Environment Presentation to CBE 497 By R.A. Hawrelak 12 Feb, 2002.

21
Environment Presentation to CBE 497 By R.A. Hawrelak 12 Feb, 2002

Transcript of Environment Presentation to CBE 497 By R.A. Hawrelak 12 Feb, 2002.

Page 1: Environment Presentation to CBE 497 By R.A. Hawrelak 12 Feb, 2002.

Environment

Presentation to CBE 497 By

R.A. Hawrelak12 Feb, 2002

Page 2: Environment Presentation to CBE 497 By R.A. Hawrelak 12 Feb, 2002.

Outline

• EH&S Department at Dow in Sarnia.

• 1969 MOE Charges Dow with 100+ Violations – PO Plant Example.

• pH Control Problem and Solution.

• Mixing for pH Control.

• API Storage Tank Venting Problem.

• Recent Nova Benzene Spill.

Page 3: Environment Presentation to CBE 497 By R.A. Hawrelak 12 Feb, 2002.

Environmental, Health & Safety

• Environmental Control Mgr (PEng)• 3 Process Engineers (PEng)• 3 Technicians (Fish Pond + Field sampling)• 1 Industrial Hygienist (BSc.)

• Health Manager (Dr.)• 3 Nurses

• Safety and Loss Prevention Mgr (PEng)• 3 Process Engineers (PEng)• Emergency Response Co-ord (PEng) + Selected Group• Fire and Security Department• Transport. Emerg. (Plant Foreman + Selected Operators)

Page 4: Environment Presentation to CBE 497 By R.A. Hawrelak 12 Feb, 2002.

1969 Dow Blue Book• MOE Charged Dow with over 100 violations in

20 Chemical Plants• Greatest Problems found in the Old PO Plant.

• White Streak CaCO3 in the St Clair River.• CaCO3 Land Fill problem.• PDC, DCIPE discharge to St Clair River.• pH problem in hyrdrolyzer effluent.• Cl2 discharge to atmosphere.• C3H6 and C3H8 discharge to atmosphere.• Explosions in Degasser.

Page 5: Environment Presentation to CBE 497 By R.A. Hawrelak 12 Feb, 2002.

New Propylene Oxide Process

Page 6: Environment Presentation to CBE 497 By R.A. Hawrelak 12 Feb, 2002.

PO Reactions

• Cl2 + C3H6 + H2O > PCH + HCl• PCH + HCl > PDC + H2O (Waste)• PDC + Cl2 > DCIPE + HCl (Waste)• PCH + NaOH > PO + NaCl + H2O• HCl + NaOH > NaCl + H2O (pH Prob)

• PDC, DCIPE, NaCl, H20, NaOH &/or HCl to Special BIOX Plant

Page 7: Environment Presentation to CBE 497 By R.A. Hawrelak 12 Feb, 2002.

pH Control on the Internet

Have you checked these web sites out?

http://www.omega.com/techref/phtour.html

This one compares a poor installation with a better one. Note the two tank option.

http://csd.newcastle.edu.au/control/simulations/ph_sim.html

This one gives a simulation of different pH control schemes. It seems to favourthe three tank system (Part 4) that I used in some applications at Dow.

Page 8: Environment Presentation to CBE 497 By R.A. Hawrelak 12 Feb, 2002.

This is Poor pH Control

Page 9: Environment Presentation to CBE 497 By R.A. Hawrelak 12 Feb, 2002.

pH12 to 2 Is A Control Problem

Page 10: Environment Presentation to CBE 497 By R.A. Hawrelak 12 Feb, 2002.

Multiple Tank Solution

Page 11: Environment Presentation to CBE 497 By R.A. Hawrelak 12 Feb, 2002.

Good pH Control

• Small tank control to pH 9.6

• 2nd tank 20 times larger than first tank and controls pH to 8.3.

• 3rd tank is 20 times larger again and controls pH to 7.0

• Very costly and takes lots of operator attention.

• Check real time pH control on Internet.

Page 12: Environment Presentation to CBE 497 By R.A. Hawrelak 12 Feb, 2002.

Mixing for pH Control

• RAH CD File on Mixing.

• Sizing of Tank and Agitator

• Blending Example 1.

• pH Control example 2.

• Draft Tube for agitator free mixing.

Page 13: Environment Presentation to CBE 497 By R.A. Hawrelak 12 Feb, 2002.

API Storage Tank Venting

• Venting problem during Pump In.• Venting problem as temperature rises during the

day.• Benzene classified as a carcinogen.• MOE regulation went from 3 ppmv at company

fence line to 1 ppmv at point of impingement.• Initially Eng’g showed 674,000 lbs lost/yr.• BLOSS Finally showed 122,000 lbs lost/yr.• Installed new , stronger tank & burned vents.

Page 14: Environment Presentation to CBE 497 By R.A. Hawrelak 12 Feb, 2002.

Loading Logistics

From Boat Shell Essolb/hr 575,000 140,000 165,000No per Yr 4.0 3.0 24.0Duration, hrs 20.87 35.71 15.15USGPM 1,308.5 318.6 375.5MM lbs/batch 12.00 5.00 2.50

Maximumm USGPM Transfer to Tank No. 4 100Normal USGPM Transfer to Tank No. 4 40

Page 15: Environment Presentation to CBE 497 By R.A. Hawrelak 12 Feb, 2002.

Average Daily Temperatures

AVERAGE DAILY AIR TEMP

0.00

10.00

20.00

30.00

40.00

50.00

60.00

70.00

80.00

90.00

0 5 10 15 20 25 30

AMBAIR°F

J AN

FEB

MAR

APR

MAY

J UN

J UL

AUG

SEP

OCT

NOV

DEC

MAX

MIN

FREEZE

2AM

Basis: J .R. Beckmann Ind. Eng. Chem. Process Dev. 20, 646-651

7AM 12 NOON 5 PM 10 PM 2 AM

Max Liq Sum

Min Liq Winter

Freeze Pt.

Page 16: Environment Presentation to CBE 497 By R.A. Hawrelak 12 Feb, 2002.

Tank Levels

Fig 3: Minimum Inventory in D-14401, Yearly Level Profile

0.00

5.00

10.00

15.00

20.00

25.00

30.00

35.00

40.00

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

3.5

4.0

4.5

5.0

5.5

6.0

6.5

7.0

7.5

8.0

8.5

9.0

9.5

10.0

10.5

11.0

11.5

12.0

LiqLevFt.

Max Liq Lev = 27.2 ft.Avg Liq Lev = 15.6 ft.Min Liq Lev = 2.0 ft.

Yearly Benzene Breathing Loss = 122,020 lbs

J uly J ulyMaySep Nov J an Mar

Page 17: Environment Presentation to CBE 497 By R.A. Hawrelak 12 Feb, 2002.

Nova Benzene Spill• Dec 16, 2000, 8:45 AM detected odour.• 1 inch line split spilling benzene, toluene and

xylene – leak found and corrected.• 6 inch line split goes undetected for 12 hours

spilling 1,000,000 litres of benzene (30%) and toluene (70%).

• Dow operator notifies Nova of Spill.• Spill detected and stopped.• Line failure due to water hammer or failure to

turn off line steam tracing on blocked flow (liq expansion).

Page 18: Environment Presentation to CBE 497 By R.A. Hawrelak 12 Feb, 2002.

Nova Benzene Spill cont’d

• No emergency response warnings given to Corunna and Froomfield residents.

• Over 100 residence received high dose of benzene.

• 10 operators exposed to extremely high benzene exposure (2% by vol).

• Leukemia now known to be “Triggered” by high benzene exposure in rats. In past ten years, 3 operators have died with leukemia.

Page 19: Environment Presentation to CBE 497 By R.A. Hawrelak 12 Feb, 2002.

Nova Conducts Studies

• Nova cannot determine evaporation rates.• RAH asked for help.• 1,000,000 litres.• 6 inch depth.• 164 ft. by 427 ft.• 3.3 mph wind.• 19,533 lb/hr evaporation rate.• 98 hours to evaporate.• Did not apply foam till after 2 days.

Page 20: Environment Presentation to CBE 497 By R.A. Hawrelak 12 Feb, 2002.

Recent Spills In Sarnia

• Nova could be facing $2MM in fine after being charged for Dec 16, 2000 spill.

• $2MM charge to Shell for Mar 8, 2000 spill.

• $1MM charge to Ceda-Reactor,a contractor at Shell.

• $0.32MM charge to Dow on March 22, 2000 for latex plant spill.

• Sarnia CAER head replaced.

Page 21: Environment Presentation to CBE 497 By R.A. Hawrelak 12 Feb, 2002.

End of Presentation.

• Good luck on applying environmental aspects to your final report.