ENTIRE ---- A MILL SURVEYinfohouse.p2ric.org/ref/31/30280.pdf · Trash analysis by Shirley Analyser...

A MILL SURVEY BIND ENTIRE . ---- NO COV'

iz

I

THE NATIONAL COTTON COUNCIL

The National Cotton Council is the only central organization representing the 12 million people who make up the American cotton industry.

Like the Congress of the United States, it is a representative body. It is composed of 244 delegates selected by the nation's cotton farmers,ginners,warehousemen,merchants,spinners, and cottonseed crushers through their own state organizations .

.>

Each branch of the cotton industry has equal representation in the National Cotton Council. Each of the s i x branches, voting separately, must approve every recommendation by a two-thirds majority, thus assuring complete unity of purpose and action.

The one goal of the National Cotton Council is to increase the consumption of American cotton, cottonseed, and their products, both at home and abroad. It seeks that goal through com- prehensive programs of promotion, research and production efficiency.

3

tt

I 1

TABLE OF CONTENTS

INTRODUCTION. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . REASONS FOR THE SURVEY. . . RECENT TRENDS I N FACTORS WHICH AFF'ECJ! WASTE

TREND I N AVERAGE INDUSTRY WASTE

T H E S U R V E Y I T S E L F .

INTERPRETATION OF RESULTS 0

INDEX OF FABRIC AND YARN CLASSIFICATIONS. . . . . . . INDEX OF PARTICIPATING MILLS (By C o d e ) . . . . . . . . Y I L L R E P O R T S . . . . 0

("

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

Grateful acknowledgement is made t o t h e i n d i v i d u a l s and o rgan iza t ions whose cooperat ion and advice made t h i s r e p o r t poss ib l e , and t o t h e many m i l l s whose d a t a on processing waste was cont r ibu ted f o r use i n

t h i s survey.

E, W. Br ingle , Southern Webbing M i l l s , Inc. Greensboro, N. C.

S. T. Burley, U.S. Dept. of Agr icu l ture , AMs, Washington, D. C.

J. L. Delany, Joanna Cotton M i l l s Company Joanna, S. C.

J. P. E l t i n g , The Kendall Company Paw Creek, N. C.

J. McCutcheon, Leward Cotton M i l l s , Inc. Worthvi l le , N. C.

D. Nickerson, U.S. Dept. of Agriculture, AMs, Washington, D. C.

J. I. T e a t , Southeastern Engineering Company Char lo t t e , N. C.

and t o t h e members of t h e Research and Technical Se rv ices Committee of t h e American Cotton

Manufacturers In s t i t u t e

INTRODUCT ION

In P~OC3eSSin cot ton t e x t i l e s from f i b e r t o f in i shed product, a port ion of

too short t o be spun; sand and earth p a r t i c l e s from t h e s o i l in which the p lan t grewiand leaf, stem and seed particles from the co t ton plant. Processing waste, horever,does not consist of short fibers and foreign matter alone--useable f i b e r a l s o find8 its way i n t o the w a s t e house through breakage aad i n e f f i c i e n c i e s . i n processing,

The percentage of waste removed var ies from m i l l t o m i l l , and for d i f f e r e n t construct ions in t h e same m i l l . T h i s survey contains information supplied by more than 200 m i l l s during 1956 and 1957, covering 27 f ab r i c and 13 y a r n classi- f i c a t i o n s manufactured Srom 1 9 5 6 crop cotton. Its purpose is t o determine as accurately as possible (1)average t o t a l waste, (2)waste removed a t each process, (3)average raw stock c h a r a c t e r i s t i c s , and(4) machinery and production data where it m o s t a f f e c t s cot ton waste i n t h e manufacture of a range of yarns and fabrics.

the r a w s tock use 8 is always removed as w a s t e . Th i s waste is composed of f ibers

REASONS FOR THE SURVEY

This survey w a s prompted by the market research need f o r up-to-date information on average waste removed from cot ton during its manufacture. Such information is used i n s tud ie s which measure the d i s t r ibu t ion of co t ton i n t o various end use products, consumption f igu res f o r items ranging i n con- s t r u c t i o n from coarse duck t o f i n e combed lawn. Quantitative comparisons between such d iverse items are impossible, however, unless a common denominator, such as bales of cot ton, is used. It is necessary, therefore , that end products be translated back t o the number of bales of cot ton necessary t o manufacture that product. For example, statistical r epor t s show how many cot ton shirts are made each year. Cutting losses are added t o t h e yardage required t o make the s h i r t s , and appropriate conversion f ac to r s based on accurate waste data are used t o add back w a s t e removed during manufacture of the fabric. Thus, the number of bales of co t ton required t o "Cotton Counts Its Cue to"8" (1) , a statist ical market report of the National Cotton Council, makes tnese marrret measurements each year, providing the industry wi th a clear p ic ture of the r e l a t i v e size of various markets f o r cot ton in over 400 end uses. I t also makes possible measurement of trends in these uses from year t o pear. Current w a s t e factors are the 8l l -hpartant key t o t r a n s l a t i n g end products accurately iP t o bales of cotton.

Current w a s t e f i gu res are a l s o required in other economic s tud ie s which compare m i l l cos t s of cot ton and competing fibers. These depend not only on average total w a s t e f o r each fabric c l a s s i f i c a t i o n , but requi re breakdowns of the t o t a l i n t o individual w a s t e components a t each process. In t h i s way, step- by-step cost comparisons can be made between the competing fibers.

Aside from its primary purpose of providing current data for market and economic s tudies , the information contained in t h i s survey can be a valuable aid t o the t e x t i l e m i l l . "he survey's lists of raw stock, production, and waste data make it possible f o r m i l l management t o compare its operation w i t h other m i l l s producing the same yarn or f ab r i c , and provide an opportunity for m i l l s t o check on t h e i r own cont ro l of waste.

and which give

produce the s h i r t s can be determined.

RECENF TRENDS I N FACTORS WHICH AF"X WASTE

Waste conversion f a c t o r s cur ren t ly in use by the Council*s Market Research Section, and by other organizations which do similar work, are based on data gathered about 26 yeam ago. They were obtained and published by the Agricul- tural Mjuetment Administration (2) in December 1933, and revlsed in 1942. An

D. H. HILL LIBRARY North Carolina State College

- 1 -

inves t iga t ion of cot ton 's h i s tory during t h i s time has brought t o l i g h t some i n t e r e s t i n g f a c t s and has emphasized the need f o r an up-dating of waste informa- t ion . During the past 25 years, important changes occurred in harvest ing and ginning methods, and s ign i f i can t advances were made in cleaning co t ton a t t h e m i l l . Cotton v a r i e t i e s , and consequently co t ton fiber characteristics, also changed during the same period. Each of these f a c t o r s exe r t s an important in- f luence on cot ton processing waste.

Grade

Ranked by Webb and Richardson(3) as f i r s t in importance among f iber proper- ties a f f e c t i n g waste, grade is not only a funct ion of t rash ,or non-lint content , but also of color and preparation. Each of t h e three f a c t o r s has a d e f i n i t e in- f luence on waste. The quant i ty of fore ign matter in cot ton ind ica tes harvest ing and ginning ef f ic iency , co lor is a funct ion of weather exposure or possible at- tack by insects or bacteria, and preparat ion reflects the effect of s torage and handling prior t o ginning, and care exercised i n t he ginning operation.

Figure 1 shows average grade index of the U. S. Crop from 1928 through 1957, (4). To determine average grade f o r each year, the numerical value of each grade w a s weighted by the number of bales of that grade produced. Connecting the five-year averages is a dotted l i n e which d i sc loses a t rend f o r t he chart. A rather steady decrease in grade index (or increase in t h e quant i ty of lower grades produced) is shown u n t i l 1946.For t h e pas t t en years the t rend l i n e shows a general l eve l l i ng of f .

-

GRADE INDEX OF U.S. COTTON 1928-1957

GM 105 SM '041

901 L M ~ ~ ~ I ~ I I ~ I ~ I I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I I I I l l I

'30 '35 '40 '45 '50 '55

FIGURe 1. Grade index of U.S. Cotton from 1928to1957. Dotted l i n e connects 5-year averages and

serves as a t rend l i n e f o r the graph.

Data from USDA, AMs, "Cotton: Grade Index of Ginning by States and United States".

- 2 -

m grade I because pre-wax tha t ne

W i i has plcc ernmenlt from a s

contenlt t hemse II

F' data pi yea r s; period1 tua t i 0) graph would show hl age no) gray a t o the, f o r sit

IP s u l t i i i n pro, Analys show tt proxim

c

m

ne

3d m

%-

3 0 1-

r- t, n- ng t- .nd

-erh .ch -ng -t. rer )WS

L

i

C r:

Two impressions might b e drawn from t h e trend i n grade index: first, t h a t grade standards have changed over t h e years; and second, t h a t t o t a l m i l l waste, because o f the increase i n production of lower grades, should be higher than i n pre-war years. Data supplied by the U. S: Department of Agriculture ind ica te t h a t ne i ther impression is cor rec t .

With respect t o the f i r s t - - the consistency i n grade standards--Nickerson(5) has p lo t ted r e s u l t s of ShirleyrAnalyser tests on cot tons from various crop years from as far back as 1936. Bales used i n these tes ts were those from which Gov- ernment Standards Boxes were made. There is good agreement between non-lint content of cot ton purchased through regular trade channels and the s tandards themselves f o r each of the years shown, pa r t i cu la r ly i n the lower grades.

TRASH ANALYSIS FOR BALES USED IN GRADE STANDARDS

1936- I956

I- 2 c w w a

I-2 E a

204 0,

1936 0

1946 0

1950

1952/3 0

1956 * “ I

I , ~ ~ --,

SGM GM SM M SLM <M SGO GO

FIGURE 2 . T r a s h ana lys i s by S h i r l e y Analyser f o r

Data from U . S . Department of Agriculture, Agricultural

ba les used i n grade standards

Marketing Service, Cotton Division

Figure 3 o f f e r s a c lose r look a t t r a s h re la t ionship t o grade. Supporting data provided by samples taken from a broad segment of t h e American crop each year s ince 1946 show t h a t average non-lint content of bales tested during t h a t period covers the same approximate spread noted i n Figure 2. The degree of fluc- t ua t ion i n non-lint content is s l i g h t l y grea te r here,but t h e information on t h i s graph is l i m i t e d t o white grades only. Inclusion of data on remaining Cottons would tend t o l eve l out the d i f fe rences , because off-color cot tons generally show higher non-lint content than do t h e w h i t e grades. The years i n which average non-lint content is low are a l s o the years i n which a higher percentage of gray and spot ted co t ton was produced. Thus, consideration of USDA data leads t o the conclusion t h a t grade s tandards a r e reasonably constant and tha t reasons f o r s i g n i f i c a n t changes i n precessing vast:: m s t be? sought elsewhere.

The second impression--that increased production of lower grades should re- s u l t i n higher average m i l l waste--might be t rue i f t h e quantity of waste removed i n processing depended s o l e l y on t r a s h content. In cont ras t t o the S h i r l e y Analyser tests which ind ica te only t r a s h content, picker and card waste tes t s show t h e quant i ty of both t r a s h and l i n t removed, and therefore more nearly approximate m i l l proces- conditions (Figure 4).

- 3 -

NON-LI NT CONTENT FOR WHITE +GRADES

PICKER AND CARD WASTE FOR WHITE GRADES

#

56- 7 5 -.-.- .-._. '.

/- - . C . -. '. -*.-Ne 0 4 --e*--- ...... .-..... ....)' ..*.-\ - - - -- -- z

3 --..*-.- ........................................ 2

z l 8 *.

LM

SLM M SM

I I

-. /* '. / ..e.. \

/ .......... \- - , -.+.0.' .. - * -. - . . e *

0 -\ ' ... ' z..... ........... ................

2. 'L - - @ - H 8

7 **.., ...................

LM

SLM

M SM

'1 0 1 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54

YEARS

FIGURE 3. Average non-lint content (by Shir ley Analyser) f o r white grades of cotton.

6

o , , , I I I I I I

46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54

YEARS

FIGURE 4. Average percentage of Picker and Card Wastes f o r white grades of cotton.

D a t a from summaries of published annual s tud ie s of regional and standardized va r i e t i e s .

Although t h e overall trash content of the crop has increased, the quant i ty of f i b e r removed i n processing co t tons has decreased, a s a r e s u l t , i n part, of improved f i b e r propert ies . Figure 4 illustrates that waste percentages a r e t rending downward w i t h t h e sharpest angle of decl ine i n the lower grades. A c l o s e r examination of the fiber proper t ies which affect waste w i l l help t o ex- p l a i n the xeason for t h i s decl ine,

Fiber Propert ies

Because m i l l waste is a funct ion of both trash and l i n t , fiber proper t ies exert an important inf luence on waste and the processabi l i ty of cotton. It is i n t e r e s t i n g t o note what has happened t o maturity, s t rength,f ineness , and length over the pas t ten years. Figure 5a shows a generally l e v e l maturity index during t h i s period. The major exception is a very mature 1949 crop. Investiga- tors(3) have ranked maturity second only t o grade among f a c t o r s a f f ec t ing picker and card waste.

The upward t rend in average f i b e r tensile s t rength is shown i n Figure 5b . There is some evidence t h a t s t ronger fibers produce s l i g h t l y more waste in earlier processes, T h i s loss is l a rge ly o f f s e t by better running qua l i ty i n roving, spinning and weaving operat ions ,

There are, of course, exceptions from s p e c i f i c growth areas, but on t he whole, average cot tons are f i n e r , a s shown i n FlgUTe 5c . Studies indicate that there ie no clear p a t t e r n of t h e effects of f ineness on waste, One study (3) relates f i n e r co t tons with lower waste, wh i l e another (8 ) f inds increased

As might be expected, more mature cot tons produce less waste.

perhaps due t o their lower f l e x i b i l i t y or e l a s t i c i t y .

w a s t e

ing l c en t l e

n

II

u averag f inencf d iv idu does g occur

Methoa

W action ef f icjl s u l t ea: i n a t i a I n ora: sary n which piecin dit ion: h ighen

-

- 4 -

;Y If

A ' 8

L-

38 is t h ex a- e r

I .

i n lis -w

;he Ite 1dY sed

,

waste with f i n e r f ibe r s ,

The t rend in upper half mean length is shown i n Figure 5d . While becom- x n g longer over t h e years,average co t tons have maintained, since l946,a consis t - ent length uniformity r a t i o of about 80.

TEST RESULTS FOR UPLAND COT~ONS

0 C

AVERAGE FIEER MATURITY. AVERAGE FIBER FINENESS

* 1946-150. MICROPROJECTOR 50-PRESENT. CAUSTICPIRE

90-1 I 501

... ....... ..... .... ... * BO c- a

75

b AVERAGE FIBER

TENSILE STRENGTH x

z 2 95

m

t- '46 '50 '55

d AVERAGE FIEROGRAPH

UPPER HALF MEAN LENGTH

1.101

.......... .............. ......... .............. 1.00 '.05L-

I I 1 I ' 2 8 1 ' ' '46 '50 '55

FIGURE 5 a, b, c, d. T e s t Results for Upland Cottons T h i s series of charts shows average maturity, s t rength , f ineness and length values f o r upland co t tons for the years shown.

USDA, PMA, "Fiber and Spinning Tes t Results f o r Some Upland Cottons Grown i n Selected Standardized-Variety Areas" ( 7 ) .

Although more cot ton of lower grades is ava i l ab le today than i n the pas t , averages of major fiber proper t ies show an improvement i n s t rength , length, and f ineness , and a f a i r l y l e v e l t rend in maturity and length uniformity ratio, In- div idua l ly , none of these proper t ies exerts as grea t an influence on waste as does grade. T h e i r combined e f f e c t , however, indicates that less w a s t e should occur i n co t ton processing.

Methods

Waste is not s o l e l y a funct ion of grade and f i b e r proper t ies , but an in te r - ac t ion of these f a c t o r s with machinery complement and condition and employee e f f i c i ency i n t he m i l l . Rising labor , overhead, and material c o s t s have re- s u l t e d i n the adoption of l a r g e r packages, higher speeds, and even i n the elim- ina t ion of entire stagas ia the series of processes through which co t ton passes. In order t o achieve success i n making these rev is ions ,mi i i s have I"aSi= i t neC99- sa ry t o maintain optimum running condi t ion of machinery, and t o employ devices which enable machinery to run w i t h less operator attention.Large packagw reduce piecing-up w a s t e s . Reduction i n number of processes and improved machinery con- d i t i o n reduce the s t r a i n imposed on the fiber and allow f o r waste reductions and higher running speeds -

- 5 -

1

TREND IN AVERAGE INDUSTRY WASTE

The sum of the e f f e c t s of changes i n f i b e r propert ies , grade,machinery, and ' processing methods, indicates t h a t waste is trending downward. This is borne out by f u r t h e r investigation. In 1950, the Council published a study on cot ton w a s t e ( 6 ) i n which U.S. C e n s u s Bureau r epor t s of t o t a l waste production and t o t a l cotton consumption were analyzed. "In 1930 t h e average waste f a c t o r f o r the co t ton text i le industry was 17.9% (excluding bagging and t i e s ) . the f a c t o r had decreased t o 16.2%-by 1947 t o 14.7% and i n 1948 w a s down t o 14.2%11

This survey revea ls that t h e current average waste f o r the industry is 13%* ( s t i l l excluding bagging and t i e s ) .

An examination of individual f a b r i c waste f a c t o r s from t h e survey f u r t h e r subs t an t i a t e s t h e decrease i n waste over the years. Earlier mention was made of a schedule of average industry waste percentages published by t h e U. S. D. A. i n 1933 f o r a range of f a b r i c s , e n t i t l e d "Cotton Regulations, Se r i e s 2, Supplement 2, Defin i t ions and Conversion Factorsv1. Table 1 compares these e a r l i e r waste figures and t h e average w a s t e s determined by t h e present survey.

Conclusions of t h e report were as follow's:

By 1935,

/

FABRIC

Numbered Duck Other Duck Constructions

Soft f i l l e d Sheeting Class "A" Sheeting C l a s s trgtc Sheeting Class "C" Sheeting Poplin & Gabardine T w i l l s

Wide Sheeting

P r in t Cloth Diaper Cloth Tobacco & Cheesecloth Carded Broadcloth

Denim Other Colored Yarn Fabrics

Te r ry Towelling Huck Towelling

1 D r i l l s

\_,Flannel

Combed Lawn Other Combed Fabrics Combed Sateen Combed Wide Sheeting

Drapery & Upholstery Corduroy

1933 STUDY SERIES 2

SUPPLEMEKT 2

15.00 15.00 15.00 15.00 14.50 15.00 15.00 14.50

14.50 14.50 14.50 14.50

16.50 _---- 14.50 15.00

17.50

33 . 00

33.00 33 . 00

-----

CURRENT _ _ -

WASTE SURVEY (Weighted Avg.)

12.75 10.50

10.50 10.50 9.50

10.50 10.75 10 . 75 10.50 10.50

12 . 00 9.75

10.75 11.50

12.25 12.25

12.25 13.75

10.75

25.00 23.50 24.00 20.00

13.25 11 . 00

DIFFERENCES

- 4.50 - 4.50 - 5.50 - 4.50 - 3.75 - 4.25 - 4.50 - 4.00

- 2.50 - 4.75 - 3.75 - 3.00

- 4.25 ---_-- - 2.25 - 1.25

- 6.75

- 8.00

- 9.00 -13.00

------

TABLE 1. Comparison of Old and New Average Fabric Waste Losses

* - In determining t h i s f igure , the weighted averages for each f a b r i c c l a s s i f i - ca t ion (described under sec t ion on weighted averages) w a s again weighted by the annual production of t h a t fabr ic ; i n t h e f a b r i c average f o r p r i n t c lo th , which represents t h e influence is greater than in a small production i t e m such as co t ton f lannel .

thus, a l a rge por t ion of t o t a l production,

Thn be l l ed , goods i n old and and 5% m f ab r i c s q q

In able t o used--ail

WhL t h e stucl t h e was: Furthe??

plement; scriptk plement;

Standar

S a However of weig a p e r m were a Y

Weights

To t o t a l w duction numeric Bureau ,, by than these [I

s t a p l e of the waste, weight

A. clude ( 1

c la s s i . vealed!

ing inf!

T: how t h r

11

il m it c

s11

2 a tl

Throughout the years, s ince 1933,

I d and new data are listed i n column three.

the percentages shown in the column la- belled, "Series 2, Supplement 2", have been widely used i n converting finifshed goods i n t o cot ton bale equivalents for market measurement. Differences between

The typical decrease ia between 4 2 nd 5% with the greatest changes i n combed goods and in higher qua l i ty carded fabr ics .

is attribut- a b l e t o improvements in fiber proper t ies , better equipment-more e f f ec t ive ly used--and programs of research and t r a i n i n g i n waste reduction.

In supM18ry, t he reduction i n processing waste over the years

THE SURVEY ITSELF

While the waste percentages contained i n t h i s report represent t he goal of the s tudy i n market ana lys is , its e f f e c t i v e use by m i l l s r equi res a breakdown of t he waste figures, and the inclusion of production data f o r p lan t comparison. Furthemore, waste percentages alone would be of l imited value without qualify- ing information on yarn and fabric construct ion, raw stock, and machinery COJII- plement, Information provided by par t i c ipa t ing m i l l s consis ted of r a w stock de- s c r i p t i o n s , picker and card production data, opening and picking machinery com- plements and waste percentages a t the individual processes.

Standardization of Data

Several d i f f e r e n t methods are used by m i l l s t o record waste Gercentages. However, f i gu res shown i n the following tables are a l l expressed as a percentage of weight of co t ton fed t o the first process, Whenever a m i l l reported w a 8 t e as a percentage of weight fed t o each process, or of weight delivered, such data were always converted t o the standard form.

Weighted Averages

To achieve more accurate averages f o r individual fabric c l a s s i f i ca t ions , to ta l w a s t e , grade and staple f igu res reported were weighted by each m i l l ' s production. A list of t h e m i l l s r epor t ing each fabric, along w i t h t o t a l waste, numerical grade, and staple of cot ton used by each m i l l , was sen t t o the Census Bureau, under a cont rac t t o w e i g h t each of t h e three values by t h a t percentage of t o t a l production represented by the individual m i l l . From these da ta t h e Census Bureau calculated weighted averages fo r grade, waste, and staple i n each fabric category. T h u s , m i l l s manufacturing o n l y a small percentage of t he t o t a l production of a specific fabric, and/or having a v e r y high or low waste, were able t o exe r t less influence on t h e average than they would had t h e weighting not been done.

A l l Census data are s t r i c t l y confident ia l . Results of t h e weighting include only the average values f o r grade, staple, and total waste f o r each fabric c l a s s i f i c a t i o n , so that production percentages f o r any one m i l l w i l l not be re- vealed .

Industry Division,

INTERPRETATION OF RGSULTS

The following points list the data contained i n t h i s survey and describe

1. a sunrmary table lists the averages f o r t o t a l waste,numerical grade, and staple length. A l l fabric classifications in which these itanis %ere weighted by *,he C e n s u s Bureau are so noted. D a t a f o r yarn-producing m i l l s have not been weighted. The summary tables a l s o give numerical averages f o r Micronaire fineness, picker and card production, and s l i v e r and lap weight.

2. data are arranged in alphabetical order by m i l l code designation. They contain fabric construct ion informa- t i o n as w e l l as a breakdown of w a s t e by processes. The extreme right-hand

how they are arranged:

In each f a b r i c or yarn c l a s s i f i c a t i o n ,

In t h e lists o f tabular information,

I

I

4

I

column shows a numerical mean f o r waste a t each process and f o r the total . This t o t a l is not a sum of t h e average increments but the mean value of to- t a l wastes.

3. In machinery and f i b e r da t a t ab le s , t h e sec t ion headed "Machinery Com- plement" lists only t h a t opening and cleaning equipment which has a bearing on quantity of waste removed. Intermediate s tages , such as feed t a b l e s , fans , rake d i s t r i b u t o r s , etc., have been omitted.

4. Tabular information on wastes is presented graphical ly i n t h e form of bar c h a r t s f o r each waste c l a s s i f i c a t i o n i n c e r t a i n f a b r i c categories . D a t a are arranged i n order of increasing t o t a l waste, from l e f t t o r igh t . To follow t h e information f o r a p a r t i c u l a r m i l l through each s t a g e of processing, through t h e series of graphs f o r t h a t m i l l . Graphs have been prepared only f o r those f a b r i c o r yarn categories i n which t h e number of m i l l s report ing is so grea t t h a t an across-the-board comparison of t abu la r data would be d i f f i c u l t t o follow. Comparisons of e i ther t h e graphical o r t he tabular data enable m i l l management t o pinpoint processes a t which waste removal is high compared w i t h other m i l l s . A m i l l w i l l o f t e n be high a t only one o r two points. By know- ing where t o look, co r rec t ive measures may be taken t o reduce waste a t t h a t process.

5. Percentage of bagging and ties has not been included i n t o t a l waste f igu res because some m i l l s reported t h e quantity so ld as waste while others reported actual tare on bales received. This f i r s t f i gu re would not, of course, include the amount used f o r bal ing sales waste. On the basis of r epor t s l i s t i n g a c t u a l tare weight, a grand average f o r bagging and t ies w a s found t o be 3.90% of gross weight of t h e bale.

6. Although most of t he waste category t i t l e s are self-explanatory, those which group s e v e r a l small c l a s s i f i c a t i o n s

it is necessary only t o read upward

are f u r t h e r defined a: follows:

Card room sweeps--------all sweeps, opening through roving Spinning room sweeps----all sweeps, spinning through warping Weave room sweeps-------all sweeps, s lashing through c lo th room Soft thread-------------all s i n g l e , unsized yarn Pl ied thread------------all p l i ed , unsized yarn Slasher o r hard thread--all s i zed yarn

A f i n e r breakdown than the categories used would be of l i m i t e d value s ince m i l l s do not normally c l a s s i f y eachbit of waste w i t h respect t o its source. The majority would be unable, therefore , t o supply data on t h a t basis.

- 8 -

Li tera ture Cited

National Cotton Council, llCotton Counts Its Cus tomersv t , Annual Publica- t ion.

Agricultural Adjustment Administration, U.S.D.A., "Cotton Regulations, Ser ies 2, Supplement 2, Defini t ions and Conversion Factors", December 1933, with adjustments by Bureau of Agricul tural and Indus t r i a l Chemistry, 1941 . Webb, R. W., and Richardson, H. B., VTtelationships Between Proper t ies of Cotton Fibers and Percentages of Wastes Associated with the Manufacture of Carded Yarns", Production and Marketing Administration, USDA, Ju ly 1946.

Agricul tural Marketing Service, USDA, 'Cotton: Grade Index of Ginning by S t a t e s and United States" , 1928-1954, November 1955; September 23, 1957.

Nickerson, D., Textile Research Journal, 20, 277-278, April 1950.

Dockray, R. H., Meadows, B., and Smith, L., llCotton Waste", Textile Research Journal, 20, 684-718, October 1950.

Production & Marketing Administration, USDA, "Fit)er and Spinning T e s t Results for Some Upland Cottons Grown i n Selected Standardized-Variety Areas. Crop of 1946", December 1946, et seq.

Leitgeb and Wskeham, Wotton Quality and Fiber Propert ies , Par t V: Effec t s of Fiber Fineness", Textile Research Journal, 26, 543-552, July 1956.

- 9 -

i

3

The following is a list of t h e f ab r i c s and yarns Each f a b r i c or yarn c l a s s i f i c a t i o n is grouped w i t h o thers of s i m i l a r cons t ruc t ion , and is preceded by a reference number which serves t o index its loca t ion in t h e study.

embraced by t h i s survey.

FABRIC AND YARN CLASSIFICATIONS PAGE NUMBER

DUCK & ALLIED FABRICS '--DUCK.. . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 SHEETINGS & ALLIED COARSE & MEDIUM YARN FABRICS

(2) OTHERDUCK. . e e 13

(3) OSNABURGS................ 14 (4) SOFT FILLED SHEETING . . . . . . . . . . 15 (5) CLASS A SHEETING . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 (6) CLASS B SHEETING . . . . . . . . . . . . 17 (7) CLASS C SHEETING . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 (8) CARDED POPLINS & GAIjARDINE . . . . . . . 19 (9) TWILLS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20

. (10) DRILLS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 (11) WIDE SHEETING. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24

PRINT CIAYI'H YARN FABRICS ,

P O T H . . . . . . . . . . . . 26 (13) D I A P E R C L O T H . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28 (14) CARDED BROADCLOTH. . . . . . . . . . . . 29 (15) TOBACCO & CHEESECLOTH. . . . . . . . . . 30 (16) D E m . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32 (17) OTHER.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33

COLORED YARN FABRICS

TOWELLING TERRY. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34

(19) H U C K . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35 NAPPED FABRICS -L.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36 FINF: COrrON FABRICS O W N . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37

(22) GINGKAM, CHAMBRAY & SEERSUCKER . . . . . 38 (23) SATEENS. . . . . . . ; . . . . . . . . . 39 (24) OTHER. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40 (25) WIDE SHEETING. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42

OTHER COTTON FABRICS & SPECIALTIES ( 1 6 ) - Y . . . . . . . . . . 43 (27) CORDUROY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 44

COMBED KNITTING YARNS 4 0 S t O 6 0 S e e 45

(29) 1 5 s t o 4 0 ~ e e 46 (30) 15s and'coarser. . . . . . . . . . . . . 48

CARDED KNITTING YARNS (31) 1 5 s t o 4 0 s . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 49 (32) 15s and coarser. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50

COMBED WEAVING YARNS

CARDED WEAVJNG YARNS (33) 1:, E t o 4 0 s . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 51

(34) 13s to 40s . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 52 (35) 15s and coarser. . . . . . . . . . . . . 54

COMBED AND CARDED THREAD (36) tius and f i n e r , . . . . . . . . . . . . . 56 (37) 4 0 s t o 6 0 s . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 57 (38) 15s and coarser. . . . . . . . . . . . . 58 (39) 15s t o 40s & 15s & coarser . . . . . . . 60

- 10 -

M. be t ica:: mill CII ca t ion

MILL I1 CODE I1

M A 0 Ax AY AZ

BA BG BI BJ BP BY

cc CN

cx DF DG DL

DN DP DR DS DT DU DW DX DY DZ

EC ED EG EH E1 E J EM EO

FA FB FC FD FE FF FH FK FL FM FN

1

M i l l s which have contributed information f o r use in t h i s survey are alpha- t i c a l l p l i s t e d below according t o t h e i r code designations. Following each 11 Code is a f a b r i c reference number which shows the f a b r i c or yarn c l a s s i f i - t i o n under which information from t h a t m i l l appears.

* MILL CODE

AA A 0

AY Az

BA BG B I BJ BP BY

cc CN

cx DF DG DL

i . =

:; DR D S DT DU DW DX DY DZ

EC ED EG EH E 1 EJ EM EO

FA FB Fc FD FE FF F H F K FL FM FN

I

FABRIC MILL REFERENCE NO, CODE

FABRIC REFERENCE NO.

35 30, 31, 34 28, 29, 33 38 18, 19

21

29 11 12 35

34

37, 39

28, 29, 36, 37

17

29, 33 31, 34 31, 32, 34

35, 38 24 34 35 20 34 1 29, 30, 37 31, 35, 38 15 15

22, 24 21 8, 9, 23 21, 26 12 7 12 4, 9, 20

12, 15 13, 15 11, 13 12 6, 7 6 12 29 12, 14, 15 12, 14, 15 1 4

FO FS FT m FV FW FX FY FZ

GA GE G I GK GL GM GT GU GZ

HB HC HD HE HF HG HH H I H J HK HL HM HN HO HP HR HS Hv Kw Hx HY

I K I L I N I O IP I R IU I V IW

9 34 4, 13 37, 39 12 1 2 12, 14 21, 27 11

8 , 9, 10

35 31, 32 31 29, 30 12 31, 32 11

16 8, 9, 10, 23 11, 25 11 25 16 16 12 12 12 12 12 23, 24 8 8, 23 23 24 26, 27 26, 27 24

34, 35

4, 9, 10 12, 14

9, 20 2, 9 8 , 9 24 16, 17 9 24 24 13, 18, 20

27

MILL CODE

JG

JM JX JY

KA m KF m K I Ks KK I(M KO KP Ku

LE LF LG LH L I LM LN LR Ls LT LU LV LW Lx LY Lz

MA MB MC MD bfE MF MG ML bm Nc NG Nli NN NR Nu

- 11 -

FABRIC MILL REFERENCE NO. CODE

FABRIC REFERENCE NO.

9, 10, 11, 26, 27

16 16 29, 30, 31,

32, 33, 34 35

35 5, 6 5 4, 5 , 6, 9 32, 35, 38 3, 9, 10 38, 39 2 5, 6 , 10, 12 10, 35 34

38 38 10 32 31 5 6 35 35 35 4 19 27 11 9 25

24 24 24 22 7 16 33 28 9

5 22 2

6 12

2, 10

oc OD

OE OF OG 01 AT OK OL OM ON OR os OT ou ov ow OY oz

PA w Pc PD PE PF PG PH PI PJ PK PL PN Po Ps PT nr Pv Pw

Irz

RD RE RJ RN R P RR RW

26 11, 22, 23,

32 33, 34 33, 34

24

29, 31 16 29, 31 16 32 22 2 11 18 1 19 1 11 9, 17, 20,

22

25

8, 18 15 15 15 15 15 35 35 38 11, 12 10 38 36, 37 37, 38, 39 36 36, 37 34, 36, 37,

38, 39 11, 20, 25

33 34 35 2 3, 9 15 5

3, 4

Class i f i ca t ion #1 NUMBERED DUCK

Summary of Fiber and Production Averages

Total Waste - 1/..12.75 P Picker Production..400.00 lb/hr Grade 1 / . . . . . . . .97 .00 Card Production... . 16.25 lb/hr Staple-l/. ..... .31/32 Lap Weight. ........ 14.50 02 MicronaTre.. .... 4.2 S l i v e r Weight. . . . . . 53.00 gr

- l/Weighted Averages

Average Du uu u1v MILL CODE DU #lo Duck #4 Duck

, Width (inches) Hose & Hose & 36 40 1.09 0.49 . . . . .^ Yards/pound belt- belt-

* Bagging & Ties Sold As ifaste ** Includes 0.5% Invisible Waste *** Includes 0.06% Cloth Room Brusher :Paste

MACHINERY COMPLEMEm PICKER DATA Opening 0 Cleaning Blades Production

1.Hop.Fdr. 4.#12 Lat.Op B.3-Blade 13.83 oz 2.Ve.rt.O~ 5.Gyrator F.Carding 382 lb/hr 3.WlS Cond.

1.Hop.Fdr. 4.#12 Lat.Op B.3-Blade 13.83 oz 2.Vert.O~ 5.Gyrator 3.Wll Cond.

F.Carding 382 lb/hr g * 1.Bl.Fdr. 4.#12 Lat.Op. .Z-Blade 16.13 oz * 2.Vert.w. 5.Sup'ior Clr. ::Kirsch. 436 lb/hr 8 3.111 Cond. 6.Cntf.Air

1.Bl.Fdr. 5.#11 Cond. B.Aldrich 14.9 oz 2.Sup'ior Clr 6.Cntf.Air Sep.M.2-Blade 403 lb/hr 3.112 Lat.Op 7.Gyrator F. Kirsch. 4.Cntf.Air 03

- 12 -

CARD DATA FIBER Production Grade Staple

1-1/32" 55.5 gr M 18.69 lb/hr SLM Brt. 1"

SLM Brt. 1-1/32" 18.69 lb/hr SLM 31/32"

M Lt.Sp. 31/32"

55.5 gr

62 gr 6's 7/8" 14 lb/hr 7's 15/16"

, 59 gr 7's 1 " 13.50 lb/hr

I _L

. Classification #2 OTHER DUCK CONSTRUCT IONS

Summary of Fiber and Production Akrages

Total Waste - 1/. .10.50 Picker Production. .400.00 lb/hr Grade 1/........85.75 Card Production,. . . 15.00 Ib/hr Staple-1/.. . . . . .31/32 Lap Weight . , , . . , . . . 15.50 02 Microna'Tre...... 4.0 Sl iver Weight. . . . , . 62.75 gr

'3

/s z s ' ,

w - l/Weighted Averages * - ,

.3

Total Waste(Bagging 11.20 14.55 9.09 12.52 13.20 11.92 and ties excluded)

* Bagging T ies Sold As Waste

I FIBER I Production Production Grade Staple I DATA I 1

PICKER DATA Blades I I co-MEKr Opening (L Cleaning

I I I .2-Blade 14.5 oz M 1 5/ 16"

SLM B r t . 1" 6.Gyrator .%Blade 560 lb/hr ~. ~

' t t . B i l e Mixr. 7 .Aid .m. I I SLM 115/16"

.Sup'ior C l r . 5.Dnstrk.Clr.

- 13 - I

Classification #3 OSNABURGS


Total Waste -1/..20.50 Picker Production..319.00 lb/hr Grade 1/. . . .To . .80.50 Card Production.. . . 12.25 lb/hr Staple-1/.....,.31/32 Lap Weight. . . . . . . . , 14.50 oz MicronaTre . . . . . 3 . 7 S l i v e r Weight... . . . 64.00 gr


I MILL CODE l AVERAGE

I MACHINERY COMPLEMEm PICKER DATA CARD DATA FIBER DATA Opening 8 Cleaning I Blades I Production i Production 1 Grade I StaDh I Fine-I- Non-I % 0

ness Lint iix - l.F-S Fdr. S.Sup*ior Clr. B.2-Blade 14 oz 62 gr M 1 " 4.8 ---- 100

4.Vert.O~. F.Carding 404 lb/hr 13.5 lb/hr

1 .Hop. Fdr . 2.#15 O p e 5.#12 Lat.Op. M.2-Blade 330 lb/hr 13 lb/hr Card Strips 15/16" ---- ---- 4.#16 Lat.Op. IB.3-BladT 15 oz I 70 gr I SGO Brt--l 15/16J15.6I----p I 3.111 Cond. 6.Sup'ior Clr. F.Carding

1.Bl.Fdr. 2.113 &Lop.

I SGO F. 2-Blade #2+

4 i:/161v 12.6 ---- I---- ---- 160 40 10.4 lb/hr Card Strip

- 14 -

I " 2.Vert ., 3.#12 I,

l.F-2 Fr 2. SUP' i l

2 .Spiral 3 .Downs;

l.F-5 Fr 2.#12 L, 3.#11 C:

1.Hop.FP

i

Classification #4 SOFT FILLED SHEETING


Total Waste 1/..10.50 Picker Production..342.00 lb/hr Grade 1 / . . . . . . . .95 .50 Card Production... . 11.50 lb/hr Staple'-1/.......33/32 Lap Weight . . . . . . . . . 15.00 02 Micronaxre.. .... 4.0 S l iver Weight. . . . . . 60.00 gr

l/Weighted Averages

MACHINERY COMPLEMENT PICKER DATA CARD DATA FIBER DATA Opening k Cleaning Blades Woduction hoduction Grade Staple Fine- -NOD- % of

ness Lint Mix

---- 40.91 l.F-7 Fdr. 5.Eup'ior Clr. B.Buckley 14.75 oz 62 gr LM Brt. 1-1/16" 4.1 --- 46.45

LM 1-1/32" 4.6 ---- 13.64 400 lb/hr 12 lb/hr LM Brt. 1-1/32" 4.5 2 .Vert. Op. 6.Horie.Clr. &Blade 83.#12 Lat.Op 7.#6 Cond. F . Kirsch. 4.#ll Cond. 8.Gyrator

r1.F-2 Fdr. 3.SRRL Op. B .Blade 'Z.Sup*ior Clr. 4.#12 Lat.Op. F.Kirsch.

1.Hop.Fdr. B .3-Blade { 2.Spira-Whirl M.2-Blade 3 .Downstrk.Cl. F.Kirsch

l.F-8 Fer. 4.Cntf.Air B.2-Blade !2.#12 Lat.Op e.Sup*ior Clr. F.Kirech. 3.#11 Cond.

S.Super Jet B.2-Blade I F.Kirsch. 4. Gyrator 1.Hop.Fdr. 12 .Cnt f . A i r

3.Super Jet B.2-Blade I F.Kirsch. 4. Gyrator 1.Hop.Fdr. 1 2. Cntf . A i r

14.75 oz 350 lb/hr

15 oz 319.56 lb/hr

15 oz 400 lb/hr

15 oz 299 lb/hr

15 oz 299 lb/hr

1-1/32' 1-1/32'

1-1/32' 11.56 l b k

SLM Brt 11-1/32'

I 14 ibjnr

12 lb/hr

10 lb/hr

Vari- ij 1. Lum. Fdr, 4.Sup1ior Clr. B.3-Blade 15 oz 70 gr Warp: 1-1/32'' 4.12 ---- 100

I 2.Mix.Fdr. 5. Gyrator M.2-Blade 330 lb/hr 9.27 lb/hr SLM Brt. Fil1ing:Y 15/16*' 4.5 ---- 100 I- 3.Ald.Clr. F.Kirsch. -

B - 15 -

,

Class i f i ca t ion #5r CLASS "A" SHEETING


Total Waste - 1/. .10.25 Picker Production. .335.00 lb/hr Grade 1 / . . . . . . . .95 .50 Card Production... . 12.50 lb/hr Staple-l/, . , . . , .32/32 Lap Weight. . . . . . . . . 14.25 oz Micronaxre . . . . . . 4.1 S l iver Weight... . . . 58.50 gr

1.Hop.Fdr. B.Blade 14 oz 56 gr 31/32 4.2 ---- 100 5.612 Lat.Op. F.Kirsch. 350 lb/hr 13.6 lb/hr to

4.5

- 16 -

- l/We ighted Averages

MACHINERY CO&HEHT PICKER DATA CARD DATA FIBER DATA

I Production Production Grade Staple Fine- Non- I I ness ( - L i n t 1 Ei: Opening & Cleaning Blades

1-1/32" ---- ---- 1-1/32" ---- ---- B. 2-Blade 14 02. 54.6 gr M l.F-7 Fdr. 4.#12.Clr.

5.#11 Cond. F.Kirsch. 325 lb/hr 11.0 1bLhr SLM SLM Brt. 1-1/32" ---- ---- Q 2.#15 O p e

3.#16 O p e I I I I I I i I

1. B1.Fdr. 3.Sup1ior.Clr. B.Aldrich 14 oz SLM 1-1/32" 4.05 ---- 100 4.#11/#12 Op. F.Kirsch. 300 lb/hr

I

l.F-5 Fdr. 4.Cntf.Air Clr B.2-Blade

3.#11 Cond.

1.Ald.Fdr. 4.Cond. B. 2-Blade 8 2.612 Ut.@. 5.Gyrator M.2-Blade 3.Sup1ior Clr. F . Kirsch. 1.Hop.Fdr. 3.Vert.W. B.Blade 2 2.Axi-Fd. 4.#12 Lat.Op. F.Kirsch.

a 2.612 Lat.9. 5.Sup'ior Clr.'F.Kirsch

M.2-Blade 3.#12 Lat.Op. F. Kirsch.

15 oz 58 gr 400 lb/hr I 14 lb/hr

15.36 oz 325 lb/hr 9 lb/hr

435 lb/hr 13 lb/hr I SLM Brt.

M SM Lt.Sp.

M SLM Brt.

SLM LM Brt.

M

1-1/32"

15/16" 15/16"

1 1' 1 " 1 ' 1

1 ' 1

31/32

4.1 ---- I

4.7

T

100

50 50

- 32 32 33 3

100 -

i C! R

C!

MACE I Ope

1.Bale Bn 2.Cntf.Ad I 3. Gyraton l.F-7 Fdn a 2.#15 Opt, I 3.#16 OP,,

l.F-5 FdX

3 2.#12 La

2 l.F-5 Fd::

4 3.sup'iol:

2.Cntf.A~

l.F-5 Fdl 2 2.Vert.W I 3.111 Co,

C l a s s i f i c a t i o n #6 CLASS "B" SHEETING

Summary of F i b e r and Production Averages

T o t a l Waste l/.. 9.50 Picker Produbtion..390.00 lb /hr Grade 1/....T...98.25 Card Production.... 12.25 lb /hr Staple-1/......,32/32 Lap Weight......... 15.00 oz


')

Micronayre....,. 4.0 S l i v e r Weight ...... 58.50 g r I

MACHINERY COMPLEMENT PICKER DATA CARD DATA FIBER DATA Opening h Cleaning Blades Production Production Grade S tap le Fine- ness - Non- Lint Ii:*

.#7 B1.Fdr. 4.#11 Cond. B.3-Blade 15 oz 56 g r M 1-1/32" 4.0 ---- 75

.#11 Cond. 5.45'Cntf.Aj.r F.Combinat 480 lb /hr 14 lb/hr SLM B r t . 1-1/32'' 4.0 ---- 25

.#12 Lat.Op.

.Bale Brkr. B.Blade 14 oz

.Cntf . A i r F.Buckley 500 lb /hr . Gyrator M.Kirsch.

.F-7 Fdr. 4.#12 Op. B. 2-Blade 14 oz

.#15 Op. 5.#11 Cond. F.Kirsch. 325 lb /hr

.F-5 Fdr. 4.Cntf . A i r B.2-Blade 1 5 oz

.#12 op. 5.Supfior C l r . F,Kirsch. 400 lb /hr

.#11 Cond.

.Ald. Fdr. 4.Cond B.2-Blade 15.36 oz .#12 Lat.Op. 5.Gyrator F.2-Blade 325 lb /hr .Sup*ior C l r . M. Kirsch.

.#16 Ope

58 g r 13 lb /hr

54.6 g r 11 lb /hr

58 g r 1 14 lb/hr

9 lb/hr ~ 55 gr

1-1/32' 1-1/32'

1-1/32' 1-1/32'

SLM B r t . 1-1/32' I M

4.1 ---- I

- 75 25

- 33-1/ 33-1/ 33-1/

100 -

- 50 50 -

3.#12 Lat.Op. B.Blade 16 oz 70 g r IF-Kirsch I 435 lb /hr 1 12.5 lb/hr I SddM B r t . 1 t:: It:: 13, 1;: I .F-5 Fdr. . Cntf . A i r

.F-5 Fdr. 4.Btr.Sec. B.2-Blade 16 oz 58.5 g r M + 1" j 4.0+ 3.0% 100

. V e r t . Op . 5.Supfior C l r . F.Kirsch. 256 lb /hr 11.77 l b / h Cond .

I

- 17 -

Classification #7 CLASS ('C" SHEETING

3 Summary of Fiber and Production Averages

Total Waste 1/. .10.50 Picker Production. .420.00 ,lb/hr Grade 1 / . . . . ~ . . . 9 5 . 2 5 Card Production... . 12,50'1b/ Staple'-1/.......33/32 Lap Weight. . . . . . . . . 14.50 oz MicronaTre ...... .4 . 1 S l i v e r Weight. . . . . . 55.00 gr

l/Weighted Averages

I MILL CODE

'hr

I I I I I I * Bagging & Ties Sold As Waste

1

MACHINERY COMPLEMEIVI' PICKER DATA CARD DATA FIBER DATA Opening & Cleaning Blades Production Production Grade Staple Fine- -Nan-- 46 of

ness Lint Mix -c

1.m op. B.3-Blade 14.25 02 55 gr SLM+ 1-1/32" 3.5tO ---- 100 F.Kirsch. 391 lb/hr 8.5 lb/hr 5.0 W 2.112 Con&

2 2.tll Cond. 5.45'Cntf.Air F.Combinat 480 lb/hr

4

1-1/32" 4.0 ---- 75 1.m B1.Fdr. 4.#11 Cond. B. 3-Blade 15 oz 56 gr M 14 lb/hr SLM Brt. 1-1/32" 4.0 ---- 25

3.112 Lat.Op.

B .3-Blade 14.5 oz 54 gr SLM (RG) 1-1/32" 4.1 4.7% 25 2.5-L Vert.-. F.2-Blade 390 lb/hr 15 lb/hr SLM (IRR) 1-1/32" 4.1 4.7% 25

r.

.> 1.Kit.F-2 Fd.Rop

3.#1l/#l2 op. M. Kirsch. LM+ (RG) 1-1/32" 4.1 5.9% 25 4.Horie.Sup~ior.Clr. LM+ (IRR) 1-1/32" 4.1 5.9% 25

/

- 18 -

MACH111

3.#12 Lat.((

3.Sup'ior ((

2.Gyrator l.F-5 Fdr.

3 Cy1 OP

. C l a s s i f i c a t i o n #8 CARDED POPLIN 8z GABARDINE


Total Waste 1/. .10.75 Picker Production. ,430.00 lb/hr Grade 1/. . . . . . . .97.75- Card Production. . . . 10.75 lb/hr Staple’-1/(32nds )33.50 Lap Weight. . . . . . . . 14.75 oz Micronaxre... . . . 4 .1 S l i v e r Weight . . . . . 55.50 gr

l/Weighted Average

- 3

- - -

* Bagging SI T i e s Sold As Waste

MACHINERY COMPLEMEMI’ PICKER DATA Opening & Cleaning

1.#7 Fdr. 3.SRRL OP. 2.Centen.Clr.

1 .B1 .Fdr 15.5 oz 2. Jr.Clr. 4. Gyrator 460 lb/hr

1 .B1 .Fdr. 2.#12 Lat.Op.

3 .B1. Fdr . 6.Cond. F.Kirsch.

1.Hop.Fdr. 4..Cond. IB.Bl.de ’ 1 15 oz 2.Vert .Op. 5. Cond . F.Kirsch . 386 lb/hr

1.Bl.Fdr. 2.Btr.Sec. 3.Su~’ior Clr.

B .3-Blade M.2-Blade I F. Kirsch. 14 oz

386 lb/hr

CARD DATA

11 ib/hr I I

~

54 gr SLM 1 ” 14 lb/hr

10.75 lb/hr 56 gr SLM+ 1-1/16’

1-1/32 56 gr M 8.5 lb/hr M 1 ”

52 gr SLM Brt. 1”to 8.94 lb/hr hf 1-1/16

50 gr M 1-3/32 7.5 lb/hr

I

3*3 5.2 ‘1 ---- 4.25 ---- I

50 50

- 30 70

- 100

l.F-5 Fdr. 4.Cntf.Air B.Aldrich 15.2 02 65 gr Cal.-M 1-3/32” 4.5 ---- 18.75 ---- 81.25 Mem.-M 1-3/32“ 4.2 ator 5.#11 Cond. F.Kirsch. 425 lb/hr 8 lb/hr

- 19 - i

http://IB.Bl.de

I N 0

I

Classification #9 TWILLS

U


Total Waste 1/..10.75 Picker Production..400.00 lb/hr Grade 1 / . . . . . . . .97 .50 Card Production... . 10.50 lb/hr Staple-l/(32nds)32.75 Lap Weight. . . . . . . . . 14.75 oz

l/Weighted Averages

Micronaxre...... 4.1 S l iver Weight. ..... 59.00 gr

-

~ ~~

8 Bagging k Ties Sold As Wast,E

PICKER DATA CdaD DATA FIBER DATA MACRIHERY COMPLEMHP opsning k Cleaning Blades h'uluction ~roduction Grade Staple Flne- ness -Ron-' Lint % M i x of ' SLASHER

THREAD

3.SRRL Op. B.2-Blade 14.5 02 jlc SLL 1-E/16'7 4.0 t c --- 100 60 gr !:4i SOFT 1.n Fdr.

THREAD w &EsBtt,n:E4€: P:E~€$~RE 4H7 €k/B€ t 11 Ik/&

CARD MOTES N AND FLY P

I r2 I DUSTHOUSE

FIBER DATA PICKSR DATA CILRD DATA PHINERY COYPLEUBNF mning k Cleaning Production Grade Staple ,- ' -tTon- % o

Lint Mix W --- 1.67 Fdr. 3." Op. 8.2-Blade 14.5 02 60 gr 8 2.centen.Clr. F.Carding 427 lb/br 11 lb/hr 4.4

1 .F-7Fdr. /I-L/32qq/4.5 [--- 2.Vert.W. 6.Horiz.Clr. M.Blade 400 lb/hr 8.50 lb/hr SLM Brt. 1-1/32" 4.1 ---- 3.612 Lat.Op. 7.66 Cond. .Kirsch. 1-1/32 4.0 ----

5.Sup'ior Clr. F.Buck1ey 1 14.75 02 1 62 gr I ;l I 4.111 Cond. 8.Gyrator

3.Vert.m. 6.#6 Cond. 4.#3 Scr.Sect. 9.111 Cond.

3.Vert.m. 8.111 Cond.

14.5 oz 405.9 lb/hr

14.5 oz 406 lb/hr

I I 1.F.Wcd.Fdrs. 4.Cntf.Air. 15 02 58 gr sm 1-1/32 4.1 ---- 100

3.111 Cond. @ 2.612 Lat.Op. 5.sup'ior cLr. 400 1b/hr 14 1b/br

62 gr 2 2.Pre-Op. 13.5 lb/hr I W 1- 1" 14.8 I---- I100

3.sup'ior. 5.Vert.m. I - I

1.Bl.Fdr. 5.45' Sup'ior B.Bucklep 15.5 02 56 gr

4.111 Cond. 7.112 Cond.

2 Vert.Op. Clr. M.3-Blade 480 lb/h .8.25 lb/hr SLM 1-1/32" 4.15 4.7% 25 I1 5 3:#12 L.t.Op. 6.111 Cond. F.Kirsch. 75 R.

1.Hop.Fdr. 4.111 Cond. B.Kirsch. 16.5 OZ 66 gr SLM Brt. 1" to 4.2 ---- 90 340 lb/hr 10.8 lb/hr SLM 1-1/32" 4.2 --- 10

3.616 Op. gj 2.Vert.m. 5.612 IPt.Op. F.Kirsch.

1.Bl.Fdr. 3 112 Lat.Op. B.Blnde 14.67 oz. 65 gr 8lz.Axi-Flo 4:#11 Scr.SectlF.KirSch I 225 lb/hr I 9 lb/hr I & Brt 1::: 1::; IIIII 1;:

1-1/32" 3.8 ---- 100 1.Bl.Fdr. 2.Lat.m. B.Aldrich 15 oz

F.KirScb. 236 lb/hr

10( IK IN EO ur FO m: JG' RP IR IL KJ EQ M CZ HY 61 JG'

I ..

Classification #10 c) DRILLS


'Total Waste 1/..10.50 Picker Production..347.00 lb/hr Grade 1/ . . . . . . . .99.50 Card Production.... 11.50 lb/hr Staple-1/.....,.32/32 Lap Weight. . . . . . . . . 14.75 oz Micronaxre. . . . . . 4.25 S l i v e r Weight. . . . . 58.00 gr


Swee s--9 i n room Swee s-weave room- - Clearer-card room-

Total Waste (Bagging 1 and ties excluded.)

THREAD r3

SOFT THREAD

- 23 -

Classification #11 WIDE SHEETING


Total Waste - 1/..10.50 Picker Production..370.00 lb/hr Grade 1 / . . . . . . . . 96 .00 Card Production... . 10.00 lb/hr Staple'-1/(32nds)33.50 Lap Weight. . . . . . . . . 14.50 oz Micronaire . . . . . . 4 . 2 S l i v e r Weight. . . . . . 54.00 gr


* Bagging & T i e s Sold As Waste ** All Motes Included In Opening & Picking Waste *** Includes 0.13% Cloth Room Brusher

ness Lint Mix 1.Bl.Fdr. 3.Axi-Flo B.Buekley 15 oz 52 gr SUI Brt. 1-1/16'' ---- ---- IUU

2 Z.Axi-Fd, 4.45* Sup'ior H.2-Blade 375 lb/hr 10.5 lb/hr

-

3 0

rl I I

-

0

2 0

0

to

m

bp

e 0

?

:? .e m

rl

d -

N

m > rl

i.

rl -

10 a

3 rn

k c

kr

l to

M

rl

.

B

tom

- k

c

a 8- m

rlm

e

W

$4 c \

n

k

E

\ 2 "Y $0,

k c

2 rl

bo

0

N7

W

rl

km

k

rl

"O.

NO

to

rl

k c

83 In

rle

G8

k

E

\

$2

W

f; de

.. E

*

ow

m

m

kk

dd

11

ma

€2 \

Wr

l

rlrl

?S

m

e

*

a0

"w

s 8

1

gz f

31SV

M O

NIS

SP

30Yd lV101

- 2

5 -

' TOTAL RAGS

0

2-

I-- THREAD

0- r l

TOTAL

, . , ,, . . -~ , &ALL CLEARER 27 -

WEAVE I ROOM SWEEPS n ..

SPINNING

SWEEPS I ROOM

n - CARD ROOM

SWEEPS r6 0

5

4

CARD STRIPS

2

I

0

2 CARD MOTES AND FLY

r l

DUSTHOUSE 0

T W I-

8 I 0 a 9

1

J

I I I I I I

* Bagging k Ties Sold As Waste

Classification #12 PRINT CLOTH


Total Waste 1/.......12.00 Grade 1/.............95.50 - Staple-l/............3~32 Microna~re......,.... 4.25 Picker Production...340.00 lb/hl: Card Production. ..... 9.25 lb/hi Lap Weight...........l4.50 oz

1/ Weighted Average

Sliver Weight. ...... .52 . 50 gr -

R NU FA FD FL HL HY FX EM HY HI B P F W E I K D W F M F H Q T H J W

I. I

- 27 -

C l a s s i f i c a t i o n #13 DIAPER CLOTH


Total Waste - 1/. . 9.75 Picker Production. .334.00 lb/hr Grade 1 / . . . . . . . .96 .00 Card Production... . 10.75 lb/hr Staple-1/.......33/32 Lap Weight. . . . . . . . . 14.50 oz Micronaxre. ..... 4.0 S l i v e r Weight...... 56.00 gr


* Bagging k T i e s Sold As Waste

MACHINERY COMF'LEMENI' PICKER DATA CARD DATA FIBER DATA Opening & Cleaning Blades 1 Production Grade 1 Staple 1 Fine-I-Non-1 Ib c

I I 1. Hov.Fd . 4.SRRL OD. IB.Blade I 15 oz z.#ii Cond. 3. Vert. Op . 5 . i ~ ~ ~ai.0~. IFiKirsch. I 228-lb/hr

6. Cond . ness Lint M i 2 ---- ---- 20 SI& Brt.

M 1,, to 1-1/1611 ZSII 1:::

52 gr 8.84 lb/hr SLM

SLM Brt. ---- ---- 30

LU 3.#12 Lat.Op. 6.Cond. ---- ---- 50 M 1,, to 1. Hop. Fd. 4. Cond . B.Blade 15 oz 62 gr 0" 2.Vert.op. 5.Cntf.Air. F.Kirsch. 380 lb/hr 10.09 lb/hr SLM ---- ---- 20 1-1/16,,

1. Hop .Fd . 4. Cond. 2 2.Vert.O~. 5. Cond . I 3.#12 Lat.Op.

1.F-2 Fd. 3.SRRL op. B.Blade 14.75 oz 2.Sup'ior C1. 4.#12 Lat.Op. F.Kirsch. 350 lb/hr

r 4.Sup'ior C1. M.Blade 325 lb/hr 3.Sup'ior C1. B.Blade 12.5 oz

F. Kirsch.

SLM Brt.

12 lb/hr

55 gr LM Brt. 10.5 lb/hr

C l a s CARII

Tota Graa Stan Mic::

l /Wi

C l a s s i f i c a t i o n #14 CARDED BROADCLMTH


Total Waste I/, .11.5O Picker Production. .350.00 lb/hr Grade 1/,...:...98.25 Card Production... . 8.75 lb/hr Staple-1/. . . . . . .34/32 Lap Weight. . . . . . . . . 14.50 oz

1

Micronaxre. ..... 4.2 Sliver Weight. . . . . . 51.00 gr

1/We ighted Averages

* Bagging & T i e s Sold A s Waste

MACHINERY COMPLEMEEHT PICKER DATA CARD DATA FIBER DATA Blades Production Production Grade Staple Fine- -NOn- % of

I

'1.F-5 Fdr. 4.2

ness Lint Mix

S W M 1-1/16" 4.0tO ---- 100 4.Sup'ior Clr. B.2-Blade 15 02 51 gr 5.Hor.Cl.Trk. F.Kirsch. 300 lb/hr 9 lb/hr

C l a s s i f i c a t i o n #15 TOBACCO & CHEESECLOTH W

Summary of Fibe r and Production Averages

Total Waste l/. .10.75 Picker Production. .350.00 l b / h r Grade 1/........95.75 Card Production.... 10.25 lb /h r

MicronaTre.. .... 4.3 S l i v e r Weight...... 52.00 g r

- Staple-l/.. .... .34/32 Lap Weight.. ....... 14.75 oz


AVERAGE MILL CODE DY DZ FA FB FL FM m PE PF PG PH RR Width (inches) 35-40.7 3 0-42 36 36 38.5 36 35-40 40 36 -_-- 39.75 42

I . 0 0 BagZinR I * 2.00 * 1.95 I* 1.80 * 2.10 2.02 1 1.92 I - Ties I * 1.50 * 1.70 I * 1.50 * 1.50 1.62 I 1.53

Bag & bale pickings1 . 02 .02 I . 01 ,02 .07 I . 09

Clearer-card room 1 .OS I .09 I .14 I .10 I . .12 Clearer-spin room I .16 I .05 I .05 I .07 I .11 I .10 Thread-soft I .65 I .40 I .65 I .90 I 1.40 I 1.23

2.17 I I 1.77 I

1 I I ) 5 1.26 I 1). 2.08 I I I 1

hqr-p .10 - 20

1.31 I I 81

I T ~ ~ ~ x t ~ ~ ~ t ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ f I ~ 9.17 I 8.54 I 10.35 I 10.15 I 11.92 I 12.16 I 11.33 I 11.68 I 10.22 I 11.04 1 11.25 I 11-74 I 1 10.79 1 * Bagging 85 Ties Sold As Waste

I

o

I

0

CARD STRIPS

I

w 27 CARD MOTES w

I I AND FLY n "

DUSTHOUSE 0

10

4

3

2 I: 0 I

CARD DATA Opening & Cleaning Blades Production Production

MACHINERY COMFWZMEW PICKER DATA

56.5 gr 1.Hop.Fdr. 4.#12 Lat.Op. B.Blade 14 02 2.Vert.Op. 5.Cntf.Air F.Kirsch. 393 lb/hr 12.07 lb/hr 3.111 Cond.

55 gr 1.Hop.Fdr. 4.Cond. B.Blade 14 02

3.#12 Lat.Op. !a 2.#11 Cond. 5.Vert.m. F.Kirsch. 277 lb/hr 10.78 lb/hr

55 gr 1.Hop.Fdr. 4.#12 Lat.Op. B.Blade 15.5 02

3.#11 Cond. 4 2.Vert.W. 5.Sup'ior Clr. F.Kirsch. 339 lb/hr 10.41 lb/hr

52 gr 1.Hop.Fdr. 4.SRRL Op. B.Blade 15 02 2.#11 Cond. 5.#12 Lat.Op. F.Kirsch. 228 lb/hr 8.84 lb/hr 3.Vert.O~. 6.#12 Cond.

I 51 gr

51 gr

53 gr

4 l.F-5 Fdr. 3.Sup'ior Clr. B.2-Blade 15 02

r* 2.Vert.Op. 4.Hor.Cl.Trnk. F.Kirsch. 300 lb/hr 9 lb/hr

l.F-7 Fdr. 3.#12 Lat.Op. B.2-Blade 15 02

E 2.Vert.Op. 4.#12 Lat.Op. F.Kirsch 300 lb/hr 9 lb/hr

6! 1.Hop.Fdr. 2.Vert.w. B.3-Blade 16.4 02 F.Kirsch. 532 lb/hr 11.8 lb/hr

F. Kirsch.

4.#11/#12 Op.

.Buckley 12.9 02 1.Hop.Fdr. 3.Cyl. OP. -[ 1 I 50 gr 2.Mix.Fdr. 4.Super Jet F.Kirsch. 383 lb/hr 9.75 lb/hr

a

i

.*- .- I I

' I I

Cdass i f i ca t ion #16 c c DENIM


Total Waste 1/. .12.25 Picker Production. .380.00 lb/hr Grade 1 / . . . . . . . , 9 2 . 0 0 Card Production... . 14.50 lb/hr Staple-1/.. . . . . .33/32 Lap Weight . . . , . . . . . 15.75 oz MicronaTre,..... 4.0 S l i v e r Weight. . . . . . 61.00 gr

- 'B C E hl

d

C I I I 1 I I I I 1

* Bagging k Ties Sold AS Waste

UCBINBRY COMPLEUm 'PICEER DATA CdRD DATA FIBEI opening k Cleaning Bldes Production Production Grade Staph

1.Bop.Fdr. 6.112 Ut.@. WARP 15.5 oz 62 gr SLY Brt. 1-1/16 2.Vert.o~. 7.111 Cond. 473 lb/br 14 lb/br

g! 3.112 Cond. 8.Sup'ior Clr. 4.F-5 Fdr. 9.111 Cond. 5.111 Cond. 10.111 Cond.

15.4 oz 400 lb/hr lW!?7g?b/hr

F-6-25 lb/hr

S W + SLM LM+

1-1/32 1-1/32 1-1/32

.Blade

2.Vert.O~. .Kirsch.

4.5

Su(+ SLY W+

1-1/32 1-1/32 1-1/32

1" 15/16" 15/16"

- :< 1:: ---- 1 3.5 ---- 3.5 ---- 3.5 ----

11.4 oz

F-8.25 lb/hr

14.5 oz M S W Brt. S W

1.Bl.Mr. 4.Dnmtrk.Clr. 2.B.1. Mixer 5.0prator 3. Spira-Whirl

1.Bop.Fdr. 4.Sup'ior Clr. .Aldrich 16 oz 2.Gyntor 5.Bl.Fdr. f.Blade I 260 lb/hr 1:; 1 11" 3.Btr.Sect. 6.Sup.r Jet F.Kirsch. -16.75 lb/h 1" I -10 lb/hr

4.3

4.3 - -

15/16"

15/16"

1-1/32

1-1/16

WARP LM FILLING M

LM+

SGO+

1.Bl.Fdr. 8.Cond. ' B.Aldrich 15.5 oe SLY Brt. 1" 2.cond. 3.Yix.Fdr. &Super Jet

7.Cyl.Btr. 1.KirsCh. 1 349 lb/hr I !: %hr I I ' I 8 4.Btr.seot. 9.Cond.

3.5tc 4.9

4.5% 100

16.Sup.r Jet 10.Wrator I I I I I

3 9 1.#12 Ut.Op. 3.111 COnd. B.Aldrich 16 02 0 1.1-7 Fdr. 4.111 Cond. M.2-Blade 276 lb/hr 17.g lb/hr SLY Brt. 1"

IF.Kirscb. 1 I I ::IN+ SLY Brt. I 1" : 1' 2.5%

4.0

4.0 4.0 -

- 32 -

L

CJass i f icat ion #17 OTHER COLORED YARN FABRICS


-1 Total Waste - 1/. .12.25 Picker Production. .145.00 lb/hr Grade 1/........89.25 Card Production... . 11.50 lb/hr Staple-1/.. . . . . .32/32 Lap Weight. . . . . . . . . 14.75 oz MicronaTre...... 3.7 S l i v e r Weight. . . . . . 60.00 gr


1 MACHINERY CO16pLEMEENI: PICKER DATA

I Production Opening k Cleaning Blades

1.sRRL op. 2.45. Sup'ior .Kirsch

3. spira-Whirl F . Kirsch.

1.Eop.Fdr. 4.Cond. B.Kirsch. F. Kirsch.

3.Sup'ior Clr. ' 2.Sup'ior C l r . 5.Axi-Flo

15 oz 239 lb/hr

14.5 oz 475 lb/hr

14.67 oz 313 lb/hr

I I I

FIBER DATA

I neas I Lint1 Mix Production Grade Staple Fine- Non- $ o I I CARD DATA

~ _--

--e- ---- 100 55 gr SLM 1 " 9.45 lb/hr

65 gr FILLING W-15 lb/hr SGO F-10 lb/hr WARP -

SLM SGO

I I

- 33 -

Classification #18 TERRY TO" I NG

Summary of Fiber & Production Averages

Total Waste 1/. ,12.25 Picker Production.,340.00 lb/hr Grade 1/....:...91.25 Card Production,, . . 14.25 lb/hr Staple-l/(32nds)32.50 Lap Weight.. . . . . . . . 13.75 oz Micronaxre... . . . 4 .1 S l i v e r Weight. . . . . . 55.50 gr


* Bagging 8~ T i e s Sold A s Waste G = Ground Warp P = P i l e Warp

MACHINERY COWLEMENl' PICKER DATA Opening & Cleaning Blades Production

q l.Op.;&el.Ihq. S.Btr.8ect. B,Aldrich 13 oz 2.Gyrator 4.Super Jet M.Aldrich 300 lb/hr

F.Kirsch.

1.Bale Brkr. 2.Sup'ior Clr. B.2-Blade 15 oz F.Carding 300 lb/hr

1.Bl.Fdr. 4.#12 Lat.Op. B.3-Blade 14 oz 2.Sup'ior Clr. 5.#11 Cond. M.2-Blade 355 lb/hr 3.Vert.m. F.Kirsch

4.112 Lat.Op. B.3-Blade 13.36 oz I-Flo 5.Sup'ior Clr. F.Kirsch. 400 lb/hr

FIBER DATA I I I ness

CARD DATA Production Grade Staple Fine-

L!?! nrt. 11-1/32" 3 , w p I I -55 gr 16 lb/hr

55 gr I LM Brt I1-1/32**1---- 14.5 lb/hr

62 13.37 oz lb/brl 1"' I 4 O 5

50 gr Gr-SLM 15/16'' 4.2 12.72 lb/hr Pile-LM+ 1-1/32ii 4.2

FIll.-SLM 15/16" 4.2

- 34 -

Clae

Totlci Graa Stan M i c n

1 .B1 .Fdr. 2.Vert 3 .Cntf .Op. .Air.

2. he-Op . 3.Sup'ior C1. 4. Spira-Whir' 5.#12 Lat-Op,

Classification #19 HUCK TOWELLING


Total Waste 1/. 33.75 Picker Production. .394.00 lb/hr Grade 1 / . . . . . . . .88 .50 Card Production... . 14.00 lb/hr Staple-l/. ..... .32/32 . Lap Weight. ........ 14.25 02

-

Micronazre ...... 3 . 4 S l i v e r Weight.. .... 59.00 gr


I MILLCWE I A Z I L V I O V I IAVERAGE I

* Bagging & Ties Sold As Waste

3 C l a s s i f i c a t i o n #20 FLANNELS


Total Waste 1/..10.75 Picker Production..350.00 lb/hr 13.00 lb/hr Grade 1 / . . . . . . . . 94 .75 Card Produbtion....

Staple-l/. . . . . . .31/32 Lap Weight. . . . . . . . . 14.00 02

Micronaxre. . . . 4.2 S l i v e r Weight. . . . . . 58.00 gr


-

3 9.69 Total WMtr(Bagging 9.42

and ties eicluded)

* Bagging k T i e s Sold As Waste ** Includes 1.04% Napper Waste

opening k Cloaniw

1.F-7 Pdr. 5.Sup'ior Clr. .Buckley 14.75 02 /:;E:h. I 400 lb/hr 1.Bl.Fdr. 5.Gyrator 14.5 02 2.Gyrator 6.Ald.m. 3.nal. YiUr 7.Cond.

I I L l.F-7 Op. 3.Sup'ior Clr. B.Blade 12.5 01.

2.Rs-op. 4.Sup'ior Clr. YI.Bl.de 325 lb/hr F.Kireeh.

1.Bop.Fddr. 4.112 2.8up'ior Clr. S.#11 3.Sup'ior Clr. 8

1

1.r-7 Fdr. 5.#12 L8t.Op. 2.#11 Cond. 6.#11 Cond. 3.112 Lnt.09. 7.Su~lior Clr.

J I4.#11 cood: 8.#ii Cond. I I 'I - 36 -

CARD DATA 'roducticn

60 gr 14.07 lb/hr

FIBER DATA - - ... .. Grade Staple Fine- -Non- % 0

ness Lint Mix MIX $1 3.6 - SLM 1" ---- 100 5.1 MIX 12 3.6 - SLU NOIL

7/8" 5.2 ---- 75 15/16l" 3.0-4 ---- 25

FILLING % %/br 1 r s p . !1/8*, 14.8 I - - LM Brt. 1-1/10'' 4.1 ---- 45.4) LM Brt. 1-1/32" 4.5 ---- 40.9

1-1/32" 4.6 ---- 13.6,

56 gr 12 lb/hr Y 15/16"

SLY 1 5/ 16

Y 15/10" sL2 zrt. 15/18" I 1S/l6" SLM

FILLING

55 gr 10.5 lb/br LM Brt 1-1/32" ---- ---- 100

65 gr WARP S lb/br Y la* 4.3 ---- 50

Sub Brt. 1" 4.3 ---- 50 FILLING Y 15/16'' 4.5 ---- 25 Y Lt.Sp. 7/8" 4.5 ---- 75

52 12.6 gr lb/hr I WARP ub Brt 11" 1::; I---- 1100 FILLING SY Lt.SP. 13/10'' ---- 100

CL COO

Too GX? Stt M i i

1. Hop. Fdr:

E l.F-7 Fdn I

http://YI.Bl.de

Class i f t c a t i o n #21 COMBED LAWN

Summary of Fibe r

i o t a 1 Waste 1/. .24.50 Grade 1/....T..102.25 Staple-l/(32nds)37.50 MicronaTre...... 3.9


& Production Averages

P icker Production. .310.00 lb /h r Card Production.... 5.00 lb /hr Lap Weight......... 13.50 02 S l i v e r Weight. . . . . 50.00 g r

1

* Bagging 8z T i e s Sold As iYaste

CARD DATA FIBER DATA MACHINERY COMPIJ3MENT PICKER DATA Blades Production Production Grade Staple Fine- -Non- % of

Opening & Cleaning ness Lint Mix E.Bttclrlny 13.27 oz 50 gr M 1-5/32" ---- ---- 100

j F.Buckley 300 lb/hr 5.85 lb/hr 54 gr SM 1-1/8" 4.0 ---- 85.6

1-5/32" 4.0 ---- 7.2 1.Hop.Fdr. 3.#12 Lat.Op. B.2-Blade 14.25 0z

2.#15 OP. 4.Vert.m. F.Kirsch. 310 lb/hr 5.8 lb/hr SM 1-5/32" 4.0 ---- 7.2

2,Lint Op. B.Mod.Kir. 12.5 oz 47 gr a r n a k 1-7/16" 3.7 2% 100

M

j l.F-7 Fdr. F.Mod.Kir. 300 lb/hr 4.5 lb/hr

---- 1-5/32" 4.05 ---- IO ---- 1-3/16" 4.05 ---- 90 B.2-Blade 14 OZ 50 gr F.Kirsch. 330 lb/hr 5 lb/hr

' Y

I

- 37 -

Classification #22 GINGHAM, CHAMBRAY, SEERSUCKER


Total Waste .... 23.00 Picker Production..358.50 lb/hr' Grade......,...102.25 Card Production.... 6.50 lb/hr Staple(32nds)...35.50 Lap Weight......... 13.50 oz Micronaire....,. 4.1 Sliver Weight.. .... 51.00 gr

* Bagging k T i e s So ld As Waste

MACHINERY COMPLEMENT PICKER DATA Opening & Cleaning Blades Production

l.F-7 Fdr. 4.#11/#12 Op. B.Aldrich 13.4 oz 2.~re-op. 5.Clg.Trunk F.Kirsch. 420 lb/hr 3.Axi-Flo. 6. Cond . 1 .B1. Fdr . 4.Dnstrk Clr. B.Porcup. 13.5 oz 2. Vert. Op . 5.Sup'ior Clr. M.3-Blade 340 lb/hr ' 3.#11 Cond.

l.F-7 Fdr. 3.#11 Cond. B.Kirsch. 13.2 oz 2. Vert. OR. 4,#12 Late@= F.Kirsch. 420 Ib/hr

F. Kirsch.

l.F-7 Fdr.

3.#16 Op.

1.Hop.Fdr. 3.Sup'ior Clr. B.Aldrich 13.34 oz 0 2.Cond. F.Kirsch. 310 lb/hr

I WARP i FILLING WARP 14.67 oz op .Fdr. 1 .B1. Fdr . B. Kirsch. W-313 lb/hr

xi-Flo 3.#12 Lat.Op. B.Blade F-225 lb/hr FILLING

- 38 - .-

CARD DATA FIBER DATA

7.0 lb/hr

1-1/8" 4.0 4.0% 55 gr 6.25 Ib/hr I sLM+ I I I

53 gr SM 1 1-1/8" [ 4.2 [ 2% 5.14 lb/hr I

SLM Brt.

'k 0: Mix -

100

100

50 16.7 20.8 12.5

100 __c

- 100

25 75 -

c1 ii c 011

To" Gr;r Strr Mill

- 1/'

* Barn ** Incll

MACAII

1.Bl.Fdr. 2 .Vert. Op.

k l.F-5 Fdr. e: 2.Gyrator I I 3.CYl.OP.

1.- B1.Fdl

Ir

Classification #23 COMBED SATEENS


Picker Production. .416.00 lb/hr Grade l/....~..lOO.OO Card Production.... 7.75 lb/hr Staple-1/.......35/32 Lap Weight......... 14.50 02 MicronaTre.......4.2 Sliver Weight..,... 55.00 gr

l/Weighted Averages

I) Total Waste 1/. .24.00

Opening k Cleaning

- 39 -

3

kk

SA

>

>N

&

dd 0 M

ommo

0e

P-m

y!

d

P

Fc d

w 0

h

k

i

a a, M

d k

Q,

2 P

Q,

;, 3 -

40

-

CARD MOTES AND FLY I

a .-I

307 -0

-

PICKER DATA I Production

Blades I lMCflINJ3RY COWPLEMEKT Opening & Cleaning r -

TF5Fdr.- 4.#11 Cond. 1,Blade 1 14 02 2.#15 Op. 5.Sup'ior Clr. F.Carding 290 lb/hr 3.#12 Lat.Op. 6.#11 Cond.

1.F-7 Op. 5.#11/#12 Op. B.Aldrich 13.4 02 %.Suptior Clr. 6.Clg.Trunk F.Kirsch. 420 lb/hr 3. Pre-Op. 7 . Cond . 4.Axi-FlO

2.Vert.Op. 4.Cond.

F.Kirsch.

1.Bale Brkr. 5.Vert.m. B.Aldrich 14 OZ 2.Gyrator 6.Cond. 3.#4 Fdr. 7 .Gyrator 4.Ald .Op.

1 .B1 .Fdr . 4.Ald.Btr.Sect B.Aldrich 14 02 2.Incl.Gyr. 5.Cond. hl.2-Blade 368 Ib/hr 3.Horiz.Gyr. F. Kirsch.

l.F7,F5 Fdr. G.Buck.Btr.Sec,B.3-Blade 13 oz 2.#12 Lat.Op. 7.Vert.m. F.Kirsch. 276 lb/hr 3.#11 Cond. 8.#2 Scr.Sect. 4.Cntf.Air 9.Gyrator

F.Kirsch. 265 lb/hr

15.F-5 Fdr.

1 .B1. Fdr . 5.Sup'ior Clr. B.Buckley 14 02 2.#12 Lat.Op. 6.#11 Cond. F.Kirsch. 322 lb/hr

4.#11 Cond.

l.F-7 Fdr. 3.#11 Cond. B.3-Blade 13.5 02 !2 2.#12 Lat.Op. M.3-Blade 350 lb/hr

r~ 1.#7 Fdr. 3.#12 Lat.Op. B.3-Blade 13.5 02

2 3.#11 Cond. 7.#12 Cond.

F. Kirsch.

2.Vert.W. . lil.2-Blade 355 lb/hr F. Kirsch.

B.Kirsch. 14.75 02 1.F-7 Fdr. 3.#16 OP. 8 2.#15 Op. 4.#11/#12 Op. F.Kirsch. 3.02 lb/hr

CARD DATA Production

50 gr 7.0,lb/hr

45 gr 7.0 lb/hr

53 gr 8 lb/hr

65 gr 8.25 lb/hr

56 gr 6.73 lb/hr

50 gc 6.75 lb/hr

52 gr 6.5 lb/hr

40 gr 5 lb/hr

55 gr 6.5 lb/hr

42 gr 6.5 lb/hr

52 gr i. 6.35 lb/hx P 7.38 lb/hx

3 C l a s s i f i c a t i o n #25 COMBED WIDE SHEETING

Summary of Fibe r and Production Averages

Tota l Waste 1/..20.00 Picker Production..345.00 lb /hr Grade 1/....:...98.00 Card Production.... 8.00 lb /hr Staple-1/(32nds)34.50 Lap Weight. . . . . . . . . 13.75 oz MicronaTre..,....4.2 S l i v e r Weight...... 50.00 g r


* Bagging 8s Ties Sold A s Waste

MACHINERY COWIUIENT PICKER DATA Opening 8 Cleaning Blades I Production

1.Hop.Fdr. 3.#12 Lat.Op. B.3-Blade 12 . V e r t .Op. 4.#11 Cond. F. Kirsch.

~ 1 .Hop .Fdr. 3.#11 Cond. B .2-Blade 2.#12 Lat.Op. 4.Vert.Op. F.Kirsch.

l.F-7 Fdr. 4.#11 Cond. B .2-Blade 2 .Vert. Op. 5.Sup'ior C l r . F.Kirsch. 13.#12 Lat.Op.

14 oz 368 lb /hr

1 4 oz 418 lb /hr

13.75 oz 385 lb /hr

,$$.Bl.Fdr. 14 oz 2.#11/#12 Op. p.2-Blade I F.Kirsch. 231 lb /hr I I

3.#11 Cond. .2-Blade 12.57 oz .Kirsch. 329 lb /hr

CARD DATA FIBER DATA

I I I I I 48 gr SLM+ 1-1/16" 4.0 - 2.7% 100

4.5 9.5 lb/hr

1-1/16*1 4.0 ---- 50 50 gr M 7.4 lb/hr SLM+ 1-1/16" 4.0 ---- 50

- 43 -

Cla; DRh

1 /" -

Classification #26 DRAPERY & UPHOLSTERY


Total Waste 1/..13.25 Picker Production..370.00 lb/hr Grade 1/. . .:. . .90.50 Card Production. . 12.50 lb/hr Staple-1/(32nds)32.50 Lap 'Weight. . . . . . . . . 14.50 oz Microna%?e..,... 3 .6 S l iver Weight. . . . . . 57.00 gr


L Bagging D T i e s Sold AS Waste

MACHINERY COMPLEMEm Opening k Cleaning I

I I s: l.F-7 Fdr. ?..Lint Op. B.Mod.Kir. W F.Mod . K i r

l.F-7 Fdr. 4.#11 Cond. B.Blade 2.Cntf.Air 5.#12 Lat.Op. F.Kirsch. 3.Vert.W. 6.Cntf.Air.

1.Hop.Fdr. 4.Super Jet B.3-Blade 2.Vert.Op. 5.Sup'ior Clr. F.Kirsch. 3.Cond.

1.Hop.Fdr. 6.#2 Scr.3ect. B.2-Blade 2.Horiz.Sup'im 7.Inc.Sup'ior. F.Xirsch. 3.Vert.W. 8.#11 Cond.

5.Lat.m.

1.Hop.Fdr. 6.#2 Scr.Sect. B.2-Blade 2.Horiz.Sup'br 7.Inc.Sup'ior. F.Kirsch.

4.#3 Scr.Sect. 9.4'6 Cond. 5. Lat . np .

6. Cond . ' $ c) 4.#3 Scr.Sect. 9.#6 Cond.

E 3.Vert.m. 8.#11 Cond.

l.F-7 Fdr. 3.#11/#12 Op. B.Blade 8 2.Vert.Op. 4.#11/#12 Op. M.Blade

F.Kirsch.

FIEER DATA Production Production Grade DATA I DATA I ness Lint Mix

I Staple I Fine-1 - Non-1 % of1 I I I 1

48 gr SLM 1-1/32" 4.1 2.6% 100 13.75 oz 400 lh/hr 12.5 lb/hr

14.5 oz 62 gr SLM 406 lb /hr 14.03 lb/hr LM Brt.

14.5 oz 62 gr SLM sp. 406 lb /hr 9.46 lb/hr

14.5 oz 55 gr I 298 lb/hr vi-11.71 lb/ hr

F-8.86 lb /h

- 43 -

WARP MIX: SLM Brt. SLM LM Brt. Lhl EM

M.Brt. M SLM Brt. SLM SLM SUI

FILLING MI1

3.6 tz ---- 100 1" UP

1" 3.35 ---- 65 1" 3.35 ---- 35

1" 3.8 - 5.0% 25 1-1/32" 4.8 5.8% 75

1-1/32" 2.6Up 9.8% 100 1-1/16"

I I

Class i f i ca t ion #27 CORDUROY

Clz; COM


Total Waste 1/. .11.00 Grade 1/. ... . .97.50 Card Production. ... 9.00 lb/hr Staple-1/.......33/32 Lap Weight. . . . . . . . . 14.75 oz Micronaxre...... 4.25 S l iver Weight... . . . 58.00 gr

Picker Production. .340.00 lb/hr, Tot Gre S te M i u


i

* Bagging & T i e s Sold As Waste

MACHINERY COMPLEMENT PICKER DATA Opening & Cleaning Blades Production

k- 1.Hop.Fdr. 4.Ald. Or,. B.2-Blade 14 oz

CARD DATA FIBER DATA Production Grade Staple I

MCSLL 1-1/16" 4.46 ---- 50 MCSLL 1-1/16" 4.46 ---- 21.42 M 1-1/16" 4.46 ---- 28.58

55 gr 8.5 lb/hr 2. &a tor

3.B1 .Fdr. 5.~up*ior Clr. p.Kirsch. I 330 lb/hr

14.75 oz 267 lb/hr

60 gr 9 lb/hr

MCSLL l.F-7 Fdr. 4.#11 Cond. .Blade

3 .Vert. Or,. 6.Cntf.Air 2.Cntf.Air. 5.#12 Lat.Op.

1-1/16" 3.8 & ---- 100 UP

1-1/16" 4.3 ---- 100

1-1;32'? 3.7 - ---- 25 1-1/32" 4.7 ---- 5'5

1 " 3.8 - 4.8% 100 4.8

e

1-1/32" 4.6 4.6% i131n 2/3R.'

14.75 oz 434 lb/hr

56 gr 8 lb/hr

~~

SLM Brt. 1.Hop.Fdr. 4.Super Jet .3-Blade 2.Vert.w. 3.Cond. 6 .Cond.

~2.Vert.m. ~1.K Fer.

3.#11 Cond. ?.#11 Cond. 4.#12 Lat.Op.

16 sz 304 lb/hr

60 gr 10.5 lb/hr

I B r t . SM

62 gr 9.08 lb/hr

MCSLL 1.Hop.Fdr. 6.#2 Scr.Sect. B.2-Blade 2.Hor.Sup'ior. 7.Inc.Sup'ior. F.Kirsch. 3. Vert . Op . 8.#6 Cond. 4.#3 Scr.Sect. 9.#11 Cond. 5.Lat.m.

14.5 oz 405.9 lb/hr

2.Cntf.Air

.F-5 Fdr. 4.45' Sup.Clr. B.2-Blade A 1 2 Lat.Op. 5.#11 Cond. M.2-Blade I .#11 Cond. 6.#12 Cond. F.Kirsch.

55 gr 9.5 lb/hr

SLM 14.25 oz 320 lb/hr

- 44 -

C l a s s i f i c a t i o n #28 COMBED KNITTING YARN 40-60


Total Waste.. .25.00 Picker Production. .315.00 lb/hr Grade.. . . . . . . . . . ----- Card Production.. . . 5.75,lb/hr S tap le . . . . . . . . . . 40 /32 Lap Weight . . . . . . . . . 12.75 oz Micronaire. ..... 3 .5 S l i v e r Weight. . . . . . 46.00 gr

-l 1 ..

- 45 -

Classification #29 COMBED KNITTING YARN 15-40 u


Total Waste.,.,.21.75 Picker Production..335.00 lb/hr Grade...,......l04.00 Card Production,... 7.25 lb/hr Staple. , . . . . . .36/32 Lap Weight. . . . . . , 13.25 oz Micronaire......--- -- Sliver Neight. . . . . , 50.25 gr

I

$b Q,

I

and ties excl I I 1 I I I I I I I I I

* Bagging & T i e s Sold A s waste ** Includes 0.25% Invisible Waste

.

~ .d

cb

-I d

\

I

>

-

-

0 0

d

I I

-

-

I I

00

2

s:

II

I

I

II

I

I

II

+

B I

m

k \

n

k E

k\

R k

M(D

0

, 0 '.

v)b

S

m

k E \

P

kd

N.

dd

k E

k\

m

dm

Y

I

I

k E

Nd

0 0

NO

dm

k k

NE

O\ P

u

ad

N\ 2

*N

N

drm

In .d

dN

dm

'> U

I

v

Ar IO

1 no

I" N3

1 1

1

- 47 -

Classification #30 COMBED KNITTING YARN 15 AND COARSER

3 Summary of Fiber and Product ion Averages

Total Waste.....20.00 Picker Production..399.00 Ib/hr Grade..........l03.00 Card Production.... 8.75 lb/hr Staple..........34/32 Lap Weight......... 13.25 oz Micronaire. ..... 4.3 Sliver Weight...... 50.00 gr

* Bagging & Ties Sold A s Waste ** Includes 0.25% Invisible Waste

1 MACHINERY COMF'UMENT PICKER DATA CARD DATA FIBER DATA Owning & Cleaning Blades I Production Grade I Staple I Fine-I-Non-l % 0:

- 48 -

I kJ Summary of Fiber and Production Averages

1.Hop.Fdr. 4.Cage Sect .Aldrlcb Total Waste..... 8.75 Picker Production..330.00 lb/hr gl2.Axi-Feed 5.Dnstrk.Bt;. F.Kirs=h. Grade..........lOl.75 Card Production.... 8.75 lb/hr 3.Axl-Flo Staple (32nds)..33.25 Lap Weight......... Micronaire...... 4.25 Sliver Weight......

1 - 1

1.Hop.Fdr. S.Supar Jet 14.50 oz 55.25 gr -1 2.Suo'Ior Clr. B.Ald.15 Op.

4.~id.#4 op. 8.sup'ior clr.

r2 I ALL THREAD

I1 0 .* I

0 r 2 CL?%ER - I ALL SWEEPS

0 CYLINDER

I E DOFFER STRIPS

0 r4

DUSTHOUSE 0

I I

w L

.3-Blade (2.#12 Upr.Clr. 4.Cntf.Alr

8 1.Aop.Fdr. 3.Vert.m.

I l

0 1.Hop.Fdr. 4.Vert.Op. 2.Cetf .Air 5.W Coed. 3.~1rator 6.81.Fdr.

1 -

is l.F-7 Fdr. 3.SRRL Op. 6.2-Blade 2.Jr.Clr. 4.111/#12 Op. F.Klrscb.

4.Sup'ior Clr. 8.2-Blade 5.Super J e t M.2-81ade

3.111 Cond. 6.Ggrator I F.Kirsch. 13-5 Fdr. 4.Cetf.Air 3 9.Lum Blender 5.Gyrator I 3.Vert.W.

1.Hop.Fdr. 5.Super Jet B.Aldrich F.KlrSCh. I 6.Cond.

I

1 ~ o p Fdr 4 111 Clr. 6.3-Blade 8 2:Sup:lor'Clr. 5:#12 Clr. 11.9-Blade F.KlrSCb. 3.Vert.W.

14 os 370 lb/m

13.8 oz 310 lb/hr

15.75 obc 350 lb/hr

15.25 0% 383 lb/hr

14 07. 370 lb/hr

15 oz 238 lb/hr

15.25 obc 334 lb/hr

350 13.30 lhhr oz

14 oz 324 lb/hr

14.25 02 324 lb/hr

14.5 02 281 lb/br

J-PL "..&.. ann Lint Mi.

1-V91" 4.5 - 100 = I F SM 10 lb/W

MIX-1 W l-Vl6" 4.4 --- 100 Z4&r MIX-2 SUI 1-1/32" 4.0 --- 80

"1. --- --- --- 20 MIX-3 SGO 1-VM" 3.5 ---- 80

Ix)IL -- 20 ---- ---- 55 P M 1-1/16" 4.35 ---- 100 A

8.52 lb/hr

SS gr W+ 1-1/32.' 4.3 ---- 52 1-1/32" 4.3 --- 40 8 lb/br SW

SLH 1-1/32" 4.3 --- 8 I I Y 1-1/16" 3.7 - ---- 100

4.7 46 ~t 7 lb/br *I

4.56 ---- 100 2 %/hr

1" ---- -I- 100 57 gr SM 10 lb/hr

Bagglng k T i e s Sold AB Waste ** Includes 0.50% Invisible Waste

C l a s s i f i c a t i o n #32 CARDED KNITTING YARN 15 AND COARSER


Total Waste..... 8.50 Picker Production..350.00 ld/hr Grade. ........ .100.25 Card Production. ... 9.50 lb/hr Staple (32nds). .32.50 Lap Weight. . . . . . . . . 14.50 02 Micronaire. ..... 4.3 S l i v e r IYeight.. .... 57.25 gr

MACHINERY COMPLEMENT PIC1 Opening & Cleaning Blades

1.Hop.Fdr. 5.Super Jet B .Blade ;I 2.Sup'ior Clr. 6.#5 Op. F.Kirsch. n 3.Bl.Fdr. 7.Super Jet 4.#4 OP. 8.Sup'ior Clr.

3 .Vert. Op . B. 3-Blade

F. Kirsch.

3.SRRL Op. B. 2-Blade

1.Bl.Fdr.

3.#11 Cond. 6.Gyrator F.Kirsch.

4 .B 1. Fdr . 8. Gyrator

R DATA CARD DATA FIBER DATA Grade I Staple I Fine-I - Non-l % o

ness Lint Mix 15.75 oz 64 gr MIX #1 M 1-1/16" 4.4 ---- 100 350 lb/hr 8 lb/hr MIX #2 SLM 1-1/32" 4.0 ---- 80

MIX #3 SGO NO11

14 oz 55 gr M+ 370 lb/hr 8 lb/hr SM

SLM

15.25 oz 60 gr MCSML 334 lb/hr 9.51b/hr

350 lb/hr 7 to 10lb/hr 13.30 oz 53 gr M

I

2.8% 100

---- 100

14 oz 300 lb/hr I 551E?hr I 1 " 4.0 ---- 100

- ~ _ _ _ _ _ . -

1.Bl.Fdr. 4.84 op. E.Ald.Peg. 14 oz ;1 2.Gyrator 5.Super Jet F.Kirsch. 3631b/hr

3.Mix.Fdr. 6. Gyrator

REGULAR STOCK WASTE REG. 1.#7 Op. 1.#5 Fdr. B.Blade 2.#11 Cond. 2.Vert.Op. M.Blade

4.Cntf .Air 4.Cntf .Air WASTE 8 3.#12 Cond. 3.#11&#12 Cond F.Kirsch.

I B.Blade 1 F.Kirsch. B. Aldrich I F.Kirsch . B1 .Fdr . 4.Vert.m.

#12 Lat.Op. 5.Sup'ior Clr. M.2-Blade 3.#11 Cond.

13 oz 50 gr M 330 lb/hr 12 lb/hr SM Lt.Sp.

STRIPS & NOIL

16 oz 66 gr SLMB 397 lb/hr 13.24 lb/hr

NOIL

- 50 -

1-1/32' 7/8" 7/81'

- '50

50 -

C l z COB

Toil Grz S t E Mia

MILL COD1

3agging Pies Bag & bale P , Motes-precl . II Kt es- opene r I Motes-picker, Dusthouse or' Card motes 8t Flat s t r i p s cy l .& doffer Comber noils Sweeps-card :: Sweeps-spin :: Clearer-card Clearer-spin Thread-so ft Thread- P1 ied Thread-0% Total Waste (11

and ties excc

Bagging & T::

MACHINEfl OpeninU

2.Cntf.Air

1.Hop.Fdr. 2.Sup'ior Cln

1 .B1 .Fdr . 2.#12 Lat OP" 3.#11 Cond.

1 .B1 .Fdr.

3.#11 Cond.

1.#5 O p e 2.#11 Cond.

C l a s s i f i c a t i o n #33 COMBED WEAVING YARN 15-40


Total Waste. .22.00 Picker Production. ,335.00 lb/hr Grade . . . . . . . . . . lO l .50 Card Production.. . . 6.75 lb/hr S t a p l e . . . , . . . . . . 3 5 / 3 2 Lap W e i g h t . . , . . . . , . 13.50 oz Micronaire. . . . . . 4.4 S l i v e r Weight. . . . . . 52.50 gr

"3 ...

MILL CODE agging ies ap; & bale pickings otes-precl.& blend otes - ope ne r otes-picker usthouse or f i l ter ard motes & f l y la t strips y l . & dof fer strips omber n o i l s weeps-card room weeps-spin room

a d Waste (Bagging and ties excluded) 21.65 I 122.00 1 Bagging & Ties Sold As Waste

MACHINERY COMPLEblEW PICI(ER DATA CARD DATA FIBER DATA Opening k Cleaning Blades Production Production Grade Staple Fine- -Non- % of ness Lint Mix

F.Kirsch. 250 lb/hr 6 lb/hr Pima S-1#2 1-7/16" 3.8 - 30 ---- 1 .B1 .Fdr. 3.#12 Lat.Op. B.Buckley 13 oz 52 gr SM 1-1/8" 4.2 ---- 70 2.Cntf.Air

4.0

1.Hop.Fdr. 3. Axi-FlO 2.Sup'ior Clr. 4.#11/#12 Op.

1.Bl.Fdr. 4.Sup'ior Clr. 2.#12 L a t Op. 5.Super Jet 3.611 Cond. 6.Gyrator F.Kirsch.

SM i M

---- 100 H ---- 100

1 .B1. Fdr . 4.#11 Cond. B.3-Blade 14.5 oZ 1-3/32" 4.1 4.- 1/3Ir 2.Vert.Op.. 5.Sup'ior Clr. 1F.Kirsch. I 502 lb/hr I 8?5';b/hr I 'LM+ I I I pw 3.#12 Lat Op. 6.#11 Cond.

4.#12 Cond. B.Blade 5.Sup'ior Clr. F.Kirsch. I 1.m Op.

2. he- Op . 3.#11 Cond.

3.#12 Cond. B.Blade 2.#11 Cond. 4.Cntf.Air I M.Blade 1.65 Op.

13 oz 50 gr M 240 lb/hr 5.75 lb/hr

13 oz 50 gr M 240 lb/hr 5.75 lb/hr M

13.5 oz 55 gr SM , 400 lb/hr 8 lb/hr

- 100

20 80

100

i ,

I I I I I I I I I

- 51 -

C l a s s i f i c a t i o n #34

u CARDED WEAVING YARN 15-40


Total Waste..... 8.75 Picker Production..314.00 lb/hr Grade.......,..lOO.OO Card Production.... 9.25 lb/hr Staple,(32nds)..33.50 Lap Weight. . . . . . . . . 14.00 oz Micronaire...... 3.6 S l i v e r Weight. . . . . . 54.00 gr

MACHINERY COMF'LEMEm PICKER DATA CARD DATA Opening 8 Cleaning Blades Production Production Orad6 Staple Fine- -Non- % of ness Lint Mix .

1-1/16" 3.75- ---- 100 14 02 55 gr SM 370 lb/hr 9 Ib/hr

1.Bl.Fdr. 3.Clg.Ttunk ---- 5 z:&e'&?r Elrr

3

< '

5.' c : r

I

VI N

I

* Bagging BE Ties Sold As Waste ** Includes 0.5m Invis ible Waste *** Includes 0.39% Twister Sweeps & 0.67% Invis ib le Waste

1 lMCRIHgRY co PICXER DATA Blades I Production

Q J ALLTHREAD

ALL CLEARER

I ALL SWEEPS

r 6

3 CARDSTRIPS

31 CARD MOTES

AND FLY

DUSTHOUSE I 0

14 oz I 370 lb/hr 3.Clg.Trunk ---- I 1.Bl.Fdr.

8 1.Hop.Fdr. 2.Vert.m. B.Blade 14 oz F.Kirsch. 250 lb/hr

1.Hop.Fdr. 4.Cage Sect. B.Aldrich 13.8 oz 2.Axi-Feed 5.Dnstrk.Clr. F.Kirsch. 310 lb/hr 3 .Axi-FlO

1.Hop.Fdr. 5.Super Jet B.Blade d 2.Sup'ior Clr. 6.#5 Op. F. Kirsch. fa 3.Bl.Fdr. 7.Super Jet 4.64 op. 8.Sup'ior Clr.

a l.F-5 Fdr. 4.Ald.Btr.Sec. B.Aldrich n 2.Sup'ior Clr. 5.#6 Cond. F.Kirsch.

3.Vert.00.

15.75 oz 350 lb/hr

14.95 oz 332 lb/hr

1.Hop.Fdr. 3.#11 Cond. B.3-Blade 14.5 oz 2.#12 Lat.Op. 4.Vert.m. F.Kirsch. 440 lb/hr

1.Hop.Fdr. 3.SRRL Op. B.Blade 14.75 02 2.Sup'ior Clr. 4.Gyrator M.Kirsch. 350 lb/hr

F.Kirsch.

1.Hop.Fdr. 5.Dnstrk.Clr. 2.Bale Brkr. 6.Sup'ior Clr. 3 .Hop .Fdr. 4.Vert.O~. 8.Gyrator

7. Cond . 1 .B1 .Fdr. 4.Sup'ior Clr. 8.2-Blade 13.3 oz 2.112 Lat.Op. 5.Super Jet M.2-Blade 350 lb/hr 3.#11 Cond. 6.Gyrator F.Rirsch.

1.Bl.Fdr. 3.#12 Lat.0~. B.2-Blade 14 02 2. Vert. Op . F.Kirsch. 233 lb/hr

1.#7 dp. 4.#12 Cond. 0 2.Pre-Op. I 3.#11 Cond.

3.#12 Cond.

F. Kirsch.

CARD DATA FIBBR DATA'

9 lb/hr

8 lb/hr

10 lb/hr

64 gr MIX #1 8 lb/hr 1-1/16" 4.4 ---- 100 I M1x'!m /1-1/51../1.0 I---- 180

NOIL I 'Ix ":GO

11.84 lb/hr

60 gr 16.75 lb/hr

58 gr

---- 1-1/32' ---- 1"

1-1/16'

1-1/32' 1-1/32?

51.92 gr SLtdChlL 1-1/32" 3.9 ---- 100 8.8 lb/hr Pin.

Avg.

53 gr M 1" 4.65 ---- 100 10 lb/hr

52.5 gr M+ 1-1/32" 4.5 ---- 50 9 lb/hr M+ 1-1/16" 4.5 ---- 50

5.75 lb/hr

1-1/32" 1-1/8"

1-1/16" 5.05 lb/hr

55 gr SLM 1-1/32" 12.25 lb/hr

Classification #36 COMBED THREAD 60 AND FINER


Total Waste. . . . .25.25 Picker Production. .265.00 lb/hr Grade. . . . . . . . . . . ----- Card Production.. . . 4'25 lb lhr Staple, (32nds) . .45.50 Lap Weight . . . . . . . . . 12.75 oz Micronaire..,... 3 .2 S l i v e r Weight. . . . . . 42.50 gr

3

* Bading & Ties Sold As Waste :* Includes 0.38% Winder & Twister Sweeps 8~ 0.54% Twister Thread

- MACHINERY C O y p L E ~ ~ PICI(ER DATA CARLI DATA Opening & Cleaning Blades I Production Production

1.Bl.Fdr. 3.#16 Op. B.3-Blade 12 oz 42 gr 2 2.Cnti.Air 4.112 Lat.0p. F.Kirsch. 300 lb/hr 4.5 lb/hr

,-, l.Bl.Fdr, 3.Cntf.Air B.3-Blade 13.5 oz 45 gr 4 2.Sup'ior Clr. 4.Cond.l F.Kirsch. 342 lb/hr 6.25 lb/hr

1.Bale Brkr. 3.Hor.Sup'ior 8.2-Blade 13.5 oz 48 gr - 2.Vert.Sup'ior 4.Cntf.Air F.Kirsch. 291.75 lb/hr 4.83 lb/hr

1.Bl.Fdr. 6.Super Jet B.3-Blade 13.5 oz 40 gr f 2.Mix.Fdr. 7.Hor.Supilor I".Kirsch. 236 lb/hr 3.5 lb/hr 3 .#4 'op. 8.45' Sup'ior

2.4.Super Jet 9.Cntf .Air 4 5.#5 Op. 10.Clg.Trunk I

I / 1.Bale Brkr. 3.Sup'ior Clr. B.Buckley 11.75 oz 44.7 gr

M.2-Blade 247 lb/hr 5.41 lb/hr F.Kirsch

- 56 -

FIBER DATA Grade Staple Fine- -Non- $ of

ness Lint Mix MIX #1 F.G.EXt.Egpt 1-7/16" 2.8 - ---- 100

Karnak #3 1-7/16" 3.1 ---- 67 Pima S-1#2 I 1-7/16" H I ' 2.95 ---- 33 PVZ

W1

Karnak #3 1-7/16" 3.1 ---- 50 Pima S-l#2 1-7/16" 2.95 ---- 50 Karnak w3 #2 1-7/16" 3.1 ---- 100

w 4 Pima S-1#1 1-1/2" 3.1 ---- 100 ---- 1-9/32'? 4.0 ---- 100 SM

Clas; coMl3;:

Tota:: Gradu Stap:: Micrcc

MILL CODE lgging Le6 i g k bale DiCkinB ,tes-precl.& blem >tes-oDener ,tes-p icker rsthouse or filtet trd motes 0 f l y Lat strips y1.k doffer strip) mber nolle weeps-card room veeps-spin room Learer-card room tearer-spin room iread-sof t wead-Plied mead-oily >tal Waste(Baggin(1 rnd ties excluded,.

Bagging & Ties S; Includes 0.26% I

MACHINERY (( Opening k

7 1.Bl.Fdr. 31 ) 2.Cntf.Air 41 I I

1 .B1 .Fdr. 2. Gyrator

4.#4 OP.

1.Bl.Fdr. 2.Sup.ior Clr. 4,,

1.Hop.Fdr. 4,,

3.Ald .Op. 6,, 2.h.er0p.,, 5,,

6 ss I 3.#4 OP. 8 .. 1 .B1 .Fdr .

2 2.Mix.Fdr. 7 I ,

14.Super Jet,

1.Bale Brkr. E 2.Spira-Whirl B 5.#5 OP.

C i a s s i f i c a t i o n #37 COMBED THREAD 40-60 ' I


Total Waste.. , . .24,00 Picker Production. ,296.00 Ib/hr Grade. . , . , , . . , . .----- 5.25 lb/hr Staple . . . . , . . . . ,44 /32 Lap Weight. . . . , . . . . 12.50 02 Micronaire,,. . . . 3.3 S l i v e r Weight,.. , . , 44.00 gr

-)

,Card Production. . .

Bagging & Ties Sold As Waste . Includes 0.25% Invisible Waste

- MACHINERY COMPLEMEKP PICKER DATA CARD DATA FIBER DATA Opening 0 Cleaning Blades h'oduction Production Grade Staple Fine- -Non- $ of

ness Lint Mix

3 l.F-Y Fdr. 3.#12 Lat.Op. B.Blade 12 oz 44 gr #3 1-7/16" 3.7 ---- 100 a 2.~ert.0~. F.Kirsch. 325 lb/hr 6.5 lb/hr

I, 1.Bl.Fdr. 3.#16 Op. B.3-Blade 12 oz 42 gr MIX #1 2.8 - MIX-#2 , to 2.4 - 2.Cntf.Air 4.#12 Lat.Op. F.Kirsch. 300 lb/hr 4.5 lb/hr F.G.Ext.Egy.l-7/16" 3.1 ---- 100

Supim #1 1-1/2" 2.8 ---- 100

= 1.Hop.Fdr. 4.#12 Lat.Op. B.3-Blade 12 02 48 gr SM 1-1/8" 4.50 ---- 100 a 2.Cntf.Air. 5.Cond. M.Kirsch. 378 lb/hr 7.18 lb/hr 3.#11 Cond. 6.Gyrator F. Kirsch.

I

1 .B1. Fdr . 5.Super Jet $.Aldrich 1 12.5 01;

2. Gyrator 6.#5 Op. .Kirsch. 360 lb/hr 5.5 lb/hr 7.Super Jet

4.#4 op.

I 36 gr '- 1 #4 11z7/2-*13.5 I---- /loo I n 1.Bl.Fdr. 3.Cntf.Air B.3-Blade 13.5 oz 45 gr Pima 5-1#2 1-7/16" 3.0 ---- 50 2.Sup'ior Clr. 4.Cond. F.Kirsch. 342 lb/hr 6.25 lb/hr Menoufi #3 1-7/16" 3.0 ---- 50

-, 1.Hop.Fdr. 4.Super Jet \\ P.3-Blade 11.5 i r b I 50 gr lPima S-1#2 1-7/16" 3.0 ---- 16.5 2.Pre-Op.) 5.Cond. I F.Kirsch. 245 lbyhr 4.25 lb/hr Pima 5-1#3 1-7/16" 3.0 ---- 16.5 I 3 .Ald. Op. 6.Cntf.Air I I . IKarnak #3 11-7/1671(---- I---- (67, 1 1. B 1. Fdr . 6. Super Jet B. 3-Blade 13.5 'kr- 40 gr w 1 2 2.Mix.Fdr. 7.Hor.Sup'ior F.Kirsch. 236 lb/hr 3.5 lb/hr Pima S-1#2 1-7/16'' 2.95 ---- 100

f 5.#5 op. 10.Clg.Trunk Karnak #3 1-7/16" 3.1 ---- 18

i 2.9-ira-Whirl M.2-Blade 247.5 lb/hr 5.05 lb/hr

3.#4 op. 8.45' Sup'ior w 2 d4.Super Jet 9.Cntf.Air P i m 5-1#2 1-7/16" 2.95 ---- 82

1.Bale Brkr. 3.Sup'ior Clr. B.Buckley 11.75 oz 50 gr P 1-1/8" 4.3 ---- 100

F.Kir8ch. 1 - _L I I I I

- 57 -

L Classification #38 CARDED THREAD 15 AND COARSM


Total Waste.....10.25 Picker F?roduction..345.00 lb/hr Grade..........100.25 Card Production.... 10.00 lb/hr Staple..........35/32 Lap Weight......,.. 14.50 oz Micronaire... . . . 3.7 S l i v e r Weight...... 61.25 gr

and ties excl

* Bagging & T i e s Sold A s Waste ** Includes 0.50% Invisible Waste

i I

%!"I' I

L- p f

0 0

rl

I I

4

i P

d

:

d

II

I - '

I

I -

? m -

N

D)

:

d

?

* -

I d

a -

2 B kd

Od

Wd

2 k3i M

rl

k c

k\

M2

8,

00

W

rl

k c

82

d

.N 2R

k

NE

O

\

lo .w d

*

dN

02

- 5

9 -

I

Cf'assif ication #39 COMBED THREAD 15-40 AND 15 AND COARSER

..- . . . . . .

I ,


Total Waste. .24.00 Picker Production. .295.00 lb/hr Grade...........----- Card Production... . 5.75 lb/hr Staple.(32nds) ..38.25 Lap Weight. . . . . . . . . 12.00 01: Micronaire.. .... 4.1 Sliver Weight... . . . 45.00 gr

3 ...

* Bagging 8s T i e s Sold As Waste

PICKER DATA CARD DATA FIBER DATA MACHI" CoyPLFyBm Qnning k Cleaning Blades FVoduction Production Grade Staple Fine- -NOD- $ of

ness Lint Mix - 1 .B 1. Fdr . 4.Cage Sect. B.Buckley 14 oz 50 gr Pi= #2 1-7/16" 3.9 ---- 100

1a.Pre-Op. 5.Dnstrk.O~. F.Kirsch. 325 lb/hr 6.5 lb/hr 3.Sup'ior Clr. 6.Cage Sect.

1.t-7 Fdr. 3.112 Lat.Op. B.Blade 12 oz 44 gr M 1-3/32" 4.4 ---- 100 Z 2.vert.m. F.Kirsch. 325 lb/hr 6.5 lb/hr

2. Gyrator 6.#5 Op. F.Kirsch. 360 1b/hr 5.5 lb/hr 3.Mix.Fdr. 7.Super Jet

1.81 .Fdr . 5.Super Jet B.Aldrich 12.5 oz 36 gr #4 1-7/16" 3.8 -e-- 166

4 . M Op.

1.Rop.Fdr. 6.Cond. B.Q-Blade 11.5 oz 50 gr MIX #1 M 1-1/8" 4.3 ---- 100 2.Pr0-W. 7 .Opener F.Kirsch. 245 lb/hr 5.25 lb/hr MIX #2 GM l-l/8it 4.2 ---- 100 S.Bl.Fdr. 8.Sup'ior Clr. 4.Ald.O~ 9.Cntf.Air. 5.Su-r Jet 1O.Clg.Trunk

l-l/S" 4.3 ---- 100 '' Brkr. S.Sup*ior Clr. B.Buckley 11.75 oz 50 gr M M.2-Blade 247.5 lb/hr 5.05 lb/hr F. Kirsch. -

- 60 -

ENTIRE ---- A MILL SURVEYinfohouse.p2ric.org/ref/31/30280.pdf · Trash analysis by Shirley Analyser...

Documents

Transcript of ENTIRE ---- A MILL SURVEYinfohouse.p2ric.org/ref/31/30280.pdf · Trash analysis by Shirley Analyser...