Entanglement Area Law (from Heat Capacity)

38
Entanglement Area Law (from Heat Capacity) Fernando G.S.L. Brandão University College London Based on joint work arXiv:1410.XXXX with Marcus Cramer University of Ulm Isfahan, September 2014

description

Fernando G.S.L. Brand ão University College London Based on joint work arXiv:1410.XXXX with Marcus Cramer University of Ulm Isfahan, September 2014. Entanglement Area Law (from Heat Capacity). Plan. What is an area law? Relevance Previous Work Area Law from Heat Capacity. Area Law. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of Entanglement Area Law (from Heat Capacity)

Page 1: Entanglement Area Law (from Heat Capacity)

Entanglement Area Law (from Heat Capacity)

Fernando G.S.L. BrandãoUniversity College London

Based on joint work arXiv:1410.XXXX with

Marcus CramerUniversity of Ulm

Isfahan, September 2014

Page 2: Entanglement Area Law (from Heat Capacity)

Plan

• What is an area law?

• Relevance

• Previous Work

• Area Law from Heat Capacity

Page 3: Entanglement Area Law (from Heat Capacity)

Area Law

Page 4: Entanglement Area Law (from Heat Capacity)

Area Law

Quantum states on a lattice

Page 5: Entanglement Area Law (from Heat Capacity)

Area Law

Quantum states on a lattice

R

Page 6: Entanglement Area Law (from Heat Capacity)

Area Law

Quantum states on a lattice

Def: Area Law holds forif for all R,

R

Page 7: Entanglement Area Law (from Heat Capacity)

When does area law hold?

1st guess: it holds for every low-energy state of local models

Page 8: Entanglement Area Law (from Heat Capacity)

When does area law hold?

1st guess: it holds for every low-energy state of local models

(Irani ‘07, Gotesman&Hastings ‘07) There are 1D models with volume scaling of entanglement in groundstate

Page 9: Entanglement Area Law (from Heat Capacity)

When does area law hold?

1st guess: it holds for every low-energy state of local models

(Irani ‘07, Gotesman&Hastings ‘07) There are 1D models with volume scaling of entanglement in groundstate

Must put more restrictions on Hamiltonian/State!

Correlation length

spectral gap

specific heat

Page 10: Entanglement Area Law (from Heat Capacity)

Relevance

1D: Area LawSα, α < 1

Good ClassicalDescription

(MPS)

Renyi Entropies:

Matrix-Product-State:

(FNW ’91Vid ’04)

Page 11: Entanglement Area Law (from Heat Capacity)

Relevance

1D: Area LawSα, α < 1

Good ClassicalDescription

(MPS)

Renyi Entropies:

Matrix-Product-State:

> 1D: ???? (appears to be connected with good tensor network description; e.g. PEPS, MERA)

(FNW ’91Vid ’04)

Page 12: Entanglement Area Law (from Heat Capacity)

Previous Work(Bekenstein ‘73, Bombelli et al ‘86, ….) Black hole entropy

(Vidal et al ‘03, Plenio et al ’05, …) Integrable quasi-free bosonic systems and spin systems

see Rev. Mod. Phys. (Eisert, Cramer, Plenio ‘10)

Page 13: Entanglement Area Law (from Heat Capacity)

Previous Work(Bekenstein ‘73, Bombelli et al ‘86, ….) Black hole entropy

(Vidal et al ‘03, Plenio et al ’05, …) Integrable quasi-free bosonic systems and spin systems

see Rev. Mod. Phys. (Eisert, Cramer, Plenio ‘10)

2nd guess: Area Law holds for

1. Groundstates of gapped Hamiltonians

2. Any state with finite correlation length

Page 14: Entanglement Area Law (from Heat Capacity)

Gapped ModelsDef: (gap)

(gapped model) {Hn} gapped if

Page 15: Entanglement Area Law (from Heat Capacity)

Gapped ModelsDef: (gap)

(gapped model) {Hn} gapped if

gap

finitecorrelation length

(Has ‘04)

AB

Page 16: Entanglement Area Law (from Heat Capacity)

Gapped ModelsDef: (gap)

(gapped model) {Hn} gapped if

gap

finitecorrelation length

Exponential smallheat capacity

(Has ‘04)

(expectation no proof)

Page 17: Entanglement Area Law (from Heat Capacity)

Area Law?

gapfinite

correlation length

area law MPS(Has ‘04) (FNW ’91

Vid ’04) ξ < O(1/Δ)

Intuition: Finite correlation length should imply area law

X ZY

l = O(ξ)

(Uhlmann)

1D

Page 18: Entanglement Area Law (from Heat Capacity)

Area Law?

gapfinite

correlation length

area law MPS(Has ‘04) (FNW ’91

Vid ’04) ξ < O(1/Δ)

Intuition: Finite correlation length should imply area law

Obstruction: Data HidingX ZY

l = O(ξ)

1D

Page 19: Entanglement Area Law (from Heat Capacity)

Area Law?

gapfinite

correlation length

area law MPS(Has ‘04) (FNW ’91

Vid ’04)

???1D

Page 20: Entanglement Area Law (from Heat Capacity)

Area Law in 1D: A Success Story

gapfinite

correlation length

area law MPS(Has ‘04) (FNW ’91

Vid ’04)

(Hastings ’07) S < eO(1/Δ)

(Arad et al ’13) S < O(1/Δ)

ξ < O(1/Δ)

???

Page 21: Entanglement Area Law (from Heat Capacity)

Area Law in 1D: A Success Story

gapfinite

correlation length

area law MPS(Has ‘04) (FNW ’91

Vid ’04)

(Hastings ’07) S < eO(1/Δ)

(Arad et al ’13) S < O(1/Δ)

(B, Hor ‘13)S < eO(ξ) ξ < O(1/Δ)

Page 22: Entanglement Area Law (from Heat Capacity)

Area Law in 1D: A Success Story

gapfinite

correlation length

area law MPS(Has ‘04) (FNW ’91

Vid ’04)

(Hastings ’07) S < eO(1/Δ)

(Arad et al ’13) S < O(1/Δ)

(B, Hor ‘13)S < eO(ξ) ξ < O(1/Δ)

(Has ’07) Analytical (Lieb-Robinson bound, filtering function, Fourier analysis)(Arad et al ’13) Combinatorial (Chebyshev polynomial)(B., Hor ‘13) Information-theoretical (entanglement distillation, single-shot info theory)

Page 23: Entanglement Area Law (from Heat Capacity)

Area Law in 1D: A Success Story

gapfinite

correlation length

area law MPS(Has ‘04) (FNW ’91

Vid ’04)

(Hastings ’07) S < eO(1/Δ)

(Arad et al ’13) S < O(1/Δ)

(B, Hor ‘13)S < eO(ξ) ξ < O(1/Δ)

Efficient algorithm (Landau et al ‘14)

(Has ’07) Analytical (Lieb-Robinson bound, filtering function, Fourier analysis)(Arad et al ’13) Combinatorial (Chebyshev polynomial)(B., Hor ‘13) Information-theoretical (entanglement distillation, single-shot info theory)

Page 24: Entanglement Area Law (from Heat Capacity)

Area Law in 1D: A Success Story

gapfinite

correlation length

area law MPS(Has ‘04) (FNW ’91

Vid ’04)

(Hastings ’07) S < eO(1/Δ)

(Arad et al ’13) S < O(1/Δ)

(B, Hor ‘13)S < eO(ξ) ξ < O(1/Δ)

Efficient algorithm (Landau et al ‘14)

2nd guess: Area Law holds for

1. Groundstates of gapped Hamiltonians2. Any state with finite correlation length

Page 25: Entanglement Area Law (from Heat Capacity)

Area Law in 1D: A Success Story

gapfinite

correlation length

area law MPS(Has ‘04) (FNW ’91

Vid ’04)

(Hastings ’07) S < eO(1/Δ)

(Arad et al ’13) S < O(1/Δ)

(B, Hor ‘13)S < eO(ξ) ξ < O(1/Δ)

Efficient algorithm (Landau et al ‘14)

2nd guess: Area Law holds for

1. Groundstates of gapped Hamiltonians 1D, YES! >1D, OPEN 2. Any state with finite correlation length 1D, YES! >1D, OPEN

Page 26: Entanglement Area Law (from Heat Capacity)

Area Law from Specific HeatStatistical Mechanics 1.01

Gibbs state: ,

Page 27: Entanglement Area Law (from Heat Capacity)

Area Law from Specific HeatStatistical Mechanics 1.01

Gibbs state: ,

energy density:

Page 28: Entanglement Area Law (from Heat Capacity)

Area Law from Specific HeatStatistical Mechanics 1.01

Gibbs state: ,

energy density:

entropy density:

Page 29: Entanglement Area Law (from Heat Capacity)

Area Law from Specific HeatStatistical Mechanics 1.01

Gibbs state: ,

energy density:

entropy density:

Specific heat capacity:

Page 30: Entanglement Area Law (from Heat Capacity)

Area Law from Specific Heat

Specific heat at T close to zero:

Gapped systems: (superconductor, Haldane phase, FQHE, …)

Gapless systems:(conductor, …)

Page 31: Entanglement Area Law (from Heat Capacity)

Area Law from Specific Heat

Thm Let H be a local Hamiltonian on a d-dimensional lattice Λ := [n]d. Let (R1, …, RN), with N = nd/ld, be a partition of Λ into cubic sub-lattices of size l (and volume ld).

1. Suppose c(T) ≤ T-ν e-Δ/T for every T ≤ Tc. Then for every ψ with

Page 32: Entanglement Area Law (from Heat Capacity)

Area Law from Specific Heat

Thm Let H be a local Hamiltonian on a d-dimensional lattice Λ := [n]d. Let (R1, …, RN), with N = nd/ld, be a partition of Λ into cubic sub-lattices of size l (and volume ld).

2. Suppose c(T) ≤ Tν for every T ≤ Tc. Then for every ψ with

Page 33: Entanglement Area Law (from Heat Capacity)

Why?Free energy:

Variational Principle:

Page 34: Entanglement Area Law (from Heat Capacity)

Why?Free energy:

Variational Principle:

Let

Page 35: Entanglement Area Law (from Heat Capacity)

Why?Free energy:

Variational Principle:

Let

Page 36: Entanglement Area Law (from Heat Capacity)

Why?Free energy:

Variational Principle:

Let

By the variational principle, for T s.t. u(T) ≤ c/l :

Page 37: Entanglement Area Law (from Heat Capacity)

Why?Free energy:

Variational Principle:

Let

By the variational principle, for T s.t. u(T) ≤ c/l :

Result follows from:

Page 38: Entanglement Area Law (from Heat Capacity)

Summary and Open Questions

Summary:

Assuming the specific heat is “natural”, area law holds for every low-energy state of gapped systems and “subvolume law” for every low-energy state of general systems

Open questions:

- Can we prove a strict area law from the assumption on c(T) ≤ T-ν e-Δ/T ?

- Can we improve the subvolume law assuming c(T) ≤ Tν ?

- Are there natural systems violating one of the two conditions?

- Prove area law in >1D under assumption of (i) gap (ii) finite correlation length

- What else does an area law imply?