English Medium Instruction as a Tool of Internationalization in Higher Education Ernesto Macaro...
-
Upload
naomi-malone -
Category
Documents
-
view
213 -
download
0
Transcript of English Medium Instruction as a Tool of Internationalization in Higher Education Ernesto Macaro...
1
English Medium Instruction as a Tool of Internationalization in Higher Education
Ernesto MacaroUniversity of Oxford: Department of Education
2
Overview
• What should be the ‘approach’ with regard to EMI in HE? (Implementation <->Research)
• What are the methodological challenges presented by EMI research ?
• Some initial findings from a survey of 54 countries
• A research agenda for EMI Oxford
3
Aims of EMI policy in Universities
• To internationalise universities?• To facilitate learning of subjects by home students?• A way of ensuring that home students can
compete in a world market?• To build/improve English language capacity of
home country?
Are these aims shared by all participants?
4
Aims of EMI policy in universities
• A new multilingual and multicultural tool for developing intercultural communication?
• Authentic language learning?• A way of forcing change in HE pedagogy?
Are these aims shared by all participants?
5
EMI Oxford: End-user research-driven approach to EMIEnglish Medium Instruction
University faculty
Secondary school teachers
University students
School students
Parents
RESEARCH EVIDENCE
Policy makers
Employers
Evolution
7
Phase 1 of project
Aims:• To map the current situation• To identify future trends
• Phase 2: online questionnaire investigating lecturer/teacher attitudes to EMI in their subject
• Phase 3: in depth analysis of smaller number of countries: Turkey; Italy; Austria
8
Phase 1 Method
• Open ended (essentially qualitative) questionnaire• Sent to British Council staff in 60 countries
worldwide• Primary analysis of data• Follow up request to plug gaps• Secondary analysis of data: attempt to quantify• Caveat: Reliability of data
9
The Field: Public vs. Public Education
Israe
l
Greece
Sri La
nka
Netherl
ands
South Afri
ca
Cypru
s
Hong Kong
Qatar
Bulgaria
Japan
Argentina
Azerbaij
an
Bahrai
n
Vietnam
German
ySp
ainSe
rbia
Pakist
an
Estonia
Saudi A
rabia
Venezu
ela
Macedonia
Seneg
al
Hungary
Croati
aGhan
a
Mainlan
d China
Taiw
an
United St
ates
Bosnia
and Herz
egovin
a
Malaysi
a
Bangla
desh
Afghan
istan
Kazakh
stan
Brazil
Monteneg
ro0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Percentage of public vs. private universities
Private universitiesPublic universities
Countries and regions (n=36)
10
The Field: Public vs. Public Education
Malaysi
a
Azerbaij
an
Sri La
nka
Netherl
ands
Vietnam
Serb
ia
South Afri
ca
Macedonia
Afghan
istan
Czech Rep
ublic
Hong Kong
Greece
Croati
a
Saudi A
rabia
Cypru
sQata
r
Kazakh
stan
Mainlan
d China
German
yJap
an
Taiw
an
BulgariaGhan
aIta
ly
Argentina
United St
ates
Bahrai
n
Venezu
ela
Hungary
Bosnia
and Herz
egovin
a
Indonesia
Pakist
an0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Percentage of public vs. private secondary schools
private secondary schoolspublic secondary schools
Countries and regions (n=32)
11
In ‘your country’, is EMI officially ‘allowed’ in public sector?
Primary Education
n percent
Allowed 29 52.7Not allowed 21 38.2
Secondary Education
n percent
Allowed 39 70.9Not allowed 13 23.6
Universities n percentAllowed 43 78.2Not allowed 10 18.2
13
Do official policies or statements on EMI exist?
Yes
No
Not known
14
Policy Changes in Past 10 Years?
Yes
No
Not known
15
General trend in each country
More
Less
Same
Mixed
Not known
16
Examples of “Mixed Trends”
Argentina “More, there is a trend towards increasing EMI at primary and secondary levels. State schools have mostly stayed away from it, despite some talks of including EMI in Buenos Aires.”
Azerbaijan “Public primary: less; public secondary: the same; public HE: more. Private primary, secondary and HE: more. “
Israel “More, universities want to teach more in English. Schools are not moving in this direction.”
Turkey “In HEIs, more. In state schools has become less with the abolishment of an initial year of EMI in the elite state Anadolu High Schools. The stated reason for abolishing EMI here is that pupils were performing poorly in science and mathematics.”
17
Official backing for ‘trends’
• Croatia: “In the context of the Bologna Process and increased international mobility as one of its priorities, the Ministry [has] Action Plan for the removal of obstacles and strengthening of the international mobility in education … including the increase in the number of study programmes offered in foreign languages”
18
Official backing for ‘trends’
• Uzbekistan: “The presidential decree of 2012 encourages English to be taught, spoken, and used for business communication at all levels and at any institution of Uzbekistan be it journalism, economics or staff of a ministry.”
19
Equivocal official backing
• Hungary: “Government recognises the efficiency of EMI programmes, ….however, it claims that EMI affects only a small number of learners (equal opportunities), and it is costly to operate (exams, qualified teachers including native speaker teachers, and materials and textbooks). New government’s quality assurance measures might even lessen the number of currently run programmes.”
21
Public Opinion on EMI
In favour
Controversial
Not known
22
Reasons for public opinion to be in favour
23
Reasons why public opinion is divided
24
Yes
No
Not known
Are there enough qualified teachers to teach EMI?
25
Yes
No
Not known
Are there any written guidelines specifying how to teach in EMI?
26
Yes
No
Not known
Are there any written guidelines that specify English-only or permit/encourage codeswitching?
30
Yes
No
Not known
Any stated expectation of language proficiency to qualify as EMI teachers ?
31
Yes for both public and private
Yes for private only
No
Not known
Is there any provision for EMI on ITE?
Yes for both public and private
Yes for private
only
No
Not known
Is there any provision for EMI on TPD?
32
Initial conclusions from Phase 1
• Long way from a ‘global’ definition (and consensus!) of EMI and its purposes or objectives
• Need: a research-driven process approach which consults stake-holders
• Introduction of EMI in tertiary is opportunistic & instrumental: effect on secondary
33
Initial conclusions from Phase 1
• Trend is towards much more EMI• There is official backing but with some ‘interesting’
exceptions• Public opinion not wholehearted support:
‘controversial’ rather than ‘against’• Concerns relate to: lack of qualified teachers; no
stated expectations of English language proficiency; lack of structural or pedagogical guidelines; little EMI content in ITE and TPD courses
35
EMI OxfordResearch Agenda
• What is the current and predicted uptake of EMI globally?• Who or what is driving EMI implementation?• What are the different forms of EMI currently being
developed? • What kind of English? Who owns the language?• What are the implications for teacher education,
teacher educators and materials developers?• What are the most sustainable mechanisms of teacher
education and development beyond the immediate period of engagement on a course?
36
EMI OxfordResearch Agenda
• What levels of English competence enable EMI teachers to provide quality instruction?
• How would we measure the success of an EMI programme? Is the learning of academic subjects improved by EMI? Will it lead to deeper understanding? If so by which groups of students?
• To what extent do language assessment systems need to change (for teachers & students)? Validity of bilingual examinations?
38
EMI OxfordResearch Agenda
• How does classroom interaction change as the medium of instruction changes?
• What are the psycholinguistic representations in the mental lexicon of abstract concepts encountered in academic subjects through EMI?
• Do abstract concepts result in restructuring of a developing bilingual lexicon?
39
EMI OxfordResearch Agenda
• What strategies are used by students in EMI classrooms in oral and written comprehension tasks?
• What are the psycholinguistic and sociolinguistic effects on students’ home language resulting from EMI used in various phases of education?
40
EMI OxfordCentre for Research and Development on English as Medium of Instruction
Department of EducationUniversity of Oxford
For further information and particularly if you can help us publicise theonline questionnaire contact: [email protected]
Thank you for listening!