Engaging all Learners through Technology

28
Engaging all Learners through Technology Marlene Anderson, Theresa Glass, Jennine Scott, Janet Tomy, Alison Wells

description

Engaging all Learners through Technology. Marlene Anderson, Theresa Glass, Jennine Scott, Janet Tomy, Alison Wells . Agenda. Theoretical Underpinning Constructivism Universal Design Differentiated Instruction. Agenda Cont’d. Technologies Explored - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of Engaging all Learners through Technology

Page 1: Engaging all Learners through Technology

Engaging all Learnersthrough Technology

Marlene Anderson, Theresa Glass, Jennine Scott, Janet Tomy, Alison Wells

Page 2: Engaging all Learners through Technology

Theoretical Underpinning

◦Constructivism◦Universal Design◦Differentiated Instruction

Agenda

Page 3: Engaging all Learners through Technology

Technologies Explored

Digital Social Stories, Microsoft MovieMaker, Photo Story 3, Webquestso Background and Researcho Purpose/Rationaleo Formato Strengths/Cautionso Future Researcho Benefits/Processo Sampleso Links to theory

Agenda Cont’d

Page 4: Engaging all Learners through Technology

Theory – Constructivism Framework – Universal Design for

Instruction Through Differentiated Instruction

◦ Technology Teaching Methods Teaching Strategies Engagement Levelling the playing field in terms of disabilities

Background - General

Page 5: Engaging all Learners through Technology

Constructivism Definition:

◦ The term refers to the notion that learners will construct knowledge for themselves i.e. they will construct meaning both individually and socially as they learn.

Therefore: We have to focus on the learner in thinking about

learning (not on the subject being taught) and, There is no knowledge independent of the meaning

attributed to experience (or that which is constructed) by the learner, or community of learners.

Page 6: Engaging all Learners through Technology

Learning is an active process. People learn to learn as they learn. The crucial action of constructing meaning is

mental: it happens in the mind. Learning involves language: the language we use

influences learning. Learning is a social activity: our learning is

intimately associated with our connection with other human beings.

Learning is contextual: we do not learn isolated facts and theories in some abstract ethereal land of the mind separate from the rest of our lives: we learn in relationship to what else we know, what we believe, our prejudices and our fears.

Principles of Constructivism developed by the work of John Dewey

Page 7: Engaging all Learners through Technology

Principles of Constructivism Developed by the works of John Dewey Con’t One needs knowledge to learn: it is not possible to

assimilate new knowledge without having some structure developed from previous knowledge to build on.

It takes time to learn: learning is not instantaneous. Motivation is a key component in learning. In fact, it

is essential to learning.

In order to engage our learners, we must be prepared to bring concepts in a way for students to “Construct their own learning.” This way of teaching can be done through Universal Design for Learning.

Page 8: Engaging all Learners through Technology

Origins of Universal Design◦ Ronald Mace, an architect and wheelchair user,

proposed the idea that physical environments and enhanced awareness of diverse consumers needs should proactively inform product design to be more functional to a broader range of people.

◦ The term “Universal Design” was coined to reflect this approach of proactively incorporating inclusive design features while minimizing the need for individual, retrofitted accommodations.

(McGuire, Scott and Shaw)

Background- Universal Design

Page 9: Engaging all Learners through Technology

Universal Design Principles:The original principles developed by architects, engineers

etc. are as follows: Equitable Use - The design is useful and marketable to people with

diverse abilities. Flexibility in Use – The design accommodates a wide range of

individual preferences and abilities. Simple and Intuitive – Use of the design is easy to understand,

regardless of the user’s experience, knowledge, language skills, or current concentration level.

Perceptible Information – The design communicates necessary information effectively to the user, regardless of ambient conditions or the user’s sensory abilities.

Tolerance for Error – The design minimizes hazards and the adverse consequences of accidental or unintended actions.

Low Physical Effort – The design can be used efficiently and comfortably and with a minimum of fatigue.

Size and Space for Approach and Use – Appropriate size and space are provided for approach, reach, manipulation and use; regardless of user’s body size, posture, or mobility.

(The Center for Universal Design, 2009, p. 1-2)

Page 10: Engaging all Learners through Technology

Guidelines for Universal Design for Instruction: Guidelines and Definition:

◦ Class Climate: Adopt practices that reflect high values with respect to both diversity and inclusiveness.

◦ Interaction: Encourage regular and effective interactions between students and the instructor and ensure that communication methods are accessible to all participants.

◦ Physical Environments and Products: Ensure that facilities, activities, materials and equipment are physically accessible to and usable by all students, and that all potential student characteristics are addressed in safety considerations.

◦ Delivery methods: Use multiple, accessible instructional methods that are accessible to all learners.

Page 11: Engaging all Learners through Technology

Guidelines for Universal Design for Instruction Continued:

◦ Information resources and technology: Ensure that course materials, notes and other information resources are engaging and accessible for all students.

◦ Feedback: Provide specific feedback on a regular basis.

◦ Assessment: Regularly assess student progress using multiple accessible methods and tools, and adjust instruction accordingly.

◦ Accommodation: Plan for accommodations for students whose needs are not met by the instructional design.

Page 12: Engaging all Learners through Technology

What Is Differentiated Instruction? Where does Differentiated Instruction (DI) fit within

Universal Design for Learning?◦ In a differentiated classroom, teachers begin where

students are – not at the beginning of the curriculum guide for the grade they are teaching.

◦ DI is about valuing “meaningful choice”, which translates into giving students self-determination and increased commitment. This does not mean whether they will or will not do the

assignment, but rather, how they will do the assignment.◦ Successful DI is about valuing ritual and variety.

Ritual establishes expectations and provides security. Variety can bring the joy and excitement of learning.

Page 13: Engaging all Learners through Technology

What Is Differentiated Instruction? Continued. . . To promote successful DI, teachers and

administrators MUST value a variety of assessments, which includes students encompassing a broad spectrum of ability and expression.

Teachers must feel free to share ideas, tips, reflective thoughts, etc. with staff during planning times, staff meetings, etc.

Engaged student conversation is the centre of a dynamic and interactive DI classroom.

In addition to this, leaving room for openness and “leading questions” at the end of a unit promotes thinking.

Page 14: Engaging all Learners through Technology

Basic Components of Planning Pyramid

Planning Pyramid Framework for Differentiated Instruction

Pat Miranda, PhD.University of British Columbia

Page 15: Engaging all Learners through Technology

Children’s brains are only 25% developed at birth. The more stimulation a child has through all of it’s senses

(hearing, taste, touch, smell, sight) the more rapidly further development will occur (M. Fox, 2008).

30% of children who are not reading well by the end of Grade 3 are at risk of dropping out or failing to graduate (Canadian Education Statistics Council 2006) .

At least 30% of students do not have sufficient reading or writing abilities by the end of Grade 6 (Canadian Education Statistics Council, 2006).

1.68% of students will be labelled Developmentally Disabled with 85% of these children showing language/reading disorders (Warr-Leeper, 2008).

Did You Know…? The Rationale

Page 16: Engaging all Learners through Technology

4.73% of students will be labelled Learning Disabled with 90% to 100% of these students showing some form of language/reading disorder.

1% will be labelled Emotionally Disordered with 70% of these children showing language disorders.

In a community study of 1,655 five year olds, 60% of those who were diagnosed with a psychiatric disorder were also diagnosed with a language/reading disorder

(Warr-Leeper, 2008)

Did You Know…? (cont’d)

Page 17: Engaging all Learners through Technology

Young people absorb an average of 8.5 hours of digital and video sensory stimulation a day. By twenty years of age the average individual has spent more then 20,000 hours on the Web, and over 10,000 hours playing video games

The educational model used to be based on increasing students overall stored information. Now information becomes obsolete quickly. As information is now retrieved easily through technology, education needs to shift to help students know where to find the information they need.

Technology helps us to develop new and efficient ways of finding, synthesizing, and communicating information. This allows learning to take place with a broader audience.

Studies suggest that individuals who spend a great deal of time on-line see an increase in decision making, integrating complex information, and short-term memory.

( George, 2008)

Did You Know…? (cont’d)

Page 18: Engaging all Learners through Technology

Insert image

Digital Social Stories

Page 19: Engaging all Learners through Technology

Developed by Gray, 1991

Are an intervention used to support social skill development, typically for students with autism spectrum disorders (ASD)

Have a specifically designed style and format

Describe a situation in terms of relevant social cues(Briody & McGarry, 2005; Delano & Stone, 2008; Gut & Safran, 2002; Gray &

Garland, 1993; Moore, 2004; More, 2008)

Social Stories

Page 20: Engaging all Learners through Technology

Descriptive Sentences- provide facts of the situation answering the who, what, where, when, and why questions

Perspective Sentences- describe another person’s feelings and behaviours

Directive Sentence- suggest a socially appropriate response to a situation

Affirmative Sentence- stress an important point and reassures the reader

(Delano & Stone, 2008; Gut & Safran, 2002, More, 2008).

Sentence Types

Page 21: Engaging all Learners through Technology

Student Specific Extensive training not required Practice/review of skills Increases communication Easily embedded into

classroom/curriculum Breaks down difficult social

concepts/understandings Visually engaging(Briody & McGarry, 2005; Crozier & Sileo, 2005; Gut & Safran, 2002; More,

2008; Rogers & Myles, 2001; Soenksen & Alper, 2006)

Strengths

Page 22: Engaging all Learners through Technology

Limited body of empirical evidence

No empirical data supporting story format

Difficult to attribute effectiveness, usually utilized with other interventions

They are only as effective as their use(Briody & McGarry, 2005; Crozier & Sileo, 2005; Gut & Safran, 2002; More,

2008; Moore, 2004; Soenksen & Alper, 2006)

Cautions

Page 23: Engaging all Learners through Technology

Effectiveness with a wider audience

Individual components (visuals, sentence ratio, text)

Control groups

(Briody & McGarry, 2005; Crozier & Sileo, 2005; Gut & Safran, 2002; More, 2008; Moore, 2004; Soenksen & Alper, 2006)

Future Research

Page 24: Engaging all Learners through Technology

Dynamic, engaging learning experiences Increased motivation, engagement Digital images increase flexibility, allow for

revisiting Allow for student engagement/participation Visually realistic, individual, flexible, and

inclusive Bank of stories may be created Addresses a variety of learning styles

(Bernad-Ripoll, 2007; More, 2008)

Digital Social Stories

Page 25: Engaging all Learners through Technology

Digital Social Story

Identify Target Behaviour

Review Behaviour Data

Communicate With Families

Identify Functional Behaviours

Write Story Script

Write From Student

Perspective

Based on Target Behaviour

One to Two Sentences per

Page

Compile Photos

People Settings

Obtain From Digital Camera

or Online Sources

Edit Photos and Save on

Computer

Utilize Digital Media

Add Text to Slides on

PowerPoint

Add Digital Photos

Record and Add Narration

The Process

Page 26: Engaging all Learners through Technology

Linking to Theory…

Page 27: Engaging all Learners through Technology

ReferencesAli, S. & Fredrickson, N. (2006). Investigating the Evidence Base of Social Stories. Educational Psychology in Practice, 22(4), 355-377.Benjamin A. (2006). Valuing Differentiated Instruction. Alexandria: Eye on Education.Bernard-Ripoll, S. (2007). Using a Self-as-Model Video Combined with Social Stories to Help a Child with Asperger Syndrome Understand Emotions. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 22(2), 100-106.Brigman, G., Lane, D., Lawrence, R., & Switzer, D. (1999). Teaching children school success skills. The Journal of Educational Research, 92, 323-329. Briody, J. & McGarry, K. (2005). Using Social Stories to Ease Children’s Transitions. Beyond the Journal,

Young Children on the Web. Burgstahler, S. (2009). Universal Design of Instruction (UDI): Definition, Principles, And Examples.

Seattle: University of Washington. Retrieved September 5/09 from http://www.washington.edu/doit/Brochures/PDF/instruction.pdf

Crozier, S. & Sileo, N. (2005). Encouraging Positive Behaviour with Social Stories. Council for Exceptional Children, 37(6), 26-31. Canadian Education Statistics Council. (2009) Pan Education indicators program. Retrieved September

19/09 from http://www.cesc.ca/mainE.html Delano, M. & Stone, L. (2008). Extending the Use of Social Stories to Young Children with Emotional and Behavioural Disabilities. Beyond Behaviour, pp.2-7.  Fox, M. (2008) Reading magic: Why reading aloud to our children will change their lives forever. New

York: Harcourt inc.

Page 28: Engaging all Learners through Technology

George, L. (2008, November). Dumbed down; The troubling science of how technology is rewiring kids’ brains. Macleans, 11 (17), 56-59.

Gray, C. (2000). The New Social Story Book (Illustrated ed.). Arlington, TX: Future Horizons. Gray. C. & Garland, J. (1993). Social stories: Improving responses of students with autism with accurate social information. Focus on Autistic Behaviour, 8, 1-10. Gut, D.M., & Safran, S.P. (2002). Cooperative learning and social stories: Effective social skills strategies for reading teachers. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 18, 87-91.Hein, G. E. (1991, October). Constructivist Learning Theory. Retrieved September 26/09 from http:

http://www.exploratorium.edu/ifi/resources/constructivistlearning.htmlMcGuire, J. M., Scott, S.S., Shaw, S.F. (2006). Universal Design and Its Applications in Educational

Environments. Remedial and Special Education, 27 (3), 166-175.Miranda, P. (2009). Workshop on Universal Design. University of British Columbia.Moore, P.S. (2004). The use of social stories in a psychology service for children with learning disabilities: a case study of a sleep problem. British Journal of Learning Disabilities, 32, 133- 138. More, C. (2008). Digital Stories Targeting Social Skills for Children With Disabilities: Multidimensional Learning. Intervention in School and Clinic, 43(3), 168-177. Rogers, M.F. & Myles, B.S. (2001). Using Social Stories and Comic Strip Conversations to Interpret Social Situations for an Adolescent with Asperger Syndrome. Intervention in School and Clinic, 38(5), 310-313. Smith, S.W., & Gilles, D.L. (2003). Using key instructional elements to systematically promote social skill generalization for students with challenging behavior. Intervention in School and Clinic, 39, 30-37.  Soenksen. D. & Alper, S. (2006). Teaching a Young Child to Appropriately Gain Attention of Peers Using a Social Story Intervention. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 21(1), 36-44. Warr-Leeper, G. (2008) . Communication at the heart of education. University of Western Ontario.