Energy Trading, Competition and Policy Harmonization in the ASEAN

download Energy Trading, Competition and Policy Harmonization in the ASEAN

of 11

Transcript of Energy Trading, Competition and Policy Harmonization in the ASEAN

  • 7/26/2019 Energy Trading, Competition and Policy Harmonization in the ASEAN

    1/11

    FEBRU

    ENERGY TRADING,COMPETITION,AND

    POLICY HARMONIZATIONIN THEASEAN

    9.2VOLUME

    PAPEROCCASIONAL

  • 7/26/2019 Energy Trading, Competition and Policy Harmonization in the ASEAN

    2/11

    With the formal economic integration of the 10 ASEAN

    member countries into a single market called the ASEAN

    Economic Community (AEC) in January 2016, we expect

    stronger and faster economic activities among the people of

    the community. The elimination of taris, the reduction of

    non-tari barriers (NTBs), and freer mobility of people and

    services mean that there is greater potential for companies

    and people to hop from one country to another withinthe region, bringing with them various businesses

    and employment opportunities.

    Lots of energy, both upstream and downstream, will be

    required to power this bigger and faster mobility of people

    and goods within the region. A country-based energy supply

    and trading alone will be insucient to catch up with this

    huge energy demand from all ASEAN member states (AMS).

    In addition to the fact that energy precedes development,

    energy powers more growth and the lack of energy can stie

    growth. An insucient energy supply could push investorsaway from the Philippines and towards other ASEAN nations

    with more stable and more aordable electricity, leaving the

    * The views and opinions expressed in this Paper are those of the author and do not necessa

    Philippines to miss out on the potential benets of the

    AEC altogether. Thus, the need for more international

    and regional energy trading will become more

    pronounced in the coming years.

    Currently, the Philippines has the unhealthy image of

    having the second highest electricity prices in Asia next

    to Japan. Over the years this has been one of the biggestdeterrents for investors who wish to invest in the Philippines.

    There are many reasons for this, two of which are (1) a lack

    ENERGY TRADING,

    COMPETITION,ANDPOLICY HARMONIZATIONIN THE

    ASEAN

    C 2016ADRiNSTITUTEfor Strategic and International Studies. All rights reserved.

    OCCASIONAL PAPER FEBRUARY 2016

    02

    ENERGY

    Currently, the Philippines has the unhealthy image of having the second highestelectricity prices in Asia next to Japan. Over the years this has been one of thebiggest deterrents for investors who wish to invest in the Philippines.

  • 7/26/2019 Energy Trading, Competition and Policy Harmonization in the ASEAN

    3/11

    of reliable supply across the countrys three grids, and

    (2) high and multiple taxes imposed on energy products,

    while many Asian countries subsidize theirs.

    International and regional energy trading would lead into

    the inux of additional supply, making the supply side

    more competitive. This in turn will lead to more aordable

    and competitive electricity prices, and thus more industrial

    and commercial activities sprouting or expanding.

    Electricity consumption and GDPexpansion in the ASEAN

    In the past decade, the Philippines has expanded

    its power capacity very slowly. While expansion has

    accelerated in more recent years, the country still suers

    from some form of energy poverty compared to many ofits neighbors in the region. For instance, even newcomer

    Vietnam has electricity consumption per capita almost

    twice that of the Philippines. The Philippines total primary

    energy supply (TPES), expressed in tons of oil

    equivalent (toe) per capita, is also low.

    As shown in Table 1, note the positive correlation

    between electricity consumption per capita and Gross

    Domestic Product (GDP) per capita, using purchasing

    power parity (PPP) values. Those on the top are

    Brunei, Singapore and Hong Kong. In the middle

    are Malaysia, Thailand, Vietnam and Indonesia. The

    Philippines can be considered in the bottom group

    in per capita electricity consumption, along with

    Laos, Cambodia and Myanmar. V

    lower per capita GDP than the Ph

    but doubled its per capita income

    one decade, from 2004 to 2014.

    Table 1. SOME ENERGY & GDP INDICATION FOR SOUTH EAST ASIAN ECONOMIES

    Sources: Columns 2 and 3: I nternational Energy Agency (IEA), Key World Energy Statistics (KWES) 2015

    Columns 4 and 5: IMF, World Economic Outlook (WEO) Database, October 2015

    * HK is not ASEAN member ** Laos is not included in KWES annual reports

    OCCASIONAL PAPER FEBRUARY 2016

    C 2016ADRiNSTITUTEfor Strategic and International Studies. All rights reserved.

    03

  • 7/26/2019 Energy Trading, Competition and Policy Harmonization in the ASEAN

    4/11

    Many of our neighbors have many cheap energy

    sources. Brunei is a top natural gas exporter and

    Indonesia and Malaysia have lots of coal. Here is

    the resource endowment in fossil fuels of

    many ASEAN countries:

    Oil: Brunei, Cambodia, Indonesia, Malaysia,

    Myanmar, Thailand, Vietnam

    Gas: Brunei, Cambodia, Indonesia, Malaysia,

    Myanmar, Philippines, Thailand, Vietnam

    Coal: Indonesia, Malaysia, Philippines, Thailand,

    Vietnam.

    For renewables endowment:

    Hydro: Cambodia, Indonesia, Laos, Malaysia,

    Myanmar, Philippines, Vietnam

    Geothermal: Indonesia, Philippines

    Solar and biomass: all countries have various

    amounts and types. Wind has limited potential.

    Fossil fuels remain as the primary source of

    electricity in many Asian countries, as shown in

    Table 2. It is divided into two parts: East Asian

    economies which have 90% or more of their total

    electricity production coming from fossil

    fuel sources, and those below 90%.

    It is notable that the Philippines ve more

    developed Asian neighbors namely Brunei, Hong

    Kong, Malaysia, Singapore and Thailand, have a

    fossil fuel dependence of 92 to 100%. They can

    attract more manufacturing and other industrial

    Table 2. Electricity production and sources in selected Asian economies, 2

    Source: International Energy Agency (IEA); ADB, Key Indicators for Asia and the Pacific 2015.

    OCCASIONAL PAPER FEBRUARY 2016

    04

    C 2016ADRiNSTITUTEfor Strategic and International Studies. All rights reserved.

  • 7/26/2019 Energy Trading, Competition and Policy Harmonization in the ASEAN

    5/11

    players, such as hotels, malls and other

    service industries, because they have

    stable, reliable and more aordable

    electricity supplies.

    For other Asian economies, like Myanmar,

    Cambodia, China, and the Philippines, energysource reliance features hydro signicantly.

    Fossil fuels are all dispatchable energy

    sources. This means that these sources can

    be dispatched or controlled anytime according

    to demand, even with very short-term demand

    hikes and with only one or two hours lead

    time. The high percentage of fossil fuels in

    the energy mix of those countries and the

    high supply capacity of big hydro plants are

    important ingredients for energy

    trading within the ASEAN.

    A number of ASEAN countries are net energy

    exporters, which means that their domestic

    energy production is bigger than their

    consumption and they export the balance.

    The biggest energy exporter is Brunei, the

    main producer of natural gas in the

    region, followed by Indonesia.

    The big net energy importers in the ASEAN

    are Singapore, Philippines and Thailand. In

    North East Asia, the big net energy

    importers are S. Korea and Taiwan.

    Table 3. Energy production and net imports of East Asian economies

    Sources: ADB, Key Indicators 2015; WB, World Development Indicators,http://databank.worldbank.org/data/reports.aspx?source=sustainable-energy-for-all

    OCCASIONAL PAPER FEBRUARY 2016

    05

    C 2016ADRiNSTITUTEfor Strategic and International Studies. All rights reserved.

  • 7/26/2019 Energy Trading, Competition and Policy Harmonization in the ASEAN

    6/11

    The ASEAN Power Grid

    The ASEAN Power Grid (APG) project was

    invented in 2007 via a Memorandum of

    Understanding signed by Energy Ministers and

    Secretaries of the region. It is a agship program

    mandated in 1997 by the ASEAN Heads of States

    under the ASEAN Vision 2020. Its main objective is

    to strengthen and promote power interconnectionand trade towards greater energy security

    and supply stability in the region.

    In a presentation, ASEAN Power Grid: Road to

    Multilateral Power Trading during the Philippine

    Electricity Summit last December 11, 2015 in

    Manila, Mr. Bambang Hermawanto, Chairman of

    the ASEAN Power Grid Consultative Committee

    (APGCC), showed this data in Chart 1. There are

    various projects that provide the various routes

    and grid interconnections among the ASEAN

    countries, current and future.

    The APG will be an extensive system of

    interconnection in the region someday, especially

    in the north, covering Vietnam, Cambodia,

    Laos, Thailand, and Myanmar, but also in the

    south, connecting Malaysia, Indonesia,

    Singapore, and Brunei.

    The Philippines is generally detached from the

    rest of the region, being in the far east, but

    interconnection is possible via Sabah and Palawan.

    There is an existing domestic natural gas pipeline

    from northern Palawan to Batangas. The nextpipelines to be constructed should include (a) Sabah

    to southern Palawan, then (b) southern to northern

    Palawan. More distant in the horizon would be pipelines running

    from Sabah to Sulu, to Tawi-tawi, to Basilan, then to

    Zamboanga and the Mindanao mainland.

    These long and extensive grids and interconnections will denitely

    cost large amount of money (see one estimate in Table 4).

    However, the long-term monetary saving

    would mean overall or net savings. There

    private partnership (PPP) and its variants

    of this huge amount of resources.

    Chart 1. List of ASEAN Power Grid projects and their earliest COD, as of May 201

    Source: Hermawanto (2015).

    OCCASIONAL PAPER FEBRUARY 2016

    06

    C 2016ADRiNSTITUTEfor Strategic and International Studies. All rights reserved.

  • 7/26/2019 Energy Trading, Competition and Policy Harmonization in the ASEAN

    7/11

    be completed by 2018/2019. Thirteen future

    projects (with completion beyond 2020) will cross

    borders, and generate a total of 24,824 MW.

    The Palawan-Sabah project is still on the drawing

    board and projected to cost half a billion dollars.

    The northern system of APG is the most extensive

    and hence, more costly. It is projected to cost

    between $22.4 to $25.5 billion for both existing

    and ongoing projects (see Table 5). Currently, there

    are 8 existing cross border projects with total

    power of 3,489 MW. There are 7 further projects,

    with a total power of 5,072 MW, expected to

    Table 4. Projected savings from APG, US$ million, in 2009 prices

    Source: ASEAN Interconnection Master Plan Study (II), June 2010.

    Table 5. Current status of APG projects, in million

    Source: Hermawanto (2015).

    Note: 6 projects consisting of 8 cross-border links already in operation.

    OCCASIONAL PAPER FEBRUARY 2016

    07

    C 2016ADRiNSTITUTEfor Strategic and International Studies. All rights reserved.

  • 7/26/2019 Energy Trading, Competition and Policy Harmonization in the ASEAN

    8/11

    Among the issues that can cause delay in APG are

    the following:

    1. Diering national policies, as some

    countries desire selfsuciency before regional

    interconnection.

    2. Wariness of an electricity restructuring owing, to

    varying reasons. These include (a) the prospect of

    the system evolving into a multilateral power trading

    arrangement, which is new to the region; (b) a

    harmonized operational and regulatory framework

    or tari structure is not available; (c) there are no

    mechanisms for power wheeling, pool rules, power

    bidding, regulatory framework and ensuring system

    reliability and security; (d) the task of obtainingnancing modalities to realize the APG; and (e)

    concerns on the harmonization of dierent national

    energy policies, regulation on export/import of

    electricity, and the availability of infrastructure.

    Mr. Hermawanto said there are so

    ASEAN spirit. These include plain

    by member governments and priv

    participation in the nancial burden

    infrastructures and institutions.

    The strategic and action plan 201

    multilateral trading, according to M

    are:

    1. Accelerate the development of t

    Power Interconnection projects.

    2. Prepare for the formation of the

    Grid institutions.

    3. Synchronize National Power De

    and optimize the generation of ele

    4. Encourage and optimize the uti

    resources, such as funding, exper

    products to develop the APG.

    The most important factor to realiz

    deregulation or relaxation of regula

    governments to assist private inve

    introduction of sub-regional interco

    further step of cross-border interc

    Fossil fuel trading

    Let us review the base load powe

    ASEAN countries, in coal in partic

    5 countries have a rising coal capafact within one decade from 2004

    case of Indonesia, there was a trip

    Table 6. Coal consumption in East Asia, million tons oil equivalent (mtoe)

    Source: BP, Statistical Review Power Data Workbook 2015

    OCCASIONAL PAPER FEBRUARY 2016

    08

    C 2016ADRiNSTITUTEfor Strategic and International Studies. All rights reserved.

  • 7/26/2019 Energy Trading, Competition and Policy Harmonization in the ASEAN

    9/11

    The most important to realize Asean Poweis the deregu

    or relaof regulations by m

    governments toprivate inves

    These are among the baselines for projections of future

    power capacity for the ASEAN 5.

    The International Energy Agency (IEA) and the

    Economic Research Institute for ASEAN and East Asia

    (ERIA) produced the South East Asia Energy Outlook

    2013 and made a projection in energy trading. The

    study projects net imports in oil but net exports in

    gas and coal for the ASEAN in 2020, to be led by

    Indonesia. The Philippines would have net imports on

    all three fossil fuels but the amounts are small enough

    that they can easily be covered by excess supply in

    other ASEAN countries like Indonesia and Malaysia.

    Oil is expressed in million barrels per day (mbpd), gas

    in billion cubic meters (bcm), and coal in megatonnes

    coal equivalent (mtce). Positive values are exports and

    negative numbers are imports.

    Table 7. Fossil fuel net trade in the ASEAN

    Source: IEA, ERIA, South East Asia Energy Outlook, September 2013. Table 3.1.

    OCCASIONAL PAPER FEBRUARY 2016

    09

    C 2016ADRiNSTITUTEfor Strategic and International Studies. All rights reserved.

  • 7/26/2019 Energy Trading, Competition and Policy Harmonization in the ASEAN

    10/11

    2. More deregulation or relaxation of many

    regulations by member governments is needed to

    assist private investment and help realize the APG.

    3. An ASEAN Electricity Exchange should beconsidered in the future to help develop dynamic

    electricity trading in the region. Currently, two

    ASEAN countries have national electricity exchange:

    Singapore and the Philippines. The respective

    bodies are (a) National Electricity Market of

    Singapore (NEMS) and (b) Wholesale

    Electricity Spot Market (WESM).

    Specically, for the Philippines:

    1. Taxes and royalties of indigenous energy sources

    in the Philippines should signicantly go down and

    some should be abolished in order to help bring

    down electricity prices. Royalties for natural gas

    from Malampaya in Palawan for instance would be

    as high as P1.45 per kWh on certain years. This

    is big considering that there are no such taxes on

    indigenous natural gas produce in Indonesia,

    Brunei and other ASEAN countries.

    2. Heavy bureaucracies and complicated

    procedures to get multiple permits from local and

    national government agencies should signicantly

    shrink to help expand the number of players in

    the power generation sector, both fossil fuels andrenewables. To endure two to ve years just to

    Concluding notes

    Mr. Hermawanto made these conclusions in his

    presentation:

    1. Electricity demand in ASEAN region will continue

    to rise despite depletion i n fuel resources, andASEAN countries collectively need to benet from

    the abundance of i ndigenous resources.

    2. Steps to realize APG are to rst encourage

    cross-border bilateral basis, then gradually to

    expand to a subregional basis, and nally to a

    fully integrated APG system.

    3. Harmonize regulatory framework and standards

    to facilitate regional energy connectivity. APG is

    a step towards the optimization and conservation

    of energy in the ASEAN region. APG also

    creates bilateral arrangements through

    cross border electricity trading toward

    multilateral trading arrangement.

    This paper agrees with the three main points by

    Mr. Hermawanto. Three market-oriented

    reforms are needed in the region.

    1. Energy price competition should prevail over price

    harmonization in order to allow the various players in

    the industrial, agri-business and commercial sectors

    of all ASEAN countries to realize cost-reduction.

    Electricity is a big cost component in many sectorsand sub-sectors like manufacturing and hotels.

    get various permits befo

    power plant is a big cont

    power supply capacity.

    3. Governance at WESMreal Independent Market

    provided by the Electric P

    Act of 2001. Safeguards

    market behavior is a func

    Regulatory Commission

    government ocials at th

    Department of Energy, th

    Liabilities Management C

    National Power Corporat

    Electrication Administra

    the spirit of independen

    Trade is governed by co

    People or companies ca

    products and services if

    or many strict regulations

    policies in energy should

    one very important stake

    consumers: rich and poo

    rural and urban. Energy t

    guided by the spirit of co

    is an important endeavor

    consumers in the region

    OCCASIONAL PAPER FEBRUARY 2016

    10

    C 2016ADRiNSTITUTEfor Strategic and International Studies. All rights reserved.

  • 7/26/2019 Energy Trading, Competition and Policy Harmonization in the ASEAN

    11/11

    C 2016ADRiNSTITUTEfor Strategic and International Studies. All rights reserved.

    is an independent international and strategic researchorganization with the principal goal of addressing theissues affecting the Philippines and East Asia

    Stratbases Albert Del Rosario Institute

    9F 6780 Ayala Avenue, Makati CityPhilippines 1200

    V 8921751F 8921754

    www.stratbase.com.ph

    ABOUTBienvenido S. Oplas, Jr.is a Fellow of the Stratbase-Albert del Rosario Institute (ADRi),President of Minimal Government Thinkers, and a columnist inBusinessWorld. [email protected].

    Mr. Oplas received his AB Economics undergraduate degree andDiploma in Development Economics (DipDE) from the University

    of the Philippines.

    9.2VOLUME