Energy Division’s Proposed Policy on Targeting and Prioritisation
description
Transcript of Energy Division’s Proposed Policy on Targeting and Prioritisation
Health and Safety Executive
Health and Safety Executive
Energy Division’s Proposed Policy on Targeting and PrioritisationWIG Conference18 September 2013Susan Mackenzie
[2013/326517]
HSE’s Intervention Policy
• Enforcement Policy Statement– Targeting, Proportionality, Consistency,
Transparency, Accountability• HID guiding principle (2012)
– Major hazard intervention programme should be based on a systematic approach based on • inherent hazard and • performance of duty holder in
controlling risk
Major Hazard Sites in UK
288 operational installations + 800 “COMAH” Sites500 Biohazard Laboratories500 Licensed Explosive Sites300 Major Hazard Pipelines50 Gas Distribution Networks6 Major Hazard Mines
Priority for Intervention
Examples of onshore Inherent hazard models
EXAMPLE INTRINSIC HAZARD FACTORS
COMAH Mines Pipelines Biological agents
Nature of substance Flammable atmosphere Length of pipeline Agent
Installation type Toxic gases Nature of fluid Nature of work
On & offsite population Inrush Flammability Complexcity
Societal risk factor Rock fall Toxicity High containment work
Safety Shafts Major accident hazard
Environment Mass transport
U/G population
Escape distance
Inherent Hazard Model Offshore
Offshore Working Group (March 2013)Principles• Broad classification• Information readily available• Preferably based on industry’s own
information• Major hazard focussed
Broad Classifications on Inherent Hazard
• High• Medium• Low• Pictorial view• Not based on a mathematical algorithm • Will require some professional judgement
Example – Draft 5
Inherent Hazard based on PLL
Operator Performance
• Operator’s performance in complying with the law to control Major Hazard risk will influence the depth and frequency of regulatory scrutiny.
• Operator Performance against single inspection topics– Strategic areas– Key risk control systems– Based on standards
Offshore inspection rating topics
Inspection guides
• Cover strategic and sector topics• Define what we look at• The standard/benchmark against we rate
performance• Performance score• Enforcement expectations• How we record (COIN requirements)
Operator Performance
Overall Operator Performance
• Work in progress across HID• Individual scores of 30-60 are
compliance gaps• Do not intend to “average” out
compliance gaps.• A full picture of performance will be
built up over a number of years• We will continue to feedback
performance at each inspection in usual way
Other intelligence may include
[Nothing New]• Time since last inspection • Issues arising out of other regulatory
contact such as – safety case assessment– incident investigations – complaints
• Incident data • Emerging issues
The concept of Indicative Resource Levels
Inspection plan progress report
Any further questions