ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT...

266
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT FOR PROPOSED CHANGE IN PRODUCT MIX FOR BULK DRUGS AND INTERMEDIATES MANUFACTURING UNIT AT Polt No. 285, 286 & 287, KIADB Industrial Area, Bommasandra-Jigani Link Road, Phase-IV TALUK: ANEKAL DISTRICT: BENGALURU, URBAN STATE: KARNATAKA COUNTRY: INDIA BY M/s. CIPLA Limited [Project termed under schedule 5(f): Category ‘A’ Synthetic organic chemicals. ToR vide file no. SEIAA 33 IND 2016, dated: 24 th Sep, 2016. Prepared by M/s. HUBERT ENVIRO CARE SYSTEMS (P) LTD, CHENNAI (NABET Accredited vide Certificate No. NABET/EIA/1619/RA0083 & MoEF Recognized Lab vide F. No. Q-15018/13/2016-CPW) MAY, 2019

Transcript of ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT...

Page 1: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORTenvironmentclearance.nic.in/.../EIA/230520198KWR1Z7LEIAReport.pdf · Bengaluru Urban District & Karnataka State by M/s. CIPLA Limited. I was

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT

FOR

PROPOSED CHANGE IN PRODUCT MIX FOR BULK DRUGS AND

INTERMEDIATES MANUFACTURING UNIT

AT

Polt No. 285, 286 & 287, KIADB

Industrial Area, Bommasandra-Jigani

Link Road, Phase-IV

TALUK: ANEKAL

DISTRICT: BENGALURU, URBAN

STATE: KARNATAKA

COUNTRY: INDIA

BY

M/s. CIPLA Limited

[Project termed under schedule 5(f): Category ‘A’ Synthetic organic chemicals.

ToR vide file no. SEIAA 33 IND 2016, dated: 24th Sep, 2016.

Prepared by

M/s. HUBERT ENVIRO CARE SYSTEMS (P) LTD, CHENNAI(NABET Accredited vide Certificate No. NABET/EIA/1619/RA0083 &

MoEF Recognized Lab vide F. No. Q-15018/13/2016-CPW)

MAY, 2019

Page 2: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORTenvironmentclearance.nic.in/.../EIA/230520198KWR1Z7LEIAReport.pdf · Bengaluru Urban District & Karnataka State by M/s. CIPLA Limited. I was

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

The following personnel are gratefully acknowledged for their fullest support in collection,

compilation of needful data regarding the project and kind cooperation in fulfilling the

report on Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) of M/s. CIPLA Limited, Bengaluru.

CIPLA Limited,

Mr. Subrat Satpathy – Site Head

Mr. Kapini Gowda - EHS

Page 3: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORTenvironmentclearance.nic.in/.../EIA/230520198KWR1Z7LEIAReport.pdf · Bengaluru Urban District & Karnataka State by M/s. CIPLA Limited. I was

Declaration of Experts contributing to the EIA

I hereby certify that I was involved in the EIA report for the project titled “ Proposed Change inProduct Mix for Bulk Drugs and Intermediates Manufacturing Unit” at Plot. No. 285, 286 &287, KIADB Industrial Area, Bommasandra-Jigani Link Road, Phase-IV, Anekal Taluk,Bengaluru Urban District & Karnataka State by M/s. CIPLA Limited. I was a part of the EIA

team in the following capacity that developed the above EIA with the support of the following

Team Members.

EIA Co-ordinator Team Member

Name: Dr.J.R. Moses Name: Mr. Abhishek Moses

Signature: Signature:

Date: 08/05/2019 Date: 08/05/2019

Contact Information:Hubert Enviro CareSystems Pvt.Ltd.,# A-21, Phase III, Behind Lion Clube School,Thiru-vi-ka Industrial Area, Guindy,Chennai –600032.Tamil Nadu, India.Email: [email protected]: www.hecs.in

Functional Area Experts (FAEs):

S. No. FunctionalAreas Name of the Expert Signature Duration of

Involvement

1. AP

FAEDr. J R Moses June 2016 – Till date

TMMr. Vamsee Krishna Navooru

Mr. Abhishek Moses

Mr. B. Tamil Selvan

Oct 2016 – Till date

June 2016 – Till date

June 2016 – Till date

Page 4: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORTenvironmentclearance.nic.in/.../EIA/230520198KWR1Z7LEIAReport.pdf · Bengaluru Urban District & Karnataka State by M/s. CIPLA Limited. I was

Mr. Harsha Vardhan

Mr. N. Varadharajan

Mrs T. Rajani

Feb 2017 – Till date

Sep 2016 – Till date

Aug 2017 – Till date

2. AQ`

FAEDr. J R Moses June 2016 – Till date

TMMr. Abhishek Moses

Mr. Harsha Vardhan

Mr. B. Tamil Selvan

June 2016 – Till date

Feb 2017 – Till date

June 2016 – Till date

3. WP

FAEDr. J R Moses June 2016 – Till date

TMMr. Vamsee Krishna Navooru

Mr. Abhishek Moses

Mr. Chengalvarayan

Mr. B. Tamil Selvan

Mr. Harsha Vardhan

Mrs T. Rajani

Oct 2016 – Till date

June 2016 – Till date

Oct 2016 – Till date

June 2016 – Till date

Feb 2017 – Till date

Aug 2017 – Till date

4. LU

FAEMr. Venkateswarlu June 2017 – Till date

TMMr. N. Varadharajan Sep 2016 – Till date

5. NV FAEMr. Brijesh Kumar March – May 2017

Page 5: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORTenvironmentclearance.nic.in/.../EIA/230520198KWR1Z7LEIAReport.pdf · Bengaluru Urban District & Karnataka State by M/s. CIPLA Limited. I was

TMMr. Vamsee Krishna Navooru

Mr. N. Varadharajan

Oct 2016 – Till date

Sep 2016 – Till date

6. EB

FAEMr. A. Manoharan Oct 2016 – Till date

TMDr. Rajkumar Samuel

Mr. B. Tamil Selvan

Mrs. Sheetal

June 2016 – Till date

June 2016 – Till date

Feb 2018 to till date

7. SE FAEMr. V. Dhivakar Aug 2016 – June 2017

8. HGFAEMr. Mallikarjuna Rao Oct 2018 to Till date

9. SHW

FAEMr. A. Manoharan June 2016 – Till date

TMMrs T. Rajani Aug 2017 – Till date

10. RH

FAEDr. J R Moses June 2016 – Till date

TMMr. Abhishek Moses

Mr. Harsha Vardhan

Mrs T. Rajani

June 2016 – Till date

Feb 2017 – Till date

Aug 2017 – Till date

AP - Air pollution monitoring, prevention and controlAQ - Meteorology, air quality modeling and predictionWP - Water pollution monitoring, prevention and controlLU - Land useNV - Noise & VibrationEB - Ecology and biodiversity

Page 6: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORTenvironmentclearance.nic.in/.../EIA/230520198KWR1Z7LEIAReport.pdf · Bengaluru Urban District & Karnataka State by M/s. CIPLA Limited. I was

SE - Socio-economicsHG - Hydrology, ground water and water conservationSHW - Solid and hazardous waste managementRH - Risk assessment and hazards management

Page 7: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORTenvironmentclearance.nic.in/.../EIA/230520198KWR1Z7LEIAReport.pdf · Bengaluru Urban District & Karnataka State by M/s. CIPLA Limited. I was

Declaration by the Head of the Accredited Consultant Organization

I, Dr. J R Moses hereby, confirm that the above mentioned experts prepared the EIA for

the “Proposed Change in Product Mix for Bulk Drugs and IntermediatesManufacturing Unit” at Plot. No. 285, 286 & 287, KIADB Industrial Area,Bommasandra-Jigani Link Road, Phase-IV, Anekal Taluk, Bengaluru Urban District& Karnataka State, by M/s. CIPLA Limited. I also confirm that I shall be fully

accountable for any misleading information mentioned in this statement.

Signature: Date: 08/05/2019

Name: Dr. J.R Moses

Designation: CEO

Name of the EIA Consultant Organization: Hubert Enviro Care Systems Pvt. Ltd.,

Chennai

Page 8: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORTenvironmentclearance.nic.in/.../EIA/230520198KWR1Z7LEIAReport.pdf · Bengaluru Urban District & Karnataka State by M/s. CIPLA Limited. I was

Table of ContentsEXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................................ii1. Introduction.............................................................................................................................................2

1.1 Project Background.........................................................................................................................21.2 Project Proponent............................................................................................................................21.3 Proposed Project .............................................................................................................................21.4 Justification & Need for the Project................................................................................................31.5 Location of the project site..............................................................................................................3

1.5.1 Sites considered for the project location .................................................................................61.6 Need for the EIA Study...................................................................................................................6

1.6.1 Project Screening and ToR .....................................................................................................61.6.2 EIA Study................................................................................................................................81.6.3 EIA Cost..................................................................................................................................8

1.7 Overview of the Methodology of the EIA Study ............................................................................91.8 Structure of the EIA Study............................................................................................................12

2. PROJECT DESCRIPTION...................................................................................................................152.1 Type of Project..............................................................................................................................152.2 Size or Magnitude of operation.....................................................................................................212.3 Project Cost ...................................................................................................................................262.4 Process Description.......................................................................................................................262.5 Resource Requirements.................................................................................................................26

2.5.1 Raw Materials .......................................................................................................................262.5.2 Land Details ..........................................................................................................................332.5.3 Water Requirement ...............................................................................................................342.5.4 Power Requirement...............................................................................................................352.5.5 Manpower Requirement........................................................................................................35

2.6 Pollution Control Measures ..........................................................................................................352.6.1 Air Pollution & Fugitive Emission Control ..........................................................................352.6.2 Odour Control .......................................................................................................................362.6.3 Noise Pollution......................................................................................................................362.6.4 Waste Water Generation and Disposal Details .....................................................................362.6.5 Hazardous and Solid waste Management .............................................................................382.6.5.1 Solid waste management.......................................................................................................382.6.5.2 Hazardous waste Management..............................................................................................39

2.7 Existing Infrastructure Facilities ...................................................................................................403. DESCRIPTION OF ENVIRONMENT ................................................................................................43

3.1 Preamble .......................................................................................................................................433.2 Study Area ....................................................................................................................................443.3 Description of the Study Area.......................................................................................................443.4 Environmentally/Ecologically Sensitive areas..............................................................................453.5 Ecological Sensitive Areas and Other Protected Area ..................................................................463.6 Physical Conditions ......................................................................................................................48

3.6.1 PIA District Profile ...............................................................................................................483.6.2 Climatic Conditions ..............................................................................................................483.6.3 Rainfall..................................................................................................................................493.6.4 Natural Resources of Bengaluru Urban PIA District ............................................................493.6.4.1 Flora & Fauna .......................................................................................................................493.6.4.2 Forest Resources ...................................................................................................................49

Page 9: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORTenvironmentclearance.nic.in/.../EIA/230520198KWR1Z7LEIAReport.pdf · Bengaluru Urban District & Karnataka State by M/s. CIPLA Limited. I was

3.6.4.3 Irrigation ...............................................................................................................................493.6.4.4 Agricultural Resources..........................................................................................................503.6.4.5 Mineral Resources.................................................................................................................513.6.5 Land Use & Land Cover .......................................................................................................533.6.5.1 Land Use Pattern of the Study Area......................................................................................553.6.6 Topography ...........................................................................................................................573.6.7 Geology of the PIA District ..................................................................................................613.6.8 Geomorphology of PIA District............................................................................................633.6.9 Hydrogeology of PIA District...............................................................................................633.6.10 Drainage Pattern in PIA District ...........................................................................................643.6.11 Soils in PIA District ..............................................................................................................673.6.12 Physiography of PIA District ................................................................................................693.6.13 Cyclones & Depressions, Winds and Coastal Erosion in PIA District .................................713.6.14 Seismicity..............................................................................................................................73

3.7 Air Environment ...........................................................................................................................733.7.1 Meteorological Conditions....................................................................................................743.7.2 Meteorological Data Collection ............................................................................................743.7.3 General Meteorological Scenario based on IMD Data .........................................................743.7.4 Meteorological Scenario during Study Period ......................................................................753.7.4.1 Atmospheric Inversion ..........................................................................................................773.7.4.2 Meteorological data during Study Period .............................................................................783.7.5 Ambient Air Quality .............................................................................................................783.7.5.1 Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Stations ............................................................................783.7.5.2 Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Techniques and Frequency ..............................................793.7.5.3 Results and Discussions ........................................................................................................803.7.5.4 Observations .........................................................................................................................90

3.8 Noise Environment .......................................................................................................................903.8.1 Results and Discussions ............................................................................................................903.8.2 Observations .............................................................................................................................913.9 Water Environment .......................................................................................................................913.9.1 Surface Water Resources ..........................................................................................................913.9.1.1 Surface Water Quality Assessment .........................................................................................1043.9.1.2 Results and Discussions ..........................................................................................................1083.9.2 Ground water resources ..........................................................................................................1083.9.2.1 Ground water Quality..............................................................................................................1093.9.2.2 Results and Discussions ..........................................................................................................1143.10 Soil as a resource and its Quality ................................................................................................1143.10.1 Soil quality ..............................................................................................................................1143.10.2 Results and Discussions ..........................................................................................................1183.11 Flora & Fauna .............................................................................................................................1193.11.1 Flora ........................................................................................................................................1193.11.1.1 Aquatic Vegetation .............................................................................................................1203.11.1.2 Planktons.............................................................................................................................1203.11.2 Fauna.......................................................................................................................................1213.11.2.1 Birds ....................................................................................................................................1233.12 Socio-economic profile of the Project Influence Area................................................................1253.12.1 Socio economic Profile of the district .....................................................................................1253.12.2 Socio economic Profile of the study area................................................................................126

Page 10: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORTenvironmentclearance.nic.in/.../EIA/230520198KWR1Z7LEIAReport.pdf · Bengaluru Urban District & Karnataka State by M/s. CIPLA Limited. I was

3.12.2.1 Employment and Livelihood...............................................................................................1353.12.2.2 Industries within the study area ..........................................................................................1413.12.2.3 Health Facilities within the study area ................................................................................1413.12.2.4 Sanitation Facilities & Drinking water facilities within the Study Area.............................1433.12.2.5 Education facilities..............................................................................................................1493.12.2.6 Other infrastructure facilities ..............................................................................................151

4 ANTICIPATED ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES....................1594.1 General..............................................................................................................................................1594.2 Construction Phase............................................................................................................................1594.3 Operation Phase ..........................................................................................................................159

4.3.1 Air Environment .................................................................................................................1604.3.1.1 Study Area ..........................................................................................................................1604.3.1.2 Objective .............................................................................................................................1614.3.1.3 Meteorological Data............................................................................................................1614.3.1.4 AERMOD Process ..............................................................................................................1624.3.1.5 The status of air pollution due to the existing DG sets Boilers and scrubbers....................1634.3.1.6 CONCLUSION ...................................................................................................................1684.3.1.7 Pollution Control Measures ................................................................................................169Air Pollution & Fugitive Emission Control ........................................................................................1694.3.2 Water Requirement .............................................................................................................1704.3.2.1 Impact due to Waste Water Generation ..............................................................................1704.3.2.2 Mitigation Measures ...........................................................................................................1704.3.2.3 Wastewater Quality and Quantity .......................................................................................1714.3.3 Noise Environment .............................................................................................................1724.3.3.1 Impacts ................................................................................................................................1724.3.3.2 Mitigation Measures ...........................................................................................................1724.3.4 Solid waste management.....................................................................................................1734.3.4.1 Impacts ................................................................................................................................1734.3.4.2 Mitigation Measures ...........................................................................................................1734.3.5 Land Environment...............................................................................................................1744.3.6 Ecology ...............................................................................................................................1744.3.7 Socio-Economic Environment ............................................................................................175

5 ANALYSIS OF ALTERNATIVES....................................................................................................1775.1 History and Background of the Site ............................................................................................1775.2 Current Proposal .........................................................................................................................1775.3 Results of the Analysis................................................................................................................177

6 ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM (EMP)...............................................................1806.1 Introduction.................................................................................................................................1806.2 Objectives ...................................................................................................................................1816.3 Project Environmental Monitoring .............................................................................................1836.4 Monitoring by CIPLA .................................................................................................................1846.5 Compliance Reports....................................................................................................................1846.6 Plantation Monitoring Programm ...............................................................................................1846.7 On-site Mock Drills Requirements .............................................................................................185

7 ADDITIONAL STUDIES ..................................................................................................................1887.1 Public Hearing ............................................................................................................................1887.2 Disaster Management Plan..........................................................................................................1887.3 R& R ...........................................................................................................................................188

Page 11: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORTenvironmentclearance.nic.in/.../EIA/230520198KWR1Z7LEIAReport.pdf · Bengaluru Urban District & Karnataka State by M/s. CIPLA Limited. I was

7.4 Risk Assessment .........................................................................................................................1888 PROJECT BENEFITS ........................................................................................................................1909 ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN.................................................................................192

9.1 Introduction.................................................................................................................................1929.2 Objectives of EMP ......................................................................................................................1929.3 EMP Roles and Responsibilities .................................................................................................193

9.3.1 Environmental Management Cell .......................................................................................1939.3.2 Compliance against the Consent Condition ........................................................................1959.3.3 Compliance to the Recommendations Mentioned In the CREP Guidelines .......................1969.3.4 Roles and Responsibilities for Environmental Management ..............................................196

9.4 EMP for Construction Phase.......................................................................................................1979.5 EMP for Operational Phase.........................................................................................................197

9.5.1 Air Quality ..........................................................................................................................1989.5.2 Noise Environment .............................................................................................................2009.5.3 Water and Wastewater Management ..................................................................................2009.5.3.1 Rain Water Harvesting System ...........................................................................................2019.5.4 Solid and Hazardous waste Management ...........................................................................2039.5.4.1 Solid waste management.....................................................................................................2039.1.1.1 Hazardous waste Management............................................................................................2039.5.5 Land Environment...............................................................................................................2049.5.6 Ecology ...............................................................................................................................2049.5.7 Green Belt Development Plan.............................................................................................2059.5.8 Socio – Economic Environment..........................................................................................206

9.6 HAZARD IDENTIFICATION AND SAFETY SYSTEM.........................................................2069.6.1 Hazard Identified In the Factory .........................................................................................2069.6.2 Scenario Based Emergency Actions ...................................................................................2069.6.3 Available Safety Systems....................................................................................................2109.6.4 Occupational Health and Safety Program ...........................................................................216Occupational Health Monitoring .....................................................................................................216

9.7 Corporate Social Responsibility..................................................................................................21910 SUMMARY & CONCLUSION .....................................................................................................229

10.1 Summary .....................................................................................................................................22910.2 Conclusion ..................................................................................................................................230

11 DISCLOSURE OF CONSULTANT ..............................................................................................23211.1 Brief Profile of Hubert Enviro Care Systems (P) Limited (HECS) ............................................232

Page 12: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORTenvironmentclearance.nic.in/.../EIA/230520198KWR1Z7LEIAReport.pdf · Bengaluru Urban District & Karnataka State by M/s. CIPLA Limited. I was

LIST OF TABLES

Table 1-1 Salient Features of the project site and its environs .............................................................5Table 2-1 Site coordinates ........................................................................................................................15Table 2-2 Nearest Habitat Profile from the project site ........................................................................15Table 2-3 Nearest Water Bodies .............................................................................................................15Table 2-4Table 2-4 Details of Existing and proposed products and capacities.................................22Table 2-5 List of Raw Materials & Quantity for Proposed New Products ..........................................27Table 2-6 Existing Solvents & Fuels Materials Tank Storage Details ................................................33Table 2-7 Land use break up details .......................................................................................................34Table 2-8 Water Consumption for the Project .......................................................................................34Table 2-9 Power and Energy Requirement............................................................................................35Table 2-10 Air Pollution Sources and Control Measures .....................................................................35Table 2-11 Liquid Waste Generation & Treatment ...............................................................................36Table 2-12 Municipal Solid Waste ...........................................................................................................39Table 2-13 Hazardous waste ...................................................................................................................39Table 3-1 Environmentally Sensitive Areas within 15km from Project Boundary ............................45Table 3-2 District land use/land cover statistics ....................................................................................53Table 3-3: Land Use/Land Cover statistics of 10 Km radius of the Study Area ...............................55Table 3-4: Climatological Summary – Bangalore Region (1971-2000) .............................................74Table 3-5 : Meteorology Data for the Study Period (September – November 2016) ......................78Table 3-6: Details of Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Locations..........................................................79Table 3-7: Analytical Methods for Analysis of Ambient Air Quality Parameters ...............................79Table 3-8: Summary of the average baseline concentrations of pollutants ......................................81Table 3-9: Summary of the average baseline concentrations of pollutants ......................................82Table 3-10: Ambient PM10 Monitoring Data..........................................................................................83Table 3-11: Ambient PM2.5 Monitoring Data.........................................................................................84Table 3-12 : Ambient SO2 Monitoring Data ...........................................................................................85Table 3-13: Ambient NO2 Monitoring Data ............................................................................................86Table 3-14: Ambient Carbon Monoxide (CO) Monitoring Data ...........................................................87Table 3-15: Ambient Ozone (O3) Monitoring Data ...............................................................................88Table 3-16: Ambient Ammonia (NH3) Monitoring Data........................................................................89Table 3-17: Ambient Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) Monitoring Data ...................................90Table 3-18: Day and Night Equivalent Noise Levels ............................................................................91Table 3-19: List of Major Water Bodies within 10Km radius................................................................92Table 3-20: Water bodies in 10km radius of Project area....................................................................94Table 3-21: Test methods used for the analysis of water quality parameters ................................104Table 3-22: Details of Surface water sampling locations ...................................................................104Table 3-23: Surface water Monitoring Results ....................................................................................105Table 3-24: Groundwater Potential in Bengaluru Urban PIA District ...............................................108Table 3-25: Details of Groundwater Quality Monitoring Locations ...................................................110Table 3-26: Ground Water Monitoring Results ....................................................................................111

Page 13: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORTenvironmentclearance.nic.in/.../EIA/230520198KWR1Z7LEIAReport.pdf · Bengaluru Urban District & Karnataka State by M/s. CIPLA Limited. I was

Table 3-27: Soil Quality Monitoring Locations .....................................................................................114Table 3-28: Soil Quality Monitoring Results .........................................................................................117Table 3-29: List of Flora Reported/Observed in the Study Area.......................................................119Table 3-30: List of Fauna Reported/Observed in Bannerghatta National Park ..............................120Table 3-31: List of Fauna Reported/Observed in the Study Area.....................................................121Table 3-32: List of Fauna Reported/Observed in Bannerghatta National Park ..............................121Table 3-33: List of Birds Reported/Observed ......................................................................................123Table 3-34: Bengaluru Urban District Social Indicators .....................................................................126Table 3-35: Socioeconomic details of the study area.........................................................................127Table 3-36: Child population within the study area .............................................................................130Table 3-37: Social group details within the study area.......................................................................133Table 3-38: Workers group distribution in the study area ..................................................................137Table 3-39: Industrial estates within the study area ...........................................................................141Table 3-40: List of major Industries within the study area .................................................................141Table 3-41: Health facilities available in Anekal Taluk .......................................................................141Table 3-42: Health profile of Anekal Taluk ...........................................................................................142Table 3-43: Village wise sanitation & drinking water facilities within the study area .....................144Table 3-44: Literacy details within the study area ...............................................................................149Table 3-45: Schools in Anekal Block including both public and private management ..................151Table 3-46 : Details of roads in Anekal taluk .......................................................................................152Table 3-47: Summary of socioeconomic Indicators within the Study area......................................152Table 4-1 Existing Stack emission details of CIPLA ...........................................................................164Table 4-2 TOP 10 HIGHEST CONCENTRATIONS OF PARTICULATE MATTER.......................167Table 4-3 TOP 10 HIGHEST CONCENTRATIONS OF SULPHUR DIOXIDE ...............................167Table 4-4 TOP 10 HIGHEST CONCENTRATIONS OF OXIDES OF NITROGEN ........................168Table 4-5 TOP 10 HIGHEST CONCENTRATIONS OF PARTICULATE MATTER.......................168Table 4-6 Total Maximum GLCs from the proposed Stack Emissions for NOV 2016...................169Table 4-7 Air Pollution Control Measures.............................................................................................169Table 4-8 Liquid Waste Generation & Treatment................................................................................171Table 9-1 EMC Responsibility ................................................................................................................194Table 9-2 Compliance against the Consent Condition .......................................................................195Table 9-3 Roles and Responsibilities of Industry ................................................................................196Table 9-4 Air Pollution Control Measures.............................................................................................198Table 9-5 Municipal Solid Waste ...........................................................................................................203Table 9-6 Hazardous waste and Management....................................................................................203Table 9-7 Identification of Hazards In Each Departments/Section With Hazard Area Map andAffecting Population .................................................................................................................................210Table 9-8 Emergency Shutting Down Procedure................................................................................213Table 9-9 CSR activities carried out (2013 to 2016)...........................................................................220Table 9-10 Cost Estimate for Environment Management Plan.........................................................227

Page 14: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORTenvironmentclearance.nic.in/.../EIA/230520198KWR1Z7LEIAReport.pdf · Bengaluru Urban District & Karnataka State by M/s. CIPLA Limited. I was

LIST OF FIGURES

Figure 1-1 Location map of the CIPLA......................................................................................................4Figure 2-1 Google Satellite Image of the Project Site (10 Km Radius) .............................................17Figure 2-2 Google Satellite Image of the Project Site (5 Km Radius)................................................17Figure 2-3 Google Satellite Image of the Project Site (1 Km Radius)................................................18Figure 2-4 Google Satellite Image demarcation of Project Site ..........................................................18Figure 2-5 Site Master Plan – CIPLA Ltd, Bommasandra ...................................................................19Figure 2-6 Site Photographs.....................................................................................................................21Figure 2-7 Process flow for production ...................................................................................................26Figure 2-8 Water Balance Chart ..............................................................................................................38Figure 3-1 Ecological Sensitive Areas within 10Km radius .................................................................47Figure 3-2 Geology & Minerals Map of Karnataka................................................................................52Figure 3-3 Land Use Pattern in the PIA District ....................................................................................53Figure 3-4 Land Use Map of Bangalore Urban district .........................................................................54Figure 3-5 Land Use Pattern of the Study Area ....................................................................................55Figure 3-6 Land use/Land cover map of the Study Area .....................................................................56Figure 3-7 Physiography map of Karnataka State ................................................................................58Figure 3-8 Contour/Physiography map of Study Area..........................................................................59Figure 3-9: Topo map of the study area .................................................................................................60Figure 3-10 Geology Map of PIA (Karnataka) .......................................................................................62Figure 3-11 Geomorphology Map of Study area ...................................................................................63Figure 3-12 Hydrogeology Map of PIA district .......................................................................................64Figure 3-13 Drainage Map of the Study area ........................................................................................66Figure 3-14 Soil Map of Karnataka State ...............................................................................................68Figure 3-15 Physiography Map of the Study Area ................................................................................70Figure 3-16 Wind Hazard Map of Karnataka .........................................................................................72Figure 3-17 Seismicity Map of India ........................................................................................................73Figure 3-18 Specific Wind rose for the Study Period............................................................................76Figure 3-19 Annual Windrose (Jan 2016 - Dec 2016) ..........................................................................77Figure 3-20 Hourly variation of the mixing heights................................................................................78Figure 3-21 Trends of Measured Ambient PM10 Concentrations in the Study Area ........................83Figure 3-22: Trends of Measured Ambient PM2.5 Concentrations in the Study Area ......................84Figure 3-23: Trends of Measured Ambient SO2 Concentrations in the Study Area.........................85Figure 3-24: Trends of Measured Ambient NO2 Concentrations in the Study Area ........................86Figure 3-25: Trends of Measured Ambient CO Concentrations in the Study Area..........................87Figure 3-26: Trends of Measured Ambient O3 Concentrations in the Study Area ...........................88Figure 3-27: Trends of Measured Ambient NH3 Concentrations in the Study Area.........................89Figure 3-28 Photographs of existing major water bodies within the study area ...............................93Figure 3-29 Ground water level fluctuation decadal mean (May 2001 – May 2010) with May 2011for Bangalore Urban District, Karnataka ...............................................................................................109Figure 3-30 Informal Consultation with Locals ....................................................................................127

Page 15: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORTenvironmentclearance.nic.in/.../EIA/230520198KWR1Z7LEIAReport.pdf · Bengaluru Urban District & Karnataka State by M/s. CIPLA Limited. I was

Figure 3-31 Map Showing the Study area of the Project in Figure FD 0301 ..................................153Figure 3-32 Map Showing the Air monitoring locations in FigureFD0302.......................................154Figure 3-33 Map Showing the Noise monitoring locations in FigureFD0303 .................................155Figure 3-34 Map Showing the Ground Water & Surface Water monitoring locations inFigureFD0304 ...........................................................................................................................................156Figure 3-35 Map Showing the Soil monitoring locations in Figure FD0305 ....................................157Figure 4-1 Study area showing the Stacks and DG set location in CIPLA boundary....................161Figure 4-2 Wind Rose diagram and frequency distribution for the month of Nov 2016 ................162Figure 4-3 Ground level concentrations of PM during Nov-2016 .....................................................165Figure 4-4 Ground level concentrations of SO2 during Nov-2016 ....................................................165Figure 4-5 Ground level concentrations of NOx during Nov-2016 ...................................................166Figure 4-6 Ground level concentrations of CO during Nov-2016 .....................................................166Figure 9-1 Environment Management Cell Organogram ...................................................................194Figure 9-2 Method to recovery solvent and to control fugitive emissions .......................................200Figure 9-3 Rain Water Harvesting System...........................................................................................202Figure 9-4 Alert Action Plan during Working/Non Working Hours ....................................................214Figure 9-5 Emergency Organization Chart ..........................................................................................215Figure 9-6 Safety, Health and Environment Policy .............................................................................218Figure 9-7 Corporate Responsibility Policy ..........................................................................................226

Page 16: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORTenvironmentclearance.nic.in/.../EIA/230520198KWR1Z7LEIAReport.pdf · Bengaluru Urban District & Karnataka State by M/s. CIPLA Limited. I was

LIST OF ANNEXURES

Annexure A: Land Possession certificateAnnexure B: Earlier Environmental clearance & EC compliance reportAnnexure C: Existing Consent for EstablishmentAnnexure D: Existing Consent for OperationAnnexure E: Forest LetterAnnexure F: Existing Site LayoutAnnexure G: Existing Green Belt LayoutAnnexure H: Existing and Proposed products mix and capacityAnnexure I: List of Raw materials & quantity for proposed new APIsAnnexure J: Manufacturing process and Material BalanceAnnexure K: Water Balance ChartAnnexure L: Schematic of ETP cum RO plant and MEE plantAnnexure M: Analysis Report (Air, Stack & effluent) of existing unitAnnexure N: Existing medical surveillance PerformaAnnexure O: MEEPL agreement copy for HW disposalAnnexure P: Scrubber Details & DrawingsAnnexure Q: Environmental statmentAnnexure R: Risk Assessment, On-site & Off-site Emergency planAnnexure S: PCB compliance reportAnnexure T: Rain water harvesting LayoutAnnexure U: Pollution load scenarioAnnexure V: Spent solvent recovery plant in existing premises – photographsAnnexure W: Proceedings of SEAC/SEIAA & EAC

LIST OF APPENDICESAppendix I: Terms of Reference by MoEF&CCAppendix II: ToR Compliance

Page 17: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORTenvironmentclearance.nic.in/.../EIA/230520198KWR1Z7LEIAReport.pdf · Bengaluru Urban District & Karnataka State by M/s. CIPLA Limited. I was

LIST OF ACCRONYMS

AAQ Ambient Air QualityAAQM Ambient Air Quality MonitoringCPCB Central Pollution Control BoardCSR Corporate Social ResponsibilityEIA Environmental Impact AssessmentEMC Environmental Management CellEMP Environmental Management PlanETP Effluent Treatment PlantFO Furnace OilGLC Ground Level ConcentrationISO International Standard for OrganizationKIADB Karnataka Industrial Area Development BoardKSPCB Karnataka State Pollution Control BoardkWh Kilowatt per hourLOS Level of ServiceMEE Multiple Effect EvaporatorMSDS Material Safety Data SheetNAAQ National Ambient Air QualityPCB Pollution Control BoardPCU Passenger Car UnitPO Pure OilR & D Research & DevelopmentRO Reverse OsmosisSEAC State Expert Appraisal CommitteeSEIAA State Environmental Impact Assessment AuthoritySTP Sewage Treatment PlantTDS Total dissolved SolidsTOR Terms of ReferenceTSDF Treatment, Storage and Disposal FacilitiesZLD Zero Liquid Discharge

Page 18: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORTenvironmentclearance.nic.in/.../EIA/230520198KWR1Z7LEIAReport.pdf · Bengaluru Urban District & Karnataka State by M/s. CIPLA Limited. I was

Executive SummaryPage i

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Page 19: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORTenvironmentclearance.nic.in/.../EIA/230520198KWR1Z7LEIAReport.pdf · Bengaluru Urban District & Karnataka State by M/s. CIPLA Limited. I was

Obtaining Environmental clearance EIA/EMP Report

Executive SummaryPage ii

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

CIPLA Limited proposes the change in product mix of Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients within

the production capacity of 119.84 MTA within its 28.49 Acres of land located at API Division.

Plot.No.285, 286 & 287, Bommasandra – Jigani Link road, KIADB IVth Phase Jigani, Bengaluru

Urban – 560105, Karnataka.

The Existing quantity is 119.84 MTA with 63 nos of APIs. Proposed change in product mix with

addition of 18 nos new products will have 113.46 MTA with 81 nos of APIs with no increase in

the overall production quantity and no increase in effluent load/pollution load. The total site area

is 115335.23 sq. m. (28.49 Acres / 11.52 Ha). The green belt is 38035.8 Sq.m / 9.39 Acres (33

%) of the total area. There is an existing environmental clearance, CFE & CFO.

The project site falls in the Latitude 12°47'8.31"N and Longitude 77°38'54.28"E at a distance of

5.4 km away from the NH-44 (old NH-7) Bengaluru to Hosur Highway.

The proposed project site is located within the deemed Eco-sensitive zone of 10 kms from the

boundary of bannerghatta national park for the reason that MoEF&CC Draft Notification No. S.O.

5639(E) dated: 30th October, 2018 the final Eco-sensitive zone declaration notification is yet to

be issued by MoEF&CC, GOI. As per the certificate issued by R.F.O (No. 415/2018-2019 dated

18.01.2019) it is located at a distance of 5.26 km from boundary of Bannerghatta National Park,

therefore even after declaration of Eco-sensitive zone for the Bannerghatta National Park the

project would attract the General Conditions of EIA Notification 2006.

The Proposed Project termed under Schedule 5 (f), Category A, Synthetic Organic Chemicals as

per the EIA Notification 2006 and its subsequent Amendments requiring EIA studies of the

project. The facility requires prior Environmental Clearance from State Environmental Impact

Assessment Authority (SEIAA), Karnataka before commencing onsite activities. The application

along with relevant project documents was submitted to SEIAA, Karnataka on 21.07.2016.

Based on the information furnished and the presentation made before the State Expert Appraisal

Committee Members, the proposal was appraised in the 170th SEAC meeting held on 18.08.2016

and was issued the Terms of Reference (TOR) for preparing Environmental Impact Assessment

(EIA) Report vide Letter No. SEIAA/F.No- SEIAA 33 IND 2016 dated 24.09.2016.

As per MoEF&CC Notification No. S.O. 804 (E) dated: 14th March, 2017 & Proceedings of the

Page 20: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORTenvironmentclearance.nic.in/.../EIA/230520198KWR1Z7LEIAReport.pdf · Bengaluru Urban District & Karnataka State by M/s. CIPLA Limited. I was

Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Page iii

135th KSEIAA Meeting referring the proposal to MoEF&CC under violation and we have been

submitted EC Application in MoEF&CC under violation vide F.No. 23-48/2018-IA.III, Proposal

No. IA/KA/IND2/69050/2017 dated: 13/09/2017 (F.No. 23-48/2018-IA.III).

The MoEF&CC Expert Appraisal Committee appraised our proposal F.No. 23-48/2018-IA.III,

dated: 13/09/2017 during the 4th EAC Violation Meeting held on 19th – 21st Feb, 2018. The

Committee opined that the case is not covered under violation and the State

Government/SEIAA can appraise the case as per the ToR granted vide File No. SEIAA 33 IND

2016 dated: 24.09.2016.

As per the MoEF proceedings of 4th EAC meeting, we have been submitted the EIA Report and

Required Annexure to Karnataka SEIAA. The Karnataka SEAC appraised our application in

201st SEAC meeting held on 30.06.2018 and the proceedings of 153rd SEIAA meeting held on

21.07.2018 stated that Authority opined that it is just and necessary to consider the proposal as

a case of violation in accordance with the SEAC to appraise the project accordingly for issue of

ToRs under violation category.

Subsequently, The Karnataka SEAC appraised our application in 217st SEAC meeting held on

02.03.2019 and the proceedings of 166rd SEIAA meeting held on 29.03.2019. The authority

observed that the proposed project site is located within the deemed Eco-sensitive zone of 10

kms from the boundary of bannerghatta national park for the reason that final Eco-sensitive

zone declaration notification is yet to be issued by MoEF&CC, GOI. The authority noted that as

per the certificate issued by R.F.O it is located at a distance of 5.26 km from boundary of

Bannerghatta National Park, therefore even after declaration of Eco-sensitive zone for the

Bannerghatta National Park the project would attract the General Conditions of EIA Notification

2006 whereby it would require environment clearance from MoEF&CC, GOI.

The Authority therefore decided to advice the proponent to approach the MoEF&CC, GOI for the

required Environmental Clearance. The authority also decided to close the file and delist from

pendency after issuing an endorsement to the proponent in this regard.

Now based on the Proceedings of 166th SEIAA meeting held on 29.03.2019, we are submitting

the EIA & required Annexure under Category A, Schedule 5(f), Synthetic Organic Chemicals

vide Issued ToR from Karnataka SEIAA File No. SEIAA 33 IND 2016 dated: 24.09.2016.

Page 21: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORTenvironmentclearance.nic.in/.../EIA/230520198KWR1Z7LEIAReport.pdf · Bengaluru Urban District & Karnataka State by M/s. CIPLA Limited. I was

Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Page iv

Chronology Matrix of the Project

Existing products having EC F. No.J-11011/214/2006-IA II(I) Dt: 05.03.2007, also CFE No CFE-

EIA/CL/EIA-342/2006-2007/44 Dated 14.07.2006 (43 products from EC, qty 200 MTPA),

KSPCB/HPI/EIA/166/CIPLA-BIA/2011-12 Dated 07.03.2012 (63 products, qty 114.22 MTPA),

KSPCB/HPI/166/2015-16/H650 Dated 04.09.2015 (77 products, qty 113.46 MTPA) and CFO No

17 CAT/APC/CIPLA/2007-2008/245 dated 06.09.2007 (7 products from EC, qty 0.35 MTPA),

KSPCB/166/HPI/2012-13/H529 Dated 04.08.2012 (63 products, qty 114.22 MTPA) & CFO

Renewal: AW-303985 dated: 24.10.2017 (33 Products, qty 109.84 MTPA) Valid upto: 30.06.2021

are available is enclosed as Annexure No. B, C & D.

Chronology Matrix of the Project

YearProducts

EC No CFE No CFO No Remarks

Name MTPA

2007 Total 43products

200 F. No.J-11011/214/2006-IA II(I)Dt: 05.03.2007

No CFE-EIA/CL/EIA-342/2006-2007/44Dated 14.07.2006(43 products from EC, qty200 MTPA)

No 17CAT/APC/CIPLA/2007-2008/245 dated06.09.2007(7 products from EC,qty 0.35 MTPA)

EC: 200 MTPA

CFE: 200 MTPA

2011-12

Total 63products

114.22 -- KSPCB/HPI/EIA/166/CIPLA-BIA/2011-12Dated 07.03.2012(63 products, qty 114.22MTPA)

KSPCB/166/HPI/2012-13/H529Dated 04.08.2012(63 products, qty114.22 MTPA)

Change in Productmix1. From 2007 CFE,43 products, qty200 MTPA.2. 20 products

newly added, qty35.52 MTA wereadded after gettingno pollution loadincrease certificate

3. Total 63products, qty114.22 MTPA.

Page 22: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORTenvironmentclearance.nic.in/.../EIA/230520198KWR1Z7LEIAReport.pdf · Bengaluru Urban District & Karnataka State by M/s. CIPLA Limited. I was

Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Page v

2015 Total 77products

113.46 -- KSPCB/HPI/166/2015-16/H650Dated 04.09.2015(77 products, qty 113.46MTPA)

Applied CFO basedon CFE dated:04.09.2015CFO was not issued,& directed to EC

Addition 14products are nottaken forproduction

2016 ProposedChange inproduct Mix63 to 81 nosproducts

114.22to113.46

EC AppliedFile No: SEIAA 33IND 2016

- - - - Change in Productmix1. From 2011-12CFE, 63 products,qty 114.22 MTPA.2. 18 productsnewly added, qty12.47 MTPA3. Quantityincreased 27products 37.07MTPA & quantitydecreased 26products 37.83MTPA4. Total 81

products, 113.46MTPA.

2017 Total 33Products

109.84 - - - - CFO Renewal: AW-303985 dated:24.10.2017(33 Products, qty109.84 MTPA)Valid upto:30.06.2021

2016-2019

Existing Total63 productsProposedChange inproduct Mix81 products

114.22

113.46

CurrentApplicationFile No: SEIAA 33IND 2016

- - - - Change in Productmix1. From 2011-12CFE, 63 products,qty 114.22 MTPA.2. 18 products

newly added, qty12.47 MTPA3. Total 81

products, 113.46MTPA.

Page 23: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORTenvironmentclearance.nic.in/.../EIA/230520198KWR1Z7LEIAReport.pdf · Bengaluru Urban District & Karnataka State by M/s. CIPLA Limited. I was

Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Page vi

I. Water Requirement

Total water requirement is 300 KLD of which fresh water requirement is 140 KLD; Water source

from the In house bore wells and private tankers. There is no change in the new proposal.

II. Waste Water Generation

Sewage and effluent generated from process and washings are taken to combined Effluent and

Sewage Treatment Plant of capacity 160 KLD further processed in RO plant. Rejects from RO

Plant along with High TDS effluent is treated in Multiple Effect Evaporator of 40 KLD capacity.

The treated waste water of 160 KLD is reused for Boiler, cooling towers and Toilet flushes. Zero

liquid discharge system is maintained in the facilities. There is no change in the new proposal.

III. Power Requirement

Power requirement of the project is 1500 KVA from BESCOM and DG 3 x 1250 KVA will act as

backup facilities in case of power failure. Diesel requirements are 20,000 lit/month & Furnace oil

25,000 lit/month is met from the source of HPCL/IOCL. There is no change in the new proposal.

IV. Man Power

The total strength of the CIPLA Limited is 300 people. No additional manpower requirement as it

is a proposed project for change in product mix. The manpower requirement will be include both

technical and non-technical personnel.

V. Solid Waste

V.VI. Municipal Waste Management

The source of Municipal solid waste in the industry will be from the domestic use. Solid wastes

generated will be stored and disposed to Composting & local pig farm. Total Municipal Solid

Waste generated during the operation phase is 150 Kg/day.

Hazardous waste Management

The various hazardous waste generated from the process are spent solvent, distillation residues,

chemical sludge from the effluent treatment plant and discarded bags from the raw materials

section. The hazardous waste will be stored separately in hazardous waste storage area and

disposed to KSPCB/CPCB authorized TSDF operators within a stipulated period of time. The

hazardous wastes will be disposed as per the Hazardous Waste (Management & Handling)

Page 24: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORTenvironmentclearance.nic.in/.../EIA/230520198KWR1Z7LEIAReport.pdf · Bengaluru Urban District & Karnataka State by M/s. CIPLA Limited. I was

Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Page vii

Rules 1989 and Other Wastes (Management and Transboundary Movement) Rules, 2016 and

subsequent amendments.

Hazardous Waste Generation

WasteCategory

Existing Proposed

Hazardouswaste

Generated

Quantity Method of handling

Existing Proposed Total

5.1 Used Oil 15 KL/A

Nochanges

15KL/A

Collected in Leak proof containers anddisposed only to KSPCB registeredauthorized reprocessors provided the oilmeets the standards as per schedule-5part-A of the rules

No Change

5.2Oil soaked

cotton waste 0.5MT/A 0.5MT/AStored in a secured manner and handover to KSPCB authorized incinerator/Coprocessing in cement kiln

28.1Process

residues &Waste

202 MT/A 202MT/A

Stored in a secured manner and handover to KSPCB authorized incinerator/Coprocessing in cement kiln / Disposal toTSDF in case calorific value is < 2500Kcal/Kg.

20.3DistillationResidue 10 MT/A 10MT/A

Stored in a secured manner and handover to KSPCB authorized incinerator/Coprocessing in cement kiln

28.2Spent

solvent 1200 KL/A 1200KL/AStored in a secured manner and handover to KSPCB authorized recycler /

33.1Discardedcontainers

2500Nos/A

2500Nos/A

Stored in a secured manner and handover to KSPCB authorized recycler afterwash/decontamination only

35.3 Sludge fromETP & MEE

salts60

MTA60

MTAStored in a secured manner and handover to KSPCB authorized TSDF

VI. Land Requirement

The Plant facilities are spread over 115335.23 sq.m, (28.49 Acres / 11.52 Ha), Total built up area

(Land utilized for buildings, utilities purpose, other allied purpose like roads, machinery

equipments etc..,) is 54997.45 sq.m (13.58 Acres) KIADB Land which is completely fortified and

protected on all four sides by boundary walls.

Page 25: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORTenvironmentclearance.nic.in/.../EIA/230520198KWR1Z7LEIAReport.pdf · Bengaluru Urban District & Karnataka State by M/s. CIPLA Limited. I was

Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Page viii

Land is owned by M/s CIPLA Limited. This land has been allotted by KIADB in the Industrial

area. The present land use is industrial.

Land use break up details

Description AREA IN SQMTS AREA INACRES

% OFAREA

Land Utilized for Buildings & Utilities Purpose 18034.03 4.45 15.6

Land Utilized for other allied purpose likeRoads, Machinery Equipments, etc.., 36963.42 9.13 32

Land Utilized for Green Belt Development 38035.8 9.39 33

Area for future expansion 22301.98 5.51 19.3Total Area 115335.23 28.49 100.00

Existing Green belt is 9.39 Acres (33 %) of 28.49 Acres.

VII. Analysis of Alternative Sites Considered

Since the existing site is only used for the proposed Change in Product Mix, no alternate sites

are considered.

VIII. Project cost

The current infrastructure is adequate for the proposed change in product mix. There is no

additional project cost as it is an existing unit. The gross value of existing infrastructure is Rs.

166 Crore.

IX. Description of the Environment

Meteorological Environment

The micro-meteorological conditions during the study period for hourly data of wind speed, wind

direction and temperature were recorded at the project site. From the Indian Meteorological

Department (IMD) at Bengaluru, the annually determined wind direction is also mostly West to

East. From the meteorological data recorded at this project site, the predominant wind direction

was observed from W to E during the study period (Sep to Nov 2016 (Post monsoon)). The wind

speed ranges between 0.83 to 2.66 m/s. The temperature ranges between 22 – 26°C. While the

relative humidity ranges from 32 - 80%. The total rainfall recorded during study period is 406

mm.

Page 26: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORTenvironmentclearance.nic.in/.../EIA/230520198KWR1Z7LEIAReport.pdf · Bengaluru Urban District & Karnataka State by M/s. CIPLA Limited. I was

Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Page ix

Ambient Air Quality

The ambient air quality has been monitored at 8 locations for 16 parameters including 12

parameters as per NAAQS, 2009 within the study area. The baseline levels of (PM2.5), (PM10),

Sulfur dioxide (SO2), Nitrogen dioxide (NO2), CO, Pb, O3, NH3, Benzene (C6H6), Benzo (a)

pyrene (C20H12), As, Ni in all the monitoring locations were found within the NAAQS limits during

the monitoring period (Post monsoon) i.e from Sep to Nov 2016.

Noise Environment

The existing ambient noise levels were monitored using precision noise level meter in and

around the project site at 10km radius at 8 locations during the study period (Sep to Nov 2016).

During the study period, day time noise levels varied between 67.2 – 84.5 dB(A) and night time

noise levels varied from 61.4 – 78.9 dB(A) across the sampling stations. The field observations

during the study period indicate that the ambient noise levels in the proposed project site were

found within the standard limits whereas in all residential areas they are slightly exceeds the

limits prescribed by CPCB/MoEF&CC.

Water Environment

The study area consists of Bommandahalli in the southern region, Hennagara /

Ramakrishnapura Lake in the part of Eastern region. The Hebbagodi and Chandapura Lake in

the North Eastern / North northeastern part from the project site. The Ragihalli Lake in the part of

Southwest region. As the KIADB Industrial Area estate lies in the North eastern region, the

representative surface water sampling locations have been chosen. The prevailing status of

water quality at eight sampling locations each for ground and surface water have been assessed

during Sep to Nov 2016.

The standard methods prescribed in IS were followed for sample collection, preservation and

analysis in the laboratory for various physiochemical parameters.

Surface water quality

The values range from 7.12-7.63 for pH, 213-1335 mg/l for TDS, 90-891 mg/l for Total Hardness,

39.7-327 mg/l for chloride and 23.5-56.0 mg/l for sulphate.

Page 27: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORTenvironmentclearance.nic.in/.../EIA/230520198KWR1Z7LEIAReport.pdf · Bengaluru Urban District & Karnataka State by M/s. CIPLA Limited. I was

Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Page x

Ground Water Quality

The values range from 7.33-8.21 for pH, 390-1280 mg/l for TDS, 140-662 mg/l for Hardness,

9.28 – 34.3 mg/l for nitrates, 48.6 – 250 mg/l for chloride, 32.2 – 123 mg/l for sulphate & BDL (DL

0.05)-0.67 mg/l for fluoride.

Land Environment

Assessment of soil characteristics is of paramount importance since the vegetation growth,

agricultural practices and production is directly related to the soil fertility and quality. It is

observed that the pH of the soil samples ranged from 5.26- 8.66, conductivity of the soil samples

ranged from 19-719 μS/cm. As the EC value is less than 2000 μS/cm, the soil is found to be non-

saline in nature. Nitrogen, potassium and phosphorous content ranges from 72-540 kg/ha, 36-

432 kg/ha, and 86-324 kg/ha.

Biological Environment

There is a Bannerghatta National Park at a distance of 5.26 Km towards West. The buffer zone

of the project site is predominantly covered by Plantation/orchards. The species observed in the

study area are mostly commercial crops and plantation crops and breaks were also observed

throughout the semi-evergreen and moist deciduous forest types. There is no extinct flora and

fauna species found in the study area.

Socio Economic Environment

Bangalore district is located in the sour eastern corner of Karnataka State. It has a geographical

area of 2196 sq.km. The district is land locked and shares its borders with Bengaluru Rural

district on the north and the east, Ramanagaram on the west, and with the state of Tamil Nadu in

the south. The population of the district is 96,21,551. Of the total population, 50,22,661 are

males and 45,98,890 are females as per 2011 Census. The district’s share of total Karnataka’s

population is 15.75 percent.

The project is located in the Jigani KIADB, Jigani of Anekal taluk of Bangalore Urban District.

The 10 Km radius covers almost a major portion of Anekal taluk and some portion of Bangalore

Corporation Limits.

The project area comprises of urban and rural background. The taluk Anekal is predominantly

rural as 68% population in rural part of the taluk. Agriculture is one of the main occupation in

rural apart from Industries and Service sector. The area has more semi and unskilled labour

forces go to the other part of the district.

Page 28: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORTenvironmentclearance.nic.in/.../EIA/230520198KWR1Z7LEIAReport.pdf · Bengaluru Urban District & Karnataka State by M/s. CIPLA Limited. I was

Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Page xi

The child sex ratio of the project area is 968 but for the district it is 944. There is a need for social

intervention is required to balance the gender inequality.

The majority of the population in the project area belongs to General Category (80.23%). The

scheduled caste and scheduled tribe population are 17.08% (22.93% of the district) and 2.07%

(3.26% of the district).

An important dimension to understand the employment scenario is through the main and

marginal workers data provided by the Census. Of the total working population, the majority

(91.20%) is the main workers i.e they have study job more than six months per annum. It is due

to the industrialization in the area. The job vibrancy is due to the secondary and tertiary sectors.

Only 10.25% of working population involved in the agriculture and allied occupation (primary).

X. Anticipated Environmental Impacts

Air Environment

Base line data reveals that ambient air quality in the study area for all the parameters are well

within the permissible limits as prescribed by National Ambient Air Quality Standards. The main

sources of emissions will be from the D.G sets, Reactors and Boiler which are facilitated with

stacks of adequate height as an air pollution control measure.

Noise Environment

Baseline line study showed that the noise levels were within the CPCB standards at industrial

sites. The designed equipment with noise levels not exceeding beyond the requirements of

Occupational Health and Safety Administration Standard will be employed. Though the noise

levels in buffer zone residential areas are slightly higher than standard limits.

Land Use

The present land use is Industrial proposed project is change in product mix without increasing

pollution load and without increasing the infrastructure facilities within the existing facility. Hence

there is no any change in land use.

Environmental Monitoring Program

A monitoring schedule with respect to Ambient Air Quality, Water & Wastewater Quality, Noise

Quality as per Karnataka State Pollution Control Board (KSPCB), shall be maintained.

Page 29: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORTenvironmentclearance.nic.in/.../EIA/230520198KWR1Z7LEIAReport.pdf · Bengaluru Urban District & Karnataka State by M/s. CIPLA Limited. I was

Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Page xii

Pollution Control Measures

The emissions from the reactors will be mitigated by providing adequate stack to the boilers and

scrubbers are connected to the reactors. The D.G sets are facilitated with adequate stack height

of 30m AGL or above to disperse the pollutants. Acoustic enclosures are provided to the DG sets

to control noise emissions.

Municipal Solid Waste is being disposed to Composting & local pig farm. The hazardous waste

will be stored separately in hazardous waste storage and disposed to KSPCB/CPCB authorized

TSDF sites within a stipulated period of time. Hazardous waste materials will be properly

disposed as per the Hazardous and other Wastes (Management and trans boundary Movement)

Rules 2016 and subsequent amendments.

Sewage and effluent generated from process and washings are taken to combined Effluent and

Sewage Treatment Plant of capacity 160 KLD further processed in RO plant. Rejects from RO

Plant along with High TDS effluent is treated in Multiple Effect Evaporator of 40 KLD capacity.

The treated waste water of 160 KLD is reused for Boiler, cooling towers and Toilet flushes. Zero

liquid discharge system is maintained in the facilities. There is no change in the new proposal.

XI. Risk Analysis

Hazard Identification and Risk Analysis including identification, screening of scenarios, and

consequence analysis of the various risk scenarios. Risk Assessment has done with respect to

the Raw materials, Processes, Solvent & neighboring villages;

The Methodology adopted for Risk Assessment by using the software PHAST examines the

progress of potential incident from the initial release to far –field dispersion including modelling of

pool spreading and evaporation, flammable and toxic effects where individual risks are to be

identified and also PHAST software.

The scope of the study mainly involves:

Identifications of Hazards

Consequence modeling

Flammable area of Vapor cloud explosion modeling

Jet Fire analysis

Toxic area of vapour cloud analysis

Blast area of vapour cloud explosion

Page 30: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORTenvironmentclearance.nic.in/.../EIA/230520198KWR1Z7LEIAReport.pdf · Bengaluru Urban District & Karnataka State by M/s. CIPLA Limited. I was

Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Page xiii

Impact limits identifications and contour mapping of the risk on the layouts.

Mitigating measures for handling and storage to reduce impacts & prevent incidents.

Risk Control Measures

Pressure safety valves for storage tanks

Pressure alarm high and pressure alarm low for storage tanks

Level indicators with monitoring from control for storage tanks

Level transmitter, Level gauge and Temperature indicators for the storage tanks

Fire protection arrangements in the form of Fire Hydrants and Monitors for the storage

tanks.

Emergency Handling checklist and procedure

XII. Disaster Management Plan

The salient features of Disaster Management Plan includes

Emergency shutdown procedure

Electrical Power Failure & Key Utility failures

Fire protection system

Emergency safety equipment & Reporting and response to emergency

Emergency Help from nearby industries and tie up with nearby industries

Emergency Control Room - is the focal point in case of an emergency from where the

operations to handle the emergency are directed and coordinated. It will be equipped with

Internal and P & T telephones, Paging system and Emergency siren.

On-Site Emergency Plan

To provide effective planning, communication and to ensure discipline while mitigating

identified emergencies at the earliest utilizing available resources, safety gadgets and

systems.

Synchronized action from all the internal and external agencies at the earliest to initiate

corrective and preventive action.

To minimize the human injury and illness during emergency mitigation, priority is given to

rescue of incident victim/s, rendering them first aid onsite and if required providing further

medical services at the earliest, which is available nearest to our plant (health city).

To minimize damage to property, general environment or work environment.

To effectively refer and utilize this revised onsite emergency plan while conducting on

site emergency and preparedness response drills and also during real emergencies.

Page 31: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORTenvironmentclearance.nic.in/.../EIA/230520198KWR1Z7LEIAReport.pdf · Bengaluru Urban District & Karnataka State by M/s. CIPLA Limited. I was

Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Page xiv

To identify any deviations during above drills and real situations to ensure any identified

and recorded observations for continual corrective actions and preventive actions.

Off-Site Emergency Plan

The Off-site Emergency Plan, which is the responsibility of the District Emergency Authority,

deals with measures to prevent and control emergencies affecting the public and the

environment. The management developed contingency plan as per Hazardous and Other

Wastes (Management and Transboundary Movement) Rules, 2016 and other applicable

regulations, in association with District Emergency Authority. A yearly mock drill of district offsite

emergency plan is essential and mandated as per National Disaster Management Guideline.

SOPs has implemented for rescues teams and regarding the wearing of full protective gear

before entering the hazardous zone and cordoning off the disaster site are required. This plan

considers the possible effects of incidents from any industry on the neighbouring population and

the remedial measures.

Inventory of hazardous chemicals

MSDS of such chemicals

Types of emergencies

Nature, extent and likely effects of such incidents

Risk and Environmental Impact Assessment

The District Emergency Authority, based on severity of any emergency in product distribution

network will declare off-site emergency.

XIII. Benefits of the Proposed Project

The proposed change in product mix in the Bulk Drugs and Intermediates Manufacturing Unit,

fulfill market requirement and will play a vital role in the health care sector and thereby addresses

the market demand and Social benefits.

The products manufactured at this facility will be exported that will aid in adding to the revenue of

the nation. The corporate social responsibilities that will be taken up by the proposed project will

improve the well-being of the society and the corporate responsibilities towards the protection of

the environment will help in conserving the ecosystem.

Page 32: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORTenvironmentclearance.nic.in/.../EIA/230520198KWR1Z7LEIAReport.pdf · Bengaluru Urban District & Karnataka State by M/s. CIPLA Limited. I was

Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Page 1

CHAPTER – 1INTRODUCTION

Page 33: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORTenvironmentclearance.nic.in/.../EIA/230520198KWR1Z7LEIAReport.pdf · Bengaluru Urban District & Karnataka State by M/s. CIPLA Limited. I was

Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Page 2

1. Introduction

1.1 Project Background

M/s. CIPLA Limited was established in the year 1973 by late Dr. K. A. Hamied now developing

under leadership of Mr. Y. K. Hamied with strong focus in India & Abroad. It is ranked amongst

top 20 in India out of 300 Indian pharma companies-ORG-IMS 2012. The CIPLA group has

approximately more than 25000 employees comprising management, marketing and technical

professionals.

In the early ninetees company decided to enter the export markets and started with export of

their products to the neighboring countries. As a part of the business expansion plan set-up

several cGMP-compliant manufacturing facilities and are built to satisfy the Norms of USFDA

and manufacturing is done as per stringent norms of WHO, EDQM.

M/s. CIPLA Limited proposes the change in product mix of Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients

within the production capacity of 119.84 MTA, The Existing quantity is 119.84 MTA with 63 nos

of APIs. Proposed change in product mix with addition of 18 nos new products will have 113.46

MTA with 81 nos of APIs with no increase in the overall production quantity and no increase in

effluent load/pollution load. The total site area is 115335.23 sq. m. (28.49 Acres / 11.52 Ha).

There is an existing environmental clearance and CFE for the products.

1.2 Project Proponent

M/s. CIPLA Limited

Corporate Office: CIPLA Ltd. – 100% EOU, Plot No. 285, 286 & 287, KIADB Industrial Area,

Bommasandra-jigani Link Road, Phase IV, Anekal Taluk, Bengaluru Urban District – 560 105,

Karnataka. Phone: +91 80 22053912 Fax +91 80 22053912.

Contact Persons: - 1) Mr. Subrat Satpathy – Site Head2) Mr. Kapini Gowda – EHS

1.3 Proposed Project

The proposed project is change in product mix of the Bulk Drugs and Intermediates

manufacturing Unit with an area of 11.52 Ha (28.49 Acres) within the Karnataka Industrial Area

Development Board, Bengaluru.

Page 34: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORTenvironmentclearance.nic.in/.../EIA/230520198KWR1Z7LEIAReport.pdf · Bengaluru Urban District & Karnataka State by M/s. CIPLA Limited. I was

Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Page 3

1.4 Justification & Need for the Project

In order to become an active player in the Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients (API) segment

catering to both domestic and international markets, CIPLA now proposes to change in product

mix of API manufacturing facility near Bommasandra-Bangalore, which will also house a state of

the art QC/QA/R&D & EHS to cater the advanced technological and market requirement.

1.5 Location of the project site

The proposed site is located at Plot No. 285, 286 & 287, KIADB Industrial Area, Bommasandra-

Jigani Link Road, Phase IV, Anekal Taluk, Bengaluru Urban, Karnataka. The site is about 11.42

Ha (28.23 Acres) and falls in 57H/9 of SOI Topo Sheet and spatial location of the site is Latitude

12°47'8.31"N and Longitude 77°38'54.28"E (Centre coordinates). Salient features of the project

site and its Environs are given in Table 1-1. Location map of CIPLA Limited given in Figure 1-1.

Page 35: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORTenvironmentclearance.nic.in/.../EIA/230520198KWR1Z7LEIAReport.pdf · Bengaluru Urban District & Karnataka State by M/s. CIPLA Limited. I was

Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Page 4

Figure 1-1 Location map of the CIPLA

Page 36: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORTenvironmentclearance.nic.in/.../EIA/230520198KWR1Z7LEIAReport.pdf · Bengaluru Urban District & Karnataka State by M/s. CIPLA Limited. I was

Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Page 5

Table 1-1 Salient Features of the project site and its environs

S.No. Particulars Details within 10Km radius from Proposed project

1 Location: Plot. No. 285, 286 & 287, KIADB Industrial AreaVillage Bommasandra-Jigani link road

Taluk (Mandal) AnekalDistrict Bengaluru Urban

State Karnataka2 Latitude 12047’8.31” N3 Longitude 77038’54.28” E4 Elevation above Mean Sea Level (MSL) 890 m5 Climatic condition as per IMD Annual Daily Mean (MIN) Temperature : 19 0C

Annual Daily Mean (MAX) Temperature : 29.4 0CAnnual Average Rainfall : 974.5 mmAnnual Average Humidity : 80 Day; 51 Night

6 Present land use at the proposed site KIADB Industrial Area7 Nearest Highway/Road Bengaluru to Hosur NH-44 (old NH-7) at a distance of 5.4 km

towards NE8 Defence installations Nil within 10 km radius9 Nearest railway station Heelalige 7.2 km towards NE & Anekal 9.4 km towards SE SW

10 Nearest airport/air strip Bengaluru Kempegowda International Airport at a distance of 46km towards North

11 Nearest village Bande Nallasandra village at a distance 1.22 kmtowards North

Jigani at a distance of 0.9 km towards WSW12 Nearest town Bangalore 25 km towards North13 Nearest town Bengaluru 25 Kms towards N14 Nearest river Nil within 10 km radius15 Archaeologically important places Nil within 10 km radius16 Nearest place of Tourist/Religious

importanceBannerghatta Nationa Park at a dstance of 5.26 km towards W

17 Ecologically sensitive areas (NationalParks/Wildlife sanctuaries/bio-spherereserves)

The Bannerghatta National Park boundary at a distance of 5.26Km towards West from the project site (as per Range forestoffice, Bannerghatta wild life Range, Kalkere, Bengaluru, LetterNo. 415/2018-19 dated: 18.01.2019)

18 Reserved/Protected forests within 10 kmradius

Nil

19 Type of soil Reddish brown clay slit soil

The proposed project site is located within the deemed Eco-sensitive zone of 10 kms from the

boundary of bannerghatta national park for the reason that MoEF&CC Draft Notification No. S.O.

Page 37: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORTenvironmentclearance.nic.in/.../EIA/230520198KWR1Z7LEIAReport.pdf · Bengaluru Urban District & Karnataka State by M/s. CIPLA Limited. I was

Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Page 6

5639(E) dated: 30th October, 2018 the final Eco-sensitive zone declaration notification is yet to

be issued by MoEF&CC, GOI. As per the certificate issued by R.F.O (No. 415/2018-2019 dated

18.01.2019) it is located at a distance of 5.26 km from boundary of Bannerghatta National Park,

therefore even after declaration of Eco-sensitive zone for the Bannerghatta National Park the

project would attract the General Conditions of EIA Notification 2006.

1.5.1 Sites considered for the project location

As discussed in earlier section. The site for the proposed project is situated at Plot No. 285, 286

& 287, KIADB Industrial Area, Bommasandra-Jigani Link Road, Phase IV, Anekal Taluk,

Bengaluru Urban, Karnataka.

No alternate sites are considered as the proposed project is change in product mix without

increasing pollution load & without increasing infrastructure facilities within the existing facility.

Land is owned by M/s. CIPLA Limited. This land has been allotted by KIADB in the Industrial

area. The present land use is industrial. The land possession certificate from KIADB is enclosed

as Annexure A.

1.6 Need for the EIA Study

According to the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) Notification issued by Ministry of

Environment, Forests& Climate Change (MoEF&CC) under Environment Protection Act, the

Proposed Project termed under Schedule 5 (f), Category B, Synthetic Organic Chemicals as per

the EIA Notification 2006 and its Amendments requiring EIA studies of the project. The facility

requires prior Environmental Clearance from State Environmental Impact Assessment Authority

(SEIAA), Karnataka before commencing onsite activities.

1.6.1 Project Screening and ToR

The proposed project site is located within the deemed Eco-sensitive zone of 10 kms from the

boundary of bannerghatta national park for the reason that MoEF&CC Draft Notification No. S.O.

5639(E) dated: 30th October, 2018 the final Eco-sensitive zone declaration notification is yet to

be issued by MoEF&CC, GOI. As per the certificate issued by R.F.O (No. 415/2018-2019 dated

18.01.2019) it is located at a distance of 5.26 km from boundary of Bannerghatta National Park,

therefore even after declaration of Eco-sensitive zone for the Bannerghatta National Park the

project would attract the General Conditions of EIA Notification 2006.

Page 38: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORTenvironmentclearance.nic.in/.../EIA/230520198KWR1Z7LEIAReport.pdf · Bengaluru Urban District & Karnataka State by M/s. CIPLA Limited. I was

Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Page 7

The proposed site is within KIADB Industrial Area. As per Amendment in EIA Notification 2006,

dated 22nd August 2013; said notification for change in product mix industries requires prior

Environmental clearance from Central Government or SEIAA under sub-section (3) of section 3.

The Proposed Project termed under Schedule 5 (f), Category B, Synthetic Organic Chemicals as

per the EIA Notification 2006 and its Amendments requiring EIA studies of the project. The

facility requires prior Environmental Clearance from State Environmental Impact Assessment

Authority (SEIAA), Karnataka before commencing onsite activities. The application along with

relevant project documents was submitted to SEIAA, Karnataka on 21.07.2016. Based on the

information furnished and the presentation made before the State Expert Appraisal Committee

Members, the proposal was appraised in the 170th SEAC meeting held on 18.08.2016 and was

issued the Terms of Reference (TOR) for preparing Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA)

Report vide Letter No. SEIAA/F.No- SEIAA 33 IND 2016 dated 24.09.2016.

As per MoEF&CC Notification No. S.O. 804 (E) dated: 14th March, 2017 & Proceedings of the

135th KSEIAA Meeting referring the proposal to MoEF&CC under violation and we have been

submitted EC Application in MoEF&CC under violation vide F.No. 23-48/2018-IA.III, Proposal

No. IA/KA/IND2/69050/2017 dated: 13/09/2017 (F.No. 23-48/2018-IA.III).

The MoEF&CC Expert Appraisal Committee appraised our proposal F.No. 23-48/2018-IA.III,

dated: 13/09/2017 during the 4th EAC Violation Meeting held on 19th – 21st Feb, 2018. The

Committee opined that the case is not covered under violation and the State

Government/SEIAA can appraise the case as per the ToR granted vide File No. SEIAA 33 IND

2016 dated: 24.09.2016.

As per the MoEF proceedings of 4th EAC meeting, we have been submitted the EIA Report and

Required Annexure to Karnataka SEIAA. The Karnataka SEAC appraised our application in

201st SEAC meeting held on 30.06.2018 and the proceedings of 153rd SEIAA meeting held on

21.07.2018 stated that Authority opined that it is just and necessary to consider the proposal as

a case of violation in accordance with the SEAC to appraise the project accordingly for issue of

ToRs under violation category.

Subsequently, The Karnataka SEAC appraised our application in 217st SEAC meeting held on

02.03.2019 and the proceedings of 166rd SEIAA meeting held on 29.03.2019. The authority

observed that the proposed project site is located within the deemed Eco-sensitive zone of 10

Page 39: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORTenvironmentclearance.nic.in/.../EIA/230520198KWR1Z7LEIAReport.pdf · Bengaluru Urban District & Karnataka State by M/s. CIPLA Limited. I was

Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Page 8

kms from the boundary of bannerghatta national park for the reason that final Eco-sensitive

zone declaration notification is yet to be issued by MoEF&CC, GOI. The authority noted that as

per the certificate issued by R.F.O it is located at a distance of 5.26 km from boundary of

Bannerghatta National Park, therefore even after declaration of Eco-sensitive zone for the

Bannerghatta National Park the project would attract the General Conditions of EIA Notification

2006 whereby it would require environment clearance from MoEF&CC, GOI.

The Authority therefore decided to advice the proponent to approach the MoEF&CC, GOI for the

required Environmental Clearance. The authority also decided to close the file and delist from

pendency after issuing an endorsement to the proponent in this regard.

Now based on the Proceedings of 166th SEIAA meeting held on 29.03.2019, we are submitting

the EIA & required Annexure under Category A, Schedule 5(f), Synthetic Organic Chemicals

vide Issued ToR from Karnataka SEIAA File No. SEIAA 33 IND 2016 dated: 24.09.2016.

1.6.2 EIA Study

The EIA study was undertaken covering all the aspects of the specific conditions mentioned in

the terms of reference issued by SEIAA. This EIA study was undertaken by M/s Hubert Enviro

Care Systems (P) Ltd (HECS), a NABET accredited EIA consulting organisation, with specific

project related inputs required for undertaking the EIA studies from M/s. CIPLA Limited,

Bangalore.

M/s. Hubert Enviro Care Systems (P) Ltd is authorized to undertake EIA studies for Synthetic

Organic Chemicals industry (dyes & dye intermediates, bulk drugs and intermediates excluding

drug formulations, synthetic rubbers basic organic chemicals, other synthetic organic chemicals

and chemical intermediates) as per the NABET accreditation scheme.

As per EIA notification, public consultation for the proposed project shall be exempted as the

project is coming up in notified Karnataka Industrial Area Development Board.

1.6.3 EIA CostEIA study was undertaken by HECS for an amount of Rs10,00,000/-(Ten lakh Only).

Page 40: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORTenvironmentclearance.nic.in/.../EIA/230520198KWR1Z7LEIAReport.pdf · Bengaluru Urban District & Karnataka State by M/s. CIPLA Limited. I was

Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Page 9

1.7 Overview of the Methodology of the EIA Study

The Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) report has been prepared based on the methods

and guidelines suggested by MoEF&CC/SEIAA to address all the specific conditions stipulated in

the Terms of Reference issued by SEIAA, Karnataka.

The EIA study team, headed by an accredited EIA Coordinator, along with the approved

Functional Area Experts, undertook detailed baseline studies as per ToR, between September

2016 to November 2016.

Micro-meteorological data comprising hourly readings of wind speed, wind direction, dry bulb

temperature, relative humidity and rainfall were measured by installing an onsite meteorological

station near the Project site. Hourly readings were collected for a period of three (03) months.

Micro-meteorological data was adopted for generating wind rose diagrams and also to predict

the ground level concentrations due to release of emissions from the proposed project.

Ambient Air Quality (AAQ) was measured at 8 locations in the study area as per the methods

and procedures recommended by Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB) Air quality sampling

was undertaken for a period of 12 weeks with a total of 24 samples per site were taken as per

the MoEF&CC guidelines. Stipulated criteria pollutants such as particulate matter size less than

10 microns (PM10), Particulate matter size less than 2.5 microns (PM2.5), Sulphur Dioxide (SO2),

Nitrogen Dioxide (NO2), Carbon monoxide (CO), Hydrocarbons (HC) and Ozone (O3) were

analysed at all the locations. The measured background air quality data was compared with that

of the prevailing National Ambient Air Quality Standards and this will also form the basis for

predicting the cumulative air quality scenario due to the operation of the proposed facility.

Hydro-geological status was studied based on the secondary published long-term data. Data on

sub-surface soil profile and also bore-log data in the study area was obtained. In additional, a

preliminary study on the regional and local acquifer status was studied based on primary and

secondary data.

Ground water samples from 9 locations were analysed as per the terms of reference for all the

designated parameters. The measured values were compared with drinking water standards.

Secondary data on the regional ground water status was also collected from the Central Ground

Water Board and the State Ground Water Board.

Page 41: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORTenvironmentclearance.nic.in/.../EIA/230520198KWR1Z7LEIAReport.pdf · Bengaluru Urban District & Karnataka State by M/s. CIPLA Limited. I was

Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Page 10

There are no major perennial rivers flowing within the study area. However surface water

samples from nine (09) locations were analysed as per the terms of reference for all the

designated parameters. All seasonal streams, rivers and water bodies located within the study

area were mapped through latest remote sensing data under land use and land cover study.

Walkthrough surveys were also undertaken to assess the current status of the water resources.

Details about the major cropping pattern and irrigation methods etc were collected from local

village offices and also published district census data. Details of the surface water quality in the

study area were also collected and analysed for designated physicochemical, elemental and

biological parameters.

Land use and land cover was mapped using remote satellite imagery. The data was processed

using applicable software models and level 2 land use classification within the study area was

developed. Total station survey was carried out within the site to assess the terrain conditions

and also possible flooding scenarios, although there are no perennial rivers in the study area. A

walkthough survey was also undertaken near the forest boundaries, major settlements and

plantation area to verify the land use as a part of the ground truth survey procedures.

Soil samples were also collected at 9 locations and all relevant parameters such as texture,

nutrients, heavy metals and other parameters were analysed in the soil samples.

Flora and Fauna survey was undertaken in the study area and all spotted ecological and

biological aspects were mapped based on grid sampling method. Bio-diversity density and

abundance were estimated. Walkthrough surveys near forest area and its environs were also

undertaken to assess the ecology around the forest areas and dependency of the local people

on the forest produce.

Primary socio economic survey was undertaken in the study area to capture the socioeconomic

conditions, major occupation of the people, drinking water and sanitation facilities, transportation

and other amenities in the study area, with a specific reference to the villages located within five

(5) km radius (Category-I) of the project site and villages located within 5 to 10Km radius

(Category-II) of the project site.

In addition to the above, district level census data published by National Informatics Centre (NIC)

was also collected for a detailed analysis on the socioeconomic aspects. Based on the

socioeconomic survey, a need based Community Development Plan under Coroporate Social

Responsibility (CSR) was suggested. Since, there are no settlements at the proposed Project

Page 42: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORTenvironmentclearance.nic.in/.../EIA/230520198KWR1Z7LEIAReport.pdf · Bengaluru Urban District & Karnataka State by M/s. CIPLA Limited. I was

Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Page 11

site, detailed Rehabilitation and Resttlement studies are not envisaged under this study;

however, the indirect impacts on the local and regional community due to land acquisition were

studied.

A typical review on the various industrial units, various pollution control systems proposed details

of wastes and discharges that are envisaged from the proposed project were also undertaken.

Such inputs are adopted while predicting various environmental impacts due to operation of the

facility and also to suggest an appropriate environmental management plan and environmental

monitoring plan.

As a part of the environmental impact assessment study, an attempt was made to predict the

possible and likely impacts on background environment. Likely air quality impacts due to release

of emissions within the CIPLA (stacks) were modelled using AERMOD model.

Ground level concentration of criteria pollutants such as Particulate Matter, Sulphur Dioxide, and

Oxides of Nitrogen were estimated using MoEF&CC approved AERMOD model. Hourly

meteorological data collected from IMD data Bengaluru, at the Project site using Lakes

environment, Canada was adapted to assess ground level concentrations. Maximum ground

level concentrations were predicted and concentration isopleths of the above mentioned

pollutants were plotted.

The predicted ground level concentrations of the respective pollutants were added to the

prevailing baseline concentrations of the designated pollutants to assess the likely cumulative

post project scenario and such values were compared with the National Ambient Air Quality

Standards.

Noise generating sources and the expected noise levels were estimated. Impact due to utilisation

of treated wastewater for greenbelt/Utilities applications were studied. Since the proposed project

will not discharge any treated wastewater into surface water bodies (ponds, rivers and Canals),

no further environmental modelling studies related to river water quality modelling etc were

considered under this study.

In addition to the above aspects, the positive environmental benefits arising from community

development plans under CSR programme, ecological and biodiversity enhancement aspects

due to development of plantation and green-cover development in the project site were also

studied.

Page 43: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORTenvironmentclearance.nic.in/.../EIA/230520198KWR1Z7LEIAReport.pdf · Bengaluru Urban District & Karnataka State by M/s. CIPLA Limited. I was

Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Page 12

Based on a detailed environmental impact assessment study, a comprehensive report on the

environmental management plan was developed covering the following aspects: air quality

management plan, noise and water quality management plan, wastewater treatment, reuse,

recycling and disposal programme, rainwater harvesting plan, socioeconomic and community

development plan, ecological and biodiversity enhancement plan. An outline of the proposed

environmental management systems, environmental cell and environmental monitoring

programme were also presented in this report.

Although the proposed project utilises the limited quantities of flammable and combustible

materials with threshold levels below the stipulated quantities under Hazardous Materials

Handling Rules, a preliminary risk assessment study and Disaster Management study, was

undertaken to assess the residual risks, if any, due to storage and handling of diesel, furnace oil,

and other combustible material. Wherever applicable, quantitative methods were adopted to

establish the heat radiation levels due to accidental fires at storage facilities.

CPCB guidelines on risk assessment methods were adopted and CPR 18E guidelines were used

for estimating the consequences of fire accidents. Based on the risk assessment study, a

preliminary fire safety and occupational health management plan was suggested. A road map for

onsite emergency and disaster management plan was suggested based on the preliminary

information available at this stage.

1.8 Structure of the EIA Study

This EIA report is structured into nine chapters as below.

Chapter 1 – Introduction presents details of project background, justification and need for the

project, screening and scoping studies etc.,

Chapter 2 – (Project Description) presents details of the proposed project, land requirement

and details of various supporting facilities required for the project.

Chapter 3 - (Description of Environment) presents a comprehensive description of the

baseline environmental conditions of the study area. This includes the data obtained from

primary surveys and also secondary published data from various authentic sources.

Page 44: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORTenvironmentclearance.nic.in/.../EIA/230520198KWR1Z7LEIAReport.pdf · Bengaluru Urban District & Karnataka State by M/s. CIPLA Limited. I was

Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Page 13

Chapter 4 – (Anticipated Environmental Impacts and Mitigation Measures) presents the

environmental aspects associated with the proposed project, envisaged emissions and

discharges from the facility, an overview of various pollution control systems proposed under

project planning activities in the detailed project report and construction and operational phase

environmental impacts.

Chapter 5 – (Analysis of Alternative Sites & Technology) presents alternative sites if any

considered for the project and alternative Technologies considered for this project.

Chapter 6 – (Environmental Monitoring Programme) depicts the summary of proposed

environmental management plan.

Chapter 7 – (Additional Studies) presents the findings of the risk assessment study, risk

mitigation plan, a preliminary onsite emergency and disaster management plan.

Chapter 8– (Project Benefits) presents the benefits of the project.

Chapter 9 – (Environmental Management Plan) depicts the summary of proposed

environmental management plan.

Chapter 10 – Presents the (Summary and Conclusion) of EIA report.

Chapter 11 – Disclosure of Consultant Engaged presents the declaration by the EIA

consultant organisation as per the NABET requirements.

Page 45: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORTenvironmentclearance.nic.in/.../EIA/230520198KWR1Z7LEIAReport.pdf · Bengaluru Urban District & Karnataka State by M/s. CIPLA Limited. I was

Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Page 14

CHAPTER – 2PROJECT DESCRIPTION

Page 46: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORTenvironmentclearance.nic.in/.../EIA/230520198KWR1Z7LEIAReport.pdf · Bengaluru Urban District & Karnataka State by M/s. CIPLA Limited. I was

Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Page 15

2. PROJECT DESCRIPTION2.1 Type of Project

M/s. CIPLA Limited proposes the change in product mix of Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients

within the production capacity of 119.84 MTA, The Existing quantity is 119.84 MTA with 63

nos of APIs. Proposed change in product mix with addition of 18 nos new products will have

113.46 MTA with 81 nos of APIs in (28.49 Acres/11.52 Ha) within KIADB Industrial Area,

Bommasandra-Jigani Link Road, Phase IV, Anekal Taluk, Bengaluru Urban District. The

proposed project falls under the schedule 5 (f) Synthetic Organic Chemicals as per the EIA

Notification dated September 14, 2006 and its amendments. There is no interlinked project.

The project is categorized into category ‘B’ as the site is located inside KIADB Industrial Area.

The project site falls in the Latitude 12°47'8.31"N and Longitude 77°38'54.28"E (Centre

coordinates). Site coordinates given in below Error! Reference source not found. and habitat

profile in Table 2-2

Table 2-1 Site coordinates

Site Point Latitude & Longitude DirectionCorne Near Vehicle 12°47'1.09" N, 77°38'52" E S

Corner Near HT Switch yard 12°47'7.0" N, 77°38'49" E SWCorner Near Scrap Yard 12°47'9" N, 77°38'50" E WProject Site NW Corner 12°47'6.27" N, 77°38'49.33" E NW

Table 2-2 Nearest Habitat Profile from the project site

SI.No Villages Distance in km Direction Population1 Jigani 0.9 WSW 170363 Bande Nallasandra 1.2 N 13484 Mada Patna 1.3 S 40765 Nanjapura 1.4 NNW 4056 Vaddarapalya 1.6 SSW 17317 Koppa 1.9 N 14748 Seethanaikana halli 2.4 SSE 3379 Rajapura 2.7 SE 912

10 Harapanahalli 3.0 W 3040

Table 2-3 Nearest Water Bodies

SI.No Villages Distance in km Direction1 Hennagara lake 1.0 SE2 Ramakrishnapura lake 4.9 ESE3 Hebbagodi lake 5.3 NE

Page 47: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORTenvironmentclearance.nic.in/.../EIA/230520198KWR1Z7LEIAReport.pdf · Bengaluru Urban District & Karnataka State by M/s. CIPLA Limited. I was

Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Page 16

4 Kammasandra lake 5.9 NE5 Chandapura lake 6.2 ENE

The notified sensitive area is Banneghatta National Park at a distance of 5.26 km towards

West.

The satellite image showing the project site and the map indicating the proposed site are

Google map covering 10 Km, 5 km, 1 km & 0.5 km radius around the project area is given in

Figure 2-1 to Figure 2-4 respectively. Site layout & Site photos are represented in Figure 2-5& Figure 2-6 respectively and site layout enclosed as Annexure F.

Page 48: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORTenvironmentclearance.nic.in/.../EIA/230520198KWR1Z7LEIAReport.pdf · Bengaluru Urban District & Karnataka State by M/s. CIPLA Limited. I was

Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Page 17

Figure 2-1 Google Satellite Image of the Project Site (10 Km Radius)

Figure 2-2 Google Satellite Image of the Project Site (5 Km Radius)

Page 49: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORTenvironmentclearance.nic.in/.../EIA/230520198KWR1Z7LEIAReport.pdf · Bengaluru Urban District & Karnataka State by M/s. CIPLA Limited. I was

Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Page 18

Figure 2-3 Google Satellite Image of the Project Site (1 Km Radius)

Figure 2-4 Google Satellite Image demarcation of Project Site

ExistingCIPLALimited

ExistingCIPLALimited

Page 50: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORTenvironmentclearance.nic.in/.../EIA/230520198KWR1Z7LEIAReport.pdf · Bengaluru Urban District & Karnataka State by M/s. CIPLA Limited. I was

Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Page 19

Figure 2-5 Site Master Plan – CIPLA Ltd, Bommasandra

Page 51: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORTenvironmentclearance.nic.in/.../EIA/230520198KWR1Z7LEIAReport.pdf · Bengaluru Urban District & Karnataka State by M/s. CIPLA Limited. I was

Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Page 20

CIPLA over all view API II Unit of the Existing Plant

ETP Laboratory RO System

Existing MEE Existing ETP

Page 52: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORTenvironmentclearance.nic.in/.../EIA/230520198KWR1Z7LEIAReport.pdf · Bengaluru Urban District & Karnataka State by M/s. CIPLA Limited. I was

Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Page 21

Existing Green Belt Area Existing Green Belt Area

Existing Green Belt Area Existing Green Belt Area

Figure 2-6 Site Photographs

2.2 Size or Magnitude of operation

M/s. CIPLA Limited proposes the change in product mix of Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients

within the production capacity of 119.84 MTA, The Existing quantity is 119.84 MTA with 63

nos of APIs. Proposed change in product mix with addition of 18 nos new products will have

113.46 MTA with 81 nos of APIs in (28.23 Acres/11.42 Ha) within KIADB Industrial Area,

Bommasandra-Jigani Link Road, Phase IV, Anekal Taluk, Bengaluru Urban District. The lists

of existing and proposed products are given Table 2-4 and Annexure H.

Page 53: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORTenvironmentclearance.nic.in/.../EIA/230520198KWR1Z7LEIAReport.pdf · Bengaluru Urban District & Karnataka State by M/s. CIPLA Limited. I was

Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Page 22

Table 2-4Table 2-4 Details of Existing and proposed products and capacities

S.No Category S.No ProductsExistingQuantity(Kgs/A)

Proposed Qty(Kgs/A)

Category wiseQty

Variation inquantity

1 CARDIOVASCULARDRUGS

1 AMLODIPINE BESYLATE 500 1000

2600

5002 AMLODIPINE MESYLATE 500 1000 5003 CIOLASTRAZOLE 3000 100 -29004 FELODIPINE 3000 500 -2500

2 ANTICANCERDRUGS

5 ANAGRELIDE 25 25

74430

06 BICALUTAMIDE 2000 2500 5007 CARBOPLATIN 25 50 258 CISPLATIN 25 50 259 ETOPOSIDE 250 500 250

10 FLUTAMIDE 5000 2000 -300011 MITIXANTRONE HCL 20 10 -1012 ANASTRAZOLE 0 100 10013 OXALIPLATIN 0 100 10014 CAPACITABINE 0 38000 38000

15 IMATINIB MESYLATE (Alpha and BetaForms) 0 10000 10000

16 VINORELBINE TARTRATE 0 50 5017 TEMOZOLOMIDE 0 500 50018 ERLOTINIB HCL 0 1500 150019 GEFTINIB 0 1500 150020 SORAFENIB TOSYLATE 0 1500 150021 DOCETAXEL TRIHYDRATE 0 100 10022 IRINOTECAN HCL 0 100 100

Page 54: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORTenvironmentclearance.nic.in/.../EIA/230520198KWR1Z7LEIAReport.pdf · Bengaluru Urban District & Karnataka State by M/s. CIPLA Limited. I was

Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Page 23

23 PACLITAXEL 0 100 10024 LAPATINIB DITOSYLATE 0 500 50025 LENALIDOMIDE 0 1000 100026 TOPOTECAN HCL 0 10 1027 GEMCITABINE HCL 0 800 80028 PEMETREXED DISODIUM 0 200 20029 BORTEZOMIB 0 10 1030 LETROZOLE 0 500 50031 SUNITINIB MALATE 0 255 25532 VINCRISTINE SULPHATE 0 50 5033 VINBLASTINE SULPHATE 0 50 5034 TEGAFUR 0 1000 100035 PAZOPANIB HCL 0 2500 250036 ABIRATERONE ACETATE 0 1000 100037 CARFILZOMIB 0 20 2038 RUXOLITINIB PHOSPHATE 0 100 10039 EVEROLIMUS 0 50 5040 EXEMESTINE 0 500 50041 ESTRAMUSTINE 0 500 50042 NILOTINIB 0 4000 400043 DASATINIB 0 500 50044 REGORAFENIB 0 200 20045 IBRUTINIB 0 500 50046 NINTEDANIB ESYLATE 0 500 50047 POMALIDOMIDE 0 500 50048 AXITINIB 0 500 500

3 CNS DRUG49 DULOXETINE 3000 500

7130-2500

50 OXCARBAZEPINE 7000 50 -695051 RILUZOLE 3000 580 -2420

Page 55: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORTenvironmentclearance.nic.in/.../EIA/230520198KWR1Z7LEIAReport.pdf · Bengaluru Urban District & Karnataka State by M/s. CIPLA Limited. I was

Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Page 24

52 RISPERIDONE 1000 500 -50053 TOPIRAMATE 10000 2500 -750054 LAMOTRIGINE POWDER 1000 2500 150055 VENLAFAXINE 5000 500 -4500

4 GASTROINTESTINALDRUGS

56 ESOMEPRAZOLE 2000 2000

7000

057 LANSOPRAZOLE 10000 1000 -900058 OMEPRAZOLE 10000 2000 -800059 PANTOPRAZOLE 1000 500 -50060 RABEPRAZOLE SODIUM 1000 500 -50061 RABEPRAZOLE POWDER 1000 500 -50062 ESOMEPRAZOLE POWDER 2000 500 -1500

5 OSTEOPOROSIS 63 RALOXIFENE 5000 1500 1500 -3500

6 ANTIBIOTICS /ANTIBACTERIALS

64 LEVOFLOXACIN 15000 3000

4700

-1200065 OFLOXACIN USP 500 500 066 CIPROFLOXACIN POWDER 190 190 067 GATIFLOXACIN POWDER 5 10 568 ENROFLOXACIN POWDER 500 1000 500

7OTHERS -ANTOGONADOTROPHIN

69 DANAZOL5000

500 500 -4500

8ARTHRITIC /RHEUMATICAGENTS

70 LEFLUNOMIDE1000

1000 1000 0

9 ANTIVIRALS

71 RIBAVIRIN 3000 1000

3100

-200072 STAVUDINE 1000 100 -90073 ZIDOVUDINE 5000 1000 -400074 VALACICLOVIR HCL 2000 500 -150075 DIDANOSINE 2000 500 -1500

10 OPTHALMIC DRUGS 76 REPROTEROLE 3000 1000 1000 -200011 ANTI HELMINTICS 77 FEBANTEL POWDER 1000 2000 10000 1000

Page 56: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORTenvironmentclearance.nic.in/.../EIA/230520198KWR1Z7LEIAReport.pdf · Bengaluru Urban District & Karnataka State by M/s. CIPLA Limited. I was

Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Page 25

78 MEBENDAZOLE POWDER 1500 2000 50079 ALBENDAZOLE POWDER 2300 4500 220080 FENBENDAZOLE POWDER 500 1500 1000

12 R&D products 81 R&D products 0 500 500 500

Total production qty In Kgs 119840 113460 113460 -6380

Total Production Qty In MT/A 119.84 113.46 113.46

Page 57: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORTenvironmentclearance.nic.in/.../EIA/230520198KWR1Z7LEIAReport.pdf · Bengaluru Urban District & Karnataka State by M/s. CIPLA Limited. I was

Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Page 26

2.3 Project Cost

There is no additional project cost as it is in existing unit. The current infrastructure is

adequate for the proposed change in product mix. The gross value of existing infrastructure is

Rs. 166 Crore.

2.4 Process Description

The process details of all the products are attached as Annexure J.

Figure 2-7 Process flow for production

2.5 Resource Requirements

2.5.1 Raw Materials

The list of raw materials given in Table 2-5 and MSDS’s are provided as Annexure I and

Annexure Q. List of solvents and tank details are given below

Table 2-6

Dispensing Raw MaterialRaw Materials Charging in Reactor and ReactionmonitoringCentrifuge operation

Material Drying Operation inDryerMillingOperationSiftingOperationBlendingOperationFinished Goods/ ProductpackingFinished Goods/ ProductDispatching

Page 58: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORTenvironmentclearance.nic.in/.../EIA/230520198KWR1Z7LEIAReport.pdf · Bengaluru Urban District & Karnataka State by M/s. CIPLA Limited. I was

Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Page 27

Table 2-5 List of Raw Materials & Quantity for Proposed New Products

SI.No Raw Materials Consumptionquantity Unit Products kg/A

1 Vinblastine Sulphate stage-I 139 Kg/A

Vincristine Sulphate - 50

2 Methanol 1392.5 lit/A3 Ethanol 1231.5 lit/A4 Sulfuric acid conc 1 lit/A5 N2 Gas 94 Kg/A6 Acetic acid 458.5 lit/A7 Tetrahydrofuran 3542.5 Kg/A8 Sodium dichromate 111 Kg/A9 Sodium bisulfite 278 Kg/A

10 Liq Ammonia 1431 lit/A11 Hyflo Super Cel 555.5 Kg/A12 Sodium bicarbonate 833.5 Kg/A13 Sodium sulphae anhyd 278 Kg/A14 Dichloromethane 12140.5 lit/A15 Vinblastine tech 285.5 Kg/A

Vinblastine sulphate - 50

16 Methanol 745 lit/A17 Sulfuric acid conc 50 lit/A18 Ethanol 2112.5 lit/A19 Liq Ammonia 771 lit/A20 Dichloromethane/Chloroform 1841.5 lit/A21 Tartaric acid 154 lit/A22 Sodium sulfate anhyd 137 Kg/A23 Nitrogen Gas 162.5 Kg/A24 5-Fluorouracil 890 Kg/A

Tegafur – 1000

25 2,3-Dihydrofuran 1420 Kg/A26 Dichlorodimethyl silane 1330 lit/A27 Acetonitrile 3490 lit/A28 Triethylamine 70 lit/A29 Diisopropyl ether 3870 lit/A30 Methanol 9870 lit/A31 Isopropyl alcohol 13290 lit/A32 Activated charcoal (acid grade) 20 Kg/A33 Hyflo 90 Kg/A

342,3-Dimethyl-2H-indazole-6-amine hydrochloride(DMIA.HCl) 2725 Kg/A Pazopanib HCL - 2500

35 2,4-Dichloro pyrimidine 5150 Kg/A36 Sodium bicarbonate 7825 Kg/A

Page 59: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORTenvironmentclearance.nic.in/.../EIA/230520198KWR1Z7LEIAReport.pdf · Bengaluru Urban District & Karnataka State by M/s. CIPLA Limited. I was

Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Page 28

37 Rectified spirit 43450 lit/A38 Dimethyl carbonate 5850 Kg/A39 Potassium carbonate 4500 Kg/A40 5-Amino-2-methylbenzenesulfonamide 2825 Kg/A41 IPA HCl 15000 lit/A42 Liquor Ammonia 10450 lit/A43 Dimethyl formamide 11250 Kg/A44 Acetonitrile 11750 lit/A45 Acetone 21575 lit/A46 Methanol 10850 lit/A47 DHEA Compound 1790 Kg/A

Abiraterone Acetate - 1000

48 Hydrazine Hydrate 1250 Kg/A49 1,1,3,3 Tetramethylguanidine 3390 Kg/A50 Iodine 3040 Kg/A51 Diethyl-(3- Pyridyl) borane 610 Kg/A

52 Bis (triphenylphosphine) Palladium dichloride 1 Kg/A53 HBr 1430 Kg/A54 Triethylamine 260 Kg/A55 4 dimethylamino pyridine 20 Kg/A

56 Acetic anhydride 410 lit/A57 Liq ammonia 5540 lit/A58 Sodium hydrosuphite 2320 Kg/A59 Aq. HBr 890 Kg/A60 Liq ammonia 1880 lit/A61 Methanol 16930 lit/A62 Acetone 14490 lit/A63 MDC 54090 lit/A64 Acetonitrile 8400 lit/A65 IPA 14530 Kg/A66 DMF 3710 Kg/A67 THF 7940 Kg/A68 Ac carbon 140 Kg/A69 Alumina 90 Kg/A70 Int 1 0.016 Kg/A

Carfilzomib – 20

71 Epoxyleucine TFA 0.008 Kg/A72 N,N DIPEA 0.02 Kg/A73 EDCI HCL 0.004 lit/A74 HOBT 0.006 Kg/A75 Acetonitrile 0.15 lit/A76 Sat NaHCO3 sol 0.086 lit/A77 Sat Brine Solution 0.174 lit/A78 4-chloropyrroo[2,3-d]pyrimidine 224 Kg/A Ruxolitinib Phosphate –

Page 60: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORTenvironmentclearance.nic.in/.../EIA/230520198KWR1Z7LEIAReport.pdf · Bengaluru Urban District & Karnataka State by M/s. CIPLA Limited. I was

Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Page 29

79 4-(pinacolato borane)-1H-Pyrazole 312 Kg/A 100

80 3-Cyclopentylacrylonitrile 118 Kg/A81 Tetrakis(triphenylphosphine)palladium(0) 72 Kg/A82 Trimethylsilylethoxymethyl chloride 279 Kg/A83 1,8-Diazabicyclo[5.4.0]undec-7-ene 12 Kg/A84 Phosphoric acid 35 lit/A85 sodium hydride 90 Kg/A86 Lithium Tetrafluoroborate 339 Kg/A87 Ammonium Hydroxide 39 Kg/A88 Sodium bicarbonate 9 Kg/A89 Potassium Carbonate 513 Kg/A90 1,2-dimethoxyethane 444 Kg/A91 ethyl acetate 20318 lit/A92 sodium chloride 615 Kg/A93 Dioxane 3433 Kg/A94 Toluene 1717 lit/A95 MTBE 1717 lit/A96 Acetonitrile 3991 lit/A97 Dichloromethane 1986 lit/A98 Heptane 3674 lit/A99 Methanol 2146 lit/A

100 Isopropanol 429 lit/A101 Hexane 1717 lit/A102 Sirolimus 100 Kg/A

Everolimus – 50

103 Ethylene glycol anhydrous 218 Kg/A104 tert-Butyldimethylsilyl chloride 635 Kg/A105 Triethyl amine 531.5 Kg/A106 DMAP 4 Kg/A107 Sodium sulphate 50 Kg/A108 Sodium chloride 50 Kg/A109 Trifluoromethanesulfonic anhydride 1385 Kg/A110 2, 6 Lutidine 768 Kg/A111 1 N Hydrochoric Acid 550 lit/A112 MDC 16600 lit/A113 Ethyl Acetate 49300.5 lit/A114 Hexane 69000 lit/A115 n Heptane 34200 lit/A116 Methanol 2175 lit/A117 Exemestane Stage-I 2740 Kg/A

Exemestine – 500118 2,3 Dichloro-5,6-Dicyano-P-Benzoquinone (DDQ) 3745 Kg/A

119 Sodium Hydroxide Flakes 2190 Kg/A

Page 61: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORTenvironmentclearance.nic.in/.../EIA/230520198KWR1Z7LEIAReport.pdf · Bengaluru Urban District & Karnataka State by M/s. CIPLA Limited. I was

Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Page 30

120 Sodium Sulphate Anhydrous 1825 Kg/A

121 Benzoic Acid 3835 lit/A122 Hyflo Supercel 270 Kg/A123 Toluene 109650 lit/A124 Acetone 18280 lit/A

125 Acetonitrile 73125 lit/A

126 Estramustine Phosphate 525 Kg/A

Estramustine – 500

127 Sodium Methoxide Powder 105 Kg/A

128 Activated Charcoal AR Grade 15 Kg/A

129 Potassium Hydroxide Flakes 450 Kg/A

130 Special Denatured Spirit With Toluene 15000 lit/A lit/A131 Methanol 6000 lit/A lit/A132 NTB Guanidinobenzoate 2840 Kg/A

Nilotinib – 4000

133 NTB Enamino Ketone 1920 Kg/A134 Potassium carbonate 4840 Kg/A135 Sodium Hydroxide 680 Kg/A136 Toluene 11040 lit/A137 N,N Dimethyl acetamide 13400 Kg/A138 NTB amine 2440 Kg/A139 Thionyl chloride 1000 Kg/A140 N methyl pyrrolidone 20560 Kg/A141 Acetone 69200 lit/A142 Methanol 27080 lit/A143 Acetonitrile 17800 lit/A144 Activated carbon 40 Kg/A145 Hydrochloric acid 80 lit/A

146 DST-Thiazole carboxamide 555 Kg/A

Dasatinib – 500

147 DST-Dichloro compound 435 Kg/A148 2-(hydroxy ethy )piperizine 1200 Kg/A149 Sodium tertary butoxide 665 Kg/A150 THF 4940 Kg/A151 methanol 21550 lit/A152 Acetic acid 555 lit/A153 N-butanol 10000 lit/A154 Acetone 665 lit/A155 RGB CMP 222 Kg/A

Regorafenib – 200156 RGB AFP 172 Kg/A157 Potassium tert butoxide 214 Kg/A158 DMF 1626 Kg/A

Page 62: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORTenvironmentclearance.nic.in/.../EIA/230520198KWR1Z7LEIAReport.pdf · Bengaluru Urban District & Karnataka State by M/s. CIPLA Limited. I was

Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Page 31

159 Ethyl acetate 13510 lit/A160 RGB Phenyl carbamate 310 Kg/A161 RGB CTA 222 Kg/A162 Phenyl chloroformate 186 Kg/A163 Pyridine 100 Kg/A164 Hexane 722 lit/A165 Acetone 2400 lit/A

166 PTSA.H2O 88 Kg/A167 Methanol 7200 lit/A168 Charcoal 40 Kg/A

169

3-Iodo-lH-pyrazolo[3,4-^pyrimidin-4-amine (31).lH-Pyrazolo[3,4- d]pyrimidin-4-amine, 30

500 Kg/A

Ibrutinib – 500

170 N-iodosuccinimide ( IS) 1070 Kg/A171 Compound 31 400 Kg/A172 boronic acid 32 656 lit/A173 potassium phosphate tribasic monohydrate 1056 Kg/A174 Dioxane 5800 Kg/A175 tetrakis(triphenylphosphine)palladium 270 Kg/A176 Compound 30 180 Kg/A177 protected piperidine 143 Kg/A178 Triphenylphosphine 233 Kg/A179 diisopropyl azodicarboxylate 180 Kg/A180 DMF 9440 Kg/A181 Nitrogen 110 Kg/A182 Methanol 11800 lit/A183 ethyl acetate 8960 Kg/A184 THF 17780 Kg/A185 Compound 35 70 Kg/A186 solution of hydrogen chloride in dioxane 590 lit/A187 diethyl ether 1420 lit/A

188 acrylic acid-d4 12 lit/A189 oxalyl chloride 23600 Kg/A190 Triethylamine 3000 Kg/A191 MDC 7900 lit/A192 5% citric acid 8300 lit/A193 Benzene 438 Kg/A194 DMF 280 Kg/A195 suspension of 36 45 Kg/A

196 Acryloyl-d3 chloride 11990 Kg/A197 Compound 122 17 Kg/A198 Nintedanib Base 450 Kg/A Nintedanib Esylate - 500

Page 63: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORTenvironmentclearance.nic.in/.../EIA/230520198KWR1Z7LEIAReport.pdf · Bengaluru Urban District & Karnataka State by M/s. CIPLA Limited. I was

Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Page 32

199 Ethane Sulfonic Acid 95 lit/A200 Acetonitrile 1572 lit/A

Axitinib – 500

201 6-nitro-indazole 81.55 Kg/A202 3, 4- dihydro -2H- pyran 84.1 Kg/A203 2,3- dichloro-5,6-dicyano-p-benzoquinone 11 Kg/A204 Dichloromethane 2915 lit/A205 DMF 1298 Kg/A206 tetrahydro -2H- pyran-2-yl) -1H- indazole 112.5 Kg/A207 potassium carbonate 125.5 Kg/A208 Iodine 207.5 Kg/A209 sodium thiosulfate 111.5 Kg/A210 potassium carbonate aqueous solution 0.75 lit/A211 DMF 944 Kg/A212 addition of the intermediate (1) 156 Kg/A213 2- vinylpyridine 63.75 Kg/A214 N, N- diisopropylethylamine 102.65 Kg/A215 tri-o-tolylphosphine 11.15 Kg/A216 palladium chloride 2.45 Kg/A217 isopropanol 864.6 lit/A218 ethanol 410 lit/A219 ammonium chloride 150 Kg/A

220(E) -6- nitro-3- [2- (pyridin-2-yl) ethenyl] -1-(tetrahydro -2H- pyran-2-yl) -1H- indazole 112.5 Kg/A

221 iron powder 81.3 Kg/A222 THF 896 Kg/A223 sodium nitrite 35.1 Kg/A

224(TC, (E) -6- amino-3- [2- (pyridin-2-yl) ethenyl ] -1- (tetrahydro -2H- pyran-2-yl) -1H- indazole 100 Kg/A

225 glacial acetic acid 682.5 lit/A226 concentrated hydrochloric acid 66.08 lit/A227 MDC 1936.836 lit/A228 potassium iodide 103.65 Kg/A229 Iodine 39.6 Kg/A230 20% sodium thiosulfate solution 1660 lit/A231 ammonia 200 lit/A

232(E) -6- iodo-3- [2- (pyridin-2-yl) ethenyl] -1-(tetrahydro-pyran-2-yl -2H-) -1H- indazole 87.5 Kg/A

233[1, I, - bis (diphenylphosphino) ferrocene]dichloropalladium dichloromethane complex 7.45 Kg/A

234 cesium carbonate 99.15 Kg/A235 2-mercapto -N- methylbenzamide 42.45 Kg/A236 ethyl acetate 1344 lit/A

Page 64: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORTenvironmentclearance.nic.in/.../EIA/230520198KWR1Z7LEIAReport.pdf · Bengaluru Urban District & Karnataka State by M/s. CIPLA Limited. I was

Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Page 33

237

(E) -N- methyl-2 - {[3- (2- (pyridin-2-yl) ethenyl)_1_ (tetrahydro -2H- pyran-2-yl) -1H - indazol-6-yl] thio} benzamide 75 lit/A

238 p-toluenesulfonic acid monohydrate 151.6 lit/A239 Methanol 316.72 lit/A240 ethanol 328 lit/A241 ethyl acetate 201.6 lit/A

Table 2-6 Existing Solvents & Fuels Materials Tank Storage Details

Existing

ProposedS.No Chemical No. of

TanksDia(m)

Height(m)

Volume(KL)

InternalPressure

Type ofstorage

InternalTemp(0c)

1 Methanol 1 2.5 6.5 25 UnderNitrogenblanketingat 50 milibar

Undergroundtank kept inRCC tankandsubmergedin Gravel

AmbientTemp

2 IPA 1 2.5 6.5 25 No Change

3 Hexane 1 2.5 6.5 25

4 EthylAcetate

1 2.5 6.5 25

5 Acetone 1 2.5 6.5 25

6 Toluene 1 2.5 6.5 257 HSD 1 3 3 40 Atmospheric

PressureAboveGround

8 Furnace oil 1 3 4 20

9 Methylene 1 2 4 15 UnderNitrogenblanketingat 50 milibar

10 Chloroform 1 2 4 15

2.5.2 Land Details

The Plant facilities are spread over 115335.23 sq.m, (28.49 Acres / 11.52 Ha), Total built up

area (Land utilized for buildings, utilities purpose, other allied purpose like roads, machinery

equipments etc..,) is 54997.45 sq.m (13.58 Acres) KIADB Land which is completely fortified

and protected on all four sides by boundary walls.

Land is owned by M/s. CIPLA Limited. This land has been allotted by KIADB in the Industrial

area. The present land use is industrial.

Page 65: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORTenvironmentclearance.nic.in/.../EIA/230520198KWR1Z7LEIAReport.pdf · Bengaluru Urban District & Karnataka State by M/s. CIPLA Limited. I was

Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Page 34

Table 2-7 Land use break up details

Description AREA IN SQMTS AREA INACRES

% OFAREA

Land Utilized for Buildings & Utilities Purpose 18034.03 4.45 15.6

Land Utilized for other allied purpose likeRoads, Machinery Equipments, etc.., 36963.42 9.13 32

Land Utilized for Green Belt Development 38035.8 9.39 33

Area for future expansion 22301.98 5.51 19.3Total Area 115335.23 28.49 100.00

Existing Green belt is 9.39 Acres (33 %) of 28.49 Acres.

2.5.3 Water Requirement

Total water requirement is 300 KLD of which fresh water requirement is 140 KLD; Water

source from the In house bore wells and private tankers. There is no change in the new

proposal.

Table 2-8 Water Consumption for the Project

SI.No Description Existing Break up (KLD) Proposed(KLD)Total water

requirementEffluent generated Total Recycled

water1 Process 60 58 Permeate 122 KLD

Condensate 38KLD No Change

2 Washing 25 253 Boiler Feed 60 354 Chiller 505 Domestic 25 226 Other utilities 20 207 Green belt 60 -

Total 300 160 160Fresh waterrequirement

(300 - 160) = 140

Total water Requirement: 300 KLDEffluent Generated: 160 KLDRecycled water: 160 KLDFresh water Requirement (300 – 160 KLD) = 140 KLD

Water balance chart for existing (300 KLD) facility is given in Figure 2-8 and enclosed as

Annexure K

Page 66: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORTenvironmentclearance.nic.in/.../EIA/230520198KWR1Z7LEIAReport.pdf · Bengaluru Urban District & Karnataka State by M/s. CIPLA Limited. I was

Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Page 35

2.5.4 Power RequirementPower requirement of the project is 1500 KVA from BESCOM. DG sets will act as backup

facilities in case of power failure, the details of power requirement given in Table 2-9.

Table 2-9 Power and Energy Requirement

Details Capacity (KVA) SourceExisting Proposed

Power Requirement 1500

No Change

BESCOMPower Back Up 1250x3 DG SetsFuel oil fired Boiler ( 2TPH x 3)

25000lit/Month (Furnace oil)

HPCL/IOCL

TFH system 200000 kcal

(1 x 200000 k cal) -

2.5.5 Manpower Requirement

The total strength of the CIPLA Limited is 300 people (permanent & contractual), No

additional manpower requirement as it is a proposed project for change in product mix. The

manpower requirement will be include both technical and non-technical personnel.

2.6 Pollution Control Measures

2.6.1 Air Pollution & Fugitive Emission Control

The major air pollution sources from the industry are DG sets, boilers and scrubbers. The DG

set and boiler sources are provided with stacks of adequate height so as to disperse the

emanating flue gases containing suspended particulate matter, oxides of sulfur and nitrogen

without affecting the ground level concentrations. The emissions generated from the reactors

are scrubbed out by wet scrubbers. The source of emission, capacity and the various Air

Pollution Control (APC) measures taken are listed in the Table 2-10.

Table 2-10 Air Pollution Sources and Control Measures

S.No

Existing Proposed

MoEF Approved No ofstacks Type of fuel Sulphur

contentKgs/hr incase of

liquid fuel

Chimneyheight (in mts)& air pollutioncontrol system

providedproposed

1 Attached toprocess

5 NA NA NA 3 m ARL/9 mAGL & scrubber

No change

2 Attached tofinishing area

2 NA NA NA Dust collector

Page 67: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORTenvironmentclearance.nic.in/.../EIA/230520198KWR1Z7LEIAReport.pdf · Bengaluru Urban District & Karnataka State by M/s. CIPLA Limited. I was

Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Page 36

3 Formulation 2 NA NA NA 3 m ARL/9 mAGL & scrubber

4 Quality Control 1 NA NA NA 3 m ARL/9 mAGL & scrubber

5 TFH system200000 k cal

1 NA NA NA 20 m AGL

6 Steam Boilers (2TPH x 3)

3 Furnace oil 4.0 % 190 Kg/Hr 30 m AGL

7Solid wasteincinerator 25kg/Hr

1 HSD 0.25 % 05 Lts/Hr 30 m AGL &Scrubber

8 Vapourabsorption

1 HSD 0.25 % 25 Lts/Hr 20 m AGL

9 (1250 x 3) KVADG sets

3 HSD 0.25 % 220 Lts/Hr 20 m AGL &silencers

Note: Due to change in product mix shall not increase any additional air pollution sources andemission rate.

2.6.2 Odour ControlTo odour has been controlled with proper mitigative measures. The scrubber details are

enclosed in Annexure P.

2.6.3 Noise PollutionThe major source of noise pollution in the industry is DG sets, boilers and reactors. DG sets

are provided with integral acoustic enclosures. Also the ambient noise levels are within the

ambient standards by inbuilt design of mechanical equipment and buildings apart from

vegetation along the periphery and at various locations within the industry premises. The

plant will be specifically designed with due consideration on minimizing noise pollution.

Higher noise levels will be felt only near the active working areas and therefore the workers

are provided with personal protective equipment as a safety measure.

2.6.4 Waste Water Generation and Disposal DetailsSewage and effluent generated from process and washings are taken to combined Effluent

and Sewage Treatment Plant of capacity 160 KLD further processed in RO plant.

Rejects from RO Plant along with High TDS effluent is treated in Multiple Effect Evaporator of

40 KLD capacity. The treated waste water of 160 KLD is reused for Boiler, cooling towers and

Toilet flushes.

Zero liquid discharge system is maintained in the facilities. There is no change in the new

proposal.

Table 2-11 Liquid Waste Generation & Treatment

Page 68: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORTenvironmentclearance.nic.in/.../EIA/230520198KWR1Z7LEIAReport.pdf · Bengaluru Urban District & Karnataka State by M/s. CIPLA Limited. I was

Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Page 37

Phase Population(Nos)

Qty ofwater

required(KLD)

Sewage/EffluentGenerated

(KLD)

Treatment Method

Existing Operation 300 300 160 Treated in combined ETP andSTP

Proposed construction Not applicable

After expansion Operation No change after proposed change in productmix

Process 300 300 160

The source of waste water, treatment methods and the final disposal of each type of

wastewater generated in Table 2-11 & Figure 2-8 respectively and the ETP and STP process

flow diagrams along with their specifications are attached as Annexure L.

Page 69: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORTenvironmentclearance.nic.in/.../EIA/230520198KWR1Z7LEIAReport.pdf · Bengaluru Urban District & Karnataka State by M/s. CIPLA Limited. I was

Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Page 38

Figure 2-8 Water Balance Chart

2.6.5 Hazardous and Solid waste Management

2.6.5.1 Solid waste managementThe Source of municipal waste in the industry will be from the domestic use. The Municipal

solid waste (Organic waste from canteen and pantry) generate150 kg/day. The total

manpower is 300 nos during Operational phase. The details are given in the following Table2-12. & Table 2-13.

Page 70: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORTenvironmentclearance.nic.in/.../EIA/230520198KWR1Z7LEIAReport.pdf · Bengaluru Urban District & Karnataka State by M/s. CIPLA Limited. I was

Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Page 39

Table 2-12 Municipal Solid Waste

Type of waste Existing Proposed

Quantity Kg/day Collection method Disposal method

Organic wastefrom canteen and

pantry

150 Bins Composting & Localpig farm

No change

As per CPCB guidelines: MSW per capita/day =0.45

2.6.5.2 Hazardous waste ManagementThe various hazardous waste generated from the process is stored in a separate hazardous

waste storage area and properly disposed as per the Hazardous and Other Wastes

(Management and Trans boundary Movement) Amendment Rules, 2016. Agreement

between TSDF and CIPLA for collection, transport, storage, treatment and disposal and also

we have a valid agreement with M/s. Enano incintech for Incineration of incinerable wastes.

The type of hazardous waste and the quantity generated are detailed in the Table 2-13.

Table 2-13 Hazardous waste

WasteCategory

Existing Proposed

Hazardouswaste

Generated

Quantity Method of handling

Existing Proposed Total

5.1 Used Oil 15 KL/A

Nochanges

15KL/A

Collected in Leak proof containers anddisposed only to KSPCB registeredauthorized reprocessors provided the oilmeets the standards as per schedule-5part-A of the rules

No Change

5.2Oil soaked

cotton waste 0.5MT/A 0.5MT/AStored in a secured manner and handover to KSPCB authorized incinerator/Coprocessing in cement kiln

28.1Process

residues &Waste

202 MT/A 202MT/A

Stored in a secured manner and handover to KSPCB authorized incinerator/Coprocessing in cement kiln / Disposal toTSDF in case calorific value is < 2500Kcal/Kg.

20.3DistillationResidue 10 MT/A 10MT/A

Stored in a secured manner and handover to KSPCB authorized incinerator/Coprocessing in cement kiln

28.2Spent

solvent 1200 KL/A 1200KL/AStored in a secured manner and handover to KSPCB authorized recycler /

33.1Discardedcontainers

2500Nos/A

2500Nos/A

Stored in a secured manner and handover to KSPCB authorized recycler afterwash/decontamination only

Page 71: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORTenvironmentclearance.nic.in/.../EIA/230520198KWR1Z7LEIAReport.pdf · Bengaluru Urban District & Karnataka State by M/s. CIPLA Limited. I was

Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Page 40

35.3 Sludge fromETP & MEE

salts60

MTA60

MTAStored in a secured manner and handover to KSPCB authorized TSDF

2.7 Existing Infrastructure Facilities

a. Land

The Plant facilities are spread over 115335.23 sq.m, (28.49 Acres / 11.52 Ha), Total built up

area (Land utilized for buildings, utilities purpose, other allied purpose like roads, machinery

equipments etc..,) is 54997.45 sq.m (13.58 Acres) KIADB Land which is completely fortified

and protected on all four sides by boundary walls.

Land is owned by M/s. CIPLA Limited. This land has been allotted by KIADB in the Industrial

area. The present land use is industrial.

b. Buildings

Total built up area is divided into various sections like Production Blocks, Engineering,

Warehouses, Administration, Canteen, Toilets etc. There is adequate space & provision for

operations.

c. Plant and Machinery & Utilities

The Plant facilities have been designed and set up with the objective to carry out almost all

chemical reactions and processes. Details of plant and machinery and utility equipments

used for the production are as below;

i. Process Equipments:

Reactors ANFD Centrifuges VTDs Jet Mill Multi Mill Sifter & Blender

ii. Machinery / Utility Equipments;

Boilers Cooling towers DG sets Air compressors

Page 72: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORTenvironmentclearance.nic.in/.../EIA/230520198KWR1Z7LEIAReport.pdf · Bengaluru Urban District & Karnataka State by M/s. CIPLA Limited. I was

Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Page 41

HVAC system (Heat, Ventilation and Air conditioning) Vacuum pumps Hot water systems Chilled water plant Dust collectors Scrubbers

iii. Safety Equipments:

Fire Hydrant System Fire Extinguishers Fire Alarm System Eye wash fountain / Safety Showers Emergency PPE cupboards Wind Sack Public Address System

Page 73: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORTenvironmentclearance.nic.in/.../EIA/230520198KWR1Z7LEIAReport.pdf · Bengaluru Urban District & Karnataka State by M/s. CIPLA Limited. I was

Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Page 42

CHAPTER – 3DESCRIPTION OF ENVIRONMENT

Page 74: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORTenvironmentclearance.nic.in/.../EIA/230520198KWR1Z7LEIAReport.pdf · Bengaluru Urban District & Karnataka State by M/s. CIPLA Limited. I was

Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Page 43

3. DESCRIPTION OF ENVIRONMENT3.1 Preamble

This chapter depicts the existing environmental conditions in and around the proposed project

with an area of 28.49 Acres (11.52 Ha) located at plot # 285, 286 & 287, KIADB Industrial Area,

Bommasandra,Link Road.IV Phase Jigani, Anekal Taluk Bengaluru Urban District & Karnataka

state. The primary baseline data monitored covered three (3) months i.e., from September to

November 2016, and secondary data was collected from Government and Semi-Government

organisations. The primary baseline data has been generated by M/s. Hubert Enviro Care

Systems (P) Ltd, Chennai, and a MoEF&CC approved Environmental Testing Laboratory for the

following Terrestrial environmental components.

Terrestrial Environmental Components

Meteorology

Temperature

Relative Humidity

Rainfall

Wind Speed & Direction

Solar Radiation

Ambient Air Quality

Particulate matter <10 micron size(PM10)

Particulate matter <2.5 micron size(PM2.5)

Sulphur Dioxide (SO2)

Nitrogen Dioxide (NO2)

Carbon Monoxide (CO)

Lead (Pb)

Ozone (O3)

Benzene (C6H6)

Benzo (a) pyrene (C20H12)

Arsenic (As)

Nickel (Ni)

Page 75: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORTenvironmentclearance.nic.in/.../EIA/230520198KWR1Z7LEIAReport.pdf · Bengaluru Urban District & Karnataka State by M/s. CIPLA Limited. I was

Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Page 44

Ammonia (NH3)

Hydrogen Fluoride (HF)

Hydrogen Bromide (HBr)

Hydrogen Sulfide (H2S)

Hydrogen Chloride (Hcl)

Ambient Noise Levels

Day equivalent noise levels

Night equivalent noise levels

Inland Water Quality

Groundwater Quality

Surface Water Quality

Soil Quality

Flora & Fauna (Ecology)

3.2 Study Area

A 10Km radial distance with the proposed project site as the epicentre has been identified as

the General study area for assessing the baseline environmental status. The core study area is

the project area and its immediate surroundings to the tune of 1.0 Km radius from the boundary.

The project area is the land where the project is being developed. Further the Project

Impact/Influence Area (PIA) is 10Km from the boundary of the core area covering Anekal Taluka

and some portion of Bangalore corporation under Bangalore urban district of Karnataka. The

map showing the study area/PIA for the EIA study is given as Error! Reference source not

found..

3.3 Description of the Study Area

As described in Chapter 1 Introduction the M/s. Cipla Limited is located 22 Km North of

Bengaluru district of Karnataka. An overall idea of the study area with reference to the physical

conditions are presented for better understanding in the following sections before proceeding

into the section on the prevailing environmental conditions of the study area. Location map of

the project site is given in Figure 1-1.

Page 76: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORTenvironmentclearance.nic.in/.../EIA/230520198KWR1Z7LEIAReport.pdf · Bengaluru Urban District & Karnataka State by M/s. CIPLA Limited. I was

Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Page 45

3.4 Environmentally/Ecologically Sensitive areas

The environmental sensitive areas covering an aerial distance of 10 km PIA from project

boundary is given in Table 3-1.

Table 3-1 Environmentally Sensitive Areas within 15km from Project Boundary

S.No Areas Proposed project location boundary1 Areas protected under international conventions,

national or local legislation for their ecological,landscape, cultural or other related value

The Bannerghatta National Park boundary at adistance of 5.26 Km towards WestRagihalli Forest –7.3 Km towards West

2 Areas which are important or sensitive forecological reasons – Wetlands, Watercourses orother water bodies, coastal zone, biospheres,mountains, forests

The Bannerghatta National Park boundary at adistance of 5.26 Km towards WestHennagara Lake-1.0 Km towards South EastKammasandra lake-5.9 Km towards North EastRagihalli Forest – 7.3 Km towards West

3 Areas used by protected, important or sensitivespecies of flora or fauna for breeding, nesting,foraging, resting, over wintering, migration

The Bannerghatta National Park boundary at adistance of 5.26 Km towards West from the project site(as per Range forest office, Bannerghatta wild lifeRange, Kalkere, Bengaluru, Letter No. 415/2018-19dated: 18.01.2019)

4 Inland, coastal, marine or underground waters5 State, National boundaries Karnataka – Tamil Nadu Border – 10.7 Km6 Routes or facilities used by the public for access

to recreation or other tourist, pilgrim areasBannerghatta - Anekal Road – 2.0 Km

7 Defence installations Nil8 Densely populated or built-up area Bommasandra village – 3.82 Km towards East North East

Doddathoguru– 6.74 Km towards North EastElectronic City-6.1Km towards North

9 Areas occupied by sensitive man-made land uses(hospitals, schools, places of worship, communityfacilities)

HospitalsNarayana Hrudyala-5.07 Km towards North EastSparsh Hospital-5.33 Km towards North EastSrinidhi Hopital-5.65 Km towards EastEducational InstitutionsBTL High School - 4.63 Km towards North EastTreamis World School-3.06 Km towards NorthRoyal Public School-5.83 Km towards North EastBTL Institute of Tech and Management-4.91 Km towardsNorth EastCondor International school-4.32 Km towards North WestChrist Academy ICSE school-5.38 Km towards North WestNidyananda High school and college-2.37 Km towards WestTapovan High School-4.11 Km towards WestVirindha Educational Academy-5.89 Km towards WestFilm Academy-5.90 Km towards WestT. Johan College-9.34 Km towards North WestSherwood High School-9.56 Km towards North WestWorship PlacesJigani Masjid-2.25 Km towards WestSri Channa Keshava Temple-7.64 Km towards South East

10 Areas containing important, high quality or scarceresources, (groundwater resources, surface

Tourism- Bhannergatta National Park-7.72 Km towardsWest

Page 77: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORTenvironmentclearance.nic.in/.../EIA/230520198KWR1Z7LEIAReport.pdf · Bengaluru Urban District & Karnataka State by M/s. CIPLA Limited. I was

Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Page 46

resources, forestry, agriculture, fisheries, tourism,minerals)

11 Areas already subjected to pollution orenvironmental damage (those where existing legalenvironmental standards are exceeded)

No Notified/Recognized polluted area within 15Km distance.

12 Areas susceptible to natural hazard which couldcause the project to present environmentalproblems, (earthquakes, subsidence, landslides,erosion or extreme or adverse climatic conditions)

The site falls in Seismic Zone – II (Low Risk) as per seismiczoning Map of India

3.5 Ecological Sensitive Areas and Other Protected Area

Ecologically sensitive areas like Biosphere Reserve, National Parks, and Wildlife Sanctuaries

protected sites as per Ramsar convention and other protected areas (PA) are not found within

10 Km radius of the project site except Bannerghatta Biological Park (BBP) located at a

distance of 5.26 Km radius from proposed project site.

The Bannerghatta Biological Park, popularly known as BBP, has been an integral part of

Bannerghatta National Park and emerged out as an independent establishment during the year

2002. It is in order to meet the growing demand for eco-recreation, eco-tourism and

conservation, an area of 545.00 Ha of forest from National park was set aside to constitute as

Biological Park originally and later extended to 731.88 Ha.

Bannerghatta Biological Park is located about 22 Kms south of Bengaluru city. It is one among

the few places in the world where wilderness is preserved so close to a big city. It is having

different units such as Zoo, Safari, Butterfly Park and Rescue Center (Conservation of captive

animals).

In Core area there are no trees in wild and mostly with scrub land. Protected areas from the

project location are shown in Figure 3-1.

Page 78: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORTenvironmentclearance.nic.in/.../EIA/230520198KWR1Z7LEIAReport.pdf · Bengaluru Urban District & Karnataka State by M/s. CIPLA Limited. I was

Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Page 47

Figure 3-1 Ecological Sensitive Areas within 10Km radius

Figure 3-2 Ecological Sensitive Areas within 10Km radius in Topo Map

Page 79: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORTenvironmentclearance.nic.in/.../EIA/230520198KWR1Z7LEIAReport.pdf · Bengaluru Urban District & Karnataka State by M/s. CIPLA Limited. I was

Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Page 48

3.6 Physical Conditions

In this section, the physical conditions of PIA district Bengaluru Urban are discussed in general

and wherever possible references to the conditions prevailing in the study area in particular are

also provided. The physical conditions are discussed as under:

District profile

Drainage, land use, geology, Physiography

Natural resources

Climatic conditions, seismic zone characteristics and natural hazards

3.6.1 PIA District Profile

Bengaluru Urban is a district of the Indian state of Karnataka. It is surrounded by the Bengaluru

Rural district on the west, east and north and the Krishnagiri district of Tamil Nadu on the south.

Bengaluru Urban district came into being in 1986, with the partition of the erstwhile Bengaluru

district into Bengaluru Urban and Bengaluru Rural districts. Bengaluru Urban has four taluks:

Bangalore North, Bengaluru East, Bengaluru South and Anekal. The city of Bengaluru is

situated in the Bengaluru Urban district. The Bengaluru Urban district has 17 hoblies, 668

villages and 9 municipal corporations. Electronics City the pride of India and hub of Bengaluru’s

Information Technology companies is situated in Anekal Taluk.

This is the most advanced district in Karnataka. It had a population of 6,537,124 of which

88.11% is urban as of 2001. As of Census 2011, its population has increased to 9,588,910, with

a sex-ratio of 908 females/males, the lowest in the state and its density is 4,378 people per

square km.

3.6.2 Climatic Conditions

Due to its elevation, Bangalore enjoys a pleasant and equable climate throughout the year. The

highest temperature recorded was 35.9 0C on April and the lowest was 10.9 0C in January.

Winter temperatures rarely drop below 140C and summer temperatures seldom exceed 360C.The PIA district has moderate climatic conditions and characterised by sub-tropical climate.

The summer heat is moderated by fairly frequent thunderstorms and occasional squalls causing

power outages and local flooding.

Source: IMD _Bangalore_1971-2000

Page 80: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORTenvironmentclearance.nic.in/.../EIA/230520198KWR1Z7LEIAReport.pdf · Bengaluru Urban District & Karnataka State by M/s. CIPLA Limited. I was

Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Page 49

3.6.3 Rainfall

The rainfall of the district is accounted by the Pre monsoon (PRE), SW

monsoon (SWM) and NE monsoon (NEM). Majority of the rainfall is contributed

by SW Monsoon. In general, humid to semi arid climatic conditions prevail in the

district. The average temperature is around 23.1˚C. The seasonal and annual

normal rainfall of the four taluks of the district from the year 2001 to 2010 is

considered for studying the rainfall pattern. The annual rainfall of Bangalore

North taluk is the highest with 1157mm and lowest for Anekal taluk with 890mm

Source: Government of India Ministry of Water Resources Central Ground Water Board.

3.6.4 Natural Resources of Bengaluru Urban PIA District

3.6.4.1 Flora & Fauna

According to Gazetteer of South India, (1988), large trees are common in Bangalore Urban

district being usually found only near villages. Among them Margosa (Meliaazardirachta),

various species of Ficus (indica, tsiela and religiosa), Tamarind, Acacias (arabica and

speciosa), Mango, Coconut Palms, Palmyra and date (Phoenixsylvestris) etc. are reported. A

large part of the district is covered with low scrub jungle, in which red sanders tree

(Pterocarpussantalinus), the satin-wood (Chloroxylonswietenia), Casuarina were found. Flora

and fauna of PIA are discussed in section 3.11.

3.6.4.2 Forest Resources

There are at least a dozen forests around Bangalore. They are mainly Makalidurga,

Devarabetta, Doddaragi Halli Betta & Chickkaragi Halli Betta, Suvarnamukhi, Thottikal Falls,

Nandihills, Skandagiri, and Muthyalamadu & Savanadurga.

3.6.4.3 Irrigation

The only river of some importance in the district is the Arkavathi river, which flows in the

northwest border of the division. This river is a tributary of the Cauvery and flows from north to

south. On the way, it forms several large tanks as at Hessaraghatta. Apart from this main river,

there are other small rivers like the Vrishabhavathi.

The Vrishabhavathi runs right from one end of the City to the other. On its way, it is fed by

effluents from various factories and sewage from several human settlements. This river is one of

Page 81: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORTenvironmentclearance.nic.in/.../EIA/230520198KWR1Z7LEIAReport.pdf · Bengaluru Urban District & Karnataka State by M/s. CIPLA Limited. I was

Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Page 50

the ugliest features in the City. It becomes particularly obnoxious near Mysore Road. Another

stream Suvarnamukhi that has its origin in the division also joins the Vrishabhavathi.

Irrigation of the cultivated lands in the district is mainly carried on by means of water drawn from

tanks and wells. In the months of April, May and June severe scarcity of water may be felt.

Bangalore City is provided with drinking water from mainly two sources, namely,

Tippagondanahally reservoir constructed across the Arkavati river in magadi taluk of Bangalore

Rural division and the Cauvery river. Both these sources become almost dry for about a month

in May-June, if the monsoons are delayed. The water table of the city is going down each year

and the open wells and bore-wells are getting drier and drier. More and more bore-wells have

been sunk over the years much beyond the carrying capacity of the water table in the city so

much, that almost alternate houses have bore wells now. Another factor for lowering of the

water table is the drying and dying up of the lakes and tanks existing in the city, which have

been either filled up to make layouts for constructing houses or for creating bus-stands and

playgrounds. Many lakes and tanks of the city are severally polluted because of the fact that

sewage waters are let into these water bodies.

3.6.4.4 Agricultural Resources

In PIA Agriculture is the main occupation of the people of the district. Rice is the staple food of

the people and paddy is the principal food crop followed by Ragi, Jowar and Maize crops.

Tobacco, Cashews, Coconut, arecanut, Cardomom, Chillies, Cotton, Sugarcane are also

cultivated.

Major Field Crops cultivated: Paddy, Ragi, Jowar, Maize, Sugarcane, Tobacco, Cotton, Chilli

etc

Horticulture crops: Mango, Orange & batavina, Cashew, Banana, Chillies, Bhendi, Brinjal,

greens, Marigold,

Plantation and Spice crops: Oil palm, Coconut, Betelvine

Livestock: Non descriptive Cattle (local low yielding), Crossbreed cattle, Non descriptive

Buffaloes (local low yielding), Graded Buffaloes, Goat, Sheep, Others (Camel, Pig, Yak etc.)

Poultry.

Page 82: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORTenvironmentclearance.nic.in/.../EIA/230520198KWR1Z7LEIAReport.pdf · Bengaluru Urban District & Karnataka State by M/s. CIPLA Limited. I was

Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Page 51

3.6.4.5 Mineral Resources

Bangalore Urban doesn’t contain minerals of sufficient commercial value. Nodular

concentrations of lime canker are found as secondary product in many places in the gneissic

regions. Graphite is observed to occur as crystalline flakes near Chikkabanavar. Geology &

Minerals map of Karnataka is given in Figure 3-3.

Page 83: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORTenvironmentclearance.nic.in/.../EIA/230520198KWR1Z7LEIAReport.pdf · Bengaluru Urban District & Karnataka State by M/s. CIPLA Limited. I was

Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Page 52

Figure 3-3 Geology & Minerals Map of Karnataka

Page 84: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORTenvironmentclearance.nic.in/.../EIA/230520198KWR1Z7LEIAReport.pdf · Bengaluru Urban District & Karnataka State by M/s. CIPLA Limited. I was

Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Page 53

3.6.5 Land Use & Land Cover

Total geographical area of Bangalore Urban district is 2184.14 Km2. Total are of Agriculture land

is 531.98 Km2 (%). Forest area covered is 26.41 Km2 (%). Built up area is 1451.41 Km2 (%).

Grass land is 5.87Km2 (%). Water bodies’ area is 36.45 Km2 (%). Waste Lands area is 122.02

Km2 (%). Others area is 10Km2 (%). Details of land use/land cover for the Benagluru district are

given in Table 3-2 and

Figure 3-4. Land Use of Bangalore Urban (2005) is given in Figure 3-5.

Table 3-2 District land use/land cover statistics

S.No Division of Land Use/LandCover

Area in Km2 Area in Acres Area in Ha % To TotalArea

1 Agriculture 531.98 131455.12 53197.99 24.352 Forest Cover 26.41 6526.05 2640.99 1.203 Built up 1451.41 358651.22 145140.99 66.454 Grass Land 5.87 1450.50 586.99 0.265 Water Bodies 36.45 9006.99 3644.99 1.676 Waste Lands 122.02 30151.79 12201.99 5.597 Others 10.00 2471.05 999.99 0.46

Total 2184.14 539712.74 218413.99 100

Figure 3-4 Land Use Pattern in the PIA District

Page 85: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORTenvironmentclearance.nic.in/.../EIA/230520198KWR1Z7LEIAReport.pdf · Bengaluru Urban District & Karnataka State by M/s. CIPLA Limited. I was

Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Page 54

Figure 3-5 Land Use Map of Bangalore Urban district

Page 86: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORTenvironmentclearance.nic.in/.../EIA/230520198KWR1Z7LEIAReport.pdf · Bengaluru Urban District & Karnataka State by M/s. CIPLA Limited. I was

Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Page 55

3.6.5.1 Land Use Pattern of the Study Area

Total Project Study Area: 331 Sq.Km. Land Use pattern of the study area is given in Table 3-3.

LULC map of the Study area is given in Figure 3-7.Table 3-3: Land Use/Land Cover statistics of 10 Km radius of the Study Area

S.No Land Use Area in Sq.Km Area in Acres Area in Ha Area inPercentage

1 Urban 89.21 22044.27 8921 39.694862 Cropland 38.65 9550.62 3865 26.951663 Plantation 18.14 4482.49 1814 11.676744 Deciduous 14.26 3523.72 1426 5.4803635 Reservoirs/Lakes/ Ponds 13.57 3353.22 1357 4.3081576 Scrub land 9.08 2243.71 908 4.0996987 Fallow land 7.82 1932.36 782 2.7432028 Scrub Forest 4.24 1047.72 424 2.3625389 Mining 3.03 748.729 303 1.280967

10 Rural 1.19 294.055 119 0.91540811 Barren Rocky Area 0.42 103.784 42 0.35951712 Gullied/ Ravinous land 89.21 22044.27 8921 0.126888

Total 331 71368.95 28882 100

Figure 3-6 Land Use Pattern of the Study Area

Page 87: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORTenvironmentclearance.nic.in/.../EIA/230520198KWR1Z7LEIAReport.pdf · Bengaluru Urban District & Karnataka State by M/s. CIPLA Limited. I was

Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Page 56

Figure 3-7 Land use/Land cover map of the Study Area

Page 88: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORTenvironmentclearance.nic.in/.../EIA/230520198KWR1Z7LEIAReport.pdf · Bengaluru Urban District & Karnataka State by M/s. CIPLA Limited. I was

Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Page 57

3.6.6 Topography

Topography of Bangalore Urban district is generally flat. Physiographically the district can be

divided into rocky upland, plateau & flat topped hills at a general elevation of about 900amsl

with its major part sloping toward south and south east forming pediplains interspersed with hills

all along the western part. The pediplains form the major part of the district underlain by granites

and gneisses with the highest elevation of 850 to 950m amsl. Major part of the pediplain

constitute low relief area having matured dissected rolling topography with erosional land slope

covered by a layer of red loamy soil of varied thickness. Major part of the pediplains is dissected

by streamlets flowing in southern direction.

The project site fall under an elevation of 860 m above the mean sea level. and the study area

contours vary from 860 m to 920 m above MSL. From the project site the high elevations were

observed towards west and West North the lowest contours wereobserved in North and NE

direction. While the remaining areas showed variations withrespect to contours

The topography of the study area mainly cover the district of Anekal taluka and major parts

forms the pediplains with an elevation of 900m amsl. Physiography map of Karnataka state is

given in Figure 3-8, Contour/Physiography map of the Study area is given in.Figure 3-9, Topo

map of the study area is given in. Figure 3-10.

Page 89: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORTenvironmentclearance.nic.in/.../EIA/230520198KWR1Z7LEIAReport.pdf · Bengaluru Urban District & Karnataka State by M/s. CIPLA Limited. I was

Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Page 58

Figure 3-8 Physiography map of Karnataka State

Page 90: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORTenvironmentclearance.nic.in/.../EIA/230520198KWR1Z7LEIAReport.pdf · Bengaluru Urban District & Karnataka State by M/s. CIPLA Limited. I was

Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Page 59

Figure 3-9 Contour/Physiography map of Study Area

Page 91: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORTenvironmentclearance.nic.in/.../EIA/230520198KWR1Z7LEIAReport.pdf · Bengaluru Urban District & Karnataka State by M/s. CIPLA Limited. I was

Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Page 60

Figure 3-10: Topo map of the study area

Page 92: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORTenvironmentclearance.nic.in/.../EIA/230520198KWR1Z7LEIAReport.pdf · Bengaluru Urban District & Karnataka State by M/s. CIPLA Limited. I was

Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Page 61

3.6.7 Geology of the PIA District

The prevailing rock is light to dark grey or whitish biotic granite gneiss, which varies

considerably from place to place, varies in texture, structure and appearance, according to the

fineness or coarseness of its constituent grins and the relative abundance or scarcity, and mode

of deposition of the darker ferro-minerals. These complex Gneissic masses have been styled

“Peninsular Gneiss”.

The schists are not conspicuous in this district, but small isolated strings of a dark hornblende

grannulite, with its contact modified phase of the secondary pale-green pyroxene rock, occur in

some parts. Among the dyke rocks, a group of dykes of charnockite affinities and also some

hornblende dykes are found bordering Kanakapura taluk. The study area mainly covers Anekal

taluk of Bangalore district, mainly Peninsular Gneiss are exposed in the study area. Geology

map of the PIA district is given in Figure 3-11.

Page 93: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORTenvironmentclearance.nic.in/.../EIA/230520198KWR1Z7LEIAReport.pdf · Bengaluru Urban District & Karnataka State by M/s. CIPLA Limited. I was

Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Page 62

Figure 3-11 Geology Map of PIA (Karnataka)

Project Site

Page 94: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORTenvironmentclearance.nic.in/.../EIA/230520198KWR1Z7LEIAReport.pdf · Bengaluru Urban District & Karnataka State by M/s. CIPLA Limited. I was

Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Page 63

3.6.8 Geomorphology of PIA District

Physiographically the district can be divided into rocky upland, plateau & flat topped hills at an

general elevation of about 900 amsl with its major part sloping towards south and south east

forming pediplains interspersed with hills all along the western part. The pediplains form the

major part of the district underlain by granites and gneisses with the highest elevation of 850 to

950 m amsl. Major part of the pediplain constitute low relief area having matured dissected

rolling topography with erosional land slope covered by a layer of red loamy soil of varied

thickness. Major part of the pediplains is dissected by streamlets flowing in southern direction.

Geomorphology Map of study area is given in Figure 3-12 which shows that major part of the

study area is covered by Denudational Origin–Pediplain Complex 83.71%, Denundational Origin

– Hills10.61%, Water Bodies 4.3% and Mining 1.29 %.

Figure 3-12 Geomorphology Map of Study area

3.6.9 Hydrogeology of PIA District

Page 95: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORTenvironmentclearance.nic.in/.../EIA/230520198KWR1Z7LEIAReport.pdf · Bengaluru Urban District & Karnataka State by M/s. CIPLA Limited. I was

Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Page 64

Groundwater occurrence, movement and recharge to aquifers are controlled by degree of

weathering, fracture pattern, geomorphological setup and rainfall. Granites and Gneisses of

peninsular gneissic group constitute major aquifers in the urban district. Ground water occurs in

phreatic conditions in the weathered zone and under semi confined to confined conditions in

fractured and jointed rock formations. Laterites of Tertiary age occur as isolated patches

capping crystalline rocks in Bangalore north taluk and ground water occur in phreatic condition.

Alluvium of 20m thick, which occur along the river courses, though of limited thickness and

aerial extent possess substantial ground water potential. Ground water prospects of the study

area are greater than 5 litres per second. Hydrogeology map of PIA district is given in Figure3-13.

Figure 3-13 Hydrogeology Map of PIA district

3.6.10 Drainage Pattern in PIA District

Page 96: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORTenvironmentclearance.nic.in/.../EIA/230520198KWR1Z7LEIAReport.pdf · Bengaluru Urban District & Karnataka State by M/s. CIPLA Limited. I was

Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Page 65

Major part of the district is drained by Shimsha and Kanva rivers of Cauvery basin i.e Bangalore

north and South taluks. (Catchment area of 468 sq.km which includes Nelamangala and Magadi

taluks of Bangalore rural also). Anekal taluk is drained by South Pennar river of Ponnaiyar

basin, which takes its birth from Nandi hills and flows towards south (Catchment area is 2005

sq.km which covers Devanahalli and Hoskote taluks of Bangalore rural district also). The study

area is drained towards hennagara lake.The hennagara lake is located on the South-East-East

part of the study area. Drainage map of the study area is given in Figure 3-14.

Page 97: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORTenvironmentclearance.nic.in/.../EIA/230520198KWR1Z7LEIAReport.pdf · Bengaluru Urban District & Karnataka State by M/s. CIPLA Limited. I was

Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Page 66

Figure 3-14 Drainage Map of the Study area

Page 98: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORTenvironmentclearance.nic.in/.../EIA/230520198KWR1Z7LEIAReport.pdf · Bengaluru Urban District & Karnataka State by M/s. CIPLA Limited. I was

Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Page 67

3.6.11 Soils in PIA District

The soils of the district can be broadly grouped into red loamy soil and lateritic soil.

Red Loamy Soils generally occur on hilly to undulating land slope on granite and gneissic

terrain. It is mainly seen in the eastern and southern parts of Bangalore north and south taluks.

Laterite soils occur on undulating terrain forming plain to gently sloping topography of

peninsular gneissic region. It is mainly covered in Anekal taluk and western parts of Bangalore

North and south taluks.

The study falls in the soil order of Alfisols type. They are in semiarid to moist ares. They formed

primarily under forest or mixed vegetative cover and are productive for most crops. Soil Map of

Karnataka is given in Figure 3-15.

Page 99: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORTenvironmentclearance.nic.in/.../EIA/230520198KWR1Z7LEIAReport.pdf · Bengaluru Urban District & Karnataka State by M/s. CIPLA Limited. I was

Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Page 68

Figure 3-15 Soil Map of Karnataka State

Page 100: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORTenvironmentclearance.nic.in/.../EIA/230520198KWR1Z7LEIAReport.pdf · Bengaluru Urban District & Karnataka State by M/s. CIPLA Limited. I was

Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Page 69

3.6.12 Physiography of PIA District

Physiographically, the district can be divided into rocky upland, plateau & flat topped hills at a

general elevation of about 950amsl.The major part is sloping towards south and south east

forming pediplains interspersed with hills all along the western part. The pediplains form the

majority of the district underlain by granites and gneisses with the highest elevation of 850 to

950amsl. The pediplain constitute low relief area having matured dissected rolling topography

with erosion land slope covered by a layer of red loamy soil of varied thickness. Physiography

Map of Study area is given in Figure 3-16.

Page 101: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORTenvironmentclearance.nic.in/.../EIA/230520198KWR1Z7LEIAReport.pdf · Bengaluru Urban District & Karnataka State by M/s. CIPLA Limited. I was

Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Page 70

Figure 3-16 Physiography Map of the Study Area

Page 102: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORTenvironmentclearance.nic.in/.../EIA/230520198KWR1Z7LEIAReport.pdf · Bengaluru Urban District & Karnataka State by M/s. CIPLA Limited. I was

Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Page 71

3.6.13 Cyclones & Depressions, Winds and Coastal Erosion in PIA District

Bangalore urban district is facing the brunt of moderate to severe floods. Floods are associated

with cloud bursts, cyclones or depressions in the Bay of Bengal and Arabian Sea. The floods

are quite common in Bangalore Urban District. As per Karnataka wind hazard map Bangalore

Urban district is falling under low damage risk zone. Karnataka wind Hazard Map is given in

Figure 3-17.

Page 103: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORTenvironmentclearance.nic.in/.../EIA/230520198KWR1Z7LEIAReport.pdf · Bengaluru Urban District & Karnataka State by M/s. CIPLA Limited. I was

Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Page 72

Figure 3-17 Wind Hazard Map of Karnataka

Page 104: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORTenvironmentclearance.nic.in/.../EIA/230520198KWR1Z7LEIAReport.pdf · Bengaluru Urban District & Karnataka State by M/s. CIPLA Limited. I was

Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Page 73

3.6.14 Seismicity

As per the IS:1893 (Part-1) 2002 of Bureau of Indian Standards (BIS), the project location/study

area falls in Zone II, which is categorised as a Low risk zone. The seismicity map of India is

shown in Figure 3-18.

Figure 3-18 Seismicity Map of India3.7 Air Environment

Project Site

Page 105: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORTenvironmentclearance.nic.in/.../EIA/230520198KWR1Z7LEIAReport.pdf · Bengaluru Urban District & Karnataka State by M/s. CIPLA Limited. I was

Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Page 74

Baseline ambient air quality assessment gives the status in the vicinity of site and is an

indispensable part of environmental impact assessment studies. Significant changes, in

predominant winds and weather conditions are observed in winter, summer and post-monsoon

seasons apart from the local topographic influences. The baseline status of air environment in

the study area is assessed through a systematic air quality surveillance programme.

3.7.1 Meteorological Conditions

The regional air quality is influenced by the meteorology of that region. The principal weather

parameters that influence the concentration of the air pollutants in the surroundings are wind

speed, wind direction and temperature. The meteorological data is useful for proper

interpretation of the baseline data. It is used as input for air quality dispersion models for

predicting the post project environmental scenario i.e. ground level concentrations due to

proposed utilities like boiler & DG sets, etc.

3.7.2 Meteorological Data Collection

Available secondary data pertaining to the meteorological parameters was obtained from the

IMD Climatalogical tables. In addition, baseline meteorological data (primary data) was

generated during the Post-monsoon Season (Sep to Nov 2016). The methodology adopted for

monitoring surface observations is as per the standard norms laid down by Bureau of Indian

Standards (BIS) i.e. IS:8829 and Indian Meteorological Department (IMD).

3.7.3 General Meteorological Scenario based on IMD Data

The nearest Indian Meteorological Department (IMD) station located to project site is Bangalore.

The Climatological data for Bangalore (12 58’ N and 77o 35’ E), published by the IMD, based

on daily observations at 08:30 and 17:30 hour IST for a 30 year period, is presented in the

following sections on the meteorological conditions of the region. The monthly variations of the

relevant meteorological parameters are reproduced in Table 3-4.

Table 3-4: Climatological Summary – Bangalore Region (1971-2000)

Page 106: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORTenvironmentclearance.nic.in/.../EIA/230520198KWR1Z7LEIAReport.pdf · Bengaluru Urban District & Karnataka State by M/s. CIPLA Limited. I was

Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Page 75

MonthTemp (oC) Rainfall

(mm)RelativeHumidity

(%)

Station LevelPressure

hPaMeanWind

Speed(m/s)

PredominantWind Directions

(From)*DailyMax.

DailyMin. Total No. of

days 08:30 17:30 08:30 17:30 08:30 17:30

Jan 27.4 14.2 1.8 0.0 86 42 17.0 13.3 1.58 E EFeb 30.1 15.9 7.6 0.4 77 34 17.5 12.9 1.75 E EMar 32.7 18.2 14.0 0.8 68 28 18.7 12.4 1.83 SW EApr 34.0 20.8 40.0 2.8 73 35 22.8 15.9 1.91 SW EMay 33.1 20.9 94.4 6.0 76 47 23.3 19.5 2.72 W WJun 29.8 19.8 80.5 5.0 83 63 22.8 21.9 4.69 W WJul 28.6 19.4 102.7 7.4 86 66 22.2 21.7 4.61 W WAug 28.0 19.2 116.6 9.3 88 68 22.2 21.9 4.08 W WSep 28.5 19.3 195.6 9.6 86 65 22.3 21.5 2.66 W WOct 28.0 19.0 152.0 8.7 85 66 22.1 20.6 1.69 W ENov 26.8 17.1 58.4 4.1 84 62 20.0 18.6 1.41 E EDec 26.1 15.1 17.3 1.5 87 56 18.1 16.2 1.53 E EMax. 34.0 20.9 195.6 9.6 87 68 22.3 21.9 4.69Min. 26.1 14.2 1.8 0.4 68 28 17.0 13.3 1.42Avg. 29.4 18.2 - 55.7 82 53 20.8 18.1 2.56

As per the above Climatological table the observations drawn for the study period are the

following.

Daily maximum temperature during the study period is 28.5oC and the daily minimum

temperature is 17.1oC were recorded in the months of September and November

respectively

Maximum and minimum relative humidity of 86% and 62% were recorded in the months of

September and November respectively

Maximum and minimum rainfall of 195.6 mm and 58.4 mm was recorded in the months of

September and November respectively

Total rainfall recorded during the study period is 406 mm

Maximum and minimum Mean wind speed during the study period is 2.66 m/s and 1.41 m/s.

Annual Wind predominant pattern is from West to East.

3.7.4 Meteorological Scenario during Study Period

Meteorological scenario in and around the project site is an essential requirement during study

period for proper interpretation of baseline air quality status. Meteorological data was collected

during the study period; post monsoon season (September 2016–November 2016).The wind

rose of the study period and annual wind rose is given in Figure 3-19.

Page 107: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORTenvironmentclearance.nic.in/.../EIA/230520198KWR1Z7LEIAReport.pdf · Bengaluru Urban District & Karnataka State by M/s. CIPLA Limited. I was

Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Page 76

W

ES

N

SW SE

NW NE

6.25%

6.25%

6.25

%

6.25

%

12.50%

12.50%

12.5

0%

12.5

0%

18.75%

18.75%

18.7

5%

18.7

5%

25.00%

25.00%

25.0

0%

25.0

0%

31.25%

31.25%

31.2

5%

31.2

5%

37.50%

37.50%

37.5

0%

37.5

0%

43.75%

43.75%

43.7

5%

43.7

5%

50.00%

50.00%

50.0

0%

50.0

0%

00.731.462.192.913.644.375.105.83

Calm conditions ratio: 0.0%(Speed threshold: 1.0)

W

E

S

N

SW SE

NW NE

2.82%

2.82%

2.82

%

2.82

%

5.65%

5.65%

5.65

%

5.65

%

8.47%

8.47%

8.47

%

8.47

%

11.29%

11.29%

11.2

9%

11.2

9%

14.11%

14.11%

14.1

1%

14.1

1%

16.94%

16.94%

16.9

4%

16.9

4%

19.76%

19.76%

19.7

6%

19.7

6%

22.58%

22.58%

22.5

8%

22.5

8%

00.941.892.833.784.72

Calm conditions ratio: 3.2%(Speed threshold: 1.0)

September 2016 October 2016

W

E

S

N

SW SE

NW NE

3.23%

3.23%

3.23

%

3.23

%

6.45%

6.45%

6.45

%

6.45

%

9.68%

9.68%

9.68

%

9.68

%

12.90%

12.90%

12.9

0%

12.9

0%

16.13%

16.13%

16.1

3%

16.1

3%

19.35%

19.35%

19.3

5%

19.3

5%

22.58%

22.58%

22.5

8%

22.5

8%

25.81%

25.81%

25.8

1%

25.8

1%

00.631.251.882.503.133.754.385.00

Calm conditions ratio: 3.2%(Speed threshold: 1.0)

November 2016

Figure 3-19 Specific Wind rose for the Study Period

Page 108: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORTenvironmentclearance.nic.in/.../EIA/230520198KWR1Z7LEIAReport.pdf · Bengaluru Urban District & Karnataka State by M/s. CIPLA Limited. I was

Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Page 77

W

E

S

N

SW SE

NW NE

1.95%

1.95%

1.95

%

1.95

%

3.90%

3.90%

3.90

%

3.90

%

5.86%

5.86%

5.86

%

5.86

%

7.81%

7.81%

7.81

%

7.81

%

9.76%

9.76%

9.76

%

9.76

%

11.71%

11.71%

11.7

1%

11.7

1%

13.66%

13.66%

13.6

6%

13.6

6%

15.62%

15.62%

15.6

2%

15.6

2%

01.222.433.654.866.087.298.519.72

Calm conditions ratio: 0.5%(Speed threshold: 1.0)

Figure 3-20 Annual Windrose (Jan 2016 - Dec 2016)Source: www.wunderground.com

3.7.4.1 Atmospheric Inversion

Atmospheric inversion level at the project site was monitored; the results observed at the site

during the study period are as follows

Average atmospheric temperature : 24.00C

Average Relative humidity : 49%

Average Wind speed : 0.83 m/s

The daily inversion level calculated based on the average temperature and average wind speed

at the project site and the maximum inversion height is derived by the graph plotted based on

the average temperature and average wind speed. The daily inversion level at the project site

varies from 50 to 1750m during 6 AM to 6 PM, the maximum recorded at 5 PM, September

2016. This is shown in Figure 3-21.

Page 109: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORTenvironmentclearance.nic.in/.../EIA/230520198KWR1Z7LEIAReport.pdf · Bengaluru Urban District & Karnataka State by M/s. CIPLA Limited. I was

Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Page 78

Figure 3-21 Hourly variation of the mixing heights

3.7.4.2 Meteorological data during Study Period

The meteorological data of study period was used for interpretation of baseline status and to

simulate the meteorological conditions for prediction of impacts in modeling studies.

Meteorology Data for the Study Period (September 2016 – November 2016).

Table 3-5 : Meteorology Data for the Study Period (September – November 2016)S. No Parameter Observation

1. Temperature Min Temperature : 22.00CMax Temperature : 26.00CAvg Temperature : 23.70C

2. Relative Humidity Range 32 to 80%3. Wind Speed Range 3.5 m/s4. Predominant Wind Direction Sept 2016-WSW

Oct 2016-NENov 2016-ENE

3.7.5 Ambient Air Quality

The selection criteria for monitoring locations are based on the following:

Topography/Terrain

Meteorological conditions

Residential and sensitive areas within the study area

Representatives of regional background air quality/pollution levels and

Representation of likely impacted areas

3.7.5.1 Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Stations

Page 110: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORTenvironmentclearance.nic.in/.../EIA/230520198KWR1Z7LEIAReport.pdf · Bengaluru Urban District & Karnataka State by M/s. CIPLA Limited. I was

Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Page 79

To evaluate the baseline air quality of the study area, Eight (08) monitoring locations have been

identified as per IMD Climatological data-Bangalore Region (1971-2000).The annual wind

predominat is from West to East,

Map showing the monitoring locations are given as Error! Reference source not found. and the

details of the locations are given in Table 3-6.

Table 3-6: Details of Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Locations

StationCode Location Type of

Wind Geographical CoordinatesDistance (km)from Project

boundaryAzimuth

Directions

A1 Project Site - 12°47'7.77"N 77°38'56.25"E --A2 Jigani U/W 12°47'12.46"N 77°38'16.00"E 1.0 WNWA3 Doddathoguru C/W 12°50'58.20"N 77°39'15.70"E 6.9 NA4 Bommasandra D/W 12°48'29.73"N 77°42'1.30"E 5.8 ENEA5 Ramakrishnapura D/W 12°46'58.12"N 77°41'42.57"E 4.7 EA6 Byagadadenahalli C/W 12°45'7.48"N 77°42'6.16"E 6.6 SEA7 Indalavadi C/W 12°43'43.65"N 77°38'27.15"E 5.8 SSWA8 Hullahalli C/W 12°49'32.01"N 77°36'55.95"E 5.5 NW

3.7.5.2 Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Techniques and Frequency

Ambient air quality was monitored twice in a week for One (01) season (shall cover 12 weeks),

i.e. during Post Monsoon season (September to November, 2016).

PM10, PM2.5, SO2, NOx, Pb, NH3, C6H6, C20H12, As, Ni, were monitored on 24 hourly basis and

O3 and CO were monitored on eight hourly basis and VOC, Cl, HCl, HBr & H2S are monitored

on 2 hrly basis. Sampling was carried out as per Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB)

monitoring guidelines at each location. Analytical methods used for analysis of parameters are

given in Table 3-7.

Table 3-7: Analytical Methods for Analysis of Ambient Air Quality Parameters

S.No Parameters Analytical method NAAQ standards: 2009 Sampling Time

1 Sulphur Dioxide (SO2),μg/m3

IS:5182(Part-2):2001(Reaff:2006) 50 (Annual) 80(24 Hours) 24 Hours

2 Nitrogen Dioxide (NO2),μg/m3 IS: 5182 (Part - 6): 2006 40 (Annual) 80 (24 Hours) 24 Hours

3 Particulate Matter(PM2.5), μg/m3 IS: 5182 (Part - 23): 2006 40 (Annual) 60 (24 hours) 24 Hours

4 Particulate Matter(PM10), μg/m3 IS:5182 (Part– 23): 2006 60 (Annual) 100 (24 hours) 24 Hours

Page 111: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORTenvironmentclearance.nic.in/.../EIA/230520198KWR1Z7LEIAReport.pdf · Bengaluru Urban District & Karnataka State by M/s. CIPLA Limited. I was

Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Page 80

5 CO mg/m3 IS:5182(Part–10):1999(Reaff:2006) 2 (8 hours) 4 (1hour) 8 Hours

6 Pb μg/m3 IS:5182(Part–22):2004(Reaff:2006) 0.5(Annual) 1(24 hours) 24 Hours

7 O3, μg/m3 IS: 5182 (Part – 9): 1974 100(8hours) 180 (1hour) 8 Hours

8 NH3, μg/m3 APHA(air) 2nd edition(Indophenol-blue method) 100(Annual) 400(24 hours) 8 Hours

9 Benzene, μg/m3 IS:5182(Part–11):1999(RA:2009) 5 (Annual) 5 (Annual) 24 Hours

10 Benzo (a) pyrene,ng/m3 IS:5182(Part–12):2004(RA:2009) 1 (Annual) 1 (Annual) 24 Hours

11 Arsenic, ng/ m3 APHA (air) 2nd edition 6 (Annual) 6 (Annual) 24 Hours

12 Volatile OrganicCompounds (ppm)

PID (Photo-Ionization Detection)Method -- -- 2 Hours

13 Chlorine (µg/m3) IS 5182 (part 19):1982(Ref 2003) -- -- 2 Hours

14 Hydrochloric acid(µg/m3) NIOSH Method -- -- 2 Hours

15 Hydrobromic acid(µg/m3) NIOSH Method -- -- 2 Hours

16 Hydrogen sulphide(µg/m3) IS 5182 (part 7) : 1973(Ref 2003) -- -- 2 Hours

17 Hydrogen fluoride(µg/m3) NIOSH Method -- -- 2 Hours

3.7.5.3 Results and Discussions

The variations of the pollutants PM10, PM2.5, SO2, NOx, CO, Pb, O3 , NH3 , C6H6, C20 H12, As, Ni,

VOC, Cl, HCl, HBr & H2S are compared with National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS),

MoEF&CC Notification, November, 2009. Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Data (September to

November, 2016) for the study area is given in Table 3-8 to Table 3-17 and trends of measured

ambient concentration in the study area were graphically represented in Figure 3-22 to Figure3-28

Page 112: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORTenvironmentclearance.nic.in/.../EIA/230520198KWR1Z7LEIAReport.pdf · Bengaluru Urban District & Karnataka State by M/s. CIPLA Limited. I was

Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Page 81

Table 3-8: Summary of the average baseline concentrations of pollutants

S.No Location Name SO2(µg/m3)

NO2(µg/m3)

PM10(µg/m3

PM2.5(µg/m3

Pb(µg/m3)

CO(mg/m3) O3

(µg/m3)NH3

(µg/m3)Benzen(µg/m3)

Benzo(a)

pyrene(ng/m3)

Arsenic(As)(ng/m3)

Nickel (Ni)(ng/m3)

1 Project Site 11.0 24.7 50.26 24.19 BDL(DL 0.05) 0.019 17.11 7.1

BDL(DL 1)

BDL(DL 1)

BDL(DL 2)

BDL(DL 10)

2 Jigani 11.1 24.9 60.4 27.2 BDL(DL 0.05) 0.012 13.3 6.44

BDL(DL 1)

BDL(DL 1)

BDL(DL 2)

BDL(DL 10)

3 Doddathoguru 10.6 21.7 58.3 25.3 BDL(DL 0.05) 0.013 12.6 5.87

BDL(DL 1)

BDL(DL 1)

BDL(DL 2)

BDL(DL 10)

4 Bommasandra 8.7 17.6 48.4 19.5 BDL(DL 0.05) 0.01 14.1 5.64

BDL(DL 1)

BDL(DL 1)

BDL(DL 2)

BDL(DL 10)

5 Ramakrishnapura 9.5 20.5 56.6 24.7 BDL(DL 0.05) 0.012 11.3 5.35

BDL(DL 1)

BDL(DL 1)

BDL(DL 2)

BDL(DL 10)

6 Byagadadenahalli 7.65 18.6 51.6 21.7 BDL(DL 0.05) 0.017

BDL(DL10)

BDL(DL 5)

BDL(DL 1)

BDL(DL 1)

BDL(DL 2)

BDL(DL 10)

7 Indalavadi 8.45 19.6 54.4 22.6 BDL(DL 0.05) 0.11 10.6 6.37

BDL(DL 1)

BDL(DL 1)

BDL(DL 2)

BDL(DL 10)

8 Hullahalli 8.01 16.4 46.6 17.9 BDL(DL 0.05)

0.011BDL

(DL10)BDL

(DL 5)

BDL(DL 1)

BDL(DL 1)

BDL(DL 2)

BDL(DL 10)

Note: BDL (Below detectable limit), DL (Detectable limit)

Page 113: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORTenvironmentclearance.nic.in/.../EIA/230520198KWR1Z7LEIAReport.pdf · Bengaluru Urban District & Karnataka State by M/s. CIPLA Limited. I was

Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Page 82

Table 3-9: Summary of the average baseline concentrations of pollutants

S.No Location NameVolatile Organic

Compounds(ppm)

Chlorine(µg/m3)

Hydrochloricacid

(µg/m3)

Hydrobromicacid

(µg/m3)

Hydrogensulphide(µg/m3)

Hydrogenfluoride(µg/m3)

1 Project Site 3.71BDL

(DL 145)BDL

(DL 140)BDL

(DL 35) BDL(DL 6) BDL(DL 350)

2 Jigani 3.61BDL

(DL 145)BDL

(DL 140)BDL

(DL 35) BDL(DL 6) BDL(DL 350)

3 Doddathoguru 2.05BDL

(DL 145)BDL

(DL 140)BDL

(DL 35) BDL(DL 6) BDL(DL 350)

4 Bommasandra BDL(0.1)BDL

(DL 145)BDL

(DL 140)BDL

(DL 35) BDL(DL 6) BDL(DL 350)

5 Ramakrishnapura 1.33BDL

(DL 145)BDL

(DL 140)BDL

(DL 35) BDL(DL 6) BDL(DL 350)

6 Byagadadenahalli BDL(0.1)BDL

(DL 145)BDL

(DL 140)BDL

(DL 35) BDL(DL 6) BDL(DL 350)

7 Indalavadi BDL(0.1)BDL

(DL 145)BDL

(DL 140)BDL

(DL 35) BDL(DL 6) BDL(DL 350)

8 Hullahalli BDL(0.1)BDL

(DL 145)BDL

(DL 140)BDL

(DL 35) BDL(DL 6) BDL(DL 350)

Note: BDL (Below detectable limit), DL (Detectable limit)

Page 114: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORTenvironmentclearance.nic.in/.../EIA/230520198KWR1Z7LEIAReport.pdf · Bengaluru Urban District & Karnataka State by M/s. CIPLA Limited. I was

Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Page 83

Table 3-10: Ambient PM10 Monitoring Data

S.No Location Name PM10 Concentration g/m³Minimum µg/m3 Maximum, µg/m3 Average, µg/m3 98th Percentile

1 Project Site 47.5 55.3 50.3 28.12 Jigani 58.2 64.3 60.4 28.33 Doddathoguru 52.6 62.6 58.4 23.74 Bommasandra 44.5 55.8 48.4 25.35 Ramakrishnapura 48.3 63.5 56.6 23.56 Byagadadenahalli 46.5 55.2 51.2 23.67 Indalavadi 47.5 58.4 54.3 23.38 Hullahalli 42.3 55.2 46.6 18.5

Figure 3-22 Trends of Measured Ambient PM10 Concentrations in the Study Area

Page 115: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORTenvironmentclearance.nic.in/.../EIA/230520198KWR1Z7LEIAReport.pdf · Bengaluru Urban District & Karnataka State by M/s. CIPLA Limited. I was

Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Page 84

Table 3-11: Ambient PM2.5 Monitoring Data

S.No Location NamePM2.5 Concentration, µg/m3

Minimumµg/m3

Maximum,µg/m3

Average,µg/m3

98thPercentile

1 Project Site 18.4 28.5 24.2 28.02 Jigani 23.2 29.5 27.2 29.33 Doddathoguru 23.2 27.5 25.3 27.34 Bommasandra 13.1 23.1 19.5 23.15 Ramakrishnapura 20.8 27.2 24.6 27.16 Byagadadenahalli 18.4 29.5 21.7 29.07 Indalavadi 18.4 25.6 22.6 25.58 Hullahalli 13.3 23.1 17.9 23.1

Figure 3-23: Trends of Measured Ambient PM2.5 Concentrations in the Study Area

Page 116: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORTenvironmentclearance.nic.in/.../EIA/230520198KWR1Z7LEIAReport.pdf · Bengaluru Urban District & Karnataka State by M/s. CIPLA Limited. I was

Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Page 85

Table 3-12 : Ambient SO2 Monitoring Data

S.No Location NameSO2 Concentration, µg/m3

Minimumµg/m3 Maximum, µg/m3 Average,

µg/m398th

Percentile1 Project Site 7.80 13.8 11.0 13.62 Jigani 5.00 13.8 11.2 13.63 Doddathoguru 7.80 12.6 10.6 12.44 Bommasandra 6.10 13.5 8.70 13.25 Ramakrishnapura 7.50 12.6 9.85 12.66 Byagadadenahalli 6.40 9.80 7.65 9.807 Indalavadi 6.40 13.0 8.45 11.58 Hullahalli 6.40 9.80 8.00 9.75

Figure 3-24: Trends of Measured Ambient SO2 Concentrations in the Study Area

Page 117: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORTenvironmentclearance.nic.in/.../EIA/230520198KWR1Z7LEIAReport.pdf · Bengaluru Urban District & Karnataka State by M/s. CIPLA Limited. I was

Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Page 86

Table 3-13: Ambient NO2 Monitoring Data

S.No Location Name

NO2 Concentration, µg/m3

Minimumµg/m3

Maximumµg/m3

Averageµg/m3 98th Percentile

1 Project Site 20.4 29.1 24.7 28.12 Jigani 21.2 28.6 24.9 28.33 Doddathoguru 15.6 23.8 21.7 23.74 Bommasandra 11.6 26.8 17.7 25.35 Ramakrishnapura 17.8 23.6 20.4 23.56 Byagadadenahalli 10.2 23.6 18.6 23.67 Indalavadi 13.8 23.5 19.7 23.38 Hullahalli 12.4 19.2 16.4 18.5

Figure 3-25: Trends of Measured Ambient NO2 Concentrations in the Study Area

Page 118: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORTenvironmentclearance.nic.in/.../EIA/230520198KWR1Z7LEIAReport.pdf · Bengaluru Urban District & Karnataka State by M/s. CIPLA Limited. I was

Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Page 87

Table 3-14: Ambient Carbon Monoxide (CO) Monitoring Data

S.No Location NameCO Concentration, mg/m3

Minimummg/m3

Maximummg/m3

Averagemg/m3 98th Percentile

1 Project Site 0.005 0.170 0.019 0.1012 Jigani 0.005 0.022 0.012 0.0213 Doddathoguru 0.005 0.018 0.013 0.0184 Bommasandra 0.005 0.019 0.011 0.0195 Ramakrishnapura 0.005 0.018 0.012 0.0186 Byagadadenahalli 0.005 0.009 0.017 0.009

7 Indalavadi 0.010 0.210 0.111 0.2018 Hullahalli 0.005 0.013 0.011 0.011

Note: - BDL = Below Detectable Limit

Figure 3-26: Trends of Measured Ambient CO Concentrations in the Study Area

Page 119: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORTenvironmentclearance.nic.in/.../EIA/230520198KWR1Z7LEIAReport.pdf · Bengaluru Urban District & Karnataka State by M/s. CIPLA Limited. I was

Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Page 88

Table 3-15: Ambient Ozone (O3) Monitoring Data

S.No Location NameO3 Concentration, µg/m3

Minimumµg/m3

Maximumµg/m3

Averageµg/m3 98th Percentile

1 Project Site 14.6 19.4 17.0 19.02 Jigani 11.2 16.5 13.9 16.43 Doddathoguru 10.2 14.6 12.4 14.64 Bommasandra 10.5 15.6 13.1 15.55 Ramakrishnapura 11.2 13.5 12.4 13.56 Byagadadenahalli 10.2 13.6 11.9 13.67 Indalavadi 10.4 11.2 10.8 11.98 Hullahalli 10.6 14.6 12.6 15.2

Figure 3-27: Trends of Measured Ambient O3 Concentrations in the Study Area

Page 120: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORTenvironmentclearance.nic.in/.../EIA/230520198KWR1Z7LEIAReport.pdf · Bengaluru Urban District & Karnataka State by M/s. CIPLA Limited. I was

Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Page 89

Table 3-16: Ambient Ammonia (NH3) Monitoring Data

S.No Location NameNH3 Concentration, µg/m3

Minimumµg/m3

Maximumµg/m3

Averageµg/m3 98th Percentile

1 Project Site 4.80 8.80 7.11 8.752 Jigani 5.40 7.28 6.42 7.27

3 Doddathoguru 4.20 7.50 5.86 7.39

4 Bommasandra 4.50 7.60 5.64 7.42

5 Ramakrishnapura BDL(DL5) BDL(DL5) BDL(DL5) BDL(DL5)

6 Byagadadenahalli 4.20 6.50 4.91 6.36

7 Indalavadi 4.80 7.29 6.39 7.29

8 Hullahalli BDL(DL5) BDL(DL5) BDL(DL5) BDL(DL5)

Figure 3-28: Trends of Measured Ambient NH3 Concentrations in the Study Area

Page 121: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORTenvironmentclearance.nic.in/.../EIA/230520198KWR1Z7LEIAReport.pdf · Bengaluru Urban District & Karnataka State by M/s. CIPLA Limited. I was

Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Page 90

Table 3-17: Ambient Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) Monitoring Data

S.No Location NameVOCs Concentration, µg/m3

Minimumµg/m3

Maximumµg/m3

Averageµg/m3 98th Percentile

1 Project Site 2.10 5.50 3.75 5.50

2 Jigani 2.10 5.40 3.60 5.40

3 Doddathoguru 1.20 4.70 2.53 4.704 Bommasandra BDL(DL0.1) BDL(DL0.1) BDL(DL0.1) BDL(DL0.1)

5 Ramakrishnapura 0.05 3.00 1.30 3.006 Byagadadenahalli BDL(DL0.1) BDL(DL0.1) BDL(DL0.1) BDL(DL0.1)

7 Indalavadi BDL(DL0.1) BDL(DL0.1) BDL(DL0.1) BDL(DL0.1)

8 Hullahalli BDL(DL0.1) BDL(DL0.1)BDL(DL0.1)

BDL(DL0.1)

Note: - BDL = Below Detectable Limit

3.7.5.4 Observations

Maximum concentrations of PM10, PM2.5, SO2, NOx, CO, Pb, O3 , NH3 , C6H6, C20 H12, As, Ni

VOC, Cl, HCl, HBr & H2S are well within the National Ambient Air Quality Standards for

Industrial, Commercial and Residential areas at all monitoring locations during the study period.

3.8 Noise Environment

The prevailing ambient noise level at a particular location is nothing but the resultant (total) of all

kinds of noise sources existing at various distances around that location. The ambient noise

level at a location varies continuously depending on the type of surrounding activities.

Ambient noise levels have been established by monitoring noise levels at eight (08) locations in

and around 10Km distance from project area during September to November, 2016 using

precision noise level meter. The noise monitoring locations in the study area were selected after

giving due consideration to the various land use categories. The land use categories include

commercial, residential, rural and sensitive areas. Noise levels were recorded on an hourly

basis for one complete day at each location using pre- calibrated noise levels. A map showing

the monitoring locations is given in Figure 3-34.

3.8.1 Results and Discussions

Page 122: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORTenvironmentclearance.nic.in/.../EIA/230520198KWR1Z7LEIAReport.pdf · Bengaluru Urban District & Karnataka State by M/s. CIPLA Limited. I was

Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Page 91

Based on the recorded hourly noise levels at each monitoring location, the day equivalent (Ld)

and night equivalent (Ln) were calculated;

Ld: Average noise levels between 6:00 hours to 22.00 hours.

Ln: Average noise levels between 22:00 hours to 6.00 hours.

The Day-Night (Ldn) equivalent noise levels were calculated using the US Environmental

Protection Agency formula:

Ldn = 10 Log [0.0416 {16 (10Ld/10) + 8 (10Ln+10/10)}]

The comparison of day equivalent noise levels (Ld) and night equivalent noise levels (Ln) with

the respective CPCB stipulated noise standards for various land use categories are shown in

theTable 3-18.

Table 3-18: Day and Night Equivalent Noise Levels

S.No Location Location

Code

Distance(km) from

Projectboundary

AzimuthDirection

Noise level indB(A) Leq CPCB Standard

EnvironmentalSettingDay Night Lday (Ld) LNight

(Ln)

1. Project Site N1 - 73.4 71.5 75 70 Industrial2. Jigani N2 1 WNW 77.3 71.0 75 70 Industrial3. Doddathoguru N3 6.9 N 78.1 73.5 55 45

Residential

4. Bommasandra N4 5.8 ENE 67.2 61.4 55 455. Ramakrishnapura N5 4.7 E 73.6 69.4 55 456. Byagadadenahalli N6 6.6 SE 78.0 73.6 55 457. Indalavadi N7 5.8 SSW 84.5 78.0 55 458. Hullahalli N8 5.5 NW 83.9 78.9 55 45

3.8.2 Observations

It is observed that the day equivalent and night equivalent noise levels at all locations are within

prescribed CPCB standards

Day equivalent noise levels (Ld) ranged between 67.2 dB(A) to 84.5 dB (A)

Night equivalent noise levels (Ln) ranged between 61.4 dB (A) to 78.9 dB (A).

The field observations during the study period indicate that the ambient noise levels were

slightly exceeded the prescribed standards by MoEF&CC.

3.9 Water Environment3.9.1 Surface Water Resources

Page 123: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORTenvironmentclearance.nic.in/.../EIA/230520198KWR1Z7LEIAReport.pdf · Bengaluru Urban District & Karnataka State by M/s. CIPLA Limited. I was

Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Page 92

There are about 109 water bodies including small and large natural/manmade within 10Km

radius from proposed project site. Realignment of storm water drainage without disturbance

shall be made in accordance with existing natural drainage forming as grid type arrangement

based on the natural slope (gravity flow) which finally discharges into major water bodies. The

study area consists of the Hennagara lake in the southern region, Ramakrishnapura lake in the

part of East South Eastern region. The Hebbagodi and Kammasandra lake in the North

Eastern/North north Eastern part from the project site. As the Bommasandra Industrial Area

estate lies in the Northeastern region, the representative surface water sampling locations have

been chosen. The List of major water bodies nearby project site is given in Table 3-19.Photographs of Existing major water bodies are given in Table 3-19.

Table 3-19: List of Major Water Bodies within 10Km radiusS.No Name of the Water bodies Distance Direction

1 Hennagara lake 3.2 SE2 Ramakrishnapura lake 4.5 ESE3 Chandapura lake 5.3 ENE4 Kammasandra Lake 5.7 NE5 Hebbagodi lake 4.9 NE6 VeerasandraKere Lake 6.3 NE7 Thirumangondan halli Lake 8.4 ENE8 Marsur Lake 7.2 ESE9 Settahalli lake 8.3 ESE

10 Meenakshi Lake 9.0 NW11 Chikka Togur lake 7.4 NNE12 Rayasandra lake 8.8 NNE13 Yelenahallikere 9.4 NW14 Muthanallur lake 8.3 ENE15 Doddkammanahalli Lake 9.3 NNW

Page 124: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORTenvironmentclearance.nic.in/.../EIA/230520198KWR1Z7LEIAReport.pdf · Bengaluru Urban District & Karnataka State by M/s. CIPLA Limited. I was

Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Page 93

Hennagara Lake Chandapura Lake

Kammasandra Lake Hebbagodi lake

Figure 3-29 Photographs of existing major water bodies within the study area

Page 125: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORTenvironmentclearance.nic.in/.../EIA/230520198KWR1Z7LEIAReport.pdf · Bengaluru Urban District & Karnataka State by M/s. CIPLA Limited. I was

Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Page 94

Table 3-20: Water bodies in 10km radius of Project area

S.No Name of Water body/NearestLocation

Distance fromProject Site(Km) Direction

AreaNearby villages

Centre of Water bodyAcres Hectares Latitude Longitude

1. Begur Lake9.72 NNW 116.90 47.25

Ckikka BegurGyanappanahalliSubash Nagar

120 52’25.25”

770 37’48.87”

2. Rayasandra9.05 NNE 73.06 29.57

NaganathapuraGhattihalliCudasandra

120 52’34.75”

770 41’27.05”

3. Naganathapura8.54 NNE 77.53 31.36

RayasandraDooda,Chikka NagamangalaChenna KeshavanagarSingasandra

120 52’10.75”

770 40’36.55”

4. Chenna Keshavanagar 7.06 NNE 31.04 12.59 Dooda,Chikka NagamangalaNaganathapura

120 51’56.77”

770 40’19.63”

5. Near Gulimangala8.52 NE 25.65 10.37

HuskurChikka NagamangalaShantipura

120 51’18.73”

770 41’46.83”

6. Near Shantipura6.15 NE 11.24 4.54

Chikka,Dodda NagamangalaGulimangalaGovindachettipalya

120 51’14.52”

770 41’22.50’’

7. Near Govindachettipalya7.69 NNE 15.88 6.41

Electronic CityDodda, ChikkaNagamangalaKonappana Agrahara

120 51’24.76’’

770 40’20.25”

8. Near Govindachettipalya7.74 NNE 11.74 4.76

Electronic CityDodda, ChikkaNagamangalaKonappana Agrahara

120 51’33.40”

770 39’59.56”

9. Near Chenna Keshavanagar8.39 N 15.10 6.09

SingasandraBasapuraChikka Togur

120 51’56.09”

770 39’37.66”

10. Near Subhash nagar8.79 NNW 9.54 3.82

BasapuraSingasandraChenna keshavanagarBegur

120 52’10.91”

770 38’58.89”

11. Near Subhash nagar 8.76 NNW 11.03 4.47 BasapuraSingasandra

120 52’07.49”

770 38’38.40’’

Page 126: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORTenvironmentclearance.nic.in/.../EIA/230520198KWR1Z7LEIAReport.pdf · Bengaluru Urban District & Karnataka State by M/s. CIPLA Limited. I was

Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Page 95

Chenna keshavanagarBegur

12. Near Tejeswininagar 9.51 NW 1.42 0.53 GyanappanahalliBegur

120 51’58.96”

770 36’50.95”

13. Near Tejeswininagar 8..68 NW 7.4 2.98 Chikka KammanahalliBegur

120 51’33.19”

770 37’00.79”

14. Near Tejeswininagar8.26 NW 20.35 8.20

Chikka KammanahalliBegurIttasandra

120 51’28.77”

770 37’23.69”

15. Near Chikka Kammanahalli 9.19 NW 16.12 6.29 Tejeswininagar 120 51’19.48’’

770 36’13.84”

16. Near Weavers Colony 9.83 NW 28.32 11.42 VaddarpalyaChikka Kammanahalli

120 51’09.89”

770 35’24.47”

17. Near Chikka Kammanahalli 8.65 NW 4.93 2.02 Weavers ColonyTejeswininagar

120 50’55.33”

770 36’11.48”

18. Near Chikka Kammanahalli 8.07 NW 9.70 3.95 Tejeswininagar 120 51’10.95”

770 37’00.69”

19. Near Chikka Kammanahalli 7.24 NW 4.30 1.73 Bettadasanapura 120 50’57.19”

770 37’19.80”

20. Near Ittasandra 7.36 NW 12.10 4.93 VaddarpalyaBettadasanapura

120 51’12.41”

770 37’58.75’’

21. Near Vaddarpalya6.80 NNW 12.16 4.94

IttasandraChikka Togur DoddaTogurKonappana Agrahara

120 51’02.71”

770 38’39.27”

22. Near Konappana Agrahara

7.39 N 36.74 14.87

Chikka TogurBasapuraGovindachettipalya, DoddaTogurElectronic City

120 51’25.29”

770 39’32.84”

23. Near Govindachettipalya6.55 NNE 5.87 2.38 Konappana Agrahara

Electronic CityShantipuraVirsandra

120 50’51.49”

770 40’25.04”

24. Near Govindachettipalya 6.50 NNE 10.67 4.33 120 50’45.86”

770 40’26.65”

25. Near lakshminarayanapura8.45 NE 29.49 11.87

GottamaranahalliGulimangalaShantipuraChintalamadavala

120 50’49.13”

770 42’28.78”

26. Near Chintalamadavala 9.15 NE 124.51 50.35 GottamaranahalliGulimangala

120 50’46.11”

770 43’05.69”

Page 127: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORTenvironmentclearance.nic.in/.../EIA/230520198KWR1Z7LEIAReport.pdf · Bengaluru Urban District & Karnataka State by M/s. CIPLA Limited. I was

Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Page 96

VaddarpalyaShingena AgraharaKaggalipuraGopasandraChikka Timmasandra

27. Muttanallur Kere

8.69 ENE 244.49 98.96

LakshmisagaraHilalige R SRamasagaraAlibommasandraMuttanallurBendiganahalliSomanahalli

120 49’19.93”

770 43’42.05”

28. Near Hilaligi5.90 ENE 24.89 10.07

BommasandraLakshmisagaraRamasagara

120 49’ 1.96” 770 42’ 9.15’’

29. Near Bangalapet(Kammasandra) 5.85 ENE 50.33 20.38

VidyanagarShree AnanthnagarVaddarpalyaHilaligi

120 49’32.34”

770 41’39.62”

30. Hebgodi Lake5.00 NE 3.64 1.46

GollahalliVirsandraShree AnanthnagarBangalapet

120 49’43.89”

770 40’49.09”

31. Near Gollahalli

4.64 NE 34.13 13.78

VirsandraHebgodiTirupalyaBangalapetShinkaripalya

120 49’52.83”

770 40’20.73’’

32. Near Gollahalli

4.18 NE 16.94 6.84

HebgodiTirupalyaMaragondanahalliVirsandraShinkaripalya

120 49’35.45” 770 40’ 3.34”

33. Near Maragondanahalli4.10 NNE 9.32 3.80

ShinkaripalyaGollahalliHebgodiTirupalya

120 49’37.86”

770 39’44.46”

34. Near Shinkaripalya4.65 NNW 18.30 7.41

MaragondanahalliElectronic CityBettadasanapura

120 50’00.71” 770 39’ 8.05”

Page 128: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORTenvironmentclearance.nic.in/.../EIA/230520198KWR1Z7LEIAReport.pdf · Bengaluru Urban District & Karnataka State by M/s. CIPLA Limited. I was

Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Page 97

Podu35. Near Virsandra

5.83 NNE 13.69 5.49Shree AnanthnagarShinkaripalyaElectronic City

120 50’22.61”

770 40’29.66”

36. Near Virsandra5.75 NNE 10.12 4.11

Dodda TogurElectronic CityShinkaripalya

120 50’27.98”

770 40’14.19”

37. Near Podu5.23 NW 22.43 9.03

BinjipuraBettadasanapuraChittikarepalya

120 49’58.06”

770 37’50.66’’

38. Near Bettadasanapura 6.97 NW 9.56 3.88 Chikka Kammanahalli 120 50’41.62’’

770 37’20.83”

39. Near Chittekarepalya 6.54 NW 4.76 1.93 Dinne Palya 120 50’13.39’’ 770 37’ 1.44’’

40. Near Dinnepalya 7.06 NW 14.98 6.08 ChittikarepalyaChikka Kammanahalli

120 50’15.25”

770 36’35.93’’

41. Near Kalkere R.F 9.65 WNW 5.52 2.24 Shanuboganahalli 120 49’54.21”

770 34’31.59’’

42. Near Timmayyanadoddi 8.19 WNW 3.42 1.39 SampigeramanagaraKalkere R.F

120 49’50.09”

770 35’29.34”

43. Near Chittekarepalya6.51 NW 7.17 2.93

DinnepalyaTimmayyanadoddiHakkibikki Colony

120 49’55.32”

770 36’42.26”

44. Near Chittekarepalya 5.65 NW 9.71 3.94 BinjipuraHakkibikki Colony

120 49’48.13’’

770 37’16.31’’

45. Near Hakkibikki Colony6.42 WNW 21.32 8.65

BodigramaSalindra DoddiSampigeramanagara

120 49’35.88”

770 36’20.92”

46. Near Hakkibikki Colony5.55 WNW 49.07 19.85

Salindra DoddiChittekarepalyaBodigramaChinnagodanapalya

120 49’18.45”

770 36’48.79”

47. Near Sampigeramanagara7.60 WNW 13.31 5.39

BodigramaSalindra DoddiLakshmipura

120 49’27.19’’

770 35’34.36’’

48. Near Bingipura4.51 NW 10.35 4.19

HulimangalaChinnagodanapalyaHakkibikki Colony

120 49’20.51”

770 37’38.86”

49. Near Hulimangala 3.86 NW 50.59 20.48 Kempapura 120 49 7.05” 770 37’

Page 129: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORTenvironmentclearance.nic.in/.../EIA/230520198KWR1Z7LEIAReport.pdf · Bengaluru Urban District & Karnataka State by M/s. CIPLA Limited. I was

Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Page 98

BinjipuraChinnagodanapalya

55.94”

50. Near nanjapura2.55 NNW 14.89 6.02

VabsandraHulimangalaKempapuraKyalasanahalli

120 48’36.72”

770 38’34.10”

51. Near Kyalasanahalli1.41 NNW 17.84 7.14

SrirampuraVabsandraTarandahalliKachanayakanahalli Colony

120 48’15.22”

770 39’18.09”

52. Near Yarandahalli2.09 NNE 8.26 3.35

SrirampuraKachanayakanahalli ColonyVabsandra

120 48’22.46” 770 40’ 4.10”

53. Near Kachanayakanahalli Colony2.49 ENE 21.92 8.84

YarandahalliSrirampuraYellamana MandiraKachanayakanahalli

120 48’ 9.40” 770 40’35.24”

54. Near Bommasandra IndustrialArea 4.17 ENE 23.26 9.39

YarandahalliKachanayakanahalliBommasandraChandapura

120 48’31.50”

770 41’20.84’’

55. Chandapura Lake5.29 ENE 23.83 9.67

KittiganahalliBommasandraHale ChandapuraLakshmisagara

120 48’20.05”

770 42’17.88”

56. Near Hale Chandapura

6.74 ENE 9.09 3.67

ChandapuraKittiganahalliHilaligiBommasandraLakshmisagaraGuddehatti

120 48’18.64” 770 43’ 0.47”

57. Near Bendiganahalli9.51 ENE 15.66 6.41

Ambedkar ColonyHale ChandapuraLakshmisagaraGuddehatti

120 48’38.53”

770 44’31.42”

58. Near Guddehatti9.25 E 8.36 3.34

Ambedkar ColonyHale ChandapuraLakshmisagaraBendiganahalliNeralur

120 47’98.58”

770 44’29.59”

59. Near Guddehatti 9.65 E 14.82 5.99 120 47’55.24”

770 44’41.87’

Page 130: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORTenvironmentclearance.nic.in/.../EIA/230520198KWR1Z7LEIAReport.pdf · Bengaluru Urban District & Karnataka State by M/s. CIPLA Limited. I was

Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Page 99

Yadavanhalli60. Near Neralur

7.10 E 43.03 17.32

TirumagondanahalliChandapuraHale ChandapuraSainagarAmbedkarnagar

120 47’49.51”

770 43’18.35’’

61. Near Tirumagondanahalli6.60 ESE 8.4 3.37

NeralurSainagarIgaluruBanahalli

120 47’29.22” 770 43’ 2.73’’

62. Near Sai nagar

8.53 E 1.39 0.57

NeralurTirumagondanahalliYadavanhalliAmbedkarnagarBaligaranahalli

120 47’16.47’’ 770 44’ 2.84’’

63. Near Mastenahalli0.69 ENE 15.81 6.42

HosahalliHennagaraSrirampuraBandenalasandra

120 47’32.94’’

770 39’47.98’’

64. Near Bandenalasandra0.42 N 21.36 8.64

KyalasanahalliSrirampuraMastenahalliJigani market

120 47’41.58’’

770 39’13.42”

65. Jigani Kere

2.24 WNW 194.56 78.70

KoppaKyalasanahalliBandenalasandraHolamanchinahalliHarapanahalli

120 47’45.19’’

770 37’54.78’’

66. Bidarakere4.70 WNW 74.06 30.01

NalsandraKoppaBegihalli

120 48’ 2.17” 770 36’37.34”

67. Near Manatapa

6.41 WNW 40.53 16.4

JangalpalyaRamasandraNalsandraKariappanahalliHullakasavanahalli

120 48’35.77’’ 770 36’ 0.53’’

68. Near Jangalpalya6.90 WNW 5.90 2.38

RamasandraNalsandraKariappanahalliHullakasavanahalli

120 48’49.43”

770 35’42.95”

Page 131: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORTenvironmentclearance.nic.in/.../EIA/230520198KWR1Z7LEIAReport.pdf · Bengaluru Urban District & Karnataka State by M/s. CIPLA Limited. I was

Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Page 100

Manatapa69. Near Sampigehalli

8.14 W 17.57 7.11VajarahalliKariappanahalliJangalpalyaKempanayakanahalli

120 48’23.96’’

770 34’54.44’’

70. Near Begihalli 4.29 W 6.73 2.69 VaddarapalyaHarapanahalli

120 47’37.91’’

770 36’29.60’’

71. Near Ramasagara4.22 WSW 3.96 1.60

VaddarapalyaHarapanahalliBukkasagara

120 46’57.63”

770 36’55.12’’

72. Near Ramasagara3.34 WSW 11.58 4.70

HarapanahalliBukkasagaraHolamanchinahalli

120 47’ 1.30’’ 770 37’20.43’

73. Near Kallabalu 3.92 WSW 8.83 3.54 BukkasagaraJigani Industrial Area

120 46’24.34”

770 37’16.01’’

74. Hennagara Kere

2.72 ESE 399.65 161.73

MastenahalliHennagaraRajapuraSitanayakanahalliVaddarpalyaHolamanchinahalliBandenalasandra

120 46’38.80’’

770 39’40.59’’

75. Near Rajapura2.81 ESE 69.90 28.29

HinnakkiSitanayakanahalliLingapuraHennagara

120 46’23.58”

770 40’38.55”

76. Ramakrishnapura Lake 4.46 ESE 12.80 5.09 HinnakkiIgaluruNaganayanahalli

120 46’40.06”

770 41’45.54”

77. Near Ramakrishnapura 5.34 E 17.39 7.06 120 46’51.31”

770 42’15.67”

78. Near Adesonatti

7.05 ESE 22.29 9.01

BandapuraMadivalaMarasurNaganayanahalliRamakrishnapura

120 46’23.48” 770 43’ 9.61”

79. Near baligaranahalli

8.86 ESE 29.01 11.72

IchanguruVeddarayapalyaKrishnasagaraAmbedkarnagarBandapura

120 46’35.15”

770 44’14.70”

Page 132: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORTenvironmentclearance.nic.in/.../EIA/230520198KWR1Z7LEIAReport.pdf · Bengaluru Urban District & Karnataka State by M/s. CIPLA Limited. I was

Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Page 101

80. Near Kambalipura9.28 ESE 96.24 38.92

MadivalaMutsandraShettihalliMaisandra

120 45’25.93” 770 44’ 6.66”

81. Near Shettihalli7.22 SE 121.97 49.37

MarasurByagadadenahalliHaleuruAvadenahalliTattanahalli

120 45’12.57”

770 42’50.38”

82. Near Shettihalli8.34 SE 55.73 22.53 120 44’

57.51”770 43’18.30”

83. Near Murasur6.40 SE 11.63 4.79

HaleuruNaganayakanahalli,Byagadadenhalli

120 45’39.34”

770 42’29.08”

84. Near Naganayakanahalli4.39 ESE 16.59 6.72

HinnakiLingapuraDodda HagadeMarasur

120 46’10.68”

770 41’29.32”

85. Near Dyavasandra3.20 SW 45.38 18.37

HaragaddeVaddarapalyaWayanahalliBommandahalli

120 45’30.70” 770 39’ 8.30”

86. Near Konasandra3.34 WSW 15.29 6.20

DyavasandraBommandahalliVaddarapalya

120 45’36.88”

770 38’31.34”

87. Near Konasandra2.91 WSW 17.43 7.04

VaddarapalyaJigani Industrial AreaMahanthalingapura

120 45’54.56”

770 38’19.09”

88. Near Jigani Industrial Area3.01 WSW 15.22 6.16

MahanthalingapuraVaddarapalyaKonasandra

120 46’13.44”

770 37’57.79”

89. Near Mahanthalingapura5.01 WSW 6.51 2.69

KallabaluGiddanehalliGoninayakanadoddiKasinakuntedoddi

120 45’55.56”

770 36’52.46”

90. Near Kunmadiwala6.53 ESE 41.47 16.81

ByagadadenhalliChennaha AgraharaAvadenahalli

120 44’51.43” 770 42’ 4.07”

91. Near Yellamnanapalya5.26 ESE 12.97 5.22

Kun MadiwalaDodda HagadeByagadadenhalli

120 45’ 9.21” 770 41’20.53”

92. Near Sappanalli 4.25 ESE 19.59 7.89 Dodda Hagade 120 45’ 770 40’

Page 133: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORTenvironmentclearance.nic.in/.../EIA/230520198KWR1Z7LEIAReport.pdf · Bengaluru Urban District & Karnataka State by M/s. CIPLA Limited. I was

Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Page 102

YellamnanapalyaWayanahalli

11.74” 30.06”

93. Near Kumbarnahalli4.01 SSE 8.56 3.43

NosenuruHaragaddeDyavasandra

120 45’ 6.42” 770 39’40.14”

94. Near Krishnanadoddi 6.31 SE 4.89 1.99 Ragihalli 120 45’ 0.85” 770 36’41.06”

95. Near Jekkanahalla 8.27 SW 14.62 5.91 HebbalaHuruganadoddi

120 43’44.64”

770 36’26.79”

96. Near Nosenuru4.92 SSE 25.62 10.36

Nosenuru GollahalliKumbarnahalliSuragijakkanahalli

120 44’35.18”

770 39’26.78”

97. Near Yellamnanapalya5.62 ESE 12.76 5.18

Dodda HagadeByagadadenhalliKunmadiwala

120 45’ 8.73’’ 770 41’20.83”

98. Near Chikka hagade6.65 SE 200.38 81.02

Chennena AgraharaVaderahalliHosakoteKempu Vedarahalli

120 44’13.69”

770 41’35.90”

99. Near Dodda Hagade5.78 SE 10.82 4.40

SoppanalliKempu VedarahalliChennena AgraharaChikka hagade

120 44’34.78” 770 41’ 1.75”

100. Near Medihalli8.59 SE 108.26 43.79

GourenahalliBodrahalliAnekalKaval Hosahalli

120 42’56.25” 770 41’ 5.16’

101. Near Kembu Vedarahalli6.43 SE 18.60 7.5

SuragijakkanahalliVaddarapalyaChikka hagade

120 44’7.56” 770 40’52.51”

102. Near Suragijakkanahalli6.51 SSE 12.36 5.02

VaddarapalyaChikka hagadeKembu VedarahalliHonnakalasapura

120 44\ 4.55” 770 40’30.21”

103. Near Honnakalasapura7.32 SSE 21.99 8.89

Sidi HosakoteSiddanapalyaGourenahalli

120 43’31.20”

770 40’39.45”

104. Near Gourenahalli7.87 SSE 12.73 5.11

MedihalliSiddanapalyaAaiyanapalya

120 43’ 7.10” 770 40’18.96”

Page 134: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORTenvironmentclearance.nic.in/.../EIA/230520198KWR1Z7LEIAReport.pdf · Bengaluru Urban District & Karnataka State by M/s. CIPLA Limited. I was

Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Page 103

105. Near Aduru6.21 SSE 16.70 6.72

VaddarapalyaSonnayakanapuraNosenuru Gollahalli

120 43’54.51” 770 39’ 7.95”

106. Near Sonnayakanapura6.95 SSE 9.06 3.66

SiddanapalyaAaiyanapalyaTimmasandraNagaiyanadoddi

120 43’25.03”

770 39’19.00”

107. Near Chikkanahalli7.73 SSW 7.24 2.98

TimmasandraNagaiyanadoddiIndlavadipura

120 43’ 4.94” 770 38’52.48”

108. Near Indlavadipura8.16 SSW 5.85 2.3

TimmasandraNagaiyanadoddiNallaiyanadoddi

120 42’54.69”

770 38’34.00”

109. Near Kadujakkanahalli5.69 SSW 12.04 4.80

Nosenuru GollahalliAduruIndlavadi

120 44’15.45”

770 38’23.96”

110. 3512.01 1420.24

Page 135: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORTenvironmentclearance.nic.in/.../EIA/230520198KWR1Z7LEIAReport.pdf · Bengaluru Urban District & Karnataka State by M/s. CIPLA Limited. I was

Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Page 104

3.9.1.1 Surface Water Quality Assessment

To establish the baseline status of water environment, the existing representative sampling

locations for surface water within a radial distance of 10Km from project site have been

selected as per CPCB guidelines of Water Quality Monitoring through an adequate survey of

the project area. Test methods used for the analysis of water quality parameters is given in

Table 3-21.

Table 3-21: Test methods used for the analysis of water quality parametersS. No Parameter Measured Test Method

1 pH (at 25°C) IS:3025 (Part - 11): 1983 (Reaff: 2006)2 Electrical Conductivity IS:3025 (Part - 14): 1983 (Reaff: 2006)3 Color IS:3025 (Part- 4) 1983 (Reaff 2006)4 Total Hardness as CaCO3 IS:3025 (Part - 21) 1983 (Reaff 2006)5 Total Alkalinity as CaCO3 IS:3025,1 (Part - 23) 1986 (Reaff 2009)6 Cadmium IS:3025 (Part 41) 19917 Chloride as Cl IS:3025 (Part - 32) 1988(Reaff 2009)8 Total Dissolved Solids IS:3025:1(Part - 16) 1984 (Reaff 2006)9 Aluminium as Al IS:3025 (Part - 55) 2003 (Reaff 2009)

10 Chromium as Cr IS:3025 (Part - 52) 2003 (Reaff 2009)11 Lead as Pb IS:3025 (Part - 47) 1994 (Reaff 2009)12 Zinc as Zn IS:3025 (Part - 49) 1994 (Reaff 2009)13 Sodium as Na IS:3025,5(Part - 45) 1993 (Reaff 2006)14 Temperature IS:3025 (Part - 9) 1983 (Reaff 2006)15 Chemical oxygen demand as O2 IS:3025 (Part-58)-200616 Dissolved Oxygen (mg/l) IS:3025 (Part - 38)1989 (Reaff 2009)17 Salinity -18 Copper as Cu IS:3025 (Part - 42)1992 (Reaff: 2009)19 BOD,5 days @200C as O2 5210B APHA22nd Edn 2012

The prevailing status of water quality at eight sampling locations each for ground water and

surface water has been assessed during September – November 2016 are presented in

Table 3-22. Surface water quality results are provided in Table 3-23. A map showing the

monitoring locations is given in Figure 3-35.

Table 3-22: Details of Surface water sampling locations

S.No Name of the Water body Distance from ProjectBoundary

Direction fromproject boundary

1 Hennagara lake 3.2 SE2 Ramakrishnapura

lake 4.5 ESE

3 Chandapura lake 5.3 ENE4 Kammasandra

Lake 5.7 NE

5 Hebbagodi lake 4.9 NE6 Chikka Togur Lake 7.4 NNE7 Meenakshi Lake 9.0 NW8 Bommandahalli 4.7 ENE

Page 136: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORTenvironmentclearance.nic.in/.../EIA/230520198KWR1Z7LEIAReport.pdf · Bengaluru Urban District & Karnataka State by M/s. CIPLA Limited. I was

Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Page 105

Table 3-23: Surface water Monitoring Results

S.No Parameters Units

DWStandards

(IS10500:2012)Acceptable

Limit

SW-1 SW-2 SW-3 SW-4 SW-5 SW-6 SW-7 SW-8

1 Source - - Lake Lake Lake Lake Lake Lake Lake Lake

2 Colour Hazen 5 BDL(DL 1.0)

BD(DL 1.0)

BDL(DL 1.0)

BDL(DL 1.0)

BDL(DL 1.0)

BDL(DL 1.0)

BDL(DL 1.0)

BDL(DL 1.0)

3 pH at 25°C - 6.5 to 8.5 7.17 7.26 7.32 7.63 7.12 7.42 7.35 7.45

4 Turbidity NTU 1 25.4 2.80 1.80 13.3 2.10 1.80 2.5 1.60

5 Total SuspendedSolids mg/l - 22.3 8.10 4.70 15.6 4.50 3.00 5.6 3.00

6 ElectricalConductivity@25◦C µmhos/cm - 1850 1960 1530 368 752 137 345 127

7 Total DissolvedSolids mg/l 500 1208 1335 933 213 462 234.0 221 216

8 Total Alkalinity asCaCO3

mg/l 200 375 448 347 50.8 61.8 52.0 44.5 48.0

9 Total Hardness asCaCO3

mg/l 200 799 891 583 90 173 110 112 104

10 Calcium as Ca mg/l 75 145 172 152 22.0 40.2 31.7 28.7 26.9

11 Magnesium as Mg mg/l 30 106 112 49.3 8.45 17.5 7.45 12.4 8.90

12 Sodium as Na mg/l - 71.7 76.5 48.1 15.6 88.3 31.70 55.7 26.8

13 Potassium as K mg/l - 19.2 15.3 14.8 7.60 8.60 5.64 11.2 6.66

14 Chloride as Cl mg/l 250 327 317 166 45.2 188 51.6 187 39.7

15 Sulphate as SO4 mg/l 200 56.0 49.7 45.1 28.2 23.5 32.6 35.6 27.30

16 Carbonate mg/l - - - - - - - - -

17 Bicarbonate mg/l - 458 546 423 62.0 75.4 77.5 65.1 62.8

Page 137: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORTenvironmentclearance.nic.in/.../EIA/230520198KWR1Z7LEIAReport.pdf · Bengaluru Urban District & Karnataka State by M/s. CIPLA Limited. I was

Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Page 106

18 Nitrate as NO3 mg/l 45 5.41 2.47 6.85 6.75 6.42 3.46 3.20 5.74

19 Fluoride as F mg/l 1 0.52 0.20 0.64 0.34 0.23 0.43 BDL(DL 0.5) 1.17

20 Sulphides mg/l 0.05 BDL(DL1) BDL(DL1) BDL(DL1) BDL(DL1) BDL(DL1) BDL(DL1) BDL(DL1) BDL(DL1)

21 % Sodium % - 15.9 15.5 14.6 25.4 51.1 37.1 46.94 34.2

22 Residual SodiumCarbonate (RSC) - - 2.9 0.7 0.9 1.1 1.1 1.3 1.5 1.1

23 Oil & Grease mg/l - BDL(DL4) BDL(DL4) BDL(DL4) BDL(DL4) BDL(DL4) BDL(DL4) BDL(DL4) BDL(DL4)

24 Arsenic mg/l 0.01 BDL(DL0.005)

BDL(DL0.005)

BDL(DL0.005)

BDL(DL0.005)

BDL(DL0.005)

BDL(DL0.005)

BDL(DL0.005)

BDL(DL0.005)

25 Cyanide mg/l 0.05 BDL(DL0.01)

BDL(DL0.01)

BDL(DL0.01)

BDL(DL0.01)

BDL(DL0.01)

BDL(DL0.01)

BDL(DL0.01)

BDL(DL0.01)

26 Cadmium mg/l 0.003 BDL(DL0.01)

BDL(DL0.01)

BDL(DL0.01)

BDL(DL0.01)

BDL(DL0.01)

BDL(DL0.01)

BDL(DL0.01)

BDL(DL0.01)

27 Chromium mg/l 0.05 BDL(DL0.05)

BDL(DL0.05)

BDL(DL0.05)

BDL(DL0.05)

BDL(DL0.05)

BDL(DL0.05)

BDL(DL0.05)

BDL(DL0.05)

28 Copper mg/l 0.05 0.045 BDL(DL0.01) 0.032 0.045 BDL

(DL0.01)BDL

(DL0.01)BDL

(DL0.01)BDL

(DL0.01)

29 Iron mg/l 0.3 0.03 0.16 0.09 0.24 0.22 0.56 6.13 0.89

30 Lead mg/l 0.01 BDL(DL0.1)

BDL(DL0.1)

BDL(DL0.1)

BDL(DL0.1)

BDL(DL0.1)

BDL(DL0.1)

BDL(DL0.1)

BDL(DL0.1)

32 Manganese mg/l 0.1 BDL(DL0.05)

BDL(DL0.05)

BDL(DL0.05)

BDL(DL0.05)

BDL(DL0.05)

BDL(DL0.05)

BDL(DL0.05)

BDL(DL0.05)

33 Mercury mg/l 0.001 BDL(DL0.001)

BDL(DL0.001)

BDL(DL0.001)

BDL(DL0.001)

BDL(DL0.001)

BDL(DL0.001)

BDL(DL0.001)

BDL(DL0.001)

34 Nickel mg/l 0.02 BDL(DL0.05)

BDL(DL0.05)

BDL(DL0.05)

BDL(DL0.05)

BDL(DL0.05)

BDL(DL0.05)

BDL(DL0.05)

BDL(DL0.05)

Page 138: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORTenvironmentclearance.nic.in/.../EIA/230520198KWR1Z7LEIAReport.pdf · Bengaluru Urban District & Karnataka State by M/s. CIPLA Limited. I was

Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Page 107

35 Selenium mg/l 0.01 BDL(DL0.005)

BDL(DL0.005)

BDL(DL0.005)

BDL(DL0.005)

BDL(DL0.005)

BDL(DL0.005)

BDL(DL0.005)

BDL(DL0.005)

36 Zinc mg/l 5 2.62 0.68 1.34 0.65 1.55 0.011 0.51 0.04

37 Phosphate mg/l - 0.76 1.25 0.17 BDL(DL0.02)

BDL(DL0.02)

BDL(DL0.02)

BDL(DL0.02)

BDL(DL0.02)

38 Dissolved Oxygen mg/l - 3.40 4.40 5.10 3.70 5.90 5.12 4.2 5.60

39 COD mg/l - 18.6 8.40 6.90 20.3 7.20 8.60 7.3 8.9

40 BOD, 3 Days @27°C mg/l - 12.8 4.20 3.60 13.4 3.10 4.10 3.5 3.20

Page 139: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORTenvironmentclearance.nic.in/.../EIA/230520198KWR1Z7LEIAReport.pdf · Bengaluru Urban District & Karnataka State by M/s. CIPLA Limited. I was

Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Page 108

3.9.1.2 Results and Discussions

Summary of analytical results

In the surface water the pH varies between 7.12-7.63, which are meeting the IS

10500:2012 for Drinking Water.

The Total Dissolved Solids range varies between 213 mg/l – 1335 mg/l for the

surface water. The TDS value of few samples exceed the acceptable limit of IS

10500:2012

The desirable limit of the chloride content is 250mg/l and permissible limit is 1000

mg/l. The chloride content in the surface water for study area is ranges between

39.7 mg/l – 327 mg/l.

The desirable limit of the sulphate content is 200mg/l and permissible limit is

400mg/l. The sulphate content of the surface water of the study area varies

between 23.5 mg/l – 56.0 mg/l meeting the desirable limit of the IS 10500: 2012.

The Total hardness ranges is between 90 mg/l - 891 mg/l, for few samples

acceptable limit of IS 10500: 2012 exceeds.

3.9.2 Ground water resources

Ground Water Department is monitoring the changes in groundwater regime continuously

through a network of Piezometer wells fitted with Automatic water level recorders in different

hydro geological and geomorphic units. Ground water level behaviour is analysed based on

monitoring of ground water level from the network hydrograph stations (NHS) established by

CGWB.

Groundwater resource of the district has been assessed keeping in view, the sustainable and

optimum development of the resource. The estimation has been done based Ground Water

Estimation methodology (GEM)-1997.Assessment is done taking into consideration of

various hydrologic units viz. Command, non command hilly area with more than 20% slope

and poor quality area.

The groundwater potential of the gross geographical area of the basin is estimated on pro-

rata basis from the district-wise groundwater resources-2012 published by the Central

Groundwater Board (CGWB) as given in Table 3-24. Ground water level fluctuation decadal

means (May 2001 – May 2010) with May 2011 for Bangalore Urban District, Karnataka is

given in Figure 3-30.

Table 3-24: Groundwater Potential in Bengaluru Urban PIA District

Page 140: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORTenvironmentclearance.nic.in/.../EIA/230520198KWR1Z7LEIAReport.pdf · Bengaluru Urban District & Karnataka State by M/s. CIPLA Limited. I was

Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Page 109

Attribute Potential /QuantityArea of the district 2190 Sq.KmNet Annual groundwater availability of the district 11723 ha-mTotal groundwater draft for irrigation, domestic and industrial uses 3794 ha-mExisting gross ground water draft for all uses 16703 ha-mDraft Exceeding the total available ground water resources leaving NilBalance Available for Exploitation Nil

Figure 3-30 Ground water level fluctuation decadal mean (May 2001 – May 2010) withMay 2011 for Bangalore Urban District, Karnataka

3.9.2.1 Ground water Quality

Total Eight (08) ground water monitoring locations were identified for assessment in different

villages around the project site based on the usage of sub surface water by the settlements/

villages in the study area. The groundwater results are compared with the desirable and

permissible water quality standards as per IS: 10500 (2012) for drinking water. Groundwater

Page 141: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORTenvironmentclearance.nic.in/.../EIA/230520198KWR1Z7LEIAReport.pdf · Bengaluru Urban District & Karnataka State by M/s. CIPLA Limited. I was

Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Page 110

quality monitoring locations and results are given in Table 3-25 and Table 3-26. A map

showing the monitoring locations is given in Figure 3-35.

Table 3-25: Details of Groundwater Quality Monitoring Locations

Station Code Location Distance (km) fromProject boundary

AzimuthDirections

GW1 Near Project Site 2.60 -GW2 Jigani 1.0 WNWGW3 Doddathoguru 6.9 NGW4 Bommasandra 5.8 ENEGW5 Ramakrishnapura 4.7 EGW6 Byagadadenahalli 6.6 SEGW7 Indalavadi 5.8 SSWGW8 Hullahalli 5.5 NE

Page 142: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORTenvironmentclearance.nic.in/.../EIA/230520198KWR1Z7LEIAReport.pdf · Bengaluru Urban District & Karnataka State by M/s. CIPLA Limited. I was

Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Page 111

Table 3-26: Ground Water Monitoring Results

S.No Parameters UNIT

DW Standards(IS

10500:2012)Acceptable

Limit

GW1 GW2 GW3 GW4 GW-5 GW-6 GW-7 GW-8

1. Source - Bore Well Bore Well Bore Well Bore Well Bore Well Bore Well Bore Well Bore Well

2. Colour Hazen 5 BDL(DL 1.0)

BDL(DL 1.0)

BDL(DL 1.0)

BDL(DL 1.0)

BDL(DL 1.0)

BDL(DL 1.0)

BDL(DL 1.0)

BDL(DL 1.0)

3. pH - 6.5 to 8.5 7.33 7.64 7.55 7.93 7.82 8.21 7.43 7.8

4. Turbidity NTU 1 BDL(DL 0.1)

BDL(DL 0.1)

BDL(DL 0.1)

BDL(DL 0.1)

BDL(DL 0.1)

BDL(DL 0.1)

BDL(DL 0.1)

BDL(DL 0.1)

5. Total SuspendedSoilds

mg/l - BDL(DL 1.0)

BDL(DL 1.0)

BDL(DL 1.0)

BDL(DL 1.0)

BDL(DL 1.0)

BDL(DL 1.0)

BDL(DL 1.0)

BDL(DL 1.0)

6. ElectricalConductivity 25◦C µmhos/cm - 978 1365 2140 1277 690 894 1095 623

7. Total DissolvedSolids mg/l 500 670 910 1280 795 462 584 690 390

8. Total Alkalinity asCaCO3 mg/l 200 187 205 368 237 144 173 188 119

9. Total Hardness asCaCO3 mg/l 200 326 401 662 432 182 251 329 140

10. Calcium as Ca mg/l 75 48.6 97.0 140.4 92.8 47.7 55.0 76.6 28.111. Magnesium as Mg mg/l 30 37.5 38.5 75.5 48.6 15.3 27.6 33.4 16.9

12. Sodium as Na mg/l - 51.4 102 146 92.6 49.5 58.2 84.4 37.1

13. Potassium as k mg/l - 17.4 36.9 35.2 19.0 15.0 20.4 22.4 13.4

14.Chlorides as Cl- mg/l

250 121 186 250 163 74.8 99.2 143 48.6

15.Sulphate (SO4) mg/l

200 77.2 112 123 83.5 32.2 42.4 60.8 33.3

Page 143: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORTenvironmentclearance.nic.in/.../EIA/230520198KWR1Z7LEIAReport.pdf · Bengaluru Urban District & Karnataka State by M/s. CIPLA Limited. I was

Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Page 112

16.Carbonate mg/l

- - - - - - - - -

17.Bicarbonate mg/l

- 189 250 449 289 176 211 229 146

18.Nitrates(NO3) mg/l

45 28.7 34.3 17.8 29.5 11.1 9.52 25.4 9.28

19.Fluoride as F- mg/l

1 0.18 0.33 0.67 0.13 0.50 BDL(DL 0.05) 0.25 0.19

20. Sulphidesmg/l

0.05 BDL(DL1) BDL(DL1) BDL(DL1) BDL(DL1) BDL(DL1) BDL(DL1) BDL(DL1) BDL(DL1)

21. % Sodium%

- 27.3 33.1 31.0 30.6 34.9 31.4 33.9 34.0

22. Sodium Absorbtionratio (SAR)

- 1.35 2.2 2.5 1.9 1.6 1.5 2.0 1.4

23. Oil & Grease mg/l - BDL(DL4) BDL(DL4) BDL(DL4) BDL(DL4) BDL(DL4) BDL(DL4) BDL(DL4) BDL(DL4)

24. Arsenic mg/l 0.01 BDL(DL0.005)

BDL(DL0.005)

BDL(DL0.005)

BDL(DL0.005)

BDL(DL0.005)

BDL(DL0.005)

BDL(DL0.005)

BDL(DL0.005)

25. Cyanide mg/l 0.05 BDL(DL0.01)

BDL(DL0.01)

BDL(DL0.01)

BDL(DL0.01)

BDL(DL0.01)

BDL(DL0.01)

BDL(DL0.01)

BDL(DL0.01)

26. Cadmium mg/l 0.003 BDL(DL0.01)

BDL(DL0.01)

BDL(DL0.01)

BDL(DL0.01)

BDL(DL0.01)

BDL(DL0.01)

BDL(DL0.01)

BDL(DL0.01)

27. Chromium mg/l 0.05 BDL(DL0.05)

BDL(DL0.05)

BDL(DL0.05)

BDL(DL0.05)

BDL(DL0.05)

BDL(DL0.05)

BDL(DL0.05)

BDL(DL0.05)

28. Copper mg/l 0.05 BDL(DL0.01) 0.02 0.02 BDL

(DL0.01)BDL

(DL0.01)BDL

(DL0.01) 0.03 0.02

29. Iron mg/l 0.3 0.37 0.11 0.34 0.14 0.46 0.12 0.23 0.21

30. Lead mg/l 0.01 BDL(DL0.1)

BDL(DL0.1)

BDL(DL0.1)

BDL(DL0.1)

BDL(DL0.1)

BDL(DL0.1)

BDL(DL0.1)

BDL(DL0.1)

31. Manganese mg/l 0.1 BDL(DL0.05)

BDL(DL0.05)

BDL(DL0.05)

BDL(DL0.05)

BDL(DL0.05)

BDL(DL0.05)

BDL(DL0.05)

BDL(DL0.05)

32. Mercury mg/l 0.001 BDLDL0.001)

BDLDL0.001)

BDL(DL0.001)

BDL(DL0.001)

BDL(DL0.001)

BDL(DL0.001)

BDL(DL0.001)

BDL(DL0.001)

33. Nickel mg/l 0.02 BDL(DL0.05)

BDL(DL0.05)

BDL(DL0.05)

BDL(DL0.05)

BDL(DL0.05)

BDL(DL0.05)

BDL(DL0.05)

BDL(DL0.05)

Page 144: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORTenvironmentclearance.nic.in/.../EIA/230520198KWR1Z7LEIAReport.pdf · Bengaluru Urban District & Karnataka State by M/s. CIPLA Limited. I was

Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Page 113

34. Selenium mg/l 0.01 BDL(DL0.005)

BDL(DL0.005)

BDL(DL0.005)

BDL(DL0.005)

BDL(DL0.005)

BDL(DL0.005)

BDL(DL0.005)

BDL(DL0.005)

35. Zinc mg/l 5 1.42 2.97 0.43 0.13 1.73 2.87 0.28 0.15

36. Phosphate mg/l - BDL(DL 0.02)

BDL(DL 0.02)

BDL(DL 0.02)

BDL(DL 0.02)

BDL(DL 0.02)

BDL(DL 0.02)

BDL(DL 0.02)

BDL(DL 0.02)

37. Dissolved Oxygen mg/l - NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

38. BOD 3days @27°C mg/l - BDL(DL 1.0)

BDL(DL 1.0)

BDL(DL 1.0)

BDL(DL 1.0)

BDL(DL 1.0)

BDL(DL 1.0)

BDL(DL 1.0)

BDL(DL 1.0)

39. COD mg/l - BDL(DL 4.0)

BDL(DL 4.0)

BDL(DL 4.0)

BDL(DL 4.0)

BDL(DL 4.0)

BDL(DL 4.0)

BDL(DL 4.0)

BDL(DL 4.0)

Page 145: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORTenvironmentclearance.nic.in/.../EIA/230520198KWR1Z7LEIAReport.pdf · Bengaluru Urban District & Karnataka State by M/s. CIPLA Limited. I was

Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Page 114

3.9.2.2 Results and Discussions

A summary of analytical results are presented below:

The ground water results of the study area indicate that the average pH ranges is varied

between 7.33-8.21

The Total Dissolved Solids ranges is varied between 390-1280mg/l for the ground water

and its meets the permissible limits of IS 10500: 2012

The desirable limit of the chloride content is 250mg/l and permissible limit is 1000 mg/l.

The chloride content in the ground water for study area is ranges between 48.6mg/l –

250mg/l.

The desirable limit of the sulphate content is 200mg/l and permissible limit is 400mg/l. the

sulphate content of the ground water of the study area is varied between 32.2 mg/l – 123

mg/l meeting the desirable limit of the IS 10500: 2012.

The Total hardness ranges is between 140-662 mg/l for ground water its meeting the

permissible limit of the IS 10500: 2012.

3.10 Soil as a resource and its Quality

The predominant soils in the PIA district are red loamy and sandy soil and laterite soil.

Laterite soil is mostly red in color and yellow loamy, pale to bright red colours are also seen.

Laterite soil is suitable for Paddy, Sugarcane, Areca nut and Plantation crops, viz.crops like

Cardamom & Plantains. Loamy red soils are distributed in the lower reaches of valleys. Red

lateritic soil is the most dominant soil type in the area. The texture of the soil varies from fine

to coarse. The soil in valleys and intermediate slopes is rich in loam whereas in upper slopes

it is much coarse in nature. The soil responds well to irrigation and other soil-managment

practices. Silty and Loamy soils are of transported origin and are found mostly along river

banks and in valley plains. They have good infiltration capacity and are well suited for

agriculture due to their fertility.

3.10.1 Soil quality

In order to assess the quality of soil at different locations in the study area, various land use

categories were taken into account. Soil sampling was carried out at Eight (08) locations in

the study area. Soil analysis was carried as per IS: 2720 methods. Soil quality monitoring

locations & results are given in Table 3-27 & Table 3-28. Map showing the monitoring

locations is given in Figure 3-36.

Table 3-27: Soil Quality Monitoring Locations

Page 146: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORTenvironmentclearance.nic.in/.../EIA/230520198KWR1Z7LEIAReport.pdf · Bengaluru Urban District & Karnataka State by M/s. CIPLA Limited. I was

Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Page 115

Location Code Location Distance (Km)w.r.t project site

Directionw.r.t. project site

S1 Project Site - -

S2 Jigani 1.0 WNW

S3 Doddathoguru 6.9 N

S4 Bommasandra 5.8 ENE

S5 Ramakrishnapura 4.7 E

S6 Byagadadenahalli 6.6 SE

S7 Indalavadi 5.8 SSW

S8 Hullahalli 5.5 NE

Page 147: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORTenvironmentclearance.nic.in/.../EIA/230520198KWR1Z7LEIAReport.pdf · Bengaluru Urban District & Karnataka State by M/s. CIPLA Limited. I was
Page 148: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORTenvironmentclearance.nic.in/.../EIA/230520198KWR1Z7LEIAReport.pdf · Bengaluru Urban District & Karnataka State by M/s. CIPLA Limited. I was

Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Page 117

Table 3-28: Soil Quality Monitoring Results

S.No Parameters Units S1 S2 S3 S4 S5 S6 S7 S8

1 Colour - Reddish Brown Brown LightBrown Dark Brown Light Brown Brown Brown Reddish

Brown Reddish Brown

2 Soil Texture - Sandy ClayLoam

Sandy ClayLoam Sandy Loam Sandy Loam Sandy Clay

LoamSandy Clay

LoamSandy Clay

Loam Loam

3 Sand % 53.0 65.0 72.0 72.0 67.0 63.0 66.0 46.04 Silt % 27.0 7.00 16.0 18.0 12.0 12.0 7.0 29.05 Clay % 20.0 28.0 12.0 10.0 21.0 25.0 27.0 25.06 pH - 7.32 7.35 5.26 6.80 7.56 7.74 7.53 8.66

7 ElectricalConductivity µmhos/cm 241 46.0 19.0 51.0 72.0 598 48.0 719

8 Infiltration Rate cm/hr 1.18 1.10 1.12 1.13 1.14 1.16 1.14 1.189 Bulk Density gm/cc 1.13 1.38 1.27 1.28 1.27 1.28 1.28 1.15

10 Cation ExchangeCapacity

meq/100gm 16.5 19.9 11.9 8.90 15.9 16.9 17.9 21.3

11 Moisture content % 14.02 10.46 9.81 9.92 5.95 13.09 11.6 4.92

12 Water HoldingCapacity % 39.0 26.0 24.0 25.0 30.0 28.0 27.0 22.0

13 Organic Carbon % 0.632 0.59 0.94 0.51 0.54 0.60 0.56 0.8714 Organic matter % 1.09 1.02 1.62 0.88 0.94 1.03 0.96 1.5015 Nitrogen as N kg/ha 275 396 72 252 432 288 108 54016 Phosphorus kg/ha 197 252 36 144 252 144 72 43217 Potassium kg/ha 189 194.4 86.4 172.8 237.6 194.4 86.4 32418 Calcium % 0.006 0.008 0.004 0.012 0.008 0.044 0.012 0.01219 Magnesium % 0.032 0.017 0.014 0.031 0.014 0.010 0.068 0.02020 Boron mg/kg 1.22 0.98 0.95 0.89 1.14 1.02 1.08 1.14

Page 149: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORTenvironmentclearance.nic.in/.../EIA/230520198KWR1Z7LEIAReport.pdf · Bengaluru Urban District & Karnataka State by M/s. CIPLA Limited. I was

Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Page 118

21 Cadmium mg/kg BDL( DL 0.1) BDL( DL 0.1)

BDL( DL 0.1)

BDL( DL 0.1)

BDL( DL 0.1)

BDL( DL 0.1)

BDL( DL 0.1)

BDL( DL 0.1)

22 Chromium mg/kg 0.04 0.02 0.021 0.028 0.03 0.05 0.011 0.02523 Copper mg/kg 11.3 8.54 11.6 10.4 7.39 11.8 21.6 6.724 Iron mg/kg 28.7 13.34 64.1 14.3 24.8 23.16 16.38 31.6

25 Lead mg/kg BDL( DL 0.1) BDL( DL 0.1)

BDL( DL 0.1)

BDL( DL 0.1) 2.1 2.87 3.78 1.62

26 Manganese mg/kg 3.20 4.5 1.1 2.4 6.2 1.14 5.6 0.9827 Zinc mg/kg 13.4 12.7 20.01 21.8 11.6 13.7 15.7 10.6

3.10.2 Results and Discussions

Summary of analytical results

The pH of the soil samples ranged from 5.26- 8.66 indicating that the soils are almost neutral in nature.

Conductivity of the soil samples ranged from 19-719 μS/cm. As the EC value is less than 2000 μS/cm, the soil is found to be non-saline

in nature

The water holding capacity of the soil samples varied from 22-39 (%).

Nitrogen content ranged from 72 kg/ha to 540 kg/ha

Phosphorous ranged from 36 to 432 kg/ha

Potassium content ranges from 86 to 324 kg/ha

Page 150: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORTenvironmentclearance.nic.in/.../EIA/230520198KWR1Z7LEIAReport.pdf · Bengaluru Urban District & Karnataka State by M/s. CIPLA Limited. I was

Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Page 119

3.11 Flora & Fauna

The study of terrestrial ecology within the study area of 10 Km radius has been carried out

through field investigation and satellite imagery data as discussed earlier

Bannerghatta National Park, near Bangalore, Karnataka, was founded within the 10 km study

area. The 65,127.5 acre (260.51 km2) national park is located about 22 km south of

Bangalore in the hills of the Anekal range with an elevation of 1245 - 1634m. The park has a

hilly terrain of granite sheets under moist deciduous forest valleys and scrubland on higher

areas. Sixteen villages border the park. The park is part of a wildlife corridor for elephants

which connects the BR Hills and the Sathyamangalam forest. The park is contiguous with

Talli reserve forest in the southeast and Bilikal forest in the south. It is a popular tourist

destination with a zoo, a pet corner, an animal rescue centre, a butterfly enclosure, a snake

house and a safari park. One hundred and one species of birds have been recorded in the

park.

A study reported 48 species of butterflies in various seasons at Bannerghatta Biological

Park. Thirty species of butterflies belong to five families viz., Papilionidae, Pieridae,

Nympalidae, Lycaenide and Hespiridae were breeding in different seasons under captive

conditions and released into the conservatory dome.The area can be classified into the

following ecological zone.

3.11.1 Flora

The field investigation and satellite imagery data show, that the study area is a mixture of

agricultural, wasteland and get irrigated by the tanks and tube wells. The Evergreen is

observed within the study area. The experimental finding of the pre monsoon season shows

the dominance of Scrubs like Anogeisses latifoila followed by Chloroxylon Swieritenia, Aacia

leucophloeatrees like Termila spp, Pterocarpus marusupium, Dalbergia latifolia, Serata,

Dendroca lamus Strictus within the study area. List of of flora reported/observed in the study

area is given in Table 3-29 and list of Fauna Reported/Observed in Bannerghatta National

Park is given in Table 3-30.

Table 3-29: List of Flora Reported/Observed in the Study Area

S.No Botanical Name Family Name Vernacular Name

1. Acacia Catechus Fabaceae Karungali2. Acacia leucophloea Mimosaceae Bellada, bili-jali3. Anogeisses latifoila Combretaceae Dinduga4. Chloroxylon Swieritenia Rutaceae Kloroksilan Svaiteniya5. Dalbergia latifolia Fabaceae Black rosewood,Blackwoodtree,Bombay

Page 151: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORTenvironmentclearance.nic.in/.../EIA/230520198KWR1Z7LEIAReport.pdf · Bengaluru Urban District & Karnataka State by M/s. CIPLA Limited. I was

Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Page 120

blackwood,East Indian reosewood, Indian blackwood6. Lagerstroemia speciosa Lythraceae Holenandi7. Plantago lanceolata Plantaginaceae Esabakolu, Esabgolu8. Pterocarpus Fabaceae Banga, Bange mara. Bengali9. Pterocarpus marusupium Fabaceae Malabarkino, Indiankino tree,vijayasar10. Shorea Talura Dipterocarpaceae aragina mara, bile bovu

Table 3-30: List of Fauna Reported/Observed in Bannerghatta National Park

S.No Botanical Name Family Name Common Name1. Acacia Catechus Fabaceae Karungali2. Azadirachta indica Meliaceae Neem3. Bambusoideae Poaceae Bamboo4. Bauhinia purpurea Caesalpiniaceae Purple orchid tree,Purple Butterfly Tree,5. Dendrocalamus Strictus Poaceae Bidiru, Kirubidiru,Konkani6. Eucalyptus Myrtaceae Blue gum tree7. Grewia tilaefolia Tiliaceae Dhaman8. Narcissus latifolia Amaryllidaceae Daffodil, daffadowndilly, narcissus, jonquil9. Peltphorum pterocarpum Fabaceae Yellow Flame, Copper Pod, Batai Laut10. Samanea saman Fabaceae Cow tamarind11. Santalum album Santalaceae white or East Indian sandalwood12. Schleichera oleosa Sapindaceae Malay Lac Tree13. T. arjuna Combretaceae White Marudah14. Tamarindus indica Fabaceae Tamarind15. Tectona Grandia Lamiaceae Saguvani16. Terminalai Spp Combretaceae Belli būdu marada17. Terminalia tomentosa Combretaceae Asan, Indian Laurel, Silver grey wood18. Terocarpus santalinus Fabaceae Agslue,Rakta Chandana& Honne

3.11.1.1 Aquatic Vegetation

Aquatic plants are found in the littoral zone, which are ideal habitats for fish and migratorybirds. The status of aquatic vegetation in various wetlands has been mapped, on the basis ofwhich it is broadly divided into completely vegetated (CV), partially vegetated (PV),vegetation on fringes (VF) and no vegetation (NV). Of the total 682 wetlands, 517 do notsupport any vegetation, of these 417 are tanks. There are 83 tanks partially vegetated, 54with vegetation on fringes and 7 are completely vegetated.

3.11.1.2 Planktons

Phytoplanktons surveyed are considered under five major groups:

S.NO Planktons Name

1 Bacillariophyceae (Diatoms):

2 Chlorophyceae:

3 Desmidiaciae (Desmids):

4 Dinophyceae:

Page 152: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORTenvironmentclearance.nic.in/.../EIA/230520198KWR1Z7LEIAReport.pdf · Bengaluru Urban District & Karnataka State by M/s. CIPLA Limited. I was

Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Page 121

5 Myxophyceae:

6 Ostracoda:

3.11.2 Fauna

Domestic – The domestic animals are mainly mammals like cow, goat, cat, dog etc arefound common in the study area.

Wild Animals – Since the natural forests constitute negligible of the forest area and sincethey are in isolated pockets, the wild life does not offer a wide spectrum of species. Wildanimals are seen in Bannerghatta National Park with native and non native species. Otherthan these, some reptiles and amphibians can also be seen with a number of bird species.

List of of fauna reported/observed in the study area is given in Table 3-31 and list of FaunaReported/Observed in Bannerghatta National Park is given in Table 3-32.

Table 3-31: List of Fauna Reported/Observed in the Study Area

Table 3-32: List of Fauna Reported/Observed in Bannerghatta National Park

Sl.No Scientific Name Family Name Common Name

Reptiles & Amphibians

1. Bufom lanostictus Bufonidae Toad

2. Calotes versicolor Agamidaa Garden lizard

3. Chameleo zeylanicus Chamaeleonidae Chamelton

4. Gecko sp. Eublepharidae Small wall lizard

5. Rana cyanophlyctis Dicroglossidae Frog

6. Rana tigrina Dicroglossidae. Frog

Rodents

7. Bandicota indica Muridae Badicoot

8. Musmusculus Muridae Mouse

9. Rattusrattus Muridae Rat

10. Ratufaindica Sciuridae Squirrel

Sl.No Scientific Name Family Name Common Name

Page 153: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORTenvironmentclearance.nic.in/.../EIA/230520198KWR1Z7LEIAReport.pdf · Bengaluru Urban District & Karnataka State by M/s. CIPLA Limited. I was

Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Page 122

Reptiles & Amphibians

1. Batagur baska Geoemydidae BatagarTerrapin,River Terrapin

2. Calman latrirostirs Alligatoridae Calman

3. Crocodylus moreletil Morelet’s Crocodile

4. Eryx johnii Russell Boidae Red Sand Boa Snakes

5. Gavialis gangeticus Gavialidae Gharial

6. Geochelone elegans Testudinidae Indian Starred Tortise

7. Geoclemys hamiltonii Geoemydidae Black Spotted Terrapins

8. Iguana Iguana Iguanidae Green iguana

9. Lissemys Punctata Trionychidae Indian mud or Flapshell Turtle

10. Naja naja Elapidae Indian Cobra

11. Ophiophagus hannah Elapidae King Cobra

12. Ptyas musosa Colubridae Rat Snake

13. Python molurus Pythonidae Indian Rock python

14. Trachemysscripta elegans Emydidae Red-eared Slider Turtles

15. Varanus bengalensis Varanidae Common Indian Monintor Lizard

16. Vipera russelli Viperidae Russells Viper

Mammales

17. Axis axis Cervidae Chital or Spotted Deer

18. Axis porcinus Animalia Hog Deer

19. Boselaphus tragocamelus Bovidae Nilgal or Blue Bull

20. Callithrix jacchus Callitrichidae Marmoset

21. Elephas maximus indicus Elephantidae Elephant Indian

22. Equus quagga Equidae Zebra

23. Erethizon dorsatum Erethizontidae Porcupine

Page 154: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORTenvironmentclearance.nic.in/.../EIA/230520198KWR1Z7LEIAReport.pdf · Bengaluru Urban District & Karnataka State by M/s. CIPLA Limited. I was

Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Page 123

3.11.2.1 Birds

Wetland and water birds make use of a variety of conditions, from dry zones and meadows

bordering lakes to open water zones. On the basis of their size, the availability of food and

suitable foraging conditions, different birds can occupy different parts of the lake. In

Bengaluru there are five major groups of water birds found based on the wetland zones they

frequent, Open water birds ,Waders and shoreline birds, Waders and shoreline birds, Birds

of reed bed and Birds of open air space above wetlands List of of birds reported/observed is

given in Table 3-33

Table 3-33: List of Birds Reported/Observed

24. Hippopotamus amphibius Hippopotamuses Hippopotamus

25. Hyaena hyaena Hyaenidae Striped Hyena

26. Melursus ursinus Ursidae Sloth Bear

27. Muntiacus Cervidae Barking Deer

28. Panthera leo Felidae Lion Hybrid

29. Panthera tigris sumatrae Felidae Surnatran Tiger

30. Panthera tigris tigris Felidae Royal Bengal Tiger

Sl.No Scientific Name Family Name Common Name

Birds Reported/Observed in the Study Area

1. Athene brama Strigidae Spotted owlet

2. Milvus migrans Accipitridae Pariya kite

3. Perdix perdix Phasianidae Patridge

Birds Reported/Observed in Bannerghatta National Park

4. Ploceus philippinus Ploceidae Baya Weaver

5. Melopsittacus undulatus Psittacidae Budgeriger

6. Nymphicus hollandicus Cacatuidae Cockatiels

7. Black-crowned night heron Ardeidae Heron Night

8. Eudocimus albus Threskiornithidae Ibis White

Page 155: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORTenvironmentclearance.nic.in/.../EIA/230520198KWR1Z7LEIAReport.pdf · Bengaluru Urban District & Karnataka State by M/s. CIPLA Limited. I was

Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Page 124

9. Agapornis Psittaculidae Love Birds

10. Lonchura atricapilla Estrildidae Munia Black Headed

11. Tyto alba Tytonidae Barn Owl

12. Bubo bubo Strigidae Eurasian Eagle Owl

13. Psittacula eupatria Psittaculidae Parakeet alexandrine

14. Psittacula krameri Psittaculidae Rose Ring parakeet

15. Pelecanus philippensis Pelecanidae Grey Pelican

16. Netta rufina Anatidae Red Crested Pochard

17. Mycteria leucocephala Ciconiidae Painted Stork

18. Chrysolophus pictus Phasianidae Yellow Golden Pheasant

19. Dromaius novaehollandiae Dromaiidae Emu

20. pavo cristatus Phasianidae White Peafowl

21. Chrysolophus amherstiae Phasianidae Lady Amherst’s Pheasant

22. Struthio camelus Struthionidae Ostrich

23. Phasianus colchicus Phasianidae Chinesering necked Pheasant

24. Cygnus atratus Anatidae Black swan

25. Lophura nycthemera Phasianidae Silver Pheasant

26. Ara chloropterus Psittacidae Green Winged Macaws

27. Rhea americana Rheidae Rhea

28. Amazona Psittacidae Amazon Parakeet

29. Psittacus erithacus Psittacidae African Grey Parrot

30. Aratinga solstitialis Psittacidae Sun Conure Parrot

31. Balearica pavonina Gruidae Black Crowned Crane

32. Ara ararauna Psittacidae Blue Gold Macaws

33. Probosciger aterrimus Gruidae Palm Cockatoo

34. Eclectus roratus Psittacidae Eclectus Parrot

Page 156: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORTenvironmentclearance.nic.in/.../EIA/230520198KWR1Z7LEIAReport.pdf · Bengaluru Urban District & Karnataka State by M/s. CIPLA Limited. I was

Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Page 125

3.12 Socio-economic profile of the Project Influence Area

Bangalore district is located in the sour eastern corner of Karnataka State. It has a

geographical area of 2196 sq.km. The district is land locked and shares its borders with

Bengaluru Rural district on the north and the east, and with the state of Tamil Nadu in the

south. The population of the district is 96,21,551. Of the total population,50,22,661 are males

and 45,98,890 are females as per 2011 Census. The district’s share of total Karnataka’s

population is 15.75 percent.

3.12.1 Socio economic Profile of the district

The district is unique in nature as more urbanized with rural population. The district is the

highest contributor to the State Economy with 33.3% contribution to GDDP (2012-13). The

per capita annual income in the district is INR 2,02,340 (2012-13).

The tertiary sector contributing 39.5% and secondary sector is contributing 36% and primary

sector is contributing 2.3% to GDP.

In rural areas Agriculture is main activities and Paddy, Ragi, Maize, oil seeds, Horticulture

crops are main crops of the district. The area has good infrastructure facilities for

transportation and storage and marketing of their agricultural products. District social

indicators are given in Table 3-34.

35. Cacatua galerita Cacatuidae Sulphur Crested Cockatoo

36. Ara macao Psittacidae Scarlet Macaw

37. Eolophus roseicapilla Cacatuinae Galah Parrot

38. Strix ocellata Strigidae Mottled wood owl

39. Trichoglossus moluccanus Psittaculidae Rainbow Lorikeet

40. Eos bornea Psittaculidae Red Lorikeet

41. Goura Columbidae Crowned Pegions

42. Psittacula columboides Psittacidae Blue Winged Parakeet

43. Buceros bicornis Bucerotidae Great Indian Horn Bill

44. Pavo cristatus Phasianidae Indian Peafowl

45. Plataleinae Threskiornithidae Spoon Bill

46. Lophura leucomelanos Phasianidae Kalij Pheasant

47. Gallus gallus Phasianidae Red Jungle Fowl

Page 157: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORTenvironmentclearance.nic.in/.../EIA/230520198KWR1Z7LEIAReport.pdf · Bengaluru Urban District & Karnataka State by M/s. CIPLA Limited. I was

Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Page 126

Table 3-34: Bengaluru Urban District Social Indicators

S.No Social Indicators Value1 Decadal variation 47.18%2 Urban population 90.94%3 Sex ratio 9164 Sex ratio for 0-6 age group 9445 Population density (per square Km) 43586 Scheduled caste population 22.93%7 Scheduled tribe population 3.26%8 Literacy rate 87.67%9 Work Participation rate 44.14%

10 Main Workers 40.10%11 Marginal Workers 4.04%12 Maternal maternity rate (per 100000 live births) 45 (2011-12)

13 Infant Mortality rate (the number of deaths of children less than oneyear of age per 1000 live births.

3 (2011-12)

Source: Census 2011 & Economic Survey 2015-16

3.12.2 Socio economic Profile of the study area

The project is located in KIADB Industrial Area, Bommasandra-Jigani link road, Anekal taluk

of Bangalore Urban District. The 10 Km radius covers almost a major portion of Anekal taluk

and some portion of Bangalore Corporation.

The project area comprises of urban and rural background. The taluk Anekal is

predominantly rural as 68% population in rural part of the taluk. Agriculture is one of the

main occupation in rural apart from Industries and Service sector. The area has more semi

and unskilled labour forces go to the other part of the district. Socioeconomic detail of the

study area is given in Table 3-35. Consultation photographs are given in Figure 3-31.

Exhibit 1: Govt. Primary School at Rajapura Exhibit 2: Interaction with people, at Rajapura

Page 158: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORTenvironmentclearance.nic.in/.../EIA/230520198KWR1Z7LEIAReport.pdf · Bengaluru Urban District & Karnataka State by M/s. CIPLA Limited. I was

Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Page 127

Exhibit 3: Interaction with public atRamakrishnapura

Exhibit 4: Socio economic survey atBommasandra

Exhibit 5: With a shop owner at Hullahalli Exhibit 6: Primary Agri. Credit Coop Society,Bukkasagara

Figure 3-31 Informal Consultation with Locals

Table 3-35: Socioeconomic details of the study area

Name of Villages Number of Household Total Population Male FemaleWithin 5 Km radiusBanahalli 1673 5819 3164 2655Bande Nalla Sandra 426 1348 836 512Bommasandra 4334 15254 8826 6428Dyavasandra 129 564 297 267Gollahalli 2160 7433 4631 2802Haragadde 2010 7735 4839 2896

Page 159: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORTenvironmentclearance.nic.in/.../EIA/230520198KWR1Z7LEIAReport.pdf · Bengaluru Urban District & Karnataka State by M/s. CIPLA Limited. I was

Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Page 128

Harapanahalli 817 3040 1670 1370Hebbagodi 9623 34827 20771 14056Hennagara 658 2801 1453 1348Hinnakki 311 1384 695 689Hosahalli 191 875 456 419Hulimangala 643 2787 1479 1308Jigani 4437 17036 9990 7046Kachanaikanahalli 1468 5606 2961 2645Kittaganahalli 2064 7280 3983 3297Konasandra 151 684 354 330Koppa 337 1474 753 721Koppa Gate 369 1415 721 694Kumbaranahalli 179 725 374 351Kyalasanahalli 547 1892 1039 853Lingapura 174 895 444 451Mada Patna 1092 4076 2569 1507Mahanthalingapura 622 2751 1429 1322Maragondahalli 2145 8824 4943 3881Masthena Halli 368 1506 775 731Nanjapura 103 405 194 211Nosenur 264 1165 620 545Nosenur Gollahalli 110 515 278 237Rajapura 200 912 473 439Ramakrishnapura 73 339 178 161S.Bingipura 463 1851 981 870Seethanaikana Halli 82 337 169 168Thirupalya 4251 14762 9433 5329Vaddara Palya 1231 4686 2835 1851Vaderamanchanahalli 778 2599 1735 864Veerasandra 2595 9190 5397 3793Yarandahalli 1472 5732 3465 2267Total 48550 180524 105210 75314Within 5 Km to 10 KmA Medihalli 105 451 236 215Adigondanahalli 324 1354 676 678Adur 150 717 368 349Agasa Thimmanahalli 5 22 14 8Ali Bommasandra 162 700 355 345Amani Doddakere 8 32 18 14Andapura 524 1769 951 818Anekal 10322 44260 22539 21721Aravantigepura 54 247 138 109Avadadenahalli 148 680 339 341Avalahalli 106 551 291 260Bagganadoddi 93 386 203 183

Page 160: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORTenvironmentclearance.nic.in/.../EIA/230520198KWR1Z7LEIAReport.pdf · Bengaluru Urban District & Karnataka State by M/s. CIPLA Limited. I was

Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Page 129

Balagaranahalli 1464 5447 3358 2089Bandapura 207 853 421 432Bannerughatta 2092 8054 4160 3894Begihalli 364 1412 731 681Bendiganahalli 183 658 342 316Bhovi Palya 1195 4379 2489 1890Bommandahalli 191 798 404 394Bukkasagara 435 1748 897 851Byagadadenahalli 272 1435 1004 431Byrappanahalli 121 486 252 234Chandapura 1240 4562 2461 2101Chandrapura -Chatrakane 1695 5934 3031 2903Chikka Hosahalli 280 1367 697 670Chikkanahalli 64 293 154 139Gollahalli 34 137 72 65Gowrenahalli 450 2226 1123 1103Guddahatti 380 1635 801 834Gulimangala 194 849 446 403Halesampigehalli 249 928 468 460Harapanahalli 817 3040 1670 1370Hasaruvani 4 17 10 7Honnakalasapura 105 494 253 241Huskur 612 2598 1317 1281Iggalur 1272 4702 2454 2248Indlawadi 439 1933 1000 933Itchangur 365 1347 832 515J.Bingipura 17 75 39 36Jangal Palya 141 520 247 273Kadajakkanahalli 125 566 293 273Kaggalipura 60 232 126 106Kalbalu 554 1979 1230 749Kalkere 770 2793 1761 1032Kammasandra Agrahara 153 664 316 348Karpur 327 2026 1047 979Kempavaderahalli 62 287 144 143Krishnasagara 141 594 324 270Laxmi Sagara 216 1007 512 495Madivala 634 2792 1399 1393Mantapa 343 1438 717 721Marasur 770 3034 1641 1393Marasur Agrahara 30 136 63 73Muthanallur 398 1663 822 841Muthanallur Amanikere 66 239 115 124Nallasandra 183 803 427 376Neralur 1500 5608 3217 2391

Page 161: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORTenvironmentclearance.nic.in/.../EIA/230520198KWR1Z7LEIAReport.pdf · Bengaluru Urban District & Karnataka State by M/s. CIPLA Limited. I was

Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Page 130

Ragihalli 402 1655 852 803Ramasagara 520 2199 1087 1112Sakalawara 204 827 424 403Sidihosakote 331 1591 830 761Sonnanayakanapura 277 1240 615 625Soppahalli 117 489 258 231Sriramapura 284 1162 595 567Suragajakkanahalli 308 1311 729 582Thattanahalli 220 923 490 433Thimmasandra 41 194 97 97Thirumagondanahalli 567 2107 1095 1012Vaderahalli 19 57 35 22BBMP part 21322 80037 42157 37880Total 57827 228749 120679 108070

Source: Census 2011

The percentage of male Child population (50.89%) is equal to female child population(49.11%). Child population details within the study area are given in Table 3-36.

Table 3-36: Child population within the study area

Village Name Child Population (0-6 age)

Male(<6 age)

Female(<6 age)

Within 5 KmBanahalli 669 329 340Bande Nalla Sandra 111 52 59Bommasandra 1722 881 841Dyavasandra 57 33 24Gollahalli 671 356 315Haragadde 772 395 377Harapanahalli 398 216 182Hebbagodi 3850 1904 1946Hennagara 367 190 177Hinnakki 171 80 91Hosahalli 115 52 63Hulimangala 320 163 157Jigani 2101 1114 987Kachanaikanahalli 637 332 305Kittaganahalli 815 439 376Konasandra 83 42 41Koppa 201 107 94Koppa Gate 230 116 114Kumbaranahalli 85 42 43Kyalasanahalli 191 100 91Lingapura 110 52 58Mada Patna 467 232 235

Page 162: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORTenvironmentclearance.nic.in/.../EIA/230520198KWR1Z7LEIAReport.pdf · Bengaluru Urban District & Karnataka State by M/s. CIPLA Limited. I was

Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Page 131

Mahanthalingapura 376 196 180Maragondahalli 1294 648 646Masthena Halli 169 91 78Nanjapura 45 20 25Nosenur 127 62 65Nosenur Gollahalli 46 28 18Rajapura 105 53 52Ramakrishnapura 63 34 29S.Bingipura 242 107 135Seethanaikana Halli 39 19 20Thirupalya 1251 646 605Vaddara Palya 597 292 305Vaderamanchanahalli 253 144 109Veerasandra 1029 532 497Yarandahalli 733 386 347Total 20512 10485 10027Within 5 Km to 10 KmA Medihalli 39 19 20Adigondanahalli 133 67 66Adur 77 31 46Agasa Thimmanahalli 3 2 1Ali Bommasandra 78 41 37Amani Doddakere 3 2 1Andapura 262 134 128Anekal 4803 2477 2326Aravantigepura 16 8 8Avadadenahalli 81 37 44Avalahalli 58 29 29Bagganadoddi 55 30 25Balagaranahalli 583 270 313Bandapura 82 45 37Bannerughatta 992 469 523Begihalli 154 75 79Bendiganahalli 92 46 46Bhovi Palya 496 257 239Bommandahalli 111 64 47Bukkasagara 224 114 110Byagadadenahalli 95 63 32Byrappanahalli 61 27 34Chandapura 584 290 294Chandrapura -Chatrakane 700 335 365Chikka Hosahalli 158 74 84Chikkanahalli 23 15 8Gollahalli 15 7 8Gowrenahalli 392 193 199

Page 163: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORTenvironmentclearance.nic.in/.../EIA/230520198KWR1Z7LEIAReport.pdf · Bengaluru Urban District & Karnataka State by M/s. CIPLA Limited. I was

Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Page 132

Guddahatti 184 88 96Gulimangala 92 48 44Halesampigehalli 120 55 65Harapanahalli 398 216 182Hasaruvani 4 3 1Honnakalasapura 55 23 32Huskur 281 138 143Iggalur 530 270 260Indlawadi 223 120 103Itchangur 161 78 83J.Bingipura 6 2 4Jangal Palya 31 14 17Kadajakkanahalli 69 34 35Kaggalipura 19 13 6Kalbalu 217 103 114Kalkere 281 151 130Kammasandra Agrahara 108 48 60Karpur 119 68 51Kempavaderahalli 34 15 19Krishnasagara 29 19 10Laxmi Sagara 146 74 72Madivala 318 164 154Mantapa 182 96 86Marasur 344 173 171Marasur Agrahara 12 7 5Muthanallur 136 66 70Muthanallur Amanikere 21 8 13Nallasandra 87 53 34Neralur 694 325 369Ragihalli 190 89 101Ramasagara 240 126 114Sakalawara 84 35 49Sidihosakote 164 89 75Sonnanayakanapura 183 86 97Soppahalli 62 31 31Sriramapura 189 99 90Suragajakkanahalli 153 81 72Thattanahalli 70 34 36Thimmasandra 19 7 12Thirumagondanahalli 247 126 121Vaderahalli 2 0 2BBMP part 10334 5306 5028Total 27208 13802 13406

Source: Census 2011

Page 164: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORTenvironmentclearance.nic.in/.../EIA/230520198KWR1Z7LEIAReport.pdf · Bengaluru Urban District & Karnataka State by M/s. CIPLA Limited. I was

Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Page 133

The majority of the population in the project area belongs to General Category (81.03%). The

scheduled caste and scheduled tribe population are 16.41% (22.93% of the district) and

2.55% (3.26% of the district). Social group details within the study area are given in Table3-37.

Table 3-37: Social group details within the study area

Village Name General Scheduledcaste Scheduled Tribe

With 5 KmBanahalli 5104 558 157Bande Nalla Sandra 987 355 6Bommasandra 13468 1512 274Dyavasandra 188 373 3Gollahalli 6561 552 320Haragadde 5790 1846 99Harapanahalli 2454 445 141Hebbagodi 29799 4134 894Hennagara 1995 753 53Hinnakki 915 377 92Hosahalli 443 411 21Hulimangala 1669 1065 53Jigani 14036 2480 520Kachanaikanahalli 4941 542 123Kittaganahalli 6211 868 201Konasandra 477 200 7Koppa 883 579 12Koppa Gate 599 721 95Kumbaranahalli 596 129 0Kyalasanahalli 1288 580 24Lingapura 392 154 349Mada Patna 3526 437 113Mahanthalingapura 1020 1475 256Maragondahalli 8196 494 134Masthena Halli 1253 240 13Nanjapura 219 180 6Nosenur 760 405 0Nosenur Gollahalli 387 19 109Rajapura 583 319 10Ramakrishnapura 132 182 25S.Bingipura 1016 826 9Seethanaikana Halli 251 61 25Thirupalya 11639 2486 637Vaddara Palya 2943 1666 77Vaderamanchanahalli 2032 368 199

Page 165: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORTenvironmentclearance.nic.in/.../EIA/230520198KWR1Z7LEIAReport.pdf · Bengaluru Urban District & Karnataka State by M/s. CIPLA Limited. I was

Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Page 134

Veerasandra 7822 1028 340Yarandahalli 4613 923 196Total 145188 29743 5593Witghin 5 Km to 10 KmA Medihalli 185 239 27Adigondanahalli 988 363 3Adur 340 377 0Agasa Thimmanahalli 22 0 0Ali Bommasandra 405 283 12Amani Doddakere 32 0 0Andapura 1704 20 45Anekal 38903 4833 524Aravantigepura 80 166 1Avadadenahalli 320 310 50Avalahalli 118 431 2Bagganadoddi 163 179 44Balagaranahalli 4837 489 121Bandapura 461 392 0Bannerughatta 6109 1835 110Begihalli 884 467 61Bendiganahalli 341 258 59Bhovi Palya 3468 729 182Bommandahalli 569 214 15Bukkasagara 999 636 113Byagadadenahalli 1013 353 69Byrappanahalli 434 50 2Chandapura 4000 502 60Chandrapura -Chatrakane 5409 429 96Chikka Hosahalli 955 403 9Chikkanahalli 232 20 41Gollahalli 132 5 0Gowrenahalli 1922 304 0Guddahatti 719 837 79Gulimangala 543 278 28Halesampigehalli 851 59 18Harapanahalli 2454 445 141Hasaruvani 17 0 0Honnakalasapura 331 154 9Huskur 1777 747 74Iggalur 3715 900 87Indlawadi 1504 345 84Itchangur 1015 324 8J.Bingipura 69 3 3Jangal Palya 514 6 0Kadajakkanahalli 375 95 96

Page 166: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORTenvironmentclearance.nic.in/.../EIA/230520198KWR1Z7LEIAReport.pdf · Bengaluru Urban District & Karnataka State by M/s. CIPLA Limited. I was

Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Page 135

Kaggalipura 155 23 54Kalbalu 1304 551 124Kalkere 2073 694 26Kammasandra Agrahara 291 302 71Karpur 1621 401 4Kempavaderahalli 135 147 5Krishnasagara 460 132 2Laxmi Sagara 777 201 29Madivala 1621 1144 27Mantapa 739 686 13Marasur 2206 791 37Marasur Agrahara 121 15 0Muthanallur 1086 549 28Muthanallur Amanikere 234 1 4Nallasandra 466 324 13Neralur 4938 542 128Ragihalli 929 485 241Ramasagara 1394 765 40Sakalawara 462 363 2Sidihosakote 1004 579 8Sonnanayakanapura 175 1065 0Soppahalli 159 329 1Sriramapura 797 308 57Suragajakkanahalli 1021 284 6Thattanahalli 519 393 11Thimmasandra 10 0 184Thirumagondanahalli 1426 598 83Vaderahalli 36 21 0BBMP part 71400 7262 1375Total 186468 37435 4846

3.12.2.1 Employment and Livelihood

Economic vibrancy in a area is shown by the type and nature of the occupation available in

the area. Of the total working population, the majority (91.46%) is the main workers i.e they

have study job more than six months per annum. It is due to the industrialization in the area.

The job opportunity is due to the development of Industrial and Service sectors. Only 10.28%

of working population involved in the agriculture and allied occupation (primary). Workers

group distribution in the study area is given in Table 3-38

Page 167: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORTenvironmentclearance.nic.in/.../EIA/230520198KWR1Z7LEIAReport.pdf · Bengaluru Urban District & Karnataka State by M/s. CIPLA Limited. I was
Page 168: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORTenvironmentclearance.nic.in/.../EIA/230520198KWR1Z7LEIAReport.pdf · Bengaluru Urban District & Karnataka State by M/s. CIPLA Limited. I was

Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Page 137

Table 3-38: Workers group distribution in the study area

Village Name TotalWorkers

MainWorkers

MarginalWorkers

AgricultureMainHousehold

MarginalHousehold

MainOthers

MarginalOthersMain

CultivatorsMainAgri.Labour

MarginalCultivators

MarginalAgrilabors

Within 5 Km radiusBanahalli 3032 2495 537 131 35 17 10 61 7 2268 503Bande Nalla Sandra 809 773 36 105 81 8 6 5 3 582 19Bommasandra 7993 7359 634 48 151 17 11 76 25 7084 581Gollahalli 5151 4988 163 56 40 24 3 43 2 4849 134Haragadde 4303 4215 88 180 143 8 4 27 1 3865 75Harapanahalli 1441 1389 52 86 39 12 0 14 1 1250 39Hebbagodi 20240 18863 1377 93 96 21 16 122 10 18552 1330Hennagara 1319 1275 44 207 184 7 6 69 2 815 29Hinnakki 514 224 290 24 14 8 29 9 80 177 173Hosahalli 407 397 10 44 6 1 0 11 5 336 4Hulimangala 1177 1139 38 74 53 7 6 13 1 999 24Jigani (CT) 8557 7923 634 83 473 11 28 225 48 7142 547Kachanaikanahalli 3646 2883 763 136 130 17 7 70 22 2547 717Kammasandra 5267 4671 596 180 407 42 51 108 18 3976 485Kittaganahalli 4073 3678 395 88 50 11 4 91 5 3449 375Koppa 631 601 30 110 72 5 6 16 2 403 17Koppa Gate 639 517 122 8 24 8 51 2 0 483 63Kyalasanahalli 922 824 98 120 98 1 20 46 21 560 56Lingapura 370 317 53 226 46 8 15 27 4 18 26Mada Patna 2396 2331 65 23 13 4 4 4 0 2291 57Maragondahalli 3777 3526 251 19 123 4 12 144 37 3240 198Masthena Halli 630 624 6 85 8 0 1 13 0 518 5

Page 169: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORTenvironmentclearance.nic.in/.../EIA/230520198KWR1Z7LEIAReport.pdf · Bengaluru Urban District & Karnataka State by M/s. CIPLA Limited. I was

Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Page 138

Nanjapura 151 145 6 46 5 1 1 3 0 91 4Rajapura 479 326 153 32 137 9 87 4 2 153 55Ramakrishnapura 187 162 25 4 2 1 1 4 0 152 23Ramasandra 169 156 13 22 48 0 7 16 0 70 6S.Bingipura 916 912 4 56 145 0 1 0 0 711 3Seethanaikana Halli 135 135 0 33 4 0 0 0 0 98 0Thirupalya 10726 9676 1050 155 67 38 27 84 74 9370 911Vaderamanchanahalli 1779 1741 38 51 14 4 0 6 1 1670 33Veerasandra 5726 5561 165 64 73 15 6 21 1 5403 143Yarandahalli 3392 3146 246 42 67 6 47 8 3 3029 190Total 101297 93322 3146 2826 303 546 1433 85917 7975 490 6636Within 5 Km to 10 KmA Medihalli 247 201 46 44 13 14 28 2 0 142 4Adigondanahalli 595 582 13 211 36 2 0 5 0 330 11Adur 257 232 25 57 49 3 13 4 0 122 9Agasa Thimmanahalli 13 13 0 1 5 0 0 1 0 6 0Ali Bommasandra 257 193 64 89 27 0 35 14 3 63 26Amani Doddakere 21 20 1 15 1 1 0 0 0 4 0Andapura 723 655 68 102 20 7 9 176 15 357 37Aravantigepura 200 199 1 47 126 0 0 3 0 23 1Avadadenahalli 292 292 0 61 15 0 0 0 0 216 0Avalahalli 239 220 19 37 92 2 7 4 0 87 10Bagganadoddi 212 168 44 97 61 3 40 0 1 10 0Balagaranahalli 3145 2987 158 62 18 8 1 1 1 2906 148Bandapura 416 276 140 116 81 8 17 8 14 71 101Bannerughatta 3491 3301 190 74 171 17 59 212 16 2844 98Begihalli 666 641 25 66 74 3 8 37 0 464 14Bendiganahalli 317 311 6 56 21 1 0 2 0 232 5

Page 170: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORTenvironmentclearance.nic.in/.../EIA/230520198KWR1Z7LEIAReport.pdf · Bengaluru Urban District & Karnataka State by M/s. CIPLA Limited. I was

Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Page 139

Bhovi Palya (Shanthi Pur) 2617 2545 72 33 13 4 4 6 2 2493 62Bommandahalli 352 352 0 91 135 0 0 2 0 124 0Bukkasagara 909 834 75 58 62 8 6 26 1 688 60Byagadadenahalli 1028 853 175 41 37 12 17 7 23 768 123Byrappanahalli 204 185 19 13 3 0 0 2 0 167 19Chandapura 2252 2133 119 131 265 18 13 70 16 1667 72Chandrapura -Chatrakane 2529 2396 133 74 24 17 0 16 4 2282 112Chikkanahalli 176 89 87 84 3 2 81 1 0 1 4Gollahalli 76 68 8 0 0 7 0 0 0 68 1Gowrenahalli 951 936 15 30 28 1 0 106 3 772 11Guddahatti 1040 658 382 125 107 14 51 51 27 375 290Gulimangala 438 249 189 59 27 37 62 12 19 151 71Halesampigehalli 427 408 19 26 16 2 0 0 0 366 17Harapanahalli 1441 1389 52 86 39 12 0 14 1 1250 39Hasaruvani 11 9 2 9 0 2 0 0 0 0 0Honnakalasapura 241 230 11 85 57 1 4 13 0 75 6Hullahalli 1672 1540 132 103 178 13 7 172 39 1087 73Huskur 1070 896 174 195 45 16 30 15 1 641 127Iggalur 2226 1970 256 192 309 15 15 100 15 1369 211Indlawadi 740 735 5 305 36 1 0 2 1 392 3Itchangur 823 737 86 128 105 1 0 1 0 503 85J.Bingipura 52 50 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 49 2Jangal Palya 357 226 131 194 3 3 2 7 37 22 89Kadajakkanahalli 243 229 14 93 17 1 10 3 0 116 3Kaggalipura 75 29 46 21 0 5 9 0 0 8 32Kalbalu 1201 1171 30 35 14 4 2 1 0 1121 24Kalkere 1204 787 417 12 8 14 6 6 1 761 396Kammasandra Agrahara 389 389 0 62 69 0 0 1 0 257 0

Page 171: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORTenvironmentclearance.nic.in/.../EIA/230520198KWR1Z7LEIAReport.pdf · Bengaluru Urban District & Karnataka State by M/s. CIPLA Limited. I was

Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Page 140

Kempavaderahalli 123 122 1 27 84 0 0 0 1 11 0Konasandra 397 366 31 97 14 1 2 37 0 218 28Krishnasagara 457 443 14 2 0 0 0 0 0 441 14Laxmi Sagara 445 444 1 83 9 0 0 3 1 349 0Madivala 1072 1042 30 446 317 12 14 5 0 274 4Mahanthalingapura 1387 1175 212 154 98 12 18 62 124 861 58Mantapa 684 658 26 89 44 2 7 60 4 465 13Marasur 1578 1559 19 179 132 2 2 11 0 1237 15Marasur Agrahara 54 38 16 22 3 1 0 2 0 11 15Muthanallur Amanikere 83 76 7 30 9 0 5 3 0 34 2Nallasandra 338 298 40 85 26 2 6 7 0 180 32Neralur 2797 2646 151 133 51 15 22 9 1 2453 113Ragihalli 765 564 201 229 124 35 97 4 2 207 67Ramasagara 1138 840 298 165 53 15 16 9 13 613 254Sakalawara 421 389 32 95 21 3 3 11 4 262 22Sidihosakote 923 713 210 392 127 9 192 15 1 179 8Sonnanayakanapura 542 534 8 100 155 2 1 4 3 275 2Soppahalli 221 221 0 68 120 0 0 0 0 33 0Sriramapura 484 332 152 3 0 4 2 3 1 326 145Suragajakkanahalli 592 582 10 98 83 1 1 13 0 388 8Thattanahalli 496 354 142 174 116 2 29 6 9 58 102Thimmasandra 101 65 36 62 1 0 25 0 6 2 5Thirumagondanahalli 1064 862 202 140 90 17 61 23 4 609 120Vaddara Palya 2675 2487 188 36 82 12 3 109 3 2260 170Vaderahalli 44 43 1 3 0 1 0 17 0 23 0BBMP (M Corp.) part 39729 35988 3741 266 1175 147 215 1183 94 33364 3285Total 108479 98544 7097 5750 578 1326 3403 82294 9935 533 7498

Page 172: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORTenvironmentclearance.nic.in/.../EIA/230520198KWR1Z7LEIAReport.pdf · Bengaluru Urban District & Karnataka State by M/s. CIPLA Limited. I was

Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Page 141

3.12.2.2 Industries within the study area

The area has more industrial estates with many leading industries are situated. Industrial

estates located within the study area are given in Table 3-39. List of Industries are given in

Table 3-40.

Table 3-39: Industrial estates within the study area

S.No Industrial Area Extent (Acres)1 Jigani I 182 Jigani II 163 Veerasandra Phase I 144 Veerasandra Phase II 105 Bommasandra Phase I 256 Bommasandra Phase II 107 Dyavasandra 30

Source: PWC

Table 3-40: List of major Industries within the study area

S.No. Industries Location1 Mallik Engineering Jigani2 PS Paints & Coats Pvt Ltd Jigani3 Shashi Bio-energy Products Jigani4 Shree Shiv Granites Jigani5 J’Pan Tubular Components Jigani6 Aron Universal Ltd. Jigani7 Hikal Ltd. Jigani8 OTIS Jigani9 Kirloskar Toyota textile machinery Pvt. Ltd. Jigani10 Bill Forge Pvt Ltd Jigani11 Kumar Organics Pvt. Ltd. Jigani12 Cipla Limited Jigani13 Mylan Limited Jigani14 Micropack Jigani15 HCL Technologies Jigani16 Microbabs Jigani17 Rich core Life sciences Pvt Ltd Jigani - Bommasandra Link Road18 BIOCON Jigani19 Strides Shasun Limited Suragajakkanahalli20 Apotex Pharmachem Jigani – Bommasandra Link Road21 Sigma Aldrich Jigani – Bommasandra Link Road22 Anthem Bioscience Pvt Ltd Bommasandra23 Ansell Jigani – Bommasandra Link Road24 Sansera Engineering Pvt Ltd Jigani – Bommasandra Link Road

3.12.2.3 Health Facilities within the study area

The public and private health facility is available in the study area. The proliferation of private

hospitals and clinics due to affordability, health awareness, education etc. Health facilities

available in Anekal taluk is given in Table 3-41.Table 3-41: Health facilities available in Anekal Taluk

Page 173: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORTenvironmentclearance.nic.in/.../EIA/230520198KWR1Z7LEIAReport.pdf · Bengaluru Urban District & Karnataka State by M/s. CIPLA Limited. I was

Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Page 142

Taluk Hospitals Community HealthCentre PHCs

Anekal Anekal

AnekalAttibeleDommasandraJiganiSarjapuraMarsurChandapuraHaragaddeHebbgodiMahantalingapura

Source: Health & family welfare department, Govt. of Karnataka

The public health facilities like sub centers and primary health centers, ambulance services

are available.

The respiratory and skin related diseases are common health problems in any industrilzed

area. People are complaining such issues during our interaction with them. The occupational

and diseases due to the pollution are the main problem in the area. The air pollution due to

the vehicle movement is more intense than the industrial pollution.

Accident is another issue due to the growing vehicular movement.

It has been observed that the ground water is depleted due to the over exploitation for

domestic and industrial purpose. So the groundwater is contaminated with more toxic

chemicals in addition to the pollution caused by the industries. Consumption of untreated

water will create water-borne disease like Diarrhea, Typhoid, Filariasis.

Sexually transmitted diseases (STI), HIV/AIDS are responsible for an enormous burden of

morbidity and mortality in the industrial area as migrants from different locations and

availability of opportunities. The uncared and uncontrolled behavior change is causing a big

social stigma in the industrial area. The concerned authority and industries are responsible

for intervention and counseling.

The other major health issue is mental health due to the stress, migration, unable to

adaptability of new environments, windfall gain from assets. Also it increases the crime rate.

The accessibility of maternity centers and awareness made people use institutional delivery

system. For understanding health profile of Anekal taluk, the health indicators are given in

Table 3-42.Table 3-42: Health profile of Anekal Taluk

Page 174: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORTenvironmentclearance.nic.in/.../EIA/230520198KWR1Z7LEIAReport.pdf · Bengaluru Urban District & Karnataka State by M/s. CIPLA Limited. I was

Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Page 143

Indicators for Composite Taluk Development IndexIndicators Anekal Taluk DistrictSex ratio (no. of females per 1000males)

835 916

Maternal Mortality rate 73 73Percentage of Institutional delivery 100 99.9Percentage Children fully immunised 78.6 100

Availability of Doctors per 1000 people 0.741 0.091

Source: Human Development report 2014

3.12.2.4 Sanitation Facilities & Drinking water facilities within the Study Area

The main source of drinking water is from Tap water and Bore well. The consumption of safe

drinking water is fully followed. In case of sanitation, access to the sanitary facility (toilets) is

not fully available. Village wise sanitation & drinking water facilities within the study area are

given in Table 3-43

Page 175: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORTenvironmentclearance.nic.in/.../EIA/230520198KWR1Z7LEIAReport.pdf · Bengaluru Urban District & Karnataka State by M/s. CIPLA Limited. I was

Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Page 144

Table 3-43: Village wise sanitation & drinking water facilities within the study area

Village Name

Main Source of Drinking WaterToiletfacility

Tapwaterfrom treatedsource

Tapwaterfromun-treatedsource

Coveredwell

Un-coveredwell Handpump Tubewell/Bor

ehole Spring River/Canal

Tank/Pond/Lake

Othersources

Within 5 KmBanahalli 2.9 87.3 0 0 0 9.8 0 0 0 0 30.4Bande Nalla Sandra 0.6 99.2 0.2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 98Bommasandra 38.3 4.4 1.3 0.1 1.4 54.2 0 0 0 0.1 90.8Chikka Hosahalli 0.7 96.4 0 0.4 0 2.6 0 0 0 0 47.8Dyavasandra 15.4 59.2 7.7 0 0 16.9 0 0 0 0.8 36.2Gollahalli 19.1 10.6 0 0 0 14.9 0 0 0 55.3 44.7Haragadde 31.7 25.7 0.1 0 0 41.8 0.1 0 0 0.6 92.5Harapanahalli 13.2 31.7 0 0 3.8 44.6 0 0.6 0 6 94.9Hebbagodi 31.6 31.8 0.4 0 0.1 29.6 0 0 0 6.4 98.8Hennagara 23.8 22.5 0 0 0.2 53.6 0 0 0 0 74.4Hinnakki 74.9 22 0.7 0 2.1 0.3 0 0 0 0 67.2Hosahalli 0 0 0 0 0 98.9 0 0 0 1.1 55.2Hulimangala 49.1 12.4 0.5 0 0 37.7 0 0 0 0.3 50.4Jigani 43.2 25.2 1.1 0.6 1.1 26.3 0 0 0 2.4 96.3Kachanaikanahalli 72.1 8.8 0.1 0.1 0 18.7 0.1 0.1 0 0.1 90.5Karpur 35.8 64.2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 60.8Kittaganahalli 52.8 9 0.1 0.1 0.7 37 0.1 0 0 0.4 96.4Konasandra 0 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 56.7Koppa 4.3 93.3 0 0 0 1.8 0.6 0 0 0 81.2Koppa Gate 0.3 98.7 0 0 0 0.5 0 0 0.5 0 52.8Kumbaranahalli 1.1 54.6 0 0 0 43.1 0 0 0 1.1 52.9Kyalasanahalli 4 4.8 5.9 3 5.7 75.6 0 0.2 0 0.8 48.7Lingapura 89 9.8 0 0 0.6 0 0 0 0 0.6 29.3

Page 176: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORTenvironmentclearance.nic.in/.../EIA/230520198KWR1Z7LEIAReport.pdf · Bengaluru Urban District & Karnataka State by M/s. CIPLA Limited. I was

Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Page 145

Mada Patna 19.6 35.6 0 0.1 0 21.6 0 0 0 23 95.9Mahanthalingapura 28.7 62.9 0 0 0 5.6 0 0 0.3 2.5 47.6Maragondahalli 25.2 42.2 10.5 0.1 0.1 22 0 0 0.1 0 94.3Masthena Halli 71.2 10.4 3 0 0 9.3 0 0 0 6 79.4Muthanallur 36.2 37.8 2.1 0 0.2 23.7 0 0 0 0 65.1Nanjapura 8.6 81 0 0 0 10.5 0 0 0 0 39Nosenur 49.6 50.4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 70.9Nosenur Gollahalli 0.9 81.2 0 0 0 17.9 0 0 0 0 14.3Rajapura 0 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 47.1Ramakrishnapura 12.1 87.9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 39.4S.Bingipura 8.9 1.4 0.2 0 3.8 81.6 0 0 0 4.1 43.3Seethanaikana Halli 62.7 1.2 10.8 0 0 22.9 0 0 0 2.4 47Thirupalya 31.2 39.6 0.5 0 0.1 22.5 0.1 0 0 5.9 79.8Vaddara Palya 75.4 10.2 0 0 0 13.2 0.1 0 0 1.1 84.8Vaderamanchanahalli 4.1 23.3 0 3.3 6.8 61.9 0 0.1 0 0.5 90.4Veerasandra 40 28.7 0 0 1.3 29.6 0.1 0 0 0.2 94Yarandahalli 34.9 1.3 0.2 0.1 4.1 51.6 5.5 0.1 0 2.3 91.7Within 5 Km to 10 kmA Medihalli 1 87.5 0 0 0 11.5 0 0 0 0 16.3Adigondanahalli 76.6 10.9 0 0 0 12.1 0 0 0 0.3 53.9Adur 65.6 30.6 0 0 0.6 3.2 0 0 0 0 34.4Agasa Thimmanahalli 0 0 0 0 0 100 0 0 0 0 60Ali Bommasandra 0 76.9 0 0 0 23.1 0 0 0 0 48Amani Doddakere 0 66.7 0 0 0 33.3 0 0 0 0 59.8Andapura 94.9 1.6 0.9 0.5 0 2 0 0 0 0 95.8Anekal (TMC) 35.1 53.8 0.2 0 0.1 8.2 0 0 0 2.5 94.6Aravantigepura 9.1 43.6 34.5 0 10.9 1.8 0 0 0 0 49.1Avadadenahalli 0 58.3 0 0 0 41.7 0 0 0 0 30.1

Page 177: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORTenvironmentclearance.nic.in/.../EIA/230520198KWR1Z7LEIAReport.pdf · Bengaluru Urban District & Karnataka State by M/s. CIPLA Limited. I was

Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Page 146

Avalahalli 0.9 94.3 0 0 0 4.7 0 0 0 0 80.2Bagganadoddi 2 94.1 0 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 12.9Balagaranahalli 6.1 68.3 0.1 0 0 25.2 0 0.1 0.1 0.1 93.9Bandapura 0 95.3 2.6 0 0 1.7 0 0 0 0.4 60.9Bannerughatta 40.7 41.7 0 1.1 0 15.7 0.1 0 0 0.8 85.4Begihalli 77.5 6 0.6 0.6 7.1 7.1 0 0 0 1.1 57Bendiganahalli 0 82.3 0 0 0 16.6 0 0 0 1.1 58Bhovi Palya (Shanthi Pur) 27.3 55.8 0.1 0 3.3 2.6 0 0 0 10.8 85.8Bommandahalli 3.4 78.7 0.6 0 0 17.2 0 0 0 0 47.1Bukkasagara 66.4 19.4 0 0 0.2 13.7 0.2 0 0 0 78Byagadadenahalli 78.6 9.1 0 0 0 11.8 0 0 0 0.5 48.1Byrappanahalli 97.2 1.7 0 0.6 0.6 0 0 0 0 0 96Chandapura 34.6 5.2 0 0.2 0.3 59.4 0 0.2 0 0 92.3Chandrapura -Chatrakane 11.9 15.9 0.1 0.1 0 39.7 0 0.1 3.4 28.8 96.5Chikkanahalli 1.3 78.9 0 0 0 19.7 0 0 0 0 55.3Gollahalli 19.1 10.6 0 0 0 14.9 0 0 0 55.3 44.7Gowrenahalli 0.9 96.9 0 0 1.8 0.4 0 0 0 0 82Guddahatti 2.4 51.6 0 0 0 46 0 0 0 0 60.5Gulimangala 35.2 19.9 1.7 0 0.6 42.6 0 0 0 0 64.2Halesampigehalli 88 5 0 0 0 6.9 0 0 0 0 89.6Harapanahalli 13.2 31.7 0 0 3.8 44.6 0 0.6 0 6 94.9Hasaruvani 0 0 0 0 0 100 0 0 0 0 0Honnakalasapura 2.9 83.7 0 0 12.5 1 0 0 0 0 37.5Hullahalli 18.4 54.5 0.4 0.3 20.2 4.4 0.3 0.1 0.1 1.3 57.2Huskur 30.3 31.3 0 0 1.2 36.9 0 0 0 0.3 87.2Iggalur 38.4 42.8 0.2 0 0 18.4 0 0 0 0.1 79.2Indlawadi 1.8 93.1 0 0 0 5.1 0 0 0 0 43.6Itchangur 0 0 0 0 0 99.7 0 0.3 0 0 62.6

Page 178: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORTenvironmentclearance.nic.in/.../EIA/230520198KWR1Z7LEIAReport.pdf · Bengaluru Urban District & Karnataka State by M/s. CIPLA Limited. I was

Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Page 147

J.Bingipura 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100Jangal Palya 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100Kadajakkanahalli 13.9 0 0 0 0 84.4 0 0 1.6 0 28.7Kaggalipura 1.7 46.6 0 0 0 51.7 0 0 0 0 64.7Kalbalu 6.6 86.7 0 0 6.4 0.2 0 0 0 0 51.4Kalkere 30.2 1.1 0 0 0 68.7 0 0 0 0 68.7Kammasandra Agrahara 0 86.3 0 0 0 13.7 0 0 0 0 32.4Kempavaderahalli 75.6 24.4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 52.6Krishnasagara 35.3 47.6 0 0 0 15.9 1.2 0 0 0 66.5Laxmi Sagara 94.4 0.4 0 0 0 5.2 0 0 0 0 35.5Madivala 12.2 38.7 0 0 0 48.3 0 0.2 0 0.6 51Mahanthalingapura 28.7 62.9 0 0 0 5.6 0 0 0.3 2.5 47.6Mantapa 30 53.2 0 0 1.4 11.6 0 0 0 3.9 71.3Marasur 25 61.1 0 0 0 13.9 0 0 0 0 72.2Marasur Agrahara 26.9 69.2 3.8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100Muthanallur Amanikere 0 83.1 0 0 0 16.9 0 0 0 0 92.1Nallasandra 29 54.3 0.5 0 0 16.1 0 0 0 0 66.1Neralur 10.2 11.6 1.5 0 0.1 76.5 0 0.1 0 0.1 88.7Ragihalli 61.6 4.8 1.2 0 0 32.2 0 0.2 0 0 38.2Ramasagara 19.5 54.7 0.2 1.1 0 23.3 0 0 0.4 0.8 79Sakalawara 19.4 69.9 0.5 0 0 8.7 0 0.5 0 1 54.9Sidihosakote 0.9 92.6 0 0 0 6.1 0 0 0 0.4 39.1Sonnanayakanapura 64.8 26.3 1.7 1.4 3.1 1.7 0 0 0 1 32.1Soppahalli 99.2 0.8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 31.4Sriramapura 4.3 47.4 0.9 0 42.2 4.3 0 0.4 0.4 0 94.8Suragajakkanahalli 10.6 59.5 0 0 0 28 0 0.3 0 1.6 86.2Thattanahalli 0 87.7 0.4 0 0 9.1 0 0 0 2.9 25.5Thimmasandra 0 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5

Page 179: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORTenvironmentclearance.nic.in/.../EIA/230520198KWR1Z7LEIAReport.pdf · Bengaluru Urban District & Karnataka State by M/s. CIPLA Limited. I was

Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Page 148

Thirumagondanahalli 24.7 43.9 0 0 0 31.1 0 0 0 0.3 58.7Vaderahalli 0 0 0 0 0 100 0 0 0 0 71.4BBMP part 24.7 43.9 0 0 0 31.1 0 0 0 0.3 96.4

Page 180: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORTenvironmentclearance.nic.in/.../EIA/230520198KWR1Z7LEIAReport.pdf · Bengaluru Urban District & Karnataka State by M/s. CIPLA Limited. I was

Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Page 149

3.12.2.5 Education facilities

The study area has a higher literacy rate due to the urbanization and industrialization of the

area. The main reasons are the accessibility to the primary education and higher education.

The literacy rate of the area is 83.74. The dropout rate is low due to the awareness of the

importance of the education. The dropout rate in elementary education is 0.2 (Anekal taluk).

Literacy details within the study area are given in Table 3-44.

Table 3-44: Literacy details within the study area

Village Name No. of Literates Percentage

Within 5 KmBanahalli 4476 86.91Bande Nalla Sandra 1032 83.43Bommasandra 12104 89.45Dyavasandra 393 77.51Gollahalli 6236 92.22Haragadde 5876 84.39Harapanahalli 2218 83.95Hebbagodi 28258 91.22Hennagara 2048 84.14Hinnakki 826 68.10Hosahalli 553 72.76Hulimangala 1840 74.58Jigani 12859 86.10Kachanaikanahalli 4221 84.95Kittaganahalli 5465 84.53Konasandra 466 77.54Koppa 1022 80.28Koppa Gate 823 69.45Kumbaranahalli 497 77.66Kyalasanahalli 1308 76.90Lingapura 600 76.43Mada Patna 3100 85.90Mahanthalingapura 1417 59.66Maragondahalli 5906 78.43Masthena Halli 1027 76.81Nanjapura 219 60.83Nosenur 763 73.51Nosenur Gollahalli 369 78.68Rajapura 634 78.56Ramakrishnapura 158 57.25S.Bingipura 1070 66.50Seethanaikana Halli 216 72.48

Page 181: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORTenvironmentclearance.nic.in/.../EIA/230520198KWR1Z7LEIAReport.pdf · Bengaluru Urban District & Karnataka State by M/s. CIPLA Limited. I was

Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Page 150

Thirupalya 11765 87.08Vaddara Palya 3151 77.06Vaderamanchanahalli 1992 84.91Veerasandra 7156 87.69Yarandahalli 4340 86.82Within 5 Km to 10 KmA Medihalli 307 74.51Adigondanahalli 925 75.76Adur 474 74.06Agasa Thimmanahalli 15 78.95Ali Bommasandra 467 75.08Amani Doddakere 19 65.52Andapura 1166 77.37Anekal 32268 81.78Aravantigepura 144 62.34Avadadenahalli 398 66.44Avalahalli 364 73.83Bagganadoddi 171 51.66Balagaranahalli 4215 86.66Bandapura 576 74.71Bannerughatta 5745 81.35Begihalli 908 72.18Bendiganahalli 414 73.14Bhovi Palya 3148 81.07Bommandahalli 433 63.03Bukkasagara 1204 79.00Byagadadenahalli 1155 86.19Byrappanahalli 293 68.94Chandapura 3428 86.17Chandrapura -Chatrakane 4822 92.13Chikka Hosahalli 859 71.05Chikkanahalli 147 54.44Gollahalli 78 63.93Gowrenahalli 1169 63.74Guddahatti 1064 73.33Gulimangala 596 78.73Halesampigehalli 668 82.67Harapanahalli 2218 83.95Hasaruvani 10 76.92Honnakalasapura 265 60.36Huskur 1819 78.51Iggalur 3607 86.46Indlawadi 1186 69.36Itchangur 930 78.41J.Bingipura 57 82.61

Page 182: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORTenvironmentclearance.nic.in/.../EIA/230520198KWR1Z7LEIAReport.pdf · Bengaluru Urban District & Karnataka State by M/s. CIPLA Limited. I was

Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Page 151

Jangal Palya 311 63.60Kadajakkanahalli 349 70.22Kaggalipura 170 79.81Kalbalu 1376 78.09Kalkere 2095 83.40Kammasandra Agrahara 343 61.69Karpur 1558 81.70Kempavaderahalli 158 62.45Krishnasagara 445 78.76Laxmi Sagara 641 74.45Madivala 1846 74.62Mantapa 997 79.38Marasur 2170 80.67Marasur Agrahara 100 80.65Muthanallur 1143 74.85Muthanallur Amanikere 178 81.65Nallasandra 544 75.98Neralur 4292 87.34Ragihalli 867 59.18Ramasagara 1553 79.28Sakalawara 546 73.49Sidihosakote 1044 73.16Sonnanayakanapura 580 54.87Soppahalli 261 61.12Sriramapura 809 83.14Suragajakkanahalli 893 77.12Thattanahalli 590 69.17Thimmasandra 111 63.43Thirumagondanahalli 1508 81.08Vaderahalli 39 70.91BBMP part 61098 87.65

Source: Census 2011

The available education infrastructure (Block level information about schools in the Anekal

Block based on DISE 2015-16 data is given in Table 3-45.

Table 3-45: Schools in Anekal Block including both public and private management

Prim

ary o

nly

Prim

ary w

ithUp

per P

rimar

y

Prim

ary w

ithUp

per P

rimar

y Sec

and H

.Sec

Uppe

r Prim

ary +

Sec a

nd H

.Sec

Prim

aryw

ithUp

per

Prim

ary&

Sec.

Uppe

rPrim

aryw

ithSe

c

Sec o

nly

Hr.S

ecOn

ly/Jr.

Colle

ge Total

190 179 17 1 80 4 39 2 5123.12.2.6 Other infrastructure facilities

Page 183: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORTenvironmentclearance.nic.in/.../EIA/230520198KWR1Z7LEIAReport.pdf · Bengaluru Urban District & Karnataka State by M/s. CIPLA Limited. I was

Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Page 152

The common parks, gardens, play grounds are available in the project area, but it is not

sufficient for the growing population. The open space required for the children and elder

citizens to move around and for outdoor activity. It is very important for maintaining human

health, so that it will strengthen the foundation of the society. Industries can contribute in

developing and maintaining the parks, garden and open space as environmental and social

activity. The area has traditionally enjoying open space and space for playing, but the

haphazard developments will deter such facility. There are ample opportunities in the study

area for developing tree avenues. As the urbanization is happening, the same time the road

infrastructure is being developed for the man and materials being transported from up

country area. The issue is the roads are getting damaged as the high vehicular movement.

The length of the roads in Anekal taluk is given in Table 3-46.

Table 3-46 : Details of roads in Anekal taluk

National Highway State Highway Major District Road26 67.8 109.37

The area needs more passenger shelters at bus stops and appropriate road signs to be

placed at conspicuous places.

Summary of socioeconomic indicators within the study area is given in Table 3-47.Table 3-47: Summary of socioeconomic Indicators within the Study area

S.No Particulars Study Area Unit1 Number of villages in the Study Area 109 Nos.

2 Total Households 85055 Nos.

3 Total Population 329236 Nos.

4 Children Population (<6 Years Old) 37386 Nos.5 SC Population 67178 Nos.6 ST Population 10439 Nos.7 Total Working Population 209776 Nos.8 Main Workers 191866 Nos.9 Marginal Workers 17910 Nos.

10 Agricultural Workers 21572 Nos.11 Household Industries 5859 Nos.12 Other Workers 182345 Nos.13 Institutional Birth Rate 100 Percentage

14 Childhood Immunization 78.6 Percentage

15 Literates 302751 Nos.

Page 184: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORTenvironmentclearance.nic.in/.../EIA/230520198KWR1Z7LEIAReport.pdf · Bengaluru Urban District & Karnataka State by M/s. CIPLA Limited. I was

Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Page 153

Figure 3-32 Map Showing the Study area of the Project in Figure FD 0301

Page 185: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORTenvironmentclearance.nic.in/.../EIA/230520198KWR1Z7LEIAReport.pdf · Bengaluru Urban District & Karnataka State by M/s. CIPLA Limited. I was

Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Page 154

Figure 3-33 Map Showing the Air monitoring locations in FigureFD0302

Page 186: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORTenvironmentclearance.nic.in/.../EIA/230520198KWR1Z7LEIAReport.pdf · Bengaluru Urban District & Karnataka State by M/s. CIPLA Limited. I was

Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Page 155

Figure 3-34 Map Showing the Noise monitoring locations in FigureFD0303

Page 187: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORTenvironmentclearance.nic.in/.../EIA/230520198KWR1Z7LEIAReport.pdf · Bengaluru Urban District & Karnataka State by M/s. CIPLA Limited. I was

Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Page 156

Figure 3-35 Map Showing the Ground Water & Surface Water monitoring locations in FigureFD0304

Page 188: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORTenvironmentclearance.nic.in/.../EIA/230520198KWR1Z7LEIAReport.pdf · Bengaluru Urban District & Karnataka State by M/s. CIPLA Limited. I was

Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Page 157

Figure 3-36 Map Showing the Soil monitoring locations in Figure FD0305

Page 189: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORTenvironmentclearance.nic.in/.../EIA/230520198KWR1Z7LEIAReport.pdf · Bengaluru Urban District & Karnataka State by M/s. CIPLA Limited. I was

Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Page 158

CHAPTER – 4ANTICIPATED ENVIRONMENTAL

IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES

Page 190: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORTenvironmentclearance.nic.in/.../EIA/230520198KWR1Z7LEIAReport.pdf · Bengaluru Urban District & Karnataka State by M/s. CIPLA Limited. I was

Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Page 159

4 ANTICIPATED ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS AND MITIGATIONMEASURES

4.1 General

Environmental Impact is any change in the environmental attributes, adverse or beneficial,

caused or induced by the proposed action or set of actions. The predicted adverse impacts

during each stage of project development are superimposed over the baseline status of the

existing environmental quality to infer the scenario of environmental conditions in the post-

project stage. The main purpose of identifying the impacts is that it helps in adopting appropriate

mitigation measures for the adverse consequences if any.

It also addresses the prediction and evaluation of the various significant impacts that are likely

to occur. The impacts on the environmental indices viz. air, water, soil, noise, biological and

socioeconomic conditions are scrutinized methodically and assessed. The most likely impacts

on the environment due to the proposed project need to be appraised during the operation

phase. The particulars on impacts that could be triggered on the environmental attributes by the

activities of the proposed project are discussed below.

4.2 Construction Phase

The total built up area is divided into various sections like production blocks, Engineering,

warehouse, Administration, canteen, toilets etc. There is adequate space and provision for

operations. The plant facilities have been designed and set up with the objective to carry out all

chemical reactions and processes.

As the entire infrastructure needed for expansion is already available there is no demand of any

further infrastructure. In the existing facility only proposed products will be manufactured and no

other construction activities So there is no any impact on Land, Air, Water, Noise, Soil &

Ecology Environment during change in product mix

4.3 Operation Phase

From an environmental perspective, this phase is of paramount significance due to its potential

to invoke long-term impacts. The adverse effects that are likely to occur during this operational

Page 191: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORTenvironmentclearance.nic.in/.../EIA/230520198KWR1Z7LEIAReport.pdf · Bengaluru Urban District & Karnataka State by M/s. CIPLA Limited. I was

Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Page 160

phase of the project are: Air Pollution (gaseous emissions), Effluent generation, noise

generation, solid waste generation.

4.3.1 Air Environment

Base line data reveals that ambient air quality in the study area for the Parameters PM, SO2 &

NO2, are well within the permissible Limits as prescribed by the National Ambient Air Quality

Standards (NAAQS) for Industrial Area, Residential, Rural & Other areas.

The major air pollution sources from the industry are DG sets, boilers and reactors. The DG set

and boiler sources are provided with stacks of adequate height so as to disperse the emanating

flue gases containing suspended particulate matter, oxides of sulfur and nitrogen & TVOC, HC

without affecting the ground level concentrations. The emissions generated from the reactors

are scrubbed out by wet scrubbers.

4.3.1.1 Study Area

CIPLA is a global pharmaceutical company whose goal is to ensure that no patient shall be

denied access to high quality & affordable medicine and support. The current study area is

ideally positioned at Jigani industrial area, Bangalore, Karnataka shown in Figure 4-1.

Page 192: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORTenvironmentclearance.nic.in/.../EIA/230520198KWR1Z7LEIAReport.pdf · Bengaluru Urban District & Karnataka State by M/s. CIPLA Limited. I was

Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Page 161

Figure 4-1 Study area showing the Stacks and DG set location in CIPLA boundary

4.3.1.2 Objective

The objective of this study is to evaluate the ambient air quality due to emission of gaseous

pollutant from Existing stacks for the study period (Sep to Nov 2016) by using numerical

simulation methods. By using these methods we can determine the maximum ground level

concentrations (GLC) for various air pollutants through air dispersion modeling technique. The

maximum GLC’s would then be utilized to assess the extent and magnitude of potential air

quality and its impact resulting from the emissions from the existing stack of CIPLA.

4.3.1.3 Meteorological Data

In order to understand the wind pattern of the study region wind-rose diagram was plotted using

WRPLOT Figure 4-2. Over this period the predominant wind direction was between E and NE

with 6.7% calm conditions. The metrological data for the month of November 2016 is considered

for GLC modeling for evaluating ambient air quality. The various parameters like temperature,

pressure, wind speed, wind direction etc., were considered and taken from secondary sources.

Page 193: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORTenvironmentclearance.nic.in/.../EIA/230520198KWR1Z7LEIAReport.pdf · Bengaluru Urban District & Karnataka State by M/s. CIPLA Limited. I was

Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Page 162

Figure 4-2 Wind Rose diagram and frequency distribution for the month of Nov 2016

4.3.1.4 AERMOD Process

AERMOD is a modeling system consisting of three separate modules: AERMET, AERMAP and

AERMOD. AERMET is a meteorological preprocessor and uses hourly surface observations,

cloud cover, and upper air parameters respectively. The terrain preprocessor AERMAP uses

Digital Elevation Model (DEM) maps as well as user generated receptor grids. AERMAP’s

output file consists of the x, y locations of each receptor, mean sea level (MSL) elevation, and

hill profile parameter.

AERMOD directly reads the three output files created by the pre-processing programs and,

along with user-entered source information, predicts ambient air concentrations for a variety of

pollutants and averaging periods ranging from 1-hour to annual. AERMOD has a regulatory

default option, as well as rural or urban dispersion coefficients, urban population settings, and

other features specific to the model. AERMOD also includes the Plume Rise Model

Enhancement (PRIME) building downwash algorithm, which calculates directional specific

building downwash widths and heights as well as downwash parameters for the cavity region of

the building (earlier downwash algorithms ignored the cavity region, and models did not

calculate concentrations for receptors located inside this area).

Page 194: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORTenvironmentclearance.nic.in/.../EIA/230520198KWR1Z7LEIAReport.pdf · Bengaluru Urban District & Karnataka State by M/s. CIPLA Limited. I was

Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Page 163

4.3.1.5 The status of air pollution due to the existing DG sets Boilers and scrubbers

In order to obtain the concentrations from the existing boilers and DG sets installed in

the study region emission inventory was carried out Table 4-1 and dispersion modeling

was carried for PM, SO2 and NOx and accordingly Iso-concentration plots were

generated and shown in Figure 4-3 - Figure 4-6. The first ten highest concentrations of

each pollutant were summarized in Table 4-2 - Table 4-5.

Page 195: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORTenvironmentclearance.nic.in/.../EIA/230520198KWR1Z7LEIAReport.pdf · Bengaluru Urban District & Karnataka State by M/s. CIPLA Limited. I was

Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Page 164

Table 4-1 Existing Stack emission details of CIPLA

S.No

Existing

ProposedSource Fuel

Used

Kg/hr incase of

liquid fuel

Gas ExitTemp(0 C)

StackDia (m)

StackHeightAboveground

level (m)

Emissions (g/s)

PM SO2 NOx CO

1 DG SET (1250KVA* 3) HSD

220 Lts/Hr232 0.31 20 0.044 0.0086 0.22 0.11

No change

2 Boiler 2TPH * 3 FO 190 Lts/Hr 100 0.59 30 0.0681 0.1193 1.045 0.095

3 Solid wasteIncenerator HSD 05 Lts/Hr 140 0.32 20 0.0006 0.0010 0.0092 0.0008

4 Scrubber - 1 NA NA 42 0.16 13 0.002222

Negligible

5 Scrubber - 2 NA NA 46 0.16 13 0.001944

6 Scrubber - 3 NA NA 47 0.22 13 0.002778

7 Scrubber - 4 NA NA 48 0.62 13 0.027778

8 Scrubber - 5 NA NA 48 0.48 13 0.019444

9 Scrubber – 6 NA NA 46 0.32 13 0.001944

10 Scrubber – 7 NA NA 46 0.32 13 0.001944

11 Scrubber - 8 NA NA 46 0.32 13 0.001944

TOTAL (g/s) 0.172 0.129 1.274 0.206

Page 196: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORTenvironmentclearance.nic.in/.../EIA/230520198KWR1Z7LEIAReport.pdf · Bengaluru Urban District & Karnataka State by M/s. CIPLA Limited. I was

Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Page 165

Figure 4-3 Ground level concentrations of PM during Nov-2016

Figure 4-4 Ground level concentrations of SO2 during Nov-2016

Page 197: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORTenvironmentclearance.nic.in/.../EIA/230520198KWR1Z7LEIAReport.pdf · Bengaluru Urban District & Karnataka State by M/s. CIPLA Limited. I was

Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Page 166

Figure 4-5 Ground level concentrations of NOx during Nov-2016

Figure 4-6 Ground level concentrations of CO during Nov-2016

Page 198: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORTenvironmentclearance.nic.in/.../EIA/230520198KWR1Z7LEIAReport.pdf · Bengaluru Urban District & Karnataka State by M/s. CIPLA Limited. I was

Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Page 167

Particulate MatterTable 4-2 TOP 10 HIGHEST CONCENTRATIONS OF PARTICULATE MATTER

S.NO UTM coordinates (m) Conc.(µg/m3)

Distance from Centerof Sources (Km)

Direction fromSource CenterE N

1 786570.9 1414871 0.30717 1 W2 787566.2 1413867 0.187 1 S3 786570.9 1413867 0.17853 1.25 SW4 787566.2 1414871 0.16099 0 05 785575.5 1414871 0.14448 2 W6 788561.5 1414871 0.12372 1 E7 787566.2 1412864 0.12018 2 S8 783584.9 1411860 0.1118 5.02 SW9 784580.2 1413867 0.10535 3.2 WSW

10 785575.5 1412864 0.0983 2.8 SW

Sulphur Dioxide (SO2)Table 4-3 TOP 10 HIGHEST CONCENTRATIONS OF SULPHUR DIOXIDE

S.NO UTM coordinates (m) Conc.(µg/m3)

Distance from Centerof Sources (Km)

Direction fromSource CenterE N

1 786570.9 1414871 0.31416 1 W2 787566.2 1413867 0.18928 1 S3 786570.9 1413867 0.17997 1.25 SW4 785575.5 1414871 0.14718 2 W5 788561.5 1414871 0.13942 1 E6 783584.9 1411860 0.1127 5.02 SW7 784580.2 1413867 0.10837 3.1 WSW8 785575.5 1412864 0.09327 2.8 SW9 784580.2 1412864 0.09214 3.6 SW

10 787566.2 1412864 0.09183 2 S

Page 199: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORTenvironmentclearance.nic.in/.../EIA/230520198KWR1Z7LEIAReport.pdf · Bengaluru Urban District & Karnataka State by M/s. CIPLA Limited. I was

Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Page 168

Oxides of Nitrogen (NOx)

Table 4-4 TOP 10 HIGHEST CONCENTRATIONS OF OXIDES OF NITROGEN

S.NO UTM coordinates (m) Conc.(µg/m3)

Distance from Centerof Sources (Km)

Direction fromSource CenterE N

1 786570.9 1414871 3.22073 1 W2 787566.2 1413867 1.94914 1 S3 786570.9 1413867 1.85599 1.25 SW4 785575.5 1414871 1.51219 2 W5 788561.5 1414871 1.38386 1 E6 783584.9 1411860 1.16228 5.02 SW7 784580.2 1413867 1.1096 3.1 WSW8 785575.5 1412864 0.98326 2.8 SW9 784580.2 1412864 0.96397 3.6 SW

10 784580.2 1414871 0.93351 3 W

Carbon Monoxide (CO)

Table 4-5 TOP 10 HIGHEST CONCENTRATIONS OF PARTICULATE MATTER

S.NO UTM coordinates (m) Conc.(µg/m3)

Distance from Centerof Sources (Km)

Direction fromSource CenterE N

1 786570.9 1414871 0.58723 1 W2 787566.2 1414871 0.4002 0 03 787566.2 1413867 0.35873 1 S4 786570.9 1413867 0.343 1.25 SW5 785575.5 1414871 0.27649 2 W6 787566.2 1412864 0.27254 2 S7 788561.5 1414871 0.22724 1 E8 783584.9 1411860 0.21481 5.02 SW9 784580.2 1413867 0.20085 3.1 WSW

10 785575.5 1412864 0.19302 2.8 SW

4.3.1.6 CONCLUSION

From the Dispersion modeling results for the air pollutants due to existing DG set, Boilers and

8 scrubbers it is observed that the maximum concentrations of PM10, SO2, NOx and CO

observed to be 0.307 µg/m3, 0.314 µg/m3, 3.221 µg/m3, and 0.587 µg/m3 respectively. So it can

be concluded that the ground level concentrations (GLC) of PM10, SO2, NOx and CO are well

Page 200: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORTenvironmentclearance.nic.in/.../EIA/230520198KWR1Z7LEIAReport.pdf · Bengaluru Urban District & Karnataka State by M/s. CIPLA Limited. I was

Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Page 169

within the standard of CPCB limits and the impact was negligible/minimum. The total increase

in concentrations above baseline status to estimate the percentage increase and

summarized in Table 4-6.

Table 4-6 Total Maximum GLCs from the proposed Stack Emissions for NOV 2016

Pollutant

AverageBase line

Conc.(µg/m3)

Estimated Max.Conc. from

source (µg/m3)

Total Conc.(µg/m3)

NAAQstandard

Distance fromSource Direction

SO2 13.8 0.314 13.8 80 1 WNOx 29.1 3.221 29.1 80 1 WPM 64.3 0.307 64.3 100 1 W

Since, no additional stacks are proposed the estimated concentration at source isalready included in existing baseline. So the percentage (%) increase in concentration iszero.

4.3.1.7 Pollution Control Measures

Air Pollution & Fugitive Emission Control

The major air pollution sources from the industry are DG sets, boilers and scrubbers. The DG

set and boiler sources are provided with stacks of adequate height so as to disperse the

emanating flue gases containing suspended particulate matter, oxides of sulfur and nitrogen

without affecting the ground level concentrations. The emissions generated from the reactors

are scrubbed out by wet scrubbers. The source of emission, capacity and the various Air

Pollution Control (APC) measures taken are listed in the Table 4-7.

There is no increase in emission source due to proposed change in product mix. All the reactors

have condensers to condense the solvent vapors. The reactor vents are connected to the

scrubber to neutralize the toxic vapors. Scrubbers have been provided with FRP/ water

circulation type having neutralizing agents.

The Scrubber attached to control the fugitive emissions and the details are attached in

Annexure P

Table 4-7 Air Pollution Control Measures

Page 201: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORTenvironmentclearance.nic.in/.../EIA/230520198KWR1Z7LEIAReport.pdf · Bengaluru Urban District & Karnataka State by M/s. CIPLA Limited. I was

Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Page 170

S.No

Existing Proposed

MoEF Approved No ofstacks Type of fuel Sulphur

contentKgs/hr incase of

liquid fuel

Chimneyheight (in mts)& air pollutioncontrol system

providedproposed

1 Attached toprocess

5 NA NA NA 3 m ARL/9 mAGL & scrubber

No change

2 Attached tofinishing area

2 NA NA NA Dust collector

3 Formulation 2 NA NA NA 3 m ARL/9 mAGL & scrubber

4 Quality Control 1 NA NA NA 3 m ARL/9 mAGL & scrubber

5 TFH system200000 k cal

1 NA NA NA 20 m AGL

6 Steam Boilers (2TPH x 3)

3 Furnace oil 4.0 % 190 Kg/Hr 30 m AGL

7Solid wasteincinerator 25kg/Hr

1 HSD 0.25 % 05 Lts/Hr 30 m AGL &Scrubber

8 Vapourabsorption

1 HSD 0.25 % 25 Lts/Hr 20 m AGL

9 (1250 x 3) KVADG sets

3 HSD 0.25 % 220 Lts/Hr 20 m AGL &silencers

4.3.2 Water Requirement

Total water requirement is 300 KLD of which fresh water requirement is 140 KLD; Water source

from the In house bore wells and private tankers. There is no change in the new proposal.

4.3.2.1 Impact due to Waste Water Generation

The source of wastewater generation from CIPLA is as follows:

Industrial process wastewater/effluent

Boiler and cooling water blow down

Domestic wastewater/Sewage

Equipment cleaning and floor washings, etc.

4.3.2.2 Mitigation Measures

Page 202: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORTenvironmentclearance.nic.in/.../EIA/230520198KWR1Z7LEIAReport.pdf · Bengaluru Urban District & Karnataka State by M/s. CIPLA Limited. I was

Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Page 171

Various mitigation measures are existing to minimise the impact if any on the water environment

due to the wastewater/runoff generation during the operation phase of the project.

Institutional arrangement for monitoring of water by pollution

Preventive measures as well as after, measures in case any contamination

Monitoring should ensure early determination of any threats to water resources in terms

of contamination

If contaminated proper expertise need to be brought in to schematise the various

recharge mechanism to reduce or nullify the impact effects.

4.3.2.3 Wastewater Quality and Quantity

Sewage and effluent generated from process and washings are taken to combined Effluent and

Sewage Treatment Plant of capacity 160 KLD further processed in RO plant. Due to proposed

there is no change in wastewater quality and quantity.

Rejects from RO Plant along with High TDS effluent is treated in Multiple Effect Evaporator of

40 KLD capacity. The treated waste water of 160 KLD is reused for Boiler, cooling towers and

Toilet flushes.

Zero liquid discharge system is maintained in the facilities. There is no change in the new

proposal.

Table 4-8 Liquid Waste Generation & Treatment

Phase Population(Nos)

Qty ofwater

required(KLD)

Sewage/EffluentGenerated

(KLD)

Treatment Method

Existing Operation 300 300 160 Treated in combined ETP andSTP

Proposed construction Not applicable

After expansion Operation No change after proposed change in productmix

Process 300 300 160

The source of waste water, treatment methods and the final disposal of each type of wastewater

generated in Error! Reference source not found. & Figure 2-8 respectively and the ETP and

STP process flow diagrams along with their specifications are attached as Annexure L.

Page 203: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORTenvironmentclearance.nic.in/.../EIA/230520198KWR1Z7LEIAReport.pdf · Bengaluru Urban District & Karnataka State by M/s. CIPLA Limited. I was

Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Page 172

4.3.3 Noise Environment

4.3.3.1 Impacts

Major sources of noise generation in CIPLA unit, noise generation sources during operationalphase are classified into two categories:

Stationary sources due to operation of heavy duty machinery at the project site like

Boilers, Compressors, DG sets, Pumps etc.

Mobile sources corresponding to mainly vehicular traffic for staff mobilization, materials,

material transportation, liquid fuel transportation to project site, etc.

The impact of vibrations beyond the site would be negligible during normal operation

phase. However, the impacts on workers engaged in the plant area would be

considerable due to occupational exposure. The fixed major equipment/units such as

boiler house, compressors, pumps, DG sets etc., also generate vibrations during

operational phase and may cause exposures to the workers/operators engaged at these

units.

4.3.3.2 Mitigation Measures

The major noise generating equipment like Compressors, DG sets, TFH, Boiler Feed

water pumps etc. is enclosed in an acoustic enclosure designed for an insertion loss of

25 dB (A) and silencers to other equipment etc.

Major noise generating equipment is designed with 85 dB (A) ensuring cumulative noise

at 1.0 m remains at 85 dB (A).

The occupational noise exposure to the workers in the form of eight hourly time weighted

average is maintained well within the prescribed Occupational Safety and Health

Administration (OSHA) standard limits.

Adequate PPE are provided to the staff exposing to noise risks.

Acoustic silencers are provided in equipment wherever necessary.

Acoustic design with sound proof glass panelling is provided for critical operator cabins /

control rooms of individual modules as well as central control facilities.

Use of personal protective equipments/devices such as ear-muffs, ear plugs etc. is

strictly enforced for the workers engaged in high noise areas.

Existing premises will attenuate and mitigate noise levels, 33 % greenbelt developed

along the periphery and at various locations within the industry.

Page 204: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORTenvironmentclearance.nic.in/.../EIA/230520198KWR1Z7LEIAReport.pdf · Bengaluru Urban District & Karnataka State by M/s. CIPLA Limited. I was

Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Page 173

Ambient noise levels are monitored at regular intervals during operational phase of the

project.

Various standards pertaining to vibrations are formulated by statutory bodies like Bureau

of Indian Standards (BIS) and Director General of Mines Safety (DGMS), which is being

practiced would be continued to mitigate the workers’ health effects due to vibrations.

4.3.4 Solid waste management

4.3.4.1 Impacts

During operation phase is likely to generate various types of solid waste which can be broadly

categorized as Hazardous Wasteand Non-hazardous Waste. Further, the generated solid waste

generation may include Biodegradable, Recyclable and Inert compounds. If the solid waste

generated is not properly managed and disposed in unauthorised manner, it will impact on soil

quality, groundwater and air quality.

4.3.4.2 Mitigation Measures

The Source of municipal waste in the industry will be from the domestic use and Strict

guidelines put in place in order to manage the solid waste generation during the operational

phase.

The various hazardous waste generated from the process is stored in a separate hazardous

waste storage area and properly disposed as per the Hazardous and Other Wastes

(Management and Trans boundary Movement) Amendment Rules, 2016. Agreement between

TSDF and CIPLA for collection, transport, storage, treatment and disposal and also we have a

valid agreement with M/s. Enano incintech for Incineration of incinerable wastes.

Used Oil - Collected in Leak proof containers and disposed only to KSPCB registered

authorized reprocessors provided the oil meets the standards as per schedule-5 part-A

of the rules.

Oil soaked cotton waste, Process residues & Waste and Distillation Residue - Stored in

a secured manner and hand over to KSPCB authorized incinerator/Co processing in

cement kiln.

Spent solvent - Stored in a secured manner and hand over to KSPCB authorized

recycler.

Page 205: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORTenvironmentclearance.nic.in/.../EIA/230520198KWR1Z7LEIAReport.pdf · Bengaluru Urban District & Karnataka State by M/s. CIPLA Limited. I was

Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Page 174

Sludge from ETP & MEE - Stored in a secured manner and hand over to KSPCB

authorized TSDF.

Thus, it can be concluded that there will be no impact on the surrounding environment due to

generation and disposal of solid waste during operation phase of the project.

4.3.5 Land Environment

Land is owned by M/s. CIPLA Limited. This land has been allotted by KIADB in the Industrial

area. The present land use is industrial. The Plant facilities are spread over 115335.23 sq.m,

(28.49 Acres / 11.52 Ha), Total built up area (Land utilized for buildings, utilities purpose, other

allied purpose like roads, machinery equipments etc..,) is 54997.45 sq.m (13.58 Acres) KIADB

Land which is completely fortified and protected on all four sides by boundary walls.

As the entire infrastructure needed for expansion is already available there is no demand of any

further infrastructure. In the existing facility only proposed products will be manufactured and no

other construction activities induced. The Proposed activity does not change the land use

classification of the site

There will be no increase in air pollution due to proposed Change in Product Mix, The Air and

Emissions source from DG, Boilers, Process with APC measures, adequate stacks heights and

vents attached to scrubbers will be within the norms. Moreover, vents of proper height have

been provided for quick dispersion and dilution of pollutants into the air. Thus, there will be no

additional effect on the surrounding soil due to gaseous emission from the project.

There will be no major effect of wastewater on soil, Installed ZLD plant to treat the effluent. The

domestic wastewater will be disposed through septic tank / soak pit system. Thus, there will be

practically very insignificant impact on land due to disposal of wastewater.

All necessary control steps for each type of Solid Wastes generated will be taken, and hence

there will be no impact on solid wastes generation on surrounding soil environment.

4.3.6 Ecology

Air emissions, liquid effluent disposal and solid waste generation are likely to have some impact

on terrestrial ecosystem. However, there will be no net increase in air pollution. Plant is already

Page 206: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORTenvironmentclearance.nic.in/.../EIA/230520198KWR1Z7LEIAReport.pdf · Bengaluru Urban District & Karnataka State by M/s. CIPLA Limited. I was

Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Page 175

maintaining ZLD system and the solid wastes will be collected and disposed off properly.

Hence, negligible impact on ecology is expected.

Existing Green belt is 9.39 Acres (33 %) of 28.49 Acres, greenbelt developed along the

periphery and at various locations within the industry.

4.3.7 Socio-Economic Environment

The project to manufacture bulk-drugs is likely to have certain positive impacts on socio

economic environment.

Company has carried out various activities in nearby villages as part of their CSR like organizing

blood donation camp, green belt development etc. The company will have an intention to spend

around 2% of the profit as per company act. In coming year it is tentatively planned CSR activity

as below.

Indirect employment potential - Various modes of indirect employment i.e. transportation,

increased business opportunities to shopkeepers etc. Over-all there is improvement in quality of

life of the people in the study area.

Thus, it can be said that the proposed project will have significant beneficial impact on the socio

economic scenario in the study area.

Page 207: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORTenvironmentclearance.nic.in/.../EIA/230520198KWR1Z7LEIAReport.pdf · Bengaluru Urban District & Karnataka State by M/s. CIPLA Limited. I was

Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Page 176

CHAPTER – 5ANALYSIS OF ALTERNATIVES

Page 208: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORTenvironmentclearance.nic.in/.../EIA/230520198KWR1Z7LEIAReport.pdf · Bengaluru Urban District & Karnataka State by M/s. CIPLA Limited. I was

Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Page 177

5 ANALYSIS OF ALTERNATIVES

5.1 History and Background of the Site

M/s. CIPLA Limited was established in the year 1973 by late Dr. K. A. Hamied now developing

under leadership of Mr. Y. K. Hamied with strong focus in India & Abroad. It is ranked amongst

top 20 in India out of 300 Indian pharma companies-ORG-IMS 2012. The CIPLA group has

approximately more than 25000 employees comprising management, marketing and technical

professionals.

M/s. CIPLA Limited proposes the change in product mix of the Bulk Drugs and Intermediates

manufacturing Unit with an area of 11.42 Ha (28.23 Acres) within the Karnataka Industrial Area

Development Board, Bengaluru. CIPLA Ltd. – 100% EOU, Plot No. 285, 286 & 287, KIADB

Industrial Area, Bommasandra-jigani Link Road, Phase IV, Anekal Taluk, Bengaluru Urban

District – 560 105, Karnataka.

5.2 Current Proposal

As the proposed project is change in product mix in existing unit in KIADB Jigani, there are no

alternative sites analysed as stated in section 5.1.

However based on the current set up the following are the advantages of the site:

The project site is located within KIADB Industrial Area, which is notified industrial area

No R &R Issues

No public hearing is required as per EIA notification

Existing infrastructure of can be utilised for the proposed project

Site is well connected by road & rail

KIADB corridor road Bengaluru to Hosur NH-44 (old NH-7) at a distance of 5.4 km

towards NE

Moreover this is now identified as one of the most important identified KIADB. This Industrial is

a focused area for major development and also for future investment.

5.3 Results of the Analysis

Page 209: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORTenvironmentclearance.nic.in/.../EIA/230520198KWR1Z7LEIAReport.pdf · Bengaluru Urban District & Karnataka State by M/s. CIPLA Limited. I was

Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Page 178

The process used for production is made by M/s. CIPLA Limited. And in house there would not

be any changes in the process. The process made by M/s CIPLA Limited is cost effective with

high quality in output.

No alternative site has been considered due to the benefits of the above site. With its innovative

technology the project is expected to meet the market demands of the pharmaceutical products

that will aid in addressing the issues in healthcare as well as lead to economic prosperity.

The current site is an earmarked industrial area by KIADB, Jigani. Therefore no further site

analysis has been carried out under this EIA.

Page 210: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORTenvironmentclearance.nic.in/.../EIA/230520198KWR1Z7LEIAReport.pdf · Bengaluru Urban District & Karnataka State by M/s. CIPLA Limited. I was

Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Page 179

CHAPTER – 6ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING

PROGRAM

Page 211: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORTenvironmentclearance.nic.in/.../EIA/230520198KWR1Z7LEIAReport.pdf · Bengaluru Urban District & Karnataka State by M/s. CIPLA Limited. I was

Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Page 180

6 ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM (EMP)6.1 Introduction

The primary aim of environmental monitoring program is to formulate a systematic, site-specific

plan for monitoring the environmental parameters within the impact area, during and after

commissioning of the project, which would aid in assessing the effectiveness of mitigation and

environmental protection measures implemented for the proposed project based on the existing

environmental scenario and the probable environmental impacts appraisal.

The plan framed for the intended facility will describe:

The details of the proposed mitigation measures taken for safeguarding the environment

at the project site as well as in the vicinity of the industrial site

Details of management plans (Greenbelt development plan, Solid waste management

plan etc)

Post project environmental monitoring programme to be undertaken after commissioning

of the project.

The associated cost components of the pollution control systems installed at the site.

For each of the environmental attributes, the monitoring plan specifies the parameters to be

monitored, location of monitoring sites, frequency and duration of monitoring and it also denotes

the applicable standards, implementation and supervising responsibilities.

Environmental monitoring programme for the proposed project is formulated. Environmental

Monitoring Programme is an important component during environmental management of the

project. The institutional mechanism planned and implemented to mitigation and monitoring

measures during all stages of the project is discussed in Chapter 9. The project management

especially the Environmental Management Cell (EMC) (described in Chapter 9) should always

go for a rational approach with regards to environmental monitoring. This includes judicious

decision making in consultation with institutional stakeholders (e.g. Karnataka State Pollution

Control Board (KSPCB) or reputed environmental consultants for appropriate changes in the

monitoring strategy, i.e., changes in the sampling frequency, sampling location, monitoring

parameters and any new/additional requirements.

The following are the main objectives of the environmental monitoring program:

From ETP for the protection of water resources

Page 212: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORTenvironmentclearance.nic.in/.../EIA/230520198KWR1Z7LEIAReport.pdf · Bengaluru Urban District & Karnataka State by M/s. CIPLA Limited. I was

Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Page 181

Provide information for documentation of monitoring of mitigation measures and impacts

Tool for the statutory authority of unanticipated adverse impacts or sudden changes in

the environmental condition due to the proposed project

Provides information that could be used for evaluating the effectiveness of implemented

mitigation measures

Provides information that could be used to verify predicted impacts and thus validate

impact prediction techniques

The efficacy of the mitigation measures being followed during operational phases can be

assessed and the measures can be revised, made more stringent and reinforced based

on the monitoring results

Environmental Monitoring can also serve a basic component of a periodic environmental

regulatory auditing program for the proposed project

Coordination with local bodies with regards to solid waste management

The following programme as detailed in the environmental monitoring programme for operation

phases implemented by the CIPLA authority. Besides the monitoring, the compliances to all

environmental clearance conditions and regular permits from KSPCB /MoEF&CC shall be

monitored and reported periodically. The likely significant impacts and mitigation measures will

also be monitored.

The environmental attributes to be monitored during operational phases of the project, specific

description along with technical details of environmental monitoring including the monitoring

parameters, methodology, sampling locations and frequency of monitoring are presented in

Section below.

6.2 Objectives

Ensure day to day operational activities are conducted in a manner in compliance with

the applicable regulatory approvals including legislation and industry standards

Evaluate the adequacy of mitigation and pollution control measures implemented for

reducing the adverse impacts caused during the construction and operation stage and

suggest additional mitigation measures, if appropriate, in the light of the results

Define a detailed framework to monitor and document for achieving full compliance with

statutory requirements

Encourage good environmental management practices through planning, commitment

and continuous improvement

Page 213: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORTenvironmentclearance.nic.in/.../EIA/230520198KWR1Z7LEIAReport.pdf · Bengaluru Urban District & Karnataka State by M/s. CIPLA Limited. I was

Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Page 182

Develop clearly defined environmental monitoring program designed to assess the

nature and extent of environmental impacts of the proposed operations and

progressively refine such programs against the targets

Define roles and responsibilities of site personnel and ensure that all people onsite are

fully informed of their responsibilities and accountabilities with regard to the environment

To comply with all regulations stipulated by the Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB)/

State Pollution Control Board (SPCB) related to air emission and liquid effluent

discharge as per air and water pollution control act/ laws

To handle hazardous wastes as per the Hazardous Waste (Management & Handling)

Rules 1989 and Other Wastes (Management and Transboundary Movement) Rules,

2016 and subsequent amendments

Review, improve and update environmental management procedures and standards

Establish response procedures for actual/potential environmental impacts including

community complaints and ensure corrective action is taken

Perspective budgeting and allocation of funds for environmental management

expenditure, Continuous development and search for innovative technologies for a

cleaner and better environment.

Page 214: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORTenvironmentclearance.nic.in/.../EIA/230520198KWR1Z7LEIAReport.pdf · Bengaluru Urban District & Karnataka State by M/s. CIPLA Limited. I was

Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Page 183

6.3 Project Environmental Monitoring

EnvironmentalAttributes

Parameters to bemonitored No. of Sampling Locations Frequency of

Monitoring Standards Methods for Sampling & Analysis Compliance

Operation Phase

Air Quality PM10, PM2.5, SO2,NO2, O3 and CO

Six (04) Twice a weekFine Particulate Samplers for PM10, PM2.5,Respirable Dust Sampler fitted with Gaseoussampling arrangements for for SO2 and NO2,O3, CO analyser /portable CO meter for CO

National Ambient Air QualityStandards released duringNovember, 2009

Noise Levels Day and night noiselevels

Six (04) Once a month Portable hand-held noise level meter. National Ambient NoiseStandards

Water Quality

Physical, Chemicaland Biological

In addition to theabove, Alpha, Betaemitters (surfacewater)

Groundwater (03)Surface water (03) Once a month Grab sampling and analysis by using standard

methods.

IS10500, 2012 drinking waterstandards for Groundwater

Designated Best UseClassification of Inland SurfaceWater of National RiversConservation Directorate,MoEF&CC for Surface Water

Soil

Soil texture, type,electricalconductivity, pH,infiltration, porosity,etc.,

Six (04) Once a year Collection and analysis of samples as per IS2720 Baseline data

MeteorologyWind speed, winddirection, rainfall,temperature,humidity.

Project Site Hourlymeasurement IMD/CPCB manual -

Treated WastewaterQuality

Physical, Chemicaland Biological

One (01) ETP Inlet ETP outlet

Daily Grab sampling and analysis by using standardmethods.

Environment ProtectionAmendment Rules, 2015

Page 215: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORTenvironmentclearance.nic.in/.../EIA/230520198KWR1Z7LEIAReport.pdf · Bengaluru Urban District & Karnataka State by M/s. CIPLA Limited. I was

Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Page 184

6.4 Monitoring by CIPLA

The environmental monitoring shall be carried out by CIPLA within their industry premises.

Monitoring guidelines should clearly indicate the conditions of discharge and the consequences

with regards to the penal action and the impact to ground water resources of the region.

Groundwater is the sole water source for millions of people in the adjoining areas. CIPLA should

not only limit the environmental monitoring as stated above, environmental monitoring

programme in terms of parameters, location and frequency shall be formulated as per the

stipulations laid by KSPCB/CPCB/MoEF&CC/SEIAA in their respective Environmental

Clearance/Consent To Establish (CTE)/Consent To Operate (CTO).

6.5 Compliance Reports

As a part of environmental monitoring programme, following compliance reports shall be

submitted to KSPCB and Regional Office of MoEF&CC.

Half yearly compliance reports in respect of the stipulated prior environmental clearance

terms and conditions on June 01 and December 01 of every calendar year

Environmental statement (Form-V) for the financial year ending March 31 to KSPCB on

or before September 30 every year

Format for maintaining records of hazardous waste if any in Form-3 as per Hazardous

and other Wastes (Management and Handling and Transboundary movement) Rules,

2008

Format for maintaining hazardous waste imported and exported in Form-10 as per

Hazardous Waste (Management and Transboundary movement) Rules, 2016

Safety data sheet for hazardous chemicals shall be maintained as per schedule-9 of

MSIHC rules, 1989 (amended 2000),

Format for maintaining notification of major accident in schedule-6 as per MISHC rules,

1989 (amended 2000)

Water Cess returns in Form-1 as per Rule 4 (1) of Water (Prevention & Control of

Pollution) Cess Rules 1978 on or before the 5th of every calendar month.

6.6 Plantation Monitoring Programm

Page 216: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORTenvironmentclearance.nic.in/.../EIA/230520198KWR1Z7LEIAReport.pdf · Bengaluru Urban District & Karnataka State by M/s. CIPLA Limited. I was

Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Page 185

Environmental Management Cell/team will monitor the following activities of greenbelt and

landscape development:

Development of nursery (if possible)

Treatment and sowing of seeds

Watering

Transport of seedlings

Planting of seedlings

Fencing of plantation area

Weeding and soil working

Pruning (trimming of plant)

Replacement/Inter planting

Watch and ward of plantation

During operation phase periodic monitoring of plantation growth, manuring, watering, pruning,

and replacement will be performed in order to properly maintain vegetation, greenbelt,

landscape and green cover.

6.7 On-site Mock Drills Requirements

On-site mock drills are very important as it helps employees to be aware of the safety

procedures and how to react during the time of crisis. Conducting mock drills at regular intervals

enhances preparedness and checks the viability of environmental/disaster management plan.

Mock drills are essential for the following reasons:

Helps in revising/improving the environmental/disaster management plan.

Helps to evaluate whether the responsible officials are trained efficiently for the

unforeseen event.

Helps in evaluating whether the emergency equipment are being maintained at CIPLA

premises.

To ensure efficient environmental/disaster management, CIPLA authority/EHS department/EMP

cell shall conduct periodic on-site mock drills in case of occurrence of the following activities:

Fire, Natural calamities (cyclones, floods, earthquakes).

Power break down.

Oil spill.

Bomb threats; War alerts/terrorist attacks.

Mock drills should also involve fire department, police, municipal authorities, hospitals and other

department/agencies that are mandated to provide emergency support. Documenting the

outcome of mock drills is an important aspect as this helps in revising the existing plan more

Page 217: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORTenvironmentclearance.nic.in/.../EIA/230520198KWR1Z7LEIAReport.pdf · Bengaluru Urban District & Karnataka State by M/s. CIPLA Limited. I was

Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Page 186

efficiently. In all safety programmes the right personnel need to be employed and this is of

utmost importance.

Page 218: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORTenvironmentclearance.nic.in/.../EIA/230520198KWR1Z7LEIAReport.pdf · Bengaluru Urban District & Karnataka State by M/s. CIPLA Limited. I was

Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Page 187

CHAPTER – 7ADDITIONAL STUDIES

Page 219: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORTenvironmentclearance.nic.in/.../EIA/230520198KWR1Z7LEIAReport.pdf · Bengaluru Urban District & Karnataka State by M/s. CIPLA Limited. I was

Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Page 188

7 ADDITIONAL STUDIES7.1 Public Hearing

The proposed project is located in Notified Industrial Area, the projects attracts the Category B

as per EIA Notification 2006; As per MoEF & CC Office Memorandum, dated 3rd June 2009; EIA

Notification, 2006 in para 7 (i), sub section III exempted from undertaking public hearing for

expansion or modernization or change of product mix in existing projects. Hence this application

based on MoEF Notification No. S.O. 804(E) of 14th March, 2017, Karnataka SEIAA has

recommended to EAC, MoEF & CC under Category A, 5(f).

7.2 Disaster Management Plan

An onsite emergency plan is attributed to the response plan that contains and minimizes the

effects due to emergencies within the installations which have a potential to cause damage to

people and facilities within the installation premises.

The On-site and offsite emergency Plan is attached as Annexure R.

7.3 R& R

Rehabilitation and resettlement is not applicable since the project is in KIADB Industrial Area,

Jigani of Bengaluru.

7.4 Risk Assessment

The Detailed risk assessment report for the proposed project is enclosed as Annexure R.

Page 220: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORTenvironmentclearance.nic.in/.../EIA/230520198KWR1Z7LEIAReport.pdf · Bengaluru Urban District & Karnataka State by M/s. CIPLA Limited. I was

Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Page 189

CHAPTER – 8PROJECT BENEFITS

Page 221: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORTenvironmentclearance.nic.in/.../EIA/230520198KWR1Z7LEIAReport.pdf · Bengaluru Urban District & Karnataka State by M/s. CIPLA Limited. I was

Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Page 190

8 PROJECT BENEFITS

Proposes for a change in product mix within the existing premises (without additional

pollution load) with no overall change in production quantity of Active Pharmaceutical

Ingredients (APIs) will play a vital role in the health care protection and thereby

addresses the market demand and Social benefits.

The proposed project which has zero liquid discharge system, which does not discharge

any effluent to ground or surroundings,

The proposal will bring trade and export opportunities to the country.

The products manufactured at this facility will be exported that will aid in adding to the

revenue of the nation.

It will also provide employment opportunities to a larger population.

The corporate social responsibilities that will be taken up by the proposed project will

improve the well-being of the society and the corporate responsibilities towards the

protection of the environment will help in conserving the ecosystem.

Page 222: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORTenvironmentclearance.nic.in/.../EIA/230520198KWR1Z7LEIAReport.pdf · Bengaluru Urban District & Karnataka State by M/s. CIPLA Limited. I was

Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Page 191

CHAPTER – 9ENVIRONMENTAL

MANAGEMENT PLAN

Page 223: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORTenvironmentclearance.nic.in/.../EIA/230520198KWR1Z7LEIAReport.pdf · Bengaluru Urban District & Karnataka State by M/s. CIPLA Limited. I was

Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Page 192

9 ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN

9.1 Introduction

This Environmental Management Plan (EMP) for the M/s. CIPLA Ltd, identifies the principles,

procedures and methods that will be used to control and minimize the environmental impacts of

the proposed minor construction and operational activities associated with the expansion project

development. It is intended to ensure that commitments made by the CIPLA to minimize project

related environmental and social impacts.

As part of our ongoing commitment to excellence in environmental and social performance we

will ensure the following:

i. Fulfill all environmental conditions associated with project approvals.

ii. Develop, promote and foster a shared sense of responsibility for environmental

and performance of the project.

iii. Promote environmental awareness and understanding among employees and

contractors through training, identification of roles and responsibilities towards

environmental management

iv. Linking project performance to overall environmental performance.

v. To monitor the environmental performance throughout the project and implement

an adaptive management approach for continuous improvement and to meet the

regulations.

9.2 Objectives of EMP

To suggest the formation of a core group (Environment Management Cell) responsible

for implementation of environmental control & protective measures as well as monitoring

of such implementation.

To ensure project components are compliant with all laws and approval conditions.

Continue baseline monitoring

Facilitate a continual review of post construction and operation activities.

To suggest preventive and mitigation measures to minimize adverse impact and to

maximize beneficial impacts like.

Preparation of afforestation or Greenbelt Development scheme.

Preparation of rain water harvesting scheme and energy conservation actions

Page 224: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORTenvironmentclearance.nic.in/.../EIA/230520198KWR1Z7LEIAReport.pdf · Bengaluru Urban District & Karnataka State by M/s. CIPLA Limited. I was

Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Page 193

To prepare a capital cost estimate and annual recurring cost for Environmental

Management Plan.

To prepare a detailed action plan for implementation of mitigation measures.

Measure the effectiveness and success of proposed mitigation measures

9.3 EMP Roles and Responsibilities

9.3.1 Environmental Management Cell

The effective implementation of the mitigation measures and consistent functioning of the

proposed project, an Environmental Management System has been proposed. The EMS

included following:

Environmental Management Cell

Environmental Monitoring Program

Personnel Training

Regular Environmental Audits and Corrective Action Plan

Documentation-Standard Operating procedures of Environmental Management

All the activities will be monitored to ensure the appropriate implementation of all

environmental mitigation activities and to identify areas where environmental

management plan compliance is not satisfied.

For effective implementation of the system, it is also necessary to have a permanent

organizational set-up. Company has set-up permanent Environmental Management Cell

(EMC) for the effective implementation and monitoring of environmental management

system.

The company assigned responsibility to the concerned for implementation of

environmental control measures.

The Environmental Management Cell (EMC) set-up by the company is given as below;

Page 225: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORTenvironmentclearance.nic.in/.../EIA/230520198KWR1Z7LEIAReport.pdf · Bengaluru Urban District & Karnataka State by M/s. CIPLA Limited. I was

Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Page 194

Figure 9-1 Environment Management Cell Organogram

This section describes the organizational structure and responsibilities for implementation of the

EMP as shown below in Table 9-1.

Executive Director of the company will be responsible for total environmental management.

Table 9-1 EMC Responsibility

S. No Name & Designation Responsibilities1 Unit Head

(Mr. Subrat Satpathy)Establish an environment management cell.Responsible for overall environmental management. Operations and take feedbackregarding all the activities performed under EMC and give directions to succeedingcomponent.Provide sufficient resources for environmental management cell to reduce theenvironment impacts.

2 Department Head(Dr. Sunil Kumar)

Develop an environmental Cell, headed by the Site Head and Global EHS Head with ateam having EHS Professionals to implement EMP responsibilities.Oversight, implementation, monitoring and compliance of the EMP and any approvalconditions, including construction supervision and performance of all staff, contractorsand all subcontractorsReview of EMP performance and implementation of correction action, or stop workprocedures, in the event of breaches of EMP conditions, that may lead to serious

Page 226: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORTenvironmentclearance.nic.in/.../EIA/230520198KWR1Z7LEIAReport.pdf · Bengaluru Urban District & Karnataka State by M/s. CIPLA Limited. I was

Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Page 195

impacts on local communities, or affect the reputation of the projectAssisting the contractor with implementation of EMP sub-plansEnsuring compliance to all project social commitments, including implementation ofcorporate social responsibility.Report environmental performance of the project directly to MoEF & CC /SEIAAReport on environmental performance also to other government regulators as required.Non-compliance / violation of environmental norms, if any are reported to VP-EHS andSite Head/Director and immediate required action is taken.Implementation of the Environmental Monitoring Plan during construction and operation.Supervision of contractor performance of implementation of the Construction.Reporting any incidents or non-compliance with the EMP to the KSPCB.Ensuring adequate training and education of all staff involved in environmentalsupervision.Reporting to MoEF & CC / SEIAA regarding EMP performance as part of an overallcommitment to continuous improvement

3 Environment-SectionHead(Mr. Sinraj )

Treatment and disposal of trade effluents and sewage effluent as per consent.Carryout ambient air quality monitoring as per consent.Monitoring the stack / chimney.Hazardous waste management handling and disposal.Plant and maintain adequate numbers of trees and gardens around the IndustryApplying and getting the consent of operation of air & water and authorization to storethe hazardous wastePrepare Management Information System (MIS) reports and budget for environmentmanagement program.To deal with the environmental issues and for ensuring compliance with the conditionsprescribed by KSPCB.

In addition to the above, company will have HSE policy to adhere with standard operating

process in order to comply with the statue and bring into focus any infringement of any norms

and directives with regards to the Health, Safety and Environment and to take further corrective

actions.

9.3.2 Compliance against the Consent Condition

Compliance against the consented conditions shall be observed with respect to the following

Acts,

Water (Prevention & Control of Pollution) Act, 1974

Air (Prevention & Control of Pollution) Act 1981

Hazardous and Other Wastes (Management and Trans-boundary Movement) Rules

2016.

Table 9-2 Compliance against the Consent Condition

Page 227: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORTenvironmentclearance.nic.in/.../EIA/230520198KWR1Z7LEIAReport.pdf · Bengaluru Urban District & Karnataka State by M/s. CIPLA Limited. I was

Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Page 196

S.No. Description Frequency Remark

1. Renewal of Consent Once in 3 years Application for renewal shall be done 60 days before theexpiry date.

2. Environmental Statement Once in a year Would be submitted for every financial year before 30thSeptember of next year.

3. Hazardous Waste Returns Once in a year Would be submitted for every financial year before 30th Juneof next year.

4. Cess Returns Monthly Twelve Returns would be submitted every year.

9.3.3 Compliance to the Recommendations Mentioned In the CREP Guidelines

The Ministry of Environment & Forest and Climate Change (MoEFCC) has launched the Charter

on "Corporate Responsibility for Environmental Protection (CREP)" with the purpose to go

beyond the compliance of regulatory norms for prevention & control of pollution through various

measures including waste minimization, in-plant process control & adoption of clean

technologies. The Charter has set targets concerning conservation of water, energy, recovery of

chemicals, reduction in pollution, elimination of toxic pollutants, process & management of

residues that are required to be disposed of in an environmentally sound manner. The Charter

enlists the action points for pollution control for various categories of highly polluting industries.

The Task Force was constituted for monitoring the progress of implementation of CREP

recommendations/ action points.

9.3.4 Roles and Responsibilities for Environmental Management

The roles and responsibilities of Industry are brought out in Table 9-3. These roles and

responsibilities can be shared by developer as a part of agreement with CIPLA industry and

shall have clear terms on environmental management responsibilities.

Table 9-3 Roles and Responsibilities of Industry

S.No. Component Responsibility of Industry

1 General agreement Strictly adhere to the plot allotment guidelines and agreement.

No pollutant shall be released to Natural water systems that affect the common people of the region.2 Water supply Water requirement shall be met from existing water supply scheme at KIADB (Inhouse Borewell and

through tankers)

Groundwater shall not be contaminated by discharge of pollutants into streams, ponds and othersurface water bodies.

3 Waterrecycle/reuse

Industry adopted recycle/reuse methodologies to the maximum extent possible. (Zero Liquiddischarge facility and Rain water Harvesting)

Page 228: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORTenvironmentclearance.nic.in/.../EIA/230520198KWR1Z7LEIAReport.pdf · Bengaluru Urban District & Karnataka State by M/s. CIPLA Limited. I was

Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Page 197

S.No. Component Responsibility of Industry

4 Wastewatercollection/conveyance

The wastewater conveyance (pipeline) within industry provided

5 Treatedwastewatermonitoring protocol

Monitoring of wastewater on a regular basis by CIPLA carried out as per SOPS and regulatorystandards at their respective holding for pH, TDS, TSS, BOD &COD etc.

6 Rainwaterharvesting

Rainwater harvesting in industry premises adopted.

7 Wastemanagement

Industry have independent Hazardous/Non-hazardous waste collection and segregation system andhas a temporary storage facility for 90 days detention which is designed as per the requirement.Wastes is periodically disposed to nearby TSDF and approved agencies as per the Hazardous wasteAuthorisation issued by KSPCB.Industry shall follow “The Hazardous Wastes (Management, Handling and Transboundary Movement)Third Amendment Rules, 2016”.

8 Post projectenvironmentalmonitoring

Industry specific critical pollutants shall be monitored at industry level.Specific requirement of monitoring and carried out as a part of compliance to CTE/CTO.

9 Stack monitoring Stack monitoring carried out by MoEF approved laboratory10 Greenbelt

developmentGreenbelt and green areas developed in the industry level as per KSPCB norms.

11 Storm watermanagement

Storm water collection within the industry provided and discharge facility into the common stormwater drains provided.

12 Truck parking Industry provided on-site parking spaces for trucks within the industry premises.

9.4 EMP for Construction Phase

Proposes for a change in product mix within the existing premises with no overall change in

production quantity of APIs. Also no additional infrastructure facilities are required for the

project..

Total built up area is divided into various sections like production blocks, Engineering,

warehouse, Administration, canteen, toilets etc. There is adequate space & provision for

operations. The plant facilities have been designed and set up with the objective to carry out all

chemical reactions and processes.

As the entire infrastructure needed for change in product mix is already available there is no

demand of any further infrastructure. In the existing facility only proposed products will be

manufactured. So there is no impact on Land, Air, Water, Noise, Soil & Ecology Environment.

9.5 EMP for Operational Phase

Page 229: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORTenvironmentclearance.nic.in/.../EIA/230520198KWR1Z7LEIAReport.pdf · Bengaluru Urban District & Karnataka State by M/s. CIPLA Limited. I was

Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Page 198

Monitoring during the operation phase shall reflect those environmental and socio-economic

issues that may persist upon completion of construction activities. Monitoring shall focus on

evaluating the effectiveness of project mitigation measures and continue baseline monitoring

and sampling. The mitigation measures to prevent adverse impact during the operation phase of

the project shall focus on the following:

1. Air quality

2. Noise environment

3. Water quality and water resources

4. Solid and hazardous waste

5. Land environment

6. Ecology

7. Socio Economic

9.5.1 Air Quality

The major source of emission is from Boiler, reactor stacks & DG stack. The details of

proposed source of air pollution & corresponding Air Pollution control equipment are already

given in Chapter 4 Environmental Impacts and mitigation measures.

APC measures are adequate stack height to disperse the pollutants. Adequate green belt has

been developed to mitigate the pollution arising due to movement of vehicles. Regular

monitoring of DG-Stack and Ambient air quality will be carried out.

Table 9-4 Air Pollution Control Measures

S.No

Existing Proposed

MoEF Approved No ofstacks Type of fuel Sulphur

contentKgs/hr incase of

liquid fuel

Chimney height (inmts) & air pollution

control systemprovided proposed

1 Attached toprocess

5 NA NA NA 3 m ARL/9 m AGL &scrubber

No change

2 Attached tofinishing area

2 NA NA NA Dust collector

3 Formulation 2 NA NA NA 3 m ARL/9 m AGL &scrubber

4 Quality Control 1 NA NA NA 3 m ARL/9 m AGL &scrubber

5 TFH system200000 k cal

1 NA NA NA 20 m AGL

Page 230: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORTenvironmentclearance.nic.in/.../EIA/230520198KWR1Z7LEIAReport.pdf · Bengaluru Urban District & Karnataka State by M/s. CIPLA Limited. I was

Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Page 199

6 Steam Boilers (2TPH x 3)

3 Furnace oil 4.0 % 190 Kg/Hr 30 m AGL

7Solid wasteincinerator 25kg/Hr

1 HSD 0.25 % 05 Lts/Hr 30 m AGL &Scrubber

8 Vapourabsorption

1 HSD 0.25 % 25 Lts/Hr 20 m AGL

9 (1250 x 3) KVADG sets

3 HSD 0.25 % 220 Lts/Hr 20 m AGL &silencers

Fugitive emission control

CIPLA has some action plan to control fugitive emission from reactors. The following is the

action plan

The outfall of reactor is connected to primary condenser,

Then outlet of primary condenser is passes through the secondary condenser, emission

passes through condenser will get condense.

The condensed emission will be recycled to process.

From vapor condenser cloud it again recycled to reactor,

In case of leakage of emission due to damage will detect manually and repair shall be

taken up.

Thus the fugitive emission is arrested

Page 231: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORTenvironmentclearance.nic.in/.../EIA/230520198KWR1Z7LEIAReport.pdf · Bengaluru Urban District & Karnataka State by M/s. CIPLA Limited. I was

Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Page 200

Figure 9-2 Method to recovery solvent and to control fugitive emissions

9.5.2 Noise Environment

The major source of noise pollution in the industry is DG sets, boilers, reactors, Air

compressors, Boiler feed water pumps. DG sets are provided with integral acoustic enclosures.

Also the ambient noise levels will be ensured within the ambient standards by inbuilt design of

mechanical equipment and buildings apart from vegetation along the periphery and at various

locations within the industry premises. The plant will be specifically designed with due

consideration on minimizing noise pollution. Higher noise levels may be felt only near the active

working areas and therefore the workers are provided with personal protective equipment as a

safety measure.

Following measures are proposed to mitigate negative impact of operation phase of the project

on the surrounding noise environment.

All the noise generating equipments will be designed / operated to ensure that noise

level does not exceed 75-70 dB (A) at plant boundary as per the requirement of Central /

State Pollution Control Board.

Noise generating sources will be maintained properly to minimize noise generated by

them.

Wherever feasible, acoustic enclosures will be provided for compressors, DG

Compliance with noise control norms will be given due importance at the time of

purchase of various equipments and it will be mentioned while placing the purchase

orders and guarantee for noise standards will be sought from suppliers.

Moreover, all the personnel working in other high noise generating areas too will be

provided with sufficient ear protecting devices.

Green belt will act as a noise barrier.

Training will be imparted to personnel to generate awareness about effects of noise and

importance of using PPEs.

9.5.3 Water and Wastewater Management

Total water requirement is 300 KLD of which fresh water requirement is 140 KLD; Water source

from the In house bore wells and private tankers. There is no change in the new proposal.

Page 232: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORTenvironmentclearance.nic.in/.../EIA/230520198KWR1Z7LEIAReport.pdf · Bengaluru Urban District & Karnataka State by M/s. CIPLA Limited. I was

Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Page 201

Sewage and effluent generated from process and washings are taken to combined Effluent and

Sewage Treatment Plant of capacity 160 KLD further processed in RO plant. Due to proposed

there is no change in wastewater quantity.

Rejects from RO Plant along with High TDS effluent is treated in Multiple Effect Evaporator of

40 KLD capacity. The treated wastewater of 160 KLD is reused for Boiler, cooling towers and

Toilet flushes.

Zero liquid discharge system is maintained in the facilities. There is no change in the new

proposal.

9.5.3.1 Rain Water Harvesting System

We have developed rain water harvesting structures to harvest the runoff water from the

rooftops and storm water drainage system for recharge of ground water. Rain water harvesting

is the techniques through which rain water is captured from the roof catchments with closed

pipe system (without mixing surface water to avoid the spillage contamination) into the recharge

pits & excess water is stored in the Rain water Storage.

Page 233: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORTenvironmentclearance.nic.in/.../EIA/230520198KWR1Z7LEIAReport.pdf · Bengaluru Urban District & Karnataka State by M/s. CIPLA Limited. I was

Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Page 202

Figure 9-3 Rain Water Harvesting System

Note: Total Rain water harvesting potential is 39065 KL/A. Process buildings are not considered for the calculation of Rainwater harvesting potential.

Page 234: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORTenvironmentclearance.nic.in/.../EIA/230520198KWR1Z7LEIAReport.pdf · Bengaluru Urban District & Karnataka State by M/s. CIPLA Limited. I was

Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Page 203

9.5.4 Solid and Hazardous waste Management

9.5.4.1 Solid waste managementThe Source of municipal waste in the industry will be from the domestic use. The Municipal solid

waste (Organic waste from canteen and pantry) generate150 kg/day. The total manpower is 300

nos during Operational phase. MSW given in Table 9-5

Table 9-5 Municipal Solid Waste

Type of waste Existing Proposed

Quantity Kg/day Collection method Disposal method

Organic wastefrom canteen and

pantry

150 Bins Composting & Localpig farm

No change

As per CPCB guidelines: MSW per capita/day =0.45

9.1.1.1 Hazardous waste ManagementThe various hazardous waste generated from the process is stored in a separate hazardous

waste storage area and properly disposed as per the Hazardous and Other Wastes

(Management and Trans boundary Movement) Amendment Rules, 2016. There is a Agreement

between TSDF and CIPLA for collection, transport, storage, treatment and disposal and also we

have a valid agreement with M/s. Enano incintech for Incineration of incinerable wastes.

Hazardous waste and management given in Table 9-6

Table 9-6 Hazardous waste and Management

WasteCategory

Existing Proposed

Hazardouswaste

Generated

Quantity Method of handling

Existing Proposed Total

5.1 Used Oil 15 KL/A

Nochanges

15KL/A

Collected in Leak proof containers anddisposed only to KSPCB registeredauthorized reprocessors provided the oilmeets the standards as per schedule-5part-A of the rules

No Change

5.2Oil soaked

cotton waste 0.5MT/A 0.5MT/AStored in a secured manner and handover to KSPCB authorized incinerator/Coprocessing in cement kiln

28.1 Processresidues &

Waste202 MT/A 202MT/A

Stored in a secured manner and handover to KSPCB authorized incinerator/Coprocessing in cement kiln / Disposal toTSDF in case calorific value is < 2500

Page 235: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORTenvironmentclearance.nic.in/.../EIA/230520198KWR1Z7LEIAReport.pdf · Bengaluru Urban District & Karnataka State by M/s. CIPLA Limited. I was

Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Page 204

Kcal/Kg.

20.3DistillationResidue 10 MT/A 10MT/A

Stored in a secured manner and handover to KSPCB authorized incinerator/Coprocessing in cement kiln

28.2Spent

solvent 1200 KL/A 1200KL/AStored in a secured manner and handover to KSPCB authorized recycler /

33.1Discardedcontainers

2500Nos/A

2500Nos/A

Stored in a secured manner and handover to KSPCB authorized recycler afterwash/decontamination only

35.3 Sludge fromETP & MEE

salts60

MTA60

MTAStored in a secured manner and handover to KSPCB authorized TSDF

9.5.5 Land Environment

Following measures are proposed to mitigate negative impact during operational phase of the

project on the land environment.

Air emissions are effectively controlled by use of scrubbers and therefore deposition of

air pollutants in and around the premises and surrounding area is not envisaged.

Disposal of solid waste is carried out through authorized vendor.

Plant is being maintained ZLD. No effluent is discharged directly on land without

treatment., impact on the land environment is not envisaged.

Hazardous materials are prohibited to be drained or dumped in the premises. Accidental

spills shall be cleaned, reported and monitored.

Thus, no impact on land is envisaged due to discharge of gaseous emission, solid waste

or liquid effluent from the proposed change in product mix.

9.5.6 Ecology

Since the proposed project is equipped with the treatment system, and the treated effluent will

be sent to RO and recycled to process boiler, feed, chiller and green belt. Solid wastes

generated during the operation phase are disposed off through authorized vendor and hence no

impact is anticipated due to solid waste in and around the site. The air pollution control devices

are already in place in the facility will control release of air pollutants to a greater extent,

however a two tiered thick green belt consisting of shrubs and trees around the periphery of the

site has been planned to intercept and arrest air pollutants released at various heights and to

Page 236: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORTenvironmentclearance.nic.in/.../EIA/230520198KWR1Z7LEIAReport.pdf · Bengaluru Urban District & Karnataka State by M/s. CIPLA Limited. I was

Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Page 205

attenuate the increased quantity of air pollutants released into the environment. It is expected

that the ecology of the region is preserved by these mitigation measures.

9.5.7 Green Belt Development Plan

The Plant facilities are spread over 115335.23 sq.m, (28.49 Acres / 11.52 Ha), Total built up

area (Land utilized for buildings, utilities purpose, other allied purpose like roads, machinery

equipments etc..,) is 54997.45 sq.m (13.58 Acres) KIADB Land which is completely fortified

and protected on all four sides by boundary walls.

Existing Green belt is 9.39 Acres (33 %) of 28.49 Acres, greenbelt developed along the

periphery and at various locations within the industry.

A well designed green-belt helps in intercepting particulate matter and gaseous pollutants and

helps in purifying the air. Trees acts as effective barrier and absorber of noise. The green belt

around an industry acts as a buffer in the event of emission control equipment failure and acts

as an indicator in the event of toxic release by visible morphological changes in the leaves, stem

etc. To accrue the benefits of greenbelt and to maximize its potential in environmental

management around an industry, choice of the green belt tree and shrub species plays a vital

role.

Selection of Trees

Adequate numbers of saplings are planted all along the periphery of the plant and available

open spaces. The major aim of greenbelt development plan is to attenuate air pollutants

released into the environment but it can also help in overall improvement in the environmental

conditions of the project site. The plan will address the following issues such as attenuation of

air pollution, noise reduction, improving the biodiversity of the region, adding aesthetics and

combating soil erosion and prevention of land degradation.

A well designed green-belt helps in intercepting particulate matter and gaseous pollutants and

helps in purifying the air. Trees acts as effective barrier and absorber of noise. The green belt

around an industry acts as a buffer in the event of emission control equipment failure and acts

as an indicator in the event of toxic release by visible morphological changes in the leaves, stem

etc. To accrue the benefits of greenbelt and to maximize its potential in environmental

management around an industry, choice of the green belt tree and shrub species plays a vital

role.

Page 237: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORTenvironmentclearance.nic.in/.../EIA/230520198KWR1Z7LEIAReport.pdf · Bengaluru Urban District & Karnataka State by M/s. CIPLA Limited. I was

Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Page 206

For development of greenbelt in outside of private property it is advisable to select tree species

high are tolerant to air pollutants, since certain species of trees has the ability to uptake large

quantities of SO2 than other species and grow at a faster rate by utilizing the available nutrients

in the soil etc.

In general, following factors have to be considered for the selection of tree species.

Native tree species should be preferred over non-native trees.

The trees must be tolerant to all the pollutants present in the area.

The trees which are evergreen and forms large round canopy with broad leaves.

The morphological feature of leaves like rough surfaced and large number of stomatalaperture.

The trees should be able to grow faster and should help in stabilization of the soil.

The tree should consume only less ground water and tree which sucks more water willnot select for plantation.

The trees should maintain ecological, land and hydrological balance of the region

9.5.8 Socio – Economic Environment

As due to the proposed project various modes of indirect employment i.e. transportation,

increased business opportunities to shopkeepers, small scale business entrepreneurs etc. will

lead to development of the area.

9.6 HAZARD IDENTIFICATION AND SAFETY SYSTEM

9.6.1 Hazard Identified In the Factory

1. Health hazard due to exposure to chemicals and chemical spillage

2. Fire hazard due to use of flammable chemicals

3. Fire and explosion hazard due to various chemical reactions

9.6.2 Scenario Based Emergency Actions

1. Action plan in case of Solvent leakage from flange joints or from bottom valveetc.,

a. Shift In-charge / Department Head should be informed immediately.

Page 238: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORTenvironmentclearance.nic.in/.../EIA/230520198KWR1Z7LEIAReport.pdf · Bengaluru Urban District & Karnataka State by M/s. CIPLA Limited. I was

Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Page 207

b. Access the situation.

c. Only trained personnel shall approach the area using suitable personnel

protective equipment’s.

d. Stop leakage by closing isolation valve.

e. Stop hot work in surrounding area.

f. Isolate the power supply of the respective area.

g. Other than the needy all should evacuate the area.

h. Cover drains / isolate from other plants with the help of sand or soil.

i. Affected persons should move to fresh air and seek medical help further.

j. Spills shall be contained with spill control sorbents and disposed to authorized

incinerator

2. Action plan in case of Fire in Centrifuge due to Solvent vapoura. Shout and break MCP

b. Trained should fight the fire with suitable PPEs.

c. Extinguish fire with DCP / CO2 / Foam extinguisher.

d. In case the fire not controlled with the use of portable fire extinguishers, start

fighting by using fire hydrant system with mobile foam unit.

e. Other than the needy all should evacuate the area.

f. Close valves on solvent pipe lines.

g. Cool down MLR tank by water spray.

h. Isolate the power supply of the respective area.

i. Close / isolate the drains with sand or soil.

j. Affected persons should be given first aid and moved for medical attention.

3. Action plan in case of Fire or Explosiona. Shout and break MCP.

b. Trained should fight the fire with suitable PPEs.

c. Extinguish with DCP / CO2 / Foam Extinguishers installed at site.

d. In case the fire not controlled with the use of portable fire extinguishers, start

fighting by using fire hydrant system and use mobile foam unit for solvent fire.

e. Isolate the power supply of the respective area.

f. Other than the needy all should evacuate the area.

g. Cool down nearby receivers / service tank, reactors etc by water spray.

Page 239: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORTenvironmentclearance.nic.in/.../EIA/230520198KWR1Z7LEIAReport.pdf · Bengaluru Urban District & Karnataka State by M/s. CIPLA Limited. I was

Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Page 208

h. Isolate interconnection of tanks, reactors, service tank, charging valves, receivers

etc.

i. Other pipelines are to be checked for isolation.

j. Close / isolate the drains with sand or soil.

k. Affected persons should be given first aid and moved for medical attention.

l. Fire tender shall be called for help and Fire water runoff shall be contained and

diverted to ETP

4. Action plan in case of Toxic Releasea. Shift In-charge / Department Head should be informed immediately.

b. Only trained personnel shall approach the area using suitable personnel

protective equipments.

c. Check the wind direction; decide route of escape and evacuating persons should

run perpendicular to the wind direction and not against / along the wind direction.

d. Evacuating personnel should use wet handkerchief on their nose.

e. Inform the neighborhood if required and if they are likely to be affected.

f. Ensure that only essential personnel are in the affected areas.

g. Rescue the persons trapped / injured.

h. Person present in other buildings should close their windows and doors to

prevent any entry of leaked gases.

i. Trace the source of leakage or spillage and isolate the system from other

equipment.

j. Isolate the electrical supply to the affected area.

k. Trap the leakage into a suitable scrubber.

l. Affected persons should be given first aid and moved for medical attention.

5. Action plan in case of Electric Fire or Shocka. Isolate the power supply to the affected area immediately before approaching the

site.

b. Do not use water for extinguishing the fire. Use CO2 type or DCP type or dry

sand to extinguishing the fire.

c. Remove any flammable or combustible material from the vicinity of the incident.

d. Remove the affected person to an open area and check his breathing.

e. If he is unconscious and not breathing initiate artificial resuscitation procedure.

f. Do first aid for any burn injury.

Page 240: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORTenvironmentclearance.nic.in/.../EIA/230520198KWR1Z7LEIAReport.pdf · Bengaluru Urban District & Karnataka State by M/s. CIPLA Limited. I was

Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Page 209

g. Physically isolate the burnt electrical components. Do not energize till the entire

circuitry is checked with megger or other devices with safety mechanisms.

6. Action plan in case of leakage or rupture of Solvent / Fuel storage tanksa. Area should be evacuated immediately and cordoned off.

b. Affected persons should be thoroughly washed using clean water and given

necessary medical aid.

c. Personnel entering the area should make use of suitable personnel protective

equipments.

d. Leaked tank must be depressurized immediately by transferring remaining

quantity into another tank or container.

e. Leakage source must be traced and plugged.

f. Isolate the nearby electrical points and prevent any fire being brought nearby. As

a precaution mobilize extra fire extinguishers to the spot to tackle fire if caught.

Spilled material spreading should be contained in a dyke and transferred to

container or it must be absorbed on sand or earth.

g. The contaminated sand or earth must be neutralized and then dumped at safe

place or burned in the fire pit. (flammable liquids should not be absorbed by

combustible solids like saw dust or combustible fibres)

h. If a spilled material in to the trench of electrical cables, then it should be drained

with natural gradient and wash with large quantity of water continuously after de

energising the cable.

i. If a spilled material gets into the storm water drain or sewer line then it will be

continuous and diverted to ETP.

7. Action plan in case of Compressed Gas Cylinder Leakagea. Move the cylinders to well ventilated area, and barricade the area. Never try to

repair the leaks when the equipment under pressure.

b. Immediately contact supplier to get the necessary information and help.

c. If fire catches to cylinder, do not try to extinguish the cylinder fire. Only cool (by

pouring water) and protect the nearby equipments from the safe distance.

8. Action plan in case of Cryogenic Gas (Liquid Nitrogen) Leakagea. Allow the spillage to evaporate by providing good ventilation.

b. If you feel the ventilation is insufficient, then immediately evacuate the area.

Page 241: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORTenvironmentclearance.nic.in/.../EIA/230520198KWR1Z7LEIAReport.pdf · Bengaluru Urban District & Karnataka State by M/s. CIPLA Limited. I was

Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Page 210

9. Action plan in case of Water Reactive Chemical Spillagea. Do not put water on the spill.

b. If it is liquid, use neutralizing agent and inert material like dry sand to absorb

spillage.

c. If it is powder / crystalline, avoid generating dusty conditions, sweep up material.

d. Placed to bag, label the bag and send to ETP for safe disposal.

e. Wash the spill area.

10. Action plan in case of Leakage through Pipe Line & Storage tanksa. If the leak in a pipe line, immediately stop the supply to corresponding pipe line

b. To remove the spilled material from that area, procedure to be followed based on

the nature of material / chemical.

Table 9-7 Identification of Hazards In Each Departments/Section With Hazard Area Mapand Affecting Population

Sl No Department Nature Of Work Hazard Effected Population1 Production Handling Chemical

ReactionsToxic ReleaseFire And Explosion

24

2 Maintenance Regular WorkElecrtrical WorkFabrication Work

FireElectrical Hazards

12

3 Quality Control Chemical AnalysisChemical Mixing

Fire And ExplosionChemical Exposure

10

4 R&D Chemical ReactionsChemical MixingGas Handling

Fire And ExplosionChemicalexposure

5

5 Stores Material HandlingSolvent Loading AndUnloadingChemical Handling

FireChemical Exposure

5

9.6.3 Available Safety Systems

1. Emergency Equipments and PPEsEach Emergency Cupboard consist the following items

1. Self Contained Breathing Apparatus (SCBA)

2. Air suits / Air Line Respirators

3. Respirator / Full Face Mask (Air purifying)

4. PVC / Acid Suit

Page 242: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORTenvironmentclearance.nic.in/.../EIA/230520198KWR1Z7LEIAReport.pdf · Bengaluru Urban District & Karnataka State by M/s. CIPLA Limited. I was

Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Page 211

5. Helmet

6. Ear Muff

7. Safety Glass & Face Shield

8. Gum boot

9. Safety Belt

10. Manila Rope / Life Safety Rope

11. Fire Axe

12. Fire Proximity Suit

13. Fire Gel Blankets / Water Gel Blanket

14. Resuscitator

15. Spill Kit

16. Safety Ladder

17. Emergency Flameproof Torches

2. Work Zone Monitoring Equipments

We have multi gas / toxic gas and oxygen detectors in that multi gas detector can be used to

check oxygen, LEL, VOC, CO and H2S concentration in atmosphere and also in confined

spaces like inside the reactor, overhead tanks, underground tanks, sump etc and oxygen

detector can be used for checking oxygen concentration in atmosphere and also in confined

spaces like inside the reactor, overhead tanks, underground tanks, sump etc.

We are having Hydro Carbon Sensors (HCS), installed in all critical areas and these will

provide the alarm once the set level is crossed.

3. First Aid BoxesA first aid kit is a collection of supplies and equipment for use in giving first aid. First Aid

boxes are available in Security Room (ECC), Admin Block and at OHC. First Aid items will

issue to injure only by authorized persons.

Following are the contents of First Aid Box,

a. Dettol – Antiseptic solution

b. Ciplox – Eye Drops

Page 243: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORTenvironmentclearance.nic.in/.../EIA/230520198KWR1Z7LEIAReport.pdf · Bengaluru Urban District & Karnataka State by M/s. CIPLA Limited. I was

Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Page 212

c. Soframycin – Skin ointment

d. Silverex – Burn ointment

e. Betadine – Microbicidal solution

f. Iodex – Pain reliever

g. Sterilized Cotton Wool

h. Adhesive Plaster

i. Surgical Paper Tape

j. Small Sterilized Dressings

k. Medium Sterilized Dressings

l. Large Sterilized Dressings

m. Sterilized Burn Dressings

n. Roller Bandage – 5 cm wide

o. Roller Bandage – 10cm wide

p. Band Aid

q. Crocin / Paracetamol Tablet

Along with the above safety systems, we have also ensured the below safety features to ensure

Zero Accident.

1. Dedicated underground solvent storage area with flame proof electrical connections,

breather valve, enough jumpers and earthing & bonding facility to unload the solvent

from road tankers.

2. No ignitable zones are declared and marked so.

3. Work permit system with strict compliance.

4. Dedicated chemical storage area with good ventilation and exhaust system and all

chemical are stored as per compatibility.

5. Dyke walls provided for the day storage chemical tanks.

6. All reactors provided with safety valves followed by rupture discs and relief valve outlets

are extended.

7. Calibration is ensured for the gauges of pressure, temperature and vacuum.

8. All reactors will be hydro tested and certified by the competent person once in a year.

9. Body earthing provided to all equipments involved in the process, electrical earthing,

static earting and instrument earthing provided wherever required.

10. Nitrogen provision provided to all reactors in view of providing nitrogen blanketing during

handling of flammables.

Page 244: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORTenvironmentclearance.nic.in/.../EIA/230520198KWR1Z7LEIAReport.pdf · Bengaluru Urban District & Karnataka State by M/s. CIPLA Limited. I was

Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Page 213

11. Process block zones are classified as per flameproof area zonal classification and

accordingly used the flameproof electrical fittings.

12. Scrubber system with lye circulation is installed to create vapor free work environment

and to release neutralized / non toxic fumes to the environment.

13. Touch pads are provided in all prominent places to discharge our body static electricity.

14. Wrist bands are provided to use during charging of chemicals in to reactors to avoid

static electricity.

15. Zero interlock, proximity switch and nitrogen line provision provided to all centrifuge

system to avoid personal injury and fire hazard.

16. Safety relief valve and gate limit switch provided to all RCVDs to avoid explosion and

personal injury.

17. Air handling units (AHUs) with BIBO (Bag In Bag Out) are provided to keep the work

environment in controlled manner (air flow pattern, temperature and humidity) to reduce

the exposure to chemicals.

18. Ventilation air units (VAUs) and Exhaust air units (EAUs) and are provided to ensure

good ventilation in the work environment.

19. Isolators are provided to handle potent chemicals.

20. HAZOP will be carried for all molecules.

Table 9-8 Emergency Shutting Down Procedure

Hazards Possible Hazards Shutting Down ProcedureGeneral Fire Fire And Explosion Switch Off Power Supply To Affected Area

Use Mcp To Communicate Emergency TeamRemove Other Inflammable And Combustible Materials

Solvent Distillation Raise Of HighTemperatures AndPressure,Explosion And Fire Hazard

Stop The AgitatorStop The HeatingApply Cooling To The Jacket Of And Inform To The Higher Authority ForFurther Action And Shut Down The Plant

Electrical Fire Electric Fire And Shock Switch – Off The Electrical Supply Of The Equipment Or Panel Involved InThe FireSwitch – Off The Mains Of The Entire Section In Case Fire SpreadRemove Flammable Liquid Drums Materialswhich Are Likely To Catch TheFireUse Only Dcp Or Co2 For Extinguishing The Fire

Dg Fire Use Nearby Foam Extinguisher If Fir Is SmallUse Mcp And Communicate To Emergency TeamClear The Area Of Diesel And Other Combustible MaterialsChange Dg Control Panel Switch To Off Mode And Switch Off Dg ByTurning The Key To Off PositionIsolate Fuel Supply By Closing The Valve

Hazards Possible Hazards Shutting Down Procedure

Page 245: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORTenvironmentclearance.nic.in/.../EIA/230520198KWR1Z7LEIAReport.pdf · Bengaluru Urban District & Karnataka State by M/s. CIPLA Limited. I was

Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Page 214

Fireboiler (Diesel Fired) Explosion Leave The Place If Rise In Temp And Pressure Is Rapid.Communicate To All By Using McpSwitch Off Boiler Firing And Fd FanKeep Water RunningIf Automation Fails Then Perform The Above OperationArrange For BlowdownDo Not Leave The Place Untill Normalcy Is Achieved,

Figure 9-4 Alert Action Plan during Working/Non Working Hours

Fire /other exigencies

Discoverer communicates byphone or personally to the security gate

Security Supervisor activates the emergency siren (15 seconds ON and 05 OFF for 3timesand communicates to Factory

Incident Controller(shift supervisor)rushes to the spot

Dispatch the fire fighting team to thespot

If it is controllable, isolate the area & dofire fighting

If it is uncontrollable shutdown all theprocess and evacuate the area & ensurethe fire agencies arrive at the spot & fire

is extinguished

Alert the employees thro’ PublicAddress System for evacuation

Ensure the Evacuation of the peoplefrom work spots.

Arrange fire brigade /first aid/Ambulance

Prevent unauthorizedpeople entering into the

company

Head count / Assembly Point / First Aid

“All Clear” siren to be activated by the Security Supervisor afterconfirming with the site controller

Page 246: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORTenvironmentclearance.nic.in/.../EIA/230520198KWR1Z7LEIAReport.pdf · Bengaluru Urban District & Karnataka State by M/s. CIPLA Limited. I was

Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Page 215

Figure 9-5 Emergency Organization Chart

COORDINATOR

Law & Order &Govt. agencies

COORDINATOR

Hospitals & Fire

brigade

COORDINATOR –

Head count &

Information to

Relatives

SITE CONTROLLER

Leading emergency

Coordinators

SAFETY SQUAD

COORDINATOR

Communication

COORDINATOR –

Rescue coordination

FIRST AIDERS

Page 247: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORTenvironmentclearance.nic.in/.../EIA/230520198KWR1Z7LEIAReport.pdf · Bengaluru Urban District & Karnataka State by M/s. CIPLA Limited. I was

Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Page 216

9.6.4 Occupational Health and Safety Program

Industrial Hygiene is one of the fast emerging fields and is a critical requirement for the well

being of employees, for which CIPLA has developed a comprehensive Occupational health

program.

The occupational Health Management system / the industrial hygiene and medical system

protects and enhances health, productivity, and wellness by anticipating, recognizing,

evaluating, controlling, and managing workplace health hazards (e.g. chemical, physical,

biological, ergonomic, psychological, etc). These systems also mitigate illnesses and injuries by

promptly recognizing, treating, investigating, and taking corrective actions.

CIPLA Occupational Health & Wellness Program covers the policies, work practices and

procedures to provide a safe and healthy environment and protect the shop floor employees,

laboratory employees and researchers from health hazards associated with the use of

hazardous chemicals.

Occupational Health Monitoring

Medical Surveillance Program: Medical surveillance program is essential to assess and

monitor employees' health and fitness both prior to employment and during the course of work;

to determine fitness for duty and to provide emergency and other treatment as needed.

Effectiveness of a medical program depends on active involvement of employees.

Developing a OH-IH Medical Surveillance Program

Pre-Employment Examination and Periodic Medical Examinations

Determination of Fitness for Duty

Communications

Emergency Medical Treatment

Medical Records

Pre-Employment Screening / Examinations- All employees shall be subject to pre-placement

medical examinations to determine their fitness for the nature of jobs on site. Potential

exposures to the work environment shall be considered before placing an employee on the job.

Page 248: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORTenvironmentclearance.nic.in/.../EIA/230520198KWR1Z7LEIAReport.pdf · Bengaluru Urban District & Karnataka State by M/s. CIPLA Limited. I was

Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Page 217

Periodic Medical Examinations- Periodic medical examination is the same as the pre-

employment screening and may be modified according to current conditions, such as changes

in the employee's symptoms, site hazards, or exposures.

Comparison of sequential medical reports with baseline data is essential to determine biologic

trends that may mark early signs of adverse health effects, and thereby facilitate appropriate

protective measures. The frequency and content of examinations are normally one year.

Page 249: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORTenvironmentclearance.nic.in/.../EIA/230520198KWR1Z7LEIAReport.pdf · Bengaluru Urban District & Karnataka State by M/s. CIPLA Limited. I was

Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Page 218

Figure 9-6 Safety, Health and Environment Policy

Page 250: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORTenvironmentclearance.nic.in/.../EIA/230520198KWR1Z7LEIAReport.pdf · Bengaluru Urban District & Karnataka State by M/s. CIPLA Limited. I was

Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Page 219

9.7 Corporate Social Responsibility

The Company is aware of the obligations towards the society and to fulfil the social obligations,

company employed semi-skilled and skilled labour from the nearby villages as much as possible

and also try to generate maximum indirect employment in the nearby villages by appointing

local contract workers.

The company will have an intention to spend around 2% of the profit as per company act. In

coming year we have tentatively planned CSR activity as below.

The various CSR activities identified and planned in the coming year are described below;

A. Education & Skill Development1. Award Scholarships / fellowships to deserving students to encourage education.

2. Provision of uniforms, books, and stationery, necessary equipments etc, to

schools.

B. Health1. Promote awareness programmes against social evils such as addictions, AIDS

etc.,

2. Providing nutritional supplements to lactating mothers, children and pregnant

women.

3. Conducting the blood donation camp.

C. Sanitation1. Provision of sanitation facility in the villages by building common toilet.

D. Providing waste collection bins to villagers1. Providing waste collection bins to the villagers for disposing the municipal waste

at their house.

E. Tree Plantation in Village1. Company will plan to provide saplings to the nearby villagers and school.

2. Plantation along the road side and development of garden / greenbelt on

government barren land.

F. Other Social Welfare Activities1. Financial & infrastructure assistance during disaster & other crisis incidents

2. Participate & contribute in local religious and social programs

Page 251: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORTenvironmentclearance.nic.in/.../EIA/230520198KWR1Z7LEIAReport.pdf · Bengaluru Urban District & Karnataka State by M/s. CIPLA Limited. I was

Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Page 220

The activities listed above are not limited to and Company will plan and perform other activities

according to the need of local community in future.

Table 9-9 CSR activities carried out (2013 to 2016)

Sl.No. Object Project Narration Amount (INR)

ProjectImplementing

partnerBeneficiary

Location

CSR Spend FY 2013 – 2014

1 MedicalMs. Bhargavi SKundargi

Support towardsmedical expenses ofthe needy 85000

Mr. Sanjeev SKundargi Bangalore

2Other CharitableActivity

Support forempowerment of girls& womens from slumcommunity

Project on Girl childand Womenempowerment 500000 CREST Bangalore

3 Educational

Construction of Twoclassrooms for Govt.Higher PrimarySchool, Hirendahalli

HirendanahalliPanchayat School 1291134 Self Bangalore

4 Medical Mr. Jaya Mendon

Support towardsmedical expenses ofthe needy 95000 Mr. Jaya Mendon Bangalore

Total 1971134

CSR Spend FY 2014 – 2015

1 Medical

Construction ofWashroom blocks forMen and Women atHumanitarian HandsHome for destitute, illand old aged people

Towards constructionof washrooms atHumanitarian TransitHome , Bangalore 1168800 Self Bangalore

2 Medical

Support towardspurchase ofmedicines & otherbasic necesscity ofHumanitarian TrasitHome, Bangalore

NGO engaged inserving underprivileged children &destitute home thatshelters abandoned &ill old aged 500000

Senior CitizensBangalore Bangalore

3 Medical

Nethra ChikitsaShibira (Eye check-upcamps includingscreening and

Towards supply ofspecs during for FreeEye check-up campsfor communities 263641

Shraddha EyeCare Trust Bangalore

Page 252: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORTenvironmentclearance.nic.in/.../EIA/230520198KWR1Z7LEIAReport.pdf · Bengaluru Urban District & Karnataka State by M/s. CIPLA Limited. I was

Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Page 221

treatment for Cataractcases)

including screening,consultation, aid tocorrect refractiveerrors, and treatmentfor cataract cases

4Educational(Infrastructure)

Construction ofWashroom blocks atGovt. High School,Doddabanahalli

Towards constructionof washrooms atGovt. High School atDoddabanahallivillage 491456 Self Bangalore

5Educational(Infrastructure)

Construction ofMultipurposecommunity hall atBandenallasandravillage

Towards constructionof Community HallBuilding,Bandenallasandravillage 751336 Self Bangalore

6 Medical

Support towardspurchase ofmedicines & doctorsfees for providingtreatment to needypatient at subsidiesrates

"FOSA HumanitarianHospital" Unit of RVMFoundation, Freehospital for poor,needy and destitutepeople 500000

FOSAHumanitarian

Hospital Bangalore

Total 3675233

CSR Spend FY 2015 – 2016

1Educational(Infrastructure)

Construction ofMultipurposecommunity hall atBandenallasandravillage

Towards constructionof Community HallBuilding,Bandenallasandravillage 961711 Self Bangalore

2 Educational

Merit Awards to SSCStudents of Govt.High schools

Awards to Meritotiousstudents fromeconomically Weakersections of society 61250 Self Bangalore

3Educational(Infrastructure)

Construction ofWashroom blocks atGovt. High School,Doddabanahalli

Towards constructionof washrooms atGovt. High School atDoddabanahallivillage 658833 Self Bangalore

4 Educational

Mobile Science LabProject for 20 Govt.Primary schools anfGovt. high schools inBangalore Urban and

Project includesHands on Scienceclassroom session,Young Instructortraining, Science fair, 1678127

AgastyaInternationalFoundation Bangalore

Page 253: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORTenvironmentclearance.nic.in/.../EIA/230520198KWR1Z7LEIAReport.pdf · Bengaluru Urban District & Karnataka State by M/s. CIPLA Limited. I was

Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Page 222

Rural Teachers training,Community visits andother supportingactivities

5 Medical

Support towardsBone MarrowTransplantation forChildren withThalassemia

Funds towards theMedical expenditurefor Bone MarrowTransplantation ofchildren sufferingfrom Thalassemia, aGenetic disorder 1400000

Sankalp IndiaFoundation Bangalore

Total 4759921

CSR Spend FY 2016 – 20171 Skilling Support towards

Training room chairsfor SCB Skill centre

Support towardspurchase of Furniturefor SCB Skill centre

1,13,000 Self

2 Skilling Low cost modelmaking competition

As part ofenvironmental dayobservation,conducted low costmodel makingcompetitionconducted withgovernment schoolchildren

8000 Self

3 Health Support for Purchaseof Sports Equipments

Support towardspurchase of sportsequipment toChildrenofGovernment SchoolDoddabanahalli

1,87,000 Self

4 Education Merit Awards Financial support tothe high achievingstudents inGovernment Schools

48,000 Self

5 Health Sanitation facilities atGovt High School,DoddabanahalliVillage

Support forconstruction ofwashrooms forGovernment SchoolChildren,

6000 Self

Page 254: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORTenvironmentclearance.nic.in/.../EIA/230520198KWR1Z7LEIAReport.pdf · Bengaluru Urban District & Karnataka State by M/s. CIPLA Limited. I was

Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Page 223

DoddabanahalliVillage

6 Health Sanitation block atGHPS, Siddanapalya

Support forconstruction ofwashrooms forGovernment SchoolChildren,DoddabanahalliVillage

8000 Self

7 AgastyaFoundation

Mobile Science Labat Banglore

Hands on Sciencetraining toGovernment SchoolChildren near VirgoNagar Unit

12,88,000 AgastyaInternationalFoundation

Total 16,58,000

CSR Spend FY 2017 – 2018

1Education Mobile Science Lab in

BangaloreHands on scienceexperience toGovernment SchoolChildren

11,16,000Agastya

InternationalFoundation

2Education Merit Award Financial support to

the high achievingstudents inGovernment Schools

72,000 Self-Implemented

3Health

SiddanapalyaSanitation Block

Support towardsconstruction ofwashrooms atGovernment PrimarySchool, Siddenapalyavillage

8,64,000 Self-Implemented

4Health Veerenahalli RO

PlantSupport forconstruction of ROWater Plant

4,01,000 Self-Implemented

5Education Class Room GLPS

Yedakola VillageSupport towardsconstruction of classrooms at GHPSYedakola village

11,08,000 Self-Implemented

Page 255: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORTenvironmentclearance.nic.in/.../EIA/230520198KWR1Z7LEIAReport.pdf · Bengaluru Urban District & Karnataka State by M/s. CIPLA Limited. I was

Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Page 224

6Skilling Enable Vision - Digital

Literacy for visuallyimpaired

Support towardscomputer literacyprogram for visuallydifferently abledpeople.

40,00,000 Enable India

7Education Sponsorship towards

special education forchildren withDisabilities

Support towards theeducation of childrenwith developmentaldisabilities 1,50,000 Spastic Society

Total 77,11,000CSR Spend FY 2018 – 2019

1 Education Science on Wheels atBanglore

Hands on ScienceTraining toGovernment Schoolchildren .

11,54,000AgastyaInternationalFoundation

2 Education

Merit Award

Financial support tobest achievingstudens inGovernment School 70,000

Self-Implemented

3 Skilling Enable Vision- DigitalLiteracy Program forVisually Impaired

Providing computertraining to people whoare visually differentlyabled

41,94,000

Enable India

4 Health Support towardsBone marrow transferat People TreeHospital Banglore

Support towardsBone marrow transferat People TreeHospital Banglore

30,00,000Sankalp IndiaFoundation

5 Education Sponsorship towardsspecial education forchildren withDevelopmentaldisabilities

Sponsorship towardsspecial education forchildren withDevelopmentaldisabilities

50,000Spastic Society

6 Health Support towards oneward in Palliative care

Support towards one12,75,000 Karunashray

Page 256: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORTenvironmentclearance.nic.in/.../EIA/230520198KWR1Z7LEIAReport.pdf · Bengaluru Urban District & Karnataka State by M/s. CIPLA Limited. I was

Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Page 225

ward in Palliative care

Total 97,43,000

Projection for 2019-20:

Extension of Mobile Science Lab - Virgo Nagar - Budget Rs. 13,79,923

Kallabalu Lake Rejuvenation- Plantation Project - Bommasandra Rs. 6, 50,000

Merit Awards Rs. 70,000 approx

Enable India Last Payment Rs. 69,673

Page 257: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORTenvironmentclearance.nic.in/.../EIA/230520198KWR1Z7LEIAReport.pdf · Bengaluru Urban District & Karnataka State by M/s. CIPLA Limited. I was

Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Page 226

Figure 9-7 Corporate Responsibility Policy

Page 258: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORTenvironmentclearance.nic.in/.../EIA/230520198KWR1Z7LEIAReport.pdf · Bengaluru Urban District & Karnataka State by M/s. CIPLA Limited. I was

Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Page 227

Table 9-10 Cost Estimate for Environment Management Plan

S.No Equipment Investment

EMP

1 MEE Nil

2 ETP Nil

3 RO Plant Nil

4 Lab Nil

5 Green Belt Area 10 Lakhs

6 DG Acoustic Already provided

7 Online Monitor Not applicable

Air Pollution Equipments8 Boiler Chimney NA

9 DG Chimney NA

10 Scrubber 30 LakhEHS

11 Fire Alarm Systems 20 Lakhs

12 Fire Hydrant System 4 Lakhs

13 Fire Fighting Equipments 2 Lakh

14 Flame Proof Fittings NA

15 Safety Equipments Existing unit

16 OHC NA

17 Annual Medical

Checkups

2 Lakhs

Total 67.5 Lakhs

Page 259: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORTenvironmentclearance.nic.in/.../EIA/230520198KWR1Z7LEIAReport.pdf · Bengaluru Urban District & Karnataka State by M/s. CIPLA Limited. I was

Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Page 228

CHAPTER – 10SUMMARY & CONCLUSION

Page 260: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORTenvironmentclearance.nic.in/.../EIA/230520198KWR1Z7LEIAReport.pdf · Bengaluru Urban District & Karnataka State by M/s. CIPLA Limited. I was

Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Page 229

10 SUMMARY & CONCLUSION10.1 Summary

An environmental Impact Assessment Study has been carried out and assessed for the

proposed project based on the TOR and baseline quality data collected for the study area.

Identification and anticipation of the potential environmental impacts due to the proposed project

with a delineation of appropriate impact mitigation measures in an Environmental Management

plan during both construction and operation phases is provided in the EIA report prepared.

The proposed project will ensure that the industrial activities relevant to the project are

environmentally sound with no adverse impacts posed on the natural environment in the

surrounding area.

The marginal impacts that might be caused by the proposed activity will be mitigated by the

existing pollution control and environmental management measures.

In a true and a larger sense, in view of the considerable benefits from the project with no major

impacts, the proposed project is said to be more beneficial to the nation.

The EMP that will be implemented for the construction and operation stages of the project will

include:

Air Pollution control and management

Noise Control and Management

Hazardous and Solid waste Management

Sewage treatment and Management

Effluent treatment and Management

Hazardous and solid waste management

DMP (Risk Assessment, Onsite and Offsite emergency Plan)

In order to effectively implement the EMP planned, an environmental management system will

be formulated.

Page 261: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORTenvironmentclearance.nic.in/.../EIA/230520198KWR1Z7LEIAReport.pdf · Bengaluru Urban District & Karnataka State by M/s. CIPLA Limited. I was

Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Page 230

10.2 Conclusion

The baseline study carried out for the study area indicates that all the physical, chemical and

biological characteristics of the environmental attributes in the surrounding area are well within

the permissible limits.

Based on this environmental assessment, the possible impacts during both pre-project and

post-project phase are anticipated and the necessary adequate control measures are

formulated to meet the statutory compliances.

With very minute negative impacts, the project positively leads to commercial business

opportunities, Employment opportunities, increased revenue and infrastructural development.

Thus this project may kindly be granted Environmental Clearance.

Page 262: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORTenvironmentclearance.nic.in/.../EIA/230520198KWR1Z7LEIAReport.pdf · Bengaluru Urban District & Karnataka State by M/s. CIPLA Limited. I was

Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Page 231

CHAPTER – 11DISCLOSURE OF CONSULTANT

Page 263: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORTenvironmentclearance.nic.in/.../EIA/230520198KWR1Z7LEIAReport.pdf · Bengaluru Urban District & Karnataka State by M/s. CIPLA Limited. I was

Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Page 232

11 DISCLOSURE OF CONSULTANT

In order to assess the potential environmental impacts due to the proposed Change in Product

Mix of the Bulk Drugs and Intermediates Manufacturing Unit by M/s. CIPLA Limited, Plot No.

285, 286 & 287, KIADB Industrial Area, Bommasandra-jigani Link Road, Phase IV, Anekal

Taluk, Bengaluru Urban District. CIPLA has engaged Hubert Enviro Care Systems (P) Limited,

Chennai to undertake EIA study. The nature of consultancy service rendered covers terrestrial

environmental assessment.

11.1 Brief Profile of Hubert Enviro Care Systems (P) Limited (HECS)

Enviro Care Systems was started in the year of 1997 by Dr. J.R.Moses with the vision to serve

the world in all environmental related problems by completing the latest technological

advancements available.

In the year 2004, Enviro Care Systems became Hubert Enviro Care Systems (P) Ltd after

having collaboration with Hubert Stavoren B.V. for higher Technology.

The company provides total pollution control solutions to several industries like Thermal Power

Plant, Pharma, R&D Facilities, Electroplating and Manufacturing, IT Parks, Residential

Complexes, Dairies, Food Processing, Textile mills, Breweries, etc.

The company is specialized in executing projects right from concept development, supply,

erection, commissioning and operation on turnkey basis. HECS has successfully executed more

than 200 environmental engineering projects for various industrial sectors both in India and

overseas.

HECS has state-of-art facilities to provide quality environmental consultancy and engineering

solutions.

Strengths of HECS

Number of Employees

Total No of Employees 736Consultancy 26Laboratory 77Projects 19Operation & Maintenance 614

Page 264: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORTenvironmentclearance.nic.in/.../EIA/230520198KWR1Z7LEIAReport.pdf · Bengaluru Urban District & Karnataka State by M/s. CIPLA Limited. I was

Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Page 233

Quality Policy of HECS

Page 265: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORTenvironmentclearance.nic.in/.../EIA/230520198KWR1Z7LEIAReport.pdf · Bengaluru Urban District & Karnataka State by M/s. CIPLA Limited. I was

Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Page 234

QCI-NABET - EIA Accreditation

Consultancy Hubert Enviro Care Systems Pvt. Ltd., Chennai

NABET Certificate No NABET/ EIA/ 1619/RA 0083

MoEFF Reg. Lab F.No. Q-15018/13/2016-CPW

National Accreditation Board for Education & Training (NABET) is a constituent board of the

Quality Council of India (QCI). QCI, NABET has accredited HECS for carrying out Category ‘A &

Category B’ EIA studies in the following sectors:

Page 266: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORTenvironmentclearance.nic.in/.../EIA/230520198KWR1Z7LEIAReport.pdf · Bengaluru Urban District & Karnataka State by M/s. CIPLA Limited. I was

Obtaining Environmental clearance from SEAC, Karnataka EIA/EMP Report

Page 235

Further details may be seen on the following URL: www.hecs.in