Non Working Hours ....................................................214Figure 9-5 Emergency Organization Chart ..........................................................................................215Figure 9-6 Safety, Health and Environment Policy .............................................................................218Figure 9-7 Corporate Responsibility Policy ..........................................................................................226
LIST OF ANNEXURES
Annexure A: Land Possession certificateAnnexure B: Earlier Environmental clearance & EC compliance reportAnnexure C: Existing Consent for EstablishmentAnnexure D: Existing Consent for OperationAnnexure E: Forest LetterAnnexure F: Existing Site LayoutAnnexure G: Existing Green Belt LayoutAnnexure H: Existing and Proposed products mix and capacityAnnexure I: List of Raw materials & quantity for proposed new APIsAnnexure J: Manufacturing process and Material BalanceAnnexure K: Water Balance ChartAnnexure L: Schematic of ETP cum RO plant and MEE plantAnnexure M: Analysis Report (Air, Stack & effluent) of existing unitAnnexure N: Existing medical surveillance PerformaAnnexure O: MEEPL agreement copy for HW disposalAnnexure P: Scrubber Details & DrawingsAnnexure Q: Environmental statmentAnnexure R: Risk Assessment, On-site & Off-site Emergency planAnnexure S: PCB compliance reportAnnexure T: Rain water harvesting LayoutAnnexure U: Pollution load scenarioAnnexure V: Spent solvent recovery plant in existing premises – photographsAnnexure W: Proceedings of SEAC/SEIAA & EAC
LIST OF APPENDICESAppendix I: Terms of Reference by MoEF&CCAppendix II: ToR Compliance
LIST OF ACCRONYMS
AAQ Ambient Air QualityAAQM Ambient Air Quality MonitoringCPCB Central Pollution Control BoardCSR Corporate Social ResponsibilityEIA Environmental Impact AssessmentEMC Environmental Management CellEMP Environmental Management PlanETP Effluent Treatment PlantFO Furnace OilGLC Ground Level ConcentrationISO International Standard for OrganizationKIADB Karnataka Industrial Area Development BoardKSPCB Karnataka State Pollution Control BoardkWh Kilowatt per hourLOS Level of ServiceMEE Multiple Effect EvaporatorMSDS Material Safety Data SheetNAAQ National Ambient Air QualityPCB Pollution Control BoardPCU Passenger Car UnitPO Pure OilR & D Research & DevelopmentRO Reverse OsmosisSEAC State Expert Appraisal CommitteeSEIAA State Environmental Impact Assessment AuthoritySTP Sewage Treatment PlantTDS Total dissolved SolidsTOR Terms of ReferenceTSDF Treatment, Storage and Disposal FacilitiesZLD Zero Liquid Discharge
Executive SummaryPage i
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Obtaining Environmental clearance EIA/EMP Report
Executive SummaryPage ii
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
CIPLA Limited proposes the change in product mix of Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients within
the production capacity of 119.84 MTA within its 28.49 Acres of land located at API Division.
Plot.No.285, 286 & 287, Bommasandra – Jigani Link road, KIADB IVth Phase Jigani, Bengaluru
Urban – 560105, Karnataka.
The Existing quantity is 119.84 MTA with 63 nos of APIs. Proposed change in product mix with
addition of 18 nos new products will have 113.46 MTA with 81 nos of APIs with no increase in
the overall production quantity and no increase in effluent load/pollution load. The total site area
is 115335.23 sq. m. (28.49 Acres / 11.52 Ha). The green belt is 38035.8 Sq.m / 9.39 Acres (33
%) of the total area. There is an existing environmental clearance, CFE & CFO.
The project site falls in the Latitude 12°47'8.31"N and Longitude 77°38'54.28"E at a distance of
5.4 km away from the NH-44 (old NH-7) Bengaluru to Hosur Highway.
The proposed project site is located within the deemed Eco-sensitive zone of 10 kms from the
boundary of bannerghatta national park for the reason that MoEF&CC Draft Notification No. S.O.
5639(E) dated: 30th October, 2018 the final Eco-sensitive zone declaration notification is yet to
be issued by MoEF&CC, GOI. As per the certificate issued by R.F.O (No. 415/2018-2019 dated
18.01.2019) it is located at a distance of 5.26 km from boundary of Bannerghatta National Park,
therefore even after declaration of Eco-sensitive zone for the Bannerghatta National Park the
project would attract the General Conditions of EIA Notification 2006.
The Proposed Project termed under Schedule 5 (f), Category A, Synthetic Organic Chemicals as
per the EIA Notification 2006 and its subsequent Amendments requiring EIA studies of the
project. The facility requires prior Environmental Clearance from State Environmental Impact
Assessment Authority (SEIAA), Karnataka before commencing onsite activities. The application
along with relevant project documents was submitted to SEIAA, Karnataka on 21.07.2016.
Based on the information furnished and the presentation made before the State Expert Appraisal
Committee Members, the proposal was appraised in the 170th SEAC meeting held on 18.08.2016
and was issued the Terms of Reference (TOR) for preparing Environmental Impact Assessment
(EIA) Report vide Letter No. SEIAA/F.No- SEIAA 33 IND 2016 dated 24.09.2016.
As per MoEF&CC Notification No. S.O. 804 (E) dated: 14th March, 2017 & Proceedings of the
Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report
Page iii
135th KSEIAA Meeting referring the proposal to MoEF&CC under violation and we have been
submitted EC Application in MoEF&CC under violation vide F.No. 23-48/2018-IA.III, Proposal
No. IA/KA/IND2/69050/2017 dated: 13/09/2017 (F.No. 23-48/2018-IA.III).
The MoEF&CC Expert Appraisal Committee appraised our proposal F.No. 23-48/2018-IA.III,
dated: 13/09/2017 during the 4th EAC Violation Meeting held on 19th – 21st Feb, 2018. The
Committee opined that the case is not covered under violation and the State
Government/SEIAA can appraise the case as per the ToR granted vide File No. SEIAA 33 IND
2016 dated: 24.09.2016.
As per the MoEF proceedings of 4th EAC meeting, we have been submitted the EIA Report and
Required Annexure to Karnataka SEIAA. The Karnataka SEAC appraised our application in
201st SEAC meeting held on 30.06.2018 and the proceedings of 153rd SEIAA meeting held on
21.07.2018 stated that Authority opined that it is just and necessary to consider the proposal as
a case of violation in accordance with the SEAC to appraise the project accordingly for issue of
ToRs under violation category.
Subsequently, The Karnataka SEAC appraised our application in 217st SEAC meeting held on
02.03.2019 and the proceedings of 166rd SEIAA meeting held on 29.03.2019. The authority
observed that the proposed project site is located within the deemed Eco-sensitive zone of 10
kms from the boundary of bannerghatta national park for the reason that final Eco-sensitive
zone declaration notification is yet to be issued by MoEF&CC, GOI. The authority noted that as
per the certificate issued by R.F.O it is located at a distance of 5.26 km from boundary of
Bannerghatta National Park, therefore even after declaration of Eco-sensitive zone for the
Bannerghatta National Park the project would attract the General Conditions of EIA Notification
2006 whereby it would require environment clearance from MoEF&CC, GOI.
The Authority therefore decided to advice the proponent to approach the MoEF&CC, GOI for the
required Environmental Clearance. The authority also decided to close the file and delist from
pendency after issuing an endorsement to the proponent in this regard.
Now based on the Proceedings of 166th SEIAA meeting held on 29.03.2019, we are submitting
the EIA & required Annexure under Category A, Schedule 5(f), Synthetic Organic Chemicals
vide Issued ToR from Karnataka SEIAA File No. SEIAA 33 IND 2016 dated: 24.09.2016.
Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report
Page iv
Chronology Matrix of the Project
Existing products having EC F. No.J-11011/214/2006-IA II(I) Dt: 05.03.2007, also CFE No CFE-
EIA/CL/EIA-342/2006-2007/44 Dated 14.07.2006 (43 products from EC, qty 200 MTPA),
KSPCB/HPI/EIA/166/CIPLA-BIA/2011-12 Dated 07.03.2012 (63 products, qty 114.22 MTPA),
KSPCB/HPI/166/2015-16/H650 Dated 04.09.2015 (77 products, qty 113.46 MTPA) and CFO No
17 CAT/APC/CIPLA/2007-2008/245 dated 06.09.2007 (7 products from EC, qty 0.35 MTPA),
KSPCB/166/HPI/2012-13/H529 Dated 04.08.2012 (63 products, qty 114.22 MTPA) & CFO
Renewal: AW-303985 dated: 24.10.2017 (33 Products, qty 109.84 MTPA) Valid upto: 30.06.2021
are available is enclosed as Annexure No. B, C & D.
Chronology Matrix of the Project
YearProducts
EC No CFE No CFO No Remarks
Name MTPA
2007 Total 43products
200 F. No.J-11011/214/2006-IA II(I)Dt: 05.03.2007
No CFE-EIA/CL/EIA-342/2006-2007/44Dated 14.07.2006(43 products from EC, qty200 MTPA)
No 17CAT/APC/CIPLA/2007-2008/245 dated06.09.2007(7 products from EC,qty 0.35 MTPA)
EC: 200 MTPA
CFE: 200 MTPA
2011-12
Total 63products
114.22 -- KSPCB/HPI/EIA/166/CIPLA-BIA/2011-12Dated 07.03.2012(63 products, qty 114.22MTPA)
KSPCB/166/HPI/2012-13/H529Dated 04.08.2012(63 products, qty114.22 MTPA)
Change in Productmix1. From 2007 CFE,43 products, qty200 MTPA.2. 20 products
newly added, qty35.52 MTA wereadded after gettingno pollution loadincrease certificate
3. Total 63products, qty114.22 MTPA.
Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report
Page v
2015 Total 77products
113.46 -- KSPCB/HPI/166/2015-16/H650Dated 04.09.2015(77 products, qty 113.46MTPA)
Applied CFO basedon CFE dated:04.09.2015CFO was not issued,& directed to EC
Addition 14products are nottaken forproduction
2016 ProposedChange inproduct Mix63 to 81 nosproducts
114.22to113.46
EC AppliedFile No: SEIAA 33IND 2016
- - - - Change in Productmix1. From 2011-12CFE, 63 products,qty 114.22 MTPA.2. 18 productsnewly added, qty12.47 MTPA3. Quantityincreased 27products 37.07MTPA & quantitydecreased 26products 37.83MTPA4. Total 81
products, 113.46MTPA.
2017 Total 33Products
109.84 - - - - CFO Renewal: AW-303985 dated:24.10.2017(33 Products, qty109.84 MTPA)Valid upto:30.06.2021
2016-2019
Existing Total63 productsProposedChange inproduct Mix81 products
114.22
113.46
CurrentApplicationFile No: SEIAA 33IND 2016
- - - - Change in Productmix1. From 2011-12CFE, 63 products,qty 114.22 MTPA.2. 18 products
newly added, qty12.47 MTPA3. Total 81
products, 113.46MTPA.
Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report
Page vi
I. Water Requirement
Total water requirement is 300 KLD of which fresh water requirement is 140 KLD; Water source
from the In house bore wells and private tankers. There is no change in the new proposal.
II. Waste Water Generation
Sewage and effluent generated from process and washings are taken to combined Effluent and
Sewage Treatment Plant of capacity 160 KLD further processed in RO plant. Rejects from RO
Plant along with High TDS effluent is treated in Multiple Effect Evaporator of 40 KLD capacity.
The treated waste water of 160 KLD is reused for Boiler, cooling towers and Toilet flushes. Zero
liquid discharge system is maintained in the facilities. There is no change in the new proposal.
III. Power Requirement
Power requirement of the project is 1500 KVA from BESCOM and DG 3 x 1250 KVA will act as
backup facilities in case of power failure. Diesel requirements are 20,000 lit/month & Furnace oil
25,000 lit/month is met from the source of HPCL/IOCL. There is no change in the new proposal.
IV. Man Power
The total strength of the CIPLA Limited is 300 people. No additional manpower requirement as it
is a proposed project for change in product mix. The manpower requirement will be include both
technical and non-technical personnel.
V. Solid Waste
V.VI. Municipal Waste Management
The source of Municipal solid waste in the industry will be from the domestic use. Solid wastes
generated will be stored and disposed to Composting & local pig farm. Total Municipal Solid
Waste generated during the operation phase is 150 Kg/day.
Hazardous waste Management
The various hazardous waste generated from the process are spent solvent, distillation residues,
chemical sludge from the effluent treatment plant and discarded bags from the raw materials
section. The hazardous waste will be stored separately in hazardous waste storage area and
disposed to KSPCB/CPCB authorized TSDF operators within a stipulated period of time. The
hazardous wastes will be disposed as per the Hazardous Waste (Management & Handling)
Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report
Page vii
Rules 1989 and Other Wastes (Management and Transboundary Movement) Rules, 2016 and
subsequent amendments.
Hazardous Waste Generation
WasteCategory
Existing Proposed
Hazardouswaste
Generated
Quantity Method of handling
Existing Proposed Total
5.1 Used Oil 15 KL/A
Nochanges
15KL/A
Collected in Leak proof containers anddisposed only to KSPCB registeredauthorized reprocessors provided the oilmeets the standards as per schedule-5part-A of the rules
No Change
5.2Oil soaked
cotton waste 0.5MT/A 0.5MT/AStored in a secured manner and handover to KSPCB authorized incinerator/Coprocessing in cement kiln
28.1Process
residues &Waste
202 MT/A 202MT/A
Stored in a secured manner and handover to KSPCB authorized incinerator/Coprocessing in cement kiln / Disposal toTSDF in case calorific value is < 2500Kcal/Kg.
20.3DistillationResidue 10 MT/A 10MT/A
Stored in a secured manner and handover to KSPCB authorized incinerator/Coprocessing in cement kiln
28.2Spent
solvent 1200 KL/A 1200KL/AStored in a secured manner and handover to KSPCB authorized recycler /
33.1Discardedcontainers
2500Nos/A
2500Nos/A
Stored in a secured manner and handover to KSPCB authorized recycler afterwash/decontamination only
35.3 Sludge fromETP & MEE
salts60
MTA60
MTAStored in a secured manner and handover to KSPCB authorized TSDF
VI. Land Requirement
The Plant facilities are spread over 115335.23 sq.m, (28.49 Acres / 11.52 Ha), Total built up area
(Land utilized for buildings, utilities purpose, other allied purpose like roads, machinery
equipments etc..,) is 54997.45 sq.m (13.58 Acres) KIADB Land which is completely fortified and
protected on all four sides by boundary walls.
Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report
Page viii
Land is owned by M/s CIPLA Limited. This land has been allotted by KIADB in the Industrial
area. The present land use is industrial.
Land use break up details
Description AREA IN SQMTS AREA INACRES
% OFAREA
Land Utilized for Buildings & Utilities Purpose 18034.03 4.45 15.6
Land Utilized for other allied purpose likeRoads, Machinery Equipments, etc.., 36963.42 9.13 32
Land Utilized for Green Belt Development 38035.8 9.39 33
Area for future expansion 22301.98 5.51 19.3Total Area 115335.23 28.49 100.00
Existing Green belt is 9.39 Acres (33 %) of 28.49 Acres.
VII. Analysis of Alternative Sites Considered
Since the existing site is only used for the proposed Change in Product Mix, no alternate sites
are considered.
VIII. Project cost
The current infrastructure is adequate for the proposed change in product mix. There is no
additional project cost as it is an existing unit. The gross value of existing infrastructure is Rs.
166 Crore.
IX. Description of the Environment
Meteorological Environment
The micro-meteorological conditions during the study period for hourly data of wind speed, wind
direction and temperature were recorded at the project site. From the Indian Meteorological
Department (IMD) at Bengaluru, the annually determined wind direction is also mostly West to
East. From the meteorological data recorded at this project site, the predominant wind direction
was observed from W to E during the study period (Sep to Nov 2016 (Post monsoon)). The wind
speed ranges between 0.83 to 2.66 m/s. The temperature ranges between 22 – 26°C. While the
relative humidity ranges from 32 - 80%. The total rainfall recorded during study period is 406
mm.
Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report
Page ix
Ambient Air Quality
The ambient air quality has been monitored at 8 locations for 16 parameters including 12
parameters as per NAAQS, 2009 within the study area. The baseline levels of (PM2.5), (PM10),
Sulfur dioxide (SO2), Nitrogen dioxide (NO2), CO, Pb, O3, NH3, Benzene (C6H6), Benzo (a)
pyrene (C20H12), As, Ni in all the monitoring locations were found within the NAAQS limits during
the monitoring period (Post monsoon) i.e from Sep to Nov 2016.
Noise Environment
The existing ambient noise levels were monitored using precision noise level meter in and
around the project site at 10km radius at 8 locations during the study period (Sep to Nov 2016).
During the study period, day time noise levels varied between 67.2 – 84.5 dB(A) and night time
noise levels varied from 61.4 – 78.9 dB(A) across the sampling stations. The field observations
during the study period indicate that the ambient noise levels in the proposed project site were
found within the standard limits whereas in all residential areas they are slightly exceeds the
limits prescribed by CPCB/MoEF&CC.
Water Environment
The study area consists of Bommandahalli in the southern region, Hennagara /
Ramakrishnapura Lake in the part of Eastern region. The Hebbagodi and Chandapura Lake in
the North Eastern / North northeastern part from the project site. The Ragihalli Lake in the part of
Southwest region. As the KIADB Industrial Area estate lies in the North eastern region, the
representative surface water sampling locations have been chosen. The prevailing status of
water quality at eight sampling locations each for ground and surface water have been assessed
during Sep to Nov 2016.
The standard methods prescribed in IS were followed for sample collection, preservation and
analysis in the laboratory for various physiochemical parameters.
Surface water quality
The values range from 7.12-7.63 for pH, 213-1335 mg/l for TDS, 90-891 mg/l for Total Hardness,
39.7-327 mg/l for chloride and 23.5-56.0 mg/l for sulphate.
Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report
Page x
Ground Water Quality
The values range from 7.33-8.21 for pH, 390-1280 mg/l for TDS, 140-662 mg/l for Hardness,
9.28 – 34.3 mg/l for nitrates, 48.6 – 250 mg/l for chloride, 32.2 – 123 mg/l for sulphate & BDL (DL
0.05)-0.67 mg/l for fluoride.
Land Environment
Assessment of soil characteristics is of paramount importance since the vegetation growth,
agricultural practices and production is directly related to the soil fertility and quality. It is
observed that the pH of the soil samples ranged from 5.26- 8.66, conductivity of the soil samples
ranged from 19-719 μS/cm. As the EC value is less than 2000 μS/cm, the soil is found to be non-
saline in nature. Nitrogen, potassium and phosphorous content ranges from 72-540 kg/ha, 36-
432 kg/ha, and 86-324 kg/ha.
Biological Environment
There is a Bannerghatta National Park at a distance of 5.26 Km towards West. The buffer zone
of the project site is predominantly covered by Plantation/orchards. The species observed in the
study area are mostly commercial crops and plantation crops and breaks were also observed
throughout the semi-evergreen and moist deciduous forest types. There is no extinct flora and
fauna species found in the study area.
Socio Economic Environment
Bangalore district is located in the sour eastern corner of Karnataka State. It has a geographical
area of 2196 sq.km. The district is land locked and shares its borders with Bengaluru Rural
district on the north and the east, Ramanagaram on the west, and with the state of Tamil Nadu in
the south. The population of the district is 96,21,551. Of the total population, 50,22,661 are
males and 45,98,890 are females as per 2011 Census. The district’s share of total Karnataka’s
population is 15.75 percent.
The project is located in the Jigani KIADB, Jigani of Anekal taluk of Bangalore Urban District.
The 10 Km radius covers almost a major portion of Anekal taluk and some portion of Bangalore
Corporation Limits.
The project area comprises of urban and rural background. The taluk Anekal is predominantly
rural as 68% population in rural part of the taluk. Agriculture is one of the main occupation in
rural apart from Industries and Service sector. The area has more semi and unskilled labour
forces go to the other part of the district.
Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report
Page xi
The child sex ratio of the project area is 968 but for the district it is 944. There is a need for social
intervention is required to balance the gender inequality.
The majority of the population in the project area belongs to General Category (80.23%). The
scheduled caste and scheduled tribe population are 17.08% (22.93% of the district) and 2.07%
(3.26% of the district).
An important dimension to understand the employment scenario is through the main and
marginal workers data provided by the Census. Of the total working population, the majority
(91.20%) is the main workers i.e they have study job more than six months per annum. It is due
to the industrialization in the area. The job vibrancy is due to the secondary and tertiary sectors.
Only 10.25% of working population involved in the agriculture and allied occupation (primary).
X. Anticipated Environmental Impacts
Air Environment
Base line data reveals that ambient air quality in the study area for all the parameters are well
within the permissible limits as prescribed by National Ambient Air Quality Standards. The main
sources of emissions will be from the D.G sets, Reactors and Boiler which are facilitated with
stacks of adequate height as an air pollution control measure.
Noise Environment
Baseline line study showed that the noise levels were within the CPCB standards at industrial
sites. The designed equipment with noise levels not exceeding beyond the requirements of
Occupational Health and Safety Administration Standard will be employed. Though the noise
levels in buffer zone residential areas are slightly higher than standard limits.
Land Use
The present land use is Industrial proposed project is change in product mix without increasing
pollution load and without increasing the infrastructure facilities within the existing facility. Hence
there is no any change in land use.
Environmental Monitoring Program
A monitoring schedule with respect to Ambient Air Quality, Water & Wastewater Quality, Noise
Quality as per Karnataka State Pollution Control Board (KSPCB), shall be maintained.
Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report
Page xii
Pollution Control Measures
The emissions from the reactors will be mitigated by providing adequate stack to the boilers and
scrubbers are connected to the reactors. The D.G sets are facilitated with adequate stack height
of 30m AGL or above to disperse the pollutants. Acoustic enclosures are provided to the DG sets
to control noise emissions.
Municipal Solid Waste is being disposed to Composting & local pig farm. The hazardous waste
will be stored separately in hazardous waste storage and disposed to KSPCB/CPCB authorized
TSDF sites within a stipulated period of time. Hazardous waste materials will be properly
disposed as per the Hazardous and other Wastes (Management and trans boundary Movement)
Rules 2016 and subsequent amendments.
Sewage and effluent generated from process and washings are taken to combined Effluent and
Sewage Treatment Plant of capacity 160 KLD further processed in RO plant. Rejects from RO
Plant along with High TDS effluent is treated in Multiple Effect Evaporator of 40 KLD capacity.
The treated waste water of 160 KLD is reused for Boiler, cooling towers and Toilet flushes. Zero
liquid discharge system is maintained in the facilities. There is no change in the new proposal.
XI. Risk Analysis
Hazard Identification and Risk Analysis including identification, screening of scenarios, and
consequence analysis of the various risk scenarios. Risk Assessment has done with respect to
the Raw materials, Processes, Solvent & neighboring villages;
The Methodology adopted for Risk Assessment by using the software PHAST examines the
progress of potential incident from the initial release to far –field dispersion including modelling of
pool spreading and evaporation, flammable and toxic effects where individual risks are to be
identified and also PHAST software.
The scope of the study mainly involves:
Identifications of Hazards
Consequence modeling
Flammable area of Vapor cloud explosion modeling
Jet Fire analysis
Toxic area of vapour cloud analysis
Blast area of vapour cloud explosion
Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report
Page xiii
Impact limits identifications and contour mapping of the risk on the layouts.
Mitigating measures for handling and storage to reduce impacts & prevent incidents.
Risk Control Measures
Pressure safety valves for storage tanks
Pressure alarm high and pressure alarm low for storage tanks
Level indicators with monitoring from control for storage tanks
Level transmitter, Level gauge and Temperature indicators for the storage tanks
Fire protection arrangements in the form of Fire Hydrants and Monitors for the storage
tanks.
Emergency Handling checklist and procedure
XII. Disaster Management Plan
The salient features of Disaster Management Plan includes
Emergency shutdown procedure
Electrical Power Failure & Key Utility failures
Fire protection system
Emergency safety equipment & Reporting and response to emergency
Emergency Help from nearby industries and tie up with nearby industries
Emergency Control Room - is the focal point in case of an emergency from where the
operations to handle the emergency are directed and coordinated. It will be equipped with
Internal and P & T telephones, Paging system and Emergency siren.
On-Site Emergency Plan
To provide effective planning, communication and to ensure discipline while mitigating
identified emergencies at the earliest utilizing available resources, safety gadgets and
systems.
Synchronized action from all the internal and external agencies at the earliest to initiate
corrective and preventive action.
To minimize the human injury and illness during emergency mitigation, priority is given to
rescue of incident victim/s, rendering them first aid onsite and if required providing further
medical services at the earliest, which is available nearest to our plant (health city).
To minimize damage to property, general environment or work environment.
To effectively refer and utilize this revised onsite emergency plan while conducting on
site emergency and preparedness response drills and also during real emergencies.
Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report
Page xiv
To identify any deviations during above drills and real situations to ensure any identified
and recorded observations for continual corrective actions and preventive actions.
Off-Site Emergency Plan
The Off-site Emergency Plan, which is the responsibility of the District Emergency Authority,
deals with measures to prevent and control emergencies affecting the public and the
environment. The management developed contingency plan as per Hazardous and Other
Wastes (Management and Transboundary Movement) Rules, 2016 and other applicable
regulations, in association with District Emergency Authority. A yearly mock drill of district offsite
emergency plan is essential and mandated as per National Disaster Management Guideline.
SOPs has implemented for rescues teams and regarding the wearing of full protective gear
before entering the hazardous zone and cordoning off the disaster site are required. This plan
considers the possible effects of incidents from any industry on the neighbouring population and
the remedial measures.
Inventory of hazardous chemicals
MSDS of such chemicals
Types of emergencies
Nature, extent and likely effects of such incidents
Risk and Environmental Impact Assessment
The District Emergency Authority, based on severity of any emergency in product distribution
network will declare off-site emergency.
XIII. Benefits of the Proposed Project
The proposed change in product mix in the Bulk Drugs and Intermediates Manufacturing Unit,
fulfill market requirement and will play a vital role in the health care sector and thereby addresses
the market demand and Social benefits.
The products manufactured at this facility will be exported that will aid in adding to the revenue of
the nation. The corporate social responsibilities that will be taken up by the proposed project will
improve the well-being of the society and the corporate responsibilities towards the protection of
the environment will help in conserving the ecosystem.
Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report
Page 1
CHAPTER – 1INTRODUCTION
Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report
Page 2
1. Introduction
1.1 Project Background
M/s. CIPLA Limited was established in the year 1973 by late Dr. K. A. Hamied now developing
under leadership of Mr. Y. K. Hamied with strong focus in India & Abroad. It is ranked amongst
top 20 in India out of 300 Indian pharma companies-ORG-IMS 2012. The CIPLA group has
approximately more than 25000 employees comprising management, marketing and technical
professionals.
In the early ninetees company decided to enter the export markets and started with export of
their products to the neighboring countries. As a part of the business expansion plan set-up
several cGMP-compliant manufacturing facilities and are built to satisfy the Norms of USFDA
and manufacturing is done as per stringent norms of WHO, EDQM.
M/s. CIPLA Limited proposes the change in product mix of Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients
within the production capacity of 119.84 MTA, The Existing quantity is 119.84 MTA with 63 nos
of APIs. Proposed change in product mix with addition of 18 nos new products will have 113.46
MTA with 81 nos of APIs with no increase in the overall production quantity and no increase in
effluent load/pollution load. The total site area is 115335.23 sq. m. (28.49 Acres / 11.52 Ha).
There is an existing environmental clearance and CFE for the products.
1.2 Project Proponent
M/s. CIPLA Limited
Corporate Office: CIPLA Ltd. – 100% EOU, Plot No. 285, 286 & 287, KIADB Industrial Area,
Bommasandra-jigani Link Road, Phase IV, Anekal Taluk, Bengaluru Urban District – 560 105,
Karnataka. Phone: +91 80 22053912 Fax +91 80 22053912.
Contact Persons: - 1) Mr. Subrat Satpathy – Site Head2) Mr. Kapini Gowda – EHS
1.3 Proposed Project
The proposed project is change in product mix of the Bulk Drugs and Intermediates
manufacturing Unit with an area of 11.52 Ha (28.49 Acres) within the Karnataka Industrial Area
Development Board, Bengaluru.
Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report
Page 3
1.4 Justification & Need for the Project
In order to become an active player in the Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients (API) segment
catering to both domestic and international markets, CIPLA now proposes to change in product
mix of API manufacturing facility near Bommasandra-Bangalore, which will also house a state of
the art QC/QA/R&D & EHS to cater the advanced technological and market requirement.
1.5 Location of the project site
The proposed site is located at Plot No. 285, 286 & 287, KIADB Industrial Area, Bommasandra-
Jigani Link Road, Phase IV, Anekal Taluk, Bengaluru Urban, Karnataka. The site is about 11.42
Ha (28.23 Acres) and falls in 57H/9 of SOI Topo Sheet and spatial location of the site is Latitude
12°47'8.31"N and Longitude 77°38'54.28"E (Centre coordinates). Salient features of the project
site and its Environs are given in Table 1-1. Location map of CIPLA Limited given in Figure 1-1.
Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report
Page 4
Figure 1-1 Location map of the CIPLA
Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report
Page 5
Table 1-1 Salient Features of the project site and its environs
S.No. Particulars Details within 10Km radius from Proposed project
1 Location: Plot. No. 285, 286 & 287, KIADB Industrial AreaVillage Bommasandra-Jigani link road
Taluk (Mandal) AnekalDistrict Bengaluru Urban
State Karnataka2 Latitude 12047’8.31” N3 Longitude 77038’54.28” E4 Elevation above Mean Sea Level (MSL) 890 m5 Climatic condition as per IMD Annual Daily Mean (MIN) Temperature : 19 0C
Annual Daily Mean (MAX) Temperature : 29.4 0CAnnual Average Rainfall : 974.5 mmAnnual Average Humidity : 80 Day; 51 Night
6 Present land use at the proposed site KIADB Industrial Area7 Nearest Highway/Road Bengaluru to Hosur NH-44 (old NH-7) at a distance of 5.4 km
towards NE8 Defence installations Nil within 10 km radius9 Nearest railway station Heelalige 7.2 km towards NE & Anekal 9.4 km towards SE SW
10 Nearest airport/air strip Bengaluru Kempegowda International Airport at a distance of 46km towards North
11 Nearest village Bande Nallasandra village at a distance 1.22 kmtowards North
Jigani at a distance of 0.9 km towards WSW12 Nearest town Bangalore 25 km towards North13 Nearest town Bengaluru 25 Kms towards N14 Nearest river Nil within 10 km radius15 Archaeologically important places Nil within 10 km radius16 Nearest place of Tourist/Religious
importanceBannerghatta Nationa Park at a dstance of 5.26 km towards W
17 Ecologically sensitive areas (NationalParks/Wildlife sanctuaries/bio-spherereserves)
The Bannerghatta National Park boundary at a distance of 5.26Km towards West from the project site (as per Range forestoffice, Bannerghatta wild life Range, Kalkere, Bengaluru, LetterNo. 415/2018-19 dated: 18.01.2019)
18 Reserved/Protected forests within 10 kmradius
Nil
19 Type of soil Reddish brown clay slit soil
The proposed project site is located within the deemed Eco-sensitive zone of 10 kms from the
boundary of bannerghatta national park for the reason that MoEF&CC Draft Notification No. S.O.
Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report
Page 6
5639(E) dated: 30th October, 2018 the final Eco-sensitive zone declaration notification is yet to
be issued by MoEF&CC, GOI. As per the certificate issued by R.F.O (No. 415/2018-2019 dated
18.01.2019) it is located at a distance of 5.26 km from boundary of Bannerghatta National Park,
therefore even after declaration of Eco-sensitive zone for the Bannerghatta National Park the
project would attract the General Conditions of EIA Notification 2006.
1.5.1 Sites considered for the project location
As discussed in earlier section. The site for the proposed project is situated at Plot No. 285, 286
& 287, KIADB Industrial Area, Bommasandra-Jigani Link Road, Phase IV, Anekal Taluk,
Bengaluru Urban, Karnataka.
No alternate sites are considered as the proposed project is change in product mix without
increasing pollution load & without increasing infrastructure facilities within the existing facility.
Land is owned by M/s. CIPLA Limited. This land has been allotted by KIADB in the Industrial
area. The present land use is industrial. The land possession certificate from KIADB is enclosed
as Annexure A.
1.6 Need for the EIA Study
According to the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) Notification issued by Ministry of
Environment, Forests& Climate Change (MoEF&CC) under Environment Protection Act, the
Proposed Project termed under Schedule 5 (f), Category B, Synthetic Organic Chemicals as per
the EIA Notification 2006 and its Amendments requiring EIA studies of the project. The facility
requires prior Environmental Clearance from State Environmental Impact Assessment Authority
(SEIAA), Karnataka before commencing onsite activities.
1.6.1 Project Screening and ToR
The proposed project site is located within the deemed Eco-sensitive zone of 10 kms from the
boundary of bannerghatta national park for the reason that MoEF&CC Draft Notification No. S.O.
5639(E) dated: 30th October, 2018 the final Eco-sensitive zone declaration notification is yet to
be issued by MoEF&CC, GOI. As per the certificate issued by R.F.O (No. 415/2018-2019 dated
18.01.2019) it is located at a distance of 5.26 km from boundary of Bannerghatta National Park,
therefore even after declaration of Eco-sensitive zone for the Bannerghatta National Park the
project would attract the General Conditions of EIA Notification 2006.
Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report
Page 7
The proposed site is within KIADB Industrial Area. As per Amendment in EIA Notification 2006,
dated 22nd August 2013; said notification for change in product mix industries requires prior
Environmental clearance from Central Government or SEIAA under sub-section (3) of section 3.
The Proposed Project termed under Schedule 5 (f), Category B, Synthetic Organic Chemicals as
per the EIA Notification 2006 and its Amendments requiring EIA studies of the project. The
facility requires prior Environmental Clearance from State Environmental Impact Assessment
Authority (SEIAA), Karnataka before commencing onsite activities. The application along with
relevant project documents was submitted to SEIAA, Karnataka on 21.07.2016. Based on the
information furnished and the presentation made before the State Expert Appraisal Committee
Members, the proposal was appraised in the 170th SEAC meeting held on 18.08.2016 and was
issued the Terms of Reference (TOR) for preparing Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA)
Report vide Letter No. SEIAA/F.No- SEIAA 33 IND 2016 dated 24.09.2016.
As per MoEF&CC Notification No. S.O. 804 (E) dated: 14th March, 2017 & Proceedings of the
135th KSEIAA Meeting referring the proposal to MoEF&CC under violation and we have been
submitted EC Application in MoEF&CC under violation vide F.No. 23-48/2018-IA.III, Proposal
No. IA/KA/IND2/69050/2017 dated: 13/09/2017 (F.No. 23-48/2018-IA.III).
The MoEF&CC Expert Appraisal Committee appraised our proposal F.No. 23-48/2018-IA.III,
dated: 13/09/2017 during the 4th EAC Violation Meeting held on 19th – 21st Feb, 2018. The
Committee opined that the case is not covered under violation and the State
Government/SEIAA can appraise the case as per the ToR granted vide File No. SEIAA 33 IND
2016 dated: 24.09.2016.
As per the MoEF proceedings of 4th EAC meeting, we have been submitted the EIA Report and
Required Annexure to Karnataka SEIAA. The Karnataka SEAC appraised our application in
201st SEAC meeting held on 30.06.2018 and the proceedings of 153rd SEIAA meeting held on
21.07.2018 stated that Authority opined that it is just and necessary to consider the proposal as
a case of violation in accordance with the SEAC to appraise the project accordingly for issue of
ToRs under violation category.
Subsequently, The Karnataka SEAC appraised our application in 217st SEAC meeting held on
02.03.2019 and the proceedings of 166rd SEIAA meeting held on 29.03.2019. The authority
observed that the proposed project site is located within the deemed Eco-sensitive zone of 10
Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report
Page 8
kms from the boundary of bannerghatta national park for the reason that final Eco-sensitive
zone declaration notification is yet to be issued by MoEF&CC, GOI. The authority noted that as
per the certificate issued by R.F.O it is located at a distance of 5.26 km from boundary of
Bannerghatta National Park, therefore even after declaration of Eco-sensitive zone for the
Bannerghatta National Park the project would attract the General Conditions of EIA Notification
2006 whereby it would require environment clearance from MoEF&CC, GOI.
The Authority therefore decided to advice the proponent to approach the MoEF&CC, GOI for the
required Environmental Clearance. The authority also decided to close the file and delist from
pendency after issuing an endorsement to the proponent in this regard.
Now based on the Proceedings of 166th SEIAA meeting held on 29.03.2019, we are submitting
the EIA & required Annexure under Category A, Schedule 5(f), Synthetic Organic Chemicals
vide Issued ToR from Karnataka SEIAA File No. SEIAA 33 IND 2016 dated: 24.09.2016.
1.6.2 EIA Study
The EIA study was undertaken covering all the aspects of the specific conditions mentioned in
the terms of reference issued by SEIAA. This EIA study was undertaken by M/s Hubert Enviro
Care Systems (P) Ltd (HECS), a NABET accredited EIA consulting organisation, with specific
project related inputs required for undertaking the EIA studies from M/s. CIPLA Limited,
Bangalore.
M/s. Hubert Enviro Care Systems (P) Ltd is authorized to undertake EIA studies for Synthetic
Organic Chemicals industry (dyes & dye intermediates, bulk drugs and intermediates excluding
drug formulations, synthetic rubbers basic organic chemicals, other synthetic organic chemicals
and chemical intermediates) as per the NABET accreditation scheme.
As per EIA notification, public consultation for the proposed project shall be exempted as the
project is coming up in notified Karnataka Industrial Area Development Board.
1.6.3 EIA CostEIA study was undertaken by HECS for an amount of Rs10,00,000/-(Ten lakh Only).
Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report
Page 9
1.7 Overview of the Methodology of the EIA Study
The Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) report has been prepared based on the methods
and guidelines suggested by MoEF&CC/SEIAA to address all the specific conditions stipulated in
the Terms of Reference issued by SEIAA, Karnataka.
The EIA study team, headed by an accredited EIA Coordinator, along with the approved
Functional Area Experts, undertook detailed baseline studies as per ToR, between September
2016 to November 2016.
Micro-meteorological data comprising hourly readings of wind speed, wind direction, dry bulb
temperature, relative humidity and rainfall were measured by installing an onsite meteorological
station near the Project site. Hourly readings were collected for a period of three (03) months.
Micro-meteorological data was adopted for generating wind rose diagrams and also to predict
the ground level concentrations due to release of emissions from the proposed project.
Ambient Air Quality (AAQ) was measured at 8 locations in the study area as per the methods
and procedures recommended by Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB) Air quality sampling
was undertaken for a period of 12 weeks with a total of 24 samples per site were taken as per
the MoEF&CC guidelines. Stipulated criteria pollutants such as particulate matter size less than
10 microns (PM10), Particulate matter size less than 2.5 microns (PM2.5), Sulphur Dioxide (SO2),
Nitrogen Dioxide (NO2), Carbon monoxide (CO), Hydrocarbons (HC) and Ozone (O3) were
analysed at all the locations. The measured background air quality data was compared with that
of the prevailing National Ambient Air Quality Standards and this will also form the basis for
predicting the cumulative air quality scenario due to the operation of the proposed facility.
Hydro-geological status was studied based on the secondary published long-term data. Data on
sub-surface soil profile and also bore-log data in the study area was obtained. In additional, a
preliminary study on the regional and local acquifer status was studied based on primary and
secondary data.
Ground water samples from 9 locations were analysed as per the terms of reference for all the
designated parameters. The measured values were compared with drinking water standards.
Secondary data on the regional ground water status was also collected from the Central Ground
Water Board and the State Ground Water Board.
Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report
Page 10
There are no major perennial rivers flowing within the study area. However surface water
samples from nine (09) locations were analysed as per the terms of reference for all the
designated parameters. All seasonal streams, rivers and water bodies located within the study
area were mapped through latest remote sensing data under land use and land cover study.
Walkthrough surveys were also undertaken to assess the current status of the water resources.
Details about the major cropping pattern and irrigation methods etc were collected from local
village offices and also published district census data. Details of the surface water quality in the
study area were also collected and analysed for designated physicochemical, elemental and
biological parameters.
Land use and land cover was mapped using remote satellite imagery. The data was processed
using applicable software models and level 2 land use classification within the study area was
developed. Total station survey was carried out within the site to assess the terrain conditions
and also possible flooding scenarios, although there are no perennial rivers in the study area. A
walkthough survey was also undertaken near the forest boundaries, major settlements and
plantation area to verify the land use as a part of the ground truth survey procedures.
Soil samples were also collected at 9 locations and all relevant parameters such as texture,
nutrients, heavy metals and other parameters were analysed in the soil samples.
Flora and Fauna survey was undertaken in the study area and all spotted ecological and
biological aspects were mapped based on grid sampling method. Bio-diversity density and
abundance were estimated. Walkthrough surveys near forest area and its environs were also
undertaken to assess the ecology around the forest areas and dependency of the local people
on the forest produce.
Primary socio economic survey was undertaken in the study area to capture the socioeconomic
conditions, major occupation of the people, drinking water and sanitation facilities, transportation
and other amenities in the study area, with a specific reference to the villages located within five
(5) km radius (Category-I) of the project site and villages located within 5 to 10Km radius
(Category-II) of the project site.
In addition to the above, district level census data published by National Informatics Centre (NIC)
was also collected for a detailed analysis on the socioeconomic aspects. Based on the
socioeconomic survey, a need based Community Development Plan under Coroporate Social
Responsibility (CSR) was suggested. Since, there are no settlements at the proposed Project
Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report
Page 11
site, detailed Rehabilitation and Resttlement studies are not envisaged under this study;
however, the indirect impacts on the local and regional community due to land acquisition were
studied.
A typical review on the various industrial units, various pollution control systems proposed details
of wastes and discharges that are envisaged from the proposed project were also undertaken.
Such inputs are adopted while predicting various environmental impacts due to operation of the
facility and also to suggest an appropriate environmental management plan and environmental
monitoring plan.
As a part of the environmental impact assessment study, an attempt was made to predict the
possible and likely impacts on background environment. Likely air quality impacts due to release
of emissions within the CIPLA (stacks) were modelled using AERMOD model.
Ground level concentration of criteria pollutants such as Particulate Matter, Sulphur Dioxide, and
Oxides of Nitrogen were estimated using MoEF&CC approved AERMOD model. Hourly
meteorological data collected from IMD data Bengaluru, at the Project site using Lakes
environment, Canada was adapted to assess ground level concentrations. Maximum ground
level concentrations were predicted and concentration isopleths of the above mentioned
pollutants were plotted.
The predicted ground level concentrations of the respective pollutants were added to the
prevailing baseline concentrations of the designated pollutants to assess the likely cumulative
post project scenario and such values were compared with the National Ambient Air Quality
Standards.
Noise generating sources and the expected noise levels were estimated. Impact due to utilisation
of treated wastewater for greenbelt/Utilities applications were studied. Since the proposed project
will not discharge any treated wastewater into surface water bodies (ponds, rivers and Canals),
no further environmental modelling studies related to river water quality modelling etc were
considered under this study.
In addition to the above aspects, the positive environmental benefits arising from community
development plans under CSR programme, ecological and biodiversity enhancement aspects
due to development of plantation and green-cover development in the project site were also
studied.
Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report
Page 12
Based on a detailed environmental impact assessment study, a comprehensive report on the
environmental management plan was developed covering the following aspects: air quality
management plan, noise and water quality management plan, wastewater treatment, reuse,
recycling and disposal programme, rainwater harvesting plan, socioeconomic and community
development plan, ecological and biodiversity enhancement plan. An outline of the proposed
environmental management systems, environmental cell and environmental monitoring
programme were also presented in this report.
Although the proposed project utilises the limited quantities of flammable and combustible
materials with threshold levels below the stipulated quantities under Hazardous Materials
Handling Rules, a preliminary risk assessment study and Disaster Management study, was
undertaken to assess the residual risks, if any, due to storage and handling of diesel, furnace oil,
and other combustible material. Wherever applicable, quantitative methods were adopted to
establish the heat radiation levels due to accidental fires at storage facilities.
CPCB guidelines on risk assessment methods were adopted and CPR 18E guidelines were used
for estimating the consequences of fire accidents. Based on the risk assessment study, a
preliminary fire safety and occupational health management plan was suggested. A road map for
onsite emergency and disaster management plan was suggested based on the preliminary
information available at this stage.
1.8 Structure of the EIA Study
This EIA report is structured into nine chapters as below.
Chapter 1 – Introduction presents details of project background, justification and need for the
project, screening and scoping studies etc.,
Chapter 2 – (Project Description) presents details of the proposed project, land requirement
and details of various supporting facilities required for the project.
Chapter 3 - (Description of Environment) presents a comprehensive description of the
baseline environmental conditions of the study area. This includes the data obtained from
primary surveys and also secondary published data from various authentic sources.
Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report
Page 13
Chapter 4 – (Anticipated Environmental Impacts and Mitigation Measures) presents the
environmental aspects associated with the proposed project, envisaged emissions and
discharges from the facility, an overview of various pollution control systems proposed under
project planning activities in the detailed project report and construction and operational phase
environmental impacts.
Chapter 5 – (Analysis of Alternative Sites & Technology) presents alternative sites if any
considered for the project and alternative Technologies considered for this project.
Chapter 6 – (Environmental Monitoring Programme) depicts the summary of proposed
environmental management plan.
Chapter 7 – (Additional Studies) presents the findings of the risk assessment study, risk
mitigation plan, a preliminary onsite emergency and disaster management plan.
Chapter 8– (Project Benefits) presents the benefits of the project.
Chapter 9 – (Environmental Management Plan) depicts the summary of proposed
environmental management plan.
Chapter 10 – Presents the (Summary and Conclusion) of EIA report.
Chapter 11 – Disclosure of Consultant Engaged presents the declaration by the EIA
consultant organisation as per the NABET requirements.
Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report
Page 14
CHAPTER – 2PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report
Page 15
2. PROJECT DESCRIPTION2.1 Type of Project
M/s. CIPLA Limited proposes the change in product mix of Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients
within the production capacity of 119.84 MTA, The Existing quantity is 119.84 MTA with 63
nos of APIs. Proposed change in product mix with addition of 18 nos new products will have
113.46 MTA with 81 nos of APIs in (28.49 Acres/11.52 Ha) within KIADB Industrial Area,
Bommasandra-Jigani Link Road, Phase IV, Anekal Taluk, Bengaluru Urban District. The
proposed project falls under the schedule 5 (f) Synthetic Organic Chemicals as per the EIA
Notification dated September 14, 2006 and its amendments. There is no interlinked project.
The project is categorized into category ‘B’ as the site is located inside KIADB Industrial Area.
The project site falls in the Latitude 12°47'8.31"N and Longitude 77°38'54.28"E (Centre
coordinates). Site coordinates given in below Error! Reference source not found. and habitat
profile in Table 2-2
Table 2-1 Site coordinates
Site Point Latitude & Longitude DirectionCorne Near Vehicle 12°47'1.09" N, 77°38'52" E S
Corner Near HT Switch yard 12°47'7.0" N, 77°38'49" E SWCorner Near Scrap Yard 12°47'9" N, 77°38'50" E WProject Site NW Corner 12°47'6.27" N, 77°38'49.33" E NW
Table 2-2 Nearest Habitat Profile from the project site
SI.No Villages Distance in km Direction Population1 Jigani 0.9 WSW 170363 Bande Nallasandra 1.2 N 13484 Mada Patna 1.3 S 40765 Nanjapura 1.4 NNW 4056 Vaddarapalya 1.6 SSW 17317 Koppa 1.9 N 14748 Seethanaikana halli 2.4 SSE 3379 Rajapura 2.7 SE 912
10 Harapanahalli 3.0 W 3040
Table 2-3 Nearest Water Bodies
SI.No Villages Distance in km Direction1 Hennagara lake 1.0 SE2 Ramakrishnapura lake 4.9 ESE3 Hebbagodi lake 5.3 NE
Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report
Page 16
4 Kammasandra lake 5.9 NE5 Chandapura lake 6.2 ENE
The notified sensitive area is Banneghatta National Park at a distance of 5.26 km towards
West.
The satellite image showing the project site and the map indicating the proposed site are
Google map covering 10 Km, 5 km, 1 km & 0.5 km radius around the project area is given in
Figure 2-1 to Figure 2-4 respectively. Site layout & Site photos are represented in Figure 2-5& Figure 2-6 respectively and site layout enclosed as Annexure F.
Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report
Page 17
Figure 2-1 Google Satellite Image of the Project Site (10 Km Radius)
Figure 2-2 Google Satellite Image of the Project Site (5 Km Radius)
Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report
Page 18
Figure 2-3 Google Satellite Image of the Project Site (1 Km Radius)
Figure 2-4 Google Satellite Image demarcation of Project Site
ExistingCIPLALimited
ExistingCIPLALimited
Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report
Page 19
Figure 2-5 Site Master Plan – CIPLA Ltd, Bommasandra
Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report
Page 20
CIPLA over all view API II Unit of the Existing Plant
ETP Laboratory RO System
Existing MEE Existing ETP
Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report
Page 21
Existing Green Belt Area Existing Green Belt Area
Existing Green Belt Area Existing Green Belt Area
Figure 2-6 Site Photographs
2.2 Size or Magnitude of operation
M/s. CIPLA Limited proposes the change in product mix of Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients
within the production capacity of 119.84 MTA, The Existing quantity is 119.84 MTA with 63
nos of APIs. Proposed change in product mix with addition of 18 nos new products will have
113.46 MTA with 81 nos of APIs in (28.23 Acres/11.42 Ha) within KIADB Industrial Area,
Bommasandra-Jigani Link Road, Phase IV, Anekal Taluk, Bengaluru Urban District. The lists
of existing and proposed products are given Table 2-4 and Annexure H.
Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report
Page 22
Table 2-4Table 2-4 Details of Existing and proposed products and capacities
S.No Category S.No ProductsExistingQuantity(Kgs/A)
Proposed Qty(Kgs/A)
Category wiseQty
Variation inquantity
1 CARDIOVASCULARDRUGS
1 AMLODIPINE BESYLATE 500 1000
2600
5002 AMLODIPINE MESYLATE 500 1000 5003 CIOLASTRAZOLE 3000 100 -29004 FELODIPINE 3000 500 -2500
2 ANTICANCERDRUGS
5 ANAGRELIDE 25 25
74430
06 BICALUTAMIDE 2000 2500 5007 CARBOPLATIN 25 50 258 CISPLATIN 25 50 259 ETOPOSIDE 250 500 250
10 FLUTAMIDE 5000 2000 -300011 MITIXANTRONE HCL 20 10 -1012 ANASTRAZOLE 0 100 10013 OXALIPLATIN 0 100 10014 CAPACITABINE 0 38000 38000
15 IMATINIB MESYLATE (Alpha and BetaForms) 0 10000 10000
16 VINORELBINE TARTRATE 0 50 5017 TEMOZOLOMIDE 0 500 50018 ERLOTINIB HCL 0 1500 150019 GEFTINIB 0 1500 150020 SORAFENIB TOSYLATE 0 1500 150021 DOCETAXEL TRIHYDRATE 0 100 10022 IRINOTECAN HCL 0 100 100
Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report
Page 23
23 PACLITAXEL 0 100 10024 LAPATINIB DITOSYLATE 0 500 50025 LENALIDOMIDE 0 1000 100026 TOPOTECAN HCL 0 10 1027 GEMCITABINE HCL 0 800 80028 PEMETREXED DISODIUM 0 200 20029 BORTEZOMIB 0 10 1030 LETROZOLE 0 500 50031 SUNITINIB MALATE 0 255 25532 VINCRISTINE SULPHATE 0 50 5033 VINBLASTINE SULPHATE 0 50 5034 TEGAFUR 0 1000 100035 PAZOPANIB HCL 0 2500 250036 ABIRATERONE ACETATE 0 1000 100037 CARFILZOMIB 0 20 2038 RUXOLITINIB PHOSPHATE 0 100 10039 EVEROLIMUS 0 50 5040 EXEMESTINE 0 500 50041 ESTRAMUSTINE 0 500 50042 NILOTINIB 0 4000 400043 DASATINIB 0 500 50044 REGORAFENIB 0 200 20045 IBRUTINIB 0 500 50046 NINTEDANIB ESYLATE 0 500 50047 POMALIDOMIDE 0 500 50048 AXITINIB 0 500 500
3 CNS DRUG49 DULOXETINE 3000 500
7130-2500
50 OXCARBAZEPINE 7000 50 -695051 RILUZOLE 3000 580 -2420
Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report
Page 24
52 RISPERIDONE 1000 500 -50053 TOPIRAMATE 10000 2500 -750054 LAMOTRIGINE POWDER 1000 2500 150055 VENLAFAXINE 5000 500 -4500
4 GASTROINTESTINALDRUGS
56 ESOMEPRAZOLE 2000 2000
7000
057 LANSOPRAZOLE 10000 1000 -900058 OMEPRAZOLE 10000 2000 -800059 PANTOPRAZOLE 1000 500 -50060 RABEPRAZOLE SODIUM 1000 500 -50061 RABEPRAZOLE POWDER 1000 500 -50062 ESOMEPRAZOLE POWDER 2000 500 -1500
5 OSTEOPOROSIS 63 RALOXIFENE 5000 1500 1500 -3500
6 ANTIBIOTICS /ANTIBACTERIALS
64 LEVOFLOXACIN 15000 3000
4700
-1200065 OFLOXACIN USP 500 500 066 CIPROFLOXACIN POWDER 190 190 067 GATIFLOXACIN POWDER 5 10 568 ENROFLOXACIN POWDER 500 1000 500
7OTHERS -ANTOGONADOTROPHIN
69 DANAZOL5000
500 500 -4500
8ARTHRITIC /RHEUMATICAGENTS
70 LEFLUNOMIDE1000
1000 1000 0
9 ANTIVIRALS
71 RIBAVIRIN 3000 1000
3100
-200072 STAVUDINE 1000 100 -90073 ZIDOVUDINE 5000 1000 -400074 VALACICLOVIR HCL 2000 500 -150075 DIDANOSINE 2000 500 -1500
10 OPTHALMIC DRUGS 76 REPROTEROLE 3000 1000 1000 -200011 ANTI HELMINTICS 77 FEBANTEL POWDER 1000 2000 10000 1000
Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report
Page 25
78 MEBENDAZOLE POWDER 1500 2000 50079 ALBENDAZOLE POWDER 2300 4500 220080 FENBENDAZOLE POWDER 500 1500 1000
12 R&D products 81 R&D products 0 500 500 500
Total production qty In Kgs 119840 113460 113460 -6380
Total Production Qty In MT/A 119.84 113.46 113.46
Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report
Page 26
2.3 Project Cost
There is no additional project cost as it is in existing unit. The current infrastructure is
adequate for the proposed change in product mix. The gross value of existing infrastructure is
Rs. 166 Crore.
2.4 Process Description
The process details of all the products are attached as Annexure J.
Figure 2-7 Process flow for production
2.5 Resource Requirements
2.5.1 Raw Materials
The list of raw materials given in Table 2-5 and MSDS’s are provided as Annexure I and
Annexure Q. List of solvents and tank details are given below
Table 2-6
Dispensing Raw MaterialRaw Materials Charging in Reactor and ReactionmonitoringCentrifuge operation
Material Drying Operation inDryerMillingOperationSiftingOperationBlendingOperationFinished Goods/ ProductpackingFinished Goods/ ProductDispatching
Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report
Page 27
Table 2-5 List of Raw Materials & Quantity for Proposed New Products
SI.No Raw Materials Consumptionquantity Unit Products kg/A
1 Vinblastine Sulphate stage-I 139 Kg/A
Vincristine Sulphate - 50
2 Methanol 1392.5 lit/A3 Ethanol 1231.5 lit/A4 Sulfuric acid conc 1 lit/A5 N2 Gas 94 Kg/A6 Acetic acid 458.5 lit/A7 Tetrahydrofuran 3542.5 Kg/A8 Sodium dichromate 111 Kg/A9 Sodium bisulfite 278 Kg/A
10 Liq Ammonia 1431 lit/A11 Hyflo Super Cel 555.5 Kg/A12 Sodium bicarbonate 833.5 Kg/A13 Sodium sulphae anhyd 278 Kg/A14 Dichloromethane 12140.5 lit/A15 Vinblastine tech 285.5 Kg/A
Vinblastine sulphate - 50
16 Methanol 745 lit/A17 Sulfuric acid conc 50 lit/A18 Ethanol 2112.5 lit/A19 Liq Ammonia 771 lit/A20 Dichloromethane/Chloroform 1841.5 lit/A21 Tartaric acid 154 lit/A22 Sodium sulfate anhyd 137 Kg/A23 Nitrogen Gas 162.5 Kg/A24 5-Fluorouracil 890 Kg/A
Tegafur – 1000
25 2,3-Dihydrofuran 1420 Kg/A26 Dichlorodimethyl silane 1330 lit/A27 Acetonitrile 3490 lit/A28 Triethylamine 70 lit/A29 Diisopropyl ether 3870 lit/A30 Methanol 9870 lit/A31 Isopropyl alcohol 13290 lit/A32 Activated charcoal (acid grade) 20 Kg/A33 Hyflo 90 Kg/A
342,3-Dimethyl-2H-indazole-6-amine hydrochloride(DMIA.HCl) 2725 Kg/A Pazopanib HCL - 2500
35 2,4-Dichloro pyrimidine 5150 Kg/A36 Sodium bicarbonate 7825 Kg/A
Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report
Page 28
37 Rectified spirit 43450 lit/A38 Dimethyl carbonate 5850 Kg/A39 Potassium carbonate 4500 Kg/A40 5-Amino-2-methylbenzenesulfonamide 2825 Kg/A41 IPA HCl 15000 lit/A42 Liquor Ammonia 10450 lit/A43 Dimethyl formamide 11250 Kg/A44 Acetonitrile 11750 lit/A45 Acetone 21575 lit/A46 Methanol 10850 lit/A47 DHEA Compound 1790 Kg/A
Abiraterone Acetate - 1000
48 Hydrazine Hydrate 1250 Kg/A49 1,1,3,3 Tetramethylguanidine 3390 Kg/A50 Iodine 3040 Kg/A51 Diethyl-(3- Pyridyl) borane 610 Kg/A
52 Bis (triphenylphosphine) Palladium dichloride 1 Kg/A53 HBr 1430 Kg/A54 Triethylamine 260 Kg/A55 4 dimethylamino pyridine 20 Kg/A
56 Acetic anhydride 410 lit/A57 Liq ammonia 5540 lit/A58 Sodium hydrosuphite 2320 Kg/A59 Aq. HBr 890 Kg/A60 Liq ammonia 1880 lit/A61 Methanol 16930 lit/A62 Acetone 14490 lit/A63 MDC 54090 lit/A64 Acetonitrile 8400 lit/A65 IPA 14530 Kg/A66 DMF 3710 Kg/A67 THF 7940 Kg/A68 Ac carbon 140 Kg/A69 Alumina 90 Kg/A70 Int 1 0.016 Kg/A
Carfilzomib – 20
71 Epoxyleucine TFA 0.008 Kg/A72 N,N DIPEA 0.02 Kg/A73 EDCI HCL 0.004 lit/A74 HOBT 0.006 Kg/A75 Acetonitrile 0.15 lit/A76 Sat NaHCO3 sol 0.086 lit/A77 Sat Brine Solution 0.174 lit/A78 4-chloropyrroo[2,3-d]pyrimidine 224 Kg/A Ruxolitinib Phosphate –
Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report
Page 29
79 4-(pinacolato borane)-1H-Pyrazole 312 Kg/A 100
80 3-Cyclopentylacrylonitrile 118 Kg/A81 Tetrakis(triphenylphosphine)palladium(0) 72 Kg/A82 Trimethylsilylethoxymethyl chloride 279 Kg/A83 1,8-Diazabicyclo[5.4.0]undec-7-ene 12 Kg/A84 Phosphoric acid 35 lit/A85 sodium hydride 90 Kg/A86 Lithium Tetrafluoroborate 339 Kg/A87 Ammonium Hydroxide 39 Kg/A88 Sodium bicarbonate 9 Kg/A89 Potassium Carbonate 513 Kg/A90 1,2-dimethoxyethane 444 Kg/A91 ethyl acetate 20318 lit/A92 sodium chloride 615 Kg/A93 Dioxane 3433 Kg/A94 Toluene 1717 lit/A95 MTBE 1717 lit/A96 Acetonitrile 3991 lit/A97 Dichloromethane 1986 lit/A98 Heptane 3674 lit/A99 Methanol 2146 lit/A
100 Isopropanol 429 lit/A101 Hexane 1717 lit/A102 Sirolimus 100 Kg/A
Everolimus – 50
103 Ethylene glycol anhydrous 218 Kg/A104 tert-Butyldimethylsilyl chloride 635 Kg/A105 Triethyl amine 531.5 Kg/A106 DMAP 4 Kg/A107 Sodium sulphate 50 Kg/A108 Sodium chloride 50 Kg/A109 Trifluoromethanesulfonic anhydride 1385 Kg/A110 2, 6 Lutidine 768 Kg/A111 1 N Hydrochoric Acid 550 lit/A112 MDC 16600 lit/A113 Ethyl Acetate 49300.5 lit/A114 Hexane 69000 lit/A115 n Heptane 34200 lit/A116 Methanol 2175 lit/A117 Exemestane Stage-I 2740 Kg/A
Exemestine – 500118 2,3 Dichloro-5,6-Dicyano-P-Benzoquinone (DDQ) 3745 Kg/A
119 Sodium Hydroxide Flakes 2190 Kg/A
Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report
Page 30
120 Sodium Sulphate Anhydrous 1825 Kg/A
121 Benzoic Acid 3835 lit/A122 Hyflo Supercel 270 Kg/A123 Toluene 109650 lit/A124 Acetone 18280 lit/A
125 Acetonitrile 73125 lit/A
126 Estramustine Phosphate 525 Kg/A
Estramustine – 500
127 Sodium Methoxide Powder 105 Kg/A
128 Activated Charcoal AR Grade 15 Kg/A
129 Potassium Hydroxide Flakes 450 Kg/A
130 Special Denatured Spirit With Toluene 15000 lit/A lit/A131 Methanol 6000 lit/A lit/A132 NTB Guanidinobenzoate 2840 Kg/A
Nilotinib – 4000
133 NTB Enamino Ketone 1920 Kg/A134 Potassium carbonate 4840 Kg/A135 Sodium Hydroxide 680 Kg/A136 Toluene 11040 lit/A137 N,N Dimethyl acetamide 13400 Kg/A138 NTB amine 2440 Kg/A139 Thionyl chloride 1000 Kg/A140 N methyl pyrrolidone 20560 Kg/A141 Acetone 69200 lit/A142 Methanol 27080 lit/A143 Acetonitrile 17800 lit/A144 Activated carbon 40 Kg/A145 Hydrochloric acid 80 lit/A
146 DST-Thiazole carboxamide 555 Kg/A
Dasatinib – 500
147 DST-Dichloro compound 435 Kg/A148 2-(hydroxy ethy )piperizine 1200 Kg/A149 Sodium tertary butoxide 665 Kg/A150 THF 4940 Kg/A151 methanol 21550 lit/A152 Acetic acid 555 lit/A153 N-butanol 10000 lit/A154 Acetone 665 lit/A155 RGB CMP 222 Kg/A
Regorafenib – 200156 RGB AFP 172 Kg/A157 Potassium tert butoxide 214 Kg/A158 DMF 1626 Kg/A
Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report
Page 31
159 Ethyl acetate 13510 lit/A160 RGB Phenyl carbamate 310 Kg/A161 RGB CTA 222 Kg/A162 Phenyl chloroformate 186 Kg/A163 Pyridine 100 Kg/A164 Hexane 722 lit/A165 Acetone 2400 lit/A
166 PTSA.H2O 88 Kg/A167 Methanol 7200 lit/A168 Charcoal 40 Kg/A
169
3-Iodo-lH-pyrazolo[3,4-^pyrimidin-4-amine (31).lH-Pyrazolo[3,4- d]pyrimidin-4-amine, 30
500 Kg/A
Ibrutinib – 500
170 N-iodosuccinimide ( IS) 1070 Kg/A171 Compound 31 400 Kg/A172 boronic acid 32 656 lit/A173 potassium phosphate tribasic monohydrate 1056 Kg/A174 Dioxane 5800 Kg/A175 tetrakis(triphenylphosphine)palladium 270 Kg/A176 Compound 30 180 Kg/A177 protected piperidine 143 Kg/A178 Triphenylphosphine 233 Kg/A179 diisopropyl azodicarboxylate 180 Kg/A180 DMF 9440 Kg/A181 Nitrogen 110 Kg/A182 Methanol 11800 lit/A183 ethyl acetate 8960 Kg/A184 THF 17780 Kg/A185 Compound 35 70 Kg/A186 solution of hydrogen chloride in dioxane 590 lit/A187 diethyl ether 1420 lit/A
188 acrylic acid-d4 12 lit/A189 oxalyl chloride 23600 Kg/A190 Triethylamine 3000 Kg/A191 MDC 7900 lit/A192 5% citric acid 8300 lit/A193 Benzene 438 Kg/A194 DMF 280 Kg/A195 suspension of 36 45 Kg/A
196 Acryloyl-d3 chloride 11990 Kg/A197 Compound 122 17 Kg/A198 Nintedanib Base 450 Kg/A Nintedanib Esylate - 500
Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report
Page 32
199 Ethane Sulfonic Acid 95 lit/A200 Acetonitrile 1572 lit/A
Axitinib – 500
201 6-nitro-indazole 81.55 Kg/A202 3, 4- dihydro -2H- pyran 84.1 Kg/A203 2,3- dichloro-5,6-dicyano-p-benzoquinone 11 Kg/A204 Dichloromethane 2915 lit/A205 DMF 1298 Kg/A206 tetrahydro -2H- pyran-2-yl) -1H- indazole 112.5 Kg/A207 potassium carbonate 125.5 Kg/A208 Iodine 207.5 Kg/A209 sodium thiosulfate 111.5 Kg/A210 potassium carbonate aqueous solution 0.75 lit/A211 DMF 944 Kg/A212 addition of the intermediate (1) 156 Kg/A213 2- vinylpyridine 63.75 Kg/A214 N, N- diisopropylethylamine 102.65 Kg/A215 tri-o-tolylphosphine 11.15 Kg/A216 palladium chloride 2.45 Kg/A217 isopropanol 864.6 lit/A218 ethanol 410 lit/A219 ammonium chloride 150 Kg/A
220(E) -6- nitro-3- [2- (pyridin-2-yl) ethenyl] -1-(tetrahydro -2H- pyran-2-yl) -1H- indazole 112.5 Kg/A
221 iron powder 81.3 Kg/A222 THF 896 Kg/A223 sodium nitrite 35.1 Kg/A
224(TC, (E) -6- amino-3- [2- (pyridin-2-yl) ethenyl ] -1- (tetrahydro -2H- pyran-2-yl) -1H- indazole 100 Kg/A
225 glacial acetic acid 682.5 lit/A226 concentrated hydrochloric acid 66.08 lit/A227 MDC 1936.836 lit/A228 potassium iodide 103.65 Kg/A229 Iodine 39.6 Kg/A230 20% sodium thiosulfate solution 1660 lit/A231 ammonia 200 lit/A
232(E) -6- iodo-3- [2- (pyridin-2-yl) ethenyl] -1-(tetrahydro-pyran-2-yl -2H-) -1H- indazole 87.5 Kg/A
233[1, I, - bis (diphenylphosphino) ferrocene]dichloropalladium dichloromethane complex 7.45 Kg/A
234 cesium carbonate 99.15 Kg/A235 2-mercapto -N- methylbenzamide 42.45 Kg/A236 ethyl acetate 1344 lit/A
Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report
Page 33
237
(E) -N- methyl-2 - {[3- (2- (pyridin-2-yl) ethenyl)_1_ (tetrahydro -2H- pyran-2-yl) -1H - indazol-6-yl] thio} benzamide 75 lit/A
238 p-toluenesulfonic acid monohydrate 151.6 lit/A239 Methanol 316.72 lit/A240 ethanol 328 lit/A241 ethyl acetate 201.6 lit/A
Table 2-6 Existing Solvents & Fuels Materials Tank Storage Details
Existing
ProposedS.No Chemical No. of
TanksDia(m)
Height(m)
Volume(KL)
InternalPressure
Type ofstorage
InternalTemp(0c)
1 Methanol 1 2.5 6.5 25 UnderNitrogenblanketingat 50 milibar
Undergroundtank kept inRCC tankandsubmergedin Gravel
AmbientTemp
2 IPA 1 2.5 6.5 25 No Change
3 Hexane 1 2.5 6.5 25
4 EthylAcetate
1 2.5 6.5 25
5 Acetone 1 2.5 6.5 25
6 Toluene 1 2.5 6.5 257 HSD 1 3 3 40 Atmospheric
PressureAboveGround
8 Furnace oil 1 3 4 20
9 Methylene 1 2 4 15 UnderNitrogenblanketingat 50 milibar
10 Chloroform 1 2 4 15
2.5.2 Land Details
The Plant facilities are spread over 115335.23 sq.m, (28.49 Acres / 11.52 Ha), Total built up
area (Land utilized for buildings, utilities purpose, other allied purpose like roads, machinery
equipments etc..,) is 54997.45 sq.m (13.58 Acres) KIADB Land which is completely fortified
and protected on all four sides by boundary walls.
Land is owned by M/s. CIPLA Limited. This land has been allotted by KIADB in the Industrial
area. The present land use is industrial.
Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report
Page 34
Table 2-7 Land use break up details
Description AREA IN SQMTS AREA INACRES
% OFAREA
Land Utilized for Buildings & Utilities Purpose 18034.03 4.45 15.6
Land Utilized for other allied purpose likeRoads, Machinery Equipments, etc.., 36963.42 9.13 32
Land Utilized for Green Belt Development 38035.8 9.39 33
Area for future expansion 22301.98 5.51 19.3Total Area 115335.23 28.49 100.00
Existing Green belt is 9.39 Acres (33 %) of 28.49 Acres.
2.5.3 Water Requirement
Total water requirement is 300 KLD of which fresh water requirement is 140 KLD; Water
source from the In house bore wells and private tankers. There is no change in the new
proposal.
Table 2-8 Water Consumption for the Project
SI.No Description Existing Break up (KLD) Proposed(KLD)Total water
requirementEffluent generated Total Recycled
water1 Process 60 58 Permeate 122 KLD
Condensate 38KLD No Change
2 Washing 25 253 Boiler Feed 60 354 Chiller 505 Domestic 25 226 Other utilities 20 207 Green belt 60 -
Total 300 160 160Fresh waterrequirement
(300 - 160) = 140
Total water Requirement: 300 KLDEffluent Generated: 160 KLDRecycled water: 160 KLDFresh water Requirement (300 – 160 KLD) = 140 KLD
Water balance chart for existing (300 KLD) facility is given in Figure 2-8 and enclosed as
Annexure K
Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report
Page 35
2.5.4 Power RequirementPower requirement of the project is 1500 KVA from BESCOM. DG sets will act as backup
facilities in case of power failure, the details of power requirement given in Table 2-9.
Table 2-9 Power and Energy Requirement
Details Capacity (KVA) SourceExisting Proposed
Power Requirement 1500
No Change
BESCOMPower Back Up 1250x3 DG SetsFuel oil fired Boiler ( 2TPH x 3)
25000lit/Month (Furnace oil)
HPCL/IOCL
TFH system 200000 kcal
(1 x 200000 k cal) -
2.5.5 Manpower Requirement
The total strength of the CIPLA Limited is 300 people (permanent & contractual), No
additional manpower requirement as it is a proposed project for change in product mix. The
manpower requirement will be include both technical and non-technical personnel.
2.6 Pollution Control Measures
2.6.1 Air Pollution & Fugitive Emission Control
The major air pollution sources from the industry are DG sets, boilers and scrubbers. The DG
set and boiler sources are provided with stacks of adequate height so as to disperse the
emanating flue gases containing suspended particulate matter, oxides of sulfur and nitrogen
without affecting the ground level concentrations. The emissions generated from the reactors
are scrubbed out by wet scrubbers. The source of emission, capacity and the various Air
Pollution Control (APC) measures taken are listed in the Table 2-10.
Table 2-10 Air Pollution Sources and Control Measures
S.No
Existing Proposed
MoEF Approved No ofstacks Type of fuel Sulphur
contentKgs/hr incase of
liquid fuel
Chimneyheight (in mts)& air pollutioncontrol system
providedproposed
1 Attached toprocess
5 NA NA NA 3 m ARL/9 mAGL & scrubber
No change
2 Attached tofinishing area
2 NA NA NA Dust collector
Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report
Page 36
3 Formulation 2 NA NA NA 3 m ARL/9 mAGL & scrubber
4 Quality Control 1 NA NA NA 3 m ARL/9 mAGL & scrubber
5 TFH system200000 k cal
1 NA NA NA 20 m AGL
6 Steam Boilers (2TPH x 3)
3 Furnace oil 4.0 % 190 Kg/Hr 30 m AGL
7Solid wasteincinerator 25kg/Hr
1 HSD 0.25 % 05 Lts/Hr 30 m AGL &Scrubber
8 Vapourabsorption
1 HSD 0.25 % 25 Lts/Hr 20 m AGL
9 (1250 x 3) KVADG sets
3 HSD 0.25 % 220 Lts/Hr 20 m AGL &silencers
Note: Due to change in product mix shall not increase any additional air pollution sources andemission rate.
2.6.2 Odour ControlTo odour has been controlled with proper mitigative measures. The scrubber details are
enclosed in Annexure P.
2.6.3 Noise PollutionThe major source of noise pollution in the industry is DG sets, boilers and reactors. DG sets
are provided with integral acoustic enclosures. Also the ambient noise levels are within the
ambient standards by inbuilt design of mechanical equipment and buildings apart from
vegetation along the periphery and at various locations within the industry premises. The
plant will be specifically designed with due consideration on minimizing noise pollution.
Higher noise levels will be felt only near the active working areas and therefore the workers
are provided with personal protective equipment as a safety measure.
2.6.4 Waste Water Generation and Disposal DetailsSewage and effluent generated from process and washings are taken to combined Effluent
and Sewage Treatment Plant of capacity 160 KLD further processed in RO plant.
Rejects from RO Plant along with High TDS effluent is treated in Multiple Effect Evaporator of
40 KLD capacity. The treated waste water of 160 KLD is reused for Boiler, cooling towers and
Toilet flushes.
Zero liquid discharge system is maintained in the facilities. There is no change in the new
proposal.
Table 2-11 Liquid Waste Generation & Treatment
Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report
Page 37
Phase Population(Nos)
Qty ofwater
required(KLD)
Sewage/EffluentGenerated
(KLD)
Treatment Method
Existing Operation 300 300 160 Treated in combined ETP andSTP
Proposed construction Not applicable
After expansion Operation No change after proposed change in productmix
Process 300 300 160
The source of waste water, treatment methods and the final disposal of each type of
wastewater generated in Table 2-11 & Figure 2-8 respectively and the ETP and STP process
flow diagrams along with their specifications are attached as Annexure L.
Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report
Page 38
Figure 2-8 Water Balance Chart
2.6.5 Hazardous and Solid waste Management
2.6.5.1 Solid waste managementThe Source of municipal waste in the industry will be from the domestic use. The Municipal
solid waste (Organic waste from canteen and pantry) generate150 kg/day. The total
manpower is 300 nos during Operational phase. The details are given in the following Table2-12. & Table 2-13.
Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report
Page 39
Table 2-12 Municipal Solid Waste
Type of waste Existing Proposed
Quantity Kg/day Collection method Disposal method
Organic wastefrom canteen and
pantry
150 Bins Composting & Localpig farm
No change
As per CPCB guidelines: MSW per capita/day =0.45
2.6.5.2 Hazardous waste ManagementThe various hazardous waste generated from the process is stored in a separate hazardous
waste storage area and properly disposed as per the Hazardous and Other Wastes
(Management and Trans boundary Movement) Amendment Rules, 2016. Agreement
between TSDF and CIPLA for collection, transport, storage, treatment and disposal and also
we have a valid agreement with M/s. Enano incintech for Incineration of incinerable wastes.
The type of hazardous waste and the quantity generated are detailed in the Table 2-13.
Table 2-13 Hazardous waste
WasteCategory
Existing Proposed
Hazardouswaste
Generated
Quantity Method of handling
Existing Proposed Total
5.1 Used Oil 15 KL/A
Nochanges
15KL/A
Collected in Leak proof containers anddisposed only to KSPCB registeredauthorized reprocessors provided the oilmeets the standards as per schedule-5part-A of the rules
No Change
5.2Oil soaked
cotton waste 0.5MT/A 0.5MT/AStored in a secured manner and handover to KSPCB authorized incinerator/Coprocessing in cement kiln
28.1Process
residues &Waste
202 MT/A 202MT/A
Stored in a secured manner and handover to KSPCB authorized incinerator/Coprocessing in cement kiln / Disposal toTSDF in case calorific value is < 2500Kcal/Kg.
20.3DistillationResidue 10 MT/A 10MT/A
Stored in a secured manner and handover to KSPCB authorized incinerator/Coprocessing in cement kiln
28.2Spent
solvent 1200 KL/A 1200KL/AStored in a secured manner and handover to KSPCB authorized recycler /
33.1Discardedcontainers
2500Nos/A
2500Nos/A
Stored in a secured manner and handover to KSPCB authorized recycler afterwash/decontamination only
Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report
Page 40
35.3 Sludge fromETP & MEE
salts60
MTA60
MTAStored in a secured manner and handover to KSPCB authorized TSDF
2.7 Existing Infrastructure Facilities
a. Land
The Plant facilities are spread over 115335.23 sq.m, (28.49 Acres / 11.52 Ha), Total built up
area (Land utilized for buildings, utilities purpose, other allied purpose like roads, machinery
equipments etc..,) is 54997.45 sq.m (13.58 Acres) KIADB Land which is completely fortified
and protected on all four sides by boundary walls.
Land is owned by M/s. CIPLA Limited. This land has been allotted by KIADB in the Industrial
area. The present land use is industrial.
b. Buildings
Total built up area is divided into various sections like Production Blocks, Engineering,
Warehouses, Administration, Canteen, Toilets etc. There is adequate space & provision for
operations.
c. Plant and Machinery & Utilities
The Plant facilities have been designed and set up with the objective to carry out almost all
chemical reactions and processes. Details of plant and machinery and utility equipments
used for the production are as below;
i. Process Equipments:
Reactors ANFD Centrifuges VTDs Jet Mill Multi Mill Sifter & Blender
ii. Machinery / Utility Equipments;
Boilers Cooling towers DG sets Air compressors
Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report
Page 41
HVAC system (Heat, Ventilation and Air conditioning) Vacuum pumps Hot water systems Chilled water plant Dust collectors Scrubbers
iii. Safety Equipments:
Fire Hydrant System Fire Extinguishers Fire Alarm System Eye wash fountain / Safety Showers Emergency PPE cupboards Wind Sack Public Address System
Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report
Page 42
CHAPTER – 3DESCRIPTION OF ENVIRONMENT
Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report
Page 43
3. DESCRIPTION OF ENVIRONMENT3.1 Preamble
This chapter depicts the existing environmental conditions in and around the proposed project
with an area of 28.49 Acres (11.52 Ha) located at plot # 285, 286 & 287, KIADB Industrial Area,
Bommasandra,Link Road.IV Phase Jigani, Anekal Taluk Bengaluru Urban District & Karnataka
state. The primary baseline data monitored covered three (3) months i.e., from September to
November 2016, and secondary data was collected from Government and Semi-Government
organisations. The primary baseline data has been generated by M/s. Hubert Enviro Care
Systems (P) Ltd, Chennai, and a MoEF&CC approved Environmental Testing Laboratory for the
following Terrestrial environmental components.
Terrestrial Environmental Components
Meteorology
Temperature
Relative Humidity
Rainfall
Wind Speed & Direction
Solar Radiation
Ambient Air Quality
Particulate matter <10 micron size(PM10)
Particulate matter <2.5 micron size(PM2.5)
Sulphur Dioxide (SO2)
Nitrogen Dioxide (NO2)
Carbon Monoxide (CO)
Lead (Pb)
Ozone (O3)
Benzene (C6H6)
Benzo (a) pyrene (C20H12)
Arsenic (As)
Nickel (Ni)
Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report
Page 44
Ammonia (NH3)
Hydrogen Fluoride (HF)
Hydrogen Bromide (HBr)
Hydrogen Sulfide (H2S)
Hydrogen Chloride (Hcl)
Ambient Noise Levels
Day equivalent noise levels
Night equivalent noise levels
Inland Water Quality
Groundwater Quality
Surface Water Quality
Soil Quality
Flora & Fauna (Ecology)
3.2 Study Area
A 10Km radial distance with the proposed project site as the epicentre has been identified as
the General study area for assessing the baseline environmental status. The core study area is
the project area and its immediate surroundings to the tune of 1.0 Km radius from the boundary.
The project area is the land where the project is being developed. Further the Project
Impact/Influence Area (PIA) is 10Km from the boundary of the core area covering Anekal Taluka
and some portion of Bangalore corporation under Bangalore urban district of Karnataka. The
map showing the study area/PIA for the EIA study is given as Error! Reference source not
found..
3.3 Description of the Study Area
As described in Chapter 1 Introduction the M/s. Cipla Limited is located 22 Km North of
Bengaluru district of Karnataka. An overall idea of the study area with reference to the physical
conditions are presented for better understanding in the following sections before proceeding
into the section on the prevailing environmental conditions of the study area. Location map of
the project site is given in Figure 1-1.
Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report
Page 45
3.4 Environmentally/Ecologically Sensitive areas
The environmental sensitive areas covering an aerial distance of 10 km PIA from project
boundary is given in Table 3-1.
Table 3-1 Environmentally Sensitive Areas within 15km from Project Boundary
S.No Areas Proposed project location boundary1 Areas protected under international conventions,
national or local legislation for their ecological,landscape, cultural or other related value
The Bannerghatta National Park boundary at adistance of 5.26 Km towards WestRagihalli Forest –7.3 Km towards West
2 Areas which are important or sensitive forecological reasons – Wetlands, Watercourses orother water bodies, coastal zone, biospheres,mountains, forests
The Bannerghatta National Park boundary at adistance of 5.26 Km towards WestHennagara Lake-1.0 Km towards South EastKammasandra lake-5.9 Km towards North EastRagihalli Forest – 7.3 Km towards West
3 Areas used by protected, important or sensitivespecies of flora or fauna for breeding, nesting,foraging, resting, over wintering, migration
The Bannerghatta National Park boundary at adistance of 5.26 Km towards West from the project site(as per Range forest office, Bannerghatta wild lifeRange, Kalkere, Bengaluru, Letter No. 415/2018-19dated: 18.01.2019)
4 Inland, coastal, marine or underground waters5 State, National boundaries Karnataka – Tamil Nadu Border – 10.7 Km6 Routes or facilities used by the public for access
to recreation or other tourist, pilgrim areasBannerghatta - Anekal Road – 2.0 Km
7 Defence installations Nil8 Densely populated or built-up area Bommasandra village – 3.82 Km towards East North East
Doddathoguru– 6.74 Km towards North EastElectronic City-6.1Km towards North
9 Areas occupied by sensitive man-made land uses(hospitals, schools, places of worship, communityfacilities)
HospitalsNarayana Hrudyala-5.07 Km towards North EastSparsh Hospital-5.33 Km towards North EastSrinidhi Hopital-5.65 Km towards EastEducational InstitutionsBTL High School - 4.63 Km towards North EastTreamis World School-3.06 Km towards NorthRoyal Public School-5.83 Km towards North EastBTL Institute of Tech and Management-4.91 Km towardsNorth EastCondor International school-4.32 Km towards North WestChrist Academy ICSE school-5.38 Km towards North WestNidyananda High school and college-2.37 Km towards WestTapovan High School-4.11 Km towards WestVirindha Educational Academy-5.89 Km towards WestFilm Academy-5.90 Km towards WestT. Johan College-9.34 Km towards North WestSherwood High School-9.56 Km towards North WestWorship PlacesJigani Masjid-2.25 Km towards WestSri Channa Keshava Temple-7.64 Km towards South East
10 Areas containing important, high quality or scarceresources, (groundwater resources, surface
Tourism- Bhannergatta National Park-7.72 Km towardsWest
Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report
Page 46
resources, forestry, agriculture, fisheries, tourism,minerals)
11 Areas already subjected to pollution orenvironmental damage (those where existing legalenvironmental standards are exceeded)
No Notified/Recognized polluted area within 15Km distance.
12 Areas susceptible to natural hazard which couldcause the project to present environmentalproblems, (earthquakes, subsidence, landslides,erosion or extreme or adverse climatic conditions)
The site falls in Seismic Zone – II (Low Risk) as per seismiczoning Map of India
3.5 Ecological Sensitive Areas and Other Protected Area
Ecologically sensitive areas like Biosphere Reserve, National Parks, and Wildlife Sanctuaries
protected sites as per Ramsar convention and other protected areas (PA) are not found within
10 Km radius of the project site except Bannerghatta Biological Park (BBP) located at a
distance of 5.26 Km radius from proposed project site.
The Bannerghatta Biological Park, popularly known as BBP, has been an integral part of
Bannerghatta National Park and emerged out as an independent establishment during the year
2002. It is in order to meet the growing demand for eco-recreation, eco-tourism and
conservation, an area of 545.00 Ha of forest from National park was set aside to constitute as
Biological Park originally and later extended to 731.88 Ha.
Bannerghatta Biological Park is located about 22 Kms south of Bengaluru city. It is one among
the few places in the world where wilderness is preserved so close to a big city. It is having
different units such as Zoo, Safari, Butterfly Park and Rescue Center (Conservation of captive
animals).
In Core area there are no trees in wild and mostly with scrub land. Protected areas from the
project location are shown in Figure 3-1.
Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report
Page 47
Figure 3-1 Ecological Sensitive Areas within 10Km radius
Figure 3-2 Ecological Sensitive Areas within 10Km radius in Topo Map
Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report
Page 48
3.6 Physical Conditions
In this section, the physical conditions of PIA district Bengaluru Urban are discussed in general
and wherever possible references to the conditions prevailing in the study area in particular are
also provided. The physical conditions are discussed as under:
District profile
Drainage, land use, geology, Physiography
Natural resources
Climatic conditions, seismic zone characteristics and natural hazards
3.6.1 PIA District Profile
Bengaluru Urban is a district of the Indian state of Karnataka. It is surrounded by the Bengaluru
Rural district on the west, east and north and the Krishnagiri district of Tamil Nadu on the south.
Bengaluru Urban district came into being in 1986, with the partition of the erstwhile Bengaluru
district into Bengaluru Urban and Bengaluru Rural districts. Bengaluru Urban has four taluks:
Bangalore North, Bengaluru East, Bengaluru South and Anekal. The city of Bengaluru is
situated in the Bengaluru Urban district. The Bengaluru Urban district has 17 hoblies, 668
villages and 9 municipal corporations. Electronics City the pride of India and hub of Bengaluru’s
Information Technology companies is situated in Anekal Taluk.
This is the most advanced district in Karnataka. It had a population of 6,537,124 of which
88.11% is urban as of 2001. As of Census 2011, its population has increased to 9,588,910, with
a sex-ratio of 908 females/males, the lowest in the state and its density is 4,378 people per
square km.
3.6.2 Climatic Conditions
Due to its elevation, Bangalore enjoys a pleasant and equable climate throughout the year. The
highest temperature recorded was 35.9 0C on April and the lowest was 10.9 0C in January.
Winter temperatures rarely drop below 140C and summer temperatures seldom exceed 360C.The PIA district has moderate climatic conditions and characterised by sub-tropical climate.
The summer heat is moderated by fairly frequent thunderstorms and occasional squalls causing
power outages and local flooding.
Source: IMD _Bangalore_1971-2000
Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report
Page 49
3.6.3 Rainfall
The rainfall of the district is accounted by the Pre monsoon (PRE), SW
monsoon (SWM) and NE monsoon (NEM). Majority of the rainfall is contributed
by SW Monsoon. In general, humid to semi arid climatic conditions prevail in the
district. The average temperature is around 23.1˚C. The seasonal and annual
normal rainfall of the four taluks of the district from the year 2001 to 2010 is
considered for studying the rainfall pattern. The annual rainfall of Bangalore
North taluk is the highest with 1157mm and lowest for Anekal taluk with 890mm
Source: Government of India Ministry of Water Resources Central Ground Water Board.
3.6.4 Natural Resources of Bengaluru Urban PIA District
3.6.4.1 Flora & Fauna
According to Gazetteer of South India, (1988), large trees are common in Bangalore Urban
district being usually found only near villages. Among them Margosa (Meliaazardirachta),
various species of Ficus (indica, tsiela and religiosa), Tamarind, Acacias (arabica and
speciosa), Mango, Coconut Palms, Palmyra and date (Phoenixsylvestris) etc. are reported. A
large part of the district is covered with low scrub jungle, in which red sanders tree
(Pterocarpussantalinus), the satin-wood (Chloroxylonswietenia), Casuarina were found. Flora
and fauna of PIA are discussed in section 3.11.
3.6.4.2 Forest Resources
There are at least a dozen forests around Bangalore. They are mainly Makalidurga,
Devarabetta, Doddaragi Halli Betta & Chickkaragi Halli Betta, Suvarnamukhi, Thottikal Falls,
Nandihills, Skandagiri, and Muthyalamadu & Savanadurga.
3.6.4.3 Irrigation
The only river of some importance in the district is the Arkavathi river, which flows in the
northwest border of the division. This river is a tributary of the Cauvery and flows from north to
south. On the way, it forms several large tanks as at Hessaraghatta. Apart from this main river,
there are other small rivers like the Vrishabhavathi.
The Vrishabhavathi runs right from one end of the City to the other. On its way, it is fed by
effluents from various factories and sewage from several human settlements. This river is one of
Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report
Page 50
the ugliest features in the City. It becomes particularly obnoxious near Mysore Road. Another
stream Suvarnamukhi that has its origin in the division also joins the Vrishabhavathi.
Irrigation of the cultivated lands in the district is mainly carried on by means of water drawn from
tanks and wells. In the months of April, May and June severe scarcity of water may be felt.
Bangalore City is provided with drinking water from mainly two sources, namely,
Tippagondanahally reservoir constructed across the Arkavati river in magadi taluk of Bangalore
Rural division and the Cauvery river. Both these sources become almost dry for about a month
in May-June, if the monsoons are delayed. The water table of the city is going down each year
and the open wells and bore-wells are getting drier and drier. More and more bore-wells have
been sunk over the years much beyond the carrying capacity of the water table in the city so
much, that almost alternate houses have bore wells now. Another factor for lowering of the
water table is the drying and dying up of the lakes and tanks existing in the city, which have
been either filled up to make layouts for constructing houses or for creating bus-stands and
playgrounds. Many lakes and tanks of the city are severally polluted because of the fact that
sewage waters are let into these water bodies.
3.6.4.4 Agricultural Resources
In PIA Agriculture is the main occupation of the people of the district. Rice is the staple food of
the people and paddy is the principal food crop followed by Ragi, Jowar and Maize crops.
Tobacco, Cashews, Coconut, arecanut, Cardomom, Chillies, Cotton, Sugarcane are also
cultivated.
Major Field Crops cultivated: Paddy, Ragi, Jowar, Maize, Sugarcane, Tobacco, Cotton, Chilli
etc
Horticulture crops: Mango, Orange & batavina, Cashew, Banana, Chillies, Bhendi, Brinjal,
greens, Marigold,
Plantation and Spice crops: Oil palm, Coconut, Betelvine
Livestock: Non descriptive Cattle (local low yielding), Crossbreed cattle, Non descriptive
Buffaloes (local low yielding), Graded Buffaloes, Goat, Sheep, Others (Camel, Pig, Yak etc.)
Poultry.
Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report
Page 51
3.6.4.5 Mineral Resources
Bangalore Urban doesn’t contain minerals of sufficient commercial value. Nodular
concentrations of lime canker are found as secondary product in many places in the gneissic
regions. Graphite is observed to occur as crystalline flakes near Chikkabanavar. Geology &
Minerals map of Karnataka is given in Figure 3-3.
Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report
Page 52
Figure 3-3 Geology & Minerals Map of Karnataka
Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report
Page 53
3.6.5 Land Use & Land Cover
Total geographical area of Bangalore Urban district is 2184.14 Km2. Total are of Agriculture land
is 531.98 Km2 (%). Forest area covered is 26.41 Km2 (%). Built up area is 1451.41 Km2 (%).
Grass land is 5.87Km2 (%). Water bodies’ area is 36.45 Km2 (%). Waste Lands area is 122.02
Km2 (%). Others area is 10Km2 (%). Details of land use/land cover for the Benagluru district are
given in Table 3-2 and
Figure 3-4. Land Use of Bangalore Urban (2005) is given in Figure 3-5.
Table 3-2 District land use/land cover statistics
S.No Division of Land Use/LandCover
Area in Km2 Area in Acres Area in Ha % To TotalArea
1 Agriculture 531.98 131455.12 53197.99 24.352 Forest Cover 26.41 6526.05 2640.99 1.203 Built up 1451.41 358651.22 145140.99 66.454 Grass Land 5.87 1450.50 586.99 0.265 Water Bodies 36.45 9006.99 3644.99 1.676 Waste Lands 122.02 30151.79 12201.99 5.597 Others 10.00 2471.05 999.99 0.46
Total 2184.14 539712.74 218413.99 100
Figure 3-4 Land Use Pattern in the PIA District
Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report
Page 54
Figure 3-5 Land Use Map of Bangalore Urban district
Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report
Page 55
3.6.5.1 Land Use Pattern of the Study Area
Total Project Study Area: 331 Sq.Km. Land Use pattern of the study area is given in Table 3-3.
LULC map of the Study area is given in Figure 3-7.Table 3-3: Land Use/Land Cover statistics of 10 Km radius of the Study Area
S.No Land Use Area in Sq.Km Area in Acres Area in Ha Area inPercentage
1 Urban 89.21 22044.27 8921 39.694862 Cropland 38.65 9550.62 3865 26.951663 Plantation 18.14 4482.49 1814 11.676744 Deciduous 14.26 3523.72 1426 5.4803635 Reservoirs/Lakes/ Ponds 13.57 3353.22 1357 4.3081576 Scrub land 9.08 2243.71 908 4.0996987 Fallow land 7.82 1932.36 782 2.7432028 Scrub Forest 4.24 1047.72 424 2.3625389 Mining 3.03 748.729 303 1.280967
10 Rural 1.19 294.055 119 0.91540811 Barren Rocky Area 0.42 103.784 42 0.35951712 Gullied/ Ravinous land 89.21 22044.27 8921 0.126888
Total 331 71368.95 28882 100
Figure 3-6 Land Use Pattern of the Study Area
Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report
Page 56
Figure 3-7 Land use/Land cover map of the Study Area
Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report
Page 57
3.6.6 Topography
Topography of Bangalore Urban district is generally flat. Physiographically the district can be
divided into rocky upland, plateau & flat topped hills at a general elevation of about 900amsl
with its major part sloping toward south and south east forming pediplains interspersed with hills
all along the western part. The pediplains form the major part of the district underlain by granites
and gneisses with the highest elevation of 850 to 950m amsl. Major part of the pediplain
constitute low relief area having matured dissected rolling topography with erosional land slope
covered by a layer of red loamy soil of varied thickness. Major part of the pediplains is dissected
by streamlets flowing in southern direction.
The project site fall under an elevation of 860 m above the mean sea level. and the study area
contours vary from 860 m to 920 m above MSL. From the project site the high elevations were
observed towards west and West North the lowest contours wereobserved in North and NE
direction. While the remaining areas showed variations withrespect to contours
The topography of the study area mainly cover the district of Anekal taluka and major parts
forms the pediplains with an elevation of 900m amsl. Physiography map of Karnataka state is
given in Figure 3-8, Contour/Physiography map of the Study area is given in.Figure 3-9, Topo
map of the study area is given in. Figure 3-10.
Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report
Page 58
Figure 3-8 Physiography map of Karnataka State
Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report
Page 59
Figure 3-9 Contour/Physiography map of Study Area
Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report
Page 60
Figure 3-10: Topo map of the study area
Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report
Page 61
3.6.7 Geology of the PIA District
The prevailing rock is light to dark grey or whitish biotic granite gneiss, which varies
considerably from place to place, varies in texture, structure and appearance, according to the
fineness or coarseness of its constituent grins and the relative abundance or scarcity, and mode
of deposition of the darker ferro-minerals. These complex Gneissic masses have been styled
“Peninsular Gneiss”.
The schists are not conspicuous in this district, but small isolated strings of a dark hornblende
grannulite, with its contact modified phase of the secondary pale-green pyroxene rock, occur in
some parts. Among the dyke rocks, a group of dykes of charnockite affinities and also some
hornblende dykes are found bordering Kanakapura taluk. The study area mainly covers Anekal
taluk of Bangalore district, mainly Peninsular Gneiss are exposed in the study area. Geology
map of the PIA district is given in Figure 3-11.
Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report
Page 62
Figure 3-11 Geology Map of PIA (Karnataka)
Project Site
Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report
Page 63
3.6.8 Geomorphology of PIA District
Physiographically the district can be divided into rocky upland, plateau & flat topped hills at an
general elevation of about 900 amsl with its major part sloping towards south and south east
forming pediplains interspersed with hills all along the western part. The pediplains form the
major part of the district underlain by granites and gneisses with the highest elevation of 850 to
950 m amsl. Major part of the pediplain constitute low relief area having matured dissected
rolling topography with erosional land slope covered by a layer of red loamy soil of varied
thickness. Major part of the pediplains is dissected by streamlets flowing in southern direction.
Geomorphology Map of study area is given in Figure 3-12 which shows that major part of the
study area is covered by Denudational Origin–Pediplain Complex 83.71%, Denundational Origin
– Hills10.61%, Water Bodies 4.3% and Mining 1.29 %.
Figure 3-12 Geomorphology Map of Study area
3.6.9 Hydrogeology of PIA District
Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report
Page 64
Groundwater occurrence, movement and recharge to aquifers are controlled by degree of
weathering, fracture pattern, geomorphological setup and rainfall. Granites and Gneisses of
peninsular gneissic group constitute major aquifers in the urban district. Ground water occurs in
phreatic conditions in the weathered zone and under semi confined to confined conditions in
fractured and jointed rock formations. Laterites of Tertiary age occur as isolated patches
capping crystalline rocks in Bangalore north taluk and ground water occur in phreatic condition.
Alluvium of 20m thick, which occur along the river courses, though of limited thickness and
aerial extent possess substantial ground water potential. Ground water prospects of the study
area are greater than 5 litres per second. Hydrogeology map of PIA district is given in Figure3-13.
Figure 3-13 Hydrogeology Map of PIA district
3.6.10 Drainage Pattern in PIA District
Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report
Page 65
Major part of the district is drained by Shimsha and Kanva rivers of Cauvery basin i.e Bangalore
north and South taluks. (Catchment area of 468 sq.km which includes Nelamangala and Magadi
taluks of Bangalore rural also). Anekal taluk is drained by South Pennar river of Ponnaiyar
basin, which takes its birth from Nandi hills and flows towards south (Catchment area is 2005
sq.km which covers Devanahalli and Hoskote taluks of Bangalore rural district also). The study
area is drained towards hennagara lake.The hennagara lake is located on the South-East-East
part of the study area. Drainage map of the study area is given in Figure 3-14.
Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report
Page 66
Figure 3-14 Drainage Map of the Study area
Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report
Page 67
3.6.11 Soils in PIA District
The soils of the district can be broadly grouped into red loamy soil and lateritic soil.
Red Loamy Soils generally occur on hilly to undulating land slope on granite and gneissic
terrain. It is mainly seen in the eastern and southern parts of Bangalore north and south taluks.
Laterite soils occur on undulating terrain forming plain to gently sloping topography of
peninsular gneissic region. It is mainly covered in Anekal taluk and western parts of Bangalore
North and south taluks.
The study falls in the soil order of Alfisols type. They are in semiarid to moist ares. They formed
primarily under forest or mixed vegetative cover and are productive for most crops. Soil Map of
Karnataka is given in Figure 3-15.
Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report
Page 68
Figure 3-15 Soil Map of Karnataka State
Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report
Page 69
3.6.12 Physiography of PIA District
Physiographically, the district can be divided into rocky upland, plateau & flat topped hills at a
general elevation of about 950amsl.The major part is sloping towards south and south east
forming pediplains interspersed with hills all along the western part. The pediplains form the
majority of the district underlain by granites and gneisses with the highest elevation of 850 to
950amsl. The pediplain constitute low relief area having matured dissected rolling topography
with erosion land slope covered by a layer of red loamy soil of varied thickness. Physiography
Map of Study area is given in Figure 3-16.
Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report
Page 70
Figure 3-16 Physiography Map of the Study Area
Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report
Page 71
3.6.13 Cyclones & Depressions, Winds and Coastal Erosion in PIA District
Bangalore urban district is facing the brunt of moderate to severe floods. Floods are associated
with cloud bursts, cyclones or depressions in the Bay of Bengal and Arabian Sea. The floods
are quite common in Bangalore Urban District. As per Karnataka wind hazard map Bangalore
Urban district is falling under low damage risk zone. Karnataka wind Hazard Map is given in
Figure 3-17.
Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report
Page 72
Figure 3-17 Wind Hazard Map of Karnataka
Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report
Page 73
3.6.14 Seismicity
As per the IS:1893 (Part-1) 2002 of Bureau of Indian Standards (BIS), the project location/study
area falls in Zone II, which is categorised as a Low risk zone. The seismicity map of India is
shown in Figure 3-18.
Figure 3-18 Seismicity Map of India3.7 Air Environment
Project Site
Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report
Page 74
Baseline ambient air quality assessment gives the status in the vicinity of site and is an
indispensable part of environmental impact assessment studies. Significant changes, in
predominant winds and weather conditions are observed in winter, summer and post-monsoon
seasons apart from the local topographic influences. The baseline status of air environment in
the study area is assessed through a systematic air quality surveillance programme.
3.7.1 Meteorological Conditions
The regional air quality is influenced by the meteorology of that region. The principal weather
parameters that influence the concentration of the air pollutants in the surroundings are wind
speed, wind direction and temperature. The meteorological data is useful for proper
interpretation of the baseline data. It is used as input for air quality dispersion models for
predicting the post project environmental scenario i.e. ground level concentrations due to
proposed utilities like boiler & DG sets, etc.
3.7.2 Meteorological Data Collection
Available secondary data pertaining to the meteorological parameters was obtained from the
IMD Climatalogical tables. In addition, baseline meteorological data (primary data) was
generated during the Post-monsoon Season (Sep to Nov 2016). The methodology adopted for
monitoring surface observations is as per the standard norms laid down by Bureau of Indian
Standards (BIS) i.e. IS:8829 and Indian Meteorological Department (IMD).
3.7.3 General Meteorological Scenario based on IMD Data
The nearest Indian Meteorological Department (IMD) station located to project site is Bangalore.
The Climatological data for Bangalore (12 58’ N and 77o 35’ E), published by the IMD, based
on daily observations at 08:30 and 17:30 hour IST for a 30 year period, is presented in the
following sections on the meteorological conditions of the region. The monthly variations of the
relevant meteorological parameters are reproduced in Table 3-4.
Table 3-4: Climatological Summary – Bangalore Region (1971-2000)
Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report
Page 75
MonthTemp (oC) Rainfall
(mm)RelativeHumidity
(%)
Station LevelPressure
hPaMeanWind
Speed(m/s)
PredominantWind Directions
(From)*DailyMax.
DailyMin. Total No. of
days 08:30 17:30 08:30 17:30 08:30 17:30
Jan 27.4 14.2 1.8 0.0 86 42 17.0 13.3 1.58 E EFeb 30.1 15.9 7.6 0.4 77 34 17.5 12.9 1.75 E EMar 32.7 18.2 14.0 0.8 68 28 18.7 12.4 1.83 SW EApr 34.0 20.8 40.0 2.8 73 35 22.8 15.9 1.91 SW EMay 33.1 20.9 94.4 6.0 76 47 23.3 19.5 2.72 W WJun 29.8 19.8 80.5 5.0 83 63 22.8 21.9 4.69 W WJul 28.6 19.4 102.7 7.4 86 66 22.2 21.7 4.61 W WAug 28.0 19.2 116.6 9.3 88 68 22.2 21.9 4.08 W WSep 28.5 19.3 195.6 9.6 86 65 22.3 21.5 2.66 W WOct 28.0 19.0 152.0 8.7 85 66 22.1 20.6 1.69 W ENov 26.8 17.1 58.4 4.1 84 62 20.0 18.6 1.41 E EDec 26.1 15.1 17.3 1.5 87 56 18.1 16.2 1.53 E EMax. 34.0 20.9 195.6 9.6 87 68 22.3 21.9 4.69Min. 26.1 14.2 1.8 0.4 68 28 17.0 13.3 1.42Avg. 29.4 18.2 - 55.7 82 53 20.8 18.1 2.56
As per the above Climatological table the observations drawn for the study period are the
following.
Daily maximum temperature during the study period is 28.5oC and the daily minimum
temperature is 17.1oC were recorded in the months of September and November
respectively
Maximum and minimum relative humidity of 86% and 62% were recorded in the months of
September and November respectively
Maximum and minimum rainfall of 195.6 mm and 58.4 mm was recorded in the months of
September and November respectively
Total rainfall recorded during the study period is 406 mm
Maximum and minimum Mean wind speed during the study period is 2.66 m/s and 1.41 m/s.
Annual Wind predominant pattern is from West to East.
3.7.4 Meteorological Scenario during Study Period
Meteorological scenario in and around the project site is an essential requirement during study
period for proper interpretation of baseline air quality status. Meteorological data was collected
during the study period; post monsoon season (September 2016–November 2016).The wind
rose of the study period and annual wind rose is given in Figure 3-19.
Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report
Page 76
W
ES
N
SW SE
NW NE
6.25%
6.25%
6.25
%
6.25
%
12.50%
12.50%
12.5
0%
12.5
0%
18.75%
18.75%
18.7
5%
18.7
5%
25.00%
25.00%
25.0
0%
25.0
0%
31.25%
31.25%
31.2
5%
31.2
5%
37.50%
37.50%
37.5
0%
37.5
0%
43.75%
43.75%
43.7
5%
43.7
5%
50.00%
50.00%
50.0
0%
50.0
0%
00.731.462.192.913.644.375.105.83
Calm conditions ratio: 0.0%(Speed threshold: 1.0)
W
E
S
N
SW SE
NW NE
2.82%
2.82%
2.82
%
2.82
%
5.65%
5.65%
5.65
%
5.65
%
8.47%
8.47%
8.47
%
8.47
%
11.29%
11.29%
11.2
9%
11.2
9%
14.11%
14.11%
14.1
1%
14.1
1%
16.94%
16.94%
16.9
4%
16.9
4%
19.76%
19.76%
19.7
6%
19.7
6%
22.58%
22.58%
22.5
8%
22.5
8%
00.941.892.833.784.72
Calm conditions ratio: 3.2%(Speed threshold: 1.0)
September 2016 October 2016
W
E
S
N
SW SE
NW NE
3.23%
3.23%
3.23
%
3.23
%
6.45%
6.45%
6.45
%
6.45
%
9.68%
9.68%
9.68
%
9.68
%
12.90%
12.90%
12.9
0%
12.9
0%
16.13%
16.13%
16.1
3%
16.1
3%
19.35%
19.35%
19.3
5%
19.3
5%
22.58%
22.58%
22.5
8%
22.5
8%
25.81%
25.81%
25.8
1%
25.8
1%
00.631.251.882.503.133.754.385.00
Calm conditions ratio: 3.2%(Speed threshold: 1.0)
November 2016
Figure 3-19 Specific Wind rose for the Study Period
Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report
Page 77
W
E
S
N
SW SE
NW NE
1.95%
1.95%
1.95
%
1.95
%
3.90%
3.90%
3.90
%
3.90
%
5.86%
5.86%
5.86
%
5.86
%
7.81%
7.81%
7.81
%
7.81
%
9.76%
9.76%
9.76
%
9.76
%
11.71%
11.71%
11.7
1%
11.7
1%
13.66%
13.66%
13.6
6%
13.6
6%
15.62%
15.62%
15.6
2%
15.6
2%
01.222.433.654.866.087.298.519.72
Calm conditions ratio: 0.5%(Speed threshold: 1.0)
Figure 3-20 Annual Windrose (Jan 2016 - Dec 2016)Source: www.wunderground.com
3.7.4.1 Atmospheric Inversion
Atmospheric inversion level at the project site was monitored; the results observed at the site
during the study period are as follows
Average atmospheric temperature : 24.00C
Average Relative humidity : 49%
Average Wind speed : 0.83 m/s
The daily inversion level calculated based on the average temperature and average wind speed
at the project site and the maximum inversion height is derived by the graph plotted based on
the average temperature and average wind speed. The daily inversion level at the project site
varies from 50 to 1750m during 6 AM to 6 PM, the maximum recorded at 5 PM, September
2016. This is shown in Figure 3-21.
Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report
Page 78
Figure 3-21 Hourly variation of the mixing heights
3.7.4.2 Meteorological data during Study Period
The meteorological data of study period was used for interpretation of baseline status and to
simulate the meteorological conditions for prediction of impacts in modeling studies.
Meteorology Data for the Study Period (September 2016 – November 2016).
Table 3-5 : Meteorology Data for the Study Period (September – November 2016)S. No Parameter Observation
1. Temperature Min Temperature : 22.00CMax Temperature : 26.00CAvg Temperature : 23.70C
2. Relative Humidity Range 32 to 80%3. Wind Speed Range 3.5 m/s4. Predominant Wind Direction Sept 2016-WSW
Oct 2016-NENov 2016-ENE
3.7.5 Ambient Air Quality
The selection criteria for monitoring locations are based on the following:
Topography/Terrain
Meteorological conditions
Residential and sensitive areas within the study area
Representatives of regional background air quality/pollution levels and
Representation of likely impacted areas
3.7.5.1 Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Stations
Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report
Page 79
To evaluate the baseline air quality of the study area, Eight (08) monitoring locations have been
identified as per IMD Climatological data-Bangalore Region (1971-2000).The annual wind
predominat is from West to East,
Map showing the monitoring locations are given as Error! Reference source not found. and the
details of the locations are given in Table 3-6.
Table 3-6: Details of Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Locations
StationCode Location Type of
Wind Geographical CoordinatesDistance (km)from Project
boundaryAzimuth
Directions
A1 Project Site - 12°47'7.77"N 77°38'56.25"E --A2 Jigani U/W 12°47'12.46"N 77°38'16.00"E 1.0 WNWA3 Doddathoguru C/W 12°50'58.20"N 77°39'15.70"E 6.9 NA4 Bommasandra D/W 12°48'29.73"N 77°42'1.30"E 5.8 ENEA5 Ramakrishnapura D/W 12°46'58.12"N 77°41'42.57"E 4.7 EA6 Byagadadenahalli C/W 12°45'7.48"N 77°42'6.16"E 6.6 SEA7 Indalavadi C/W 12°43'43.65"N 77°38'27.15"E 5.8 SSWA8 Hullahalli C/W 12°49'32.01"N 77°36'55.95"E 5.5 NW
3.7.5.2 Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Techniques and Frequency
Ambient air quality was monitored twice in a week for One (01) season (shall cover 12 weeks),
i.e. during Post Monsoon season (September to November, 2016).
PM10, PM2.5, SO2, NOx, Pb, NH3, C6H6, C20H12, As, Ni, were monitored on 24 hourly basis and
O3 and CO were monitored on eight hourly basis and VOC, Cl, HCl, HBr & H2S are monitored
on 2 hrly basis. Sampling was carried out as per Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB)
monitoring guidelines at each location. Analytical methods used for analysis of parameters are
given in Table 3-7.
Table 3-7: Analytical Methods for Analysis of Ambient Air Quality Parameters
S.No Parameters Analytical method NAAQ standards: 2009 Sampling Time
1 Sulphur Dioxide (SO2),μg/m3
IS:5182(Part-2):2001(Reaff:2006) 50 (Annual) 80(24 Hours) 24 Hours
2 Nitrogen Dioxide (NO2),μg/m3 IS: 5182 (Part - 6): 2006 40 (Annual) 80 (24 Hours) 24 Hours
3 Particulate Matter(PM2.5), μg/m3 IS: 5182 (Part - 23): 2006 40 (Annual) 60 (24 hours) 24 Hours
4 Particulate Matter(PM10), μg/m3 IS:5182 (Part– 23): 2006 60 (Annual) 100 (24 hours) 24 Hours
Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report
Page 80
5 CO mg/m3 IS:5182(Part–10):1999(Reaff:2006) 2 (8 hours) 4 (1hour) 8 Hours
6 Pb μg/m3 IS:5182(Part–22):2004(Reaff:2006) 0.5(Annual) 1(24 hours) 24 Hours
7 O3, μg/m3 IS: 5182 (Part – 9): 1974 100(8hours) 180 (1hour) 8 Hours
8 NH3, μg/m3 APHA(air) 2nd edition(Indophenol-blue method) 100(Annual) 400(24 hours) 8 Hours
9 Benzene, μg/m3 IS:5182(Part–11):1999(RA:2009) 5 (Annual) 5 (Annual) 24 Hours
10 Benzo (a) pyrene,ng/m3 IS:5182(Part–12):2004(RA:2009) 1 (Annual) 1 (Annual) 24 Hours
11 Arsenic, ng/ m3 APHA (air) 2nd edition 6 (Annual) 6 (Annual) 24 Hours
12 Volatile OrganicCompounds (ppm)
PID (Photo-Ionization Detection)Method -- -- 2 Hours
13 Chlorine (µg/m3) IS 5182 (part 19):1982(Ref 2003) -- -- 2 Hours
14 Hydrochloric acid(µg/m3) NIOSH Method -- -- 2 Hours
15 Hydrobromic acid(µg/m3) NIOSH Method -- -- 2 Hours
16 Hydrogen sulphide(µg/m3) IS 5182 (part 7) : 1973(Ref 2003) -- -- 2 Hours
17 Hydrogen fluoride(µg/m3) NIOSH Method -- -- 2 Hours
3.7.5.3 Results and Discussions
The variations of the pollutants PM10, PM2.5, SO2, NOx, CO, Pb, O3 , NH3 , C6H6, C20 H12, As, Ni,
VOC, Cl, HCl, HBr & H2S are compared with National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS),
MoEF&CC Notification, November, 2009. Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Data (September to
November, 2016) for the study area is given in Table 3-8 to Table 3-17 and trends of measured
ambient concentration in the study area were graphically represented in Figure 3-22 to Figure3-28
Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report
Page 81
Table 3-8: Summary of the average baseline concentrations of pollutants
S.No Location Name SO2(µg/m3)
NO2(µg/m3)
PM10(µg/m3
PM2.5(µg/m3
Pb(µg/m3)
CO(mg/m3) O3
(µg/m3)NH3
(µg/m3)Benzen(µg/m3)
Benzo(a)
pyrene(ng/m3)
Arsenic(As)(ng/m3)
Nickel (Ni)(ng/m3)
1 Project Site 11.0 24.7 50.26 24.19 BDL(DL 0.05) 0.019 17.11 7.1
BDL(DL 1)
BDL(DL 1)
BDL(DL 2)
BDL(DL 10)
2 Jigani 11.1 24.9 60.4 27.2 BDL(DL 0.05) 0.012 13.3 6.44
BDL(DL 1)
BDL(DL 1)
BDL(DL 2)
BDL(DL 10)
3 Doddathoguru 10.6 21.7 58.3 25.3 BDL(DL 0.05) 0.013 12.6 5.87
BDL(DL 1)
BDL(DL 1)
BDL(DL 2)
BDL(DL 10)
4 Bommasandra 8.7 17.6 48.4 19.5 BDL(DL 0.05) 0.01 14.1 5.64
BDL(DL 1)
BDL(DL 1)
BDL(DL 2)
BDL(DL 10)
5 Ramakrishnapura 9.5 20.5 56.6 24.7 BDL(DL 0.05) 0.012 11.3 5.35
BDL(DL 1)
BDL(DL 1)
BDL(DL 2)
BDL(DL 10)
6 Byagadadenahalli 7.65 18.6 51.6 21.7 BDL(DL 0.05) 0.017
BDL(DL10)
BDL(DL 5)
BDL(DL 1)
BDL(DL 1)
BDL(DL 2)
BDL(DL 10)
7 Indalavadi 8.45 19.6 54.4 22.6 BDL(DL 0.05) 0.11 10.6 6.37
BDL(DL 1)
BDL(DL 1)
BDL(DL 2)
BDL(DL 10)
8 Hullahalli 8.01 16.4 46.6 17.9 BDL(DL 0.05)
0.011BDL
(DL10)BDL
(DL 5)
BDL(DL 1)
BDL(DL 1)
BDL(DL 2)
BDL(DL 10)
Note: BDL (Below detectable limit), DL (Detectable limit)
Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report
Page 82
Table 3-9: Summary of the average baseline concentrations of pollutants
S.No Location NameVolatile Organic
Compounds(ppm)
Chlorine(µg/m3)
Hydrochloricacid
(µg/m3)
Hydrobromicacid
(µg/m3)
Hydrogensulphide(µg/m3)
Hydrogenfluoride(µg/m3)
1 Project Site 3.71BDL
(DL 145)BDL
(DL 140)BDL
(DL 35) BDL(DL 6) BDL(DL 350)
2 Jigani 3.61BDL
(DL 145)BDL
(DL 140)BDL
(DL 35) BDL(DL 6) BDL(DL 350)
3 Doddathoguru 2.05BDL
(DL 145)BDL
(DL 140)BDL
(DL 35) BDL(DL 6) BDL(DL 350)
4 Bommasandra BDL(0.1)BDL
(DL 145)BDL
(DL 140)BDL
(DL 35) BDL(DL 6) BDL(DL 350)
5 Ramakrishnapura 1.33BDL
(DL 145)BDL
(DL 140)BDL
(DL 35) BDL(DL 6) BDL(DL 350)
6 Byagadadenahalli BDL(0.1)BDL
(DL 145)BDL
(DL 140)BDL
(DL 35) BDL(DL 6) BDL(DL 350)
7 Indalavadi BDL(0.1)BDL
(DL 145)BDL
(DL 140)BDL
(DL 35) BDL(DL 6) BDL(DL 350)
8 Hullahalli BDL(0.1)BDL
(DL 145)BDL
(DL 140)BDL
(DL 35) BDL(DL 6) BDL(DL 350)
Note: BDL (Below detectable limit), DL (Detectable limit)
Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report
Page 83
Table 3-10: Ambient PM10 Monitoring Data
S.No Location Name PM10 Concentration g/m³Minimum µg/m3 Maximum, µg/m3 Average, µg/m3 98th Percentile
1 Project Site 47.5 55.3 50.3 28.12 Jigani 58.2 64.3 60.4 28.33 Doddathoguru 52.6 62.6 58.4 23.74 Bommasandra 44.5 55.8 48.4 25.35 Ramakrishnapura 48.3 63.5 56.6 23.56 Byagadadenahalli 46.5 55.2 51.2 23.67 Indalavadi 47.5 58.4 54.3 23.38 Hullahalli 42.3 55.2 46.6 18.5
Figure 3-22 Trends of Measured Ambient PM10 Concentrations in the Study Area
Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report
Page 84
Table 3-11: Ambient PM2.5 Monitoring Data
S.No Location NamePM2.5 Concentration, µg/m3
Minimumµg/m3
Maximum,µg/m3
Average,µg/m3
98thPercentile
1 Project Site 18.4 28.5 24.2 28.02 Jigani 23.2 29.5 27.2 29.33 Doddathoguru 23.2 27.5 25.3 27.34 Bommasandra 13.1 23.1 19.5 23.15 Ramakrishnapura 20.8 27.2 24.6 27.16 Byagadadenahalli 18.4 29.5 21.7 29.07 Indalavadi 18.4 25.6 22.6 25.58 Hullahalli 13.3 23.1 17.9 23.1
Figure 3-23: Trends of Measured Ambient PM2.5 Concentrations in the Study Area
Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report
Page 85
Table 3-12 : Ambient SO2 Monitoring Data
S.No Location NameSO2 Concentration, µg/m3
Minimumµg/m3 Maximum, µg/m3 Average,
µg/m398th
Percentile1 Project Site 7.80 13.8 11.0 13.62 Jigani 5.00 13.8 11.2 13.63 Doddathoguru 7.80 12.6 10.6 12.44 Bommasandra 6.10 13.5 8.70 13.25 Ramakrishnapura 7.50 12.6 9.85 12.66 Byagadadenahalli 6.40 9.80 7.65 9.807 Indalavadi 6.40 13.0 8.45 11.58 Hullahalli 6.40 9.80 8.00 9.75
Figure 3-24: Trends of Measured Ambient SO2 Concentrations in the Study Area
Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report
Page 86
Table 3-13: Ambient NO2 Monitoring Data
S.No Location Name
NO2 Concentration, µg/m3
Minimumµg/m3
Maximumµg/m3
Averageµg/m3 98th Percentile
1 Project Site 20.4 29.1 24.7 28.12 Jigani 21.2 28.6 24.9 28.33 Doddathoguru 15.6 23.8 21.7 23.74 Bommasandra 11.6 26.8 17.7 25.35 Ramakrishnapura 17.8 23.6 20.4 23.56 Byagadadenahalli 10.2 23.6 18.6 23.67 Indalavadi 13.8 23.5 19.7 23.38 Hullahalli 12.4 19.2 16.4 18.5
Figure 3-25: Trends of Measured Ambient NO2 Concentrations in the Study Area
Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report
Page 87
Table 3-14: Ambient Carbon Monoxide (CO) Monitoring Data
S.No Location NameCO Concentration, mg/m3
Minimummg/m3
Maximummg/m3
Averagemg/m3 98th Percentile
1 Project Site 0.005 0.170 0.019 0.1012 Jigani 0.005 0.022 0.012 0.0213 Doddathoguru 0.005 0.018 0.013 0.0184 Bommasandra 0.005 0.019 0.011 0.0195 Ramakrishnapura 0.005 0.018 0.012 0.0186 Byagadadenahalli 0.005 0.009 0.017 0.009
7 Indalavadi 0.010 0.210 0.111 0.2018 Hullahalli 0.005 0.013 0.011 0.011
Note: - BDL = Below Detectable Limit
Figure 3-26: Trends of Measured Ambient CO Concentrations in the Study Area
Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report
Page 88
Table 3-15: Ambient Ozone (O3) Monitoring Data
S.No Location NameO3 Concentration, µg/m3
Minimumµg/m3
Maximumµg/m3
Averageµg/m3 98th Percentile
1 Project Site 14.6 19.4 17.0 19.02 Jigani 11.2 16.5 13.9 16.43 Doddathoguru 10.2 14.6 12.4 14.64 Bommasandra 10.5 15.6 13.1 15.55 Ramakrishnapura 11.2 13.5 12.4 13.56 Byagadadenahalli 10.2 13.6 11.9 13.67 Indalavadi 10.4 11.2 10.8 11.98 Hullahalli 10.6 14.6 12.6 15.2
Figure 3-27: Trends of Measured Ambient O3 Concentrations in the Study Area
Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report
Page 89
Table 3-16: Ambient Ammonia (NH3) Monitoring Data
S.No Location NameNH3 Concentration, µg/m3
Minimumµg/m3
Maximumµg/m3
Averageµg/m3 98th Percentile
1 Project Site 4.80 8.80 7.11 8.752 Jigani 5.40 7.28 6.42 7.27
3 Doddathoguru 4.20 7.50 5.86 7.39
4 Bommasandra 4.50 7.60 5.64 7.42
5 Ramakrishnapura BDL(DL5) BDL(DL5) BDL(DL5) BDL(DL5)
6 Byagadadenahalli 4.20 6.50 4.91 6.36
7 Indalavadi 4.80 7.29 6.39 7.29
8 Hullahalli BDL(DL5) BDL(DL5) BDL(DL5) BDL(DL5)
Figure 3-28: Trends of Measured Ambient NH3 Concentrations in the Study Area
Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report
Page 90
Table 3-17: Ambient Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) Monitoring Data
S.No Location NameVOCs Concentration, µg/m3
Minimumµg/m3
Maximumµg/m3
Averageµg/m3 98th Percentile
1 Project Site 2.10 5.50 3.75 5.50
2 Jigani 2.10 5.40 3.60 5.40
3 Doddathoguru 1.20 4.70 2.53 4.704 Bommasandra BDL(DL0.1) BDL(DL0.1) BDL(DL0.1) BDL(DL0.1)
5 Ramakrishnapura 0.05 3.00 1.30 3.006 Byagadadenahalli BDL(DL0.1) BDL(DL0.1) BDL(DL0.1) BDL(DL0.1)
7 Indalavadi BDL(DL0.1) BDL(DL0.1) BDL(DL0.1) BDL(DL0.1)
8 Hullahalli BDL(DL0.1) BDL(DL0.1)BDL(DL0.1)
BDL(DL0.1)
Note: - BDL = Below Detectable Limit
3.7.5.4 Observations
Maximum concentrations of PM10, PM2.5, SO2, NOx, CO, Pb, O3 , NH3 , C6H6, C20 H12, As, Ni
VOC, Cl, HCl, HBr & H2S are well within the National Ambient Air Quality Standards for
Industrial, Commercial and Residential areas at all monitoring locations during the study period.
3.8 Noise Environment
The prevailing ambient noise level at a particular location is nothing but the resultant (total) of all
kinds of noise sources existing at various distances around that location. The ambient noise
level at a location varies continuously depending on the type of surrounding activities.
Ambient noise levels have been established by monitoring noise levels at eight (08) locations in
and around 10Km distance from project area during September to November, 2016 using
precision noise level meter. The noise monitoring locations in the study area were selected after
giving due consideration to the various land use categories. The land use categories include
commercial, residential, rural and sensitive areas. Noise levels were recorded on an hourly
basis for one complete day at each location using pre- calibrated noise levels. A map showing
the monitoring locations is given in Figure 3-34.
3.8.1 Results and Discussions
Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report
Page 91
Based on the recorded hourly noise levels at each monitoring location, the day equivalent (Ld)
and night equivalent (Ln) were calculated;
Ld: Average noise levels between 6:00 hours to 22.00 hours.
Ln: Average noise levels between 22:00 hours to 6.00 hours.
The Day-Night (Ldn) equivalent noise levels were calculated using the US Environmental
Protection Agency formula:
Ldn = 10 Log [0.0416 {16 (10Ld/10) + 8 (10Ln+10/10)}]
The comparison of day equivalent noise levels (Ld) and night equivalent noise levels (Ln) with
the respective CPCB stipulated noise standards for various land use categories are shown in
theTable 3-18.
Table 3-18: Day and Night Equivalent Noise Levels
S.No Location Location
Code
Distance(km) from
Projectboundary
AzimuthDirection
Noise level indB(A) Leq CPCB Standard
EnvironmentalSettingDay Night Lday (Ld) LNight
(Ln)
1. Project Site N1 - 73.4 71.5 75 70 Industrial2. Jigani N2 1 WNW 77.3 71.0 75 70 Industrial3. Doddathoguru N3 6.9 N 78.1 73.5 55 45
Residential
4. Bommasandra N4 5.8 ENE 67.2 61.4 55 455. Ramakrishnapura N5 4.7 E 73.6 69.4 55 456. Byagadadenahalli N6 6.6 SE 78.0 73.6 55 457. Indalavadi N7 5.8 SSW 84.5 78.0 55 458. Hullahalli N8 5.5 NW 83.9 78.9 55 45
3.8.2 Observations
It is observed that the day equivalent and night equivalent noise levels at all locations are within
prescribed CPCB standards
Day equivalent noise levels (Ld) ranged between 67.2 dB(A) to 84.5 dB (A)
Night equivalent noise levels (Ln) ranged between 61.4 dB (A) to 78.9 dB (A).
The field observations during the study period indicate that the ambient noise levels were
slightly exceeded the prescribed standards by MoEF&CC.
3.9 Water Environment3.9.1 Surface Water Resources
Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report
Page 92
There are about 109 water bodies including small and large natural/manmade within 10Km
radius from proposed project site. Realignment of storm water drainage without disturbance
shall be made in accordance with existing natural drainage forming as grid type arrangement
based on the natural slope (gravity flow) which finally discharges into major water bodies. The
study area consists of the Hennagara lake in the southern region, Ramakrishnapura lake in the
part of East South Eastern region. The Hebbagodi and Kammasandra lake in the North
Eastern/North north Eastern part from the project site. As the Bommasandra Industrial Area
estate lies in the Northeastern region, the representative surface water sampling locations have
been chosen. The List of major water bodies nearby project site is given in Table 3-19.Photographs of Existing major water bodies are given in Table 3-19.
Table 3-19: List of Major Water Bodies within 10Km radiusS.No Name of the Water bodies Distance Direction
1 Hennagara lake 3.2 SE2 Ramakrishnapura lake 4.5 ESE3 Chandapura lake 5.3 ENE4 Kammasandra Lake 5.7 NE5 Hebbagodi lake 4.9 NE6 VeerasandraKere Lake 6.3 NE7 Thirumangondan halli Lake 8.4 ENE8 Marsur Lake 7.2 ESE9 Settahalli lake 8.3 ESE
10 Meenakshi Lake 9.0 NW11 Chikka Togur lake 7.4 NNE12 Rayasandra lake 8.8 NNE13 Yelenahallikere 9.4 NW14 Muthanallur lake 8.3 ENE15 Doddkammanahalli Lake 9.3 NNW
Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report
Page 93
Hennagara Lake Chandapura Lake
Kammasandra Lake Hebbagodi lake
Figure 3-29 Photographs of existing major water bodies within the study area
Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report
Page 94
Table 3-20: Water bodies in 10km radius of Project area
S.No Name of Water body/NearestLocation
Distance fromProject Site(Km) Direction
AreaNearby villages
Centre of Water bodyAcres Hectares Latitude Longitude
1. Begur Lake9.72 NNW 116.90 47.25
Ckikka BegurGyanappanahalliSubash Nagar
120 52’25.25”
770 37’48.87”
2. Rayasandra9.05 NNE 73.06 29.57
NaganathapuraGhattihalliCudasandra
120 52’34.75”
770 41’27.05”
3. Naganathapura8.54 NNE 77.53 31.36
RayasandraDooda,Chikka NagamangalaChenna KeshavanagarSingasandra
120 52’10.75”
770 40’36.55”
4. Chenna Keshavanagar 7.06 NNE 31.04 12.59 Dooda,Chikka NagamangalaNaganathapura
120 51’56.77”
770 40’19.63”
5. Near Gulimangala8.52 NE 25.65 10.37
HuskurChikka NagamangalaShantipura
120 51’18.73”
770 41’46.83”
6. Near Shantipura6.15 NE 11.24 4.54
Chikka,Dodda NagamangalaGulimangalaGovindachettipalya
120 51’14.52”
770 41’22.50’’
7. Near Govindachettipalya7.69 NNE 15.88 6.41
Electronic CityDodda, ChikkaNagamangalaKonappana Agrahara
120 51’24.76’’
770 40’20.25”
8. Near Govindachettipalya7.74 NNE 11.74 4.76
Electronic CityDodda, ChikkaNagamangalaKonappana Agrahara
120 51’33.40”
770 39’59.56”
9. Near Chenna Keshavanagar8.39 N 15.10 6.09
SingasandraBasapuraChikka Togur
120 51’56.09”
770 39’37.66”
10. Near Subhash nagar8.79 NNW 9.54 3.82
BasapuraSingasandraChenna keshavanagarBegur
120 52’10.91”
770 38’58.89”
11. Near Subhash nagar 8.76 NNW 11.03 4.47 BasapuraSingasandra
120 52’07.49”
770 38’38.40’’
Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report
Page 95
Chenna keshavanagarBegur
12. Near Tejeswininagar 9.51 NW 1.42 0.53 GyanappanahalliBegur
120 51’58.96”
770 36’50.95”
13. Near Tejeswininagar 8..68 NW 7.4 2.98 Chikka KammanahalliBegur
120 51’33.19”
770 37’00.79”
14. Near Tejeswininagar8.26 NW 20.35 8.20
Chikka KammanahalliBegurIttasandra
120 51’28.77”
770 37’23.69”
15. Near Chikka Kammanahalli 9.19 NW 16.12 6.29 Tejeswininagar 120 51’19.48’’
770 36’13.84”
16. Near Weavers Colony 9.83 NW 28.32 11.42 VaddarpalyaChikka Kammanahalli
120 51’09.89”
770 35’24.47”
17. Near Chikka Kammanahalli 8.65 NW 4.93 2.02 Weavers ColonyTejeswininagar
120 50’55.33”
770 36’11.48”
18. Near Chikka Kammanahalli 8.07 NW 9.70 3.95 Tejeswininagar 120 51’10.95”
770 37’00.69”
19. Near Chikka Kammanahalli 7.24 NW 4.30 1.73 Bettadasanapura 120 50’57.19”
770 37’19.80”
20. Near Ittasandra 7.36 NW 12.10 4.93 VaddarpalyaBettadasanapura
120 51’12.41”
770 37’58.75’’
21. Near Vaddarpalya6.80 NNW 12.16 4.94
IttasandraChikka Togur DoddaTogurKonappana Agrahara
120 51’02.71”
770 38’39.27”
22. Near Konappana Agrahara
7.39 N 36.74 14.87
Chikka TogurBasapuraGovindachettipalya, DoddaTogurElectronic City
120 51’25.29”
770 39’32.84”
23. Near Govindachettipalya6.55 NNE 5.87 2.38 Konappana Agrahara
Electronic CityShantipuraVirsandra
120 50’51.49”
770 40’25.04”
24. Near Govindachettipalya 6.50 NNE 10.67 4.33 120 50’45.86”
770 40’26.65”
25. Near lakshminarayanapura8.45 NE 29.49 11.87
GottamaranahalliGulimangalaShantipuraChintalamadavala
120 50’49.13”
770 42’28.78”
26. Near Chintalamadavala 9.15 NE 124.51 50.35 GottamaranahalliGulimangala
120 50’46.11”
770 43’05.69”
Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report
Page 96
VaddarpalyaShingena AgraharaKaggalipuraGopasandraChikka Timmasandra
27. Muttanallur Kere
8.69 ENE 244.49 98.96
LakshmisagaraHilalige R SRamasagaraAlibommasandraMuttanallurBendiganahalliSomanahalli
120 49’19.93”
770 43’42.05”
28. Near Hilaligi5.90 ENE 24.89 10.07
BommasandraLakshmisagaraRamasagara
120 49’ 1.96” 770 42’ 9.15’’
29. Near Bangalapet(Kammasandra) 5.85 ENE 50.33 20.38
VidyanagarShree AnanthnagarVaddarpalyaHilaligi
120 49’32.34”
770 41’39.62”
30. Hebgodi Lake5.00 NE 3.64 1.46
GollahalliVirsandraShree AnanthnagarBangalapet
120 49’43.89”
770 40’49.09”
31. Near Gollahalli
4.64 NE 34.13 13.78
VirsandraHebgodiTirupalyaBangalapetShinkaripalya
120 49’52.83”
770 40’20.73’’
32. Near Gollahalli
4.18 NE 16.94 6.84
HebgodiTirupalyaMaragondanahalliVirsandraShinkaripalya
120 49’35.45” 770 40’ 3.34”
33. Near Maragondanahalli4.10 NNE 9.32 3.80
ShinkaripalyaGollahalliHebgodiTirupalya
120 49’37.86”
770 39’44.46”
34. Near Shinkaripalya4.65 NNW 18.30 7.41
MaragondanahalliElectronic CityBettadasanapura
120 50’00.71” 770 39’ 8.05”
Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report
Page 97
Podu35. Near Virsandra
5.83 NNE 13.69 5.49Shree AnanthnagarShinkaripalyaElectronic City
120 50’22.61”
770 40’29.66”
36. Near Virsandra5.75 NNE 10.12 4.11
Dodda TogurElectronic CityShinkaripalya
120 50’27.98”
770 40’14.19”
37. Near Podu5.23 NW 22.43 9.03
BinjipuraBettadasanapuraChittikarepalya
120 49’58.06”
770 37’50.66’’
38. Near Bettadasanapura 6.97 NW 9.56 3.88 Chikka Kammanahalli 120 50’41.62’’
770 37’20.83”
39. Near Chittekarepalya 6.54 NW 4.76 1.93 Dinne Palya 120 50’13.39’’ 770 37’ 1.44’’
40. Near Dinnepalya 7.06 NW 14.98 6.08 ChittikarepalyaChikka Kammanahalli
120 50’15.25”
770 36’35.93’’
41. Near Kalkere R.F 9.65 WNW 5.52 2.24 Shanuboganahalli 120 49’54.21”
770 34’31.59’’
42. Near Timmayyanadoddi 8.19 WNW 3.42 1.39 SampigeramanagaraKalkere R.F
120 49’50.09”
770 35’29.34”
43. Near Chittekarepalya6.51 NW 7.17 2.93
DinnepalyaTimmayyanadoddiHakkibikki Colony
120 49’55.32”
770 36’42.26”
44. Near Chittekarepalya 5.65 NW 9.71 3.94 BinjipuraHakkibikki Colony
120 49’48.13’’
770 37’16.31’’
45. Near Hakkibikki Colony6.42 WNW 21.32 8.65
BodigramaSalindra DoddiSampigeramanagara
120 49’35.88”
770 36’20.92”
46. Near Hakkibikki Colony5.55 WNW 49.07 19.85
Salindra DoddiChittekarepalyaBodigramaChinnagodanapalya
120 49’18.45”
770 36’48.79”
47. Near Sampigeramanagara7.60 WNW 13.31 5.39
BodigramaSalindra DoddiLakshmipura
120 49’27.19’’
770 35’34.36’’
48. Near Bingipura4.51 NW 10.35 4.19
HulimangalaChinnagodanapalyaHakkibikki Colony
120 49’20.51”
770 37’38.86”
49. Near Hulimangala 3.86 NW 50.59 20.48 Kempapura 120 49 7.05” 770 37’
Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report
Page 98
BinjipuraChinnagodanapalya
55.94”
50. Near nanjapura2.55 NNW 14.89 6.02
VabsandraHulimangalaKempapuraKyalasanahalli
120 48’36.72”
770 38’34.10”
51. Near Kyalasanahalli1.41 NNW 17.84 7.14
SrirampuraVabsandraTarandahalliKachanayakanahalli Colony
120 48’15.22”
770 39’18.09”
52. Near Yarandahalli2.09 NNE 8.26 3.35
SrirampuraKachanayakanahalli ColonyVabsandra
120 48’22.46” 770 40’ 4.10”
53. Near Kachanayakanahalli Colony2.49 ENE 21.92 8.84
YarandahalliSrirampuraYellamana MandiraKachanayakanahalli
120 48’ 9.40” 770 40’35.24”
54. Near Bommasandra IndustrialArea 4.17 ENE 23.26 9.39
YarandahalliKachanayakanahalliBommasandraChandapura
120 48’31.50”
770 41’20.84’’
55. Chandapura Lake5.29 ENE 23.83 9.67
KittiganahalliBommasandraHale ChandapuraLakshmisagara
120 48’20.05”
770 42’17.88”
56. Near Hale Chandapura
6.74 ENE 9.09 3.67
ChandapuraKittiganahalliHilaligiBommasandraLakshmisagaraGuddehatti
120 48’18.64” 770 43’ 0.47”
57. Near Bendiganahalli9.51 ENE 15.66 6.41
Ambedkar ColonyHale ChandapuraLakshmisagaraGuddehatti
120 48’38.53”
770 44’31.42”
58. Near Guddehatti9.25 E 8.36 3.34
Ambedkar ColonyHale ChandapuraLakshmisagaraBendiganahalliNeralur
120 47’98.58”
770 44’29.59”
59. Near Guddehatti 9.65 E 14.82 5.99 120 47’55.24”
770 44’41.87’
Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report
Page 99
Yadavanhalli60. Near Neralur
7.10 E 43.03 17.32
TirumagondanahalliChandapuraHale ChandapuraSainagarAmbedkarnagar
120 47’49.51”
770 43’18.35’’
61. Near Tirumagondanahalli6.60 ESE 8.4 3.37
NeralurSainagarIgaluruBanahalli
120 47’29.22” 770 43’ 2.73’’
62. Near Sai nagar
8.53 E 1.39 0.57
NeralurTirumagondanahalliYadavanhalliAmbedkarnagarBaligaranahalli
120 47’16.47’’ 770 44’ 2.84’’
63. Near Mastenahalli0.69 ENE 15.81 6.42
HosahalliHennagaraSrirampuraBandenalasandra
120 47’32.94’’
770 39’47.98’’
64. Near Bandenalasandra0.42 N 21.36 8.64
KyalasanahalliSrirampuraMastenahalliJigani market
120 47’41.58’’
770 39’13.42”
65. Jigani Kere
2.24 WNW 194.56 78.70
KoppaKyalasanahalliBandenalasandraHolamanchinahalliHarapanahalli
120 47’45.19’’
770 37’54.78’’
66. Bidarakere4.70 WNW 74.06 30.01
NalsandraKoppaBegihalli
120 48’ 2.17” 770 36’37.34”
67. Near Manatapa
6.41 WNW 40.53 16.4
JangalpalyaRamasandraNalsandraKariappanahalliHullakasavanahalli
120 48’35.77’’ 770 36’ 0.53’’
68. Near Jangalpalya6.90 WNW 5.90 2.38
RamasandraNalsandraKariappanahalliHullakasavanahalli
120 48’49.43”
770 35’42.95”
Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report
Page 100
Manatapa69. Near Sampigehalli
8.14 W 17.57 7.11VajarahalliKariappanahalliJangalpalyaKempanayakanahalli
120 48’23.96’’
770 34’54.44’’
70. Near Begihalli 4.29 W 6.73 2.69 VaddarapalyaHarapanahalli
120 47’37.91’’
770 36’29.60’’
71. Near Ramasagara4.22 WSW 3.96 1.60
VaddarapalyaHarapanahalliBukkasagara
120 46’57.63”
770 36’55.12’’
72. Near Ramasagara3.34 WSW 11.58 4.70
HarapanahalliBukkasagaraHolamanchinahalli
120 47’ 1.30’’ 770 37’20.43’
73. Near Kallabalu 3.92 WSW 8.83 3.54 BukkasagaraJigani Industrial Area
120 46’24.34”
770 37’16.01’’
74. Hennagara Kere
2.72 ESE 399.65 161.73
MastenahalliHennagaraRajapuraSitanayakanahalliVaddarpalyaHolamanchinahalliBandenalasandra
120 46’38.80’’
770 39’40.59’’
75. Near Rajapura2.81 ESE 69.90 28.29
HinnakkiSitanayakanahalliLingapuraHennagara
120 46’23.58”
770 40’38.55”
76. Ramakrishnapura Lake 4.46 ESE 12.80 5.09 HinnakkiIgaluruNaganayanahalli
120 46’40.06”
770 41’45.54”
77. Near Ramakrishnapura 5.34 E 17.39 7.06 120 46’51.31”
770 42’15.67”
78. Near Adesonatti
7.05 ESE 22.29 9.01
BandapuraMadivalaMarasurNaganayanahalliRamakrishnapura
120 46’23.48” 770 43’ 9.61”
79. Near baligaranahalli
8.86 ESE 29.01 11.72
IchanguruVeddarayapalyaKrishnasagaraAmbedkarnagarBandapura
120 46’35.15”
770 44’14.70”
Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report
Page 101
80. Near Kambalipura9.28 ESE 96.24 38.92
MadivalaMutsandraShettihalliMaisandra
120 45’25.93” 770 44’ 6.66”
81. Near Shettihalli7.22 SE 121.97 49.37
MarasurByagadadenahalliHaleuruAvadenahalliTattanahalli
120 45’12.57”
770 42’50.38”
82. Near Shettihalli8.34 SE 55.73 22.53 120 44’
57.51”770 43’18.30”
83. Near Murasur6.40 SE 11.63 4.79
HaleuruNaganayakanahalli,Byagadadenhalli
120 45’39.34”
770 42’29.08”
84. Near Naganayakanahalli4.39 ESE 16.59 6.72
HinnakiLingapuraDodda HagadeMarasur
120 46’10.68”
770 41’29.32”
85. Near Dyavasandra3.20 SW 45.38 18.37
HaragaddeVaddarapalyaWayanahalliBommandahalli
120 45’30.70” 770 39’ 8.30”
86. Near Konasandra3.34 WSW 15.29 6.20
DyavasandraBommandahalliVaddarapalya
120 45’36.88”
770 38’31.34”
87. Near Konasandra2.91 WSW 17.43 7.04
VaddarapalyaJigani Industrial AreaMahanthalingapura
120 45’54.56”
770 38’19.09”
88. Near Jigani Industrial Area3.01 WSW 15.22 6.16
MahanthalingapuraVaddarapalyaKonasandra
120 46’13.44”
770 37’57.79”
89. Near Mahanthalingapura5.01 WSW 6.51 2.69
KallabaluGiddanehalliGoninayakanadoddiKasinakuntedoddi
120 45’55.56”
770 36’52.46”
90. Near Kunmadiwala6.53 ESE 41.47 16.81
ByagadadenhalliChennaha AgraharaAvadenahalli
120 44’51.43” 770 42’ 4.07”
91. Near Yellamnanapalya5.26 ESE 12.97 5.22
Kun MadiwalaDodda HagadeByagadadenhalli
120 45’ 9.21” 770 41’20.53”
92. Near Sappanalli 4.25 ESE 19.59 7.89 Dodda Hagade 120 45’ 770 40’
Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report
Page 102
YellamnanapalyaWayanahalli
11.74” 30.06”
93. Near Kumbarnahalli4.01 SSE 8.56 3.43
NosenuruHaragaddeDyavasandra
120 45’ 6.42” 770 39’40.14”
94. Near Krishnanadoddi 6.31 SE 4.89 1.99 Ragihalli 120 45’ 0.85” 770 36’41.06”
95. Near Jekkanahalla 8.27 SW 14.62 5.91 HebbalaHuruganadoddi
120 43’44.64”
770 36’26.79”
96. Near Nosenuru4.92 SSE 25.62 10.36
Nosenuru GollahalliKumbarnahalliSuragijakkanahalli
120 44’35.18”
770 39’26.78”
97. Near Yellamnanapalya5.62 ESE 12.76 5.18
Dodda HagadeByagadadenhalliKunmadiwala
120 45’ 8.73’’ 770 41’20.83”
98. Near Chikka hagade6.65 SE 200.38 81.02
Chennena AgraharaVaderahalliHosakoteKempu Vedarahalli
120 44’13.69”
770 41’35.90”
99. Near Dodda Hagade5.78 SE 10.82 4.40
SoppanalliKempu VedarahalliChennena AgraharaChikka hagade
120 44’34.78” 770 41’ 1.75”
100. Near Medihalli8.59 SE 108.26 43.79
GourenahalliBodrahalliAnekalKaval Hosahalli
120 42’56.25” 770 41’ 5.16’
101. Near Kembu Vedarahalli6.43 SE 18.60 7.5
SuragijakkanahalliVaddarapalyaChikka hagade
120 44’7.56” 770 40’52.51”
102. Near Suragijakkanahalli6.51 SSE 12.36 5.02
VaddarapalyaChikka hagadeKembu VedarahalliHonnakalasapura
120 44\ 4.55” 770 40’30.21”
103. Near Honnakalasapura7.32 SSE 21.99 8.89
Sidi HosakoteSiddanapalyaGourenahalli
120 43’31.20”
770 40’39.45”
104. Near Gourenahalli7.87 SSE 12.73 5.11
MedihalliSiddanapalyaAaiyanapalya
120 43’ 7.10” 770 40’18.96”
Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report
Page 103
105. Near Aduru6.21 SSE 16.70 6.72
VaddarapalyaSonnayakanapuraNosenuru Gollahalli
120 43’54.51” 770 39’ 7.95”
106. Near Sonnayakanapura6.95 SSE 9.06 3.66
SiddanapalyaAaiyanapalyaTimmasandraNagaiyanadoddi
120 43’25.03”
770 39’19.00”
107. Near Chikkanahalli7.73 SSW 7.24 2.98
TimmasandraNagaiyanadoddiIndlavadipura
120 43’ 4.94” 770 38’52.48”
108. Near Indlavadipura8.16 SSW 5.85 2.3
TimmasandraNagaiyanadoddiNallaiyanadoddi
120 42’54.69”
770 38’34.00”
109. Near Kadujakkanahalli5.69 SSW 12.04 4.80
Nosenuru GollahalliAduruIndlavadi
120 44’15.45”
770 38’23.96”
110. 3512.01 1420.24
Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report
Page 104
3.9.1.1 Surface Water Quality Assessment
To establish the baseline status of water environment, the existing representative sampling
locations for surface water within a radial distance of 10Km from project site have been
selected as per CPCB guidelines of Water Quality Monitoring through an adequate survey of
the project area. Test methods used for the analysis of water quality parameters is given in
Table 3-21.
Table 3-21: Test methods used for the analysis of water quality parametersS. No Parameter Measured Test Method
1 pH (at 25°C) IS:3025 (Part - 11): 1983 (Reaff: 2006)2 Electrical Conductivity IS:3025 (Part - 14): 1983 (Reaff: 2006)3 Color IS:3025 (Part- 4) 1983 (Reaff 2006)4 Total Hardness as CaCO3 IS:3025 (Part - 21) 1983 (Reaff 2006)5 Total Alkalinity as CaCO3 IS:3025,1 (Part - 23) 1986 (Reaff 2009)6 Cadmium IS:3025 (Part 41) 19917 Chloride as Cl IS:3025 (Part - 32) 1988(Reaff 2009)8 Total Dissolved Solids IS:3025:1(Part - 16) 1984 (Reaff 2006)9 Aluminium as Al IS:3025 (Part - 55) 2003 (Reaff 2009)
10 Chromium as Cr IS:3025 (Part - 52) 2003 (Reaff 2009)11 Lead as Pb IS:3025 (Part - 47) 1994 (Reaff 2009)12 Zinc as Zn IS:3025 (Part - 49) 1994 (Reaff 2009)13 Sodium as Na IS:3025,5(Part - 45) 1993 (Reaff 2006)14 Temperature IS:3025 (Part - 9) 1983 (Reaff 2006)15 Chemical oxygen demand as O2 IS:3025 (Part-58)-200616 Dissolved Oxygen (mg/l) IS:3025 (Part - 38)1989 (Reaff 2009)17 Salinity -18 Copper as Cu IS:3025 (Part - 42)1992 (Reaff: 2009)19 BOD,5 days @200C as O2 5210B APHA22nd Edn 2012
The prevailing status of water quality at eight sampling locations each for ground water and
surface water has been assessed during September – November 2016 are presented in
Table 3-22. Surface water quality results are provided in Table 3-23. A map showing the
monitoring locations is given in Figure 3-35.
Table 3-22: Details of Surface water sampling locations
S.No Name of the Water body Distance from ProjectBoundary
Direction fromproject boundary
1 Hennagara lake 3.2 SE2 Ramakrishnapura
lake 4.5 ESE
3 Chandapura lake 5.3 ENE4 Kammasandra
Lake 5.7 NE
5 Hebbagodi lake 4.9 NE6 Chikka Togur Lake 7.4 NNE7 Meenakshi Lake 9.0 NW8 Bommandahalli 4.7 ENE
Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report
Page 105
Table 3-23: Surface water Monitoring Results
S.No Parameters Units
DWStandards
(IS10500:2012)Acceptable
Limit
SW-1 SW-2 SW-3 SW-4 SW-5 SW-6 SW-7 SW-8
1 Source - - Lake Lake Lake Lake Lake Lake Lake Lake
2 Colour Hazen 5 BDL(DL 1.0)
BD(DL 1.0)
BDL(DL 1.0)
BDL(DL 1.0)
BDL(DL 1.0)
BDL(DL 1.0)
BDL(DL 1.0)
BDL(DL 1.0)
3 pH at 25°C - 6.5 to 8.5 7.17 7.26 7.32 7.63 7.12 7.42 7.35 7.45
4 Turbidity NTU 1 25.4 2.80 1.80 13.3 2.10 1.80 2.5 1.60
5 Total SuspendedSolids mg/l - 22.3 8.10 4.70 15.6 4.50 3.00 5.6 3.00
6 ElectricalConductivity@25◦C µmhos/cm - 1850 1960 1530 368 752 137 345 127
7 Total DissolvedSolids mg/l 500 1208 1335 933 213 462 234.0 221 216
8 Total Alkalinity asCaCO3
mg/l 200 375 448 347 50.8 61.8 52.0 44.5 48.0
9 Total Hardness asCaCO3
mg/l 200 799 891 583 90 173 110 112 104
10 Calcium as Ca mg/l 75 145 172 152 22.0 40.2 31.7 28.7 26.9
11 Magnesium as Mg mg/l 30 106 112 49.3 8.45 17.5 7.45 12.4 8.90
12 Sodium as Na mg/l - 71.7 76.5 48.1 15.6 88.3 31.70 55.7 26.8
13 Potassium as K mg/l - 19.2 15.3 14.8 7.60 8.60 5.64 11.2 6.66
14 Chloride as Cl mg/l 250 327 317 166 45.2 188 51.6 187 39.7
15 Sulphate as SO4 mg/l 200 56.0 49.7 45.1 28.2 23.5 32.6 35.6 27.30
16 Carbonate mg/l - - - - - - - - -
17 Bicarbonate mg/l - 458 546 423 62.0 75.4 77.5 65.1 62.8
Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report
Page 106
18 Nitrate as NO3 mg/l 45 5.41 2.47 6.85 6.75 6.42 3.46 3.20 5.74
19 Fluoride as F mg/l 1 0.52 0.20 0.64 0.34 0.23 0.43 BDL(DL 0.5) 1.17
20 Sulphides mg/l 0.05 BDL(DL1) BDL(DL1) BDL(DL1) BDL(DL1) BDL(DL1) BDL(DL1) BDL(DL1) BDL(DL1)
21 % Sodium % - 15.9 15.5 14.6 25.4 51.1 37.1 46.94 34.2
22 Residual SodiumCarbonate (RSC) - - 2.9 0.7 0.9 1.1 1.1 1.3 1.5 1.1
23 Oil & Grease mg/l - BDL(DL4) BDL(DL4) BDL(DL4) BDL(DL4) BDL(DL4) BDL(DL4) BDL(DL4) BDL(DL4)
24 Arsenic mg/l 0.01 BDL(DL0.005)
BDL(DL0.005)
BDL(DL0.005)
BDL(DL0.005)
BDL(DL0.005)
BDL(DL0.005)
BDL(DL0.005)
BDL(DL0.005)
25 Cyanide mg/l 0.05 BDL(DL0.01)
BDL(DL0.01)
BDL(DL0.01)
BDL(DL0.01)
BDL(DL0.01)
BDL(DL0.01)
BDL(DL0.01)
BDL(DL0.01)
26 Cadmium mg/l 0.003 BDL(DL0.01)
BDL(DL0.01)
BDL(DL0.01)
BDL(DL0.01)
BDL(DL0.01)
BDL(DL0.01)
BDL(DL0.01)
BDL(DL0.01)
27 Chromium mg/l 0.05 BDL(DL0.05)
BDL(DL0.05)
BDL(DL0.05)
BDL(DL0.05)
BDL(DL0.05)
BDL(DL0.05)
BDL(DL0.05)
BDL(DL0.05)
28 Copper mg/l 0.05 0.045 BDL(DL0.01) 0.032 0.045 BDL
(DL0.01)BDL
(DL0.01)BDL
(DL0.01)BDL
(DL0.01)
29 Iron mg/l 0.3 0.03 0.16 0.09 0.24 0.22 0.56 6.13 0.89
30 Lead mg/l 0.01 BDL(DL0.1)
BDL(DL0.1)
BDL(DL0.1)
BDL(DL0.1)
BDL(DL0.1)
BDL(DL0.1)
BDL(DL0.1)
BDL(DL0.1)
32 Manganese mg/l 0.1 BDL(DL0.05)
BDL(DL0.05)
BDL(DL0.05)
BDL(DL0.05)
BDL(DL0.05)
BDL(DL0.05)
BDL(DL0.05)
BDL(DL0.05)
33 Mercury mg/l 0.001 BDL(DL0.001)
BDL(DL0.001)
BDL(DL0.001)
BDL(DL0.001)
BDL(DL0.001)
BDL(DL0.001)
BDL(DL0.001)
BDL(DL0.001)
34 Nickel mg/l 0.02 BDL(DL0.05)
BDL(DL0.05)
BDL(DL0.05)
BDL(DL0.05)
BDL(DL0.05)
BDL(DL0.05)
BDL(DL0.05)
BDL(DL0.05)
Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report
Page 107
35 Selenium mg/l 0.01 BDL(DL0.005)
BDL(DL0.005)
BDL(DL0.005)
BDL(DL0.005)
BDL(DL0.005)
BDL(DL0.005)
BDL(DL0.005)
BDL(DL0.005)
36 Zinc mg/l 5 2.62 0.68 1.34 0.65 1.55 0.011 0.51 0.04
37 Phosphate mg/l - 0.76 1.25 0.17 BDL(DL0.02)
BDL(DL0.02)
BDL(DL0.02)
BDL(DL0.02)
BDL(DL0.02)
38 Dissolved Oxygen mg/l - 3.40 4.40 5.10 3.70 5.90 5.12 4.2 5.60
39 COD mg/l - 18.6 8.40 6.90 20.3 7.20 8.60 7.3 8.9
40 BOD, 3 Days @27°C mg/l - 12.8 4.20 3.60 13.4 3.10 4.10 3.5 3.20
Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report
Page 108
3.9.1.2 Results and Discussions
Summary of analytical results
In the surface water the pH varies between 7.12-7.63, which are meeting the IS
10500:2012 for Drinking Water.
The Total Dissolved Solids range varies between 213 mg/l – 1335 mg/l for the
surface water. The TDS value of few samples exceed the acceptable limit of IS
10500:2012
The desirable limit of the chloride content is 250mg/l and permissible limit is 1000
mg/l. The chloride content in the surface water for study area is ranges between
39.7 mg/l – 327 mg/l.
The desirable limit of the sulphate content is 200mg/l and permissible limit is
400mg/l. The sulphate content of the surface water of the study area varies
between 23.5 mg/l – 56.0 mg/l meeting the desirable limit of the IS 10500: 2012.
The Total hardness ranges is between 90 mg/l - 891 mg/l, for few samples
acceptable limit of IS 10500: 2012 exceeds.
3.9.2 Ground water resources
Ground Water Department is monitoring the changes in groundwater regime continuously
through a network of Piezometer wells fitted with Automatic water level recorders in different
hydro geological and geomorphic units. Ground water level behaviour is analysed based on
monitoring of ground water level from the network hydrograph stations (NHS) established by
CGWB.
Groundwater resource of the district has been assessed keeping in view, the sustainable and
optimum development of the resource. The estimation has been done based Ground Water
Estimation methodology (GEM)-1997.Assessment is done taking into consideration of
various hydrologic units viz. Command, non command hilly area with more than 20% slope
and poor quality area.
The groundwater potential of the gross geographical area of the basin is estimated on pro-
rata basis from the district-wise groundwater resources-2012 published by the Central
Groundwater Board (CGWB) as given in Table 3-24. Ground water level fluctuation decadal
means (May 2001 – May 2010) with May 2011 for Bangalore Urban District, Karnataka is
given in Figure 3-30.
Table 3-24: Groundwater Potential in Bengaluru Urban PIA District
Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report
Page 109
Attribute Potential /QuantityArea of the district 2190 Sq.KmNet Annual groundwater availability of the district 11723 ha-mTotal groundwater draft for irrigation, domestic and industrial uses 3794 ha-mExisting gross ground water draft for all uses 16703 ha-mDraft Exceeding the total available ground water resources leaving NilBalance Available for Exploitation Nil
Figure 3-30 Ground water level fluctuation decadal mean (May 2001 – May 2010) withMay 2011 for Bangalore Urban District, Karnataka
3.9.2.1 Ground water Quality
Total Eight (08) ground water monitoring locations were identified for assessment in different
villages around the project site based on the usage of sub surface water by the settlements/
villages in the study area. The groundwater results are compared with the desirable and
permissible water quality standards as per IS: 10500 (2012) for drinking water. Groundwater
Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report
Page 110
quality monitoring locations and results are given in Table 3-25 and Table 3-26. A map
showing the monitoring locations is given in Figure 3-35.
Table 3-25: Details of Groundwater Quality Monitoring Locations
Station Code Location Distance (km) fromProject boundary
AzimuthDirections
GW1 Near Project Site 2.60 -GW2 Jigani 1.0 WNWGW3 Doddathoguru 6.9 NGW4 Bommasandra 5.8 ENEGW5 Ramakrishnapura 4.7 EGW6 Byagadadenahalli 6.6 SEGW7 Indalavadi 5.8 SSWGW8 Hullahalli 5.5 NE
Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report
Page 111
Table 3-26: Ground Water Monitoring Results
S.No Parameters UNIT
DW Standards(IS
10500:2012)Acceptable
Limit
GW1 GW2 GW3 GW4 GW-5 GW-6 GW-7 GW-8
1. Source - Bore Well Bore Well Bore Well Bore Well Bore Well Bore Well Bore Well Bore Well
2. Colour Hazen 5 BDL(DL 1.0)
BDL(DL 1.0)
BDL(DL 1.0)
BDL(DL 1.0)
BDL(DL 1.0)
BDL(DL 1.0)
BDL(DL 1.0)
BDL(DL 1.0)
3. pH - 6.5 to 8.5 7.33 7.64 7.55 7.93 7.82 8.21 7.43 7.8
4. Turbidity NTU 1 BDL(DL 0.1)
BDL(DL 0.1)
BDL(DL 0.1)
BDL(DL 0.1)
BDL(DL 0.1)
BDL(DL 0.1)
BDL(DL 0.1)
BDL(DL 0.1)
5. Total SuspendedSoilds
mg/l - BDL(DL 1.0)
BDL(DL 1.0)
BDL(DL 1.0)
BDL(DL 1.0)
BDL(DL 1.0)
BDL(DL 1.0)
BDL(DL 1.0)
BDL(DL 1.0)
6. ElectricalConductivity 25◦C µmhos/cm - 978 1365 2140 1277 690 894 1095 623
7. Total DissolvedSolids mg/l 500 670 910 1280 795 462 584 690 390
8. Total Alkalinity asCaCO3 mg/l 200 187 205 368 237 144 173 188 119
9. Total Hardness asCaCO3 mg/l 200 326 401 662 432 182 251 329 140
10. Calcium as Ca mg/l 75 48.6 97.0 140.4 92.8 47.7 55.0 76.6 28.111. Magnesium as Mg mg/l 30 37.5 38.5 75.5 48.6 15.3 27.6 33.4 16.9
12. Sodium as Na mg/l - 51.4 102 146 92.6 49.5 58.2 84.4 37.1
13. Potassium as k mg/l - 17.4 36.9 35.2 19.0 15.0 20.4 22.4 13.4
14.Chlorides as Cl- mg/l
250 121 186 250 163 74.8 99.2 143 48.6
15.Sulphate (SO4) mg/l
200 77.2 112 123 83.5 32.2 42.4 60.8 33.3
Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report
Page 112
16.Carbonate mg/l
- - - - - - - - -
17.Bicarbonate mg/l
- 189 250 449 289 176 211 229 146
18.Nitrates(NO3) mg/l
45 28.7 34.3 17.8 29.5 11.1 9.52 25.4 9.28
19.Fluoride as F- mg/l
1 0.18 0.33 0.67 0.13 0.50 BDL(DL 0.05) 0.25 0.19
20. Sulphidesmg/l
0.05 BDL(DL1) BDL(DL1) BDL(DL1) BDL(DL1) BDL(DL1) BDL(DL1) BDL(DL1) BDL(DL1)
21. % Sodium%
- 27.3 33.1 31.0 30.6 34.9 31.4 33.9 34.0
22. Sodium Absorbtionratio (SAR)
- 1.35 2.2 2.5 1.9 1.6 1.5 2.0 1.4
23. Oil & Grease mg/l - BDL(DL4) BDL(DL4) BDL(DL4) BDL(DL4) BDL(DL4) BDL(DL4) BDL(DL4) BDL(DL4)
24. Arsenic mg/l 0.01 BDL(DL0.005)
BDL(DL0.005)
BDL(DL0.005)
BDL(DL0.005)
BDL(DL0.005)
BDL(DL0.005)
BDL(DL0.005)
BDL(DL0.005)
25. Cyanide mg/l 0.05 BDL(DL0.01)
BDL(DL0.01)
BDL(DL0.01)
BDL(DL0.01)
BDL(DL0.01)
BDL(DL0.01)
BDL(DL0.01)
BDL(DL0.01)
26. Cadmium mg/l 0.003 BDL(DL0.01)
BDL(DL0.01)
BDL(DL0.01)
BDL(DL0.01)
BDL(DL0.01)
BDL(DL0.01)
BDL(DL0.01)
BDL(DL0.01)
27. Chromium mg/l 0.05 BDL(DL0.05)
BDL(DL0.05)
BDL(DL0.05)
BDL(DL0.05)
BDL(DL0.05)
BDL(DL0.05)
BDL(DL0.05)
BDL(DL0.05)
28. Copper mg/l 0.05 BDL(DL0.01) 0.02 0.02 BDL
(DL0.01)BDL
(DL0.01)BDL
(DL0.01) 0.03 0.02
29. Iron mg/l 0.3 0.37 0.11 0.34 0.14 0.46 0.12 0.23 0.21
30. Lead mg/l 0.01 BDL(DL0.1)
BDL(DL0.1)
BDL(DL0.1)
BDL(DL0.1)
BDL(DL0.1)
BDL(DL0.1)
BDL(DL0.1)
BDL(DL0.1)
31. Manganese mg/l 0.1 BDL(DL0.05)
BDL(DL0.05)
BDL(DL0.05)
BDL(DL0.05)
BDL(DL0.05)
BDL(DL0.05)
BDL(DL0.05)
BDL(DL0.05)
32. Mercury mg/l 0.001 BDLDL0.001)
BDLDL0.001)
BDL(DL0.001)
BDL(DL0.001)
BDL(DL0.001)
BDL(DL0.001)
BDL(DL0.001)
BDL(DL0.001)
33. Nickel mg/l 0.02 BDL(DL0.05)
BDL(DL0.05)
BDL(DL0.05)
BDL(DL0.05)
BDL(DL0.05)
BDL(DL0.05)
BDL(DL0.05)
BDL(DL0.05)
Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report
Page 113
34. Selenium mg/l 0.01 BDL(DL0.005)
BDL(DL0.005)
BDL(DL0.005)
BDL(DL0.005)
BDL(DL0.005)
BDL(DL0.005)
BDL(DL0.005)
BDL(DL0.005)
35. Zinc mg/l 5 1.42 2.97 0.43 0.13 1.73 2.87 0.28 0.15
36. Phosphate mg/l - BDL(DL 0.02)
BDL(DL 0.02)
BDL(DL 0.02)
BDL(DL 0.02)
BDL(DL 0.02)
BDL(DL 0.02)
BDL(DL 0.02)
BDL(DL 0.02)
37. Dissolved Oxygen mg/l - NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
38. BOD 3days @27°C mg/l - BDL(DL 1.0)
BDL(DL 1.0)
BDL(DL 1.0)
BDL(DL 1.0)
BDL(DL 1.0)
BDL(DL 1.0)
BDL(DL 1.0)
BDL(DL 1.0)
39. COD mg/l - BDL(DL 4.0)
BDL(DL 4.0)
BDL(DL 4.0)
BDL(DL 4.0)
BDL(DL 4.0)
BDL(DL 4.0)
BDL(DL 4.0)
BDL(DL 4.0)
Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report
Page 114
3.9.2.2 Results and Discussions
A summary of analytical results are presented below:
The ground water results of the study area indicate that the average pH ranges is varied
between 7.33-8.21
The Total Dissolved Solids ranges is varied between 390-1280mg/l for the ground water
and its meets the permissible limits of IS 10500: 2012
The desirable limit of the chloride content is 250mg/l and permissible limit is 1000 mg/l.
The chloride content in the ground water for study area is ranges between 48.6mg/l –
250mg/l.
The desirable limit of the sulphate content is 200mg/l and permissible limit is 400mg/l. the
sulphate content of the ground water of the study area is varied between 32.2 mg/l – 123
mg/l meeting the desirable limit of the IS 10500: 2012.
The Total hardness ranges is between 140-662 mg/l for ground water its meeting the
permissible limit of the IS 10500: 2012.
3.10 Soil as a resource and its Quality
The predominant soils in the PIA district are red loamy and sandy soil and laterite soil.
Laterite soil is mostly red in color and yellow loamy, pale to bright red colours are also seen.
Laterite soil is suitable for Paddy, Sugarcane, Areca nut and Plantation crops, viz.crops like
Cardamom & Plantains. Loamy red soils are distributed in the lower reaches of valleys. Red
lateritic soil is the most dominant soil type in the area. The texture of the soil varies from fine
to coarse. The soil in valleys and intermediate slopes is rich in loam whereas in upper slopes
it is much coarse in nature. The soil responds well to irrigation and other soil-managment
practices. Silty and Loamy soils are of transported origin and are found mostly along river
banks and in valley plains. They have good infiltration capacity and are well suited for
agriculture due to their fertility.
3.10.1 Soil quality
In order to assess the quality of soil at different locations in the study area, various land use
categories were taken into account. Soil sampling was carried out at Eight (08) locations in
the study area. Soil analysis was carried as per IS: 2720 methods. Soil quality monitoring
locations & results are given in Table 3-27 & Table 3-28. Map showing the monitoring
locations is given in Figure 3-36.
Table 3-27: Soil Quality Monitoring Locations
Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report
Page 115
Location Code Location Distance (Km)w.r.t project site
Directionw.r.t. project site
S1 Project Site - -
S2 Jigani 1.0 WNW
S3 Doddathoguru 6.9 N
S4 Bommasandra 5.8 ENE
S5 Ramakrishnapura 4.7 E
S6 Byagadadenahalli 6.6 SE
S7 Indalavadi 5.8 SSW
S8 Hullahalli 5.5 NE
Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report
Page 117
Table 3-28: Soil Quality Monitoring Results
S.No Parameters Units S1 S2 S3 S4 S5 S6 S7 S8
1 Colour - Reddish Brown Brown LightBrown Dark Brown Light Brown Brown Brown Reddish
Brown Reddish Brown
2 Soil Texture - Sandy ClayLoam
Sandy ClayLoam Sandy Loam Sandy Loam Sandy Clay
LoamSandy Clay
LoamSandy Clay
Loam Loam
3 Sand % 53.0 65.0 72.0 72.0 67.0 63.0 66.0 46.04 Silt % 27.0 7.00 16.0 18.0 12.0 12.0 7.0 29.05 Clay % 20.0 28.0 12.0 10.0 21.0 25.0 27.0 25.06 pH - 7.32 7.35 5.26 6.80 7.56 7.74 7.53 8.66
7 ElectricalConductivity µmhos/cm 241 46.0 19.0 51.0 72.0 598 48.0 719
8 Infiltration Rate cm/hr 1.18 1.10 1.12 1.13 1.14 1.16 1.14 1.189 Bulk Density gm/cc 1.13 1.38 1.27 1.28 1.27 1.28 1.28 1.15
10 Cation ExchangeCapacity
meq/100gm 16.5 19.9 11.9 8.90 15.9 16.9 17.9 21.3
11 Moisture content % 14.02 10.46 9.81 9.92 5.95 13.09 11.6 4.92
12 Water HoldingCapacity % 39.0 26.0 24.0 25.0 30.0 28.0 27.0 22.0
13 Organic Carbon % 0.632 0.59 0.94 0.51 0.54 0.60 0.56 0.8714 Organic matter % 1.09 1.02 1.62 0.88 0.94 1.03 0.96 1.5015 Nitrogen as N kg/ha 275 396 72 252 432 288 108 54016 Phosphorus kg/ha 197 252 36 144 252 144 72 43217 Potassium kg/ha 189 194.4 86.4 172.8 237.6 194.4 86.4 32418 Calcium % 0.006 0.008 0.004 0.012 0.008 0.044 0.012 0.01219 Magnesium % 0.032 0.017 0.014 0.031 0.014 0.010 0.068 0.02020 Boron mg/kg 1.22 0.98 0.95 0.89 1.14 1.02 1.08 1.14
Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report
Page 118
21 Cadmium mg/kg BDL( DL 0.1) BDL( DL 0.1)
BDL( DL 0.1)
BDL( DL 0.1)
BDL( DL 0.1)
BDL( DL 0.1)
BDL( DL 0.1)
BDL( DL 0.1)
22 Chromium mg/kg 0.04 0.02 0.021 0.028 0.03 0.05 0.011 0.02523 Copper mg/kg 11.3 8.54 11.6 10.4 7.39 11.8 21.6 6.724 Iron mg/kg 28.7 13.34 64.1 14.3 24.8 23.16 16.38 31.6
25 Lead mg/kg BDL( DL 0.1) BDL( DL 0.1)
BDL( DL 0.1)
BDL( DL 0.1) 2.1 2.87 3.78 1.62
26 Manganese mg/kg 3.20 4.5 1.1 2.4 6.2 1.14 5.6 0.9827 Zinc mg/kg 13.4 12.7 20.01 21.8 11.6 13.7 15.7 10.6
3.10.2 Results and Discussions
Summary of analytical results
The pH of the soil samples ranged from 5.26- 8.66 indicating that the soils are almost neutral in nature.
Conductivity of the soil samples ranged from 19-719 μS/cm. As the EC value is less than 2000 μS/cm, the soil is found to be non-saline
in nature
The water holding capacity of the soil samples varied from 22-39 (%).
Nitrogen content ranged from 72 kg/ha to 540 kg/ha
Phosphorous ranged from 36 to 432 kg/ha
Potassium content ranges from 86 to 324 kg/ha
Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report
Page 119
3.11 Flora & Fauna
The study of terrestrial ecology within the study area of 10 Km radius has been carried out
through field investigation and satellite imagery data as discussed earlier
Bannerghatta National Park, near Bangalore, Karnataka, was founded within the 10 km study
area. The 65,127.5 acre (260.51 km2) national park is located about 22 km south of
Bangalore in the hills of the Anekal range with an elevation of 1245 - 1634m. The park has a
hilly terrain of granite sheets under moist deciduous forest valleys and scrubland on higher
areas. Sixteen villages border the park. The park is part of a wildlife corridor for elephants
which connects the BR Hills and the Sathyamangalam forest. The park is contiguous with
Talli reserve forest in the southeast and Bilikal forest in the south. It is a popular tourist
destination with a zoo, a pet corner, an animal rescue centre, a butterfly enclosure, a snake
house and a safari park. One hundred and one species of birds have been recorded in the
park.
A study reported 48 species of butterflies in various seasons at Bannerghatta Biological
Park. Thirty species of butterflies belong to five families viz., Papilionidae, Pieridae,
Nympalidae, Lycaenide and Hespiridae were breeding in different seasons under captive
conditions and released into the conservatory dome.The area can be classified into the
following ecological zone.
3.11.1 Flora
The field investigation and satellite imagery data show, that the study area is a mixture of
agricultural, wasteland and get irrigated by the tanks and tube wells. The Evergreen is
observed within the study area. The experimental finding of the pre monsoon season shows
the dominance of Scrubs like Anogeisses latifoila followed by Chloroxylon Swieritenia, Aacia
leucophloeatrees like Termila spp, Pterocarpus marusupium, Dalbergia latifolia, Serata,
Dendroca lamus Strictus within the study area. List of of flora reported/observed in the study
area is given in Table 3-29 and list of Fauna Reported/Observed in Bannerghatta National
Park is given in Table 3-30.
Table 3-29: List of Flora Reported/Observed in the Study Area
S.No Botanical Name Family Name Vernacular Name
1. Acacia Catechus Fabaceae Karungali2. Acacia leucophloea Mimosaceae Bellada, bili-jali3. Anogeisses latifoila Combretaceae Dinduga4. Chloroxylon Swieritenia Rutaceae Kloroksilan Svaiteniya5. Dalbergia latifolia Fabaceae Black rosewood,Blackwoodtree,Bombay
Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report
Page 120
blackwood,East Indian reosewood, Indian blackwood6. Lagerstroemia speciosa Lythraceae Holenandi7. Plantago lanceolata Plantaginaceae Esabakolu, Esabgolu8. Pterocarpus Fabaceae Banga, Bange mara. Bengali9. Pterocarpus marusupium Fabaceae Malabarkino, Indiankino tree,vijayasar10. Shorea Talura Dipterocarpaceae aragina mara, bile bovu
Table 3-30: List of Fauna Reported/Observed in Bannerghatta National Park
S.No Botanical Name Family Name Common Name1. Acacia Catechus Fabaceae Karungali2. Azadirachta indica Meliaceae Neem3. Bambusoideae Poaceae Bamboo4. Bauhinia purpurea Caesalpiniaceae Purple orchid tree,Purple Butterfly Tree,5. Dendrocalamus Strictus Poaceae Bidiru, Kirubidiru,Konkani6. Eucalyptus Myrtaceae Blue gum tree7. Grewia tilaefolia Tiliaceae Dhaman8. Narcissus latifolia Amaryllidaceae Daffodil, daffadowndilly, narcissus, jonquil9. Peltphorum pterocarpum Fabaceae Yellow Flame, Copper Pod, Batai Laut10. Samanea saman Fabaceae Cow tamarind11. Santalum album Santalaceae white or East Indian sandalwood12. Schleichera oleosa Sapindaceae Malay Lac Tree13. T. arjuna Combretaceae White Marudah14. Tamarindus indica Fabaceae Tamarind15. Tectona Grandia Lamiaceae Saguvani16. Terminalai Spp Combretaceae Belli būdu marada17. Terminalia tomentosa Combretaceae Asan, Indian Laurel, Silver grey wood18. Terocarpus santalinus Fabaceae Agslue,Rakta Chandana& Honne
3.11.1.1 Aquatic Vegetation
Aquatic plants are found in the littoral zone, which are ideal habitats for fish and migratorybirds. The status of aquatic vegetation in various wetlands has been mapped, on the basis ofwhich it is broadly divided into completely vegetated (CV), partially vegetated (PV),vegetation on fringes (VF) and no vegetation (NV). Of the total 682 wetlands, 517 do notsupport any vegetation, of these 417 are tanks. There are 83 tanks partially vegetated, 54with vegetation on fringes and 7 are completely vegetated.
3.11.1.2 Planktons
Phytoplanktons surveyed are considered under five major groups:
S.NO Planktons Name
1 Bacillariophyceae (Diatoms):
2 Chlorophyceae:
3 Desmidiaciae (Desmids):
4 Dinophyceae:
Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report
Page 121
5 Myxophyceae:
6 Ostracoda:
3.11.2 Fauna
Domestic – The domestic animals are mainly mammals like cow, goat, cat, dog etc arefound common in the study area.
Wild Animals – Since the natural forests constitute negligible of the forest area and sincethey are in isolated pockets, the wild life does not offer a wide spectrum of species. Wildanimals are seen in Bannerghatta National Park with native and non native species. Otherthan these, some reptiles and amphibians can also be seen with a number of bird species.
List of of fauna reported/observed in the study area is given in Table 3-31 and list of FaunaReported/Observed in Bannerghatta National Park is given in Table 3-32.
Table 3-31: List of Fauna Reported/Observed in the Study Area
Table 3-32: List of Fauna Reported/Observed in Bannerghatta National Park
Sl.No Scientific Name Family Name Common Name
Reptiles & Amphibians
1. Bufom lanostictus Bufonidae Toad
2. Calotes versicolor Agamidaa Garden lizard
3. Chameleo zeylanicus Chamaeleonidae Chamelton
4. Gecko sp. Eublepharidae Small wall lizard
5. Rana cyanophlyctis Dicroglossidae Frog
6. Rana tigrina Dicroglossidae. Frog
Rodents
7. Bandicota indica Muridae Badicoot
8. Musmusculus Muridae Mouse
9. Rattusrattus Muridae Rat
10. Ratufaindica Sciuridae Squirrel
Sl.No Scientific Name Family Name Common Name
Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report
Page 122
Reptiles & Amphibians
1. Batagur baska Geoemydidae BatagarTerrapin,River Terrapin
2. Calman latrirostirs Alligatoridae Calman
3. Crocodylus moreletil Morelet’s Crocodile
4. Eryx johnii Russell Boidae Red Sand Boa Snakes
5. Gavialis gangeticus Gavialidae Gharial
6. Geochelone elegans Testudinidae Indian Starred Tortise
7. Geoclemys hamiltonii Geoemydidae Black Spotted Terrapins
8. Iguana Iguana Iguanidae Green iguana
9. Lissemys Punctata Trionychidae Indian mud or Flapshell Turtle
10. Naja naja Elapidae Indian Cobra
11. Ophiophagus hannah Elapidae King Cobra
12. Ptyas musosa Colubridae Rat Snake
13. Python molurus Pythonidae Indian Rock python
14. Trachemysscripta elegans Emydidae Red-eared Slider Turtles
15. Varanus bengalensis Varanidae Common Indian Monintor Lizard
16. Vipera russelli Viperidae Russells Viper
Mammales
17. Axis axis Cervidae Chital or Spotted Deer
18. Axis porcinus Animalia Hog Deer
19. Boselaphus tragocamelus Bovidae Nilgal or Blue Bull
20. Callithrix jacchus Callitrichidae Marmoset
21. Elephas maximus indicus Elephantidae Elephant Indian
22. Equus quagga Equidae Zebra
23. Erethizon dorsatum Erethizontidae Porcupine
Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report
Page 123
3.11.2.1 Birds
Wetland and water birds make use of a variety of conditions, from dry zones and meadows
bordering lakes to open water zones. On the basis of their size, the availability of food and
suitable foraging conditions, different birds can occupy different parts of the lake. In
Bengaluru there are five major groups of water birds found based on the wetland zones they
frequent, Open water birds ,Waders and shoreline birds, Waders and shoreline birds, Birds
of reed bed and Birds of open air space above wetlands List of of birds reported/observed is
given in Table 3-33
Table 3-33: List of Birds Reported/Observed
24. Hippopotamus amphibius Hippopotamuses Hippopotamus
25. Hyaena hyaena Hyaenidae Striped Hyena
26. Melursus ursinus Ursidae Sloth Bear
27. Muntiacus Cervidae Barking Deer
28. Panthera leo Felidae Lion Hybrid
29. Panthera tigris sumatrae Felidae Surnatran Tiger
30. Panthera tigris tigris Felidae Royal Bengal Tiger
Sl.No Scientific Name Family Name Common Name
Birds Reported/Observed in the Study Area
1. Athene brama Strigidae Spotted owlet
2. Milvus migrans Accipitridae Pariya kite
3. Perdix perdix Phasianidae Patridge
Birds Reported/Observed in Bannerghatta National Park
4. Ploceus philippinus Ploceidae Baya Weaver
5. Melopsittacus undulatus Psittacidae Budgeriger
6. Nymphicus hollandicus Cacatuidae Cockatiels
7. Black-crowned night heron Ardeidae Heron Night
8. Eudocimus albus Threskiornithidae Ibis White
Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report
Page 124
9. Agapornis Psittaculidae Love Birds
10. Lonchura atricapilla Estrildidae Munia Black Headed
11. Tyto alba Tytonidae Barn Owl
12. Bubo bubo Strigidae Eurasian Eagle Owl
13. Psittacula eupatria Psittaculidae Parakeet alexandrine
14. Psittacula krameri Psittaculidae Rose Ring parakeet
15. Pelecanus philippensis Pelecanidae Grey Pelican
16. Netta rufina Anatidae Red Crested Pochard
17. Mycteria leucocephala Ciconiidae Painted Stork
18. Chrysolophus pictus Phasianidae Yellow Golden Pheasant
19. Dromaius novaehollandiae Dromaiidae Emu
20. pavo cristatus Phasianidae White Peafowl
21. Chrysolophus amherstiae Phasianidae Lady Amherst’s Pheasant
22. Struthio camelus Struthionidae Ostrich
23. Phasianus colchicus Phasianidae Chinesering necked Pheasant
24. Cygnus atratus Anatidae Black swan
25. Lophura nycthemera Phasianidae Silver Pheasant
26. Ara chloropterus Psittacidae Green Winged Macaws
27. Rhea americana Rheidae Rhea
28. Amazona Psittacidae Amazon Parakeet
29. Psittacus erithacus Psittacidae African Grey Parrot
30. Aratinga solstitialis Psittacidae Sun Conure Parrot
31. Balearica pavonina Gruidae Black Crowned Crane
32. Ara ararauna Psittacidae Blue Gold Macaws
33. Probosciger aterrimus Gruidae Palm Cockatoo
34. Eclectus roratus Psittacidae Eclectus Parrot
Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report
Page 125
3.12 Socio-economic profile of the Project Influence Area
Bangalore district is located in the sour eastern corner of Karnataka State. It has a
geographical area of 2196 sq.km. The district is land locked and shares its borders with
Bengaluru Rural district on the north and the east, and with the state of Tamil Nadu in the
south. The population of the district is 96,21,551. Of the total population,50,22,661 are males
and 45,98,890 are females as per 2011 Census. The district’s share of total Karnataka’s
population is 15.75 percent.
3.12.1 Socio economic Profile of the district
The district is unique in nature as more urbanized with rural population. The district is the
highest contributor to the State Economy with 33.3% contribution to GDDP (2012-13). The
per capita annual income in the district is INR 2,02,340 (2012-13).
The tertiary sector contributing 39.5% and secondary sector is contributing 36% and primary
sector is contributing 2.3% to GDP.
In rural areas Agriculture is main activities and Paddy, Ragi, Maize, oil seeds, Horticulture
crops are main crops of the district. The area has good infrastructure facilities for
transportation and storage and marketing of their agricultural products. District social
indicators are given in Table 3-34.
35. Cacatua galerita Cacatuidae Sulphur Crested Cockatoo
36. Ara macao Psittacidae Scarlet Macaw
37. Eolophus roseicapilla Cacatuinae Galah Parrot
38. Strix ocellata Strigidae Mottled wood owl
39. Trichoglossus moluccanus Psittaculidae Rainbow Lorikeet
40. Eos bornea Psittaculidae Red Lorikeet
41. Goura Columbidae Crowned Pegions
42. Psittacula columboides Psittacidae Blue Winged Parakeet
43. Buceros bicornis Bucerotidae Great Indian Horn Bill
44. Pavo cristatus Phasianidae Indian Peafowl
45. Plataleinae Threskiornithidae Spoon Bill
46. Lophura leucomelanos Phasianidae Kalij Pheasant
47. Gallus gallus Phasianidae Red Jungle Fowl
Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report
Page 126
Table 3-34: Bengaluru Urban District Social Indicators
S.No Social Indicators Value1 Decadal variation 47.18%2 Urban population 90.94%3 Sex ratio 9164 Sex ratio for 0-6 age group 9445 Population density (per square Km) 43586 Scheduled caste population 22.93%7 Scheduled tribe population 3.26%8 Literacy rate 87.67%9 Work Participation rate 44.14%
10 Main Workers 40.10%11 Marginal Workers 4.04%12 Maternal maternity rate (per 100000 live births) 45 (2011-12)
13 Infant Mortality rate (the number of deaths of children less than oneyear of age per 1000 live births.
3 (2011-12)
Source: Census 2011 & Economic Survey 2015-16
3.12.2 Socio economic Profile of the study area
The project is located in KIADB Industrial Area, Bommasandra-Jigani link road, Anekal taluk
of Bangalore Urban District. The 10 Km radius covers almost a major portion of Anekal taluk
and some portion of Bangalore Corporation.
The project area comprises of urban and rural background. The taluk Anekal is
predominantly rural as 68% population in rural part of the taluk. Agriculture is one of the
main occupation in rural apart from Industries and Service sector. The area has more semi
and unskilled labour forces go to the other part of the district. Socioeconomic detail of the
study area is given in Table 3-35. Consultation photographs are given in Figure 3-31.
Exhibit 1: Govt. Primary School at Rajapura Exhibit 2: Interaction with people, at Rajapura
Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report
Page 127
Exhibit 3: Interaction with public atRamakrishnapura
Exhibit 4: Socio economic survey atBommasandra
Exhibit 5: With a shop owner at Hullahalli Exhibit 6: Primary Agri. Credit Coop Society,Bukkasagara
Figure 3-31 Informal Consultation with Locals
Table 3-35: Socioeconomic details of the study area
Name of Villages Number of Household Total Population Male FemaleWithin 5 Km radiusBanahalli 1673 5819 3164 2655Bande Nalla Sandra 426 1348 836 512Bommasandra 4334 15254 8826 6428Dyavasandra 129 564 297 267Gollahalli 2160 7433 4631 2802Haragadde 2010 7735 4839 2896
Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report
Page 128
Harapanahalli 817 3040 1670 1370Hebbagodi 9623 34827 20771 14056Hennagara 658 2801 1453 1348Hinnakki 311 1384 695 689Hosahalli 191 875 456 419Hulimangala 643 2787 1479 1308Jigani 4437 17036 9990 7046Kachanaikanahalli 1468 5606 2961 2645Kittaganahalli 2064 7280 3983 3297Konasandra 151 684 354 330Koppa 337 1474 753 721Koppa Gate 369 1415 721 694Kumbaranahalli 179 725 374 351Kyalasanahalli 547 1892 1039 853Lingapura 174 895 444 451Mada Patna 1092 4076 2569 1507Mahanthalingapura 622 2751 1429 1322Maragondahalli 2145 8824 4943 3881Masthena Halli 368 1506 775 731Nanjapura 103 405 194 211Nosenur 264 1165 620 545Nosenur Gollahalli 110 515 278 237Rajapura 200 912 473 439Ramakrishnapura 73 339 178 161S.Bingipura 463 1851 981 870Seethanaikana Halli 82 337 169 168Thirupalya 4251 14762 9433 5329Vaddara Palya 1231 4686 2835 1851Vaderamanchanahalli 778 2599 1735 864Veerasandra 2595 9190 5397 3793Yarandahalli 1472 5732 3465 2267Total 48550 180524 105210 75314Within 5 Km to 10 KmA Medihalli 105 451 236 215Adigondanahalli 324 1354 676 678Adur 150 717 368 349Agasa Thimmanahalli 5 22 14 8Ali Bommasandra 162 700 355 345Amani Doddakere 8 32 18 14Andapura 524 1769 951 818Anekal 10322 44260 22539 21721Aravantigepura 54 247 138 109Avadadenahalli 148 680 339 341Avalahalli 106 551 291 260Bagganadoddi 93 386 203 183
Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report
Page 129
Balagaranahalli 1464 5447 3358 2089Bandapura 207 853 421 432Bannerughatta 2092 8054 4160 3894Begihalli 364 1412 731 681Bendiganahalli 183 658 342 316Bhovi Palya 1195 4379 2489 1890Bommandahalli 191 798 404 394Bukkasagara 435 1748 897 851Byagadadenahalli 272 1435 1004 431Byrappanahalli 121 486 252 234Chandapura 1240 4562 2461 2101Chandrapura -Chatrakane 1695 5934 3031 2903Chikka Hosahalli 280 1367 697 670Chikkanahalli 64 293 154 139Gollahalli 34 137 72 65Gowrenahalli 450 2226 1123 1103Guddahatti 380 1635 801 834Gulimangala 194 849 446 403Halesampigehalli 249 928 468 460Harapanahalli 817 3040 1670 1370Hasaruvani 4 17 10 7Honnakalasapura 105 494 253 241Huskur 612 2598 1317 1281Iggalur 1272 4702 2454 2248Indlawadi 439 1933 1000 933Itchangur 365 1347 832 515J.Bingipura 17 75 39 36Jangal Palya 141 520 247 273Kadajakkanahalli 125 566 293 273Kaggalipura 60 232 126 106Kalbalu 554 1979 1230 749Kalkere 770 2793 1761 1032Kammasandra Agrahara 153 664 316 348Karpur 327 2026 1047 979Kempavaderahalli 62 287 144 143Krishnasagara 141 594 324 270Laxmi Sagara 216 1007 512 495Madivala 634 2792 1399 1393Mantapa 343 1438 717 721Marasur 770 3034 1641 1393Marasur Agrahara 30 136 63 73Muthanallur 398 1663 822 841Muthanallur Amanikere 66 239 115 124Nallasandra 183 803 427 376Neralur 1500 5608 3217 2391
Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report
Page 130
Ragihalli 402 1655 852 803Ramasagara 520 2199 1087 1112Sakalawara 204 827 424 403Sidihosakote 331 1591 830 761Sonnanayakanapura 277 1240 615 625Soppahalli 117 489 258 231Sriramapura 284 1162 595 567Suragajakkanahalli 308 1311 729 582Thattanahalli 220 923 490 433Thimmasandra 41 194 97 97Thirumagondanahalli 567 2107 1095 1012Vaderahalli 19 57 35 22BBMP part 21322 80037 42157 37880Total 57827 228749 120679 108070
Source: Census 2011
The percentage of male Child population (50.89%) is equal to female child population(49.11%). Child population details within the study area are given in Table 3-36.
Table 3-36: Child population within the study area
Village Name Child Population (0-6 age)
Male(<6 age)
Female(<6 age)
Within 5 KmBanahalli 669 329 340Bande Nalla Sandra 111 52 59Bommasandra 1722 881 841Dyavasandra 57 33 24Gollahalli 671 356 315Haragadde 772 395 377Harapanahalli 398 216 182Hebbagodi 3850 1904 1946Hennagara 367 190 177Hinnakki 171 80 91Hosahalli 115 52 63Hulimangala 320 163 157Jigani 2101 1114 987Kachanaikanahalli 637 332 305Kittaganahalli 815 439 376Konasandra 83 42 41Koppa 201 107 94Koppa Gate 230 116 114Kumbaranahalli 85 42 43Kyalasanahalli 191 100 91Lingapura 110 52 58Mada Patna 467 232 235
Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report
Page 131
Mahanthalingapura 376 196 180Maragondahalli 1294 648 646Masthena Halli 169 91 78Nanjapura 45 20 25Nosenur 127 62 65Nosenur Gollahalli 46 28 18Rajapura 105 53 52Ramakrishnapura 63 34 29S.Bingipura 242 107 135Seethanaikana Halli 39 19 20Thirupalya 1251 646 605Vaddara Palya 597 292 305Vaderamanchanahalli 253 144 109Veerasandra 1029 532 497Yarandahalli 733 386 347Total 20512 10485 10027Within 5 Km to 10 KmA Medihalli 39 19 20Adigondanahalli 133 67 66Adur 77 31 46Agasa Thimmanahalli 3 2 1Ali Bommasandra 78 41 37Amani Doddakere 3 2 1Andapura 262 134 128Anekal 4803 2477 2326Aravantigepura 16 8 8Avadadenahalli 81 37 44Avalahalli 58 29 29Bagganadoddi 55 30 25Balagaranahalli 583 270 313Bandapura 82 45 37Bannerughatta 992 469 523Begihalli 154 75 79Bendiganahalli 92 46 46Bhovi Palya 496 257 239Bommandahalli 111 64 47Bukkasagara 224 114 110Byagadadenahalli 95 63 32Byrappanahalli 61 27 34Chandapura 584 290 294Chandrapura -Chatrakane 700 335 365Chikka Hosahalli 158 74 84Chikkanahalli 23 15 8Gollahalli 15 7 8Gowrenahalli 392 193 199
Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report
Page 132
Guddahatti 184 88 96Gulimangala 92 48 44Halesampigehalli 120 55 65Harapanahalli 398 216 182Hasaruvani 4 3 1Honnakalasapura 55 23 32Huskur 281 138 143Iggalur 530 270 260Indlawadi 223 120 103Itchangur 161 78 83J.Bingipura 6 2 4Jangal Palya 31 14 17Kadajakkanahalli 69 34 35Kaggalipura 19 13 6Kalbalu 217 103 114Kalkere 281 151 130Kammasandra Agrahara 108 48 60Karpur 119 68 51Kempavaderahalli 34 15 19Krishnasagara 29 19 10Laxmi Sagara 146 74 72Madivala 318 164 154Mantapa 182 96 86Marasur 344 173 171Marasur Agrahara 12 7 5Muthanallur 136 66 70Muthanallur Amanikere 21 8 13Nallasandra 87 53 34Neralur 694 325 369Ragihalli 190 89 101Ramasagara 240 126 114Sakalawara 84 35 49Sidihosakote 164 89 75Sonnanayakanapura 183 86 97Soppahalli 62 31 31Sriramapura 189 99 90Suragajakkanahalli 153 81 72Thattanahalli 70 34 36Thimmasandra 19 7 12Thirumagondanahalli 247 126 121Vaderahalli 2 0 2BBMP part 10334 5306 5028Total 27208 13802 13406
Source: Census 2011
Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report
Page 133
The majority of the population in the project area belongs to General Category (81.03%). The
scheduled caste and scheduled tribe population are 16.41% (22.93% of the district) and
2.55% (3.26% of the district). Social group details within the study area are given in Table3-37.
Table 3-37: Social group details within the study area
Village Name General Scheduledcaste Scheduled Tribe
With 5 KmBanahalli 5104 558 157Bande Nalla Sandra 987 355 6Bommasandra 13468 1512 274Dyavasandra 188 373 3Gollahalli 6561 552 320Haragadde 5790 1846 99Harapanahalli 2454 445 141Hebbagodi 29799 4134 894Hennagara 1995 753 53Hinnakki 915 377 92Hosahalli 443 411 21Hulimangala 1669 1065 53Jigani 14036 2480 520Kachanaikanahalli 4941 542 123Kittaganahalli 6211 868 201Konasandra 477 200 7Koppa 883 579 12Koppa Gate 599 721 95Kumbaranahalli 596 129 0Kyalasanahalli 1288 580 24Lingapura 392 154 349Mada Patna 3526 437 113Mahanthalingapura 1020 1475 256Maragondahalli 8196 494 134Masthena Halli 1253 240 13Nanjapura 219 180 6Nosenur 760 405 0Nosenur Gollahalli 387 19 109Rajapura 583 319 10Ramakrishnapura 132 182 25S.Bingipura 1016 826 9Seethanaikana Halli 251 61 25Thirupalya 11639 2486 637Vaddara Palya 2943 1666 77Vaderamanchanahalli 2032 368 199
Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report
Page 134
Veerasandra 7822 1028 340Yarandahalli 4613 923 196Total 145188 29743 5593Witghin 5 Km to 10 KmA Medihalli 185 239 27Adigondanahalli 988 363 3Adur 340 377 0Agasa Thimmanahalli 22 0 0Ali Bommasandra 405 283 12Amani Doddakere 32 0 0Andapura 1704 20 45Anekal 38903 4833 524Aravantigepura 80 166 1Avadadenahalli 320 310 50Avalahalli 118 431 2Bagganadoddi 163 179 44Balagaranahalli 4837 489 121Bandapura 461 392 0Bannerughatta 6109 1835 110Begihalli 884 467 61Bendiganahalli 341 258 59Bhovi Palya 3468 729 182Bommandahalli 569 214 15Bukkasagara 999 636 113Byagadadenahalli 1013 353 69Byrappanahalli 434 50 2Chandapura 4000 502 60Chandrapura -Chatrakane 5409 429 96Chikka Hosahalli 955 403 9Chikkanahalli 232 20 41Gollahalli 132 5 0Gowrenahalli 1922 304 0Guddahatti 719 837 79Gulimangala 543 278 28Halesampigehalli 851 59 18Harapanahalli 2454 445 141Hasaruvani 17 0 0Honnakalasapura 331 154 9Huskur 1777 747 74Iggalur 3715 900 87Indlawadi 1504 345 84Itchangur 1015 324 8J.Bingipura 69 3 3Jangal Palya 514 6 0Kadajakkanahalli 375 95 96
Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report
Page 135
Kaggalipura 155 23 54Kalbalu 1304 551 124Kalkere 2073 694 26Kammasandra Agrahara 291 302 71Karpur 1621 401 4Kempavaderahalli 135 147 5Krishnasagara 460 132 2Laxmi Sagara 777 201 29Madivala 1621 1144 27Mantapa 739 686 13Marasur 2206 791 37Marasur Agrahara 121 15 0Muthanallur 1086 549 28Muthanallur Amanikere 234 1 4Nallasandra 466 324 13Neralur 4938 542 128Ragihalli 929 485 241Ramasagara 1394 765 40Sakalawara 462 363 2Sidihosakote 1004 579 8Sonnanayakanapura 175 1065 0Soppahalli 159 329 1Sriramapura 797 308 57Suragajakkanahalli 1021 284 6Thattanahalli 519 393 11Thimmasandra 10 0 184Thirumagondanahalli 1426 598 83Vaderahalli 36 21 0BBMP part 71400 7262 1375Total 186468 37435 4846
3.12.2.1 Employment and Livelihood
Economic vibrancy in a area is shown by the type and nature of the occupation available in
the area. Of the total working population, the majority (91.46%) is the main workers i.e they
have study job more than six months per annum. It is due to the industrialization in the area.
The job opportunity is due to the development of Industrial and Service sectors. Only 10.28%
of working population involved in the agriculture and allied occupation (primary). Workers
group distribution in the study area is given in Table 3-38
Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report
Page 137
Table 3-38: Workers group distribution in the study area
Village Name TotalWorkers
MainWorkers
MarginalWorkers
AgricultureMainHousehold
MarginalHousehold
MainOthers
MarginalOthersMain
CultivatorsMainAgri.Labour
MarginalCultivators
MarginalAgrilabors
Within 5 Km radiusBanahalli 3032 2495 537 131 35 17 10 61 7 2268 503Bande Nalla Sandra 809 773 36 105 81 8 6 5 3 582 19Bommasandra 7993 7359 634 48 151 17 11 76 25 7084 581Gollahalli 5151 4988 163 56 40 24 3 43 2 4849 134Haragadde 4303 4215 88 180 143 8 4 27 1 3865 75Harapanahalli 1441 1389 52 86 39 12 0 14 1 1250 39Hebbagodi 20240 18863 1377 93 96 21 16 122 10 18552 1330Hennagara 1319 1275 44 207 184 7 6 69 2 815 29Hinnakki 514 224 290 24 14 8 29 9 80 177 173Hosahalli 407 397 10 44 6 1 0 11 5 336 4Hulimangala 1177 1139 38 74 53 7 6 13 1 999 24Jigani (CT) 8557 7923 634 83 473 11 28 225 48 7142 547Kachanaikanahalli 3646 2883 763 136 130 17 7 70 22 2547 717Kammasandra 5267 4671 596 180 407 42 51 108 18 3976 485Kittaganahalli 4073 3678 395 88 50 11 4 91 5 3449 375Koppa 631 601 30 110 72 5 6 16 2 403 17Koppa Gate 639 517 122 8 24 8 51 2 0 483 63Kyalasanahalli 922 824 98 120 98 1 20 46 21 560 56Lingapura 370 317 53 226 46 8 15 27 4 18 26Mada Patna 2396 2331 65 23 13 4 4 4 0 2291 57Maragondahalli 3777 3526 251 19 123 4 12 144 37 3240 198Masthena Halli 630 624 6 85 8 0 1 13 0 518 5
Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report
Page 138
Nanjapura 151 145 6 46 5 1 1 3 0 91 4Rajapura 479 326 153 32 137 9 87 4 2 153 55Ramakrishnapura 187 162 25 4 2 1 1 4 0 152 23Ramasandra 169 156 13 22 48 0 7 16 0 70 6S.Bingipura 916 912 4 56 145 0 1 0 0 711 3Seethanaikana Halli 135 135 0 33 4 0 0 0 0 98 0Thirupalya 10726 9676 1050 155 67 38 27 84 74 9370 911Vaderamanchanahalli 1779 1741 38 51 14 4 0 6 1 1670 33Veerasandra 5726 5561 165 64 73 15 6 21 1 5403 143Yarandahalli 3392 3146 246 42 67 6 47 8 3 3029 190Total 101297 93322 3146 2826 303 546 1433 85917 7975 490 6636Within 5 Km to 10 KmA Medihalli 247 201 46 44 13 14 28 2 0 142 4Adigondanahalli 595 582 13 211 36 2 0 5 0 330 11Adur 257 232 25 57 49 3 13 4 0 122 9Agasa Thimmanahalli 13 13 0 1 5 0 0 1 0 6 0Ali Bommasandra 257 193 64 89 27 0 35 14 3 63 26Amani Doddakere 21 20 1 15 1 1 0 0 0 4 0Andapura 723 655 68 102 20 7 9 176 15 357 37Aravantigepura 200 199 1 47 126 0 0 3 0 23 1Avadadenahalli 292 292 0 61 15 0 0 0 0 216 0Avalahalli 239 220 19 37 92 2 7 4 0 87 10Bagganadoddi 212 168 44 97 61 3 40 0 1 10 0Balagaranahalli 3145 2987 158 62 18 8 1 1 1 2906 148Bandapura 416 276 140 116 81 8 17 8 14 71 101Bannerughatta 3491 3301 190 74 171 17 59 212 16 2844 98Begihalli 666 641 25 66 74 3 8 37 0 464 14Bendiganahalli 317 311 6 56 21 1 0 2 0 232 5
Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report
Page 139
Bhovi Palya (Shanthi Pur) 2617 2545 72 33 13 4 4 6 2 2493 62Bommandahalli 352 352 0 91 135 0 0 2 0 124 0Bukkasagara 909 834 75 58 62 8 6 26 1 688 60Byagadadenahalli 1028 853 175 41 37 12 17 7 23 768 123Byrappanahalli 204 185 19 13 3 0 0 2 0 167 19Chandapura 2252 2133 119 131 265 18 13 70 16 1667 72Chandrapura -Chatrakane 2529 2396 133 74 24 17 0 16 4 2282 112Chikkanahalli 176 89 87 84 3 2 81 1 0 1 4Gollahalli 76 68 8 0 0 7 0 0 0 68 1Gowrenahalli 951 936 15 30 28 1 0 106 3 772 11Guddahatti 1040 658 382 125 107 14 51 51 27 375 290Gulimangala 438 249 189 59 27 37 62 12 19 151 71Halesampigehalli 427 408 19 26 16 2 0 0 0 366 17Harapanahalli 1441 1389 52 86 39 12 0 14 1 1250 39Hasaruvani 11 9 2 9 0 2 0 0 0 0 0Honnakalasapura 241 230 11 85 57 1 4 13 0 75 6Hullahalli 1672 1540 132 103 178 13 7 172 39 1087 73Huskur 1070 896 174 195 45 16 30 15 1 641 127Iggalur 2226 1970 256 192 309 15 15 100 15 1369 211Indlawadi 740 735 5 305 36 1 0 2 1 392 3Itchangur 823 737 86 128 105 1 0 1 0 503 85J.Bingipura 52 50 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 49 2Jangal Palya 357 226 131 194 3 3 2 7 37 22 89Kadajakkanahalli 243 229 14 93 17 1 10 3 0 116 3Kaggalipura 75 29 46 21 0 5 9 0 0 8 32Kalbalu 1201 1171 30 35 14 4 2 1 0 1121 24Kalkere 1204 787 417 12 8 14 6 6 1 761 396Kammasandra Agrahara 389 389 0 62 69 0 0 1 0 257 0
Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report
Page 140
Kempavaderahalli 123 122 1 27 84 0 0 0 1 11 0Konasandra 397 366 31 97 14 1 2 37 0 218 28Krishnasagara 457 443 14 2 0 0 0 0 0 441 14Laxmi Sagara 445 444 1 83 9 0 0 3 1 349 0Madivala 1072 1042 30 446 317 12 14 5 0 274 4Mahanthalingapura 1387 1175 212 154 98 12 18 62 124 861 58Mantapa 684 658 26 89 44 2 7 60 4 465 13Marasur 1578 1559 19 179 132 2 2 11 0 1237 15Marasur Agrahara 54 38 16 22 3 1 0 2 0 11 15Muthanallur Amanikere 83 76 7 30 9 0 5 3 0 34 2Nallasandra 338 298 40 85 26 2 6 7 0 180 32Neralur 2797 2646 151 133 51 15 22 9 1 2453 113Ragihalli 765 564 201 229 124 35 97 4 2 207 67Ramasagara 1138 840 298 165 53 15 16 9 13 613 254Sakalawara 421 389 32 95 21 3 3 11 4 262 22Sidihosakote 923 713 210 392 127 9 192 15 1 179 8Sonnanayakanapura 542 534 8 100 155 2 1 4 3 275 2Soppahalli 221 221 0 68 120 0 0 0 0 33 0Sriramapura 484 332 152 3 0 4 2 3 1 326 145Suragajakkanahalli 592 582 10 98 83 1 1 13 0 388 8Thattanahalli 496 354 142 174 116 2 29 6 9 58 102Thimmasandra 101 65 36 62 1 0 25 0 6 2 5Thirumagondanahalli 1064 862 202 140 90 17 61 23 4 609 120Vaddara Palya 2675 2487 188 36 82 12 3 109 3 2260 170Vaderahalli 44 43 1 3 0 1 0 17 0 23 0BBMP (M Corp.) part 39729 35988 3741 266 1175 147 215 1183 94 33364 3285Total 108479 98544 7097 5750 578 1326 3403 82294 9935 533 7498
Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report
Page 141
3.12.2.2 Industries within the study area
The area has more industrial estates with many leading industries are situated. Industrial
estates located within the study area are given in Table 3-39. List of Industries are given in
Table 3-40.
Table 3-39: Industrial estates within the study area
S.No Industrial Area Extent (Acres)1 Jigani I 182 Jigani II 163 Veerasandra Phase I 144 Veerasandra Phase II 105 Bommasandra Phase I 256 Bommasandra Phase II 107 Dyavasandra 30
Source: PWC
Table 3-40: List of major Industries within the study area
S.No. Industries Location1 Mallik Engineering Jigani2 PS Paints & Coats Pvt Ltd Jigani3 Shashi Bio-energy Products Jigani4 Shree Shiv Granites Jigani5 J’Pan Tubular Components Jigani6 Aron Universal Ltd. Jigani7 Hikal Ltd. Jigani8 OTIS Jigani9 Kirloskar Toyota textile machinery Pvt. Ltd. Jigani10 Bill Forge Pvt Ltd Jigani11 Kumar Organics Pvt. Ltd. Jigani12 Cipla Limited Jigani13 Mylan Limited Jigani14 Micropack Jigani15 HCL Technologies Jigani16 Microbabs Jigani17 Rich core Life sciences Pvt Ltd Jigani - Bommasandra Link Road18 BIOCON Jigani19 Strides Shasun Limited Suragajakkanahalli20 Apotex Pharmachem Jigani – Bommasandra Link Road21 Sigma Aldrich Jigani – Bommasandra Link Road22 Anthem Bioscience Pvt Ltd Bommasandra23 Ansell Jigani – Bommasandra Link Road24 Sansera Engineering Pvt Ltd Jigani – Bommasandra Link Road
3.12.2.3 Health Facilities within the study area
The public and private health facility is available in the study area. The proliferation of private
hospitals and clinics due to affordability, health awareness, education etc. Health facilities
available in Anekal taluk is given in Table 3-41.Table 3-41: Health facilities available in Anekal Taluk
Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report
Page 142
Taluk Hospitals Community HealthCentre PHCs
Anekal Anekal
AnekalAttibeleDommasandraJiganiSarjapuraMarsurChandapuraHaragaddeHebbgodiMahantalingapura
Source: Health & family welfare department, Govt. of Karnataka
The public health facilities like sub centers and primary health centers, ambulance services
are available.
The respiratory and skin related diseases are common health problems in any industrilzed
area. People are complaining such issues during our interaction with them. The occupational
and diseases due to the pollution are the main problem in the area. The air pollution due to
the vehicle movement is more intense than the industrial pollution.
Accident is another issue due to the growing vehicular movement.
It has been observed that the ground water is depleted due to the over exploitation for
domestic and industrial purpose. So the groundwater is contaminated with more toxic
chemicals in addition to the pollution caused by the industries. Consumption of untreated
water will create water-borne disease like Diarrhea, Typhoid, Filariasis.
Sexually transmitted diseases (STI), HIV/AIDS are responsible for an enormous burden of
morbidity and mortality in the industrial area as migrants from different locations and
availability of opportunities. The uncared and uncontrolled behavior change is causing a big
social stigma in the industrial area. The concerned authority and industries are responsible
for intervention and counseling.
The other major health issue is mental health due to the stress, migration, unable to
adaptability of new environments, windfall gain from assets. Also it increases the crime rate.
The accessibility of maternity centers and awareness made people use institutional delivery
system. For understanding health profile of Anekal taluk, the health indicators are given in
Table 3-42.Table 3-42: Health profile of Anekal Taluk
Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report
Page 143
Indicators for Composite Taluk Development IndexIndicators Anekal Taluk DistrictSex ratio (no. of females per 1000males)
835 916
Maternal Mortality rate 73 73Percentage of Institutional delivery 100 99.9Percentage Children fully immunised 78.6 100
Availability of Doctors per 1000 people 0.741 0.091
Source: Human Development report 2014
3.12.2.4 Sanitation Facilities & Drinking water facilities within the Study Area
The main source of drinking water is from Tap water and Bore well. The consumption of safe
drinking water is fully followed. In case of sanitation, access to the sanitary facility (toilets) is
not fully available. Village wise sanitation & drinking water facilities within the study area are
given in Table 3-43
Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report
Page 144
Table 3-43: Village wise sanitation & drinking water facilities within the study area
Village Name
Main Source of Drinking WaterToiletfacility
Tapwaterfrom treatedsource
Tapwaterfromun-treatedsource
Coveredwell
Un-coveredwell Handpump Tubewell/Bor
ehole Spring River/Canal
Tank/Pond/Lake
Othersources
Within 5 KmBanahalli 2.9 87.3 0 0 0 9.8 0 0 0 0 30.4Bande Nalla Sandra 0.6 99.2 0.2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 98Bommasandra 38.3 4.4 1.3 0.1 1.4 54.2 0 0 0 0.1 90.8Chikka Hosahalli 0.7 96.4 0 0.4 0 2.6 0 0 0 0 47.8Dyavasandra 15.4 59.2 7.7 0 0 16.9 0 0 0 0.8 36.2Gollahalli 19.1 10.6 0 0 0 14.9 0 0 0 55.3 44.7Haragadde 31.7 25.7 0.1 0 0 41.8 0.1 0 0 0.6 92.5Harapanahalli 13.2 31.7 0 0 3.8 44.6 0 0.6 0 6 94.9Hebbagodi 31.6 31.8 0.4 0 0.1 29.6 0 0 0 6.4 98.8Hennagara 23.8 22.5 0 0 0.2 53.6 0 0 0 0 74.4Hinnakki 74.9 22 0.7 0 2.1 0.3 0 0 0 0 67.2Hosahalli 0 0 0 0 0 98.9 0 0 0 1.1 55.2Hulimangala 49.1 12.4 0.5 0 0 37.7 0 0 0 0.3 50.4Jigani 43.2 25.2 1.1 0.6 1.1 26.3 0 0 0 2.4 96.3Kachanaikanahalli 72.1 8.8 0.1 0.1 0 18.7 0.1 0.1 0 0.1 90.5Karpur 35.8 64.2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 60.8Kittaganahalli 52.8 9 0.1 0.1 0.7 37 0.1 0 0 0.4 96.4Konasandra 0 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 56.7Koppa 4.3 93.3 0 0 0 1.8 0.6 0 0 0 81.2Koppa Gate 0.3 98.7 0 0 0 0.5 0 0 0.5 0 52.8Kumbaranahalli 1.1 54.6 0 0 0 43.1 0 0 0 1.1 52.9Kyalasanahalli 4 4.8 5.9 3 5.7 75.6 0 0.2 0 0.8 48.7Lingapura 89 9.8 0 0 0.6 0 0 0 0 0.6 29.3
Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report
Page 145
Mada Patna 19.6 35.6 0 0.1 0 21.6 0 0 0 23 95.9Mahanthalingapura 28.7 62.9 0 0 0 5.6 0 0 0.3 2.5 47.6Maragondahalli 25.2 42.2 10.5 0.1 0.1 22 0 0 0.1 0 94.3Masthena Halli 71.2 10.4 3 0 0 9.3 0 0 0 6 79.4Muthanallur 36.2 37.8 2.1 0 0.2 23.7 0 0 0 0 65.1Nanjapura 8.6 81 0 0 0 10.5 0 0 0 0 39Nosenur 49.6 50.4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 70.9Nosenur Gollahalli 0.9 81.2 0 0 0 17.9 0 0 0 0 14.3Rajapura 0 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 47.1Ramakrishnapura 12.1 87.9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 39.4S.Bingipura 8.9 1.4 0.2 0 3.8 81.6 0 0 0 4.1 43.3Seethanaikana Halli 62.7 1.2 10.8 0 0 22.9 0 0 0 2.4 47Thirupalya 31.2 39.6 0.5 0 0.1 22.5 0.1 0 0 5.9 79.8Vaddara Palya 75.4 10.2 0 0 0 13.2 0.1 0 0 1.1 84.8Vaderamanchanahalli 4.1 23.3 0 3.3 6.8 61.9 0 0.1 0 0.5 90.4Veerasandra 40 28.7 0 0 1.3 29.6 0.1 0 0 0.2 94Yarandahalli 34.9 1.3 0.2 0.1 4.1 51.6 5.5 0.1 0 2.3 91.7Within 5 Km to 10 kmA Medihalli 1 87.5 0 0 0 11.5 0 0 0 0 16.3Adigondanahalli 76.6 10.9 0 0 0 12.1 0 0 0 0.3 53.9Adur 65.6 30.6 0 0 0.6 3.2 0 0 0 0 34.4Agasa Thimmanahalli 0 0 0 0 0 100 0 0 0 0 60Ali Bommasandra 0 76.9 0 0 0 23.1 0 0 0 0 48Amani Doddakere 0 66.7 0 0 0 33.3 0 0 0 0 59.8Andapura 94.9 1.6 0.9 0.5 0 2 0 0 0 0 95.8Anekal (TMC) 35.1 53.8 0.2 0 0.1 8.2 0 0 0 2.5 94.6Aravantigepura 9.1 43.6 34.5 0 10.9 1.8 0 0 0 0 49.1Avadadenahalli 0 58.3 0 0 0 41.7 0 0 0 0 30.1
Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report
Page 146
Avalahalli 0.9 94.3 0 0 0 4.7 0 0 0 0 80.2Bagganadoddi 2 94.1 0 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 12.9Balagaranahalli 6.1 68.3 0.1 0 0 25.2 0 0.1 0.1 0.1 93.9Bandapura 0 95.3 2.6 0 0 1.7 0 0 0 0.4 60.9Bannerughatta 40.7 41.7 0 1.1 0 15.7 0.1 0 0 0.8 85.4Begihalli 77.5 6 0.6 0.6 7.1 7.1 0 0 0 1.1 57Bendiganahalli 0 82.3 0 0 0 16.6 0 0 0 1.1 58Bhovi Palya (Shanthi Pur) 27.3 55.8 0.1 0 3.3 2.6 0 0 0 10.8 85.8Bommandahalli 3.4 78.7 0.6 0 0 17.2 0 0 0 0 47.1Bukkasagara 66.4 19.4 0 0 0.2 13.7 0.2 0 0 0 78Byagadadenahalli 78.6 9.1 0 0 0 11.8 0 0 0 0.5 48.1Byrappanahalli 97.2 1.7 0 0.6 0.6 0 0 0 0 0 96Chandapura 34.6 5.2 0 0.2 0.3 59.4 0 0.2 0 0 92.3Chandrapura -Chatrakane 11.9 15.9 0.1 0.1 0 39.7 0 0.1 3.4 28.8 96.5Chikkanahalli 1.3 78.9 0 0 0 19.7 0 0 0 0 55.3Gollahalli 19.1 10.6 0 0 0 14.9 0 0 0 55.3 44.7Gowrenahalli 0.9 96.9 0 0 1.8 0.4 0 0 0 0 82Guddahatti 2.4 51.6 0 0 0 46 0 0 0 0 60.5Gulimangala 35.2 19.9 1.7 0 0.6 42.6 0 0 0 0 64.2Halesampigehalli 88 5 0 0 0 6.9 0 0 0 0 89.6Harapanahalli 13.2 31.7 0 0 3.8 44.6 0 0.6 0 6 94.9Hasaruvani 0 0 0 0 0 100 0 0 0 0 0Honnakalasapura 2.9 83.7 0 0 12.5 1 0 0 0 0 37.5Hullahalli 18.4 54.5 0.4 0.3 20.2 4.4 0.3 0.1 0.1 1.3 57.2Huskur 30.3 31.3 0 0 1.2 36.9 0 0 0 0.3 87.2Iggalur 38.4 42.8 0.2 0 0 18.4 0 0 0 0.1 79.2Indlawadi 1.8 93.1 0 0 0 5.1 0 0 0 0 43.6Itchangur 0 0 0 0 0 99.7 0 0.3 0 0 62.6
Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report
Page 147
J.Bingipura 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100Jangal Palya 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100Kadajakkanahalli 13.9 0 0 0 0 84.4 0 0 1.6 0 28.7Kaggalipura 1.7 46.6 0 0 0 51.7 0 0 0 0 64.7Kalbalu 6.6 86.7 0 0 6.4 0.2 0 0 0 0 51.4Kalkere 30.2 1.1 0 0 0 68.7 0 0 0 0 68.7Kammasandra Agrahara 0 86.3 0 0 0 13.7 0 0 0 0 32.4Kempavaderahalli 75.6 24.4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 52.6Krishnasagara 35.3 47.6 0 0 0 15.9 1.2 0 0 0 66.5Laxmi Sagara 94.4 0.4 0 0 0 5.2 0 0 0 0 35.5Madivala 12.2 38.7 0 0 0 48.3 0 0.2 0 0.6 51Mahanthalingapura 28.7 62.9 0 0 0 5.6 0 0 0.3 2.5 47.6Mantapa 30 53.2 0 0 1.4 11.6 0 0 0 3.9 71.3Marasur 25 61.1 0 0 0 13.9 0 0 0 0 72.2Marasur Agrahara 26.9 69.2 3.8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100Muthanallur Amanikere 0 83.1 0 0 0 16.9 0 0 0 0 92.1Nallasandra 29 54.3 0.5 0 0 16.1 0 0 0 0 66.1Neralur 10.2 11.6 1.5 0 0.1 76.5 0 0.1 0 0.1 88.7Ragihalli 61.6 4.8 1.2 0 0 32.2 0 0.2 0 0 38.2Ramasagara 19.5 54.7 0.2 1.1 0 23.3 0 0 0.4 0.8 79Sakalawara 19.4 69.9 0.5 0 0 8.7 0 0.5 0 1 54.9Sidihosakote 0.9 92.6 0 0 0 6.1 0 0 0 0.4 39.1Sonnanayakanapura 64.8 26.3 1.7 1.4 3.1 1.7 0 0 0 1 32.1Soppahalli 99.2 0.8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 31.4Sriramapura 4.3 47.4 0.9 0 42.2 4.3 0 0.4 0.4 0 94.8Suragajakkanahalli 10.6 59.5 0 0 0 28 0 0.3 0 1.6 86.2Thattanahalli 0 87.7 0.4 0 0 9.1 0 0 0 2.9 25.5Thimmasandra 0 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5
Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report
Page 148
Thirumagondanahalli 24.7 43.9 0 0 0 31.1 0 0 0 0.3 58.7Vaderahalli 0 0 0 0 0 100 0 0 0 0 71.4BBMP part 24.7 43.9 0 0 0 31.1 0 0 0 0.3 96.4
Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report
Page 149
3.12.2.5 Education facilities
The study area has a higher literacy rate due to the urbanization and industrialization of the
area. The main reasons are the accessibility to the primary education and higher education.
The literacy rate of the area is 83.74. The dropout rate is low due to the awareness of the
importance of the education. The dropout rate in elementary education is 0.2 (Anekal taluk).
Literacy details within the study area are given in Table 3-44.
Table 3-44: Literacy details within the study area
Village Name No. of Literates Percentage
Within 5 KmBanahalli 4476 86.91Bande Nalla Sandra 1032 83.43Bommasandra 12104 89.45Dyavasandra 393 77.51Gollahalli 6236 92.22Haragadde 5876 84.39Harapanahalli 2218 83.95Hebbagodi 28258 91.22Hennagara 2048 84.14Hinnakki 826 68.10Hosahalli 553 72.76Hulimangala 1840 74.58Jigani 12859 86.10Kachanaikanahalli 4221 84.95Kittaganahalli 5465 84.53Konasandra 466 77.54Koppa 1022 80.28Koppa Gate 823 69.45Kumbaranahalli 497 77.66Kyalasanahalli 1308 76.90Lingapura 600 76.43Mada Patna 3100 85.90Mahanthalingapura 1417 59.66Maragondahalli 5906 78.43Masthena Halli 1027 76.81Nanjapura 219 60.83Nosenur 763 73.51Nosenur Gollahalli 369 78.68Rajapura 634 78.56Ramakrishnapura 158 57.25S.Bingipura 1070 66.50Seethanaikana Halli 216 72.48
Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report
Page 150
Thirupalya 11765 87.08Vaddara Palya 3151 77.06Vaderamanchanahalli 1992 84.91Veerasandra 7156 87.69Yarandahalli 4340 86.82Within 5 Km to 10 KmA Medihalli 307 74.51Adigondanahalli 925 75.76Adur 474 74.06Agasa Thimmanahalli 15 78.95Ali Bommasandra 467 75.08Amani Doddakere 19 65.52Andapura 1166 77.37Anekal 32268 81.78Aravantigepura 144 62.34Avadadenahalli 398 66.44Avalahalli 364 73.83Bagganadoddi 171 51.66Balagaranahalli 4215 86.66Bandapura 576 74.71Bannerughatta 5745 81.35Begihalli 908 72.18Bendiganahalli 414 73.14Bhovi Palya 3148 81.07Bommandahalli 433 63.03Bukkasagara 1204 79.00Byagadadenahalli 1155 86.19Byrappanahalli 293 68.94Chandapura 3428 86.17Chandrapura -Chatrakane 4822 92.13Chikka Hosahalli 859 71.05Chikkanahalli 147 54.44Gollahalli 78 63.93Gowrenahalli 1169 63.74Guddahatti 1064 73.33Gulimangala 596 78.73Halesampigehalli 668 82.67Harapanahalli 2218 83.95Hasaruvani 10 76.92Honnakalasapura 265 60.36Huskur 1819 78.51Iggalur 3607 86.46Indlawadi 1186 69.36Itchangur 930 78.41J.Bingipura 57 82.61
Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report
Page 151
Jangal Palya 311 63.60Kadajakkanahalli 349 70.22Kaggalipura 170 79.81Kalbalu 1376 78.09Kalkere 2095 83.40Kammasandra Agrahara 343 61.69Karpur 1558 81.70Kempavaderahalli 158 62.45Krishnasagara 445 78.76Laxmi Sagara 641 74.45Madivala 1846 74.62Mantapa 997 79.38Marasur 2170 80.67Marasur Agrahara 100 80.65Muthanallur 1143 74.85Muthanallur Amanikere 178 81.65Nallasandra 544 75.98Neralur 4292 87.34Ragihalli 867 59.18Ramasagara 1553 79.28Sakalawara 546 73.49Sidihosakote 1044 73.16Sonnanayakanapura 580 54.87Soppahalli 261 61.12Sriramapura 809 83.14Suragajakkanahalli 893 77.12Thattanahalli 590 69.17Thimmasandra 111 63.43Thirumagondanahalli 1508 81.08Vaderahalli 39 70.91BBMP part 61098 87.65
Source: Census 2011
The available education infrastructure (Block level information about schools in the Anekal
Block based on DISE 2015-16 data is given in Table 3-45.
Table 3-45: Schools in Anekal Block including both public and private management
Prim
ary o
nly
Prim
ary w
ithUp
per P
rimar
y
Prim
ary w
ithUp
per P
rimar
y Sec
and H
.Sec
Uppe
r Prim
ary +
Sec a
nd H
.Sec
Prim
aryw
ithUp
per
Prim
ary&
Sec.
Uppe
rPrim
aryw
ithSe
c
Sec o
nly
Hr.S
ecOn
ly/Jr.
Colle
ge Total
190 179 17 1 80 4 39 2 5123.12.2.6 Other infrastructure facilities
Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report
Page 152
The common parks, gardens, play grounds are available in the project area, but it is not
sufficient for the growing population. The open space required for the children and elder
citizens to move around and for outdoor activity. It is very important for maintaining human
health, so that it will strengthen the foundation of the society. Industries can contribute in
developing and maintaining the parks, garden and open space as environmental and social
activity. The area has traditionally enjoying open space and space for playing, but the
haphazard developments will deter such facility. There are ample opportunities in the study
area for developing tree avenues. As the urbanization is happening, the same time the road
infrastructure is being developed for the man and materials being transported from up
country area. The issue is the roads are getting damaged as the high vehicular movement.
The length of the roads in Anekal taluk is given in Table 3-46.
Table 3-46 : Details of roads in Anekal taluk
National Highway State Highway Major District Road26 67.8 109.37
The area needs more passenger shelters at bus stops and appropriate road signs to be
placed at conspicuous places.
Summary of socioeconomic indicators within the study area is given in Table 3-47.Table 3-47: Summary of socioeconomic Indicators within the Study area
S.No Particulars Study Area Unit1 Number of villages in the Study Area 109 Nos.
2 Total Households 85055 Nos.
3 Total Population 329236 Nos.
4 Children Population (<6 Years Old) 37386 Nos.5 SC Population 67178 Nos.6 ST Population 10439 Nos.7 Total Working Population 209776 Nos.8 Main Workers 191866 Nos.9 Marginal Workers 17910 Nos.
10 Agricultural Workers 21572 Nos.11 Household Industries 5859 Nos.12 Other Workers 182345 Nos.13 Institutional Birth Rate 100 Percentage
14 Childhood Immunization 78.6 Percentage
15 Literates 302751 Nos.
Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report
Page 153
Figure 3-32 Map Showing the Study area of the Project in Figure FD 0301
Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report
Page 154
Figure 3-33 Map Showing the Air monitoring locations in FigureFD0302
Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report
Page 155
Figure 3-34 Map Showing the Noise monitoring locations in FigureFD0303
Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report
Page 156
Figure 3-35 Map Showing the Ground Water & Surface Water monitoring locations in FigureFD0304
Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report
Page 157
Figure 3-36 Map Showing the Soil monitoring locations in Figure FD0305
Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report
Page 158
CHAPTER – 4ANTICIPATED ENVIRONMENTAL
IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES
Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report
Page 159
4 ANTICIPATED ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS AND MITIGATIONMEASURES
4.1 General
Environmental Impact is any change in the environmental attributes, adverse or beneficial,
caused or induced by the proposed action or set of actions. The predicted adverse impacts
during each stage of project development are superimposed over the baseline status of the
existing environmental quality to infer the scenario of environmental conditions in the post-
project stage. The main purpose of identifying the impacts is that it helps in adopting appropriate
mitigation measures for the adverse consequences if any.
It also addresses the prediction and evaluation of the various significant impacts that are likely
to occur. The impacts on the environmental indices viz. air, water, soil, noise, biological and
socioeconomic conditions are scrutinized methodically and assessed. The most likely impacts
on the environment due to the proposed project need to be appraised during the operation
phase. The particulars on impacts that could be triggered on the environmental attributes by the
activities of the proposed project are discussed below.
4.2 Construction Phase
The total built up area is divided into various sections like production blocks, Engineering,
warehouse, Administration, canteen, toilets etc. There is adequate space and provision for
operations. The plant facilities have been designed and set up with the objective to carry out all
chemical reactions and processes.
As the entire infrastructure needed for expansion is already available there is no demand of any
further infrastructure. In the existing facility only proposed products will be manufactured and no
other construction activities So there is no any impact on Land, Air, Water, Noise, Soil &
Ecology Environment during change in product mix
4.3 Operation Phase
From an environmental perspective, this phase is of paramount significance due to its potential
to invoke long-term impacts. The adverse effects that are likely to occur during this operational
Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report
Page 160
phase of the project are: Air Pollution (gaseous emissions), Effluent generation, noise
generation, solid waste generation.
4.3.1 Air Environment
Base line data reveals that ambient air quality in the study area for the Parameters PM, SO2 &
NO2, are well within the permissible Limits as prescribed by the National Ambient Air Quality
Standards (NAAQS) for Industrial Area, Residential, Rural & Other areas.
The major air pollution sources from the industry are DG sets, boilers and reactors. The DG set
and boiler sources are provided with stacks of adequate height so as to disperse the emanating
flue gases containing suspended particulate matter, oxides of sulfur and nitrogen & TVOC, HC
without affecting the ground level concentrations. The emissions generated from the reactors
are scrubbed out by wet scrubbers.
4.3.1.1 Study Area
CIPLA is a global pharmaceutical company whose goal is to ensure that no patient shall be
denied access to high quality & affordable medicine and support. The current study area is
ideally positioned at Jigani industrial area, Bangalore, Karnataka shown in Figure 4-1.
Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report
Page 161
Figure 4-1 Study area showing the Stacks and DG set location in CIPLA boundary
4.3.1.2 Objective
The objective of this study is to evaluate the ambient air quality due to emission of gaseous
pollutant from Existing stacks for the study period (Sep to Nov 2016) by using numerical
simulation methods. By using these methods we can determine the maximum ground level
concentrations (GLC) for various air pollutants through air dispersion modeling technique. The
maximum GLC’s would then be utilized to assess the extent and magnitude of potential air
quality and its impact resulting from the emissions from the existing stack of CIPLA.
4.3.1.3 Meteorological Data
In order to understand the wind pattern of the study region wind-rose diagram was plotted using
WRPLOT Figure 4-2. Over this period the predominant wind direction was between E and NE
with 6.7% calm conditions. The metrological data for the month of November 2016 is considered
for GLC modeling for evaluating ambient air quality. The various parameters like temperature,
pressure, wind speed, wind direction etc., were considered and taken from secondary sources.
Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report
Page 162
Figure 4-2 Wind Rose diagram and frequency distribution for the month of Nov 2016
4.3.1.4 AERMOD Process
AERMOD is a modeling system consisting of three separate modules: AERMET, AERMAP and
AERMOD. AERMET is a meteorological preprocessor and uses hourly surface observations,
cloud cover, and upper air parameters respectively. The terrain preprocessor AERMAP uses
Digital Elevation Model (DEM) maps as well as user generated receptor grids. AERMAP’s
output file consists of the x, y locations of each receptor, mean sea level (MSL) elevation, and
hill profile parameter.
AERMOD directly reads the three output files created by the pre-processing programs and,
along with user-entered source information, predicts ambient air concentrations for a variety of
pollutants and averaging periods ranging from 1-hour to annual. AERMOD has a regulatory
default option, as well as rural or urban dispersion coefficients, urban population settings, and
other features specific to the model. AERMOD also includes the Plume Rise Model
Enhancement (PRIME) building downwash algorithm, which calculates directional specific
building downwash widths and heights as well as downwash parameters for the cavity region of
the building (earlier downwash algorithms ignored the cavity region, and models did not
calculate concentrations for receptors located inside this area).
Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report
Page 163
4.3.1.5 The status of air pollution due to the existing DG sets Boilers and scrubbers
In order to obtain the concentrations from the existing boilers and DG sets installed in
the study region emission inventory was carried out Table 4-1 and dispersion modeling
was carried for PM, SO2 and NOx and accordingly Iso-concentration plots were
generated and shown in Figure 4-3 - Figure 4-6. The first ten highest concentrations of
each pollutant were summarized in Table 4-2 - Table 4-5.
Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report
Page 164
Table 4-1 Existing Stack emission details of CIPLA
S.No
Existing
ProposedSource Fuel
Used
Kg/hr incase of
liquid fuel
Gas ExitTemp(0 C)
StackDia (m)
StackHeightAboveground
level (m)
Emissions (g/s)
PM SO2 NOx CO
1 DG SET (1250KVA* 3) HSD
220 Lts/Hr232 0.31 20 0.044 0.0086 0.22 0.11
No change
2 Boiler 2TPH * 3 FO 190 Lts/Hr 100 0.59 30 0.0681 0.1193 1.045 0.095
3 Solid wasteIncenerator HSD 05 Lts/Hr 140 0.32 20 0.0006 0.0010 0.0092 0.0008
4 Scrubber - 1 NA NA 42 0.16 13 0.002222
Negligible
5 Scrubber - 2 NA NA 46 0.16 13 0.001944
6 Scrubber - 3 NA NA 47 0.22 13 0.002778
7 Scrubber - 4 NA NA 48 0.62 13 0.027778
8 Scrubber - 5 NA NA 48 0.48 13 0.019444
9 Scrubber – 6 NA NA 46 0.32 13 0.001944
10 Scrubber – 7 NA NA 46 0.32 13 0.001944
11 Scrubber - 8 NA NA 46 0.32 13 0.001944
TOTAL (g/s) 0.172 0.129 1.274 0.206
Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report
Page 165
Figure 4-3 Ground level concentrations of PM during Nov-2016
Figure 4-4 Ground level concentrations of SO2 during Nov-2016
Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report
Page 166
Figure 4-5 Ground level concentrations of NOx during Nov-2016
Figure 4-6 Ground level concentrations of CO during Nov-2016
Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report
Page 167
Particulate MatterTable 4-2 TOP 10 HIGHEST CONCENTRATIONS OF PARTICULATE MATTER
S.NO UTM coordinates (m) Conc.(µg/m3)
Distance from Centerof Sources (Km)
Direction fromSource CenterE N
1 786570.9 1414871 0.30717 1 W2 787566.2 1413867 0.187 1 S3 786570.9 1413867 0.17853 1.25 SW4 787566.2 1414871 0.16099 0 05 785575.5 1414871 0.14448 2 W6 788561.5 1414871 0.12372 1 E7 787566.2 1412864 0.12018 2 S8 783584.9 1411860 0.1118 5.02 SW9 784580.2 1413867 0.10535 3.2 WSW
10 785575.5 1412864 0.0983 2.8 SW
Sulphur Dioxide (SO2)Table 4-3 TOP 10 HIGHEST CONCENTRATIONS OF SULPHUR DIOXIDE
S.NO UTM coordinates (m) Conc.(µg/m3)
Distance from Centerof Sources (Km)
Direction fromSource CenterE N
1 786570.9 1414871 0.31416 1 W2 787566.2 1413867 0.18928 1 S3 786570.9 1413867 0.17997 1.25 SW4 785575.5 1414871 0.14718 2 W5 788561.5 1414871 0.13942 1 E6 783584.9 1411860 0.1127 5.02 SW7 784580.2 1413867 0.10837 3.1 WSW8 785575.5 1412864 0.09327 2.8 SW9 784580.2 1412864 0.09214 3.6 SW
10 787566.2 1412864 0.09183 2 S
Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report
Page 168
Oxides of Nitrogen (NOx)
Table 4-4 TOP 10 HIGHEST CONCENTRATIONS OF OXIDES OF NITROGEN
S.NO UTM coordinates (m) Conc.(µg/m3)
Distance from Centerof Sources (Km)
Direction fromSource CenterE N
1 786570.9 1414871 3.22073 1 W2 787566.2 1413867 1.94914 1 S3 786570.9 1413867 1.85599 1.25 SW4 785575.5 1414871 1.51219 2 W5 788561.5 1414871 1.38386 1 E6 783584.9 1411860 1.16228 5.02 SW7 784580.2 1413867 1.1096 3.1 WSW8 785575.5 1412864 0.98326 2.8 SW9 784580.2 1412864 0.96397 3.6 SW
10 784580.2 1414871 0.93351 3 W
Carbon Monoxide (CO)
Table 4-5 TOP 10 HIGHEST CONCENTRATIONS OF PARTICULATE MATTER
S.NO UTM coordinates (m) Conc.(µg/m3)
Distance from Centerof Sources (Km)
Direction fromSource CenterE N
1 786570.9 1414871 0.58723 1 W2 787566.2 1414871 0.4002 0 03 787566.2 1413867 0.35873 1 S4 786570.9 1413867 0.343 1.25 SW5 785575.5 1414871 0.27649 2 W6 787566.2 1412864 0.27254 2 S7 788561.5 1414871 0.22724 1 E8 783584.9 1411860 0.21481 5.02 SW9 784580.2 1413867 0.20085 3.1 WSW
10 785575.5 1412864 0.19302 2.8 SW
4.3.1.6 CONCLUSION
From the Dispersion modeling results for the air pollutants due to existing DG set, Boilers and
8 scrubbers it is observed that the maximum concentrations of PM10, SO2, NOx and CO
observed to be 0.307 µg/m3, 0.314 µg/m3, 3.221 µg/m3, and 0.587 µg/m3 respectively. So it can
be concluded that the ground level concentrations (GLC) of PM10, SO2, NOx and CO are well
Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report
Page 169
within the standard of CPCB limits and the impact was negligible/minimum. The total increase
in concentrations above baseline status to estimate the percentage increase and
summarized in Table 4-6.
Table 4-6 Total Maximum GLCs from the proposed Stack Emissions for NOV 2016
Pollutant
AverageBase line
Conc.(µg/m3)
Estimated Max.Conc. from
source (µg/m3)
Total Conc.(µg/m3)
NAAQstandard
Distance fromSource Direction
SO2 13.8 0.314 13.8 80 1 WNOx 29.1 3.221 29.1 80 1 WPM 64.3 0.307 64.3 100 1 W
Since, no additional stacks are proposed the estimated concentration at source isalready included in existing baseline. So the percentage (%) increase in concentration iszero.
4.3.1.7 Pollution Control Measures
Air Pollution & Fugitive Emission Control
The major air pollution sources from the industry are DG sets, boilers and scrubbers. The DG
set and boiler sources are provided with stacks of adequate height so as to disperse the
emanating flue gases containing suspended particulate matter, oxides of sulfur and nitrogen
without affecting the ground level concentrations. The emissions generated from the reactors
are scrubbed out by wet scrubbers. The source of emission, capacity and the various Air
Pollution Control (APC) measures taken are listed in the Table 4-7.
There is no increase in emission source due to proposed change in product mix. All the reactors
have condensers to condense the solvent vapors. The reactor vents are connected to the
scrubber to neutralize the toxic vapors. Scrubbers have been provided with FRP/ water
circulation type having neutralizing agents.
The Scrubber attached to control the fugitive emissions and the details are attached in
Annexure P
Table 4-7 Air Pollution Control Measures
Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report
Page 170
S.No
Existing Proposed
MoEF Approved No ofstacks Type of fuel Sulphur
contentKgs/hr incase of
liquid fuel
Chimneyheight (in mts)& air pollutioncontrol system
providedproposed
1 Attached toprocess
5 NA NA NA 3 m ARL/9 mAGL & scrubber
No change
2 Attached tofinishing area
2 NA NA NA Dust collector
3 Formulation 2 NA NA NA 3 m ARL/9 mAGL & scrubber
4 Quality Control 1 NA NA NA 3 m ARL/9 mAGL & scrubber
5 TFH system200000 k cal
1 NA NA NA 20 m AGL
6 Steam Boilers (2TPH x 3)
3 Furnace oil 4.0 % 190 Kg/Hr 30 m AGL
7Solid wasteincinerator 25kg/Hr
1 HSD 0.25 % 05 Lts/Hr 30 m AGL &Scrubber
8 Vapourabsorption
1 HSD 0.25 % 25 Lts/Hr 20 m AGL
9 (1250 x 3) KVADG sets
3 HSD 0.25 % 220 Lts/Hr 20 m AGL &silencers
4.3.2 Water Requirement
Total water requirement is 300 KLD of which fresh water requirement is 140 KLD; Water source
from the In house bore wells and private tankers. There is no change in the new proposal.
4.3.2.1 Impact due to Waste Water Generation
The source of wastewater generation from CIPLA is as follows:
Industrial process wastewater/effluent
Boiler and cooling water blow down
Domestic wastewater/Sewage
Equipment cleaning and floor washings, etc.
4.3.2.2 Mitigation Measures
Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report
Page 171
Various mitigation measures are existing to minimise the impact if any on the water environment
due to the wastewater/runoff generation during the operation phase of the project.
Institutional arrangement for monitoring of water by pollution
Preventive measures as well as after, measures in case any contamination
Monitoring should ensure early determination of any threats to water resources in terms
of contamination
If contaminated proper expertise need to be brought in to schematise the various
recharge mechanism to reduce or nullify the impact effects.
4.3.2.3 Wastewater Quality and Quantity
Sewage and effluent generated from process and washings are taken to combined Effluent and
Sewage Treatment Plant of capacity 160 KLD further processed in RO plant. Due to proposed
there is no change in wastewater quality and quantity.
Rejects from RO Plant along with High TDS effluent is treated in Multiple Effect Evaporator of
40 KLD capacity. The treated waste water of 160 KLD is reused for Boiler, cooling towers and
Toilet flushes.
Zero liquid discharge system is maintained in the facilities. There is no change in the new
proposal.
Table 4-8 Liquid Waste Generation & Treatment
Phase Population(Nos)
Qty ofwater
required(KLD)
Sewage/EffluentGenerated
(KLD)
Treatment Method
Existing Operation 300 300 160 Treated in combined ETP andSTP
Proposed construction Not applicable
After expansion Operation No change after proposed change in productmix
Process 300 300 160
The source of waste water, treatment methods and the final disposal of each type of wastewater
generated in Error! Reference source not found. & Figure 2-8 respectively and the ETP and
STP process flow diagrams along with their specifications are attached as Annexure L.
Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report
Page 172
4.3.3 Noise Environment
4.3.3.1 Impacts
Major sources of noise generation in CIPLA unit, noise generation sources during operationalphase are classified into two categories:
Stationary sources due to operation of heavy duty machinery at the project site like
Boilers, Compressors, DG sets, Pumps etc.
Mobile sources corresponding to mainly vehicular traffic for staff mobilization, materials,
material transportation, liquid fuel transportation to project site, etc.
The impact of vibrations beyond the site would be negligible during normal operation
phase. However, the impacts on workers engaged in the plant area would be
considerable due to occupational exposure. The fixed major equipment/units such as
boiler house, compressors, pumps, DG sets etc., also generate vibrations during
operational phase and may cause exposures to the workers/operators engaged at these
units.
4.3.3.2 Mitigation Measures
The major noise generating equipment like Compressors, DG sets, TFH, Boiler Feed
water pumps etc. is enclosed in an acoustic enclosure designed for an insertion loss of
25 dB (A) and silencers to other equipment etc.
Major noise generating equipment is designed with 85 dB (A) ensuring cumulative noise
at 1.0 m remains at 85 dB (A).
The occupational noise exposure to the workers in the form of eight hourly time weighted
average is maintained well within the prescribed Occupational Safety and Health
Administration (OSHA) standard limits.
Adequate PPE are provided to the staff exposing to noise risks.
Acoustic silencers are provided in equipment wherever necessary.
Acoustic design with sound proof glass panelling is provided for critical operator cabins /
control rooms of individual modules as well as central control facilities.
Use of personal protective equipments/devices such as ear-muffs, ear plugs etc. is
strictly enforced for the workers engaged in high noise areas.
Existing premises will attenuate and mitigate noise levels, 33 % greenbelt developed
along the periphery and at various locations within the industry.
Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report
Page 173
Ambient noise levels are monitored at regular intervals during operational phase of the
project.
Various standards pertaining to vibrations are formulated by statutory bodies like Bureau
of Indian Standards (BIS) and Director General of Mines Safety (DGMS), which is being
practiced would be continued to mitigate the workers’ health effects due to vibrations.
4.3.4 Solid waste management
4.3.4.1 Impacts
During operation phase is likely to generate various types of solid waste which can be broadly
categorized as Hazardous Wasteand Non-hazardous Waste. Further, the generated solid waste
generation may include Biodegradable, Recyclable and Inert compounds. If the solid waste
generated is not properly managed and disposed in unauthorised manner, it will impact on soil
quality, groundwater and air quality.
4.3.4.2 Mitigation Measures
The Source of municipal waste in the industry will be from the domestic use and Strict
guidelines put in place in order to manage the solid waste generation during the operational
phase.
The various hazardous waste generated from the process is stored in a separate hazardous
waste storage area and properly disposed as per the Hazardous and Other Wastes
(Management and Trans boundary Movement) Amendment Rules, 2016. Agreement between
TSDF and CIPLA for collection, transport, storage, treatment and disposal and also we have a
valid agreement with M/s. Enano incintech for Incineration of incinerable wastes.
Used Oil - Collected in Leak proof containers and disposed only to KSPCB registered
authorized reprocessors provided the oil meets the standards as per schedule-5 part-A
of the rules.
Oil soaked cotton waste, Process residues & Waste and Distillation Residue - Stored in
a secured manner and hand over to KSPCB authorized incinerator/Co processing in
cement kiln.
Spent solvent - Stored in a secured manner and hand over to KSPCB authorized
recycler.
Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report
Page 174
Sludge from ETP & MEE - Stored in a secured manner and hand over to KSPCB
authorized TSDF.
Thus, it can be concluded that there will be no impact on the surrounding environment due to
generation and disposal of solid waste during operation phase of the project.
4.3.5 Land Environment
Land is owned by M/s. CIPLA Limited. This land has been allotted by KIADB in the Industrial
area. The present land use is industrial. The Plant facilities are spread over 115335.23 sq.m,
(28.49 Acres / 11.52 Ha), Total built up area (Land utilized for buildings, utilities purpose, other
allied purpose like roads, machinery equipments etc..,) is 54997.45 sq.m (13.58 Acres) KIADB
Land which is completely fortified and protected on all four sides by boundary walls.
As the entire infrastructure needed for expansion is already available there is no demand of any
further infrastructure. In the existing facility only proposed products will be manufactured and no
other construction activities induced. The Proposed activity does not change the land use
classification of the site
There will be no increase in air pollution due to proposed Change in Product Mix, The Air and
Emissions source from DG, Boilers, Process with APC measures, adequate stacks heights and
vents attached to scrubbers will be within the norms. Moreover, vents of proper height have
been provided for quick dispersion and dilution of pollutants into the air. Thus, there will be no
additional effect on the surrounding soil due to gaseous emission from the project.
There will be no major effect of wastewater on soil, Installed ZLD plant to treat the effluent. The
domestic wastewater will be disposed through septic tank / soak pit system. Thus, there will be
practically very insignificant impact on land due to disposal of wastewater.
All necessary control steps for each type of Solid Wastes generated will be taken, and hence
there will be no impact on solid wastes generation on surrounding soil environment.
4.3.6 Ecology
Air emissions, liquid effluent disposal and solid waste generation are likely to have some impact
on terrestrial ecosystem. However, there will be no net increase in air pollution. Plant is already
Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report
Page 175
maintaining ZLD system and the solid wastes will be collected and disposed off properly.
Hence, negligible impact on ecology is expected.
Existing Green belt is 9.39 Acres (33 %) of 28.49 Acres, greenbelt developed along the
periphery and at various locations within the industry.
4.3.7 Socio-Economic Environment
The project to manufacture bulk-drugs is likely to have certain positive impacts on socio
economic environment.
Company has carried out various activities in nearby villages as part of their CSR like organizing
blood donation camp, green belt development etc. The company will have an intention to spend
around 2% of the profit as per company act. In coming year it is tentatively planned CSR activity
as below.
Indirect employment potential - Various modes of indirect employment i.e. transportation,
increased business opportunities to shopkeepers etc. Over-all there is improvement in quality of
life of the people in the study area.
Thus, it can be said that the proposed project will have significant beneficial impact on the socio
economic scenario in the study area.
Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report
Page 176
CHAPTER – 5ANALYSIS OF ALTERNATIVES
Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report
Page 177
5 ANALYSIS OF ALTERNATIVES
5.1 History and Background of the Site
M/s. CIPLA Limited was established in the year 1973 by late Dr. K. A. Hamied now developing
under leadership of Mr. Y. K. Hamied with strong focus in India & Abroad. It is ranked amongst
top 20 in India out of 300 Indian pharma companies-ORG-IMS 2012. The CIPLA group has
approximately more than 25000 employees comprising management, marketing and technical
professionals.
M/s. CIPLA Limited proposes the change in product mix of the Bulk Drugs and Intermediates
manufacturing Unit with an area of 11.42 Ha (28.23 Acres) within the Karnataka Industrial Area
Development Board, Bengaluru. CIPLA Ltd. – 100% EOU, Plot No. 285, 286 & 287, KIADB
Industrial Area, Bommasandra-jigani Link Road, Phase IV, Anekal Taluk, Bengaluru Urban
District – 560 105, Karnataka.
5.2 Current Proposal
As the proposed project is change in product mix in existing unit in KIADB Jigani, there are no
alternative sites analysed as stated in section 5.1.
However based on the current set up the following are the advantages of the site:
The project site is located within KIADB Industrial Area, which is notified industrial area
No R &R Issues
No public hearing is required as per EIA notification
Existing infrastructure of can be utilised for the proposed project
Site is well connected by road & rail
KIADB corridor road Bengaluru to Hosur NH-44 (old NH-7) at a distance of 5.4 km
towards NE
Moreover this is now identified as one of the most important identified KIADB. This Industrial is
a focused area for major development and also for future investment.
5.3 Results of the Analysis
Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report
Page 178
The process used for production is made by M/s. CIPLA Limited. And in house there would not
be any changes in the process. The process made by M/s CIPLA Limited is cost effective with
high quality in output.
No alternative site has been considered due to the benefits of the above site. With its innovative
technology the project is expected to meet the market demands of the pharmaceutical products
that will aid in addressing the issues in healthcare as well as lead to economic prosperity.
The current site is an earmarked industrial area by KIADB, Jigani. Therefore no further site
analysis has been carried out under this EIA.
Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report
Page 179
CHAPTER – 6ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING
PROGRAM
Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report
Page 180
6 ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM (EMP)6.1 Introduction
The primary aim of environmental monitoring program is to formulate a systematic, site-specific
plan for monitoring the environmental parameters within the impact area, during and after
commissioning of the project, which would aid in assessing the effectiveness of mitigation and
environmental protection measures implemented for the proposed project based on the existing
environmental scenario and the probable environmental impacts appraisal.
The plan framed for the intended facility will describe:
The details of the proposed mitigation measures taken for safeguarding the environment
at the project site as well as in the vicinity of the industrial site
Details of management plans (Greenbelt development plan, Solid waste management
plan etc)
Post project environmental monitoring programme to be undertaken after commissioning
of the project.
The associated cost components of the pollution control systems installed at the site.
For each of the environmental attributes, the monitoring plan specifies the parameters to be
monitored, location of monitoring sites, frequency and duration of monitoring and it also denotes
the applicable standards, implementation and supervising responsibilities.
Environmental monitoring programme for the proposed project is formulated. Environmental
Monitoring Programme is an important component during environmental management of the
project. The institutional mechanism planned and implemented to mitigation and monitoring
measures during all stages of the project is discussed in Chapter 9. The project management
especially the Environmental Management Cell (EMC) (described in Chapter 9) should always
go for a rational approach with regards to environmental monitoring. This includes judicious
decision making in consultation with institutional stakeholders (e.g. Karnataka State Pollution
Control Board (KSPCB) or reputed environmental consultants for appropriate changes in the
monitoring strategy, i.e., changes in the sampling frequency, sampling location, monitoring
parameters and any new/additional requirements.
The following are the main objectives of the environmental monitoring program:
From ETP for the protection of water resources
Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report
Page 181
Provide information for documentation of monitoring of mitigation measures and impacts
Tool for the statutory authority of unanticipated adverse impacts or sudden changes in
the environmental condition due to the proposed project
Provides information that could be used for evaluating the effectiveness of implemented
mitigation measures
Provides information that could be used to verify predicted impacts and thus validate
impact prediction techniques
The efficacy of the mitigation measures being followed during operational phases can be
assessed and the measures can be revised, made more stringent and reinforced based
on the monitoring results
Environmental Monitoring can also serve a basic component of a periodic environmental
regulatory auditing program for the proposed project
Coordination with local bodies with regards to solid waste management
The following programme as detailed in the environmental monitoring programme for operation
phases implemented by the CIPLA authority. Besides the monitoring, the compliances to all
environmental clearance conditions and regular permits from KSPCB /MoEF&CC shall be
monitored and reported periodically. The likely significant impacts and mitigation measures will
also be monitored.
The environmental attributes to be monitored during operational phases of the project, specific
description along with technical details of environmental monitoring including the monitoring
parameters, methodology, sampling locations and frequency of monitoring are presented in
Section below.
6.2 Objectives
Ensure day to day operational activities are conducted in a manner in compliance with
the applicable regulatory approvals including legislation and industry standards
Evaluate the adequacy of mitigation and pollution control measures implemented for
reducing the adverse impacts caused during the construction and operation stage and
suggest additional mitigation measures, if appropriate, in the light of the results
Define a detailed framework to monitor and document for achieving full compliance with
statutory requirements
Encourage good environmental management practices through planning, commitment
and continuous improvement
Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report
Page 182
Develop clearly defined environmental monitoring program designed to assess the
nature and extent of environmental impacts of the proposed operations and
progressively refine such programs against the targets
Define roles and responsibilities of site personnel and ensure that all people onsite are
fully informed of their responsibilities and accountabilities with regard to the environment
To comply with all regulations stipulated by the Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB)/
State Pollution Control Board (SPCB) related to air emission and liquid effluent
discharge as per air and water pollution control act/ laws
To handle hazardous wastes as per the Hazardous Waste (Management & Handling)
Rules 1989 and Other Wastes (Management and Transboundary Movement) Rules,
2016 and subsequent amendments
Review, improve and update environmental management procedures and standards
Establish response procedures for actual/potential environmental impacts including
community complaints and ensure corrective action is taken
Perspective budgeting and allocation of funds for environmental management
expenditure, Continuous development and search for innovative technologies for a
cleaner and better environment.
Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report
Page 183
6.3 Project Environmental Monitoring
EnvironmentalAttributes
Parameters to bemonitored No. of Sampling Locations Frequency of
Monitoring Standards Methods for Sampling & Analysis Compliance
Operation Phase
Air Quality PM10, PM2.5, SO2,NO2, O3 and CO
Six (04) Twice a weekFine Particulate Samplers for PM10, PM2.5,Respirable Dust Sampler fitted with Gaseoussampling arrangements for for SO2 and NO2,O3, CO analyser /portable CO meter for CO
National Ambient Air QualityStandards released duringNovember, 2009
Noise Levels Day and night noiselevels
Six (04) Once a month Portable hand-held noise level meter. National Ambient NoiseStandards
Water Quality
Physical, Chemicaland Biological
In addition to theabove, Alpha, Betaemitters (surfacewater)
Groundwater (03)Surface water (03) Once a month Grab sampling and analysis by using standard
methods.
IS10500, 2012 drinking waterstandards for Groundwater
Designated Best UseClassification of Inland SurfaceWater of National RiversConservation Directorate,MoEF&CC for Surface Water
Soil
Soil texture, type,electricalconductivity, pH,infiltration, porosity,etc.,
Six (04) Once a year Collection and analysis of samples as per IS2720 Baseline data
MeteorologyWind speed, winddirection, rainfall,temperature,humidity.
Project Site Hourlymeasurement IMD/CPCB manual -
Treated WastewaterQuality
Physical, Chemicaland Biological
One (01) ETP Inlet ETP outlet
Daily Grab sampling and analysis by using standardmethods.
Environment ProtectionAmendment Rules, 2015
Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report
Page 184
6.4 Monitoring by CIPLA
The environmental monitoring shall be carried out by CIPLA within their industry premises.
Monitoring guidelines should clearly indicate the conditions of discharge and the consequences
with regards to the penal action and the impact to ground water resources of the region.
Groundwater is the sole water source for millions of people in the adjoining areas. CIPLA should
not only limit the environmental monitoring as stated above, environmental monitoring
programme in terms of parameters, location and frequency shall be formulated as per the
stipulations laid by KSPCB/CPCB/MoEF&CC/SEIAA in their respective Environmental
Clearance/Consent To Establish (CTE)/Consent To Operate (CTO).
6.5 Compliance Reports
As a part of environmental monitoring programme, following compliance reports shall be
submitted to KSPCB and Regional Office of MoEF&CC.
Half yearly compliance reports in respect of the stipulated prior environmental clearance
terms and conditions on June 01 and December 01 of every calendar year
Environmental statement (Form-V) for the financial year ending March 31 to KSPCB on
or before September 30 every year
Format for maintaining records of hazardous waste if any in Form-3 as per Hazardous
and other Wastes (Management and Handling and Transboundary movement) Rules,
2008
Format for maintaining hazardous waste imported and exported in Form-10 as per
Hazardous Waste (Management and Transboundary movement) Rules, 2016
Safety data sheet for hazardous chemicals shall be maintained as per schedule-9 of
MSIHC rules, 1989 (amended 2000),
Format for maintaining notification of major accident in schedule-6 as per MISHC rules,
1989 (amended 2000)
Water Cess returns in Form-1 as per Rule 4 (1) of Water (Prevention & Control of
Pollution) Cess Rules 1978 on or before the 5th of every calendar month.
6.6 Plantation Monitoring Programm
Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report
Page 185
Environmental Management Cell/team will monitor the following activities of greenbelt and
landscape development:
Development of nursery (if possible)
Treatment and sowing of seeds
Watering
Transport of seedlings
Planting of seedlings
Fencing of plantation area
Weeding and soil working
Pruning (trimming of plant)
Replacement/Inter planting
Watch and ward of plantation
During operation phase periodic monitoring of plantation growth, manuring, watering, pruning,
and replacement will be performed in order to properly maintain vegetation, greenbelt,
landscape and green cover.
6.7 On-site Mock Drills Requirements
On-site mock drills are very important as it helps employees to be aware of the safety
procedures and how to react during the time of crisis. Conducting mock drills at regular intervals
enhances preparedness and checks the viability of environmental/disaster management plan.
Mock drills are essential for the following reasons:
Helps in revising/improving the environmental/disaster management plan.
Helps to evaluate whether the responsible officials are trained efficiently for the
unforeseen event.
Helps in evaluating whether the emergency equipment are being maintained at CIPLA
premises.
To ensure efficient environmental/disaster management, CIPLA authority/EHS department/EMP
cell shall conduct periodic on-site mock drills in case of occurrence of the following activities:
Fire, Natural calamities (cyclones, floods, earthquakes).
Power break down.
Oil spill.
Bomb threats; War alerts/terrorist attacks.
Mock drills should also involve fire department, police, municipal authorities, hospitals and other
department/agencies that are mandated to provide emergency support. Documenting the
outcome of mock drills is an important aspect as this helps in revising the existing plan more
Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report
Page 186
efficiently. In all safety programmes the right personnel need to be employed and this is of
utmost importance.
Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report
Page 187
CHAPTER – 7ADDITIONAL STUDIES
Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report
Page 188
7 ADDITIONAL STUDIES7.1 Public Hearing
The proposed project is located in Notified Industrial Area, the projects attracts the Category B
as per EIA Notification 2006; As per MoEF & CC Office Memorandum, dated 3rd June 2009; EIA
Notification, 2006 in para 7 (i), sub section III exempted from undertaking public hearing for
expansion or modernization or change of product mix in existing projects. Hence this application
based on MoEF Notification No. S.O. 804(E) of 14th March, 2017, Karnataka SEIAA has
recommended to EAC, MoEF & CC under Category A, 5(f).
7.2 Disaster Management Plan
An onsite emergency plan is attributed to the response plan that contains and minimizes the
effects due to emergencies within the installations which have a potential to cause damage to
people and facilities within the installation premises.
The On-site and offsite emergency Plan is attached as Annexure R.
7.3 R& R
Rehabilitation and resettlement is not applicable since the project is in KIADB Industrial Area,
Jigani of Bengaluru.
7.4 Risk Assessment
The Detailed risk assessment report for the proposed project is enclosed as Annexure R.
Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report
Page 189
CHAPTER – 8PROJECT BENEFITS
Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report
Page 190
8 PROJECT BENEFITS
Proposes for a change in product mix within the existing premises (without additional
pollution load) with no overall change in production quantity of Active Pharmaceutical
Ingredients (APIs) will play a vital role in the health care protection and thereby
addresses the market demand and Social benefits.
The proposed project which has zero liquid discharge system, which does not discharge
any effluent to ground or surroundings,
The proposal will bring trade and export opportunities to the country.
The products manufactured at this facility will be exported that will aid in adding to the
revenue of the nation.
It will also provide employment opportunities to a larger population.
The corporate social responsibilities that will be taken up by the proposed project will
improve the well-being of the society and the corporate responsibilities towards the
protection of the environment will help in conserving the ecosystem.
Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report
Page 191
CHAPTER – 9ENVIRONMENTAL
MANAGEMENT PLAN
Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report
Page 192
9 ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN
9.1 Introduction
This Environmental Management Plan (EMP) for the M/s. CIPLA Ltd, identifies the principles,
procedures and methods that will be used to control and minimize the environmental impacts of
the proposed minor construction and operational activities associated with the expansion project
development. It is intended to ensure that commitments made by the CIPLA to minimize project
related environmental and social impacts.
As part of our ongoing commitment to excellence in environmental and social performance we
will ensure the following:
i. Fulfill all environmental conditions associated with project approvals.
ii. Develop, promote and foster a shared sense of responsibility for environmental
and performance of the project.
iii. Promote environmental awareness and understanding among employees and
contractors through training, identification of roles and responsibilities towards
environmental management
iv. Linking project performance to overall environmental performance.
v. To monitor the environmental performance throughout the project and implement
an adaptive management approach for continuous improvement and to meet the
regulations.
9.2 Objectives of EMP
To suggest the formation of a core group (Environment Management Cell) responsible
for implementation of environmental control & protective measures as well as monitoring
of such implementation.
To ensure project components are compliant with all laws and approval conditions.
Continue baseline monitoring
Facilitate a continual review of post construction and operation activities.
To suggest preventive and mitigation measures to minimize adverse impact and to
maximize beneficial impacts like.
Preparation of afforestation or Greenbelt Development scheme.
Preparation of rain water harvesting scheme and energy conservation actions
Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report
Page 193
To prepare a capital cost estimate and annual recurring cost for Environmental
Management Plan.
To prepare a detailed action plan for implementation of mitigation measures.
Measure the effectiveness and success of proposed mitigation measures
9.3 EMP Roles and Responsibilities
9.3.1 Environmental Management Cell
The effective implementation of the mitigation measures and consistent functioning of the
proposed project, an Environmental Management System has been proposed. The EMS
included following:
Environmental Management Cell
Environmental Monitoring Program
Personnel Training
Regular Environmental Audits and Corrective Action Plan
Documentation-Standard Operating procedures of Environmental Management
All the activities will be monitored to ensure the appropriate implementation of all
environmental mitigation activities and to identify areas where environmental
management plan compliance is not satisfied.
For effective implementation of the system, it is also necessary to have a permanent
organizational set-up. Company has set-up permanent Environmental Management Cell
(EMC) for the effective implementation and monitoring of environmental management
system.
The company assigned responsibility to the concerned for implementation of
environmental control measures.
The Environmental Management Cell (EMC) set-up by the company is given as below;
Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report
Page 194
Figure 9-1 Environment Management Cell Organogram
This section describes the organizational structure and responsibilities for implementation of the
EMP as shown below in Table 9-1.
Executive Director of the company will be responsible for total environmental management.
Table 9-1 EMC Responsibility
S. No Name & Designation Responsibilities1 Unit Head
(Mr. Subrat Satpathy)Establish an environment management cell.Responsible for overall environmental management. Operations and take feedbackregarding all the activities performed under EMC and give directions to succeedingcomponent.Provide sufficient resources for environmental management cell to reduce theenvironment impacts.
2 Department Head(Dr. Sunil Kumar)
Develop an environmental Cell, headed by the Site Head and Global EHS Head with ateam having EHS Professionals to implement EMP responsibilities.Oversight, implementation, monitoring and compliance of the EMP and any approvalconditions, including construction supervision and performance of all staff, contractorsand all subcontractorsReview of EMP performance and implementation of correction action, or stop workprocedures, in the event of breaches of EMP conditions, that may lead to serious
Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report
Page 195
impacts on local communities, or affect the reputation of the projectAssisting the contractor with implementation of EMP sub-plansEnsuring compliance to all project social commitments, including implementation ofcorporate social responsibility.Report environmental performance of the project directly to MoEF & CC /SEIAAReport on environmental performance also to other government regulators as required.Non-compliance / violation of environmental norms, if any are reported to VP-EHS andSite Head/Director and immediate required action is taken.Implementation of the Environmental Monitoring Plan during construction and operation.Supervision of contractor performance of implementation of the Construction.Reporting any incidents or non-compliance with the EMP to the KSPCB.Ensuring adequate training and education of all staff involved in environmentalsupervision.Reporting to MoEF & CC / SEIAA regarding EMP performance as part of an overallcommitment to continuous improvement
3 Environment-SectionHead(Mr. Sinraj )
Treatment and disposal of trade effluents and sewage effluent as per consent.Carryout ambient air quality monitoring as per consent.Monitoring the stack / chimney.Hazardous waste management handling and disposal.Plant and maintain adequate numbers of trees and gardens around the IndustryApplying and getting the consent of operation of air & water and authorization to storethe hazardous wastePrepare Management Information System (MIS) reports and budget for environmentmanagement program.To deal with the environmental issues and for ensuring compliance with the conditionsprescribed by KSPCB.
In addition to the above, company will have HSE policy to adhere with standard operating
process in order to comply with the statue and bring into focus any infringement of any norms
and directives with regards to the Health, Safety and Environment and to take further corrective
actions.
9.3.2 Compliance against the Consent Condition
Compliance against the consented conditions shall be observed with respect to the following
Acts,
Water (Prevention & Control of Pollution) Act, 1974
Air (Prevention & Control of Pollution) Act 1981
Hazardous and Other Wastes (Management and Trans-boundary Movement) Rules
2016.
Table 9-2 Compliance against the Consent Condition
Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report
Page 196
S.No. Description Frequency Remark
1. Renewal of Consent Once in 3 years Application for renewal shall be done 60 days before theexpiry date.
2. Environmental Statement Once in a year Would be submitted for every financial year before 30thSeptember of next year.
3. Hazardous Waste Returns Once in a year Would be submitted for every financial year before 30th Juneof next year.
4. Cess Returns Monthly Twelve Returns would be submitted every year.
9.3.3 Compliance to the Recommendations Mentioned In the CREP Guidelines
The Ministry of Environment & Forest and Climate Change (MoEFCC) has launched the Charter
on "Corporate Responsibility for Environmental Protection (CREP)" with the purpose to go
beyond the compliance of regulatory norms for prevention & control of pollution through various
measures including waste minimization, in-plant process control & adoption of clean
technologies. The Charter has set targets concerning conservation of water, energy, recovery of
chemicals, reduction in pollution, elimination of toxic pollutants, process & management of
residues that are required to be disposed of in an environmentally sound manner. The Charter
enlists the action points for pollution control for various categories of highly polluting industries.
The Task Force was constituted for monitoring the progress of implementation of CREP
recommendations/ action points.
9.3.4 Roles and Responsibilities for Environmental Management
The roles and responsibilities of Industry are brought out in Table 9-3. These roles and
responsibilities can be shared by developer as a part of agreement with CIPLA industry and
shall have clear terms on environmental management responsibilities.
Table 9-3 Roles and Responsibilities of Industry
S.No. Component Responsibility of Industry
1 General agreement Strictly adhere to the plot allotment guidelines and agreement.
No pollutant shall be released to Natural water systems that affect the common people of the region.2 Water supply Water requirement shall be met from existing water supply scheme at KIADB (Inhouse Borewell and
through tankers)
Groundwater shall not be contaminated by discharge of pollutants into streams, ponds and othersurface water bodies.
3 Waterrecycle/reuse
Industry adopted recycle/reuse methodologies to the maximum extent possible. (Zero Liquiddischarge facility and Rain water Harvesting)
Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report
Page 197
S.No. Component Responsibility of Industry
4 Wastewatercollection/conveyance
The wastewater conveyance (pipeline) within industry provided
5 Treatedwastewatermonitoring protocol
Monitoring of wastewater on a regular basis by CIPLA carried out as per SOPS and regulatorystandards at their respective holding for pH, TDS, TSS, BOD &COD etc.
6 Rainwaterharvesting
Rainwater harvesting in industry premises adopted.
7 Wastemanagement
Industry have independent Hazardous/Non-hazardous waste collection and segregation system andhas a temporary storage facility for 90 days detention which is designed as per the requirement.Wastes is periodically disposed to nearby TSDF and approved agencies as per the Hazardous wasteAuthorisation issued by KSPCB.Industry shall follow “The Hazardous Wastes (Management, Handling and Transboundary Movement)Third Amendment Rules, 2016”.
8 Post projectenvironmentalmonitoring
Industry specific critical pollutants shall be monitored at industry level.Specific requirement of monitoring and carried out as a part of compliance to CTE/CTO.
9 Stack monitoring Stack monitoring carried out by MoEF approved laboratory10 Greenbelt
developmentGreenbelt and green areas developed in the industry level as per KSPCB norms.
11 Storm watermanagement
Storm water collection within the industry provided and discharge facility into the common stormwater drains provided.
12 Truck parking Industry provided on-site parking spaces for trucks within the industry premises.
9.4 EMP for Construction Phase
Proposes for a change in product mix within the existing premises with no overall change in
production quantity of APIs. Also no additional infrastructure facilities are required for the
project..
Total built up area is divided into various sections like production blocks, Engineering,
warehouse, Administration, canteen, toilets etc. There is adequate space & provision for
operations. The plant facilities have been designed and set up with the objective to carry out all
chemical reactions and processes.
As the entire infrastructure needed for change in product mix is already available there is no
demand of any further infrastructure. In the existing facility only proposed products will be
manufactured. So there is no impact on Land, Air, Water, Noise, Soil & Ecology Environment.
9.5 EMP for Operational Phase
Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report
Page 198
Monitoring during the operation phase shall reflect those environmental and socio-economic
issues that may persist upon completion of construction activities. Monitoring shall focus on
evaluating the effectiveness of project mitigation measures and continue baseline monitoring
and sampling. The mitigation measures to prevent adverse impact during the operation phase of
the project shall focus on the following:
1. Air quality
2. Noise environment
3. Water quality and water resources
4. Solid and hazardous waste
5. Land environment
6. Ecology
7. Socio Economic
9.5.1 Air Quality
The major source of emission is from Boiler, reactor stacks & DG stack. The details of
proposed source of air pollution & corresponding Air Pollution control equipment are already
given in Chapter 4 Environmental Impacts and mitigation measures.
APC measures are adequate stack height to disperse the pollutants. Adequate green belt has
been developed to mitigate the pollution arising due to movement of vehicles. Regular
monitoring of DG-Stack and Ambient air quality will be carried out.
Table 9-4 Air Pollution Control Measures
S.No
Existing Proposed
MoEF Approved No ofstacks Type of fuel Sulphur
contentKgs/hr incase of
liquid fuel
Chimney height (inmts) & air pollution
control systemprovided proposed
1 Attached toprocess
5 NA NA NA 3 m ARL/9 m AGL &scrubber
No change
2 Attached tofinishing area
2 NA NA NA Dust collector
3 Formulation 2 NA NA NA 3 m ARL/9 m AGL &scrubber
4 Quality Control 1 NA NA NA 3 m ARL/9 m AGL &scrubber
5 TFH system200000 k cal
1 NA NA NA 20 m AGL
Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report
Page 199
6 Steam Boilers (2TPH x 3)
3 Furnace oil 4.0 % 190 Kg/Hr 30 m AGL
7Solid wasteincinerator 25kg/Hr
1 HSD 0.25 % 05 Lts/Hr 30 m AGL &Scrubber
8 Vapourabsorption
1 HSD 0.25 % 25 Lts/Hr 20 m AGL
9 (1250 x 3) KVADG sets
3 HSD 0.25 % 220 Lts/Hr 20 m AGL &silencers
Fugitive emission control
CIPLA has some action plan to control fugitive emission from reactors. The following is the
action plan
The outfall of reactor is connected to primary condenser,
Then outlet of primary condenser is passes through the secondary condenser, emission
passes through condenser will get condense.
The condensed emission will be recycled to process.
From vapor condenser cloud it again recycled to reactor,
In case of leakage of emission due to damage will detect manually and repair shall be
taken up.
Thus the fugitive emission is arrested
Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report
Page 200
Figure 9-2 Method to recovery solvent and to control fugitive emissions
9.5.2 Noise Environment
The major source of noise pollution in the industry is DG sets, boilers, reactors, Air
compressors, Boiler feed water pumps. DG sets are provided with integral acoustic enclosures.
Also the ambient noise levels will be ensured within the ambient standards by inbuilt design of
mechanical equipment and buildings apart from vegetation along the periphery and at various
locations within the industry premises. The plant will be specifically designed with due
consideration on minimizing noise pollution. Higher noise levels may be felt only near the active
working areas and therefore the workers are provided with personal protective equipment as a
safety measure.
Following measures are proposed to mitigate negative impact of operation phase of the project
on the surrounding noise environment.
All the noise generating equipments will be designed / operated to ensure that noise
level does not exceed 75-70 dB (A) at plant boundary as per the requirement of Central /
State Pollution Control Board.
Noise generating sources will be maintained properly to minimize noise generated by
them.
Wherever feasible, acoustic enclosures will be provided for compressors, DG
Compliance with noise control norms will be given due importance at the time of
purchase of various equipments and it will be mentioned while placing the purchase
orders and guarantee for noise standards will be sought from suppliers.
Moreover, all the personnel working in other high noise generating areas too will be
provided with sufficient ear protecting devices.
Green belt will act as a noise barrier.
Training will be imparted to personnel to generate awareness about effects of noise and
importance of using PPEs.
9.5.3 Water and Wastewater Management
Total water requirement is 300 KLD of which fresh water requirement is 140 KLD; Water source
from the In house bore wells and private tankers. There is no change in the new proposal.
Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report
Page 201
Sewage and effluent generated from process and washings are taken to combined Effluent and
Sewage Treatment Plant of capacity 160 KLD further processed in RO plant. Due to proposed
there is no change in wastewater quantity.
Rejects from RO Plant along with High TDS effluent is treated in Multiple Effect Evaporator of
40 KLD capacity. The treated wastewater of 160 KLD is reused for Boiler, cooling towers and
Toilet flushes.
Zero liquid discharge system is maintained in the facilities. There is no change in the new
proposal.
9.5.3.1 Rain Water Harvesting System
We have developed rain water harvesting structures to harvest the runoff water from the
rooftops and storm water drainage system for recharge of ground water. Rain water harvesting
is the techniques through which rain water is captured from the roof catchments with closed
pipe system (without mixing surface water to avoid the spillage contamination) into the recharge
pits & excess water is stored in the Rain water Storage.
Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report
Page 202
Figure 9-3 Rain Water Harvesting System
Note: Total Rain water harvesting potential is 39065 KL/A. Process buildings are not considered for the calculation of Rainwater harvesting potential.
Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report
Page 203
9.5.4 Solid and Hazardous waste Management
9.5.4.1 Solid waste managementThe Source of municipal waste in the industry will be from the domestic use. The Municipal solid
waste (Organic waste from canteen and pantry) generate150 kg/day. The total manpower is 300
nos during Operational phase. MSW given in Table 9-5
Table 9-5 Municipal Solid Waste
Type of waste Existing Proposed
Quantity Kg/day Collection method Disposal method
Organic wastefrom canteen and
pantry
150 Bins Composting & Localpig farm
No change
As per CPCB guidelines: MSW per capita/day =0.45
9.1.1.1 Hazardous waste ManagementThe various hazardous waste generated from the process is stored in a separate hazardous
waste storage area and properly disposed as per the Hazardous and Other Wastes
(Management and Trans boundary Movement) Amendment Rules, 2016. There is a Agreement
between TSDF and CIPLA for collection, transport, storage, treatment and disposal and also we
have a valid agreement with M/s. Enano incintech for Incineration of incinerable wastes.
Hazardous waste and management given in Table 9-6
Table 9-6 Hazardous waste and Management
WasteCategory
Existing Proposed
Hazardouswaste
Generated
Quantity Method of handling
Existing Proposed Total
5.1 Used Oil 15 KL/A
Nochanges
15KL/A
Collected in Leak proof containers anddisposed only to KSPCB registeredauthorized reprocessors provided the oilmeets the standards as per schedule-5part-A of the rules
No Change
5.2Oil soaked
cotton waste 0.5MT/A 0.5MT/AStored in a secured manner and handover to KSPCB authorized incinerator/Coprocessing in cement kiln
28.1 Processresidues &
Waste202 MT/A 202MT/A
Stored in a secured manner and handover to KSPCB authorized incinerator/Coprocessing in cement kiln / Disposal toTSDF in case calorific value is < 2500
Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report
Page 204
Kcal/Kg.
20.3DistillationResidue 10 MT/A 10MT/A
Stored in a secured manner and handover to KSPCB authorized incinerator/Coprocessing in cement kiln
28.2Spent
solvent 1200 KL/A 1200KL/AStored in a secured manner and handover to KSPCB authorized recycler /
33.1Discardedcontainers
2500Nos/A
2500Nos/A
Stored in a secured manner and handover to KSPCB authorized recycler afterwash/decontamination only
35.3 Sludge fromETP & MEE
salts60
MTA60
MTAStored in a secured manner and handover to KSPCB authorized TSDF
9.5.5 Land Environment
Following measures are proposed to mitigate negative impact during operational phase of the
project on the land environment.
Air emissions are effectively controlled by use of scrubbers and therefore deposition of
air pollutants in and around the premises and surrounding area is not envisaged.
Disposal of solid waste is carried out through authorized vendor.
Plant is being maintained ZLD. No effluent is discharged directly on land without
treatment., impact on the land environment is not envisaged.
Hazardous materials are prohibited to be drained or dumped in the premises. Accidental
spills shall be cleaned, reported and monitored.
Thus, no impact on land is envisaged due to discharge of gaseous emission, solid waste
or liquid effluent from the proposed change in product mix.
9.5.6 Ecology
Since the proposed project is equipped with the treatment system, and the treated effluent will
be sent to RO and recycled to process boiler, feed, chiller and green belt. Solid wastes
generated during the operation phase are disposed off through authorized vendor and hence no
impact is anticipated due to solid waste in and around the site. The air pollution control devices
are already in place in the facility will control release of air pollutants to a greater extent,
however a two tiered thick green belt consisting of shrubs and trees around the periphery of the
site has been planned to intercept and arrest air pollutants released at various heights and to
Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report
Page 205
attenuate the increased quantity of air pollutants released into the environment. It is expected
that the ecology of the region is preserved by these mitigation measures.
9.5.7 Green Belt Development Plan
The Plant facilities are spread over 115335.23 sq.m, (28.49 Acres / 11.52 Ha), Total built up
area (Land utilized for buildings, utilities purpose, other allied purpose like roads, machinery
equipments etc..,) is 54997.45 sq.m (13.58 Acres) KIADB Land which is completely fortified
and protected on all four sides by boundary walls.
Existing Green belt is 9.39 Acres (33 %) of 28.49 Acres, greenbelt developed along the
periphery and at various locations within the industry.
A well designed green-belt helps in intercepting particulate matter and gaseous pollutants and
helps in purifying the air. Trees acts as effective barrier and absorber of noise. The green belt
around an industry acts as a buffer in the event of emission control equipment failure and acts
as an indicator in the event of toxic release by visible morphological changes in the leaves, stem
etc. To accrue the benefits of greenbelt and to maximize its potential in environmental
management around an industry, choice of the green belt tree and shrub species plays a vital
role.
Selection of Trees
Adequate numbers of saplings are planted all along the periphery of the plant and available
open spaces. The major aim of greenbelt development plan is to attenuate air pollutants
released into the environment but it can also help in overall improvement in the environmental
conditions of the project site. The plan will address the following issues such as attenuation of
air pollution, noise reduction, improving the biodiversity of the region, adding aesthetics and
combating soil erosion and prevention of land degradation.
A well designed green-belt helps in intercepting particulate matter and gaseous pollutants and
helps in purifying the air. Trees acts as effective barrier and absorber of noise. The green belt
around an industry acts as a buffer in the event of emission control equipment failure and acts
as an indicator in the event of toxic release by visible morphological changes in the leaves, stem
etc. To accrue the benefits of greenbelt and to maximize its potential in environmental
management around an industry, choice of the green belt tree and shrub species plays a vital
role.
Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report
Page 206
For development of greenbelt in outside of private property it is advisable to select tree species
high are tolerant to air pollutants, since certain species of trees has the ability to uptake large
quantities of SO2 than other species and grow at a faster rate by utilizing the available nutrients
in the soil etc.
In general, following factors have to be considered for the selection of tree species.
Native tree species should be preferred over non-native trees.
The trees must be tolerant to all the pollutants present in the area.
The trees which are evergreen and forms large round canopy with broad leaves.
The morphological feature of leaves like rough surfaced and large number of stomatalaperture.
The trees should be able to grow faster and should help in stabilization of the soil.
The tree should consume only less ground water and tree which sucks more water willnot select for plantation.
The trees should maintain ecological, land and hydrological balance of the region
9.5.8 Socio – Economic Environment
As due to the proposed project various modes of indirect employment i.e. transportation,
increased business opportunities to shopkeepers, small scale business entrepreneurs etc. will
lead to development of the area.
9.6 HAZARD IDENTIFICATION AND SAFETY SYSTEM
9.6.1 Hazard Identified In the Factory
1. Health hazard due to exposure to chemicals and chemical spillage
2. Fire hazard due to use of flammable chemicals
3. Fire and explosion hazard due to various chemical reactions
9.6.2 Scenario Based Emergency Actions
1. Action plan in case of Solvent leakage from flange joints or from bottom valveetc.,
a. Shift In-charge / Department Head should be informed immediately.
Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report
Page 207
b. Access the situation.
c. Only trained personnel shall approach the area using suitable personnel
protective equipment’s.
d. Stop leakage by closing isolation valve.
e. Stop hot work in surrounding area.
f. Isolate the power supply of the respective area.
g. Other than the needy all should evacuate the area.
h. Cover drains / isolate from other plants with the help of sand or soil.
i. Affected persons should move to fresh air and seek medical help further.
j. Spills shall be contained with spill control sorbents and disposed to authorized
incinerator
2. Action plan in case of Fire in Centrifuge due to Solvent vapoura. Shout and break MCP
b. Trained should fight the fire with suitable PPEs.
c. Extinguish fire with DCP / CO2 / Foam extinguisher.
d. In case the fire not controlled with the use of portable fire extinguishers, start
fighting by using fire hydrant system with mobile foam unit.
e. Other than the needy all should evacuate the area.
f. Close valves on solvent pipe lines.
g. Cool down MLR tank by water spray.
h. Isolate the power supply of the respective area.
i. Close / isolate the drains with sand or soil.
j. Affected persons should be given first aid and moved for medical attention.
3. Action plan in case of Fire or Explosiona. Shout and break MCP.
b. Trained should fight the fire with suitable PPEs.
c. Extinguish with DCP / CO2 / Foam Extinguishers installed at site.
d. In case the fire not controlled with the use of portable fire extinguishers, start
fighting by using fire hydrant system and use mobile foam unit for solvent fire.
e. Isolate the power supply of the respective area.
f. Other than the needy all should evacuate the area.
g. Cool down nearby receivers / service tank, reactors etc by water spray.
Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report
Page 208
h. Isolate interconnection of tanks, reactors, service tank, charging valves, receivers
etc.
i. Other pipelines are to be checked for isolation.
j. Close / isolate the drains with sand or soil.
k. Affected persons should be given first aid and moved for medical attention.
l. Fire tender shall be called for help and Fire water runoff shall be contained and
diverted to ETP
4. Action plan in case of Toxic Releasea. Shift In-charge / Department Head should be informed immediately.
b. Only trained personnel shall approach the area using suitable personnel
protective equipments.
c. Check the wind direction; decide route of escape and evacuating persons should
run perpendicular to the wind direction and not against / along the wind direction.
d. Evacuating personnel should use wet handkerchief on their nose.
e. Inform the neighborhood if required and if they are likely to be affected.
f. Ensure that only essential personnel are in the affected areas.
g. Rescue the persons trapped / injured.
h. Person present in other buildings should close their windows and doors to
prevent any entry of leaked gases.
i. Trace the source of leakage or spillage and isolate the system from other
equipment.
j. Isolate the electrical supply to the affected area.
k. Trap the leakage into a suitable scrubber.
l. Affected persons should be given first aid and moved for medical attention.
5. Action plan in case of Electric Fire or Shocka. Isolate the power supply to the affected area immediately before approaching the
site.
b. Do not use water for extinguishing the fire. Use CO2 type or DCP type or dry
sand to extinguishing the fire.
c. Remove any flammable or combustible material from the vicinity of the incident.
d. Remove the affected person to an open area and check his breathing.
e. If he is unconscious and not breathing initiate artificial resuscitation procedure.
f. Do first aid for any burn injury.
Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report
Page 209
g. Physically isolate the burnt electrical components. Do not energize till the entire
circuitry is checked with megger or other devices with safety mechanisms.
6. Action plan in case of leakage or rupture of Solvent / Fuel storage tanksa. Area should be evacuated immediately and cordoned off.
b. Affected persons should be thoroughly washed using clean water and given
necessary medical aid.
c. Personnel entering the area should make use of suitable personnel protective
equipments.
d. Leaked tank must be depressurized immediately by transferring remaining
quantity into another tank or container.
e. Leakage source must be traced and plugged.
f. Isolate the nearby electrical points and prevent any fire being brought nearby. As
a precaution mobilize extra fire extinguishers to the spot to tackle fire if caught.
Spilled material spreading should be contained in a dyke and transferred to
container or it must be absorbed on sand or earth.
g. The contaminated sand or earth must be neutralized and then dumped at safe
place or burned in the fire pit. (flammable liquids should not be absorbed by
combustible solids like saw dust or combustible fibres)
h. If a spilled material in to the trench of electrical cables, then it should be drained
with natural gradient and wash with large quantity of water continuously after de
energising the cable.
i. If a spilled material gets into the storm water drain or sewer line then it will be
continuous and diverted to ETP.
7. Action plan in case of Compressed Gas Cylinder Leakagea. Move the cylinders to well ventilated area, and barricade the area. Never try to
repair the leaks when the equipment under pressure.
b. Immediately contact supplier to get the necessary information and help.
c. If fire catches to cylinder, do not try to extinguish the cylinder fire. Only cool (by
pouring water) and protect the nearby equipments from the safe distance.
8. Action plan in case of Cryogenic Gas (Liquid Nitrogen) Leakagea. Allow the spillage to evaporate by providing good ventilation.
b. If you feel the ventilation is insufficient, then immediately evacuate the area.
Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report
Page 210
9. Action plan in case of Water Reactive Chemical Spillagea. Do not put water on the spill.
b. If it is liquid, use neutralizing agent and inert material like dry sand to absorb
spillage.
c. If it is powder / crystalline, avoid generating dusty conditions, sweep up material.
d. Placed to bag, label the bag and send to ETP for safe disposal.
e. Wash the spill area.
10. Action plan in case of Leakage through Pipe Line & Storage tanksa. If the leak in a pipe line, immediately stop the supply to corresponding pipe line
b. To remove the spilled material from that area, procedure to be followed based on
the nature of material / chemical.
Table 9-7 Identification of Hazards In Each Departments/Section With Hazard Area Mapand Affecting Population
Sl No Department Nature Of Work Hazard Effected Population1 Production Handling Chemical
ReactionsToxic ReleaseFire And Explosion
24
2 Maintenance Regular WorkElecrtrical WorkFabrication Work
FireElectrical Hazards
12
3 Quality Control Chemical AnalysisChemical Mixing
Fire And ExplosionChemical Exposure
10
4 R&D Chemical ReactionsChemical MixingGas Handling
Fire And ExplosionChemicalexposure
5
5 Stores Material HandlingSolvent Loading AndUnloadingChemical Handling
FireChemical Exposure
5
9.6.3 Available Safety Systems
1. Emergency Equipments and PPEsEach Emergency Cupboard consist the following items
1. Self Contained Breathing Apparatus (SCBA)
2. Air suits / Air Line Respirators
3. Respirator / Full Face Mask (Air purifying)
4. PVC / Acid Suit
Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report
Page 211
5. Helmet
6. Ear Muff
7. Safety Glass & Face Shield
8. Gum boot
9. Safety Belt
10. Manila Rope / Life Safety Rope
11. Fire Axe
12. Fire Proximity Suit
13. Fire Gel Blankets / Water Gel Blanket
14. Resuscitator
15. Spill Kit
16. Safety Ladder
17. Emergency Flameproof Torches
2. Work Zone Monitoring Equipments
We have multi gas / toxic gas and oxygen detectors in that multi gas detector can be used to
check oxygen, LEL, VOC, CO and H2S concentration in atmosphere and also in confined
spaces like inside the reactor, overhead tanks, underground tanks, sump etc and oxygen
detector can be used for checking oxygen concentration in atmosphere and also in confined
spaces like inside the reactor, overhead tanks, underground tanks, sump etc.
We are having Hydro Carbon Sensors (HCS), installed in all critical areas and these will
provide the alarm once the set level is crossed.
3. First Aid BoxesA first aid kit is a collection of supplies and equipment for use in giving first aid. First Aid
boxes are available in Security Room (ECC), Admin Block and at OHC. First Aid items will
issue to injure only by authorized persons.
Following are the contents of First Aid Box,
a. Dettol – Antiseptic solution
b. Ciplox – Eye Drops
Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report
Page 212
c. Soframycin – Skin ointment
d. Silverex – Burn ointment
e. Betadine – Microbicidal solution
f. Iodex – Pain reliever
g. Sterilized Cotton Wool
h. Adhesive Plaster
i. Surgical Paper Tape
j. Small Sterilized Dressings
k. Medium Sterilized Dressings
l. Large Sterilized Dressings
m. Sterilized Burn Dressings
n. Roller Bandage – 5 cm wide
o. Roller Bandage – 10cm wide
p. Band Aid
q. Crocin / Paracetamol Tablet
Along with the above safety systems, we have also ensured the below safety features to ensure
Zero Accident.
1. Dedicated underground solvent storage area with flame proof electrical connections,
breather valve, enough jumpers and earthing & bonding facility to unload the solvent
from road tankers.
2. No ignitable zones are declared and marked so.
3. Work permit system with strict compliance.
4. Dedicated chemical storage area with good ventilation and exhaust system and all
chemical are stored as per compatibility.
5. Dyke walls provided for the day storage chemical tanks.
6. All reactors provided with safety valves followed by rupture discs and relief valve outlets
are extended.
7. Calibration is ensured for the gauges of pressure, temperature and vacuum.
8. All reactors will be hydro tested and certified by the competent person once in a year.
9. Body earthing provided to all equipments involved in the process, electrical earthing,
static earting and instrument earthing provided wherever required.
10. Nitrogen provision provided to all reactors in view of providing nitrogen blanketing during
handling of flammables.
Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report
Page 213
11. Process block zones are classified as per flameproof area zonal classification and
accordingly used the flameproof electrical fittings.
12. Scrubber system with lye circulation is installed to create vapor free work environment
and to release neutralized / non toxic fumes to the environment.
13. Touch pads are provided in all prominent places to discharge our body static electricity.
14. Wrist bands are provided to use during charging of chemicals in to reactors to avoid
static electricity.
15. Zero interlock, proximity switch and nitrogen line provision provided to all centrifuge
system to avoid personal injury and fire hazard.
16. Safety relief valve and gate limit switch provided to all RCVDs to avoid explosion and
personal injury.
17. Air handling units (AHUs) with BIBO (Bag In Bag Out) are provided to keep the work
environment in controlled manner (air flow pattern, temperature and humidity) to reduce
the exposure to chemicals.
18. Ventilation air units (VAUs) and Exhaust air units (EAUs) and are provided to ensure
good ventilation in the work environment.
19. Isolators are provided to handle potent chemicals.
20. HAZOP will be carried for all molecules.
Table 9-8 Emergency Shutting Down Procedure
Hazards Possible Hazards Shutting Down ProcedureGeneral Fire Fire And Explosion Switch Off Power Supply To Affected Area
Use Mcp To Communicate Emergency TeamRemove Other Inflammable And Combustible Materials
Solvent Distillation Raise Of HighTemperatures AndPressure,Explosion And Fire Hazard
Stop The AgitatorStop The HeatingApply Cooling To The Jacket Of And Inform To The Higher Authority ForFurther Action And Shut Down The Plant
Electrical Fire Electric Fire And Shock Switch – Off The Electrical Supply Of The Equipment Or Panel Involved InThe FireSwitch – Off The Mains Of The Entire Section In Case Fire SpreadRemove Flammable Liquid Drums Materialswhich Are Likely To Catch TheFireUse Only Dcp Or Co2 For Extinguishing The Fire
Dg Fire Use Nearby Foam Extinguisher If Fir Is SmallUse Mcp And Communicate To Emergency TeamClear The Area Of Diesel And Other Combustible MaterialsChange Dg Control Panel Switch To Off Mode And Switch Off Dg ByTurning The Key To Off PositionIsolate Fuel Supply By Closing The Valve
Hazards Possible Hazards Shutting Down Procedure
Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report
Page 214
Fireboiler (Diesel Fired) Explosion Leave The Place If Rise In Temp And Pressure Is Rapid.Communicate To All By Using McpSwitch Off Boiler Firing And Fd FanKeep Water RunningIf Automation Fails Then Perform The Above OperationArrange For BlowdownDo Not Leave The Place Untill Normalcy Is Achieved,
Figure 9-4 Alert Action Plan during Working/Non Working Hours
Fire /other exigencies
Discoverer communicates byphone or personally to the security gate
Security Supervisor activates the emergency siren (15 seconds ON and 05 OFF for 3timesand communicates to Factory
Incident Controller(shift supervisor)rushes to the spot
Dispatch the fire fighting team to thespot
If it is controllable, isolate the area & dofire fighting
If it is uncontrollable shutdown all theprocess and evacuate the area & ensurethe fire agencies arrive at the spot & fire
is extinguished
Alert the employees thro’ PublicAddress System for evacuation
Ensure the Evacuation of the peoplefrom work spots.
Arrange fire brigade /first aid/Ambulance
Prevent unauthorizedpeople entering into the
company
Head count / Assembly Point / First Aid
“All Clear” siren to be activated by the Security Supervisor afterconfirming with the site controller
Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report
Page 215
Figure 9-5 Emergency Organization Chart
COORDINATOR
Law & Order &Govt. agencies
COORDINATOR
Hospitals & Fire
brigade
COORDINATOR –
Head count &
Information to
Relatives
SITE CONTROLLER
Leading emergency
Coordinators
SAFETY SQUAD
COORDINATOR
Communication
COORDINATOR –
Rescue coordination
FIRST AIDERS
Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report
Page 216
9.6.4 Occupational Health and Safety Program
Industrial Hygiene is one of the fast emerging fields and is a critical requirement for the well
being of employees, for which CIPLA has developed a comprehensive Occupational health
program.
The occupational Health Management system / the industrial hygiene and medical system
protects and enhances health, productivity, and wellness by anticipating, recognizing,
evaluating, controlling, and managing workplace health hazards (e.g. chemical, physical,
biological, ergonomic, psychological, etc). These systems also mitigate illnesses and injuries by
promptly recognizing, treating, investigating, and taking corrective actions.
CIPLA Occupational Health & Wellness Program covers the policies, work practices and
procedures to provide a safe and healthy environment and protect the shop floor employees,
laboratory employees and researchers from health hazards associated with the use of
hazardous chemicals.
Occupational Health Monitoring
Medical Surveillance Program: Medical surveillance program is essential to assess and
monitor employees' health and fitness both prior to employment and during the course of work;
to determine fitness for duty and to provide emergency and other treatment as needed.
Effectiveness of a medical program depends on active involvement of employees.
Developing a OH-IH Medical Surveillance Program
Pre-Employment Examination and Periodic Medical Examinations
Determination of Fitness for Duty
Communications
Emergency Medical Treatment
Medical Records
Pre-Employment Screening / Examinations- All employees shall be subject to pre-placement
medical examinations to determine their fitness for the nature of jobs on site. Potential
exposures to the work environment shall be considered before placing an employee on the job.
Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report
Page 217
Periodic Medical Examinations- Periodic medical examination is the same as the pre-
employment screening and may be modified according to current conditions, such as changes
in the employee's symptoms, site hazards, or exposures.
Comparison of sequential medical reports with baseline data is essential to determine biologic
trends that may mark early signs of adverse health effects, and thereby facilitate appropriate
protective measures. The frequency and content of examinations are normally one year.
Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report
Page 218
Figure 9-6 Safety, Health and Environment Policy
Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report
Page 219
9.7 Corporate Social Responsibility
The Company is aware of the obligations towards the society and to fulfil the social obligations,
company employed semi-skilled and skilled labour from the nearby villages as much as possible
and also try to generate maximum indirect employment in the nearby villages by appointing
local contract workers.
The company will have an intention to spend around 2% of the profit as per company act. In
coming year we have tentatively planned CSR activity as below.
The various CSR activities identified and planned in the coming year are described below;
A. Education & Skill Development1. Award Scholarships / fellowships to deserving students to encourage education.
2. Provision of uniforms, books, and stationery, necessary equipments etc, to
schools.
B. Health1. Promote awareness programmes against social evils such as addictions, AIDS
etc.,
2. Providing nutritional supplements to lactating mothers, children and pregnant
women.
3. Conducting the blood donation camp.
C. Sanitation1. Provision of sanitation facility in the villages by building common toilet.
D. Providing waste collection bins to villagers1. Providing waste collection bins to the villagers for disposing the municipal waste
at their house.
E. Tree Plantation in Village1. Company will plan to provide saplings to the nearby villagers and school.
2. Plantation along the road side and development of garden / greenbelt on
government barren land.
F. Other Social Welfare Activities1. Financial & infrastructure assistance during disaster & other crisis incidents
2. Participate & contribute in local religious and social programs
Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report
Page 220
The activities listed above are not limited to and Company will plan and perform other activities
according to the need of local community in future.
Table 9-9 CSR activities carried out (2013 to 2016)
Sl.No. Object Project Narration Amount (INR)
ProjectImplementing
partnerBeneficiary
Location
CSR Spend FY 2013 – 2014
1 MedicalMs. Bhargavi SKundargi
Support towardsmedical expenses ofthe needy 85000
Mr. Sanjeev SKundargi Bangalore
2Other CharitableActivity
Support forempowerment of girls& womens from slumcommunity
Project on Girl childand Womenempowerment 500000 CREST Bangalore
3 Educational
Construction of Twoclassrooms for Govt.Higher PrimarySchool, Hirendahalli
HirendanahalliPanchayat School 1291134 Self Bangalore
4 Medical Mr. Jaya Mendon
Support towardsmedical expenses ofthe needy 95000 Mr. Jaya Mendon Bangalore
Total 1971134
CSR Spend FY 2014 – 2015
1 Medical
Construction ofWashroom blocks forMen and Women atHumanitarian HandsHome for destitute, illand old aged people
Towards constructionof washrooms atHumanitarian TransitHome , Bangalore 1168800 Self Bangalore
2 Medical
Support towardspurchase ofmedicines & otherbasic necesscity ofHumanitarian TrasitHome, Bangalore
NGO engaged inserving underprivileged children &destitute home thatshelters abandoned &ill old aged 500000
Senior CitizensBangalore Bangalore
3 Medical
Nethra ChikitsaShibira (Eye check-upcamps includingscreening and
Towards supply ofspecs during for FreeEye check-up campsfor communities 263641
Shraddha EyeCare Trust Bangalore
Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report
Page 221
treatment for Cataractcases)
including screening,consultation, aid tocorrect refractiveerrors, and treatmentfor cataract cases
4Educational(Infrastructure)
Construction ofWashroom blocks atGovt. High School,Doddabanahalli
Towards constructionof washrooms atGovt. High School atDoddabanahallivillage 491456 Self Bangalore
5Educational(Infrastructure)
Construction ofMultipurposecommunity hall atBandenallasandravillage
Towards constructionof Community HallBuilding,Bandenallasandravillage 751336 Self Bangalore
6 Medical
Support towardspurchase ofmedicines & doctorsfees for providingtreatment to needypatient at subsidiesrates
"FOSA HumanitarianHospital" Unit of RVMFoundation, Freehospital for poor,needy and destitutepeople 500000
FOSAHumanitarian
Hospital Bangalore
Total 3675233
CSR Spend FY 2015 – 2016
1Educational(Infrastructure)
Construction ofMultipurposecommunity hall atBandenallasandravillage
Towards constructionof Community HallBuilding,Bandenallasandravillage 961711 Self Bangalore
2 Educational
Merit Awards to SSCStudents of Govt.High schools
Awards to Meritotiousstudents fromeconomically Weakersections of society 61250 Self Bangalore
3Educational(Infrastructure)
Construction ofWashroom blocks atGovt. High School,Doddabanahalli
Towards constructionof washrooms atGovt. High School atDoddabanahallivillage 658833 Self Bangalore
4 Educational
Mobile Science LabProject for 20 Govt.Primary schools anfGovt. high schools inBangalore Urban and
Project includesHands on Scienceclassroom session,Young Instructortraining, Science fair, 1678127
AgastyaInternationalFoundation Bangalore
Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report
Page 222
Rural Teachers training,Community visits andother supportingactivities
5 Medical
Support towardsBone MarrowTransplantation forChildren withThalassemia
Funds towards theMedical expenditurefor Bone MarrowTransplantation ofchildren sufferingfrom Thalassemia, aGenetic disorder 1400000
Sankalp IndiaFoundation Bangalore
Total 4759921
CSR Spend FY 2016 – 20171 Skilling Support towards
Training room chairsfor SCB Skill centre
Support towardspurchase of Furniturefor SCB Skill centre
1,13,000 Self
2 Skilling Low cost modelmaking competition
As part ofenvironmental dayobservation,conducted low costmodel makingcompetitionconducted withgovernment schoolchildren
8000 Self
3 Health Support for Purchaseof Sports Equipments
Support towardspurchase of sportsequipment toChildrenofGovernment SchoolDoddabanahalli
1,87,000 Self
4 Education Merit Awards Financial support tothe high achievingstudents inGovernment Schools
48,000 Self
5 Health Sanitation facilities atGovt High School,DoddabanahalliVillage
Support forconstruction ofwashrooms forGovernment SchoolChildren,
6000 Self
Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report
Page 223
DoddabanahalliVillage
6 Health Sanitation block atGHPS, Siddanapalya
Support forconstruction ofwashrooms forGovernment SchoolChildren,DoddabanahalliVillage
8000 Self
7 AgastyaFoundation
Mobile Science Labat Banglore
Hands on Sciencetraining toGovernment SchoolChildren near VirgoNagar Unit
12,88,000 AgastyaInternationalFoundation
Total 16,58,000
CSR Spend FY 2017 – 2018
1Education Mobile Science Lab in
BangaloreHands on scienceexperience toGovernment SchoolChildren
11,16,000Agastya
InternationalFoundation
2Education Merit Award Financial support to
the high achievingstudents inGovernment Schools
72,000 Self-Implemented
3Health
SiddanapalyaSanitation Block
Support towardsconstruction ofwashrooms atGovernment PrimarySchool, Siddenapalyavillage
8,64,000 Self-Implemented
4Health Veerenahalli RO
PlantSupport forconstruction of ROWater Plant
4,01,000 Self-Implemented
5Education Class Room GLPS
Yedakola VillageSupport towardsconstruction of classrooms at GHPSYedakola village
11,08,000 Self-Implemented
Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report
Page 224
6Skilling Enable Vision - Digital
Literacy for visuallyimpaired
Support towardscomputer literacyprogram for visuallydifferently abledpeople.
40,00,000 Enable India
7Education Sponsorship towards
special education forchildren withDisabilities
Support towards theeducation of childrenwith developmentaldisabilities 1,50,000 Spastic Society
Total 77,11,000CSR Spend FY 2018 – 2019
1 Education Science on Wheels atBanglore
Hands on ScienceTraining toGovernment Schoolchildren .
11,54,000AgastyaInternationalFoundation
2 Education
Merit Award
Financial support tobest achievingstudens inGovernment School 70,000
Self-Implemented
3 Skilling Enable Vision- DigitalLiteracy Program forVisually Impaired
Providing computertraining to people whoare visually differentlyabled
41,94,000
Enable India
4 Health Support towardsBone marrow transferat People TreeHospital Banglore
Support towardsBone marrow transferat People TreeHospital Banglore
30,00,000Sankalp IndiaFoundation
5 Education Sponsorship towardsspecial education forchildren withDevelopmentaldisabilities
Sponsorship towardsspecial education forchildren withDevelopmentaldisabilities
50,000Spastic Society
6 Health Support towards oneward in Palliative care
Support towards one12,75,000 Karunashray
Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report
Page 225
ward in Palliative care
Total 97,43,000
Projection for 2019-20:
Extension of Mobile Science Lab - Virgo Nagar - Budget Rs. 13,79,923
Kallabalu Lake Rejuvenation- Plantation Project - Bommasandra Rs. 6, 50,000
Merit Awards Rs. 70,000 approx
Enable India Last Payment Rs. 69,673
Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report
Page 226
Figure 9-7 Corporate Responsibility Policy
Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report
Page 227
Table 9-10 Cost Estimate for Environment Management Plan
S.No Equipment Investment
EMP
1 MEE Nil
2 ETP Nil
3 RO Plant Nil
4 Lab Nil
5 Green Belt Area 10 Lakhs
6 DG Acoustic Already provided
7 Online Monitor Not applicable
Air Pollution Equipments8 Boiler Chimney NA
9 DG Chimney NA
10 Scrubber 30 LakhEHS
11 Fire Alarm Systems 20 Lakhs
12 Fire Hydrant System 4 Lakhs
13 Fire Fighting Equipments 2 Lakh
14 Flame Proof Fittings NA
15 Safety Equipments Existing unit
16 OHC NA
17 Annual Medical
Checkups
2 Lakhs
Total 67.5 Lakhs
Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report
Page 228
CHAPTER – 10SUMMARY & CONCLUSION
Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report
Page 229
10 SUMMARY & CONCLUSION10.1 Summary
An environmental Impact Assessment Study has been carried out and assessed for the
proposed project based on the TOR and baseline quality data collected for the study area.
Identification and anticipation of the potential environmental impacts due to the proposed project
with a delineation of appropriate impact mitigation measures in an Environmental Management
plan during both construction and operation phases is provided in the EIA report prepared.
The proposed project will ensure that the industrial activities relevant to the project are
environmentally sound with no adverse impacts posed on the natural environment in the
surrounding area.
The marginal impacts that might be caused by the proposed activity will be mitigated by the
existing pollution control and environmental management measures.
In a true and a larger sense, in view of the considerable benefits from the project with no major
impacts, the proposed project is said to be more beneficial to the nation.
The EMP that will be implemented for the construction and operation stages of the project will
include:
Air Pollution control and management
Noise Control and Management
Hazardous and Solid waste Management
Sewage treatment and Management
Effluent treatment and Management
Hazardous and solid waste management
DMP (Risk Assessment, Onsite and Offsite emergency Plan)
In order to effectively implement the EMP planned, an environmental management system will
be formulated.
Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report
Page 230
10.2 Conclusion
The baseline study carried out for the study area indicates that all the physical, chemical and
biological characteristics of the environmental attributes in the surrounding area are well within
the permissible limits.
Based on this environmental assessment, the possible impacts during both pre-project and
post-project phase are anticipated and the necessary adequate control measures are
formulated to meet the statutory compliances.
With very minute negative impacts, the project positively leads to commercial business
opportunities, Employment opportunities, increased revenue and infrastructural development.
Thus this project may kindly be granted Environmental Clearance.
Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report
Page 231
CHAPTER – 11DISCLOSURE OF CONSULTANT
Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report
Page 232
11 DISCLOSURE OF CONSULTANT
In order to assess the potential environmental impacts due to the proposed Change in Product
Mix of the Bulk Drugs and Intermediates Manufacturing Unit by M/s. CIPLA Limited, Plot No.
285, 286 & 287, KIADB Industrial Area, Bommasandra-jigani Link Road, Phase IV, Anekal
Taluk, Bengaluru Urban District. CIPLA has engaged Hubert Enviro Care Systems (P) Limited,
Chennai to undertake EIA study. The nature of consultancy service rendered covers terrestrial
environmental assessment.
11.1 Brief Profile of Hubert Enviro Care Systems (P) Limited (HECS)
Enviro Care Systems was started in the year of 1997 by Dr. J.R.Moses with the vision to serve
the world in all environmental related problems by completing the latest technological
advancements available.
In the year 2004, Enviro Care Systems became Hubert Enviro Care Systems (P) Ltd after
having collaboration with Hubert Stavoren B.V. for higher Technology.
The company provides total pollution control solutions to several industries like Thermal Power
Plant, Pharma, R&D Facilities, Electroplating and Manufacturing, IT Parks, Residential
Complexes, Dairies, Food Processing, Textile mills, Breweries, etc.
The company is specialized in executing projects right from concept development, supply,
erection, commissioning and operation on turnkey basis. HECS has successfully executed more
than 200 environmental engineering projects for various industrial sectors both in India and
overseas.
HECS has state-of-art facilities to provide quality environmental consultancy and engineering
solutions.
Strengths of HECS
Number of Employees
Total No of Employees 736Consultancy 26Laboratory 77Projects 19Operation & Maintenance 614
Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report
Page 233
Quality Policy of HECS
Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report
Page 234
QCI-NABET - EIA Accreditation
Consultancy Hubert Enviro Care Systems Pvt. Ltd., Chennai
NABET Certificate No NABET/ EIA/ 1619/RA 0083
MoEFF Reg. Lab F.No. Q-15018/13/2016-CPW
National Accreditation Board for Education & Training (NABET) is a constituent board of the
Quality Council of India (QCI). QCI, NABET has accredited HECS for carrying out Category ‘A &
Category B’ EIA studies in the following sectors:
Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report
Page 235
Further details may be seen on the following URL: www.hecs.in