Enhancing Application Performance with PfR TechAdvantage Webinar

Cisco Confidential © 2012 Cisco and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. 1

Enhancing Application Performance Performance Routing (PfR)

Jean-Marc Barozet ([email protected]) Sumanth Kakaraparthi ([email protected])

The Cisco TechAdvantage Webinars – January 9, 2013

Network Operating Systems Technology Group

© 2012 Cisco and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. Cisco Confidential 2

Register for a Technical Seminar with our Cisco Software SMEs: http://www.ciscolive.com/london/registration-packages/

Session Title Session Number

Advanced LISP Techtorial TECIPM-3191 Advanced Network Automation TECNMS-3601

Application Awareness in the Network; the Route to Application Visibility and Control TECRST-2672

Converged Access: Wired/Wireless System Architecture, Design and Operations TECCRS-2678

Enterprise QoS Design Strategy TECRST-2501

IP Mobility Deep Dive TECSPG-3668

IPv6 for Dummies: An Introduction to IPv6 TECMPL-2192

IPv6 Security TECRST-2680

Scaling the IP NGN with Unified MPLS TECNMS-3601

Software Defined Networking and Use Cases TECSPG-2667

Understanding and Deploying IP Multicast Networks TECIMP-1008


Panelists Speakers

Sumanth Kakaraparthi Product Manager

[email protected]

Shabaz Yousaf Technical Marketing Engineer

[email protected]

Jean-Marc Barozet Technical Leader

[email protected]

Scott Van de Houten Distinguished Architect [email protected]


•  Submit questions in Q&A panel and send to “All Panelists” Avoid CHAT window for better access to panelists

•  Please complete the post-event survey

•  For WebEx audio, select COMMUNICATE > Join Audio Broadcast

•  Where can I get the presentation? Or send email to: [email protected]

•  Join us February 13th for our next TechAdvantage Webinar: Unleash the Power of Your Network with One Platform Kit (onePK) www.cisco.com/go/techadvantage

•  For WebEx call back, click ALLOW phone button at the bottom of participants side panel


•  Positioning Key Customer Challenges PfR Benefits

•  Performance Routing 101

•  Use cases: Internet Edge Enterprise WAN

•  Reporting Tools – NetFlow export, SNMP

•  Conclusion

© 2012 Cisco and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. Cisco Confidential 7 How Application Are Consumed

Drastic Change in Application Consumption, Delivery, Type


37% 50% Percent of CIO’s

who say the majority of their apps will be in the Cloud by

2015

Consider Cloud ready WAN to be the Most Critical Infrastructure

for Cloud 28% : Virtualized DC

21% - SP SLA

* 1300+ Global IT professionals across 13 countries www.cisco.com/go/cloudsurvey

Expectation

Key Findings—Cisco Global Cloud Networking Survey, April 2012*


37% 60% 66% 60% 50% Percent of CIO’s

who say the majority of their apps will be in the Cloud by

2015

Consider Cloud ready WAN to be the Most Critical Infrastructure

for Cloud 28% : Virtualized DC

21% - SP SLA

Cited Performance

as a Key Challenge for Cloud

Cited Security and Policy as

a Key Challenge for Cloud

Cited Management

as a Key Challenge for Cloud

* 1300+ Global IT professionals across 13 countries www.cisco.com/go/cloudsurvey

Expectation Reality: Top Network Challenges

Key Findings—Cisco Global Cloud Networking Survey, April 2012*

vs.


WAN Internet

Branch with no direct Internet access

Branch with direct Internet access

Public SaaS Data Centers


•  I don’t know, if I am getting my SLA

•  I don’t know, the applications running in my network

•  I don’t know, how to isolate performance problems

•  I don’t know, how much non-business traffic is consuming

WAN Internet









WAN Internet









WAN Internet




•  I can’t do, anything about poor and inconsistent performance

•  I can’t do, anything about my Network outages

•  I can’t do, anything about under utilization of my Expensive WAN links

•  I can’t do, anything about unreliability for my WAN links






WAN Internet









Visibility Control Report


Save 40% operational cost by smart load balancing

Increase WAN reliability with out increase in $ cost

Avoid service outages

Improve application performance


SP-‐A

SP-‐B

BR

MC/BR

BR

BR

HQ

MC


SP-‐A

SP-‐B

BR

MC/BR

BR

BR

HQ

MC

Network Outage Network

Outage


SP-‐A

SP-‐B

BR

MC/BR

BR

BR

HQ

MC

Network Outage

Network Outage

Pfr enabled


Expensive SP-‐A

SP-‐B

BR

MC/BR

BR

BR

HQ

MC

Voice and Video

Bussiness Critical

Rest of traffic


Expensive SP-‐A

SP-‐B

BR

MC/BR

BR

BR

HQ

MC

Pfr enabled Voice and Video

Bussiness Critical

Rest of traffic


SP-‐A

SP-‐B BR

MC/BR

BR

BR

HQ

MC

Voice and Video

Business Critical

Rest of traffic

SP-‐C BR

BR


SP-‐A

SP-‐B BR

MC/BR

BR

BR

HQ

MC


Business Critical

Rest of traffic

SP-‐C BR

BR


SP-‐A

SP-‐B BR

MC/BR

BR

BR

HQ

MC


Business Critical

Rest of traffic

SP-‐C BR

BR

Ready for Business Critical

Ready for Voice and Video


SP-‐A

SP-‐B

BR

MC/BR

BR

BR

HQ

MC


SP-‐A

SP-‐B

BR

MC/BR

BR

BR

HQ

MC

Service outage

Service Outage


SP-‐A

SP-‐B

BR

MC/BR

BR

BR

HQ

MC

Service outage

Service Outage

Pfr enabled


•  Maximize all ISP bandwidth by load sharing other Internet traffic

•  Protect business Cloud applications from network brownout

Loss > 10%

•  Cloud Service preferred path – ISP1

Cloud Service & Load Balancing Policy

ISP-1 (Primary) ISP-2 (Secondary)

Detect loss > 10%

Cloud Service

Best Effort traffic

Internet •  Internet Access with Multiple ISPs

•  Optimization policies based on Prefixes

•  Egress and Ingress Optimization


•  Internet Access with Multiple ISPs

•  Optimization policies based on Prefixes

•  Egress and Ingress Optimization

•  Protect business Cloud applications from network brownout

Loss > 10%

•  Cloud Service preferred path – ISP1 •  Maximize all ISP bandwidth by load sharing other

Internet traffic

Cloud Service & Load Balancing Policy

ISP-1 (Primary) ISP-2 (Secondary)

Detect loss > 10%

Cloud Service

Best Effort traffic

Internet


•  Protect voice and video quality Latency > 200ms; Jitter > 30ms

•  Protect Critical applications from brownouts Loss > 5%

•  Voice & Video preferred path SP-A •  Critical Apps preferred path SP-A •  Maximize utilization by load sharing

Multimedia & Critical Data Policy

SP-A (MPLS VPN) SP-B (DMVPN)

Critical Apps

Best Effort traffic

WAN Detect high jitter

Voice - Video

•  Enterprise WAN

•  Optimization policies based on Applications

•  Egress Optimization only


•  Enterprise WAN

•  Optimization policies based on Applications

•  Egress Optimization only

•  Protect voice and video quality Latency > 200ms; Jitter > 30ms

•  Protect Critical applications from brownouts Loss > 5%

•  Voice & Video preferred path SP-A •  Critical Apps preferred path SP-A •  Maximize utilization by load sharing

Multimedia & Critical Data Policy

SP-A (MPLS VPN) SP-B (DMVPN)

Critical Apps

Best Effort traffic

WAN

Voice - Video

Detect high jitter


•  The Decision Maker: Master Controller (MC) Apply policy, verification, reporting No packet forwarding/ inspection required

MC

•  The Forwarding Path: Border Router (BR) Learn, measure, enforcement

•  Optimize by: Reachability, Delay, Loss, Jitter, MOS, Throughput, Load, and/or $Cost

BR BR

WAN1 WAN2


WAN1 (IP-‐VPN)

WAN2 (IPVPN, DMVPN)

MC/BR

MC/BR

BR

MC/BR

BR

BR

HQ

MC

BR BR

MC

Enterprise WAN ISP1 ISP2

Internet Edge

Branch


•  Multisite MC Peering Framework •  MC to MC Peering Framework can be used to

exchange policies, services and feedback •  Remote Site Discovery

Automatic discovery of branch routers

Simplifies Configuration – prefix and target discovery Probing Efficiency – sharing of probe data across policies Enhance PfR – remote site bandwidth discovery

BR BR

HQ

MC

MC/BR MC/BR BR MC/BR

WAN2 (IPVPN, DMVPN)

WAN1 (IP-‐VPN)


•  Each MC announces its site name, inside prefixes, probe target address and remote bandwidth

BR BR

HQ

MC

MC/BR

MC/BR

BR MC/BR

Site HQ Publish

Prefix H1, H2, H3 Responder H

Site 1 Publish

Prefix A Responder 1

Site 2 Publish

Prefix B Responder 2

Site 3 Publish

Prefix C, D, E Responder 3, 4

WAN2 (IPVPN, DMVPN)

WAN1 (IP-‐VPN)


•  Mapping table built on each site •  Allows automatic jitter probe configuration •  Allows automatic probe generation

BR BR

HQ

MC


WAN2 (IPVPN, DMVPN)

WAN1 (IP-‐VPN)

Prefixes Responders Sites Prefix A Prefix B Prefix C, D, E

Responder1 Responder2

Responder3, 4

Site 1 Site 2 Site 3


Learning

Monitoring (Passive – Active)

Choosing Your Policies

Enforcing the Path

Get the Traffic Classes in the MC database

Get the Traffic Classes Performance Metrics

Check Delay, loss, threshold, Bandwidth and more …

Use a good performing path per Traffic Class


Traffic Classes

BR BR

HQ


MC

The Rest of the Traffic

Voice, Video, Critical

10.1.1.0/24 10.1.2.0/24

10.2.1.0/24 … 10.2.9.0/24

WAN2 (IPVPN, DMVPN)

WAN1 (IP-‐VPN)

•  PfR determines the traffic classes from the traffic flowing through the border routers

•  Subsets of the total traffic must be identified, and these traffic subsets are named traffic classes

Dest. IP DSCP Delay Loss Jitter BW

10.2.2.0/24 - 0 … …

… … … … …

Dest. IP DSCP AppID Delay Loss Jitter BW

10.2.2.0/24 EF 0 … …

… … … … …

Dest. IP DSCP AppID Delay Loss Jitter BW

10.2.2.0/24 AF31 0 … …

… … … … …

Global

Application Groups

or


Prefixes

Prefixes + DSCP

Applications

Traffic Classes

Definition

Traffic Classes

BR BR

HQ


MC



•  Check Prefixes and application/DSCP per branch ‒  This will give an idea of the

number of Traffic Classes

‒  Tune Aggregation Mask as needed

Rest of the Traffic

Voice - Video

Critical Application

10.10.1.0/24 10.10.2.0/24

10.20.1.0/24 … 10.20.9.0/24

EXAMPLE Critical Apps – DSCP AF31 •  Mask 24 – 11 TCs •  Mask 16 – 2 TCs

WAN2 (IPVPN, DMVPN)

WAN1 (IP-‐VPN)


Traffic Classes

Destination Prefix DSCP

App Id

Delay Loss Ingress

BW Egress

BW BR Exit

BR BR

HQ


MC

NetFlow Cache

NetFlow Cache

§  MC commands BRs to learn Traffic Classes WAN2

(IPVPN, DMVPN) WAN1 (IP-‐VPN)

Traffic Classes


Traffic Classes

BR BR

HQ


MC


App Id

Delay Loss Ingress

BW Egress

BW BR Exit

10.1.1.1/32 EF BR1 E0/0

20.2.1.0/24 AF31 BR2 E0/0 30.1.1.0/24 0 BR1 E0/0

NetFlow Cache

NetFlow Cache

§  BRs use their NetFlow cache ‒  Top Talkers based on throughput

§  BRs aggregate based on the configured destination mask

§  Send the reports to the MC every minute

WAN2 (IPVPN, DMVPN)

WAN1 (IP-‐VPN)


Traffic Classes

Learning



Enforcing the Path

Passive

§  PfR Netflow Monitoring §  Flows Need not be symmetrical

Delay Loss

Egress BW

Reachability

Ingress BW

Passive Performance

Metrics BR BR

HQ


MC

NetFlow Cache

NetFlow Cache

WAN2 (IPVPN, DMVPN)

WAN1 (IP-‐VPN)


BR BR

HQ


MC

BR Links Ingress Egress

BR1 Gig1/1

BR2 Gig1/2


App Id

Delay Loss Ingress

BW Egress

BW BR Exit

10.1.1.1/32 0 BR1 Gi1/1

10.1.10.0/24 AF11 BR1 Gi1/2 … 0 BR2 Gi1/1

§  PfR uses NetFlow to collect and aggregate passive monitoring statistics on a per traffic class basis.

§  MC Instructs BRs to monitor the performance

WAN2 (IPVPN, DMVPN)

WAN1 (IP-‐VPN)

Traffic Classes


BR Links Ingress Egress

BR1 Gig1/1 200 40

BR2 Gig1/2 130 60


App Id

Delay Loss Ingress

BW Egress

BW BR Exit

10.1.1.1/32 0 60 0 20 40 BR1 Gi1/1

10.1.10.0/24 AF11 110 0 52 60 BR1 Gi1/2 … 0 89 1 34 10 BR2 Gi1/1

BR BR

HQ


NetFlow Cache

MC

NetFlow Cache

§  Border routers collect and report passive monitoring statistics to the master controller approximately once per minute.

§  BRs gather performance measurements using Netflow §  BRs report Performance Metrics for Traffic Classes to

the Master Controller

WAN2 (IPVPN, DMVPN)

WAN1 (IP-‐VPN)

Traffic Classes


Learning

Monitoring (Passive - Active)


Enforcing the Path

Active

§  PfR enables IP SLA feature §  Probes sourced from BR §  ICMP probes learned or configured §  TCP, UDP, JITTER need ip sla

responder

Delay Loss

Jitter

Reachability

MOS BR BR

HQ


MC

Active Performance

Metrics

Traffic Classes

WAN1 (IP-‐VPN)

WAN2 (IPVPN, DMVPN)


Fast

Active Throughput

§  Active probes on all path all the time §  Passive to measure BW only

§  Passive to measure BW only §  Active probing on current exit

BR BR

HQ


MC Traffic

Classes

§  Fast Mode is used when fast failover is needed

WAN1 (IP-‐VPN)

WAN2 (IPVPN, DMVPN)

Active Performance

Metrics


BR BR

HQ


MC


App Id

Delay Jitter Loss Ingress

BW Egress

BW BR Exit

10.1.1.1/32 EF BR1 Gi1/1

10.1.10.0/24 AF31 BR1 Gi1/2 … 0 BR2 Gi1/1

§  Active monitoring involves creating a stream of synthetic traffic (IP SLA probes) that replicates a traffic class as closely as possible.

§  MC Instructs BRs to send probes and monitor the performance

WAN1 (IP-‐VPN)

WAN2 (IPVPN, DMVPN)

Traffic Classes


BR BR

HQ



App Id


BW Egress

BW BR Exit

10.1.1.1/32 EF 60 10 0 20 40 BR1 Gi1/1

10.1.10.0/24 AF31 110 15 0 52 60 BR1 Gi1/2 … 0 89 26 1 34 10 BR2 Gi1/1

MC

§  BRs gather performance measurements using IP SLA probes ‒  The performance metrics of the synthetic traffic

are collected ‒  BRs report Performance Metrics for Traffic

Classes to the MC §  The MC applies results to the traffic class entry in the

Master Controller database

WAN1 (IP-‐VPN)

WAN2 (IPVPN, DMVPN)

Traffic Classes


Traffic Classes

Learning



Enforcing the Path

Link §  Load balancing §  Max utilization §  Link grouping §  $Cost

Application Performance §  Reachability §  Delay §  Loss §  MOS §  Jitter

BR BR

HQ


MC



WAN2 (IPVPN, DMVPN)

WAN1 (IP-‐VPN)



BR BR

HQ


2. Loss


3. Jitter 4. Delay

Load-Balancing Rest of the Traffic

Voice - Video


MC 1. Link-Group

2. Loss

4. Delay

1. Link-Group

§  Multiple resolvers can be assigned §  Set of Policies per Application Group §  Resolver Priority

WAN2 (IPVPN, DMVPN)

WAN1 (IP-‐VPN)



Learning


Enforcing the Path


Destination Prefix §  BGP

-  Egress: route injection or Modifying the BGP Local Preference attribute

-  Ingress: BGP AS-PATH Prepend or AS Community

§  EIGRP Route Control §  Static Route Injection §  PIRO

Application §  Dynamic PBR §  NBAR/CCE BR BR

HQ



MC

WAN2 (IPVPN, DMVPN)

WAN1 (IP-‐VPN)


WAN1 (IP-‐VPN)

WAN2 (IPVPN, DMVPN)

MC/BR

MC/BR

BR

MC/BR

BR

BR

HQ

MC

BR BR

MC

ISP1 ISP2

Internet Edge

Branch


•  Problem Statement Ingress/Egress path are under/over utilized Maximize bandwidth utilization (uplinks with different BW

•  Manual Solution Consider The Traffic Patterns of the Enterprise.

Does the Enterprise Host Content?

Does the Enterprise Access Content?

Not Sure? Graph Interface Byte Count

Use NetFlow

Even better, use Flexible NetFlow

•  In General, sites have a 80:20 traffic volume (in bytes) mix. Fix only the 80% Direction.

20% direction doesn’t matter unless links are widely varying speeds.

R1 R2

Egr

ess

Ingr

ess

Internet

ISP B ISP A

1000 Mbps

20 Mbps


•  “Direction Applied”, works together with Route Maps

Tool/Attribute Direction of Traffic Flow Affected Implementation

Longest Match

Local Preference

AS_Path

Inbound and Outbound

Outbound

Static or Redistribution / Received

Direction Applied: Inbound

Direction Applied: Outbound Inbound

Communities Inbound Direction Applied: Outbound


•  PfR used to load balance the traffic Distributes traffic based upon Link Utilization (Load) Links can have different bandwidths New default policies based on load-balancing

•  Cisco ASR1k is typical BR/MC with BR terminating Internet connections

•  BGP routing BRs must be iBGP peers Default routing or Partial routes or Full routes

•  PfR can actively manage up to 20k Prefixes concurrently (with ASR1000)

12.4T/15.0.1M IOS-XE 3.3.0

eBGP eBGP

R5 R4

HQ

R3

iBGP

ISP1 ISP2 ISP3

ISP4 ISP5

ISP6


Dest Prefixes (NetFlow) Learning

Monitoring Passive – Global

Policies

Path Enforcement BGP

Egress BW Utilization

Load-Balancing (range)

Inject BGP Route

BGP Local Pref

R5 R4

HQ

R3

55% 45% eBGP eBGP

iBGP

ISP1 ISP2 ISP3

ISP4 ISP5

ISP6


Inside Prefixes (BGP) Learning

Monitoring Passive – Global

Policies

Path Enforcement BGP

Ingress BW Utilization

Load-Balancing (range)

BGP AS-PATH Prepend

BGP Community

R5 R4

HQ

R3

20% 17% eBGP eBGP

iBGP

ISP1 ISP2 ISP3

ISP4 ISP5

ISP6


WAN1 (IP-‐VPN)

WAN2 (IPVPN, DMVPN)

MC/BR

MC/BR

BR

MC/BR

BR

BR

HQ

MC

BR BR

MC

Enterprise WAN ISP1 ISP2

Branch


•  Problem Statement: Recent carrier routing problem cause a network outage (Blackout). Fluctuating performance over the WAN is causing intermittent application problems (Brownout) Secondary/Backup WAN path under utilized

•  Solution: PfR Application based optimization Protect Voice and Video traffic:

primary path, check delay, loss, jitter – fallback secondary

Protect Business Applications: primary path, check loss, utilization – fallback secondary

Best effort Applications – Maximize bandwidth utilization: load balanced across SPs or use the secondary path

BR BR

HQ


MC



WAN2 (IPVPN, DMVPN)

WAN1 (IP-‐VPN)

Rest of the Traffic

Voice - Video



Prefixes

Prefixes + DSCP

Applications

Learning

Traffic Classes

BR BR

HQ


MC



WAN2 (IPVPN, DMVPN)

WAN1 (IP-‐VPN) Rest of the Traffic

Voice - Video

Critical Application Classes of Applications


Monitoring Fast – Voice/Video

Passive – Rest

Active – Critical Apps NetFlow NetFlow


App Id


BW Egress

BW BR Exit

10.1.1.1/32 EF 60 10 0 20 40 BR1 Gi1/1

10.1.10.0/24 AF31 110 20 0 52 60 BR1 Gi1/2 … EF 89 35 1 34 10 BR2 Gi1/1


App Id

Delay Loss Ingress

BW Egress

BW BR Exit

10.1.1.1/32 0 60 0 20 40 BR1 Gi1/1

10.1.10.0/24 AF11 110 0 52 60 BR1 Gi1/2 … 0 89 1 34 10 BR2 Gi1/1

Probes Probes

Traffic Classes

BR BR

HQ


MC

WAN2 (IPVPN, DMVPN)

WAN1 (IP-‐VPN)


2. Loss

3. Jitter 4. Delay

Load-Balancing Rest of the Traffic

Voice - Video


1. Link-Group

2. Loss

4. Delay

1. Link-Group

Policies

BR BR

HQ


MC



WAN2 (IPVPN, DMVPN)

WAN1 (IP-‐VPN)


•  Standard based

•  PfR NetFlow v9 Export The PfR NetFlow v9 Exporter resides on the PfR Master Controller Exports Passive Metrics, Active Metrics, Events, Configuration

•  PfR SNMP MIB TC as a row of cpfrTrafficClassTable TC Status as a row of cpfrTrafficClassStatusTable performance metrics as a row of cpfrTrafficClassMetricsTable Traps

•  NMS application vendors engaged!

•  Cisco Prime Assurance engaged!

71

BR BR

HQ

MC


WAN2 (IPVPN, DMVPN)

WAN1 (IP-‐VPN)

NetFlow

SNMP Read


•  Matching ID numbers are the way to associate template to the data records •  The header follows the same format as prior NetFlow versions so collectors will be backward compatible •  Each data record represents one flow •  If exported flows have different fields, they cannot be contained in the same template record (i.e., BGP next hop

cannot be combined with MPLS-aware, NetFlow records)

Data FlowSet Template FlowSet #0 Option Template FlowSet

#1 FlowSet ID #256

Data FlowSet FlowSet ID #257

Template ID 258

(Specific Field Types

and Lengths)

(Version, # Packets,

Sequence #, Source ID)

Flows from Interface A

Flows from Interface B

To Support Technologies Such as MPLS or Multicast, This Export Format Can Be Leveraged to Easily Insert New Fields

FlowSet ID

Option Data Record

(Field Values)

Option Data Record

(Field Values)

Template Record Template ID #257 (Specific Field

Types and Lengths)

Template Record Template ID #254 (Specific Field

Types and Lengths)

Data Record (Field Values)

Data Record

(Field Values)

Option Data FlowSet

Data Record (Field Values)


MC


Cisco 7200-NPE-G2

12.4, 12.4T 15M/T

Cisco 3900 Cisco 3800 12.4, 12.4T

15M/T

Cisco 2900 Cisco 2800 12.4, 12.4T

15M/T

Cisco 1900 Cisco 1800 12.4, 12.4T,

15M/T Cisco 6500 12.2(33)SXH (Deprecated)

Cisco 7600 12.2(33)SRB

(Limited Support)

Cisco ASR 1000

BR in IOS-XE 2.6.1 MC in IOS-XE 3.3.0

77

Cisco 3900 Cisco 3800 12.4, 12.4T

15M/T

© 2012 Cisco and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. Cisco Confidential 78 78

PfR

New Cisco ISR G2 Simplified Feature Sets Classic Cisco IOS Software Feature Sets •  New ISR-G2 1900, 2900, 3900 •  A single IOS Universal Image for all ISR Generation 2

ISR Platforms •  PfR is within the DATA package.

•  Existing ISR 1800, 2800, 3800, 7200

ASR 1000 Series •  ASR1001: Use Universal Image (U or UK9) with Advanced IP Services (AIS) or Advanced Enterprise

Services (AES) technology package license •  All other ASR1000 (ASR1002-F, ASR1002, ASR1004, ASR1006, ASR1013): Use Advanced IP

Services (AIS/AISK9) or Advanced Enterprise Services (AES/AESK9) images


•  Docwiki – Performance Routing Home Technology Overview, Solution Guides, Troubleshooting Guides, FAQ

http://docwiki.cisco.com/wiki/PfR:Home Performance Routing Technology Overview

http://docwiki.cisco.com/wiki/PfR:Technology_Overview Performance Routing Solution Guides

http://docwiki.cisco.com/wiki/PfR:Solutions Performance Routing Troubleshooting Guide

http://docwiki.cisco.com/wiki/PfR:Troubleshooting

•  Configuration Understanding Performance Routing

http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/pfr/configuration/guide/pfr-understand.html Basic Configuration

http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/pfr/configuration/guide/pfr-basic.html Advanced Configuration

http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/pfr/configuration/guide/pfr-advanced.html

79


•  2h Session: Deploying PfR Breakout – BRKRST-2362 •  4h Lab: Deploying and Operating PfR – LTRRST-2006 •  9h Techtorial: Application Visibility and Control – TECRST-2672

80


•  Thank you! •  Please complete the post-event survey •  Join us February 13th for our next webinar:

Unleash the Power of Your Network with One Platform Kit (onePK) Register: www.cisco.com/go/techadvantage Follow us @GetYourBuildOn

Thank you.

Enhancing Application Performance with PfR TechAdvantage Webinar

Technology

Transcript of Enhancing Application Performance with PfR TechAdvantage Webinar