Energy Friendly Greenhouse Production
-
Upload
ovankooten -
Category
Documents
-
view
692 -
download
2
Transcript of Energy Friendly Greenhouse Production
10/16/2009
1
Crop production in low�energy
greenhouses
Leo Marcelis
Increased awareness: save fossil energy
Aims for energy saving (Reduction of CO2 emission;
from 1990 to 2020)
Glasshouses: 48%
Netherlands: 30%
EU: 20%
Need for energy saving in greenhouse horticulture
� Energy costs: 15�30% of a grower
� Greenhouses: 10% of national gas consumption
� Energy for
� heating, reducing air humidity, lighting, CO2
€ -
€ 0.05
€ 0.10
€ 0.15
€ 0.20
€ 0.25
€ 0.30
€ 0.35
€ 0.40
€ 0.45
2-1-2003 2-1-2004 1-1-2005 1-1-2006 1-1-2007 1-1-2008 31-12-2008
Gas
pric
e (€
)
Energiebalance tomato (reference)
Bron: T. Dueck
Solar radiation
Floor 177 MJ m�2` yr�1
Heat 2
Heat 1
roof
wall
How to reduce energy use?
� screens
� Lower temperature
� Temperature integration (within 24 h, several days)
� Postponing starting date
� Control of air humidity
� Cultivar choice
� Less lighting
10/16/2009
2
Recent years many new developments
� Co�generation heat and power
� Geothermal heat
� Electricity producing greenhouse (ELKAS)
� LED lighting
� (semi�)closed greenhouse
Co�generation of heat and power
� Very efficient use of heat, electricity and CO2
Geothermal heat ELKAS: Electricity producing greenhouse
Energy saving with LED lights? Greenhouse energy use
� Solar radiation provides much more energy than needed on annual basis, however ….
� Provided in summer; needed in winter
� Problem of timing
� Solution: closed greenhouse!
10/16/2009
3
Energy storage in aquifers
� Harvest solar energy in summer; use it in winter
� Proven technology, but new in horticulture
� More than 160 applications in the Netherlands(office buildings, hospitals, apartment blocks)
Aquifer = layer of porous sand holding water between 2 clay layers
Energy harvest in summer
Aquifers (porous sand between 2 clay layers)5�8oC 16�18oC
Use energy from aquifer in winter
v Heat Pump
Aquifers (porous sand between 2 clay layers)5�8oC 16�18oC
Features of a closed greenhouse
� Active cooling and dehumidification
� Heat storage in summer in aquifers
� Use of stored heat in winter
Advantages of a closed greenhouse
� Reduced energy consumption & CO2 emission(about 30% less fossil fuel needed)
� Reduction in biocide use
� Reduction in water use
� Higher yields, because of* High CO2 in summer* Air movement (boundary layer �)* Higher light transmissivity
(no ventilators in roof)
Closed or semi�closed greenhouse
Disadvantage of closed greenhouse
� High costs
� Semi�closed greenhouse is more realistic
� Less cooling capacity; allow some window opening
10/16/2009
4
CO2 concentrations in closed and conventional greenhouse
High values in summer !
0
300
600
900
1200
1500
1800
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
Week number after planting
CO
2 co
ncen
tratio
n (p
pm)
(closed symbols = closed greenhouse)
Simulated (lines) and measured tomato yield
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
0 30 60 90 120 150 180 210 240 270
Day number of the year
Yie
ld (
kg/m
2)
Closed symbol is closed greenhouse, open symbol is control
Both in measurements and simulation 16% higher yield in closed greenhouse
Cooling from underneath
sunny weather: 5˚C cooler under crop than above
Above
Below
Bron: Dieleman et al
Time (hour)
Air t
em
pera
ture
(˚C
)
Cooling from below: bigger tomato fruits
80
90
100
110
120
130
140
15 20 25 30 35 40
Week number
Fru
it si
ze (
g) boven
onder
open
Bron: Dieleman et al
Above
Below
Open
Higher air humidity in semi closed greenhouse
(summer)
0
2
4
6
1:00 5:00 9:00 13:00 17:00 21:00
Time (hour)
Vap
our
defic
it (g
/m3 )
Open houseSemi-closed house
Bron: Dieleman et al
Temperature on a sunny day
Open house: plant temperature lower than air
Closed house: plant temperature higher than air
15
20
25
30
35
0:00 6:00 12:00 18:00 0:00
Time of day
Tem
pera
ture
(oC
)
Open: air
Open: crop
Closed: airclosed: crop
Bron: Dieleman et al
10/16/2009
5
Semi�closed greenhouse
� Semi�closed rather than closed greenhouse.
� Energy saving of up to 30%
� Increase in crop yield: 20% desired
� Economics: investment is high
How to reduce energy use?
� screens
� Lower temperature
� Temperature integration (within 24 h, several days)
� Postponing starting date
� Control of air humidity
� Cultivar choice
� Less lighting
How to save energy at a nursery with high intensity lighting and co-generation?
� Most instances surplus of heat
� Hardly any saving through temperaure or humidity control
� If heat buffer is empty, let temperature drop at night!
Temperature
� Most important factor for energy use (75�90% when no lights)
� Energy use depends on :
� Heating set point
� Temperature integration
� Isolation greenhouse (isolation value, window opening, screen)
� Outside temperature, wind, radiation loss
Energiebalance tomato (temp. setpoint 2oC lower)
Bron: T. Dueck
Solar radiation
Floor �31 MJ m�2
Yield: �3%Gas use: �15.5%
Heat 2
Heat 1
roof
wall
Temperature integration
� Crop often responds to long term average temperature, rather than instantaneous values
� Make use of flexibility of the plant
� Automatic by program of climate computer
� By hand
10/16/2009
6
Temperature integration
� Within 24 h
� Two situations:� Let the sun heat greenhouse during the day (for free). Less heating at
night
� Day time: less heating while heating at night when closed screen
� Several day
� Day with much wind and less sun: accept lower greenhouse temperature: to be compensated later (not needed always!) ; Independent of outside temperature
�
�
Temperature integration (TI) within 24h
Sun setSun rise
setpoint
referenceTI�sunny day
Temperature greenhouse air
Energy saving: lower temperature at night (heating) higher temperature during day (windows closed)
Additional advantage of closing windowus: higher CO2 concentration �
Temperature integration within 24h in sweet pepper
0
100
200
300
5 10 15 20 25 30
Time (weeks)
Dry
mas
s fr
uits
(g/
plan
t)
optimaal
standaard
`
Optimal: � same average temp.; fluctuation 16�30oC� during daytime less ventilation, at night less heating
2.5 m3 gas saved; same fruit set and production Bron: A. Dieleman.
Conclusions
� By a combination of factors: energy saving of 50% is possible with the same yield
Thank you for your attention
© Wageningen UR