ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL … Summary English... · 2019. 2. 15. ·...

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT AND

ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN for

HANOTA IRRIGATION PROJECT MADHYA PRADESH

January, 2019

Executive Summary-English

Prepared for:

BINA PROJECT MANAGEMENT UNIT

Prepared by:

R. S. Envirolink Technologies Pvt. Ltd. 402, Bestech Chambers Commercial Plaza,

B-Block, Sushant Lok-I, Gurgaon Phone: +91-124-4295383: www.rstechnologies.co.in

http://www.rstechnologies.co.in/

Bina Project Management Unit Executive Summary of Hanota Irrigation Project

RS Envirolink Technologies Pvt. Ltd. 1

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

1. GENERAL The purpose of Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) is to assist in the

decision making process and to ensure that the project options under

consideration are environmentally sound and sustainable. This Environmental

Impact Assessment (EIA) study has been conducted to identify possible

environmental impacts and to suggest ways for mitigating or minimizing

them. The EIA also identifies the possible benefits and adverse impacts on the

environment as a result of construction and operation of the project. The

Environment Management Plan (EMP) provides a plan which, upon

implementation, will reduce impacts of the project and minimize

environmental degradation.

2. OVERVIEW OF THE PROJECT Water Resources Department, Government of Madhya Pradesh proposes to

construct a 27.2 m high dam across Bina River near Hanota village of Tehsil

Khurai in District Sagar in the state of Madhya Pradesh. Catchment area up to

the proposed dam site is 2252.14 sq km.

The project will irrigate 40,000 ha of Culturable Command Area (CCA) and

benefit 182 villages. The creation of reservoir due to construction of dam will

lead to submergence of 3560.02 ha of land, of which, 2810.52 ha is private land

and 749.50 ha is government land. Total 46 villages will be affected due to

submergence. The project is envisaged to have a gross storage capacity of

150.22 MCM and the live storage capacity of 146.84 MCM. The location of the

project is shown in Figure 1.

The salient features of the project are given in Table 1. The layout map of the

project is given at Figure 2.

Table 1: Salient Features of Hanota Irrigation project I Location

State Madhya Pradesh District Sagar Tehsil / Block Khurai Toposheet No 55L/4, 55 l/8 Latitude 24˚00'22.07" Longitude 78˚16'48.25" River Bina River Sub Basin Betwa River Basin Yamuna Tribal/ Non-Tribal Non-Tribal Distance From 60 Km From Sagar



Probable Estimated Cost 1392.42Crore Irrigation Proposed 40000 Ha

II Hydrology Catchment Area 2252.14 Sq.km Maximum Flood Discharge (PMF) 11511.80 Cumecs 75% Dependable Yield 608.81 MCM Proposed Design Flood As per Norms

III Reservoir Data Gross Storage 150.22 MCM Live storage 146.84 MCM Dead Storage 3.38 MCM Gross Area of Submergence at F.R.L. 3560.02 Ha. Private Land 2810.52 Ha. Government Land 749.50 Ha. Forest Land 0 Ha. Details of Villages Submerged No. of Villages Fully Submerged 2 Nos No. of Villages Partially Submerged 44 Nos Family Affected 776

IV Dam Data Type Of Dam Composite Dam Total Length including earthen bund 5010M Saddle 1No. 800 m Length Length of Spillway 176.25 M Height 27.2 M No. of Openings 10 Size Of Gates 10.00 M X 12.5 M Crest Level 418 M Thickness of Peir 3.00 M

V Control Level Top Level of Dam 433.00 M Top Level of Dam Gates 428.00 M Crest Level 418.00 M

VI Canal Length of Rising Main Approx. 12.4 KM. Max. Dia of Rising Main 3.00 M Power Required. 8.61 MW

VII Area Proposed Under Irrigation 40000 Ha. Annual Irrigation 40000 Ha. Crop Kharif Nil Crop Rabi 40000 Ha. Crop Perennial 0 Total 40000 Ha.

VIII Financial Aspects (Estimated Cost) Unit -I Head Works Rs.76182.36 Lakhs Unit -II Canal Rs. 63060.01 Lakhs Total Rs.139242.37 Lakhs Cost Per Hectare Rs. 3.48 Lakhs B.C. Ratio 1.52

3. COMMAND AREA OF PROJECT Command area covers 182 villages. Out of the total 182 villages, 118 villages

falls in Bina and Khurai tehsils of Sagar district while the rest 64 villages falls in

Kurwai and Pathari tehsils of Vidisha district. The proposed Culturable

Command Area (CCA) of 40,000 ha is irrigated by piped irrigation system

during Rabi season. The scheme will irrigate the area of the Wheat 3MV –



21,000 ha and Gram – 19,000 ha. The detail of irrigation planning and

proposed cropping pattern is given in Table 2.

Table 2: Irrigation Planning and Proposed Cropping pattern

S. No.

Type of Crop Name of

Crop Area (ha)

Intensity of Irrigation

(% of CCA) Method of Irrigation

2 Rabi Wheat 3MV 21000 52.50% By Gravity Pressure/ Sprinkler 3 Rabi Gram 19000 47.50% By Gravity Pressure/ Sprinkler Total Rabi 40000 100.00%

Figure 1: Location Map of Hanota Irrigation Project



Figure 2: Layout Map of Hanota Irrigation Project



4. LAND REQUIREMENT Total land requirement for the project (temporary and permanent) and break

up of same is as under:

Table 3: Details of land to be acquired for Hanota Irrigation Project

Total Land requirement : 3560.02 ha

(a) Government Revenue Land : 749.50 ha

(b) Forest Land : 0.00 ha

(c) Private land : 2810.52 ha

(i) Irrigated : 1419.06 ha

(ii) Unirrigated : 1391.46 ha

5. ENVIRONMENTAL BASELINE STATUS

6.1 Study Area

The data on environmental parameters was collected from the study marked

for EIA study. The Study Area for assessment of environmental baseline status

was delineated as follows:

The area within 10 km radius of the main project components like

proposed reservoir area and dam site

Area within 2.5 km buffer on either side of pipeline (water conductor

system) in proposed command area

Command Area

Water Conductor System – In this dam is proposed to be constructed which

will supply water by canal network and later distribute in the command area.

Command Area - The gross command area of Hanota Irrigation Project is

51371 ha to irrigate 40000 ha of command area by drip/sprinkler system.

The study area prepared based upon the above criteria falls in Sagar and

Vidhisha districts. A map of the study area is given at Figure 3.



Figure 3: Map showing Study Area of Hanta Irrigation Project



6.2 Physiography

To understand the topography of the study are, Digital Elevation Map, Relief

map, and slope map were prepared from Digital Elevation Model (DEM).

Elevation in the study area varies between 378m and 632m above msl.

Majority of the study area falls under Gently sloping to Moderately sloping

categories constituting nearly 98% of the study area.

6.3 Meteorology

Average mean maximum temperature of 42.20C in Sagar district recorded

during the month of May while average mean minimum temperature of

12.80C was recorded during the month of January. In Vidhisha district, average

mean maximum temperature of 42.30C was recorded during the month of

May and average mean minimum temperature of 11.7°C during the month of

January. The mean annual average rainfall was recorded as 1449.25mm in

Sagar district while, 1541.03mm in Vidisha district. The Relative Humidity is

generally low throughout the year, except during monsoon months when

average relative humidity is close to 82% in Sagar and 84% in Vidisha district in

the month of August. The wind speed is higher during the pre-monsoon

period as compared to the post-monsoon period. The average maximum wind

speed of 18.5 Kmph is observed during the month of June at Sagar district and

20.7 Kmph in month of May for Vidisha district.

6.4 Soil

Dominant soil type in study area is comprised of Fine montmorillonitic,

hyperthermic, Typic Haplusterts which have Deep, moderately well drained,

clayey soils on very gently sloping plain land with moderate erosion. Soil

fertility status of the area was assessed based upon soil test results. The soil of

the area is reddish brown and black and the texture of soil in general is

predominantly sandy-loamy. The soil fertility based upon Nutrient Index in

terms of NPK, in case of Nitrogen and Potassium it is Medium while in case of

Potassium it is Low. Wheat, soybean, gram and vegetables are the major crops

grown in the study area.

6.5 Ambient Air Quality

It was observed during the air quality monitoring that the vehicles are the

only source of air pollution in the study area. The concentrations of PM10,

PM2.5, SOx and NOx at all the sites were well within the Residential & Rural

area permissible limits prescribed by National Ambient Air Quality Standard

2009 notified by CPCB.



6.6 Noise & Traffic

As per results of ambient noise quality monitoring the noise level in the area

are within permissible limits as per CPCB standards ‘The Noise Pollution

(Regulation and Control) Rules, 2000 (amended to date)’ except from the

monitoring site N4 (Dhurua village) located near National Highway 934. This is

mainly due to absence of any industrial establishment and low traffic density

in the study area.

6.7 Water Quality and Aquatic Ecology

The surface water in the study area at most of the locations fall under Class ‘A’

i.e. Drinking Water Source without conventional treatment but after

disinfection according to CPCB, Water Quality Criteria. This is because of

higher count of total coliform i.e. less than 50 MPN/100 ml, DO is 6 mg/l or

more and BOD is less than 2 mg/l. According to WQI surface water quality in

general is in Good category throughout the study area.

According to BIS standards for Drinking Water (2012) all the ground water

samples collected from the study area fall within permissible limits of the

same. Similarly, the Water Quality Index for all the ground water samples fall

in Excellent ground water quality class.

6.8 Land use/ Land cover

For the preparation of land use/ landcover map of the study area, digital data

on land use/landcover maps prepared by National Remote Sensing Centre

(NRSC), Indian Space Research Organisation (ISRO) of Dept. of Space with

Remote Sensing Applications Centre, MP Council of Science & Technology as

partner were used from their web portal

http://bhuvan.nrsc.gov.in/gis/thematic/index.php. The raster data used was

processed in GIS environment for further refinement using information from

Google Earth.

Agriculture is the main land use in the area. Around 8% of the study area is

under forest comprised of Deciduous and Scrub forest.

Land use/ land cover Area (ha) Area (%)

Deciduous Forest 8295.71 6.74

Scrub Forest 1748.68 1.42

Scrub Land 6158.52 5.00

Agricultural/ Fallow Land 100764.77 81.81

Settlement 4433.85 3.60

Waterbody 1763.92 1.43

Total 123165.45 100.00

http://bhuvan.nrsc.gov.in/gis/thematic/index.php



6.9 Forest Types

Forest areas in the study area fall upstream of dam and surrounding

submergence area. These forests in the study area can be classified in

accordance with the ‘A Revised Survey of the Forest Types of India’ by

Champion and Seth (1968) fall under Dry Tropical Forest type with 4 sub-

types.

6.10 Floristics

6.10.1 Vegetation Profile of the Study Area

There are very sparse patches of open forests comprised of mixed deciduous

forest in the upper catchment of Bina river within the study area. Most of the

tree species which are abundant and contribute most of the general

appearance of the forests are Acacia catechu, Anogeissus pendula, Acacia

pennata, Feronia limonia, Madhuca indica, Butea monosperma, Ziziphus

jujuba, Azadiracta indica, Mangifera indica, Aegle marmelos, Tectona grandis

and others of xerophytic nature. The shrub communities include species like

Calotropis procera, Solanum xanthocarpum, Carissa carandus, Achyranthes

aspera, Prosopis juliflora, Ziziphus oenopolia, Vitex negundo and other

associated species. The herbaceous species of these types of forests

recorded includes Xanthium strumarium, Themeda quadrivalvis, Apluda

mutica, Euphorbia hirta, Cynodon dactylon, Saccharum spontaneum,

Crysopogon gryllus, Tridax procumbens, and other species form the ground

vegetation.

There are number of invasive species which are either weeds of agricultural

crop fields or nearby degraded areas near the settlements and as ruderals

along roadsides. These are mainly species like Parthenium hysterophorus,

Argemone mexicana, Achyranthes aspera, Lantana camara, Xanthium

strumarium, Senna tora, etc.

6.10.2 Species Composition

During the present study, in the study area of Hanota Irrigation project 151

plant species belonging to 48 families were recorded. Out of 151

flowering plant species, the herbs were most dominant lifeform with 54

species, followed by trees with 42 species, shrubs with 30 species, grasses

with 12 species, climbers and sedges each with 5 species and parasitic plants

with 3 species. Fabaceae, Asteraceae and Poaceae followed by Malvaceae,

Lamiaceae and Euphorbiaceae are the most dominant families found in the

study area.



6.10.3 Rare Threatened and Endangered Species

None of the plant species found in the study area falls under any of the IUCN

Red list of Threatened Species Version 2018-2. Majority of the 151 species

have not been evaluated or assessed yet by IUCN. All species that have been

assessed are under Least Concern category (LC).

6.10.4 Economically Important Plant Species

The people of the area use wild plants in their daily life as food, medicine,

fiber, vegetables, fruits and various minor forest products. Plant species are

used internally for treating Pneumonia, asthma, swelling, dysentery, diarrhea,

tumor, fever, typhoid and externally for skin diseases, cuts and boils, etc.

6.11 Faunal Elements

The fauna of the study area has been compiled with the help of direct sighting

during field survey, supplemented with secondary sources and information

provided by local people during field survey in the study area. For the

preparation of checklist of animals, Forest Working Plan of North Sagar Forest

Division was consulted. In addition, data was compiled from published

literature like Prater (1998) for mammals, Daniel (2002) for reptiles and Ali &

Ripley (1983) for birds.

Mammals in the study area comprised of 16 species. 42 species of birds

belonging to 12 Orders and 28 Families are reportedly found in the study area.

Main species of herpetofauna in the study area are Rana tigrina (Common

Frog), Eutropis carinata (Skink), Naja Naja (King Cobra), Carbrus rhynchops

(water snake), Bufo (Toad), and Zamenis mucosus (Common Rat Snake) etc.

Only 7 species of butterfly were recorded from the proposed project area.

6.11.1 Conservation Status of Fauna

As per IUCN Red list of Threatened Species Version 2018-2, all species of

mammals reported from the study have been listed under Least Concern (LC)

category.

According to Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972; four mammalian species

reported from the study area are listed as Schedule-II species and three

species are listed as Schedule-III while rest of the species are Schedule-IV

species.

Among the bird River Lapwing (Vanellus duvaucelii) is under Near Threatened

category of IUCN Ver. 2018-2, rest of the birds listed above in the study area

fall under Least Concern category. As per the Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972



avifaunal species reported from the study area are listed in Schedule IV and V.

6.12 Fish Fauna

During experimental fishing, 2 species landed in the net. These are Labeo rohita

and Macrognathus pancalus. In all 14 species are reportedly found in the river.

Out of 14 species 9 belong to family Cyprinidae. All these species are under

Least Concern category of IUCN Redlist Ver. 2018-2. According to CAMP report

(1998) most of the species are under Low Risk/near threatened category.

6.13 SOCIAL ENVIRONMENT

Study area comprises of 261 villages falling under Bina & Khurai tehsils of

Sagar district and Kurwai & Pathari tehsils of Vidisha district. Study area

villages include 182 benefited villages, 13 affected as well as benefited villages

and 33 affected villages also. The villages, where land/ property irrespective

of their ownership are likely to be partially or fully submerged due to the

project have been taken as Project Affected Villages while villages located in

the command area have been termed as Project Benefited Villages.

6.13.1 Socio Economic Profile of the Sampled Villages

Socio-economic survey of villages located in the project study area was carried

out on sample survey basis. Under the sample survey, 29 villages out of the

total 182 project benefitted villages and all the 26 project affected villages

were selected, which constitute about 25 % sample size.

7 ASSESSMENT OF IMPACTS

7.1 Ambient Air Quality

Irrigation schemes in general do not have much impact on air environment

during their operation, however, due to construction activities such as

excavation, movement of material, operation of construction equipment,

storage of material, etc. air pollution do occur requiring control by mitigation

measures.

In an irrigation project, air pollution occurs mainly during project construction

phase. During operation phase, no major impacts are envisaged.

7.2 Noise Environment

During construction period sources of noise will be the vehicles and

equipment for excavation and construction at the project site. Due to

construction activity in the area, noise levels will increase during the period of

construction, however, they will remain limited to the work area mainly



where large-scale construction activity will progress. Additionally, noise levels

will increase on approach roads due to increased traffic.

However, no major impacts are envisaged on noise environment during project

operation phase.

7.3 Water resources

Water is used in construction activities leading to wastewater generation with

high suspended solids. Similarly, effluents due to washing from truck or

equipment etc. would have high concentration of oil and grease. Assessment of

quantum of wastewater from such activities is difficult, however, they can impact

the nearby water bodies if surface run off with high suspended solid is washed

into them. The major impacts during operation of project considered as a part of

the study are

Changes in flow regime in downstream

Impacts on ground water

Impacts on waterlogging and soil salinity

Changes in water quality due to increased use of fertilizers

7.4 Land Environment

7.4.1 Impact Due to Muck Generation

Muck, if not securely transported and dumped at pre-designated sites, can have

serious environmental impacts, such as:

Can be washed away into the main river which can cause negative impacts

on the aquatic ecosystem of the river.

Can lead to impacts on various aspects of environment. Normally, the land

is cleared before muck disposal. During clearing operations, trees are cut,

and undergrowth perishes as a result of muck disposal.

In many of the sites, muck is stacked without adequate stabilisation

measures. In such a scenario, the muck moves along with runoff and

creates landslide like situations. Many a times, boulders/large stone pieces

enter the river/water body, affecting the benthic fauna and other

components of aquatic biota.

Normally muck disposal is done at low lying areas, which get filled up due

to stacking of muck. This can sometimes affect the natural drainage pattern

of the area leading to accumulation of water or partial flooding of some

area which can provide ideal breeding habitat for mosquitoes.

7.4.2 Impact due to Waste Generation

The main sources of wastes in case of the proposed project can be divided



into following categories:

Municipal waste from residential areas

Solid wastes from labour camps

Bio-medical wastes from Dispensary

Construction and demolition waste

Solid waste generated from temporary and permanent colonies during

construction and operation phase will be disposed off as per Solid Wastes

Management Rules, 2016 issued by MOEF vide S.O.1357 (E) dated 8th, April

2016, and for any infrastructure development for collection, storage,

segregation, transportation, processing and disposal of municipal solid

wastes.

7.4.3 Impact due to Land Requirement and change in land-use

Major impact of land acquisition is permanent change of landuse, which is

unavoidable. Additionally, land acquisition has impacts on local population by way

of loss of their agriculture land and hence livelihood and also impact on flora and

fauna by way of loss of forest land and clearing of vegetation on acquired land.

Mitigation and management of such impacts is discussed as part of EMP.

7.5 Terrestrial Ecology

During project construction phase, labour population is likely to congregate

near various construction sites. Overall there will be marginal increase in

population at various construction sites, of which major populations may be

inclined to use fuel wood which may have adverse impact on flora. Hence, to

minimize such impacts, community kitchens and use of kerosene and cooking

gas have been recommended. Project construction and operation can have serious irreversible impacts on the wildlife habitat and their migration between protected areas. It is recommended that a separate wildlife management plan should be prepared in consultation with expert agency and local forest department to ensure that project construction and operation should not interfere with the habitat of wildlife in surroundings.

7.6 Impact on Socio-economic Environment

a) Positive Impacts on Socio-Economic Environment

The entire project has been designed to benefit the farmers and

bring about positive change by providing water for irrigation

A number of marginal activities and jobs would be available to the

locals during construction phase.



b) Negative Impacts on Socio-Economic Environment

Project would require acquisition of 2810.52 ha of private land

leading to affecting 775 families. These families will be resettled and

rehabilitated as per the provisions of The Right to Fair Compensation

and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and

Resettlement Act, 2013.

In addition, influx of workers and floating population during project

construction phase can lead to cultural clashes, law and order

concerns and health issues.

Project construction may bring about some changes in the socio-

economic environment of the area including increased threats to the

health of the community.

8 ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN

8.1 Biodiversity Conservation & Wildlife Management Plan

The biodiversity management plan is based upon the understanding of

diversity and distribution of floral and faunal species gathered during

preparation of baseline, identification of existing threats to biodiversity,

concerns of local inhabitants and impacts of developmental activities on

animal and plant species. The proposed plan focus mainly on promotion of

eco-developmental activities and creating environmental awareness.

8.2 Catchment Area Treatment (CAT) Plan

In the present study, CAT Plan has been formulated for the catchment till the

proposed dam site on Bina river. The total area of the catchment is 2252.14 sq

km. The plan has been prepared as per the guidelines of Soil & Land Use

Survey of India (SLUSOI), Government of India.

The catchment area treatment involves

Understanding of the erosion characteristics of the terrain and,

Suggesting remedial measures to reduce the erosion rate.

8.3 Fisheries Development Plan

To mitigate the adverse impact of Hanota Irrigation project on aquatic ecology

of the area, the following measures shall be adopted to protect and preserve

existing aquatic life:

Development of reservoir fishery

Releasing /ensuring minimum Environment flow in the river



8.4 Command Area Development Plan (CAD Plan)

The Command Area Development Plan (CAD) must be implemented in a

holistic manner with irrigation project so that irrigation potential created

gets utilized with improvement in water use efficiency, increase in

agricultural productivity and production and to bring sustainability in the

irrigated agriculture in a participatory environment. The main objective is

reducing the gap between irrigation potential created and that utilized.

8.5 Rehabilitation & Resettlement Plan

There are 746 project affected families, from 46 villages who are identified as

the families whose land and/or houses will be acquired for the project. The

Rehabilitation and Resettlement Plan has been prepared to comprehensively

address the issues arising out of land acquisition, assessment of

land/house/asset coming under acquisition, estimation of extent of loss and

compensation to be offered in line with The Right to Fair Compensation and

Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013

(RFCT_LARR).

8.6 Landscaping, Restoration & Green Belt Development Plan

After the project work and related activities are over restoration work should

be carried out in these disturb areas to bring them back to their similar or

near-similar pre-construction conditions and land use.

Green belt development will comprise of plantations at various places like

alongside roads, around the periphery of reservoir rim, and at different

project offices and colonies.

8.7 Reservoir Rim Treatment Plan

The Hanota Irrigation project is proposed on the Bina River and total extent of

the reservoir is about 3560.20 ha. The water level of the reservoir will

fluctuate during operational period leads to little chances of sudden draw

down of water in the reservoir, yet due to presence of loose material at the

banks of reservoir sliding cannot be ruled out.

A combination of engineering as well as biological measures has been

suggested for slope stability and control of landslides in the reservoir area.

8.8 Muck Dumping Plan

Muck generated from dam’s foundation after assuming swell factor of 25%

has been estimated as 78,34,387 cum which shall be utilized for construction

of earthen dam, producing coarse and fine aggregate for concrete production



and in fillings for developing areas for construction facilities.

Muck requiring disposal from laying pipe line network especially rising and

gravity mains has been estimated as 11,61,765 cum. In addition, some muck

will also be generated while lying distributary network and field channels. The

total muck so generated will be utilized for refilling of the trenches and the

approach road proposed to be constructed along the canal.

8.9 Solid Waste Management Plan

The project authority shall, within the territorial area of the project complex/

colony, be responsible for the implementation of the provision of Solid

Wastes Management. Adequate facilities for collection, conveyance and

disposal of solid waste will be developed. Any solid waste generated in the

project complex/ project colony/ labour colony, shall be managed and

handled appropriately. Various aspects of solid waste management include:

Reuse/Recycling

Storage/Segregation

Collection and Transportation

Disposal

8.10 Public Health Delivery System

Medical services at secondary level play a vital and complimentary role to the

tertiary and primary health care systems and together form a comprehensive

district based health care system. Following activities are proposed:

Ambulance: 2 no. with all the basic Medicare facilities and small DG set,

etc. to cater for project staff and villages in the project area.

First aid posts including sheds, furniture, medico, para-medico/Nurses

and attendant, consumables and basic equipment.

Budget for strengthening existing medical facilities.

Budget for Health Awareness/ Vaccination Camps

8.11 Energy Conservation Measures

With an estimated migrant population during peak construction of around

900 persons in the area, the existing facilities will become insufficient for

supply of kitchen fuel for the migrant population during the construction of

the project. Fuel for cooking and space heating is an essential requirement

and in the absence of adequate fuel availability they will resort to tree cutting

for use of fuel wood. Therefore, the project authorities would make adequate

arrangements such as upgradation of LPG depot, Community kitchen, Supply

of Kitchen fuel, efficient cooking facilities and Solar Lantern.



8.12 Ground Water Management Plan

The plan shall be implemented through the state Water Resource Department

in close association with CGWB and the following broad parameters shall be

included and the cost shall be funded by the State and Center

Aquifer mapping

Strengthening of groundwater monitoring observation wells

Training and capacity building

Participatory groundwater management

Groundwater Assessment, regulation, information dissemination etc.

8.13 Environmental Safegaurds During Construction

Management of construction-related impacts would be the responsibility of

the project proponent (through its contractors, as and where relevant, and as

described in the EMP). Air and water are two major environmental factors

that are directly affected by any kind of construction activity. Apart from

pollution aspect from construction sites and construction activities, another

major concern during construction work is related to workers safety.

To ensure the all the mitigation measures remain in place for the entire

duration of the project it is proposed that a rapid audit will be carried out

every three months and a detailed third party audit every year to take

corrective and preventive measures for control of pollution and ensuring

workers safety.

8.14 Disaster Management Plan

In order to visualize the worst case scenario Dam Break Modeling exercise

was undertaken and an inundation map was prepared. Based upon the

outputs generated from this modeling, a Disaster Management Plan has been

formulated. This plan presents warning and notification procedures to be

followed in case of failure or potential failure of the dam. The purpose is to

provide timely warning to the population likely to be affected and alert key

people who have to take respective actions in case of an emergency.

8.15 Environmental Monitoring Plan

Monitoring shall be performed during all stages of the project (namely:

construction and operation) to ensure that the impacts are no greater than

predicted, and to verify the impact predictions. The monitoring program will

indicate where changes to procedures or operations are required, in order to

reduce impacts on the environment or local population. The monitoring

program for the proposed project will be undertaken to meet the following

objectives:



To monitor the environmental conditions (Ambient air and noise quality) in

the project area and nearby villages during construction as well as

operational phase of the project;

To monitor the surface and ground water quality in the project area

To monitor the status of terrestrial biodiversity within the project area.

To check on whether mitigation and benefit enhancement measures have

actually been adopted, and are proving effective in practice.

8.16 Cost Estimates of EMP

An amount of Rs. 9338.42 lakh has been allocated for the implementation of

Environmental Management Plan and Corporate Environment Responsibility

Plan for Hanota Irrigation Project is summarized in the table given below.

S. No. Management Plans Amount

(Rs. in lakh)

1 Biodiversity Conservation And Wildlife Management Plan

50.00

2 Catchment Area Treatment Plan 250.47

3 Fisheries Development Plan 75.00

4 Command Area Development Plan 600.00

5 Resettlement and Rehabilitation Plan 7000.00

6 Landscaping, Restoration and Green Belt Development Plan

73.00

7 Reservoir Rim Treatment Plan 60.00

8 Muck Management Plan 500.00

9 Solid Waste Management Plan 92.50

10 Public Health Delivery System 150.00

11 Energy Conservation Measures 150.50

12 Environmental Safeguards during Constriction Activities 125.00

13 Disaster Management Plan 100.00

14 Environment Monitoring Plan 111.95

Total 9338.42



ANNEXURE

List of Project Affected Villages S.

No. Village Name

District: Sagar Tehsil: Khurai

1 Hanota 2 Bairagarh 3 Barodiya Nainagir 4 Dalpatpur Girant 5 Dalpatpur Malgujari

6 Dalpatpur Raiyatwari 7 Giltora 8 Guwari 9 Kajrai

10 Katheli 11 Kaurasa 12 Khajra Harchandra 13 Kundru 14 Mahuna Jat 15 Majhera

S. No. Village Name

Tehsil: Rahatgarh 16 Bamhori Seth 17 Basoda 18 Binaiki 19 Jhila 20 Khatakheri 21 Madiya 22 Pipariya Muktyar

District: Vidisha Tehsil: Kurwai

23 Badoh 24 Bisraha 25 Bisrai 26 Chandanpur 27 Chanduli 28 Chaupda 29 Jajpon 30 Jamaniya

S. No. Village Name

31 Khadakhedi 32 Khajuriya 33 Ramgarh 34 Saidpur

Tehsil: Pathari 35 Gondkhedi 36 Hasampur 37 Kankal Khedi 38 Mahuakheda 39 Padmyai 40 Patra 41 Pirotha

Tehsil: Tyonda 42 Bandrawali 43 Karai Kalan 44 Parasari 45 Sairwasa 46 Ukayla

List of Project Benefited/ Affected Villages S.

No. Village Name

District: Sagar Tehsil: Bina

1 Agasod 2 Bagdawli

3 Bagharupa (Bagharupa)

4 Bamhori Durjan 5 Bamhorikela 6 Barodia 7 Berodiya Gath 8 Besrakasoi 9 Bhakrai

10 Bhapson 11 Bhartoli 12 Bhilawali 13 Bhojpur 14 Bildhai Buzurg 15 Bindhai 16 Chakk Agasod 17 Chandera 18 Chikanota 19 Daulatpur 20 Dehri 21 Dhana

S. No.

Village Name

22 Dhanora 23 Dhanora 24 Dhansara 25 Dharmpur 26 Dhawai 27 Dhimroli 28 Dhurua 29 Donmandi 30 Eran 31 Etawa 32 Gada 33 Godhana 34 Gohar 35 Gulaua 36 Hadkal Khati 37 Hansalkhedi 38 Hansua 39 Hansuwa 40 Hardot 41 Hingti 42 Hinnod 43 Hiranchipa 44 Itaiya 45 Jaukheri

S. No.

Village Name

46 Jirawaro 47 Jodh 48 Kaethani Ryt. 49 Kajarai 50 Kalraoni 51 Kaorja 52 Karai 53 Kathai 54 Khamaukhedi 55 Kirbida 56 Kirond 57 Kurua 58 Lakhahar 59 Mahadeo Kheri 60 Mahoota 61 Manau 62 Manmati 63 Mewli 64 Mudari 65 Mudari 66 Mudianayak 67 Muhasa 68 Musyawada 69 Nahron



S. No.

Village Name

70 Naniyakheri 71 Nibodiya 72 Nogaon 73 Nopura 74 Padaria 75 Pahakheri 76 Pahlejpur 77 Pali 78 Par 79 Patkui 80 Pipariya 81 Pipariya Puran 82 Purarana 83 Purena 84 Rahatwas 85 Rampur 86 Rasulpur 87 Reta 88 Rupau 89 Sabdha 90 Sanai 91 Sargoli 92 Satni 93 Satoriya 94 Shekhpur 95 Sirchopi 96 Sironjipur

Tehsil: Khurai 97 Kulwai 98 Dhikuwa 99 Bamhori Sabdalpur

100 Ghatiyari 101 Hadkari 102 Lakhan Kheda 103 Dhurdhuru 104 Odhomadh 105 Isharwara 106 Silgaon 107 Harvanshpur 108 Sarkhedi

S. No.

Village Name

109 Silarpur

110 Bagthari Patti Khurai

111 Bagthari Patti Khimlasa

112 Rusalla 113 Tihar 114 Suneti 115 Ghorat 116 Harduwa 117 Hanota

District: Vidisha Tehsil: Kurwai 118 Bandora 119 Gudawal 120 Koshi Korhi 121 Suneti 122 Khwaja Khedi 123 Badoh 124 Bisraha 125 Bisrai 126 Chandanpur 127 Chanduli 128 Chaupda 129 Jajpon 130 Jamaniya 131 Khadakhedi 132 Khajuriya 133 Ramgarh 134 Saidpur

Tehsil: Pathari 135 Mala 136 Devli 137 Daud Khedi 138 Futera 139 Datera 140 Sapli 141 Ukawad 142 Jartoli 143 Shyampur Gudawal 144 Palita

S. No.

Village Name

145 Poonakhedi 146 Kishanpur 147 Jaroli 148 Mathrapur 149 Chhapara 150 Manesha 151 Satoh 152 Dughawari 153 Rusalla 154 Banoh 155 Babai Khurd 156 Ramkhiriya 157 Simarghan 158 Kakrawali 159 Padraj 160 Katangi 161 Mankyai 162 Bandorli 163 Bandraotha 164 Bilakhedi 165 Kankron 166 Mahuakheda 167 Dhamonipura 168 Bilgona 169 Dankhedi 170 Gondkhedi 171 Babai Kalan 172 Bagoda 173 Chilpahadi 174 Parsora 175 Bisloni 176 Pathari 177 Pipliya 178 Sherpur 179 Andhiyar Bawadi 180 Barkheda 181 Semar Khedi 182 Kankal Khedi

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL … Summary English... · 2019. 2. 15. ·...

Documents

Transcript of ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL … Summary English... · 2019. 2. 15. ·...