Environmental and Exploration Geophysics IIpages.geo.wvu.edu/~wilson/geol554/GPR_16/GPR2-09.pdf ·...

23
1 Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography Environmental and Exploration Geophysics II tom.h.wilson [email protected] Department of Geology and Geography West Virginia University Morgantown, WV Radar Methods + Odds Radar Methods + Odds - - n n - - Ends Ends Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography Thinning layer response and resolution considerations. The vertical resolution limits encountered in seismic have a nearly identical parallel in GPR

Transcript of Environmental and Exploration Geophysics IIpages.geo.wvu.edu/~wilson/geol554/GPR_16/GPR2-09.pdf ·...

  • 1

    Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography

    Environmental and Exploration Geophysics II

    [email protected]

    Department of Geology and GeographyWest Virginia University

    Morgantown, WV

    Radar Methods + OddsRadar Methods + Odds--nn--EndsEnds

    Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography

    Thinning layer response and resolution considerations.

    The vertical resolution limits encountered in seismic have a nearly identical parallel in GPR

  • 2

    Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography

    Horizontal resolution - Huygen’s wavelet & diffraction perspectives the Fresnel zone

    Destructive interference

    Constructive interference

    Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography

    Horizontal Resolution: The Fresnel Zone

  • 3

    Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and GeographyPerry-Castaneda Library Map Collection

    • Location near Hobbes, NM• West Pearl Queen formation, ~4500 feet deep• About 20 years of oil and gas production• A few years of inactivity• Injection of ~2100 tons CO2 over 2 months• Subsequent production

    GPR case history: CO2 leakage at a carbon sequestration pilot.

    Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography

    “MM&V is defined as the capability to measure the amount of CO2 stored at a specific sequestration site, monitor the site for leaks or other deterioration of storage integrity over time, and to verify that the CO2 is stored in a way that is permanent and not harmful to the host ecosystem…Subsurface MM&V involves tracking the fate of the CO2within the geologic formations underlying the earth and possible migration to the surface.”

    - Sequestration Roadmap, 2004

    MM&V activities cover a lot of ground

  • 4

    Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography

    Geologic Setting

    Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography

    The pilot site is located approximately 25 miles southwest of Hobbs, NM. Oil and gas fields in the area are highlighted in red. Scholle (2000) (see http://geoinfo.nmt.edu/staff/scholle/guadalupe.html#genset). An introduction and virtual geologic field trip to the Permian reef complex, Guadalupe and Delaware mountains, New Mexico-West Texas).

  • 5

    Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography

    From Carpenter (2005)

    • Nine wells in immediate area• Several hundreds in

    surrounding area• 3-D seismic survey

    First, geologic characterization of deep strata for carbon sequestration

    Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography

    Geophysicists/geologists provide the reservoir model

    • Porosity and permeability maps generated• Production history• 4-D seismic for validation

    Simulation of flow in complex reservoirs

  • 6

    Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography

    Short photo lineaments (yellow) are shown on an orthophoto of the test site. The locations of injection well (red) and capillary absorption tube samplers (black) are spotted on the photo.

    Remote sensing evaluation of structural imprint

    Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography

    Rose diagram of photolineaments picked from a contrast enhanced digital copy of a 1949 black and white aerial photo of the area (left)

    surrounding the West Pearl Queen pilot injection well and orthophoto on the right

  • 7

    Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography

    GPR unitSensors & Software Inc. –

    Smart CartVisit http://www.sensoft.ca/

    Looking into the near-surface depositional environments

    Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography

    Shallow Diffraction

    Diffraction with

    velocity of 0.19m/nsShallow

    Diffraction

    Diffraction with

    velocity of 0.19m/ns

    Diffraction hyperbola having a velocity of 0.19 m/ns is displayed next to a shallow diffraction originating in the near surface sand cover.

  • 8

    Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography

    West Pearl Queen Field Area

    Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography

    Hall (2002)Phillips (1999)

    The Mescalero caliche is a calcified soil horizon that developed throughout the area about 90,000 to 400,000 years ago

  • 9

    Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography

    Mescalero caliche

    Plio-Pleistocene

    Upper MioceneOgallala Group

    γ ray 0 10 20 30 40 50

    dept

    h (fe

    et)

    0

    10

    20

    30

    40

    50

    Quaternary

    Gamma ray log from the Stivason #5 well 400 meters east of the Stivason#4 injection well. The low gamma ray response between 4 and 9 feet subsurface is associated with the Mescalero caliche.

    Well control helps even for very shallow exploration targets

    Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography

    634900 635000 635100 635200 635300 6354003610400

    3610500

    3610600

    3610700

    3610800

    3610900

    3611000

    36933694369536963697369836993700370137023703370437053706370737083709371037113712

    Local Topography in Area of GPR Survey West Pearl Queen Pilot Site

    Feet

    Elevation data provided by Bob Benson Colorado School of MinesElevations were surveyed for seismic source and receiver locations at the site

    You need to know the topography

  • 10

    Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography

    634900 635000 635100 635200 635300 6354003610400

    3610500

    3610600

    3610700

    3610800

    3610900

    3611000

    3672

    3674

    3676

    3678

    3680

    3682

    3684

    3686

    3688

    3690

    3692

    3694

    3696

    3698

    3700

    Structure on Top of the Mescalero CalicheDerived from Calculated Velocity of 0.2 m/ns

    Elev

    atio

    n (fe

    et)

    634900 635000 635100 635200 635300 6354003610400

    3610500

    3610600

    3610700

    3610800

    3610900

    3611000

    36863687368836893690369136923693369436953696369736983699370037013702370337043705

    Elev

    atio

    n (fe

    et)

    Structure on Top of Mescalero CalicheCorrection Velocity Set at the Anomalously Low Value of 0.1 m/ns

    Relative drop of about 4 feet

    Structure and velocity

    Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography

    Stivason #4CO2 injection well

    Structure of the Mescalero caliche is superimposed on an orthophoto of the injection site. GPR survey lines are shown in yellow. Locations of the injection well, CATS, and interpreted

    faults are also shown.

    CATS stands for capillary adsorption tube sampler

  • 11

    Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography

    0.020

    0.030

    0.040

    1.050.0100.0150.0200.0- 2 -

    250.0300.0350.0374.0SP:

    0.020

    0.030

    0.040

    GPR profile located 275 meters northwest of the injection well illustrates the general character of the reflection events from the Mescalero caliche

    observed across the site.

    Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography

    Stivason #5Thickness of the Mescalero calicheestimated from interpreted two-way radar reflection travel times through the caliche using an interval velocity of 0.15m/ns. Interpreted faults/fracture zones and areas of missing caliche are highlighted.

  • 12

    Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography

    Missing caliche zone

    Missing caliche zone Abrupt thinning and

    disappearance of calichereflection events are illustrated

    in this GPR profile.

    Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography

    Concentrations of PDCH measured during a 54-day exposure period are superimposed on an orthophoto of the pilot site. The locations of the injection well, CATS, interpreted faults, and eroded caliche areas are shown for reference.

    Perfluorocarbon tracers (PFCs)

  • 13

    Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography

    PTCH concentrations measured during the 54-day exposure period.

    Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography

    PDCB concentrations measured during the 54 day exposure period.

  • 14

    Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography

    Characterization: Surface to reservoir

    Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography

    Mechanical Layer Formation

    Depth to Topft

    Depth to Baseft

    Thicknessft

    Average Densityg/cm3

    Average Poisson's Ratio

    Young's Modulus (Pascals)

    1 Ogallala 0 98 98 1.66 0.30 4.79x107

    2 Chinle 98 853 755 1.76 0.257 1.94x1010

    3 Santa Rosa 853 1336 483 2.00 0.29 2.76x1010

    4 Tri/Perm undiff. 1336 1714 378 2.56 0.24 1.53x1010

    5 Rustler 1714 1907 193 2.48 0.30 6.39x1010

    6 Salado and Castile 1907 3317 1410 2.11 0.324 3.59x1010

    7 Tansill 3317 3523 206 2.92 0.297 7.01 x1010

    8 Yates 3523 3810 287 2.87 0.293 6.44 x1010

    9 Upper Seven Rivers 3810 3975 165 2.63 0.282 4.8 x1010

    10 Lower Seven Rivers 3975 4484 509 2.77 0.289 7.81 x1010

    11 Upper Queen/Shattuck 4484 4538 54 2.54 0.249 4.13 x1010

    12 Lower Queen 4538 5026 488 2.77 0.288 7.86 x1010

    13 Grayburg 5026 5125 99 2.84 0.297 9.54 x1010

    Mechanical properties

  • 15

    Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography

    0

    0.02

    0.04

    0.06

    0.08

    0.1

    0.12

    0.14

    0.16

    0.18

    0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000

    Distance (m)

    Vert

    ical

    dis

    plac

    emen

    t (m

    m)

    Figure 8. Vertical Displacement at Ground Surface

    Displacement at t = 150 days

    Displacement at t = 53 days

    Geomechanical Simulations

    Bromhal et al. (2005)

    Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography

    • Atmospheric transport • Diffusion in near-surface

    Near-surface flow models can help in locating samplers, examining results.

    Bromhal et al. (2005)

  • 16

    Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography

    On the way to Pump Canyon

    Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography

  • 17

    Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography

    Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography

    The CO2 injection well

  • 18

    Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography

    Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography

    11m Massive Sand

    1.2m Shale

  • 19

    Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography

    Locating near-surface migration pathways using terrain conductivity data

    Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography

    From Pinnacle (2009)

    Surface deformation from CO2 injection? Tiltmeter observations

  • 20

    Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography

    Modelers view the Fruitland as a series of three coals that have uniform thickness throughout the area.

    Fassett’s (1997) regional correlations indicate presence of considerable stratigraphic heterogeneity on a regional scale

    Regional cross section from Fassett (1997) spans about 3 miles

    Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography

    Laura Wray (2000)

    Individual log and generalized schematic representations of the reservoir

  • 21

    Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography

    3D Seismic suggests the reservoir is much more complex

    Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography

    Local discontinuity

  • 22

    Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography

    Tuning cube and spectral decomposition

    Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography

    Frequency slicing

  • 23

    Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography