Engineering salary guide

download Engineering salary guide

of 16

description

Engineering salary guide

Transcript of Engineering salary guide

  • 2015 U.S. Compensation Outlook: Salaries Edging Upward

    As the recession slowly recedes and Americans continue to gain confidence about a slow but steady economic recovery, U.S. workers will see their salaries track a slight upward trajectory in 2015. The newest Mercer 2014/2015 U.S. Compensation Planning Survey says American employees can expect a median base salary increase of 3.0 percent in 2015, up just slightly from Mercers reported 2014 median increase of 2.9 percent.

    Mercers 2015 projection is expected to hold fairly steady across most industries and suggests that regional fluctuations will be negligible, ranging a maximum of 0.2 percent.

    For example: North Central and South Central budgets are in line

    with the national average of 3.0 percent. Northeast, Southeast and West Coast regions are

    slightly lower, hovering between 2.8 percent and 2.9 percent.

    This years anticipated boost exemplifies the trend of paychecks inching upward year over year in the post-recession economy. For example, an Aon Hewitt survey reports that the average pay raise for salaried employees climbed to 3.7 percent in 2008 and then fell to an all-time low of 1.8 percent in 2009 when the economic tumble was in full force. Since then, employees have seen slight pay improvements, and this years anticipated 3.0 percent figure will be the highest percentage gain since the 2009 low point.

    3

    U.S. employers on track to increase median base salaries by 3 percent

  • Rationale for Raises

    Theres No Escaping the Fundamental Appeal of Money

    In the Mercer survey, 99 percent of the more than 1,500 participating companies expect to raise salaries in 2015. A solid majority (68%) of those organizations report their primary reason for doing so relates to greater competition for their workforce or anticipated labor shortages and concern over retention and losing good employees.

    To illustrate the effect of salaries on talent retention strategies, the Mercer data shows that employers continue to tie pay hikes to performance and reward top employees with raises averaging 4.8 percent, while the weakest performers averaged a pay increase of just 0.1 percent. Additionally, variable pay plans are now the norm and encourage ongoing high performance by offering monetary rewards that employees must earn on an annual basis.

    In its 2014 Global Workforce Study, the professional services firm Towers Watson studied how a workers age impacts the importance of compensation. The result? Regardless of age, employees most frequently cited base pay as the motivation for joining or leaving an organization.

    Randstad recorded a similar result in its 2014 Workplace Trends and Salary Survey of hiring managers across the United States. When asked why employees resign, over half (59%) of respondents said the number-one reason employees depart is to accept a better offer of pay/benefits elsewhere.

    99%salaries in 2015

    RA

    ISE of companies expect to

    4.8%

    are rewarded with raisesaveraging

    Source: Mercer 2014/2015 US Compensation Planning Survey

    Randstad Engineering: 2015 Salary Guide2

  • The Bottom Line

    Gen Y vs. Gen Z:Whos Most Motivated by Money?

    Although salaries continue to move upward, this years limited increase indicates that employers do not feel extreme pressure to focus on employee pay as a recruiting and retention strategy, which likely reflects the measured tempo of the post-recession economic recovery. However, as more employment choices become available and companies intensify their recruiting efforts, workers expectations for salary augmentation will likely rise as well. Now is the time for employers to adjust their compensation plans in preparation for the next wave of economic growth.

    When it comes to the importance of earning more money, do Gen Ys think differently than Gen Zs, the youngest demographic group currently entering the workforce?

    In the first study of its kind, Randstad US and Millennial Branding compared the workplace expectations of Gen Y (ages 21 to 32) and Gen Z (ages 16 to 20). Money ranked as a top-three work motivator for both groups; however, Gen Ys report that money is their primary motivator to work harder and stay with their employer longer, whereas younger Gen Zs are most interested in advancement opportunities.

    (ages 21 to 32)

    (ages 16 to 20)

    Source: Randstad US/Millennial Branding, 2014 Gen Y vs. Gen Z

    Workplace Expectations Study (global results)

  • While the majority of employees can expect their wallets to be a bit fatter this year, high-performing workers will fare even better and see the biggest payoff for their efforts. Companies nationwide continue to focus on retaining and engaging top performers and are willing to pay more for the best, which explains why growing numbers of companies are adopting variable pay incentives.

    Variable compensation is a pay-for-performance model that is budgeted for separately from fixed-cost base salaries. Employees generally earn variable pay incentives on an annual basis for meeting business and individual goals, which allows companies to hold the line on base pay and incentivize workers at all levels with rewards tied to performance.

    Variable Pay Plans: Growing in Popularity

    Five-year trend of average base pay increases

    How popular are alternative pay plans? Aon Hewitt says 90 percent of companies offer broad-based variable pay plans, and in 2015 employers expect to spend 12.7 percent of payroll on variable pay for salaried exempt employees.

    Source: Mercer 2014/2015 US Compensation Planning Survey

  • With more than 5,000 workforce specialists in the United States, our field offices are well-suited to spot salary trends and observe current dynamics within recruiting and hiring. Weve therefore asked our recruiting teams across the country to share their salary-related observations and have compiled their thoughts in the Q&A below. The information cited here does not apply to every industry or geographic area but instead reflects the most significant trends reported by our teams.

    The industry is in flux. Engineering professionals know they are in high demand and as such are demanding higher pay, but many employers are not yet meeting the talent pools increased salary requirements. Candidates frequently receive several competing offers, and weve therefore seen new-hire pay inching up, but not nearly to the level expected by candidates and especially by those who are currently employed.

    As a result, most candidates are content to stay with their current employer vs. move to another company for the same pay, especially if they are in line for a promotion and dont want to become the low person on the totem pole at a new organization.

    Many companies need engineers with five to 10 years experience. However five years ago we were still in a recession, and many candidates were unable to find jobs, especially entry-level positions. The result was that fewer engineers entered the workplace, and we now see extreme competition for mid-level professionals. On the one hand, employers need to increase salaries to attract talent with the desired experience, and on the other hand they must extend counteroffers to current employees to keep these tenured individuals on board. This is a very different market than a few years ago when higher unemployment tempered engineering salaries.

    What salary trends has the engineering profession experienced in the last 12 months?

    What particular effects does the constricted labor market have on the engineering profession?

    What Were Seeing:Salary Insights from Randstad

    1

    2

    5Randstad Engineering: 2015 Salary Guide

  • Weve seen companies sweeten new-hire deals by offering flex time or adjustable work hours, increased 401(k) matches and more generous vacation or PTO packages. Weve also seen companies give promotions to current employees so as to retain them, and in some instances organizations have offered employees reduced work schedules in tandem with a pay increase. Companies are also more open to bringing in nonlocal talent, which has caused greater negotiation on relocation packages or signing bonuses in lieu of increased salaries.

    Hiring activity in Detroit and much of the central United States has picked up in response to the automotive industry recovery, with salaries moving upward as well. Houston is also a hotbed for engineering activity, and the war for talent is particularly high in that metropolitan area. Los Angeles (and California in general) is another area where engineering hiring is expanding rapidly.

    It used to be taboo for engineering candidates to have jumpy job histories, but now we see an increased number of candidates move from company to company for more money because they are in such high demand.

    What strategies are employers taking to attract and retain employees in addition to offering higher salaries?

    What regions of the United States have recently experienced the most salary change for the engineering profession?

    3

    4

    Randstad Engineering: 2015 Salary Guide6

  • Money and commute are of paramount importance to employees, so one scenario producing reduced salary negotiations is when candidates compare job offers with significantly different travel or relocation requirements. In these cases, candidates will frequently accept a lower salary so they can stay closer to home. Another instance when salaries do not dominate occurs when a new or exciting employment sector opens up and many people want to work in it. For example, weve seen environmental/civil engineers take a pay cut so they can get into energy/sustainability companies because they knew the future is strong for that particular industry.

    Are there situations in which employers dont need to compete on salary?

    5

  • Using the Randstad Salary Guide for Engineering Positions

    The data presented within this section represents a geographic listing of starting salary ranges typical for new hires with approximately three to seven years experience. Each job title listed includes three salary data points: low (25th percentile), mid (50th percentile) and high (75th percentile).

    Please note that salaries in your area may vary based upon local market conditions and position-specific requirements such as experience levels, professional certifications or certain software knowledge. In addition, the salary data has been drawn from multiple industries and may not accurately portray a companys specific situation.

    Salary data was provided by Economic Research Institute (ERI). ERI is a widely known provider of robust job competency, cost-of-living, executive compensation and salary surveys (containing 565,000 organizations data). www.erieri.com

    Because every organization structures its internal departments differently, the job titles presented here may not match those within your organization. For more detailed information and market-specific analysis, please contact one of our staffing and recruitment specialists at your local Randstad office.

    Salary KeySalary data is reported for six geographic areas:

    MidwestIllinoisIndianaIowaKansasMichiganMinnesotaMissouriNebraskaNorth DakotaOhio South DakotaWisconsin

    MountainArizonaColoradoIdahoMontanaNevadaNew MexicoUtahWyoming

    NortheastConnecticutMaineMassachusettsNew HampshireNew JerseyNew YorkPennsylvaniaRhode IslandVermont

    PacificAlaskaCaliforniaHawaiiOregonWashington

    SoutheastAlabamaDelawareFloridaGeorgiaKentuckyMarylandMississippiNorth CarolinaSouth CarolinaTennessee VirginiaWashington, DCWest Virginia

    West South CentralArkansasLouisianaOklahomaTexas

  • Job Title Low Mid High

    Job Title Low Mid High

    Randstad Engineering: 2015 Salary Guide10

    Aerospace Engineer $72,243 $79,871 $89,729

    Biomedical Engineer $66,180 $71,376 $78,097

    Civil Engineer $61,478 $67,483 $75,302

    Construction Manager $83,225 $91,997 $103,233

    Electrical Engineer $70,649 $77,624 $86,644

    Engineering Manager $95,666 $105,544 $118,265

    General and Operations Manager $75,036 $83,378 $94,178

    Instrumentation/Controls Engineer $50,467 $55,312 $61,641

    Manufacturing Engineer $59,880 $65,715 $73,318

    Mechanical Engineer $66,415 $72,945 $81,420

    Mountain

    Midwest

    Aerospace Engineer $73,323 $80,902 $90,697

    Biomedical Engineer $67,250 $72,445 $79,157

    Civil Engineer $62,516 $68,550 $76,374

    Electrical Engineer $71,730 $78,670 $87,639

    Electronics Engineer $66,961 $73,434 $81,817

    Engineering Manager $99,575 $109,702 $122,706

    Instrumentation/Controls Engineer $51,445 $56,371 $62,779

    Manufacturing Engineer $60,902 $66,776 $74,396

    Mechanical Engineer $67,486 $74,011 $82,458

    Quality Engineer $58,120 $63,716 $70,982

  • Job Title Low Mid High

    Job Title Low Mid High

    11Randstad Engineering: 2015 Salary Guide

    Aerospace Engineer $81,970 $90,326 $101,048

    Biomedical Engineer $75,255 $81,015 $88,397

    Civil Engineer $70,006 $76,712 $85,334

    Construction Manager $93,990 $103,481 $115,635

    Electrical Engineer $80,212 $87,872 $97,704

    Engineering Manager $110,557 $121,532 $135,571

    Instrumentation/Controls Engineer $57,665 $63,163 $70,261

    Manufacturing Engineer $68,215 $74,749 $83,154

    Mechanical Engineer $75,517 $82,743 $92,024

    Quality Engineer $65,124 $71,359 $79,385

    Pacific

    Biomedical Engineer $72,643 $78,276 $85,519

    Civil Engineer $67,533 $74,066 $82,507

    Construction Manager $91,033 $100,443 $112,485

    Electrical Engineer $77,483 $85,013 $94,703

    Engineering Manager $111,696 $122,806 $137,004

    General and Operations Manager $88,802 $98,477 $110,829

    Instrumentation/Controls Engineer $55,454 $60,775 $67,655

    Manufacturing Engineer $65,792 $72,150 $80,366

    Mechanical Engineer $72,898 $79,971 $89,093

    Quality Engineer $62,792 $68,847 $76,675

    Northeast

  • Job Title Low Mid High

    Job Title Low Mid High

    Randstad Engineering: 2015 Salary Guide12

    Chemical Engineer $72,635 $80,645 $90,885

    Civil Engineer $61,153 $67,463 $75,578

    Construction Manager $83,825 $92,968 $104,571

    Electrical Engineer $70,727 $78,035 $87,378

    Engineering Manager $96,839 $107,089 $120,201

    Instrumentation/Controls Engineer $49,444 $54,501 $61,036

    Manufacturing Engineer $59,484 $65,618 $73,510

    Mechanical Engineer $66,308 $73,161 $81,948

    Petroleum Engineer $102,262 $111,648 $123,571

    Quality Engineer $56,613 $62,441 $69,947

    West South Central

    Biomedical Engineer $66,631 $71,945 $78,767

    Civil Engineer $61,820 $67,977 $75,928

    Construction Manager $83,966 $92,847 $104,208

    Electrical Engineer $71,193 $78,295 $87,428

    Engineering Manager $99,352 $109,639 $122,809

    General and Operations Manager $77,802 $86,595 $97,889

    Instrumentation/Controls Engineer $50,460 $55,445 $61,908

    Manufacturing Engineer $60,182 $66,171 $73,910

    Mechanical Engineer $66,872 $73,542 $82,137

    Quality Engineer $57,360 $63,060 $70,431

    Southeast

  • Sources

    Aon Hewitt Surveyhttp://aon.mediaroom.com/2013-08-29-Aon-Hewitt-Sur-vey-Shows-2014-Salary-Increases-to-Reach-Highest-Levels-Since-2008

    Mercer 2014/2015 US Compensation Planning Surveyhttp://www.mercer.com/newsroom/pay-raises-for-us-employ-ees-continue-to-grow-steadily-new-mercer-survey-finds.html

    Randstad US and Millennial Branding, 2014 Gen Y vs. Gen Z Workplace Expectations Studyhttp://www.randstadusa.com/about/news/millennial-branding-and-randstad-us-release-first-worldwide-study-comparing-gen-y-and-gen-z-workplace-expectations/

    SHRM (Society for Human Resource Management)http://www.shrm.org/hrdisciplines/compensation/articles/pag-es/variable-pay-high.aspx

    Towers Watson 2014 Global Workforce Studyhttp://www.towerswatson.com/en-US/Insights/IC-Types/Sur-vey-Research-Results/2014/07/balancing-employer-and-employ-ee-priorities

    Randstad US is a wholly owned subsidiary of Randstad Holding nv, a $22.0 billion global provider of HR services. As the third largest staffing organization in the United States, Randstad holds top positions in permanent placement, office and administrative, IT and accounting and finance. From professional services, commercial staffing and recruitment process outsourcing to managed services and more, Randstad delivers a comprehensive range of temporary, temporary-to-hire, permanent placement and outsourced placement services. With its 5,324 employment experts, Randstad puts approximately 100,000 people to work in the United States each week through its network of nearly 1,000 branches and client-dedicated locations.

    About Randstad US

  • www.randstadengineering.com