ENGLISH NATIVE SPEAKER’S ORAL PRODUCTION IN TERMS OF …
Transcript of ENGLISH NATIVE SPEAKER’S ORAL PRODUCTION IN TERMS OF …
ENGLISH NATIVE SPEAKER’S ORAL PRODUCTION IN TERMS OF USING
COHESIVE DEVICE IN THE VLOG LINGUAMARINA AND ENGLISH LINGUA TRIP
THESIS
By:
KUSNUL KHOTIMAH
201410100311212
ENGLISH LANGUAGE EDUCATION DEPARTMENT
FACULTY OF TEACHER TRAINING AND EDUCATION
UNIVERSITY OF MUHAMMADIYAH MALANG
2021
ENGLISH NATIVE SPEAKER’S ORAL PRODUCTION IN TERMS OF USING
COHESIVE DEVICE IN THE VLOG LINGUAMARINA AND ENGLISH LINGUA TRIP
THESIS
This thesis is submitted to meet one of the requirements to achieve
Sarjana Degree in English Language Education
By :
KUSNUL KHOTIMAH
201410100311212
ENGLISH LANGUAGE EDUCATION DEPARTMENT
FACULTY OF TEACHING TRAINING AND EDUCATION
UNIVERSITY OF MUHAMMADIYAH MALANG
2021
This thesis was written by Kusnul Khotimah and was approved on
02 August 2021
By:
Advisor II, Advisor I,
Khoiriyah, M.A Dr. Sri Hartiningsih, M.M
i
ii
MOTTO AND DEDICATIONS
Motto
“Waking up before dawn is good, Because these habits increase health and wealth”
(Aristotle in Robin Sharma's book "The 5 am Club")
Dedications
This thesis is dedicated to:
My great parents dad Masrukin and mom Bude Nurul
My sister Helmina and my brothers Nu’man & Abay Always support and love me
My advisors Mrs. Hartiningsih and Mrs. Khoiriyah with her knowledge and guidance
My close friends Ryza, Fitri, Devis, Zaki always support me
all parties who have provided support in completing this thesis
iii
iv
ENGLISH NATIVE SPEAKER’S ORAL PRODUCTION IN TERMS OF USING
COHESIVE DEVICEIN THE VLOG LINGUAMARINA AND ENGLISH LINGUA TRIP
ABSTRACT
Cohesive device refers to word, phrase, phrases, names, synonyms, pronouns,
linking words feature that occurs when elements in discourse are related to each other and the
perception of one element is informed by the interpretation of another. The purpose of this
study is to analyze types of cohesive devices and determine the commonly used in the oral
production of grammatical cohesion in the vlog Linguamarina and English lingua Trip.
The method which is used in this study is the qualitative descriptive method. Thus,
document transcription of vlog Linguamarina and English Lingua trip is the source of data for
this study. The data was collected from the Linguamarina and English with Trip you tube
channel, which was uploaded on August 12, 2020, and January 6, 2021, with the theme “How
to speak English fast and understand native speaker”.
The study's finding showed that the type and the dominant cohesive device used in
oral production in the vlog Linguamarina and English with Lingua Trip. The type of cohesive
device used by a native speaker in the vlog was a reference. It is divided into personal
reference (I, you, them, us, it, me) and demonstrative reference (that, this, those, there)
substitution (one, do, so) conjunction (and, us, or, because, if, because of, but, if, the next,
now, the first up, first) and ellipsis. As a result, the most common type of cohesive device
utilized in their vlog was a reference, particularly personal reference, and conjunction,
particularly additive conjunction.
Keywords: , cohesive device, grammatical cohesion, vlog, native speaker
v
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
All praises to Allah Subhanahu Wa Ta’ala, the Almighty and Merciful God who has given the
researcher blessings for completing this thesis entitled “Native Speaker Oral Production In Term
of Using Cohesive Device”. Also, Sholawat and Salam are directed to Prophet Muhammad
Sallallahu Alaihi Wasallam who shows the right path for all Muslims in all worlds. The researcher
would like to express the highest gratitude and countless appreciation to the following people:
1. The deepest gratitude to my first advisor, Mrs. Sri Hartiningsih, and my second advisor, Mrs.
Khoiriyah, for their patience in giving advice and motivation during the consultation period.
2. The biggest appreciation to my mother, father, and all families for the prayers and support every
single night and day.
3. A special thanks to my friends and to all friends who could not be mentioned here for their help
and supports.
Malang, July 30, 2021
Kusnul Khotimah
vi
TABLE OF CONTENT MOTTO AND DEDICATIONS ................................................................................................................ ii
AUTHOR’S DECLARATION OF ORIGINALITY .............................................................................. iii
ABSTRACT ................................................................................................................................................ iv
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT .......................................................................................................................... v
CHAPTER 1 ................................................................................................................................................ 1
INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................................................... 1
1.1 Research Background .......................................................................................................................... 1
1.2 Research Problem ............................................................................................................................... 3
1.3 Research Objectives ............................................................................................................................ 4
1.4 Scope and Limitations ......................................................................................................................... 4
1.5 Research significance .......................................................................................................................... 4
1.6 Definition of Key Term……..……………………………………………………………………………………………………………5
CHAPTER II ........................................................................................................................................... ….6
REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE ................................................................................................ 6
2.1 Vlog ..................................................................................................................................................... 6
2.2 Cohesion.............................................................................................................................................. 7
2.2.1 Grammatical Cohesion ................................................................................................................. 8
2.2.1.1 Reference .................................................................................................................................. 9
2.2.1.2 Substitution ............................................................................................................................. 10
2.2.1.3 Ellipsis ...................................................................................................................................... 11
2.2.1.3 Conjunction ............................................................................................................................. 12
CHAPTER III ........................................................................................................................................... 15
RESEARCH AND METHOD ................................................................................................................. 15
3.1 Research Design ................................................................................................................................ 15
3.2 Research Object ................................................................................................................................ 16
3.3 Data Collection .................................................................................................................................. 16
3.3.1 Technique and Instrument ......................................................................................................... 16
3.3.1.1 Vlog transcription. ................................................................................................................... 17
3.3.1 The procedure of collecting data ............................................................................................... 17
vii
Data Analysis ........................................................................................................................................... 18
CHAPTER IV............................................................................................................................................ 19
FINDINGS AND DISCUSSION .............................................................................................................. 19
4.1 Findings of Study ............................................................................................................................... 19
4.1.1 Type of Cohesive Device ............................................................................................................ 19
4.1.2 The Dominant Cohesive Device Used………………………………………………………………………….…………25
Discussion................................................................................................................................................ 27
CHAPTER V ............................................................................................................................................. 31
CONCLUSION AND SUGGESTION .................................................................................................... 31
5.1 Conclusion ......................................................................................................................................... 31
5.2 Suggestion ......................................................................................................................................... 31
5.2.1 Teacher....................................................................................................................................... 32
5.2.2 EFL Students ............................................................................................................................... 32
5.2.3 Further research ........................................................................................................................ 32
REFERENCES .......................................................................................................................................... 33
APPENDIX 1 ............................................................................................................................................. 35
VIDEO TRANSCRIPTION 1 ........................................................................................................................ 35
APPENDIX 2 ............................................................................................................................................. 42
VIDEO TRANSCRIPTION 2 ........................................................................................................................ 42
APPENDIX 3 ............................................................................................................................................. 55
VIDEO TRANSCRIPTION 3 ........................................................................................................................ 55
APPENDIX 4 ............................................................................................................................................. 71
VIDEO TRANSCRIPTION 4 ........................................................................................................................ 71
33
REFERENCES
Adiantika, H. N. (2015). Cohesive devices in EFL students ’ expository writing, 4(1), 94–102.
Agus Wirawan, I. W. G., Udayana, I. N., & Sri Rahayuni, N. K. (2018). Referential Cohesion in
Donald Trump`s Speech Transcript. Humanis, 22, 111.
https://doi.org/10.24843/jh.2018.v22.i02.p16
Ahangar, A. A., Taki, G., & Rahimi, M. (2012). The use of conjunctions as cohesive devices in
Iranian sport live radio and TV talks. SKASE Journal of Theoretical Linguistics, 9(2), 56–
72.
Ahangar, A. A., Taki, G., & Rahimi, M. (2017). Identity: A cohesive device in some Persian live
sport radio and TV talks. Acta Scientiarum Language and Culture, 39(4), 397–406.
https://doi.org/10.4025/actascilangcult.v39i4.34149
Ahmad, Mahmood, & Siddique. (2019). Organisational Skills in Academic Writing: A Study on
Coherence and Cohesion in Pakistani Research Abstracts. Languages, 4(4), 92.
https://doi.org/10.3390/languages4040092
Alawdat, M. (2013). Using e-portfolios and ESL learners. US-China Educaiton Review, 3(5),
339–351.
Almutairi, N. D. (2017). Discourse Analysis of Cohesive Devices in Saudi Student’s Writing.
World Journal of Educational Research, 4(4), 516. https://doi.org/10.22158/wjer.v4n4p516
Alzankawi, M. (2019). Kuwaiti Undergraduate Problems With Cohesion in Efl Writing, 5(4),
34
55–65. https://doi.org/10.20472/iac.2017.33.003
Bahaziq, A. (2016). Cohesive Devices in Written Discourse: A Discourse Analysis of a Student’s
Essay Writing. English Language Teaching, 9(7), 112. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v9n7p112
Chernov, A. (2013). Lexical Cohesion Computed by Thesaural Relations as an Indicator of the
Structure of Text (Morris, Hirst, 1991), 4.
Chunmei, Y. (2017). Realization of Textual Cohesion and Coherence in Business Letters through
Presupposition. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 4(2), 1–5.
https://doi.org/10.14445/23942703/ijhss-v4i2p101
Coşkun, E. (2011). Cohesion in compositions of Turkish and immigrant students. Kuram ve
Uygulamada Egitim Bilimleri, 11(2), 892–899.
Creswell, J. W. (2015). Research Design Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods
Approaches (FOURTH, Vol. 3). US: SAGE.
Dewi, D. S. (2016). Analysis of Cohesion on Writing Comparative Paragraph of English
Department. ANGLO-SAXON: Jurnal Ilmiah Program Studi Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris,
7(2), 82. https://doi.org/10.33373/anglo.v7i2.507
Fidan, M. (2018). The Usage of Video Blog ( v log ) in the “ School E xperience ” Course : The
Opinions of the Pre-service Teachers Okul Deneyimi Dersinde Video Günlüğü ( v log )
Kullanımı : Öğretmen Adaylarının Görüşleri, 161–177.
Fitriati, S. W., & Yonata, F. (2017). Examining Text Coherence in Graduate Students of English
Argumentative Writing: Case Study. SSRN Electronic Journal, (June 2018).
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3053531
35
Gao, W., Tian, Y., Huang, T., & Yang, Q. (2010). Vlogging: A survey of videoblogging
technology on the web. ACM Computing Surveys, 42(4), 1–58.
https://doi.org/10.1145/1749603.1749606
Huang, H. T. D., & Hung, S. T. A. (2013). Exploring the utility of a video-based online EFL
discussion forum. British Journal of Educational Technology, 44(3), 90–94.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2012.01373.x
Karadeniz, A. (2017). Cohesion and Coherence in Written Texts of Students of Faculty of
Education. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 5(2), 93.
https://doi.org/10.11114/jets.v5i2.1998
Masithoh, H., & Fadlilah, S. (2017). Grammatical Cohesion Found in Recount Texts of
“Pathway to English” X Grade Curriculum 2013 General Program by Erlangga. Vision:
Journal for Language and Foreign Language Learning, 6(1), 77.
https://doi.org/10.21580/vjv6i11586
Mohajan, H., & Mohajan, H. K. (2018). Qualitative Research Methodology in Social Sciences
and Related Subjects. UTC Journal of Economic Development, Environment and People,
7(01), 23–48.
Parker, C., & Pfeiffer, S. (2005). Video blogging: Content to the max. IEEE Multimedia, 12(2),
4–8. https://doi.org/10.1109/MMUL.2005.41
Yang, W., & Sun, Y. (2012). The use of cohesive devices in argumentative writing by Chinese
EFL learners at different proficiency levels. Linguistics and Education, 23(1), 31–48.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2011.09.004
36