ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT · PDF file(1BASEMENT+LOWER GROUND + STILT + UPPER STILT 1, 2,...
Transcript of ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT · PDF file(1BASEMENT+LOWER GROUND + STILT + UPPER STILT 1, 2,...
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT
FOR
Construction of Proposed MSB IT/ITES Building
(Earlier EC: Letter No. SEIAA/TN/F.523/EC/8(a)/213/2012 dt: 05.09.2013)
ANNEXURES
Project termed under Schedule (8b) Category ‘B1’ – [Township and area
development projects as per EIA Notification 2006 and its Amendments] AT
VILLAGE: PALLIKARANAI
TALUK: SHOLINGANALLUR
DISTRICT: KANCHEEPURAM
STATE: TAMILNADU
PROPOSED by
Dr.S. Thayalan
C/o. Mr. Ramakrishnan Sankaran
Regus Olympia, Olympia Tech Park, Level-2,
Altius Block, No.1 SIDCO Industrial Estate, Guindy, Chennai - 600032.
REPORT PREPARED BY
(NABET Accredited vide Certificate No: NABET/EIA/1619/RA 0083
& MoEF Recognized lab vide F.No Q-15018/29/2012-CPW)
HUBERT ENVIRO CARE SYSTEMS PVT LTD, CHENNAI.
FEBRUARY 2018
Annexure No.
Annexure
Page no
1. Land Document 1
2. CMDA Land Use Letter Nov 4 2010 8
3. Existing EC and compliance 9
4. Geotechnical Investigation Report 11 Jul 2016 25
5. CMWSSB letter 96
6. Topo plan showing 500m radius from the site. 97
7. Site Plan 98
8. Site Layout with Survey No 99
9. Contour Plan 100
10. Greenbelt layout 101
11. Storm water run-off calculation 102
12. Water Balance Chart 104
13. Airport NOC 105
14. Traffic NOC 111
15. FIRE NOC 113
16. FLood NOC 121
17. Energy Saving Measure_Block 1_24.06.2016 123
18. Energy Saving Measure_Block 2 & 3_24.06.2016 129
19. Disposal letter for excavation & construction 135
20. STP Feasibility Report - 600-350-350KLD 137
21. Dual Piping System 154
22. Pallikaranai_Area Statement 155
Appendix No.
Appendix
Page no
1. TOR 157
2. TOR Compliance 160
Annexures
GEO MARINE CONSULTANTS (P) LTD., # 11, 2nd Main Road, Kannappa Nagar Ext,
Kottivakkam, Chennai – 600 041. Ph. No. 044 - 24481485 & 24480305.
Email: [email protected] / [email protected].
CLIENT
K RAHEJA GROUP
HORIZON VIEW PROPERTIES PVT LTD.,
CHENNAI.
TITLE
GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION REPORT
GMC-K RAHEJA GROUP- PALLIKARANAI JC-GT-121
DATE REV. ON DESCRIPTION PREPARED
BY REVIEWED
BY APPROVED
BY
15/12/2011
00
SUBMISSION FOR DESIGN OF FOUNDATIONS
SIGN
11/07/2016
01
SUBMISSION FOR DESIGN OF FOUNDATIONS
DATE
11/07/2016
11/07/2016
11/07/2016
DESIGNATION
GEOLOGIST
TEAM LEADER
MANAGING DIRECTOR
NAME
S.N. KARTHIKEYAN
K. RAMALINGAM
Dr. C.V. PRASAD
PROJECT
PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION OF MSB IT/ITES PARK BUILDINGS
(1BASEMENT+LOWER GROUND + STILT + UPPER STILT 1, 2, 3 +
13 FLOORS) AT COMPRISED IN SURVEY NO. 56/1B, 56/2A2A,
56/2A2B, 56/2A4A, 56/2A4B, 56/2B2A, 56/2B2B, 76/1A1, 76/1C1B,
76/4, 76/5, 76/9, 75/1, 75/5, 57/3B, 76/1A2A, 76/1A2B, 76/1B1, 76/1B2,
76/1C2, 76/1D, 76/2A, 76/2B, 76/3, 76/7, 76/10, 75/3A1, 75/3A2, 75/3B,
75/2A, 75/2B, 76/1C1A1, 83/3, 86/4A, 84/3, 84/2B, 75/7, 75/8A1,
75/8A2, 75/4, 76/8, 75/6 PALLIKARANAI, CHENNAI.
CONTENTS
K Raheja Corp Pvt Ltd., Pallikaranai
CHAPTER-1
SEC. NO.
CONTENTS
INTRODUCTION
PAGE NO.
i-ii
1.0 Project Information Matrix 1
1.1 Scope of Work 1
1.1.1 Field Work 1
1.1.2 Laboratory Work 1
1.2 Structure of the Report 1
CHAPTER-2
INVESTIGATION METHODOLOGY & TEST RESULTS
2.0 Preamble 2
2.1 Scope of Drilling 2
2.2 Methodology of Field Work 2
2.2.1 Equipment Used and Method of Drilling 2
2.2.2 Standard Penetration Test s 2
2.2.3 Collection of Soil Samples 2
2.2.4 Collection of Ground Water Samples 2
2.3 Laboratory Testing 3
2.3.1 On Coarse Grained Soil 3
2.3.2 On Fine Grained Soil 3
2.3.3 Chemical Analysis Tests 3
2.4 Summary 3
FIGURES
2.0
Site Plan showing the Location of Field Investigation Points
4
2.1to Soil Profile 5-20
2.8 2.9 Cross Sectional Variation 21
2.10 to Grain Size Distribution Curve 22-29
2.17 2.18 to Hydrometer Analysis 30-37
2.25
TABLES 2.1to 2.8
Laboratory Test Results 38-45
2.9 Results of Chemical analysis 46
CHAPTER-3
SUB-SURFACE STRATIFICATION
3.0 Preamble 47
3.1 Design sub soil profile 47-52
K Raheja Corp Pvt Ltd., Pallikaranai
CHAPTER-4 4.0
FOUNDATION SYSTEM
Preamble
53
4.1 Proposed Structures 53
4.2 Foundation System 53
TABLE-4.1
Recommended Allowable Bearing Pressures 54
CHAPTER-5
5.1
RECOMMENDATIONS
Recommendations for foundation
55
5.2 Recommendations for Excavation 55
ANNEXURE
Typical Bearing Capacity Computations For Shallow Foundations
56
A1 Relationship Between Angle of Internal Friction & N-Value 57
A2 Relationship Between UCC & SPT -Value (N) of Saturated Clay 57
REPORT TEXT
K Raheja Corp Pvt Ltd., Pallikaranai
CHAPTER-1 INTRODUCTION
PROJECT INFORMATION MATRIX
Nature of project : Proposed MSB IT/ITES PARK (1Basement+Lower Ground + Stilt + Upper
Stilt 1, 2, 3 + 13 Floors)
Project Owner : K RAHEJA CORP PVT LTD
Project Location : Pallikaranai, Chennai
Job Code : JC-GT-121
SCOPE OF WORK
1.1.1 Field Work Making Eight soil investigation bore holes of 150 mm diameter up to 14 m depth or up to the
refusal strata with SPT>100 .
Conducting Standard Penetration Test (SPT) within the borehole at every 1.0m depth interval
and thereafter at every 1.5m up to the borehole termination depth
Collection of soil samples and undisturbed samples from the clayey strata with SPT-value
greater than 2 to less than 15
Collection of water samples
1.1.2 Laboratory Work
Natural Moisture Content
Atterberg limits
Grain Size Analysis
Chemical Analysis test on soil and water samples to give pH, Chlorides and Sulphates
Structure of the Report
Contents
Introduction
Investigation Methodology & Test Results
Sub-Surface Stratification
Foundation System
Recommendation
Annexure
K Raheja Corp Pvt Ltd., Pallikaranai
Preamble:
INVESTIGATION METHODOLOGY &
TEST RESULTS
CHAPTER-2
Eight soil investigation boreholes were put as per the planning of the engineer in-charge and
these locations are shown in Fig.2.0.The equipment used and the methodology adopted to
carry out the fieldwork is described below.
Scope of Drilling:
The drilling depth of 12.0m below E.G.L was recommended by M/S. K RAHEJA CORP PVT
LTD, irrespective of the characteristics of the strata encountered.
Methodology of Field Work:
Equipment Used and Method of Drilling:
All the boreholes were sunk by conventional rotary drilling rigs. For borehole Methodology
followed for boring conformed to IS: 1892 -2000. Boring was progressed by the cutting action of
rotating bit with water circulation and stabilizing the side of the boreholes by using casing
pipes/bentonite slurry up to required depth to prevent collapse of sidewall. Boring was
continued by normal boring process using MS soil cutter in soil. However Tungsten Carbide
(TC) bit drilling was resorted to drill in highly weathered rock stratum where the normal boring
process became slow. Diamond Core (DC) bit drilling was adopted in moderately weathered
rock formations where penetration using TC bit was became slow.
Standard Penetration Tests:
This is a field test to determine “Penetration Resistance of Stratum at the Test Depth”. This has
been conducted in the boreholes generally up to refusal depth using procedures described in
IS: 2131- 2002. In this test, split spoon sampler (50.8 mm OD and 35 mm ID) has replaced
driving bit. Sampler is then driven by dropping 63.5 kg hammer on top of driving collar with free
fall of 75 cm. The length of sampler is 60 cm.
The tests were conducted at the depth intervals indicated in Chapter-1 (Sec.1.1.1).
Collection of Soil Samples:
2.2.3.1 Disturbed Samples:
The SPT-samples collected were used as disturbed soil samples. These samples were used for
visual and physical identification and for conducting laboratory classification tests as per
I.S.1498-1970.
Collection of Ground Water Samples:
One representative water Sample from each borehole was collected after 24 hours of
completing the borehole.
K Raheja Corp Pvt Ltd., Pallikaranai
Laboratory testing:
On Coarse Grained Soil
On the representative samples, sieve analysis tests were conducted to arrive at grain size
distribution. These tests were conducted as per I.S.2720 (part 4)-1985 and the results are
presented in Tables-2.1 to 2.8. The grain size distribution is presented in Fig. 2.10 to 2.17.
On Fine Grained Soil
On the SPT sample index property tests were conducted to estimate consistency. These test
results are presented in Tables-2.1 to 2.8. The hydrometer analysis is presented in Fig. 2.18 to
2.25.
Chemical Analysis Tests
On representative soil samples chemical analysis tests were conducted to estimate pH,
Chloride and Sulphates and these results are presented in Table - 2.9.
Summary:
The locations of the field investigation boreholes are shown in site plan given in Fig.2.0. The
average sub soil profiles encountered at each location along with their classification and
engineering properties are presented in Figs.2.1 to 2.8. Further, the cross sectional variation of
the sub surface profile through different bore holes is presented in Figs.2.9.
SITE PLAN
SUB STATION
SOIL PROFILE
17/1
1/2
011
10
cm
Pen
et
for
70
blo
ws
SITE INVESTIGATION DRILLHOLE No.
BH-01
PROJECT
DRILL HOLE RECORD
Proposed Construction of MSB IT/ITES PARK Building (1Basement+Lower
Ground + Stilt + Upper Stilt 1, 2, 3 + 13 Floors) at Pallikaranai, Chennai.
DIA OF BORE HOLE
SHEET 1
150mm
OF 2
100mm
METHOD Rotary E D M Y D M Y
CO-ORDINATES DATE to MACHINE NO. 1 N 16 11 2011 19 11 2011
FLUSHING MEDIUM
Drilling
Bentonite GROUND LEVEL 0.5 ORIENTATION/DIP VERTICAL
progress per
meter
Time
SPT-DATA
Blows/cm.
Sample Details Layer Data
Hr. Min. N' Type No. Geotechnical Description
15 05
To - -
15 08
1
- -
1.00
1 1 4
5 SS
1 1.00
-0.5
Filled Up Soil
(Grey,Wet,Firm,Silty CLAY (CH) Clay of High
Plasticity) 15 24
To
15 41
2
- - - -
1.45 1.45
L1 2.0
16 04
To
- - - -
Grey,Wet,Firm,Silty CLAY (CH) Clay of High
Plasticity 16 11
3
L2 3.0
16 29
To
16 31
4
- - - -
L3 4.0
Greyish Brown,Moist,V.Soft,Silty CLAY (CH)
Clay of High Plasticity
16 51
To - - - -
16 55
5
L4 5.0
Greyish Brown,Moist,V.Soft,Silty CLAY (CI)
with Sand Pockets Lean Clay of Medium
Plasticity
17 16
To - - - -
17 32
Greyish Brown,Moist,Stiff,Silty CLAY (CH)
Clay of High Plasticity
6
10 56
To - -
6.40 6.40
- -
+ + +
+ +
L5 6.2
11 16
7
7.00 6cm Penet for
>100 SS 7 7.00
-6.5
+ + +
+ +
Greyish Brown,V.Dense,Completely
7.06 50 blows
7.06 + + + Weathered Rock
Total - - Drilling
Time
8 26 min
- -
8.00 3cm Penet for
>100 SS
8 8.00 -7.5
+ + + + +
+ +
+ + +
L6 8.0
Total
Drilling -
Time
1 Hr
9
- 29 10
8.03
9.00
50 blows
- - - -
8.03
CS 9 9.00 -8.5
+ +
+ + +
+ +
+ + +
+ +
+ + +
Greyish Brown,Highly Weathered Rock,
Descent from Charnockite 15 15 + +
To -
15 47
10
- 7 0
10.00 -
- - - CS 10
10.00 -9.5
+ + +
+ +
+ + +
+ +
L7 10.0
REMARKS
Groundwater table encountered at E.G.L during the time of investigation
of Bore Holes due to rain.
Depth
belo
w E
.G.L
. (m
)
16/1
1/2
011
Date
Casin
g D
epth
/Siz
e
Wate
r D
epth
(m
)
Tota
l C
ore
Re
cove
ry %
R.Q
.D %
DE
PT
H (
m)
0-1
5
15
-30
30
-45
Depth
(m)
R.L
. (m
)
Le
ge
nd
No.
Depth
(m
)
2.00 2 3 4 7 SS 2 2.00 -1.5
2.45
2.45
3.00
1
0
0
0
SS
3
3.00
-2.5
3.45
3.45
4.00
1
0
2
2
SS
4
4.00
-3.5
4.45
4.45
5.00
2
4
4
8
SS
5
5.00
-4.5
5.45
5.45
6.00
21
39
>100
SS
6
6.00
-5.5
CS - Core Sample LOGGED K. LOGANATHAN
SS - Split Spoon Sample DATE 17/11/2011
UDS - Undisturbed Sample CHECKED KARTHIKEYAN
WS - Wash Sample DATE 25/11/2011
SITE INVESTIGATION DRILLHOLE No.
BH-01
DRILL HOLE RECORD SHEET 2 OF 2
PROJECT
Proposed Construction of MSB IT/ITES PARK Building (1Basement+Lower
Ground + Stilt + Upper Stilt 1, 2, 3 + 13 Floors) at Pallikaranai, Chennai.
DIA OF BORE HOLE
150mm
100mm
METHOD Rotary CO-ORDINATES
E DATE D M Y
to D M Y
MACHINE NO. 1 N 16 11 2011 19 11 2011
FLUSHING MEDIUM Bentonite GROUND LEVEL 0.5 ORIENTATION/DIP VERTICAL
De
pth
be
low
E.G
.L.
(m) Drilling
progress per
meter
Ca
sin
g D
ep
th/S
ize
Wa
ter
De
pth
(m
)
To
tal C
ore
Re
co
ve
ry %
R.Q
.D %
SPT-DATA Sample Details
L
eg
en
d
Layer Data
Da
te
Time
DE
PT
H (
m) Blows/cm.
N'
Type
No.
D
ep
th(m
)
R.L
. (m
)
No
.
De
pth
(m
)
Geotechnical Description Hr.
Min.
0-1
5
15
-30
30
-45
+ + +
11
/11/2
011
-
-
69
49
11.00
-
-
-
-
CS
11
11.00
-10.5
+ + + + + + +
+ + +
L8
11.0
Pinkish Grey,Moderately Weathered Rock,
Descent from Charnockite Total
Drilling
Time 2hr
24 min
+ + 14
20 1 8
+ + + - - 99 80 + + + + +
To
16 15
12 12.00 - - - - CS 12 12.00 -11.5 + +
+ + +
19/1
1/2
011
Total
Drilling
-
-
98
98
+ + + + +
Dark Grey,Fresh Charnockite Rock
13
14
Time 2hr
15 min
-
-
98
98
13.00
14.00
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
CS
CS
13
14
13.00
14.00
-12.5
-13.5
+ + + + + + +
+ + + + +
+ + + + +
L9
14.0
Total
Drilling
Time 2hr
15 min
15 16 17 18 19 20 CS - Core Sample LOGGED K. LOGANATHAN Remarks
SS - Split Spoon Sample DATE 19/11/2011 Groundwater table encountered at E.G.L during the time of investigation of
Bore Holes due to rain. UDS - Undisturbed Sample CHECKED KARTHIKEYAN
DS - Disturbed Sample DATE 25/11/2011
Borehole terminated at 14 m depth below E.G.L
FIG.2.1 Sub Soil Profile at BH-01 Location
. . .
SITE INVESTIGATION DRILLHOLE No.
BH-02
DRILL HOLE RECORD SHEET 1
Proposed Construction of MSB IT/ITES PARK Building (1Basement+Lower
OF 2
PROJECT Ground + Stilt + Upper Stilt 1, 2, 3 + 13 Floors) at Pallikaranai, Chennai.
DIA OF BORE HOLE 150mm 100mm
METHOD Rotary E D M Y D M Y
CO-ORDINATES DATE to MACHINE NO. 1 N 21 11 2011 23 11 2011
FLUSHING MEDIUM Bentonite GROUND LEVEL 0.5
Drilling
ORIENTATION/DIP VERTICAL
progress per
meter
Time
SPT-DATA
Blows/cm.
Sample Details Layer Data
Hr. Min. N' Type No. Geotechnical Description
13 45
To - - - -
13 50 Filled Up Soil
1 1.00 6
14 08
8 9 17 SS 1 1.00 -0.5 (Grey,Wet,V.Stiff,Sandy Silty CLAY (CI)
Lean Clay of Medium Plasticity)
To - - -
14 30
2
1.45 -
2.00
1 1 2
3 SS
1.45
2 2.00
-1.5
L1 2.0
Total
Drilling
Time
- - - -
2.45
2.50
- - - -
UDS
2.45
3 2.50
-2.0
Greyish Brown,Moist,Soft,Silty CLAY (CH)
Clay of High Plasticity
9 min
3
3.00 0 0 0
0 SS
4 3.00
-2.5 L2 3.0
15 37
To - -
3.45 - -
3.45
15 42
4
15 53
To
15 40
- - - -
4.00 0 1 3 4 SS
4.45
5 4.00
4.45
-3.5
L3 5.0
Grey,Moist,V.Soft to Soft,Silty CLAY (CI)
with Sand Pockets Lean Clay of Medium
Plasticity
5 5.00 4 3 6 9 SS 6 5.00 -4.5
16 22
To - -
5.45 5.45 - -
Greyish Brown,Moist,Stiff,Silty CLAY (CH)
Clay of High Plasticity 16 42
L4 6.0 6 6.00
17 02
7 7 30 37 SS 7 6.00 -5.5 . . . . . . .
L5 6.3
Grey,Clayey Silty SAND (SC)
To - -
17 13
- - 6.45 6.45 + + +
+ +
+ + + 7 7.00 8cm Penet for >100 SS 8 7.00 -6.5 + + Brown,V.Dense,Completely Weathered
09 20
To - - -
10 00
7.08
-
50 blows 7.08 + + + + +
+ + +
Rock
8 8.00 SPT Hammer
Rebounded
>100 WS 9
8.00 -7.5
+ + L6 8.0
+ + Total + + + Brownish Grey,Moderately Weathered Rock,
Drilling
Time
- - 36 17 + + Descent from Charnockite
55 min
9
Total
9.00
- - -
- CS 10
9.00 -8.5
+ + + L7
+ + +
9.0
Drilling - - 55 0 + + Brownish Grey,Slightly Weathered Rock,
Time + + + Descent from Charnockite 50 min + +
10 10.00 - - - - CS 11 10.00 -9.5 + + + 10.0
REMARKS
Groundwater table encountered at E.G.L during the time of investigation
of Bore Holes due to rain.
Depth
belo
w E
.G.L
. (m
)
22/1
1/2
011
21/1
1/2
011
Date
Casin
g D
epth
/Siz
e
Wate
r D
epth
(m
)
Tota
l C
ore
Re
cove
ry %
R.Q
.D %
DE
PT
H (
m)
0-1
5
15
-30
30
-45
Depth
(m)
R.L
. (m
)
Le
ge
nd
No.
Depth
(m
)
CS - Core Sample LOGGED K. LOGANATHAN
SS - Split Spoon Sample DATE 22/11/2011
UDS - Undisturbed Sample CHECKED KARTHIKEYAN
WS - Wash Sample DATE 25/11/2011
SITE INVESTIGATION DRILLHOLE No.
BH-02
DRILL HOLE RECORD SHEET 2 OF 2
PROJECT
Proposed Construction of MSB IT/ITES PARK Building (1Basement+Lower
Ground + Stilt + Upper Stilt 1, 2, 3 + 13 Floors) at Pallikaranai, Chennai.
DIA OF BORE HOLE
150mm
100mm
METHOD Rotary CO-ORDINATES
E DATE D M Y
to D M Y
MACHINE NO. 1 N 21 11 2011 23 11 2011
FLUSHING MEDIUM Bentonite GROUND LEVEL 0.5 ORIENTATION/DIP VERTICAL
De
pth
be
low
E.G
.L.
(m) Drilling
progress per
meter
Ca
sin
g D
ep
th/S
ize
Wa
ter
De
pth
(m
)
To
tal C
ore
Re
co
ve
ry %
R.Q
.D %
SPT-DATA Sample Details
L
eg
en
d
Layer Data
Da
te
Time
DE
PT
H (
m) Blows/cm.
N'
Type
No.
D
ep
th(m
)
R.L
. (m
)
No
.
De
pth
(m
)
Geotechnical Description Hr.
Min.
0-1
5
15
-30
30
-45
1
+ + +
11
22/1
1/2
01
-
-
67
31
11.00
-
-
-
-
CS
12
11.00
-10.5
+ + + + + + +
+ + +
L8
11.0
Brownish Grey,Slightly Weathered Rock,
Descent from Charnockite Total
Drilling
Time 1hr
55 min
+ +
12
/11/2
011
Total
Drilling
Time 1hr
27 min
-
-
18
0
12.00
-
-
-
-
CS
13
12.00
-11.5
+ + + + +
+ + + + +
+ + +
Brownish Grey,Moderately Weathered Rock,
Descent from Charnockite
2 3
Total
Drilling
-
-
10
0
+ + + + +
13
Time
56 min
13.00
-
-
-
-
CS
14
13.00
-12.5
+ + + + +
L9
13.0
14 15 16 17 18 19 20 CS - Core Sample LOGGED K. LOGANATHAN Remarks
SS - Split Spoon Sample DATE 23/11/2011 Groundwater table encountered at E.G.L during the time of investigation of
Bore Holes due to rain. UDS - Undisturbed Sample CHECKED KARTHIKEYAN
DS - Disturbed Sample DATE 25/11/2011
Borehole terminated at 13 m depth below E.G.L
FIG.2.2 Sub Soil Profile at BH-02 Location
. . . .
25/1
1/2
011
SITE INVESTIGATION DRILLHOLE No.
BH-03
DRILL HOLE RECORD SHEET 1
Proposed Construction of MSB IT/ITES PARK Building (1Basement+Lower
OF 2
PROJECT Ground + Stilt + Upper Stilt 1, 2, 3 + 13 Floors) at Pallikaranai, Chennai.
DIA OF BORE HOLE 150mm 100mm
METHOD Rotary
MACHINE NO. 1
E D M Y D M Y
CO-ORDINATES DATE to N 24 11 2011 26 11 2011
FLUSHING MEDIUM Bentonite GROUND LEVEL 0.5 ORIENTATION/DIP VERTICAL
Drilling
progress per
meter
Time
SPT-DATA Sample Details
Blows/cm.
Layer Data
Hr. Min.
N' Type
No.
Geotechnical Description
13 34
To - - - -
13 48
Filled Up Soil
1 1.00 2
13 59
3 5 8 SS 1 1.00 -0.5 (Greyish Brown,Wet,Stiff,Silty CLAY (CH)
Clay of High Plasticity)
To - -
14 12
2
1.45 1.45 - -
L1 2.0
14 22
To - - - -
14 25
3
L2 3.0
Grey,Wet,Soft,Silty CLAY (CH) Clay of High
Plasticity
14 42
To
14 45
- - - -
4
14 57
To -
- - -
Grey,Greyish Brown,Moist,Stiff to V.Stiff,Silty
CLAY (CI) with Sand Pockets Lean Clay of
15 07 Medium Plasticity
5 5.00 5 8 11 19 SS
5 5.00
-4.5
15 28
To - - - -
15 35
6
15 53
5.45 5.45
L3 . . . .
. . . . . . .
6.0
Brownish Grey,Clayey Silty SAND (SC) . . .
L4 6.5
To - - - - + + +
16 00
+ +
7 7.00 46 10cm >100 SS 7 7.00 -6.5 + + +
16 21 7.25 Penet for
50 blows
7.25 + +
+ + + Brown,V.Dense,Completely Weathered
Rock To - - -
- + +
16 38 + + +
8 8.00 10cm Penet for >100 SS 8 8.00 -7.5 + + L5 8.1
17 01
To - -
33 21
8.10 50 blows 8.10 + + +
+ +
17 30 + + +
+ + 9 9.00 - - -
Total
- CS 9 9.00 -8.5 + + +
+ + Brownish Grey,Moderately Weathered Rock,
Descent from Charnockite
Drilling - Time 1Hr
- 53 27 + + + + +
55min + + + 10 10.00 - - - - CS 10 10.00 -9.5 + + L6 10.0
REMARKS
Groundwater table encountered at E.G.L during the time of investigation
of Bore Holes due to rain.
Depth
belo
w E
.G.L
. (m
)
24/1
1/2
011
Date
Casin
g D
epth
/Siz
e
Wate
r D
epth
(m
)
Tota
l C
ore
Re
cove
ry %
R.Q
.D %
DE
PT
H (
m)
0-1
5
15
-30
30
-45
Depth
(m)
R.L
. (m
)
Le
ge
nd
No.
Depth
(m
)
2.00 1 2 2 4 SS 2 2.00 -1.5
2.45
2.45
3.00
5
5
6
11
SS
3
3.00
-2.5
3.45
3.45
4.00
3
6
10
16
SS
4
4.00
-3.5
4.45
4.45
6.00 11 18 21 39 SS 6 6.00 -5.5
6.40
6.40
CS - Core Sample LOGGED K. LOGANATHAN
SS - Split Spoon Sample DATE 25/11/2011
UDS - Undisturbed Sample CHECKED NOBLE PHILIP PULICKAL
WS - Wash Sample DATE 09/12/2011
SITE INVESTIGATION DRILLHOLE No.
BH-03
DRILL HOLE RECORD SHEET 2 OF 2
PROJECT
Proposed Construction of MSB IT/ITES PARK Building (1Basement+Lower
Ground + Stilt + Upper Stilt 1, 2, 3 + 13 Floors) at Pallikaranai, Chennai.
DIA OF BORE HOLE
150mm
100mm
METHOD Rotary CO-ORDINATES
E DATE D M Y
to D M Y
MACHINE NO. 1 N 24 11 2011 26 11 2011
FLUSHING MEDIUM Bentonite GROUND LEVEL 0.5 ORIENTATION/DIP VERTICAL
De
pth
be
low
E.G
.L.
(m) Drilling
progress per
meter
Ca
sin
g D
ep
th/S
ize
Wa
ter
De
pth
(m
)
To
tal C
ore
Re
co
ve
ry %
R.Q
.D %
SPT-DATA Sample Details
L
eg
en
d
Layer Data
Da
te
Time
DE
PT
H (
m) Blows/cm.
N'
Type
No.
D
ep
th(m
)
R.L
. (m
)
No
.
De
pth
(m
)
Geotechnical Description Hr.
Min.
0-1
5
15
-30
30
-45
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
26/1
1/2
011
-
-
-
-
52
97
44
75
11.00
12.00
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
CS
CS
11
12
11.00
12.00
-10.5
-11.5
+ + + + +
+ + + + +
+ + +
L7
11.0
Grey,Slightly Weathered Rock, Descent from
Charnockite
Total
Drilling
Time 1hr
48min
+ +
+ + + + +
+ + + + +
L8
12.0
Grey,Slightly Fractured,Fresh Charnockite
Rock
Total
Drilling
Time 1hr
55min
CS - Core Sample
SS - Split Spoon Sample
UDS - Undisturbed Sample
DS - Disturbed Sample
LOGGED K. LOGANATHAN Remarks
DATE 26/11/2011 Groundwater table encountered at E.G.L during the time of investigation of
Bore Holes due to rain. CHECKED NOBLE PHILIP PULICKAL
DATE 09/12/2011
Borehole terminated at 12 m depth below E.G.L
FIG.2.3 Sub Soil Profile at BH-03 Location
10
cm
Pen
et
for
55
blo
ws
14
cm
Pen
et
for
90
blo
ws
SITE INVESTIGATION DRILLHOLE No.
BH-04
DRILL HOLE RECORD SHEET 1
Proposed Construction of MSB IT/ITES PARK Building (1Basement+Lower
OF 2
PROJECT Ground + Stilt + Upper Stilt 1, 2, 3 + 13 Floors) at Pallikaranai, Chennai.
DIA OF BORE HOLE 150mm 100mm
METHOD Rotary
MACHINE NO. 1
E D M Y D M Y
CO-ORDINATES DATE to N 28 11 2011 29 11 2011
FLUSHING MEDIUM Bentonite GROUND LEVEL 0.5 ORIENTATION/DIP VERTICAL
Drilling
progress per
meter
Time
SPT-DATA Sample Details
Blows/cm.
Layer Data
Hr. Min.
N' Type
No.
Geotechnical Description
14 20
To - - - -
14 30
Filled Up Soil
1 1.00 1
14 42
2 4 6 SS 1 1.00 -0.5 (Grey,Wet,Firm,Silty CLAY (CH) Clay of High
Plasticity)
To - - - -
14 50
2
1.45 1.45
L1 2.0
15 20
To - - - -
15 24
3
L2 3.0
Greyish Brown,Moist,Soft,Silty CLAY (CH)
Clay of High Plasticity
15 36
To - - - -
15 41
4
L3 4.0
Greyish Brown,Moist,Stiff,Silty CLAY (CI)
Clay of Medium Plasticity
15 58
To - - - -
16 08
5
Greyish Brown,Moist,Stiff,Silty CLAY (CH)
Clay of High Plasticity
16 27
To - - -
-
+ + +
L4 5.5
16 47 + +
6 + + +
17 16 + +
To -
- - - + + +
17 35 + +
+ + + 7 7.00 29 13cm >100 SS 7 7.00 -6.5 + +
09 30 7.06 Penet for
50 blows
7.06 + + + + +
To - - - - + + +
09 55
+ + Brownish Grey,V.Dense,Residual Soil
8 + + +
10 10
To - - - -
10 25
9
+ +
+ + +
+ +
+ + +
+ +
10 35 + + +
To - - - -
10 50
+ + + + +
+ + 10 + + + L5 10.0
CS - Core Sample LOGGED K. LOGANATHAN REMARKS
SS - Split Spoon Sample DATE 29/11/2011
UDS - Undisturbed Sample CHECKED NOBLE PHILIP PULICKAL
WS - Wash Sample DATE 09/12/2011
(F) Sample Failed
Groundwater table encountered at E.G.L during the time of investigation
of Bore Holes due to rain.
Depth
belo
w E
.G.L
. (m
)
29/1
1/2
011
28/1
1/2
011
Date
Casin
g D
epth
/Siz
e
Wate
r D
epth
(m
)
Tota
l C
ore
Re
cove
ry %
R.Q
.D %
DE
PT
H (
m)
0-1
5
15
-30
30
-45
Depth
(m)
R.L
. (m
)
Le
ge
nd
No.
Depth
(m
)
2.00 1 2 2 4 SS 2 2.00 -1.5
2.45
2.45 2.50 - - - - UDS(F) - 2.50 -2.0
3.00
3
8
6
14
SS
3
3.00
-2.5
3.45
3.45
4.00
3
5
7
12
SS
4
4.00
-3.5
4.45
4.45
5.00
8
5
8
13
SS
5
5.00
-4.5
5.45
5.45
6.00
6
18
>100
SS
6
6.00
-5.5
6.40
6.40
8.00 39 48 >100 SS 8 8.00 -7.5
8.40
8.40
9.00
25
32
39
71
SS
9
9.00
-8.5
9.45
9.45
29/1
1/2
011
SITE INVESTIGATION DRILLHOLE No.
BH-04
DRILL HOLE RECORD SHEET 2
Proposed Construction of MSB IT/ITES PARK Building (1Basement+Lower
OF 2
PROJECT Ground + Stilt + Upper Stilt 1, 2, 3 + 13 Floors) at Pallikaranai, Chennai.
DIA OF BORE HOLE 150mm 100mm
METHOD Rotary
MACHINE NO. 1
E D M Y D M Y CO-ORDINATES DATE to
N 28 11 2011 29 11 2011
FLUSHING MEDIUM Bentonite GROUND LEVEL 0.5 ORIENTATION/DIP VERTICAL
Drilling
progress per
meter
Time
Hr. Min.
SPT-DATA Sample Details
Blows/cm.
N' Type No.
Layer Data
Geotechnical Description
10.00 32 18 20 38 SS 10 10.00 -9.5 + + +
11 35 + + L6 10.5 Brownish Grey,V.Dense,Residual Soil
To - - - - 10.45 10.45
11 50 + +
11 11.00 3cm Penet for
>100 WS 11 11.00
-10.5 + + +
11.03 50 blows 11.03 + +
12 20 + + + To
12 47
- - 10 0 + +
+ + +
12 12.00 3cm Penet for >100 CS 12 12.00 -11.5 + +
12.03 50 blows 12.03 + + + Greyish Brown,V.Dense,Completely
Total
Drilling
Time 1hr
6 min
+ + - - 10 0 + + +
+ +
Weathered Rock, Descent from Charnockite
13 13.00 - - - -
CS 13 13.00 -12.5 + + + + +
16 25
To
17 00
14
15
16
25 - - 7 0
13.80 - -
- - CS 14 13.80 -13.3
+ + + + +
+ + + L6
13.8
17
18
19
20
CS - Core Sample LOGGED
K. LOGANATHAN REMARKS
SS - Split Spoon Sample DATE 29/11/2011
UDS - Undisturbed Sample CHECKED NOBLE PHILIP PULICKAL
Groundwater table encountered at E.G.L during the time of investigation of
Bore Holes due to rain.
DS - Disturbed Sample DATE 09/12/2011
Borehole terminated at 13.8 m depth below E.G.L
FIG.2.4 Sub Soil Profile at BH-04 Location
De
pth
be
low
E.G
.L.
(m)
Da
te
Ca
sin
g D
ep
th/S
ize
Wa
ter
De
pth
(m
)
To
tal C
ore
Re
co
ve
ry %
R.Q
.D %
DE
PT
H (
m)
0-1
5
15
-30
30
-45
De
pth
(m)
R.L
. (m
)
Le
ge
nd
No
.
De
pth
(m
)
01/1
2/2
011
SITE INVESTIGATION DRILLHOLE No.
BH-05
DRILL HOLE RECORD SHEET 1
Proposed Construction of MSB IT/ITES PARK Building (1Basement+Lower
OF 2
PROJECT Ground + Stilt + Upper Stilt 1, 2, 3 + 13 Floors) at Pallikaranai, Chennai.
DIA OF BORE HOLE 150mm 100mm
METHOD Rotary
MACHINE NO. 1
E D M Y D M Y
CO-ORDINATES DATE to N 28 11 2011 29 11 2011
FLUSHING MEDIUM Bentonite GROUND LEVEL 0.5 ORIENTATION/DIP VERTICAL
Drilling
progress per
meter
Time
SPT-DATA Sample Details
Blows/cm.
Layer Data
Hr. Min.
N' Type
No.
Geotechnical Description
14 47
To - - - -
14 50
Filled Up Soil
1 1.00 1
15 00
1 2 3 SS 1 1.00 -0.5 (Grey,Wet,Soft,Sandy Silty CLAY (CI) Lean
Clay of Medium Plasticity)
To - - - -
15 13
2
1.45 1.45
L1 2.0
15 29
To
15 32
3
L2 3.0
Greyish Brown,Wet,Firm,Silty CLAY (CH)
Clay of High Plasticity
15 45
To
15 47
4
L3 4.0
Grey,Wet,Soft,Sandy Silty CLAY (CI) Lean
Clay of Medium Plasticity
16 00
To
16 07
5
L4 5.0
Greyish Brown,Wet,Firm,Silty CLAY (CH)
Clay of High Plasticity
16 30
To
16 45
Greyish Brown,Moist,Stiff,Silty CLAY (CH)
Clay of High Plasticity
6
17 16 + +
L5 6.3
+ To + + Greyish Brown,V.Dense,Residual Soil
17 35 + + +
7 + +
L6 7.0
+ + + 09 20 + +
To + + + 09 47 + +
8 + + +
8.13 50 blows 8.13 + +
10 15 + + + To - - - - + + Greyish Brown,V.Dense,Completely
10 40 + + + Weathered Rock
9 9.00
6cm Penet for >100 WS 9 9.00 -8.5
+ +
10 55
9.06 50 blows
9.06 + + +
+ + To - - - - + + +
11 17 + + + + +
10 + +
10.0
CS - Core Sample LOGGED K. LOGANATHAN REMARKS
SS - Split Spoon Sample DATE 01/12/2011
UDS - Undisturbed Sample CHECKED
NOBLE PHILIP PULICKAL
(F) - Sample Failed
Groundwater table encountered at E.G.L during the time of investigation
WS - Wash Sample DATE 09/12/2011 of Bore Holes due to rain.
Depth
belo
w E
.G.L
. (m
)
30/1
1/2
011
Date
Casin
g D
epth
/Siz
e
Wate
r D
epth
(m
)
Tota
l C
ore
Re
cove
ry %
R.Q
.D %
DE
PT
H (
m)
0-1
5
15
-30
30
-45
Depth
(m)
R.L
. (m
)
Le
ge
nd
No.
Depth
(m
)
2.00 2 3 3 6 SS 2 2.00 -1.5
2.45
- - - -
2.45
3.00
0
0
3
3
SS
3
3.00
-2.5
3.45
- - - -
3.45
4.00
1
2
3
5
SS
4
4.00
-3.5
4.45
- - - -
4.45 4.50 - - - - UDS(F) - 4.50 -4.0
5.00
4
4
5
9
SS
5
5.00
-4.5
5.45
5.45 - - - -
6.00
13 18 72
90
SS
6
6.00
-5.5
6.45
- - - -
6.45
7.00
5cm Penet for
>100
SS
7
7.00
-6.5
7.05 50 blows 7.05 - - - -
8.00 13cm Penet for >100 SS 8 8.00 -7.5
01/1
2/2
011
SITE INVESTIGATION
DRILLHOLE No.
BH-05
DRILL HOLE RECORD SHEET 2
Proposed Construction of MSB IT/ITES PARK Building (1Basement+Lower
OF 2
PROJECT Ground + Stilt + Upper Stilt 1, 2, 3 + 13 Floors) at Pallikaranai, Chennai.
DIA OF BORE HOLE 150mm 100mm
METHOD Rotary
MACHINE NO. 1
E D M Y D M Y CO-ORDINATES DATE to
N 28 11 2011 29 11 2011
FLUSHING MEDIUM Bentonite GROUND LEVEL 0.5 ORIENTATION/DIP VERTICAL
Drilling
progress per
meter
Time
Hr. Min.
SPT-DATA Sample Details
Blows/cm.
N' Type No.
Layer Data
Geotechnical Description
10.00
11 40 10.03
3cm Penet for
50 blows
>100 WS 10 10.00 -9.5
10.03
+ + +
To - - - -
12 03
Greyish Brown,V.Dense,Completely
Weathered Rock
11 11.00 3cm Penet for >100 WS 11 11.00 -10.5
Total
Drilling
Time 50
min
- - 25 0
11.03 50 blows 11.03
Brownish Grey,Moderately Weathered Rock,
Descent from Charnockite
12 12.00 - - - - CS 12 12.00 -11.5
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
CS - Core Sample LOGGED K. LOGANATHAN REMARKS
SS - Split Spoon Sample DATE 01/12/2011
UDS - Undisturbed Sample CHECKED NOBLE PHILIP PULICKAL
DS - Disturbed Sample DATE 09/12/2011
Groundwater table encountered at E.G.L during the time of investigation of
Bore Holes due to rain.
Borehole terminated at 12 m depth below E.G.L
FIG.2.5 Sub Soil Profile at BH-05 Location
De
pth
be
low
E.G
.L.
(m)
Da
te
Ca
sin
g D
ep
th/S
ize
Wa
ter
De
pth
(m
)
To
tal C
ore
Re
co
ve
ry %
R.Q
.D %
DE
PT
H (
m)
0-1
5
15
-30
30
-45
De
pth
(m)
R.L
. (m
)
Le
ge
nd
No
.
De
pth
(m
)
+ + + + + + +
+ + +
L7
11.0
+ + + + + + +
+ + + + +
L8
12.0
6cm
Pe
net
for
50
blo
ws
SITE INVESTIGATION DRILLHOLE No.
BH-06
DRILL HOLE RECORD SHEET 1
Proposed Construction of MSB IT/ITES PARK Building (1Basement+Lower
OF 2
PROJECT Ground + Stilt + Upper Stilt 1, 2, 3 + 13 Floors) at Pallikaranai, Chennai.
DIA OF BORE HOLE 150mm 100mm
METHOD Rotary
MACHINE NO. 1
E D M Y D M Y
CO-ORDINATES DATE to N 02 12 2011 03 12 2011
FLUSHING MEDIUM Bentonite GROUND LEVEL 0.5 ORIENTATION/DIP VERTICAL
Drilling
progress per
meter
Time
SPT-DATA Sample Details
Blows/cm.
Layer Data
Hr. Min.
N' Type
No.
Geotechnical Description
10 50
To - - - -
10 53
Filled Up Soil
1 1.00 1
11 10
2 7 9 SS 1 1.00 -0.5 (Grey,Wet,Stiff,Silty CLAY (CH) Clay of High
Plasticity)
To - - - -
11 24
2
11 35
1.45 1.45
L1 2.0
Greyish Brown,Moist,V.Soft,Silty CLAY (CH)
Clay of High Plasticity
To - - - -
11 40
3
Grey,Wet,Silty CLAY (CI)
12 19
To - - - -
12 23
Grey,Wet,Stiff,Sandy Silty CLAY (CI) Lean
Clay of Medium Plasticity
4
12 40
To
12 47
5
14 03
- - - -
Greyish Brown,Moist,M.Stiff to Stiff,Silty
CLAY (CH) Clay of High Plasticity
To -
14 12
6
- - -
14 43
To - - - -
14 53
7
15 12 + + + To - - - -
15 33
8
Brownish Grey,V.Dense,Residual Soil
15 54
To
- - - -
16 22 + +
9 9.00
4cm Penet for
>100
SS 10 9.00 -8.5 + + + L6 9.0
9.04 50 blows 9.04 + +
16 50 + + + To - - - - + + Brownish Grey,V.Dense,Completely
17 20 + + +
10 + +
10.0
Weathered Rock
CS - Core Sample LOGGED K. LOGANATHAN REMARKS
SS - Split Spoon Sample DATE 02/12/2011
UDS - Undisturbed Sample CHECKED KARTHIKEYAN
WS - Wash Sample DATE 12/12/2011
(F) Sample Failed
Groundwater table encountered at E.G.L during the time of investigation
of Bore Holes due to rain.
Depth
belo
w E
.G.L
. (m
)
02/1
2/2
011
Date
Casin
g D
epth
/Siz
e
Wate
r D
epth
(m
)
Tota
l C
ore
Re
cove
ry %
R.Q
.D %
DE
PT
H (
m)
0-1
5
15
-30
6cm
Pe
net
for
50
blo
ws
30
-45
Depth
(m)
R.L
. (m
)
Le
ge
nd
No.
Depth
(m
)
2.00 1 0 1 1 SS 2 2.00 -1.5
2.45
2.45
L2
2.5
2.50 - - - - UDS 3 2.50 -2.0
L3
3.0
3.00 3 5 7 12 SS 4 3.00 -2.5
3.45
3.45
4.00
4
2
4
6
SS
5
4.00
L4 4.0
-3.5
4.45
4.45
5.00
2
3
6
9
SS
6
5.00
-4.5
5.45
5.45
6.00
29
50
>100
SS
7
6.00
L5 6.0
-5.5 + + +
6.36
6.36 + +
+ + +
7.00
7.03
3cm Penet for
50 blows
>100
SS(F)
WS
8
7.00
7.03
-6.5
+ +
+ + +
+ +
+ +
+ + +
8.00 16 52 >100 SS 9 8.00 + +
-7.5 + + +
8.36
8.36 + +
+ + +
03/1
2/2
011
SITE INVESTIGATION
DRILLHOLE No.
BH-06
DRILL HOLE RECORD SHEET 2
Proposed Construction of MSB IT/ITES PARK Building (1Basement+Lower
OF 2
PROJECT Ground + Stilt + Upper Stilt 1, 2, 3 + 13 Floors) at Pallikaranai, Chennai.
DIA OF BORE HOLE 150mm 100mm
METHOD Rotary
MACHINE NO. 1
E D M Y D M Y CO-ORDINATES DATE to
N 02 12 2011 03 12 2011
FLUSHING MEDIUM Bentonite GROUND LEVEL 0.5 ORIENTATION/DIP VERTICAL
Drilling
progress per
meter
Time
Hr. Min.
SPT-DATA Sample Details
Blows/cm.
N' Type No.
Layer Data
Geotechnical Description
10.00
09 40 10.07
7cm Penet for
60 blows
>100 SS 11 10.00 -9.5
10.07
+ + + + +
To - - - - + + + Brownish Grey,V.Dense,Completely
Weathered Rock
10 10 + +
11 11.00 3cm Penet for
>100 SS(F) 12 11.00 -10.5 + + + L7 11.0
11.03 50 blows WS 11.03 + +
10 40
To - - 26 12
+ + + + +
Brownish Grey,Moderately Weathered Rock,
Descent from Charnockite
11 15 + + +
12 12.00 -
- - -
CS 12 12.00 -11.5 + + L8 12.0
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
CS - Core Sample LOGGED
K. LOGANATHAN REMARKS
SS - Split Spoon Sample DATE 03/12/2011
UDS - Undisturbed Sample CHECKED KARTHIKEYAN
Groundwater table encountered at E.G.L during the time of investigation of
Bore Holes due to rain.
DS - Disturbed Sample DATE 12/12/2011
Borehole terminated at 12 m depth below E.G.L
FIG.2.6 Sub Soil Profile at BH-06 Location
De
pth
be
low
E.G
.L.
(m)
Da
te
Ca
sin
g D
ep
th/S
ize
Wa
ter
De
pth
(m
)
To
tal C
ore
Re
co
ve
ry %
R.Q
.D %
DE
PT
H (
m)
0-1
5
15
-30
30
-45
De
pth
(m)
R.L
. (m
)
Le
ge
nd
No
.
De
pth
(m
)
06/1
2/2
011
SITE INVESTIGATION DRILLHOLE No.
BH-07
DRILL HOLE RECORD SHEET 1
Proposed Construction of MSB IT/ITES PARK Building (1Basement+Lower
OF 2
PROJECT Ground + Stilt + Upper Stilt 1, 2, 3 + 13 Floors) at Pallikaranai, Chennai.
DIA OF BORE HOLE 150mm 100mm
METHOD Rotary E D M Y D M Y
CO-ORDINATES DATE to MACHINE NO. 1 N 05 12 2011 06 12 2011
FLUSHING MEDIUM Bentonite GROUND LEVEL ORIENTATION/DIP VERTICAL
Drilling
progress per
meter
Time
SPT-DATA Sample Details
Blows/cm.
Layer Data
Hr. Min. N' Type No. Geotechnical Description
12 31 1
To - - - -
Filled Up Soil (Silty CLAY )
12 35
2
L1
2.0
12 44
To - - - -
12 51
3
14 17
Greenish Grey,Moist,Soft,Silty CLAY (CH)
Clay of High Plasticity
To - - - -
14 20
4 4.00 1 2
3 5 SS 3 4.00 -4.0
L2 4.0
14 38
To - -
14 40
4.45 4.45 - -
Brownish Green,Moist,M.Stiff to Stiff,Silty 5 5.00
14 52
2 3 6 9 SS 4 5.00 -5.0 CLAY (CI) Lean Clay of Medium Plasticity
To - - -
14 55
5.45 5.45 -
L3 5.9
6 6.00 9
15 24
13 18 31 SS 5 6.00 -6.0 + + + + +
To - - - - 6.45 6.45 + + + Whitish Brown,Dense,Residual Soil
15 28
7 7.00 15 18 77 95
SS 6 7.00 -7.0
+ +
+ + +
L4 7.0
16 02
To -
- - -
7.45 7.45
+ + +
+ + +
L5 7.4
Yellowish Green,V.Dense,Residual Soil
16 13 + +
8 8.00 15cm Penet for >100 SS 7 8.00 -8.0 + + +
16 49
To - -
8.15
- -
61 blows 8.15 + +
+ + +
16 58 + + Yellowish Green,V.Dense,Completely
+ + + Weathered Rock
9 9.00 4cm Penet for >100 SS 8 9.00 -9.0 + +
09 59 9.04 50 blows 9.04 + + +
To - - - -
10 26
+ + + + +
+ + 10 + + + 10.0
CS - Core Sample LOGGED J.BASKAR REMARKS
SS - Split Spoon Sample DATE 06/12/2011
UDS - Undisturbed Sample CHECKED KARTHIKEYAN
WS - Wash Sample DATE 12/12/2011
Groundwater table encountered at E.G.L during the time of investigation
of Bore Holes due to rain.
Depth
belo
w E
.G.L
. (m
)
05/1
2/2
011
Date
Casin
g D
epth
/Siz
e
Wate
r D
epth
(m
)
Tota
l C
ore
Re
cove
ry %
R.Q
.D %
DE
PT
H (
m)
0-1
5
15
-30
30
-45
Depth
(m)
R.L
. (m
)
Le
ge
nd
No.
Depth
(m
)
2.00 2 1 2 3 SS 1 2.00 -2.0
2.45
2.45
3.00
2
1
2
3
SS
2
3.00
-3.0
3.45
3.45
06/1
2/2
011
SITE INVESTIGATION
DRILLHOLE No.
BH-07
DRILL HOLE RECORD SHEET 2
Proposed Construction of MSB IT/ITES PARK Building (1Basement+Lower
OF 2
PROJECT Ground + Stilt + Upper Stilt 1, 2, 3 + 13 Floors) at Pallikaranai, Chennai.
DIA OF BORE HOLE 150mm 100mm
METHOD Rotary
MACHINE NO. 1
E D M Y D M Y CO-ORDINATES DATE to
N 05 12 2011 06 12 2011
FLUSHING MEDIUM Bentonite GROUND LEVEL ORIENTATION/DIP VERTICAL
Drilling
progress per
meter
Time
Hr. Min.
SPT-DATA Sample Details
Blows/cm.
N' Type No.
Layer Data
Geotechnical Description
10 55
10.00
10.06
6cm Penet for
39 blows after
>100 SS 9
10.00 -10.0
10.06
+ + + + +
L6 10.4
Yellowish Green,V.Dense,Completely
Weathered Rock
To - - 43 0
11 51
that SPT
Hammer
Rebounded
+ + + + +
11 11.00 - - - - CS 10 11.00
-11.0 + + +
Yellowish Grey,Fine to Coarse + +
Grains,Moderately Weathered Rock, Descent
12 08 + + + from Charnockite
To - - 35 0 + +
13 13 + + +
12 12.00 -
- - -
CS 11 12.00 -12.0 + + L7 12.0
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
CS - Core Sample LOGGED
J.BASKAR REMARKS
SS - Split Spoon Sample DATE 06/12/2011
UDS - Undisturbed Sample CHECKED KARTHIKEYAN
Groundwater table encountered at E.G.L during the time of investigation of
Bore Holes due to rain.
DS - Disturbed Sample DATE 12/12/2011
Borehole terminated at 12 m depth below E.G.L
FIG.2.7 Sub Soil Profile at BH-07 Location
De
pth
be
low
E.G
.L.
(m)
Da
te
Ca
sin
g D
ep
th/S
ize
Wa
ter
De
pth
(m
)
To
tal C
ore
Re
co
ve
ry %
R.Q
.D %
DE
PT
H (
m)
0-1
5
15
-30
30
-45
De
pth
(m)
R.L
. (m
)
Le
ge
nd
No
.
De
pth
(m
)
. . .
. . .
08/1
2/2
011
SITE INVESTIGATION DRILLHOLE No.
BH-08
DRILL HOLE RECORD SHEET 1
Proposed Construction of MSB IT/ITES PARK Building (1Basement+Lower
OF 2
PROJECT Ground + Stilt + Upper Stilt 1, 2, 3 + 13 Floors) at Pallikaranai, Chennai.
DIA OF BORE HOLE 150mm 100mm
METHOD Rotary
MACHINE NO. 1
E D M Y D M Y
CO-ORDINATES DATE to N 07 12 2011 08 12 2011
FLUSHING MEDIUM Bentonite GROUND LEVEL 0.5 ORIENTATION/DIP VERTICAL
Drilling
progress per
meter
Time
SPT-DATA Sample Details
Blows/cm.
Layer Data
Hr. Min.
N' Type
No.
Geotechnical Description
12 37
To - - - -
12 41
Filled Up Soil (Greyish
1 1.00 1
13 57
2 3 5 SS 1 1.00 -0.5 brown,Wet,M.Stiff,Silty CLAY (CH) Clay of
High Plasticity)
To - - - -
14 00
1.45 1.45
2 2.00 -
14 17
- - - UDS 2 2.00 -1.5
. . . . . . .
. . . . . . .
L1 2.0
To - - - -
14 19
. . . . . . .
. . . . . . .
. . . . L2 3.0
Greyish Green,Clayey Silty SAND (SC)
3 3.00
14 31
3 5 7 12 SS 3 3.00 -2.5 . . . . . . .
. . . . . . .
Greyish Green,Moist,Poorly Graded,
To
14 33
- - - 3.45 3.45
- . . . .
. . . . . . .
. . . . . . .
L3 4.0
M.Dense,Clayey Silty SAND (SC) Sand-Silt-
Clay mixture
4 4.00 4 5 6 11 SS 4 4.00 -3.5
14 51
To - - - -
14 54
4.45 4.45
5 5.00 4 5
15 16
6 11 SS 5 5.00 -4.5 Greyish Brown,Moist,Stiff,Silty CLAY (CH)
Clay of High Plasticity
To - - - -
15 19
5.45 5.45
L4 6.0
6 6.00 12 15
15 48
16 31 SS 6 6.00 -5.5 . . . . . . .
. . . . . . .
To - -
15 52
6.45 6.45 - -
. . . . . . .
. . . . . . .
. . . .
Brownish Green,Moist,Poorly Graded,
Dense,Clayey Silty SAND (SC) Sand-Silt-
Clay mixture
7 7.00 11 15cm
Penet for
>100 SS 7 7.00 -6.5 . . . . . . .
. . .
L5 7.2
16 18 7.30
To - - - - 57 blows 7.30 + + +
+ + 16 20 + + +
8 8.00 15cm Penet for >100 SS 8 8.00 -7.5 + +
8.15 62 blows
8.15 + + + 16 42 + +
To - - - - + + + 16 45 + + Yellowish Brown,V.Dense,Residual Soil
9 9.00 37 7cm Penet for
>100
SS 9 9.00 -8.5 + + +
+ + 10 31 9.22 56 blows 9.22 + + +
To - - - - + + 10 36 + + +
10 + +
10.0
CS - Core Sample LOGGED J BASKAR REMARKS
SS - Split Spoon Sample DATE 08/12/2011
UDS - Undisturbed Sample CHECKED KARTHIKEYAN
WS - Wash Sample DATE 12/12/2011
Groundwater table encountered at E.G.L during the time of investigation
of Bore Holes due to rain.
Depth
belo
w E
.G.L
. (m
)
07/1
2/2
011
Date
Casin
g D
epth
/Siz
e
Wate
r D
epth
(m
)
Tota
l C
ore
Re
cove
ry %
R.Q
.D %
DE
PT
H (
m)
0-1
5
15
-30
30
-45
Depth
(m)
R.L
. (m
)
Le
ge
nd
No.
Depth
(m
)
08/1
2/2
011
SITE INVESTIGATION DRILLHOLE No.
BH-08
DRILL HOLE RECORD SHEET 2
Proposed Construction of MSB IT/ITES PARK Building (1Basement+Lower
OF 2
PROJECT Ground + Stilt + Upper Stilt 1, 2, 3 + 13 Floors) at Pallikaranai, Chennai.
DIA OF BORE HOLE 150mm 100mm
METHOD Rotary
MACHINE NO. 1
E D M Y D M Y CO-ORDINATES DATE to
N 07 12 2011 08 12 2011
FLUSHING MEDIUM Bentonite GROUND LEVEL ORIENTATION/DIP VERTICAL
Drilling
progress per
meter
Time
Hr. Min.
SPT-DATA Sample Details
Blows/cm.
N' Type No.
Layer Data
Geotechnical Description
10.00 15cm Penet for >100 SS 10 10.00 -10.0 + + + 10 59 10.15 63 blows 10.15 + +
To - - - - + + + 11 26 + +
11 11.00 12cm Penet for >100 SS(F) 11 11.00 -11.0 + + +
11.12 60 blows WS 11.12 + + Yellowish Brown,Brownish Green,
11 57
To -
12 42
- - -
+ + + + +
+ + +
V.Dense,Residual Soil
12 12.00 19 15cm
>100 SS 12 12.00 -12.0 + +
Penet for + + +
12.30 57 blows
12.30 + + L6 12.3
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
CS - Core Sample LOGGED
J BASKAR REMARKS
SS - Split Spoon Sample DATE 08/12/2011
UDS - Undisturbed Sample CHECKED KARTHIKEYAN
(F) Sample Failed
Groundwater table encountered at E.G.L during the time of investigation of
DS - Disturbed Sample DATE 12/12/2011
Borehole terminated at 12 m depth below E.G.L
FIG.2.8 Sub Soil Profile at BH-08 Location
Bore Holes due to rain.
De
pth
be
low
E.G
.L.
(m)
Da
te
Ca
sin
g D
ep
th/S
ize
Wa
ter
De
pth
(m
)
To
tal C
ore
Re
co
ve
ry %
R.Q
.D %
DE
PT
H (
m)
0-1
5
15
-30
30
-45
De
pth
(m)
R.L
. (m
)
Le
ge
nd
No
.
De
pth
(m
)
CROSS SECTION PROFILE
Grain Size Distribution Curves
K Raheja Copr Pvt Ltd, Pallikaranai
100.00
90.00
80.00
70.00
60.00 6.0m
50.00 7.0m
40.00
30.00
20.00
10.00
0.00
0.0001 0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10 100
GRAIN SIZE (mm)
Fig. 2.10 GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION CURVE - BH-01
% O
F F
INE
S
8.0m
K Raheja Copr Pvt Ltd, Pallikaranai
100.00
90.00
80.00
70.00
60.00 6.0m
50.00 7.0m
40.00
30.00
20.00
10.00
0.00
0.0001 0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10 100
GRAIN SIZE (mm)
Fig. 2.11 GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION CURVE - BH-02
% O
F F
INE
S
8.0m
K Raheja Copr Pvt Ltd, Pallikaranai
100.00
90.00
80.00
70.00
60.00 6.0m
50.00 7.0m
40.00
30.00
20.00
10.00
0.00
0.0001 0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10 100
GRAIN SIZE (mm)
Fig. 2.12 GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION CURVE - BH-03
% O
F F
INE
S
8.0m
K Raheja Copr Pvt Ltd, Pallikaranai
100.00
90.00
80.00
70.00
6.0m
60.00
7.0m
50.00 9.0m
10.0m
40.00
11.0m
30.00
20.00
10.00
0.00
0.0001 0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10 100
GRAIN SIZE (mm)
Fig. 2.13 GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION CURVE - BH-04
% O
F F
INE
S
K Raheja Copr Pvt Ltd, Pallikaranai
100.00
90.00
80.00
70.00
6.0m
60.00 7.0m
8.0m
50.00 9.0m
40.00
11.0m
30.00
20.00
10.00
0.00
0.0001 0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10 100
GRAIN SIZE (mm)
Fig. 2.14 GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION CURVE - BH-05
% O
F F
INE
S
10.0m
K Raheja Copr Pvt Ltd, Pallikaranai
100.00
90.00
80.00
70.00
6.0m
60.00 7.0m
8.0m
50.00 9.0m
40.00
11.0m
30.00
20.00
10.00
0.00
0.0001 0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10 100
GRAIN SIZE (mm)
Fig. 2.15 GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION CURVE - BH-06
% O
F F
INE
S
10.0m
K Raheja Copr Pvt Ltd, Pallikaranai
100.00
90.00
80.00
70.00
6.0m
60.00
7.0m
50.00 8.0m
9.0m
40.00
10.0m
30.00
20.00
10.00
0.00
0.0001 0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10 100
GRAIN SIZE (mm)
Fig. 2.16 GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION CURVE - BH-07
% O
F F
INE
S
K Raheja Copr Pvt Ltd, Pallikaranai
100.00
90.00
80.00
70.00
2.0m
60.00 3.0m
6.0m
7.0m
50.00 8.0m
9.0m
40.00 10.0m
12.0m
30.00
20.00
10.00
0.00
0.0001 0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10 100
GRAIN SIZE (mm)
Fig. 2.17 GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION CURVE - BH-08
% O
F F
INE
S
HYDROMETER ANALYSIS CURVE
K Raheja Copr Pvt Ltd, Pallikaranai
% F
iner
Bore Hole No: 1 Depth: 5.0m
100.0
90.0
80.0
70.0
60.0
50.0
40.0
30.0
20.0
10.0
0.0
0.001 0.010 0.100 1.000
Particle Size Diameter (mm)
Fig.2.18 Hydrometer Analysis Master Curve
(FINES) Silt and Clay Sand
K Raheja Copr Pvt Ltd, Pallikaranai
% F
iner
Bore Hole No: 2 Depth: 2.5m UDS
100.0
90.0
80.0
70.0
60.0
50.0
40.0
30.0
20.0
10.0
0.0
0.001 0.010 0.100 1.000
Particle Size Diameter (mm)
Fig.2.19 Hydrometer Analysis Master Curve
(FINES) Silt and Clay Sand
K Raheja Copr Pvt Ltd, Pallikaranai
% F
iner
Bore Hole No: 3 Depth: 4.0m
100.0
90.0
80.0
70.0
60.0
50.0
40.0
30.0
20.0
10.0
0.0
0.001 0.010 0.100 1.000
Particle Size Diameter (mm)
Fig.2.20 Hydrometer Analysis Master Curve
(FINES) Silt and Clay Sand
Bore Hole No: 4 Depth: 2.0m
% F
iner
100.0
90.0
80.0
70.0
60.0
50.0
40.0
30.0
20.0
10.0
0.0
0.001 0.010 0.100 1.000
Particle Size Diameter (mm)
Fig.2.21 Hydrometer Analysis Master Curve
(FINES) Silt and Clay Sand
Bore Hole No: 5 Depth: 2.0m
% F
iner
100.0
90.0
80.0
70.0
60.0
50.0
40.0
30.0
20.0
10.0
0.0
0.001 0.010 0.100 1.000
Particle Size Diameter (mm)
Fig.2.22 Hydrometer Analysis Master Curve
(FINES) Silt and Clay Sand
Bore Hole No: 6 Depth: 4.0m
% F
iner
100.0
90.0
80.0
70.0
60.0
50.0
40.0
30.0
20.0
10.0
0.0
0.001 0.010 0.100 1.000
Particle Size Diameter (mm)
Fig.2.23 Hydrometer Analysis Master Curve
(FINES) Silt and Clay Sand
Bore Hole No: 7 Depth: 3.0m
% F
iner
100.0
90.0
80.0
70.0
60.0
50.0
40.0
30.0
20.0
10.0
0.0
0.001 0.010 0.100 1.000
Particle Size Diameter (mm)
Fig.2.24 Hydrometer Analysis Master Curve
(FINES) Silt and Clay Sand
Bore Hole No: 8 Depth: 6.0m
% F
iner
100.0
90.0
80.0
70.0
60.0
50.0
40.0
30.0
20.0
10.0
0.0
0.001 0.010 0.100 1.000
Particle Size Diameter (mm)
Fig.2.25 Hydrometer Analysis Master Curve
(FINES) Silt and Clay Sand
LABORATORY TEST RESULTS
K Raheja Copr Pvt Ltd, Pallikaranai
Table-2.1 Laboratory Classification of Soil Samples from BH-01
Dep
th o
f S
am
ple
belo
w E
.G.L
.
(m)
SP
T-V
alu
e
Typ
e o
f S
am
ple
Sub Soil Classification
Fine Grained (FG) Coarse Grained (CG)
NM
C(%
)
LL
(%
)
PL
(%
)
I P
Ic
SL
(%
)
FS
(%
)
Co
nsis
tan
cy
Po
sit
ion
Wit
h R
esp
ect
to A
-Alin
e
IS:N
ota
tio
n
Gra
vel
(%)
Co
ars
e (
%)
Med
ium
(%
)
Fin
e (
%)
Sil
t (%
)
Cla
y (
%)
D10
(m
m)
D30(m
m)
D60
(m
m)
CU=
D6
0/D
10
Cc=
D3
02/(
D10x
D60)
Rela
tive D
en
sit
y
IS-Notation
Gra
vel
San
d
1.0 5 SS 40 81 26 55 0.75 7 111 Firm Above CH - - - - 60 40 - - - - - FG>50% FG>50% FG>50%
2.0 7 SS 45 76 34 41 0.74 8 89 Firm Above CH - - - - 55 45 - - - - - FG>50% FG>50% FG>50%
3.0 0 SS 50 54 26 28 0.15 11 76 Very Soft Above CH - - - - 68 32 - - - - - FG>50% FG>50% FG>50%
4.0 2 SS 36 40 21 19 0.22 11 90 Very Soft Above CI - - - - 71 29 - - - - - FG>50% FG>50% FG>50%
5.0 8 SS 35 68 33 35 0.94 8 74 Stiff Above CH - - - - 57 43 - - - - - FG>50% FG>50% FG>50%
6.0 >100 SS 37 48 21 27 0.40 8 75 CG>50% Above - 17 9 30 21 12 11 - - - - - V.Dense <50% SC
7.0 >100 SS - - - - - - - CG>50% - - 40 3 22 19 16 0 - - - - - V.Dense <50% SM
8.0 >100 SS - - - - - - - CG>50% - - 6 7 66 6 15 0 - - - - - V.Dense <50% SM
LL=Liquid Limit PL=Plastic Limit SL=Shrinkage Limit CU=Uniformity Coefficient
Ip=Plasticity Index CG=Coarse Grained Ic=(LL-NMC)/Ip CC=Coefficient of Curvature
FG=Fine Grained NMC=Nature Moisture Content FS=Differential Frees Well Index
K Raheja Copr Pvt Ltd, Pallikaranai
Table-2.2 Laboratory Classification of Soil Samples from BH-02
Dep
th o
f S
am
ple
belo
w E
.G.L
.
(m)
SP
T-V
alu
e
Typ
e o
f S
am
ple
Sub Soil Classification
Fine Grained (FG) Coarse Grained (CG)
NM
C(%
)
LL
(%
)
PL
(%
)
I P
Ic
SL
(%
)
FS
(%
)
Co
nsis
tan
cy
Po
sit
ion
Wit
h R
esp
ect
to A
-Alin
e
IS:N
ota
tio
n
Gra
vel
(%)
Co
ars
e (
%)
Med
ium
(%
)
Fin
e (
%)
Sil
t (%
)
Cla
y (
%)
D10
(m
m)
D30(m
m)
D60
(m
m)
CU=
D6
0/D
10
Cc=
D3
02/(
D10x
D60)
Rela
tive D
en
sit
y
IS-Notation
Gra
vel
San
d
1.0 17 SS 17 41 17 24 1.01 15 33 V.Stiff Above CI - - - - 76 24 - - - - - FG>50% FG>50% FG>50%
2.0 3 SS 52 71 33 38 0.50 10 50 Soft Above CH - - - - 60 40 - - - - - FG>50% FG>50% FG>50%
2.5 - UDS 33 51 25 26 0.69 13 35 - Above CH 0 0 7 26 30 37 - - - - - FG>50% FG>50% FG>50%
3.0 0 SS 36 36 20 16 0.00 18 29 Very Soft Above CI - - - - 74 26 - - - - - FG>50% FG>50% FG>50%
4.0 4 SS 33 37 21 16 0.25 17 15 Soft Above CI - - - - 72 28 - - - - - FG>50% FG>50% FG>50%
5.0 9 SS 39 71 33 38 0.85 11 167 Stiff Above CH - - - - 58 42 - - - - - FG>50% FG>50% FG>50%
6.0 37 SS 20 39 22 17 1.07 15 65 CG>50% Above - 34 9 23 8 15 11 - - - - - Dense <50% SC
7.0 >100 SS - - - - - - - CG>50% - - 33 6 24 22 15 0 - - - - - V.Dense <50% SM
8.0 >100 SS - - - - - - - CG>50% - - 0 1 60 26 13 0 - - - - - V.Dense <50% SM
LL=Liquid Limit PL=Plastic Limit SL=Shrinkage Limit CU=Uniformity Coefficient
Ip=Plasticity Index CG=Coarse Grained Ic=(LL-NMC)/Ip CC=Coefficient of Curvature
FG=Fine Grained NMC=Nature Moisture Content FS=Differential Frees Well Index
K Raheja Copr Pvt Ltd, Pallikaranai
Table-2.3 Laboratory Classification of Soil Samples from BH-03
Dep
th o
f S
am
ple
belo
w E
.G.L
.
(m)
SP
T-V
alu
e
Typ
e o
f S
am
ple
Sub Soil Classification
Fine Grained (FG) Coarse Grained (CG)
NM
C(%
)
LL
(%
)
PL
(%
)
I P
Ic
SL
(%
)
FS
(%
)
Co
nsis
tan
cy
Po
sit
ion
Wit
h R
esp
ect
to A
-Alin
e
IS:N
ota
tio
n
Gra
vel
(%)
Co
ars
e (
%)
Med
ium
(%
)
Fin
e (
%)
Sil
t (%
)
Cla
y (
%)
D10
(m
m)
D30(m
m)
D60
(m
m)
CU=
D6
0/D
10
Cc=
D3
02/(
D10x
D60)
Rela
tive D
en
sit
y
IS-Notation
Gra
vel
San
d
1.0 8 SS 31 59 30 29 0.95 13 21 Stiff Above CH - - - - 66 34 - - - - - FG>50% FG>50% FG>50%
2.0 4 SS 55 72 33 39 0.43 11 21 Soft Above CH - - - - 60 40 - - - - - FG>50% FG>50% FG>50%
3.0 11 SS 26 38 24 14 0.85 15 4 Stiff Above CI - - - - 72 28 - - - - - FG>50% FG>50% FG>50%
4.0 16 SS 19 42 19 22 1.01 14 50 V.Stiff Above CI - - - - 70 30 - - - - - FG>50% FG>50% FG>50%
5.0 19 SS 19 42 22 20 1.13 14 44 V.Stiff Above CI - - - - 70 30 - - - - - FG>50% FG>50% FG>50%
6.0 39 SS 18 49 24 25 1.24 14 78 CG>50% Above - 10 15 33 17 15 10 - - - - - Dense <50% SC
7.0 >100 SS - - - - - - - CG>50% - - 14 5 17 33 31 0 - - - - - V.Dense <50% SM
8.0 >100 SS - - - - - - - CG>50% - - 7 4 19 37 33 0 - - - - - V.Dense <50% SM
LL=Liquid Limit PL=Plastic Limit SL=Shrinkage Limit CU=Uniformity Coefficient
Ip=Plasticity Index CG=Coarse Grained Ic=(LL-NMC)/Ip CC=Coefficient of Curvature
FG=Fine Grained NMC=Nature Moisture Content FS=Differential Frees Well Index
Table-2.4 Laboratory Classification of Soil Samples from BH-04 D
ep
th o
f S
am
ple
belo
w E
.G.L
.
(m)
SP
T-V
alu
e
Typ
e o
f S
am
ple
Sub Soil Classification
Fine Grained (FG) Coarse Grained (CG)
NM
C(%
)
LL
(%
)
PL
(%
)
I P
Ic
SL
(%
)
FS
(%
)
Co
nsis
tan
cy
Po
sit
ion
Wit
h R
esp
ect
to A
-Alin
e
IS:N
ota
tio
n
Gra
vel
(%)
Co
ars
e (
%)
Med
ium
(%
)
Fin
e (
%)
Sil
t (%
)
Cla
y (
%)
D10
(m
m)
D30(m
m)
D60
(m
m)
CU=
D6
0/D
10
Cc=
D3
02/(
D10x
D60)
Rela
tive D
en
sit
y
IS-Notation
Gra
vel
San
d
1.0 6 SS 38 61 30 31 0.74 14 36 Firm Above CH - - - - 65 35 - - - - - FG>50% FG>50% FG>50%
2.0 4 SS 52 70 33 37 0.49 11 20 Soft Above CH - - - - 62 38 - - - - - FG>50% FG>50% FG>50%
3.0 14 SS 23 39 20 19 0.84 15 37 Stiff Above CI - - - - 72 28 - - - - - FG>50% FG>50% FG>50%
4.0 12 SS 39 74 32 42 0.83 14 90 Stiff Above CH - - - - 58 42 - - - - - FG>50% FG>50% FG>50%
5.0 13 SS 25 51 24 27 0.97 13 61 Stiff Above CH - - - - 68 32 - - - - - FG>50% FG>50% FG>50%
6.0 >100 SS 17 36 21 15 1.29 16 67 CG>50% Above - 47 3 15 20 10 5 - - - - - V.Dense GC <50%
7.0 >100 SS - - - - - - 56 CG>50% - - 5 7 29 29 25 5 - - - - - V.Dense <50% SM
9.0 71 SS - - - - - - - CG>50% - - 2 6 38 27 27 0 - - - - - V.Dense <50% SM
10.0 38 SS - - - - - - - CG>50% - - 2 7 40 23 28 0 - - - - - Dense <50% SM
11.0 >100 WS - - - - - - - CG>50% - - 0 10 78 12 0 0 - - - - - V.Dense <50% SP
LL=Liquid Limit PL=Plastic Limit SL=Shrinkage Limit CU=Uniformity Coefficient
Ip=Plasticity Index CG=Coarse Grained Ic=(LL-NMC)/Ip CC=Coefficient of Curvature
FG=Fine Grained NMC=Nature Moisture Content FS=Differential Frees Well Index WS = Wash Sample
Table-2.5 Laboratory Classification of Soil Samples from BH-05 D
ep
th o
f S
am
ple
belo
w E
.G.L
.
(m)
SP
T-V
alu
e
Typ
e o
f S
am
ple
Sub Soil Classification
Fine Grained (FG) Coarse Grained (CG)
NM
C(%
)
LL
(%
)
PL
(%
)
I P
Ic
SL
(%
)
FS
(%
)
Co
nsis
tan
cy
Po
sit
ion
Wit
h R
esp
ect
to A
-Alin
e
IS:N
ota
tio
n
Gra
vel
(%)
Co
ars
e (
%)
Med
ium
(%
)
Fin
e (
%)
Sil
t (%
)
Cla
y (
%)
D10
(m
m)
D30(m
m)
D60
(m
m)
CU=
D6
0/D
10
Cc=
D3
02/(
D10x
D60)
Rela
tive D
en
sit
y
IS-Notation
Gra
vel
San
d
1.0 3 SS 33 43 21 22 0.44 13 33 Soft Above CI 0 2 14 23 35 26 - - - - - FG>50% FG>50% FG>50%
2.0 6 SS 40 63 31 32 0.72 11 50 Firm Above CH - - - - 65 35 - - - - - FG>50% FG>50% FG>50%
3.0 3 SS 29 36 20 16 0.47 14 40 Soft Above CI - - - - 73 27 - - - - - FG>50% FG>50% FG>50%
4.0 5 SS 33 51 26 25 0.72 12 62 Firm Above CH - - - - 68 32 - - - - - FG>50% FG>50% FG>50%
5.0 9 SS 29 52 28 24 0.96 11 113 Stiff Above CH - - - - 68 32 - - - - - FG>50% FG>50% FG>50%
6.0 90 SS - - - - - - 32 CG>50% - - 24 9 15 27 25 0 - - - - - V.Dense <50% SM
7.0 >100 SS - - - - - - - CG>50% - - 66 3 6 10 15 0 - - - - - V.Dense GM <50%
8.0 >100 SS - - - - - - 16 CG>50% - - 6 4 20 35 35 0 - - - - - V.Dense <50% SM
9.0 >100 WS - - - - - - - CG>50% - - 5 4 77 12 2 0 - - - - - V.Dense <50% SP
10.0 >100 WS - - - - - - - CG>50% - - 1 11 81 6 1 0 - - - - - V.Dense <50% SP
11.0 >100 WS - - - - - - - CG>50% - - 2 11 69 14 4 0 - - - - - V.Dense <50% SP
LL=Liquid Limit PL=Plastic Limit SL=Shrinkage Limit CU=Uniformity Coefficient
Ip=Plasticity Index CG=Coarse Grained Ic=(LL-NMC)/Ip CC=Coefficient of Curvature
FG=Fine Grained NMC=Nature Moisture Content FS=Differential Frees Well Index WS = Wash Sample
Table-2.6 Laboratory Classification of Soil Samples from BH-06 D
ep
th o
f S
am
ple
belo
w E
.G.L
.
(m)
SP
T-V
alu
e
Typ
e o
f S
am
ple
Sub Soil Classification
Fine Grained (FG) Coarse Grained (CG)
NM
C(%
)
LL
(%
)
PL
(%
)
I P
Ic
SL
(%
)
FS
(%
)
Co
nsis
tan
cy
Po
sit
ion
Wit
h R
esp
ect
to A
-Alin
e
IS:N
ota
tio
n
Gra
vel
(%)
Co
ars
e (
%)
Med
ium
(%
)
Fin
e (
%)
Sil
t (%
)
Cla
y (
%)
D10
(m
m)
D30(m
m)
D60
(m
m)
CU=
D6
0/D
10
Cc=
D3
02/(
D10x
D60)
Rela
tive D
en
sit
y
IS-Notation
Gra
vel
San
d
1.0 9 SS 33 70 32 38 0.97 11 25 Stiff Above CH - - - - 63 37 - - - - - FG>50% FG>50% FG>50%
2.0 1 SS 54 63 24 40 0.23 11 78 Very Soft Above CH - - - - 65 35 - - - - - FG>50% FG>50% FG>50%
2.5 - UDS 41 44 19 25 0.13 12 26 - Above CI - - - - 72 28 - - - - - FG>50% FG>50% FG>50%
3.0 12 SS 23 46 20 26 0.90 12 89 Stiff Above CI 0 1 15 30 26 28 - - - - - FG>50% FG>50% FG>50%
4.0 6 SS 39 63 27 36 0.65 11 90 Firm Above CH - - - - 65 35 - - - - - FG>50% FG>50% FG>50%
5.0 9 SS 41 95 33 63 0.87 8 140 Stiff Above CH - - - - 53 47 - - - - - FG>50% FG>50% FG>50%
6.0 >100 SS 28 31 16 15 0.21 18 65 CG>50% Above - 0 1 19 42 30 8 - - - - - V.Dense <50% SC
7.0 >100 WS - - - - - - - CG>50% - - 32 13 45 8 2 0 - - - - - V.Dense <50% SP
8.0 >100 SS - - - - - - - CG>50% - - 4 4 21 35 36 0 - - - - - V.Dense <50% SM
9.0 >100 SS - - - - - - - CG>50% - - 40 11 19 15 15 0 - - - - - V.Dense <50% SM
10.0 >100 SS - - - - - - - CG>50% - - 6 9 41 24 20 0 - - - - - V.Dense <50% SM
11.0 >100 WS - - - - - - - CG>50% - - 7 9 74 1 9 0 - - - - - V.Dense <50% SP-SC
LL=Liquid Limit PL=Plastic Limit SL=Shrinkage Limit CU=Uniformity Coefficient
Ip=Plasticity Index CG=Coarse Grained Ic=(LL-NMC)/Ip CC=Coefficient of Curvature
FG=Fine Grained NMC=Nature Moisture Content FS=Differential Frees Well Index
Table-2.7 Laboratory Classification of Soil Samples from BH-07 D
ep
th o
f S
am
ple
belo
w E
.G.L
.
(m)
SP
T-V
alu
e
Typ
e o
f S
am
ple
Sub Soil Classification
Fine Grained (FG) Coarse Grained (CG)
NM
C(%
)
LL
(%
)
PL
(%
)
I P
Ic
SL
(%
)
FS
(%
)
Co
nsis
tan
cy
Po
sit
ion
Wit
h R
esp
ect
to A
-Alin
e
IS:N
ota
tio
n
Gra
vel
(%)
Co
ars
e (
%)
Med
ium
(%
)
Fin
e (
%)
Sil
t (%
)
Cla
y (
%)
D10
(m
m)
D30(m
m)
D60
(m
m)
CU=
D6
0/D
10
Cc=
D3
02/(
D10x
D60)
Rela
tive D
en
sit
y
IS-Notation
Gra
vel
San
d
2.0 3 SS 49 65 31 34 0.47 11 65 Soft Above CH - - - - 64 36 - - - - - FG>50% FG>50% FG>50%
3.0 3 SS 38 51 21 29 0.43 14 47 Soft Above CH - - - - 68 32 - - - - - FG>50% FG>50% FG>50%
4.0 5 SS 31 45 25 20 0.70 13 45 Firm Above CI - - - - 71 29 - - - - - FG>50% FG>50% FG>50%
5.0 9 SS 26 43 23 19 0.85 13 58 Stiff Above CI - - - - 72 28 - - - - - FG>50% FG>50% FG>50%
6.0 31 SS - - - - - - 23 CG>50% - - 24 7 14 25 30 0 - - - - - Dense <50% SM
7.0 95 SS - - - - - - - CG>50% - - 6 4 31 33 26 0 - - - - - V.Dense <50% SM
8.0 >100 SS - - - - - - - CG>50% - - 20 7 17 31 25 0 - - - - - V.Dense <50% SM
9.0 >100 SS - - - - - - - CG>50% - - 18 5 22 38 17 0 - - - - - V.Dense <50% SM
10.0 >100 SS - - - - - - - CG>50% - - 10 3 34 37 16 0 - - - - - V.Dense <50% SM
LL=Liquid Limit PL=Plastic Limit SL=Shrinkage Limit CU=Uniformity Coefficient
Ip=Plasticity Index CG=Coarse Grained Ic=(LL-NMC)/Ip CC=Coefficient of Curvature
FG=Fine Grained NMC=Nature Moisture Content FS=Differential Frees Well Index
Table-2.8 Laboratory Classification of Soil Samples from BH-08 D
ep
th o
f S
am
ple
belo
w E
.G.L
.
(m)
SP
T-V
alu
e
Typ
e o
f S
am
ple
Sub Soil Classification
Fine Grained (FG) Coarse Grained (CG)
NM
C(%
)
LL
(%
)
PL
(%
)
I P
Ic
SL
(%
)
FS
(%
)
Co
nsis
tan
cy
Po
sit
ion
Wit
h R
esp
ect
to A
-Alin
e
IS:N
ota
tio
n
Gra
vel
(%)
Co
ars
e (
%)
Med
ium
(%
)
Fin
e (
%)
Sil
t (%
)
Cla
y (
%)
D10
(m
m)
D30(m
m)
D60
(m
m)
CU=
D6
0/D
10
Cc=
D3
02/(
D10x
D60)
Rela
tive D
en
sit
y
IS-Notation
Gra
vel
San
d
1.0 5 SS 45 64 31 33 0.57 11 88 Firm Above CH - - - - 65 35 - - - - - FG>50% FG>50% FG>50%
2.0 - UDS 21 34 15 19 0.66 15 73 CG>50% Above - 11 5 16 25 35 8 - - - - - - <50% SC
3.0 12 SS 23 45 22 23 0.96 13 113 CG>50% Above - 6 3 19 25 38 9 - - - - - M.Dense <50% SC
4.0 11 SS 29 67 29 38 1.00 12 110 Stiff Above CH - - - - 65 35 - - - - - FG>50% FG>50% FG>50%
5.0 11 SS 32 76 30 47 0.94 10 140 Stiff Above CH - - - - 61 39 - - - - - FG>50% FG>50% FG>50%
6.0 31 SS 29 59 29 30 1.02 12 130 CG>50% Above - 15 9 23 20 25 8 - - - - - Dense <50% SC
7.0 >100 SS 22 53 28 25 1.24 14 25 CG>50% Above - 13 5 15 27 40 0 - - - - - V.Dense <50% SC
8.0 >100 SS - - - - - - 22 CG>50% - - 13 7 19 21 40 0 - - - - - V.Dense <50% SM
9.0 >100 SS - - - - - - 13 CG>50% - - 16 6 17 27 34 0 - - - - - V.Dense <50% SM
10.0 >100 SS - - - - - - 20 CG>50% - - 6 5 17 60 12 0 - - - - - V.Dense <50% SP-SM
12.0 >100 SS - - - - - - 18 CG>50% - - 15 6 20 27 32 0 - - - - - V.Dense <50% SM
LL=Liquid Limit PL=Plastic Limit SL=Shrinkage Limit CU=Uniformity Coefficient
Ip=Plasticity Index CG=Coarse Grained Ic=(LL-NMC)/Ip CC=Coefficient of Curvature
FG=Fine Grained NMC=Nature Moisture Content FS=Differential Frees Well Index
K Raheja Copr Pvt Ltd, Pallikaranai
Table-2.9 Results of Chemical Analysis
SL
No.
Bore
HoleNo.
Soil
Depth of
Sample
(m)
pH
Chlorides
(ppm)
Sulphates
(ppm)
1
BH-04
3.0
7.35
236
455
2 BH-05 2.0 7.38 239 458
3 BH-06 3.0 7.35 253 469
4 BH-07 3.0 7.35 244 481
5 BH-08 3.0 7.39 241 485
Chemical analysis on water sample was not performed due to
groundwater table encountered at E.G.L during the time of Bore
Hole investigation due to rain.
K Raheja Corp Pvt Ltd., Pallikaranai
CHAPTER-3
SUB-SURFACE STRATIFICATION
Preamble:
The sub surface stratification at borehole location, with respect to Foundation/Geotechnical
Engineering Application are derived based on the visual identification, laboratory classification
tests and field insitu strength tests. Further, the strength parameters are estimated based on
the in-situ strength test results as per the following correlations.
Design Sub Soil Profile:
The sub soil characteristics obtained at the test location are further processed to arrive at the
design soil parameters required for the design of sub structure using the following shear
strength correlations with respect to the Standard Penetration Test Values of different layers.
For Coarse Grained Material, Ref. IS: 6403 to estimate Angle of Shearing Resistance
(Reproduced and shown in Fig.A1)
For Fine Grained Material, Ref. Terzaghi & Peck, 1948, to estimate Unconfined
Compressive Strength (Reproduced and shown in Fig.A2)
Based on the above, the average design soil characteristics are given below:
K Raheja Corp Pvt Ltd., Pallikaranai
REFERENCE BORE HOLE-BH: 1 Ref R.L. of G.L. (m): 0.00
La
ye
r N
o.
Layer Thk. (m)
Type of Strata
Colour
Av
e.
De
sig
n S
PT
Re
lati
ve
De
ns
ity
C
on
sis
ten
cy
()
kN
/m3
Shear Parameters
To
p.
R.L
.
Bo
t. R
.L.
Th
ick
nes
s
(Cu)
kP
a
()
Deg
.
1 0.00 2.00 2.00 Silty Clay Grey 5 - Medium Stiff 15 33 -
2 2.00 3.00 1.00 Silty Clay Grey 7 - Medium Stiff 16 47 -
3 3.00 4.00 1.00 Silty Clay Greyish Brown
0 - Very Soft 13 4 -
4 4.00 5.00 1.00 Silty Clay Greyish Brown
2 - Very Soft 14 13 -
5 5.00 6.20 1.20 Silty Clay Greyish Brown
8 - Medium Stiff 16.5 53 -
6
6.20
8.00
1.80
Completely Weathered
Rock
Brownish Grey
>100
Very Dense
-
21
-
42.5
7
8.00
10.00
2.00
Highly Weathered
Rock
Greyish Brown
>100
Very Dense
-
21
-
42.5
8
10.00
11.00
1.00
Moderately Weathered
Rock
Pinkish Grey
>100
Very Dense
-
21
-
42.5
9 11.00 14.00 3.00 Fresh Rock Dark Grey >100 Very Dense - 21 - 42.5
K Raheja Corp Pvt Ltd., Pallikaranai
REFERENCE BORE HOLE-BH: 2 Ref R.L. of G.L. (m): 0.00
La
ye
r N
o.
Layer Thk. (m)
Type of Strata
Colour
Av
e.
De
sig
n S
PT
Re
lati
ve
De
ns
ity
C
on
sis
ten
cy
()
kN
/m3
Shear Parameters
To
p.
R.L
.
Bo
t. R
.L.
Th
ick
nes
s
(Cu)
kP
a
()
Deg
.
1 0.00 2.00 2.00 Silty Clay Grey 17 - Very Stiff 20 113 -
2 2.00 3.00 1.00 Silty Clay Greyish Brown
3 - Soft 14 20 -
3 3.00 5.00 2.00 Silty Clay Grey 2 - Very Soft 14 13 -
4 5.00 6.00 1.00 Silty Clay Greyish Brown
9 - Stiff 17 60 -
5 6.00 6.30 0.30 Clayey Silty
Sand Grey 37 Dense - 19.5 - 37.9
6
6.30
8.00
1.70
Completely Weathered
Rock
Brown
>100
Very Dense
-
21
-
42.5
7
8.00
9.00
1.00
Moderately Weathered
Rock
Brownish Grey
>100
Very Dense
-
21
-
42.5
8
9.00
11.00
2.00 Slightly
Weathered Rock
Brownish Grey
>100
Very Dense
-
21
-
42.5
9
11.00
13.00
2.00
Moderately Weathered
Rock
Brownish Grey
>100
Very Dense
-
21
-
42.5
K Raheja Corp Pvt Ltd., Pallikaranai
REFERENCE BORE HOLE-BH: 3 Ref R.L. of G.L. (m): 0.00
La
ye
r N
o.
Layer Thk. (m)
Type of Strata
Colour
Av
e.
De
sig
n S
PT
Re
lati
ve
De
ns
ity
C
on
sis
ten
cy
()
kN
/m3
Shear Parameters
To
p.
R.L
.
Bo
t. R
.L.
Th
ick
nes
s
(Cu)
kP
a
()
Deg
.
1 0.00 2.00 2.00 Silty Clay Greyish Brown
8 - Medium Stiff 16.5 53 -
2 2.00 3.00 1.00 Silty Clay Grey 4 - Soft 14.5 27 -
3 3.00 6.00 3.00 Silty Clay Grey 15 - Stiff 20 100 -
4 6.00 6.50 0.50 Clayey Silty
Sand Brownish
Grey 39 Dense - 19.5 - 38.5
5
6.50
8.10
1.60
Completely Weathered
Rock
Brown
>100
Very Dense
-
21
-
42.5
6
8.10
10.00
1.90
Moderately Weathered
Rock
Brownish Grey
>100
Very Dense
-
21
-
42.5
7
10.00
11.00
1.00
Slightly Weathered
Rock
Grey
>100
Very Dense
-
21
-
42.5
8 11.00 12.00 1.00 Fresh Grey >100 Very Dense - 21 - 42.5
REFERENCE BORE HOLE-BH: 4 Ref R.L. of G.L. (m): 0.00
La
ye
r N
o. Layer Thk. (m)
Type of Strata
Colour
Av
e.
De
sig
n
SP
T
R
ela
tive
De
ns
ity
C
on
sis
ten
cy
()
kN
/m3
Shear Parameters
To
p.
R.L
.
Bo
t. R
.L.
Th
ick
nes
s
(Cu)
kP
a
()
Deg
.
1 0.00 2.00 2.00 Silty Clay Grey 6 - Medium Stiff 15.5 40 -
2 2.00 3.00 1.00 Silty Clay Greyish Brown
4 - Soft 14.5 27 -
3 3.00 4.00 1.00 Silty Clay Greyish Brown
14 - Stiff 19.5 93 -
4 4.00 5.50 1.50 Silty Clay Greyish Brown
13 - Stiff 19 87 -
5 5.50 10.00 4.50 Residual Soil Brownish
Grey 70 Very Dense - 21 - 42.5
6 10.00 10.50 0.50 Residual Soil Brownish
Grey 38 Dense - 19.5 - 38.2
7
10.50
13.80
3.30
Completely Weathered
Rock
Greyish Brown
>100
Very Dense
-
21
-
42.5
K Raheja Corp Pvt Ltd., Pallikaranai
REFERENCE BORE HOLE-BH: 5 Ref R.L. of G.L. (m): 0.00
La
ye
r N
o.
Layer Thk. (m)
Type of Strata
Colour
Av
e.
De
sig
n S
PT
Re
lati
ve
De
ns
ity
C
on
sis
ten
cy
()
kN
/m3
Shear Parameters
To
p.
R.L
.
Bo
t. R
.L.
Th
ick
nes
s
(Cu)
kP
a
()
Deg
.
1 0.00 2.00 2.00 Silty Clay Grey 3 - Soft 14 20 -
2 2.00 3.00 1.00 Silty Clay Greyish Brown
6 - Medium Stiff 15.5 40 -
3 3.00 4.00 1.00 Sandy Silty
Clay Grey 3 - Soft 14 20 -
4 4.00 5.00 1.00 Silty Clay Greyish Brown
5 - Medium Stiff 15 33 -
5 5.00 6.30 1.30 Silty Clay Greyish Brown
9 - Stiff 17 60 -
6 6.30 7.00 0.70 Residual Soil Greyish Brown
90 Very Dense - 21 - 42.5
7
7.00
11.00
4.00
Completely Weathered
Rock
Greyish Brown
>100
Very Dense
-
21
-
42.5
8
11.00
12.00
1.00
Moderately Weathered
Rock
Brownish Grey
>100
-
-
-
-
-
REFERENCE BORE HOLE-BH: 6 Ref R.L. of G.L. (m): 0.00
La
ye
r N
o.
Layer Thk. (m)
Type of Strata
Colour
Av
e.
De
sig
n S
PT
Re
lati
ve
De
ns
ity
C
on
sis
ten
cy
()
kN
/m3
Shear Parameters
To
p.
R.L
.
Bo
t. R
.L.
Th
ick
nes
s
(Cu)
kP
a
()
Deg
. 1 0.00 2.00 2.00 Silty Clay Grey 9 - Stiff 17 60 -
2 2.00 2.50 0.50 Silty Clay Greyish Brown
1 - Very Soft 13.5 7 -
3 2.50 3.00 0.50 Silty Clay Grey - - - - - -
4 3.00 4.00 1.00 Sandy Silty
Clay Grey 12 - Stiff 18.5 80 -
5 4.00 6.00 2.00 Silty Clay Greyish Brown
8 - Medium Stiff 16.5 53 -
6 6.00 9.00 3.00 Residual Soil Brownish
Grey >100 Very Dense - 21 - 42.5
7
9.00
11.00
2.00
Completely Weathered
Rock
Brownish Grey
>100
Very Dense
-
21
-
42.5
8
11.00
12.00
1.00
Moderately Weathered
Rock
Brownish Grey
>100
-
-
-
-
-
K Raheja Corp Pvt Ltd., Pallikaranai
REFERENCE BORE HOLE-BH: 7 Ref R.L. of G.L. (m): 0.00
La
ye
r N
o.
Layer Thk. (m)
Type of Strata
Colour
Av
e.
De
sig
n S
PT
Re
lati
ve
De
ns
ity
C
on
sis
ten
cy
()
kN
/m3
Shear Parameters
To
p.
R.L
.
Bo
t. R
.L.
Th
ick
nes
s
(Cu)
kP
a
()
Deg
.
1 0.00 2.00 2.00 Silty Clay - - - - - - -
2 2.00 4.00 2.00 Silty Clay Greenish
Grey 3 - Soft 14 20 -
3 4.00 5.90 1.90 Silty Clay Brownish
Green 7 - Medium Stiff 16 47 -
4 5.90 7.00 1.10 Residual Soil Whitish Brown
31 Dense - 19.5 - 36.3
5 7.00 7.40 0.40 Residual Soil Yellowish
Green 95 Very Dense - 21 - 42.5
6
7.40
10.40
3.00
Completely Weathered
Rock
Yellowish Green
>100
Very Dense
-
21
-
42.5
7
10.40
12.00
1.60
Moderately Weathered
Rock
Yellowish Grey
>100
-
-
-
-
-
REFERENCE BORE HOLE-BH: 8 Ref R.L. of G.L. (m): 0.00
La
ye
r N
o.
Layer Thk. (m)
Type of Strata
Colour
Av
e.
De
sig
n S
PT
Re
lati
ve
De
ns
ity
C
on
sis
ten
cy
()
kN
/m3
Shear Parameters
To
p.
R.L
.
Bo
t. R
.L.
Th
ick
nes
s
(Cu)
kP
a
()
Deg
.
1 0.00 2.00 2.00 Silty Clay Greyish Brown
5 - Medium Stiff 15 33 -
2 2.00 3.00 1.00 Clayey Silty
Sand Greyish Green
- - - - - -
3 3.00 4.00 1.00 Clayey Silty
Sand Greyish Green
12 - - 16 - 30.6
4 4.00 6.00 2.00 Silty Clay Greyish Brown
11 - Stiff 18 73 -
5 6.00 7.20 1.20 Clayey Silty
Sand Brownish
Green 31 Dense - 19.5 - 36.3
6 7.20 12.30 5.10 Residual Soil Yellowish
Brown >100 Very Dense - 21 - 42.5
FOUNDATION SYSTEM
K Raheja Corp Pvt Ltd., Pallikaranai
Preamble:
FOUNDATION SYSTEM
CHAPTER-4
In the design of foundation system, the stress-strain compatibility of the super structure, sub
structure and the bearing strata should be satisfied both individually and as a combined
system. In view of this, the following data are needed for the design of foundation system,
defined in terms of the type of sub structure and the bearing strata characteristics.
The super structure characteristics along with the loading pattern on the sub structure
The sub soil characteristics that define the required substructure configuration for a
safe transfer of super-structural loads to the bearing strata
Considering the above aspects of the foundation design, the suitable type of foundation
system is presented below.
Proposed Structures
The proposed structure is a MSB IT/ITES PARK commercial building consisting of
1 Basement Lower Ground + Stilt + Upper Stilt 1, 2, 3 + 13 Floors.
Foundation System:
For the kind of proposed configuration of structure, sub soil conditions shallow foundation
system shall be adopted and the basement clear height of about 6.0m from the existing
ground level, as informed by the client in charge during the time of preparation of report.
The recommended allowable bearing pressures of different sizes of footing with different
embedment lengths in rocky formation are worked out and presented in table-4.1.
Typical computations are presented in annexure.
Since the sub soil stratum below the founding level is rock with varying grade of weathering
only immediate elastic settlement will takes place.
K Raheja Corp Pvt Ltd., Pallikaranai
Table-4.1 Recommended Allowable Bearing Pressures
SL.No
Size of Footing(m)
Depth of Embedment in Weathered rock(m)
Allowable bearing pressure(kPa)
1
2
1 750
1.25 900
1.5 1100
2
3
1 900
1.25 1100
1.5 1300
3
4
1 1000
1.25 1200
1.5 1400
4
5
1 1100
1.25 1300
1.5 1500
5
6
1 1200
1.25 1400
1.5 1500
For footing sizes in between the sizes indicated above, safe bearing pressure cab be arrived
at by interpolating the values given above.
RECOMMENDATIONS
K Raheja Corp Pvt Ltd., Pallikaranai
CHAPTER-5
RECOMMENDATIONS
Recommendation for Foundation:
For the kind of sub soil conditions isolated column footings as discussed in Chapter-4 can be
adopted.
During monsoon season, open dewatering may be adopted.
The recommended allowable bearing pressures of different sizes of footing with different
embedment lengths in rocky formation are worked out and presented in table-4.1.
Since, chlorides and sulphates are well within the permissible limits, no special steel or
cement is required for the construction of footings.
Recommendation for Excavation:
For carrying out the deep excavation, the sides can be retained by installing contiguous bore
cast insitu pile taken for a minimum depth three times the diameter of pile into underlying hard
rock, which is encountered beyond 10.0m to 11.0m and duly anchored with passively pre-
stressed rock anchors.
For the kind of rock profile excavation from 6.0m to 11.0m no blasting is required and
convention excavators can be used, however, for excavator from 11.0m to 12.0m,
conventional excavator fitted with rock breakers may be required.
Though the soil in the excavated depth is clayey in nature, the strata beyond 6.0m being
completely weathered rock, it is ideal to provide deep bore wells of 15.0m deep in a 20.0m
grid and lower the water table to the bottom of excavation.
Optional
The efficiency of excavation in the top very soft clay can be improved by increasing the
consistency of the clay. For increasing the consistency, sand-lime columns of 200mm
diameter spaced in a grid of 1.0m and 4.0m deep can be used. However, this
recommendation is a guide line and can be used, subject to site experience while carrying out
the excavation in the soft clay.
FOR GEO MARINE CONSULTANTS (P) LTD., CHENNAI.
(DR.VENKATA PRASAD CHINTALURI)
ANNEXURE
TYPICAL BEARING CAPACITY COMPUTATIONS FOR SHALLOW FOUNDATIONS
K Raheja Copr Pvt Ltd, Pallikaranai
COMPUTATION OF BEARING CAPACITY AS PER IS:6403
Geometrical Data :
Ref. BH-01
Shape of the Foundation Square
Depth of Two Basement floor Height from E.G.L(m) 6.00
Minimum Depth of Foundation embedment in Weathered Rock (m) 1.00
Bottom of Foundation Depth of Bearing Strata below E.G.L(m) 7.00
Breadth of Footing "B" (m) 6.00
Length of Footing "L" (m) 6.00
B/L 1.00
Inclination of Vertical Load with the Vertical (a) 0.00
Soil Data :
Design
Parameters:
Type of Effective Bearing Strata : Weathered rock
Design SPT-value of the Bearing Strata : 60.00
Type of Shear Failure: General
Angle of Shearing Resistance 42.50
Bulk Density of Soil above the foundation depth (bulk) 18.00
Effective Overburden pressure at foundation level (q) 8.00
Water Table Correction Factor (w') 0.50
Bearing Capacity Factors:
Nc = N/A
Nq = 99.54
Ng = 190.59
Shape Factors:
Sc = -
Sq = 1.20
Sg = 0.80
Depth Factors :
Dc = -
Dq = 1.01
Dg = 1.01
Inclination Factor:
Ic = 1.00
Iq = 1.00
Ig = 1.00
Ultimate Bearing Capacity (Qu) :
Safe Bearing Capacity
(Qsafe) :
Qu=q*(Nq-1)*Sq*Dq*Iq + 0.5*B*g*Ng*Sg*Dg*Ig*w' 5088.41 kPa
(g should be read as gama)
Factor of Safety (F.S.) : 2.50
Qsafe : 2035.36 kPa
Say Qsafe 1500 kPa
2 Computation of Settlement: (as per IS:8009-Part-I-Ref. Eq.11)
2.1 Elastic Settlement (Se)
Since, the bearing straata are weathered rock, for the prupose of computing the settlement, which will be of
elastic type, the weathered rock is modeled as coarse graiend sand and accordingly, the Es is estimated
using SPT-value correlation. Further, to estimate the maximum settlement, the maximum size of footing is
considered as 6.0m.
The immediate elastic settlement (Si)= qB(1-m2)*I/Es
q= bearing pressure 1500.00
Poission's Ratio (m1) 0.20
Modulus of Elasticity (Es)(Ref. Joseph E Bowels,1996,page316,Table5.6, Japanese
design standards)
Modulus of Elasticity (Es) 156000.00
Size of footing considered for maximum settlement(m) 6.00
Influence factor 1.00
Elastic Settlement (DHi ) 55.38 mm
<60 mm
K Raheja Corp Pvt Ltd., Pallikaranai
4th Main road
4th Main Road
Indira Grandeur
N A R A Y A N A P U R A M L A K E
5th Street
RADIAL HIGHWAY(200 FEET), PALLIKARANAI VILLAGE, TAMBARAM TALUK, KANCHEEPURAM DISTRICT.
TOPO PLAN SHOWING 500M RADIUS FROM THE SITE SURVEY No: 57, 75, 76, 83, 84 & 85,
E
S
North
W
12th
str
eet
VR
ITY
MA
RB
LE
S
SHO
PS
HO
USE
S
F L
Y O
V E
R
200FEET ROADP A L L I K A R A N A I R A D I A L R O A D
R A D I A L R O A D (O
U T E R R I N G R O A
D)
To Thoraipakkam 3Km
To Pallavaram 7km
V E L A C H E R Y - T A M A B A R A M R O A D
V E L A C H E R Y - T A M A B A R A M R O A D
To
Vel
ache
ry 3
km
To
Med
avak
kam
4km
ChettinaduEnclave
BadmintonCourt
4th Street
6th Street
H o u s e s
H o u s e s
H o u s e s
H o u s e s
H o u s e s
H o u s e s
7th Street
8th Street
9th Street
10th Street
K U L A T H U R R O A D
To Kovilampakkam 3km
Raj Garments
*
Vid
uth
alai
Nag
ar 3
rd M
ain
Roa
d
Vid
uth
alai
Nag
ar 2
nd
Mai
n R
oad
Mpl Ford
*
Selva VinayagarTemple
AmmanTemple
Road
Gop
al N
agar
P o n d
NagathammanTemple
S h o p s
S h o p s
Kulakkarai Street
H o u s e s
H o u s e s H o u s e s
H o u s e s
H o u s e s
VGP
Raj
esh
Nag
ar
Nehru Street
1st Main R
oad
7th
Cr
St.
6th
Cr
St.
4th
Cr
St.
2nd
Cr
St.
2nd
Cr
St.
2nd
Cr
St.
H o u s e s
V.J EnclaveS+2
Karishma G+1
Apartment
S h o p s
S h
o p
s
V.G.S
*Mini Hall
*ThangamalTower G+4
E R I K A R A I S A L A I
H o u s e s H o u s e s
H o
u s
e s
2nd Street
Roa
d
3rd
Mai
n R
oadH o u s e s
H o u s e s H o u s e s
4th Street
5th Street
H o u s e s
H o u s e s
H o u s e s
5th
Cr
Str
eet
H o u s e s
S h o p s
1st Street
2nd Street
3rd Street
S h o p s
S h o p s
H o u s e s
Sri Balaji Dental College
Jerusalem College of Engineering
PanjabNational Bank
*
*CanaraBank
*CognizantG+9
*Jasmin InfotechPvt.Ltd.
*Shell PetrolBunkCasa Grande
TulipsoG+2 G+2
Vac
ant L
and
H o u s e s
Road
Lans
on T
oyat
aG
+2
Tes
t Ste
elIn
dust
ries
SITE
*VMP ComplexG+2
*Bhagawathi
Tember Mart L A K E
Channel
Road Vacant Land
Krishna Moorthy Street
Gol
den
Ave
nu
e
Rajeshwari Nagar 3rd Street
1st
Str
eet
2nd Street
3rd
Str
eet
4th Street
Kri
shn
a N
agar
Mai
n R
oad
2nd Street
IndiraGrandeur
6th Main Road
LIC Nagar
5th Main Road
3rd Main Road
2nd Main Road
5th
Str
eet
V a
c a
n t
L
a n
d
Road
V a c a n t L a n d
H o u s e s
3rd Main Road
V a c a n t L a n d
Road
V a
c a
n t
L
a n
dPar
thas
arat
hi
Sal
ai
RoadRoad
Road
V a c a n t L a n d
V a c a n t L a n d
V a c a n t L a n d
V a c a n t L a n d
V a c a n t L a n d
V a c a n t L a n d
V a c a n t L a n d
V a c a n t L a n d
V a c a n t L a n d
Road
Road
Road
V a c a n t L a n d
V a c a n t L a n d
V a c a n t L a n d
Road
Road
7th Main Road
4th Main Road
V a c a n t L a n d
V a c a n t L a n d
V a
c a
n t
L
a n
d
15th Street
15th Street
Thai Nagar
Roa
d
Roa
d
Roa
d
Roa
d
RoadNew Life
Nursery & PrimarySchool
H o u s e s
H o u s e s H o u s e s
H o u s e s
H o u s e s
Channel
Mailai Balaji Nagar
Road
Road
Roa
d
Roa
d
Road
Road
H o u s e s
H o u s e s H o u s e s
Road
*Helan CharitableTrust
*ICICI Bank ATM
HP PetrolBunk
H o u s e s
N a t i o n a l I n s t i t u t e o fO c e a n T e c h n o l o g y
Water Logged Area
P a l l i k a r a n a i M a r s h L a n d
Red Sun Servised Apartments
V a c a n t L a n dMa.Po.Si 1st Street
Ma.Po.Si 2nd Street
S h
o p
sS
h o
p
H o u s e s
BurialGround
H o u s e s
H o u s e s
Vac
ant
Lan
d
Muthoot
*Finance
1st
Str
eet
2nd
Str
eet
* Akshaya Apartment G+3
* Soft Team Solutions Pvt.Ltd.
*JacinthMetric School *Victory Wind Farm
Service Pvt.Ltd.
3rd
Str
eet
Madaveethi Street
Mad
avee
thi
Cr.
Str
eet
8th Street
7th Street
IIT
Col
ony
3rd
Str
eet
TutouosicApartment G+1*
Sree Guru ViharApartment G+4*
S h o p s
H o u s e s
H o u s e s
4th Street
Rajmani's Apartment G+1*
4th
Str
eet
Ma.Po.Si 3rd Street
H o u s e s
H o u s e s
H o u s e s
H o u s e s
LittleMillenum*School
Kam
akot
ti N
agar
5th
Str
eet
Kam
akot
ti N
agar
6th
Str
eet
Kamakotti Nagar 1st Main Road
Kamakotti Nagar 2nd Main Road
6th Cross Street
8th
Cro
ss S
tree
t
1st Main Road
1st Main Road
7th
Cro
ss S
tree
t
Kam
akot
ti N
agar
7th
Str
eet
7th
Cro
ss S
tree
t
Kam
akot
ti N
agar
8th
Str
eet
1st Main Road
Kam
akot
ti N
agar
8th
Cro
ss S
tree
t
V a
c a
n t
L
a n
d
H o u s e s
H o u s e s Sri
San
kara
Bal
a V
idya
laya
Gol
den
Jubi
lee
Sch
ool
**Vishnoo Sree
Dhara G+2
*Mace RoseApartment G+1
H o u s e s
H o u s e s
H o u s e s
Chennai CorporationPlay Ground
H o u s e s
*AdhidyaApartment S+3
H o u s e s
Lakshmi BalajiTemple
R500M
V a c a n t L a n d
Dr. Kamakshi Memorial Hospital
14.01
BLOCK-2
BLOCK-3
BLOCK-1
OSR - 3296.79 Sq.Mt
Entry
Exit
SPA
CE
FOR
ROA
D W
IDEN
ING
Entry
ExitSUBSTATION
HSD YARD
14.0
0
14.6
7
14.56
14.87 14.48
17.91
16.05
18.68
14.12
14.09
14.49
31.98
14.52
DROP OFF
200'
-0"
WID
E PA
LLIK
ARAN
AI H
IGH
ROAD
18.1219.71
14.8
9
28.78
14.2
2
27.54
14.1
4
14.0
0
14.0
2
26.55
14.6
8
14.0
0m14.48
DROP OFF
26.5
4
201.32 AS
PE
R FM
B201.09 A
S P
ER
SITE
96.39 AS PER FMB
96.40 AS PER SITE
48.16 AS
PE
R FM
B
48.26 AS
PE
R S
ITE
23.943.27
169.20 AS PER FMB
169.14 AS PER SITE
139.49 AS
PE
R FM
B
2.78
AS
PE
R F
MB
142.14 AS
PE
R S
ITE
70.96 AS PER FMB
DRAWING TITLE
DATE
CHECKEDSMK
DRAWN
SCALE1" = 32' - 0" ( 1:400) 27-10-2016
COLOUR INDICATION
PROPOSED BUILDING
ACCESS ROAD
PLOT BOUNDARY
JOB TITLE
NORTH POINT
PLAN SHOWING THE PROPOSED MSB IT / ITESBUILDINGS AT SURVEY NOS.56/1B, 56/2A2A,56/2A2B, 56/2A4A, 56/2A4B, 56/2B2A, 56/2B2B,57/3B, 76/7, 76/9, 76/8, 76/4(PART-1&2) ,76/3,76/1A1, 76/1A2, 76/1B, 76/1C1A1, 76/10,76/1C1B, 76/5, 76/2A, 76/2B, 76/1C2, 76/1D, 75/1,75/2A&2B, 75/3A, 75/3B, 75/4, 75/5, 75/6, 75/7,75/8A1, 75/8A2, 84/3, 84/2B, 83/3, 86/4, DOORNO.2,PALLAVARAM THORAIPAKKAMRADIAL ROAD, PALLIKARANAI VILLAGE,SHOLINGANALLUR TALUK,KANCHEEPURAM DISTRICT.
STRUCTURAL ENGINEER
72.73AS PER SITE
18.84 AS
PE
R FM
B
18.84 AS
PE
R S
ITE
20.76 AS PER FMB
20.76 AS PER SITE
18.80 AS
PE
R FM
B18.80 A
S P
ER
SITE
20.80 AS PER FMB
20.80 AS PER SITE
15.36 AS
PE
R FM
B
15.36 AS
PE
R S
ITE
41.20 AS PER FMB
41.20 AS PER SITE
12.00 AS
PE
R FM
B
12.00 AS
PE
R S
ITE
41.00 AS PER FMB41.00 AS PER SITE
55.98 AS
PE
R FM
B
55.98 AS
PE
R S
ITE
29.12 AS
PE
R FM
B
29.12 AS
PE
R S
ITE3.71
AS
PE
R FM
B
3.71
AS
PE
R S
ITE39.95 AS PER FMB
39.95 AS PER SITE8.46 AS
PE
R FM
B9.41 A
S P
ER
SITE
35.85 AS PER FMB
35.92 AS PER SITE
34.13
59.53 AS
PE
R FM
B
60.34 AS
PE
R S
ITE
As per document 49998.49(LEAST)As per FMB 50714.86As per Site 50655.01
O.S.R. Area Required 4999.85 Sq.m.O.S.R. Area Provided 5038.64 Sq.m.
Sq.m.Sq.m.Sq.m.
35.49 AS PER FMB35.53 AS PER SITE
39.17 AS PER FMB36.33 AS PER SITE
4.48 AS
PE
R FM
B5.17 A
S P
ER
SITE
17.18 AS
PE
R FM
B17.16 A
S P
ER
SITE
OWNER SIGNATURE
LICENSED SURVEYOR
VELACHERY MAIN ROAD
PALLIKARANI FLY OVER
VELACHERY MAIN ROAD
TO TAMBARAM
TO MEDAVAKKAM
VELACHERY MRTS
RAILWAY STATION
DR.KAMAKSHI
MEMORIAL HOSPITAL
NARAYANAPURAM
LAKE
200'-0" WIDE PALLIKARANAI HIGH ROAD
MEDAVAKKAM HIGH ROAD
MEDAVAKKAM HIGH ROAD
TO THORAIPAKKAM
PROPOSED SITE
COGNIZANT
TECHNOLOGY
SOLUTIONS
NOT TO SCALE
TECHNOLOGYCENTRE OF WIND ENERGY
Phone : 044-24572457 Thiruvanmiyur, Chennai – 600 041, INDIA18, 3rd Seaward road, Valmiki nagar,nvanataraj & venkat A R C H I T E C T S
NO:27, SECOND STREETBALAJI NAGARROYAPETTAHCHENNAI - 600 014.
DR.S.THAYALAN & OTHERS
RAW WATER U.G SUMPSIZE:3.8MX5.0MX2.5M+0.3FBCAPACITY:48,000 LTS
FIRE WATER U.G SUMPSIZE:8.0MX5.0MX2.5M+0.3FBCAPACITY:1,00,000 LTS
FILTER WATER U.G SUMPSIZE:5.5MX5.0MX2.5M+0.3FBCAPACITY:69,000 LTS
(±0.00)
2.50
(SW
D)
SECTION-XX'
FIRE WATER U.G SUMPSIZE:8.0MX5.0MX2.5M+0.3FBCAPACITY:1,00,000 LTS
RAW WATER U.G SUMPSIZE:3.8MX5.0MX2.5M+0.3FBCAPACITY:48,000 LTS
FILTER WATER U.G SUMPSIZE:5.5MX5.0MX2.5M+0.3FBCAPACITY:69,000 LTS
0.30
0.30 (FB)
2.50
(SW
D)
0.30
(-3.50)
PLAN OF SUMP
FIRE WATER U.G SUMPSIZE:8.0MX5.0MX2.5M+0.3FBCAPACITY:1,00,000 LTS
0.20 8.00 0.20 8.00 0.20 3.80 0.20 5.50 0.20
X X'
26.30
5.45
0.20
5.00
0.20
FIRE WATER U.G SUMPSIZE:8.0MX5.0MX2.5M+0.3FBCAPACITY:1,00,000 LTS 2.
50(S
WD
)0.
30
96.01
45.9
0
98.5144
.65
22901830
230
230
2670
2290
1830
230
1990 1830
230
300
230
230
230
150
22901830
230
230
2670
2290
1830
230
1990 1830
230
300
230
230
230
150
SCALE : 1: = 100
1.00
PEBBLE STONES
5 TO 7.5CM
1.50
SLOPE 1 IN 20
0.30
0.1150.72
0.925
0.37
0.10
0.45
RAFT FOUNDATION TO DETAIL
12"
GATE DETAIL
7.20 M
1.50 M
G.L
PLINTH BEAM
SAND FILLINGP.C.C.
BRICK FOOTING
1.51
0.23
0.23
0.15
BRICK PIER
BRICK WALL4.5" THK.
0.45
0.45
1.51
NOT TO SCALE
0.075P.C.C FILLING
0.11
FIRE WATER U.G SUMP BELOWSIZE:8.0MX5.0MX2.5M+0.3FB
CAPACITY:1,00,000 LTS
FIRE WATER U.G SUMP BELOWSIZE:8.0MX5.0MX2.5M+0.3FB
CAPACITY:1,00,000 LTS
SIZE:3.8MX5.0MX2.5M+0.3FBCAPACITY:48,000 LTS
RAW WATER U.G SUMP BELOW
SIZE:5.5MX5.0MX2.5M+0.3FBCAPACITY:69,000 LTS
DOMESTIC WATER U.G SUMP BELOW
7.25
3.90
3.42
39.80 AS PER FMB
37.22 AS PER SITE
14.40 AS
PE
R FM
B14.40 A
S P
ER
SITE
RAIN WATER COLLECTION
CLOSEDSCIENTIFICALLY
2.29
2.29
ALEX JACOB41/A, BEACH ROAD,KALASHETRA COLONYCHENNAI - 600 090.
FIRE WATER U.G SUMP BELOWSIZE:8.0MX5.0MX2.5M+0.3FB
CAPACITY:1,00,000 LTS
FIRE WATER U.G SUMP BELOWSIZE:8.0MX5.0MX2.5M+0.3FB
CAPACITY:1,00,000 LTS
SIZE:3.8MX5.0MX2.5M+0.3FBCAPACITY:48,000 LTS
RAW WATER U.G SUMP BELOW
SIZE:5.5MX5.0MX2.5M+0.3FBCAPACITY:69,000 LTS
DOMESTIC WATER U.G SUMP BELOWFIRE WATER U.G SUMP BELOW
SIZE:8.0MX5.0MX2.5M+0.3FB
CAPACITY:1,00,000 LTS
FIRE WATER U.G SUMP BELOW
SIZE:8.0MX5.0MX2.5M+0.3FB
CAPACITY:1,00,000 LTS
SIZE:3.8MX5.0MX2.5M+0.3FB
CAPACITY:48,000 LTSRAW WATER U.G SUMP BELOW
SIZE:5.5MX5.0MX2.5M+0.3FB
CAPACITY:69,000 LTSDOMESTIC WATER U.G SUMP BELOW
39.80 AS PER FMB39.80 AS PER SITE
4.58 AS
PE
R FM
B4.58 A
S P
ER
SITE
44.30 AS PER FMB44.57 AS PER SITE
12.57 AS
PE
R FM
B
12.27 AS
PE
R S
ITE
37.11 AS PER FMB37.28 AS PER SITE
24.83 AS
PE
R FM
B
24.84 AS
PE
R S
ITE
42.92 AS PER FMB43.19 AS PER SITE
22.98 AS
PE
R FM
B
41.82 AS
PE
R FM
B39.55 A
S P
ER
SITE
25.30 AS
PE
R S
ITE
32.02 AS PER FMB30.79 AS PER SITE
31.38
77.00
5.10
58.80
39.00
49.90
5.40
35.70
19.25
50.30
5.40
22.85
1.90
RAIN WATER COLLECTION
CLOSEDSCIENTIFICALLY
2.29
2.29
RAIN WATER COLLECTION
CLOSEDSCIENTIFICALLY
2.29
2.29
RAIN WATER COLLECTION
CLOSEDSCIENTIFICALLY
2.29
2.29
SULLAGE WATER COLLECTION
CLOSEDSCIENTIFICALLY
2.29
2.29
RAIN WATER COLLECTION
CLOSEDSCIENTIFICALLY
2.29
2.29
SULLAGE WATER COLLECTION
CLOSEDSCIENTIFICALLY
2.29
2.29
RAIN WATER COLLECTION
CLOSEDSCIENTIFICALLY
2.29
2.29
SULLAGE WATER COLLECTION
CLOSEDSCIENTIFICALLY
2.29
2.29
1.0m W
ide Perculation P
it
1.0m W
ide Perculation P
it
1.0m Wide Perculation Pit1.0m Wide Perculation Pit1.0m Wide Perculation Pit
1.0m W
ide Perculation P
it
1.0m W
ide Perculation P
it
1.0m Wide Perculation Pit
1.0m Wide Perculation Pit
1.0m Wide Perculation Pit
1.0m Wide Perculation Pit
1.0m Wide Perculation Pit
1.0m Wide Perculation Pit
1.0m Wide Perculation Pit
1.0m Wide Perculation Pit
1.0m Wide Perculation Pit
1.0m Wide Perculation Pit
1.0m
Wid
e P
ercu
latio
n P
it
1.0m
Wid
e P
ercu
latio
n P
it
1.0m
Wid
e P
ercu
latio
n P
it
1.0m W
ide Perculation P
it
OSR - 1741.85 Sq.Mt
36.77
31.19
14.61
17.214.29
14.408.66
STP
4.50
4.50
4.50
4.50
22.5621.24
HSD YARD
BELO
W G
ROUN
D
STP
BELO
W G
ROUN
D
STP
BELO
W G
ROUN
D
28.3
5
13.97
7.20
010203040506070809101112131415
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
44
43
42
41
40
39
38
37
36
35
34
33
2829303132
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170171172173
174
175
176
177
178
179
223
226
227
234
235
244
280
287290
298
308
318
392
388
378
406
398
393
412
411
410
409
408
407
010204 030507 0608091012 11131416 15171819
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
DG
SET
OPE
N T
RAN
SFO
RMER
YA
RD D
G S
ET
29.0
7
14.57
OPEN TRANSFORMER
YARD
22.2
6
12.80
11.75
17.95
4.70 9.68
16.99
3.69
16.80
40.79
10.14
11.26
7.40
30.66
DG SET
OPE
N T
RAN
SFO
RMER
YA
RD
28.30
17.10
9.84
31.13
22.78
13.74
8.52
18.00
10.00
1.50
1.501.50
1.50
23.00
10.00
14.0
0
14.4
5
14.0
2
14.0014.04
14.04
14.0
5
7.59
3.01 95.07
34.48
96.39
1.00
14.91
38.32
14.07
20.69
BASEMENT EXTENT LINE
14.01
14.15
14.0
2
14.89
15.53
BASEM
ENT EXTEN
T LINE
BASEM
ENT EXTEN
T LINE
BASEMENT EXTENT LINE
BASE
MEN
T EX
TEN
T LIN
E
15.72
17.3
0
45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92
116117118119120121122123124125126127128129130131132133134135136137138139140141142143144145146147148149150151152153154155156157
185
180
191
186
192
197
198
203204
209
210
215216
222
245
260
270
279
319 330
331
338
348
357
358
368
377
42.10
Ramp UP 1:25 Slope
30.00Ramp DN1:25 Slope
30.00
Ramp DN1:25 Slope
30.00 Ramp UP 1:25 Slope
30.00
Ramp UP
1:25 Slope30.00
Ramp DN
1:25 Slope
288
293
295
2966.00
6.18
TOTAL BUILT-UP AREA 330897.72TOTAL FSI AREA (ACHIEVED) 181971.61 Sq.m.FSI ACHIEVED 3.640
PLOT COVERAGE 27.930%
CAR PARKING REQUIRED 2730CAR PARKING PROVIDED 2780
TWO WHEELERSPARKING REQUIRED 5459TWO WHEELERSPARKING PROVIDED 5560
BLOCK -1
FLOORSPLINTH AREA DEDUCTION
10% NON FSI AREA
100% NONFSI AREA PARKING FSI AREA
BASEMENT - 2 10391.73 29.60 0.00 384.88 9977.25 0.00BASEMENT -1 10391.73 29.60 0.00 384.88 9977.25 0.00FLOOR-STILT 7863.66 31.13 624.32 391.88 5275.62 1540.71UPPER STILT 1 7863.67 1086.85 0.00 385.16 6391.66 0.00UPPER STILT 2 7863.67 33.79 13.46 385.16 7431.26 0.00UPPER STILT 3 7863.67 36.99 13.46 385.16 7428.06 0.00FLOOR 01 7417.62 156.26 590.99 342.89 0.00 6327.48FLOOR02 7417.62 156.26 590.99 342.89 0.00 6327.48FLOOR 03 7417.62 156.26 590.99 342.89 0.00 6327.48FLOOR 04 7417.62 156.26 993.32 342.89 0.00 5925.15FLOOR 05 7417.62 156.26 590.99 342.89 0.00 6327.48FLOOR 06 7417.62 156.26 590.99 342.89 0.00 6327.48FLOOR 07 7417.62 156.26 993.32 342.89 0.00 5925.15FLOOR 08 7417.62 156.26 590.99 342.89 0.00 6327.48FLOOR 09 7417.62 156.26 590.99 342.89 0.00 6327.48FLOOR 10 7417.62 156.26 590.99 342.89 0.00 6327.48FLOOR 11 7417.62 156.26 993.32 342.89 0.00 5925.15FLOOR 12 7417.62 156.26 590.99 342.89 0.00 6327.48FLOOR 13 7417.62 156.26 590.99 342.89 0.00 6327.48TOTAL 148667.14 3279.38 9541.06 6774.65 46481.11 82590.95
BLOCK – 2
FLOORS DEDUCTION10% NON FSI AREA
100% NON FSI AREA PARKING FSI AREA
BASEMENT – 3 5854.13 21.85 0.00 212.43 5619.85 0.00BASEMENT – 2 5854.13 21.85 0.00 212.43 5619.85 0.00BASEMENT – 1 5854.13 21.85 0.00 212.43 5619.85 0.00FLOOR-STILT 4341.34 50.05 606.03 212.43 2522.06 950.77UPPER STILT 1 4341.34 247.91 63.32 212.43 3817.68 0.00UPPER STILT 2 4341.34 37.05 63.32 212.43 4028.54 0.00UPPER STILT 3 4341.34 37.05 63.32 212.43 4028.54 0.00FLOOR 01 4336.39 82.05 254.58 179.89 0.00 3819.87FLOOR02 4336.39 82.05 254.58 179.89 0.00 3819.87FLOOR 03 4336.39 82.05 254.58 179.89 0.00 3819.87FLOOR 04 4336.39 82.05 546.12 179.89 0.00 3528.33FLOOR 05 4336.39 82.05 254.58 179.89 0.00 3819.87FLOOR 06 4336.39 82.05 254.58 179.89 0.00 3819.87FLOOR 07 4336.39 82.05 546.12 179.89 0.00 3528.33FLOOR 08 4336.39 82.05 254.58 179.89 0.00 3819.87FLOOR 09 4336.39 82.05 254.58 179.89 0.00 3819.87FLOOR 10 4336.39 82.05 254.58 179.89 0.00 3819.87FLOOR 11 4336.39 82.05 546.12 179.89 0.00 3528.33FLOOR 12 4336.39 82.05 254.58 179.89 0.00 3819.87FLOOR 13 4336.39 82.05 254.58 179.89 0.00 3819.87TOTAL 91300.82 1504.26 4980.15 3825.58 31256.37 49734.46
BLOCK – 3
FLOORS DEDUCTION10% NON FSI AREA
100% NON FSI AREA PARKING FSI AREA
BASEMENT – 3 5881.40 26.75 0.00 210.19 5644.46 0.00BASEMENT – 2 5881.40 26.75 0.00 210.19 5644.46 0.00BASEMENT – 1 5881.40 26.75 0.00 210.19 5644.46 0.00FLOOR-STILT 4330.89 51.55 582.40 210.19 2547.76 938.99UPPER STILT 1 4330.89 222.84 0.00 210.19 3897.86 0.00UPPER STILT 2 4330.89 38.59 0.00 210.19 4082.11 0.00UPPER STILT 3 4330.89 38.59 0.00 210.19 4082.11 0.00FLOOR 01 4312.69 76.65 240.96 177.83 0.00 3817.25FLOOR02 4312.69 76.65 240.96 177.83 0.00 3817.25FLOOR 03 4312.69 76.65 240.96 177.83 0.00 3817.25FLOOR 04 4312.69 76.65 546.64 177.83 0.00 3511.57FLOOR 05 4312.69 76.65 240.96 177.83 0.00 3817.25FLOOR 06 4312.69 76.65 240.96 177.83 0.00 3817.25FLOOR 07 4312.69 76.65 546.64 177.83 0.00 3511.57FLOOR 08 4312.69 76.65 240.96 177.83 0.00 3817.25FLOOR 09 4312.69 76.65 240.96 177.83 0.00 3817.25FLOOR 10 4312.69 76.65 240.96 177.83 0.00 3817.25FLOOR 11 4312.69 76.65 546.64 177.83 0.00 3511.57FLOOR 12 4312.69 76.65 240.96 177.83 0.00 3817.25FLOOR 13 4312.69 76.65 240.96 177.83 0.00 3817.25TOTAL 91032.73 1428.27 4631.92 3783.12 31543.22 49646.20
PLINTH AREA
PLINTH AREA
BLOCK-2
BLOCK-3
BLOCK-1
OSR - 3296.79 Sq.Mt
Entry
Exit
SPA
CE
FOR
ROA
D W
IDEN
ING
Entry
ExitSUBSTATION
HSD YARD
DROP OFF
DROP OFF
FIRE WATER U.G SUMP BELOW
SIZE:8.0MX5.0MX2.5M+0.3FB
CAPACITY:1,00,000 LTS
FIRE WATER U.G SUMP BELOW
SIZE:8.0MX5.0MX2.5M+0.3FB
CAPACITY:1,00,000 LTS
SIZE:3.8MX5.0MX2.5M+0.3FB
CAPACITY:48,000 LTS
RAW WATER U.G SUMP BELOW
SIZE:5.5MX5.0MX2.5M+0.3FB
CAPACITY:69,000 LTS
DOMESTIC WATER U.G SUMP BELOW
RAIN WATER
COLLECTION
CLOSED
SCIENTIFICALLY
FIRE WATER U.G SUMP BELOW
SIZE:8.0MX5.0MX2.5M+0.3FB
CAPACITY:1,00,000 LTS
FIRE WATER U.G SUMP BELOW
SIZE:8.0MX5.0MX2.5M+0.3FB
CAPACITY:1,00,000 LTS
SIZE:3.8MX5.0MX2.5M+0.3FB
CAPACITY:48,000 LTS
RAW WATER U.G SUMP BELOW
SIZE:5.5MX5.0MX2.5M+0.3FB
CAPACITY:69,000 LTS
DOMESTIC WATER U.G SUMP BELOW
FIR
E
W
A
TE
R
U
.G
S
U
M
P
B
E
LO
W
SIZE:8
.0M
X5.0M
X2.5M
+0.3FB
C
APAC
ITY:1
,00,0
00 LTS
FIR
E
W
A
TE
R
U
.G
S
U
M
P
B
E
LO
W
SIZE:8
.0M
X5.0M
X2.5M
+0.3FB
C
APAC
ITY:1
,00,0
00 LTS
S
IZ
E
:3.8
M
X
5.0M
X
2.5M
+0.3FB
C
A
P
A
C
IT
Y
:48,0
00 LTS
R
A
W
W
A
TE
R
U
.G
S
U
M
P
B
E
LO
W
S
IZ
E
:5.5
M
X
5.0M
X
2.5M
+0.3FB
C
APAC
ITY:6
9,000 L
TS
D
O
M
E
S
TIC
W
A
TE
R
U
.G
S
U
M
P
B
E
LO
W
RAIN WATER
COLLECTION
CLOSED
SCIENTIFICALLY
RAIN WATER
COLLECTION
CLOSED
SCIENTIFICALLY
RAIN WATER
COLLECTION
CLOSED
SCIENTIFICALLY
SULLAGE WATER
COLLECTION
CLOSED
SCIENTIFICALLY
RAIN WATER
COLLECTION
CLOSED
SCIENTIFICALLY
SULLAGE WATER
COLLECTION
CLOSED
SCIENTIFICALLY
RAIN WATER
COLLECTION
CLOSED
SCIENTIFICALLY
SULLAGE WATER
COLLECTION
CLOSED
SCIENTIFICALLY
1.0m W
ide Percolation P
it
1.0m W
ide Percolation P
it
1.0m Wide Percolation Pit1.0m Wide Percolation Pit1.0m Wide Percolation Pit
1.0m W
ide Percolation P
it
1.0m W
ide Percolation P
it
1.0m Wide Percolation Pit
1.0m Wide Percolation Pit
1.0m Wide Percolation Pit
1.0m Wide Percolation Pit
1.0m Wide Percolation Pit
1.0m Wide Percolation Pit
1.0m Wide Percolation Pit
1.0m Wide Percolation Pit
1.0m Wide Percolation Pit
1.0m Wide Percolation Pit
1.0m
Wid
e P
erco
latio
n P
it
1.0m
Wid
e P
erco
latio
n P
it
1.0m
Wid
e P
erco
latio
n P
it
1.0m W
ide Percolation P
it
OSR - 1741.85 Sq.Mt
STP
HSD YARD
BELO
W G
ROUN
D
STP
BELO
W G
ROUN
D
STP
BELO
W G
ROUN
D
010203040506070809101112131415
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
44
43
42
41
40
39
38
37
36
35
34
33
2829303132
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170171172173
174
175
176
177
178
179
223
226
227
234
235
244
280
287290
298
308
318
392
388
378
406
398
393
412
411
410
409
408
407
010204 030507 0608091012 11131416 15171819
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
DG
SET
OPE
N T
RAN
SFO
RMER
YA
RD D
G S
ET
OPEN TRANSFORMER
YARD
DG SET
OPE
N T
RAN
SFO
RMER
YA
RD
BASEMENT EXTENT LINE
BASEM
ENT EXTEN
T LINE
BASEM
ENT EXTEN
T LINE
BASEMENT EXTENT LINE
BASE
MEN
T EX
TEN
T LIN
E
45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92
116117118119120121122123124125126127128129130131132133134135136137138139140141142143144145146147148149150151152153154155156157
185
180
191
186
192
197
198
203204
209
210
215216
222
245
260
270
279
319 330
331
338
348
357
358
368
377
Ramp UP 1:25 Slope
Ramp DN1:25 Slope
Ramp DN1:25 Slope
Ramp UP 1:25 Slope
Ramp UP
1:25 SlopeRamp DN
1:25 Slope
288
293
295
296
DRAWING TITLE
DATE
CHECKED
SMK
DRAWN
SCALE
1" = 32' - 0" ( 1:400) 27-10-2016
SITE PLAN
COLOUR INDICATION
PROPOSED BUILDING
ACCESS ROAD
PLOT BOUNDARY
JOB TITLE
NORTH POINT
PLAN SHOWING THE PROPOSED MSB IT / ITES
BUILDINGS AT SURVEY NOS.56/1B, 56/2A2A,
56/2A2B, 56/2A4A, 56/2A4B, 56/2B2A, 56/2B2B,
57/3B, 76/7, 76/9, 76/8, 76/4(PART-1&2) ,
76/3,76/1A1, 76/1A2, 76/1B, 76/1C1A1, 76/10,
76/1C1B, 76/5, 76/2A, 76/2B, 76/1C2, 76/1D, 75/1,
75/2A&2B, 75/3A, 75/3B, 75/4, 75/5, 75/6, 75/7,
75/8A1, 75/8A2, 84/3, 84/2B, 83/3, 86/4A, DOOR
NO.2,PALLAVARAM THORAIPAKKAM
RADIAL ROAD, PALLIKARANAI VILLAGE,
SHOLINGANALLUR TALUK,
KANCHEEPURAM DISTRICT.
STRUCTURAL ENGINEER
OWNER SIGNATURE
LICENSED SURVEYOR
Phone : 044-24572457
Thiruvanmiyur, Chennai – 600 041, INDIA
18, 3rd Seaward road, Valmiki nagar,nvanataraj & venkat A R C H I T E C T S
NO:27, SECOND STREET
BALAJI NAGAR
ROYAPETTAH
CHENNAI - 600 014.
DR.S.THAYALAN & OTHERS
ALEX JACOB
41/A, BEACH ROAD,
KALASHETRA COLONY
CHENNAI - 600 090.
(with SURVEY NUMBER)
2
0
0
'-
0
"
W
ID
E
R
O
A
D
7
6
/
7
7
5
/
3
A
76/1
C1B
5
7
/
3
B
7
6
/
9
76/1A1
P
A
R
T
1
7
6
/
5
7
5
/
1
7
6
/
4
P
A
R
T
2
75/5
7
6
/
4
7
6
/
3
76/1
0
7
5
/
3
B
76/2A
76/2B
76/1C
2
76/1D
76/1
A2
76/1
B
76/1
C1A
1
75/4
7
5
/
2
A
&
2
B
7
6
/
8
8
4
/
2
B
75/8A
1
75/7
75/6
8
6
/
4
A
8
4
/
3
8
4
/
2
B
8
3
/3
75/8A
2
56/1B
56/2A
4A
56/2A
2A
56/2A
2B
56/2A
4B
56/2B
2B
56/2B
2A
8
6
/
4
A
LAND AREA SCHEDULE
Shed
Shed
Shed
Shed
SER
VIC
E
RO
AD
SER
VIC
E
RO
AD
N
Shed
N
SER
VIC
E
RO
AD
SER
VIC
E
RO
AD
P o n d
C u
l v
e r
t
C u l v e r t
L a w n
C u l v e r t
C u l v e r t
C u l v e r t
Car
Tra
ck
P o n d
DOOR No: 2,
TOPOGRAPHICAL SURVEY MAP OF
M/s.K.RAHEJA CORP PRIVATE (LTD)
SCALE: 1:800 (1CM = 80M)
North
WE
S
RADIAL HIGHWAY (200 FEET),
PALLIKARANAI,
CHENNAI-600 100.
N 500
PART-I
PART-II
KAMATCHI MEMORIAL HOSPITAL(OPPOSITE)
ME
DA
VAK
KA
M H
IGH
RO
AD
N 550
N 600
N 650
N 700
N 750
N 800
N 850
N 900
E 2
50
E 3
00
E 3
50
E 4
00
E 4
50
E 5
00
E 5
50
E 6
00
E 6
50
E 7
00
E 7
50
E 8
00
Lansan Toyota Show Room
Tes
t St
eel
Indu
stri
es
Bri
dge
Bri
dge
N
V a c a n t L a n d
ROAD
V a c a n t L a n d
Under Construction
Ayy
anar
Aut
omob
iles
Shell Petrol Bunk
Jasmin Infotech
C o g n i z a n t
C h a n n e l
C h a n n e l
C h
a n
n e
l
Bridge
R O A D
C u l v e r tV a c a n t L a n d
V a c a n t L a n d
V a
c a
n t
L a
n d
Kamatchi Memorial Hospital
Under Construction
Und
er C
onst
ruct
ionVacant Land
Und
er C
onst
ruct
ionVacant Land
Car
Tra
ck
H o
u s
e
H o
u s
e
H o
u s
e
H o
u s
e
Vacant Land
Vac
ant
Lan
d
H o u s e
Nat
iona
l In
stit
ute
oce
an T
echn
olog
y
Can
ara
Ban
k A
TM
Punjab National Bank
Mahindra Marbles & Granites
R O
A D
Vacant Land
Bri
dge
Bri
dge
Bri
dge
C h
a n
n e
l
ROAD
RO
AD
Shed
RP-1
RP-2
RP-3
RP-4
RP-5
TBM 4.775
72.7
23 [
238'
-7"]
51.909 [170'-4"]
201.281 [660'-4"]
127.
319
[417
'-9"]
12.268[40'-3"]
44.5
47 [
146'
-2"]
4.583[15']
60.335 [197'-11"]
39.554 [129'-9"]
24.856 [81'-7"]
37.2
80[1
22'-4
"]
6.03
6 [
19'-1
0"]
5.99
8[1
9'-8
"]6.
046
[19'
-10"
]
4.116[13'-6"]
17.161[56'-4"]
36.3
26 [
119'
-2"]
17.173 [56'-4"]
5.173[17']
39.8
00 [
130'
-7"]
37.2
19 [
122'
-1"]
14.400[47'-3"]
43.1
92 [
141'
-8"]
20.7
57 [
68'-1
"]
18.837[61'-10"]
88.794 [291'-4"]
35.9
20 [
117'
-10"
]
7.65
6[2
5'-1
"]
6.53
6[2
1'-5
"]
5.62
5 [
18'-5
"]39
.955
[13
1'-1
"]
9.410[30'-10"]
41.0
00 [
134'
-6"]
41.2
00 [
135'
-2"]
12.000[39'-4"]
20.8
00 [
68'-3
"]
15.360[50'-5"]
18.800 [61'-8"]
48.255 [158'-4"]
25.301 [83']
30.7
92[1
01']
3.510[11'-6"]
7.48
8[2
4'-7
"]
7.53
6[2
4'-9
"]60
.173
[197
'-5"]
18.699[61'-4"]
49.710 [163'-1"]
51.945 [170'-5"]
49.442 [162'-3"]
169.
183
[555
'-1"]
6.93
0[2
2'-9
"]
142.137 [466'-4"]
7.55
8[2
4'-1
0"]
29.3
55[9
6'-4
"]
7.26
3[2
3'-1
0"]
24.2
70 [
79'-8
"]
42.508 [139'-6"]
47.368[155'-5"]
7.31
8[2
4']
12.275[40'-3"]
46.089[151'-3"]
47.833 [156'-11"]
11.832[38'-10"]
49.317[161'-10"]
24.245[79'-7"]
58.9
15[1
93'-3
"]
60.1
14[1
97'-3
"]
39.9
71[1
31'-2
"]
18.5
84[6
1']
54.6
25[1
79'-3
"]
39.6
68[1
30'-2
"]
16.3
89[5
3'-9
"]
18.5
90 [
61']
7.300[23'-11"]
24.331[79'-10"]
7.958[26'-1"]
HFL=3.371
35.5
84 [
116'
-9"]
= 237188.505 SQ.FT
= 5.445 ACRES
= 22035.534 SQ.MTPART-I
= 308055.548 SQ.FT
= 7.072 ACRES
= 28619.298 SQ.MTPART-II
= 545244.053 SQ.FT
= 50654.832SQ.MT
= 12.517 ACRES
TOTAL SITE AREA
14.01
BLOCK-2
BLOCK-3
BLOCK-1
OSR - 3296.79 Sq.Mt
Entry
Exit
SPA
CE
FOR
ROA
D W
IDEN
ING
Entry
ExitSUBSTATION
HSD YARD
14.0
0
14.6
7
14.56
14.87 14.48
17.91
18.68
14.12
14.09
14.49
31.98
14.52
DROP OFF
2
0
0
'-
0
"
W
ID
E
P
A
L
L
IK
A
R
A
N
A
I H
IG
H
R
O
A
D
18.1219.71
14.8
9
28.78
14.2
2
27.54
14.1
4
14.0
0
14.0
2
26.55
14.6
8
14.0
0m14.48
DROP OFF
26.5
4
201.32 AS
PE
R FM
B201.09 A
S P
ER
SITE
96.39 AS PER FMB
96.40 AS PER SITE
48.16 AS
PE
R FM
B
48.26 AS
PE
R S
ITE
23.943.27
169.20 AS PER FMB
169.14 AS PER SITE
139.49 AS
PE
R FM
B
2.78
AS
PE
R F
MB
142.14 AS
PE
R S
ITE
70.96 AS PER FMB
72.73AS PER SITE
18.84 AS
PE
R FM
B
18.84 AS
PE
R S
ITE
20.76 AS PER FMB
20.76 AS PER SITE
18.80 AS
PE
R FM
B18.80 A
S P
ER
SITE
20.80 AS PER FMB
20.80 AS PER SITE
15.36 AS
PE
R FM
B
15.36 AS
PE
R S
ITE
41.20 AS PER FMB
12.00 AS
PE
R FM
B
12.00 AS
PE
R S
ITE
41.00 AS PER FMB41.00 AS PER SITE
55.98 AS
PE
R FM
B
55.98 AS
PE
R S
ITE
29.12 AS
PE
R FM
B
29.12 AS
PE
R S
ITE3.71
AS
PE
R FM
B
3.71
AS
PE
R S
ITE39.95 AS PER FMB
39.95 AS PER SITE8.46 AS
PE
R FM
B9.41 A
S P
ER
SITE
35.85 AS PER FMB
35.92 AS PER SITE
34.13
59.53 AS
PE
R FM
B
60.34 AS
PE
R S
ITE
35.49 AS PER FMB35.53 AS PER SITE
39.17 AS PER FMB36.33 AS PER SITE
4.48 AS
PE
R FM
B5.17 A
S P
ER
SITE
17.18 AS
PE
R FM
B17.16 A
S P
ER
SITE
96.01
45.9
0
98.51
44.6
5
FIRE WATER U.G SUMP BELOW
SIZE:8.0MX5.0MX2.5M+0.3FB
CAPACITY:1,00,000 LTS
FIRE WATER U.G SUMP BELOW
SIZE:8.0MX5.0MX2.5M+0.3FB
CAPACITY:1,00,000 LTS
SIZE:3.8MX5.0MX2.5M+0.3FB
CAPACITY:48,000 LTS
RAW WATER U.G SUMP BELOW
SIZE:5.5MX5.0MX2.5M+0.3FB
CAPACITY:69,000 LTS
DOMESTIC WATER U.G SUMP BELOW
7.25
3.90
3.42
39.80 AS PER FMB
37.22 AS PER SITE
14.40 AS
PE
R FM
B14.40 A
S P
ER
SITE
RAIN WATER
COLLECTION
CLOSED
SCIENTIFICALLY
2.29
2.2
9
FIRE WATER U.G SUMP BELOW
SIZE:8.0MX5.0MX2.5M+0.3FB
CAPACITY:1,00,000 LTS
FIRE WATER U.G SUMP BELOW
SIZE:8.0MX5.0MX2.5M+0.3FB
CAPACITY:1,00,000 LTS
SIZE:3.8MX5.0MX2.5M+0.3FB
CAPACITY:48,000 LTS
RAW WATER U.G SUMP BELOW
SIZE:5.5MX5.0MX2.5M+0.3FB
CAPACITY:69,000 LTS
DOMESTIC WATER U.G SUMP BELOW
FIR
E
W
A
TE
R
U
.G
S
U
M
P
B
E
LO
W
SIZE:8
.0M
X5.0M
X2.5M
+0.3FB
C
APAC
ITY:1
,00,0
00 LTS
FIR
E
W
A
TE
R
U
.G
S
U
M
P
B
E
LO
W
SIZE:8
.0M
X5.0M
X2.5M
+0.3FB
C
APAC
ITY:1
,00,0
00 LTS
S
IZ
E
:3.8
M
X
5.0M
X
2.5M
+0.3FB
C
A
P
A
C
IT
Y
:48,0
00 LTS
R
A
W
W
A
TE
R
U
.G
S
U
M
P
B
E
LO
W
S
IZ
E
:5.5
M
X
5.0M
X
2.5M
+0.3FB
C
APAC
ITY:6
9,000 L
TS
D
O
M
E
S
TIC
W
A
TE
R
U
.G
S
U
M
P
B
E
LO
W
39.80 AS PER FMB39.80 AS PER SITE
4.58 AS
PE
R FM
B4.58 A
S P
ER
SITE
44.30 AS PER FMB44.57 AS PER SITE
12.57 AS
PE
R FM
B
12.27 AS
PE
R S
ITE
37.11 AS PER FMB37.28 AS PER SITE
24.83 AS
PE
R FM
B
24.84 AS
PE
R S
ITE
42.92 AS PER FMB43.19 AS PER SITE
22.98 AS
PE
R FM
B
41.82 AS
PE
R FM
B39.55 A
S P
ER
SITE
25.30 AS
PE
R S
ITE
32.02 AS PER FMB30.79 AS PER SITE
31.38
77.00
5.10
58.80
39.00
49.90
5.40
37.60
50.30
5.40
42.10
RAIN WATER
COLLECTION
CLOSED
SCIENTIFICALLY
2.29
2.2
9
RAIN WATER
COLLECTION
CLOSED
SCIENTIFICALLY
2.29
2.2
9
RAIN WATER
COLLECTION
CLOSED
SCIENTIFICALLY
2.29
2.2
9
SULLAGE WATER
COLLECTION
CLOSED
SCIENTIFICALLY
2.29
2.2
9
RAIN WATER
COLLECTION
CLOSED
SCIENTIFICALLY
2.29
2.2
9
SULLAGE WATER
COLLECTION
CLOSED
SCIENTIFICALLY
2.29
2.2
9
RAIN WATER
COLLECTION
CLOSED
SCIENTIFICALLY
2.29
2.2
9
SULLAGE WATER
COLLECTION
CLOSED
SCIENTIFICALLY
2.29
2.2
9
1.0m W
ide Percolation P
it
1.0m W
ide Percolation P
it
1.0m Wide Percolation Pit1.0m Wide Percolation Pit1.0m Wide Percolation Pit
1.0m W
ide Percolation P
it
1.0m W
ide Percolation P
it
1.0m Wide Percolation Pit
1.0m Wide Percolation Pit
1.0m Wide Percolation Pit
1.0m Wide Percolation Pit
1.0m Wide Percolation Pit
1.0m Wide Percolation Pit
1.0m Wide Percolation Pit
1.0m Wide Percolation Pit
1.0m Wide Percolation Pit
1.0m Wide Percolation Pit
1.0m
Wid
e P
erco
latio
n P
it
1.0m
Wid
e P
erco
latio
n P
it
1.0m
Wid
e P
erco
latio
n P
it
1.0m W
ide Percolation P
it
OSR - 1741.85 Sq.Mt
36.77
31.19
14.61
17.214.29
14.408.66
STP
4.50
4.50
4.50
4.50
22.5621.24
HSD YARD
BELO
W G
ROUN
D
STP
BELO
W G
ROUN
D
STP
BELO
W G
ROUN
D
28.3
5
13.97
7.20
010203040506070809101112131415
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
44
43
42
41
40
39
38
37
36
35
34
33
2829303132
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170171172173
174
175
176
177
178
179
223
226
227
234
235
244
280
287290
298
308
318
392
388
378
406
398
393
412
411
410
409
408
407
010204 030507 0608091012 11131416 15171819
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
DG
SET
OPE
N T
RAN
SFO
RMER
YA
RD D
G S
ET
29.0
7
14.57
OPEN TRANSFORMER
YARD
22.2
6
12.80
11.75
17.95
4.70 9.68
16.99
3.69
16.80
40.79
10.14
11.26
7.40
30.66
DG SET
OPE
N T
RAN
SFO
RMER
YA
RD
28.30
17.10
9.84
31.13
22.78
13.74
8.52
18.00
10.00
1.50
1.501.50
1.50
23.00
10.00
14.0
0
14.4
5
14.0
2
14.0014.04
14.04
14.0
5
7.59
3.01 95.07
34.48
96.39
1.00
14.91
38.32
14.07
20.69
BASEMENT EXTENT LINE
14.01
14.0
2
14.89
15.53
BASEM
ENT EXTEN
T LINE
BASEM
ENT EXTEN
T LINE
BASEMENT EXTENT LINE
BASE
MEN
T EX
TEN
T LIN
E
15.72
17.3
0
45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92
116117118119120121122123124125126127128129130131132133134135136137138139140141142143144145146147148149150151152153154155156157
185
180
191
186
192
197
198
203204
209
210
215216
222
245
260
270
279
319 330
331
338
348
357
358
368
377
42.10
Ramp UP 1:25 Slope
30.00Ramp DN1:25 Slope
30.00
Ramp DN1:25 Slope
30.00 Ramp UP 1:25 Slope
30.00
Ramp UP
1:25 Slope30.00
Ramp DN
1:25 Slope
288
293
295
2966.00
6.18
16.1914.10
22.2
6
12.80
OSR 5,038.64CAR PARKING(GREEN PAVERS)LANDSCAPE
BUILDING
6,663.15
16,555.97
5,061.47
AREA STATEMENT (GROUND COVERAGE)
S.NO. LEGEND AREA (IN SQ.M)1.
2.
3.
4.
DESCRIPTION
V
E
L
A
C
H
E
R
Y
M
A
IN
R
O
A
D
P
A
L
L
IK
A
R
A
N
I F
L
Y
O
V
E
R
V
E
L
A
C
H
E
R
Y
M
A
IN
R
O
A
D
T
O
T
A
M
B
A
R
A
M
D
R
.K
A
M
A
K
S
H
I
M
E
M
O
R
IA
L
H
O
S
P
IT
A
L
N
A
R
A
Y
A
N
A
P
U
R
A
M
L
A
K
E
2
0
0
'-
0
"
W
ID
E
P
A
L
L
IK
A
R
A
N
A
I H
IG
H
R
O
A
D
M
E
D
A
V
A
K
K
A
M
H
IG
H
R
O
A
D
M
E
D
A
V
A
K
K
A
M
H
I
G
H
R
O
A
D
T
O
T
H
O
R
A
IP
A
K
K
A
M
PROPOSED
SITE
C
O
G
N
IZ
A
N
T
T
E
C
H
N
O
L
O
G
Y
S
O
L
U
T
IO
N
S
KEY PLANNOT TO SCALE
T
E
C
H
N
O
L
O
G
Y
C
E
N
T
R
E
O
F
W
IN
D
E
N
E
R
G
Y
RAW WATER U.G SUMPSIZE:3.8MX5.0MX2.5M+0.3FB
CAPACITY:48,000 LTS
FIRE WATER U.G SUMPSIZE:8.0MX5.0MX2.5M+0.3FB
CAPACITY:1,00,000 LTS
FILTER WATER U.G SUMPSIZE:5.5MX5.0MX2.5M+0.3FB
CAPACITY:69,000 LTS
(±0.00)
2.50(S
WD
)
SECTION-XX'
FIRE WATER U.G SUMPSIZE:8.0MX5.0MX2.5M+0.3FB
CAPACITY:1,00,000 LTS
RAW WATER U.G SUMPSIZE:3.8MX5.0MX2.5M+0.3FB
CAPACITY:48,000 LTS
FILTER WATER U.G SUMPSIZE:5.5MX5.0MX2.5M+0.3FB
CAPACITY:69,000 LTS
0.30
0.30
(FB)
2.50(S
WD
)
0.30
(-3.50)
PLAN OF SUMP
FIRE WATER U.G SUMPSIZE:8.0MX5.0MX2.5M+0.3FB
CAPACITY:1,00,000 LTS
0.20 8.00 0.20 8.00 0.20 3.80 0.20 5.50 0.20
X X'
26.30
5.4
5
0.2
05
.0
00
.2
0
FIRE WATER U.G SUMPSIZE:8.0MX5.0MX2.5M+0.3FB
CAPACITY:1,00,000 LTS 2.50(S
WD
)
0.30
2290
1830
COLLECTIONSUMP DETAIL
RAIN WATER
230
230
26
70
22
90
18
30
230
19
90
1830
SECTION ON DD
230
30
0
23
0
23
0
23
0
15
0
2290
1830
COLLECTIONSUMP DETAIL
SULLAGE WATER
230
230
26
70
22
90
18
30
230
19
90
1830
SECTION ON DD
230
30
0
23
0
23
0
23
0
15
0
PEBBLE BEDSCALE : 1: = 100
SECTION OF
1.00
PEBBLE STONES
5 TO 7.5CM
1.50
SLOPE 1 IN 20
0.3
0
0.115
0.72
0.9
25
0.3
7
0.1
0
0.4
5
RAFT FOUNDATION TO DETAIL
12"
GATE DETAIL
7.20 M
1.5
0 M
G.L
PLINTH BEAM
SAND FILLINGP.C.C.
COMPOUND WALL
BRICK FOOTING
1.51
0.2
3
0.2
3
0.1
5
DETAIL
BRICK PIER
BRICK WALL4.5" THK.
0.4
5
0.4
5
1.51
DWARF WALL SECTIONNOT TO SCALE
0.0
75P.C.C FILLING
0.11
V
E
L
A
C
H
E
R
Y
M
A
IN
R
O
A
D
P
A
L
L
IK
A
R
A
N
I F
L
Y
O
V
E
R
V
E
L
A
C
H
E
R
Y
M
A
IN
R
O
A
D
T
O
T
A
M
B
A
R
A
M
D
R
.K
A
M
A
K
S
H
I
M
E
M
O
R
IA
L
H
O
S
P
IT
A
L
N
A
R
A
Y
A
N
A
P
U
R
A
M
L
A
K
E
2
0
0
'-
0
"
W
ID
E
P
A
L
L
IK
A
R
A
N
A
I H
IG
H
R
O
A
D
M
E
D
A
V
A
K
K
A
M
H
IG
H
R
O
A
D
M
E
D
A
V
A
K
K
A
M
H
I
G
H
R
O
A
D
T
O
T
H
O
R
A
IP
A
K
K
A
M
PROPOSED
SITE
C
O
G
N
IZ
A
N
T
T
E
C
H
N
O
L
O
G
Y
S
O
L
U
T
IO
N
S
KEY PLANNOT TO SCALE
T
E
C
H
N
O
L
O
G
Y
C
E
N
T
R
E
O
F
W
IN
D
E
N
E
R
G
Y
RAW WATER U.G SUMPSIZE:3.8MX5.0MX2.5M+0.3FB
CAPACITY:48,000 LTS
FIRE WATER U.G SUMPSIZE:8.0MX5.0MX2.5M+0.3FB
CAPACITY:1,00,000 LTS
FILTER WATER U.G SUMPSIZE:5.5MX5.0MX2.5M+0.3FB
CAPACITY:69,000 LTS
(±0.00)
2.50(S
WD
)
SECTION-XX'
FIRE WATER U.G SUMPSIZE:8.0MX5.0MX2.5M+0.3FB
CAPACITY:1,00,000 LTS
RAW WATER U.G SUMPSIZE:3.8MX5.0MX2.5M+0.3FB
CAPACITY:48,000 LTS
FILTER WATER U.G SUMPSIZE:5.5MX5.0MX2.5M+0.3FB
CAPACITY:69,000 LTS
0.30
0.30
(FB)
2.50(S
WD
)
0.30
(-3.50)
PLAN OF SUMP
FIRE WATER U.G SUMPSIZE:8.0MX5.0MX2.5M+0.3FB
CAPACITY:1,00,000 LTS
0.20 8.00 0.20 8.00 0.20 3.80 0.20 5.50 0.20
X X'
26.30
5.4
5
0.2
05
.0
00
.2
0
FIRE WATER U.G SUMPSIZE:8.0MX5.0MX2.5M+0.3FB
CAPACITY:1,00,000 LTS 2.50(S
WD
)
0.30
2290
1830
COLLECTIONSUMP DETAIL
RAIN WATER
230
230
26
70
22
90
18
30
230
19
90
1830
SECTION ON DD
230
30
0
23
0
23
0
23
0
15
0
2290
1830
COLLECTIONSUMP DETAIL
SULLAGE WATER
230
230
26
70
22
90
18
30
230
19
90
1830
SECTION ON DD
230
30
0
23
0
23
0
23
0
15
0
PEBBLE BEDSCALE : 1: = 100
SECTION OF
1.00
PEBBLE STONES
5 TO 7.5CM
1.50
SLOPE 1 IN 20
0.3
0
0.115
0.72
0.9
25
0.3
7
0.1
0
0.4
5
RAFT FOUNDATION TO DETAIL
12"
GATE DETAIL
7.20 M
1.5
0 M
G.L
PLINTH BEAM
SAND FILLINGP.C.C.
COMPOUND WALL
BRICK FOOTING
1.51
0.2
3
0.2
3
0.1
5
DETAIL
BRICK PIER
BRICK WALL4.5" THK.
0.4
5
0.4
5
1.51
DWARF WALL SECTIONNOT TO SCALE
0.0
75P.C.C FILLING
0.11
DRAWING TITLE
DATE
CHECKED
SMK
DRAWN
SCALE
1" = 32' - 0" ( 1:400) 27-10-2016
SITE PLAN
COLOUR INDICATION
PROPOSED BUILDING
ACCESS ROAD
PLOT BOUNDARY
JOB TITLE
NORTH POINT
PLAN SHOWING THE PROPOSED MSB IT / ITES
BUILDINGS AT SURVEY NOS.56/1B, 56/2A2A,
56/2A2B, 56/2A4A, 56/2A4B, 56/2B2A, 56/2B2B,
57/3B, 76/7, 76/9, 76/8, 76/4(PART-1&2) ,
76/3,76/1A1, 76/1A2, 76/1B, 76/1C1A1, 76/10,
76/1C1B, 76/5, 76/2A, 76/2B, 76/1C2, 76/1D, 75/1,
75/2A&2B, 75/3A, 75/3B, 75/4, 75/5, 75/6, 75/7,
75/8A1, 75/8A2, 84/3, 84/2B, 83/3, 86/4A, DOOR
NO.2,PALLAVARAM THORAIPAKKAM
RADIAL ROAD, PALLIKARANAI VILLAGE,
SHOLINGANALLUR TALUK,
KANCHEEPURAM DISTRICT.
STRUCTURAL ENGINEER
OWNER SIGNATURE
LICENSED SURVEYOR
Phone : 044-24572457
Thiruvanmiyur, Chennai – 600 041, INDIA
18, 3rd Seaward road, Valmiki nagar,nvanataraj & venkat A R C H I T E C T S
NO:27, SECOND STREET
BALAJI NAGAR
ROYAPETTAH
CHENNAI - 600 014.
DR.S.THAYALAN & OTHERS
ALEX JACOB
41/A, BEACH ROAD,
KALASHETRA COLONY
CHENNAI - 600 090.
ROAD 12,356.805.
SERVICES 4,322.466.
TOTAL SITE AREA 49,998.497.
BLOCK 1
BLOCK 2
BLOCK 3
TOTAL BUILT UP AREA
BUILT-UP AREA STATEMENT
S.NO. AREA (IN SQ.M)1.
2.
3.
4.
DESCRIPTION1,48,667.14
91,346.13
91,332.73
3,31,346.00
Annexure - 4
DESIGN DETAILS
Rain water harvesting technique has been adopted as per NBC Part-9, 5.5.12.1
The rational method is to be preferred to calculate the Storm water run-off.
Q = Runoff in m3/sec
I = Intensity of rainfall in mm/ hr.
A = Drainage area in hectares.
C = Co-efficient of run off as below
Run-off co-efficient for various types of surfaces
Open grounds, unpaved street 0.30
Parks, lawns, gardens 0.20 to 0.50
Macadam roads, pavements 0.70
Asphalt pavements 0.85 to 0.70
Water tight roof surface 0.95
Total Run-off : ROOF TOP
Q = Runoff 0.323 m3/sec
I = Intensity of rainfall 79 mm/hr
A = Drainage area in hectares. 1.55 Ha
C = Co-efficient of run off 0.95
Data assumed:
Considering 15 min of rainfall
Volume of rainwater available for harvesting is 291 Cum
This run-off is being diverted to roof top rain water collection sump, which
shall be used for domestic purposes after the necessary treatment.
Rain water recharging technique has been adopted as per NBC Part-9, 5.5.12.2
Total Run-off : PODIUM AREA / HARDSCAPE & DRIVEWAY
Q = Runoff 0.105 m3/sec
I = Intensity of rainfall 30 mm/hr
A = Drainage area in hectares. 1.80 Ha
C = Co-efficient of run off 0.70
Data assumed:
Considering 15 min of rainfall
Volume of rainwater available for recharging is 95 Cum
Date : 25.06.16
Project : Raheja IT park at Pallikaranai, Chennai
To supplement the ever growing shortage of protected, pure and safe water supply for
human consumption rain water is an ideal source which can be conserved and used in a
useful manner by the people.
Rational formula for calculating runoff = Q = (C I A) / 360
It is essential to catch the runoff and use it for augmentation of ground water reservior
by modifying the natural movement of surface water by recharging it by artificial means
for example, construction of recharge structures.
Subject : Storm Water Management
DesignTree Service Consultants Pvt Ltd
Total Run-off : GARDEN AREA
Q = Runoff 0.034 m3/sec
I = Intensity of rainfall 30 mm/hr
A = Drainage area in hectares. 1.65 Ha
C = Co-efficient of run off 0.25
Data assumed:
Considering 15 min of rainfall
Volume of rainwater available for recharging is 31 Cum
Therefore the total Run-off from the site is 126 Cum
Deep recharge well design calculation:
Assumed data for designing the subsurface reservoirs;
1. Good granular zones below 30m.
2. Transmissivity of the principal aquifer of 1500 m2 / day.
3. Static water level i.e the Piezometric level in Pre monsoon is 30 m to 50m below ground level.
• Total depth of chamber 3 m. BGL
• Total depth of filter material in the chamber 1.5 m
• Voids in the combination of filter material 0.5
• Depth of effective open space in the chamber 1.5 m
Surface area of well = Total run-off from site/ effective depth of well = 56 sqm
The number of tube well requirement is
= 6 Nos.
Area of each re-charge well is
10 sqm
Number of recharge wells provided is 6 Nos
Amount of water recharging through recharge wells is 126 Cum
Excess water is find its way to External Storm water drain is 0 Cum
Total surface area of well /
no. of tubewells
All the above characters of the principal aquifer in the area provided a friendly geo-hydrological regime of the
aquifer to accommodate sufficient quantity of water through Artificial Recharge by gravity head recharge
well. Both the piezometic head and the quality of water will be improved in the influence zone of the
recharge system.
Total volume available /
Recharge efficiency of
borewell
DesignTree Service Consultants Pvt Ltd
BLUE - WATERYELLOW - LOSSESRED - EFFLUENTGREEN - TREATED
Fresh WaterRequirement786 KLDTotal WaterRequirement1431 KLD
Gardening930 KLDDomestic501 KLD501 KLD 930 KLD
SewageGeneration1150 KLD400 KLD 750 KLD
STP600 KLD - 1No350 KLD - 2 NosUF Plant
HVAC450 KLD Gardening55 KLD
150 KLD
645 KLD
645 KLD
645 KLD 1150 KLD1300 KLD
1150 KLD
101 KLD
180 KLD
WATER BALANCE DRAWING
CONSULTANT:
IMO No.DATE SCALE REV
DWG No: DD - HECS - WBD - 001
TITLE: CLIENT:
WATER BALANCE DRAWING
29-12-17
HECS(P)Ltd, CHENNAI1. Not To Scale.2. For Planning Purpose Only.
NOTES:
M/s. SYCAMORE PROPERTIES PVT LTD.,OLYMPIA TECH PARK, SIDCO INDUSTRIAL ESTATE,
GUINDY, CHENNAI-600032.
Total Water Requirement - 1431 KLD.Sewage Generated - 1150 KLD.Recycled Water - 557 KLD.Fresh Water Requirement - 786 KLD.
C/O K.Raheja Corp Pvt Ltd, No:1,Sidco Industrial Estate Level-2, AltiusBlock, Regus Olympia, OlympiaTechpark, Guindy, Chennai- 600032
No Objection Certificate for Height Clearance
1. This NOC is issued by Airports Authority of India (AAI) in pursuance of responsibility conferred by and as per theprovisions of Govt. of India (Ministry of Civil Aviation) order GSR751 (E) dated 30th Sep. 2015 for Safe and RegularAircraft Operations.
2. This office has no objection to the construction of the proposed structure as per the following details:
NOC ID : CHEN/SOUTH/B/100417/250424 Applicant Name* venkatesan.M Site Address* IT/ITES Door No 2,,sholinganallur/Pallikaranai/,Chennai,Tamil Nadu
Site Coordinates* 80 12 22.75-12 56 47.47, 80 12 23.15-12 56 50.10, 80 12 24.05-12 56 48.73, 80 1225.07-12 56 47.18, 80 12 25.48-12 56 49.80,
Site Elevation in mtrs AMSL assubmitted by Applicant*
2.92 M
Permissible Top Elevation inmtrs Above Mean SeaLevel(AMSL)
83.12M
*As provided by applicant3. This NOC is subject to the terms and conditions as given below:
a. Permissible Top elevation has been issued on the basis of Site coordinates and Site Elevation submitted by Applicant.AAI neither owns the responsibility nor authenticates the correctness of the site coordinates & site elevation provided bythe applicant. If at any stage it is established that the actual data is different, this NOC will stand null and void and actionwill be taken as per law. The office in-charge of the concerned aerodrome may initiate action under the Aircraft(Demolition of Obstruction caused by Buildings and Trees etc.) Rules, 1994”
b. The Structure height (including any superstructure) shall be calculated by subtracting the Site elevation in AMSL fromthe Permissible Top Elevation in AMSL i.e. Maximum Structure Height = Permissible Top Elevation minus (-) SiteElevation.
c. The issue of the 'NOC' is further subject to the provisions of Section 9-A of the Indian Aircraft Act, 1934 and anynotifications issued there under from time to time including the Aircraft (Demolition of Obstruction caused by Buildingsand Trees etc.) Rules,1994.
Page 1/2
S.Thayalan & others Date: 25-10-2017
Valid Upto: 24-10-2025
Page 2/2
d. No radio/TV Antenna, lighting arresters, staircase, Mumtee, Overhead water tank and attachments of fixtures of anykind shall project above the Permissible Top Elevation of 83.12M, as indicated in para 2.
e. Only use of oil fired or electric fired furnace is permissible, within 8 KM of the Aerodrome Reference Point.
f. The certificate is valid for a period of 8 years from the date of its issue.One time revalidation without assessment maybe allowed, provided construction work has commenced,subject to the condition that such request shall be made withinthe validity period of the NOC and the delay is due to circumstances which are beyound the control of the developer.
g. No light or a combination of lights which by reason of its intensity, configuration or colour may cause confusion withthe aeronautical ground lights of the Airport shall be installed at the site at any time, during or after the construction of thebuilding. No activity shall be allowed which may affect the safe operations of flights
h. The applicant will not complain/claim compensation against aircraft noise, vibrations, damages etc. caused by aircraftoperations at or in the vicinity of the airport.
i. Day markings & night lighting with secondary power supply shall be provided as per the guidelines specified in chapter6 and appendix 6 of Civil Aviation Requirement Series ‘B’ Part I Section 4, available on DGCA India website:www.dgca.nic.in
j. The applicant is responsible to obtain all other statutory clearances from the concerned authorities including theapproval of building plans. This NOC for height clearances is to ensure the safe and regular aircraft operations and shallnot be used as document for any other purpose/claim whatsoever, including ownership of land etc.
k. This NOC has been issued w.r.t. the Civil Airports. Applicant needs to seek separate NOC from Defence, if the site lieswithin their jurisdiction.
l. In case of any discrepancy/interpretation of NOC letter, English version shall be valid.
m. In case of any dispute w.r.t site elevation and/or AGL height, top elevation in AMSL shall prevail.
Chairman NOC Committee
Region Name: SOUTH
Address: General Manager AirportsAuthority of India, RegionalHeadquarter, Southern Region,Chennai Airport,Chennai-600027 (Tamil Nadu)
Email ID: [email protected]
Contact No: 044-22560046
C/O K.Raheja Corp Pvt Ltd. No:1,Sidco Industrial Estate, Level-2,Altius Block, Regus Olympia,Olympia Techpark, Guindy, Chennai600032 No Objection Certificate for Height Clearance
1. This NOC is issued by Airports Authority of India (AAI) in pursuance of responsibility conferred by and as per theprovisions of Govt. of India (Ministry of Civil Aviation) order GSR751 (E) dated 30th Sep. 2015 for Safe and RegularAircraft Operations.
2. This office has no objection to the construction of the proposed structure as per the following details:
NOC ID : CHEN/SOUTH/B/100417/250426 Applicant Name* venkatesan.M Site Address* IT/ITES, Door No 2,Sholinganallur / Pallikaranai,Chennai,Tamil Nadu
Site Coordinates* 80 12 27.21-12 56 50.99, 80 12 27.90-12 56 53.87, 80 12 28.36-12 56 52.53, 80 1228.68-12 56 50.81, 80 12 29.47-12 56 53.75,
Site Elevation in mtrs AMSL assubmitted by Applicant*
3.66 M
Permissible Top Elevation inmtrs Above Mean SeaLevel(AMSL)
83.86M
*As provided by applicant3. This NOC is subject to the terms and conditions as given below:
a. Permissible Top elevation has been issued on the basis of Site coordinates and Site Elevation submitted by Applicant.AAI neither owns the responsibility nor authenticates the correctness of the site coordinates & site elevation provided bythe applicant. If at any stage it is established that the actual data is different, this NOC will stand null and void and actionwill be taken as per law. The office in-charge of the concerned aerodrome may initiate action under the Aircraft(Demolition of Obstruction caused by Buildings and Trees etc.) Rules, 1994”
b. The Structure height (including any superstructure) shall be calculated by subtracting the Site elevation in AMSL fromthe Permissible Top Elevation in AMSL i.e. Maximum Structure Height = Permissible Top Elevation minus (-) SiteElevation.
c. The issue of the 'NOC' is further subject to the provisions of Section 9-A of the Indian Aircraft Act, 1934 and anynotifications issued there under from time to time including the Aircraft (Demolition of Obstruction caused by Buildingsand Trees etc.) Rules,1994.
Page 1/2
S.Thayalan & Others Date: 25-10-2017
Valid Upto: 24-10-2025
Page 2/2
d. No radio/TV Antenna, lighting arresters, staircase, Mumtee, Overhead water tank and attachments of fixtures of anykind shall project above the Permissible Top Elevation of 83.86M, as indicated in para 2.
e. Only use of oil fired or electric fired furnace is permissible, within 8 KM of the Aerodrome Reference Point.
f. The certificate is valid for a period of 8 years from the date of its issue.One time revalidation without assessment maybe allowed, provided construction work has commenced,subject to the condition that such request shall be made withinthe validity period of the NOC and the delay is due to circumstances which are beyound the control of the developer.
g. No light or a combination of lights which by reason of its intensity, configuration or colour may cause confusion withthe aeronautical ground lights of the Airport shall be installed at the site at any time, during or after the construction of thebuilding. No activity shall be allowed which may affect the safe operations of flights
h. The applicant will not complain/claim compensation against aircraft noise, vibrations, damages etc. caused by aircraftoperations at or in the vicinity of the airport.
i. Day markings & night lighting with secondary power supply shall be provided as per the guidelines specified in chapter6 and appendix 6 of Civil Aviation Requirement Series ‘B’ Part I Section 4, available on DGCA India website:www.dgca.nic.in
j. The applicant is responsible to obtain all other statutory clearances from the concerned authorities including theapproval of building plans. This NOC for height clearances is to ensure the safe and regular aircraft operations and shallnot be used as document for any other purpose/claim whatsoever, including ownership of land etc.
k. This NOC has been issued w.r.t. the Civil Airports. Applicant needs to seek separate NOC from Defence, if the site lieswithin their jurisdiction.
l. In case of any discrepancy/interpretation of NOC letter, English version shall be valid.
m. In case of any dispute w.r.t site elevation and/or AGL height, top elevation in AMSL shall prevail.
Chairman NOC Committee
Region Name: SOUTH
Address: General Manager AirportsAuthority of India, RegionalHeadquarter, Southern Region,Chennai Airport,Chennai-600027 (Tamil Nadu)
Email ID: [email protected]
Contact No: 044-22560046
C/O K.Raheja Corp Pvt Ltd.No.1, Sidco Industrial Estate,Level-2, Altius Block, RegusOlympia,Olympia Techpark, GuindyChennai 600 032
No Objection Certificate for Height Clearance
1. This NOC is issued by Airports Authority of India (AAI) in pursuance of responsibility conferred by and as per theprovisions of Govt. of India (Ministry of Civil Aviation) order GSR751 (E) dated 30th Sep. 2015 for Safe and RegularAircraft Operations.
2. This office has no objection to the construction of the proposed structure as per the following details:
NOC ID : CHEN/SOUTH/B/100417/250427 Applicant Name* venkatesan.M Site Address* IT/ITES Door No. 2,Sholinganallur / Pallikaranai,Chennai,Tamil Nadu
Site Coordinates* 80 12 29.30-12 56 50.66, 80 12 29.99-12 56 53.73, 80 12 30.43-12 56 52.20, 80 1230.86-12 56 50.39, 80 12 31.62-12 56 53.61,
Site Elevation in mtrs AMSL assubmitted by Applicant*
3.42 M
Permissible Top Elevation inmtrs Above Mean SeaLevel(AMSL)
83.62M
*As provided by applicant3. This NOC is subject to the terms and conditions as given below:
a. Permissible Top elevation has been issued on the basis of Site coordinates and Site Elevation submitted by Applicant.AAI neither owns the responsibility nor authenticates the correctness of the site coordinates & site elevation provided bythe applicant. If at any stage it is established that the actual data is different, this NOC will stand null and void and actionwill be taken as per law. The office in-charge of the concerned aerodrome may initiate action under the Aircraft(Demolition of Obstruction caused by Buildings and Trees etc.) Rules, 1994”
b. The Structure height (including any superstructure) shall be calculated by subtracting the Site elevation in AMSL fromthe Permissible Top Elevation in AMSL i.e. Maximum Structure Height = Permissible Top Elevation minus (-) SiteElevation.
c. The issue of the 'NOC' is further subject to the provisions of Section 9-A of the Indian Aircraft Act, 1934 and anynotifications issued there under from time to time including the Aircraft (Demolition of Obstruction caused by Buildingsand Trees etc.) Rules,1994.
Page 1/2
S.Thayalan & Others Date: 25-10-2017
Valid Upto: 24-10-2025
Page 2/2
d. No radio/TV Antenna, lighting arresters, staircase, Mumtee, Overhead water tank and attachments of fixtures of anykind shall project above the Permissible Top Elevation of 83.62M, as indicated in para 2.
e. Only use of oil fired or electric fired furnace is permissible, within 8 KM of the Aerodrome Reference Point.
f. The certificate is valid for a period of 8 years from the date of its issue.One time revalidation without assessment maybe allowed, provided construction work has commenced,subject to the condition that such request shall be made withinthe validity period of the NOC and the delay is due to circumstances which are beyound the control of the developer.
g. No light or a combination of lights which by reason of its intensity, configuration or colour may cause confusion withthe aeronautical ground lights of the Airport shall be installed at the site at any time, during or after the construction of thebuilding. No activity shall be allowed which may affect the safe operations of flights
h. The applicant will not complain/claim compensation against aircraft noise, vibrations, damages etc. caused by aircraftoperations at or in the vicinity of the airport.
i. Day markings & night lighting with secondary power supply shall be provided as per the guidelines specified in chapter6 and appendix 6 of Civil Aviation Requirement Series ‘B’ Part I Section 4, available on DGCA India website:www.dgca.nic.in
j. The applicant is responsible to obtain all other statutory clearances from the concerned authorities including theapproval of building plans. This NOC for height clearances is to ensure the safe and regular aircraft operations and shallnot be used as document for any other purpose/claim whatsoever, including ownership of land etc.
k. This NOC has been issued w.r.t. the Civil Airports. Applicant needs to seek separate NOC from Defence, if the site lieswithin their jurisdiction.
l. In case of any discrepancy/interpretation of NOC letter, English version shall be valid.
m. In case of any dispute w.r.t site elevation and/or AGL height, top elevation in AMSL shall prevail.
Chairman NOC Committee
Region Name: SOUTH
Address: General Manager AirportsAuthority of India, RegionalHeadquarter, Southern Region,Chennai Airport,Chennai-600027 (Tamil Nadu)
Email ID: [email protected]
Contact No: 044-22560046
Scanned by CamScanner
Scanned by CamScanner
Proposed Commercial building KRC IT Building at Pallikarni- Block 1
Energy Saving by using copper wound transformers for Comm.Power loss using CU. wound transformer 1.20%
SI Description Total Power Total
NO Allocated in Power required
Area in Sqmt Watts per Sqmt in KW
1 COMMERCIAL & COMMON AREA 130644 53 6924
TOTAL 6924
Maximim demand in kW at 0.6 diversity factor 4154.5
Consumption of power for 12 hours per day 49853.8
Minimum demand in kW at 0.1 diversity factor 692.4
Consumption of power for 12 hours per day 8309.0
Total consumption of power per day 58162.7
Total consumption of power per year 212.29 Lakh Units
Savings in power loss using CU 2.55 Lakh Units
wound transformer
Proposed Commercial building KRC IT Building at Pallikarni- Block 1
Energy Saving by using HF Ballast
Power loss using conventional ballast 25%
Power loss using HF ballast 14%
Savings in power loss using HF ballast 11%
SI Description Total Power Total
NO Allocated in Power required
Area in Sqmt Watts per Sqmt in KW
1 COMMAN AREA 130644 5 653
TOTAL 653
Maximim demand in kW at 0.8 diversity factor 523
Consumption of power for 12 hours per day 6271 (1)
Minimum demand in kW at 0.2 diversity factor 131
Consumption of power for 12 hours per day 1568 (2)
Total consumption of power per day 7838.6 ( 1 + 2 )
Total consumption of power per year 28.61 Lakh Units
Savings in power loss using HF ballast 3.15 Lakh Units
Proposed Commercial building KRC IT Building at Pallikarni- Block 1
Electrical Power savings using CFL for lighting
Savings in power Using CFL as against Fluorescent Lamps 30%
SI Description Total Power Total
NO Allocated in Power required
Area in Sqmt Watts per Sqmt in KW
1 COMMAN AREA 130644 5 653
TOTAL 653
Maximim demand in kW at 0.8 diversity factor 523
Consumption of power for 12 hours per day 6271 (1)
Minimum demand in kW at 0.2 diversity factor 131
Consumption of power for 12 hours per day 1568 (2)
Total consumption of power per day 7838.6 ( 1 + 2 )
Total consumption of power per year 28.61 Lakh Units
Savings in power using CFL 8.58 Lakh Units
Proposed Commercial building KRC IT Building at Pallikarni- Block 1
Electrical Power savings using Solar Power for External lighting
SI Description Total Power Total
NO Allocated in Power required
Area in Sqmt Watts per Sqmt in KW
1 External Lighting 20.0
TOTAL 20
Maximim demand in kW at 1.0 diversity factor 20.0
Consumption of power for 6 hours per day 120 (1)
Minimum demand in kW at 0.5 diversity factor 10.0
Consumption of power for 6 hours per day 60 (2)
Total consumption of power per day 180.0 ( 1 + 2 )
Total consumption of power per year 0.66 Lakh Units
Savings in power by using Solar Power 0.66 Lakh Units
Proposed Commercial building KRC IT Building at Pallikarni- Block 1
Electrical Power savings using water Cooled Chillers
Savings in power by using Water Cooled Chillers as against Air cooled Chiller 20%
SI Description Total Power Total
NO Allocated in Power required
Area in Sqmt Watts per Sqmt in KW
1 COMMERCIAL 130644 25 3266
TOTAL 3266
Maximim demand in kW at 0.6 diversity factor 1960
Consumption of power for 12 hours per day 23516 (1)
Minimum demand in kW at 0.1 diversity factor 327
Consumption of power for 12 hours per day 3919 (2)
Total consumption of power per day 27435.2 ( 1 + 2 )
Total consumption of power per year 100.14 Lakh Units
40.06 Lakh Units
Savings in power using water Cooled Chillers and heat recovery wheel
Proposed Commercial building KRC IT Building at Pallikarni- Block 1
Savings in Electrical Power Consumption - SUMMARY
SI
NO
With Cu wound Transformer
with HFBallast With CFL
With Water Cooled Chillers
With Solar Power for External
lightingTotal
Consumption Total Saving
1 Savings in lakh kwh units 2.5 3.1 0.7 40.1 0.66 212.29
2 Savings in percentage 1.2 1.5 0.3 18.9 0.003 21.9
SAVING
Proposed Commercial building KRC IT Building at Pallikarni- Block 2 & 3
Energy Saving by using copper wound transformers for Comm.Power loss using CU. wound transformer 1.20%
SI Description Total Power Total
NO Allocated in Power required
Area in Sqmt Watts per Sqmt in KW
1 COMMERCIAL & COMMON AREA 161666 53 8568
TOTAL 8568
Maximim demand in kW at 0.6 diversity factor 5141.0
Consumption of power for 12 hours per day 61691.6
Minimum demand in kW at 0.1 diversity factor 856.8
Consumption of power for 12 hours per day 10281.9
Total consumption of power per day 71973.5
Total consumption of power per year 262.70 Lakh Units
Savings in power loss using CU 3.15 Lakh Units
wound transformer
Proposed Commercial building KRC IT Building at Pallikarni- Block 2 & 3
Energy Saving by using HF Ballast
Power loss using conventional ballast 25%
Power loss using HF ballast 14%
Savings in power loss using HF ballast 11%
SI Description Total Power Total
NO Allocated in Power required
Area in Sqmt Watts per Sqmt in KW
1 COMMAN AREA 161666 5 808
TOTAL 808
Maximim demand in kW at 0.8 diversity factor 647
Consumption of power for 12 hours per day 7760 (1)
Minimum demand in kW at 0.2 diversity factor 162
Consumption of power for 12 hours per day 1940 (2)
Total consumption of power per day 9699.9 ( 1 + 2 )
Total consumption of power per year 35.40 Lakh Units
Savings in power loss using HF ballast 3.89 Lakh Units
Proposed Commercial building KRC IT Building at Pallikarni- Block 2 & 3
Electrical Power savings using CFL for lighting
Savings in power Using CFL as against Fluorescent Lamps 30%
SI Description Total Power Total
NO Allocated in Power required
Area in Sqmt Watts per Sqmt in KW
1 COMMAN AREA 161666 5 808
TOTAL 808
Maximim demand in kW at 0.8 diversity factor 647
Consumption of power for 12 hours per day 7760 (1)
Minimum demand in kW at 0.2 diversity factor 162
Consumption of power for 12 hours per day 1940 (2)
Total consumption of power per day 9699.9 ( 1 + 2 )
Total consumption of power per year 35.40 Lakh Units
Savings in power using CFL 10.62 Lakh Units
Proposed Commercial building KRC IT Building at Pallikarni- Block 2 & 3
Electrical Power savings using Solar Power for External lighting
SI Description Total Power Total
NO Allocated in Power required
Area in Sqmt Watts per Sqmt in KW
1 External Lighting 20.0
TOTAL 20
Maximim demand in kW at 1.0 diversity factor 20.0
Consumption of power for 6 hours per day 120 (1)
Minimum demand in kW at 0.5 diversity factor 10.0
Consumption of power for 6 hours per day 60 (2)
Total consumption of power per day 180.0 ( 1 + 2 )
Total consumption of power per year 0.66 Lakh Units
Savings in power by using Solar Power 0.66 Lakh Units
Proposed Commercial building KRC IT Building at Pallikarni- Block 2 & 3
Electrical Power savings using water Cooled Chillers
Savings in power by using Water Cooled Chillers as against Air cooled Chiller 20%
SI Description Total Power Total
NO Allocated in Power required
Area in Sqmt Watts per Sqmt in KW
1 COMMERCIAL 161666 25 4042
TOTAL 4042
Maximim demand in kW at 0.6 diversity factor 2425
Consumption of power for 12 hours per day 29100 (1)
Minimum demand in kW at 0.1 diversity factor 404
Consumption of power for 12 hours per day 4850 (2)
Total consumption of power per day 33949.8 ( 1 + 2 )
Total consumption of power per year 123.92 Lakh Units
49.57 Lakh Units
Savings in power using water Cooled Chillers and heat recovery wheel
Proposed Commercial building KRC IT Building at Pallikarni- Block 2 & 3
Savings in Electrical Power Consumption - SUMMARY
SI
NO
With Cu wound Transformer
with HFBallast With CFL
With Water Cooled Chillers
With Solar Power for External
lightingTotal
Consumption Total Saving
1 Savings in lakh kwh units 3.2 3.9 0.7 49.6 0.66 262.70
2 Savings in percentage 1.2 1.5 0.3 18.9 0.003 21.8
SAVING
DETAILED FEASIBILITY REPORT ON
WATER SUPPLY & SEWERAGE BOARD
SYSTEM FOR SEWAGE TREATED WITH A EMPHASIS OF
TERTIARY TREATMENT PLANT FOR SEWAGE
TREATMENT PLANT & AFTER TERTIARY TREATMENT
TREATED WATER SHALL BE USED FOR FLUSHING,
GARDENING & HVAC PURPOSES FOR
PROPOSED MSB IT/ITES PARK AT SURVEY NO. 56/1B,
56/2A2A, 56/2A2B, 56/2A4A, 56/2A4B, 56/2B2A,
56/2B2B, 57/3B, 76/7, 76/9, 76/8, 76/4(PART-1&2),
76/3, 76/1A1, 76/1A2, 76/1B, 76/1C1A1, 76/10,
76/1C1B, 76/5, 76/2A, 76/2B, 76/1C2, 76/1D, 75/1,
75/2A&2B, 75/3A, 75/3B, 75/4, 75/5, 75/6, 75/7,
75/8A1, 75/8A2, 84/3, 84/2B, 83/3, 86/4, DOOR
NO.2,PALLAVARAM THORAIPAKKAM RADIAL ROAD,
PALLIKARANANI VILLAGE, SHOLINGANALLUR TALUK,
KANCHEEPURAM DISTRICT.
December 2017
1) INTRODUCTION:
M/s. Raheja Corp, is setting up IT/ITES park at survey no. 56/1B, 56/2A2A, 56/2A2B,
56/2A4A, 56/2A4B, 56/2B2A, 56/2B2B, 57/3B, 76/7, 76/9, 76/8, (PART-1&2), 76/3, 76/1A1,
76/1A2, 76/1B, 76/1C1A1, 76/10, 76/1C1B, 76/5, 76/2A, 76/2B, 76/1C2, 76/1D, 75/1,
75/2A&2B, 75/3A, 75/3B, 75/4, 75/5, 75/6, 75/7, 75/8A1, 75/8A2, 84/3, 84/2B, 83/3,
86/4, door no.2, Pallavaram Thoraipakkam Radial Road, Pallikaranani village, Sholinganallur
Taluk, Kancheepuram District , with a view to conserve fresh water resources and adopt re
cycle and re-use measures. They propose to set up a water pollution control and re-use
system for the wastewater generated from entire campus and also proposed to harvest and
recharge ground water as storm water management. The only source of waste waters is
from toilets, kitchens/pantries and wash basins and washrooms etc in the campus and
therefore domestic in nature.
This report details the following from the proposed facility: Collection, Treatment and
Disposal of Domestic Effluents.
2) QUANTITY AND QUALITY OF WASTEWATERS
For commercial unit with a population of 32,139 souls and average water consumption
considered for design is 45 LPCD.
The wastewater quantity from domestic sources is considered at maximum of 90% of water
consumed. Hence the quantity of wastewater generated is as below,
a) Quantity of wastewater flow for STP = 600,000 Lit/day for Block-01
b) Quantity of wastewater flow for STP = 350,000 Lit/day for Blocks-02
c) Quantity of wastewater flow for STP = 350,000 Lit/day for Blocks-03
Treatment plant for treating sewage in the campus has been proposed for a capacity of 600cum/day, 350cum/day & 350cum/day.
3) CHARACTERIZATION
The general characteristic of sewage is considered as shown in the table below.
General characteristics:
pH : 7 – 10
BOD : 250 – 350 mg/L
COD : 500 – 600 mg/L
SS : 150mg/lt.
The anticipated final water quality:
pH : 6 – 9
BOD : < 20 mg/L
COD : < 60 mg/L
SS : < 30 mg /L
TSS : < 10 mg/L
Residual Chlorine : > 1.0 mg/L
E.Coli : Nil
4) MODE OF TREATMENT
It is proposed to setup a treatment plant for treating the domestic waste, kitchen waste
adopting Mixed Bed BIo Reactor using diffused aeration. The other modes of treatment
considered before arriving at activated sludge process are FAB (Fluidized Aerobic Bio
Reactor), ASP (Activated Sludge Process), SBR ( Sequencing Batch Reactor) etc. The
advantages and disadvantages of the each scheme, initial investment and maintenance cost
etc were compared and finally arrived at providing a STP using MBBR – Mixed Bed Bio
Reactor.
The units proposed for the proposed STP with MBBR are:
SL. No.
Name of the Unit
Purpose
1 Bar Screen Chamber For removing unwanted floating materials.
2 Equalization Tank To even out the flow variations and continuous uniform
mixing operations with course bubble.
3 Anoxic Tank For BOD reduction under anoxic conditions
4
MBBR Reactor
Activated Sludge Process for developing the bacterial
culture, which stabilizes the waste using submerged
diffusers. The reactor is provided with floating media which acts as an attached growth media for the enhanced
growth of biological organism
5
Settling Tank
The settling tank / clarified water tank acts as secondary
settling tank for settling the floating solids and activated
sludge which escapes out of the MBBR reactor. It also acts
as concentrator for the return activated sludge
6
Clarified Water Tank
The clarified water tank / pre-filtration tank is a storage
tank for collecting the over flow supernatant from the settling tank. From this tank the treated water is fed into
the Sand Filter and Carbon filter for further polishing and
treatment
7 Pressure Sand Filter To filter out suspended solids if any in the treated water.
8 Activated Carbon Filter To remove color and Odor if any in the filtered water.
9
Chlorinator
To disinfect the treated water to make it safe to come in contact with humans so that the treated water can be
used for gardening / allied uses.
5A) METHOD ADOPTED FOR THE DESIGN
The Sewage Treatment Plant is designed MBBR (Mixed Bed Bio Reactor). The system is
designed for a continuous operation scheme on a 24 x 7 basis.
Bar Screen
chamber
PSF
ACF
Chlorine
Dosage
Equalization Tank
a) TREATMENT FLOW CHART
600 KLD Raw Sewage
Anoxic Tank
MBBR Tank
Settling Tank
Excess sludge
Disposed in to
Filter Press for
Drying
Clarified Water Tank
Final Holding
Tank
To Reuse for
Flushing /
Gardening/HVAC
purposes
b) DESIGN OF THE INDIVIDUAL UNITS
Bar Screen Chamber:
Provide a chamber of size 1.0 m x 0.60 m to suit sewer gradient to accommodate an
inclined bar screen with opening less than 10 mm. Provide a bar screen of 20 X 6 mm flats
with 10mm spacing in between as coarse bar screen and provide a 1.0 m x 0.60m bar screen
with 10mm sq openings as a Fine Bar Screen.
Equalization tank:
The flow from the bar screen chamber is let into the equalization tank. This tank is
provided to even out the flow variation, and to provide a continuous feed into the
secondary biological treatment units.
Design flow = 600,000 Lit/day
Average flow = 20 Hours
Provide Equalization Tank with a HRT of 6 Hours (holding capacity)
Hence required volume of the tank = 180.00 m3
Provide a tank of 180,000 Lit. Capacity.
The tank size would be 72sqm x 2.5m (effective volume)
Anoxic Tank:
Flow = 600 KLD.
Average Flow = Plant Capacity / 20 hrs
30 m3/hr
HRT = 2.5 Hours
Volume of Anoxic Tank = 75.0 m3
Hence provide an anoxic tank with a volume of ~ 75 m3
The tank size would be 18.75 sqm x 4m (effective volume)
MBBR Tank:
Flow = 600 KLD.
MLSS = 5000 mg/L
Food to Mass ratio ( F/M) = 0.135
Total BOD in Kg/day = (BOD in mg/L x Plant Capacity) / 1000
Total BOD in Kg/day = 210.0 kg/day
Volume of Aeration Tank = Total BOD / ( MLSS x F/M Ratio)
= 311.1 m3
Hence provide an MBBR tank with a volume of ~ 315 m3
The tank size would be 78.75 sqm x 4m (effective volume)
Calculation of Air Volume
"BOD5 after treatment <10 mg/lit
"BOD5 Loading = 350 mg/lit
"Total BOD5 load = 600 x 1000 x 350kg/day
1000000
"Total BOD5 load = 210 kg/day
BOD5 load in Kg/day in the aeration tank = 210 Kg
Oxygen required in Kg/day = 420 kg/day
(2 kgs of Oxygen is required for every Kg of BOD5 to be removed)
% of Oxygen in air = 0.21
Density of air = 1.2
Air Volume required per day = 1667 m3 of 02 / day
No. of hours of oxygenation = 18
= 92.6 m3 / hr
Diffuser Transfer efficiency = 92.6/0.18
(18 % for 4.5m submergence after providing for media loss)
= 514 m3 / hr
Hence, Air volume required in Aeration tank = 514 m3
/ hr
Consider 30% extra for equalization tank = 669 m3 / hr
Total Air Volume required = 670 m3 / hr
Therefore Total air requirement in Cum. / Day = 670 m3 / hr
Secondary Clarifier :
Plant Capacity = 600 KLD
Loading Rate = 25 m3/sqm/day
Volume Considered in Design = 2 times plant capacity
Surface area of settling tank = Plant Capacity x 2 / Loading Rate
Surface area = 35 m2
= 35 m2
Liquid depth considered in the settling tank = 4 m
Volume of Settling tank = 35m2
x 4m
Hence provide a settling tank with a volume of ~ 140 m3
The tank size would be 35 sqm x 4m (effective volume)
Clarified Water Tank / Pre filtration Tank :
Plant Capacity = 600 KLD
Average Flow = 30 m3/ hr
HRT = 6 hours
Volume of Clarified Water Tank = 180 m3
Hence provide a Clarified water tank with a volume of ~ 180 m3
The tank size would be 60 sqm x 3.0m (effective volume)
Pressure Sand Filter:
Flow = 600,000 Lt/day
Loading rate = 12 Cumec/ Sqm. /Hr
Considering the operation of 15 hours of filter provide a Pressure Sand filter of 2100 mm dia
with sand as media over layer, under drainpipe, laterals face piping etc.
Activated Carbon Filter:
Flow = 600,000 liter/day
Loading rate = 12 Cumec/Sqm/hr.
Considering the operation of 15 hours of filter provide an Activated carbon filter of 2100
mm diameter with activated carbon filter media with under drainpipe, lateral face piping.
Chlorination:
The filtered water is further chlorinated through an online automatic chlorination system
with electronic dosing pump for disaffection. Provide one no. 300 Lts capacity automatic
Chlorinator with electronic metering pump to ensure the residual chlorine level to be less
than 2 PPM for disinfect ion so that it will not affect the plantations. The Chlorinator shall
be coupled with the filter outlet.
Pumps:
A. Provide 2 Nos. Sewage transfer pumps (one working and one standby)
Capacity : 30.0 KLH @ 10m head
Type : Centrifugal pumps / Submersible
Solid handling size : Up to 10 mm
Duty: To pump the sewage from the Equalization tank to the SBR Tank.
B. Provide 2 No. Sludge transfer
Capacity : 20 KLH/hr @ 10 m head
Type : centrifugal Pumps
Solid handling size : Up to 25 mm
Duty: To pump the sludge from the SBR tank to the Sludge Holding Tank and from there
dried using mechanical filter press.
C. Provide 2 Nos. Filter feed pumps (one working and one standby)
Capacity : 40.0 KLH @ 35 m head
Type : centrifugal pumps, self priming
Solid handling size : Up to 5 mm
Duty: To pump the Treated effluent from the Pre-filtration tank through the Pressure Sand
Filter and Activated Carbon Filter.
THE CIVIL UNITS AND ITS SIZES AS DESIGNED ARE:
Sl. No Name of the Unit Size in m.
1 Bar Screen Chamber (1.0 x 0.6) m
2 Equalization Tank 72 sqm x 2.5m
3 Anoxic Tank 18.75 sqm x 4.0 m
4 MBBR Tank 78.75 sqm x 4.0m
5 Settling Tank 35.0 sqm x 4m
6 Clarified Water Tank 60.0sqm x 3.0m
7 Final effluent tank 67.0sqm x 4.5m
8 Pressure Sand Filter 2100 mm dia and 2000 mm height
9 Activated Carbon Filter 2100 mm dia and 2000 mm height
10 Chlorinator 300 Lts capacity
11 Sludge Holding tank 15 sqm x 4m
Mechanical Equipment Proposed
SL NO ITEM Qty
1 Bar Screen 1 No.
2 Raw Sewage Pumps 2 Nos.
3 Air Blowers 4 Nos.
4 Sludge Transfer pumps 1 No.
5 Pressure Sand Filter 1 No.
6 Activated Carbon Filter 1 No.
7 Filter Feed Pumps 2 Nos.
8 Chlorinator 1 No.
9 Mechanical Filter Press 1 No.
10 MBBR Media 1 Lot
Bar Screen
chamber
PSF
ACF
Chlorine
Dosage
Equalization Tank
5B & 5C) METHOD ADOPTED FOR THE DESIGN
The Sewage Treatment Plant is designed MBBR (Mixed Bed Bio Reactor). The system is
designed for a continuous operation scheme on a 24 x 7 basis.
a) TREATMENT FLOW CHART
350 KLD Raw Sewage
Anoxic Tank
MBBR Tank
Settling Tank
Excess sludge
Disposed in to
Filter Press for
Drying
Clarified Water Tank
Final Holding
Tank
To Reuse for
Flushing /
Gardening/HVAC
purposes
b) DESIGN OF THE INDIVIDUAL UNITS
Bar Screen Chamber:
Provide a chamber of size 1.0 m x 0.60 m to suit sewer gradient to accommodate an
inclined bar screen with opening less than 10 mm. Provide a bar screen of 20 X 6 mm flats
with 10mm spacing in between as coarse bar screen and provide a 1.0 m x 0.60m bar screen
with 10mm sq openings as a Fine Bar Screen.
Equalization tank:
The flow from the bar screen chamber is let into the equalization tank. This tank is
provided to even out the flow variation, and to provide a continuous feed into the
secondary biological treatment units.
Design flow = 350,000 Lit/day
Average flow = 20 Hours
Provide Equalization Tank with a HRT of 6 Hours (holding capacity)
Hence required volume of the tank = 105.00 m3
Provide a tank of 105,000 Lit. Capacity.
The tank size would be 42 sqm x 2.5m (effective volume)
Anoxic Tank:
Flow = 350 KLD.
Average Flow = Plant Capacity / 20 hrs
17.5 m3/hr
HRT = 2.5 Hours
Volume of Anoxic Tank = 43.75 m3
Hence provide an anoxic tank with a volume of ~ 50.00 m3
The tank size would be 12.5 sqm x 4m (effective volume)
MBBR Tank:
Flow = 350 KLD.
MLSS = 5000 mg/L
Food to Mass ratio ( F/M) = 0.135
Total BOD in Kg/day = (BOD in mg/L x Plant Capacity) / 1000
Total BOD in Kg/day = 122.5 kg/day
Volume of Aeration Tank = Total BOD / ( MLSS x F/M Ratio)
= 181 m3
Hence provide an MBBR tank with a volume of ~ 180 m3
The tank size would be 45.00 sqm x 4m (effective volume)
Calculation of Air Volume
"BOD5 after treatment <10 mg/lit
"BOD5 Loading = 350 mg/lit
"Total BOD5 load = 350 x 1000 x 350kg/day
1000000
"Total BOD5 load = 122.5 kg/day
BOD5 load in Kg/day in the aeration tank = 122.5 Kg
Oxygen required in Kg/day = 245 kg/day
(2 kgs of Oxygen is required for every Kg of BOD5 to be removed)
% of Oxygen in air = 0.21
Density of air = 1.2
Air Volume required per day = 972.2 m3 of 02 / day
No. of hours of oxygenation = 18
= 54.01 m3 / hr
Diffuser Transfer efficiency = 54.01 /0.18
(18 % for 4.5m submergence after providing for media loss)
= 300.06 m3 / hr
Hence, Air volume required in Aeration tank = 300 m3
/ hr
Consider 30% extra for equalization tank = 390 m3 / hr
Total Air Volume required = 390 m3 / hr
Therefore Total air requirement in Cum. / Day = 390 m3 / hr
Secondary Clarifier :
Plant Capacity = 350 KLD
Loading Rate = 35.00 m3/sqm/day
Volume Considered in Design = 2 times plant capacity
Surface area of settling tank = Plant Capacity x 2 / Loading Rate
Surface area = 20 m2
= 20 m2
Liquid depth considered in the settling tank = 4 m
Volume of Settling tank = 20 m2
x 4m
Hence provide a settling tank with a volume of ~ 80 m3
The tank size would be 20 sqm x 4m (effective volume)
Clarified Water Tank / Pre filtration Tank :
Plant Capacity = 350 KLD
Average Flow = 17.5 m3/ hr
HRT = 6 hours
Volume of Clarified Water Tank = 105 m3
Hence provide a Clarified water tank with a volume of ~ 105 m3
The tank size would be 35 sqm x 3.0m (effective volume)
Pressure Sand Filter:
Flow = 350,000 Lt/day
Loading rate = 12 Cumec/ Sqm. /Hr
Considering the operation of 15 hours of filter provide a Pressure Sand filter of 1500 mm dia
with sand as media over layer, under drainpipe, laterals face piping etc.
Activated Carbon Filter:
Flow = 350,000 liter/day
Loading rate = 12 Cumec/Sqm/hr.
Considering the operation of 15 hours of filter provide an Activated carbon filter of 1500
mm diameter with activated carbon filter media with under drainpipe, lateral face piping.
Chlorination:
The filtered water is further chlorinated through an online automatic chlorination system
with electronic dosing pump for disaffection. Provide one no. 200 Lts capacity automatic
Chlorinator with electronic metering pump to ensure the residual chlorine level to be less
than 2 PPM for disinfect ion so that it will not affect the plantations. The Chlorinator shall
be coupled with the filter outlet.
Pumps:
A. Provide 2 Nos. Sewage transfer pumps (one working and one standby)
Capacity : 17.5 KLH @ 10m head
Type : Centrifugal pumps / Submersible
Solid handling size : Up to 10 mm
Duty: To pump the sewage from the Equalization tank to the SBR Tank.
B. Provide 2 No. Sludge transfer
Capacity : 20 KLH/hr @ 10 m head
Type : centrifugal Pumps
Solid handling size : Up to 25 mm
Duty: To pump the sludge from the SBR tank to the Sludge Holding Tank and from there
dried using mechanical filter press.
C. Provide 2 Nos. Filter feed pumps (one working and one standby)
Capacity : 23.3 KLH @ 35 m head
Type : centrifugal pumps, self priming
Solid handling size : Up to 5 mm
Duty: To pump the Treated effluent from the Pre-filtration tank through the Pressure Sand
Filter and Activated Carbon Filter.
THE CIVIL UNITS AND ITS SIZES AS DESIGNED ARE:
Sl. No Name of the Unit Size in m.
1 Bar Screen Chamber (1.0 x 0.6) m
2 Equalization Tank 42 sqm x 2.5m
3 Anoxic Tank 12.50 sqm x 4.0 m
4 MBBR Tank 45.00 sqm x 4.0m
5 Settling Tank 23.00 sqm x 3.50 m
6 Clarified Water Tank 35 sqm x 3.0 m
7 Final effluent tank 40.0 sqm x 4.5m
8 Pressure Sand Filter 1500 mm dia and 2000 mm height
9 Activated Carbon Filter 1500 mm dia and 2000 mm height
10 Chlorinator 200 Lts capacity
11 Sludge Holding tank 10 sqm x 4m
Mechanical Equipment Proposed
SL NO ITEM Qty
1 Bar Screen 1 No.
2 Raw Sewage Pumps 2 Nos.
3 Air Blowers 4 Nos.
4 Sludge Transfer pumps 1 No.
5 Pressure Sand Filter 1 No.
6 Activated Carbon Filter 1 No.
7 Filter Feed Pumps 2 Nos.
8 Chlorinator 1 No.
9 Mechanical Filter Press 1 No.
10 MBBR Media 1 Lot
6) CONCLUSIONS:
The STP would be able to treat the sewage to the standards prescribed by the TNPCB with
treated BOD levels less than 20 mg/lit. The treated water is safe to come in contact as the
chlorination is done to kill the bacteria disinfection. The treated water will be consumed in
irrigation, flushing toilets, HVAC purposes as well as washing pavements and driveways.
******
TO DRAINTO DRAIN TO DRAIN
PGPG
PGPG
NRV
DUAL PIPING SYSTEM SCHEMATIC DIAGRAM
BLOCK -1
FLOORSBUILT-UPAREA DEDUCTION
10% NON FSI AREA
100% NON FSI AREA PARKING FSI AREA
BASEMENT FLOOR 10391.73 29.60 0.00 384.88 9977.25 0.00LOWER GROUND 10391.73 29.60 0.00 384.88 9977.25 0.00FLOOR-STILT 7847.07 31.13 624.32 391.88 5275.62 1524.12UPPER STILT 1 7827.09 1086.84 0.00 385.16 6355.09 0.00UPPER STILT 2 7827.09 33.79 13.46 385.16 7394.68 0.00UPPER STILT 3 7827.09 36.99 13.46 441.33 7335.31 0.00FLOOR 01 7432.80 178.90 553.82 340.64 0.00 6359.44FLOOR02 7432.80 178.90 553.82 340.64 0.00 6359.44FLOOR 03 7432.80 178.90 553.82 340.64 0.00 6359.44FLOOR 04 7432.80 178.90 553.82 340.64 0.00 6359.44FLOOR 05 7432.80 178.90 553.82 340.64 0.00 6359.44FLOOR 06 7432.80 178.90 553.82 340.64 0.00 6359.44FLOOR 07 7432.80 178.90 553.82 340.64 0.00 6359.44FLOOR 08 7432.80 178.90 553.82 340.64 0.00 6359.44FLOOR 09 7432.80 178.90 553.82 340.64 0.00 6359.44FLOOR 10 7432.80 178.90 553.82 340.64 0.00 6359.44FLOOR 11 7432.80 178.90 553.82 340.64 0.00 6359.44FLOOR 12 7432.80 178.90 553.82 340.64 0.00 6359.44FLOOR 13 7432.80 178.90 553.82 340.64 0.00 6359.44TOTAL (SqM) 148738.20 3573.65 7850.90 6801.61 46315.20 84196.84
BLOCK – 2
FLOORS DEDUCTION10% NON FSI AREA
100% NON FSI AREA PARKING FSI AREA
LOWER GROUND 5877.18 27.05 0.00 210.44 5639.69 0.005877.18 27.05 0.00 210.44 5639.69 0.005877.18 27.05 0.00 210.44 5639.69 0.00
FLOOR-STILT 4341.34 51.30 610.00 210.44 2522.06 947.54UPPER STILT 1 4341.34 249.22 63.32 210.44 3818.36 0.00UPPER STILT 2 4341.34 38.35 63.32 210.44 4029.23 0.00UPPER STILT 3 4341.34 38.35 63.32 210.44 4029.23 0.00FLOOR 01 4323.15 80.57 251.07 177.82 0.00 3813.69FLOOR02 4323.15 80.57 251.07 177.82 0.00 3813.69FLOOR 03 4323.15 80.57 251.07 177.82 0.00 3813.69FLOOR 04 4323.15 80.57 251.07 177.82 0.00 3813.69FLOOR 05 4323.15 80.57 251.07 177.82 0.00 3813.69FLOOR 06 4323.15 80.57 251.07 177.82 0.00 3813.69FLOOR 07 4323.15 80.57 251.07 177.82 0.00 3813.69FLOOR 08 4323.15 80.57 251.07 177.82 0.00 3813.69FLOOR 09 4323.15 80.57 251.07 177.82 0.00 3813.69FLOOR 10 4323.15 80.57 251.07 177.82 0.00 3813.69FLOOR 11 4323.15 80.57 251.07 177.82 0.00 3813.69FLOOR 12 4323.15 80.57 251.07 177.82 0.00 3813.69FLOOR 13 4323.15 80.57 251.07 177.82 0.00 3813.69TOTAL (SqM) 91197.85 1505.78 4063.87 3784.74 31317.95 50525.51
BLOCK – 3
FLOORS DEDUCTION10% NON FSI AREA
100% NON FSI AREA PARKING FSI AREA
LOWER GROUND 6006.98 26.75 0.00 210.19 5770.04 0.006006.98 26.75 0.00 210.19 5770.04 0.006006.98 26.75 0.00 210.19 5770.04 0.00
FLOOR-STILT 4330.89 51.55 582.40 210.19 2547.76 938.99UPPER STILT 1 4330.89 222.84 0.00 210.19 3897.86 0.00UPPER STILT 2 4330.89 38.59 0.00 210.19 4082.11 0.00UPPER STILT 3 4330.89 38.59 0.00 210.19 4082.11 0.00FLOOR 01 4312.69 76.65 240.96 177.83 0.00 3817.25FLOOR02 4312.69 76.65 240.96 177.83 0.00 3817.25FLOOR 03 4312.69 76.65 240.96 177.83 0.00 3817.25FLOOR 04 4312.69 76.65 240.96 177.83 0.00 3817.25FLOOR 05 4312.69 76.65 240.96 177.83 0.00 3817.25FLOOR 06 4312.69 76.65 240.96 177.83 0.00 3817.25FLOOR 07 4312.69 76.65 240.96 177.83 0.00 3817.25FLOOR 08 4312.69 76.65 240.96 177.83 0.00 3817.25FLOOR 09 4312.69 76.65 240.96 177.83 0.00 3817.25FLOOR 10 4312.69 76.65 240.96 177.83 0.00 3817.25FLOOR 11 4312.69 76.65 240.96 177.83 0.00 3817.25FLOOR 12 4312.69 76.65 240.96 177.83 0.00 3817.25FLOOR 13 4312.69 76.65 240.96 177.83 0.00 3817.25TOTAL (SqM) 91409.47 1428.27 3714.88 3783.12 31919.96 50563.24
CZ Pallikaranai _ Area Statement
BUILT-UPAREA
BUILT-UPAREA
Appendix
No.21-239/2017-IA-III
Goverment of India
Minister of Enviroment,Forest and Climate Change
Impact Assessment Division
***
Indira Paryavaran Bhavan,
Vayu Wing,3rd Floor,Aliganj,
Jor Bagh Road,New Delhi-110003
07 Sep 2017
To,
M/s K RAHEJA CORP
C/o Ramakrishnan Sankaran, K Raheja Corp, Regus olympia, Olympia Tech Park, Level-2,
Altius Block, No-1, SIDCO Industrial Estate, Guindy, Chennai,
Chennai-600032
Tamil Nadu
Tel.No.044-42994023; Email:[email protected]
Sir/Madam,
This has reference to the proposal submitted in the Ministry of Environment, Forest
and Climate Change to prescribe the Terms of Reference (TOR) for undertaking detailed EIA
study for the purpose of obtaining Environmental Clearance in accordance with the provisions of
the EIA Notification, 2006. For this purpose, the proponent had submitted online information in the
prescribed format (Form-1 ) along with a Pre-feasibility Report. The details of the proposal are
given below:
1. Proposal No.: IA/TN/NCP/66796/2017
2. Name of the Proposal: Construction of Proposed MSB IT/ITES Building
3. Category of the Proposal: New Construction Projects and Industrial
Estates
4. Project/Activity applied for: 8(b) Townships and Area Development
projects.
5. Date of submission for TOR: 18 Jul 2017
In this regard, under the provisions of the EIA Notification 2006 as amended, the Standard TOR
for the purpose of preparing environment impact assessment report and environment
management plan for obtaining prior environment clearance is prescribed with public consultation
as follows:
STANDARD TERMS OF REFERENCE (TOR) FOR EIA/EMP REPORT FOR PROJECTS/ACTIVITIES REQUIRING ENVIRONMENT CLEARANCE
8(b): STANDARD TERMS OF REFERENCE FOR CONDUCTINGENVIRONMENT IMPACT ASSESSMENT STUDY FOR TOWNSHIP/AREA DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS INFORMATION TO BEINCLUDED IN EIA/EMP REPORT
1) Examine details of land use as per Master Plan and land use around 10 km radius of the project site.Analysis should be made based on latest satellite imagery for land use with raw images.
2) Submit details of environmentally sensitive places, land acquisition status, rehabilitation ofcommunities/ villages and present status of such activities.
3) Examine baseline environmental quality along with projected incremental load due to the project.
4) Environmental data to be considered in relation to the project development would be (a) land, (b)groundwater, (c) surface water, (d) air, (e) bio-diversity, (f) noise and vibrations, (g) socio economicand health.
5) Submit a copy of the contour plan with slopes, drainage pattern of the site and surrounding area.
6) Submit the details of the trees to be felled for the project.
7) Submit the present land use and permission required for any conversion such as forest, agricultureetc.
8) Submit Roles and responsibility of the developer etc for compliance of environmental regulationsunder the provisions of EP Act.
9) Ground water classification as per the Central Ground Water Authority.
10) Examine the details of Source of water, water requirement, use of treated waste water and preparea water balance chart.
11) Rain water harvesting proposals should be made with due safeguards for ground water quality.Maximize recycling of water and utilization of rain water. Examine details.
12) Examine soil characteristics and depth of ground water table for rainwater harvesting.
13) Examine details of solid waste generation treatment and its disposal.
14) Examine and submit details of use of solar energy and alternative source of energy to reduce thefossil energy consumption.
15) DG sets are likely to be used during construction and operational phase of the project. Emissionsfrom DG sets must be taken into consideration while estimating the impacts on air environment.Examine and submit details.
16) Examine road/rail connectivity to the project site and impact on the traffic due to the proposedproject. Present and future traffic and transport facilities for the region should be analysed withmeasures for preventing traffic congestion and providing faster trouble free system to reach differentdestinations in the city.
STANDARD TERMS OF REFERENCE (TOR) FOR EIA/EMP REPORT FORPROJECTS/ACTIVITIES REQUIRING ENVIRONMENT CLEARANCE
17) A detailed traffic and transportation study should be made for existing and projected passenger andcargo traffic.
18) Examine the details of transport of materials for construction which should include source andavailability.
19) Examine separately the details for construction and operation phases both for EnvironmentalManagement Plan and Environmental Monitoring Plan with cost and parameters.
20) Submit details of a comprehensive Disaster Management Plan including emergency evacuationduring natural and man-made disaster.
*****
COMPLIANCE TO TERMS OF REFERENCE - STANDARD TOR
Sl. No. Terms of Reference Compliance
1. Examine details of land use as per
Master plan and land use around
10 km radius of the project site. Analysis
should be made based on latest satellite
imagery for land use with raw images.
Land use is Commercial as per CMDA Master
plan for Pallikaranai. Attached as Annexure.
Land use around 10 Km radius is as given in
Chapter 3, Table 3-3.
2. Submit details of environmentally
sensitive places, land acquisition status,
rehabilitation of communities/villages and
present status of such activities
Environmentally sensitive areas given in
Chapter 3, Table 3-1.
3. Examine baseline environmental
quality along with projected incremental
load due to the project.
Baseline environmental quality along with
projected incremental load details are discussed
in Chapter 3
4. Environmental data to be
considered in relation to the project
development would be (a) land, (b) ground
water, (c) surface water (d)air, (e)
biodiversity, (f) noise and vibrations, (g)
socio economic and health.
Environmental data to be considered in relation
to the project development are discussed in
Chapter 3
5. Submit a copy of the contour plan with
slopes, drainage pattern of the site and
surrounding area. Any obstruction of the
same by the project.
The contour plan with slopes, drainage pattern of
the site and surrounding area is given in chapter
2, as Figure 2-6.
6. Submit the details of trees to be
felled for the project
No trees will be felled as the proposed
MSB IT/ITES is already vacant.
7. Submit the present land use and
permission required for any conversion such
as forest, agriculture etc.
Present land use is commercial as per CMDA
Masterplan (Attached as Annexure) and no
conversion is hence involved.
8. Submit roles and responsibilities of the
developer etc for compliance of
environmental regulations under the
provisions of the EP Act.
Roles and Responsibilities of the developer are
given in Chapter 9.
Sl. No. Terms of Reference Compliance
9. Ground water classification as per
the Central Ground Water Authority
As per GO No.52, the site comes under safe zone
10. Examine the details of source of water,
water requirement, use of treated
wastewater and prepare a water balance
chart.
Total water requirement is 1431 KLD of which
874 KLD is fresh water. Water will be sourced
from CWSSB. Details are given in Chapter 2,
Section 2.6. Water balance diagram is attached
as Annexure.
11. Rainwater harvesting proposals
should be made with due safeguards for
groundwater quality. Maximize recycling
of water and utilization of wastewater.
Examine details.
Rainwater harvesting Details are discussed in
Chapter 9, Section 9.5.
12. Examine soil characteristics and
depth of ground water table for rainwater
harvesting.
Soil characteristics and depth of ground
water table for rainwater harvesting are
discussed in Chapter 9, Section 9.5.
13. Examine details of solid waste
generation treatment and its disposal.
Solid waste generated is reacted in house in
organic convertor is disposed by Treatment in
Bio Methanation facility and the inorganic waste
is handed over to authorized vendors. Detailed
in Chapter 2, section 2.9
14. Examine and submit the use of solar energy
and alternative source of energy to reduce
the fossil energy consumption. Energy
conservation and energy efficiency.
Energy conservation and energy efficiency are
discussed in Chapter 2, Section 2.4
15. DG sets are likely to be used
during, construction and operation phases
of the project. Emission from DG sets
must be taken into consideration while
estimating the impacts on air environment.
Examine and submit details.
GLCs for DG emission detailed in Chapter 4,
section 4.3.8
Sl. No. Terms of Reference Compliance
16. Examine road/ rail connectivity to the
project site and impact on the traffic due to
the proposed project. Present and future
traffic and transport facilities for the region
should be analyzed with measures for
preventing traffic congestion and providing
faster trouble free system to reach
different destinations in the city.
The site is well connected through Pallavaram –
Thoraipakkam road which is state highway 109.
Detailed Traffic studies are as given in Chapter 3,
Section 3.11 and impacts as given in
Chapter 4, Section 4.3.9
17. A detailed traffic and transportation
study should be made for existing and
projected passenger and cargo traffic.
Detailed Traffic studies are as given in
Chapter 3, Section 3.12.6 and impacts as
given in Chapter 4, Section 4.3.9
18. Examine the details of transport of
materials for construction which should
include source and availability.
The details of transport of materials for
construction are discussed in Chapter 2,
Section 2.5
19. Examine separately the details for
construction and operation phases for both
Environmental Management Plan and
Environmental Monitoring Plan with cost and
parameters
The details for construction and operation
phases for both Environmental Management
Plan and Environmental Monitoring Plan
are discussed in Chapter 6, section 6.3
20. Submit details of a Comprehensive Disaster
Management Plan including emergency
evacuation during natural and manmade
disasters
Details of a Comprehensive Disaster
Management Plan including emergency
evacuation are discussed in Chapter 7, section
7.2
5