ENRICHMENTS IN THE JORDAN OIL SHALES - · PDF file · 2016-10-1223 - The...
Transcript of ENRICHMENTS IN THE JORDAN OIL SHALES - · PDF file · 2016-10-1223 - The...
![Page 1: ENRICHMENTS IN THE JORDAN OIL SHALES - · PDF file · 2016-10-1223 - The sedimentary texture (e.g., bioturbation features, laminations) are pristine 24 throughout the cores and do](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022030420/5aa7dc407f8b9ab8228ccf98/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
GSA Data Respository 2016339Repeated enrichment of trace metals and organic carbon on an Eocene high-energy shelf caused by anoxia and reworking März et al.
ARGUMENTS AGAINST HYDROTHERMAL OR EPIGENETIC METAL 1
ENRICHMENTS IN THE JORDAN OIL SHALES 2
In sedimentary rocks, hyper-enrichments of a wide range of trace metals are often explained 3
by the syn-genetic input of metal-rich hydrothermal solutions or brines into the 4
contemporaneous sea water, or by the post-depositional (epigenetic) stratiform intrusion of 5
metal-rich fluids into sedimentary formations. Here we will argue against a contribution of 6
either of these processes to the trace metal hyper-enrichments in the studied Jordan oil shales. 7
8
Ruling out epigenetic enrichments: 9
- In the cores, no stratiform or strata-cutting metal-rich veins or layers are found, but 10
the metal enrichments appear to be finely dispersed within the sediment. 11
- The organic matter is of low thermal maturity, implying that the sediments were not 12
affected by post-depositional high-temperature overprint. 13
- Highest metal enrichments do not stand in any relationship to lowest carbonate 14
contents, which implies that metal enrichments did not form in carbonate dissolution 15
features. 16
- The classical epigenetic stratiform ore deposits are most strongly enriched in Zn, but 17
also in Pb, and not substantially enriched in Cr and V. However, the Jordan oil shales 18
lack significant Pb enrichments and are instead strongly enriched in Cr and V. 19
- Fossils (e.g., planktonic and benthic foraminifera, shell fragments) are generally well 20
to moderately preserved with sharp boundaries, and show no signs of dissolution by 21
acidic hydrothermal fluids. 22
![Page 2: ENRICHMENTS IN THE JORDAN OIL SHALES - · PDF file · 2016-10-1223 - The sedimentary texture (e.g., bioturbation features, laminations) are pristine 24 throughout the cores and do](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022030420/5aa7dc407f8b9ab8228ccf98/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
- The sedimentary texture (e.g., bioturbation features, laminations) are pristine 23
throughout the cores and do not show any signs of post-depositional overprint. 24
Ruling out syn-genetic hydrothermal enrichments: 25
- There are no signs of volcanic activity on the Eocene paleo-shelf of Jordan, and no 26
signs of hydrothermal mounds, veins or pathways in older (Cretaceous-Paleocene) 27
strata in the area that could have delivered metal-rich hydrothermal solutions. 28
- Highest trace metal enrichments occur in Units II and IV, where enrichments of Zr 29
and P as well as sedimentary structures and bioturbation features indicate episodic 30
water column mixing. These conditions are not conducive to the spreading of a 31
hydrothermal plume or metal-rich brine, which would require stable salinity 32
stratification. 33
- Spreading of metal-rich brines is not supported by the continuous presence, and good 34
preservation, of planktonic and benthic fossils as well as bioturbation features that 35
exclude the presence of hyper-saline brines loaded with dissolved or particulate 36
metals at toxic levels. 37
![Page 3: ENRICHMENTS IN THE JORDAN OIL SHALES - · PDF file · 2016-10-1223 - The sedimentary texture (e.g., bioturbation features, laminations) are pristine 24 throughout the cores and do](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022030420/5aa7dc407f8b9ab8228ccf98/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
1
10
100
1000
10000 Unit I averageUnit II averageUnit III averageUnit IV averageUnit V averagePeru upwellingBlack Sea Unit 2Med. SapropelsOceanic Anoxic Event 2Cret.-Pal. Jordan (shale)Cret.-Pal. Jordan (limestone)Mid-Penn. Midcontinent (shale)Miss. Brooks Range (calc. shale)Miss. Brooks Range (phos. shale)Cambrian China (sulfide .horizon)Cambrian China (black shale)
Mo U V Zn Ni Cr
Elem
ent e
xces
s co
nten
ts re
lativ
e to
Ave
rage
Sha
le
Figure DR1Element excess contents relative to average shale composition (Wedepohl, 1971, 1991) for Jordan oil shales (average for Units I-V in cores OS22 and OS23) and various modern and ancient organic-rich lithologies deposited under anoxic/sulfidic conditions (data from Brumsack, 2006; Fleurance et al., 2013; Coveney and Glascock, 1989; Slack et al., 2015; Lehmann et al., 2007).
![Page 4: ENRICHMENTS IN THE JORDAN OIL SHALES - · PDF file · 2016-10-1223 - The sedimentary texture (e.g., bioturbation features, laminations) are pristine 24 throughout the cores and do](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022030420/5aa7dc407f8b9ab8228ccf98/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
0 200 400 600
250
200
150
100
50
0
0 2500 5000
0 1000 2000 3000
0 1000 2000
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1
0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1
20 40 60 80 100
Adj
uste
d co
ring
dept
h (m
)
V/Al (ppm/wt%)Mo/Al (ppm/wt%)
Zn/Al (ppm/wt%) Cr/Al (ppm/wt%)
FeHR/FeT
FeS/FeHR
Non-sulphide S (% of total S)
885
705
1,438
835
765
3,767
5,963
0 50 100
250
200
150
100
50
0
0 1 2 3
0 10 20 30
0 2 4 6 8
0 500 1000
0 250 500
0 4 8 12 16
Adj
uste
d co
ring
dept
h (m
)TOC (wt%)CaCO3 (wt%)
Al (wt%) S (wt%)
Hydrogen Index (mg HC/g TOC)
Zr/Al (ppm/wt%)
P/Al (wt%/wt%)
I
II
III
IV
V
Figure DR2
A
B
Ano
xic
Oxi
c
Sulp
hidi
c
Ano
xic,
no
n-su
lphi
dic
II
IV
I
III
V
A
B
C
A
B
C
Core OS22 records of (A) CaCO3 (wt%), Al (wt%), TOC (wt%), S (wt%), P/Al (wt%/wt%), and Zr/Al (wt%/ppm); and (B) Mo/Al (ppm/wt%), Zn/Al (ppm/wt%), V/Al (ppm/wt%), Cr/Al (ppm/wt%), FeHR/FeT, FeS/FeHR and non-sulphide S (% of total S), against adjusted drilling depth (meters, 0 m = top of black shale succession). Columns on right are geochemical Units (I-V) and lithological units (A-C).